Personal and Community Nutrition

Transcription

CHAPTER
2
Personal and Community Nutrition
A person’s food behavior is influenced by personal factors as well as community
issues affecting food availability, consumption and expenditure trends,
consumer information, and food safety.
Nutrition Concepts Online
http://evolve.elsevier.com/Grodner/foundations/
Have you ever thought about who is responsible for your
health? Perhaps you thought of your parents, spouse, or significant other. Or possibly you have always taken your health
for granted, not as something to actively work toward
improving or maintaining. What about the health of the
community in which you live or work? Have you ever considered the health status of the residents of your town or
college community?
Healthy People 2020 offered the following recommendation:
The health of the individual is tied to the overall health of the
population or community. Likewise the health status of the
community is influenced by the shared attitudes and actions
of those who reside in the community. To support promotion of good health, we must take responsibility for our personal health and the health of our communities-at-large. This
chapter considers strategies to improve our health by taking
charge of our personal nutrition and becoming aware of the
nutrition issues of our communities.
the merging and balancing of physical, intellectual, emotional,
social, and spiritual dimensions. Considering these dimensions in relation to personal and community nutrition broadens our understanding. The physical health dimension is
represented by the food guides presented in this chapter. By
following the recommendations of the food guides, we may
reduce the risk of diet-related diseases. Consumer decisions
about food purchases and application of food safety recommendations depend on reasoning abilities that reflect the
intellectual health dimension. The emotional health dimension
may affect the ability to be flexible when adopting suggested
guideline changes. If we (or our clients) have problems doing
so, will we view ourselves as “failures”? Social health dimension
is tested as we (and our clients) interact with family and friends
when we attempt to follow the guidelines. Can we be role
models for others without being perceived as threats? Many
religions stress personal responsibility for caring for one’s
body, which embodies the spiritual health dimension. Part of
that responsibility includes the foods we choose to eat.
The decisions individuals make about the food they eat
determine their health and wellness. Health professionals frequently give advice about appropriate foods for clients to
consume. Therefore, it is important for nurses in institutional
and community settings to understand how personal factors
and community issues that affect food availability, consumption and expenditure trends, consumer information, and
food safety can influence a person’s food behaviors. The
effects of these personal and community factors on consumers’ food decisions are some of the major topics of this chapter.
ROLE IN WELLNESS
PERSONAL NUTRITION
As presented in Chapter 1, wellness is a lifestyle through which
we continually strive to enhance our level of health. Health is
As adults, each of us is ultimately responsible for the quality
of our dietary intake. Although external forces may affect our
The recommended overarching goals for Healthy People
2020 continue the tradition of earlier Healthy People initiatives of advocating for improvements in the health of
every person in our country. They address the environmental factors that contribute to our collective health and
illness by placing particular emphasis on the determinants
of health. Health determinants are the range of personal,
social, economic, and environmental factors that determine the health status of individuals or populations.1
20
CHAPTER 2 Personal and Community Nutrition
everyday food choices, we can decide to have the internal
self-awareness to consciously modify those forces. Being
accountable for our nutritional status and health may require
adjustment of some personal goals to allow time to work on
achieving a wellness lifestyle.
Food Selection
Our food preferences, food choice, and food liking affect the
foods we select to eat. Although these terms reflect similar
food-related behaviors, they are different.2 Food preferences
are those foods we choose to eat when all foods are available
at the same time and in the same quantity. Factors affecting
preferences include genetic determinants and environmental
effects. Genetic factors include inborn desires for sweet and
salty flavors. One study of taste receptors notes that because
of genetic taste markers, some people experience the taste of
vegetables such as broccoli and Brussels sprouts as bitter and
therefore avoid such foods, whereas other people find this
flavor enjoyable.3 Consumption of cruciferous vegetables,
such as broccoli and Brussels sprouts, may be associated with
a decreased risk of developing certain cancers.3 If some people
avoid them because of perceived bitter taste, will they be
more at risk for cancers?
Environmental effects are learned preferences that are the
result of cultural and socioeconomic influences. We often
adjust our choices to match those around us. Because we are
around our families the most, their influence is the most
significant factor in the choices we make; therefore, the
dietary patterns we experience as children affect us throughout our lives4 (see the Cultural Considerations box, Ethnic
Food Preferences and Foodborne Illness). In fact, even the
food a mother eats prenatally affects the preferences of her
child in the future.5
An indirect influence on food preferences is the media.
Television advertising in particular is a potent force that influences the foods we prefer and buy. Programs spread messages
about the food and lifestyle preferences of different socioeconomic groups. A TV show about a working-class family presents images of food intake associated with those of a lower
socioeconomic status; dinner might be hot dogs and beans.
In another TV show, an upper socioeconomic family might
sit down to a meal of baked salmon and salad. Each unintentionally sends messages about appropriate food intake for
individuals belonging to each socioeconomic group.
Health promotion issues are tied to food preferences. If
recommendations call for changes in foods for which preference is rooted in genetic determinants, the motivation for
change needs to be different from when the food preference
is environmentally learned. New preferences can be learned;
genetic preferences are more difficult to change.
Food choice concerns the specific foods that are convenient to choose when we are actually ready to eat; rarely are
all our preferred foods available at the same time to satisfy
our preferences. Food choices are restricted by convenience.
As a result of our hectic lifestyles, we tend to avoid foods that
take long to prepare. Instead, we often repeatedly choose
foods that are easy to prepare and eat, regardless of their
21
nutritional value. Cost is also a factor. We sometimes weigh
cost benefits against time benefits. If a food costs more but
saves time, we may choose it. We may decide that a food item,
even if nutrient dense, costs too much money for the benefits
received. Again, nutritional value may not be a prime concern
that affects food choice.
Food liking considers which foods we really like to eat.
We may want to eat foods that enhance our health, but we
like to eat chocolate cake, for example. We constantly weigh
all the factors of preference, choice, and liking when we select
the foods we eat. Ultimately, these three types of food behaviors greatly affect individual nutritional status.2
These three food behaviors may be covertly manipulated
when the food industry develops and markets foods that
appeal to our possible genetic preferences of sweet and/or
salty.3 These preferences are reinforced by repeated consumption and through advertising promoting the taste and
“having fun” when consuming these products.6 Marketing
promotions and product availability may influence selection
by consumers because of convenience, including accessibility, cost, or time saving, often with no consideration of nutritional value. Food liking evolves from, and may be the result
of, repeated exposures. While some are able to moderate
their consumption of less-nutrient-dense food products,
others cannot, thereby impacting their nutritional status and
health determinants.6
It is the small steps we take that eventually lead to cumulative change. As we study different aspects of food and nutrition, we will present suggestions that move us and our clients
toward significant change. These suggestions will lead to the
formation of new personal food habits.
COMMUNITY NUTRITION
The nutritional status of our communities is a reflection of
our individual nutritional health. Perhaps the most significant factor affecting the nutritional status of communities is
economics. Having sufficient funds to purchase adequate
food supplies is a necessity. Public health nutrition efforts to
prevent nutrient deficiencies include the U.S. government’s
Food Stamp Program. This program provides individuals
and families below certain income levels with coupons to
purchase nutritious foods. Another such effort is the Special
Supplemental Nutrition Program for Women, Infants, and
Children (WIC). The WIC program provides nutrition counseling, supplemental foods, and referrals to other health care
and social services to women who are pregnant or breastfeeding and to infants and children up to the age of 5 who are at
nutritional risk. Both programs have a significant impact on
improving the nutritional status of those who participate.
Additional government programs are discussed in Chapters
12 and 13.
Another level of public health nutrition is aimed at the
nutrient excesses of our dietary intake. In the late 1970s, a
new era in nutrition recommendations began in the United
States. Rather than focusing on nutrient deficiencies as a
cause of poor health, health professionals began to notice that
22
the cause of an increasing amount of chronic illness was possibly tied to excessive intake of certain nutrients such as saturated fats, cholesterol, sodium, and sugars. As knowledge of
diet-related diseases (e.g., heart disease, hypertension, cancer,
diabetes, osteoporosis, and obesity) increases, sets of dietary
recommendations from different government agencies and
voluntary health and scientific associations evolve to address
this issue.
Each set of recommendations serves a different purpose.
For example, recommendations from the American Heart
Association focus on lifestyle and dietary factors that affect
risk factors of coronary artery disease, whereas those of
the American Cancer Society center on issues related to
cancer development. Despite differences in the focus of the
recommendations, consensus exists on the guidelines for
maintaining general good health. These recommendations
are incorporated into our national goals. All recommendations suggest reducing intake of saturated fat, trans fat, total
fat, cholesterol, sodium, sugar, and excessive kcal and increasing our intake of fiber, complex carbohydrates, fruits, and
vegetables. These goals form the basis of health promotion
efforts to implement primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention strategies. Education at the community level that
reaches as many individuals and families as possible continues to be a challenge for health professionals.
The recommendations are still needed as four of the ten
most common leading causes of death in the United States
are diet-related disorders including heart disease, cancers,
stroke (cerebrovascular disease), and diabetes mellitus.7
Dietary Guidelines for Americans
In response to the dietary recommendations, the U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) and U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services (HHS) developed in 1977 the Dietary
Guidelines for Americans. These guidelines are updated every
5 years and are intended for healthy Americans older than 2
years of age. The Dietary Guidelines for Americans are based
on the latest scientific knowledge about diet, physical activity,
and other health issues. This knowledge is used to formulate
lifestyle and dietary pattern recommendations that will
contain adequate nutrients, promote health, maintain active
lifestyles, and decrease the risk of chronic diseases. As such,
the Dietary Guidelines serve as the foundation of federal
nutrition policy and education.8
The American public consumes insufficient amounts of
certain nutrients such as vitamin D, calcium, potassium, and
dietary fiber, even though excessive energy intake has led to
a majority of Americans being overweight or obese. The
current, Dietary Guidelines for Americans 2010 (hereafter
referred to simply as Dietary Guidelines), focuses on the goals
Choose fruits and vegetables each day to reduce the risk of diet-related diseases. (From
Photos.com.)
of “good health and optimal functionality across the life
span” with consideration of the malnutrition (deficiency of
nutrient intake) and weight issues of the population-at-large.8
Consequently, to attain these goals a lifestyle (behavioral)
approach is suggested. This approach centers on a total diet
concept. To implement a total diet concept that is balanced
in energy and nutrient content, dietary patterns would
emphasize portion size and consumption of plant foods such
as vegetables, beans, fruits, whole grains, nuts and seeds, and
increased intake of low-fat dairy products and moderate
amounts of poultry, lean meats, and eggs.8 In addition, lower
intake of foods with added sugars and solid fats supports
energy balance goals.
To sustain this endeavor, community support will be critical so that on a population level, individuals and families can
adopt these guidelines whether eating at home, at school or
work, or in restaurants. Local food availability is a concern
to assure that more nutrient dense foods are affordable and
accessible in all settings from the neighborhood supermarket
to fast food restaurants. The techniques to prepare simple
home cooked meals and strategies of food safety are prerequisites for achieving the goals of the Dietary Guidelines. These
techniques and strategies can be taught in informal and
formal educational settings including health care clinics,
public health departments, faith-based organization, and
print and electronic media.
Listed in Box 2-1 are the four major actions that if implemented would assist everyone to practice health-promoting
nutrient consumption and be physically active.
BOX 2-1
MODIFICATIONS TO IMPROVE
AMERICAN HEALTH STATUS
Based on a review of scientific evidence from the Nutrition Evidence Library, four significant modifications to
our dietary intake patterns and lifestyle habits will significantly improve the overall health status of Americans:
• Reduce the incidence and prevalence of overweight
and obesity of the U.S. population by reducing overall
calorie intake and increasing physical activity.
• Shift food intake patterns to a more plant-based diet
that emphasizes vegetables, cooked dry beans and peas,
fruits, whole grains, nuts, and seeds. In addition, increase
the intake of seafood and fat-free, low-fat milk and milk
products and consume only moderate amounts of lean
meats, poultry, and eggs.
• Significantly reduce intake of foods containing added
sugars and solid fats because these dietary components
contribute excess calories and few, if any, nutrients. In
addition, reduce sodium intake and lower intake of refined
grains, especially refined grains that are coupled with
added sugar, solid fat, and sodium.
• Meet the 2008 Physical Activity Guidelines for
Americans.
(From: U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services: Report of the Dietary Guidelines
Advisory Committee on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans,
2010, Washington, DC, 2010. Accessed June 16, 2010, from
www.dietaryguidelines.gov.)
23
Additional details of the Dietary Guidelines are available
at www.dietaryguidelines.gov.
As nurses work within communities and/or hospital settings, the Dietary Guidelines provide nutrient and physical
health recommendations on which community programming and patient education can be based.
Lifestyle Applications
Your clients and patients would certainly like to follow
the Dietary Guidelines, but how should they do this? Their
busy schedules barely allow time to eat much of anything.
Ask them to consider the following nutrition-related
suggestions:
• In the morning, choose dry cereals and bread products
(e.g., English muffins) that contain whole grains, and
alternate or mix these with less-fiber favorites. If no time
can be found for breakfast, stock up on portable juices and
portable fruit, such as apples or bananas, which can be
eaten on the way to class or work. Bring fruit in backpacks
or briefcases for a quick snack.
• Be creative with vending machine selections. Choose
lower-fat and lower-sugar selections such as raisins, bagel
chips, pretzels (rub off the excess salt), popcorn, and even
some plain cookies or crackers. Some vending machines
stock small cans of tuna fish, yogurt, and fruit. Contact
the staff responsible for filling the vending machines to
request healthier selections.
• If lunch and dinner are on the run and fast-food drivethroughs are the only option, select lower-fat items such
as grilled chicken sandwiches or plain hamburgers without
the sauce. Don’t order french fries or milkshakes (unless
they are low fat) every time, but instead alternate with
salads and low-fat milk, juice, or water.
• Perhaps lunch and dinner are in a college or employee
cafeteria. Try to select turkey, chicken (without the skin),
fish, and lean beef dishes. Include whole grain bread,
a grain (rice or pasta), several vegetables, and salad. Try
fruit for dessert; it is good with frozen low-fat yogurt,
if available.
• Maybe your clients don’t really eat “meals” but eat snacks
throughout the day. This is called grazing. It is possible to
graze and follow the Dietary Guidelines by choosing
wholesome foods instead of candy bars and soda. Highquality grazing foods often available include bagels (with
a little cream cheese), yogurt, fruit, pretzels, pizza (but not
daily because of the high-fat content of the cheese), and
dry cereals with milk.
The next time your clients are food shopping or grabbing a
snack or meal, encourage them to stop a moment and consider the best choices available (Box 2-2).
FOOD GUIDES
When we are armed with the latest nutrient recommendations, we can easily apply this knowledge to the way we eat
every day. Because we think about what food to eat rather
than what nutrients we need, these nutrient recommenda-
24
BOX 2-2
IMPLEMENTING DIETARY
GUIDELINES: EASIER SAID
THAN DONE
As most of us become familiar with the Dietary Guidelines
for Americans recommendations and MyPyramid, we probably reflect on the different food choices available to us and
what changes we could most easily implement. But many
low-income and unemployed individuals and families don’t
have the luxury of deciding among a variety of available
foods. Instead, their problem is one of food insecurity.
Food insecurity is the limited access to safe, nutritious food
and may be measured as a marker of undernutrition among
people who are also poor and isolated from mainstream
society. Retarded growth and iron deficiency along with food
insecurity may lead to health disparities because of income,
race, and ethnicity. The available financial resources of these
households may not stretch far enough to provide sufficient
quantities of high-quality foods. A recurring strain for these
families is to provide enough food for their children and
themselves; sometimes they may all experience hunger.
In this context, the definition of hunger is not just the physiologic need for food. Instead, a social definition of hunger is
the inability to access enough food to feel nourished and
satisfied.
Although government programs like food stamps and WIC
and private nonprofit food banks do fill hunger gaps, they are
often insufficient to provide enough food for all of those in
need. When clients struggle to adopt new dietary guidelines,
keep in mind the range of food choices easily available.
(available at http://www.MyPyramid.gov). For individuals
who do not have a computer or access to one, or don’t have
computer skills, hard-copy print materials are available.
By following the interrelated recommendations of MyPyramid, the following results can be expected:9
• Increasing intake of vitamins, minerals, dietary fiber, and
other essential nutrients, especially those often low in
typical diets
• Lowering intake of saturated fats, trans fats, and cholesterol and increasing intake of fruits, vegetables, and whole
grains, decreasing risk for some chronic diseases
• Balancing intake with energy needs, preventing weight
gain, and/or promoting a healthy weight
The recommendations represent the following four
themes:
1. Variety: Eat foods from all food groups and subgroups.
2. Proportionality: Eat more of some foods (fruits, vegetables, whole grains, fat-free or low-fat milk products) and
less of others (foods high in saturated or trans fats, added
sugars, cholesterol salt, and alcohol).
3. Moderation: Choose types of foods that limit intake of
saturated or trans fats, added sugars, cholesterol, salt, and
alcohol.
4. Activity: Be physically active every day.
The simple MyPyramid symbol reminds us and our clients
to make healthy food choices and to be physically active.
The significant concepts of the symbol are highlighted in
Figure 2-1.
Other Food Guides
tions are most useful when translated into real food. To help
us do this, food guides have been developed.
MyPyramid Food Guidance System
How do we and our clients implement the recommendations
of the Dietary Guidelines on an everyday basis? In the past,
the Food Guide Pyramid filled this purpose, but it has been
replaced by the MyPyramid Food Guidance System designed
to guide us through our food selections to meet the goals of
the Dietary Guidelines.9 The creation of MyPyramid took into
account the present patterns of consumption of Americans
plus the recommendations of the Dietary Guidelines and the
Dietary Reference Intakes (DRIs). The result is a total diet
that meets the nutrient needs from foods while limiting
dietary components that are often eaten in excess. A tool to
use in conjunction with MyPyramid is the Nutrition Facts
labels on food products.
MyPyramid is an Internet-based interactive tool providing recommendations based on a person’s age, sex, and
activity level. Individuals can go directly to the website
(www.MyPyramid.gov) and enter their own data to receive
personalized guides to the food group servings to meet their
needs. The food groups include grains, vegetables, fruits, milk
and dairy products, and meat and beans (Figure 2-1). MyPyramid is intended for adults; a MyPyramid for Preschoolers
(ages 2 to 5), MyPyramid for Kids (ages 6 to 11), and MyPyramid for Moms (pregnancy and lactating) are also available
Not all health professionals view the recommendations of
MyPyramid as the most sound to improve and maintain
health. Some cite the increasing incidence of diet-related
disorders as evidence that MyPyramid recommendations do
not meet our health goals. These disorders include type 2
diabetes, obesity, and syndrome X. Syndrome X, or metabolic syndrome, is a group of heart disease risk factors including abdominal obesity, glucose intolerance, high blood
pressure, and abnormal blood lipid levels. Perhaps the
pyramid is not being followed correctly, resulting in continuing diet-related disorders. Research supports that the
dietary intake of most Americans is unbalanced when compared with the recommendations of MyPyramid. Intake of
meats and grains is higher than recommendations, while
consumption of dairy, fruits, and vegetables is lower (Figure
2-2).10 If it is being followed, then the emphasis of the
pyramid on complex carbohydrates from grains and the use
of animal-derived foods (dairy and protein sources) as the
foundation of our dietary intake do not provide the expected
health benefits.
One of the first alternative pyramids to address these concerns was developed by Dr. Walter Willett, chairperson of the
Department of Nutrition at the Harvard School of Public
Health. Based on accumulated scientific research, this
pyramid—the Healthy Eating Pyramid—changes the focus of
food selection and distinguishes between whole and refined
grain foods as well as highlights plant sources of protein, such
25
FIG 2-1 Anatomy of MyPyramid. (From U.S. Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition
Policy and Promotion: Anatomy of MyPyramid (CNPP-16), Alexandria, Va, 2005, Author. Accessed
August 21, 2009, from www.mypyramid.gov/downloads/MyPyramid_Anatomy.pdf.)
as nuts and legumes, which contain healthful plant oils
(Figure 2-3). Animal-derived foods are pushed high up on
the Healthy Eating Pyramid to reflect that they are foods to
be consumed occasionally. For example, red meat is to be
used sparingly or infrequently. Fish, poultry, and eggs are to
be consumed zero to two times a day. This is different from
the traditional pyramid, which groups animal and plant
sources of protein together (meat, poultry, fish, dry beans,
eggs, and nuts) with suggested servings of two or three times
a day without distinguishing between the nutrient content
of these foods. In addition, the Healthy Eating Pyramid
includes recommendations for daily exercise and weight
control (Figure 2-3).11
Alternative (Figure 2-4) and ethnic food pyramids are
also available, providing specific food selections conforming
to the general pyramid categories. These recognize that
traditional dietary patterns of other cultures also offer opportunities to decrease the risk of diet-related disorders. The
Asian, Mediterranean, and Latin American Diet Pyramids are
accessible from the Oldways Preservation & Exchange Trust
website (www.oldwayspt.org). These pyramids differ from
MyPyramid in the number of servings of animal foods,
legumes, nuts, and seeds recommended.12 Vegetarian and
soul food pyramids have been created as well. Other countries and commonwealths have food guides reflecting their
national food supply, food consumption patterns, and nutritional status. Examples of the food guides for Mexico, and
Puerto Rico are shown in Figure 2-4. Although the shapes of
the guides may differ from MyPyramid of the United States,
all recommend similar distributions of food category servings.13 Ethnic food guides may be useful when caring for
clients from other countries.
26
BOX 2-3
HEALING FOODS PYRAMID
The Healing Foods Pyramid is a softer, kinder food guide to
promote mindful nourishment as an aspect of healing and/or to
maintain health. Created by Monica Myklebust, MD, director,
and Jenna Wunder, MPH, RD, of the University of Michigan
Integrative Medicine, the pyramid is based on their extensive
experiences with complementary and alternative approaches
to health care.
The Healing Foods Pyramid emphasizes foods with restorative benefits and/or essential nutrients in natural forms. The
core of dietary intake is primarily plant-based foods, with small
amounts of animal foods. Food choices can be varied and balanced by nutrients, colors, and portion sizes. The “healing”
aspect of the pyramid also applies to the production of the food
supply. We need to heal and renew our environment, since
food production affects the earth. Finally, mindful eating, which
is eating with awareness of all the senses, keeps us focused
on the experience of nourishing our bodies. The Healing Foods
Pyramid will continue to evolve as knowledge of food and nutrition expands.
Healing Foods Pyramid. (Courtesy and copyright 2004 the University of Michigan Integrative Medicine, Ann Arbor. Available for download and purchase at www.med.umich.edu/
umim/food-pyramid/index.htm.)
FIG 2-2 American diets are out of balance with dietary recommendations. (From
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance
System Survey Data. Atlanta, 2008, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services,
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed January 10, 2010, from
www.fruitsandvegetablesmorematters.gov.
Red meat,
butter
White rice,
white bread,
white pasta,
potatoes,
soda, and
sweets
Use sparingly
Dairy or calcium
supplement,
1-2 times/day
Multiple vitamins
for most
Fish, poultry, eggs, 0-2 times/day
Nuts, legumes,
1-3 times/day
Alcohol in
moderation
(if appropriate)
Vegetables (in abundance)
Whole grain foods
(at most meals)
Fruits, 2-3 times/day
Plant oils (olive, canola, soy,
corn, sunflower, peanut,
and other vegetable oils)
Daily exercise and weight control
FIG 2-3 Healthy Eating pyramid. (From Willett W: Eat, drink, and be healthy, New York, 2004,
Simon & Schuster.)
27
28
A
B
FIG 2-4 International food guides: Mexico (A) and Puerto
Rico (B) (From Painter J, Rah J-H, Lee Y-K: Comparison of
international food guide pictorial presentations, J Am Diet
Assoc 102(4):483-489, 2002, with permission from the American Dietetic Association.)
FRUITS & VEGGIES—MORE MATTERS
Perhaps you have noticed banners and brochures in your
local supermarket that proclaim “Fruits & Veggies—
More Matters” and other posters advising increased consumption of fruits and vegetables (Figure 2-5). These
banners are part of the National Fruit & Vegetable Program.
This program represents the first partnership of government, not-for-profit agencies, and private industry to
improve the health of Americans. By increasing consumption of fruits and vegetables by all age groups, the program
may reduce the risk of certain cancers, diabetes, stroke, and
high blood pressure.14
The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) is
the federal agency leading this public health initiative to
FIG 2-5 Fruits & Veggies—More Matters logo. (Courtesy
of Produce for Better Health; www.fruitsandveggiesmore
matters.org.)
encourage and motivate consumers to adopt strategies that
result in the consumption of 2 to 6 1 2 cups (4 to 13 servings)
of fruits and vegetables as recommended daily. By doing so,
the goals of the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, Healthy
People, and other dietary recommendations may be achieved.
Research shows that about 75% of Americans adults do
not consume five or more servings of fruits and/or vegetables
a day, which means that only 25% are eating the minimum
suggestion. Only 10% follow the recommendations of the
Dietary Guidelines to eat seven or more servings of fruits and/
or vegetables a day.10 Therefore, most Americans do not meet
the recommended five servings of fruits and vegetables a day,
even though this amount is the minimum number recommended by MyPyramid. By focusing on only fruits and
vegetables, the “Fruits & Veggies” campaign becomes an
easy way to decrease intake of fats because fruits and vegetables are naturally low in fat. With seven or more servings of
fruits and vegetables each day, increased consumption of
fiber, vitamin C, and beta carotene will occur. These nutrients, in addition to their functions as essential nutrients,
are recognized as having the potential to reduce the risk of
developing heart disease and certain cancers. Fruits and vegetables are also excellent sources of antioxidants and phytochemicals, for which potential health benefits are continually
being uncovered.
Although it may be difficult to determine the percentage
of daily dietary fat consumed, it is easy to count the number
of servings of fruits and vegetables. If more fruits and vegetables are eaten every day, cravings for high-fat foods will
tend to decrease.
Exchange Lists
The food guides refer to eating a number of servings of specific foods daily. But what is a “serving”? A resource for
serving sizes is the Exchange Lists for Meal Planning, published jointly by the American Dietetic Association (ADA)
and the American Diabetes Association15 (see Appendix A).
Serving sizes may differ by weight or volume from the portion
sizes we receive in restaurants or serve ourselves at home.
29
TABLE 2-1
EXCHANGE GROUP NUTRIENT VALUE
The Following Table Shows the Amount of Nutrients in One Serving from Each List.
GROUPS/LISTS
CARBOHYDRATE (g)
PROTEIN (g)
FAT (g)
CALORIES
Carbohydrates Group
Starch
Fruit
Milk
Fat-free
Reduced-fat
Whole
Other carbohydrates
Vegetables
15
15
3
—
0-1
—
80
60
12
12
12
15
5
8
8
8
Varies
2
0-3
5
8
Varies
—
90
120
150
Varies
25
Meat and Meat Substitute Group
Very lean
Lean
Medium-fat
High-fat
Fat Group
—
—
—
—
5
7
7
7
7
45
0-1
3
5
8
35
55
75
100
From American Diabetes Association and American Dietetic Association: Exchange lists for meal planning (revised), Alexandria, Va, 1995,
American Dietetic Association.
Foods are divided into different groups or lists: carbohydrates, meat and meat substitutes, and fats. Each list or
exchange contains sizes of servings for foods of that category,
and each serving size provides a similar amount of carbohydrate, protein, fat, and kcal. The carbohydrate group is subdivided into lists of starch, fruit, milk, other carbohydrates,
and vegetables. The meat and meat substitute group is sorted
by fat content (Table 2-1).
The exchange lists were first developed for use by
people with diabetes. A dietitian can create an appropriate
dietary program that prescribes the number of kcal and
units of each exchange category to be consumed daily, as
well as a plan for when foods should be eaten. By using the
exchange lists for carbohydrate counting, an individual can
choose favorite foods from each list while controlling the
amount and kind of carbohydrates consumed throughout
the day.
Guidelines for individuals with diabetes, published by the
ADA, deemphasize prescribed calculated kcaloric diets only
using the exchange lists.16 The focus is now on adapting
dietary intake to meet individual metabolic nutrition and
lifestyle requirements (see Chapter 19).
The exchange lists encourage variety and help to control
kcal and grams of carbohydrates, protein, and fats. As a tool
for dietary instruction, these lists have been adapted to meet
the needs of weight reduction programs and nutrition therapy
planning. MyPyramid also uses the concept of units of servings by recommending a range of servings for each food
category. A difference is that MyPyramid categorizes groups
of foods based on the nutrients they contain, whereas the
exchange lists categorize groups by proportion of carbohydrate, protein, and fat.
Criteria for Future Recommendations
Although the current recommendations are expected to
provide sound advice for a while, other organizations may
issue their own guidelines in the future. Which guidelines
should we follow? Should we change our eating habits and
revise client dietary recommendations for each new study?
Or, to avoid confusion, should new recommendations just
be ignored?
Following are criteria used to evaluate future dietary
guidelines and recommendations:
• Consider the source of the nutrition advice. Are the recommendations from a federal government agency? If so, the
work of these agencies is usually reviewed by health and
nutrition professionals before release to the public. If the
advice is from a private nonprofit group, is the group
nationally recognized? A number of well-respected organizations are devoted to prevention and treatment of specific diseases, such as the American Heart Association,
American Cancer Society, and American Diabetes Association. In addition, there are professional associations,
including the ADA and the Society for Nutrition Education, that specialize in the relationship of nutrition and
health. Assess the comprehensiveness of the recommendations. Do the recommendations address only one health
problem? If so, is that a health problem that affects your
clients? Would following these recommendations have
any negative effects? Would a category of nutrients be
underconsumed? Recommendations addressing several
health issues are usually more complete and provide an
increased level of prevention.
• Evaluate the basis of the recommendations. How were
the recommendations determined? The current recom-
30
BOX 2-4
TYPES OF RESEARCH
Experimental Study
Consists of an experimental group receiving treatment (or
dietary change) and a control group receiving no treatment
(or dietary change); differences, if any, are then noted; called
clinical or laboratory study.
Case Study
Analyzes an individual case of a disease or health difference
to determine how factors may influence health; a naturalistic
study because no manipulation of dietary intake or behaviors
occurs.
Epidemiologic Study
Studies populations; tracks the occurrence of health or
disease processes among populations; may use historical
data, surveys, and/or medical records to determine possible
factors influencing the health of a group of people.
mendations are based on many research studies on the
relationships between diet and diseases. If new recommendations are issued, are they based on the results of
new studies? If so, how many and what kinds of studies
(Box 2-4)? Collecting this type of information means
doing more than just listening to a 2-minute radio
announcement or a 5-minute TV report. Some newspapers contain in-depth evaluations of research; others just
skim the surface. It may be necessary to read the original
study in the library or on the Internet, or to discuss the
recommendations with other health professionals.
• Estimate the ease of application. Can the recommendations be easily adopted? Are they presented in terms
of foods (easier to apply) or nutrients (harder to apply)?
Is a degree in nutrition needed to understand the
recommendations?
CONSUMER FOOD DECISION MAKING
Community supports can have an impact on the quality of
personal nutrition. Most important are the consumer decisions made daily when buying food to be prepared in the
home or when eating out.
Food Selection Patterns
Food selection patterns may be estimated from assessing
government data gathered through national surveys and programs. One approach is to evaluate information gathered
from the online MyPyramid Tracker. Developed as part of
the MyPyramid food guidance system, the MyPyramid
Tracker measures the dietary quality of an individual’s
food intake and physical activity based on the extent to
which the intake follows the Dietary Guidelines and the DRI
recommendations.17
According to research, those with more healthful dietary
intakes have higher levels of nutrition knowledge and
advanced education levels. Consequently, the data reveal that
higher socioeconomic characteristics are related to a greater
understanding of nutrition and the effects of healthy diets in
reducing the risks of diet-related disorders.18 This difference
may reflect access to resources (e.g., time and financial
means) supporting preparation and consumption of foods
that follow the dietary guidelines.
As a nation we need to improve our nutrient intake. An
aspect of doing so must take into account our beliefs and
attitudes toward our dietary intake. A study using national
data reveals that only 23% of the surveyed population is
interested in improving their intake, whereas 37% are not
interested in doing so, and 40% believe their intake does not
need to change. Most view healthy eating as too complicated.
In addition, the majority views snacking as an unhealthy
practice, and as a result, the majority chooses snacks that are
also unhealthy.19
Application to nursing: When working with clients, we
can be aware of their attitudes toward nutrition and dietary
change. Although changing dietary intake is a prime strategy to reduce the risk of diet-related chronic disorders,
many Americans are not interested in changing their eating
behaviors. In addition, the belief that snacking is unhealthy
is unfortunate. Snacks do not have to be high fat, high
sodium, or calorie laden. Consuming additional fruits, vegetables, and whole grain foods is often best accomplished
through wisely selected additional “mini meals” or snacks.
We may need to educate or remind clients about the nutritional benefits of dietary change as a disease-prevention
strategy, and we should definitely emphasize the positive
value of snacking on wholesome foods. Providing clients
with simple techniques for changing food selection habits
is crucial.
Food Consumption Trends
Food consumption trends reflect the food decisions
Americans made in the past. Tracking these trends is the
responsibility of the USDA. Following changes in consumption trends across the years for specific foods reveals information about food substitutions, including food prices or
technologic changes that bring new types of food products to
the marketplace. Food consumption trends now show that
generally Americans eat more food in larger portions with
additional snacks, which results in a greater caloric intake
than in the past.20
Implications of food consumption trends. Food consumption trends affect the nutritional status of the U.S. population. Consumption of fruits and vegetables keeps
increasing but still does not meet recommended intakes. This
is a concern because fruit and vegetable consumption is ideal
to reduce risk factors associated with diet-related chronic
diseases.21 Underconsumption may be related to cost. Income
differences may account for the difference in consumption
because low-income households consume fewer fruits and
vegetables than other households. Generally, however, many
of us need to learn how to prepare the wider variety of vegetables available in the supermarkets so they taste and look
good and are safe to eat. Teaching how to prepare foods is an
adjunct goal of nutrition education. Programs such as Fruits
& Veggies—More Matters that provide point-of-purchase
preparation techniques and recipes should prove effective.
Additionally, the popularity of TV cooking shows, such as
those broadcast on the Food Network, increase our knowledge base. Some shows such as Iron Chef America, Top Chef,
and Throwdown with Bobby Flay—through the use of themes
and competitions are popular with viewers, including some
men who previously had no interest in food preparation.
Although consumption of cereals and grains is increasing,
dietary guideline recommendations are to increase the intake
of whole grains rather than continue to increase refined
grains. A way to accomplish this is to learn new ways to
prepare different kinds and forms of grains, such as wheat,
rice, buckwheat, and corn, in the forms of pastas, couscous,
and tortillas to meet the dietary recommendations of 6 to 11
servings a day. For the best nutrient value, grains and cereals
should be consumed as whole grains, not refined, for at least
half of the daily servings. Breakfast cereals can be a way to
become accustomed to whole grains. These products have
qualities in demand by today’s consumers; they are convenient, may contain fiber, are good sources of nutrients, and
are low in calories.
Animal sources of protein (total meat)—meat, poultry,
fish, and shellfish—are increasing.22 In recent years, within
this category, beef consumption decreased while poultry
and fish consumption increased. More fish is being consumed because of increased availability of fresh and frozen
fish since the development of refrigerated and frozen storage
techniques.
The way meat, poultry, and fish are cooked determines the
final dietary fat content. The message to reduce dietary fat
and cholesterol intake affects how we consume and prepare
animal protein. Health benefits are greatest when we choose
low-fat cooking methods. Some popular ethnic cuisines
extend meat, poultry, or fish by combining protein sources
with cereals, grains, vegetables, and sauces.
Dairy product trends reflect dietary recommendations
to consume products that are lower in fat. The consumption
of whole milk with high amounts of fat is decreasing, while
the consumption of low-fat and nonfat milk and other dairy
products is increasing because of the wide array of new
products in the marketplace. Consumption of yogurt and
other fermented dairy products with live cultures continues
to increase because of their health benefits. Of concern are
the continuing trends that as children and adolescents grow
older, consumption of milk and juice declines, while soft
drink intake increases.23 Soft drinks are drunk in larger
quantities per serving than either milk or juice products,
so they provide more total calories. Such sweetened
beverages may be a factor in the increasing obesity rates of
American youth.
31
Caloric sweetener consumption continues to increase.22
Consumption of cane and beet sugars has decreased, but corn
and noncaloric sweetener consumption has increased. These
changes occurred because the technologies associated with
producing corn sweeteners from cornstarch and manufacturing noncaloric sweeteners reduced their costs, allowing them
to compete economically with cane and beet sugars. Sweetener and beverage consumption trends affect the nutritional
status, depending on whether the type of sweetener or beverage chosen increases or decreases the intake of energy and
other nutrients. Other issues of sweeteners are discussed in
Chapter 4.
Although these trends reflect per capita consumption patterns based on the total population, it is our individual food
choices that have the greatest influence on our personal level
of wellness.
Effective Food-Buying Styles
This chapter is full of information about consumer decisions, but how is it to be applied? How do you and your
clients become better shoppers? The first step is to tailor a
shopping style to one’s particular situation. Consider the
following to formulate the most effective approach to food
shopping:
• Food budget: A food budget should take into account
the funds needed to keep a moderate amount of food
in the home and the money spent on meals away
from home.
• Consumer diversity: Buying food for a single young adult
is different from buying for a family. Lifestyles of household members affect the number and types of meals served
and the kinds and amounts of food served.
• Dietary preferences: We all have food preferences based
on ethnicity, habits, chronic illness, or ethical views such
as vegetarianism. Each preference affects food-buying
selections.
• Shopping frequency: Each household works best with
a shopping plan—perhaps weekly, every 2 weeks, or on
the way home from school or work when things
are needed.
• Location and types of food stores: Different types of
food stores provide a range of services and products.
Conventional supermarkets, superstores, super centers,
and super warehouse stores are valuable for fresh
produce, perishables, and basic grocery items; wholesale
clubs and limited assortment warehouse stores are good
for bulk foods at low prices; specialty stores offer unique
foods at high prices; and convenience stores “save
the day.”
CONSUMER INFORMATION AND WELLNESS
The more information consumers have about the food they
eat, the better they can choose foods that contribute to wellness. Nutrition education is necessary for consumers to use
the additional information appropriately.
32
PERSONAL PERSPECTIVES
The LocalHarvest Blog: Local and Organic for $37/week February 24, 2009
LocalHarvest.org, a unique website, is a dynamic public nationwide directory of small farms, farmers markets, and other local
food sources. The site search engine connects consumers with
sources of local sustainably grown food and family farms. Products from small farms are accessible through an online store.
This entry of the LocalHarvest Blog written by Erin Barnett,
director of LocalHarvest.org, gives a perspective of the “home
economics” of eating locally.
Last week I was part of a panel at local farm conference,
where my assignment was to talk about the “home economics” of eating locally. I spoke about what my family eats and
why, and the time and money our diet requires.
I was especially curious about the money part. It should be
said that my husband and I put a high value on eating well. We
also grow a lot of our own food. It’s our sustenance, both
physical and spiritual. Turns out, the garden saves us a lot of
money, too.
I went through a year’s worth of credit card statements, the
check book register, and my memory of how much cash I
spent at the farmers market and found that on average, our
family spent $412 a month on food last year. This is for two
adults and one voracious toddler—a 2.5 eater household. Do
the math, and it comes out to $37/person per week. If you’re
broke, or have a big family, $37/person per week is a lot. But
if you’re lucky enough to have a good job, it might seem like
a reasonable number. Did I mention this includes our eating-out
budget? It does. We live in a small town with not too many
restaurant choices, so that keeps the eating-out impulse in
check. So does liking to cook.
After figuring the cash, I made a list of what we’re getting
for that much money. By intent, and by dint of the bounty
of rural Minnesota, all our meat, milk, cheese, and eggs are
local and organic. We eat a moderate amount of meat (1-2
chickens a month and a pound or two of beef), but go through
a fair amount of eggs and dairy products.
Most of the rest of the food, besides the produce, is not local.
Grains, beans, tofu, corn chips, condiments, chocolate—not
local, but often organic.
In the summer and fall, 100% of our veggies and fruits are
either grown in our gardens or bought at the farmers market.
In the winter and spring, about 2/3 of our fruit and 3/4 of our
veggies are local because we freeze and can so much food in
the summer. Here’s a list of the garden produce we are eating
this winter.
• Frozen: kale, chard, sweet corn, pesto, red bell peppers,
tomato sauce, winter squash, strawberries, plums
• Fresh food, stored in the basement: potatoes, onions, garlic,
sweet potatoes, parsnips (also had beets, but they are gone)
• Canned: various tomato products, pickles, salsa, jam,
applesauce.
Except the strawberries and apples, which we picked at
organic farms near here, all this came out of our large garden.
Another thing that makes our food dollars go farther is that
we make a few things we could buy, like bread, yogurt, granola.
We do these things because we like the process, the results,
and the lack of packaging. Moreover, the food is OURS because
we made it. Being so intimately involved with our food brings
a lot of soulfulness to our lives, and we love it.
Here is one last thing I have recently realized is key to our
family making good use of all this food. Planning ahead. Last
month I started spending about an hour a month planning the
supper menus for the whole coming month. I cannot tell you
what a difference it makes. At our house, if we do not have a
plan, the “what’s for supper?” question sucks up an unbelievable amount of time and energy. Having it written down makes
the actual cooking a snap. It makes trips to the grocery store
more efficient and ensures that we don’t waste any food
because we have a plan for it.
To good food, and happy cooks!
From Barnett E: The LocalHarvest blog: Local and organic for $37/week, February 24, 2009. Accessed January 10, 2010, at
www.localharvest.org/blog/lh/entry/local_and_organic_for_37.
Food Labeling
Food labels are the best way for consumers to see how individual foods fit their nutritional needs. The function of food
labels is twofold. The first is to assist consumers to select
foods with the most health-providing qualities. The second
is to motivate food companies to enhance the nutritional
value of food products because labels reveal ingredient and
nutrient content.24
Food labeling for processed foods in the United States is
based on standards established under authority of the 1990
Nutrition Labeling and Education Act. Although nutrition
labeling is mandatory for most processed products, it is voluntary for fresh meat, poultry, fish, milk, eggs, and produce.
An example of the label for processed foods is shown in
Figure 2-6.
The Nutrition Facts panel must list the quantities of
energy (kcal), fat, and the following other specific nutrients
in a serving:
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
•
Total food energy
Food energy from fat
Total fat
Saturated fat
Trans fat
Cholesterol
Sodium
Total carbohydrates
Dietary fiber
Sugars
Protein
Vitamins A and C
Calcium
Iron
The Daily Values (DVs) is a system for food labeling
composed of two sets of reference values: reference daily
intakes (RDIs) and daily reference values. The percent of DVs
information, based on a 2000-kcal diet, is intended to show
1 Start here
Serving sizes consistent
across product lines,
stated in household and
metric measures, reflecting amounts people
actually eat.
Kcals from fat are
shown on the label to
help consumers meet
dietary guidelines that
recommend people
get no more than 30
percent of their kcals
from fat.
Serving Size 1 cup (228g)
Servings Per Container 2
Amount Per Serving
2 Check calories
Calories 90
Calories from Fat 30
% Daily Value*
3 Limit these
nutrients
List of nutrients covers
those most important to
health of consumers,
most of whom need to
worry about getting too
much of certain items
(fat, for example) rather
than too few vitamins
or minerals as in the past
Sugars: Amounts listed
include naturally occurring
sugars and those added.
No Daily Value established.
4 Get enough of
these nutrients
Total Fat 3g
Saturated Fat 0g
Trans Fat 3g
Cholesterol 0mg
Sodium 470mg
Total Carbohydrate 13g
Dietary Fiber 2g
Sugars 3g
This info must be on all
food labels. The remaining info displayed if label
is large enough.
0%
0%
20%
4%
10%
% Daily Value shows
how a food fits into
the overall daily diet.
Quick guide to
% DV based on
2,000 calories
For all nutrients:
• 5% or less
is low
• 20% or more
is high
Protein 3g
Vitamin A
80%
Vitamin C
Calcium
60%
4%
Iron
5 Footnote*
5%
6
4%
* Percent Daily Values are based on a 2,000 calorie diet.
Your Daily Values may be higher or lower depending on
your calorie needs.
2,500
2,000
Calories:
80g
Less than 65g
Total Fat
25g
Less than 20g
Sat Fat
300mg
Less than 300mg
Cholesterol
2,400mg
Less than 2,400mg
Sodium
375g
300g
Total Carbohydrate
30g
25g
Dietary Fiber
Some Daily Values are
maximums, as with fat
(65 grams or less):
others are minimums,
as with carbohydrates
(300 grams or more).
The daily values on the
label are based on a
daily diet of 2,000 and
2,500 kcals. Individuals
should adjust the values
to fit their own kcal
intake.
FIG 2-6 An example of the food label format that currently is mandatory in the United
States. (From U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Washington, DC.)
33
34
consumers how much of a day’s ideal intake of a particular
nutrient they are eating. DVs for selected nutrients and food
components based on a 2500-calorie diet are also given at the
bottom of the label.
Uses of %DV
The %DV is useful to make comparisons between products,
to assess nutrient content claims, and to choose a mix of
foods to balance nutrient intake. Making comparisons
between the %DV of similar products is possible if the serving
sizes are the same. Which brand has the lowest fat content?
Which has the highest fiber content? Assessing nutrient
content claims is simple when using %DV. By considering
the %DV of fiber in two food products, the better source of
fiber can be quickly determined. This can be used for any
nutrient content claim. Using %DV to balance nutrient
intake is accomplished by combining foods high in %DV of
a particular nutrient, such as fat, with foods low in %DV of
that nutrient. A person’s daily intake of fat can still be less
than 100%DV.24
Uniform definitions for food descriptors, such as light,
low fat, and others for nutrient content claims, are now
clearly defined and must be consistently used for all foods
(Box 2-5). This information helps consumers who try to
control their intakes of specific nutrients and food
components.
To assist consumers in reaching the Dietary Guidelines
recommendation to consume at least 3 ounces of whole
grains daily, manufacturers have increased whole grain ingredients in many products. The Whole Grains Council, an
organization of scientists, manufacturers, and chefs, developed a series of three stamps to appear on packaging that
identify the whole grain content of a product (Figure 2-7). A
“100% excellent” source stamp signifies a product containing
1 ounce or 1 full serving, and all grains are whole grain. An
“excellent” source stamp signifies a product providing 1
ounce or 1 full serving of whole grains. A “good” source
stamp represents a product adding 1 2 ounce or 1 2 serving
of whole grains. (Whole grain content is not the same as
dietary fiber content, even though dietary fiber is part of the
whole grain.)
BOX 2-5
FOOD DESCRIPTORS
Free
Contains only a tiny or insignificant amount of fat, cholesterol,
sodium, sugar, and/or calories. For example, a “fat-free”
product will contain less than 0.5 g of fat per serving.
Low
“Low” in fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, sodium, and/or
calories; can be eaten fairly often without exceeding dietary
guidelines. So “low in fat” means no more than 3 g of fat
per serving.
Lean
Contains less than 10 g of fat, 4 g of saturated fat, and 95 mg
of cholesterol per serving. “Lean” is not as lean as “low.”
“Lean” and “extra lean” are USDA terms for use on meat
and poultry products.
Extra Lean
Contains less than 5 g of fat, 2 g of saturated fat, and 95 mg
of cholesterol per serving. Although “extra lean” is leaner
than “lean,” it is still not as lean as “low.”
Reduced, Less, Fewer
Contains 25% less of a nutrient or calories. For example, hot
dogs might be labeled “25% less fat than our regular hot
dogs.”
Light/Lite
Contains one third fewer calories or one half the fat of the
original. “Light in sodium” means a product with one half the
usual sodium.
More
Contains at least 10% more of the daily value of a vitamin,
mineral, or fiber than the usual single serving.
Good Source of …
Contains 10% to 19% of the daily value for a particular
vitamin, mineral, or fiber in a single serving.
From U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition: Guidance for Industry A food labeling guide:
IX. Appendix A: Definitions of Nutrient Content Claims, College
Park, Md, 2008 (April), Author.
Organic Food Standards and Labels
Fresh produce and a variety of foods are labeled “organic.”
Just what does organic mean? The USDA established national
standards for food products to be labeled organic, regardless
of where the food is grown or processed. Farmers who
produce organic food focus on the use of renewable resources
and soil and water conservation to maintain and/or improve
the environment for the future. Animal-derived foods such
as meat, poultry, eggs, and dairy products are labeled organic
when no antibiotics or growth hormones are used in the
rearing of the animals. Produce is grown without the use of
conventional pesticides, synthetic fertilizers, bioengineering,
or radiation. Before a product can be labeled organic, certification by government-approved inspectors is required of
farms where foods are grown as well as of companies that
process foods to ensure that the USDA organic standards are
followed.25
Specific labeling rules exist for foods containing organic
ingredients. Single-ingredient foods may use the organic seal
and the word organic on labeling or on display posters. These
foods may include fresh fruits, vegetables, cheese, cartons
of eggs or milk, meat packages, and other single-ingredient
foods. When foods contain more than one ingredient, specific labeling categories are followed (Box 2-6).25
The term natural may also be used, but it is not the same
as organic. Natural often signifies that the ingredients of a
product are less processed and more wholesome but does not
address how the ingredients were grown or the animals
reared. Organic means that the food is certified as fulfilling
BOX 2-6
35
LABELING DEFINITIONS FOR
ORGANIC FOODS
The National Organic Program division of the USDA
has levels of certification for foods containing organically
grown ingredients. A product label may display the following
terminology:
“100% Organic”: All ingredients meet or exceed USDA
specifications for organic foods, which bans the use of synthetic pesticides, herbicides, chemical fertilizers, antibiotics,
and hormones.
“Organic”: At least 95% of ingredients meet or exceed
USDA specifications for organic foods.
“Made with Organic Ingredients”: At least 70% of ingredients meet or exceed USDA specifications for organic foods.
If less than 70% of ingredients are organic but one or more
ingredients are organic, the specific organic ingredients can
be identified as organic but only in the small type on the
ingredient panel.
U.S. Organic seal.
From U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing
Service: Organic Labeling and Marketing Information, Washington,
DC, 2002 (Updated April 2008), Author. Accessed August 2, 2009,
from www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/nop.
ingredients and serving sizes that affect calories and nutrient
content. (See the Teaching Tool box Just the Facts: Using
Labels to Teach Nutrition Literacy for information on how
to help clients evaluate food labels.)
Health Claims
FIG 2-7 Whole Grain Stamps. (Whole Grain Stamps are a
trademark of Oldways Preservation and Exchange Trust and
the Whole Grains Council; www.wholegrainscouncil.org.)
the USDA organic standards for farming and/or rearing of
animals, not how the ingredients have been processed during
the manufacturing procedures. Organic soda prepared from
organically grown sugar/and or high-fructose corn syrup and
flavorings is not more nutrient dense or natural than a soda
from a national beverage company containing similar ingredients grown under conventional means. Consumers need to
be savvy about the nutrient density of the foods chosen
regardless of whether the product meets USDA organic standards (see Box 2-6).
Application to nursing: Check the Nutrition Facts panels
for products purchased regularly. Ingredients may be changed
by manufacturers, and similar products may be created from
different formulations. This may result in modifications of
Health claims relating a nutrient or food component to the
risk of a disease or health-related condition now appear on
food labels. Only health claims approved by the U.S. Food
and Drug Administration (FDA) may be on the label. This
information helps consumers select those foods that can keep
them healthy and well.
So far, the health claims allowed include a relationship
among the following:
• Potassium and reduced risk of high blood pressure
(hypertension)
• Plant sterol and plant stanol esters and heart disease (Plant
sterols and stanols are substances found naturally in
certain plant foods that provide health benefits.)
• Whole grains and reduced risk of heart disease and certain
cancers
• Soy protein and reduced risk of heart disease
• A diet with enough calcium and a lower risk of
osteoporosis
• A diet low in total fat and a reduced risk of some
cancers
• A diet low in saturated fat, cholesterol, and trans fat and
a reduced risk of coronary heart disease
• A diet rich in fiber-containing grain products, fruits, and
vegetables and a reduced risk of some cancers
• A diet rich in fiber-containing grain products, fruits,
and vegetables and a reduced risk of coronary heart
disease
36
TEACHING TOOL
Just the Facts: Using Labels to Teach
Nutrition Literacy
Health care providers view nutrition as a basic component of
health education and refer patients to nutritionists for nutrition education. Nurses are in the position to reinforce nutrition concepts first presented by nutritionists. Although
physicians may be viewed as the experts on health, patients
who have low literacy skills tend to use their social network
of family and friends for health and nutrition information.
Consequently, for interventions to be successful, members
of social networks should be included. The approach should
be visual, interactive, and culturally appropriate. This lesson
on label comprehension fits these three criteria.
Clients should be presented with three boxes of cereal or
Nutrition Facts labels from three cereal products. Choose
three different products. For example, include a heavily presweetened cereal, a lightly sweetened cereal, and one with
no added sweeteners. Ask the following questions:
• Which has the most kcal per serving? This may be affected
by weight, volume of the cereal (popped with air), and the
density of added ingredients like raisins.
• Which has the largest serving size? Serving sizes are the
same by weight for all products in a food category.
• Which contains the most dietary fat? Fat is not an issue
with cereals, except for granola.
• Which contains the most sodium? Some cereals contain
about 300 mg, which is high for sodium-sensitive clients.
• Which contains the most added sugars? Added sugars can
range from none to 13 g per serving.
• How many calories come from sugars? Multiply the
number of grams of sugars by 4 kcal. By dividing this
number by the total kcal per serving and multiplying
the decimal by 100, you can determine the percentage of
sugar content.
• Which contains the most fiber? Fiber content can range
from none to about 5 g per serving.
As your study of nutrition continues, you may add other questions and be able to relate client responses to preventive
health issues of diet-related diseases or to address specific
dietary needs of a patient’s nutrition therapy.
Data from Lee SY et al.: Health literacy, social support, and health:
a research agenda, Soc Sci Med 58(7):1309-1321, 2004.
• A diet low in sodium and a reduced risk of high blood
pressure
• A diet rich in fruits and vegetables and a reduced risk of
some cancers
• Folic acid and a decreased risk of neural tube defect–
affected pregnancy
• Dietary sugar alcohols and a reduced risk of dental caries
(decay)
• Fluoridated water and reduced risk of dental caries
(decay)
• Soluble fiber from certain foods, such as whole oats and
psyllium seed husk, as part of a diet low in saturated fat
and cholesterol and a reduced risk of heart disease
Food labeling legislation also covers dietary supplements.
The Dietary Supplement Health and Education Act of 1994
(DSHEA) requires the FDA to prove a dietary supplement is
unsafe or adulterated or has false or misleading labeling. The
act does not allow claims about diagnosis, treatment, or prevention of disease but does allow that claims of certain benefits must be truthful. A standard statement is required on
the label by the FDA26 (see Chapter 16).
FOOD SAFETY
Food safety is influenced by community decisions and personal behaviors. We expect the larger community, such as
government agencies, to supervise the production and preparation of food products to ensure the safety of the foods we
purchase. But once we as consumers purchase food products,
we are responsible for the proper handling of foods to prevent
foodborne illness.
These concerns apply equally in the nursing setting. Our
clients are also consumers. Our recommendations regarding
nutritional intake are “translated” by our clients when they
become consumers. As we advise about nutrition concerns,
public and personal food safety is an issue.
The knowledge, attitudes, perceptions, and concerns that
consumers have about food safety affect the food decisions
they make. There is enormous concern from consumers and
the food industry that the U.S. food supply must be safe. To
have a safe food supply, it is essential for each sector of the
food chain (producers, manufacturers, wholesalers, food
stores, food service outlets, and consumers) to follow correct
food-handling procedures. Such procedures, called Hazard
Analysis Critical Control Points (HACCP) programs, are developed for the various segments of the food system to improve
food quality. Regardless of government actions and manufacturing procedures concerning safe food preparation,
responsibility ultimately is on the individual consumer who
prepares food at home.
Risk Analysis and Food Safety
Setting risk standards involves determining a balance between
risk and benefit for those who produce and consume foods.
Risks to human health and to the environment are balanced
against the economic benefits sustained by the use of insecticides, fungicides, and rodenticides. However, like the other
approaches used to set risk standards, risk-benefit estimates
for foods are limited by the unavailability of reliable quantitative data to use in the analysis.
Biotechnology: Consumer Risk or Benefit?
Biotechnology has become a common term. But how does it
relate to our nutrient intake and food supply? Forms of food
biotechnology control the modification of the genetic structure of foods at the molecular level to improve nutrient
content, increase crop or animal yield, inhibit spoilage,
and otherwise enhance desirable characteristics of food
products.
Traditional biotechnology efforts resulted in random
mutations from crossbreeding of plants or animals. These
changes seem to have shown little risk to consumers or
the environment. However, the new molecular biotechnology raises concerns by some consumers and scientists,
although risks are decreased compared with traditional
biotechnology.
An example of biotechnology involves the transfer of a
bacterium gene to corn and cotton plants that allows the
plants to create pesticides as part of their natural growth
cycle. The created pesticides are harmful only to insects
preying on those plants and are harmless to humans and
other insects and animals. Consequently, fewer pesticides can
be used while maintaining or increasing crops.27
Currently, genetically engineered crops are commonly
used for feeds for animals. More than half of soybean and a
quarter of corn crops are genetically altered forms. This
means the poultry and meats we consume most likely were
raised on these crops.
To ensure safety, food that has been transformed with
genes should be tested to determine whether toxic substances
have been unwittingly produced or whether the food produces a protein that may elicit an allergic reaction in susceptive individuals. Routine testing determines whether the
modified product now contains an allergen not previously
detected. The evaluation process of the FDA meets the international food safety guidelines as set by the Codex Alimentarius Commission. The Codex is an organization of the
World Health Organization and the Food and Agriculture
Organization of the United Nations. The Codex is the highest
international organization overseeing food standards.27
Additional questions need to be considered as other food
products are genetically modified. Will such changes increase
supply and availability, thereby lowering the price of nutritious foods? An example is the increased milk yield from cows
treated with recombinant bovine somatotropin (rBST),
sometimes called bovine growth hormone (BGH) or bovine
hormone somatotropin (BST). Another change is the use in
cheese-making of pure chymosin enzyme from molecular
biotechnology rather than the more expensive rennet from
calves’ stomachs. The FDA has approved both of these products of biotechnology.
How would lower prices affect the farmers who grow the
crops or whose cows produce the milk? If these genetic
manipulations keep prices high by producing “status” perfect
quality produce, who gains? Or are these scientific developments simply a continuation of the food biotechnology time
line started when milk was first pasteurized to destroy bacteria? There are no clear answers.
A recent development is the availability of cattle, swine,
and goat clones. The clones of these species and their offspring have been declared safe for consumption by humans
and animals by the FDA. According to the FDA, special food
labels for such cloned and cloned-related products are not
necessary because scientifically there is no difference between
foodstuff from the cloned animals and traditionally raised
animals. Clones are primarily used for breeding rather than
37
as a direct source of food. This means that cloned animals
participate in conventional (sexual) breeding and the resulting offspring are a food source. Clones of other animals such
as sheep are not recommended for consumption at this time
because not much is known as yet about other cloned
species.28
Food Safety and Manufactured Products
Once produce is grown and ready to be eaten or processed
into multi-ingredient products, other issues of food safety
arise. Food safety approaches consider risk as keeping substances out of the food supply and benefits as enhancing the
shelf life and maintaining the nutrition quality of food products. This was the basis of the original Delaney Clause that
addresses food additives and other detailed government regulations. In 1996 the Food Quality Protection Act was passed,
which replaced the zero tolerance for cancer-causing agents
in foods of the Delaney Clause by reforming federal standards
for pesticide residues in foods with a standard of “reasonable
certainty of no harm.”
Additives that are considered safe and were already in use
when the food safety acts first went into effect are on a generally recognized as safe (GRAS) list; new additives are added
as their safety is established. However, in the years since the
original GRAS list was established, methods of analysis have
become more sensitive and can detect lower and lower levels
of these substances, thus calling into question the safety of
additives on the original list. As a result, a comprehensive
review of the list and all chemicals added to food is conducted
periodically by the Federation of American Societies for
Experimental Biology (FASEB).
Additives used for their functional properties in foods
during processing—that is, to improve food quality in some
way—are called intentional (direct) food additives, and
those that contaminate or inadvertently become a part of a
food at some time as it passes through the food system are
called incidental (indirect) food additives. Direct additives
are used to improve, maintain, and stabilize food quality; to
increase availability across the country and lengthen storage
time; to increase convenience; to decrease waste; and to stabilize or increase nutrient content. Table 2-2 lists selected
intentional GRAS food additives. Indirect additives include
pesticide and herbicide residues, animal drugs, processing
aids, and packaging constituents that migrate from the
package into the food. Regardless of their source, indirect
additives seem to be of greatest concern to consumers.
Foodborne Illness
From the practical standpoint of keeping people well, consumers and professionals must acknowledge the importance
of microbiologic contaminants; both groups need to work
together to help prevent foodborne illness. In addition to
discomfort, these illnesses cause greater economic costs in
terms of lost time at work and productivity than most people
can imagine. Unfortunately, the incidence of foodborne
illness in the United States is increasing, according to the
CDC, which keeps statistical data on these illnesses. Because
38
TABLE 2-2
INTENTIONAL FOOD ADDITIVES
TYPE OF ADDITIVE
PURPOSE
Processing Aids
Anticaking agents
Conditioners
Dough strengtheners
Drying agents
Emulsifiers
Enzymes
Firming agents
Flour treatments
Leavening agents
Lubricants
Propellants
Solvents
Stabilizers
Texturizers
Thickening agents
Prevent particles from collecting together in clumps (e.g., keep salt free flowing)
Make dough less sticky and easier to handle
Help dough to withstand mechanical action of automatic processing
Absorb moisture to keep packaged products from becoming soggy or lumpy
Prevent oil separation in salad dressings
Speed up reactions that otherwise would be very slow
Stabilize and prevent flow of a dough
Modify response of flour to mixing, as in making a dough
Make baked products rise and become light (e.g., yeast baking powder, soda)
Ingredients such as fat in a dough that help keep it pliable and moldable
Gases used to make sprays from fluids (e.g., oil spray for coating pans)
Fluids in which particles of another compound dissolve (e.g., water is a solvent for sugar)
Used to keep fat globules small in ice cream or air bubbles small in whipped cream
Contribute to texture in some way (e.g., crunchy)
Increase thickness (viscosity) of liquids
Preservatives
Acidulants
Antimicrobials
Antioxidants
Curing and pickling agents
Fumigants
Oxidizing and reducing agents
Acids that prevent growth of microorganisms in food
Control growth of microorganisms in food
Help prevent or slow down development of “off” flavors and odors of fat-containing
foods
Control microbial growth in meat, pickles, sauerkraut
Chemical control of pests and/or deterioration; usually leave residues in the food
Influence interactions in food systems that cause deterioration
Appearance and Flavor Enhancers
Clarifying agents
Color
Flavor enhancers
Flavoring agents
Nonnutritive sweeteners
Nutritive sweeteners
Combine with and precipitate or disperse compounds that prevent fluids from being clear
Natural or synthetic compounds added to improve the color of food
Improve flavor by strengthening flavors in a product
Added to foods to improve flavor or for special effects
Noncaloric compounds usually with high intensity of sweetness
Sweeteners that supply calories
many cases of foodborne illness are not reported, federal
agencies must rely on estimates to define the size of the
problem. Microorganisms are estimated to be responsible for
76 million cases of foodborne illness, resulting in 325,000
hospitalizations and about 5000 deaths each year.29
Food can become contaminated with bacteria, molds,
parasites, and viruses during production, processing, transporting, storage, and retailing. It also can become contaminated in the home. Although the entire food distribution
system may contribute to foodborne illness, improper handling of food in the home is a commonly overlooked source
of contamination and growth of illness-causing microorganisms. The severity of foodborne illness varies with the microorganism, the susceptibility of the person, and the amount of
bacteria or enterotoxin ingested. Information about sources,
symptoms, and special control recommendations for
common bacterial infections and intoxications are identified
in Box 2-7.
Some individuals are at greater risk of foodborne illness.
These high-risk groups include the elderly, children, pregnant women, individuals with human immunodeficiency
virus/acquired immunodeficiency syndrome (HIV/AIDS),
and others whose immune systems are compromised such as
individuals undergoing chemotherapy. Individuals living in
institutional settings such as nursing homes, assisted living
communities, correctional facilities, schools, shelters, or
daycare centers are also at greater risk for foodborne illness.30
As the palates of Americans become more accustomed to
exotic sensations, the Japanese meal of sushi—raw fish with
vinegared rice—often is ordered in the growing number of
Japanese restaurants. However, the fish must be served fresh
and free of parasites; Anisakidae nematode parasites can be a
problem when eating raw fish. Although such parasitic infections are usually transient, several cases of more serious parasitic bowel obstruction have occurred, characterized by
sudden symptoms of severe nausea and/or vomiting, abdominal pain, and diarrhea.31
Therefore, sushi is not a dish to prepare at home. It is
safest when prepared by specially trained chefs. Licensing of
sushi chefs is not mandatory in the United States; consequently, sushi chefs are not required to meet the strict standards of licensed chefs. As a precaution, people with reduced
BOX 2-7
39
FOODBORNE ILLNESS: TEN LEAST WANTED FOODBORNE PATHOGENS
Least Wanted Foodborne Pathogens
The U.S. Public Health Service has identified the following
microorganisms as being the biggest culprits of foodborne
illness, either because of the severity of the sickness or the
number of cases of illness they cause. Beware of these pathogens: Fight BAC!
Learn Where They Are and How to Avoid Them
1. Campylobacter: Second most common bacterial cause
of diarrhea in the United States. Sources: raw and
undercooked poultry and other meat, raw milk, and
untreated water.
2. Clostridium botulinum: This organism produces a toxin that
causes botulism, a life-threatening illness that can prevent
the breathing muscles from moving air in and out of the
lungs. Sources: Improperly prepared home-canned foods;
honey should not be fed to children younger than 12
months old.
3. Escherichia coli 0157:H7: A bacterium that can produce a
deadly toxin and that causes approximately 73,000 cases
of foodborne illness each year in the United States. Sources:
Beef, especially undercooked or raw hamburger; produce;
raw milk; and unpasteurized juices and ciders.
4. Listeria monocytogenes: Causes listeriosis, a serious
disease for pregnant women, newborns, and adults with a
weakened immune system. Sources: Unpasteurized dairy
products, including soft cheeses; sliced deli meats; smoked
fish; hot dogs; paté; and deli-prepared salads (i.e., egg,
ham, seafood, and chicken salads).
5. Norovirus: The leading viral cause of diarrhea in the United
States. Poor hygiene causes Norovirus to be easily passed
from person to person and from infected individuals to food
items. Sources: Any food contaminated by someone who
is infected with this virus.
6. Salmonella: Most common bacterial cause of diarrhea in
the United States and the most common cause of foodborne deaths. Responsible for 1.4 million cases of foodborne illness a year. Sources: Raw and undercooked eggs,
undercooked poultry and meat, fresh fruits and vegetables,
and unpasteurized dairy products.
7. Staphylococcus aureus: This bacterium produces a toxin
that causes vomiting shortly after being ingested. Sources:
Cooked foods high in protein (e.g., cooked ham, salads,
bakery products, dairy products) that are held too long at
room temperature.
8. Shigella: Causes an estimated 448,000 cases of diarrhea
illnesses per year. Poor hygiene causes Shigella to be easily
passed from person to person and from infected individuals
to food items. Sources: Salads, unclean water, and any food
handled by someone who is infected with the bacterium.
9. Toxoplasma gondii: A parasite that causes toxoplasmosis,
a very severe disease that can produce central nervous
system disorders, particularly mental retardation and visual
impairment in children. Pregnant women and people with
weakened immune systems are at higher risk. Sources:
Raw or undercooked pork.
10. Vibrio vulnificus: Causes gastroenteritis, wound infection,
and severe bloodstream infections. People with liver diseases are especially at high risk. Sources: Raw or undercooked seafood, particularly shellfish.
Chart accessed January 10, 2010, from http://www.fightbac.org/about-foodborne-illness/least-wanted-pathogens. Accessed September 13,
2010.
immune system disorders, liver disorders, and other at-risk
people should avoid consuming raw and undercooked fish
and animal foods such as sushi and sashimi (raw fish only).30
Even though such complications are rare, these foods should
still not be an everyday treat but can be enjoyed safely in
moderation (see the Cultural Considerations box, Ethnic
Food Preferences and Foodborne Illness).
What could be more wholesome and healthful than fresh
cider straight from the cider mill? Unfortunately, a number
of people who sipped cider at an apple farm in Massachusetts
learned otherwise when they fell victim to a pathogenic type
of Escherichia coli (E. coli) bacteria and experienced gastrointestinal distress. It seems that apples used for cider are often
those that have fallen to the ground and have blemishes. The
problem is those apples may come in contact with animal
feces and manure fertilizer; unless the apples are washed well
or the cider is pasteurized or preserved with sodium benzoate, this contamination can lead to illness.
Consequently, all packaged juices that are not pasteurized
or treated to prevent the growth of illness-causing microbes
must have warning labels stating the following:
WARNING: This product has not been pasteurized and
therefore may contain harmful bacteria that can cause
serious illness in children, the elderly, and people with
weakened immune systems.
Some types of E. coli are normally found in the human intestinal system; they are responsible for producing vitamins B12
and K and for limiting the growth of other undesirable bacteria. But we have few defenses against the pathogenic E. coli
0157:H7. This form of E. coli was found in a batch of meat
that had been distributed to restaurants in the northwest
United States in 1993. When the cooks at a fast-food restaurant chain undercooked hamburgers containing this E. coli
organism, 4 children died and about 500 people became ill.
The bacteria attacked the intestinal walls, which allowed the
effects to spread to other parts of the body, particularly the
kidneys. Cooking the meat to a well-done stage with no trace
of redness would have destroyed the E. coli bacteria.32 As a
result of this outbreak, the USDA now recommends that
ground beef and venison be cooked to a minimum internal
temperature of 71° C (160° F ) and poultry to 82° C (180° F)
40
CULTURAL CONSIDERATIONS
Ethnic Food Preferences and Foodborne Illness
America is sometimes described as a “cultural melting
pot.” This means that the traditions of our many ethnic and
racial subgroups are accepted and sometimes adopted by
others within the larger American population. Some of these
ethnic food preferences may be associated with increased
risk of foodborne illness. The following text contains a few
examples.
During the Christmas holiday season, chitterlings (cooked
swine intestines) are served as part of African American tradition. During this same holiday time frame of November through
December, the incidence of Yersinia enterocolitica increases
and peaks in December among African Americans, particularly
among young children. The illness even occurs among infants
whose pacifiers test positive for the pathogen. This foodborne
illness should be considered when symptoms of fever, abdominal pain, and bloody diarrhea are presented, especially from
November through February. The infection may mimic appendicitis. Other symptoms may include joint pain and blood
infections. More severe cases may require antibiotic therapy.
To prevent infection, boil raw chitterlings for 5 minutes before
cleaning and cooking. Care should be taken to avoid crosscontamination through food contact with surfaces and utensils
in the cooking area and even through person to person (such
as infants and young children) if hands are not washed
thoroughly with soap and warm water.
Among Hispanic Americans, a homemade soft cheese prepared from unpasteurized milk, queso fresco, has been tied to
cases of Listeriosis. National data from the CDC indicate that
this risk of infection is greater for Hispanic women of childbearing ages and their infants. Other Hispanic food consumption
practices potentially linked to greater risk of food-related illness
are consumption of unpasteurized fruit juices, undercooked
eggs, certain fruits, and vegetables for Campylobacter infection
as well as salmonellosis and listeriosis.
Application to nursing: Generally, the American minority
groups of African Americans, Hispanics, and Asians have
higher incidence of foodborne illness than non-Hispanic whites.
This may be tied to specific ethnic foods and their preparation
and storage. As the differences in rates and types of foodborne
illnesses are studied, food safety strategies geared to specific
ethnic and racial subgroups will be possible.
We need to ask our clients what they ate the previous day
to really determine the cause of their “stomach virus.” A
response of “some cheese” may not be sufficient, particularly
if the client is from a specific ethnic group. Being sensitive to
ethnicity does not mean treating everyone as if their diet is the
same but treating each individual in a culturally sensitive
approach to maintain and/or restore health.
Data from Ray SM et al.: Population-based surveillance for Yersinia enterocolitica infections in FoodNet sites, 1996-1999: Higher risk of
disease in infants and minority populations, Clin Infect Dis 38(Suppl 3):S181-S189, 2004; Taege A: Food-borne disease, Disease management
project, Cleveland, 2004, The Cleveland Clinic Foundation; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Food Safety and Inspection Service: Yersiniosis
and Chitterlings: Tips to Protect You and Those You Care for from Foodborne Illness, February 2007. Accessed on January 10, 2010, from
www.fsis.usda.gov/PDF/Yersiniosis_and_Chitterlings.pdf.
in restaurants and in the home. E. coli 0157:H7 is also thought
to have been responsible for illnesses from raw milk, dry
cured salami, lettuce, produce from manure-fertilized
gardens, potatoes, radish sprouts, alfalfa sprouts, yogurt,
sandwiches, and water. The CDC estimates that at least
20,000 cases of E. coli–related foodborne illnesses occur each
year as additional outbreaks occur.
While these examples of foodborne disease appeared to
be locally bound, nationwide outbreaks of E. coli and salmonella have occurred and unfortunately may continue
as the food sources become more diverse. Green, leafy
vegetables, a foundation of a health-promoting dietary
pattern, have been determined to be sources of several E.
coli occurrences due to contamination at various levels of
production and processing. Should we still consume green,
leafy vegetables? Of course we should but we can take
control by practicing appropriate food safety measures in
our homes, while federal food-safety agencies which includes
the USDA, FDA, and the CDC, work to limit and prevent
foodborne illnesses through creation of mechanisms and
policies to uncover potential sources of contamination
within production and processing of the food supply.33
Other outbreaks of salmonella include contaminated peppers
and peanut butter that was used as an ingredient of peanut
products, including ice cream, snack bars, cereals, and even
in pet food.33 Media-wide announcements of such episodes
include specific products that should not be consumed once
the source has been identified.
To assist the public in dealing with food and medical
related adverse reactions, the following hotlines are
available:
Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition Outreach
and Information Center: (888) SAFE FOOD
FDA Foodborne Illness Reporting Emergency Line: (301)
443-1240
FDA Medical Products Reporting MedWatch Line: (800)
FDA-1088
FDA website: www.fda.gov/medwatch/how.htm
USDA Meat and Poultry Food Safety Hotline: (800)
535-4555
Food Preparation Strategies
Although government inspection programs should guard
against foodborne illnesses, we must adhere to safe food handling procedures in the home and follow food safety guidelines when we eat away from home as an aspect of personal
Ground beef/
160° F
Chicken breasts
hamburgers
Pork
160° F
Whole chicken
Steaks and roasts
145° F
Fish
Egg dishes
160° F
For questions, USDA Meat and Poultry Hotline:
1-888-MPHotline (1-888-674-6854)
FIG 2-8 Fight BAC! This logo represents the public-private
coalition of the Partnership for Food Safety Education, which
educates the public about food safety strategies through
multiple media approaches. Materials are available at
www.fightbac.org. (From Partnership for Food Safety Education, Washington, DC.)
responsibility for our nutrition. Following are some recommendations from FightBAC!, a public-private coalition of the
Partnership for Food Safety Education that informs the
public about food safety strategies34 (Figure 2-8):
• To ensure sanitary food handling in the home, make sure
the food preparer’s hands are clean, that clean equipment
is used, and that a clean surrounding is maintained,
including cutting boards and countertops.
• Wash hands with soap and hot water before preparing and
cooking foods.
• Wash cutting boards, utensils, and countertops that come
into contact with uncooked meats, poultry, or fish with
hot soapy water and a disinfectant.
• Do not place cooked foods on unwashed surfaces where
uncooked foods have been prepared because the cooked
foods will become contaminated with the microorganisms
on these surfaces. Cooking destroys bacteria, but bacteria
from uncooked foods on unwashed surfaces can reinfect
any cooked food placed on them.
• Keep foods either colder than 4° C (40° F) or hotter
than 60° C (140° F). The danger zone for rapid growth of
microorganisms is a temperature inside this range. Foods
can easily fall into this zone at a picnic or a potluck meal.
• Use a simple food thermometer to check internal temperatures when cooking meat, poultry, and fish. USDA
Recommended Internal Temperatures:
41
170° F
180° F
145° F
• Refrigerate cooked foods immediately after meals or after
they are cooked. DO NOT cool to room temperature and
then refrigerate.
• Boil all home-canned vegetables, meats, poultry, and fish
for 10 minutes before tasting.
• Discard or boil marinades used with uncooked meats,
poultry, and fish after marinating is completed; bacteria
are not destroyed until heated.
• Cook all meat 71° C (160° F), poultry 82° C (180° F),
shellfish, and fish to the well-done stage.
• Do not eat or taste any uncooked foods containing raw
eggs, including cookie and cake batters. They could
contain salmonella.
• NEVER use a recipe that calls for raw eggs and is
not cooked or baked after addition of the eggs. When
making homemade ice cream, cook the eggs by making
soft custard; do not use raw eggs in the mixture to
be frozen.
• Microwave cooking can be tricky and dangerous. NEVER
store defrosted and/or partially cooked meats and poultry.
Cook them completely to the well-done stage first, and
then eat or refrigerate.
• When food shopping, choose perishable foods (those
from the refrigerator or freezer cases) last and get them
home as soon as possible. Don’t leave them sitting in the
car while doing other errands.
• Never buy or use foods in a bulging can, cracked jar, or
bulging lid. Damage to containers may have allowed botulism to develop. Don’t taste to determine if spoiled; this
toxin is extremely dangerous.
Of course, adhering to these guidelines can become a major
challenge in disaster situations. The Personal Perspectives
box, Surviving Katrina from a Food Perspective, provides
some insight into a unique situation in which a medical
center was tasked to find safe ways to continue providing
meal service to its patients in the aftermath of Hurricane
Katrina in 2005, one of the worst natural disasters in the
United States.
Additional common food safety mistakes include the
following:
• Thawing frozen foods and meats on countertop; instead,
thaw in microwave or refrigerator
• Cooling leftovers on the counter; instead, refrigerate in
small batches as soon as possible
• Marinating at room temperature; instead, refrigerate when
marinating
• Delaying refrigeration of restaurant “doggie bags”; instead,
place in a thermos-cooler bag
• Tasting stirring spoon; instead, use a clean spoon for each
taste test
42
PERSONAL PERSPECTIVES
Surviving Katrina from a Food Perspective
Hurricane Katrina hit the Atlantic basin in August 2005, devastating New Orleans and the coastal regions of Louisiana, Mississippi, and Alabama, which meant that hundreds of thousands
of individuals were displaced because their homes and communities were destroyed. Following is a personal account by
the director of Food & Nutrition Services, University of South
Alabama Medical Center, Mobile, as she and her staff struggled to prepare food for patients and staff during and after the
hurricane.*
Despite a good disaster plan in place at the University of
South Alabama Medical Center, during Hurricane Katrina we
learned there can always be scenarios that plans just do not
cover. When that happens, you must improvise!
For example, the ceiling caved in during the lunch service,
pouring buckets of water into the cafeteria. We pulled the
contents out of our portable salad bar, removed the sneeze
guard and used the bar to catch rain and drain through the salad
bar floor drain. Then we roped the area surrounding the bar
with caution tape. (Always have spare tape stored in your
department; you can’t wait for the maintenance department,
especially during a disaster.)
After the cave-in, we switched dinner to carryout dinners.
Each department head preordered the number of meals
needed for their staff, and at serving time one person from
each department used a cart to pick up meals for their
co-workers.
Other issues involved cafeteria transactions. When the cash
registers were not functioning due to power outages or leaks,
we learned it is a good idea to keep notebooks and pencils in
the registers so cashiers can tally and record meal sales.
What do you do when the ice supply keeps getting stolen
from the machines? The first night after the theft, I slept next
to the ice machine with one eye open. The next night we
hooked gauges up to a compressor and posted a sign reading:
Contaminated Ice!
Later we had hasp locks installed on the ice machines and
secured them when the department was closed. In the future
we will also bag ice before a storm and store it in a walk-in
freezer with emergency power.
The most important lesson I learned from this experience is
to be as prepared as possible, but to be able to think critically
and adapt for the numerous unplanned events that occur.
Nancy Brumfield, RD
Director of Food & Nutrition Services
University of South Alabama Medical Center
Mobile, Alabama
The following excerpt is from an FDA bulletin on food safety
during and after a hurricane.† For additional information, go to
www.fda.gov.
Here’s what FDA suggests consumers can do at home to
keep their food safe:
Food Safety When the Power Goes Out
• Keep the refrigerator and freezer doors closed as much as
possible to maintain the cold temperature. The refrigerator
will keep food cold for about 4 hours if it is unopened. A full
freezer will keep the temperature for approximately 48 hours
(24 hours if it is half full) if the door remains closed. Buy dry
or block ice to keep the refrigerator as cold as possible if the
power is going to be out for a prolonged period of time. Fifty
pounds of dry ice should hold an 18-cubic foot fully stocked
freezer cold for two days.
• If you plan to eat refrigerated or frozen meat, poultry, fish,
or eggs while they are still at safe temperatures, it’s important that the food is thoroughly cooked to the proper temperature to assure that any foodborne bacteria that may be
present is destroyed.
• Wash fruits and vegetables with water from a safe source
before eating.
• For infants, if possible, use prepared, canned baby formula
that requires no added water. When using concentrated or
powdered formulas, prepare with bottled water if the local
water source is potentially contaminated.
Once the Power Is Restored
• Once the power is restored you will need to evaluate the
safety of the food. If an appliance thermometer was kept in
the freezer, read the temperature when the power comes
back on. If the thermometer stored in the freezer reads 40°
F or below the food is safe and may be refrozen. If a thermometer has not been kept in the freezer, check each
package of food to determine the safety. Remember, you
can’t rely on appearance or odor. If the food still contains ice
crystals or is 40° F or below, it is safe to refreeze or cook.
• Refrigerated food should be safe as long as the power is out
for no more than 4 hours. Keep the door closed as much as
possible. Discard any perishable food (such as meat, poultry,
fish, eggs or leftovers) that has been above 40° F for two
hours or more.
*From Brumfield N: “After the theft, I slept next to the ice machine with one eye open,” ADA Times, 3(2, Nov/Dec):4, 2005.
†
From U.S. Food and Drug Adminstration: Food facts:What consumers need to know about food and water safety during hurricanes, power
outages, and floods, December 2009 (updated May 2009), Author, Retrieved September 12, 2010, from www.fda.gov/Food/
ResourcesForYou/Consumers/ucm076881.htm.
43
• Consuming hide-and-seek Easter eggs; instead prepare
some to be refrigerated
• Buying foods with expired use dates; instead, check dates
when shopping
We tend to be casual about food preparation. After all, we eat
all the time. However, sometimes being too relaxed allows for
these bacterial and viral contaminations to occur. In our
homes, we must implement basic food safety procedures
when preparing and storing foods; in food retail markets and
food service facilities, we count on the expertise and supervision of public health officers to enforce regulations that
provide safe food.
As nurses we must recognize our role in providing safe
foods to patients. When handling foods for patients, care
must be taken to prevent contamination by using the techniques of food handlers, such as hand washing before serving
meals or assisting patients with their meals.
Food Preservation to Control Foodborne Illness
Through the years, many methods were developed and used
to preserve food for future use by controlling decomposition
and microbial growth that could lead to foodborne illness.
Besides drying and dehydrating, which limit moisture in the
food, methods developed include canning, refrigerating and
freezing, pasteurizing, curing and smoking, modified atmosphere packaging, aseptic packaging, and irradiating foods.
In canning, heat is used to destroy microorganisms; in pickling, salt, acid (vinegar), and usually heat control microbial
growth; and in jellies and jams, sugar is the preservative.
Refrigerating and freezing limit the growth of microorganisms by the use of cold temperatures. Pasteurizing uses heat
to destroy pathogenic organisms in milk and other undesirable ones in other foods. Salts and different types of smoke
cure and preserve meat, poultry, and fish. Modified atmosphere packaging provides an atmosphere of various gases in
the package that helps control microbial growth to preserve
the food. Aseptic packaging preserves food and prevents contamination by placing food products that are sterilized separately from the packaging into sterilized containers, which are
immediately sealed.
Irradiation is a procedure by which food is exposed to
radiation that destroys microorganisms, insect growth, and
parasites that could spoil food or cause illness. This food
preservation technology results in an increase of international and domestic food trade. By decreasing economic
losses caused by food spoilage, insects, sprouting, parasites,
microorganisms associated with foodborne disease, and
changes associated with ripening, irradiated products can be
shipped farther and still remain safe to eat. The use of irradiation for poultry products is a specific example of efforts to
control salmonellosis and campylobacteriosis.
Irradiation involves exposure of food to gamma irradiation using cobalt-60 or cesium-137 or to an electron beam
from electron accelerators. The machine sources may be the
least controversial of the sources of radiation because they are
independent of nuclear energy, so there is no radioactive
waste. Extensive testing shows irradiated foods as wholesome
FIG 2-9 The radura symbol must be carried by all foods
that have been treated with radiation, although it need
not be carried by processed foods that include irradiated
ingredients.
and nonradioactive and provides consumers with a reduced
risk of foods contaminated with micro-organisms that cause
foodborne illness.30
Irradiated whole foods (as opposed to foods containing
irradiated ingredients) in the United States must be labeled
as “Treated with Radiation” or “Treated by Irradiation” and
must display the international symbol for irradiated foods,
radura (Figure 2-9).
As health professionals we can assist other food and nutrition professionals to educate our clients as consumers about
the value of this technology as safeguarding our food supply
in the marketplace and in our homes.
TOWARD A POSITIVE NUTRITION LIFESTYLE:
LOCUS OF CONTROL
Do things just happen to you? Does it seem as if school,
family, or society affect what you do without your input? Or
do you feel that you have control over what takes place? Do
you have a life plan (or weekly plan) that you follow? Locus
of control is the perception of one’s ability to control life
events and experiences. Having an internal locus of control
means feeling as if you can influence the forces with which
you come into contact. You have an inner sense of your
ability to guide life events. An external locus of control is
defined as the perception of not being able to control what
happens to you and that outside forces have power over what
you experience.
44
Let’s apply these concepts to your style of making food
choices when shopping. In particular, consider the nutritional implications of locus of control. If you have an internal
locus of control, you may develop a basic plan of the types of
nutritious foods to be purchased during a shopping trip. You
may make a few unplanned purchases, but they would be
limited. You feel in control of your choices. Having an external locus of control means you might start out with a shopping list, but you are probably easily swayed by in-store
promotions, coupons, and even colorful packaging to select
products not on your list. You often buy more than needed
because so much “looked good.”
Awareness of our type of locus of control allows us to
develop strategies to improve our food decisions. Individuals
with an internal locus of control tend to develop their own
approaches for changing food-related behaviors; those with
an external locus of control may need a structured program
or group support to provide guidance to modify their food
behaviors.
SUMMARY
This chapter considers factors of personal and community
nutrition. Food preferences, food choices, and food liking
greatly influence the foods we choose and so affect our
overall nutritional status. As knowledge of the relationship
between diet and disease increases, public health approaches
to diet-related disease prevention encourage us to select
foods not just for their nutrient and energy content but
for their primary disease prevention value as well. Food
guides were created to implement the dietary recommendations on a daily basis. These guides address the concerns
of nutrient adequacy and primary disease prevention.
MyPyramid and the “Fruits & Veggies—More Matters”
program are easy to follow to improve our nutritional
intake. Food consumption trends in the United States are
an indication of changes in the American diet. These trends
for fruits and vegetables; cereals and grains; meat, poultry,
and fish; dairy products; and sweeteners reflect the availability and food choices of per capita consumption. This
information helps us translate nutrients into food categories and attend to consumer needs and issues when advising clients or patients.
Providing health professionals and consumers with more
information about foods through food labels increases the
probability that decisions made and advice given about which
foods to eat will be based on nutrition as well as on taste, thus
contributing to health and wellness. Food safety is of concern
because of its potential to eliminate or at least substantially
decrease foodborne illness as more is learned about the
various causes of this illness. Knowledge of how bacteria,
molds, parasites, and viruses can be problems in the food
supply helps us understand how to control these problems
to stay well.
THE NURSING APPROACH
MyPyramid Teaching Project
One of the nurse’s main roles in health education is teaching
individuals and groups about nutrition. Each learning session is
related to assessment of the client’s learning needs and goals
identified by the nurse and client. The overall objective of
teaching/learning is to change behavior.
Factors that contribute to learning include the person’s ability
to comprehend English, literacy, motivation, readiness, involvement, relevance of the topic, and environment. Obviously, if
the person does not speak or understand English, it is important to obtain an interpreter.
Some learning principles include (1) developing appropriate
teaching materials that are age specific (e.g., children, older
adults), (2) providing information that clients can relate to and
covering what is known before proceeding to what is unknown,
(3) pacing the learning session, (4) providing teaching aids and
materials (e.g., visual handouts), (5) using layperson’s terms,
and (6) providing feedback and praise when appropriate.
The nurse can implement a variety of teaching methods, such
as explanation, discussion, demonstration, group discussion,
and role-playing.
Following is an example of a MyPyramid teaching project
using the nursing process of ADPIE: assessment, diagnosis,
planning, implementation, and evaluation.
ASSESSMENT
Assess Client/Learner Characteristics
•
•
•
•
Age
Language and ability to read
Readiness to learn
Learning style preference—visual aids, reading, demonstration, hands-on
DIAGNOSIS
Diagnose the knowledge deficit; determine the learning need
• What is already known about MyPyramid? About the traditional food pyramid?
• What does this person need to know or be able to do?
• What specific aspect of MyPyramid is this individual interested in learning?
45
THE NURSING APPROACH—cont’d
MyPyramid Teaching Project—cont‘d
Example: Deficient knowledge: types and amounts of food
recommended
PLANNING
Plan the Teaching
a. Objectives
What measurable behavior changes can result from the
learning experience?
Examples:
The client/learner will be able to:
• Explain the symbols and guidelines in MyPyramid.
• Use MyPyramid as a guide for making healthy food choices.
• Seek out the MyPyramid website and obtain personalized
guidelines.
• Track eating patterns at www.mypyramid.gov.
• Set a specific goal for improving food choices, based on
MyPyramid guidelines.
b. Content
What information is appropriate for a teaching session 15 to 30
minutes long? Consider how long the person can focus and
how much depth of information will be appropriate for the age
of the person.
Examples:
• Purpose of MyPyramid (why developed, how it helps the
individual)
• Meaning of the symbols (figures, colors, etc.)
• MyPyramid’s general guidelines for activity and healthy
eating
• MyPyramid plan (individualized types and amounts of food)
• Availability of interactive information and MyPyramid Tracker
at www.mypyramid.gov
c. Teaching methods
What methods will facilitate change?
Examples:
• Lecture/discussion
• Demonstrate use of MyPyramid interactive site by sitting
at a computer guiding the client/learner through the
program.
• Provide and interpret a visual handout from www.
mypyramid.gov, individualized by age and activity level.
?
d. Evaluation plan
How can learning be measured to determine if identified goals
have been met?
Examples:
• Administer a short verbal quiz about MyPyramid.
• Play a game to sort out different foods and identify best
choices to match MyPyramid.
• Assist the client/learner to write a specific measurable goal
based on better food choices identified in MyPyramid.
• Observe the individual navigate in the MyPyramid website
and obtain a personalized plan.
IMPLEMENTATION
Implement the Teaching Plan
• Choose a time and place where there will be no
interruptions.
• Revise your plan as needed to match the knowledge and
interest of the client/learner.
• Make the process interactive. Check for understanding frequently through an activity or what the individual states
regarding the new information.
• Use understandable, age-appropriate terminology.
• Use visual aids and handouts the client/learner can use later.
EVALUATION
Evaluate
a. Client/learner
• What was the client/learner able to demonstrate at the end
of the teaching session?
• Were the behavior change goals met, partially met, or not
met?
b. Nurse/teacher
• Was the client/learner engaged in the lesson?
• Which teaching method or activity was effective?
• What was ineffective? What could be implemented differently to improve effectiveness next time?
• Was the teaching experience enjoyable? If not, how could
the experience be improved?
APPLYING CONTENT KNOWLEDGE
Jenny is again visiting her primary health care provider for a
“stomach virus.” She has been seen several times for the
same problem over the past few months. When conducting
the intake interview, you wonder if she could have a recurring
foodborne illness. What are three assessment questions you
might ask her?
46
WEBSITES OF INTEREST
MyPyramid Food Guidance System
www.mypyramid.gov
The official “home” of MyPyramid, the interactive food
guidance system.
U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA)
www.fda.gov
Gateway website connecting areas serviced and supervised
by the FDA.
FoodSafety.gov
www.foodsafety.gov
A gateway linking government food safety-related
resources.
REFERENCES
1. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health
Service: Executive summary Phase 1 report: Recommendations
for the framework and format of Healthy People 2020, Last
revision Dec 11, 2008. Accessed on January 10, 2010, from
www.healthypeople.gov/HP2020.
2. Logue AW: The psychology of eating and drinking: An
introduction, ed 3, New York, 2004, Taylor & Francis Books
Inc.
3. Drewrowski A, Henderson SA, Barratt-Fornell A: Genetic taste
markers and food preferences, Drug Metab Dispos
29(4 pt2, April):535-538, 2001.
4. Birch LL, Fisher JA: The role of experience in the development
of children’s eating behavior. In Capaldi ED, editor: Why we
eat what we eat: The psychology of eating, ed 2, Washington,
DC, 2001, American Psychological Association.
5. Mennella JA, Beauchamp GK: The early development of
human flavor preferences. In Capaldi ED, ed: Why we eat what
we eat: The psychology of eating, ed 2, Washington, DC, 2001,
American Psychological Association.
6. Kessler DA: The end of overeating: controlling the insatiable
American appetite, New York, 2009, Rodale Inc.
7. Heron M et al: Deaths: Final data for 2006, Nat Vital Stat
Report 57. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health
Statistics, 2009.
8. U.S. Department of Agriculture, U.S. Department of Health
and Human Services: Report of the Dietary Guidelines Advisory
Committee on the Dietary Guidelines for Americans, 2010,
Washington, DC, 2010, Author. Accessed June 16, 2010, from
www.dietaryguidelines.gov.
9. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy
and Promotion: MyPyramid food guidance system education
framework, Alexandria, Va, 2005, Author. Accessed January 10,
2010, from www.mypyramid.gov/professionals/index.html.
10. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC): Behavioral
risk factor surveillance system survey data, Atlanta, 2008, U.S.
Department of Health and Human Services, Centers for
Disease Control and Prevention. Accessed January 10, 2010,
from www.fruitsandveggiesmorematters.gov.
11. Willett WC, Skerrett PJ: Eat, drink, and be healthy, New York,
2005, Free Press/Simon & Schuster.
12. Oldways Preservation Trust: Mediterranean diet pyramid, Latin
American diet pyramid, Asian diet pyramid, Cambridge, Mass,
2009, Author. Accessed January 10, 2010, from
www.oldwayspt.org.
13. Painter J, Rah J-H, Lee Y-K: Comparison of international food
guide pictorial presentations, J Am Diet Assoc 102(4):483-489,
2002.
14. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: About the
National Fruit & Vegetable Program, Atlanta, 2009, Author.
Accessed January 10, 2010, from
www.fruitsandveggiesmorematters.gov.
15. American Diabetes Association, American Dietetic Association:
Exchange lists for meal planning (revised), Alexandria, Va/
Chicago, 2003, Authors.
16. Wylie-Rosett J, et al: 2006-2007 American Diabetes Association
Nutrition Recommendations: Issues for Practice Translation, J
Am Diet Assoc 107(8):1296-1304, 2007.
17. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Center for Nutrition Policy
and Promotion: MyPyramid Tracker (OMB 0584-0535),
Alexandria, Va, 2005, Author. Accessed January 10, 2010, from
www.mypyramidtracker.gov.
18. Beydoun MA, Wang Y: Do nutrition knowledge and beliefs
modify the association of socio-economic factors and diet
quality among US adults? Prev Med 46(2):145-153, 2008.
19. The Hartman Group: Healthy eating trends 2009 HartBeat July
29, 2009. Accessed January 10, 2010, from
www.hartman-group.com/hartbeat/
healthy-eating-connections-to-attitudes-about-aging.
20. Blisard N, et al: Low-income households’ expenditures on fruits
and vegetables, Agricultural Economic Report No. (AER833),
Washington, DC, 2004 (May), Economic Research Service,
U.S. Department of Agriculture.
21. Wells HF, Buzby JC: Dietary Assessment of Major Trends in
U.S. Food Consumption, 1970-2005, Economic Information
Bulletin No. 33. March 2008, Economic Research Service, U.S.
Dept. of Agriculture.
22. Economic Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture:
Diet Quality and Food Consumption: Dietary Trends from Food
and Nutrient Availability Data, Washington, DC, 2009 (July),
Author. Retrieved January 10, 2010, from www.ers.usda.gov/
Briefing/DietQuality/Availability.htm.
23. Rampersaud GC, et al: National survey beverage consumption
data for children and adolescents indicate the need to
encourage a shift toward more nutritive beverages, J Am Diet
Assoc 103(1):97-100, 2003.
24. U.S. Food and Drug Administration, Center for Food Safety
and Applied Nutrition: How to understand and use the nutrition
facts label, College Park, Md, 2000 (updated November 2004),
Author. Accessed January 10, 2010, from
www.cfsan.fda.gov/~dms/foodlab.html.
25. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agricultural Marketing
Service: Organic Labeling and Marketing Information,
Washington, DC, 2002 (Updated April 2008), Author.
Accessed January 10, 2010, from www.ams.usda.gov/AMSv1.0/
nop.
and Applied Nutrition: Dietary Supplement Health and
Education Act of 1994, College Park, Md, 1995 (December),
(Updated June 2009), Author. Accessed January 10, 2010, from
www.fda.gov/Food/DietarySupplements/default.htm.
27. Bren L: FDA Consumer: Genetic engineering: The future of
foods? College Park, Md, 2003 (Nov/Dec), U.S. Food and Drug
Administration, Center for Food Safety and Applied Nutrition.
and Applied Nutrition: FDA Issues Documents on the Safety of
Food from Animal Clones (Press Release). January 15, 2008,
(Updated June 2009), Author. Accessed January 10, 2010, from
www.fda.gov/NewsEvents/Newsroom/
PressAnnouncements/2008/ucm116836.htm.
47
29. National Digestive Diseases Information Clearinghouse,
(NDDIC), National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and
Kidney Diseases (NIDDK), National Institutes of Health:
Bacteria and foodborne illness, NIH Publication No. 07–4730,
2007 (May). Accessed January 10, 2010, from
www.digestive.niddk.nih.gov/ddiseases/pubs/bacteria/.
30. American Dietetic Association: Position of the American
Dietetic Association: Food and water safety, J Am Diet Assoc
109(8):1449-1460, 2009.
31. Takei H, Powell SZ: Intestinal anisakidosis (anisakiosis), Ann
Diagn Pathol 11(5):350-352, 2007.
32. Buchanan RL, Doyle MP: Foodborne disease significance of
Escherichia coli 0157:H7 and other enterohemorrhagic E. coli,
Food Technol 51(10):67-96, 1994.
33. Maki DG: Coming to grips with food borne infection—peanut
butter, peppers, and nationwide salmonella outbreaks, N Engl J
Med 360(10):949-953, 2009.
34. Partnership for Food Safety Education: FightBAC! Washington,
DC, 2004, Author. Accessed January 10, 2010, from
www.fightbac.org.

Personal and Community Nutrition

Transcription

Similar documents

Top 10 Tips: Improve everyday nutrition

Kretschmar Premium Boneless Bavarian Ham For

Slides - Society for Nutrition Education and Behavior

Linear Growth Retardation (Stunting) and Nutrition Ricardo Uauy

EATING PLAN FOR TYPE 2 DIABETES

TLS® Thermochrome with Advantra Z® and

YOGURT ACTIVIA LIGHT VANILLA LOW FAT Nutrition

The Fusion of Various Food Cultures Yields a New American

Addicted to Fries - the CCPOA Benefit Trust Fund

Diet and Nutrition in Crohn`s Disease and Ulcerative Colitis

food and nutrition research institute department of science and

TABLE OF CONTENTS - Natural Products Association