Angular/Depth Dependent Analysis
Transcription
Angular/Depth Dependent Analysis
Abstract #: TR05 In-vivo T2 and T1ρ Mapping of Femoral Cartilage at 3T: Angular/Depth Dependent Analysis (Category: Technical Report) Hon J. Yu1,2 (hjyu@uci.edu), Eiko Yamabe2, Peter Huy Pham4, Kayleigh Kaneshiro2, Ran Schwarzkopf3, Dave Hitt5, Hiroshi Yoshioka2 1Tu & Yuen Center for Functional Onco-Imaging, and 2Department of Radiological Sciences, 3Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California, Irvine, CA, USA 4Loma Linda University Medical Center, Loma Linda, CA, USA 5Philips Healthcare, U.S. Clinical Science Department, Cleveland, OH, USA Disclosures Nothing to disclose: All authors Background and Aims T1ρ-map via MRI is shown to be sensitive to proteoglycan content and promises to be a valuable quantitative tool along with T2-map for early detection of cartilage degeneration. Unknown, however, is whether or not the T1ρ value of normal cartilage is dependent on the angular/depth factors affecting T2 value, such as magic angle effect and laminar anisotropy. Methods – Acquisition Utilization of a clinical 3T scanner (Philips) and an 8-channel knee receive-only RF-coil. Both T2 and T1ρ in geometrically matched sagittal slices with following parameters – T2: Multi-echo TSE sequence (TR=2700; TE=13-91); T1ρ: Multi-shot 3D T1-FFE sequence for read-out with a rotary echo based T1ρ preparatory pulses for 4 different spin lock durations (TSL=10,20,40,60 ms).; Reconstructed voxel size: 0.3x0.3x3 mm. Methods – Processing Image alignment assessed and performed separately with respect to the first series of T2 and T1ρ via a rigid-body transformation using SPM package in Matlab. Mono-exponential, pixel-by-pixel fitting for both T2 and T1ρ map using a custom program in Matlab. Manual segmentation of entire medial femoral condyle cartilage followed by a semi-automatic angular/depth segmentation of cartilage using a custom program. T2 and T1ρ map T2 (w/ TE=13) T2-map T1ρ-map T1ρ (w/ TSL=10) 0 50 100 (ms) Angular/depth segmentation _ + 0˚ Angular convention with respect to B0 at 0˚ Angular/depth profile T2 Full-thickness Deep-Layer SuperficialLayer 70 60 50 40 30 -50 0 50 100 150 Orientation to B0 (degree) 80 T1r value (ms) T2 value (ms) 80 T1ρ 70 60 50 40 30 -50 -30 -10 10 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 Orientation to B0 (degree) * Based on a single slice of medial femoral condyle cartilage in normal volunteers analyzed thus far with no major mis-alignment observed between T2 and T1ρ series (n=12; age: 23-35 yrs.) Summary The results demonstrate the potential of a novel segmentation methodology for quantitative assessment of cartilage in vivo using T2 and T1ρ mapping. A very robust co-registration technique, however, is critical for a reliable cartilage-only profile assessment when it is based on a single ROI-drawing and angular/depth segmentation in presence of subject motion between T2 and T1ρ series.