IWMP - 1 (Zari Bujarg) Final

Transcription

DISTRICT WATERSHED DEVELOPMENT UNIT
DAHOD
DETAILED PROJECT REPORT
(DPR)
IWMP-1 GARBADA (2009-10)
PROJECT IMPLEMENTATION AGENCY
DY. CONSERVATOR OF FOREST, FOREST DIVISION, DEVGADH BARIA
DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, GUJARAT STATE.
District Watershed Development Unit
DAHOD
Declaration
Under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP) 2009-10, the Detailed Project Report (DPR) for the Zari-Bujarg
cluster consisting of six priority villages namely Gulbar, Jambua, Nimach, Gangarada, Simaliya Bujarg and Zari Bujarg had
been prepared based on priority map of district given by BISAG. The total project area proposed to be treated under this
cluster is 3069.84ha w ith the total project cost 368.38 Lakhs & 96.20 Lakhs as conversion amount.
The DPR is successfully completed with joint efforts of District Watershed Development Unit (DWDU-Dahod) and Project
Implementatio n Agency (PIA). The PIA nominated from Gujarat State Watershed Management Agency (GSWMA) for IWMP -1
(Zari-Bujarg) is Devgarh Bariya Division, Forest Department.
The DPR is finally submitted to DWDU-Dahod for required corrections/amendments and for further procedures.
Dy. Conservator of Forest
Forest Division, Devgarh Bariya
Garbada-1, District- Dahod
PIA: Department of Forest, Devgadh Baria
Page No: 2
DAHOD
Declaration
Under Integrated Watershed Management Programme 2009-10, the DPR for IWMP-1 (Zari-Bujarg) had been submitted by PIA
to DWDU-Dahod. The DPR is verified and necessary amendments were made to overcome technically limitatio ns and to carry
out effective implementatio n.
The DPR is made online on website - http://www.ruraldev.gujarat.gov.in/ (Commissionerate of Rural Development Gujarat
State) and hereby put for the approval.
Project Manager
Dahod
Page No: 3
DAHOD
Approval Letter
The Detailed Project Report of IWMP-1 (Zari-Bujarg) prepared by DWDU - Dahod & PIA Devgarh Bariya Forest Division,
Gujarat Forest Department) had been designed as per the New Common Guidelines, 2008.
It states briefly the need for implementing the watershed project in Zari-Bujarg cluster and suggests the appropriate so lutio ns
to overcome the water scarcity through ho listic approach. It also put the emphasis on improving livelihood pattern of the rural
section.
I hereby approve the DPR of IWMP-1 (Zari-Bujarg).
Chairman
District Watershed Development Unit, Dahod
&
District Development Officer
Dahod
Page No: 4
DAHOD
Contents
CHAPTER 1 - PROJECT BACKGROUND .....................................................................................................................................................................................12
1 1- PROJECT BACKGROUND....................................................................................................................................................................................................13
HISTORY – DAHOD...................................................................................................................................................................................................................13
Climate.....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................14
District's Population Information ..............................................................................................................................................................................................15
Project area identity and location .............................................................................................................................................................................................15
Table no.1: Basic project information .......................................................................................................................................................................................16
Area proposed to be treated ......................................................................................................................................................................................................16
Table no. 2: Weightage of the project .......................................................................................................................................................................................18
Table no. 2.1: Criteria and weight-age for selection of watershed.............................................................................................................................................18
Project type: Hilly /Other ..........................................................................................................................................................................................................19
Table no. 3: Watershed information .........................................................................................................................................................................................19
1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Zaribujarg project ..........................................................................................................................20
Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area .......................................................................................................................................20
Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area............................................................................................................................................22
CHAPTER 2 - PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY ....................................................................................................................................................................24
2.1 Project Implementing Agency.............................................................................................................................................................................................25
2.2 About Gujarat Forest Department as a PIA.........................................................................................................................................................................25
2.2.1 The organization and its objectives ..................................................................................................................................................................................25
2.2.2 Objectives of the Forest Department..................................................................................................................................................................................26
Page No: 5
DAHOD
Table no. 6: PIA ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................27
Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level ....................................................................................................................................................................................................27
2.3 SWOT Analysis of the PIA ...................................................................................................................................................................................................28
Strength: ..................................................................................................................................................................................................................................28
Opportunities:...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................28
Threats:....................................................................................................................................................................................................................................28
CHAPTER 3 – BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT AREA...................................................................................................................................................29
Figure -2, Field Visit at Garbada Project Area ............................................................................................................................................................................30
3. DPR Process .........................................................................................................................................................................................................................31
3.1 Geography and Geo-hydrology ...........................................................................................................................................................................................31
3.1.1 Land Use Pattern ..............................................................................................................................................................................................................31
Table no. 8: Land use pattern ...................................................................................................................................................................................................31
3.1.2 Soil type and topography ..................................................................................................................................................................................................32
Table no. 9: Soil type and topography ......................................................................................................................................................................................32
Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition ...............................................................................................................................................................................32
Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion ......................................................................................................................................................................................................33
Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions .................................................................................................................................................................................34
Table no. 12: Climatic conditions..............................................................................................................................................................................................35
Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief......................................................................................................................................................................................35
The elevation is hilly and the slop range is from 5 to 11 percent and the major streams of the project area are Pat Nadi.3.1.4 Land and Agriculture ......................35
3.1.4 Land and Agriculture .......................................................................................................................................................................................................36
Table no. 14: Land ownership details .......................................................................................................................................................................................36
Page No: 6
DAHOD
Table no. 15: Area Agriculture .................................................................................................................................................................................................37
Table no. 16: Irrigation Facilities..............................................................................................................................................................................................37
Table no. 17: Crop details .........................................................................................................................................................................................................38
Table no. 18: Livestock details of the project IWMP 1...............................................................................................................................................................40
Table no. 19: Drinking water Facilities Prevailing in the project area .......................................................................................................................................40
Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources ..............................................................................................................................................................41
Table no. 21: Demographic information ...................................................................................................................................................................................42
Table no. 22: Literacy rate........................................................................................................................................................................................................42
Table no. 23: Migration details .................................................................................................................................................................................................43
3.2.2 Migration Pattern:............................................................................................................................................................................................................43
Table no. 24: Poverty ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................43
Table no. 25: Village infrastructure ..........................................................................................................................................................................................44
3.2.3 Infrastructure Facilities: ...................................................................................................................................................................................................44
Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets ...........................................................................................................................................................................................45
Table no. 27: Income ................................................................................................................................................................................................................45
Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR .................................................................................................................................................................................46
Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution) ...................................................................................................................................................46
3.4 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: Project Area v/s District v/s State v/s Country v/s World .............................................................47
3.4.1 Maize Production:.............................................................................................................................................................................................................48
3.4..2 Paddy Production:............................................................................................................................................................................................................48
CHAPTER 4 – WATERSHED ACTIVITIES PLANNED..................................................................................................................................................................50
Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects..................................................................................................................................51
Page No: 7
DAHOD
Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area........................................................................................................................................53
4.2Object tree analysis .............................................................................................................................................................................................................55
4.2 Institutions At Village Level ................................................................................................................................................................................................56
4.2.1 Watershed Committee (WC) ..............................................................................................................................................................................................56
Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details .............................................................................................................................................................................56
4.2.2 Self Help Group.................................................................................................................................................................................................................62
Table no. 33: SHG detail ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................62
Table no. 34: UG detail .............................................................................................................................................................................................................64
4.3 Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP – 1 (Zari Bujarg Watershed) ..................................................................................................................65
4.3.1 Entry Point Activity (EPA) .................................................................................................................................................................................................65
Entry Point Activities ...............................................................................................................................................................................................................65
Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.) ...............................................................................................................................66
Table no.36: Details of Ridge line treatment /land based activities in watershed work ...........................................................................................................68
Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) ......................................................................70
Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) .....................................................71
Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.) .....................................................71
Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro- enterprise.............................................................................................72
Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas .................................................................................................74
40.2Vermi compost Unit............................................................................................................................................................................................................75
40.3 Nursery .............................................................................................................................................................................................................................77
4.4 Vermi Composting unit for Zari Bujarg village ....................................................................................................................................................................78
4.4.1 Introduction .....................................................................................................................................................................................................................78
Page No: 8
DAHOD
4.4.2 About the worms...............................................................................................................................................................................................................78
4.4.3 Location ...........................................................................................................................................................................................................................78
4.4.4 Use ...................................................................................................................................................................................................................................78
4.5 Components of a Commercial Unit......................................................................................................................................................................................79
4.5.1 Sheds................................................................................................................................................................................................................................79
4.5.2 Vermi-beds .......................................................................................................................................................................................................................79
4.5.3 Land.................................................................................................................................................................................................................................79
4.5.4 Seed Stock ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................79
4.5.5 Fencing.............................................................................................................................................................................................................................79
4.5.6 Water Supply System ........................................................................................................................................................................................................80
4.5.7 Machinery ........................................................................................................................................................................................................................80
Table no.41: Linkages developed at village level ......................................................................................................................................................................80
Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works............................................................................................................81
Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas .............................................................................................................................................83
Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution ...............................................................................................................................................................................84
Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan.........................................................................................................................................................................................85
Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities.........................................................................................................................................85
CHAPTER 5 – BUDGET .............................................................................................................................................................................................................86
Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project ........................................................................................................................................................................87
Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP ..............................................................................................................................87
Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement ................................................................................................................................................................88
Convergence Opportunities......................................................................................................................................................................................................89
Page No: 9
DAHOD
Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes ..........................................................................................................................................90
Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects ................................................................................................................................................93
CHAPTER 6 – EXPECTED OUTCOME ........................................................................................................................................................................................94
Table no.52: Environmental Benefits .......................................................................................................................................................................................95
Table no. 53: Status of Drinking water .....................................................................................................................................................................................95
Table no. 54: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas.....................................................................................................................................96
Table no. 55: Area under horticulture ......................................................................................................................................................................................98
Table no. 56: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.) ........................99
Table no. 57: Employment in Project area .............................................................................................................................................................................. 100
Table no. 58: Details of seasonal migration from Project area ................................................................................................................................................ 100
Table no.59: Per capita Income .............................................................................................................................................................................................. 101
Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages ............................................................................................................................................................................. 103
Table no. 61: Logical Framework analysis .............................................................................................................................................................................. 104
CHAPTER 7 – Quality and Sustainability Issues ...................................................................................................................................................................... 108
7 Quality and Sustainability Issues ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 109
7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation ................................................................................................................................................................................ 109
7.2 Plans for Project management: ......................................................................................................................................................................................... 110
7.3 Watershed Development Fund: ........................................................................................................................................................................................ 110
7.4 User Charges: ................................................................................................................................................................................................................... 110
CHAPTER 8 – MAPS................................................................................................................................................................................................................ 111
Existing Structure / Baseline Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada) .............................................................................................................................. 112
Geomoroplogy Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada).................................................................................................................................................. 113
Page No: 10
DAHOD
Ground Water Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada) .................................................................................................................................................. 114
Land Use / Land Cover Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)....................................................................................................................................... 115
River Water Body Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada) .............................................................................................................................................. 116
Slop Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada) ................................................................................................................................................................. 117
Soil Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)................................................................................................................................................................... 118
Action Plan of Village Name: Gangarda (Zari Bujarg – Garbada) ............................................................................................................................................. 119
Action Plan of Village Name: Gulbar (Zari Bujarg – Garbada) .................................................................................................................................................. 120
Action Plan of Village Name: Jambua (Zari Bujarg – Garbada) ................................................................................................................................................ 121
Action Plan of Village Name: Nimach (Zari Bujarg – Garbada) ................................................................................................................................................ 122
Action Plan of Village Name: Simaliya Bujarg (Zari Bujarg – Garbada) ..................................................................................................................................... 123
Action Plan of Village Name: Zari Bujarg (Zari Bujarg – Garbada) ............................................................................................................................................ 124
Table no. 62: Abbreviations: ................................................................................................................................................................................................ 125
Page No: 11
DAHOD
CHAPTER 1 - PROJECT BACKGROUND
Page No: 12
DAHOD
1 1- PROJECT BACKGROUND
HISTORY – DAHOD
Dahod District, also known as Dohad District, is located in Gujarat state in wastern India. The city of Dahod is the district's administrative
headquarters. The district has an area of 3,642 Kms, and a population of 1, 636, 433 (2001 census), with a population density of 449 persons per KM.
Dahod District was created on 2nd October, 1997, and was formerly part of Panchmahal District. It's territory mostly consists of two former Princely
State, namely Baria (Devgadh) and Sanjeli in addition to Fatepura Taluka of Sunth (Pampur) State, along with the two "eastern mahals" of Dahod and
Jhalod from the former Panchmahals. It was 9.55% urban as of 2001 census.
The district is bounded by Panchmahal District to the west, Vadodara District to the south, Jhabua District and Alirajpur District of Madhya Pradesh
State to the east and southeast respectively, and Banswara District of Rajasthan State to the north and northeast. The population of the district is
mostly rural, and a majority of the district's residents are Tribals, mostly Bhils. Dahod District also has the second larges t population of "Dawoodi
Bohra" sect of Muslims in India.
The District of Dahod is further sub-divided into the following Talukas (Tehsils):Dahod
Jhalod
Devgadh Baria
Garbada
Limkheda
Fatepura
Dhanpur
The actual name is "Dohad", which later got transformed into Dahod. The Mughal Emperor Aurangzeb was born in a mosque within the fort of Dahod.
There is a government polytechnic college since 1963 and it was started by Indian Prime Minister Mr. Moraraji Desai and now gover nment degree
engineering college is also there. The degree college is affiliated to Gujarat University.
Page No: 13
DAHOD
As far as topography of the district is concerned Jhalod and Dahod are in plains. Normal slope is mainly in north of Jhalod and Fatepura Taluka and
Steep slope is in Devgadh Baria, Dhanpur and Limkheda Taluka.
Geologically the Dahod district is composed of Rocks of Aravalli formation of Delhi systems. At some places Limestone and Basalt are exposed. The
south, southwest and southeast part of Garbada, Dhanpur and Devgadh Baria Taluka comprises of metamorphic rocks like Granite, Phyllite, Schist, and
Quartzite. The west portion of Limkheda Taluka is mainly composed of Quartzite rocks and North, Central and Southwest area covering Dahod &
Jhalod is composed of Basalt and limestone. Rest of the area including Fatepura Taluka is composed of Phyllite and Quartzite rocks.
Geohydrologically, the Rocks of Dahod District have low porosity and permeability. In the district the compactness of rock formation increases with
depth and overall yield in aquifers is low. In Dahod District water found at shallow depth i.e. 40 to 50 mts.
Climate
The climate of district is usually hot. This district is considered as rain fed area. The average rain of district is 739 mm. Sometime s rain delays and
district has to face drought. It's very hot during March to June, while from November to February winter prevails in district
No.
Year
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
1991
1992
1993
1994
1995
1996
1997
1998
1999
2000
Dahod Garbada Dhanpur
650
549
724
1124
441
907
981
715
352
271
650
549
724
1124
441
907
981
715
338
298
819
742
936
1441
400
1207
1250
546
330
314
Devgadh Baria
Limkheda
Zalod
Fatepura
628
616
857
1380
570
1029
1024
795
402
414
819
742
936
1441
400
1207
1250
840
411
447
762
742
862
1376
691
1297
820
1012
633
?
558
678
703
1183
814
1925
1455
757
506
319
Page No: 14
DAHOD
District's Population Information
Total seven talukas and 696 villages are covered in Dahod district. Total population of district is 16.35 lakh. (2001) Out of which men are 8.2 4 lakh and
women are 8.11 lakh. Urban population is 1, 56,378.
No.
Name of
Taluka
No. of
Villages
Population
(2001)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Dahod
Garbada
Dhanpur
D. Daria
Limkheda
Zalod
Fatepura
86
34
90
87
152
151
96
368511
142391
131855
208197
239293
359759
185368
696
1635374
Total:
Literacy Ratio
(in percentage)
Woman Man Total
37.05
22.91
19.90
31.39
31.40
33.43
33.39
61.18
49.67
44.31
67.33
63.17
58.49
62.16
Geographical
Area
49.22
36.30
32.20
49.46
47.29
46.04
47.81
58190.69
23461.08
46638.71
64480.86
59718.48
79839.79
30947.55
31.70 59.45 45.65
363277.20
Population of scheduled tribes in the newly formed Dahod district is 72 % and scheduled castes are 3 %. Urban population is 8 %, while percentage of
rural population 92%.
Project area identity and location
Zari Bujarg (IWMP - 1) project is situated in Garbada Taluka, of the Dahod District of Gujarat State. The project is a cluster of eleven micro watersheds
i.e., 5E2A6d3j, 5E2A6d3k, 5E2A6d3f, 5E2A6d3g, 5E2A6c2e, 5E2A6d3c, 5E2A6c2d, 5E2A6d3h, 5E2A6c2l, 5E2A6c2h, 5E2A6c2k. The total project area of
the watershed is about 3069.84 ha is proposed to be treated under Integrated Watershed Management Programme (IWMP).
The livelihood of the people of this area is primarily based on rain fed agriculture, labour work, agriculture labour work, a nd animal husbandry. Mainly
the people of this area are migrating to various cities to earn by doing Labour Work, viz. Agricultural Labour Work, Construction and Small Businesses
to Rajkot, Valsad, Surat, Ahmedabad, etc. places.
Page No: 15
DAHOD
There are no irrigation facilities in the designated watershed area. Watershed may help for fodder development which will be helpful for animal
husbandry. Due to less rain fall people had been migrated in various parts of Gujarat. To check the seasonal migration of the people, the main
occupation farming is required to be strengthened.
Table no.1: Basic project information
Sl
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Name
of the
project
Zari
Khurd
Villages
Name
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Census code
180050131730000
180050131740000
180050131750000
180050131720000
180050131700000
180050131820000
Gram
Panchayats
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Gangarda
Zarikhurd
Taluka
Garbada
District
Dahod
Total:
Area of
the
project
302.11
575.41
522.97
588.26
878.72
2702.37
5569.84
Area
proposed
to be
treated
302.11
75.41
22.97
588.26
378.72
1702.37
3069.84
Total
project
cost
36.25
9.05
2.76
70.59
45.45
204.28
368.38
PIA
Range
Forest
Dev.
Bariya
Area proposed to be treated
Watershed Development Programme is selected on the basis of thirteen parameters namely (1.) Poverty Index, (2.) Percentage of SC/ST, (3.) Actual
Wages, (4.) Percentage of small and marginal farmers, (5.) Ground water status, (6.) Moisture Index, (7.) Area under rain fed agriculture, (8.)
Drinking water situation in the area, (9.) Percentage of degraded land, (10.) Productivity p otential of the land, (11.) Continuity of another
watershed that has already developed/treated, (12.) Cluster approach for plain (13.) Cluster approach for hilly terrain. Based on these thirteen
parameter a composite ranking was been given to Zari Bujarg watershed project as given in Table No. 2.
The total number of families under BPL (Below Poverty Line) is 939, which is 37.98% of the total households of the village. Hence a score of 5 has
been given. The percentages of (Schedule Tribes) STs in the village are about 98.50%, SCs are 1.23% and OBCs are Nil. Hence a score of 10 has been
given.
Rain fed agriculture forms the primary occupation of the village due to the fact that ground water is either unavailable or too deep to fetch and hence
unfit for usage. In Zari Bujarg project area there are more than 80% farmers are small and marginal hence the score of 10 has been given.
Page No: 16
DAHOD
Figure1, Geographic location of Zaribujarg Project
Dahod – District Map
Zaribujarg
Page No: 17
DAHOD
Table no. 2: Weightage of the project
Project
Project
name
type
i
ii
Zari Bujarg Other/Hilly
7.5
10
Weightage
iii
5
iv
10
v
2
vi
10
Table no. 2.1: Criteria and weight-age for selection of watershed
Sr.
Maximum
Criteria
No
Score
Poverty index (% of poor to
1
10
Above 80% (10)
population)
2 % of SC/ST population
10
More than 40% (10)
Actual wages are
3 Actual wages
5
significantly lower than
minimum wages (5)
4 % of small and marginal
10
More than 80% (10)
farmers
5 Ground water status
5
Over exploited (5)
6 Moisture index/DPAP/DDP
-66.7 & below (15)
15
Block
DDP Block
7 Area under rain fed
More than 90% (15)
15
agriculture
8 Drinking water
No source (10)
10
9 Degraded land
10 Productivity potential of the
land
15
15
High – above 20% (15)
Lands with low
production & where
productivity can be
vii
15
Total
viii
5
Ix
15
x
10
xi
10
xii
15
Xiii
15
129.5
Ranges & Scores
80 to 50% (7.5)
50 to 20% (5)
Below 20% (2.5)
20 to 40% (5)
Actual wages are equal
to or higher than
minimum wages (0)
Less than 20%(3)
50 to 80% (5)
Less than 50% (3)
Critical (3)
-33.3 to -66.6 (10)
DPAP Block
80 to 90% (10)
Sub critical (2)
0 to -33.2 (0)
Non DPAP/DDP Block
70 to 80% (5)
Problematic village
(7.5)
Medium – 10 to 20%
(10)
Lands with moderate
production & where
productivity can be
Partially covered (5)
-
-
Safe (0)
Above 70%
(Rejected)
Fully overfed (0)
Low – less than 10% of
TGA (5)
Lands with high
production & where
productivity can be
Page No: 18
-
DAHOD
11 Contiguity to another
watershed that has already
been developed/treated
12 Cluster approach in the
plains (more than one
contiguous microwatersheds in the project)
13 Cluster approach in the hills
(more than one contiguous
micro-watersheds in the
project)
Total:
10
15
15
150
significantly enhanced
with reasonable efforts
(15)
Contiguous to
previously treated
watershed & contiguity
within the micro
watersheds in the
project (10)
Above 6 microwatersheds in cluster
(15)
enhanced with
reasonable efforts (10)
Contiguity within the
micro watersheds in
the project but non
contiguous to
previously treated
watershed (5)
4 to 6 microwatersheds in cluster
(10)
marginally enhanced
with reasonable efforts
(5)
Neither contiguous to
previously treated
watershed nor
contiguity within the
micro watersheds in
the project (0)
(5)
Above 5 microwatersheds in cluster
(15)
(10)
(5)
150
90
41
-
2.5
Project type: Hilly /Other
Table no. 3: Watershed information
No. Of
Name of
watersheds
Watershed code
the project
to be treated
5E2A6d3j, 5E2A6d3k, 5E2A6d3f, 5E2A6d3g, 5E2A6c2e, 5E2A6d3c,
Zari Bujarg
11
5E2A6c2d, 5E2A6d3h, 5E2A6c2l, 5E2A6c2h, 5E2A6c2k
-
Watershed
regime/type/order
Mini Watershed
Page No: 19
DAHOD
1.3 Other developmental projects/schemes running in the Zaribujarg project
Table no.4: Developmental programmes running in the project area
Year of
commencement
Villages
covered
Estimated
number of
beneficiaries
2005-2006
13
1390
2008-2009
13
528
2004-2005
13
10
2003-2004
13
5
2004-2005
13
1080
Jilla Panchayat
In this scheme the government gives
pension to the old age peoples/villagers.
2001-2002
13
628
SWO
In this scheme government provides Rs.
5000 to BPL female during her marriage.
-
13
430
Sl
no
Name of the
programme/scheme
1
NREGS (National Rural
Employment Guarantee
Scheme)
DRDA / NREGA
2
BRGF (Backward Region Grant
Fund)
DRDA
3
IAY (Indira Awas Yojna)
DRDA
4
Sardar Awas Yojna
TASP / Takedari
5
SGSY (Swarnjayanti Gram
Swarojgar Yojna)
DRDA
6
IGNOAPS (Indira Gandhi
National Old Age Pension
Scheme)
7
Kuwarbai Nu Mameru
Sponsoring agency
Objectives of the programme/scheme
The main objective of this scheme is to
provide 100 days employment to the local
people.
The main objective of this scheme is to
fulfill the missing link of the other rural
schemes.
Provides housing facility to BPL
beneficiaries is the main objective of this
scheme.
beneficiaries.
This scheme gives training, gives facilities
to male and female by establishing a small
groups like SHG, UG etc. to the local
villagers to make them capable to earn by
growing their capabilities.
Page No: 20
DAHOD
8
Chiranjivi Yojna
SWO
9
Balika Samrudhi Yojna
Jilla Panchayat
10
Vidhva Sahay Yojna
11
Ambedkar Awas Yojna
12
Sankat Mochan Yojna
13
Pandit Dindayal Awas Yojna
14
Bajpai Bankebal Yojna
15
Tapak Sinchay Sahay Yojna
Samaj Kalyan
Jilla Panchayat
Agriculture
Department
This is a health care scheme to save girl
child.
In this scheme government gives female
child the facilities like, bicycle, and
scholarship to get well educated.
2007-2008
13
248
1997-1998
13
320
This scheme is mainly for widow women.
The facilities provided by this scheme is
like, cash pension, etc.
1997-1998
13
282
To provide shelter or upgrade the existing
shelter for people living below poverty
line in urban slums.
1989-1990
13
5
1997-1998
13
182
-
-
2
-
-
89
-
-
628
beneficiaries.
Provides loan to unemployed educated
peoples.
In this scheme agricultural department
gives irrigation facility to small / marginal
farmers.
Page No: 21
DAHOD
Table no. 5: Previous Watershed programmes in the project area
No. Of
Area
Sl
Watershe
Projec
Year
Name of
micro
under
n
t name started
villages
watersh d codes treatmen
o
t
ed
1
2
3
DPAP
Batch
No-5
DPAP
Batch
No-6
DPAP
Batch
No-7
Nandawa
199900
200001
Batch
No-8
7
5E1B7
Nalwai
Bhe
Patiya
200102
200203
Gangarda
Nimach
Vijagarh
Zari
Bujargh1
Zari
Bujargh2
Boriyala
Noda
l
agenc
y
PIA
500
500
3
5E1B7
500
Govt.
Govt.
DRDA NGO
Dahod
DRDA
Dahod
NG
O
500
9
5E1B7
500
Govt.
DRDA
Dahod
NG
O
500
5E1B7
500
500
Expenditur
e incurred
up to start
of IWMP
%
financial
completio
n
% physical
completio
n
30
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
100.00%
97.92%
97.92%
97.26%
97.26%
30
30
30
30
500
500
5
Tota
l
cost
(La)
30
500
500
Gadoi
DPAP
4
Chandela
Fundin
g
source
30
30
30
30
Govt.
DRDA
Dahod
NG
O
30
30
Page No: 22
DAHOD
DPAP
Batch
No-9
5
6
7
DPAP
Block
No-10
DPAP
Block
No-11
Block
No-12
500
Gangardi
2003-04
DPAP
8
Dadur
2004-05
Panchvada
Sahda
Garbada-1
Vadva
Chharchhoda
Garbada-3
Garbada-2
8
Govt.
DRDA
Dahod
Taluka
Panchayat
Garbada
3
5E2A6c2g
500
5E2A6c2g
500
5E2A6c2e
5E2A6c1a
5E2A6d3l
5E2A6a3l
4
4
5E2A6a3s
5E2A6a1d
5E2A6a1d
500
500
5E2A6c2m
500
5E2A6a3q
465.6
5E2A6a3m
500
99.87%
99.87%
30
Govt.
500
500
500
500
30
30
500
Jeshawada
Chharchhoda
Nadhelav-1
Nadhelav-2
Tunkivaju01312000
Nelsur013010300
2006-07
Vajelav01310200
Abhlod01310500
Total:
500
500
Simaliya Buzarg
Pandedi
Boriyala-2
2005-06
5E2A6
30
Govt.
DRDA
Dahod
DRDA
Dahod
Taluka
Panchayat
Garbada
30
100.00% 100.00%
30
30
30
Taluka
Panchayat
Garbada
100.00% 100.00%
30
30
Govt.
DRDA
Dahod
Taluka
100.00% 100.00%
Panchayat
Garbada
30
16
5E2A6c1b
534.4
-
14500
-
-
-
720
0
99.38%
Page No: 23
99.38%
DAHOD
CHAPTER 2 - PROJECT IMPLEMENTING AGENCY
Page No: 24
DAHOD
2.1 Project Implementing Agency
The Project Implementing Agency (PIA) is being selected by an appropriate mechanism by State Level Nodal Agency (SLNA). PIAs would be
responsible for implementation of watershed project. The PIA of Zari Khurd watershed project is Deputy Conservator of Forest, Forest Division
Devgadh Baria.
2.2 About Gujarat Forest Department as a PIA
2.2.1 The organization and its objectives
Minister for
Fores t &
Environment
Minister of
State for Fores t
& Environment
Department
Department
PCCF Gujarat State
Fores t Department
Principal
Secretary
Fores t &
Environment
APCCF D & M
Department
CCF (T erritori al Circle)
DY.C.F (Territorial Division, D.
Bariya (PIA)
ACF(District co-ordinator At
PIA level)
RFO (Nodal Officer, IWMP)
RFO
Garbada
RFO Vasiya dungri
RFO
Dhanpur
RFO
Limkheda
RFO
Zhalod
RFO
Dahod
RFO Kanjeta
Page No: 25
DAHOD
Gujarat state was constituted as the Union of India on 1st May, 1960 after the bifurcation of the State of Bombay. Gujarat Forest department is
entrusted with the prime responsibility of protection, conservation and development of the forests and wildlife of the state.
The total geographical area of the state is 196024 sq. kms out of which 18961.56 sq. kms (9.67%) is the declared forest area with 7.72% of area as
forest cover. Whereas, the unique features of the state are the climatic and geomorphologic conditions, the largest coastline in the country, the saline
deserts of Rann, grasslands, wetlands. These factors have bestowed the state with the diversity of flora and fauna. The fauna l biodiversity consists of
14% fishes, 18 % reptiles, 37% avifauna and 25% of the mammal population of the country.
2.2.2 Objectives of the Forest Department
 Protection, Conservation and development of forests and wild life, the adoption of measures of soil conservation, moisture co nservation and
increasing soil fertility.
 The utilization of the forest so as to obtain the maximum yield consistent with their permanent maintenance and the supply of the needs of
the people, agriculture, industry and defence.
 To conduct research into silvi culture, utilization and other problems affecting the regeneration and development of the forests.
 To achieve the goals of National Forest policy 1988 and to cover the maximum area under forests.
 To create awareness among the people about the forests and environment.
 To increase active participation of local people in protection & conservatio n of forest with special emphasis on tribal, poor & women.
2.2.3 Status of Working Plans in Gujarat state
Gujarat state is situated along the western coast of the country with a total geographical area of 1,96,024 sq km having only 9.8% designated forest
lands, divided by the Tropic of Cancer. The forests of Gujarat consist of four major types, namely
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Tropical Moist Deciduous,
Tropical Dry Deciduous,
Littoral and Swamp and
Northern Tropical Thorny Forests.
Page No: 26
DAHOD
The PIA has experienced staff comprising Watershed Development Team of: Civil Engineer, Agriculture Expert and Community Mobilization and other
staff as Data Entry Operator, Surveyor, Accountant and Messenger. This team has a role of planning, implementing, supervising, documenting and
promoting watershed development projects and related developmental activities in the district as per The New guidelines 2008 .
Table no. 6: PIA
Sl.
Names of project
Details of PIA
No.
1
(i)
(ii)
(iii)
(iv)
(v)
(vi)
IWMP – 1
Zari Bujarg
Type of organization
Name of organization
Designation & Address
Telephone
Fax
E-mail
District Level Nodal Agency
Devgadh Bariya Range
District Forest Officer
02678-220425
02678-220425
iwmp1zaribujarg@gmail.com
PIA for the IWMP – 1 Garbada Taluka is located at the Range Forest Office Garbada. District Watershed Development Unit, Dahod has allotted 4
WDT’s at PIA level; the details of 4 WDT’s are listed as under:
Table no. 7: Staff at PIA level
Sl.
Name
Age
no
Sex
Designation
1
Chavda Rakesh
25
M
2
3
Patel Jigna
Shah Ravindra
26
34
F
M
W.D.T
Agriculture
W.D.T C.M
W.D.T Civil
4
Rafikbhai Mansuri
37
M
W.D.T D.E.O
Qualification
Experience
Job
assigned
Monthly
remuneration
B.SC Forestry
2.7 Years
Field Work
8000/-
B.A, M.S.W
Diploma Civil
Data Entry
Operator
1 Year
4 Years
Field Work
Field Work
8000/8000/-
11 Years
Office Work
5000/-
Page No: 27
DAHOD
2.3 SWOT Analysis of the PIA
Strength:
(1) Dedicated and experience staffs and multidisciplinary team.
(2) Independent District Level Nodal Agency.
(3) Strong linkages with national and state level institutions, agricultural universities, North Gujarat University and NGOs for capacity building and technical
guidance.
(4) Scientific planning in watershed projects with the help of BISAG, Gandhinagar.
(5) District level monitoring, coordination & cooperation committee.
(6) Well establishment of PRIs for social audits.
Weakness:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
(5)
Insufficient funds for complete watershed projects per hectare
No permanent staff
No permanent office building
No technical equipments facilities
No vehicle or TA is given to surveyor to perform job speedily
Opportunities:
(1)
(2)
(3)
(4)
Sustainable livelihood generation landless and asset less
Improvement of socio-economic status of poor
Awareness generation among the illiterates through IEC (Information, Education and Communication) activities by usage of new ICT activities
Usage of new technologies of watershed modelling and GPS for monitoring the watershed activities
Threats:
(1) Lack of sustainable agriculture development
(2) Delay of releasing project fund from the higher authority
(3) Lack of contribution and cooperation from local peoples
(4) Low and irregular rainfall in the project area
(5) Low literacy rate in the project area
(6) Low availability of Water/Canal/Irrigation Sources
(7) High migration ratio
(8) Low land productivity, erratic and an even distribution of rain.
(9) Undulating , hilly terrain
Page No: 28
DAHOD
CHAPTER 3 – BASIC INFORMATION OF THE PROJECT
AREA
Page No: 29
DAHOD
Figure -2, Field Visit at Garbada Project Area
Page No: 30
DAHOD
3. DPR Process
First village visit then village meeting , Transits walk, PRA ( Participatory Rural Appraisal), WDC Formation, Bas e line survey, Net Planning, SHG, UG Formation, DPR
preparation.
3.1 Geography and Geo-hydrology
3.1.1 Land Use Pattern
The net geographical area of the project Zari Bujarg (IWMP – 1) is 5569.84 ha. The total forest area is about 24.12 percent which is under cultivation
under Zari Bujarg project and completely rain fed. The Kharif crop is mainly taken in the project area.
Table no. 8: Land use pattern
S.
No.
Names of
villages
1
2
3
4
5
6
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Total:
Geographical
Area of the
village
302.11
575.41
522.97
588.26
878.72
2702.37
Forest
Area
0.00
93.34
292.97
0.00
0.00
957.31
5569.84 1343.62
Land under
Rain
agricultural
fed area
use
129.45
352.55
207.60
561.87
519.12
1596.18
Permanent
pastures
Wasteland
Cultivable
Noncultivable
2211.92
242.11
400.60
550.69
635.92
258.73
4.00
77.00
4.40
15.00
212.30
33.00
4.00
77.00
4.40
15.00
212.29
33.03
168.66
52.52
18.00
11.39
147.30
115.88
3366.77 4299.97
345.70
345.72
513.75
Land in Hector
By the above table it can be concluded that forest area is 24.12 percent, land under agricultural use is 60.45 percent and ra in fed area is 77.20
percent. Most of the area is rain fed area of the total geographical area is rain fed area that is 77.20 percent.
Page No: 31
DAHOD
3.1.2 Soil type and topography
Zari Bujarg watershed project falls Western/Southern Hills of Gujarat Agro-climatic zone. The soil is mainly Lateride, Calcareous, and Loamy. The soil is
dark brown and black cotton in surface colour. The depth of soil is moderate to deep about 36 to 48 cm. The predominant texture of soil is loamy sand
and silt and clay. The soil fertility is poor with low nitrogen, phosphorus and potash. The topography of the area is hilly with undulating plains and
steep slopes ranging from 0 to 16% slope.
Table no. 9: Soil type and topography
Name of the AgroS.
Area
climatic zone covers
No.
in ha
project area
1
2
3
4
5
6
Southern Hills
Major soil types
b) Area in
a)Type
ha
Names of the
villages
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
3069.84
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Topography
Clayey, Mixed,
Hypothermic
and Lithic
Ustochrepts
302.11
75.41
22.97
588.26
378.72
1702.37
Hilly
Hilly
Hilly
Hilly
Hilly
Hilly
Total:
3069.84
-
# Flat, undulating, moderate slope, Steep slope
Major Soil types are Clayey, Mixed, Hypothermic and Lithic Ustochrepts. And topography of the area is hilly.
Table no. 10: Flood and drought condition
Sl.
Flood
Drought
Village
no
(Incidence)
(Incidence)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Not Affected
3-5 Years
By the above table it can be conclude that, all the villages (selected) are not affected by flood.
Page No: 32
DAHOD
Table no. 11.1: Soil Erosion
Type of
erosion
Cause
a
b
c
d
Water erosion
Sheet
Rill
Gully
Ravenous
Sub-Total
Wind erosion
Total
Area
affected
(ha)
Run off
(mm/ year)
10
90
100
100
Average soil loss
(Tonnes/ ha/
year)
780
12.25
780
By the above table, it can be concluded that, 90 percent of the area is affected by Gully Erosion.
Table no. 11.2: Soil Salinity/Alkalinity (Salinity ingress)
Name of the
Survey
Soil
Type of Salinity
Village
Number
pH
(Inherent/Ingress)
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
45/1/4
1/1/A
64/1
43
21/3
69/2/A
106
73/2
56
27
12/7/2001
23
26/3
7.3
7.2
6.6
7.1
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.1
7.2
6.9
7.3
7.1
7.2
0.82
0.64
0.6
0.7
0.75
0.85
0.87
0.95
0.78
0.67
0.73
0.62
0.72
Page No: 33
DAHOD
Simaliya Bujarg
Gangarda
Zari Bujarg
67/2
1-Feb
75/1
147/2
161
174/5
30/4
189
354/1
106
211/1
506
6.8
6.9
7.1
7.2
7.2
7.2
7.1
7.1
7.1
6.7
6.5
6.8
0.8
0.75
0.72
0.78
0.81
0.95
1.1
0.98
0.9
0.84
1.2
0.97
Average: 7.05
0.82
The minimum soil pH of the project area is 6.5 and the maximum soil pH of the project area is 7.3 and the averag e is 7.05. The average salinity of the
project area is 0.82.
Table no. 11.3: Water logging Conditions
Survey
Name of the Village
Number
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
N/A
Reasons
Undulate
condition
The area is not affected by water logging.
Page No: 34
DAHOD
Table no. 12: Climatic conditions
Name of
Average rainfallproject
last 5 years
Zari Bujarg
1032mm
Average temperature (Celsius)
Summer
Max
Min
44
36
Winter
Max
Min
34
19
Because of the topology of the project area is hilly the summer is very hot and winter is cool. Average rainfall of the project area since last 5 years is
1032 mm.
Table no. 13: Physiographic and relief
Project name
Elevation
Slope range (%)
Zari Bujarg
Hilly
5-11
Major streams
Pat Nadi
The elevation is hilly and the slop range is from 5 to 11 percent and the major streams of the project area are Pat Nadi.
Page No: 35
DAHOD
3.1.4 Land and Agriculture
The area is completely dependent on rainfall. The rainfall is highly lacking in amplitude or quality which has res ulted in recurrent phenomenon of
draught. The average rainfall of this area is about 1032 mm (according to the previous five year data). The rainy days area less than 40, this
mismatched diffusion is directing to runoff of soil every year to the streams and a small streams.
Lack of surface water source and unavailability of ground water has decreased irrigation and drinking water. The average land holding is about 1 ha.
Lack of irrigation source forces the majority of these farmers to migrate to ensure their livelihood. That affects directly the demographic profile of the
village. The major crops cultivated in the area are Maize, Paddy, Soyabean, Wheat, Pigeon Pea, and Gram in the village. If rain is good and proper
irrigation source is available then the farmer can takes rabi crops viz. Wheat, and Gram in good quantity.
The project area has about 1419 cows and 1691 buffaloes out of which majority are local breed; there are 2841 bullock, 3124 Goats, 3226 other
animals. Majority of Tribal community depends on Goat, Cow, and Buffaloes rearing for their livelihood. Lack of rain and surface water has reduced
the fodder and pasture area for their animals. This leads to heavy migration to other parts of the state with their family me mbers and due to this
animal husbandry is poor. The productivity of the milching animals is too low.
Table no. 14: Land ownership details
Total owned land (ha)
Sl
Village
no
Gen
OBC
SC
1
2
3
4
5
6
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
0.00
0.00
1.60
0.00
3.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
34.08
13.04
9.04
0.00
Total:
4.60
56.16
3.08
0.40
13.76
0.00
1.68
0.00
ST
HHs giving
land on
lease
HHs taking
land on
lease
162.91
515.54
256.52
119.43
139.22
241.18
1
4
0
0
3
0
0
22
0
2
0
1
18.92 1434.8
8
25
Page No: 36
DAHOD
Table no. 15: Area Agriculture
Sl
no
1
2
3
4
5
6
Net sown area
One
Two
Three
time
times
times
Village
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Total:
154.07
113.72
93.89
104.04
97.58
86.98
29.58
17.51
12.21
3.92
9.31
19.76
0
0
0
0
0
0
650.28
92.29
0
Table no. 16: Irrigation Facilities
Sl
no
1
2
3
4
5
6
Source 1 : Canal
Village
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Source 2 : Check dam / Pond /
Check Wall
Source 3 : Well/Bore/River
Availabilit
y months
Net
area
Gross
area
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Availability
months
Net
area
Gross
area
Availability
months
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
5
5
5
5
4
Net
area
10.50
91.50
33.00
56.50
77.50
74.50
Gross
area
10.50
91.50
33.00
56.50
77.50
74.50
* Area in Acre
Page No: 37
DAHOD
Table no. 17: Crop details
Sl
no
1
2
3
4
5
6
Sl
no
1
2
3
4
5
6
Maize
Village
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya
Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Total:
Produc
tion
85
280
201
111
91958
254761
206840
65714
100
75060
754
31
159
776
199941
1254
874
16
333
Maize
Village
Produ
ction
Area
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya
Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Total:
Produ
Produc
ctivit Area
tion
y
1081
56
46788
911
129
78895
1031
79
56200
593
39
18945
Area
694333
1
250
7
2840
10 10660
11
5565
Kharif (Monsoon)
Soyabean
Paddy
Pigeon Pea
Other
Area
Produc
tion
Produc
tivity
839
612
712
489
6
22
0
0
3570
14955
50
0
605
682
500
0
21695
707
22
10830
495
0
0
0
1
450
750
11962
729
672
1429
50
932559
29405
653
571
0
85
0
0
487
10
60
4800
490
501
222523
Wheat
Produ
Produc Produc
ctivit Area
tion
tivity
y
500
7
6085
836
410
27
17010
619
1055
3
3630
1156
499
0
0
0
Produ
ction
Produc
tivity
0
0
48 19096
30 16200
8
4000
0
400
545
516
Area
Rabi (Winter)
Gram
39296
Area
Produ
ction
Prod
uctiv
ity
0
374
381
0
Produc
tivity
0
0
39 14662
10
3950
0
0
Pigeon Pea
23862
Other
Area
Produc
tion
Produc
tivity
Produ
Area
ction
Produc
tivity
Produ
Area
ction
19
83
9
1
10665
25885
6690
275
554
311
715
324
1
1900
40 10695
2
1000
0
0
1357
269
446
0
3
1345
33 11745
4
1700
0
0
Prod
uctiv
ity
420
357
438
0
7
4430
610
3
2650
779
19
6040
321
1
340
405
0
100
833
0
36
0
0
615
15
41
10215
29375
690
711
15
132
8680
49555
574
445
0
44
0
0
619
0
40
0
0
512
23745
13935
Page No: 38
14890
DAHOD
Sl
Village
1
2
3
4
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya
Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
no
5
6
Total:
Maize
Produ Produc
Area
ction
tivity
-
-
-
-
-
-
0
0
-
Wheat
Produ Produc
Area
ction
tivity
-
-
-
Zaid (Summer)
Gram
Produ Produc
Area
ction
tivity
0.20
80
400
-
-
-
0
100
227
0.20
50
250
0
100
227 0.40
130
325
Pigeon Pea
Other
Produ Produc
Produ Produ
Area
Area
ction
tivity
ction ctivity
0.40
80
200
2
750
347
0
210
525
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
960
436
0.40
80
200
3
Maize, Paddy, Soyaben, Pigeon Pea, Wheat, Gram, Adad, Groundnut, and etc. are the crops in Garbada Taluka (Zari Bujarg Watershed). Crop details
are well illustrated in Table No. 17 (Kharif, Rabi, and Zaid). Crops area production and productivity are seasonal. In Kharif (Monsoon) season the
production of the crop is good compared to those of other two seasons. In Garbada Taluka the 776 ha has been used to produce 694333 KG of Maize
with the productivity of 874 KG/Ha, 333 ha to produce 222523 KG of Paddy (Rice) with the productivity of 672 KG/Ha, 50 ha to produce 29405 KG of
Soyabean with the productivity of 571 KG/Ha, 85 ha to produce 39296 KG of Pigeon Pea with the productivity of 487 KG/Ha, while other crops in 60 ha
to produce 23862 KG with the productivity of 501 KG/Ha. On the other ha nd if we talk about the Rabi (Winter) season there are Wheat, Gram, and
Pigeon Pea as the main crops. The 132 ha has been used to produce 49555 KG of Gram with the productivity of 445 KG/ha, 41 ha to produce 29375 KG
of Wheat with the productivity of 711 KG/Ha, 44 ha to produce 13935 KG of Pigeon Pea with the productivity of 619 KG/Ha, 36 ha to produce 23745
KG of Maize with the productivity of 614 KG/Ha and 40 ha to produce 14890 KG of other crops with the productivity of 512 KG/Ha. In Zaid ( summer)
season some farmers produces crops like Wheat and Gram only due to the scarcity of water. In Zaid (Summer) season the production of the crops are
the 0.40 ha to produce 130 KG of Gram (Gram) with the productivity of 325 KG/Ha, 0.40 ha to produce 80 KG of Pigeon Pea (Pulses) with the
productivity of 200 KG/Ha and . The Large Farmers with the irrigation facilities like Private Bore, or Private Well can be able to take the crops.
Page No: 39
DAHOD
Table no. 18: Livestock details of the project IWMP 1
Buffalo
Cow
Sl
Village
no
No
Milk
No
Milk
1
2
3
4
5
6
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Total:
Total Milk
(Buffalo &
Cow)
Goat
No
Milk
Sheep
Bullock
Hen
Others
183
408
263
194
67
576
5490
11240
7890
5820
2010
15490
143
394
249
136
65
432
4287
10820
7470
4080
1950
11285
9777
22060
15360
9900
3960
26775
406
1461
4
677
252
324
7308
23298
72
12186
4536
7686
5
8
1036
44
1
3
434
849
562
353
139
504
-
188
1001
438
235
114
153
1691
47940
1419
39892
87832
3124
55086
1097
2841
0
2129
3.2. Socio – Economic Profile
3.2.1 Demographic Status:
Zari Bujarg watershed project mainly covers Gulbar, Jambua, Nimach, Gangarda, Simaliya Bujarg and Zari Bujarg villages which comprises of 2472
households with a population of 24592 including 12321 males and 12281 female. The sex ratio is about 997 female to 1000 male. There are about 939
BPL families. The female literacy rate as low as 26.27 per cent.
Table no. 19: Drinking water Facilities Prevailing in the project area
Sl
Ground water
Source of drinking
Availability
Village
no
table (mt)
water
in months
1
2
3
4
5
6
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
45-50
30-35
30-35
30-35
30-35
35-40
Open Well, Private Well,
Hand-pump
6-8
8-12
8-12
8-12
8-12
8-12
Quality
Poor
Average
Average
Average
Average
Average
Page No: 40
DAHOD
Table no. 20: Details of Common Property Resources
Total Area (ha) Area owned/ In
possession of
Names
S.
of
CPR Particulars
Govt.
No.
Pvt.
Public
project
(specify
PRI
persons
Property
deptt.)
1
Zari
Bujarg
Wasteland/ degraded land
Pastures
Orchards
Village Woodlot
Forest
Village Ponds/ Tanks
Community Buildings
Weekly Markets
Permanent markets
Temples/ Places of worship
Others (Pl. specify)
Total/Average:
3.00
610.67
Area available for treatment (ha)
Pvt.
persons
Govt.
(specify
deptt.)
PRI
Public
Property
513.75
345.70
224.10
1343.62
27.00
-
-
-
-
513.75
345.70
224.10
1343.62
-
-
-
-
-
-
1273.30
-
-
-
0.00
2.00 1273.30 2427.17
0.00
0.00
613.67 2454.17
2.00
-
-
Page No: 41
DAHOD
Table no. 21: Demographic information
Sl
no
1
2
3
4
5
6
Village
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Total:
Total
Population
Male Female
3045
2342
1943
3615
4090
9557
24592
Table no. 22: Literacy rate
Sl
Village
no
Total
1
2
3
4
5
6
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Total:
3045
2342
1943
3615
4090
9557
24592
1528
1180
958
1810
2006
4839
12321
1527
1162
985
1805
2084
4718
12281
%
18.10
35.20
26.60
26.30
25.50
25.90
26.27
SC
Total Male Female
0
0
0
99
45
54
0
0
0
86
39
47
0
0
0
117
53
64
302 136
166
Literacy
Male
%
1528
1180
958
1810
2006
4839
12321
27.80
48.30
40.30
38.10
37.60
38.20
38.38
Female
1527
1162
985
1805
2084
4718
12281
%
Total
0
4.23
0
2.38
0
1.22
7.83
3045
2196
1938
3525
4090
9431
24225
%
8.60
22.40
13.30
14.10
13.60
12.90
14.15
ST
Total
Female
%
1675 100.00
0
1208 93.77
0
1066 99.74
0
1939 97.51
0
2250 100.00
0
5187 98.68
0
10901
589.
70
13324
0
Male
1370
988
872
1586
1841
4244
Literacy %
above age 14
OBC
Male Female
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Literacy %
below age 14
30.00
20.00
25.00
23.50
22.30
18.89
70.00
80.00
75.00
76.50
77.70
81.11
23.28
76.72
Page No: 42
%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
DAHOD
Table no. 23: Migration details
Migration
Sl
no
1
2
3
4
5
6
Village
Total
population
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Total:
Migration by months
Total
Male
Female
3045
2342
1943
3615
4090
9557
2059
1557
1077
2365
3197
7687
1348
1023
708
1547
2154
4990
1215
732
485
1395
2142
5381
24592
17942
11770
11349
Up to 3
months
3-6
months
More than
6 months
246
450
359
543
130
329
321
987
698
179
561
699
2057
3445
343
435
132
567
676
796
2949
Main reason for
migration
Low rainfall, Shortage of
irrigation source
development, Scarcity of
water, low potential of land,
Low rainfall, Degraded &
Undulating Terrain, Less
education level.
-
Income
during
migration
/ month
3690000
8641100
8577000
2655050
2260000
3780000
29603150
3.2.2 Migration Pattern:
Migration is during summer season to various parts of the state like Ahmedabad, Surat, Vadodara, Dahej and Saurashtra as dail y wages agricultural
labors and construction workers. Lack of fodder availability and grazing land for smaller ruminant also forces these farmers to migrate to other places.
Table no. 24: Poverty
BPL
Sl
no
1
2
3
4
5
6
Total
Household
Village
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Total:
419
378
239
502
394
540
2472
0-16
17-20
Total
% of
BPL HH
96
87
55
115
91
124
63
57
36
75
59
81
159
144
91
190
150
205
37.95
38.10
38.08
37.85
38.07
37.96
568
371
939
38.00
Total
Land
less
HH
44
75
48
62
49
53
331
% of
land less
HH
10.5
19.84
20.08
12.35
12.44
9.81
85.02
Page No: 43
DAHOD
Table no. 25: Village infrastructure
Sl
no
1
2
3
4
5
6
Village
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya
Bujarg
Zari
Bujarg
Pucca
road to
the
village
(Y/N)
Y
Y
Y
Y
LP
UP
HS
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
N
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Y
N
N
N
N
N
Distance
from
nearest
market
yard
2 K.M
17 K.M
15 K.M
10 K.M
Y
Y
N
N
N
N
N
10 K.M
N
N
N
2
Y
Y
Y
Y
N
Y
N
10 K.M
1
1
N
6
Schools
Post
Colleges
Banks
Office
(Number)
(Number)
(Distance)
Milk
collection
centre
(Number)
Milk
cooperative
(Number)
1
1
1
N
Other
cooperatives
Any other
institution
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
1
2
3
2
/ CBIs
(Number)
3.2.3 Infrastructure Facilities:
Zari Bujarg watershed is well connected with Garbada Taluka with Kaccha and Pucca roads. The village has electricity connecti ng under Jyothigram
Yojana of Gujarat Government. Nearly 71.63 per cent of households in the village have their personal electric meters. Since ground water is very
deeply and mostly unavailable so electricity is not used for agricultural purpose. Zari Khurd watershed has ten villages viz. Gulbar, Jambua, Nimach,
Gangarda, Simaliya Bujarg and Zari Bujarg having the facilities like Lower Primary School, Under Primary School and High Primary School, Post Office,
Milk Collection Centre, Milk Cooperative, and other institutions (Anganwadi, Panchayat etc.).
Page No: 44
DAHOD
Table no. 26: Facilities / HH assets
Sl
no
1
2
3
4
5
6
Village
HHs with
electricity
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Total:
HHs with
safety
latrines
HHs with
phones
Land
line
411
365
239
471
390
439
1
109
22
18
2
6
2315
158
Agriculture
Animal
husbandry
863980
1344800
1957000
2511135
2553630
1732321
112800
8700
722020
67540
6000
12900
HHs with vehicle
Mobile
0
24wheeler wheeler
23
282
82
183
94
115
9
42
2
41
19
14
779
127
HHs with
TV set
0
7
3
31
3
17
13
3
1
11
67
HHs with
cooking
gas
HHs with
Drinking
water
-
0
HHs with
fridge
2
-
0
Table no. 27: Income
Sl
no
1
2
3
4
5
6
Village
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Total:
10962866
Casual
labour
5829200
4412100
2256200
2565280
3422800
4863700
929960 23349280
Others
Total
1154500
1226300
866700
1628950
1390100
1485500
7960480
6991900
5801920
6772905
7372530
8094421
7752050 42994156
Page No: 45
2
Other
163
98
49
105
52
70
537
DAHOD
Table no.28: Dependence on Forest/CPR
Sl
no
1
2
3
4
5
6
Grass
Village
Fuel
Wood for Building
Total
Income
% sells
Income
% sells
Income
% sells
Income
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Here in this area the people of village are not selling the Grass, Fuel and Wood. They use these items for their own consumption.
3.3 Livelihood Pattern:
The villagers earn their livelihood from animal husbandry and agriculture and during lean s easons they go as daily wages labourers at hilly fields of
villages. Another noticeable occupation of the people is to create bucket, supdu, etc. from the community and land or forest.
Table no. 29: Livelihood pattern (Occupational distribution)
Animal
Sl
Total
Agriculture Casual
Village
Agriculture husbandry
Services Handicraft Others
no
workforce
+ AH
labour
(AH)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Total:
419
378
239
502
395
546
397
342
226
484
335
438
49
275
33
34
4
4
47
7
33
32
4
3
396
275
238
443
376
486
6
22
2
5
15
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
378
222
224
46
71
372
2479
2222
399
126
2214
50
0
1313
Page No: 46
DAHOD
3.4 Comparative data of the crop productivity of the area: Project Area v/s District v/s State v/s Country v/s World
The purpose of this study is to provide a comparative analysis of productivity of Gamdi watershed villages with reference to World, I ndia, Gujarat,
Dahod district. "The term productivity in general means the total output per unit of factor input. For example land productivity means output per
hector of land. Productivity is an average and is calculated by dividing the total output of a particular crop by the total c ultivated area under that crop"
Data area made available by
the Baseline survey. The
results
show
that
productivity is important not
only because we observe a
strong positive relationship
with profits but that the
results are suggestive of
important scale that should
be taken to improve the
production. This
result
indicates
that
Gamdi
watershed villages have a
very
low
productivity
compared to World, India,
Gujarat and Dahod. The productivity is low not because of the land is unproductive or the farmer's lack of skills to managing their crop but it is due to
the lack of irrigation sources availability and scarcity of water.
Page No: 47
DAHOD
3.4.1 Maize Production:
Maize is widely cultivated throughout the world, and a greater weightage of maize is produced each year than any other grain. The United States
produces almost half of the world's harvest (~42.5%); other top producing countries include China, Brazil, Mexico, Argentina, India and France. The
Maize was planted worldwide, with a yield of 4970.9 kilogram/hectare. In India, it is grown in about 7.59 Million Hectors with a production of 14.71
Million Tonnes and productivity of 1938 KG/Hector. Gujarat alone produces about 57.76 % of the total Maize of our country from 57.44 % of the area
with a record productivity of about 1100 KG/Hector. Dahod district has very good productivity 1430 KG/Hector. The Gulbar, Jambua, Nimach,
GAngarda, Simaliya Bujarg and Zari Bujarg have the productivity of 1080.59, 910.61, 1030.70, 592.98, 753.61, and 1253.70 KG/Ha respectively.
3.4..2 Paddy Production:
Second largest producer of white rice. Rice is India's
preeminent crop, and is the staple food of the people of the
eastern and southern parts of the India. The world
production of Rice is about 4090 KG/Ha, Indian production
of Rice is about 2101 KG/Ha, Gujarat production of Rice is
1959 KG/Ha, and the Dahod district production of rice is
about 1421 KG/Ha. Rice is the second most important grain
in Zari Bujarg watershed villages and the production per
hector of Gulbar, Jambua, Nimach, Gangarda, Simaliya
Bujarg and Zari Bujarg is about 839.40, 612.25, 712.11,
488.78, 707.14, and 729.39 KG/Ha respectively.
Page No: 48
DAHOD
3.4.3. Soybean Production:
The Soybean is a species of legume native to East Asia. The
plant is classed as an oilseed rather than a pulse. It is an
annual plant that has been used in China for 5,000 years to
primarily add nitrogen into the soil as part of crop
rotation. Fat-free (defatted) soybean meal is a primary,
low-cost, source of protein for animal feeds and most
prepackaged meals; soy vegetable oil is another valuable
product of processing the soybean crop. Soybean products
such as TVP (Textured Vegetable Protein), for example
important ingredients in many meat and dairy analogues.
Soybeans can produce at least twice as much protein per
acre than any other major vegetable or grain crop, 5 to 10
times more protein per acre than land set aside for grazing
animals to make milk, and up to 15 times more protein per
acre than land set aside for meat production.
Soyabean Production Chart
Page No: 49
DAHOD
CHAPTER 4 – WATERSHED ACTIVITIES PLANNED
Page No: 50
DAHOD
4 watershed Activities
Table no. 30: Details of Scientific Planning and Inputs in IWMP projects
S.
No.
Scientific criteria/ inputs used
Planning
Cluster approach
Whether technical back-stopping for the project has been arranged? If yes, mention the name of the Institute
Baseline survey
Hydro-geological survey
Contour mapping
Participatory Net Planning (PNP)
Remote sensing data-especially soil/ crop/ run-off cover
Ridge to Valley treatment
Online IT connectivity between
(1) Project and DRDA cell/ZP
(2) DRDA and SLNA
(3) SLNA and DoLR
Availability of GIS layers
1. Cadastral map
Whether
scientific
criteria
was used
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Page No: 51
DAHOD
2. Village boundaries
3. Drainage
4. Soil (Soil nutrient status)
5. Land use
6. Ground water status
7. Watershed boundaries
8. Activity
Crop simulation models#
Integrated coupled analyzer/ near infrared visible spectroscopy/ medium spectroscopy for high speed soil
nutrient analysis
Normalized difference vegetation index (NDVI)#
Weather Station
(A) Inputs
1. Bio-pesticides
2. Organic manures
3. Vermicompost
4. Bio-fertilizer
5. Water saving devices
6. Mechanized tools/ implements
7. Bio-fencing
8. Nutrient budgeting
9. Automatic water level recorders & sediment samplers
Any other (please specify)
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
No
#NDVI - Ratio of the differences of the response of vegetation in the near infrared & red regions of the electromagnetic spectrum
Page No: 52
DAHOD
Table no.31: Details of PRA Activities conducted in the project area
Sr. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Name of the
PRA Activity /
FGD
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya bujarg
Zari bujarg
Date
Number of
people present
Lessons learnt
10-06-10
11-06-10
14-06-10
09-06-10
08-06-10
15-06-10
43
60
25
51
42
78
Mostly people
are illiterate ,
Uneducated
/they believe in
old technique
for farming
Understanding
of the problem
Yes
situation
After giving fully
information of the project
and give some examples,
then they are ready to join
us
Page No: 53
DAHOD
4.1 Problem tree analysis
Page No: 54
DAHOD
4.2Object tree analysis
Page No: 55
DAHOD
4.2 Institutions At Village Level
4.2.1 Watershed Committee (WC)
It is a committee that is constituted by Gram Sabha to implement the watershed project with technical support of WDTs in the village. This committee
is registered under society Registration Act 1860. The Gram Sabha of the village selects the cha irman of the watershed committee with the secretary
who will be a paid functionary. A watershed committee was formed accordingly in Zari Bujarg watershed project villages.
Table no. 32: Watershed Committee details
Sl.
No.
1
Names
of WCs
Date of
Registration
as a Society
(dd/mm/
yyyy)
Jalstrav
Vikas
F/1751/Dahod
Mandal,
Gulbar
Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF
LandAny Educational Function/s
UG SHG GP
less
other qualification assigned#
President
Secretary
Member
M
M
M
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
BA
BA
5th
-
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
M
M
M
M
F
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
5th
8th
10th
3rd
-
Member
Member
M
F
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
3rd
4th
-
Member
Member
Forester
M
M
F
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2nd
12th
-
Page No: 56
DAHOD
Sl.
No.
2
Names
of WCs
Date of
Registration
as a Society
(dd/mm/
yyyy)
Jalstrav
Vikas
F/1750/Dahod
Mandal,
Jambua
Designation M/F OBC ST SF MF LF
President
Secretary
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Forester
Member
M
M
F
F
M
M
M
M
M
F
M
F
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
UG SHG GP
less
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
8th
4th
4th
5th
10th
12th
12th
12th
4th
Page No: 57
-
DAHOD
Sl. Names
No. of WCs
3
Date of
Registration
as a Society
(dd/mm/
yyyy)
Nimach F/1558/Dahod
Designation M/F OBC ST SF MF LF
President
Secretary
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Forester
Member
Member
Member
Member
Forester
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
F
F
F
F
M
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
UG SHG GP
less
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7th
7th
7th
8th
5th
8th
5th
7th
10th
5th
12th
BA
8th
4th
12th
Page No: 58
-
DAHOD
Sl. Names of
No.
WCs
4
Jalstrav
Vikas
Samiti
Gangarda
Date of
Registration
as a Society Designation M/F SC ST SF MF LF
UG SHG GP
less
(dd/mm/
yyyy)
Under
Process
President
Secretary
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Forester
M
M
M
F
M
M
M
M
F
M
M
M
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
7th
10th
4th
2nd
7th
5th
10th
12th
-
Page No: 59
DAHOD
Sl.
No.
5
Names
of WCs
Jalstrav
Vikas
Samiti,
Simaliya
Bujarg
Date of
Registration
UG SHG GP
less
(dd/mm/
yyyy)
Under
Process
President
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
F
M
F
F
M
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
12th
5th
5th
8th
8th
5th
12th
12th
12th
8th
10th
10th
-
Page No: 60
DAHOD
Sl.
No.
6
#
A.
C.
E.
G.
I.
Names
of WCs
Jalstrav
Vikas
Mandal,
Zari
Bujar
Date of
Registration
UG SHG GP
less
(dd/mm/
yyyy)
32468
President
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
Member
M
M
M
M
M
M
M
F
M
F
F
M
M
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
12th
5th
5th
8th
8th
5th
12th
12th
12th
8th
10th
10th
-
Only the letter assigned, as below, needs to be typed, except for `J’, where the type may be specifically mentioned.
PNP and PRA
B.
Planning
Maintenance of Accounts
D.
Signing of cheques and making payments
Supervision of construction activities
F.
Cost Estimation
Verification & Measurement
H.
Record of labour employed
Social Audit
J.
Any other (please specify).
Page No: 61
DAHOD
4.2.2 Self Help Group
Self Help Groups are motivated, small homogenous groups organized together through credit and thrift activities. Self Help Group initiatives especially
for women help uplift their livelihood. Generally Self Help Groups include landless and poor women.
Before formation of the SHGs, during PRA activities, Focused Group Discussions (FGDs) were held with the women, which came up with the following
observations:
(a) Lack of proper credit facilities due to low intervention of formal financial credit ins titution.
(b) Excessive exploitation of weaker section by money lenders.
(c) Lack of attitude for saving among poor people.
(d) Lack of knowledge on credit and thrift activity and banking.
With a detailed discussion with some of the local NGOs working in the area like Sadguru, Prakruti, Grisarv, GSRDC Vadodara, and Utthan Limkheda, it
was planned to have some capacity building training regarding SHG activities. It was also proposed to have some livelihood ac tivities which will
promote women empowerment.
Table no. 33: SHG detail
S. No.
Village
Name
Total no. of UGs
Men
Women
Both
Total
1
Gulbar
0
7
0
5
2
Jambua
0
5
0
5
No. of SC/ST in each
category
No. of members
No. of BPL in each
category
Categories
M
F
Total
M
F
Total
M
F
Total
(i)Landless
(ii) SF
(iii) MF
(iv) LF
(i)Landless
(ii) SF
(iii) MF
(iv) LF
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
30
33
0
13
20
22
0
14
30
33
0
13
20
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
30
33
0
13
20
22
0
14
30
33
0
13
20
22
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
30
33
0
13
20
22
0
14
30
33
0
13
20
22
0
Page No: 62
DAHOD
3
Nimach
0
2
0
2
4
Gangarda
0
4
0
4
5
Simaliya
Bujarg
0
5
0
6
6
Zhari
Bujarg
0
7
0
7
Total:
0
30
0
(i)Landless
(ii) SF
(iii) MF
(iv) LF
(i)Landless
(ii) SF
(iii) MF
(iv) LF
(i)Landless
(ii) SF
(iii) MF
(iv) LF
(i)Landless
(ii) SF
(iii) MF
(iv) LF
29
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
11
0
11
33
0
0
0
44
22
0
11
44
22
0
341
0
11
11
0
11
33
0
0
0
44
22
0
11
44
22
0
341
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
11
0
11
33
0
0
0
44
22
0
11
44
22
0
341
0
11
11
0
11
33
0
0
0
44
22
0
11
44
22
0
341
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
11
0
11
33
0
0
0
44
22
0
11
44
22
0
341
4.2.3 User Group:
User Groups are normally formed to manage an activity or ass et created under the programme on a long term basis. The user group collect user
charges from their members, oversee the works and manage the benefits.
It was decided that each group would formulate certain internal rules and have feeling of ownership with community spirit.
Page No: 63
DAHOD
Table no. 34: UG detail
S.
No.
Village
Name
1
Total no. of UGs
No. of members
Men
Women
Both
Gulbar
0
0
3
2
Jambua
0
0
1
0
3
Nimach
0
0
0
51
4
Gangarda
0
0
0
51
5
Simaliya
Bujarg
0
0
0
51
6
Zhari
Bujarg
0
0
0
51
Total:
0
0
4
Total
204
Categories
(i)Landless
(ii) SF
(iii) MF
(iv) LF
(i)Landless
(ii) SF
(iii) MF
(iv) LF
(i)Landless
(ii) SF
(iii) MF
(iv) LF
(i)Landless
(ii) SF
(iii) MF
(iv) LF
(i)Landless
(ii) SF
(iii) MF
(iv) LF
(i)Landless
(ii) SF
(iii) MF
(iv) LF
0
M
0
10
9
0
0
3
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
15
0
0
13
9
0
0
23
20
0
118
F
0
6
8
0
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
9
7
0
0
7
4
0
0
19
15
0
80
Total
0
12
16
0
0
6
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
14
0
0
14
8
0
0
38
30
0
160
No. of SC/ST in each
category
M
F
Total
0
0
0
10
6
12
9
8
16
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
3
6
3
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
9
18
15
7
14
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
7
14
9
4
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
19
38
20
15
30
0
0
0
118
80
160
No. of BPL in each
category
M
F
Total
0
0
0
5
3
8
2
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
3
8
2
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
3
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
5
13
5
4
9
0
0
0
33
19
52
Page No: 64
DAHOD
4.3 Physical activities to be undertaken under IWMP – 1 (Zari Bujarg Watershed)
4.3.1 Entry Point Activity (EPA)
EPA activities are certain important works which are in urgent demand of the local community. This helps in establishment of credibility of Watershed
Development Team (WDT). It also acts as a rapport building activity of the village community. A group discussion was conducted with Watershed
Development Committee (WDC) regarding EPA activity; it was conveyed to the amount of Rs. 14.74 Lack was allotted for EPA acti vity, which was a 4
per cent of total allocated budget. The villagers discussed various activities which they felt is important but after a brief discussion it was conveye d to
them that only those activities can taken, which revive the common natural resources. It was also taken into priority that there should be an
instrument of convergence which will result in sustainability of activities.
Entry Point Activities
Page No: 65
DAHOD
Table no.35: Entry point activities (EPA) (All financial figures in lakh Rs.)
1
Gulbar
145013
Filtered Drinking Water Facilities in school
Grassland/Gauchar Development
Roof water harvesting
Cattle Camp
Books for school library
Computer Training for Youth
Total
2
Jambua
36197
3
Nimach
11026
Cattle Camp
Total
Cattle Camp
Total
4
Gangarda
282365
Animal Water Trough
Cattle Camp
Computer Training for Youth(1person=3500)
Recharge of well
Total
0
10000
35000
27013
3000
70000
145013
15000
8197
10000
3000
36197
11026
11026
15000
86100
10000
85165
38100
35000
3000
10000
282365
0
1
1
1
20
1
0.82
1
1
1
1
6
1
24
3
1
1
1
Page No: 66
DAHOD
5
6
A
B
C
D
E
F
G
K
L
M
Grassland/Gauchar Development (1 ha = Rs. 10000/-)
20000
2
Recharge of well
63500
5
Simaliya
15000
1
181786
Buzarg
Cattle Camp
10000
1
3286
1
70000
20
Total
181786
Grassland/Gauchar Development (1 ha = Rs. 10000/-)
40000
4
3000
1
35000
1
Zharibujzarg
817138
Animal Water Trough
172200
12
Cattle Camp
59438
Recharge of well
317500
25
15000
1
175000
50
Total
817138
Grand Total
1433525
This activity will be very helpful for stop the soil erosion, stop the farm bund damaging, and will grow the
moisture level of the soil, and will rise the water table too.
The ground water level'll rise.
This activity will be helpful to provide drinking water to Animals and Birds.
We've planned to give Reverse Osmosis plant in School and/or in Anganwadi for drinkable water to children &
teacher.
Rooftop Water Harvesting is especially used to save the raining water and use it in proper way. We've planned to
give such facility to School & Anganwadi initially.
Grassland/Gauchar Development is one of the important activity for Entry Point. Which will be more beneficial
for the local peoples to use waste/grassland/gauchar land.
We've planned to give books for school and/or library for the local people to gather knowledge.
High quality seed will be provided to the village people in this activity.
We've planned to give computer basic course training to the village people accoroding to village literacy rate
criteria.
Animal chekup will be done by professional veterinary surgeon.
Page No: 67
DAHOD
Table no.36: Details of Ridge line treatment /land based activities in watershed work
Type of treatment
S. Village
No. name
1
Gulbar
Type of land
Executing
agency
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii)
(iii)
Forest
Others
(F)
(pl.
specify)
F
UG
(i)
Ridge
area
(R)
(ii)
Drain
age
line
(D)
(iii)
Land
dev.
(L)
(i)
Private
(P)
Stone Bund
R
R
L
P
-
Nala plug
Farm bund
Field Water
Outlets
-
D
-
L
L
P
P
-
-
-
-
L
P
-
Plantation
-
D
-
P
-
Name of
structures
(ii)
Commu
-nity
(c )
Target
T
Expected
month & year
of
completion
(mm/yyyy)
983
5.19
Dec-14
UG
UG
1
6769
0.79
3.25
Dec-14
Dec-14
-
UG
238
5.27
Dec-14
F
UG/SHG
20000
1.00
UG
4
8.00
23.50
2.20
1.57
1.24
6.01
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Check Wall
No. of
units
(No./
cu.m./
rmt)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
M W O
Total:
2
Jambua
Stone bund
Nala plug
Farm bund
Plantation
R
R
D
-
L
L
L
L
P
P
P
-
-
F
-
UG
UG
UG
417
2
2589
UG/SHG
20000
1.00
Total:
3
Field Water
Nimach Outlets
Farm bund
Plantation
-
-
L
P
-
-
UG
25
0.55
Dec-14
R
-
L
L
P
-
-
-
UG
2533
1.22
UG/SHG
10000
0.50
Dec-14
Dec-14
2.27
Dec-14
Total:
Page No: 68
DAHOD
4
Gangarda
Stone bund
Nala plug
Gully plug
Field Water Outlets
Farm bund
Check Wall
Plantation
R
R
D
D
D
D
-
L
L
L
L
L
L
P
P
P
P
P
-
-
F
F
F
F
F
UG
UG
UG
UG
UG
UG
1360
5
335
553
3350
8
7.18
3.93
3.56
12.25
1.61
16.00
UG/SHG
20000
1.00
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
45.53
Dec-14
Total:
5
Simaliya
Bujarg
Stone bund
Farm bund
Field Water Outlets
Check Wall
Gully plug
Plantation
R
-
-
D
D
D
-
R
L
L
L
P
P
P
-
F
-
L
L
-
-
F
F
F
UG
UG
UG
UG
UG
1145
3440
232
6
145
6.05
1.65
4.92
12.00
1.54
UG/SHG
20000
1.00
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
27.16
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Total:
6
Zari
Bujarg
Stone bund
Farm bund
Field Water Outlets
Nala plug
Check Wall
R
-
-
Plantation
R
D
D
D
-
L
L
L
L
P
P
P
P
-
F
-
F
F
F
L
-
-
UG
UG
UG
UG
UG
5787
24857
2230
6
17
30.56
11.93
47.28
4.72
34.00
UG/SHG
20000
4
132.49
Total:
Grand Total: 236.96
(M – Materials, W- wages, O- others, T – Total)
Page No: 69
Dec-14
Dec-14
DAHOD
Table no.37: Activities related to Surface water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
Proposed target
Augmentation/ repair of
Construction of new structures
existing structures
Sl
Village
Type of
Storage
Area
Area
no
Name
structures
Storage Estimated
to be
to be capacity Estimated
No
No
cost
cost
irrigated capacity
irrigated
(Lakh
(ha)
(ha)
Ltr)
1
Gulbar
2
Jambua
3
Gangarda
4
Simaliya
Bujarg
6
Zaribujarg
Total target
Area to
be
Storage
capacity
Estimated
irrigated
(ha)
cost
(i) Nala Plug
(ii) Check Wall
(i) Nala Plug
(i) Nala Plug
(ii) Check Wall
-
-
-
-
1
4
2
5
8
0.0948
0.96
0.1884
0.4716
1.92
444.44
888.88
0.79
8
1.57
3.93
16
1
4
2
5
8
0
444.44
0
0
888.88
0.79
8
1.57
3.93
16
(ii) Check Wall
-
-
-
-
6
1.44
666.66
12
6
666.66
12
(i) Nala Plug
-
-
-
-
6
0.5664
-
4.72
6
4.72
(ii) Check Wall
-
-
-
-
17
4.08
1888.87
34
17
0
1888.8
7
26
5.0748
1999.98
42.29
1999.98
42.29
Total/Average:
0
0
0
0
26
Page No: 70
34
DAHOD
Table no.38: Activities related to recharging ground water resources in the project areas (all financial figures in lakh Rs.)
S.
No.
Name of
Villages
1
Gulbar
2
Jambua
3
Nimach
4
Gangarda
5
Simaliya
Bujarg
6
Zari
Bujarg
Type of structures
(i)Open wells
(ii)Bore wells
Total for the village:
(i)Open wells
(ii)Bore wells
(i)Open wells
(ii)Bore wells
(i)Open wells
(ii)Bore wells
(i)Open wells
(ii)Bore wells
(i)Open wells
(ii)Bore wells
Total for the project:
Augmentation/ repair of existing
recharging structures
Area to be
Estimated
No.
irrigated (ha)
cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Proposed target
Construction of new recharging
structures
Estimated
Area to be
No.
irrigated (ha)
cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Total target
Area to be
irrigated (ha)
Estimated
cost
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page No: 71
DAHOD
Table no.39: Details of activities related to livelihood, production system and micro- enterprise
Type of land
S.
No.
Name of
village
Name of activity
1
2
3
1
Gulbar
Demonstration Plot
Kitchen Gardening
Drip Irrigation
Floriculture
Horticulture Plant
Nursery
Vermi Compost
2
Jambua
Demonstration Plot
Vegetable Kitchen Gardening
Horticulture Plant
Floriculture & Vegetation
Vermi Compost
3
Nimach
Horticulture Plant
(i)
(ii)
Private Community
4
P
P
P
P
P
P
5
C
C
C
C
C
C
(iii)
Others
(pl.
specify)
6
-
P
P
P
P
C
C
C
C
-
P
C
-
Executing
agency
(i) UG
(ii)SHG
(iii) Farmer
7
UG,SHG
UG, SHG
UG, SHG
SHG
UG, SHG
UG, SHG, Farmer
UG, SHG
Total:
UG, SHG
UG, SHG
UG, SHG
SHG
UG, SHG
Total:
UG, SHG
Total:
Target
Estimated Expected month &
cost (Rs. year of completion
in lakh)
(mm/yyyy)
8
1.02
0.296
0.6
0.12
2.095
4.95
7.2
16.281
1.02
0.37
1.89
0.15
1.8
5.23
0.6
0.6
9
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Page No: 72
DAHOD
4
5
Gangarda
Simaliya
Bujarg
Demonstration Plot
Floriculture Demo
Drip Irrigation
Kitchen Gardening
Horticulture Plant
Nursery
Vermi Compost
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
C
C
C
C
C
-
Crop Demonstration
Vermi Compost
Bamboo or Wooden Work
Floriculture Demo
Nursery
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
C
C
C
C
C
-
Gram Vatika
Plantation/Grass on Farm Bund
Horticulture Plant
Floriculture & Vegetation
Drip Irrigation
Crop Demonstration Plot
Nursery
Vermi Compost
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
P
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
-
Drip Irrigation
6
Zari Bujarg
UG,SHG
UG, SHG
UG, SHG
SHG
UG, SHG
UG, SHG
UG, SHG, Farmer
Total:
UG,SHG
UG, SHG
UG, SHG
SHG
UG, SHG
UG, SHG
UG, SHG, Farmer
Total:
UG,SHG
UG, SHG
UG, SHG
SHG
UG, SHG
UG, SHG, Farmer
UG,SHG
UG, SHG, Farmer
SHG
UG, SHG
Total:
Grand Total:
1.28
0.425
1.2
0.37
2.51
6.60
15
27.38
6.00
0.37
1.18
0.43
1.70
1.97
6.60
18.24
1.4
20
2.7
0.42
1.8
2.59
2.55
9.9
1
18.6
60.96
128.69
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Page No: 73
DAHOD
Table no. 40: Activities related to livelihoods by Self Help Groups (SHGs) in the project areas
S.
No.
Names of Villages
1
Gulbar
2
Jambua
4
Gangarda
5
Simaliya Bujarg
6
Zari Bujarg
Major activities of the SHGs
Average annual
No. of SHGs
income from
Name of activity
involved
activity per SHG
(Rs.)
Vermi Compost
Kitchen Gardening
Floriculture Demo
Floriculture
Kitchen Gardening
Vermi Compost
Vermi Compost
Nursery
Kitchen Gardening
Nursery
Vermi Compost
Kitchen Gardening
Floriculture
Vermi Compost
Kitchen Gardening
Floriculture
Total:
3
4
3
4
4
14
25500
40200
45000
391500
40200
25500
25500
50000
40200
50000
25500
40200
391500
30000
25500
40200
391500
1678000
Page No: 74
DAHOD
40.2Vermi compost Unit
0.23
2 Vermi (Ascenia Fatida) =
1
Construction Of compost pit cost
2
Vermi (Ascenia Fatida)
= (3*1.5)= qty 2 bed
= Rate- 1300.00
Total Amount-2600
= 9 kg
Rate=300
Amu= 2700
Page No: 75
DAHOD
3
Green Net (90%)
4
Iron Pipe
5
Organic Fertilizer
Lab our Exp
1 to 6 Total Coast
Qty 30 Smt
Rate = 50/smt
= 1500
= 60 Ft
Rate =20/Feet
Amu= 1200.00
3000 kg+ Tree Leaf
Qty = 3000 Kg
Rate = 500
Amo= 1500
Rate = 500
10,000
Outcome And Profit Details Of Vermicompost Unit
1
2
3
4
5
Vermicompost (1 st Qut ) = 4 ton =Rs. 1500, Total Amount = 6000/Vermicompost (2 st Qut ) = 5 ton = Rs. 1500, Total Amount = 7500/Vermicompost (3 st Qut ) = 5 ton = Rs. 1500, Total Amount = 7500/Vermicompost (4 st Qut ) = 5 ton = Rs. 1500, Total Amount = 7500/verms 3000/Coast of Row material and Others = Rs. 10000
Net Yearly Income = Rs. 21500
Page No: 76
DAHOD
40.3 Nursery
Sr. No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
Particulars
Pavdo (Saddle)
Tikkam (Getti)
Tagara ()
Kodadi
Water Jug
Polythene
Misc
Land Development
Cultivation
Soil Expenses
Compost
Chemical Fertilizer
Polythene Filling
Expenses
Seed Expenditure
Irrigation Expenses
Maintenance Expenses
Live Hedge Fencing
Expenses
Seeds treatment
Seed care
Qty
2
2
5
3
5
10000
-
Rate Amount
100
200
200
400
80
400
50
150
225
1125
1.5
15000
1000
Total:
18275
1000
800
800
1000
1200
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Total:
G Total:
Say:
2000
2000
1500
1500
2000
500
300
14600
32875
33000
Page No: 77
DAHOD
4.4 Vermi Composting unit for Zari Bujarg village
4.4.1 Introduction
The process of composting crop residues using earthworms comprise spreading the agricultural wastes and cow dung in layers as 1.5 m wide and 0.9
m high beds of required length. Earthworms are introduced in between the layers @ 350 worms per m3 of bed volume. The beds are maintained at
about 40 – 50% moisture content and a temperature of 20 – 30 oC by sprinkling water over the beds. The earthworms being voracious eaters consume
the biodegradable matter and give out a part of the matter as excreta or vermi-castings. The vermi-casting containing nutrients are rich manure for
the plants.
4.4.2 About the worms
Eisenia fetida, Eudrilus eugeniae, and Perionyx excavatius are some of the species for rearing to convert organic wastes into manure. The worms feed
on any biodegradable matter ranging from coir waste to kitchen garbage and vermin composting units are ideally suited to loca tions / units with
generation of considerable quantities of organic wastes. One earthworm reaching reproductive age of about si x week lays one egg capsule (containing
7 embryos) every 7 – 10 days. Three to seven worms emerge out of each capsule. Thus, the multiplication of worms under optimum growth conditions
is very fast. The worms live for about 2 years. Fully grown worms could be separated and dried in an oven to make ‘worm meal’ which a rich source of
protein (70%) is for use in animal feed.
4.4.3 Location
Zari Khurd watershed villages have lots of animals so it can become good vermi compost centre as well as good source of li velihood. Vermi Compost is
very suitable for fruit, flower and vegetable as well as cereal crops. It increases quality and quantity of product in per unit area.
4.4.4 Use
Put lack irrigation arid desert so chemical is not advisable so to increate nutritive value of soil and available farmyard manure vermi compost has more
nutrient compare to other manures and fertilizer so by the use of vermi compost we can reduce use of chemical fertilizer. Ver mi compost not only
supply nutrient but also improve quantity of hormones for plant growth, improves the soil structure leading to increase in water and nutrient holding
capacities of soil.
Page No: 78
DAHOD
4.5 Components of a Commercial Unit
4.5.1 Sheds
Zari Bujarg watershed villages have high temperature in summer so we need a shed structure for vermi compost unit. We can make it by the use of
concrete pillars because this will act as a source of income for those in the village who produce pillars. It will prevent we tting of beds due to rain on a
windy day.
While designing the sheds adequate room has to be left around the beds for easy movement of the labour attending to the filling and harvesting the
beds.
4.5.2 Vermi-beds
Scientific bed size is 75 cm – 90 cm thick depending on the provision of filter for drainage of excess water. The whole bed area should be above the
ground. The bed should have a uniform height over the entire width to the extent possible to avoid low production owing to low bed volumes. The
proper bed width should not be more than 1.5 m to allow easy access to the centre of the bed.
4.5.3 Land
About 135 square meter of land will be required to set up a vermi compost production unit in Zari Khurd watershed villages. I t should have at least 2
to 3 sheds each of about 180 – 200 sq feet. It should have a good watering arrangement and other equipments as required because moisture is very
essential for vermi compost production. We can take land from Gram Panchayat and it can be taken on lease of at least 10 – 15 years.
4.5.4 Seed Stock
This is very important thing because worms multiply at the rate of 350 worms per m3 of bed space over a period of 6 month to a year.
4.5.5 Fencing
The entire area has to be fenced to prevent the animals and other unwanted elements. These could be estimated based on the le ngth of the periphery
of the farm.
Page No: 79
DAHOD
4.5.6 Water Supply System
We have to maintain always 50% moisture content, there is need to plan for a water source, lifting mechanism and a system of conveying and
applying the water to the vermi-beds. Drippers with round the clock flow arrangement would be quite handy for continuous supply and saving on
water. Such a water supply / application system requiring considerable initial investment, however, reduces the operational c osts on hand watering
and proves economical in the long run. The cost of these items depends on the capacity of the unit and the type of water supply chosen.
4.5.7 Machinery
Farm machinery and implements are required for cutting the raw material in small pieces, conveying shredded raw material to the vermi-sheds,
loading, unloading, collection of compost, loosening of beds for aeration, shifting of the compost. Costs of providing necessary i mplements and the
machinery have to be included in the project cost.
Table no.41: Linkages developed at village level
Sr. No.
Village
Name of activity
Forward/Backward
linkage
Linkage with
Outcome
KVK/Agro centre
1
Gulbar
Demonstration Plot
2
Jambua
Demonstration Plot
3
Nimach
4
Gangarda
5
Simaliya Bujarg
Demonstration Plot
6
Zaribujarg
Demonstration Plot
Floriculture
demo/demonstration plot
Hybrid certified and
new technique
new technique
new technique
new technique
new technique
KVK/Agro centre
Hybride or certified
seed /learninig about
new farming technique
KVK/Agro centre
KVK/Agro centre
KVK/Agro centre
Hybride or certified
seed /learninig about
new farming technique
Page No: 80
DAHOD
Table no.42: Details of activities connected with vegetative cover in watershed works
Type of treatment
S. Village
No. name
1
Gulbar
Name of
structures
(i)
(ii)
Ridge Drainage
area
line
(R)
(D)
Executing
agency
(i) UG
(ii)
(ii)SHG
(i)
(iii)
Commu(iii)
Private
Forest
nity
Others
(P)
(F)
(c )
(pl.
specify)
P
F
UG
Type of land
(iii)
Land
dev.
(L)
Stone Bund
R
R
L
Nala plug
Farm bund
Field Water
Outlets
-
D
-
L
L
P
P
-
-
-
-
L
P
-
Plantation
-
D
-
P
-
Target
No. of
units
(No./
cu.m./
rmt)
Estimated cost
(Rs. in lakh)
M W O
983
5.19
Dec-14
UG
UG
1
6769
0.79
3.25
Dec-14
Dec-14
-
UG
238
5.27
Dec-14
F
UG/SHG
20000
1.00
UG
4
8.00
Dec-14
Dec-14
23.50
Dec-14
Check Wall
Total:
2
Jambua
Stone bund
Nala plug
Farm bund
Plantation
R
R
D
-
L
L
L
L
P
P
P
-
-
F
-
UG
UG
UG
417
2
2589
2.20
1.57
1.24
UG/SHG
20000
1.00
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
6.01
Dec-14
Total:
3
Field
Water
Outlets
Nimach
Farm bund
Plantation
T
Expected
month & year
of completion
(mm/yyyy)
-
-
L
P
-
-
UG
25
0.55
Dec-14
R
-
L
L
P
-
-
-
UG
2533
1.22
UG/SHG
10000
0.50
Dec-14
Dec-14
2.27
Dec-14
Total:
Page No: 81
DAHOD
4
Stone bund
Nala plug
Gully plug
Field
Water
Gangarda
Outlets
Farm bunding
Check Wall
Plantation
R
-
D
D
L
L
L
P
P
-
-
F
F
F
UG
UG
UG
1360
5
335
7.18
3.93
3.56
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
-
D
L
P
-
F
UG
553
12.25
Dec-14
R
D
-
L
L
P
P
-
-
F
UG
UG
3350
8
1.61
16.00
UG/SHG
20000
1.00
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
45.53
Dec-14
Total:
5
Simaliya
Bujarg
Stone bund
Farm bund
Field
Water
Outlets
Check Wall
Gully plug
Plantation
R
-
L
L
P
P
-
F
UG
UG
1145
3440
6.05
1.65
Dec-14
Dec-14
-
D
L
P
-
F
UG
232
4.92
Dec-14
R
D
D
-
F
F
UG
UG
6
145
12.00
1.54
UG/SHG
20000
1.00
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
27.16
Dec-14
L
L
-
-
Total:
6
Zari
Bujarg
Stone bund
Farm bund
Field
Water
Outlets
Nala plug
Check Wall
R
-
L
L
P
P
-
F
UG
UG
5787
24857
30.56
11.93
Dec-14
Dec-14
-
D
L
P
-
F
UG
2230
47.28
Dec-14
-
L
P
-
F
F
UG
UG
6
17
4.72
34.00
Plantation
R
D
D
-
L
-
-
UG/SHG
20000
4
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Dec-14
Total: 132.49
Grand Total: 236.96
Page No: 82
DAHOD
Table no.43: Details of activities in the CPRs in the project areas
S.
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Name(s) of
the villages
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya
Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Activity proposed
Target area under
the activity (ha)
Plantation
Horticulture Plant
Floriculture
Total for village:
Plantation
Horticulture Plant
Floriculture
Total for village:
Plantation
Horticulture Plant
Total for village:
Plantation
2.35
41.90
3.20
47.45
2
37.80
3.20
43
0.50
11.95
12.45
20.54
9.2
50.2
79.94
20.54
100.00
39.4
159.94
0.5
100
54
3.8
158.3
342.78
Floriculture Demo
Horticulture Plant
Total for village:
Plantation
Floriculture Demo
Horticulture Plant
Total for village:
Plantation
Horticulture Plant
Floriculture
Total for village:
Total for project:
Target
Estimated
expenditure
(Rs. in Lakh)
1.00
2.10
0.12
3.22
1.00
1.89
0.15
3.04
0.50
0.60
1.10
1.00
0.43
2.51
3.935
1.00
0.43
1.97
3.395
4
20
2.7
0.42
27.12
14.6825
Expected no.
of
beneficiaries
3045
3045
2342
2342
1943
1943
3615
3615
4090
4090
9557
9557
24592
Page No: 83
DAHOD
Table no. 44: Capacity Building Institution
S.
No.
Name of the
Training
Institute
Full Address with contact
no., website & e-mail
Type of
Institute#
Area(s) of
specializatio
n
Accreditation details
Reference Year
Trainings
No. of
trainings
assigned
No. of
trainees to be
trained
Capacity
Building,
N.M Sadguru
Training
Water And
Autonomous Programme
1
NGO
2011-12
7
183
Development
Body
Under
Foundation
Watershed
Development
Programme
Capacity
Krushi
Anand Agricultural University,
Research
Building /
2
Vigyan
Dahod – 389151, PH No –
University
2011-12
7
183
Institute
Training
Kendra (KVK)
02673-245659
Programme
# Central govt. Dept./ State govt. Dept./ Autonomous Body/ Research Institutes/ Universities/ Others (pl. specify)
$ Capacity Building/ Agriculture/ Horticulture/ Animal Husbandry/ Pisciculture/ Remote Sensing/ Water conservation/ Ground water/ Forestry/ livelihoods/
entrepreneurship development/ others (pl. specify)
Post Box – 71, Dahod –
389151, Gujarat, PH No –
0091-2673-238601, FAX0091-2673-238604, Email
Address:
nmsadguru@gmail.com
Page No: 84
DAHOD
Table no. 45: Capacity Building plan
S. No.
1
State
Project Stakeholders
Gujarat
PIA
WDTs
UGs
SHGs
WCs
GPs
Community
Total no. of
persons
5
5
544
183
58
11
200
No. of persons to be
trained
5
5
144
183
58
11
200
No. of training
programmes
3
6
9
9
5
3
7
Estimated cost
30000
60000
90000
90000
50000
30000
70000
Table no.46: Information, education and Communication Activities
S. No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Activity
Information Gathering
Street Plays
Video Shows
Pamphlets & Posters
Banners & Hoardings
Education
Executing agency
Estimated expenditure (Rs.)
Outcome
(may quantify, wherever possible)
DWDU - Dahod
DWDU - Dahod
DWDU - Dahod
DWDU - Dahod
DWDU - Dahod
DWDU - Dahod
0.2
0.85
1.15
0.6
1.1
10.9
Awareness regarding watershed
projects to the village peoples.
Page No: 85
DAHOD
CHAPTER 5 – BUDGET
Page No: 86
DAHOD
Table no. 47: Budget at a glance for the project
Sl
no
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
Budget component
Administrative costs
Monitoring
Evaluation
Entry Point activity
Institution and Capacity Building
Detailed Project Report
Watershed Development Works
Livelihood activities for asset less
Production systems and micro-enterprises
Consolidation phase
Total:
Cost requirement
% of
Amount
Budget
10
36.84
1
3.68
1
3.68
4
14.74
5
18.42
1
3.68
50
184.19
10
36.84
13
47.89
5
18.42
100
368.38
Table no. 48: Village wise- component wise budget available under IWMP
Sl
no
1
2
3
4
5
6
Village
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya
Bujarg
Zaribujarg
Total:
Activity
Livelihood
for asset
less
3.63
0.90
0.28
7.06
1.45
0.36
0.11
2.82
1.81
0.45
0.14
3.53
0.36
0.09
0.03
0.71
Watershed
development
Work
18.13
4.52
1.38
35.30
1.82
2.27
0.45
22.72
4.54
5.91
2.27
8.17
14.74
10.21
18.42
2.04
3.68
102.14
184.19
20.43
36.84
26.56
47.89
10.21
18.42
EPA
Institution
and CB
DPR
Production system
and Microenterprises
Consolidation
4.71
1.18
0.36
9.18
1.81
0.45
0.14
3.53
Total
31.90
7.96
2.43
62.12
39.99
179.77
324.18
Page No: 87
DAHOD
Table no. 49: Village wise gap in funds requirement
Sl
No
1
2
3
4
5
6
Village
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zaribujarg
Total:
Total cost
requirement
39.78
11.24
2.87
72.91
45.40
193.45
365.65
Total funds
available
under IWMP
26.46
6.66
1.99
51.57
33.60
149.17
269.45
Gap in funds
requirement
13.32
4.58
0.88
21.34
11.80
44.28
96.20
Page No: 88
DAHOD
Convergence Opportunities
Social Capital
Related
 NREGS
 TASP
 Sakhi Mandal, SGSY
(Self Employment)
NRM Related
INTEGRATED
PLANNING



Micro Irrigation
AGWR, AIBP
Horticulture and
Bamboo Making


RKVY, BRGF
State Finance
Commission
MPLAD
Others
IWMP





Irrigation
Rural Development
Forest
Agriculture
Tribal Development


Page No: 89
DAHOD
Table no.50: Details of Convergence of IWMP with other Schemes
S.
No.
Village
Activity to be carried out
Stone Bund
Nala plug
Farm bund
Field Water Outlets
1
Gulbar
Plantation
Check Wall
Demonstration Plot
Horticulture Plant
Nursery
Vermi Compost
Total:
Stone bund
Nala plug
Farm bund
2
Jambua
Plantation
Demonstration Plot
Horticulture Plant
Vermi Compost
Total:
Fund made available
to IWMP due to
convergence (Rs. in
lakh)
1.20
0.24
0.98
0.74
0.20
2.02
0.68
0.80
2.30
4.16
13.32
0.39
0.55
0.30
0.30
0.60
0.11
0.70
1.63
4.58
Scheme with which
convergence took
place
MGNREGA
Agriculture Department
MGNREGA
MGNREGA
Horticult. fDepartment
MGNREGA
MGNREGA
Horticulture Department
Reference no. of
activity/ task/
structure in DPR
Level at which decision
for convergence was
taken
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.42
Table No.42
Table No.42
Table No.42
Table No.42
Due to insufficient Grant
available in IWMP project
to cover all the activities
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.42
Table No.42
Table No.42
Table No.42
Table No.42
Page No: 90
DAHOD
3
Nimach
Field Water Outlets
Farm bund
Plantation
Total:
4
Gangarda
Stone bund
Nala plug
Gully plug
Field Water Outlets
Farm bunding
Check Wall
Plantation
Demonstration Plot
Horticulture Plant
Nursery
Vermi Compost
Total:
0.21
0.53
0.15
0.88
1.78
0.98
0.57
2.27
0.31
4.00
0.30
0.95
1.00
2.50
6.68
21.34
MGNREGA
MGNREGA
MGNREGA
MGNREGA
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.42
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.42
Table No.42
Table No.42
Table No.36
Table No.42
Page No: 91
DAHOD
Stone bund
Farm bund
Field Water Outlets
Check Wall
Gully plug
5
Simaliya
Bujarg
Plantation
Vermi Compost
Drip Irrigation
Demonstration Plot
Horticulture Plant
Nursery
Total:
Stone bund
Farm bund
Field Water Outlets
Nala plug
Check Wall
6
Zari
Bujarg
Plantation
Horticulture Plant
Crop Demonstration Plot
Nursery
Vermi Compost
Total:
Grant Total:
0.48
0.18
0.91
2.40
0.27
0.20
2.50
0.07
0.25
0.34
0.90
3.30
11.80
6.99
2.74
10.74
1.09
7.82
0.92
5.89
0.62
0.59
2.28
1.00
4.28
44.28
96.20
MGNREGA
MGNREGA
MGNREGA
MGNREGA
-
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.42
Table No.42
Table No.42
Table No.42
Table No.42
Table No.36
Table No.42
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.36
Table No.42
Table No.42
Table No.42
Table No.42
Table No.42
Table No.42
-
Page No: 92
DAHOD
Table no. 51: Public-Private Partnership in the IWMP projects
S. No.
Name of
Private Sector
Partner
Agency
Type of agreement signed
a) MoU
b)Contract
c) Any other
(pl. specify)
Financial contribution
IWMP
Private
sector
Partnership
Interventions
Expected
Outcomes
Page No: 93
Comments
DAHOD
CHAPTER 6 – EXPECTED OUTCOME
Page No: 94
DAHOD
Table no.52: Environmental Benefits
Water storage
(Cmt)
Soil loss (cmt)
Sr.
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Village
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Gangarda
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Total:
Preproject
Expected
postproject
Preproject
Expected
postproject
15
18
20
15
18
20
106.00
8.95
10
10.5
9
9
11.6
59.05
1
1
1
1
1
1
6.00
2.5
3.5
2.0
1.5
2.5
3.5
15.50
Ground water table (mt)
Open
Open
Bore
Bore
well:
well:
well:
well:
prepostprepostproject project project project
10
12
11
11
12
11
66.50
8.5
10.5
9.0
9.5
10.0
9.5
57.00
55
49
47
55
55
45
306.00
Tree cover
Area in
Ha.:
preproject
Area in
Ha.:
postproject
Tree
count:
preproject
Tree
count:
postproject
0
44
93.34
43
35 292.97
0
46
0
47
957.31
36
251.00 1343.62
0.00
5.03
15.79
0.00
0.00
51.60
72.42
0
0
0
5
4
0
9
2
2
1
21
21
1
46
Table no. 53: Status of Drinking water
S.
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Availability of drinking water (no. of months in a year)
Quality of drinking water
Names of Villages
Pre-project
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Gangarda
6-9
Expected Post project
10-12
Pre-project
Average,
Poor
Expected
Post-project
Good
Comments
Availability
will increase
up to 3 to 4
months and
quality will
become
good
Page No: 95
DAHOD
Table no. 54: Details of Kharif crop area and yield in the project areas
Sr no
Name of
village
1
Gulbar
2
Jambua
Season
Name of
crops
Pre-project
Area
Average
Yield (Qtl)
(ha)
per ha.
85.1
919.58
55.74
467.88
5.9
35.7
0.5
2.5
Kharif
Maize
(Monsoon) Paddy
Soyabean
Maize
Wheat
Rabi
(Wheat)
7.28
(Winter) Gram (Gram)
19.26
Pigeon Pea
1.4
Other
3.2
Village Total: 178.4
Kharif
Maize
279.77
(Monsoon) Paddy
128.86
Soyabean
21.92
Pigeon Pea
47.74
Other
39.23
Maize
6.92
Wheat
(Wheat)
27.48
Rabi
(Winter) Gram (Gram)
83.28
Pigeon Pea
39.7
Other
32.94
Gram (Gram)
0.2
Zaid
Pigeon Pea
0.4
(Summer)
Other
2.16
Village total 708.4
Expected Post-project
Area
Average Yield
(ha)
per ha (qtl)
127.65
83.61
8.85
0.75
1379.37
701.82
53.55
3.75
60.85
106.65
19
13.45
203.2
2547.61
788.95
149.55
190.96
146.62
28.4
10.92
28.89
2.1
4.8
267.57
419.655
193.29
32.88
71.61
58.845
10.38
91.28
159.98
28.5
20.18
304.8
3821.42
1183.43
224.33
286.44
219.93
42.6
170.1
258.85
106.95
117.45
0.8
0.8
7.5
375.59
41.22
124.92
59.55
49.41
0.3
0.6
3.24
1062.66
255.15
388.28
160.43
176.18
1.2
1.2
11.25
563.38
Page No: 96
DAHOD
Kharif
Maize
(Monsoon) Paddy
Soyabean
Pigeon Pea
Other
3
Nimach
Rabi
(Winter)
Zaid
(Summer)
Maize
Wheat
(Wheat)
Gram (Gram)
Pigeon Pea
Other
Other
Village total
Kharif
Maize
(Monsoon) Paddy
Soyabean
Other
4
Simaliya
Bujarg
Rabi
(Winter)
Maize
Wheat
(Wheat)
Gram (Gram)
Pigeon Pea
Other
Village total
200.68
78.92
0.1
29.74
10.38
10.1
2068.4
562
0.5
162
39.5
106.6
301.02
118.38
0.15
44.61
15.57
15.15
3102.6
843
0.75
243
59.25
159.9
3.14
9.36
2.24
3.88
36.3
66.9
10
17
4.71
14.04
3.36
5.82
54.45
100.35
15
25.5
0.4
2.1
0.6
3.15
348.9
99.6
30.68
21.88
0.6
7.26
279.21
750.6
216.95
108.3
4.5
44.3
523.41
149.4
46.02
32.82
0.9
10.89
418.81
1125.9
325.43
3.4
18.84
0.84
0.12
183.2
26.5
60.4
3.4
1
135.11
5.1
28.26
1.26
0.18
274.83
66.45
90.6
402.09
Page No: 97
DAHOD
5
6
Zari
Bujarg
Gangarda
Kharif
Maize
(Monsoon) Paddy
Soyabean
Other
Wheat
Rabi
(Wheat)
(Winter)
Gram (Gram)
Village total
Kharif
Maize
(Monsoon) Paddy
Pigeon Pea
Rabi
(Winter)
Project total
159.48
16.4
1429.1
9.8
14.8
15.116
1645
110.82
38.76
7.75
Maize
11.15
Gram (Gram)
0.85
Village total 169.3
3064
1999.41 239.2215
119.62
24.6
9325.59
2143.65
48
14.7
2999.12
179.43
13988.39
72
102.15
86.8
1946.93
657.14
189.45
40
55.65
2.75
189
2940.03
153.23
130.2
2920.39
985.71
284.18
60
83.48
4.13
283.5
4609.48
22.2
22.674
2467.05
166.23
58.14
11.625
16.725
1.275
253.995
4595.52
Table no. 55: Area under horticulture
S.
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Name of
Village
crop
Existing area under
horticulture (ha)
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Mango, Guava,
Pomogranate,
Gangarda
Chiku, Aamla
Simaliya
Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Total:
Area under
horticulture proposed
to be covered through
IWMP (ha)
4.05
7.71
7.01
7.88
41.9
37.8
11.95
50.2
11.77
36.21
74.63
39.4
54
235.25
Page No: 98
DAHOD
Table no. 56: Details of livestock in the project areas (for fluids please mention in litres, for solids please mention in kgs. and income in Rs.)
S.
No.
Name of
Village
1
Gulbar
2
Jambua
3
Nimach
4
Gangarda
5
Simaliya
Bujarg
5
Zari Bujarg
Type of Animal
Milch-animals
Draught Purpose animals
Animals for other purpose
Milch-animals
Milch-animals
Milch-animals
Milch-animals
Milch-animals
Total:
732
434
193
2263
Pre-Project
Yield
17085
45358
849
1009
516
562
1474
1007
353
279
384
139
115
1332
504
156
10309
15432
22086
8496
34461
108457
No.
Income
410040
1088592
370368
530064
203904
827064
2602968
Expected Post-project
No.
Yield
Income
1025
23919
608
574056
270
3168
63501
1189
1524028.8
1413
722
21605
787
518515.2
2064
1410
30920
494
742089.6
391
538
11894
195
285465.6
161
1865
48245
706
1157889.6
218
14432.6
151839.8 3644155.2
Remarks
Page No: 99
DAHOD
Table no. 57: Employment in Project area
S.
No.
1
2
3
4
5
6
Names of
Villages
Wage employment
SC
Gulbar
0
Jambua
356
Nimach
0
Simaliya Bujarg
0
Zari Bujarg
421
Gangarda
310
Total: 1087
No. of mandays
No. of beneficiaries
ST
Others Women Total SC
ST
Others Women Total
10962
0
6577 10962
0 3045
0
1827 3045
7906
169
5059
8431 99 2196
47
1405 2342
6977
18
4197
6995
0 1938
5
1166 1943
14724
0
8834 14724
0 4090
0
2454 4090
33952
32
20643 34405 117 9431
9
5734 9557
12690
14
7808 13014 86 3525
4
2169 3615
87210
233
53118 88531 302 24225
65
14755 24592
SC
0
99
0
0
117
86
302
Self employment
No. of beneficiaries
ST
Others Women Total
3045
0
1827 3045
2196
47
1405 2342
1938
5
1166 1943
4090
0
2454 4090
9431
9
5734 9557
3525
4
2169 3615
24225
65
14755 24592
Table no. 58: Details of seasonal migration from Project area
Sl.
No.
Names of
villages
1
2
3
4
5
6
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Simaliya Bujarg
Zari Bujarg
Gangarda
Total:
No. of persons
migrating
Preproject
No. of days per year of
migration
Expected
post project
300
300
225
450
750
350
2375
250
225
175
350
600
300
1900
Pre-project
Expected
post project
120
90
120
90
Page No: 100
DAHOD
Table no.59: Per capita Income
Sr.
No.
1
2
3
Village
Gulbar
Jambua
Nimach
Source of Income
864
0
Expected post
project
1014
0
112
312
582
6
0
0
115
134
93.34
582
0
0
0
115
284
0
87
287
441
22
0
0
122
195
292.97
441
0
0
0
122
345
250
722
922
225
2
0
0
867
225
0
0
0
867
Pre-project
Agriculture
Forestry
Animal
Husbandry
Casual Labour
Services
Handicraft
Business
Others
Agriculture
Forestry
Animal
Husbandry
Casual Labour
Services
Handicraft
Business
Others
Agriculture
Forestry
Animal
Husbandry
Casual Labour
Services
Handicraft
Business
Others
Page No: 101
DAHOD
4
5
6
Gangarda
Simaliya
Bujarg
Zari
Bujarg
Agriculture
Forestry
Animal
Husbandry
Casual Labour
Services
Handicraft
Business
Others
251
0
401
0
67
267
256
5
0
0
162
256
0
0
0
162
Agriculture
255
405
0
0
60
260
342
15
0
0
139
173
957.31
342
0
0
0
139
323
375
129
329
486
0
0
0
148
486
0
0
0
148
Forestry
Animal
Husbandry
Casual Labour
Services
Handicraft
Business
Others
Agriculture
Forestry
Animal
Husbandry
Casual Labour
Services
Handicraft
Business
Others
Page No: 102
DAHOD
Table no. 60: Backward-Forward linkages
Sr.
Project
No.
Type of Marketing Facility
1
2
3
Backward linkages
Seed certification
Seed supply system
4
Fertilizer supply system
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
Zari
Bujarg
Pesticide supply system
Credit institutions
Water supply
Extension services
Nurseries
Tools/machinery suppliers
Price Support system
Labour
Forward linkages
Harvesting/threshing machinery
Storage (including cold storage)
Road network
Transport facilities
Markets / Mandis
Agro and other Industries
Milk and other collection centres
Labour
Vermi compost
Pre-project (no.)
During the project
(no.)
Post-project (no.)
Local Verity
-
Hybrid
Urea, DAP
-
Bio Fertilizer, Vermi Compost
Money Lander
Rainy
30
Nothing
250
KVK
-
Bank, SHG
Irrigation
KVK
37
Employment Training
Irrigation Facilities
405
Page No: 103
DAHOD
Table no. 61: Logical Framework analysis
Project Structure
Expected Result
GOAL:
* Purchasing power of
villagers.
*
Impact assessment study
*
Living standard will
improve
* Saving and annual
expenditure of households
*
Evaluation report
*
Increase in ground water * Household assets
table
*
Comparison between
baseline survey and
evaluation report
*
Farmers will get
Irrigation during off
seasons too.
* Migration
*
Physical observation
* Cropping pattern
*
Physical Verification and
FGD with farmers
OUTCOMES:
Agricultural income will
increase
* Net area under agriculture
will increases
*
*
Total agricultural
production will increase
* Export of agricultural
products.
*
Evaluation report
*
Soil moisture content
will increase
* Presence of vegetation
cover in the project area
*
Discussion with Villagers /
Farmers
OBJECTIVE - 1
*
To minimize the
degradation of land and
to conserve the natural
resources of the project
area.
Means of Verification
IMPACT:
The income of families
will increased
*
To conserve the soil and
moisture and enhance the
income of the people of
the project area through
watershed activities
Performance Variable
Indicator
Risk/
Assumptions
Natural Disaster
(Drought) &
Political Intervention
Maintenance of the
structure after the
project completion
Page No: 104
DAHOD
OBJECTIVE - 2
*
To increase the per capita
income of BPL and
marginal farmers through
various livelihood
activities.
*
*
OBJECTIVE-3:
*
To strengthen the local
institution
Activity for Objective - 1
1. Soil and moisture
conservation works.
2. Use of advance water
conservation techniques
*
*
*
OUTCOMES:
Reduction in migration
of families from the
project area.
* Number of people
migrating for employment
opportunity
*
* Number of people engaged
in livelihood activities.
*
Physical verification/
Photographs
* Number of people
involved in self
employment activities.
*
FGDs and PRA.
OUTCOMES:
Presence of strong and
dynamic local
governance
* Number of meetings
initiated by the local
leaders.
*
People participation and
representation will
increase.
* Number of people's
organization present at
grass root level.
*
Evaluation report, FGD,
Observations
* Number of watershed,
physical structure
presents in the project
area.
* Diversified farming.
*
Physical verification
*
Discussion with Villagers /
Farmers
* Number of households
having drip irrigation
system of their houses
*
Physical verification and
PRA
Availability of
employment within the
project area.
Unemployment will
reduce.
OUTPUTS:
Completion of soil and
moisture conservation
works.
Optimum utilization of
available water
Interest of the people
Page No: 105
DAHOD
3. Modern agricultural
*
techniques for enhancing
of agricultural
productivity through crop
demonstration plot
Change in the cultivation
pattern and adoption of
new techniques in
agriculture to utilize the
maximum potential of
the land.
Activity for Objective - 2
1. Promotion of livelihood *
activities like dairy unit,
vermicompost, nursery
raising, fodder production
and garment stitching.
OUTPUTS:
People will set-up their
micro-enterprise on
demand based activities.
2. Capacity building
activities for
improvement
entrepreneurial skill.
Activity for Objective-3:
1. Organize training and
awareness programme
for Village institutions
*
2. Capacity building
workshops and exposure
visits of User Group and
Watershed Committee
*
Improved knowledge
and enhancement of
skills for self
development
OUTPUTS:
Quality of local leaders
will improve and use of
more democratic
method of decision
making.
Local leaders will take
interest to understand
the programmes and
schemes and utilize for
the benefit of the village.
*
* Number of people
migrating for employment
opportunities.
*
Observations
* Number of people
showing their interest to
set-up micro enterprise.
*
Observations
* Number of small
enterprise set-up
*
* Number of case resolved
within the locality.
*
Observations and FGD.
* Number of schemes utilize
for the benefit of the
villages.
*
FGDs and PRA
Natural Disaster
(Drought)
Page No: 106
DAHOD
3. Formation of people
organization at the grass
root level.
*
There will be proper
management of available
resources by the
people's organization.
*
There will be proper
implementation of the
projects
*
Participation of deprived * Number of deprived/ poor
section will increase
people participated in the
meeting of Gram Sabha
*
Representation of local
people will increase
* Watershed activities is
implementing smoothly
without any hindrance
* Representation of local
people will increase
Page No: 107
DAHOD
CHAPTER 7 – Quality and Sustainability Issues
Page No: 108
DAHOD
7 Quality and Sustainability Issues
7.1 Plans for Monitoring and Evaluation
A Web-based GIS System is being developed for monitoring and evaluating the project in its planning & implementation phases. The system would be
available on a public domain and can be accessed by all the stakeholders of the project. The system shows the entire state of Gujarat and all of those
areas selected over the next 10 years. Filtering allows the user to zoom onto one particular project. Details related to soil type, Land-use classification,
inhabitation etc., can be obtained village-wise. Furthermore, survey-number wise details related to ownership, irrigation source, yield etc., can also be
accessed by the users of the system. This system is being used for pooling up the details obtained from the DPR. In other words, the DPR is made
available online in the form of a database which will help the stakeholders know areas of importance viz., already treated areas/historical works in
the area, proposed areas for treatment etc., for further treatment and planning. The system would also show the satellite imageries of various years
from the project inception stage to the project closing stages. This allows the user to evaluate the effectiveness of the treatment and thereby plan
corrective measures for the project area. The system would serve as an aiding tool to the planners and Evaluators for judging the efficacy of the
project.
Yet another component of the Web-based GIS system is the Mobile based Monitoring & Evaluation System, which will help the ground staff alias
WDTs (Watershed Development Team) to transmit information from the ground level to the central server. Also , any higher-up official in charge of
the project can obtain information regarding the project area on their mobile phone by means of an SMS. The system works in t he following manner.
The WDT equipped with a GPS instrument marks the latitude-longitude information of various treatment areas during the DPR. The probable sites
are then transferred onto the central server. During the works phase, any progress in the treatment areas is reported to the server by means of an
SMS by the WDT. Similarly, any nodal officer or higher-up official can view the progress in a project by means of summarized reports generated over
frequent periods of time.
Page No: 109
DAHOD
7.2 Plans for Project management:
The Project management of any watershed programme is very important. It mainly depends upon the community organization and the village
level institutes. In Zaribujarg project, watershed committee, various user groups and SHGs have been formulated for post proj ect operation and
maintenance of assets created during project period. Major emphasis will be on equity and sustainable benefit of the project even after
implementation stage. A proper link-up will be built during project period with various institutes and capacity building organization. They will act as
a major kingpin during post implementation for scaling up the successful experience during project.
7.3 Watershed Development Fund:
The major source of financial assistance after post implementation period is watershed Development Fund.
7.4 User Charges:
Various user groups will be formed in village. These user groups will collect user charges according to the designated rules formed during the fo rmation of
user group. These funds will be transferred to the WDF funds as per these formulated rules.
Page No: 110
DAHOD
CHAPTER 8 – MAPS
Page No: 111
DAHOD
Existing Structure / Baseline Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)
Page No: 112
DAHOD
Geomoroplogy Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)
Page No: 113
DAHOD
Ground Water Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)
Page No: 114
DAHOD
Land Use / Land Cover Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)
Page No: 115
DAHOD
River Water Body Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)
Page No: 116
DAHOD
Slop Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)
Page No: 117
DAHOD
Soil Map of Project Name: Zari Bujarg (Garbada)
Page No: 118
DAHOD
Action Plan of Village Name: Gangarda (Zari Bujarg – Garbada)
Page No: 119
DAHOD
Action Plan of Village Name: Gulbar (Zari Bujarg – Garbada)
Page No: 120
DAHOD
Action Plan of Village Name: Jambua (Zari Bujarg – Garbada)
Page No: 121
DAHOD
Action Plan of Village Name: Nimach (Zari Bujarg – Garbada)
Page No: 122
DAHOD
Action Plan of Village Name: Simaliya Bujarg (Zari Bujarg – Garbada)
Page No: 123
DAHOD
Action Plan of Village Name: Zari Bujarg (Zari Bujarg – Garbada)
Page No: 124
DAHOD
Table no. 62: Abbreviations:
Sr.
No
Short
Form
Full Form
Integrated Watershed Management
Programme
2
PIA
Project Implementation Agency
3
SC
Schedule Caste
4
ST
Schedule Tribe
5
DPAP
Drought Prone Areas Programme
6
DDP
Desert Development Programme
Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment
7 MGNREGS
Guarantee Scheme
8
NREGS
National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme
9
DRDA
District Rural Development Agency
10
BRGF
Backward Rural Guarantee Fund
11
IAY
Indira Awas Yojna
12
TSP
Total Sanitation Programme
13
SGSY
Swarnjayanti Gram Swarojgar Yojna
1
IWMP
Sr.
No
Short
Form
Full Form
14
PDAY
Pandit Dindayal Awas Yojna
15
16
17
18
19
SWOT
BSY
VSY
AAY
SMY
20
IGNOAPS
21
22
23
24
25
26
BBY
TSSY
BPL
APL
NGO
OBC
Strength Weakness Opportunities and thread
Balika Samrudhi Yojna
Vidhva Sahay Yojna
Ambedkar Awas Yojna
Sankat Mochan Yojna
Indira Gandhi National Old Age Pension
Scheme
Bajpai Bankebal Yojna
Tapak Sinchay Sahay Yojna
Below Poverty Line
Above Poverty Line
Non Governmental Organization
Other Backward Class
Page No: 125

IWMP - 1 (Zari Bujarg) Final

Transcription

Similar documents

THE SURGE July 2016

Beatty Saugeen River Subwatershed

Lower Main Saugeen River Subwatershed

Proposed Protected Are a Expansion of the Maganasipi

Seine River IWMP Table of Contents - Seine

SUSTAINABLE PACIFIC GROVE APRIL MEETING

Dahod - Central Ground Water Board

Village Ecodevelopment Committee

Los combustibles fósiles liberan bióxido de carbono al quemarse e

VM - Village Market