September 2, 2003 - to go back to the Index Page
Transcription
September 2, 2003 - to go back to the Index Page
STOP ATTACKS ON YOUR INSTANT MESSENGER Memory for Your Mobile Devices EASY WAYS TO START YOUR WEB BLOG Voodoo’s Screaming Gamer Notebook www.pcmag.com T H E I N D E P E N D E N T G U I D E TO T EC H N O LO GY SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 Picture Perfect • 21 Compact & High-End Digital Cameras Tested • Photo-Editing Software • Reader Satisfaction Survey MICHAEL J. MILLER Forward Thinking N E W WAY S TO C O M M U N I C AT E THE INDUSTRY CONFERENCES I attend have always attracted early technology adopters laden with PDAs, cell phones, notebooks, and e-mail gadgets way before they became mainstream. The recent Supernova 2003 conference in Washington, D.C., was no exception. I found myself interested not only in the content of the conference but also in the technology that the attendees were using. At the conference, former FCC chairman Reed Hundt argued that the current policy of requiring the existing phone and cable companies to install highspeed connections is not sufficient to deliver highspeed lines (10 Mbps or faster) everywhere. He argued that the government should subsidize universal highspeed connections to every home in the U.S., serviced by multiple ISPs. This, he said, would be a better investment for the economy than the current requirement that all TV sets accept broadcast HDTV signals. I have serious doubts that Hundt’s idea will come to fruition, given the current economic and political situations. But the idea is certainly interesting. Other speakers discussed the difficulties in replacing the analog twisted-pair connections that run from the street into our homes, the “stupid” network (in which the intelligence is in the devices at the network’s core and edge), and the role of the FCC in set- ting telecommunications policy. All these issues sparked thoughtful debates on the future shape of the Internet and on the impact of government regulations. I was equally intrigued by how the conference was run. Although it took place in the basement of a hotel where cell phone signals couldn’t reach, all the participants were connected using their laptops and a Wi-Fi access point. The conference had not only an official Web site but also an official wiki—a shared online space where attendees could post comments. At least half a dozen people were commenting on the proceedings on their blogs, or Web logs. Attendees were discussing the conference over Internet Relay Chat (IRC). And needless to say, almost everyone was communicating via instant messaging. The software people were using was not the stuff of corporate networks. Most of it came from small companies or individuals operating on the fringe of the computer industry. The wiki was created using software from Socialtext. Some of the blogs were built with Blogger, and some people were using Six Apart’s Moveable Type. Jabber was the instantmessaging client of choice, and the debates about RSS and Echo as methods of sharing thoughts and headlines were heated. These tools still have some rough edges, but they are changing the way we work. Blogging will become even more popular when AOL Journals arrives in AOL 9.0. BLOGS FOR EVERYONE PEOPLE HAVE BEEN blogging for some time, but now it’s going mainstream. What started out as a bunch of high-tech geeks, and later political pundits, has now reached critical mass. One acquaintance of mine keeps a blog of life in the town where we live. This is particularly useful since he can update it more frequently than the local newspaper is delivered or the paper’s Web site is updated. Google’s recent purchase of Pyra Labs, maker of the popular Blogger software, has helped introduce more people to blogging. Suddenly, easy blogging tools are everywhere. In our After Hours section this issue (page 154), we evaluate several online tools that can help you get started. Blogging will become even more popular now that America Online has announced that AOL 9.0 will include AOL Journals. Blogging is a fascinating trend that will only get bigger over the next few years. www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 7 Forward Thinking MICHAEL J. MILLER WEB SERVICES BUILD MOMENTUM THE NEXT BIG wave of IT investment will go toward integrating new and existing applications using Web services protocols. Software companies have been promoting this idea for a while, but I’m just now beginning to see a lot more progress. Every business I talk to runs old applications, wants new applications, and has an ever-tighter budget. Most though not all of the legacy application developers are creating tools to expose data via XML -based Web services. Even popular sites such as Amazon, eBay, and Google are now exposing their information via Web services. Getting applications to work together is more than just supporting XML (eXtensible Markup Language). Other standards are involved in basic Web services, including SOAP (Simple Object Access Protocol), WSDL (Web Services Description Language), and UDDI (Universal Description, Discovery, and Integration). But even those aren’t enough. What really matters is the degree to which application functions can be exposed in a standardscompliant way. So different industries are now creating different flavors of XML to improve the quality of data links. They’re in the process of deciding industry-specific data exchange formats—a vital link for expanding Web services to external partners. Over the next few years, companies will experiment with Web services to tie together their applications. I expect to see some tension between the individuals and small companies that have done some of the original work on the Web and the big organizations like IBM , Microsoft, and Sun Microsystems that envision a more structured, potentially proprietary approach to Web services. Several recent developments are helping to move integration along. SalesForce.com recently launched sforce, an online application builder designed to let developers pull together new applications built on existing ones. And I’ve seen some neat ways of combining Web components, such as Above All Software’s AppBrowser. But to move Web services forward, lots of work is needed on standards, industry-specific data structures, pilot programs, and new tools. Like every other integration method hyped over the past two decades, Web services isn’t a panacea. But it could make creating, managing, and maintaining applications much easier. And that would be a big win for everyone. Starting on page 122 is the second of our three-part series on Web services. Here, we evaluate the application servers that are the core of the new platforms from all of the big IT development companies. Next month, we’ll look at the different methods for integrating applications. T H E L AT E S T I N D I G I TA L P H OTO G R A P H Y ONE OF MY favorite things to do in the summer is to visit outdoor art shows. One trend I’ve noticed in recent years is the effect of digital photography on art. My favorite photographs are taken with large-format film cameras. But more and more, I’m seeing quite interesting work photographers are doing Kodak EasyShare DX6340 with digital cameras. At a recent show, I saw great photos taken with top-ofthe-line digital SLRs and conventional digital cameras. Some of them were shot with film cameras but made excellent use of digital editing tools for extreme close-ups and color work. The photo-editing tools available today are nothing short of amazing. 8 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com To help you select the right camera and the best software package to make your photos look better than ever, check out our roundups of digital cameras (page 84) and photo-editing softPentax Optio 550 ware (page 111). You’ll be surprised at the quality that the latest compact digital cameras deliver today. And don’t miss the results of our reader satisfaction survey on digital cameras (page 94) to find out which manufacturers make the grade. MORE ON THE WEB: Join us online and make your voice heard. Talk back to Michael J. Miller in our opinions section, www.pcmag.com/miller. 䊛 Contents.1 SEP TEMBER 2, 2003 VOL. 22 NO. 1 5 www.pcmag.com/current_issue In 1991, the first fully digital camera—the Dycam Model 1—shipped, shooting at 376-by-240 resolution. C OV E R STO RY First Looks 84 34 ACT! 6.0 for 2004 35 Salesforce 36 Salesnet 36 Upshot 38 VoodooPC Envy M460 Gamebook 38 Acer TravelMate C110TCi 40 Microsoft Money Premium 2004 42 Apple iSight 42 Mapopolis GPS for the Handspring Treo 44 Nero 6 Ultra Edition 44 Kodak DCS Pro 14n 46 Canvas 9 Professional Edition 46 Sony DSC-U60 Cyber-shot U 47 Minolta-QMS magicolor 2350 EN 47 HP Color LaserJet 1500L 48 QuarkXPress 6 49 EDGE DiskGO! USB Watch Flash Drive 50 Iomega NAS P800m 50 Toshiba PCX5000 Wireless Cable Modem Gateway 56 Mathematica 5.0 56 Kid Defender L 34 Snap ••• ••• ••• Happy When it comes to digital cameras, image quality always counts more than style. But with so many great-looking models out there, you might as well consider the coolness factor, too. We’ve focused this roundup on 15 compact cameras, the most stylish group of products we’ve seen in years. We also look at 3 popular prosumer models and a handful of surprisingly affordable SLRs. ON THE COVER Stop Attacks on Your Instant Messenger page 74 ALSO IN THIS ISSUE 59 Feedback 158 Backspace Picture Perfect page 84 Voodoo’s Screaming Gamer Notebook page 38 Photo-Editing Software page 111 Memory for Your Mobile Devices page 70 Reader Satisfaction Survey page 94 Easy Ways to Start Your Web Blog page 154 www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 15 Contents.2 SEP TEMBER 2, 2003 27 Pipeline Sony brings static objects to life. 27 College students: They’ve got game. 27 Where is it unacceptable to use a cell phone? 28 Digital cameras—set to outsell traditional ones. 28 Your vibrating cell phone just got smarter. 28 Microsoft’s spam woes. 30 COMING ATTRACTIONS: 17-inch Toshiba Satellite, Samsung ML-2152W wireless IMAGE EDITING D E V E LO P M E N T TO O L S 111 Clean Up Your Image 122 Brave New Apps: The Application Servers In our continuing series on building and deploying Web services, we compare six leading application servers, the backbones for the latest enterprise Web apps. We also weigh in on J2EE versus .NET and examine caching technologies. 70 Solutions 74 Flash Memory: Pick a Card. You finally have a digital camera, MP3 player, or PDA, but which flash memory format is right for you? We make sense of the confusing array of media and standards. Security Watch: Instant messaging opens several holes in your system and leaves you open to attack. Stay vigilant to stay safe. 76 Enterprise: Blade computing scores big at the NHL’s annual draft event. 78 Internet Professional: Cookies aren’t just about invading people’s privacy. Follow this recipe to put them to work on your Web site. 80 User to User: Our experts show you how to force a Win XP crash, how to interpret scanner bit-depth ratings, and more. 16 Our redesigned Printer Product Guide features an updated Buying Guide, with everything you need to know about buying a printer. It also tells you what the best, newest, and best-selling printers are! (www.pcmag.com/printers) FIRST LOOKS printer, AMD Athlon 64, InBoxer mail filter, Kensington WiFi Finder, Eudora 6.0. 70 www.pcmag.com PRODUCT GUIDE 27 Telephone lines and red eyes won’t ruin your vacation photos again. The latest wave of midrange image-editing software can help you touch up your photos before you print them. They’re easy to use and inexpensive. Online Opinions 7 61 63 65 67 Michael J. Miller: Forward Thinking Bill Machrone: ExtremeTech John C. Dvorak John C. Dvorak’s Inside Track Bill Howard: On Technology Personal Technology 154 After Hours Blog On: We evaluate four online tools that help you create, design, and organize your personal online journal—also known as a blog. New reviews every week! Coming soon: • Hitachi G1000 PDA • Olympus E-1 Digital SLR • PhotoVista Panorama 3.0 (www.pcmag.com/firstlooks) N E W S A N D A N A LY S I S The latest technology trends: • Next-generation blogging • Spam in the crosshairs • The DVD standards war (www.pcmag.com/news) TO O L S YO U C A N U S E • Downloads: We’ve built these utilities just for you. Check out our indexed list of utilities from A to Z. (www.pcmag.com/utilities) • Discussions: Log on and participate! (http://discuss.pcmag.com/pcmag) EXCLUSIVE COLUMNS DVORAK ONLINE K Each Monday, John C. Dvorak gives you his take on what’s happening in high tech today. Visit www.pcmag.com/dvorak. ULANOFF ONLINE K And each Wednesday, Lance Ulanoff puts his own unique spin on technology. Visit www.pcmag.com/ulanoff. 156 Gear & Games Microsoft’s Rise of Nations; the Gyration Ultra GT Cordless Optical Mouse; the Skullcandy LINK; and a mini-review of four expansion packs for your favorite games. P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com Coming up: • Content management secrets • Notebook 3-D graphics shootout (www.extremetech.com) w w w. p c m a g . c o m /p i p e l i n e T E C H N O L O G Y T R E N D S & N E W S A N A LY S I S TODAY PORN, TOMORROW... Bring Me to Life Sony seeks to animate ordinary objects. For the Love Of the Game ARE YOU SHELLING OUT MONEY I ILLUSTRATION BY JOYCE HESSELBERTH; PHOTOGRAPH BY ROY MCMAHON/CORBIS [ [ magine a framed portrait movie trailer or get the nearest that comes to life and tells theater and showtimes.” Or in a person’s story when you an art gallery, you could find point a camera at it. Or picture out more about a painting. a virtual billboard visible only Sony is also working on ways to people who want to see the for video and audio to play ad. That’s the concept behind within the actual area bounded the Sony Entertainment Vision by the sending transceivers— Sensor, an imaging rather than on, say, a chip prototype that camera. In this scemay be built into nario, a picture This is future digital could come to life no ordinary within its frame. In cameras, camera phones, and perthat same scenario, imaging sonal communicayou could tilt the sensor. tions gadgets. EVS camera, and Developed by the image within researchers at the the frame would Tokyo-based Sony-Kihara take on the same slant. Research Center, the chip is a The EVS could be part of a CMOS sensor, currently a 320virtual business card, or it by 240-pixel array measuring 5 could be used to glean informaby 7 mm, with an adjacent tion while walking past booths memory array. But this is no at trade shows. There’s no reaordinary imaging sensor. son there has to be a physical Point an EVS camera at an image bounded by the sensors, object surrounded by four which makes virtual highway infrared transceivers sending billboards possible. For now, out invisible pulsed signals, the Entertainment Vision Senand it receives information. sor remains a research project. For instance, when you pass a But Sony has announced plans movie billboard that is EVSto build its own CMOS-sensor enabled, according to Shinichi foundry, and that could make Yoshimura, senior manager at real products possible in the Sony-Kihara, “You can see the next two years.—Bill Howard for somebody’s college education? If so, you may be interested in some new findings from the Pew Research Center, which suggest that college students have good game. The study reports that computer, video, and online games “are woven into the fabric of everyday life for college students,” and are much more intertwined with students’ social lives than previously suspected. Some 70 percent of college students reported playing video, computer, or online games at least once in a while, and 65 percent reported playing games regularly or occasionally. One of five said that gaming helped them make new friends and improve existing friendships. In a move that could have ripple effects in the streamingmedia arena, Acacia Media Technologies claims that it has five far-reaching patents on the transmission of audio and video “employing digitalsignal processing to achieve high rates of data compression.” The company is currently involved in legal disputes with pornography site operators over alleged infringement of the patents. The disputes may lead to confrontations with bigger streaming-media players. ALWAYS-ON COMPUTERS IBM and Motorola are devel- oping a potentially revolutionary memory technology designed for always-on computers and cell phones, which will reduce data loss, shorten time for data to load, and improve battery life. Called MRAM (magnetoresistive random access memory), it will use magnetic rather than electrical charges to store data. So when you shut off your computer, you won’t lose the data that’s in memory. Performance and reliability could benefit from that. OPEN WINDOW Gaming is encroaching on academics, though. Nearly half of the respondents admitted that games keep them from studying “some” or “a lot.” As gaming proliferates, look for that trend to grow.—Sebastian Rupley Microsoft has warned of a critical security flaw affecting each version of Windows that the company supports. The flaw lets hackers attack Windows machines. To download a free patch, visit www.microsoft.com and search for Microsoft Security Bulletin MS03-023. Mobile Manners Americans increasingly believe that talking on a cell phone is unacceptable in a car, but nearly one-third of them think it’s fine in a restaurant. What about in a movie theater? Take it outside, say the vast majority. Locations where Americans think it is acceptable to use a cell phone M 2000 2002 In a supermarket In the bathroom In the car 60% 39% 76% 53% 47% 46% On public transportation In a restaurant At the movies or a theater 52% 31% 11% 45% 28% 6% Source: Wirthlin Worldwide for LetsTalk.com, September 2002. Based on a survey of 1,001 U.S. cell-phone owners aged 18 and over. www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 27 PIPELINE Digital-Camera Milestone Feel Your Phone ard times may persist, but not for all things digital. The past two years have been the most challenging period for the photography industry in a decade, say analysts at the Photo Marketing Association (PMA), but the rise of digital cameras stands in stark contrast. In fact, this year marks a milestone year in the making: PMA researchers expect sales of digital cameras to surpass sales of traditional cameras for the first time ever (see the graphic). generating distinct vibrations for different callers, simulating the sensation of a giggle to accompany an on-screen LOL!, or creating the feel of a golf club whacking a ball in a cell-phone game. That’s all poised to become possible with a new breed of cell phones that will use haptics. Haptics technology provides tactile feedback for virtual simulations and environments—as found in vibrating joysticks for computer games, in which the vibrations vary with game scenarios. Immersion Corp. has been the longtime leader in haptics, and the company has developed haptic interfaces for everything from BMWs to medical-training tools. Recently, the company has come up with vibrotactile motors for cell phones, which could have a number of applications. The increasing complexity of cell phones and the popularity of games for them—not to mention the increasing distraction they pose in public places—have H U.S. Camera Sales Millions of cameras sold (nonprofessional market) Digital Traditional 25 20 15 10 5 * ** 03 20 01 02 20 00 20 99 20 19 97 98 19 19 19 96 0 ILLUSTRATION BY JOYCE HESSELBERTH; PHOTOGRAPH BY BILLY HUSTACE/GETTY IMAGES * Estimated. ** Projected. Source: PMA Marketing Research. 28 Overall U.S. camera sales are expected to rise from 23.7 million units in 2002 to 24.9 million units this year—nothing to write home about—but digitalcamera sales are expected to soar from 9.4 million last year to nearly 13 million this year. Part of the reason digital cameras are on such a tear is that better technology has ironed out photo quality differences between film and digital cameras. The PMA also says that digital cameras are becoming a cultural phenomenon—especially around the holidays. Mike Worswick of Wolfe’s Cameras, Camcorders & Computers in Kansas attributes the health of his business over the past year to sales of digital cameras as holiday gifts. “Although film sales will not recover,” concludes the PMA’s 2003 forecast, “digital cameras will continue to be a growth product.” For reviews of digital cameras, see “Snap Happy” (page 84).—SR Two-Fisted Privacy S IMAGINE YOUR CELL PHONE created an ideal time for cellphone manufacturers to put haptics into handsets, says Immersion’s CTO and VP of technology adoption, Dean Chang. Cell phones and pagers already include very simple vibrotactile motors, but Immersion’s motors will provide a range of responses, especially for games. “In a golf game, you would be able to feel the difference between a 300foot drive where you hit it off the sweet spot of the club, versus a shank,” says Chang. The company is not ready to make partner announcements, but Chang predicts that haptics cell phones will show up by next spring’s Consumer Electronics Show.—Lance Ulanoff ometimes a state law can extend far beyond that state. California has a tough new privacy law which makes it the first U.S. state to require businesses and government offices to notify people when any database that lists personal information experiences a security breach. According to the California Breach Law (SB 1386), businesses must disclose “any breach of the security of data to any resident of California whose unencrypted personal information was or is reasonably believed to have been acquired by an unauthorized person.” The bill is intended to curb identity theft, but businesses outside California aren’t paying attention, says Adam Rak of Symantec Corp. “The law applies not only to California companies but to companies that have customers in California,” he says. Noncompliance could bring lawsuits or FTC fines of up to $25,000 per day or both for as long as the security breach and lack of disclosure persist. Lock down that data.—SR Microsoft’s Dual Spam Duty No good spam-fighting deed goes unpunished, or that’s how it seems when you’re Microsoft. After initiating high-profile spam lawsuits and pleading with Congress for tougher regulations, Microsoft itself is taking antispam criticism. Much unsolicited e-mail appears to come from the company’s own e-mail services, including Hotmail, and critics charge that spammers have exploited Microsoft’s WebDAV tool. WebDAV (Web-based Distributed Authoring and Versioning) is an open set of HTTP extensions that lets people edit files collaboratively on a remote Web server. “It allows us to deliver a richer Webbased e-mail service,” says Larry Grothaus, an MSN product manager. Unfortunately, WebDAV also allows spammers to send more messages. Normally, a user has to fill out a Web-based form manually to create an P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com e-mail, but WebDAV lets junk e-mailers run automated scripts for often anonymous mass mailings. Critics want Microsoft to prevent spammers from exploiting WebDAV on Hotmail and MSN servers. Microsoft says that it has already instituted spam-fighting changes in Hotmail. “We have measures in place to address using WebDAV as an exploitative tool,” says Grothaus. Such measures include limiting the daily messages a free Hotmail user can send. The trouble, say analysts such as John Levine of the Coalition Against Unsolicited Commercial Email, is that you can still “sign up for lots of MSN and Hotmail accounts, then run spamware that pumps out spam via WebDAV using those accounts.” Microsoft is considering new approaches to fighting spam. In the meantime, users will keep pressing the Delete button.—John R. Quain PIPELINE That’s Entertainment Toshiba is introducing a new desktop replacement notebook, the Toshiba Satellite P25-S507, which features a 17-inch wide-screen display à la the Apple PowerBook 17-inch. The 1,440-by-900 display will make the Satellite ideal for watching DVD movies and playing games in dorm rooms or on the road. High-end features also include a built-in DVD-RW drive, 802.11a/b wireless support, and the nVidia GeForce FX Go5200 graphics chip. There will also be a Windows Media Center Edition model. —Jamie M. Bsales 64-Bit on the Desktop AMD has set a launch date—September 23—for its Athlon 64 family of desktop and notebook processors. Athlon 64 processors will be fully compatible with current and future 32-bit Windows applications and will offer an upgrade path for high-end apps that may migrate to a 64-bit platform.—JMB Price: Not yet set. Advanced Micro Devices Inc., www.amd.com. $2,100 street. Toshiba America Information Systems Inc., www.csd.toshiba.com. Print Without Wires As wireless networks become ubiquitous, look for more peripheral devices to come with wireless receivers built in. One of the first will be the Samsung ML-2152W. This 21-ppm monochrome laser printer has an integrated 802.11b NIC that lets users on a wireless network send it print jobs—no cables required. It also features a duplexer and a 500-sheet paper tray.—JMB $650 street. Samsung Electronics America, www.samsungusa.com/printer. Is It Hot? Public wireless hot spots are cropping up all over the place. But how do you know if you’re in range without booting up your laptop and searching for a signal? Try the pocket-size Kensington WiFi Finder. Just press a button and the device instantly lets you know if your location is wired for 802.11b or 802.11g. Three LEDs indicate signal strength, and the device is smart enough to filter out other wireless signals, including those of cordless phones and Bluetooth networks.—JMB 30 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com Spam Squelcher Instead of relying on rules or lists, Audiotrieve’s InBoxer will use language-analysis techniques to identify spam messages and separate them from your legitimate correspondence.—JMB $29.95 direct. Audiotrieve LLC, www .inboxer.com. Squelch Spam, Too $25 street. Kensington Technology Group, www.kensington.com. Qualcomm’s Eudora 6.0 e-mail program will feature new spam-filtering capabilities and a “content concentrator” to help you get to the heart of a rambling e-mail thread quickly.—JMB $49.95 direct. Qualcomm Inc., www.eudora.com. HANDS-ON TESTING OF NEW PRODUCTS 46 Canvas 9 Professional Edition 46 Sony DSC-U60 Cyber-shot U 47 Minolta-QMS magicolor 2350 EN 42 Apple iSight 42 Mapopolis GPS for the Handspring Treo 44 Nero 6 Ultra Edition 44 Kodak DCS Pro 14n Unwire Your Sales Force THE MAGAZINE WORLD’S LARGEST COMPUTER-TESTING FACILITY BY CAROL ELLISON Salespeople cannot be effective in today’s competitive environment if they lack up-to-date information on their customers, accounts, and pending deals. New functions and features from sales-force automation heavyweights ACT! 6.0, Salesforce, Salesnet, and UpShot enhance that effectiveness with better off- line and wireless capabilities, tighter integration with Microsoft Outlook and back-office applications, and improved security for users on the road. Since mobile sales teams tend to spend more time off-line than in the office or connected to the Internet, we looked at each product with special attention to its off-line behavior. Web-based customer-relationship management (CRM) packages—Salesforce, Salesnet, and UpShot— have off-line versions to ensure that sales teams can still access their data after they disconnect. ACT!, a traditional Windows application designed to manage sales accounts off-line, has improved Web-based access and now allows data to be shared across a network. grate and synchronize data with MAS 90/ MAS 200, Peachtree, and QuickBooks accounting systems, Outlook, and the Palm OS and Pocket PC. For 2004, ACT! 6.0 delivers some noteworthy updates, including an all-new e-mail client with HTML templates and the ability to create graphically rich HTML e-mail. There’s also enhanced integration with Outlook and support for Eudora, ACT! 6.0 for 2004 ACT! was one of the first sales- force automation tools, before that term even existed. It started out as a simple but effective contact manager and has continued to grow from there. The program now serves as a basic CRM tool for small to midsize businesses that do not require enterprise-class solutions. ACT! 6.0 covers most business situations with versions that inte34 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com Lotus Notes, and other SMTP/ POP3 e-mail accounts. You can now attach Microsoft Office documents and PDF, JPG, and BMP files to contact records and view them from within ACT! Activity look-ups let you view histories of customer contacts, and a built-in browser lets you view and attach Web pages to contacts. The optional ACT! for Web add-in tackles the needs of the mobile salesperson. The edition installs to a Web server, providing a networked ACT! database to those in the office while giving remote users real-time access to the data via the Internet (or via a direct connection into the company network). ACT! for Web calendars can be configured to include private and public activities and, depending on access, users can view and edit appointments, activities, and contact notes, as well as sales histories. Best of all, clients do not require any other ACT! product to run ACT! for Web. It runs as an off-line application, so the data is still there when they disconnect. All users are required to enter a user name and password to access the database, and administrators can set group and individual rights and even field-level security to control who sees what. (The company is finishing up an SSL security component.) Feature for feature, ACT! for Web cannot compete with the The add-in ACT! 6.0 for Web lets you share contact records across a corporate network or the Internet. Web-based enterprise CRM systems reviewed here. But it provides a robust toolset for smaller businesses on a budget. It remains one of the best out-ofthe-box sales-force automation solutions a small business could ask for. ACT! 6.0 for 2004 $229.95 direct; upgrade, $129.95; ACT! for Web, $249 per user. Best Software Inc., 888-855-5222, www.act.com. lllmm PHOTOGRAPHY BY THOM O’CONNOR 38 VoodooPC Envy M460 Gamebook 38 Acer TravelMate C110TCi 40 Microsoft Money Premium 2004 w w w. p c m a g . c o m /f i r s t l o o k s 47 HP Color LaserJet 1500L 48 QuarkXPress 6 49 EDGE DiskGO! USB Watch Flash Drive 50 Iomega NAS P800m Salesforce Salesforce.com’s offline edition is a subset of its Web-based version. Salesforce uses the metaphor of a briefcase to indicate the sales records you take with you on the road. The briefcase holds up to 500 accounts, 4,000 contacts, 4,000 opportunities, 6,000 tasks, and 6,000 events. You can display events and tasks from two months prior to two years ahead of the time you synchronize. Off-line installation is fast and easy. You simply log onto Salesforce.com and click an install button. (This took less than 2 minutes on our broadband connection.) Then from a dropdown menu, you choose whether to take all of your accounts with you, manually select the ones you want, or take sets of records linked to opportunities or activities. Salesforce resolves conflicts between Web-based and off-line files by presenting you with readonly versions to review before you select one to keep. Accounts, contacts, opportu- 50 Toshiba PCX5000 Wireless Cable Modem Gateway 56 Mathematica 5.0 56 Kid Defender lllll EXCELLENT llllm VERY GOOD lllmm GOOD llmmm FAIR lmmmm POOR nities, calendar, and task lists are exchanged. Other information in Salesforce (such as campaigns, leads, forecasts, customer inquiries, team solution strategies, the document library, and reports), deemed more appropriate for activity in the office, is available only when you’re connected to the server. All data transfers take place over a secure SSL connection, and users are authenticated stance, ask to see all deals closing this month that are greater than $1 million. You can also install a small client on the device to store queries for future use. manage multiple sales teams, workflow, and business processes. It can also automatically trigger opportunity alerts to be sent when a deal closes or certain Salesforce’s powerful new S3 (Smarter, Stronger, Simpler) edition gives IT departments a client-server application platform called sforce, which lets them integrate Salesforce with back-office applications (see the sidebar “Customize Salesforce”). S3 also provides a shared document library, richmedia HTML e-mail templates, an Outlook edition, and tools to business conditions are met. S3 delivers a total of 100 new features, including the Personal Edition S3 with basic CRM functions and Outlook integration. Salesforce.com offers Personal Edition free to individual professionals who don’t already use Salesforce. In its default configuration, Salesforce is easy to learn and use while still delivering the Salesforce’s off-line edition possesses the same easy-touse, uncluttered interface as its Web-based version. each time they log on. Sales records are stored in XML files, but the actual sales data is stored as machine-readable code to make it invisible to any intruder who attempts to read the file. For an end-to-end CRM solution, wireless editions are available for both browser-based and e-mail–based devices. Both let you enter real-time queries to retrieve the exact data you need while roaming. You can, for in- Customize Salesforce T WHAT THE RATINGS MEAN he simple but effective sforce developer tools, available for both Microsoft .NET and generic Java platforms, use today’s Web services standards to let your IT department build custom software that works with Salesforce’s Web-based CRM application. To understand how these sforce toolkits work is arguably to understand the future of service-oriented software. Using function calls built on Web services, sforce developers can log in and invoke functionality on the standard Salesforce.com-hosted CRM solution in custom applications. The sforce APIs themselves are remarkably simple, with just a handful of basic actions like executing queries, updates, and insert and delete operations. Within Salesforce.com’s hosted ASP solution resides a database for keeping track of about 30 entities needed for effective CRM. In the .NET toolkit, the sforce add-in browser tool allows .NET programmers to browse core Salesforce.com entities (such as users, products, and price books) and entities that model the sales process itself (such as leads and opportunities). Because the business logic here for each entity is lowlevel (querying, updating, deleting, and inserting records only), it will be up to your developers to build higher-level business logic on top of these basic database operations. The good news is we found that it’s easy to get started on this, at least with the Visual Studio add-in tools. — Richard V. Dragan sforce SDK for Visual Studio .NET 1.0. Price: For development, free download; for deployed applications, $50 per user per month. Salesforce.com Inc., 800-667-6389, www.sforce.com/us. llllm www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 35 FIRST LOOKS Salesnet lets off-line users subscribe to contacts, accounts, and deals. These are updated with all the accompanying appointments and tasks when the users go online. however, a bit too much is left to the individual user’s discretion to make it ideal for small businesses whose sales teams require ready-to-go functionality. Salesnet $65 per user per month. Salesnet, www.salesnet.com. lllmm functions you need on the road. Its new S3 version contains integration and customization tools that provide powerful enhancements without compromising its simplicity. Add its wireless and Outlook integration editions and you have a combination that’s hard to beat. Salesforce Personal Edition, free for one year; Team Edition, $995 per 5 users per year; Professional Edition, $65 per user per month; Enterprise Edition, $125 per user per month. SalesForce.com Inc., 800-667-6389, www.salesforce.com. llllm Salesnet Salesnet tackles enterprise CRM with a solution built on Microsoft’s .NET framework. It installs as an application on off-line users’ hard drives and stores data in a secure SQL database. It places no limitations on the number of records used off-line. Performance does not degrade as you add records, and its password-protected database offers superior security. Installation took less than 10 minutes, since wizards make setup a snap. Salesnet uses 128bit SSL security (if the admin so chooses) and three-tiered authentication, requiring users to enter their company name, user name, and a password every time they transfer data between the Web-based and off-line versions. Users can subscribe to either a full data set or to individual records that they will take offline. The .NET framework lets administrators customize fields, 36 business processes, report filters, and templates that update automatically whenever users log back on. Users may do a full refresh of all the records or synchronize only the changes. You can set Salesnet to have data that was entered via the Web-based version override the database-resident record, or vice versa. It also reports the number of records that have changed since the last refresh and how conflicts were resolved. Web-based and off-line interfaces are similar except for the home screens. You may customize a graphical dashboard displaying sales charts as your Web-based home screen. The UpShot UpShot combines the power of an SQL database with the .NET framework to manage sales records and communicate business processes and best practices to Web-based and off-line users. An administrator can create multiple views of sales data for different groups and individuals. UpShot is easy to install. Since data for the off-line edition is stored and displayed in an Excel spreadsheet, the download is basically the templates and macros you will use. The download took less than 2 minutes across our broadband connection. The spreadsheet can scale to any size but becomes more cumbersome as it grows. Once data has been downloaded, the off-line edition displays it as accounts, to dos, appointments, events, contacts, deals, and partners. Any business processes and report filters that have been linked to the data will come along, too. The powerful SQL engine that manages UpShot’s Web-based database does not follow you offline. But the familiar off-line Excel spreadsheet looks and operates surprisingly like the Webbased version and should require no additional training. UpShot opens new sheets in a multisheet spreadsheet as managers drill down through the data off-line. graphs make a nice display, but the tools to create them are primitive, and positioning the graphs is challenging. At this writing, Salesnet had announced but not yet shipped a Wireless/Instant Messaging edition designed to provide a roaming solution that salespeople can use from a car, cab, or train. Salesnet’s impressive scalability, outstanding off-line security, and host of customizable features make it a good choice for large organizations with IT staffs to configure its many options and enforce corporate IT policies. In its default mode, P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com Managers can create and automate new sales processes and workflows, route new leads to the appropriate teams and salespeople, launch follow-up procedures, and configure UpShot to send out executive alerts automatically when certain conditions are met in a deal. Salespeople can also use UpShot’s drag-and-drop tools to customize their own views of the data. UpShot provides a number of useful tools in separate spreadsheets, including a user-configurable dashboard for sales managers and a sample price-quote generator that can be adapted to your individual business. That said, the Excel component suffers from the problems you’d expect to encounter when you send a spreadsheet to do a database’s job. Performance slows as the number of records grows and, unless your IT team creates and distributes passwordprotected worksheets to your sales team in advance, it’s up to your users to password-protect the worksheets themselves using Excel’s internal security controls. UpShot $65 per user per month, plus $25 per month for off-line and MS Outlook integration editions. UpShot Corp., 888-700-8774, www.upshot.com. lllmm FIRST LOOKS The Envy of Mobile Gamers BY KONSTANTINOS KARAGIANNIS he ability to take PC gaming on the go is not recent, but it’s only recently that such gaming got good. Now VoodooPC is trying to make it near T great. As with the vendor’s desktop systems, the VoodooPC Envy M460 Gamebook is both coollooking—eight exotic colors are available—and pricey at $3,299. Despite the flashy colors, this is far more than a vanity box. Inside are two new mobile milestones: The ATI Radeon MobiliThe paint job screams, and so does the performance. ty 9600 GPU and a desktoplike 7,200-rpm 60GB hard drive. The screen is a bright, crisp, 15-inch SXGA+ unit (1 ,400–by-1 ,050). Games and video both look stellar, making this panel a perfect companion for the new Radeon, with its 64MB of 333-MHz DDR SDRAM. MPEG blockiness is nicely controlled by the chip, and 3-D performance is aided by the 12 pixel-shader operations per cycle. And the Envy proved the Radeon’s worth. While it didn’t perform like a desktop on our benchmark tests, it far outclassed most other notebooks. On 3DMark2001 SE, it hit 9,303 (with anti-aliasing disabled), while most high-end notebooks barely pass half that. Consider our results on 3D WinMark 2003 (2,656), Jedi Knight II (87 fps), and Unreal Tournament (22 fps), all run at 1,024–by-768. Performance on standard applications was greatly helped by the combination of a fast hard drive, a 2.6-GHz Pentium 4M, and 512MB of 333-MHz DDR SDRAM. With a Business Winstone 2002 score of 32.2 and a Multimedia Content Creation Winstone 2003 score of 42.5, the Envy is one of the fastest notebooks we’ve ever tested. For some, the most amazing trick that VoodooPC has pulled off is in the realm of size and weight. Approximately 1.1 inches thick and 5.5 pounds light, the Envy is pleasantly unlike the 10-pound monsters with similar screens. But the 1-hour 52minute BatteryMark score didn’t exactly set the unit apart from said competition. The sleek form factor doesn’t preclude an optical drive—a DVD/CD-RW combo is inside—or built-in 802.11a/b wireless. The tight design does put out some heat, though, barely staying within the limits of lap comfort. With a three-year warranty and upgradable design—the video card can be removed and replaced with a future ATI part —enthusiasts will have plenty of time to appreciate this machine’s colorful performance. VoodooPC Envy M460 Gamebook With 2.6-GHz Pentium 4M, 512MB 333-MHz DDR SDRAM, ATI Radeon Mobility 9600 graphics, 60GB 7,200rpm hard drive, DVD-ROM/CD-RW drive, wired and 802.11a/b wireless Ethernet, $3,299 direct. VoodooPC, 888-708-6636, www.voodoopc.com. OVERALL llllm M lllmm P llmmm V lllmm Centrino Goes Convertible BY KONSTANTINOS KARAGIANNIS cer may not have changed much in the outward design of its Tablet PC offering, but the new TravelMate C110TCi ($2,199 direct) does bring the Centrino combination of Pentium M power and Intel 802.11b wireless to the convertible. At 1.0 by 10.1 by 8.5 inches (HWD), it’s still a tiny device. It has a 10.4-inch XGA screen, weighs just 3.2 pounds, and is just a lot peppier than the original PIII-M powered version. The C110TCi achieved a Business Winstone 2002 score of 21.3 and a Multimedia Content Creation Winstone 2003 score of 26.6, making it the fastest Tablet PC we’ve seen so far. By way of comparison, the Motion Computing M1300—our previous performance leader—scored 19.0 on Business Winstone and 22.5 on Content Creation. The A 38 larger slate M1300 did deliver about an hour more of battery life than the C110TCi, which gave us only 2 hours 22 minutes on our Business Winstone 2002 BatteryMark test. At least the battery’s rapid-charge technology worked, enabling us to revive the unit in about 90 minutes. In some ways, the C110TCi is limited by its design—most notably the tiny keyboard, which has a spacebar that’s difficult to hit consistently when you’re touch typing. In slate mode, you have a choice of using a mini stylus that fits in the screen or a full-size stylus that needs to be carried separately. Go with the larger one, except for emergencies, and you’ll have much better handwriting recognition. For switching between slate P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com This Acer TravelMate converts from a laptop to a slate. and laptop modes, it’s too bad that Acer didn’t rethink the two side push-button latches that require two hands to operate. The screen is a notebook LCD with the same limitation we’ve seen in other Tablet PCs: one poor viewing angle in portrait mode. For use as a main computer, the C110TCi is probably best ordered with the optional Acer EasyPort docking station ($124), but we like that a FireWire external DVD-ROM/CD-RW combo drive is included in this package. Consider adding a better burning package than the included NTI CD Maker. Overall, the Acer TravelMate C110TCi is a solid performer thanks to the Pentium M, but it could use a few more perceptible hardware tweaks before its next incarnation. Acer TravelMate C110TCi With 900-MHz Pentium M, 512MB DDR SDRAM, 40GB hard drive, FireWire DVD-ROM/CD-RW combo, 10.4-inch XGA screen, wired and wireless Ethernet, $2,199 direct. Acer America Corp., 800-733-2237, www.acer.com. lllmm FIRST LOOKS Microsoft Money 2004: Premium Personal-Finance Package Gets Even Better BY KATHY YAKAL n this iffy economy, it’s more important than ever to know where you stand financially and where you’re headed. Microsoft Money, our Editors’ Choice among personal-finance packages last year (First Looks, September 17, 2002), is back with a raft of new and enhanced features and added services. Money 2004 doesn’t break new ground as notably as in some years past, but new and returning users will find a lot to like. The changes in Microsoft Money Premium 2004 ($80 street, not including a $20 mail-in rebate) build on an already exceptional finance manager, adding power primarily in two areas: taxes and bill paying. Microsoft also includes online bill paying, online tax prep, and other services to sweeten the pot. The Deluxe version ($60 before $20 rebate) shares most of the same features, with a subset of the extended services delivered by Premium. If you use just the core personalfinance components and won’t miss links to outside services, Microsoft still offers the Standard edition ($30 before $10 rebate). One disappointment: Current users have to pay full price to move to Money 2004; there is no special (lower) pricing if you’re upgrading. Money 2004 is an easily navigable, exceptionally competent tool for keeping track of your money. A comprehensive, customizable home page pulls together data from all of the program’s major elements, and you can toggle over to the related task page at any time. Alternate views focus primarily on content areas (accounts and bills, investing, tax, and planning). A new customizable pulldown task list lets you jump quickly to specific activities. I 40 Also new on the program’s main page is breaking news from CNBC, Kiplinger’s, and Reuters. Where appropriate, Money 2004 shifts you over to the MSN Money Web site seamlessly, providing additional integration, information, and tools. Money 2004 covers all the personal-financial bases. You can set up accounts and pay bills manually or electronically, and create and track detailed, customizable portfolios. The enhanced Alerts Center delivers breaking news and other user-defined financial information to your e-mail, cell phone, or desktop. You can also synchronize accounts and investment data with the MSN Money Web site. The product provides additional tools to analyze and maximize your investments, like a capital gains estimator and 401(k) manager. A comprehensive planning module helps you create a lifetime financial plan, and you can manage smaller elements with tools like a debtreduction planner and newpurchase wizard. Your income tax information also has a home in Money 2004, which includes a tax estimator and a deduction finder. You can create numerous flexible reports and get assistance from an exceptional help system. The Advisor FYI feature sprinkles personalized advice through the program and lets you set alerts for specific events and changes, such as an account balance getting too high or low, or when spending hits specified limits. Another nice touch: Both the Premium and Deluxe versions offer Credit Center, a centralized guide to your debt accounts and credit management. A minidebt-reduction planner and a table of your debt accounts are displayed, along with additional P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com Money 2004’s Credit Center helps you mange debt and keep tabs on your credit rating. You can have Money 2004 alert you about price moves, news, or ratings shifts on the stocks in your portfolio. resources for handling your outstanding debt. Beyond the program itself, the free services Microsoft has included with the Premium and Deluxe versions might win over fence-sitters wondering whether or not to upgrade. Add-ons include bill paying through MSN Bill Pay, online tax filing through H&R Block, credit report monitoring from Experian, and consulting advice from an American Express financial planner. If you opt for Premium, you get 24 months of MSN Bill Pay (versus 12 moths for Deluxe), and a one-year subscription (125 transactions) to GainsKeeper (www.gainskeeper.com), the highly respected portfoliomanagement site that provides analysis tools to help you optimize after-tax returns. Simply import your portfolio into GainsKeeper and it provides you with an actual Schedule D. We’ll have to wait to see the next version of Intuit’s Quicken family to judge whether current Quicken users should switch to Money, or vice-versa. But if you’re a current Money user confident you’ll stay in the fold, Money 2004 is compelling—especially if you’ll use the extra services to help offset the purchase price. Microsoft Money Premium 2004 Street price: $80. Requires: 32MB RAM (64MB recommended); 75MB hard drive space; Microsoft Windows 98, 2000, Me, or XP; Microsoft Internet Explorer 6.0 or later. Microsoft Corp., 888-218-5617, www .microsoft.com. lllll FIRST LOOKS Apple iSight: Halfway There BY SASCHA SEGAN he new Apple iSight Web camera is positively gorgeous. But as with any Webcam, the hardware is just half the story, and iSight lacks the basic software commonly included with cameras that cost much less than the iSight’s hefty $150 street price. At the very least, the iSight should collect a few design awards. The black-and-white box splits in half, revealing a dun metal, cylindrical camera nestled among an assortment of clear stands and white cables. The stands are meant to mount on or adhere to various Mac displays (both CRTs and LCDs), so you can look at the iSight face-on while you’re teleconferencing. The iSight uses a quarter-inch CCD to capture 640- by 480pixel images in 24-bit color. A dual-element, noise-canceling microphone filtered out the sound of a TV in the background while keeping voices sharp, and an auto-focus system—unusual on Webcams—brought images into sharp focus from a range of about 3 inches to 15 feet. Focusing takes a few seconds, however, and sometimes we had to wave a hand in front of the camera to activate the auto-focus. Plug the iSight’s FireWire cable into a Mac and it’s ready to go, with no drivers or configuration needed. In fact, there’s not even a CD in the box—but that’s not necessarily a good thing, as we’ll discuss below. But first, the iSight does have some strengths. First and foremost, the camera is designed to work with Apple’s iChat AV. Now in beta (and downloadable free of charge from Apple’s Web site), iChat AV is a multimedia IM application for Mac users. The final version will be included with Apple’s upcoming Panther (OS X 10.3) operating system. With a cuddly, icon-based interface, iChat AV acts as a competent IM client and allows videoconferencing in a 352-by- T 42 288 window with other iChat AV users. The iChat software and iSight hardware are tightly tied together: Close the iSight’s iris and your conference is paused. Throughout a dozen videoconferences, we were able to get an acceptable 15 to 20 frames per second using an 800-MHz iMac G4 on a broadband connection, with noticeable compression artifacts but generally clear images. The color balance tended a little towards green, but not annoyingly. Oddly, images from our iSight were mirror-flipped, rendering text unreadable. We had no trouble hearing any of our correspondents. iChat AV can’t talk to any other videoconferencing system, though, and Apple bundles none of the usual Webcam software with the iSight. You can’t manually adjust the brightness, the color balance, the white balance, or the contrast. You can’t snap still pictures with the iSight, use it as a video camera, or feed video to the Web. You also can’t use the iSight as a surveillance camera out of the box. And despite Apple’s recent push The design of the Apple iSight is the best we’ve seen in a Webcam. But the software bundle is weak (nonexistent, actually). for integration, iSight doesn’t feed into iMovie. There is third-party software for all of these functions, and the iSight worked well with half a dozen Webcam applications we tried. The iSight even plugs into PCs, where we used it with Yahoo! Messenger and NetMeeting. But on a PC, the microphone doesn’t work because it lacks a Windows driver (Apple says third parties are welcome to write such a driver). If all your friends and col- leagues sign up for iChat AV, the $150 admission price for an iSight might be fine with you. But given that the iSight costs more than any competing wired Webcam, we had hoped buyers wouldn’t need to spend even more on third-party utilities to get full functionality. Apple iSight Street price: $150. Requires: 600-MHz G3 or better, Mac OS X 10.2.5 or later, broadband Internet connection. Apple Computer Corp., 800-692-7753, www.apple.com. lllmm Find Your Way with a Treo BY BRUCE BROWN our PDA becomes a valuable navigation aid with Mapopolis.com’s GPS add-ons for most popular makes of Palm OS and PocketPC handhelds. We tested the Mapopolis GPS for the Handspring Treo ($180 street). The bundle includes a National Marine Electronics Association–compatible (and waterproof) GPS module, a Mapopolis v.5.16 PDA mapping application, and downloadable street maps for the U.S. (excluding Alaska) and major Canadian cities. The GPS add-on measures 2.5 by 1.9 by 0.9inches (HWD) and weighs 6.6 ounces. A 9-foot power adapter (for boat or car) is included, though there’s no special means of attaching the GPS to a dashboard. With the software’s icon-based navigation tools, it’s easy to view, zoom, scroll, and search Mapopolis maps, which you can customize with street colors Y P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com and street, town, and landmark names. The turn-by-turn directions feature lets you display directions as a text list or on the corresponding map. With the latter option, the GPS displays your current position on the PDA map as you navigate. The bundle worked fine on our tests with a Handspring Treo 270. The PDA application plus the Hartford, Connecticut, county map required 1,751K of PDA storage, which is noteworthy because Treos lack expansion to store map segments. But all in all, the Mapopolis GPS for the Handspring Treo is a compact accessory for road trips in unfamiliar territory. Mapopolis GPS for the Handspring Treo Street price: $180. Requires: Host PC running Microsoft Windows 98, Me, 2000, or XP; Handspring Treo PDA running Palm OS 3.0 or later with 1MB free storage (8MB free storage recommended). Mapopolis.com Inc., 216-371-1791, www.mapopolis.com. lllmm FIRST LOOKS Nero 6 Moves Ahead of the Disc-Creation Pack Nero 6 Ultra Edition’s array of new applications make it far more than a mere disc-burning program. BY DON LABRIOLA ower users have sworn by past versions of Ahead Software’s CD-creation utility. Nero 6 Ultra Edition complements the richly featured Nero disc-mastering program with a suite of applications that turn it into a full-blown contentcreation environment. The result is a surprisingly powerful and cost-effective solution for anyone who wants to produce virtually any type of CD or DVD. Despite its expanded scope, nearly all of Nero 6’s core discmastering functionality remains in its Nero Burning ROM module. As before, Burning ROM supports a broad array of disc formats and content types. It also still uses straightforward Windows Explorer–style drag-anddrop procedures and includes handy wizards that help new users set up projects and perform common disc creation chores. Nero 6 also retains several auxiliary modules. These include the Nero Wave Editor (a program for editing sound files) and Nero Cover Designer (which lets you create many types of inserts, covers, and booklets for jewel cases and DVD boxes). The suite also contains Nero Express, a newbie-friendly version of Burning ROM that features a simpler interface. P 44 Nero 6’s new modules introduce a fistful of major enhancements that include DVD authoring, video capture, system backup, and multitrack audio production. During our handson testing, we found most of the new programs to be at least adequate—and at best very good— for modest content-creation, authoring, and mastering tasks. In that latter group is the new Nero SoundTrax multitrack recording program, which provides an integrated audio production environment packed with advanced sound-editing tools. Nero BackItUp is also a gem, providing wizard-based system backup capabilities. It can perform tasks such as multiple simultaneous backups and unattended network backups on any type of Nero-supported media, and it lets you customize jobs with a good selection of filtering, prioritization, and scheduling options. Passable modules include media player and jukebox programs and an improved slide show application with basic photo-editing capabilities. All of this functionality is packed behind an intelligent task-oriented front end that boasts a seemingly endless array of customization options, a Favorites section, and the ability to notify you automatically when P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com The program’s endlessly customizable StartSmart interface provides logical, task-oriented access to its huge feature set. Ahead updates any module. (As with previous releases of Nero, all updates can be downloaded free of charge for the life of the Nero 6 product.) If all this isn’t enough, Ahead even throws in a Neato disc label applicator and a handful of blank labels. Nero 6’s biggest drawback is its very basic video-editing capabilities, which don’t even let you split a movie file into two clips. Its NeroVision Express 2 DVD/VCD-authoring module does a good job of creating animated menus, titles, and transitions, but its contentediting functions are limited to trimming the length of clips and dragging them around a timeline. If you edit video more than rarely, you’ll want a dedicated package such as Pinnacle Studio 8. We were also disappointed with the woefully deficient documentation provided for some modules, and by the fact that the program ships with only trial versions of its MP3 and MP3Pro encoders. You have to purchase full versions of these utilities separately if you want to create MP3 files. Much of the motivation for Nero 6’s increased scope was the pressure exerted when its biggest competitor, Roxio’s Easy CD & DVD Creator 6 (First Looks, March 25), added its own DVD-authoring, video-editing, sound-editing, and image-editing capabilities. We found that Creator still has a small edge in a few areas, namely image management and video editing. But in most ways, Nero 6 beats Creator at its own game, providing a broader selection of content creation modules and deeper feature sets within many of the applications. For example, Nero 6 offers much greater sound-editing functionality, more flexible backup options, across-the-board MPEG-4 support, and superior music and movie playback options. The Nero front end is far more sophisticated than Creator’s relatively simple menu system and does a better job of integrating and providing logical access to the suite’s many features. Those who consider the Roxio program’s added capabilities to be bloatware will be less impressed with Nero 6’s even larger feature set. But if you’re looking for an all-in-one toolkit that can create and burn content onto nearly any type of DVD or CD, then Nero 6 Ultra Edition is tough to beat at the price. Nero 6 Ultra Edition $99.99 direct ($69.99 download). Ahead Software Inc., www.nero.com. llllm FIRST LOOKS Kodak Camera Delivers 14 Megapixels BY LES FREED he 14-megapixel Kodak T Professional DCS Pro 14n digital SLR camera ($5,000 street) isn’t for everyone. But for professionals who need extremely high-resolution digital images, it’s a relative bargain. For the rest of us, the Pro 14n offers a peek into the next generation of digital cameras. The Pro 14n is based on Nikon’s N80 midrange 35-mm SLR camera. But the star attraction is the full-frame, 14megapixel CMOS image sensor (by FillFactory). While that megapixel rating is what probably caught your attention, pros will get excited by the “fullframe” descriptor. That’s because most digital SLRs have sensors smaller than a standard 35-mm film frame. For example, the Nikon D100’s image sensor is about two-thirds the size of a 35mm film frame. Hence lenses attached to the D100 have an effective focal length of 1.5 times the lens’s actual focal length. In practical terms, this means that an ultrawide 20-mm lens becomes a much more sedate 30 mm when mounted on the D100. This is a boon for users of telephoto lenses but a bust for landscape, nature, and architectural photographers who rely on wide-angle lenses for much of their work. On the outside, the Pro 14n looks bulky and bottom-heavy because of the way Kodak has added the electronics and battery pack to the bottom of the Nikon body. The base of the camera also serves as a second grip (with its own shutter release button) when you’re holding the camera vertically. Despite the bulked-up look, the Pro 14n is relatively light and easy to hold (although the vertical grip is a tight fit for larger hands). The controls (on the top and front sides of the camera) are inherited from the N80 body and will be instantly recognizable to Nikon users. Other Kodak controls surround the 2-inch color LCD screen on the rear of the camera. An additional monochrome LCD screen (located below the main screen) shows the camera’s status while you’re shooting and offers helpful information while you’re navigating the camera’s menu system on the main screen. A hinged door next to the status screen covers slots for CompactFlash (Type I or II) and SD/ MMC memory cards. Power is provided by a compact, lightweight lithium ion battery pack that slides into the base of the camera. We were surprised to discover that the Pro 14n takes about 4 seconds to start up. Most digital SLRs are ready to go as soon as you flip the power switch, but the Kodak recalibrates itself after every power-up and every ISO speed change. This is a major annoyance (and possibly a deal breaker) for news, sports, and nature photographers who need to be ready to shoot instantly. The viewfinder image is large and bright. Like the Nikon N80, the Pro 14n has an on-demand gridline feature that displays a grid overlay in the viewfinder. The lines help avoid tilted horizons and leaning buildings by giving you horizontal and vertical reference lines. The image quality from the Pro 14n is among the best we’ve seen from any digital camera, as the additional pixels translate Built on a Nikon SLR body, the Kodak DCS Pro 14n adds a 14-megapixel full-frame image sensor. The rear of the camera features a bright 2-inch LCD screen as well as a monochrome status screen. directly into increased resolution. We were pleasantly surprised with the Pro 14n’s excellent dynamic range, which helps keep small details in shadow and highlight areas from being lost. We got the best results shooting at ISO speeds of 80 and 100; at ISO speeds of 200 and above, the image sensor’s noise level increases noticeably. We first saw the Pro 14n as a prototype at the Photokina 2002 show nearly a year ago. That was the same show at which Canon announced its 11-megapixel EOS1Ds (“Canon Delivers Unsurpassed Pro Digital SLR,” First Looks, March 25). Although the two cameras look similar on paper—both have ultra-high resolution, full-frame image sensors, and access to a large array of lenses— they are very different in the flesh. The EOS-1Ds has a faster and more sophisticated auto-focus, better environmental sealing, and a much higher shooting speed (3 frames per second for the Canon versus 1.7 fps for the Kodak). That has made it a hit with nature, sports, and magazine photographers— that is, those who can afford its $8,000 price. On the plus side of the ledger for the Kodak unit, the Pro 14n is smaller and weighs 1.3 pounds less than the Canon model. And since it offers similar image quality (and Nikon lens compatibility) at a much lower price, the Kodak DCS Pro 14n might be the better choice for industrial, studio, portrait, and wedding photographers who won’t miss the instant-on and fast-shooting capabilities. The rest of us will just have to wait for the price of full-frame sensors to come down from the stratosphere. Kodak DCS Pro 14n $5,000 street. Eastman Kodak Co., 800-235-6325, www.kodak.com. llllm www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 45 FIRST LOOKS Canvas 9 Eases Workflow BY SALLY WIENER GROTTA n a segment dominated by Adobe Illustrator, Canvas (originally developed by Deneba but now owned by ACD Systems) carved out a loyal following among technical illustrators, design professionals, and business communicators. Canvas 9 Professional Edition ($399.95 direct) offers extensive workflow enhancements, interface improvements, and even greater precision than previous versions. Canvas 9’s interface redesign is welcome. Tool properties no longer appear in an intrusive floating palette but abide in a context-sensitive Properties Bar, which offers more options than any competitor. The Text Properties Bar, for instance, provides immediate access to all formatting and typesetting controls, with nothing hidden in menus. The Properties Bar also changes dynamically, depending upon what type of object is selected. Camera Withstands Sand and Surf tion with imaging tools. But the new floating-point coordinate BY SALLY WIENER GROTTA system (as seen in CAD proaving fun and taking grams) has replaced the underpictures at the beach lying DTP-style code, providing even greater precision and conis as American as aptrol over data. Scaling can be as ple pie, but you sure can large as a whopping 2,000 by ruin your day if you drop 2,000 miles, with a zoom ratio of your camera into the 102,400 percent. Measurements sand or water. The Sony DSC - U 60 Cybermay be as small as angstroms or microns. Every point and line of a drawing or The Sony DSC-U60 Cyberphoto is mathematically shot U is a 2-megapixel digital controllable, with concamera that is waterproof to a straints, units of meadepth of 5 feet, making it ideal surement, and pixelfor poolside shooting. level spatial coordinates all definable. shot U ($250 street) is a Despite all of its precision, devilishly clever digital Canvas 9 has a comparatively camera ideal for easy and easy learning curve. That said, safe outdoor shooting— experienced users of programs even underwater. such as CorelDraw and IllusThe cool-looking DSC-U60 trator will find that they first is designed to be held vertically have to unlearn established in the right hand. The controls methods and procedures if they (five buttons and a mode move to Canvas. switch) are easy to use. Images are saved to a Sony Memory Stick. The battery and memory card compartment are sealed with a replaceable O ring, which Sony says makes the camera waterproof to a depth of 5 feet. The DSC-U60 is a 2-megapixel camera with only two resolutions (1,632-by-1,224 or 640-by480) and a single compression level. Its fixed-focal-length, semi-wide-angle lens (which acts as a normal lens underwater) can be set to auto or Canvas 9’s interface redesign brings more of its power to the manual focus. Its four-mode surface, with greater configuration options and flexibility. flash illuminates to 6 feet. The DSC-U60 can capture up to 15 seconds of video, but it doesn’t Canvas 9 also consolidates All in all, Canvas 9 is a powerhave audio-recording capability options intelligently; its new ful tool for precision illustration or a video-out port. Presets Palette puts all colors, and layout. Technical illustraDesigned for point-andpen strokes, lines, and arrows tors in particular will find it shooters, the camera has no into one tabbed dialog. Your suits their needs better than the manual exposure settings, but most frequently accessed attrib- artist-centric competition. you can select from a variety of utes and tools are automatically Canvas 9 Professional Edition preset shooting modes: underplaced closer to the top. Direct price: $399.95. Requires: water, skin tones, outdoor activUtilizing a desktop publish- Pentium III or Mac G3 or better; ity, twilight, night scene, or vivid ing page-layout metaphor, Can- 128MB RAM; 100MB free hard drive nature (enhanced color). You vas has long used object-based space; Microsoft Windows 2000 or XP, or Mac OS X 10.2 or later. ACD can also apply black and white, editing to combine technical Systems of America Inc., 305-596sepia, solarization, and negative drawing and creative illustra- 5644, www.canvas9.com. llllm I 46 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com H special effects. Shooting the DSC-U60 is pure fun. It boots up in less than a second, recycles in 2.5 seconds, and fires five frames in 3 seconds in burst mode. Shooting underwater (we tested it in a swimming pool) was even more fun, though its small 1-inch screen meant that we had to check our settings above water before submerging. Image quality out of the water is very good: sharp, colorful, and well exposed. Shooting in bright sunlight, however, can cause flare and streaking, because the DSC-U60 has no lens shade. Underwater shots are less clear and colorful but have a funky, fun look to them nonetheless. The DSC-U60 is perfect for the seashore, lake, or back yard—anywhere you’d want a small, easy-to-use point-andshoot camera that can stand up to the elements. Sony DSC-U60 Cyber-shot U Street price: $250. Requires: USB port; Microsoft Windows 98 SE, 2000, Me, or XP. Sony Electronics Inc., 888-2227669, www.sonystyle.com. lllmm FIRST LOOKS Near-Photo Quality from a Laser BY M. DAVID STONE s a group, color laser printers have two serious disadvantages compared with ink jets: higher prices and lower-quality photo output. Price will likely always favor the ink jets, but the Minolta-QMS magicolor 2350 EN ($1,100 street) may change perceptions about inferior quality: It boasts photo output that puts many ink jets to shame. Setup couldn’t be easier, as the printer comes preloaded with its consumables. All you have to do is attach the paper tray extension and plug everything in. Connection options include USB 1.1, parallel port, and Ethernet. Running the CD installs the drivers and provides fully automated network setup, so you don’t have to know very much about networks to get the printer up and running. In most ways, the 2350 EN is a typical four-pass color laser, with one notable difference. It can A print each of its 4 colors at 16 different levels, which gives it a range of 4,096 possible colors for each printer dot instead of the usual 8 (cyan, yellow, magenta, red, green, blue, black, and white). And being able to print more colors per dot lets the printer use fewer dots to create other colors, so gradients change gradually and more smoothly. The photo output (on goodquality laser paper and laser glossy paper) qualifies as nearphoto quality. It trails the best photo output from a dedicated photo ink jet but should prove more than sufficient for brochures and the like. Text and graphics output was also very good, with text easily readable at sizes as small as 4 points in several of the fonts we test with. Speed, however, was a mixed bag. The printer managed close to its claimed speeds, printing a 100-page monochrome Word file at 15.6 pages per minute and HP’s Personal Color Laser BY M. DAVID STONE he list of color laser printers that can be considered personal printers is exceedingly short. With the HP Color LaserJet 1500L ($800 street), the list has just grown by one. The price alone is enough to make the 1500L interesting; that it also offers reasonable output quality and speed is icing. The personal nature of the 1500L goes beyond the price. USB is the only connection choice, and its paper tray holds 125 sheets—enough for no more than light-duty printing. You can add a 250sheet paper tray (or buy the LaserJet 1500 model, which includes the 250-sheet tray but is otherwise essentially identical to the 1500L). T The 1500 series is physically similar to the LaserJet 2500 that we reviewed last year (First Looks, December 3, 2002), and the printers also share the same engine. The biggest difference is that instead of rasterizing images in the printer as with the 2500, the 1500 models use your printing a 30-page file with color at 3.9 ppm. It also did reasonably well on our Excel test files, printing a singlepage color graph in 39 seconds and two pages with three graphs in 49 seconds. It was relatively slow for The engine in the Minolta-QMS magicolor 2350 EN can create 4,096 colors per dot, versus 8 for other color lasers. a laser on our 8-by-10 photos, however, taking from 2 minutes to 3 minutes, depending on the photo. But that’s still reasonable, considering that the quality is worth waiting the extra minute for. So if you want the combination of text and graphics speed, text quality that comes only computer to process the image. This can make your system unresponsive while printing, but we noticed a delay just once during our tests. Setting up the 1500 is straightforward, if a bit tedious. For each of the four toner cartridges, you have to open and close the printer cover and push a button to rotate a carousel. Output quality runs the gamut from fair to excellent. Text as small as 4 points is easily readable in many of the fonts we tested with. Colors in graphics are appropriately saturated, and photo quality is typical for a color laser (which is to say, no match for a dediA true personal color laser printer, the HP Color LaserJet 1500L delivers reasonable output at an affordable price. with lasers printers, and the near-photo quality that most laser printers can’t offer, the magicolor 2350 EN may well be your printer of choice. Minolta-QMS magicolor 2350 EN Street price: $1,100. Requires: Microsoft Windows 95 or later, or Linux, or Mac OS 9.x or later. Minolta-QMS Inc., 800-523-2696, www.minolta-qms .com. llllm cated photo ink jet). Some lines in the graphics were uneven, however, and in other graphics we saw posterization. On our tests (using a system equipped with 1.4-GHz Pentium 4 CPU), the 1500L delivered 15.5 pages per minute when producing our 100-page monochrome Microsoft Word text document. For a 30-page color document, speed dropped to 3.9 ppm. Results for our 8-by-10 test photos ranged from 45 to 58 seconds, depending on the photo. Ultimately, the Color LaserJet 1500L is a good package. But be aware that the Minolta-QMS magicolor 2300DL (also reviewed in First Looks, December 3, 2002) offers a bit more— including a network card—for the same price. HP Color LaserJet 1500L Street price: $800. Requires: Microsoft Windows 98, 98 SE, Me, 2000, or XP; or Mac OS 9.x or later; USB port. Hewlett-Packard Co., 800-752-0900, www.hp.com. lllmm www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 47 FIRST LOOKS Quark Comes to OS X BY LUISA SIMONE he big news about QuarkXPress 6 is its longanticipated support of Mac OS X. Indeed, this release of QuarkXPress has the potential to speed up adoption of OS X within the desktop publishing community. Windows users may feel that this aspect doesn’t concern them. After all, QuarkXPress has run on both Windows 2000 and XP since Version 5. But the adoption of QuarkXPress 6 on the Mac side is key to maintaining Quark’s dominance in the DTP marketplace. Not to mention, the new features in QuarkXPress 6 for both platforms are significant in their own right. There is increased efficiency in all of the major areas of the program, including file management, print output, and Web page production. This release improves workflow with a new organizational structure. A new entity called a QuarkXPress Project lets you collect multiple publication files (referred to as Layout Spaces) in one central location. The layouts can differ wildly from one another. For example, a corporate identity package could contain Layout Spaces for a business card, a letterhead, a brochure, and a Web site. Tabs along the bottom of the workspace simplify switching between the various Layout Spaces. A Project can have as many as 25 Layout Spaces, each containing up to 2,000 pages; this arrangement lets you organize small and large projects alike. Individual Layout Spaces within a project can share resources, such as style sheets, colors, and hyphenation settings. Unfortunately, a number of QuarkXPress functions—such as indexes, find/change, and drag-and-drop copy—are not supported across Layout Spaces. One new feature that is designed to work across Layout Spaces is text synchronization. Synchronized text is stored in a T 48 special palette that works much like other palettes in the program. You can click an icon (or drag) to insert text into multiple documents. Once synchronized, updating the content (but not the formatting) of the text block automatically propagates the change to all instances. There are some shortcomings. During testing we discovered that you must synchronize the entire contents of a text box, making it necessary to structure your layouts with lots of small pieces of information. Synchronization is also limited to text; images are not supported. Still, In QuarkXPress 6, tabs along the bottom of the workspace let you switch between the various documents that comprise a project. Note the new palette for synchronized text, which lists text blocks by name. You can now generate PDF files directly within QuarkXPress 6. Basic configuration options include the ability to generate smaller files by downsampling hi-res images. this is a powerful tool that lets you use the same text in totally different layouts (such as print and Web documents) with the confidence that the information will be identical in all locations. A few key enhancements to the workspace improve efficiency. For example, QuarkXPress finally has a multiple Undo command that can reverse up to the last 30 actions. And when you register the product, you receive an Xtension to display imported images at full resolution (rather than as a low-res preview). The prepress industry is moving away from using native files for output and toward P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com Adobe PDF as the standard. QuarkXPress 6 adds direct PDF output as an option. A huge convenience, this lets you prepare files for a service bureau or generate soft proofs for clients. Best of all, it saves money, because you don’t need third-party software (such as Adobe Acrobat). However, the distiller in QuarkXPress offers only basic configuration options, such as font embedding and downsampling. It can’t save PDF styles for reuse or protect documents with security features. QuarkXPress 6 now also supports composite color output and in-RIP separations, thanks to the addi- tion of DeviceN and As Is color output options. Several features introduced in Version 5 have been beefed up in this release. For example, the QuarkXPress Web authoring tools now include cascading menus, disjointed (or two-position) rollovers, and the ability to specify font families for cascading style sheets. And you can create more flexible table layouts, because you can now link the text cells in a table to one another (or indeed to any text box). QuarkXPress 6 also improves XML functionality, primarily by licensing the Xerces engine to parse XML. But be warned, there are still intrinsic limitations to these tools. For example, without the ability to generate table headers automatically or to import formatted Excel tables, QuarkXPress is still underpowered for large-scale tabular design work. And while designers may find the integrated HTML tools convenient for simple site design, QuarkXPress cannot compete with power of a dedicated HTML editor like Macromedia’s Dreamweaver. Ultimately, of course, QuarkXPress doesn’t compete with DreamWeaver; it competes with Adobe InDesign. In a feature-by-feature comparison, FIRST LOOKS QuarkXPress is clearly lacking the technologically advanced tools found in InDesign, such as robust support for OpenType (the multiline composer) and true object transparency. In addition, Adobe’s complimentary product line makes it easy to streamline the production workflow. For example, InDesign can import native Photoshop files, but you still need a third-party Xtension to bring PSD files into QuarkXPress 6. And though the price differential isn’t so significant when you amortize it over the life of the product, at $1,045 QuarkXPress 6 is significantly more expensive than InDesign ($699). Inertia—and the large pool of Quark-proficient publishing pros—may be Quark’s ace in the hole. The word in the industry is that many users did not upgrade from Version 4 to 5. Upgrading now for a few hun- dred dollars will deliver major benefits, including editable layers, HTML authoring tools, XML support, and a table editor. Furthermore, though Quark has added significant new fea- tures, the interface is remarkably unchanged. In other words, QuarkXPress 6 presents a very comfortable upgrade path to users familiar with Versions 4 and 5. In a production environment, the incremental improvements offered by QuarkXPress 6 may be preferable to the dra- matic change needed to move to InDesign. QuarkXPress 6 List price: $1,045 (upgrade from 5.0, $199; upgrade from 4.0, $299). Requires: 128MB RAM; Microsoft Windows 2000 or XP, or Mac OS X 10.1. Quark Inc., 800-676-4575, www.quark.com/products/xpress. lllmm Storage on Hand (Well, Wrist) So you think you’re cool with your USB keychain memory device? We’ve got you beat. The new EDGE DiskGO! USB Watch Flash Drive has 128MB or 256MB of built-in flash memory, with the USB connector cleverly concealed in the rubber wristband. It’s comfortable on the wrist, and a red LED at the 9:00 position signals drive activity when loading or unloading files. At a recent trade show our test unit got lots of use, moving presentations and miscellaneous files from machine to machine, and we never had to fish in our pockets or briefcase for it. The DiskGO! comes with a USB extension cable so that you can keep it right on your wrist when in use. For all that memory within, the analog watch does nothing but tell time. We’d love to see some alarm, timer, or PDA functions in a future version.—Bill Machrone EDGE DiskGO! USB Watch Flash Drive Street price: 128MB, $90; 256MB, $140. EDGE Digital Media products, Peripheral Enhancements Corp., 580-3326581, www.peripheral.com. lllmm without wires. without worries. Specia l $15 Rebat * e FREE Presentation Remote Included Without a Doubt the Most Complete Wireless Keyboard Combo Just imagine your work space completely free from the clutter of cables. Wouldn't you be more comfortable and productive with a keyboard, mouse and presentation remote you can use up to 30 feet from your computer? Let Communicator remove the wires from your desk and the worries from your next presentation. *Get $15 back when you buy this month. See www.vpcommunicator.com/PCM for details. www.vpcommunicator.com (800) 340-1331 © 2003, Interlink Electronics, Inc. All registrations and trademarks are properties of their respective owners. FIRST LOOKS Midrange NAS Device Delivers Speed BY S. JAE YANG ast year we reviewed a new crop of network-attached storage (NAS) devices targeted at small businesses (“Storage Made Simple,” December 3, 2002). If your business needs something a little more robust, consider the Iomega NAS P800m ($12,499 list) we recently tested. The price makes it reasonable for midsize businesses, and the speed and feature set are enterprise-class. The model we tested came with dual 2.4-GHz Intel Xeon CPUs, 1GB of ECC DDR SDRAM, and eight 120GB Ultra ATA-100 hard drives (adding up to almost a terabyte of storage) in a 2U chassis. The eight hot-swappable drives come configured in RAID Level 5 for a good balance of performance and reliability, but they can also support RAID 0 or RAID 1. The P800m runs on Windows Server with SAK (Server Appliance Kit), hence it’s instantly scalable. With Microsoft’s DFS, multiple Windows NAS arrays can be bound into one logical drive. Because the OS is installed on the hard drive, the P800m is less appliance-like than NASs that run an embedded Linux OS. In order to compensate for this, the P800m keeps a redundant copy of the OS. Many of the management and administrative tools are presented through the Terminal Services client running within the Internet Explorer browser via the ActiveX control. (This means the management interface cannot be fully accessed using a Netscape browser.) An administrator versed in Windows Server could manage the NAS through the Remote Desktop interface as if it were just another Windows server. The P 800m’s top cover is hinged at the middle, which makes it possible to access the hot-swappable power supplies without pulling the unit completely out of the rack. Setup L 50 was easy. Once the P800m was connected, the Iomega NAS Discovery Utility identified its IP address. If your network does not have a DHCP server, the utility lets you assign a static IP address. On our NetBench 7.0.3 test, the P800m served up files at 250 Mbps (megabits per second) through its dual Gigabit network interfaces without breaking a sweat. The throughput peaked at 24 clients and only gradually rolled off to 200 Mbps at 56 clients. (Since NetBench is a stress test that continuously bombards the file server being tested, the load imposed by the test clients equates to a load pro- duced by several times more clients in a real-world setting.) By comparison, the best performer in the entry-level NAS The Iomega NAS P800m features dual Xeon CPUs and eight 120GB hard drives in a 2U chassis. roundup peaked at 200 Mbps at 12 clients. Even more impressive was the P800m’s response time, which was at worst 5 ms, even at the maximum load of 60 clients. The entry-level NASs averaged close to 25 ms at 60 clients. So if your business needs an easy-to-configure yet robust NAS, the P800m is worth a look. Iomega NAS P800m List price: $12,499. Iomega Corp., 801332-1000, www.iomega.com. llllm Toshiba’s Home Networking Play BY BRUCE BROWN hen Toshiba told us it was releasing a home wireless gateway, we rolled our eyes. Dell and HP had also entered a field already crowded with the likes of D-Link, Linksys, Netgear, and half a dozen others. But after testing the Toshiba PCX5000 W Wireless Cable Modem Gateway ($200 street, or $149 direct after instant rebate), we welcome them to the party. Toshiba’s fullfeatured product and helpful installation wizard make for P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com an impressive one-piece smallnetwork solution. Residential gateways typically come packed with a DHCP router, firewall, 10/100 Ethernet switch, and (nowadays) an integrated wireless access point. Toshiba has upped the ante by including a DOCSIS-certified cable modem, as well as SofaWare’s stateful packet inspection. The only thing missing is high-speed wireless (namely, the new 802.11g). Toshiba’s JumpMaster Home Networking Wizard is a gem. It The Toshiba PCX5000 Wireless Cable Modem Gateway combines an 802.11b wireless access point with a cable modem. walks you through configuring each PC on your network and setting up the shared connection with your cable provider. In no time our wired and wireless PCs were connected. File transfers speeds among wired and wireless PCs were right in line with what we’ve seen from other products, as was the range. For users who need greater range, a frontmounted jack accepts an optional external antenna. If you already have a cable modem, there’s no compelling reason to buy the PCX5000 over a modem-less residential gateway except to conserve desk space—unless you can save a monthly modem rental fee from your cable provider. But the PCX 5000 delivers on its promise of easy installation and a full feature set, so if you’re about to sign up for cable Internet access and want to connect both wired and wireless computers, the Toshiba PCX5000 has a good story to tell. Toshiba PCX5000 Wireless Cable Modem Gateway Street price: $200. Toshiba America Information Systems Inc., 800-3160920, www.toshiba.com. llllm FIRST LOOKS Mathematica 5.0 Adds Up BY BARRY SIMON xactly 15 years after Mathematica’s initial release, Wolfram Research has released Mathematica 5.0 ($1,880 direct). The new version of this high-end mathematical package has one major focus: an overhaul of the engine for numerical computation. There are also changes in some symbolic elements and enhancements of Mathematica’s ability to communicate with other programs. From its start, Mathematica has been a multifaceted powerhouse with symbolic and numeric calculation abilities, superb graphics, and the capability to produce technical documents. But its core has always been its symbolic engine, with arbitrary-precision real arithmetic, exact rational arithmetic, and computer algebra. E That core requires overhead, however, and this led to Mathematica’s excelling at symbolic calculation but being only good, not great, at numeric calculation. MatLab, specifically, has always occupied the top position for number-crunching excellence. Wolfram Research clearly intends this new version of Mathematica to compete with MatLab in that area. In our testing, we found Version 5.0 dramatically faster at numeric computing than its predecessors. One calculation that took us 5 minutes in Mathematica 4.2 took only 15 seconds in this new release. The program gets its speed boost from identifying numerical calculations early to minimize symbolic overhead, from more efficient use of memory and CPU , and from vastly im- proved algorithms such as the numeric differential equation solver. Version 5 adds special handling for sparse matrix problems—long a hallmark of MatLab’s intelligence. There are also improved Reduce and RS olve algorithms. Mathematica’s numerics are now comparable to MatLab’s, but they’re not betMathematica still features superb ter. Given the differgraphics abilities and a top-notch ence in languages, symbolic engine. Version 5.0 adds a long-term MatLab competitive numeric engine as well. users won’t be tempted to switch, but Mathematica users who re- users will want to upgrade. luctantly shifted to MatLab for Mathematica 5.0 numerical calculations will find that they can stay in Mathematica now. And the numeric improvements are so spectacular that most current Mathematica Keep Tabs on Kids with Real-Time Monitor BY JAY MUNRO nowing what your kids are up to online is crucial. Actiontec’s Kid Defender ($39.95 per year) offers a unique live view of your child’s Web activities unavailable in other monitoring and filtering products we’ve seen. Along with the standard URL blocking for offensive Web sites, newsgroups, chats, and file downloads, Kid Defender’s foremost claim to fame is its realtime remote monitoring. Parents can sit by their child’s side virtually, at the office or home, seeing whatever the child sees on the screen. The product installs in two parts: a client (for the child) and a console (for the parent) that provides configuration options and a view of the child’s IM, chat, or Web-surfing activity. The parent viewer can monitor multiple machines for wellconnected families, and both parents can monitor simultane- K 56 ously. To keep screen clutter down you can configure URLs, chat, and IM screen names as trusted, so you don’t have to monitor chats with grandma or visits to Disney.com. Once you’ve registered, Kid Defender signals the Actiontec server when your child goes online. Parents open the client and watch their child’s online activities. If the parent client is minimized, a small message pops up from the tool tray. If parents prefer not to monitor in real time, they can save usage logs to view later. In our testing, we found that Kid Defender tracked everything the child client did. By default, Web sites are listed only by URL as the kids surf, but you can display the current site live. We had live display turned on, but Actiontec’s Kid Defender lets you remotely monitor a child’s Web surfing, file downloading, and IM activities in real time. You can block access to sites and newsgroups. P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com Direct price: $1,880; upgrade, $375. Requires: 64MB RAM, 345MB disk space, Microsoft Windows 98 or later. Wolfram Research Inc., 800-9653726, www.wolfram.com. llllm irritating pop-ups generated on the sites visited by the child machine were mirrored on the parent machine, so we turned off that feature. Parents can enter a list of offensive URLs and words to block. Unlike the closed proprietary lists many filtering products use, we liked Kid Defender’s open text list, which can be edited or appended easily. Although the list covers many sites, we found lots of inappropriate material left unblocked. If a parent sees something the kids shouldn’t, the parent can immediately block the URL. Parents can also control access to newsgroups and file-sharing programs. Though its filtering capabilities could be improved, Kid Defender is ideal for parents who want to be involved in what their kids are viewing, even when out of the house. Kid Defender Direct price: With two console and two client licenses, $39.95 per year. Actiontec Electronics Inc., 866-7768322, www.kiddefender.com. llllm “I’d rather pay BMG for shipping and handling on free CDs than pay a monthly fee for nothing.” R EG I ST E R I N G D I S P L E A S U R E WHAT PLANET ARE these music services from that they’d think most of us would be interested in paying outrageous sums for streaming rights—in other words, just listening to music online (After Hours, August 5, page 138)? I can do that for free at Yahoo! As for downloading burnable tracks, I’d rather spend my money on mail-order music clubs and swap CDs with my friends. If these services want my business, they are going to have to lower their prices and increase their song quantities. I want no monthly subscription fee and a small fee (less than $1) to download burnable tracks. I’d rather pay BMG for shipping and handling on free CDs than pay a monthly fee for nothing. Registration should require nothing more than a valid e-mail address, and we should be charged only for downloads. CASS CHASE work with anything other than Windows 98. A private individual wrote an interface program that lets the printer work on most Windows XP machines, but why can’t Canon’s team of engineers do the same? JAY E. MORRIS C A N ’ T H AV E I T B OT H WAYS JOHN C. DVORAK COMPLAINS about a lack of consolidation among standards, but he’s always going on about Microsoft and how it dominates the market, squashes competition, and suppresses new technology. Microsoft, for bad or good, is an overwhelmingly accepted standard. JOSH BROOKS GAMES ON THE FRINGE I JUST WANTED TO LET YOU KNOW how happy I am to see indie DERIDING IRIDER SO JOHN C. DVORAK LOVES the iRider browser, huh? He says it has “so many new features” (Inside Track, July, page 63). Okay, there’s a real-estate–eating bar on the left that lets you browse Web pages you’ve already visited. And you can download Web pages in the background. I’m still waiting for the earth-shattering innovations. I mean, I can download multiple pages using tabs in Safari and Camino for Mac OS X or Mozilla for Linux, Mac OS, and Windows. They can load in the background while I finish the content on the page I’m viewing, and I can click back and forth to compare products on different pages. Granted, I have to tell the browser to do this, but then again, I’m not stuck with hundreds of thumbnails for pages that I don’t want indexed but still have to clean up later. So where’s the innovation? Ah, here it is: iRider is Windows-only, uses Internet Explorer as its rendering engine, and uses the same bookmarks folder that IE does. Looks like iRider is just IE with some extra bloat on top. Dvorak wouldn’t know an innovation if it came up and bit him in an original way. JOSEPH PRISCO D R I V E R S WA N T E D JOHN C. DVORAK NAILED IT on driver updates (“Promises, Promises,” July, page 61). I have a Canon BJC-5000 that’s less than 5 years old. It’s in excellent working order, yet Canon can’t or won’t make it How to Contact Us We welcome your comments and suggestions. When sending e-mail to Letters, please state in the subject line of your message which article or column prompted your response. E-MAIL pcmag@ziffdavis.com MAIL Letters, PC Magazine, 28 East 28th Street, New York, NY 10016-7930. All letters become the property of PC Magazine and are subject to editing. We regret that we cannot answer letters individually. w w w. p c m a g . c o m /fe e d b a c k games reviewed in Quick Clips (After Hours, July, page 165). More and more people are turning to games from independent developers as a break from big-business titles, and it’s nice to see major publications take notice. GREGORY MICEK DVO R A K B L A STS LO O S E L I P S I WANT TO THANK JOHN C. DVORAK for his recent online column “Dangerous Phone Calls” (June 30, www.pcmag.com/dvorak) Computers, phones, laptops, and PDAs have brought us to the point where we communicate more often and more openly, but ethics and etiquette have gone out the window . People tend to forget that they sign confidentiality agreements with their employers, and they’re expected to be discreet with information about partners, vendors, services providers, and so on. One overheard statement in the wrong hands could lead to the termination of an important contract, huge lawsuits for breach of confidentiality, and of course the loss of a job. It’s time we all got back to business—the way business should be done, with discretion and etiquette. SUZETTE Y. GAUVIN Corrections and Amplifications n In our review of Kidsnet (“Parental Guidance Suggested,” July, page 163), we wrote that Kidsnet blocks all but 125,000 sites, which have been reviewed by the company’s staff. In fact, Kidsnet has reviewed 125,000 top-level domains, each of which can include dozens or hundreds of individual Web sites. n In our roundup of PDF creation tools (August 5, page 95), we mention an incorrect price for Adobe Acrobat 6.0 Professional. The correct price is $449. In the "Which Tool Is Right for You?" sidebar in that story, we mention Adobe Acrobat Essentials. The correct name of the product is Adobe Acrobat Elements, and the correct price for Elements is $28 per user. n BurnItFirst, an online music service reviewed in “Music Services: Paying the Piper” (After Hours, August 5), discontinued service on July 1, after the issue had gone to press. We regret any confusion this may have caused. www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 59 w w w. ex t re m e te c h . c o m • BILL MACHRONE ExtremeTech How Good Is Your Sound Card? W hatever you do, don’t believe the manufacturer’s specs; they’re meaningless. We’ve been testing audio performance at PC Magazine for as long as PCs have been multimedia-capable, and our results have typically shown that the published numbers are the theoretical specifications of the sound chip and do not reflect real-world performance. The actual numbers are usually far worse, for a variety of reasons. One is the huge amount of electrical noise inside a PC: Millions of transistors switch on and off at incredible speeds, each one creating tiny power spikes and electromagnetic emanations that add up to background hiss. Motherboards and expansion cards are encrusted with bypass capacitors to suppress the racket, but that’s not always enough. Cost is another factor. Some manufacturers use crummy, low-performing audio parts simply to save money. Motherboard-based solutions usually use some of your CPU power to act as a soft DSP, but the downside is that your PC may actually slow down during audio tasks, or the audio may be glitchy. Why waste high-quality audio, vendors figure, on a pair of $1 speakers in blow-molded plastic cases? That approach may make sense for a machine that will never play anything but error beeps and e-mail alerts, but it runs counter to the burgeoning trend of putting your music collection on your desktop or laptop. Good speakers can’t make up for poor audio coming from the line-out or headphone jack. You won’t know what you’re missing, however, until you hear the unbelievable quality of the sound that emanates from high-end cards such as those made by Echo Audio or M-Audio. They make a significant difference in the audio experience. I’ve run my own sweep and noise floor tests (www.extremetech .com/htyl and www.pcmag.com/htyl), as well as critical-listening tests, and the difference between stock audio components and the add-ons is striking. You don’t need a pile of test equipment or golden ears, as the hi-fi purists call them, to determine the quality of your audio. That just got a whole lot easier, thanks to the efforts of RightMark Gathering, an open-source group led by a couple of Russian programmers. They’ve created and continually enhanced the RightMark Audio Analyzer (RMAA), which lets you test your sound card with nothing more than a male-to-male mini stereo cable. You use this cable as a loopback device from your sound card’s outputs to its inputs. RMAA then tests the sound card’s frequency response, signal-to-noise ratio, dynamic range, harmonic distortion, and intermodulation distortion, and presents the results numerically and graphically. RMAA is freeware, yet it replaces $1,000-plus lab equipment that gives you the same conclusions. ExtremeTech senior analyst Dave Salvator recently put a bunch of new motherboard audio chips through their paces with RMAA and some other tools (“The State of Motherboard Audio,” July 1, www .extremetech.com/motheraudio) and found that some of the new DSP-based chips represent a dramatic improvement. Some of the better chips rival the audio performance of good sound cards and have little drain on the CPU. This is progress, but as you will see from Dave’s article, there will always be room for premium sound cards. The latest version of RMAA can even be used for speaker testing. It supports the Microphone Data File (MDF) format, which lets the software correct for the actual frequency response of a calibrated microphone. A calibrated mic might set you back $150 to $300, and calibrating an existing mic costs nearly as much. But if you don’t care about absolute frequency response, you can use an uncalibrated mic to make relative measurements. I’ve gotten loads of good information about speaker systems and amplifiers from uncalibrated mics. And once you’ve characterized a sound card’s performance, you can intersperse almost any audio equipment into the loop between the output and input. RightMark has just published another handy tool, RightMark 3D. It tests your system for hardware and software support of DirectSound, using nothing more than your ears. It also performs a CPU usage test, so you can compare the loads that different sound cards put on your system. The old SoundBlaster Live on my desktop system is kind of an embarrassment. Time to upgrade! Good speakers can’t make up for poor audio coming from the lineout or headphone jack. Bill Machrone is VP of editorial development for Ziff Davis Media. Visit his digs at www.extremetech.com. You can also reach him at bill_machrone@ziffdavis.com. www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 61 John C. Dvorak The Agony of Unresolved Standards T ake 802.11b (please!). Just as it was becoming universal, the standards gods moved on to 802.11a and 802.11g, because they offer more speed. This is just fine, but if the past is any indication of the future, then the entire wireless-networking industry will be in flux until things settle down. Think of Ethernet 15 years ago. Those of us who have experienced the growth patterns of computers, operating systems, modems, and networking gear know the agony of change. It’s made worse by the sudden speeding up of change for change’s sake. The most satisfied users of wireless networking have two things in common: a Macintosh and AirPort, an ersatz proprietary version of 802.11b. This reminds me of the satisfied users of SCSI technology: also Mac users, for mostly the same reason. Although AirPort isn’t quite as unusual as Apple’s early implementations of SCSI, it carries the same sub-rosa message: If you want to be sure that your 802.11a/b/g network runs flawlessly, then make sure all the components are from the same vendor. And make sure they were built around the same time, too. You can draw your own conclusions as to what this statement says about Wi-Fi testing and compatibility claims. I guess everyone has his own definition of compatible. On a recent trip to Seattle, I was unable to get on the Wayport network at the Sea-Tac airport with my Toshiba Portégé 4000, which has numerous annoying 802.11 idiosyncrasies. It was also unable to connect at a pricey hotel in Switzerland recently, because its encryption setup didn’t match the one on the 802.11 router. Once, I couldn’t even get a signal in a hot spot. I turned the laptop over to a techie running the network, who said, “Oh, of course it won’t work. You have to set this. Then this. Then this. Then this. There, now it works.” Hey, great! Meanwhile, we’re already hearing about how mixed networks (802.11b/g) break down left and right. And this will always be the case, especially when things get even more complicated with 802.11i—the new, secure Wi-Fi—and its lesser version (just to confuse you more), WPA, or Wi-Fi Protected Access. I guess you could group these into a new, more meaningful category of substandards. (Pun intended.) Today’s technologists have lost appreciation for the concept of standing still long enough for users to get their bearings. They need to remember that manufacturers and users can work around problems. When a popular software or hardware design is on the market longer than six months, creative workarounds begin to appear. These have always been less likely to create new problems, because they have to be written cautiously and tend to be outside the main code or design. They usually don’t fix one thing while messing up something else. But nobody will even consider developing a workaround when the code base is changing every few weeks, only to be discarded for a totally new code base that has more lines of code, weirder bugs, and security holes. I am convinced this is a result of the dot-com era, which was inaugurated largely by the Microsoft/ Netscape wars and the emergence of the fast-paced mediocre upgrade cycle. Internet time was the culprit, you might say. In fact, there was never any such thing as Internet time. As a result, we’re seeing simple lunacy and poorly-thought-out panic upgrades. Microsoft is still on this ridiculous treadmill. Instead of feeding us all these miserable Win XP upgrades (have you looked at your Add/Remove Software list recently?) while designing some new gosh-awful OS, the company should do a complete recompile of Win XP, give us each a copy, and let us live with it for a while. Microsoft recently bailed out of the stock options merry-go-round, so it doesn’t need to be growing like mad just to pump up the stock. How about giving us something stable, so we don’t have to listen to the constant carping of those arrogant Mac users? People used to say that the problem with standards is that there are too many of them. I’d argue that the problem with standards is that they wiggle too much, and right now most of the wiggling is taking place in the wireless arena. I see nothing changing, but I think people need to know that they’re on shaky ground. It’s wiggling right now! Instead of feeding us all those miserable upgrades, Microsoft should do a complete recompile of Win XP, give us each a copy, and let us live with it for a while. MORE ON THE WEB: Read John C. Dvorak’s column every Monday at www.pcmag.com/dvorak. You can reach him directly at pcmag@dvorak.org. www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 63 Inside Track JOHN C. DVORAK A re we finally about to see chips without clocks? This has been a goal of some advanced designers, and now at least two companies hope to bring some working products to market. I hope the timing is right! The two names to look out for are Fulcrum Microsystems, of Pasadena, California, and fund-seeking, London-based Self-Timed Solutions. Fulcrum is doing a RISC chip, and Self-Timed Solutions is coming out with a clockless version of the ARM chip. Every chip company is looking at this idea, since it offers new design strategies. Theorists, many from Caltech, believe that reliance on a central clock to time all the signals within a chip becomes too cumbersome as performance demands increase. A clockless architecture would surely end chipmarketing wars based on timing speeds. The Big Scare Dept.: A new development in the open-source movement needs comment. It’s called viral opensource, among other terms. Apparently, it has CEOs of more than a few software companies spooked. Personally, I think it’s a comeuppance for the ludicrous licensing overhead that we’ve been saddled with since the early days. The situation is kind of hard to follow, but essentially, some general public licenses (GPLs) say that if any code generated by a compiler gets into any commercial product, then the commercial product falls into the public domain, or into open-source, or whatever. A lawyer friend of mine described the possibilities, and they are very interesting. If you have a rogue programmer who moves some GPL code into your product, then your product may suddenly become subject to the GPL—or worse, depending on the original license. Let me take it to an extreme. Let’s say I design a compiler. In the license agreement, I clearly state that any product that uses anything created by my compiler must become public-domain. Some programmer working for you then uses my compiler, and your product has one line of my code in it. Your product is now public-domain by law, since such licenses are legal and binding. Go sue the coder—if you can find him. In a state that passes the Uniform Computer Information Transactions Act (UCITA), you may not even be able to litigate. You are just out of luck. Interesting, eh? Finding That File Dept.: Windows XP users soon realize that the OS’s search function has been changed to include only registered file types. That’s why you can’t find those old WordStar files any more. According to Microsoft, this change is meant to improve performance. To me, it makes the search function useless. There is a Registry fix that makes Win XP look at all the files, the way Windows 2000 and Windows 98 do. But why bother, when you can buy a tool that is much more powerful and versatile, such as FileLocator Pro, from Mythicsoft (www .mythicsoft.com)? A single-user license is extremely cheap, at $12.99. FileLocator Pro digs through even ZIP and CAB files. For you old-timers who are trying to find that WordStar document you lost years ago, the newest version of FileLocater Pro flips the WordStar highorder bit, so the preview window shows the text properly. The preview window is very important when you’re looking for lost files, and Win XP search without a window can be agonizing. My advice: Get FileLocator Pro. This product is a gem. Highly recommended. While We’re on the Subject of Microsoft Dept.: Can anyone out there even imagine the sheer number of Win XP error messages sent to Microsoft every day? The company must have collected billions by now. Sometimes my machine sends two or three a day. It must be a nightmare. And since I’m complaining, let me openly ask Microsoft about something that makes no sense to me. The other day, A clockless architecture would surely end chipmarketing wars based on timing speeds. I made a three-picture panorama. Microsoft Photo Editor choked on it and showed this error message: “The Image is too large (too many bytes).” The picture was merely 2.4MB. I could open it in Adobe Photoshop, PixWizard, and half a dozen other products but not Microsoft Photo Editor. Microsoft is promoting itself as the center of the multimedia universe, but the Microsoft default image editor can’t open even a relatively small image. Does this remind anyone of the concept that 640K ought to be enough memory for anyone? Just baffling. Genuinely Interesting Hardware Dept.: While playing around with wireless 802.11b gear for my column, I was seriously impressed by the D-Link AirPlus DWL-900AP+ wireless access point. I ended up installing it. What struck me was not so much its low price ($99 list) but that it can be programmed as an access point, a bridge, a repeater, or a client. It can also be used as a DHCP server. The DWL-900AP+ can run at an enhanced 22 Mbps. It has a lone RJ-45 connector and a little OS you can use to tell the thing what you want it to be. If you replace it with an access point, for example, you can program it to serve as something else. It also incorporates 256bit encryption. This, to me, is the epitome of modern gear. Geez, why buy anything else? www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 65 B I L L H OWA R D On Technology Driving the Future L ess is more, in the eyes of the Bauhaus movement. But all too often, to the PC movement, less is less. Consider when you’re struggling to find your computer’s mute key (say the boss just walked in and the music’s too loud) but your minimalist keyboard requires you to use—what was it?—Fn-End. In cases like that, you’d really prefer a dedicated mute key or a giant volume knob, even if it made the keyboard too cluttered to the designer’s eye. Score one for the forces of moderation in one of the finest computing devices ever to roll off a production line. And roll it does: the new Audi A8 L, the latest in the top-this-if-you-can class of megacars that are moving platforms for convergence technology, with 90-plus on-board microprocessors. Audi’s breakthrough is a joysticklike control knob dubbed the MMI (Multi Media Interface), which simplifies the driver’s life and removes clutter from the cockpit. Dashboards became complex in the 1990s when cars added navigation, radio/satellite-TV entertainment, his-and-hers climate controls, and adjustable suspensions. A high-end car might have 100 knobs, buttons, and indicators. In-dash LCD panels were the first step toward simplicity, with one postcard-size space to control the audio system, the climate, and possibly a navigation system. The defining moment for hard-core minimalists was the BMW 7 Series of 2001, with its haptic iDrive Controller. This force-feedback controller’s innards were engineered by Immersion Corp. (the brains behind many PC joysticks) and linked to a 9-inch LCD panel powered by Windows CE. It swept away half the controls on the dashboard, leaving you with a beautiful expanse of ash veneer. But to access features that were once a button press away, you had to slide, twirl, and press the iDrive Controller. And Microsoft’s early effort at adapting Windows to a new platform had stability issues. Audi has a better idea. The MMI controller is a big knob in the middle of the console that you turn, then press to select, just like the iDrive Controller. But this one doesn’t vibrate or slide. And the MMI has a supporting cast of buttons near the controller. Think of them as you would multimedia PC buttons that take you directly to e-mail, the Web, or a media player. On the A8 L, an outer layer of buttons takes you to eight key functions arrayed in groups of two: Radio and CD/TV, Net (OnStar but not e-mail or the Web) and Telephone, Navigation and Info, and Car and Setup. Press one and the appropriate information pops up on the 7-inch LCD panel. Buttons arranged twoand-two on either side of the controller let you finetune your selections; their changing functions are shown on the edges of the LCD panel. Just below the controller are Forward and Reverse buttons (especially useful for music) and a Return button, which works like a PC’s Esc key. Audi understands that users sometimes make mistakes and need to back up. Windows CE (now called Windows Automotive) lost out to QNX Neutrino, a real-time operating system from a company with two decades of experience in life-support systems and nuclear power plants—and few plans to run Audi’s life in the future. With Microsoft, confided one Audi manager, “You were always thinking they had plans to control more than your dashboard.” (Microsoft automotive business unit general manager Bob McKenzie says that Microsoft would like to partner with automakers on more extensive projects in the future.) Other controls make use of the LCD on an asneeded basis. When you start to turn the passengerside thermostat knob, a big temperature display comes up on-screen; tap it when you’re done and the previous display returns. Part of the reason you need a controller in a highend car is complexity. This Audi, all 4,500 pounds and $74,000 of it, has an air suspension, vent fans in the seats, parking-distance sonar, and even a powered rear sunshade. For simplicity’s sake, some of the less used controls are moved to the MMI. The A8 L still has room for improvement. For example, Japanese automakers make better navigation systems. On BMWs, the parking sonar comes with an iconic bird’s-eye view showing the car and the nearest object. And although the A8 L’s audio system has a mute button adjacent to the MMI, you can’t easily mute the navigation system voice when it gets on your nerves. Still, this car is closer to your house than Bauhaus. The Audi A8 L is one of the finest computing devices ever to roll off a production line. MORE ON THE WEB: You can contact Bill Howard directly at bill_howard@ziffdavis.com. For more On Technology columns, go to www.pcmag.com/howard. www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 67 w w w. p c m a g . c o m /s o l u t i o n s But once cameras surpassed 1 megapixel, the need for smaller, high-capacity, removable memory became clear. Flash Memory: Pick a Card Memory cards are increasingly handy and ubiquitous, but which one is right for you? BY BILL HOWARD Most digital cameras, music players, and PDAs use flash memory cards to store data. These small media cards hold anywhere from 8MB to 1GB of data, and they are remarkably inexpensive—currently about 50 cents per megabyte. At such prices, flash memory is spreading fast and even nibbling at the small-hard-drive market. With more than half a dozen types of flash memory cards available (plus USB memory keys and tiny hard drives), however, you should choose carefully. Here’s an overview of the various flash memory cards, including their underlying technologies, their uses, and their prospects for the future. If you have an interest in photography, portable audio, and file transfer, you may want to simplify your hardware shopping by focusing on no more than one or two formats, to ensure smooth transfers among your devices. WHAT IS FLASH? Apply an electrical charge to a cell in a memory chip and you change its state from 0 to 1—or 1 to 0. Remove power from a typical memory chip and it forgets the 0s and 1s. Not so with flash memory: It maintains the state of each cell when the chip powers down. There are two downsides: Flash memory cards cost more, and they are slower than traditional hard drives. Generally speaking, the transfer rate of flash memory is about 1 MBps. New technologies and interfaces can double or triple that rate, but you will pay extra for the convenience. Either way, the slowest, cheapest DRAM chip used in your PC is vastly quicker than the fastest flash memory chip available. That’s why small hard drives live on. The market for flash memory cards evolved with the advent of digital cameras in the mid-1990s. At the time, Sony Mavica cameras, which have floppy disk drives in their back panels, were vastly preferred over those with proprietary serial cables. SmartMedia (SM). The first standardsbased memory cards to appear, SmartMedia units are about as thick as playing cards. But the deck is stacked against the SmartMedia card, because it has the biggest footprint (about 2.7 square inches, compared with Secure Digital’s 1.2 square inches), and its flexibility makes it vulnerable to damage. It has no controller to let your PC treat it as a standard hard drive, so you must pay extra for a PC Card adapter (about $25). Also, some devices won’t work with cards larger than about 16MB or 32MB. SmartMedia’s design limits it to 128MB. Fuji and Olympus used to be the biggest backers of SmartMedia, but now they are making the transition to their own format called xD-Picture Card. Expect to see few if any new devices using SmartMedia. SmartMedia card dimensions: 1.8 by 1.5 by 0.06 inches (HWD). Maximum capacity: 128MB. MultiMediaCard (MMC). Along with SmartMedia, MMC was the other early memory Flash Memory Format Support If you own multiple devices, try to standardize on one flash memory type. Memory Stick (MS) and Secure Digital (SD) are your best bets—with CompactFlash as a secondary option. MMC technology is being phased out, but its media fit in SD slots. MS Duo and miniSD media require an adapter to fit into devices that accept their full-size counterparts. Here we’ve listed support among major vendors. DIGITAL CAMERAS NOTEBOOKS PDAs MUSIC PLAYERS CAR STEREOS CompactFlash Canon*, HP, Kodak*, Nikon IBM Dell, HP/Compaq, Toshiba Frontier Labs Blaupunkt Memory Stick Konica, Sony Samsung, Sharp, Sony Sony Sony Alpine, Pioneer, Sony Secure Digital Casio, Contax , HP/Compaq, Kodak, Konica, Kyocera, Minolta, Panasonic, Pentax, Samsung, Toshiba IBM, Panasonic, Toshiba Dell, HP/Compaq, Palm, Toshiba Panasonic, RCA Panasonic Fuji*, Olympus*, Samsung N/A N/A Digitalway, Rio, Samsung N/A Fuji, Olympus N/A N/A N/A N/A SmartMedia xD-Picture Card * The company is phasing out this media type, or support is available only in older products. N/A—Not applicable: No products in this group support the media type. SOLUTIONS How Thin Clients Avoid 74 Security Watch: IM vulnerabilities. To keep the NHL draft running smoothly all the processing happening behind the clients on each team table, two blades r Should one blade fail the others pick up 76 Enterprise: Hockey’s new blade servers. <?php setcookie ("been_here", "yes", time() + 604800); ?> 78 Internet Professional: Make some cookies. 79 User to User: Tips and tricks. M A K I N G T E C H N O L O G Y W O R K F O R YO U Flash Forecast Projected sales in 2007: 315 million cards According to research firm IDC, flash memory card sales will increase from about 100 million units this year to 315 million annually in 2007. Secure Digital and miniSD cards will own more than half the market in 2007, followed by the Memory Stick formats. CompactFlash, the leader at the turn of the decade, will slide in sales, and SmartMedia will virtually disappear. Source: IDC, June 2003. standard. It’s less damage-prone because of its rigid plastic shell. It has the same footprint and pin-out as its successor, the Secure Digital (SD) card. MMCs fit in SD devices but not the other way around (because SD cards are thicker). SD music players typically won’t play audio from an MMC, because SD players require encrypted music. Most companies are currently phasing out MMC devices. MMC loyalists are backing a format called RS MMC, which is essentially miniSD (see below) but half as thick; its fate is uncertain. MMC dimensions: 1.2 by 0.9 by 0.05 inches. RS MMC dimensions: 0.7 by 0.9 by 0.05 inches. Current maximum capacity: 128MB. Projected capacity by 4Q 2004: MMC, 256MB; RS MMC, 512MB. CompactFlash (CF). CF is the aging but far- from-dead flash memory champion. More devices currently use CF than any other media type. Its future likely lies in professional digital cameras that need massive capacity—4GB CF cards are becoming available—and whose users don’t mind the size of CF cards (roughly half of a PC Card). Makers of consumer and advanced amateur cameras—led by Kodak—are moving to smaller SD cards, but pros will stick with CF. Most CF cards are Type II, which are as thick as PC Cards. CompactFlash card dimensions: 1.4 by 1.7 by 0.2 inches. Current maximum capacity: 4GB. Projected capacity by 4Q 2004: 8GB to 16GB. PC Card memory. Type II (standardthickness) PC Cards had some popularity among users who wanted more capacity miniSD 48% Memory Stick Duo 29% Secure Digital 8% Memory Stick Pro 6% CompactFlash 4% MultiMediaCard (MMC) 2% xD-Picture Card 2% Smart Media Others 0.01% 1% than CF cards supply. But these cards were never used in cameras or audio devices, and now that CF and USB keys have adequate capacity, there’s not much call for PC Card flash memory outside of specialized markets. The highest available capacity is 2GB (for $1,000 to $2,000); CF cards are already there and headed for 4GB. PC Card dimensions: 3.4 by 2.1 by 0.2 inches. Current maximum capacity: 2GB. Projected capacity by 4Q 2004: 4GB. Memory Stick. Sony created and supports Sony offers a bank-switched Memory Stick with Memory Select, two banks of 128MB you access by flipping a switch. To reach beyond 128MB of contiguous memory, Sony offers Memory Stick Pro—now at 1GB—but it’s generally not backward-compatible, even though it physically fits in the Memory Stick slots of older devices. (Every kind of Memory Stick works in a Memory Stick Pro slot, directly or with an adapter.) If you live in an all-Sony world, the convenience is outstanding: You can off-load video clips and stills from a Sony DV camcorder and show them on a Sony TV or carry them on a Sony Clié handheld. Memory Stick (original, Select, and Pro) dimensions: 2.0 by 0.8 by 0.1 inches. Memory Stick Duo dimensions: 1.2 by 0.8 by 0.06 inches. Maximum capacity: original, Duo, 128MB; Select, 256MB; Pro, 1GB. Projected capacity by 4Q 2004: Duo, 512MB; Pro, 2GB. Secure Digital (SD). Secure Digital has the broadest support and brightest future. The cards are very small, however, so they’re easy to lose. For audio buffs, the biggest drawback is that SD players, like Memory Stick players, require you to check out music from your PC, and the conversion process can be slow. SD is second only to CF in capacity, with projections of 16GB by the end of 2005. A number of notebooks have added dedicated SD slots as well. An even smaller miniSD card is also available, primarily for use in cell phones, with cameras and music players coming later. Stick it in an adapter and it fits in any SD slot. the Memory Stick format across its vast product line, and several other vendors offer Memory Stick products as well. Memory Stick was introduced in 1999 and quickly grew to constitute about a quarter of the flash memory market. The standard has resulted in a confusing array of devices all called Memory Stick. First, there is Memory Stick, which is limited to 128MB. It comes in regular and OpenMG (Magic Gate) versions; only the latter can handle audio files. A tinier version, Memory Stick Duo, is currently used in cell phones, and there are plans to include compatibility with digital cameras and music players. The Memory Stick Duo is TOP ROW: PC Card hard drive (left), USB memory key. only a bit smaller than an SD BOTTOM ROW (left to right): IBM Microdrive, Compactcard. Flash card, Memory Stick, Secure Digital card, miniSD To address the limited card, Memory Stick Duo, SmartMedia card. capacity of Memory Stick, www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 71 SOLUTIONS Secure Digital dimensions: 1.2 by 0.9 by 0.07 inches. miniSD: 0.8 by 0.8 by 0.05 inches. Maximum capacity: 512MB; miniSD, 256MB. Projected capacity by 4Q 2004: 2GB; miniSD, 512MB. xD-Picture Card. Camera makers Fuji and Olympus have gone from the bulkiest memory card standard, SmartMedia, to the smallest, xD. xD-Picture Cards do not have controllers, which adds to the cost of a PC Card adapter, but they offer faster read and write times. xD is unlikely to surpass SD sales or to have the broad cross-device support of SD or Memory Stick, but Olympus is a major player in digital photography. If your interests lie only with digital photography, there’s no downside to xD other than capacities currently lower than CF and SD. xD-Picture Card dimensions: 1.0 by 0.8 by 0.06 inches. Maximum capacity: 512MB. Projected capacity by 4Q 2004: 1GB. ALTERNATIVE MEMORY Sometimes the storage device you want isn’t a flash memory card. Here are a few other options. USB memory keys. The likeliest replacement for a floppy disk drive is not a writable CD drive but rather a USB memory key. Such devices range from 8MB to 512MB and cost as little as 25 cents a megabyte during a sale; 40 to 50 cents a megabyte is more typical. This is the preferred way to take work home from the office or to move a PowerPoint presentation. Some USB keys are bootable (great for IT staff), if the PC allows it. USB keys should reach 2GB to 4GB by the end of 2004. Mini hard drives. The IBM Microdrive, a 1GB hard drive, is the same size as a CF card, and it has revolutionized the professional photography market. It can be used in most cameras with CF slots and costs about $300. The drive is faster than flash memory, but it’s more delicate and draws more power. A 4GB version is expected from Hitachi, which bought the technology from IBM. With the included Microdrive–to–PC Card adapter, you have 1GB of fast, removable notebook storage. For about the same price, you can buy a removable PC Card hard drive (not flashbased) from Toshiba or Hitachi that holds 5GB or 2GB, respectively. Such devices make sense for road warriors who need to back up lots of data. Digital camera off-load units. If you fill up your digital camera on the road, the easiest solution is to off-load the media card to your laptop. Barring that option, a handful of somewhat expensive devices 72 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com BUYING AND USING FLASH CARDS • The easiest way to transfer data from a portable device to a PC is to stick a flash memory card into your computer. A USB reader that accepts media of every major format costs less than $50. Also, many new notebooks come with built-in memory card slots. All Sony models accept Memory Stick media, and many Toshiba laptops take SD cards. But just because a device has a Memory Stick or SD reader doesn’t mean it can write copy-protected digital music files to the card. Check the specs on each unit first. • SD cards are small and easily misplaced. Invest in a small card wallet; some are as simple as sheets of stiff antistatic plastic with slots. • If you’re shopping for a TV or DVD player, look for ones with a flash memory slot—PC Card (the most versatile), SD, or Memory Stick. • Some digital cameras (notably Kodak models) have 8MB to 32MB of embedded memory, so if you forget your memory card, you can still take a dozen pictures or so. • You’ll get the best value buying memory cards about one or two levels down from the current maximum capacity of your chosen media type—say, 128MB USB keys or 256MB to 512MB CF cards. • Most but not all USB keys are recognized by current PCs, Macs, and notebooks as small hard drives. A few USB keys require you to install a driver beforehand, which limits their use as data-transfer devices. • USB keys are getting fatter (wider), and it’s a squeeze to fit one next to another USB device. You can get around that with a short USB extension cord ($5 to $10). By 2004, PCs will have USB ports with wider spacing. • If you opt for SD for new devices but you have an old CF camera, you can buy CF adapters that fit SD cards inside. One example is the Minolta SD-CF1 ($70 street); it’s small enough to close the door on the card chamber. In some cases, if you store secure audio on an SD card, you can’t also store photos. CF and Memory Stick do not have this limitation. • New, high-capacity memory cards tend to have faster read and write times than older cards. When you’re using USB-based card readers, the fastest cards will benefit some from USB 2.0 connections; otherwise, use a PC Card or internal slot for the fastest transfers possible. • The more costly CF cards, marked as high-speed (2X or 4X, relative to a standard 150KBps transfer rate), are beneficial for high-end cameras that capture big images (typically 4 megapixels and up). For consumer cameras, you don’t need the extra speed. • Think twice about buying a music player with embedded memory (and no memory slot) unless it’s dirt-cheap. If 128MB seems small today, it will be woefully little in 18 months. Some of the midlevel to high-end devices are heading toward cheap hard drives of 1GB to 2GB instead of flash memory, and a 10GB jukebox will soon cost less than $200. • Computer and office supply stores typically promote flash memory cards in weekly specials to drive traffic. Memory that normally sells for 50 cents a megabyte will be 25 cents after rebate, and sometimes a whole card may be just $10. Keep an eye out for sales.—BH let you off-load flash memory cards to a specialty portable hard drive. Some double as media players, such as the Archos AV320 ($570 street, www.archos.com) or the SmartDisk FlashTrax ($500 list, www.smartdisk.com). If you need more memory while traveling, most copy shops, instant photo printers, and small computer stores should be able to copy your memory cards to a writable CD. Even if they don’t advertise the service, they should have the ability to do this. A fair price is about $10. Ask to browse the CD to make sure all your pictures are there before wiping your memory card clean. Based on our experience with memory cards as well as what makers have revealed privately about the future, we believe there are clear choices. Memory Stick and Secure Digital (along with their smaller siblings) will have the longest, fullest lives. CompactFlash is solid now, but future non-Sony consumer devices will likely go to SD. Bill Howard is a contributing editor of PC Magazine. SOLUTIONS w w w. p c m a g . c o m /s e c u r i ty wa tc h T H E LO O KO U T IM Security: Don’t Get Fooled Instant-messaging clients leave your PC open to attacks. Here’s how to close the holes. By Brett Glass U sing an instant messenger (IM) comprehensive update of IE to fix the bug. program seems like a harmless Other IM systems haven’t proved way to have a conversation. Un- immune, either. In 2002, Internet securifortunately, IM can be exploited to damage, ty site CERT warned of buffer overcommandeer, or infect your machine. flow exploits in ICQ (www.cert.org/ Attacks on IM programs (such as MSN advisories/CA-2002-02.html) and Yahoo! Messenger, AIM, ICQ, and so on) fall into Messenger (www.cert.org/advisories/ the same categories as other network at- CA-2002-16.html). The best you can do to avoid exploits tacks. Some attacks take advantage of bugs or weaknesses in the software; oth- is to watch for advisories and keep your ers exploit human foibles. Here’s how to software (including browsers and e-mail defend yourself against IM security programs) up to date. You should also breaches. be very skeptical of messages that ask Most IM systems were not designed you to visit a URL, accept a file, or run a with security in mind. For example, a program. recently discovered buffer overflow bug All of the popular IM systems have in AIM left users’ computers vulnerable built-in mechanisms to let users to a remote takeover attack. AOL was exchange and share files, and these fealucky: It was able to close the hole by tures can be dangerous. If configured blocking exploit attempts as they passed incorrectly, a file-sharing mechanism can through its servers. (For more details on share far more than you intend. What’s this bug, see the bulletin at http://www more, once a worm or virus has control of .w00w00.org/advisories/aim.html.) your machine, it can use file-sharing and Microsoft, howtransmission feaever, was unable to tures to send your block a worm that personal informaspread widely in tion to a malicious 2002 via its instantthird party or to messaging programs propagate itself. AIM, .NET Messenger, (Windows Messenger, MSN Messenger, and .NET and others let you disable Messenger) as well as Infile transfers from the Prefternet Explorer (The bug erences or Options menus; was actually in IE, but the it’s a good idea to do this. If worm relied on the IM you receive an AIM notice AIM WARNS YOU when a programs to propagate.) that someone wants to file transfer is requested. Victims received instant send you an image or file, messages, seemingly sent use a mechanism other by people they know, telling them to visit than IM (such as phone or e-mail) to veria particular Web page. When they did, the fy that the request is legitimate. IMers often fall victim to social engiWeb page used a bug in IE to take over their machines, scanning the victims’ ad- neering attacks, in which a message condress books for IM contacts and sending vinces a user to run a malicious program, all of the contacts the same message. For- reveal a password, or otherwise expose tunately, the worm did not carry a mali- his system. CERT has some good advice cious payload, but it could have. Infected for avoiding such tricks at www.cert users had to download and install a large, .org/incident_notes/IN-2002-03.html. 74 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com SOBIG IS BACK Yet another variant of the persistent and malleable Sobig worm is on the loose. This version, dubbed Sobig.E, hides inside zipped file attachments. Otherwise, the worm is virtually identical to the other Sobig viruses that have been marauding across the Internet for several months. Despite its familiar infection method and repeated warnings from antivirus companies, Sobig.E is having a field day so far. The worm was discovered on June 25, and e-mail security provider MessageLabs stopped more than 27,000 copies of Sobig.E in the first 24 hours. The worm arrives in an e-mail message with one of several subject lines, including Re: application, and Re: movie. The body text reads, Please see the attached zip file for details. The attachment is named your_details.zip. The zipped file contains an infected PIF file. Sobig.E also spoofs the From address on the messages it sends out from infected machines, disguising which PCs have been hit and making cleanup more difficult. The worm is also capable of spreading itself through open network shares. Sobig first appeared in January, and four variants have since popped up, each with a slight tweak to the code.—Dennis Fisher In addition, IM users don’t realize that messages are sent as plain text. This means that snoopers can read every exchange. People often fail to use caution when IM ing with strangers. Did your teenager just let your vacation plans slip to a local hoodlum? Did an employee reveal key details of your next product to a competitor posing as an admiring customer? This most human of security holes can only be solved via monitoring. Vendors such as Akonix Systems and IM logic offer software that lets businesses watch their employees’ IM traffic, and CypherGuard makes software that encrypts IM messages. Snoopware programs such as SpectorSoft’s Spector Pro let parents scan their childrens’ IM traffic. In general, the same rules that apply to all computer security apply to IM : Be skeptical, be cautious, and perform regular upgrades and maintenance. Brett Glass is a freelance consultant, author, and programmer. SOLUTIONS CASE STUDY National Hockey League By distributing the computing load across all resources, blade architecture keeps organizations like the NHL in the game. Hockey’s New Blades Blade computing scores big at the NHL’s annual draft event. By Alan Cohen PHOTOGRAPH BY GARY HERSHORN/GETTY IMAGES Y 76 ou wouldn’t think a sport that’s played with wooden sticks would make a good high-tech showcase. But in June’s NHL Entry Draft—an annual event where the 30 teams of the National Hockey League pick their next squads of players—the NHL used blade computing, an innovative new technology that promises to boost the efficiency and availability of corporate networks while decreasing administrative chores. Now in its 40th year, the Entry Draft is familiar to any hockey fan with cable television: 30 tables set in a circle around a large room, with general managers, scouts, and owners sitting at the tables, filling out their future rosters through nine rounds of draft picks spread over two days. For years, the process was decidedly low-tech: Nervous kids carried slips of paper to a podium to register the teams’ picks. It got a little more advanced with the advent of the PC. But each PC had to be configured individually, and if one went down during the draft, all business would stop until the IT squad could configure a new unit. This was a less-thanoptimal scenario for an event that is broadcast live on television. The NHL’s blade system offers an entirely new architecture: A single chassis— a Sun Fire B1600 Blade Platform—holds eight Sun Fire B100s Blade Servers, which run all the applications the teams need and display them back to the Sun Ray 150 thinclient terminals on the 30 team tables. Four of the eight blades run the Sun Ray terminals; two blades run Lotus Domino Server to support the Lotus Notes–based applications used for the draft; two other blades serve as hot-swappable backups. That is a cautious setup—and probably overkill. Even if a blade should fail and no backup is available, the blade architecture—like the structural support of a building—is designed to distribute the load across the remaining resources. In P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com other words, it picks up the slack and keeps business running smoothly. Manufacturers like Sun Microsystems have pitched this as a key benefit of blade computing: Pooled resources allow for greater efficiency. Instead of having one piece of equipment overburdened and another largely idle, the workload is spread over all available machines. It’s an effective system, and that’s particularly important for an event like the NHL draft. “Outside of the Stanley Cup, these are probably the most important two days of the year for our member clubs,” says Ken Chin, the NHL’s vice president of events and entertainment. “They’re deciding their future, and they don’t need any distractions from technology.” The thin-client desktops also minimize glitches and delays. The draft requires some complicated business-process management—accessing information on players, keeping track of which team has picked which player, routing choices to approval groups, and feeding real-time data out to the league’s Web site. But since all this takes place in one central location—on the blade servers—replac- ing or adding a new desktop is simply a matter of plugging in a new Sun Ray 150. “If a thin client goes out, you plug in a new one and see your whole environment on the new client without having to do anything on the server,” says Brian Foley, an advanced development systems engineer at Sun. “The administrative ease and the scalability are the key to the system.” While the NHL’s blade servers use Sun SPARC processors running Solaris 8, Sun’s chassis allows for a mix of operating systems (Solaris and Linux) and processors (SPARC and Intel x86). This year’s draft in Nashville, Tennessee, finished 90 minutes earlier each day than the year before—without any technical glitches. Foley doesn’t give all the credit to the blades, but he does boast that the system “went absolutely smooth as silk.” For the NHL, a penalty-free draft is one goal that benefits all the teams. “This is helping us run our business more smoothly,” says Susan Rosenfeld, director of corporate markets for the NHL. Time will tell whether the first-round picks live up to their potential. But the blades, it seems, have already scored. How Thin Clients Avoid Thin Ice To keep the NHL draft running smoothly, the 30 NHL teams use zero-administration thin clients at their tables, with all the processing happening behind the scenes on the blade platform. There, four blades run the Sun Ray thin clients on each team table, two blades run Lotus Domino Server to power the NHL’s apps, and two blades are spares. Should one blade fail, the others pick up the slack. The blade architecture keeps costs and delays down. SUN FIRE BLADE PLATFORM Eight Sun Fire B100s Blade Servers running Solaris 8 DRAFT NHL staff Sun Ray 150 thin clients 30 team tables Network connection to blade platform Sun Ray Server software in loadbalance/ fail-over mode Blade servers running Lotus Domino Spare blades SOLUTIONS domain for each user, so don’t waste them. And cookies are not secure, so you shouldn’t store any sensitive data within them, such as credit card numbers. The second part of the PHP script is in Despite their bad press, cookies are a good way to personalize the middle of the <BODY> tag, and it is a simple if statement. The first line reads a visitor’s experience at your site. We show you how to start in the cookie, automatically making it a using them. By Warren Ernst PHP variable because of the $ in front of been_here. The == means equal to in PHP. ontrary to popular belief, cook- argument sets the name of the cookie The third argument is what the if stateies were not created to invade variable to "been_here" (as in “Has this ment should look for. users’ privacy. These small text visitor been here already?”). The second The lines of text that appear within files are used to overcome the “stateless- argument sets the value of the cookie to the curly brackets before and after the ness” of HTTP transactions, and they are store, which in this example is "yes". The else statement are the lines that will or a powerful tool for Webmasters, because third argument sets the length of time (in will not appear in the Web pages based they allow a site to remember things seconds) that the cookie will be stored on the if statement. If the page has been about its visitors. Your site, for example, before it is automatically deleted. In this loaded before, the first Thanks line will be displayed; otherwise the second one might want to determine whether a visi<?php will appear. tor has been there before and display a setcookie ("been_here", "yes", Instead of just these simple text lines, different block of text or banner ad for time() + 604800); you could have entire blocks of HTML repeat visitors. Cookies are fairly easy to ?> code here, such as tables, forms, Javacreate and use. The “recipe” that follows <html> Script, or more PHP code. The options will get you started. <head> HTML can’t read and write cookies, but are practically limitless. <title>Cookies Test</title> nearly all the Web page scripting lanWeb sites typically store only one </head> guages do. Here, we’ll use PHP, which is cookie with a single unique variable, such <body> an ideal choice, because it has several as a user number, and then they cross<h1>This is my website. </h1> built-in cookie management commands reference that number with an on-site acthat are easy to use and understand. Note count information database. For example, <?php if ($been_here == "yes") that your Web server will need PHP inthe cookie could store "user_number" and { "123456" and then look up user 123456 in stalled (most hosting services already print "Thanks for returning to the internal database to retrieve the have PHP, and installing it on your own the site again.<p>"; } server is easy), and your Index.htm file name, credit card number, and e-mail adelse will need to be saved with a PHP extendress. Tying cookies to a database gives { print "Thanks for checking us sion (as Index.php). But you don’t need to you a lot more flexibility and security. out for the first time.<p>"; know PHP to use the sample file, and you Other sites do not have access to this } can copy and paste the important bits database, so even if other programs or ?> directly into your own files. people read the cookie, there’s no per</body> Take a look at the simple Index.php file sonal information there to be read or </html> in the figure on the right. There are only shared. (The vast majority a few key sections that relate to cookies. of cookies store nothing THIS INDEX.PHP FILE lets you create a cookie that will tell you The first section is at the top of the file, case, the length is more than serial numbers. whether a visitor has already where the cookie is created. The second 604,800 seconds, You can check this out youraccessed your site. section is within the <BODY> tags, where which is one self, using Notepad to open we check to see whether our cookie ex- week. The cookie cookie files in your Tempoisted when the page first loaded. If so, the is written immediately after the page is rary Internet Files folder.) Additionally, file displays a certain line of text; if not, downloaded and displayed. you can store as many fields as you want then a different line appears. You can change any of these argu- in your own database, so you don’t need To create the cookie, we use the PHP ments as needed. Most likely, you’ll to worry about the 20-cookie limit. function setcookie, as shown in line 1. change the length of time to something Despite common fears, cookies have no Cookies must be sent before any other suitable to your site, and if you have other intrinsic power to violate privacy. Used headers are sent, which means you must variables you’d like to set, you can simply carefully, they provide enormous conveput the call to the function before any change "been_here" and "yes" to what nience for both Webmasters and users. <html> or <head> tags, or that function will you need, such as "bought_something", fail. The setcookie function can accept "has_account", or "under_18". PHP, how- Warren Ernst is a computer consultant, several arguments. In our case, the first ever, lets you store only 20 cookies per author, and journalist in southern California. Making Cookies C 78 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com SOLUTIONS w w w. p c m a g . c o m /u s e r to u s e r PC MAGAZINE’S COMMUNITY OF EXPERTS AND READERS Forcing Windows to Crash on all my users installing this fix. I want to bring this to the attention of computer users. As users develop program tasks that require filename sorts, they need to be aware of this unpublicized Microsoft change that will directly impact their desired end results. FRED GOULD You can force Windows 2000 and XP to display the blue screen of death. Hopefully, the only reason to do this is that you’ll never see it otherwise! In the Registry key HKEY_LOCAL_MACHINE\System\ CurrentControlSet\Services\ i8042prt\Parameters, find or create a DWORD value named CrashOnCtrlScroll. Double-click on the value and set its data to 1. Restart your computer. Now you can cause a crash by holding the right-hand Ctrl key and pressing the Scroll Lock key twice. DIRK A. D. SMITH Actually, a valid reason to crash your computer deliberately is to test your recovery options. Windows 2000 and XP can be configured so that in the rare event of a crash, a memory dump will be saved for debugging purposes and your system will restart automatically. If your system needs maximum uptime, it behooves you to verify how well it recovers from a crash. First, make sure the recovery configuration is correct. Right-click on My Computer and choose Properties, then click on the Advanced tab. If you are running Windows XP, click on the Settings button in the Startup and Recovery pane. If you’re running Win 2000, click on the button titled Startup and Recovery. In the System Failure pane you’ll generally want all three of the following options checked: Write an event to the system log, Send an administrative alert, and Automatically restart. If you choose the 64KB Small Memory Dump, each occurrence is written separately to the folder specified. The Kernel Memory Dump is larger, and a Complete Memory Dump requires that you have a paging file large enough to hold all physical RAM plus 1MB; this is the largest option. By default, the two larger options are written to the file Memory.dmp in the Windows folder, with each occurrence overwriting the previous. Once you get the settings as you want them, close any open programs and use the special keystroke to crash the system. You can verify that the desired memory dump is FIGURE 1: You can modify the Registry to force Windows to crash. FIGURE 2: You may never see this Windows XP memory-dump screen unless you invoke it deliberately. written and check how long it takes to restart after a crash.—Neil J. Rubenking Windows XP Changes Filename Sorting Microsoft changed the filename sort algorithm in Windows XP, making it different from all previous versions. The only reference I’ve found is the Microsoft Knowledge Base Article Q318872 that addresses an incorrect sort order in Windows XP. This article in turn refers to a new Windows API function called StrCmpLogicalW, which implements the new sort algorithm. I have almost 5,000 filenames that were constructed so that Windows Explorer would sort the filenames chronologically (using the old character-by-character sort algorithm). These files have been distributed across the United States. I now have the task of renaming all these files so that Windows XP will sort them chronologically and still have them sort correctly in previous Windows versions. There is a small Registry fix that will restore the old sort order, but I can’t rely There are actually two distinct points here. First, Windows XP has a new sorting algorithm for filenames. Second, this algorithm may break down when filenames contain ten or more consecutive digits. The problem with long strings of digits has been fixed in the latest Windows XP service pack, but the change to the sort algorithm remains. In previous versions of Windows, filenames are sorted text-wise, character by character. File1.txt, File10.txt, and File100.txt are all placed before File2.txt, because the digit 1 comes before the digit 2. Most users have grown accustomed to zeropadding sequential numbers in filenames— File010.txt correctly comes after File002.txt. Under Windows XP, though, each block of consecutive digits is treated as a number and sorted as such. Even without zeropadding, File10.txt comes after File2.txt. For most users, this will be a benefit, not a problem. If you’re one of the few who have developed solutions that rely on the old order, you can make the Registry tweak mentioned above. Launch REGEDIT from the Start menu’s Run dialog and navigate to HKEY_LOCAL_ MACHINE\Software\Microsoft\Windows\ Currentversion\Policies\Explorer. In the right-hand pane, find or create a DWORD value named NoStrCmpLogical. Double-click it and set its data to 1 (no matter whether it’s hex or decimal). Now Win XP will sort filenames the old way.—NJR Truth in Scanning I recently purchased an HP ScanJet 3570c scanner. The box indicates that this model scans at 48 bits, but it actually seems to be limited to 24-bit color. Are consumers being misled or have I just misunderstood? JEFF SMITH You can force Windows 2000 or XP to display the blue screen of death. www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 79 A higher bit-depth means that a scanner can retain more color information. Scanner technology can be very confusing. When a manufacturer labels its product as 48-bit, it means that the analog-to-digital converter, which translates analog color information from the sensor into digital-pixel values, can output 16 bits from each of the three color channels (red, green, and blue). A higher bit depth means that a scanner can retain more color information in each pixel with greater precision, leading to a higher dynamic range and more-accurate colors. Dynamic range is a measure of image density, showing how well a scanner can reproduce pure white and pure black. For scanners, dynamic range is measured on a 0 to 4 scale, with 0 being pure white and 4 being very (but not pure) black. A scanner with good dynamic range can map input shades correctly to output shades, making images look brighter, with more visible detail in bright and shadow areas. Generally, the number of bits determines the maximum dynamic range of a scanner, but other factors—such as having a high-quality, low-noise CCD and electronics—also play a big part. A scanner with a 48-bit internal depth (16 bits per pixel), however, may have an external depth of only 24-bits (8 bits per pixel). The image is scanned and processed at 48 bits, but your PC gets back a 24-bit image. The quality of the scanned image is not as good as the original, but since the 24-bit image was derived from a source with more color information, it will look markedly better than one that was scanned and processed at 24 bits to begin with. The reason for the discrepancy between internal and external color depths is that no PC hardware—and virtually no software— can handle more than 24 bits. Some scanners can capture and return the same bit depth, as much as 36, 42, or 48 bits, but the host application has to be able to handle an image of that size. Adobe Photoshop, for example, can handle up to 48 bits, though with limited functionality (most filters won’t work). HOW TO CONTACT US E-MAIL K pcmsolutions@ziffdavis.com FAX K 212-503-5799 MAIL K User to User, PC Magazine, 28 East 28 Street, New York, NY 10016-7930 If we print your tip, you’ll receive a PC Magazine T-shirt. We regret that we cannot answer letters individually. 80 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com batch file lines longer than the command Unfortunately, once you have an image processor accepts. The following batch file higher than 24-bits in Photoshop, you can’t launches your three URLs in such a way that do much with it. The standard Windows graphics API is only 8-bits per channel; no each takes about one vertical third of a graphics card will display more than 8 bits 1,024-by-768 screen, with a bit left over at per channel on your monitor and no printer the bottom for the taskbar: can output more than 24-bit color. There is no easy way to tell whether a scanner can deliver greater than 24-bit data to the software unless the vendor tells you on the box, in its literature, or on its Web site. Look for a rating that describes both internal and external color. Otherwise, if a vendor indicates only 48-bit color, assume the rating is just internal and that the scanner delivers only 24-bit color externally. For more information on scanner technology and products, check out our feature story FIGURE 3: You can launch multiple URLs and get “Scantastic!” (www.pcmag.com/ them to tile vertically with a batch file. article2/0,4149,367272,00.asp). And take a look at “How Scanners Work” at ExtremeTech (www start iexplore.exe javascript: resizeTo(1024,240);moveTo(0,0); .extremetech.com/article2/ document.location.href=”http://yahoo 0,3973,395111,00.asp).—Richard Fisco Launch Multiple URLs Can you show me how to create a shortcut to open more than one Web site simultaneously? I created the following batch file to do this: START http://yahoo.com START http://www.pcmag.com START http://weather.com When I ran it, however, only the last site appeared. Also, I’d like all three sites to line up vertically. The first site should use the top third of the screen, the second should use the middle third, and the last site should take the bottom third. Will the trick suggested in the tip “Control IE’s Initial Size” (www.pcmag.com/article2/ 0,4149,562363,00.asp) help? PANCHANATH BOONMA In order to have all three sites appear, you need to change a setting in IE. Select Internet Options from the Tools menu, click the Advanced tab, and uncheck the box titled Reuse windows for launching shortcuts. As for using the JavaScript trick from the previous tip, you definitely can do so as long as the URLs you want to open don’t make the .com” start iexplore.exe javascript: resizeTo(1024,240);moveTo(0,240); document.location.href=”http://www .pcmag.com” start iexplore.exe javascript: resizeTo(1024,240);moveTo(0,480); document.location.href=”http:// weather.com” These three batch file lines wrap dreadfully when formatted for publication, so keep in mind that each begins with start and ends with a URL in quotes. We discovered an odd problem with this technique on an older Windows 98 system, however. Every time the batch file sent the three commands in rapid succession, IE’s Content Advisor kicked in, even though it was clearly turned off. To solve this problem, we introduced a delay of a few seconds between the commands using an old batch file trick: The CHOICE command presents an optional prompt and waits for the user to press one of a specified set of keys. It can optionally return a default value after a specified time-out. To get a batch file delay of 5 seconds, insert a line like CHOICE /c:x /t:x,5 between each line that launches a URL. With this addition, the Content Advisor problem disappeared.—NJR SOLUTIONS Like many of the features in Outlook, the trick is knowing where to look for the option you need. Make Shift Turn Off Caps Lock I find it a lot more convenient to have the Shift key release the Caps Lock function, as typewriters do. Windows 2000 offers this option during installation, but most people never notice it. With Windows XP, the feature is available from the Control Panel, but only when you install another keyboard layout during installation. I have tracked down a way to control this setting after the fact by manipulating the Registry. In the Registry key HKEY_CURRENT_USER\ Keyboard Layout, create a DWORD value named Attributes, if it isn’t already present. Double-click on it, then choose Hexadecimal, and set its value to 00010000. Now, when you press and release the Shift key while the Caps Lock is active, Caps Lock will turn off. BILL RUGGIRELLO This tip applies to both Windows 2000 and XP. But it won’t take effect until you restart the computer. After you make this change, the Caps Lock key always turns Caps Lock on; you can no longer use it to turn Caps Lock off. You must turn Caps Lock off by tapping either Shift key. This tip reduces the chances of looking up at your screen only to find that you’ve typed a whole paragraph in uppercase.—NJR Setting the TaskPad View I like to use Microsoft Outlook 2002 with the Calendar folder open, showing the daily calendar page and the TaskPad with a list of tasks. Outlook insists on listing all tasks, however, even those that aren’t due for months. I’d rather have Outlook show the tasks in the same way it shows appointments: namely, to display only those tasks that are due on the currently selected day. This seems to be an odd oversight. Is there a setting I’ve missed? STEVEN GOLDBERG Like many of the options in Outlook, the issue is not that the option is missing, but that you have to know where to look. In this case, you can change what Outlook shows on the TaskPad by choosing View |TaskPad View and picking from the list of options. (You’ll only see the View |TaskPad View selection when the Calendar is open.) You can show All Tasks, which is what you describe seeing; Today’s Tasks, which FIGURE 4: Here’s a formula to sort multiple rows individually. shows you all the unfinished tasks with a start date of the current day or before, no matter what day you have selected in the calendar; or any of several other choices, including Active Tasks For Selected Days, which is the setting you seem to be looking for. This setting shows you all the tasks with a start date of the currently selected days or before (based on the selection showing in the monthly calendar above the TaskPad).—M. David Stone Sort Thousands of Rows Individually My lotto spreadsheet has about 1,500 rows, each containing numbers from a drawing. Each row has five columns with a number in each cell, but the numbers for each row are unsorted. How can I sort from lowest to highest in each row? BOB Z. You can do that using Microsoft Excel’s Sort feature, but the tedium might kill you before you reach the last of those 1,500 rows. Here is what you have to do. Highlight the first row and choose Sort from the Data menu. Excel asks whether you want to expand the selection. You don’t want to do that, as it would sort the entire block of data based on the selected row. Instead, select Continue with the current selection and click on the Sort button. Now, in the Sort dialog, you must click on the Options button, select Sort left to right, click on OK, and click on OK again. That’s one row down, 1,499 to go. To save your sanity, you can create a new set of columns that contain your numbers in sorted order. Suppose your numbers start in cell A1 and occupy rows A through E. In cell G1, enter the formula =SMALL($A1:$E1,1). Copy that formula across into cells H1 through K1. Edit each to change the second argument to 2, 3, 4, and 5. For example, cell K1 would contain =SMALL($A1:$E1,5). The formulas return the smallest number, the second smallest, and so on up to the fifth smallest. In other words, they display the five numbers from the first row in sorted order. Select G1 through K1 and press Ctrl-C. Select the rest of columns G through K, all the way to the bottom, and press Ctrl-V. Those columns now contain your lotto numbers with each row sorted from lowest to highest.—NJR Switching Identities in Outlook Express My husband and I share a computer, and we both use Microsoft Outlook Express under Windows XP as our e-mail client. We use the program’s Identity feature to keep our mail separate. But sometimes when we select Switch Identity, OE disappears and never comes back. LINDA FELLEN Microsoft acknowledges this bug in Knowledge Base article 311399, but knowing about it and fixing it are not the same. Until Microsoft corrects the problem, you must go into the Task Manager (press Ctrl-AltDel), choose the Processes tab, and end the Msimn.exe process. Then relaunch Outlook Express and you should be able to switch between identities freely. Keep these instructions handy, because each time you reboot, you’ll have to go through them all over again.—Ben Z. Gottesman www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 81 R E V I E W E D I N T H I S S T O R Y 94 Panasonic Lumix DMC-F1S lllmm 95 Pentax Optio 550 lllll 96 Polaroid Photomax PDC 3350 lmmmm 102 Samsung Digimax V4 lllmm 102 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-P8 llllm 102 Toshiba PDR-T30 lllmm 87 Editors’ Choice 88 Digital SLRs 92 Phone In Your Photos 94 Reader Survey 96 Summary of Features 97 Price/Performance Index 98 Performance Tests 100 Prosumer Cameras [ [ 86 Canon PowerShot S400 Digital Elph llllm 86 Casio Exilim EX-Z3 llllm 87 Fujifilm FinePix F410 lllmm 87 HP Photosmart 935 llllm 90 Kodak EasyShare DX6340 llllm 90 Konica Digital Revio KD-500Z lllmm 90 Minolta DiMage F300 lllmm 92 Nikon Coolpix 3100 lllmm 93 Olympus Stylus 400 Digital llmmm COVER STORY Snap ••• ••• ••• Happy BY SALLY WIENER GROTTA AND DANIEL GROTTA Sunday at New York City’s Bronx Zoo: A lowland gorilla nurses her newborn as the youngsters horse around and Papa naps contentedly in the branches of a nearby tree. You reach for your camera, adjust the aperture and focus, account for ambient lighting—and miss the moment. Now picture this: You slip a compact digital camera out of your shirt pocket, snap a shot, and check the LCD to make sure the littlest one didn’t blink. This one makes the great-ape family album for sure. Previous generations of compact cameras were all about compromises—smaller image sensors, lower resolutions, and limited zoom capabilities. Sure, they were fun toys, but that was all. Today’s compact digital cameras have done away with most compromises and really pack some punch. What’s so great about the latest model? For starters, image quality is no longer an issue. Most digital cameras can produce stunning, high-quality pictures that are virtually indistinguishable from film-based photos. Although we may see a new generation of 6-megapixel models next year, consumers have embraced 3-, 4-, and 5megapixel digital cameras for amateur electronic photography. Such models are good enough for gorgeous 8-by-10, 8.5-by-11, or 11-by-14 color prints. Digital cameras are also easier to use than ever. Most models work fine in “just push the button, dummy” mode, and USB connections, camera docks, better software, and inexpensive card readers make the potentially tough job of transferring im- ages to your computer a breeze. What’s more, they shoot faster, the batteries last longer, and inexpensive, high-capacity memory cards mean you’ll never run out of storage. Best of all, there’s an enormous selection of brands and models, from simple point-and-shooters to everythingbut-the-kitchen-sink cameras. And today’s prices were unthinkable just a couple years ago, perhaps explaining the vast jump in sales: For the first time ever, digital camera sales are expected to outpace sales of film-based cameras this year, according to the Photo Marketing Association. What do you sacrifice for all this impressive miniaturization? Not much, actually. Most compromises are economic and ergonomic, not technical. Lenses, sensors, and circuitry are so good now that compact models’ image quality and speed can be every bit as good as those of full-size consumer digital cameras. And there’s no technical reason why camera manufacturers can’t load compacts up with all the exotic features found on their larger consumer counterparts. Two limitations stand out: You’ll get fewer shots, because the batteries are physically smaller and therefore more limited. And the time needed between shots (the recycle time) is longer, because manufacturers reduce buffer memory in an effort to keep production costs down. Small may also mean inconvenient in the hands of kids and older folks, for whom pressing tiny buttons or peering at a small screen may be difficult. And Style, simplicity, and smashing picture quality put the fun into digital photography as never before. Think compact and you can’t go wrong. ••• PHOTOGRAPHY BY ••• MICHAEL SCOTT KENNEY ••• AND THOM O’CONNOR www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 85 the light weight of these models makes them tougher to hold steady. So how do you decide which of the newest compact digital cameras to buy? In a word, style. Unlike early digital cameras, which looked like cheap, plastic computer peripherals with lenses stuck on the front—or worse, ugly, utilitarian film-camera imitations, today’s models could fill a page from the Sharper Image catalog. They’re slim, sleek, and shiny, and they’re small enough to fit into a shirt pocket. Consumers have gone for these supercool, hot-selling compacts like no other class of digital camera. The 15 cameras we tested have much in common. Each of them has some sort of lens protector that opens automatically when you turn the camera on, and all have optical zoom lenses, LCD viewfinders, and removable memory cards. You can also record brief videos, although the Nikon and Olympus models can’t record sound. In general, these attractive models are of fairly high quality, rating 3 or 4 stars. Beyond our extensive testing and expert analysis, it’s always helpful to go back to our readers and find out how the cameras ON THE they’ve been using over the past year have fared. And that’s exactly what we did in our second annual reader survey on digital camFor reviews and camera news, go to www.pcmag.com/cameras. eras. So go out and take your best shot. The gorillas are waiting. MORE WEB Canon PowerShot S400 Digital Elph 4.0 megapixels, $599 list. 800-652-2666, www.usa.canon.com. OVERALL RATING: l l l l m More than any other compact digital camera, the gorgeous Canon PowerShot S400 Digital Elph has the look and feel of a fine precision instrument. Shaped like a pack of cards, this surprisingly heavy camera (7.9 oz.) offers point-and-shoot simplicity, crisp images, and an intelligent though limited assortment of modes. The S400 will delight die-hard gadgeteers, though serious photographers won’t find manual control over f-stop and shutter speed. THE SNAZZY Canon PowerShot S400 Digital Elph, a popular model. ••• ••• ••• 86 Everything is well marked with either words or icons, making controls easy to find. The movie and panorama modes are even activated by analog controls, although youngsters and those with arthritic hands may find the buttons hard to press. The 1.5-inch LCD viewfinder is sharp, bright, and responsive, but the optical viewfinder has no focusable diopter (a dial to correct the viewfinder for astigmatism, near- or farsightedness, and so on). The S400’s memory and battery compartments are convenient and accessible; the zoom lever is well placed in front of the shutter button, and a simple slider toggles between shoot and playback modes. Shooting with the S400 is an acquired skill. Although you can easily shoot onehanded, the controls are positioned so that you’ll need both hands to operate the select buttons and mode dial. What’s more, settings must be chosen from two different menus, invoked by pressing two separate buttons, and deciphering the icons on the LCD can be confusing. The S400 has faster-than-average boot and recycle times, so it’s responsive; plus, an autofocus light assists focusing in low light. Picture quality is very good. Our simulated daylight test image exhibited very good colors, excellent detail, and the sharpest edges we saw, but it was slightly Our contributors: Les Freed and Sally Wiener Grotta are contributing editors of PC Magazine. Daniel Grotta is president of DigitalBenchmarks. Carol Levin is an executive editor. Associate editor Jeremy A. Kaplan, staff editor Laarni Almendrala Ragaza, and PC Magazine Labs project leader Glenn Menin were in charge of this story. P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com underexposed, with a minimal shift toward cyan. Our test flash picture was evenly illuminated and very sharp, but it had a significant yellow cast and was about 1 f-stop overexposed. (1 f-stop in either direction is noticeable; 2 is significant; 3 is too dark or light.) The S400 is pricey for a 4-megapixel compact, but its design, construction, performance, and image quality make it an excellent choice for those who love well-built precision cameras but don’t want to go through the hassle of manual adjustment.—SWG and DG Casio Exilim EX-Z3 3.2 megapixels, $399.99 list. 800-836-8580, www.exilim.casio.com. l l l l m The smallest, lightest, and thinnest compact in our lineup, the Casio Exilim EXZ3 ($399.99 list) is the camera you’ll take with you everywhere. The 3.2-megapixel EX-Z3 is equipped with a few impressive big-camera features, but because of its diminutive size (2.2 by 3.4 by 0.9 inches), Casio had to make some compromises. So although the EX-Z3 is simple to operate, its image quality is disappointing. Turned off, the EX-Z3 is the size and shape of a deck of playing cards, but when switched on, its 3X Pentax zoom lens is longer than the camera is wide. Casio has opted for a minimalist approach, so the only controls are a pair of menu and display buttons, a record/playback switch, and a jog dial. The most noteworthy feature is a bright 2-inch LCD, the largest available in a compact camera. The screen displays large, sharp type—entire words and phrases rather than abbreviations and icons—which makes reading menus much easier than on other cameras. But the LCD is a power hog, so you won’t get as many shots per battery charge. THE EXILIM’S zoom lens is longer than the camera is wide. D I G I TA L C A M E R A S Photo enthusiast: Pentax Optio 550 Point-and-shoot: Kodak EasyShare DX6340 When we set out to cover the compact digital camera landscape, we knew there would be some stylish cameras out there. But we were hardly prepared for such a good-looking and highly capable bunch. The gleaming metallic bodies, great image quality, and pocket-size convenience of most of the cameras we looked at for this roundup should push thoughts of forthcoming PDA or LCD monitor purchases far from your mind as well. And while we wouldn’t mind owning almost any of the 15 compact cameras we put through their paces for our annual digital camera roundup, our Editors’ Choice for the photo-enthusiast crowd goes, hands down, to the Pentax Optio 550. Though pricey at $600 (street), it packs a ton of features into a tiny, attractive package. The competition in the less expensive point-and-shoot class was closer, but our nod goes to the Kodak EasyShare DX6340. Kodak’s family of EasyShare cameras has won our consistent applause for ease of use and the amazing EasyShare software; this new entry doesn’t disappoint. And the new Kodak EasyShare printer dock 6000 is yet another of Kodak’s clever inventions. But you can save only 4 from the series. Unlike most digital cameras, the F410 doesn’t offer separate quality (compression) settings; it offers only various resolutions, with hardware interpolation up to 6 megapixels. But our tests indicated that there’s virtually no image quality difference between the 3-megapixel and 6-megapixel modes. Our simulated daylight shots were slightly underexposed, with attractive colors but only average sharpness. Our flash shots exhibited excellent dynamic range, good illumination, and accurate color, but again with only average sharpness. Sheer simplicity and quick handling make the F410 a worthy competitor, but good looks alone aren’t enough to make this a great camera.—SWG and DG HP Photosmart 935 5.3 megapixels, $450 street. 888-999-4747, www.hp.com. l l l l m The EX-Z3 does not offer manual exposure control, though it has image-enhancing tools, including a real-time histogram, manual white balance, manual focus, and exceptionally easy-to-use program modes. Boot and recycle times are average, but the EX-Z3 excels in playback. You can program slide shows, create folders with your favorite shots, and trim, resize, copy, or rotate images. With all these great capabilities, we question the absence of a videoout port, which a few cameras have. Image quality with the default settings is only fair. Our daylight test image was muddy and significantly underexposed, though it had good detail. Our flash test image was overexposed by 1.5 f-stops, but it had very good color and illumination. If you’re willing to forgo some image quality for style, the EX-Z3 is an excellent value, especially since its two-button dock is included rather than sold as a costly option.—SWG and DG Fujifilm FinePix F410 3.1 megapixels, $499.95 list. 800-800-3854, www.fujifilm.com. l l l m m Though light on features, the small, square Fujifilm FinePix F410 is easy, fast, and fun to operate, making it a good choice for the family. The F410’s gently sculpted shape is comfortable and convenient to hold—even one-handed—and its few buttons and controls are strategically placed. A slider selects still shots, video recording, or playback modes. Unfortunately, the F410 is one of only two cameras we tested that don’t have separate selftimer buttons. Instead, the timer is activated only from a menu. Images are saved to the new postage stamp–size xD-Picture Cards. Inexplicably, Fujifilm has put a cheap plastic tripod screw socket into its otherwise excellent all-metal body. The F410 is a basic point-and-shoot camera, even in the so-called manual THE HP PHOTOSMART 935 has marvelous image clarity. mode. Manual mode simply means that you can select the ISO equivalency and white balance from a list of presets. The only other available settings are normal or enhanced color and black-and-white. Boot and recycling times are faster than average, and with few modes or parameters to set, overall throughput is relatively fast. Also, the two burst modes (called top 4 and bottom 4) let you shoot anything from 4 to 25 frames at the rate of 3 per second. HP takes over CCD-size bragging rights with the 5.3-megapixel HP Photosmart 935. Feature-laden as it is, the 935 has its sights set on the point-and-shoot consumer who wants something extra. The camera’s ease of use is exemplified in the legible and detailed help screens on the big LCD. The onscreen menu is functionally designed, and scroll buttons enhance the usability. The 935’s boxy design won’t win any style awards, but it fits well in your hand, and a molded contour on the camera face makes single-handed use (for “righties”) easy. The 935 is certainly no slouch in terms of features. For starters, it has a 3X Pentax optical zoom and includes common exposure settings for action, landscape, and portrait, as well as aperture priority, metering, white balance (for sun, shade, tungsten, fluorescent, and manual), and various ISO speeds for more sophisticated shooters. The on-screen help can assist the uninitiated in taking pictures without resorting to the manual. Finally, HP’s Instant Share button automates printing and e-mailing, and the company thoughtfully supplies an additional USB printer cable. The 935 has multiple resolution and JPEG compression choices and can shoot and review up to 120 seconds of MPEG video with its internal microphone and speaker. HP’s software is simple and intuitive, allowing for easy transferring to a PC, organizing, printing, and e-mailing, as well as some rudimentary editing. The 935 garnered an impressive 1,400 lines per inch (average) on our resolution www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 87 Digital SLRs: Lower Prices at the High End Professional features at consumer prices: Digital SLR cameras now start at just $1,400. Wow! W hen it comes to image quality, a single-lens reflex camera (SLR) is clearly a breed apart. Look through the viewfinder of an SLR and you’ll see the actual image in the lens. That makes photo composition accurate and easy. By comparison, the cameras we tested for our main story and for “Three Big Shots” (page 100) have small viewfinders mounted near the lenses and show an imperfect view at best. An SLR also offers interchangeable lenses, from ultrawide and fish-eye lenses to monster telephotos that often weigh (and cost) much more than the camera body itself. Most important, a digital SLR uses an image sensor that is much larger than that found in a point-and-shoot model. The larger sensor delivers improved image quality, less noise, and a higher dynamic range—the ability to resolve bright and dark areas simultaneously. SLRs may be large, complex, and pricey, but they also offer flexibility, accuracy, and image quality that point-and-shoot models just can’t equal, making SLRs popular with serious amateurs and pros alike. First-generation digital SLRs were designed for pros, with price tags to match. Then in 2000 came the 3.3-megapixel Canon EOS D30, the first consumer digital SLR. It was a bargain at $3,500; similar models carried price tags of $6,000 and up. Today you can buy a digital SLR for as little as $1,400. We tested two of the latest and most innovative consumer SLRs: the Canon EOS 10D and the Sigma SD9. We also previewed the new Olympus E-1, announced shortly before we went to press. The EOS 10D uses a Canon-developed CMOS chip, the SD9 uses the innovative Foveon X3 CMOS sensor, and the E-1 uses a Kodak-developed CCD. C O N S U M E R CANON EOS 10D The Canon EOS 10D ($1,500 street) is the company’s thirdgeneration consumer digital SLR, and it shows, offering an 88 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com unbeatable combination of image quality, ergonomics, and value. Canon has addressed the few complaints we had with previous models (sluggish auto-focus, erratic flash exposure, and the lack of a focus indicator in the viewfinder). The result is a smooth, elegant camera that isn’t much more difficult to use than a point-and-shoot model. The EOS 10D’s magnesium alloy exterior has nonslip rubber on the handgrip. The control layout is logical, and frequently changed settings like ISO speed, auto-focus mode, and white balance are controlled by dedicated buttons on the top. The rear of the camera has a bright 1.8-inch LCD for image playback and menu display. A smaller LCD on the top of the camera shows exposure information, shooting mode, and frames remaining. The included lithium ion battery pack provides enough power for several hundred images and takes about 90 minutes to recharge with the included external charger. As with other consumer digital SLRs, the EOS 10D uses an image sensor that’s about two-thirds the size of a 35-mm film frame, so the effective focal length of the lens is multiplied by a factor of 1.6. This means that a 50-mm lens, when used with the EOS 10D, performs like an 80-mm lens on a 35mm film camera. Canon supplied its pricey 16- to 35-mm f-2.8 lens ($1,400) with our test camera, but many EOS 10D buyers opt for the 24- to 85-mm ($310) or the 28- to 135mm ($400) version as a starter lens. You can select from a variety of exposure modes, from fully automatic to completely manual. As on many Canon cameras, the EOS 10D’s shutter-mode dial has six preset modes, including portrait, action, night shot, and scenery. These modes are handy for newcomers to SLR cameras, but more experienced photographers will appreciate the manual-control option. The Canon EOS 10D is a pleasure to use, producing terrific images with excellent clarity, color, and sharpness. We are especially impressed by its lack of image noise, even at very D I G I TA L C A M E R A S Though it looks very much like the Olympus E-10 and E-20N noninterchangeable-lens SLRs, the E-1 is a new design inside and out. But the control layout is very similar to those cameras, so E-Series fans will feel right at home with the E-1. Olympus has announced five lenses for the E-1, from 11 to 300 mm SIGMA SD9 (equivalent to 22 to 600 mm in 35-mm focal lengths). The Sigma SD9 ($1,400 street) is the only camera to use the The E-1 is the first camera built to conform to the Four innovative new Foveon X3 chip, the first chip that is sensitive Thirds open standard created by Fuji, Kodak, and Olympus, to all three primary colors. Conventional CMOS and CCD image which specifies a standard image sensor size (4/3 inches) sensors are monochromatic, so they use a mask of colored and lens mount, as well as other optical, electronic, and dots (called a Bayer mask) overlaid on the sensor. Electronics mechanical standards. The basic premise behind Four in the camera read information from the sensor at the instant Thirds is that existing 35-mm bodies and lenses are unnecof exposure and generate a three-color RGB value for each essarily large for digital cameras. The Four Thirds partners pixel using a process called hope to establish a interpolation. The X3 sensor PERFORMANCE TESTS: DIGITAL SLRs standard for smaller, produces an RGB value for lighter, less expensive High scores are best. each pixel on the chip, cameras and lenses. Resolution (lines per inch) Color Incandescent Fluorescent Flash eliminating the need for the Bold type denotes first place. Horizontal Vertical In theory, any Four Canon EOS 10D 1,800 1,800 Excellent Excellent Excellent mask and the interpolation. Sigma SD9 Thirds lens will work with >2,000* >2,000* Good Very good Excellent While the SD9 isn’t as any Four Thirds camera. * The standard ISO 1223 chart reports resolutions only as high as 2,000 lines per inch. aesthetically refined as the Kodak provides the CCD image sensor for the E-1; so far, the company’s archrival, Fuji, Canon EOS 10D, the camera’s image quality speaks for itself. The 3.5-megapixel Foveon chip produces at least as much has been mum about its future plans. Canon and Nikon, detail and resolution as a conventional 6-megapixel sensor. which have huge investments in existing lens designs, are You’ll have to endure a few quirks to get those excellent unlikely to rush to build Four Thirds cameras anytime soon. images, though. The SD9 uses Sigma’s own lens mount, so At $2,199 list, the 5-megapixel E-1 is more expensive than you’re locked into that lens system. The company doesn’t a 6-megapixel consumer SLR like the Canon EOS 10D or Nikon D100. Olympus is emphatic that the E-1 is a professionalprovide a rechargeable battery, and the camera requires two level camera, comparable to 4- and 5-megapixel pro SLRs like types of power. The digital electronics use four double-A or two lithium cells. The analog electronics (including the shutter the Canon EOS 1D and the Nikon D1x (each $4,000). A consumer variant of the E-1 is planned for 2004. Though Olymand light meter) take a pair of lithium batteries. pus won’t comment on the price, that unit will probably cost Quirks aside, the SD9 is the first consumer digital SLR to include a dust shield as part of the lens mount. Its unique less than $1,200. viewfinder has a translucent mask, letting you see just outside Olympus sent us a preproduction E-1 with a 14- to 54-mm of the camera’s field of view. And it is also the first sub-$2,000 lens. Final production units should be identical to our camera, camera with both USB and FireWire connections. although the firmware will probably change before final reMost high-end digital cameras store images in JPEG, RAW, lease. The E-1 is the first Olympus camera to let users install or TIFF format, but the SD9 saves all images in Foveon’s own firmware updates. It goes one step beyond the Sigma SD9 by X3F RAW format. Sigma’s excellent Photo Pro software prooffering high-speed USB 2.0 in addition to FireWire. Unlike vides after-the-fact color and exposure correction for X3F many newer Olympus cameras, it uses CompactFlash. files, and it can save files as JPEGs or TIFFs. But if you just The E-1 is noticeably smaller and lighter (by nearly a pound) want a JPEG file in a hurry, this isn’t the camera for you. than most digital SLRs, and the 14- to 54-mm lens provides a The Sigma SD9’s relatively slow auto-focus and 2-fps very useful range of focal lengths, equivalent to 28 to 108 mm shooting rate rule it out for sports and action photography. on a 35-mm camera. It can focus on objects as close as 8 But its excellent image quality, accurate color rendering, and inches. The E-1’s quality is top-notch, with extensive weather low price tag will appeal to advanced amateurs and budget- sealing around the lens mount, doors, and controls to keep minded professional photographers. (631-585-1144, www dust and moisture out. Its innovative self-cleaner uses ultra.sigmaphoto.com. llllm ) sonic vibration to shake dust off the image sensor each time the camera powers up. P R O F E S S I O N A L Despite its preproduction status, our test camera performed OLYMPUS E-1 flawlessly. The photographs we took were sharp and clear, When it ships in October, the Olympus E-1 ($2,199 list) will with accurate, vibrant color and virtually no noise, even at high mark a radical departure in digital SLR cameras. Unlike other ISO settings. With the E-1, Olympus has a winner on its hands. digital SLRs, which are based on 35-mm camera designs, the (800-645-8160, www.olympusamerica.com. No rating— E-1 is designed from the start to be a digital camera. preproduction unit.)—Les Freed high (400 and 800) ISO speeds. The EOS 10D also turned in eye-catching results on our performance tests, with very high scores for color accuracy and image resolution. (800-8284040, www.usa.canon.com. lllll ) www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 89 D I G I TA L C A M E R A S tests, and that resolving power really came into play on our jury tests, earning the 935 excellent ratings for focus. Image clarity was marvelous, and the 935 achieved very good ratings for color and dynamic range. The test score for boot-up time was average, but the recycle time was good. HP provides a 32MB SD card and a USB interface with a cable for file transfer, but you need the optional HP Photosmart 8886 camera dock ($80 street) for TV connectivity and battery recharging. The 935 is an extremely user-friendly and powerful camera.—Glenn Menin THE KODAK DX6340 IS an exceptionally easy-to-use camera. Kodak EasyShare DX6340 3.1 megapixels, $329 list. 800-235-6325, www.kodak.com. l l l l m Consider the Kodak EasyShare DX6340 the camera for anyone intimidated by the word digital. The newest EasyShare delivers not only exceptional ease of use but also good performance for its class. No wonder it’s an Editors’ Choice camera. This 3.1-megapixel camera has a 4X optical zoom and comes with 16MB of builtin memory. At 9.4 ounces, it is the heaviest in our roundup, but its heft makes it solid and stable in your hand. The well-labeled and accessible controls are larger than most—a plus for some people. And the 1.8-inch LCD showcases a well-designed menu. A round control dial with a center toggle switch accesses the video, auto, sport, portrait, night, landscape, and close-up modes as well as Kodak’s PAS menu. For more experienced photographers, this menu accesses aperture and shutter priority modes. Other custom settings include exposure compensation and white balance. The DX6340 records video with audio in QuickTime (at a fixed focal length) and works with the included EasyShare software. EasyShare’s installation is painless, and its simple interface lets you transfer, e-mail, print, organize, and edit photos or order prints online. (But don’t throw out your copy of Adobe Photoshop.) Our test results were mostly favorable. Our jury liked both flash and nonflash still images, although it ranked the DX6340 last in pixel transition, which could affect image sharpness. The three quality settings are limited to JPEG files; the camera doesn’t offer an uncompressed file format. Optional but worthwhile accessories: The EasyShare camera dock 6000 gives 90 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com you one-touch picture transfers and quick charging, while the truly portable EasyShare printer dock 6000 outputs sparkling 4- by 6-inch borderless images on special photo paper. Unlike some products here, the Kodak camera does not include rechargeable batteries or a charger. Also keep in mind that on our reader survey (page 94), satisfaction with Kodak cameras trails other manufacturers’ scores. Nevertheless, the ease of use, image quality, and affordability make the DX6340 an excellent choice.—GM Konica Digital Revio KD-500Z 5.0 megapixels, $599.95 list. 800-285-6422, www.konica.com. l l l m m A solid fast-shooter that captures highquality images, the Konica Digital Revio KD-500Z is certain to appeal to anyone who wants big-picture capability in a small package. It’s the smallest and slimmest of the 5-megapixel cameras we tested. When you slide open the lens cover on the KD-500Z, you’re greeted by flashing aquamarine LEDs and musical chords. But the KD-500Z offers few features, so don’t look for manual exposure settings or selectable ISO equivalencies. The only changeable parameters are four whitebalance presets. And the optical viewfinder does not have a focusable diopter. The bottom compartment doesn’t have a catch to keep the battery from accidentally falling out. And the tripod screw socket is plastic, not metal. The KD-500Z is unique among the cameras we reviewed in its support for Memory Stick and SD—but not both at once. Oddly, it has just 2MB of built-in memory, enough for only about 17 VGA images. The buttons are placed and labeled well, but navigation (especially exiting) and menus are confusing and frustrating. The 1.5-inch LCD viewfinder is detailed, and although it displays a white crosshair in the center, current settings are small and sometimes impossible to read against bright backgrounds. The KD-500Z is a quick shooter. It had the fastest boot time of the cameras we tested and a very respectable recycle time. It offers various playback options, including fast pan and zoom, play back, resize, move, and add audio commentary. Its visual resolution, the highest of the models we tested, translates into good but not excellent images. Our simulated daylight test shot had correct colors and excellent detail but low contrast and no snap. The flash test image had average sharpness and good color but was slightly underexposed. The stylish KD-500Z may not have all the features of the other 5-megapixel compact units we reviewed, but its size, speed, and looks make it a worthwhile choice.—SWG and DG Minolta DiMage F300 5.0 megapixels, $600 street. 201-825-4000, www.minoltausa.com. l l l m m KONICA offers big-picture capability in a small package. You’ll either love or hate the Minolta DiMage F300’s long, square, utilitarian-looking body. But underneath its all-metal skin is a camera whose sophistication ranges from “auto-everything” point-and-shoot capability to full manual exposure control. And at $600, you pay a premium for it. You can operate the F300 easily with one hand, since it’s the only camera in our roundup with a sculpted nonslip grip on the back. The buttons are small and easy to press, but some are poorly marked with unfamiliar icons. A large, easy-to-set select dial surrounds the shutter button. Unlike most compacts, the F300 has a control panel on top that obviates using the power-hungry LCD to show the camera’s status. That’s good, because the F300 is powered by only two double-A batteries, which are easily accessible from the side. The F300 offers extensive manual control, including aperture and shutter priority, adjustable exposure bracketing, and manual focus and focus area selection, as well as sharpness, contrast, saturation, and flash adjustments. It’s one of only a handful of digital cameras that have a bulb setting for time exposures. The parameters menu is extensive but straightforward, yet reading the small type on the LCD and using the right combination of analog controls can be frustrating. For all its power, the F300 is slow, with pokey boot and recycle times. Burst mode (continuous advance), however, is reason- ably fast. The F300 earned top honors for the best pixel transition among the cameras we tested. Though our daylight test shot was slightly underexposed, it contained lots of detail and excellent color. But the flash test shot was unevenly illuminated, somewhat blurry, and significantly overexposed, although colors were good. The F300 is capable of capturing very good pictures with either a minimum of fuss or a high degree of precision. It’s a fine choice for photo-savvy shutterbugs with less technically adept spouses or families.—SWG and DG Nikon Coolpix 3100 3.2 megapixels, $349.95 list. 800-645-6689, www.nikonusa.com. l l l m m There’s no mistaking the Nikon Coolpix 3100 for anything but a high-quality cam- Phone In Your Photos I f you think your cell phone delivers instant gratification now, just wait. With the latest wireless services and phones, you can snap photos and transmit them to another cell phone, an e-mail account, or the Web. Some models are so jam-packed with applications that they seem to double as tiny multimedia production studios, offering fullmotion video-recording capability. Camera phones may be novelties now, but not for long. But don’t get your hopes too high just yet. First, the interfaces on most are not as intuitive as they need to be, which is especially important when a phone offers multiple applications accessible only via a cramped keypad. Second, the Multimedia Messaging Service (MMS) for phone-tophone photo sharing does not yet work across networks. Finally, since wireless networks don’t yet support simultaneous voice and data, you can’t transmit a photo until your call is over. Simultaneous voice and data capabilities are expected in upcoming wireless standards like WCDMA. Most of all, don’t think of a cell-phone camera as a replacement for a full-fledged digital camera. It’s not. At resolutions ranging from 352 by 288 pixels (that’s just one-tenth of a megapixel) to 640-by-480, photos are nowhere near the quality of those from even a cheap digital camera. Rather, such photos are meant for viewing on a cell phone or in a small window on a computer display. In other words, they’re perfect for impulsive picture taking. Despite the rough edges, cell-phone cameras represent an indisputably fun way to take photos, and consumers are snapping up them up at an explosive rate— P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com and effects in the Coolpix 3100. era at the right price. Conventional in appearance and comfortable to use, with lots of assistance to make shooting easy and fun, the Coolpix 3100 offers basic pointand-shoot simplicity to anyone who finds most digital cameras ergonomically challenged. Image quality, however, doesn’t live up to Nikon’s usual high standards. around 50 million worldwide expected this year (mostly in Japan), says Tony Henning, senior analyst at The Future Image WIRE. He expects that camera phones will outsell digital and film cameras combined in 2003. The main drivers of their popularity, says Neil Strothers, a senior analyst at InStat/MDR, are simply that they’re fun and the prices are low. AT&T Wireless, Cingular Wireless, Sprint PCS, T-Mobile, and Verizon Wireless each offer phones with built-in cameras. Before you dive in, though, study the pricing plans. If you think cell-phone pricing is convoluted now, the photo services add yet another layer of complexity. You can buy cell phones with detachable cameras as extra-cost options, but we reviewed models with built-in cameras—less stuff to lose. We had low expectations for these phones: They’d be hard to use, and we’d have to break out the manual. But the Sanyo SCP 8100 ($199 before rebate) with the Sprint PCS Vision Pictures Pack (an extra $15 per month with any service plan) changed our minds. It is surprisingly easy to use. We powered it on and easily snapped a photo of a coworker using the camera key on the keypad. [ NOKIA 3650 ] 92 YOU’LL FIND innovative modes [ LG VX6000 ] D I G I TA L C A M E R A S Although the Coolpix 3100’s silver body is plastic, not metal, a rounded battery compartment makes the camera easy to grip and operate one-handed. Most of the buttons on the back, as well as the mode dial, can be quickly accessed, although not all are easily identifiable. The viewfinder is bright and very readable but slow to turn on, and it dims when you press the shutter halfway. The memory card door is flimsy, and the compartment on the bottom has no safety catch to keep the batteries from accidentally falling out. The Coolpix 3100 has virtually no controls, though it offers innovative modes and effects. It can macro-focus as close as 1.6 inches (without the flash blowing out!), and it takes large 640-by-480 videos, even in black-and-white or sepia tones. It has a best-shot selector and provides 14 easy-to- follow scene modes for shooting portraits, fireworks, and so on. Better yet, four common modes—sports, landscape, portrait, and night portrait—are accessible via the mode-select dial and come with visual cues for novices. In playback, you can enhance, crop, copy, or create a slide show. The Coolpix 3100 had decent boot and recycle times, and overall image quality is good. Our daylight test image was underexposed by 1 f-stop, with accurate color and good detail but not great sharpness. The flash test shot, though crisp, had uneven exposure. But for a 3.2-megapixel compact, the Coolpix 3100 is a fun camera at an attractive price.—SWG and DG Olympus Stylus 400 Digital 4.1 megapixels, $500 street. 800-201-7766, www.olympusamerica.com. l l m m m THE OLYMPUS is curvaceous, intuitive, and weatherproof. Responding to on-screen prompts, we saved the shot, typed in an e-mail address (painstaking but doable), added a 10-second voice memo, and sent it on its way. The interface stepped us through the process without overloading us with options. Conveniently, the SCP 8100 uploads photos to the Sprint PCS Pictures Web site automatically. What could have been a real headache took just a few minutes—no manual required. Sprint scores big points for ease of use, and you can’t beat the price. On the downside, phone-to-phone photo sharing is limited to other PCS Vision handsets, the photos are small (352 by 288 pixels), and editing is limited to changing the color tone to sepia, black and white, or negative. And the SCP 8100 has just 512K of memory. For straightforward, no-frills picture taking, however, this combo unit won’t disappoint. Though late to the game, Verizon Wireless introduced its PIX service ($2.99 per month for unlimited photos) and the LG VX6000 Camera Phone ($199 before rebate) in July. The wait was worthwhile. The simple, exquisite interface has clear icons and labels, excellent integration with the contact list, and automatic photo uploads to its secure Web site. The camera has three levels of zoom, three resolution settings (up to 640by-480), basic photo-editing options, and fun extras like boilerplate captions and a self-timer. Best of all, the $2.99 monthly service price is unbeatable. There’s just one downside: merely 90K of memory for pictures. Perfect for gadgeteers, the Nokia 3650 (about $250 before rebate; pricing varies by location) from Cingular Wireless (also available from AT&T and T-Mobile) isn’t as intuitive as the Sanyo device, but it’s so packed with applications that voice calling seems like an afterthought. The camera shoots photos at 640-by-480 resolution and has a zoom feature. The Nokia 3650 is excellent for video postcards; it records 15-second video clips to its generous 20MB of memory. The The curvaceous Olympus Stylus 400 Digital is an exceptionally handsome allmetal camera that combines art, simplicity, and weatherproofing. But although it’s included RealOne Mobile Player supports 3GP videos (the format in which movies are created under the new 3GPP wireless data standard). The memory card is full of Javabased photo-editing applications, including FotoFunPack, which lets you create and edit images of your subjects as bodybuilders and turn them into sliding-tile puzzles and other diversions. You can also add borders and frames. Cingular does not currently support MMS, but you can send photos via e-mail, Bluetooth, or infrared. You can also upload photos to Ofoto to share with family and friends. The pricing plan is based on kilobytes used, which is hardly the simplest approach; a photo at medium resolution can range from 18K to 40K, depending on the message size and network coverage. That’s about 54 cents per picture, depending on your wireless Internet plan. For quick videos and loads of photo options—at a price—this is the model to get. The Samsung SGH-v205 ($349 before rebate), available with T-Mobile’s t-zones service ($2.99 per month for about 40 photos), is a no-frills camera phone that gets the job done. It has 2MB of memory, resolution is skimpy (352 by 288), and it doesn’t offer any editing tools, frames, or borders, but it does have captions. The phone book is well integrated with the e-mail application, but it does display unfortunate error messages like “Your picture was delivered as text only.” Though the phone is priced on the high end, monthly service pricing is much less expensive than plans from competitors. The Panasonic GU87 ($399 before rebate), available from AT&T Wireless (40 cents per photo transmission), has four resolution settings (from 80 by 60 pixels to 640 by 480 pixels), zoom, a self-timer, a self-portrait feature (a tiny mirror on the faceplate), and 1MB of memory. The interface is laden with cryptic icons that are difficult to decipher, though we did manage to change photos to sepia and put frames around them.—Carol Levin www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 93 THE LUMIX is a small, beautifully finished camera. easy to use, it offers limited options and controls, and image quality is uneven. Besides having its lens protected by a gold anodized sliding cover, the Stylus 400 is weatherproofed (but not waterproofed, so don’t try dunking it!) with rubber seals over its ports and compartments. Once the cover is off, however, the lens is unprotected. The Stylus 400’s limited controls are nicely placed on the back, but because of the weatherproofing, the memory card compartment on the side is hard to pry open. And it doesn’t have a speaker or microphone, so movies are silent. The Stylus 400 has an intuitive menu for its sparse features. You can choose resolution (but not compression level), set white balance and exposure compensation, and select panoramas or one of five program modes, but that’s about all. Instead of pressing a playback button to view your photos, you close the lens cover. Boot and recycle times were faster than average, but image quality was uneven and our test flash shot disappointing. The flash shots were simply unacceptable at distances under 5 feet. On the other hand, daylight shots had good color and detail, a slight cyan cast notwithstanding. Style, convenience, and weatherproofing define the Olympus Stylus 400 Digital, but it’s pricey for a 4-megapixel compact, and its overpowered flash limits indoor photography.—SWG and DG Panasonic Lumix DMC-F1S 3.2 megapixels, $399.95 list. 800-211-7262, www.panasonic.com. l l l m m The Panasonic Lumix DMC-F1S is a small, beautifully finished camera that sets itself Reader Survey: Digital Cameras Y ou get what you pay for. That’s the obvious conclusion from nearly 10,000 responses to our annual Service and Reliability Survey on digital cameras. Readers’ favorite cameras tend to be the most advanced, most expensive ones. Last year (in our August issue), Canon, Fuji, Minolta, Nikon, Olympus, and Sony received A’s, indicating superior scores for overall satisfaction, satisfaction with reliability, the number of units needing repair in the past year, and the likelihood of buying from the same company again. This year, Minolta falls to a C. In 2002, only Sony had a significantly better-than-average percentage of units needing repair. This year, Canon and Olympus also do. These two companies also surpass Sony TOP REASONS SPECIFIED FOR CONTACTING TECH SUPPORT and Kodak in terms of the total number of responses this time, pushing them to third and fourth place. Canon climbs to the top for cameras a year old or less, with 40 percent more responses than the closest competitor. Canon, Nikon, Olympus, and Sony receive A’s in this age bracket. Fujifilm falls to a C. Minolta gets a D and is the only company with a significantly worse-than-average percentage of recently purchased units needing repairs. Getting off on the right foot is key, and in the context of first-year cameras, the companies with E’s (HP and Toshiba) or D’s (Kodak and Minolta) clearly have had difficulty; 12 and 18 percent of their units have had problems out of the box, versus MARKET SHARE 2002 survey 2003 survey Megapixels Camera not operating to its specifications Canon 9.4% 15.7% Casio 2.1% 1.3% Epson 1.8% 0.8% Canon Fujifilm 6.5% 7.4% Fujifilm HP 7.3% 5.9% 18.5% 14.4% Minolta 1.7% 3.0% Nikon 7.9% 10.1% 17.5% 18.2% Panasonic 1.9% 0.9% Kodak Polaroid 2.6% 1.4% Nikon 21.4% 19.1% 1.4% 1.7% Battery/power-related problems Difficulty connecting camera to PC Pictures don’t look as expected Kodak HP Kodak Olympus Minolta Nikon Olympus Sony Toshiba Sony Percent K 94 FIRST-YEAR SATISFACTION BY RESOLUTION 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 Percentages may not total 100 because of rounding. Based on all survey responses, including those for sub-2-megapixel cameras, which are not otherwise included in the survey results. P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com Overall satisfaction* 2 to <3 (1,309 responses) 8.1 3 to <4 (1,567) 8.5 4 to <5 (1,006) 8.8 ≥ 5 (749) 9.0 * On a scale of 1 to 10, where 10 is best. TOP REASONS SPECIFIED FOR NEEDING REPAIRS Broken part Would not turn on Photo quality problems Difficulty connecting camera to PC Canon Olympus Sony Percent K 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 D I G I TA L C A M E R A S pressed. The few buttons and controls on the back are conveniently placed and clearly marked. The 1.5-inch LCD has excellent color, contrast, and resolution. The DMC-F1S is a glorified point-andshooter with confusing menus. You can’t specify f-stops or shutter speeds, though these settings are displayed on-screen prior to recording. Among the handful of notable settings are exposure bracketing, spot metering, continuous auto-focus, audio annotation, and adjustable color saturation and color effects. Instead of resolutions, auto mode lets you choose among Enlarge, 4-by-6, and Internet settings. Although its boot and recycle times are average for a 3-megapixel unit, the DMC- quality is only average. Our daylight test shot was slightly underexposed but exhibited good color and acceptable sharpness. Our flash shot was evenly illuminated but contrasty, increasing the perception of sharpness; the colors, while not accurate, were appealing. The DMC-F1S doesn’t have lots of extras, but it’s one of the few digital cameras with the look and feel of a fine film camera.—SWG and DG Pentax Optio 550 5.0 megapixels, $600 street. 800-8770155, www.pentaxdigital.com. l l l l l The Pentax Optio 550 is a powerhouse that delivers almost every digital To learn more about how we surveyed, go to our Web site: www.pcmag.com/sr/methodology.—Ben Z. Gottesman A Significantly better than average C Average SURVEY RESULTS: DIGITAL CAMERAS th Un i thets ne pa edin st 12 g re mo pai nth r in Wo s uld br an buy d a th ga is in B Significantly worse than average fac ll s ati s or Ov era C Average Re a gr ders ad ’ R e ep A Significantly better than average Sa t rel isfac iab tio ilit n w y i tC tio n ard B Significantly worse than average OVERALL POINT-AND-SHOOT Camera Canon PowerShot A40 (102 responses) Re s (m olut eg ion ap ixe ls) n FIRST-YEAR SATISFACTION BY MODEL tio no more than 9 percent for higher-rated companies. Overall, few readers have needed technical support (10 percent), and even fewer have needed repairs (6 percent). In fact, so few have reported support and repair issues that we don’t see statistically significant differences on these measures among the camera makers. F1S gives a tactile sense of precision. Image Ov e sa rall tis fac apart with a superb 3X zoom lens designed by famed optical manufacturer Leica. It has some noteworthy settings, but its feature set is limited, the menus are confusing, and the documentation is poorly written. Even so, the DMC-F1S will appeal to those accustomed to precision mechanics but not interested in top-quality images. Rectangular, with a dramatic flat front and a sliding disk that protects the lens, the all-metal camera can easily be operated one-handed. The small mode dial on top has a beautifully knurled ring around the outside for easier turning and a tiny OK button in the middle that’s difficult to activate. The power switch next to the shutter button is exposed and can accidentally be A 2.0 Canon PowerShot A70 (59) C 3.2 Canon PowerShot S200 (59) C 2.0 Canon PowerShot S230 (69) C 3.2 Canon PowerShot S400 (65) A 4.0 Fujifilm FinePix 2650 Zoom (50) C 2.0 Canon (1,742 responses) A A A A A Kodak EasyShare CX4230 Zoom (58) B 2.1 Casio (110) D C C C B Kodak EasyShare DX4330 Zoom (71) C 3.1 Epson (55) C C C C C Kodak EasyShare LS443 Zoom (79) A 4.0 Fujifilm (677) A A A C A Nikon Coolpix 2500 (77) B 2.1 HP (430) E B B C B Olympus Camedia D-550 Zoom (94) C 3.0 Kodak (1,201) E B B C B AVERAGE 8.6* Minolta (343) C C C C C PROSUMER AND DIGITAL SLRs Nikon (1,196) A A A C A Canon PowerShot G2 (118 responses) C 4.0 Olympus (1,719) A A A A A Canon PowerShot G3 (113) C 4.0 Pentax (51) C C C C C Canon PowerShot S30 (62) C 3.0 Sony (1,461) A A A A A Canon PowerShot S40 (56) C 4.0 Toshiba (172) E B B C B Canon PowerShot S45 (67) C 4.0 8.2* 8.7* 6.8% 8.1* Fujifilm FinePix S602 Zoom (68) C 3.3 Fujifilm FinePix 3800 (81) C 3.2 AVERAGE FIRST YEAR Canon (1,057 responses) A A A A A Nikon Coolpix 4500 (70) B 4.0 Fujifilm (383) C C C C C Nikon Coolpix 5700 (99) C 5.0 HP (207) E B B C B Olympus Camedia C-720 Ultra Zoom (62) B 3.0 Kodak (454) D C C C B Olympus Camedia C-4000 Zoom (109) C 4.0 Minolta (213) D C C B C Olympus Camedia C-5050 Zoom (82) A 5.0 Nikon (532) A A A C A Sony Cyber-shot DSC-F717 (75) A 6.0 Olympus (756) A A A A A Sony Cyber-shot DSC-S85 (55) C 4.1 Sony (668) A A A C A Canon EOS 10D** (58) A 6.3 Toshiba (66) E B B C B Nikon D100** (65) A 6.0 8.4* 8.8* 4.4% 8.5* AVERAGE AVERAGE GREEN text denotes Readers’ Choice. All of the charted measures contribute to the Readers’ Report Card grade. A dash indicates that we do not have enough survey data to give the company a score. * On a scale of 1 to 10, where 10 is best. 8.8* * On a scale of 1 to 10, where 10 is best. ** The Canon EOS 10D and the Nikon D100 are the only digital SLRs with enough responses for inclusion. We are comparing the results against prosumer cameras but not factoring them into the category average. www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 95 camera feature, mode, and parameter imaginable. Despite its complexity, this cleverly designed, all-metal 5-megapixel compact is easy to operate and should appeal to both savvy shooters and neophytes. It earns an Editors’ Choice nod for photo enthusiasts. The brushed-metal front, along with the optical and auto-focus viewfinders, gives the Optio 550 the look of a high-quality 35mm rangefinder film camera. Its buttons, controls, and dials are well marked, and most are easy to reach, even one-handed. The LCD is bright and highly readable but sometimes appears cluttered and confusing because of all the status numbers and icons. Though extensive, the menus are logically organized. Our only criticisms of the otherwise excellent construction concern the plastic compartment doors and the plastic tripod screw socket. The Optio 550 stands out on several fronts: The only compact with a 5X optical zoom, it’s also the only one with a focusable diopter in its optical viewfinder; and it alone offers time-lapse photography, macro focusing under 1 inch, 3-D shooting, double exposures, and fast-forward in movie playback. It has a variety of manual controls for exposure, white balance, sharpness, saturation, contrast bracketing, and more. For less sophisticated photographers, the Optio 550 offers nine program modes, a panorama assist, and mode defaults that remember your settings. The Optio 550 was slow to boot, though its recycle time was above average. Image quality is good to excellent. Our simulated daylight image was significantly underexposed but sharp, with good color. Our flash shot was beautiful, with even illumination, wide dynamic range, and excellent colors.—SWG and DG Polaroid Photomax PDC 3350 3.3 megapixels, $299 list. 800-777-5331, www .spectraintl.com. l m m m m The Polaroid Photomax PDC 3350 ($299 list) is the largest and least expensive product in this roundup. But it has the look and feel of a cheap camera, with subpar performance, only a handful of features, and ho-hum image quality. The all-plastic silver body is roughly the size of a conventional 35-mm film camera, but its slim width lets you just barely slip it into a shirt pocket. The PDC 3350 has a handy nonslip pad on the front, but its few buttons are small and hard to press. On top, the plastic mode dial’s color-coded icons are crowded and difficult to see. The viewfinder is bright and responsive but freezes for 2 seconds when the shutter is pressed halfway. In auto mode, the only menu options S U M M A RY O F F E AT U R E S y YES o NO Canon PowerShot S400 Digital Elph Casio Exilim EX-Z3 Fujifilm FinePix F410 HP Photosmart 935 Price $599 list $399.99 list $499.95 list $450 street Weight (with batteries and memory card) 7.9 oz. 5.2 oz. 6.9 oz. 9.1 oz. Dimensions (HWD, in inches) Effective megapixels Maximum resolution (dpi) 3.4 x 2.2 x 1.1 4.0 2,272 x 1,704 2.2 x 3.4 x 0.9 3.2 2,048 x 1,536 2.7 x 3.3 x 1.1 3.1 2,816 x 2,120 2.6 x 3.8 x 1.8 5.3 2,608 x 1,952 Included batteries Battery charger/AC adapter 1 lithium ion yo 1 lithium ion yy 1 lithium ion yy 2 AA alkaline oo Toll-free technical support 800-652-2666 800-435-7732 800-800-3854 800-474-6836 Technical-support hours (eastern time) 3:00a–midnight M–F, noon–8:00 Sat. 8:00a–10:00p 9:00–8:00 M–F M–F; 9:00a– 10:00p Sat., Sun. 24/7 Interface USB 1.1 USB 1.1 LCD size (inches) 1.5 Optional dock, USB 1.1 2.0 1.5 Optional dock, USB 2.0 (full speed) 1.5 Included memory* 32MB CF 10MB internal 16MB xD 32MB SD Picture/video file formats JPEG / AVI yy o JPEG / AVI yo o JPEG / AVI yo o JPEG / MPEG Slide show/panorama framing mode Time-lapse photography USB Mass Storage Class o y y y Print Image Matching EXIF 2.2–compatible OPTICAL SPECIFICATIONS o y y y y y o y 35-mm equivalent (mm) ISO equivalencies 36–108 35–105 50, 100, 200, 400 50, 100, 200 38–114 200, 400, 800 37–111 100, 200, 400 Aperture range Shutter speed range (seconds) f-2.8–4.9 f-2.6–4.3 f-2.8–11.6 f-2.6–9.0 15–1/2,000 o o 1–1/2,000 o o 1/4–1/2,000 15–1/2,000 o o Closest macro (inches) Optical/digital zoom Flash modes 4.0 3X / 3.6X Auto, night scene, on, red eye 2.4 3X / 4X Auto, off, on, red eye 4.0 3X / 4.4X Auto, off, on, red eye, slow sync 5.5 3X / 7X Auto, auto with red eye, night, night with red eye, on Remote shutter release Tripod mount o Metal o Metal o Plastic o Plastic DIGITAL SPECIFICATIONS Continuous-shooting mode Auto-exposure bracketing COMPLEX BUT USEABLE, the Optio is a real powerhouse. RED denotes Editors’ Choice. 96 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com are image resolution and quality, but in manual mode you can adjust resolution, compression, exposure compensation, white balance, ISO setting, and slow shutter. The camera doesn’t offer any special features, program modes, or other manual settings. Both the f-stop and shutter speed are displayed on the viewfinder, but you can’t change them. While the PDC 3350 has a last-shot review button, you must hit it a second time when you’re ready to shoot, because pressing the shutter doesn’t instantly return you to shooting mode. Boot and recycle times were the slowest of the cameras we tested. Our daylight test shot was somewhat underexposed, with significant clipping in the highlights and inaccurate but acceptable colors. Our flash shot was significantly overexposed and unevenly illuminated, with washed-out colors and reduced sharpness. y o * CF—CompactFlash, MS—Memory Stick, SD—Secure Digital, xD—xD-Picture Card. y** o o D I G I TA L C A M E R A S Despite its low price, the PDC 3350’s poor to barely average image quality and slow performance prevent us from recommending it.—SWG and DG Samsung Digimax V4 4.0 megapixels, $450 street. 201-902-0347, www.samsungcamerausa.com. l l l m m There’s nothing unique or exceptional about the Samsung Digimax V4. But it’s a good-looking, well-designed, reasonably priced 4.0-megapixel compact camera. The Digimax V4’s muted-gray plastic body has a curved ridge in front and raised bumps on the back for a sure grip. The camera can be used one-handed, but with some buttons placed to the left of the LCD, you’ll need both hands to adjust all the settings. It doesn’t have a focusable diopter in the optical viewfinder; the power switch on top of the camera can easily be pressed quality is very good, though. Our daylight test shot had excellent exposure and very good color, though depth of field was limited. Our flash shot was sharp and nicely illuminated, with accurate colors. If you eschew flashy technology in favor of solid dependability at a fair price, you’ll like this camera.—SWG and DG by accident, and you must hit the review button to return to shooting mode instead of pressing the shutter halfway. Although this probably won’t matter to most people, the Digimax V4 can operate on nine different battery types, and the menus can be displayed in 15 languages. The Digimax V4 works equally well as a point-and-shoot camera or in full manual, aperture, or shutter priority mode. The only program modes are portrait and night scene, however. A built-in illuminator helps focus, and the wireless remote is convenient for shooting self-portraits. Navigating menus is simple and straightforward, aided by the color-coded tabs for Program, Setup, and MyCAM. MyCAM lets you save three groups of settings. Performance was not the Digimax V4’s strong suit; its boot and recycle times were slow for a 4-megapixel camera. Image Sony Cyber-shot DSC-P8 3.2 megapixels, $399.95 direct. 888-449-7669, www.sony.com. l l l l m The Sony Cyber-shot DSC-P8 is the most stylish camera we tested. Weighing 7.0 ounces, it feels solid and stable in the hand, and all the control dials and buttons are truly responsive. And when we opened the access panel to remove the Memory Stick, the battery remained securely in place. Anyone who has fumbled on the floor for lost components can appreciate this. Download this table at www.pcmag.com. Kodak EasyShare DX6340 Konica Digital Revio KDMinolta 500Z DiMage F300 Nikon Coolpix 3100 Olympus Stylus 400 Digital Panasonic Lumix DMC-F1S Pentax Optio 550 Polaroid Photomax PDC 3350 Samsung Digimax V4 Sony Cybershot DSC-P8 Toshiba PDR-T30 $329 list $599.95 list $600 street $349.95 list $500 street $399.95 list $600 street $299 list $450 street $399.95 direct $399.99 list 9.4 oz. 7.8 oz. 7.8 oz. 7.1 oz. 7.0 oz. 6.3 oz. 8.8 oz. 7.3 oz. 7.3 oz. 7.0 oz. 7.2 oz. 4.3 x 2.5 x 1.5 3.1 2,032 x 1,524 2.3 x 3.8 x 1.7 5.0 2,592 x 1,944 2.1 x 4.4 x 1.3 5.0 2,560 x 1,920 2.5 x 3.5 x 1.5 3.8 x 2.2 x 1.3 3.2 4.1 2,048 x 1,536 2,272 x 1,704 2.0 x 4.1 x 1.3 3.2 2,048 x 1,536 3.9 x 2.3 x 1.6 5.0 2,592 x 1,944 2.5 x 4.2 x 1.5 3.3 2,048 x 1,536 2.1 x 4.1 x 1.5 4.0 2.0 x 4.3 x 1.4 3.2 2.1 x 4.3 x 1.1 3.2 2,272 x 1,704 2,048 x 1,536 2,048 x 1,536 1 lithium oo 1 lithium ion yo 1 lithium oo 1 lithium oo 1 lithium ion yy 1 lithium ion yo 2 AA alkaline oo 1 lithium oo 1 InfoLithium yy 1 lithium ion oy 800-235-6325 888-756-6422 9:00–6:00 M–F 877-462-4464 9:00–8:00 M–F 800-645-6689 800-622-6372 24/7 9:00a–10:00p M–F 800-272-7033 9:00–9:00 M–F; 10:00–7:00 Sat., Sun. 800-877-0155 9:00–6:30 M–F 888-235-0808 10:00–7:00 M–F, 10:00– 4:00 Sat. 866-344-4629 9:00–8:00 M–F, 9:00–5:00 Sat. 888-449-7669 8:00a–9:00p daily 800-829-8318 9:00–9:00 M–F AV, optional dock, USB 1.1 1.8 USB 1.1 USB 1.1 USB 1.1 USB 1.1 AV out, USB 1.1 USB 1.1 USB 1.1 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 1.5 USB 2.0 (full speed) 1.5 USB 1.1 1.5 AV out, USB 1.1 1.5 16MB internal 32MB SD 16MB CF 16MB xD 16MB SD 16MB SD 16MB internal 32MB SD 16MB MS 16MB SD JPEG / MOV yo o 2MB internal, 16MB SD JPEG / AVI yo o JPEG,TIFF / MOV yo o JPEG / MOV oo o JPEG / MOV yy o JPEG / AVI yo y JPEG, TIFF / MOV JPEG / AVI yy yo y o JPEG, TIFF / AVI JPEG / MPEG yo yo o o JPEG / AVI yy o o y y y y o y y y o y o y o y y y o y y y y o y y y o o y o o y y 36–114 100, 200, 400 39–117 100 38–114 64, 100, 200, 400 38–115 50, 100, 200, 400, 800 35–105 80, 125, 160, 200, 320 35–105 50, 100, 200, 400 38–188 64, 100, 200, 400 35–105 100, 200, 400 38–114 100, 200, 400 39–117 100, 200, 400 38–76 100, 200, 400 f-2.2–13.0 f-2.8–8.2 f-2.8–4.7 f-2.8–4.9 f-3.1–5.2 f-2.8–4.9 f-2.8–7.9 f-2.7–4.9 f-2.7–4.9 f-2.8–5.6 f-2.8–4.0 4–1/2,000 y y 1–1/2,000 o y 15–1/1,000 y y 4–1/3,000 y o 4–1/1,000 y o 8–1/2,000 y y 8–1/4,000 y y 1–1/2,000 o o 15–1/2,000 y y 2–1/2,000 y y 4–1/1,000 o o 3.9 4X / 3.5X Auto, fill, off, red eye 2.3 3X / 3X Auto, off, on, red eye 5.7 3X / 4X Auto, auto with red eye, fill, fill with red eye, off 1.6 3X / 4X 8.0 3X / 4X 3.9 3X / 3X 0.8 5X / 4X 4.0 3X / 2X 2.4 3X / 4X 3.9 3X / 3.2X 3.9 2X / 4X Auto, auto with red eye, off, on, slow sync with red eye Auto, auto with red eye, off, on, on with red eye Auto, off, on, red eye Auto, auto with Auto, off with red eye, fill, off, slow sync, on, slow sync red eye Auto, off, on, red eye o Metal o Plastic y Metal o Metal y Plastic o Metal y Metal o None 9:00–8:00 M–F 1 lithium ion yo Auto, off, on, Auto, fill, firstred eye, slow curtain slow sync sync, first curtain with red eye, off, red eye, slow sync o y Plastic Metal o Metal 1.5 ** The HP Photosmart 935 supports slide show mode via an optional camera dock. www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 97 PERFORMANCE TESTS Photos, Finished: Performance and Quality Tests The latest digital cameras deliver more bang for the buck than ever: They are laden with features, offer up to 5-megapixel resolution, and include special features like video and audio recording and real-time histograms. For the discriminating consumer or hobbyist, however, the purchase decision should still come down to performance and quality. So we tested and measured the cameras’ optics and processing abilities by analyzing image resolution and sharpness. Quantifiable performance results tell one story, but the human eye often tells another. So we supplemented our test results with our jury’s subjective image analysis. In our performance testing, we measured each camera’s boot time (the time between turning on the camera and taking a shot) and the recycle time (the time required between pictures). We collaborated with DigitalBenchmarks (www .digitalbenchmarks.com), an independent digital camera testing facility run by Daniel Grotta, to perform precise industry-standard performance timings. PIXEL TRANSITION: NOT JUST BLACK AND WHITE We used a standardized ISO test page (we refer to it as the target), which includes a pixel transition pattern for measuring a camera’s ability to deal with both horizontal and vertical transitions. This pattern consists of a black plane at a 5degree angle against a white background. We photographed the image and imported it into Adobe Photoshop, where we analyzed the black and white edges pixel by pixel. We counted the number of “gray” transition pixels between the black and white edges. These give a sense of the level of sharpness captured by each camera; the fewer transition pixels the sharper the image. RESOLUTION: WHAT’S MY LINE (WIDTH)? Resolution should not be determined simply by the sheer number of photo sensor cells on a camera’s CCD, because each camera’s optics and processing ability affect performance. Using the standardized ISO test page (we refer to it as the target) and pixel-level analysis in Photoshop, we counted the number of discernable lines per inch as a measure of resolution. This target includes image sections with both horizontal and vertical parabolic converging lines. Using a mechanical stand and lighting conditions that eliminate the need for a flash, we laid the target flat and stabilized it with a vacuum. We then set each camera on a timer and configured it for maximum optical resolution. We saved the resulting images in the file format with the least compression offered by each device and, when possible, set the f-stop at the smallest aperture setting and lowest ISO speed to avoid electronic noise. PERFORMANCE TESTS: AND THE BEEP GOES ON When capturing those spontaneous, once-in-a-lifetime moments, digital cameras that take a long time to boot up or prepare to shoot again can be infuriating. A camera’s configuration settings can affect these timings. For our performance tests, we measured speed two ways: For the first test runs, we turned on each camera’s LCD and flash; then, whenever possible, we turned these power drains off and retested (some digital cameras don’t allow this). To measure the boot time, we set each camera on a stand in front of a monitor that displayed a counter program. We started the program at the same moment we switched the camera on. The images each camera captured reflect the amount of time it needed to warm up and take a first shot. PERFORMANCE TESTS: COMPACT CAMERAS Boot time with LCD and flash Recycle time with LCD and flash Vertical L Center average L (seconds) M (seconds) M 1,350 1,050 1,200 1,200 1,450 1,100 1,550 1,500 1,150 1,300 1,200 1,400 950 1,200 1,150 1,050 1,325 1,050 1,175 1,200 1,400 1,100 1,550 1,525 1,175 1,300 1,200 1,400 1,000 1,175 1,150 1,050 3.8 2.8 2.8 2.7 4.4 4.7 2.1 5.9 3.9 3.6 3.7 6.5 5.6 6.3 2.9 7.3 3.8 4.7 3.9 3.9 2.3 1.6 2.6 3.4 4.3 5.5 2.9 2.6 5.2 5.2 4.2 4.1 L High scores are best. Pixel transition M Resolution (lines per inch) Bold type denotes first place. Maximum resolution Horizontal L Canon PowerShot S400 Digital Elph Casio Exilim EX-Z3 Fujifilm FinePix F410 (3-megapixel mode) Fujifilm FinePix F410 (6-megapixel mode) HP Photosmart 935 Kodak EasyShare DX6340 Konica Digital Revio KD-500Z Minolta DiMage F300 Nikon Coolpix 3100 Olympus Stylus 400 Digital Panasonic Lumix DMC-F1S Pentax Optio 550 Polaroid Photomax PDC 3350 Samsung Digimax V4 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-P8 Toshiba PDR-T30 2,272 x 1,704 2,048 x 1,536 2,048 x 1,536 2,816 x 2,120 2,608 x 1,952 2,032 x 1,354 2,592 x 1,944 2,560 x 1,920 2,048 x 1,536 2,272 x 1,704 2,048 x 1,536 2,592 x 1,944 2,048 x 1,536 2,272 x 1,704 2,048 x 1,536 2,048 x 1,536 2% 4% 4% 3% 3% 5% 2% 2% 3% 3% 3% 3% 4% 2% 3% 4% 1,300 1,050 1,150 1,200 1,350 1,100 1,550 1,550 1,200 1,300 1,200 1,400 1,050 1,150 1,150 1,050 M Low scores are best. RED denotes Editors’ Choice. 98 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com D I G I TA L C A M E R A S The recycle time is the time a camera takes to prepare for the next shot. The repeatability of such a test relies heavily on an individual person’s response time, but the attending DigitalBenchmarks technician who performed the tests moonlights as a drummer. You can’t beat that. Fujifilm FinePix F410 and the Nikon Coolpix 3100 were excellent, at 1,175. At just 1,000, the Polaroid Photomax PDC 3350 had the poorest resolving power among the 3-megapixel models—though still acceptable performance for this group. The 4-megapixel cameras also delivered reasonable results; the Canon PowerShot S400 Digital Elph led the pack with an IMAGE QUALITY TESTING: WE’LL BE THE JUDGE OF THAT impressive score of 1,325 discernable lines. The 5-megapixel Performance measurements notwithstanding, the human eye Konica Digital Revio KD-500Z topped all competitors with an is best for judging photo quality. We captured still images excellent score of 1,550. with and without the flash (we simulated daylight with fullThe Konica impressed us not just with its 5-megapixel spectrum, nonflicker fluorescent lighting), and our jury resolution; its 2.1-second boot time and 2.6-second recycle ranked their quality. We then displayed these images on two time added up to be the best in the roundup. In view of the 21-inch Sony Multiscan GDM-F520 monitors (high-end Triniaverage recycle time of 4.6 seconds, the Kodak was quick tron CRTs), which were identically optimized with an X-Rite to the punch, at 1.6 seconds. The Samsung Digimax V4 and DTP92 Colorimeter, using MonacoView 3.0.0 software the Polaroid Photomax PDC 3350 trailed the pack on our (www.monacosys.com). timed tests. Recycle times do not reflect performance of For optimum stability and sharpness, we turned on each cameras with burst-shooting modes. This mode is usually camera’s self-timer and configured it using the default setlimited, however, in terms of flash ability, quality settings, tings. We saved all images as and so on.—Analysis written by JPEGs and ranked all shots Glenn Menin IMAGE QUALITY: JURY TEST RESULTS according to scorecards cusHigh scores are best (on a scale of 1 to 10). J Performance measurements can retomized for each scenario. We With flash No flash Bold type denotes first place. veal optics quality and chip efficiency, but scored each image on expoCONSUMER CAMERAS ultimately a camera’s output must still sure, illumination, color, clarity, Canon PowerShot S400 Digital Elph 6 9 please the eye. No PC Magazine digital Casio Exilim EX-Z3 6 7 and dynamic range. camera roundup would be complete without WHAT THE NUMBERS MEAN The average pixel transition score for all cameras was an acceptable 3 percent. The Canon, Konica, Minolta, and Samsung units tied for the top spot, at 2 percent. The Kodak ranked worst at 5 percent. Resolution results were all within the expected ranges and consistent with each camera’s megapixel rating. In the 3-megapixel range, center average resolution scores for both the Fujifilm FinePix F410 (3-megapixel mode) Fujifilm FinePix F410 (6-megapixel mode) 7 7 6 7 HP Photosmart 935 Kodak EasyShare DX6340 7 6 7 8 Konica Digital Revio KD-500Z Minolta DiMage F300 Nikon Coolpix 3100 Olympus Stylus 400 Digital Panasonic Lumix DMC-F1S 8 6 6 5 5 7 9 7 8 6 Pentax Optio 550 7 6 Polaroid Photomax PDC 3350 4 5 Samsung Digimax V4 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-P8 Toshiba PDR-T30 6 7 6 7 5 5 PROSUMER CAMERAS Minolta DiMage 7Hi 6 9 Olympus E-20N 6 7 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-F717 5 6 a jury ranking based on human observation. We performed two types of jury tests: flash capture tests to determine how well the cameras can illuminate a scene and nonflash tests to evaluate their abilities to capture daylight. Our jury liked the Canon PowerShot S400 Digital Elph best overall in the simulateddaylight tests. This camera garnered perfect jury scores in clarity and dynamic range for its crisp images and evenly illuminated scenes, which indicated sufficient flash power. Less impressive were both the Toshiba PDR-T30 and Sony Cyber-shot DSCP8; both of these cameras produced images that were somewhat dim, lacking detail in the dark shadowy areas with these autoexposure/focus/flash settings. These three images illustrate the effects of auto-flash illumination on a scene. As you can see, the image from the Konica Digital Revio KD-500Z (A) shows well-balanced illumination; details are clearly evident in the highlights and shadows (note the teddy bear’s shirt and white nap). The Olympus Stylus 400 Digital’s autoflash oversaturated this scene (B), giving the image a blown-out appearance. On the other hand, the Panasonic Lumix DMC-F1S did not cast enough light on this subject (C), and the image is too dark. In these last two cases, the cameras would have benefited from having the exposure compensation set manually. M A B C www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 99 D I G I TA L C A M E R A S [ SONY [ OLYMPUS Camedia ] Cyber-Shot ] Three Big Shots Consumer cameras on steroids, prosumer models offer more robust bodies, faster shooting performance, higher-quality lenses, and superior image quality—for a price. T here are two types of people: those who take pictures and those who take photographs. If your enthusiasm for photos goes no farther than family trips and birthday parties, the cameras in our main story are ideal. But if you can appreciate a well-framed shot, you’ll want to step up to a prosumer model. Between consumer digital cameras and professional single-lens reflex (SLR) models sit prosumer cameras, which are considerably larger and heavier, offer faster performance, and cost up to twice as much as consumer devices with the same resolution. They also take higher-quality images, though usually not in default mode; that’s what all the exposure options and controls are for and why a mastery of basic photographic techniques is important. Unlike SLRs, prosumer cameras do not have interchangeable lenses. MINOLTA DIMAGE 7HI The all-black Minolta DiMage 7Hi ($1,200 street) is a complicated-looking camera with controls that are scattered but accessible and clearly marked. You can set all the important parameters via these analog controls instead of navigating menus—handy for quick shooting. But the heart and soul of the 7Hi are in its outstanding 7X optical zoom, the only true apochromatic lens on a digital camera. Apochromatic means it corrects for all three primary colors (all others correct for only two), producing more accurate color and less color aliasing. You zoom manually by turning the collar and can use macro mode only when the lens is extended to full telephoto. The nifty electronic viewfinder swivels 90 degrees for waist-level viewing, and you can select it full-time via a switch or automatically toggle it on and off simply by putting your eye to the viewfinder. Though not the fastest camera, the 7Hi has a 64MB buffer that lets you shoot unimpeded while writing images to memory. It saves JPEGs, TIFFs, and RAW files, but RAW files open only on computers with Minolta’s driver installed. The 7Hi’s Achilles’ heel is its power system. The compartment underneath the LCD accommodates four double-A nickel hydride batteries but is difficult to close. Also, the camera’s high power drain translates into limited battery life. Other than that, the DiMage 7Hi offers excellent handling and shooting. (201-825-4000, www.minoltausa.com. llllm ) OLYMPUS [ MINOLTA CAMEDIA E-20N Dimage 7HI ] Because of its size and weight, operating the Olympus Camedia E-20N ($1,000 street) for any length of time can be tiring, especially with the optional vertical-grip battery pack. It’s the only prosumer model with support for an external matched through-the-lens strobe for better flash shots and actual color temperature settings rather than presets. But the E-20N’s analog controls are inconveniently placed almost at random and seem at odds with the menu settings. On the upside, the camera has two dials for quick and easy access, an illuminated control panel, and an articulated LCD that swings out 90 degrees. The beautiful Olympus 4X zoom lens is one of the few designed from the ground up for use with a digital camera. When the included lens hood is attached, however, you can’t use the pop-up flash at wide angles because the hood will occlude some of the illumination. The E-20N saves in JPEG, TIFF, and RAW formats and supports CompactFlash and SmartMedia. Boot time is slow, but recycling is fast. Writing to memory is slowed by the camera’s buffer size. The E-20N offers true optical through-the-lens viewing, but it uses a beam splitter that makes the viewfinder extremely difficult to see clearly in low light. A beam splitter sends 90 percent of the light to the CCD and 10 percent to the viewfinder; most SLRs use a swinging mirror. Despite these frustrations, this well-built camera is an excellent workhorse. (800-201-7766, www.olympusamerica.com. llllm ) SONY CYBER-SHOT DSC-F717 The Carl Zeiss 5X zoom lens on the Sony Cyber-shot DSC-F717 ($700 street) is almost as large and heavy as the camera itself, but viewing from almost any angle is easy, because the lens swivels 120 degrees. Zoom is electronically controlled, and you can vary the zooming speed by pressing the lever harder or lighter. The unit has an electronic, eye-level viewfinder and a 1.8-inch LCD; while its analog controls are haphazardly placed on the body and lens, most settings can be selected via easyto-follow menus. The InfoLithium rechargeable battery provides hours of operation and even displays a minute-by-minute countdown. You can shoot images in either 4:3 or 3:2 aspect ratios and save pictures as JPEGs or TIFFs to the Memory Stick. Boot and recycle times were relatively fast. Two exclusive Sony features are NightFrame and NightShot—the ability to see and PERFORMANCE TESTS: PROSUMER CAMERAS shoot in total darkness—useful for Boot time Recycle time surveillance and nature photography. L High scores are best. Pixel Resolution (lines per inch) with LCD with LCD Maximum M Low scores are best. transition Horizontal Vertical Center and flash and flash But the maximum shutter speed is resolution Bold type denotes first place. average L (seconds) M (seconds) M L L M only 0.001 seconds. Still, the DSCMinolta DiMage 7Hi 2,560 x 1,920 2% 1, 400 1,450 1,425 3.3 2.0 F717 is an excellent, all-around camOlympus E-20N 2,560 x 1,920 3% 1,400 1,350 1,375 N/A 2.0 Sony Cyber-shot DSC-F717 2,560 x 1,712 3% 1,450 1,450 1,450 3.0 2.1 era. (888-449-7669, www.sony.com. N/A—Not applicable: The camera cannot boot with the LCD and flash turned on. llllm )—SWG and DG 100 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com D I G I TA L C A M E R A S PRICE/PERFORMANCE INDEX As usual, the costliest cameras tend to get the most points. The Editors’ Choice– winning Pentax Optio 550 has the highest score but also costs $600 street. Features like time-lapse photography, a 0.8-inch macro mode, and 5X optical zoom, combined with very good test results and jury scores, reflect its top quality. Those looking for a better balance of price and performance should consider our other Editors’ Choice, the Kodak EasyShare DX6340. At just $329 list, it still offers slide show mode, 4X optical zoom, and decent performance test results and jury scores. THE DATA POINTS: To determine each camera’s performance/ features score, we include its features, its performance test scores, and our jury ratings. Features account for about 70 percent of the score. The tests account for nearly 20 percent, and the jury ratings account for the rest. THE DSC-P8 packs a whole lot of features into a small body. The menu system on the 1.8-inch LCD is sophisticated, with clever but small icons. The DSC-P8 packs a full feature set, including a viewable histogram—a nice touch. There are multiple configurations for white balance (adjusting only to flash is convenient), meterings, and exposure, which enthusiasts require. Other notable features include abundant auto settings, multiple video settings (with audio), and the ability to shoot video in macro mode. Sony’s 3X optical zoom lens has a 35-mm equivalent of 39 to 117 mm. But the placement of the zoom control feels awkward when you’re peering through the viewfinder with your left eye. The DSC-P8 scored about average on our pixel transition test, which measures perceived sharpness. Resolution results for this 3.2-megapixel camera were below average for the group, though acceptable for a camera of its class. Performance timings 102 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com PERFORMANCE/ FEATURES 60 70 80 MOST BANG FOR THE BUCK 90 Polaroid $300 Kodak $350 Nikon Toshiba Panasonic Casio $400 Sony HP Fujifilm Samsung $450 Olympus $500 $550 RED denotes Editors’ Choice. were average for boot-up and very good for recycle time. Our jury particularly liked the sample image with the flash. Like HP, Sony claims that its camera is USB 2.0–compatible. But we found no difference in transfer time using USB 1.1 or 2.0 connections, indicating that the DSCP8 is limited to USB 2.0 full-speed transfers, not high-speed. The Memory Stick itself may be the bottleneck, but conversations with Sony were inconclusive at best. The DSC-P8 comes with Sony’s proprietary 16MB Memory Stick and NP-FC11 InfoLithium rechargeable battery, along with an AC adapter for in-camera recharging; we’d like all cameras to include such an item. This sleek and stylish product is sure to please a novice or enthusiast photographer.—GM Toshiba PDR-T30 3.2 megapixels, $399.99 list. 800-288-1354, www.dsc.toshiba.com. l l l l m The Toshiba PDR-T30 is a 3.2-megapixel digital camera with a unique touch screen that lets you draw directly onto images and select settings. Although it’s a beautifully finished camera that produces very good flash pictures, you may find the touch screen too small and frustrating. The all-metal PDR-T30 is rounded on one side and square on the other, so it can stand vertically as well as horizontally. Activating the camera requires an inconvenient two-step process of sliding a mirrored flap to expose the lens and using a separate power switch on top. The built- Minolta Canon Konica Pentax PRICE in flash automatically pops up and stays up whether you’re using it or not. The PDR-T30 does not have a tripod socket screw, audio capability, or a video output, and the USB port is on the flat side of the camera, so it cannot be attached while the camera is standing vertically. Apart from the touch screen—which doubles as the LCD viewfinder—the PDR-T30 does not have an optical viewfinder. There’s a review button plus a tiny fourway rocker/wide-angle/telephoto switch, but it’s oversensitive and difficult to use. Although the PDR-T30 is a point-andshoot camera with few manual adjustments or features, it has five program modes as well as movie and multishot capability. The touch screen works equally well with the strap-attached stylus or your fingernail. The screen is quite legible, but some of the icons are unfamiliar, and the menu sequences are not intuitive. Drawing on captured images is fun, but the screen’s small size makes neatness and precision difficult. Performance was slow, especially with the two-step power-on, and quality ranged from fair to very good. Our daylight test shot was significantly underexposed, with acceptable sharpness but drab colors. Our flash test shot exhibited even illumination, excellent color, and good detail. If the PDR-T30 were larger and better implemented, it would be a really cool camera for kids and doodlers. And it’s the only choice for real-estate or insurance agents, for whom touch-screen annotation is a crucial factor.—SWG and DG E IMAGE EDITING Clean Up Your Image photographs captured with a $300 camera; hence the demand for midlevel image-editing programs. Though these products differ from one another, all offer powerful correction features, creative filter effects, and flexible photo composition tools. But unlike Photoshop, they’re cheap. As you might expect, each program provides automated tools that are easy to use. For example, they all can automatically remove red eye. They all offer tools for advanced image-editing Digital cameras are hot. But the truth is, no matter how functions, such as interactive histograms that report on capable the hardware is, you still need software the distribution of tonal values in a picture and to perfect your pictures. Sometimes low-cost lets users modify the shadow, midtone, and cameras introduce lens distortions; somehighlight values independently. times inappropriate lighting results in In evaluating the products here, we underexposed or overexposed images, focus on practical issues. For instance, and sometimes the photographer Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0 earns B Y LU I S A S I M O N E frames the subjects poorly. extra points for ease of use, because REVIEWED IN THIS STORY You can correct all of these probit includes automated output oplems—and many more—with tions and a streamlined but flexible 113 Adobe Photoshop image-editing software. Of course, user interface. Elements 2.0 llllm Adobe Photoshop is still the gold We have broadened our criteria 113 Jasc Paint Shop Pro 8 llllm standard for image correction and enfor advanced correction tools to in118 Microsoft Digital Image hancement. But it is difficult to justify clude nondestructive editing tools. Suite 9 lllmm buying a $600 software package to edit For example, both Photoshop Elements 118 Ulead PhotoImpact 8 llllm [ PHOTOGRAPHY BY PAULINE CUTLER/GETTYIMAGES Once you get a digital camera, it won’t be long before you realize you need an image-editing program to polish your photos before printing them. [ 112 Editors’ Choice 116 Scorecard www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 111 and Jasc Paint Shop Pro 8 offer adjustment layers, which apply dynamic-range and color corrections to image data lower in the layer stack. The effects layers preserve the original image data, and they can be modified or removed at any time. Likewise, layer-blending modes—something that at first seems totally artsy— are actually quite useful for intensifying washed-out colors or blending details back into an image that has been softened by filter effects. There is a natural synergy between digital images and the Web. Though all of these programs offer some level of Web output, the hands-down winner in this area is Ulead PhotoImpact 8, which can do everything from generating automated Web galleries to producing custom HTML pages. Finally, we look at each program’s ability to perform mundane tasks, such as finding, organizing, and archiving the hundreds or thousands of image files that digital photography creates. In this market niche, most of the image-editing programs concentrate on visual browsing tools. Only Microsoft Digital Image Library (part of Microsoft Digital Image Suite 9) delivers easy-to-use archival functions. The other programs here, however, have complementary image management programs: Adobe Photoshop Album, Paint Shop Photo Album, and Ulead Photo Explorer (which is bundled with Ulead PhotoImpact 8). For a roundup of these and other products, see our online story “Pictures, Pictures Everywhere” at w w w . p c m a g . c o m /a r t i c l e 2 / 0,4149,887373,00.asp. If each program in this roundup seems to have very particular strengths, appearances are not deceiving. But this is good news. No program can or should be all things to all users. The differentiating factors among these extremely capable programs mean that you can find the exact product to meet your specific digitalimaging needs. Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0 The midlevel image-editing market has matured in the past couple of years. But despite some stiff competition, Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0 remains on top. Every one of the image-editing apps we review brings something valuable to the table, which is why you won’t see any low scores on our scorecard. But Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0 presents the best overall balance of features, power, and ease of use. Of course, Elements’ relationship to Adobe Photoshop doesn’t hurt; the hand-me-down technology makes the less expensive Elements seem surprisingly sophisticated and capable. But unlike Photoshop, Elements has new users in mind, with several kinds of in-program support, including tips, step-by-step help, one-touch fixes, and readyto-use effects. Ulead PhotoImpact 8 deserves an honorable mention for its extraordinary range of features, from image editing and enhancement with vector tools and special effects to Web publishing. Its output options, particularly its Web capabilities, are the most advanced here. Jasc Paint Shop Pro 8 rivals even Photoshop in capabilities, though its ease of use suffers in favor of features. Paint Shop Pro also has filters designed specifically to handle the photo problems that lowend cameras pose. Although the other programs here offer tools to help users keep track of their cartloads of image files, only Microsoft Digital Image Suite 9’s Digital Image Library handles them like a pro. It has archival functions and can catalog the images you keep on removable media—a real bonus for those who have as many gigabytes of photos as they have hard drive space. Our contributors: Luisa Simone is a contributing editor of PC Magazine. Associate editor Matthew P. Graven and PC Magazine Labs project leader Jonathan Roubini were in charge of this story. 112 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com PHOTOSHOP ELEMENTS borrows technology from the professional Adobe Photoshop. IMAGE EDITING ALL REVIEWS BY LUISA SIMONE Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0 $99 direct. Adobe Systems Inc., www.adobe.com/ products/photoshopel. OVERALL RATING: llllm As its name implies, Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0 is based on Adobe’s flagship product, Photoshop. Thanks to this relationship, Elements offers an impressive amount of state-of-the-art graphics technology while striking an excellent balance of power and ease of use. Elements uses a similar toolbar and many of the same floating palettes as Photoshop. And the program employs the same technology to perform essential operations, such as gamma correction and hue/saturation adjustments. But Elements presents such high-end func- same cloning, retouching, and painting tools found in Photoshop. Elements provides a full complement of special-effects filters, vector shapes, and editable text. You can embellish images with Layer Effects such as bevels, glows, and drop shadows. Layer Effects are more powerful than simple filters, because they remain editable. You can change an effect at any time by editing parameters, such as the angle of a drop shadow or the size of a beveled edge. To be sure, Elements doesn’t provide all the capabilities of Photoshop. Instead, Adobe has deliberately streamlined and simplified Photoshop in creating Elements. Outputting to the Web, for example, does not include the options of slicing and text styles. And mistakes are no big deal, thanks to a History palette that lets you roll back edits. For basic image management, Elements offers an integrated File Browser, which displays thumbnails of the current folder sorted by predefined criteria such as date, size, and filename. The File Browser also supports batch file functions to rename, rotate, move, or copy multiple files. During our testing, Elements accessed the images from a digital camera via USB without a hitch, and it even displayed EXIF data in the browser. The browser doesn’t offer archival functions, however, such as keyword searches or catalogs of removable media. For advanced photo management tools, you can buy Adobe Photoshop Album ($49.99 direct). Elements has a remarkable balance of usability and features. It’s a very good choice for users with varying levels of experience. Jasc Paint Shop Pro 8 Download, $99 direct; CD, $109. Jasc Software Inc., www.jasc.com. llllm PAINT SHOP PRO offers sophisticated tools, including Adjustment Layers. tions in a simple interface that is more comfortable for novices. For example, there are automated tools that can easily fix red eye, eradicate color casts, sharpen blurry images, and more. We especially like the Fill Flash and Adjust Backlighting commands, which use familiar photographic terms to perform tonal corrections. Although Elements provides a lot of hand-holding for novices, it doesn’t handcuff more experienced users. The Levels dialog box, for example, is still available for users who want complete control over tonal values. Elements also includes versatile layer technology, which supports blending modes and nondestructive adjustment layers. You can use the images, generating JavaScript mouseovers, and designing HTML pages from scratch. Instead, an automated mechanism generates a Web-ready photo gallery from a list of images. Other output options also emphasize convenience. When you attach photos to an e-mail message, Elements can resize the file. You can print multiple copies of an image on a single sheet of paper or log on to Shutterfly (http://adobe.shutterfly .com) to order prints, calendars, or greeting cards. We’re particularly fond of its ability to generate a PDF slide show. The Help feature includes hints about the currently selected tool, step-by-step recipes for common tasks, and a host of ready-to-use effects, such as photo frames Among the programs reviewed here, Jasc Paint Shop Pro 8 offers the most professional set of features, closely matching those of Adobe Photoshop 7.0 (but not Photoshop Elements). This means that Paint Shop Pro delivers an amazing amount of power at a very low price. But it also means that the program takes a while to learn. Paint Shop Pro has a revamped user interface, making this version easier to learn and use than previous releases. For example, the toolbar has been reorganized with flyouts that logically group similar tools, and the Learning Center contains detailed instructions for many common tasks. Meanwhile, automated tools, such as One Step Photo Fix, auto-sharpen, and red-eye removal, let even novices be productive immediately. Paint Shop Pro also MORE ON THE WEB: Read more about digital imaging at www.pcmag.com / digitalimaging. And for tips on using your image-editing program, visit www.pcmag.com/imageediting. www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 113 IMAGE EDITING SCORECARD ol s to ut tp Ou Ef fe c ts ed Ad va nc Ea se of us e llll using file attributes and keywords. All the products do fairly well at automated correction, which includes one-click red-eye removal, image straightening, and color balancing. Advanced tools include a product’s manual controls for elements like color, contrast, hue, and saturation. Ulead PhotoImpact 8 outstrips the other programs in effects (plug-ins and special effects) and in output, which involves everything from the number of export formats to support for Web output, photo albums, and novelty items. Au to co ma rr te ec d tio n –EXCELLENT –VERY GOOD l l l –GOOD l l –FAIR l –POOR lllll Im ag m ec an a ag ptu em re en an t d The four image-editing tools in this roundup are all quite capable. The overall ratings are close, but each application finds a balance between ease of use and power, and that’s where the differences show. Ease of use, always a problem for the more powerful programs, is where Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0 shines. The image capture and management rating involves both the process of acquiring images from a camera or other device (or a CD) and the ability to organize and catalog image thumbnails intuitively, OVERALL Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0 lllll lll llll llll llll llll llll Jasc Paint Shop Pro 8 Microsoft Digital Image Suite 9 lll lll lll lllll llll lll llll llll lllll lll lll lll lll lll Ulead PhotoImpact 8 lll llll llll llll lllll lllll llll RED denotes Editors’ Choice. has several tools that address the shortcomings of low-end cameras. New lens filters, for example, can correct barrel, fish-eye, and pincushion distortions. Nonetheless, Paint Shop Pro is really aimed at power users. The program offers a wealth of correction mechanisms, including black-and-white points, a channel mixer, histogram adjustments, and tone cures. We are very impressed with the extensive support for nondestructive editing. You can create complex compositions using Paint Shop Pro’s powerful layer technology. Blending modes, transparency settings, layer masks, and the ability to create discrete layer groups give you total control over how layers interact. Adjustment Layers, for example, let you edit or reverse color, contrast, and tonal adjustments. Likewise, Mask Layers let you hide portions of an image or create varying levels of transparency while preserving the original image. Paint Shop Pro has rudimentary support for CMYK separations. The program does not let you edit composite CMYK images, but it does split RGB color data into individual files for the cyan, magenta, yellow, and black channels necessary for four-color printing. Paint Shop Pro supports editable text and vector shapes. Version 8.01 fixes a bug with the text engine that prevented some edits from appearing in composi116 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com tions. The program ships with an excellent collection of special-effects filters, including texture effects, lighting controls, and artistic media. Our one criticism is that object-level effects, such as drop shadows and bevels, are applied as static filters, which cannot be subsequently modified. The template-based approach lets you lay out multiple images to be printed on a single page. And a deal with Shutterfly ( www.jasc.shutterfly.com) lets you easily order prints as well as specialty items like calendars and greeting cards. Paint Shop Pro’s integrated browser includes modest file management functions, including the ability to sort thumbnails and search the current directory for a filename. The browser worked flawlessly with our USB-connected digital camera, but it does have a few weaknesses. The sort order is not dynamic; you have to resort each time you add new images. And you must open files in Paint Shop Pro before you can retrieve the camera settings stored as EXIF data. The companion pro- MICROSOFT DIGITAL IMAGE LIBRARY lets you manage images, even when they’re stored on CD. gram Paint Shop Photo Album ($49) delivers true archival functions. If you prefer quick fixes, Paint Shop Pro is not for you. But if you enjoy the technology behind digital image editing, you’ll be happy with its vast toolset. Microsoft Digital Image Suite 9 $130 street. Microsoft Corp., www.microsoft.com/ imaging. lllmm Microsoft Digital Image Suite 9 comprises two programs, Microsoft Digital Image Pro 9 and Microsoft Digital Image Library 9. The suite’s look and feel are reminiscent of the entry-level Microsoft Picture It! line. The big news in this release is Digital Image Library, which delivers powerful yet easy-to-use archival functions. Digital Image Library imports images from external sources (CDs, digital cameras, scanners) and archives images to removable media. It also lets you catalog images without having to copy them to your hard drive—a great way to keep a permanent, searchable record of removable media. Digital Image Library can sort thumbnails using several criteria, including date, size, and file type. More important, it can sort based on user-defined keywords and ratings. The interface is elegant, with contextsensitive menus and icon-driven commands making the program’s functions nearly self-explanatory. And you can perform batch file operations—copy, rotate, and so on—from within Digital Image Library. Digital Image Pro is the suite’s core program for correcting and manipulating images. Like other Picture It! products, Digital Image Pro eschews traditional toolbars and palettes, opting instead for a simplified interface built around the task pane. The interface also has two dockable palettes for files and for the Stack, which is Microsoft’s take on layers. For absolute neophytes, the task pane is a blessing, presenting only the information needed for a current job. For example, the Colorize Brush task pane walks you through selecting brush sizes, choosing colors, and painting on a canvas. But experienced users will be frustrated: You can’t bypass the hand-holding. Digital Image Pro has lots of automated correction tools to eliminate common problems, such as red eye, crooked images, and poor exposures. And a numSEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 117 IMAGE EDITING ber of retouching tools help inexperi- image-editing functions while retaining Photo Impact has a number of autoenced users clean up their photographs. an entry-level interface. But if you’re look- matic functions to correct common For example, the new Smart Erase func- ing for an easy-to-use, powerful image- photographic problems, such as out-oftion removes a selected area while intelli- archiving tool, Digital Image Library alone focus images, color casts, poor expogently filling in the space with sampled may justify the suite’s high price. sures, and red eye. Rather than making pixels from the background. you hunt through various commands, the Digital Image Pro has some very useful Ulead PhotoImpact 8 Post-Processing wizard provides a cenmanual correction tools. The Adjust Lev- Download, $79.95 direct; CD, $89.95; upgrade, $44.95 tral location and lots of detailed instrucels pane, for example, has a histogram of download or $49.95 on CD. Ulead Systems Inc., www tions for all of the automated correction .ulead.com/pi. llllm gray values, as well as separate controls tools. Like other products in this for shadows, midtones, and highlights. Calling Ulead PhotoImpact 8 just another roundup, PhotoImpact uses photographAnd the new Unsharp Mask filter lets image-editing program is a little insulting, ic techniques in filter form to apply nonyou improve picture quality by increasing because it contains robust vector tools linear tonal corrections. Fill Flash and the contrast only along the edges of and amazing Web publishing capabilities, Enhance Shadow can correct underas well as a full complement of image cor- exposures and overexposures. details in a photograph. The program also provides several rection and enhancement features. Expert users who want total control Mastering all of the tools within over image correction will prefer to use handy output options, including templates for printing multiple pictures on a PhotoImpact requires some time and the program’s advanced functions, single sheet and the ability to save images effort. There are two main reasons for including the Levels dialog box, tone at appropriate resolutions for e-mail at- this. First, the menu structure is idiosyn- maps, and color adjustments. A feature tachments or handheld devices. You can cratic; both the Dynamic Range Exten- called Dynamic Range Extension boralso connect to MSN Photos to order sion filter and the Enhance Lighting filter rows an idea from traditional darkroom prints, photo T-shirts, techniques by letting and greeting cards. you combine two The program further photos of the same distinguishes itself image, taken with diffrom the competition ferent exposures, to by including a number maintain detail in of ready-made proboth highlight and jects, such as broshadow areas. chures and calendars. Several handy tools Our favorite output can help you create option—Photo Story seamless, complex Lite—is available from compositions. The within Digital Image Layers palette lets Library. A Photo Story you specify layer is a narrated slide transparency and show that can be blending modes. saved to Windows PhotoImpact falls just Media Video (WMV) short of Photoshop format or to a video Elements and Paint CD. This function is Shop Pro, however, available only to Winbecause it does not PHOTOIMPACT goes beyond traditional image editing, offering a variety of Web tools. dows XP users. support Adjustment Our testing revealed that Digital Image are image correction tools, but the for- Layers. But the program is full of other Pro suffers from several intrinsic limita- mer is found on the Format menu (along terrific tools. We especially like the tions. For example, the Stack lets you with other image correction tools) and Match Background command, which adjust transparency and change the the latter is in the Effects menu. This blends the background of a floating stacking order in a photo montage, but kind of inconsistency makes the program object into the underlying image. you can’t assign different blending modes more difficult to learn. PhotoImpact includes a host of (like multiply or overlay) as you can in Second, the program offers different special-effects filters, from the utilitarthe other programs here. Likewise, Digi- functions for different types of data. For ian (like Unsharp Mask) to the artistic tal Image Pro’s brush-based tools come in example, automated drop shadows can be (like Watercolor). Beyond these static only seven predefined sizes. And with the an attribute of a vector object (such as an effects, PhotoImpact offers several exception of GIF animations, Digital ellipse) but not a raster object (such as a effects that can be animated and saved Image Pro doesn’t output sophisticated cutout of a photographic figure). Photo- directly to a GIF file. This is a handy way Web graphics, like Web galleries or shop Elements, by contrast, can apply the to add down-and-dirty animated JavaScript mouse-overs. same drop-shadow layer effect to either elements to a Web site. For example, Particle can generate falling snow, and Digital Image Pro adds advanced raster or vector objects. 118 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com Type can make text glow. PhotoImpact puts a special emphasis on vector-based text and shapes. You can create complex outlines with Bezier drawing tools. And you can even add realistic depth effects to both text and shapes with specialized attributes that are reminiscent of 3-D modeling programs, such as chiseled edges, reflection maps, and multiple light sources. PhotoImpact offers remarkable Web features. It lets you build custom Web pages complete with pictures, banners, buttons, and HTML. The integrated Component Designer lets you generate complex objects (like mouse-over buttons) simply by selecting options in a dialog box. For automated Web output, try Web Albums and Web Galleries. We are big fans of PhotoImpact’s JavaScript Slide Show functions, which lets you assign behaviors to the individual pieces of a sliced image. Thus, you can add playback commands (like next or previous) to selected slices for controlling the presentation in other slices. Other nifty output options include printing multiple copies of a picture on a single sheet of paper and saving a slide show to a video CD. Our one complaint about the product is that there is actually too much in the box. For example, a bundled standalone program called Album lets you organize your images into collections of thumbnails. But you can’t automatically load a selected image into PhotoImpact for editing; this, coupled with a complex, database-driven approach to keywords, makes Album a cumbersome product with limited usefulness. You can safely ignore Album, though, because PhotoImpact ships with another program, Photo Explorer, which offers many more conveniences. Photo Explorer is a browser, not a true archival program. But it can launch PhotoImpact for editing images, display EXIF camera stats, and connect to Ulead’s photo-sharing Web site, iMira (www .imira.com). PhotoImpact doesn’t quite match Adobe Photoshop Elements 2.0, but it does provide an impressive breadth of features. If you want a single solution that offers more than just traditional image-editing features—especially Webrelated tools—then you should consider PhotoImpact. E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 119 lights 100% additive-free natural tobacco For a sample CARTON call: 1-800-872-6460 ext. 33001 No additives in our tobacco does NOT mean a safer cigarette. SURGEON GENERAL’S WARNING: Cigarette Smoke Contains Carbon Monoxide. SMOKING “LIGHT” FILTERED CIGARETTES DOES NOT ELIMINATE THE HEALTH RISKS OF SMOKING. Actual levels of tar and nicotine experienced by the smoker may vary widely depending on how you smoke. For more information, see www.nascigs.com Natural American Spirit® is a registered trademark of Santa Fe Natural Tobacco Company. Offer restricted to smokers 21 years of age or older. Offer good only in the USA. Offer void where restricted or prohibited by law or by SFNTC policy. Limit one sample carton per person per year (12 months). © SFNTC 3 B Y R I C H A R D V. D R A G A N This second feature in our series on building and deploying Web services explores the software that runs your business code and weighs in on the J2EEversus-.NET dilemma. S R E V R E S N O I T A C I L E H REVIEWED IN THIS STORY T 124 BEA WebLogic Server 8.1 lllll 126 JBoss 3.2 lllll 128 Microsoft Windows Server 2003 lllll 129 Oracle9i Application Server lllll 131 Sun ONE Application Server 7 lllll 133 WebSphere Application Server 5 lllll P P A 125 The Big Decision: J2EE or .NET? 125 Editors’ Choice 126 Caching In on Performance 127 Scorecard 128 Page Scripting: The Simpler App Servers 130 Performance Tests 132 Summary of Features or GERS Retail Systems, application servers and Web services aren’t just buzzwords: They’re business necessities. The 250-employee San Diego–based company develops point-of-sale software for over 300 retailers, including Black & Decker, Nextel, and Z Gallerie—a national upscale home furnishings chain. Management realized back in 2000 that it would have to update its infrastructure with an application server to keep the company ahead of the competition. The goal was to let businesses offer their customers multiple ways to buy goods: from retail stores, the Web, online catalogs, kiosks, mobile phones, and PDAs. The company also wanted to keep up with customers that were moving their servers to Linux to reduce licensing costs—a growing trend in corporate America. GERS needed a way to adapt the system it had built up over 29 years. “We have a pretty significant legacy system that now integrates into our applications, and we didn’t want to have to rebuild them from the ground up,” says Andy George, VP of development. So the company turned to Web services running F D U E L I N G P L A T F O R M S Here we compare the two competing architectures that underpin application servers. .NET PHOTOGRAPHY: GETTY IMAGES/HULTON ARCHIVE J2EE Standard supported through the JCP (Java Community Process) TYPE OF TECHNOLOGY Proprietary Many MIDDLEWARE VENDORS Microsoft Java Virtual Machine (JVM) 1.3, 1.4 VIRTUAL MACHINE Common Language Runtime (CLR) 1.1 JavaServer Pages (JSP) SERVER-SIDE SCRIPTING ASP (Active Server Pages) .NET Enterprise JavaBeans (EJBs) built with entitymodeling tools in Java. MIDDLE-TIER LOGIC Custom-built .NET Managed Components in multiple .NET languages. JDBC DATABASE ACCESS ADO.NET Java Message Service (JMS) RELIABLE MESSAGING MSMQ Java Transaction Service (JTS) TRANSACTIONS Microsoft Transaction Services No BUILT-IN WEB SERVICES Yes Java 2 Platform, Micro Edition (J2ME) MOBILE .NET Compact Framework on application server software to extend its existing business logic. This way, GERS could serve customers that wanted to use multiple retail channels and satisfy customers moving to Linux. From early 2001, GERS engineers pursued development on BEA WebLogic Server and JBoss, while another group of its programmers worked with the Microsoft .NET beta. When it came to putting a system into production, the availability of J2EE for Linux was critical. The decision in mid-2002 to choose WebSphere instead of WebLogic, JBoss, or .NET as a Web services delivery platform came down to three requirements: support for a variety of infrastructures running at customers’ locations, strong administration features, and keeping GERS’s own developers happy. Only WebSphere delivered on all three. The result? Z Gallerie is running GERS software on 50 Linux servers, and its sales managers can now open a Web browser at home to see details about any orders transacted at their stores’ point-of-sale devices that day. The $5 million project is already seeing a return on investment. GERS’s experience illustrates how Web services, Linux, and .NET are major considerations in choosing an application server, the nerve center that runs an enterprise’s mission-critical code. Reducing costs by integrating different systems has become a primary business goal for IT organizations choosing app servers. Further cutting costs, the price of app servers themselves has plummeted—from as much as $50,000 two years ago to a more comfortable four-figure range now. Web services are well positioned to make cost-reducing integration work. In the previous article in this series on the new application paradigm (“Brave New Apps: The Development Tools,” August 5, page 114), we evaluated tools you use to develop the apps. This time, we compare six leading application servers that can run the code built in those development tools. To test the software, we deployed an application called Nile 2.0, which simulates an online bookstore. We produced an EJB 2.0 version to test the J2EE application servers and a functionally equivalent .NET version to test Microsoft’s offering. We evaluated how easily we could deploy and manage the application in each product, checking for over 100 specific features. Each product offers a Web services strategy—essential for the dawning era of service-oriented architectures (SOAs). In GERS’s case, a SOA made point-of-sale systems available across different servers www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 123 and devices. In the past, developers used CORBA and DCOM to connect applications over a network, but those produced tightly coupled connections. Now, developers are wiring together discrete pieces of application logic using Web service standards like SOAP and WSDL, which result in loosely coupled systems— that is, they’re adaptable to future needs. Connecting existing code bases is also less programmer-intensive. Gone are the days when developer productivity was measured in lines of code. Today, the leading players in the application server market rely on Java 2 Enterprise Edition (J2EE) 1.3—a rich model for building business and database components (Enterprise JavaBeans, or EJBs), messaging (JMS), transactions (JTS), and Web-based user interfaces (JavaServer Pages, or JSP). In a twist of timing and history, the current standard—J2EE 1.3—does not specifically include Web service support. J2EE 1.4 (now in beta) will specify Web services when it arrives in late 2003. The software makers currently offer proprietary solutions to handle Web service issues, but their levels of support for emerging standards, such as those for workflow (like Web Service Inspection Language and security), can vary. THE CHALLENGER: .NET Into the Web services fray comes the Microsoft .NET Framework, now in Version 1.1 and included with Windows Server 2003. Microsoft has implemented Web services in .NET by hiding many of the underlying plumbing details. While J2EE developers need wizards and tools to build Web services, in .NET these aren’t necessary. It’s easy to forget that an app server performs many of the same functions as an OS. In Windows, messaging is provided by MSMQ (Microsoft Message Queuing), transactions by MTS (Microsoft Transaction Services), and Web serving by IIS 6.0, all backed up with a new set of APIs that rival Java for developer productivity. In fact, .NET developers can use an eclectic collection of languages for development, including C#, Visual Basic .NET, and even a .NET version of Java called Visual J#. On the downside, choosing Microsoft means giving up cross-vendor compatibility, and you’ll have to forget about running servers on Linux. Clearly, Redmond has confidence in .NET’s performance: Microsoft was the only company that agreed to let PC Magazine Labs run throughput tests on its software. (See the performance tests on page 130.) Although J2EE is firmly entrenched in many businesses—especially in the banking, insurance, and automotive industries—Microsoft clearly sees a chance to leap-frog the rest of the app server market by pointing to .NET’s easy, built-in Web services support. ENTICING PRICING As the GERS experience suggests, IT departments want easy access to different J2EE application servers early in the course of a project. The infrastructure companies clearly see the benefit of hooking developers early, and several have recently begun to offer low-cost or even no-cost developer licenses. In fact, both BEA and Sun offer free versions for developers, and JBoss is free open-source. And new, lower-price versions of app server software in the $1,000 ballpark are available from most of the companies. Still, price isn’t the only consideration. When deciding on an app server, you should evaluate each platform’s administrative capabilities. These can be very minimal—as in JBoss—or fully scalable, caching-capable, and cluster-aware, as in BEA, Oracle, and IBM’s offerings. Companies running on one or two servers will choose differently from those running hundreds. Application servers are now mature products that can bring legacy systems together using Web services. The success of GERS shows that whether you’re building from scratch or trying to get old code to work with new platforms, the current software is ready for the challenge. Our contributors: Richard V. Dragan is a contributing editor, and Matthew D. Sarrel is a technical director at PC Magazine Labs. Timothy Dyck is a freelance technical writer. Associate editor Michael W. Muchmore and Labs project leader Sahil Gambhir were in charge of this story. 124 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com BEA WebLogic Server 8.1 $10,000 direct per CPU. BEA Systems Inc., 800-8174232, www.bea.com. OVERALL RATING: l l l l l BEA WebLogic Server 8.1 is a top con- tender for any organization running Javabased software. Its impressive potential for scalability, JVM performance, and new emphasis on making J2EE and Web services easier for developers are noteworthy. This is a very deep application server that’s easy to run and easy to manage, especially on multiple clusters. WebLogic’s configuration wizard let us set up several default domains effortlessly. Like the other J2EE app servers we reviewed, WebLogic runs on Windows, Linux, and many versions of Unix. We tested it on Windows 2000 Server and XP and found setup among the easiest. BEA is unique in that its Java Virtual Machine (JVM), JRockit 1.3, is optimized for serverside Java running on Intel Xeon and Itanium processors. WebLogic’s Web-based console offers robust tools for managing J2EE applications. The interface ranks in the forefront of products we reviewed in both ease of use and depth. It makes deploying J2EE EAR (enterprise application archive) and WAR (Web application archive) files a cinch through a browser and lets you safely update them on a running server. Clustering support—clearly not an afterthought—is available at every level of your deployment. A standout feature: WebLogic’s clustering can use a twophase commit when you make changes to clustered servers. Before a change takes effect, every server casts a vote to indicate whether there are any errors. You can cancel an update if a problem occurs. WebLogic’s capabilities for monitoring the performance of EJBs and other J2EE resources are excellent, with statistics and log messages available for most resources and services. BEA has succeeded in making the building of Web services and EJBs easy. The new WebLogic Workshop 8.1, a visual developer tool, gives you a set of framework classes to speed up the creation of EJBs and Web services tailored to easy deployment on Version 8.1 of the app server. For example, these classes let developers build asynchronous Web services and Web services that use JMS (Java Message Service) for guaranteed delivery. These messaging smarts equal those that IBM’s A P P L I C AT I O N S E R V E R S The Big Decision: J2EE or .NET B PHOTOGRAPHY: GETTY IMAGES/HULTON ARCHIVE oth J2EE and .NET provide an environment for executing business logic (server- or client-side), and they both contain specifications and APIs for accessing data, directory services, and remote applications. Once you dig deeper, however, the differences surface. One major difference is the basic philosophy toward programming and deployment. .NET is inextricably tied to Windows operating systems, so you don’t need to install separate application server software. Java is mostly cross-platform, though J2EE application server vendors have added proprietary extensions in an attempt to distinguish themselves from competitors. Java programs are compiled into platform-independent byte code and then interpreted and executed by a Java Virtual Machine running on almost any operating system. This means that programmers wanting to deploy J2EE have just one language choice: Java. Meanwhile, .NET’s Common Language Runtime (CLR) executes a language-independent intermediate language (IL). A developer can compile any of a multitude of languages that support the CLR’s core component model into IL, which is then just-in-time–compiled into native Windows code. Alternatively, the whole application can be precompiled into a Windows EXE or DLL. Another major difference between the platforms: Microsoft .NET lacks a complete and fully documented component model. This means that .NET really isn’t comparable to J2EE, which boasts an established EJB specification—already in Version 2. While it is easier to field a .NET solution quickly, the rigidity of the EJB specification ensures that large-scale development projects can WebSphere offers. BEA also brands a WebLogic version of Borland JBuilder for developers who want to do traditional low-level Java coding. Although BEA has considerable clout, with over 1,000 customers, the platform still plays well with others. Its Java Management Extensions (JMX) enable it to work with management tools like those from HP and Tivoli Systems. And its security APIs, which provide integrated authentication and encryption, work with numerous network hardware and security software products. Like Oracle and Sun, BEA offers lowcost and no-cost versions of WebLogic, including a subscription-based service for developers (at $495 per seat for quarterly CDs that include all BEA software). A 20-user version of the Workgroup Edition ($3,000 per CPU) makes WebLogic enforce best coding practices and design rules. But this stringency comes at the cost of more difficulty for the average developer to master. .NET makes development and deployment very easy, yet it requires extensive customization if you want to build a missioncritical environment in which reliability, transaction integrity, and message queue management are essential. By contrast, J2EE projects require extensive customization to begin with. At this time, Microsoft has an edge in Web service support, with transparent server-side XML parsing and SOAP implementation. The J2EE community needs to play catch-up and release updated versions of related APIs while developers are still in the early stages of adopting Web services. The flexibility of each technology enters the equation at a different point of the cycle: J2EE relies on a fixed language for development yet is platform-independent for deployment. By contrast, .NET is languageindependent for development yet platform-dependent for deployment. If you have extensive Java programming knowledge and want to deploy your application to many devices, then J2EE is what you need. If your programming knowledge or existing code base is in a variety of languages and you will never have to deploy your application to anything but a Windows environment, .NET may be the answer. J2EE application servers range from free to $20,000 per CPU, but Microsoft includes the .NET Framework in Windows Server 2003. This simplifies licensing and support, because you only have to deal with a single vendor. But if your company chooses to develop mission-critical applications in .NET, you’ll find yourself at Microsoft’s mercy regarding upgrades, licenses, and support.—Matthew D. Sarrel BEA WebLogic Server 8.1 The best interface, excellent clustering and high-availability features, leading development tools for Web services built from standard Enterprise JavaBeans, and trouble-free implementation catapult BEA WebLogic Server 8.1 above the competition. In fact, it’s the only product with an excellent rating on every one of our Scorecard categories: setup, deployment, scalability and availability, administration, interoperability, and documentation. This application server uses the only Java Virtual Machine that’s optimized for serverside Java: JRockit 1.3. WebLogic’s management console gives you the best depth and ease in controlling clustered servers and monitoring J2EE apps. Finally, support for both asynchronous and guaranteed-delivery Web services outstrips that found in the other tools. Honorable mention goes to IBM’s WebSphere Application Server 5, which matches WebLogic in management interfaces and clustering. We applaud IBM for dropping the proprietary configuration scheme that used its DB2 database in favor of standard XML configuration. For companies that already have an investment in IBM technologies or that need to update IBM legacy systems such as CICS via Web services, WebSphere is the top choice. www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 125 Caching In on Performance N o one likes to put up with sluggish Web applications—a condition that developers can minimize by caching at the application server. Caching stores frequently accessed data in memory, letting Web applications bypass time-consuming processing and accesses to back-end resources. This enables fast, reliable delivery of both static and dynamic content. Caching can also save developers from costly hardware expenditures. As our tests confirmed (page 130), caching delivers significant performance improvements. Application server companies offer myriad caching options, but the most common are page-level caching, object caching, and data caching. Page-level caching works by simply storing Web pages in memory. Object caching is trickier to implement, because it requires you to maintain a balance of system resources. Data caching consists of caching the results of queries to the data source. An application server must deal with the nuances of when to put new content into the cache or flush earlier cached content. Managing cache coherency in a clustered environment entails yet another level of complexity, because multiple instances of the application server can have their own caching policies. A variety of solutions are available to unburden application servers from this complexity, enabling them to achieve performance improvements under heavy loads. CHUTNEY APPTIMIZER Chutney Apptimizer ($50,000 and up) comes in editions for vanilla J2EE, BEA WebLogic, and Microsoft IIS. It offers an engine that can store the results of previously invoked function calls, presentationlayer data like HTML and XML, session objects, and even SOAP calls. A major performance issue with caching in J2EE is the need to collect and recycle unused cached objects from memory, a process known as garbage collection. This is considered expensive because it requires intense CPU usage, and it can lead to system bottlenecks. Because Apptimizer for J2EE can store code objects, it reduces the need for garbage collection by comparing incoming requests for an object against objects stored in its own cache. It then delivers the data to the user straight from the Apptimizer engine. Apptimizer versions support caching geared specifically toward IIS and BEA WebLogic Server. Apptimizer runs on AIX, Linux, Solaris, and Windows 2000. (Chutney Technologies Inc., 404-995-6711, www.chutneytech.com.) SPIDERCACHE ENTERPRISE Although geared toward small to midsize businesses, SpiderCache Enterprise ($4,000 and up) has enterprise-class features, notably request queuing—a method of synchronizing cached data across a SpiderCache cluster—and security privilege features for managing cache states. Administrators can manage the cache environment centrally using a Windows, Web, or command line interface. Besides offering object caching, SpiderCache can automatically manage caches based on Web events, user events, time-tolive settings, schedules, database events, and source code changes. SpiderCache runs on Linux, Solaris, and Windows NT or 2000. (WARP Solutions Inc., 212-962-9277, www.warpsolutions .com.)—Sahil Gambhir affordable on the production side. Any organization that chooses WebLogic will get an app server that has been battle-tested at very large installations. WebLogic doesn’t skimp on either ease-ofuse or the scalability that comes from advanced clustering technology. And its enhancements for Java developers make an already solid platform even better. As a result, WebLogic earns our Editors’ Choice. 126 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com JBoss 3.2 Free download. The JBoss Group LLC, www.jboss.org. lllmm JBoss has built up a dedicated following thanks to its license-fee-free, no-frills approach and transactional features on a par with some application servers you’d have to pay for. Although it’s a solid and scalable J2EE application server, we’d like to see enhanced support for Web ser- vices, a simpler administration console, and wizards for easy deployment and configuration. Offered under the LGPL open-source license, JBoss has the flexibility of running in any environment that supports JDK 1.3. It comes in three editions: one with JBoss’s own Jetty JSP/servlet engine, one that substitutes Tomcat for Jetty, and one with neither. PHOTOGRAPHY: GETTY IMAGES/HULTON ARCHIVE XCACHE 2.2 Sites that use content delivery networks (CDNs)—providers of edge-of-network content—will find XCache 2.2 ($4,500 direct) particularly useful. XCache is designed to integrate easily into such environments while empowering CDNs with distribution and synchronization of dynamic content. Other appealing features include granular administration features over what gets cached, and Gzip, which compresses white spaces in pages for greater performance over low bandwidths. XCache works with Windows NT and Windows 2000 Server with IIS. (XCache Technologies, 877-709-8894, www.xcache.com.) A P P L I C AT I O N S E R V E R S To get up and running with JBoss, you simply download and unzip the code. Its requirements of only 40MB of hard drive space and 128MB of RAM are advantages for developers who need to run the application server on laptops or desktops. Since JBoss doesn’t have its own Java Virtual Machine (JVM), it uses Sun Microsystems’ Hotspot, which is fairly easy to set up. Earlier versions of JBoss did not include clustering, replication, or fail-over, but the latest version fills these gaps. It replicates information in each node, and a process automatically detects failed nodes and redirects requests to the remaining nodes. Vertical clustering is simple: You just add a couple of JAR and XML config files and JBOSS 3.2 copy the default server directory. Unlike other servers in this roundup, JBoss is not part of an integrated platform, so there’s no integrated development environment, database, integration server, or portal matched to it. Instead, JBoss relies on third-party tools. The JBoss .NET BEA WEBLOGIC SERVER 8.1 extensions and the open-source The adminisApache Axis trative conframework let desole of BEA velopers expose WebLogic Java components Server 8.1 places comas Web services mon tasks for .NET and J2EE, within easy respectively. But reach on its this approach does welcome screen. not come close to the level of support found in BEA WebLogic Server tions for EJBs and data sources in the conor WebSphere. sole. For any of these tasks, you have to What it lacks in components, JBoss go to the command line. Performance and makes up for in support for Java stan- application monitoring are rudimentary, dards. JBoss makes which made tuning our test app a laboriextensive use of ous and iterative process. JMX , a technology For open-source software, the docuJBoss 3.2 gives that modularizes mentation is surprisingly lucid, though we you a crosssection view of components for would like to see information on upgrade core services, management and paths. If you need advanced server help including an monitoring. And it with clustering, JMX, or CMP (containerEJB’s status takes JMX further managed persistence) beans, you have to and properties. But to make than other J2EE pony up a fee for documentation from the any changes vendors, turning JBoss Group. Otherwise, you can seek adyou have to go all of JBoss’s ser- vice from newsgroups. to the comvices into little On the horizon JBoss 4.0, currently in mand line. modular pieces Developer Release 1, will introduce a new called Mbeans. You can add, drop, or re- programming architecture called Aspectconfigure these with a high degree of Oriented Programming, which adds object persistence, caching, replication, ease and flexibility. The administration console offers a transactions, security, and new mechaclear view of running EJBs, but we are dis- nisms for pooling objects. appointed by the absence of manageThough it doesn’t offer the level of inment, configuration, and deployment op- tegrated support found in other J2EE ap- SCORECARD The setup rating indicates the ease and flexibility of the application server’s installation and setup process. Deployment reflects the steps involved in getting an application running inside the application server container, along with options such as hot deployments. For scalability and availability, we take into account features like load balancing, clustering, failover, and –EXCELLENT –VERY GOOD l l l –GOOD l l –FAIR l –POOR caching mechanisms. Under administration we examine the management interface, control over deployed objects, and monitoring of system resources. Interoperability refers to the application server’s interaction with foreign systems, including support for Web services and business connectors; we also consider cross-platform support. Documentation includes online integrated help. cu m en Do In t er op er ab ili ta tio n ty n ra tio ist in m Ad oy m en pl De Se tu p t llll Sc al av abi ai lity la bi an lit d y lllll OVERALL BEA WebLogic Server lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll lllll JBoss Microsoft Windows Server 2003 lll lll lll ll ll ll lll llll llll llll llll lll lllll llll Oracle9i Application Server Sun ONE Application Server WebSphere Application Server llll llll lllll lll llll ll llll lllll llll ll llll lll lllll lll lllll lllll llll llll lllll llll llll RED denotes Editors’ Choice. www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 127 W eb page–scripting languages offer a simpler, less costly way to build Web applications than the full-scale J2EE or Microsoft .NET models, which the products in our main reviews use. Processes running directly on a Web server mean that programmers can add scripting code right into an HTML page. A scripting language makes the most sense for straightforward Web applications that don’t need to share code with other corporate applications and don’t require vast scalability or simply don’t justify hiring high-end programmers. JAVASERVER PAGES (JSP) JavaServer Pages is the Web-scripting component of the J2EE standard. There is a lot of choice in JSP servers: Every high-end J2EE application server supports JSP, and there are also a number of lowcost and no-cost options. The Apache Software Foundation’s JSP server Tomcat is free (http://jakarta.apache.org/tomcat). Like ASP, JSP provides one programming model for both Web application and component development. Companies using Java on their applications or database servers will find JSP a natural choice. JSP is also similar to ASP in that its use of a high-end programming language (in this case Java) means that high-end developer skills are required than with PHP or Macromedia ColdFusion. There are more choices and more variety among JSP development tools than for any other Web-scripting languages. BEA, Borland, IBM, Macromedia, and Sun all provide options at a variety of price levels. MACROMEDIA COLDFUSION ColdFusion has been around since 1995, and it continues to offer a compelling combination: the easiest scripting language to learn, along with one of the best HTML and Web development tools around—Macromedia Studio MX. Like PHP, ColdFusion uses its own language, designed just for Web development. But the ColdFusion language is consistent and simple to understand, and because it uses HTML-style tags, it’s easy for HTML designers to pick up. Nonprofessional developers will find ColdFusion programming far easier on their blood pressure than either ASP or JSP. plication servers, JBoss does deliver a highly extensible and customizable installation for developers willing to put in the time. And did we mention it’s free? Microsoft Windows Server 2003 Enterprise Edition with Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 and 25 client licenses, $3,999 direct. Microsoft Corp., 425-882-8080, www.microsoft.com. l l l l m As the only non-J2EE offering in this roundup, Microsoft Windows Server 128 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com The current release of ColdFusion MX runs on Linux, Solaris, Windows, and HP-UX. It can run on its own or as an add-on for a Java app server; pricing starts at $1,299. (Macromedia Inc., www.macromedia.com.) MICROSOFT ASP .NET Building on the huge Visual Basic programmer base and Microsoft’s excellent development tools, Microsoft ASP .NET is a strong choice for those using Microsoft’s Web server, Internet Information Services (IIS). ASP .NET (www.asp.net) is a major advance over classic Active Server Pages. It now supports the many .NET languages. ASP .NET provides some compelling Web-project scalability features. Visual Studio .NET provides drag-and-drop graphical page and Web form design and automatically generates code for very common Web application tasks, such as checking the validity of incoming parameters and enforcing access security on pages. In addition, ASP .NET makes accessible the large .NET class library, and it includes a rich set of prebuilt HTML controls, including data grids and controls for mobile devices. Wrapping your head around the .NET Framework is a complex task but can reward you with more productive development. (Microsoft Corp., www.microsoft.com.) PHP The free, open-source PHP (Personal Home Page) hitched its star to Linux and to The Apache Software Foundation’s HTTP Server Project early on and has never looked back. PHP stands out for its cross-platform support (it can run on almost any OS and Web server) as well as its massive function library, which does everything from creating Adobe PDF files on the fly to accessing data in databases and calling external Microsoft COM or Java objects. But PHP offers much less opportunity for code and skills reuse than ASP or JSP does, and native PHP IDEs are less rich than options like Microsoft Visual Studio or Macromedia Studio MX, which does have basic PHP support. PHP 5.0 beta 1, which should be available by the time you read this, will add structured exception handling—a feature the other big three scripting languages have—and much stronger object-oriented programming. (The PHP Group, www.php.net.)—Timothy Dyck 2003 Enterprise Edition ($3,999) offers the most proprietary technology—and some of the most powerful. Along with the new Microsoft .NET Framework, this OS is up to the task of running enterprise applications and deploying Web services. Windows Server 2003 rivals J2EE competitors in depth of features: It includes a Web server called Internet Information Services 6.0, a UDDI server that’s part of the operating system, reliable messaging using Microsoft Message Queue (MSMQ) services, and transactions through Microsoft Transaction Services (MTS). Although these enterprise services run in Windows itself, not .NET, developers can program with them using the .NET APIs. A notable enhancement here is the ability to reach hardware with multiple CPUs and ever larger memory spaces. The Enterprise Edition we reviewed can reach eight CPUs, plus 32GB memory PHOTOGRAPHY: GETTY IMAGES/HULTON ARCHIVE Page Scripting: The Simpler App Servers A P P L I C AT I O N S E R V E R S address spaces. A separately available 64bit edition goes to 32 CPUs and 512GB of RAM. The newest release not only makes managing clusters with fail-over easier but also supports the largest range of hardware we’ve seen for Windows, including support for Itanium CPUs. The coding and testing of Nile, our e-commerce Web application, revealed strengths as well as a few weak points in the .NET Framework. Microsoft’s own developers recoded a version of Nile that yielded impressive performance thanks to improved caching options, including fragment-level caching. Only Oracle offers fragment-level caching for J2EE. (See our performance test results on page 130.) or configuring .NET components with permissions requires a remote log-on or Terminal Services—an awkward arrangement. To be fair, Terminal Services is enhanced in this version, and new command line tools for administration can extend your management options. Since the .NET Framework is hardwired to support standards such as SOAP and WSDL, it does a much better job than J2EE app servers at hiding the complexity of Web services. Even BEA WebLogic Workshop, which hides many of the details of Web services, cannot approach the simplicity of exposing code as Web methods in .NET. Doing this requires only a single line of code, which generates all the underlying XML MICROSOFT WINDOWS SERVER 2003 automatically— You administer a truly whizbang Web applicafeature. But untions in Milike solutions crosoft Windows Server from BEA and 2003 with IBM, this doesn’t Performance offer the reliabilMonitor and the ity and security management needed for enconsole, along with new wizterprise Web serards for .NET vice deployment Framework M i c ro s o f t ’s components. implementation The .NET path offers fewer options in of current Web service standards can building business logic and database com- jump-start any IT organization’s efforts. If ponents. Microsoft has no official blue- you don’t mind committing to a single print for business objects comparable to technology provider, the strengths of Enterprise JavaBeans (EJB), though it rec- .NET and Windows Server are hard to ommends best practices on the Web (www beat. The platform makes a convincing .microsoft.com/resources/practices). The case for an operating system acting as an .NET developers have to devise their own application server, both in overall cost component models based on these prac- and in the wealth of services for .NET tices, while a J2EE developer just needs to enterprise applications.—RVD run a wizard to get EJB. With .NET, Microsoft offers the advan- Oracle9i Application Server tage of giving developers a choice of lan- Java Edition, $5,000 direct per CPU; Enterprise guages. Microsoft’s stellar tool Visual Stu- Edition, $20,000 per CPU. Oracle Corp., 800-672dio .NET includes C#, Visual Basic .NET, 2531, www.oracle.com. l l l l m JScript .NET, and a special .NET version of The industrial-strength reputation—and Java called J#. All components can inter- price tag—of Oracle’s database business operate at runtime seamlessly. J2EE de- precedes its entry into application servers. velopers can code only in Java. With built-in robust clustering, security, Windows Server does not offer a single and business intelligence, Oracle9i Appliconsole to perform all administrative cation Server Enterprise Edition is a tasks—a feature that J2EE app servers do powerful platform that harnesses Oracle’s provide. In Windows, you need to use database technology to deliver enterprise separate Microsoft Management Console portals and wireless applications. (MMC) windows to manage IIS and .NET The new, lighter-weight Java Edition Framework components, and you use Per- ($5,000 per CPU) will please developers formance Monitor to check resource who just want a certified J2EE app serusage. Adding users to Active Directory ver. Its atypical use of an Oracle data- base instead of XML for configuration could spell vendor lock-in, and documentation is weak. Oracle9iAS runs on a good selection of operating systems, including Linux and several Unix flavors. We installed it on Windows 2000 using the Oracle Universal Installer. For the Enterprise Edition, the number of services and tools you can install is truly massive (well over 250), requiring two passes with the installer— one for an Oracle Infrastructure and another to install the Web server and J2EE components. Portal, wireless, and business intelligence are also options. The installation process for Oracle9iAS is the most resource-intensive of the products we reviewed, because you must install a complete Oracle database along with all supporting management tools first. You also need to create a management repository in the database—a different approach from the XML-based configuration profiles all the other tested J2EE products use. The Java Edition’s installation is more streamlined. While the Enterprise Edition bundles the app server tools around a core of the Oracle database, the Java Edition concentrates on J2EE. It combines the Oracle9iAS Containers for J2EE (OC4J)—implementations of Web, EJB, and Web service containers—with two developer tools: JDeveloper for Java software development and TopLink for entity modeling. The biggest change in this version for experienced Oracle users turning toward J2EE is a new administration tool called the Enterprise Manager Web Site (EMWS). You must still use the standalone console version of Enterprise Manager to configure databases and users, among other tasks, but this new tool lets you manage the application server features of the platform just as the other app servers’ administration consoles do. We used EMWS successfully to install new Web applications, including EJBbased apps, and to set up data sources. EMWS also handles configuring Oracle’s Web server and a Web-caching server. Besides the nuts and bolts of running J2EE, EMWS excels at presenting performance MORE ON THE WEB For more analysis and reviews of enterprise software, log on to www.pcmag.com. www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 129 PERFORMANCE TESTS Application Servers Benchmark-testing enterprise software has become an open process in which both the software companies and the testing organizations participate. We proposed such a test strategy for comparing J2EE and .NET application servers. After months of development and discussion with vendors—and several methodology plans—we arrived at what we considered a fair way to measure the products’ throughput when running our test Web application, an online bookstore called Nile 2.0. We delivered the source code to the leading J2EE and .NET platform providers and gave them the opportunity to optimize the code for their application servers. We coded Nile in both J2EE EJB 2.0 and .NET versions; the latter functionally paralleled the J2EE version while observing .NET programming practices. We required the optimized applications to generate the same HTML as our reference version and to follow other run rules. Unfortunately, after initially agreeing to participate in our tests, all of the commercial J2EE leaders—BEA, IBM, Oracle, and Sun—declined for various reasons. Some said they did not have the resources to send experts to PC Magazine Labs to assist us; others disagreed with our testing methodology. Collectively, their responses are an indication of the high stakes and intense competition in the application server market. As a result, we worked only with downloadable versions of the J2EE products (which limited the number of users) and were not able to compare J2EE and .NET performance. Microsoft, however, did agree to participate. We revised our testing strategy to show how optimization and caching can improve the performance of .NET applications. and resource usage with simple, understandable graphics. We used this visual feedback to tune the Web cache for our bookstore app. Support for clustered machines comes standard with Oracle9iAS, and Oracle’s considerable experience THE LOAD GENERATION TOOL To simulate thousands of users visiting our e-commerce site, we used e-TEST suite, a load/stress tool from Empirix. Assisted by Empirix engineers, we designed load scenarios to mimic typical user interactions: logging on and off, searching, browsing, and purchasing. We designated a percentage of agents for each scenario, based on traffic patterns at actual e-commerce sites. Because each Empirix load agent requires only 0.3MB of space (and we had 30 desktop computers with 512MB each), we were able to create over 25,000 virtual users. We ramped up the test load by 250 virtual users every 3 minutes, inserting a think time of 5 seconds per page, and ran each test until a peak user rate (100 percent CPU utilization) was achieved and application server throughput leveled off. WHAT THE NUMBERS MEAN Both our original version of Nile and the Microsoft-optimized version are written in C# using the .NET Framework and are functionally equivalent; yet we saw considerable performance differences. The first graph compares the throughput of the two versions. The optimized one, coded by Microsoft’s experts, exploits such enhancements as using business objects and parameterized SQL; with a heavy user load, it was able to transmit nearly twice as many pages per second. The second graph shows how caching can dramatically improve performance. With caching turned on in the optimized version of Nile, the app server was able to bypass timeconsuming reads from the database, instead caching both data and code objects in memory. We then went a step farther by storing additional objects as session variables and used fragment- and page-level caching of Web pages on the optimized version of Nile. This is a way to cache entire dynamic ASPX pages, avoiding the need for the server to rebuild HTML pages. This setup (represented by a solid line in the second graph) in large-database installations shows. Core J2EE features include a souped-up Web server based on Apache and a separate Web-caching server—a significant enhancement. As in Microsoft’s caching solution, you can manage Oracle JSPs in a ORACLE9i APPLICATION SERVER The new Web-based Oracle Enterprise Manager provides good visual feedback about resource usage in Oracle9iAS, plus status info for all configured components within this powerful J2EE application server. 130 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com cache by placing special custom tags in code. This means very little extra work for developers for potentially significant performance gains. Oracle has simplified EJB creation in the included JDeveloper IDE with custom framework classes—Business Components for Java. At press time, Oracle had just announced a new initiative called Oracle Application Development Framework (ADF), a set of productivity classes based on Web services and well-known J2EE design patterns. Even with the move toward Web-based administration, the process of installing and running J2EE applications in Oracle9iAS is still more complex than in the competition. It makes you run more tools, A P P L I C AT I O N S E R V E R S .NET NILE TEST: Optimized vs. Unoptimized PPS 600 Optimized application Peak: 535 pages per second, 2,039 virtual users 500 400 300 utilities, and services. This is no doubt a residue of Oracle’s history with enterprise solutions. The company has produced a somewhat more streamlined J2EE package, but you’ll need Oracle database expertise—and an Oracle budget— if you plan to run with this application server.—RVD Sun ONE Application Server 7 $2,000 direct per CPU. Sun Microsystems Inc., 800555-9786, www.sun.com. l l l m m Sun Microsystems’ application server offerings have undergone numerous shifts in branding and strategic focus over the past few years. Released in late 2002, Version 7 of Sun ONE Application Server (SOAS) represents a complete break with 200 Unoptimized application Peak: 276 pages per second, 1,859 virtual users 100 0 0 400 Virtual users 800 1,200 1,600 .NET NILE TEST: The Caching Advantage 2,000 PPS 4,000 Optimized application with object and page caching Peak: 3,867 pages per second, 17,530 virtual users 3,500 3,000 2,500 2,000 Optimized application with object caching Peak: 2,387 pages per second, 15,054 virtual users BETTER THE TEST-BED To simulate an actual production site, we used rack-mounted HP Netserver LT 6000r servers running Microsoft Windows Server 2003, Enterprise Edition: Our tested application server software ran on two six-CPU servers, each equipped with 900-MHz Xeon processors and 4GB of addressable memory. For the database tier, we used a six-CPU server equipped with a 700-MHz Intel Xeon CPU and 2GB of addressable memory, running Oracle9i, Release 2. The database server was equipped with mirrored primary and log drives—20 9GB swappable disk drives configured with RAID 5, a multidisk specification that optimizes read and write speeds. To minimize the variables in our tests, we set up the database with Oracle’s Transaction Type preselection choice and kept tweaks to a minimum. We held the database table entries to thousands of records, instead of millions, because we wanted to tax the application server rather than the database. We networked the Empirix agents to two Extreme Summit 48 switches with single gigabit uplink ports, which allowed a practical bandwidth of about 800 Mbps. With the help of F5 Networks engineers, we set up an F5 Big-IP 5000 IP Application Switch and connected the database server and the two servers running the app server software we were testing. The F5 switch allowed us to funnel the load from the Extreme switches to this software. It distributed the incoming requests between the two servers using a round-robin load-balancing algorithm and sticky session persistence to maintain data integrity.—Analysis written by Sahil Gambhir BETTER delivered a 62 percent increase in peak performance over the test run without page caching—and a staggering increase over our original version of Nile, with more than 14 times the throughput. But this approach adds the overhead of keeping objects in memory, and the administrator has to maintain a cache–flushing policy in the face of changing HTML designs. 1,500 1,000 500 0 Virtual users 4,000 8,000 12,000 0 16,000 The charts above show tested throughput in pages per second (pps) with Microsoft Windows Server 2003. The top chart shows the difference between an unoptimized version of our Nile 2.0 online bookstore application and a functionally equivalent version that Microsoft coded with optimizations. For the bottom chart, we used caching with the optimized version: first object caching alone, then adding dynamic page caching. the past. Sun has reengineered SOAS’s code base from the ground up, added more integration with the operating system Solaris, and slashed the price. The app server comes in three flavors. Surpassing BEA’s developer licensing scheme in thrift, the Platform Edition is a free download and can be used to develop and even deploy app servers for free (with remote administration disabled). We tested the Standard Edition, which permits remote administration, installing it on Windows 2000 Advanced Server and XP. SOAS Standard Edition comes with Solaris 8 and 9, and Sun certifies a version for Red Hat Linux 7.2. The company says an Enterprise Edition of SOAS is slated for release in the third quarter of 2003. This edition will offer high-availability features like failover and load balancing. Currently, these features are available only through thirdparty software or hardware. We were up and running fast with the provided installation program. Previous Sun app servers required multiple components (like a directory and Web server) to be configured together, which was a hassle. The streamlined installation brings Sun in line with its competitors. A plus here is that Sun’s app server runs with Version 1.4 of its Java Virtual Machine, HotSpot. The other app servers are still using Version 1.3. Sun’s proprietary HTTP server is included and offers good control over tuning things www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 131 S U M M A RY O F F E AT U R E S Download this table at Application Servers BEA WebLogic Server 8.1 y YES o NO www.pcmag.com. JBoss 3.2 Microsoft Windows Oracle9i Server 2003 Application Server Cost per CPU Express, $495; Enterprise, $10,000 None (open-source) Standard Edition: $999; Enterprise Edition, $3,999 Java Edition, $5,999; Enterprise Edition, $20,000 Operating systems supported Linux, NSK, Unix, Windows (server versions) AS/400, Linux, Unix, Windows Server 2003 Linux, Unix, Windows VMS, Windows (server (server versions) versions) Load-balancing types Dynamic, random, round-robin, weighted Fixed, random, roundrobin, user-definable Dynamic, random, round-robin, weighted Fail-over/In-memory session replication yy yy Component clustering Hot backup y y y o Rolling upgrades DEPLOYMENT y WAP/WML support Multi-application server (virtual hosting) Hot deployment of JSPs WebSphere Sun ONE Application Application Server 7 Server 5 Platform Edition, free; Standard Edition, $2,000; Enterprise Edition, $10,000 Linux, Solaris, Windows (server versions) $10,000; Enterprise Edition, $23,750; Express, $2,000 Random, round-robin None Dynamic, random, round-robin, weighted yy yy oo yy y o y o o y y y y y y y y yy y y oo y y yy y N/A yy y y yy y y yy y y Hot deployment of component objects Version tracking y o y o y y y o y o y o Audit of deployments Native rollback features y y y y o y y y y o o y Security protocols supported Digital certificates, SSL SSL SSL, TLS SSL, 3DES FIPS-140, PKCS#11, SSL, TLS, X509 certificates Native database drivers WYSIWYG tool for front-end design O/R mapping Connection pooling DEVELOPMENT y o y y o CertPath, GSKiT, JCE, JSSE, PKCS, Web Seal, XML Digital Signature, zOS System SSL y y y y o y y y o y y y y y y y y y y On-line source archives y y y y y y Export application as a JAR/WAR Message queue adapters included Can publish component in a UDDI Browser-based administration console JDBC driver types PERFORMANCE yy 3 y y oo 0 y y N/A N/A 2 y o yy 4 y y yy 1 y y yy 1 y y 2, 4 2, 3 N/A 2, 4 2, 4 2, 4 Caching coherency in clusters Thread pooling Caching of full/fragmentary pages Query results caching y y y o o y y y o y y y yo y y yo o y yy y y yy y y yo y o yo y y Linux, OS400, Unix, Windows (server versions), zOS SCALABILITY Updatable database cache Supports lazy loads y y y y y o Includes native Java Virtual Machine ADMINISTRATION y o N/A y y y Supports plug-ins to an SNMP agent Central domain management y y y y y y y y y y y y Deploy/undeploy via GUI Garbage collection via logs/console STANDARDS SUPPORTED yy yy oo oo yy yy yy oo yy yo yy yo Compliant with J2EE versions 1.3 1.3 N/A 1.3 1.2, 1.3 1.3 J2EE-certified/licensed Servlet yy 2.3 oo 2.3 N/A N/A N/A yy 2.3 yy 2.3 yy 2.3 JSP 1.2 1.2 N/A 1.2 1.2 1.2 EJB JMS 2.0 1.02 2.0 1.0.2b N/A N/A 2.0 1.0 2.0 1.0.2 2.0 1.0.2 JNDI 1.2 1.1 N/A 1.2 1.2 1.2 JMX 1.1 1.1 N/A None 1.0 1.0 ActiveX COM+ CORBA o y y o o y y y o o y y o o y y y y yy yo y y yy yo yy LDAP/Active Directory RED denotes Editors’ Choice. 132 N/A—Not applicable: Microsoft Windows Server 2003 does not support J2EE. P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com A P P L I C AT I O N S E R V E R S like file caching and thread pools. While all the other Java products we reviewed—except Oracle9iAS—rely on a Web-only administrator console, Sun delivers a standalone Java application. The two are functionally equivalent, and we relied on the Web version to configure a test server domain. The tool facilitates uploading standard EAR, WAR, and JAR files and lets you verify them before deployment. The Standard Edition lets you deploy JAR files to multiple nodes, but getting a real cluster going requires ning Solaris: an appealing, low-cost solution that’s likely to remain relevant as J2EE evolves, given Sun’s commitment to the language and platform.—RVD WebSphere Application Server 5 $10,000 per CPU direct; Enterprise Edition, $23,750 direct; Express Edition, $2,000. IBM Corp., 888-7467426, www.ibm.com. l l l l m in making the administration console approachable, even for first-time users. The resulting tool is at the front of the pack in administration features. With JMX support, WebSphere can also be managed and monitored by enterprise tools like Tivoli for even greater reliability. IBM’s experience with enterprise transactions shines through. Its compensating transactions feature intelligently cleans up if a business process fails midway, and asynchronous Beans facilitate reliable messaging between disparate systems. The Enterprise Edition offers a welldesigned blueprint for wiring together all kinds of systems. A CICS gateway to access mainframe data is a built-in option. Modeling workflow between different systems is a strength, using the companion WebSphere Studio Application Developer, Integration Edition ($6,000), which facilitates business integration by connecting Web services. Leading-edge support for XML-based workflow is standard, too. A more modestly priced version of WebSphere Application Server, called Express Edition, is available for $2,000, for smallerfootprint dynamic Web applications. Underneath the hood, IBM’s own Java Virtual Machine powers WebSphere. The company has optimized its Web services stack, including support for using SOAP over Java RMI (remote method invocation) for improved performance. Like BEA, IBM generally builds its own J2EE features rather than relying on open-source efforts, and it has made a considerable investment in proprietary implementations of Web service standards to speed things along. Delivering leading-edge support for Web services, WebSphere is a safe choice for any business with the budget to tackle large Web services projects. The product offers IBM’s tried-and-true experience with enterprise integration along with excellent administration within a robust J2EE platform.—RVD E With robust clustering, effective administration, and business workflow that uses Web services, IBM’s WebSphere Application Server 5 is ready to tackle even the largest projects. SUN ONE APPLICATION SERVER 7 For all the enterprise features, though, Sun ONE you’ll pay enterApplication prise prices. Server’s WebSphere administration console earns runs on Winpoints with a dows, Linux, cleanly deUnix, OS 400, signed interand zOS. IBM face and a JDBC wizard. has worked at simplifying the using a separate load balancer until the installation process: Version 5 drops an earlier dependence on the DB2 database Enterprise Edition arrives. Sun’s cleanly designed console gives for storing configuration information, you good control over various J2EE instead using XML , as BEA WebLogic resources. Managing database sources Server and Sun ONE Application Server and connection pools is simple: A wizard do. All configuration is now stored in walks you through the settings required the standard J2EE Server.xml files. You administer WebSphere using a very for popular JDBC and database platforms, including DB2, Microsoft SQL Server, and effective Web-based interface that rivals Oracle. (The PointBase database is in- Sun’s for a streamlined appearance. The cluded as a freebie.) more you use it, the more you’ll be imFor Web services, Sun promises easier pressed by its depth. Highlights include a upgrades to evolving standards. In place quick status screen for spotting configuraof numerous updates and acronym-laden tion problems and a summary of recent downloads (JAXP, JAXM, JAX-RPC), message activity, including errors. a single Web Services Developer Pack For many tasks in the console, a stepsimplifies the process. Sun hopes this by-step wizard guides you, and help text approach will enable its app server to is placed by each option. After you comgrow with changing Web services as new plete each screen, you are then reminded releases become available. of your changes’ possible effects before Although Sun brought Java into the you save them. We used this wizardry to world, the completely redesigned SOAS 7 create multiple WEBSPHERE APPLICATION SERVER 5 is a newcomer compared with BEA instances of app WebLogic Server and IBM’s WebSphere. servers and deWebSphere The largest enterprises will want to wait ployed Web apApplication and see whether its reliability and scala- plications very Server’s bility are acceptable. And they may want easily. administration to wait for the Enterprise Edition. In any Although help console procase, Sun’s aggressive pricing scheme prompts can ocvides step-bystep help as marks a welcome shift. casionally look a you perform In its present form, Sun ONE Applica- bit cryptic, IBM common J2EE tion Server has some catching up to do. has generally tasks. But it’s a natural fit for any enterprise run- done a fine job www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 133 w w w. p c m a g . c o m /a f te r h o u r s T E C H N O L O G Y O N YO U R T I M E Blog On BY TROY DREIER T ony Pierce says he does it for the chicks. “I can’t play guitar, I can’t sing,” he says. But he can type. Writing a blog (or Weblog, an online journal) might not seem like the best way to score dates, but the creator of tonypierce.com says he’s gotten dates, gifts, and even cash from readers. Blogs have been around since the Web was created. Some function as diaries, letting the hosts detail their lives, while others link to sites or stories of interest. You can find them by searching for blog directories online. Early blogs were coded and uploaded by hand, but in the past few years easy-to-use tools have removed the hassle and made blogging accessible to everyone. As the number of blogs has exploded, so has their presence in the cultural landscape. There are now specialized blogs for every occupation and hobby. At LawMeme.com, a group blog, Yale law students weigh in on topics from the news. And at VentureBlog (www.ventureblog.com), venture capitalists ponder dot-coms. “It’s extremely difficult to measure Weblog numbers,” says Michael Gartenberg, a research director with Jupiter Research. The number of blogs could be anywhere from “several hundred thousand to several million,” he says, although a Jupiter study shows that 4 percent of online users regularly read blogs and 2 percent maintain or contribute to them. “They give people with strong opinions a way to express those opinions,” says Garten- Blogger Blogger is by far the biggest name in online blogging tools and probably has the most members, with 1.5 million registered users (though far fewer are actively blogging). Google recently acquired Blogger, raising its profile even further. The free version WHAT THE RATINGS MEAN of Blogger is simple lllll EXCELLENT to use but is (underllllm VERY GOOD standably) light on lllmm GOOD llmmm FAIR features. You can lmmmm POOR select from seven 154 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com Lycos Blog Builder berg. He compares the current blog revolution with the desktop publishing revolution of the late 1980s. In this roundup, we evaluate four popular online blogging tools. All can be used by beginners with no HTML knowledge, and two have free versions. The best tools are simple to use, allow full customization of the blog’s pages, and offer photo storage, community forum features, and RSS links (either Rich Site Summary or Really Simple Syndication, an XML method of providing a content feed from one site to another). Of the four tools in the story, only Lycos Blog Builder requires you to use a specific host. The other three provide methods for getting your blog content onto your own site. Pierce hopes that people can get over their qualms about imperfect writing. “Just do it every day and you’ll get better,” he says. “Maybe in three lines, you could write something really heartbreaking.” simple templates and format their entries with bold or italic text or with links, which are bare minimum capabilities. It doesn’t host pictures or have community features. Because it’s text-only, Blogger doesn’t have a storage limit. We would have liked to review Blogger Pro, the paid version of Blogger, but it was in the middle of an overhaul and wasn’t Blogger accepting new members. For current members, Blogger Pro allows photo posting, RSS links, and e-mail posting—a great feature, not included in the other three tools we reviewed, that lets you e-mail a blog entry and have it appear on the site. AFTER HOURS the changes, then reload a page from the site to view the change. Blogs can be updated online, but LiveJournal also offers links to a number of third-party desktop tools for posting new content, including apps that work with Palm- and Windows-based handhelds as well as cell phones. You can set your Live Journal blog to accept user comments, but you can’t upload By default, Blogger accounts are hosted pictures to your entries. Basic version, free; paid version, $25 per year. on BlogSpot (www.blogspot.com), a storLiveJournal, www.livejournal.com. llmmm age site owned by Blogger. Free accounts have ads on their pages. Upgraded acLycos Blog Builder counts cost $5 or $10 per month for 25MB or 100MB of storage space and are ad-free. Terra Lycos added a blog-buildWe would prefer to have seen a unified ing tool to its Tripod and Ansign-up sheet that combines Blogger and gelfire site-creation services in BlogSpot. February and gave it an upgrade Although Blogger may regain the crown with photo-upload features and more soon, it’s not currently a versatile or powtemplates in June. It doesn’t have a free erful tool. If the new version of Blogger version, but Blog Builder delivers an Pro isn’t finished by the time you read excellent, easy-to-use toolset. this, consider Lycos Blog Builder. Start by registering for an account with Basic, free. Pyra Labs, www.blogger.com. Tripod or Angelfire. Basic site hosting is lllmm free, but creating a blog requires signing up for a paid account ($4.95 to $19.95 per LiveJournal month, plus a $10 to $15 setup fee). The LiveJournal is a simple, elegant service lowest-priced account comes with 25MB of storage and 5GB of monthly bandwidth. that’s perfect for those on a budget who Paid subscribers can want to create a no-frills blog. The service isn’t loaded with features, but it is possible create a standalone blog Weblogger or one with a personal to participate without a monthly fee. home page. Though Accounts are free only if you can get an Blog Builder doesn’t account code from an existing member. offer as much fine The owners say this keeps the online control over the look of community tight and prevents abusive the template as Blogger posters from signing up. If you don’t Pro or Weblogger does receive an invitation from a member, (you can’t make HTML you’ll need to purchase a membership. changes), it’s the easiest LiveJournal encourages even free memoption for newbies. bers to kick some money in and help pay During setup, you can for the site. Paying gets you a few extra choose to make a multiperks, such as an e-mail account, a shorter URL, multiple user pictures, and the ability authored blog, add a to customize the site template with HTML. buddy page, get an RSS link, get listed in an LiveJournal offers 13 themes. Though online blog directory, some are jarring to the eye, you can cusallow comments, and tomize all the get e-mail notification colors. But making whenever someone selections isn’t MORE ON posts a comment. You easy, since the can also choose from 24 attractive temsite’s Journal Modi- T HE WE B www.pcmag.com/ plates and customize colors and fonts. fication page personaltech The interface for adding a new entry is doesn’t offer temVisit our site for clean and simple, with fields for entering a plate or color more Quick Clips title and main text as well as buttons for previews. You need and Gear & Games adding pictures and links. to pick a theme or reviews. Every step of the way, we found Lycos color, click to save Blog Builder a pleasure and easy to use. If you’re just starting out and want a simple, good-looking blog, this is the way to go. $4.95 to $19.95 per month. Lycos Inc., http://blog.tripod.lycos.com. llllm Weblogger The one tool in this roundup that means business, Weblogger is designed for business teams that need a collaborative space online. You can register for a free 30-day trial, but after that, Weblogger’s blog hosting plan costs $9.95 per month or $79.95 per year. The site offers 37 professional-looking themes and helpful tutorials for newbies. Powered by Manila, a strong and flexible content management system, Weblogger isn’t as simple to use as the other services we reviewed, but it offers a superb level of template control for business professionals. You can stick with one of the themes or customize all the elements on the page—altering the HTML template of every page within a site, editing the XML tags for the site navigation, and adding Cascading Style Sheets. A site administrator can set up an entire staff for a site, specifying the role, permissions, and password for each member. Although Weblogger offers less server space than Lycos Blog Builder (10MB of storage and 512MB of monthly bandwidth), that shouldn’t be a problem, since it’s ONLINE meant for use by closed groups. For creating private blogs for a limited set of people, Weblogger is a powerful tool with a hard-to-beat set of capabilities. 30-day free trial; basic hosting, $9.95 per month or $79.95 per year. Weblogger.com, www.weblogger.com. lllmm www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 155 AFTER HOURS Link Your Sounds Mousing in Air Feeling tied down to your office chair? Stand up and mouse with the Gyration Ultra GT Cordless Optical Mouse. Thanks to a built-in dual-axis gyroscope, moving the on-screen cursor is as simple as waving your hand. For example, if you raise your hand while holding the mouse, the pointer moves towards the top of your monitor. On-screen movements are crisp and precise, which makes this the best 3-D mouse we’ve ever seen. And with its long battery life, you can mouse around in bliss all day long.—Robyn Peterson $79.95 list; with keyboard, $99. Gyration Inc., www.gyration.com. llllm Do you carry a mobile phone and a music player? The Skullcandy LINK eliminates the clumsiness of swapping out headsets when the phone rings: It attaches to both. Calls are automatically answered, and the remote lets you adjust your music volume and—depending on the kind of phone you have—voice-dial, mute, or disconnect calls. Models are available for virtually any kind of cell phone.—Carol A. Mangis $24.95 direct; with backphones or earbuds, $29.95. Device Development Corp., www.skullcandy.com. llllm Radio Mouse The MouseCaster is a PS/2 scroll-wheel mouse based on rollerball technology with a unique quality: It includes an FM stereo tuner that plays through your computer’s speakers. The mouse connects to the line-in port on your sound card and comes equipped with an external antenna for improved reception. An on-screen display controls up to 28 preprogrammed channels, and you can record radio content in a variety of formats. But to record to MP3, you have to find an open-source MP3 encoder. And setup is not intuitive.—Craig Ellison $29.95 direct. www.mousecaster.com. llmmm Digital Drumming Learning to play the drums is easy and inexpensive with the realistic Pacific Digital DrumXtreme DX-100 USB Digital Drum Kit. Putting together the drum set can take a couple of hours, but folding it for transport or storage is quick and simple. Plug the master controller into a PC’s USB port and use the training videos, play a drum game, and practice with music tracks. Plug headphones into your PC’s audio-out jack so you won’t bug your neighbors as you wail away.—Bruce Brown $300 street. Pacific Digital Corp., www.pacificdigital.com. lllmm 156 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com AFTER HOURS Game Expansion Packs QUICK CLIPS Rise of Nations By Tricia Harris A game once had a clear life cycle: It was released, played, and then replaced by the next great game. But now, publishers can extend the life of a game by releasing expansion packs for successful titles. The goal is to add more of what players want—maps, characters, game play, and story—and improve technical and graphical features. We review four current packages here. Later this year, we’ll also see expansions for Neverwinter Nights (Shadows of Undrentide) and Anarchy Online (Shadowlands). EverQuest: The Legacy of Ykesha Battlefield 1942: The Road to Rome In this package, you get to play two new sides of the World War II conflict: the Free French Forces and the Italian Army. The array of vehicles and weapons that go with those two groups adds realism. Although the maps aren’t spectacular, they are useful additions to the Battlefield 1942 experience. You won’t find a lot of new game play, but there are loads of new weapons and vehicles. Fans looking for more of the same should check out The Road to Rome. EverQuest launched in 1999—and the gaming world has never been the same since. Sony has cranked out five expansion packs for this online series, and this is the latest. The game boasts a new race (the Frogloks), new zones, updated models, and assorted other goodies. Best are the various technology improvements, which balance the game. Still, you get the feeling that Sony is ready to move on to its next adventure, EverQuest II, expected in late 2003. $21.99 direct. Sony Online Entertainment Inc., http://soe.sony.com. llllm $29.95 direct. Electronic Arts Inc., www.eagames.com. lllmm Dark Age of Camelot: Shrouded Isles New races, new areas to conquer, and better quests give this EverQuest challenger more longevity. One important aspect of the game is player housing, and Mythic does an admirable job of giving the game a much needed community feel and a more social setting. For example, you can fix up your abode to show off allegiances and personal style. This title is a nice addition to a mostly player-versusplayer environment. $19.99 list. Mythic Entertainment Inc., www.mythicentertainment.com. llllm When you combine the designer of Civilization II with the publisher of Age of Empires, you get a pretty cool game. Rise of Nations combines all the best parts of turn-based, empirebuilding games with the excitement of real-time strategy. You can guide 18 nations from the Ancient Age to the Information Age. The best part of this game is the lack of micromanagement, which can often bog down real-time strategy games. Here, smart “citizens” deal with the details and let you handle larger issues.—Daniel S. Evans $54.95 list. Microsoft Game Studios, www. microsoft.com/games/riseofnations llllm X2: Wolverine’s Revenge This game chronicles the origin of the X-Men’s Wolverine. He escapes from his creators and eventually returns to confront them at the infamous Weapon X facility. Wolverine has some killer moves and heightened senses that let him detect enemies with a button press. X-Men fans will enjoy the storyline, but the graphics could use a little work. —Cisco Cheng $30 street. Activision Inc., www.wolverinesrevenge .com. lllmm Rayman 3: Hoodlum Havoc Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne This title takes you back to Azeroth months after the final conflict in last year’s captivating Warcraft III: Reign of Chaos. Frozen Throne has four new hero races and five neutral races that you can recruit to your cause. That’s not a bad idea, especially if your tactical ability is more akin to Custer’s than Napoleon’s. The tweaks to game play as well as additional maps and other items provide more of the intense real-time strategy that made Warcraft III a standout. $34.95 direct. Blizzard Entertainment, www. blizzard.com. llllm This PC version of the popular console game drops you into a cartoonish fantasy land, where your goal is to restore peace and order to the land by playing through wonderfully rendered 3-D levels. What separates Rayman 3 from the slew of other games in this genre is its comedic style, flair, and excellent voice acting. Drawbacks are poor camera angles and slight difficulty playing without a game pad.—Ari Vernon $19.99 list. Ubi Soft Entertainment, www.rayman3.com. lllmm www.pcmag.com SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 P C M A G A Z I N E 157 SEARCHING FOR SIGNS OF BLUETOOTH DECAY Edited by Don Willmott L They arrive at your door wearing surgical masks. (Fujitsu site) L Duh, we thought we were a jean-yus! (ViperNet online IQ test) L He looks pretty darned happy for a person whose call isn’t going through. (TDS Metrocom flyer) L Dialog boxes that say “Trust us” always make us just a little nervous. (Eudora) L Backspace on the Road: Austin, Texas. J The article and the ad collide, and this time it’s deadly! (SFGate) w w w. p c m a g .c o m / b a c k s p a c e If your entry is used, we’ll send you a PC Magazine T-shirt. Submit your entries via e-mail to backspace@ziffdavis.com (attachments are welcome) or to Backspace, PC Magazine, 28 E. 28th St., New York, NY 10016-7930. Ziff Davis Media Inc. shall own all property rights in the entries. Winners this issue: William Boyce, Beth Cohen, Carl Francis, Kevin Miller, Roy Rumohr, and Jacob Vanus. PC Magazine, ISSN 0888-8507, is published semi-monthly except 3 issues in October and monthly in January and July at $39.97 for one year. Ziff Davis Media Inc, 28 E. 28th St., New York, NY 10016-7930. Periodicals postage paid at New York, NY 10016-7930 and at additional mailing offices. POSTMASTER: Address changes to PC Magazine, P.O. Box 54070, Boulder, CO 80328-4070. The Canadian GST registration number is 865286033. Canada Post International Publications Mail Product (Canadian Distribution) Sales Agreement No. 266477. Printed in the U.S.A. 158 P C M A G A Z I N E SEPTEMBER 2, 2003 www.pcmag.com