Can gluten affect multiple sclerosis?
Transcription
Can gluten affect multiple sclerosis?
Correspondencia: Ismael San Mauro Martín – Research Centre in Nutrition and Health (CINUSA group) C/ Artistas 39, 2º-5 - 28020 Madrid – Teléfono: 910 114 113 – E-mail: info@cinusagroup.com Revisión 13 18 Can gluten affect multiple sclerosis? Ismael San Mauro Martín1, Elena Garicano Vilar2 Research Manager, 2Data Manager & Research. Research Centre in Nutrition and Health (CINUSA group). Madrid. 1 ABSTRACT. Introduction: Multiple sclerosis is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disorder, characterized by the presence of disseminated demyelinating lesions in the central nervous system. Gluten not only affects the organism causing celiac disease, but it also intervenes in other pathologies associated with glycoproteins. Gluten can cause neurologic damages through a combination of antibodies of crossed-reaction, complex immune diseases and direct toxicity. Some studies show the positive effect of removing gluten from a patient’s diet. Aim: To review scientific literature related to gluten ingestion in multiple sclerosis, and to analyse the evidence that this hypothesis supports. Methods: Bibliographic search in PubMed database. Several search strategies were designed, combining keywords according to the studies that were sought in order to find the highest scientific evidence possible. Results: The cause of neurologic symptoms are not known but it has been suggested that the autoimmunity resulting from the molecular mimicry between gliadin and proteins from the nervous system have a relevant role. Some patients suffering from multiple sclerosis experienced a significant relief of their symptoms after being on a gluten-free diet. Conclusion: There is a possible association between the disruption of the flow of information within the brain and body and gluten. Studied patients may improve or stabilize their cognitive condition with the removal of gluten. Studies reviewed have all shown low-medium evidence as a whole. More studies are needed, specially randomized clinical trials. Key words: gluten, antigliadin, multiple sclerosis, neurologic disease. RESUMEN. Introducción: La esclerosis múltiple es un trastorno inflamatorio autoimmune, caracterizado por la presencia de lesiones desmielinizantes diseminadas en el sistema nervioso central. El gluten no sólo afecta al organismo causando la enfermedad celíaca, sino que también interviene en otras patologías asociadas con glicoproteínas. El gluten puede ocasionar lesiones neurológicas por medio de la combinación de anticuerpos cros-reactivos, enfermedades inmunes complejas y daño directo. Algunos estudios muestran el efecto positivo de la eliminación del gluten de la dieta de los pacientes. Objetivo: revisar la literatura científica relacionada con el gluten y la esclerosis múltiple, y analizar la evidencia que apoya esta posible relación. Métodos: búsqueda bibliográfica en la base de datos PubMed. Se diseñaron varias estrategias de búsqueda, combinando palabras clave de acuerdo con los estudios que fueron hallados, con el fin de obtener la evidencia científica de mayor calidad. Resultados: la causa de los síntomas neurológicos no se conoce, pero se ha sugerido que un proceso autoinmune resultado de un proceso de mimetismo molecular entre la gliadina y las proteínas del sistema nervioso podría tener un papel relevante. Algunos pacientes de esclerosis múltiple experimentan una reducción significativa de sus síntomas tras seguir una dieta libre de gluten. Conclusión: hay una posible asociación entre la disrupción del flujo de información entre cerebro, cuerpo y gluten. Los estudios revisados tienen un grado bajo-medio de evidencia en conjunto. Se precisan más estudios y especialmente ensayos clínicos aleatorizados. Palabras clave: gluten, antigliadina, esclerosis múltiple, enfermedad neurológica. ❑❑Introduction Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune disorder1, characterized by the presence of disseminated demyelinating lesions in the central nervous system (CNS)2. It has a multifactorial etiology, including environmental, immunological, and genetic factors1. Activated, potentially autoimmune, T cells cross the blood-brain barrier and produce inflammatory plaques and axonal loss in the brain, spinal cord or optic nerves. The result is the accumulation of gliosis and demyelination in areas of the CNS. MS affects about 1% of the population worldwide, mainly young women2. MS could be associated with other autoimmune diseases, such us celiac disease (CD) and vice versa1. The association of autoimmune disorders and CD is REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE ESCLEROSIS MÚLTIPLE considered to be due to a shared genetic tendency3. CD occurs in up to 11% of the patients, together with MS4. When both occur in a patient, CD is frequently silent, and the patient is initially diagnosed with the autoimmune disease3. Arguments for the coexistence of both conditions are the cerebrospinal fluid and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings, improvement of gastrointestinal manifestations and polyneuropathy upon gluten-free diet (GFD), and previous reports which refer to the collateral concurrence of both conditions4. CD is a systemic immune-mediated intestinal disorder with gluten sensitivity which is characterized with villus atrophy and crypt hyperplasia1. The genetic basis for gluten intolerance are mainly attributed to the HLA class-II locus located on chromosome 6p213. A high level of Immunoglobulin A (IgA) Nº 37 - Diciembre de 2015 Ismael San Mauro Martín, Elena Garicano Vilar ❑❑Objectives The aims of this manuscript were to review scientific literature related to the ingestion of gluten and GFD in MS; to study the link between MS and CD; and to analyse the evidence that these hypothesis are supported by. ❑❑Material and methods Search strategy The present text was a systematic review. It focuses on scientific literature about gluten (ingestion and sensibility) and MS. Thus, a bibliographic search has been made on PubMed data base and other scientific data bases. The studies undertaken on gluten and MS were systematically reviewed in September 2015. The search was done by two independent researchers who subsequently corroborated the results found. The exact electronic search strategy is outlined in Figure 1, below. Identification Search terms In order to gather the most relevant studies, several search strategies were designed, combining keywords according to the study that was aimed for, with the highest scientific evidence possible. There was a limitation imposed in the year of publication of the studies: not older than 30 years. The search strategy was the following: (“glutens”[MeSH Terms] OR “glutens”[All Fields] OR “gluten”[All Fields] OR “triticum”[MeSH Terms] OR “triticum”[All Fields] OR “wheat”[All Records identified through database searching (n=48) 19 Eligibility Screening Records after duplicates removed (n=47) Included anti-tissue transglutaminase-2 (tTG-2) antibody in the serum of the patients is an important serologic marker for diagnosis3. There is prevalence in the general population is 1-2% worldwide2. Gluten is a glycoprotein formed by two other glycoproteins: gliadin and glutenin. These glycoproteins are presented in some cereals of usual consumption, such as wheat, barley, rye and probably oat, and in other cereals of less frequent consumption, like spelt (dinkel wheat) or triticale (hybrid of wheat and rye)5. Gluten can cause neurological damage through a combination of antibodies of crossed-reaction, causing complex immune diseases and direct toxicity6. Although its relation to some toxicity and hiper-allergenicity, it is due to broad use on food industry and due to its physical and chemical characteristics, giving great viscosity to food cooking6. The two major steps leading to diagnosis of CD are: 1) blood test for gluten autoantibodies (IgA, anti-endomysial, tTG, deamidated gliadin peptide) and 2) a small bowel biopsy to assess gut damage. Gene test alone are not used to diagnose CD, they can only exclude the probability of developing the disease7. Many immunopathogenic mechanisms and different antibodies associated with gluten have been described as capable of crossing the blood-brain barrier and deposit at the level of the Purkinje cells, where they produce a marked inflammatory response followed by neuronal degeneration and cerebellar atrophy2. Some patients with MS show high levels of anti-tTG-2 antibodies, which was said before, it seems to be an important serological marker in the diagnosis of the disease2. MS and CD are considered T-cell-mediated autoimmune diseases, and the involvement of Th1 cells in their pathogenesis has also been suggested. However, in CD, activated HLA-restricted gliadin-specific T cells and antigliadin antibodies (AGA) are found systemically. AGA might be responsible for white-matter abnormalities1. As gluten sensitivity shows concurrence with neurological manifestations like white-matter lesions, MS has been studied because of the association with gluten sensitivity, as it might be suggested by the etiology of “atypical” primary progressive MS8. Based on the possible association of MS with other autoimmune processes, we briefly review studies relating MS to CD and whether a GFD should be considered or not in these patients. Records screened (n=47) Full text articles assessed for eligibility (n=22) Titles excluded (n=25) due to: -Not related to the topic (n=14) -Older than 30 years (n=10) -Studies in animals (n=1) Full text articles excluded (n=5) due to: -Irrelevant focus (n=5) Studies included (n=17) Figure 1 PRISMA diagram demonstrating the search strategy and its results. REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE ESCLEROSIS MÚLTIPLE Nº 37 - Diciembre de 2015 Revisión Fields] OR “gliadin”[MeSH Terms] OR “gliadin”[All Fields] OR “glutenin”[MeSH Terms] OR “glutenin”[All Fields]) AND (“multiple sclerosis”[MeSH Terms] OR (“multiple”[All Fields] AND “sclerosis”[All Fields]) OR “multiple sclerosis”[All Fields]) AND (Case Reports[ptyp] OR Randomized Controlled Trial[ptyp] OR Overall[ptyp] OR Observational Study[ptyp] OR Multicenter Study[ptyp] OR Comparative Study[ptyp] OR Clinical Trial[ptyp] OR Clinical Trial, Phase I[ptyp] OR Controlled Clinical Trial[ptyp]). 13 Inclusion/Exclusion criteria: The following types of studies were included: related to the aims, studies that reported presence of CD or non-celiac gluten sensivity (NCGS) in patients, cohort or case-control studies, case-reports, crossover, controlled trials and randomized clinical trials. The exclusion criteria were as follows: duplicated studies or non-related with the topic, controversial biomarkers to get and support results or conclusions, reviews, opinions, expert’s opinions, letters, conference papers and editorial papers. ❑❑Results 20 Search results A total of 48 articles were retrieved in this systematic review. After reading all the articles we were led to the exclusion of 29 of them for not following the proposed criteria or being duplicated. Thus, only 17 studies were considered legible for systematic review and have been included after a double revision. The characteristics of those directly related with gluten and MS are described in Table I. ❑❑Discussion A possible relationship between the presence of AGA in gluten intolerance and the incidence of MS has been debated since the 1960s9, 10. It’s been suggested that antibodies directed against gluten and gliadin in wheat may play a role in the pathogenesis of MS by affecting the permeability of the blood-brain barrier11. Currently, controversial data are available about efficacy of a GFD in alleviating MS manifestations, which needs additional studies12. Gluten-related disorders are a spectrum of systemic immune mediated conditions that occur at any age in genetically susceptible individuals upon ingesting gluten13. Rodrigo L et al. found a high prevalence of CD (OR: 5.33; CI-95%: 1.07-26.45) among MS patients (11.1%), 5-10 times higher than the frequency found in the general population2. NevertheREVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE ESCLEROSIS MÚLTIPLE less, they have not found any differences between the DQ2 and DQ8 genetic markers in patients and control groups. They also discovered several duodenal lesions in 29% of MS patients and mild villous atrophy in 11.1% of them2. All of these findings, altogether with the high prevalence of CD in first-degree relatives (32%)2 support that cryptic gluten sensitivity may be involved in the pathogenesis of MS14. These two diseases, MS and CD, share some human leukocyte antigens (HLA)15. The structural and functional properties of HLA-DQ and -DR molecules that confer susceptibility to several common autoimmune diseases, such as MS, have been defined. The relevant polymorphisms directly affect interaction with peptides, which provides strong support for the hypothesis that these diseases are peptide-antigen driven15. Several studies indicate that structural modifications of peptides can affect major histocompatibility complex class II binding and/or Tcell receptors recognition and should be considered in the analysis of T-cell responses in autoimmune diseases16. The cause of neurological manifestations regarding gluten is still unclear, but it has been suggested that the resulting autoimmunity of the molecular mimicry between gliadin and proteins on the nervous system has an important role17, 18. Multiple changes in antibodies against various antigens are found in MS19. Patients with neurological disease sometimes present with antigliadin and anti-tTG antibodies9, 20. The association between these antibodies and MS has been previously suggested: Shor DB et al.9 found a highly significant increase in IgG antibodies against gliadin and tissue ansglutaminase titers in MS patients. A study from Norway has reported significantly higher serum levels of AGA in the MS group compared to a control group19. IgA antibodies against casein were significantly increased, while anti-endomycium and tTG antibodies were negative19. Pengiran Tengah CD et al.21 found IgA anti-endomysial antibody in 2% of MS patients. IgG anti-gliadin antibody was found in 12% of patients and 13% of blood donors, concluding that anti-gliadin antibody (especially IgG isotype) can be a non-specific finding. Contrary to the studies mentioned above, in a study conducted by Borhani A et al., no significant differences in serum levels of AGA were detected between MS patients and normal controls22. None of the 217 patients with MS of Nicoletti A et al.23 study presented IgG and IgA anti-gliadin, anti-endomysial antibodies, anti-tissue transglutaminase and antireticulin; therefore data did not show an increased frequency of celiac disease among patients with MS. Finally, in a study performed by Rodrigo L et al.2, Nº 37 - Diciembre de 2015 REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE ESCLEROSIS MÚLTIPLE HernándezLahoz C, Rodríguez S, Tuñón A, et al.31 2009 2011 Rodrigo L, HernándezLahoz C, Fuentes D, et al.2 2013 Case report Prospective observational study Case report 72 RRMS Clinical Trial Batur-Caglayan HZ, Irkec C, Yildirim-Capraz I, et al.1 1 Case report Azizi Z, Ebrahimi 2014 Daryani N, Rezaii Salim M, et al.12 2014 Rodrigo L, HernándezLahoz C, Fuentes D, et al.30 1 72 MS 126 first-degree relatives 123 healthy controls. 1 1 Case report 2014 Finsterer J, Leutmezer F.4 N Sample Methodology Year Authors TABLE I MS and CD are considered T-cell-mediated autoimmune diseases, and the involvement of Th1 cells in their pathogenesis is suggested. Gluten sensitivity might be the etiology of “atypical” primary progressive MS. Prevalence of gluten intolerance is 5.5 to 11 times higher in MS patients than in the general population. A GFD should be considered for any MS patient. Is it a CD with secondary CNS lesions that are confused with those of EM and responds favorably to the GFD, or, rather, we are facing the neuroprotective effect of GFD on a RRMS, which also has an associated CD remitting under GFD? CD may mimic MS and may be present despite the absence of AGA, endomysial or tTG antibodies. Authors end up referring the patient has CD not a MS. The patient improved secondary clinic of CD (digestive and clinical iron deficiency). No mention of the course of MS is made. GFD has shown a neuro-protective effect in RRMS patients. Conclusion Quantification of tTG-2 by commercial ELISA. Genetic markers HLA-DQ2 and HLA-DQ8, by PCR using specific primers and a commercial kit. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy with multiple biopsies from the first and second portion of the duodenum. No Serological and CD genetic markers, together with an upper GI endoscopy with multiple duodenal biopsies. tTG levels. HLA-II typing. Duodenal biopsy. Yes Yes Yes No Upper endoscopy with small bowel biopsy No Was CD and NCGS diagnosed? Yes CD and NCGS included No Characteristics and results of gluten and MS related studies No Yes Yes Yes No No 3 2+ 3 2++ 3 3 Association study Prospective study Association study Prospective study Association study Association study Positive Evidence Objective and results characteristics Ismael San Mauro Martín, Elena Garicano Vilar Nº 37 - Diciembre de 2015 21 REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE ESCLEROSIS MÚLTIPLE Nº 37 - Diciembre de 2015 Descriptive study (Selfadministered postal survey) A- Case Report B- Cross-sectional study Cross-sectional study Case report Cross-sectional study 2009 2008 2007 2007 Leong EM, Semple SJ, Angley M, et al.33 Frisullo G, Nociti V, Iorio R, et al.26 Nicoletti A, Patti F, Lo Fermo S, et al.25 Trucco Aguirre E, Olano Gossweiler C, Mendez Pereira C, et al.15 Alaedini A, Okamoto H, Briani C, et al.17 Cross-sectional study 2009 Shor DB, Barzilai O, Ram M, et al.9 2008 Methodology Year 9 CD patients and elevated levels of IgG and/or IgA AGA 9 patients with neurologic disease (3 with MS) without AGA 4 healthy subjects. 1 217 MS 200 controls A- 1 MS-CD B- 30 relapsingremmiting MS (15 in the acute (relapse) and 15 in the stable phase (remission) of disease) 20 controls. 416 161 MS 166 controls N Sample AGA response in immunized animals and CD patients can cross-react with the synapsin I protein. Such cross-reactivity may provide clues into the pathogenic mechanism of the neurologic deficits that are associated with gluten sensitivity. In the MS-CD patient the cognate interactions that occur between T-bet expressing B and T cells during the exacerbation of neurologic symptoms may enhance type1 immunity and increase pathology. Thus, the interaction between MS- and CD-related inflammatory processes may result in an amplification of Th1 immune response. Data did not show an increased frequency of CD among patients with MS. SSc and CD share some HLA antigens. Neither IgG nor IgA AGA showed significant differences between MS patients and controls. Gluten sensitivity is not associated with MS in Iran. The majority of people with MS reported using dietary interventions (64.7%), including GFD (16.4%). Conclusion Yes Yes Yes Yes No CD and NCGS included Yes Biopsy-proven, IgG / IgA Serology and biopsy IgG and IgA AGA, anti-endomysial antibodies, tTG and anti-reticulin No IgG and IgA AGA by enzyme immuno assay (EIA). The test of IgA tTG and duodenal biopsy were carried out in patients with either IgA or IgG AGA positive sera. No Was CD and NCGS diagnosed? Yes Yes No Yes Yes No 2- 3 2+ 2- 2- 2+ Intervention study Association study Intervention study Intervention study Association study Intervention study Positive Evidence Objective and results characteristics 13 Authors Characteristics and results of gluten and MS related studies (continuation) 22 TABLE I Revisión Cross-sectional study Cross-sectional study 1998 1996 Hadjivassiliou M, Gibson A, Davies-Jones GA, et al.10 Descriptive study 2002 Volta U, De Giorgio R, Petrolini N, et al.32 Pratesi R, Gandolfi L, Friedman H, et al.11 Cross-sectional study 2004 Reichelt KL, Jensen D.19 Methodology Cross-sectional study Year Pengiran Tengah 2004 CD, Lock RJ, Unsworth DJ, et al.21 Authors TABLE I 4 active CD on a gluten-containing diet (3 F, 1 M) 11 biopsy proven CD on a GFD (9 F, 2M) 52 non-coeliac controls (26 F, 26 M) 53 neurological dysfunction of unknown cause 94 specific neurological diagnosis (12 with MS) 50 healthy blood donors. 160 (120 F, 40 M), 1 with MS. 36 MS (21 F, 15 M) 26 controls 49 (33 F, 16 M) 30 anonymous blood donors (15 female) used as serologic controls. N Sample Biopsy proven Serum IgG and IgA antigliadin antibodies, using ELISA Yes Yes Yes CD can sometimes present in the guise of a neurological disorder, which may greatly improve when a GFD is started promptly. Sera from patients with active CD contain IgA antibodies that react with human brain vessel structures. These antibodies are not present in sera from CD patients on a GFD or non-coeliac controls. Gluten sensitivity is common in patients with neurological disease of unknown cause and may have aetiological significance. No positive results were explicitly reported for MS patients. No Yes IgA antibodies were measured in serum Yes against gluten, gliadin, lactoglobulin, lactalbumin, casein and ovalbumin in patients with MS and controls using ELISA technique. IgG was likewise measured for gluten and gliadin. CD-related antibodies (AGA, anti-endomysial Yes and anti-human recombinant tissue transglutaminase (h-tTG). Diagnosis of CD was confirmed by endoscopic duodenal biopsy. 2- 2- 2- 2- Intervention study Intervention study Association study / Intervention study Intervention study Intervention study No AGA (IgG and IgA) and IgA anti-tTG were detected by ELISA 2- Positive Evidence Objective and results characteristics Was CD and NCGS diagnosed? Yes CD and NCGS included Yes There may be a possible moderately increased uptake of some specific proteins from the gut in MS compared with controls. 16% of MS patients and 17% of blood donor controls had AGA, mainly IgG isotype, reflecting the long-established poor disease specificity for IgG AGA. Conclusion Characteristics and results of gluten and MS related studies (continuation) Ismael San Mauro Martín, Elena Garicano Vilar REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE ESCLEROSIS MÚLTIPLE Nº 37 - Diciembre de 2015 23 Revisión 13 24 high serum levels of anti-tTG-2 antibodies were observed in relapsing-remitting MS patients and their first-degree relatives compared to health controls. This study failed to report the role of serological gluten markers in the pathogenesis of MS2. All this findings support the associations between AGA and tTG to MS; although the specific role of these antibodies in the pathogenesis of MS remains uncertain and requires additional research. The following mechanism is suggested to explain the neuronal connection which could affect MS: High AGA levels and have been associated with idiopathic neuropathy. It has been demonstrated that serum given to patients suffering from neurological symptoms and AGA attach to the neural tissue, which implies that the antibody has a crossed-reaction with auto-antigens. The crossed-reaction doublet was identified as a “synapsin I”, a member of a neuronal phosphoprotein´s group involved in the regulation of neurotransmitter´s release17. The same authors found out that human and animal AGA can have a crossed-reaction with synapsin I, a cytosolic phosphoprotein found in the majority of neurons of the central and peripheral neural systems. The similarity between synapsin I and gliadin is based on the fact that both have high frequency regions of proline and glutamine residues. The presence of this amino acids sequences could be responsible for the crossreactivity observed in AGA. The interruption of the activity of synapsin I indicates that it is necessary for the formation and maintenance of the reserve of synaptic vesicles and, therefore, the regulation of neurotransmitter´s release. More specifically, the union between anti-synapsin I and antibodies has proved to reduce the post-tetanic potentiation and to increase the speed and extension of the synaptic depression17. Other authors, such as Frisullo G et al.24 found in MS-CD patients that the interaction between MSand CD-related inflammatory processes may result in an amplification of Th1 immune response. They showed in their patients a strong increased expression of T-bet, the key transcription factor for the development of Th1 cells, in circulating T, B cells and monocytes. Conversely, no difference of T-bet expression was observed in B cells from relapsingremitting MS patients, neither in relapse or in remission, nor in controls24. concluding that high consumption of bread and pasta correlated positively with MS. A study from Croatia also reported more frequent wheat and rye bread consumption among MS cases, although this difference was not statistically significant. However, one study found no significant difference in the intake of gluten-containing products between MS subjects and controls, and another small case-control study observed no difference in bread and cereal intakes between cases and controls. Yet another case-control study found a protective effect of higher cereal and bread intake on risk of MS. Bowling AC et al.26 sustaining there are no diets, specifically GFD, or dietary supplements that are definitely effective in altering the disease course in MS. On the contrary, it is suggested that treatment with a GFD can provide considerable benefits to the patients having both a gluten-related disorder and demyelinating diseases of the CNS12, 27. The response of the GFD was excellent, both from the digestive and the neurologic point of view in the average follow-up period of three years long in Rodrigo L et al. study2. Similar results were obtained in other studies of the same author28, 29: a GFD has a neuroprotective role in the majority of MS patients, especially improving the physical capacity and the activity of lesions seen on MRI. Volta U et al.30 investigated neurological symptoms in 160 consecutive patients (120 female, 40 male) with biopsy-proven CD. Neurological symptoms improved or disappeared in 7 patients who started a GFD within 6 months after neurological onset, and in none of 4 patients who began later. MS patients from Leong EM et al.31 study reported using dietary interventions (64.7%) including GFD (16.4%) to alleviate ‘general’ as well as specific MS symptoms such as muscle weakness, urinary or memory problems and mobility, besides looking for better general health and well-being. This suggests that neurological disorders may greatly improve when a GFD is promptly started. It is worth mentioning that the included studies show, overall, a low-medium degree of evidence32, due to their designs. Furthermore, in some studies, authors did not report clearly the presence or absence of CD or NCGS (and the procedures for diagnosis), which can distort the associations suggested by the authors. ❑❑Gluten intake ❑❑Conclusion Evidence is torn between the fact that higher gluten consumption is a risk factor for MS25: one study reported significantly higher intake of cereal-derived products by MS subjects when compared to controls, Based on the present review, there is low-medium evidence relating MS, CD and gluten intake, with not enough harmony in the results. Low grade of evidence was also found in the study’s designs. REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE ESCLEROSIS MÚLTIPLE Nº 37 - Diciembre de 2015 Ismael San Mauro Martín, Elena Garicano Vilar Studies have found an increased incidence of immunoglobulin A and G antibodies from exposure to both gluten and gliadin among MS patients, sometimes highly significant, compared with controls, while others have found no association. Evaluating if any specific diet benefits a particular MS patient is difficult due to the unpredictable nature of flare-ups and the long-term progression of the disease. But in MS-CD patients, treatment with GFD should be considered, given that it has not been shown to be harmful. Continued studies, specially randomized clinical trials, of these individuals with multiple autoimmune disorders are necessary to help identify shared genetic susceptibility and to apply for the appropriate treatment strategies for patients. Ethical standards Conflict of interests: authors declare they have no conflict of interest. Abbreviations AGA: Anti-gliadin antibodies; CD: Celiac disease; CNS: Central nervous system; GFD: Gluten-free diet; HLA: Human leukocyte antigens; IgA: Immunoglobulin A; IgG: Immunoglobulin G; NCGS: non-celiac gluten sensivity; MRI: Magnetic resonance imaging; MS: Multiple sclerosis; RRMS: relapsing-remitting form of MS; tTG: anti-tissue transglutaminase. Bibliografía 1.- Batur-Caglayan HZ, Irkec C, Yildirim-Capraz I, Atalay-Akyurek N, Dumlu S. A case of multiple sclerosis and celiac disease. Case Rep Neurol Med 2013; 2013:576921. 2.- Rodrigo L, Hernández-Lahoz C, Fuentes D, Álvarez N, López-Vázquez A, González S. Prevalence of celiac disease in multiple sclerosis. BMC Neurol 2011;11:31. 3.- Hernández-Lahoz C, Rodrigo L. Multiple sclerosis and celiac disease, celiac disease - from pathophysiology to advanced therapies. 2012; Dr. Peter Kruzliak (ed.), ISBN: 978-953-51-0684-5, Intech, DOI: 10.5772/47882. 4.- Finsterer J, Leutmezer F. Celiac disease with cerebral and peripheral nerve involvement mimicking multiple sclerosis. J Med Life 2014;7(3):440-4. 5.- Comino I, Moreno Mde L, Real A, Rodríguez-Herrera A, Barro F, Sousa C. The gluten-free diet: testing alternative cereals tolerated by celiac patients. Nutrients 2013 Oct 23;5(10):4250-68. 6.- Ford RP. The gluten syndrome: a neurological disease. Med Hypotheses 2009;73(3):438-40. 7.- Elli L, Branchi F, Tomba C, Villalta D, Norsa L, Ferretti F, Roncoroni L, Bardella MT. Diagnosis of gluten related disorders: Celiac disease, wheat allergy and non-celiac gluten sensitivity. World J Gastroenterol 2015 Jun 21;21(23):7110-9. 8.- Hadjivassiliou M, Sanders DS, Grünewald RA. Multiple sclerosis and occult gluten sensitivity. Neurology 2005;64(5):933-4. 9.- Shor DB, Barzilai O, Ram M, Izhaky D, Porat-Katz BS, Chapman J, Blank M, Anaya JM, Shoenfeld Y. Gluten sensivity in multiple sclerosis: experimental myth or clinical truth? Ann N Y Acad Sci 2009;1173:343-9. 10.- Hadjivassiliou M, Gibson A, Davies-Jones GA, Lobo AJ, Stephenson TJ, Mildford-Ward A. Does cryptic gluten sensivity play a part in neurological illness? Lancet 1996;347(8998):369-71. 11.- Pratesi R, Gandolfi L, Friedman H, Farage L, de Castro CA, Catassi C. Serum IgA antibodies from patients with coeliac disease react strongly with human brain blood-vessel structures. Scand J Gastroenterol 1998;33(8):817-21. 12.- Azizi Z, Ebrahimi Daryani N, Rezaii Salim M, Javid Anbardan S. A case of concurrent multiple sclerosis and celiac disease. Govaresh 2013;18:261-5. 13.- Hernández-Lahoz C, Rodrigo L. Gluten-related disorders and demyelinating diseases. Med Clin (Barc) 2013;140(7):314-9. 14.- Di Marco R, Mangano K, Quattrocchi C, Amato F, Nicoletti F, Buschard K. Exacerbation of protracted-relapsing experimental allergic encephalomyelitis in DA rats by gluten-free diet. AMPIS 2004;112(10):651-5. 15.- Trucco Aquirre E, Olano Gossweiler C, Mendez Pereira C, Isasi Capelo ME, Isasi Capelo ES, Rondan Olivera M. Celiac disease associated with systemic sclerosis. Gastroenterol Hepatol 2007;30(9):538-40. 16.- Wucherpfenning KW. Insights into autoimmunity gained from structural analysis of MHC-peptide complexes. Curr Opin Immunol 2001;13(6):650-6. 17.- Alaedini A, Okamoto H, Briani C, Wollenberg K, Shill HA, Bushara KO, et al. Immune cross-reactivity in celiac disease: anti-gliadin antibodies bind to neuronal synapsin I. J Immunol 2007;178(10):6590-5. 18.- Barbeau WE. Interactions between dietary proteins and the human system: implications for oral tolerance and foodrelated diseases. Adv Exp Med Biol 1997;415:183-93. REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE ESCLEROSIS MÚLTIPLE Nº 37 - Diciembre de 2015 25 Revisión 19.- Reichelt KL, Jensen D. IgA antibodies against gliadin and gluten in multiple sclerosis. Acta Neurol Scand 2004;110:239-41. 20.- Ghezzi A, Zaffaroni M. Neurological manifestations of gastrointestinal disorders, with particular reference to the differential diagnosis of multiple sclerosis. Neurol Sci 2001;22(2):S117-22. 21.- Pengiran Tengah CD, Lock RJ, Unsworth DJ, Wills AJ. Multiple sclerosis and occult gluten sensivity. Neurology 2004;62(12):2326:7. 22.- Borhani Haghighi A, Ansari N, Mokhtari M, Geramizadeh B, Lankarani KB. Multiple sclerosis and gluten sensitivity. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 2007;109:651-3. 23.- Nicoletti A, Patti F, Lo Fermo S, Sciacca A, Laisa P, Liberto A, Lanzafame S, Contraffatto D, D’Agate C, Russo A, Zappia M. Frequency of celiac disease is not increased among multiple sclerosis patients. Mult Scler 2008;14(5):698700. 24.- Frisullo G, Nociti V, Iorio R, Patanella AK, Marti A, Cammarota G, Mirabella M, Attilio Tonali P, Batocchi AP. Increased expression of T-bet in circulating B cells from a patient with multiple sclerosis and celiac disease. Hum Immunol 2008;69(12):837-9. 25.- Accelerated Cure Project for Multiple Sclerosis. Analysis of specific nutritional factors in the development of MS. 2006, pp. 1-30. Available at: http://www.acceleratedcure.org/sites/default/files/curemap/phase2-nutrition-individualagents.pdf 26.- Bowling AC, Stewart TM. Current complementary and alternative therapies for multiple sclerosis. Curr Treat Options Neurol 2003;5(1):55-68. 27.- San Mauro-Martín I, Garicano-Vilar E, Collado-Yurrita L, Ciudad-Cabañas MJ. Is gluten the great etiopathogenic agent of disease in the XXI century? Nutr Hosp 2014;30(6):1203-10. 28.- Rodrigo L, Hernández-Lahoz C, Fuentes D, Mauri G, Alvarez N, Vega J, González S. Randomised clinical trial comparing the efficacy of a gluten-free diet versus a regular diet in a series of relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis patients. Int J Neurol Neurother 2014;1:2. 29.- Hernández-Lahoz C, Rodríguez S, Tuñón A, Saiz A, Santamarta E, Rodrigo L. Sustained clinical remission in a patient with remittent-recurrent multiple sclerosis and celiac disease gluten-free diet for 6 years. Neurologia 2009;24(3):213-5. 30.- Volta U, De Giorgio R, Petrolini N, Strangbellini V, Barbara G, Granito A, De Ponti F, Corinaldesi R, Bianchi FB. Clinical findings and anti-neuronal antibodies in coeliac disease with neurological disorders. Scand J Gastroenterol 2002;37(11):1276-81. 31.- Leong EM, Semple SJ, Angley M, Siebert W, Petkov J, McKinnon RA. Complementary and alternative medicines and dietary interventions in multiple sclerosis: what is being used in South Australia and why? Complement Ther Med 2009;17(4):216-23. 32.- Aguilera-Eguía R. Evidence 1 A with recommendation A?, or 1 ++ with recommendation B? What really understand about the levels of evidence and grades of recommendation? Part I. Nutr Hosp 2015;32(3):1393-4. 13 26 REVISTA ESPAÑOLA DE ESCLEROSIS MÚLTIPLE Nº 37 - Diciembre de 2015