FRANCESCO GIORGINO
Transcription
FRANCESCO GIORGINO
FRANCESCO GIORGINO DIPARTIMENTO DELL’EMERGENZA E DEI TRAPIANTI DI ORGANI SEZIONE DI MEDICINA INTERNA, ENDOCRINOLOGIA, ANDROLOGIA E MALATTIE METABOLICHE Intensive Glucose Control Wrong patient «Imperfect» glucoselowering drugs Limited benefit on CVD prevention ↑ Weight gain ↑ Hypoglycemia Potential ↑ CV risk Drug-drug interactions Excess (CV) mortality Giorgino F. et al., Ann N Y Acad Sci, in press Baseline (t=0) End of clamp (t=150 min) P=0.0003 Mean QT interval, ms 450 440 430 420 P=NS Significant prolongation of QT interval after hypoglycemic clamps 410 400 390 380 Increased risk of arrhythmias 370 360 0 Euglycemic clamp (n=8) Hypoglycemic* clamp 2 weeks after glibenclamide withdrawal (n=13) NS=not significant. *2.5 and 3.0 mmol/L (45 and 54 mg/dL) during the last 60 minutes of the clamp. Landstedt-Hallin L et al. J Intern Med. 1999;246:299–307. Intensive Tx Standard Tx No previous hypoglycemia At least one HR (adj.) hypoglycemia 1.3% 2.8% 220/17031 34/1208 1.0% 4.9%* 180/17516 17/345 Hypoglycemic events requiring medical assistance Annualized mortality rates *p=0.009 1.28 (0.88-1.85) 2.87 (1.73-4.76) Bond DE et al., BMJ, 2010 Tight Glycemic Control ↑ Incidence of Hypoglycemia ↓ Long-Term Complications ↓ Medication Adherence (↓ QoL, Fear of Hypos, Lost Productivity) ↑ QoL Compromized Glycemic Control Positive ↑ Long-Term Complications Impact on Healthcare Budget & QoC Negative Adapted from Fidler C et al, J Med Econ, 2011 Missing 2 basal insulin injections per week = Randløv et al. J Diabetes Sci Technol 2008;2:229–35 0.2–0.3% increase in HbA1c Basal insulin usually the optimal initial regimen, with 1-2 noninsulin agents. Insulin secretagogues (SU/glinides) typically stopped with more complex insulin regimens. Comprehensive education regarding SMBG, diet, exercise, and the avoidance of, and response to, hypoglycemia. Holman R et al. N Engl J Med 2007 Currently available long-acting insulin analogues do not always last 24 hours1 Variability of glucose lowering effect of current insulins (interpatient and intra-patient)1 Basal insulins must be administered at the same time every day2 Variability and suboptimal duration of action limit titration and favor the incidence of hypoglycaemia1 1. Evans et al. Diabetes, Obesity and Metabolism 2011;13: 677–684; 2. Joshi et al. SA Fam Pract 2009;51:97–102; Tolerable insulin range Mean profile B Plasma insulin A Plasma insulin Plasma insulin Individual data C Time Time Time Peaked mean profile, Smooth, flat mean profile, Smooth, flat mean profile, with high variability but high variability with low variability Figures show theoretical data Patients with NOCT Patients without NOCT Type 2 diabetes CV FPG (%) CV FPG (%) Type 1 diabetes 3 months 3 months FBG, fasting blood glucose; FPG, fasting plasma glucose; NOCT, Nocturnal Nocturnal hypoglycaemia; CV FPG, coefficient of variance for fasting plasma glucose Adapted from Niskanen et al. Diabetes Res Clin Pract 2009;86:e15–18. FPG (mmol/L) FPG (mg/dL) Target zone Hypoglycaemia zone Day Adapted from Kovatchev et al. Diabetes Care 2006;29:2433–8 Adapted from Kovatchev et al. Diabetes Care 2006;29:2433–8 LysB29(Nε-hexadecandioyl-γ-Glu) des(B30) human insulin s s G V E E Q Q C C C C T T S S II C C S S LL Y Y Q Q LL E E N N Y Y C C N N G II V A chain s s s s F V N N Q Q H H LL C C G G S S H H LL V V E E A A LL Y Y LL V V C C G G E E R R G G F F F F Y Y T T P P K F V K B chain desB30 Insulin NH O Glutamic acid ‘spacer’ O HO O N H Hexadecandioyl Fatty diacid side chain I Jonassen et al. Diabetes 59 (Suppl. 1): A11, 2010 I Jonassen et al. Diabetologia 2010;53(Suppl.1):S388 972-P L-γ-Glu OH O Brange et al. Diabetes Care 1990;13:923–54 Insulin degludec association From injection to absorption Multi-hexamer formation key to protraction mechanism Insulin degludec di-hexamers Injected formulation Loss of Phenol Insulin degludec multi-hexamers S.c. depot formation Loss of Zn2+ [ Phenol; Zn2+] Insulin degludec monomers I Jonassen et al. Diabetes 59 (Suppl. 1): A11, 2010 I Jonassen et al. Diabetologia 2010;53(Suppl.1):S388 972-P Absorption AUC: area under the curve AUCGIR,τ GIR,τ, total area under the GIR curve over a 24-hour dosing interval at steady state Nosek et al. IDF 2011:P-1452; Diabetologia 2011;54(suppl. 1):S429 (1055-P); Diabetes 2011;60(suppl. 1A):LB14 Half-life of Insulin Degludec and Insulin Glargine IDeg 0.8 U/kg IGlar 0.8 U/kg Insulin concentration (% of maximum) 100 10 1 0 24 48 72 Time since injection (hours) IDeg Half-life (hours) Mean half-life 96 120 IGlar 0.4 U/kg 0.6 U/kg 0.8 U/kg 0.4 U/kg 0.6 U/kg 0.8 U/kg 25.9 27.0 23.9 11.8 14.0 11.9 25.4 12.5 Heise et al. IDF 2011:P-1444; Diabetologia 2011;54(suppl. 1):S425; Diabetes 2011;60(suppl. 1A):LB11 Diabetes Obes Metab. 2012 May 17. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1326.2012.01627.x. [Epub ahead of print] * * * * α-gluc, alpha glucose; BB, basal–bolus; BOT, basal–oral therapy; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4; met, metformin; OAD, oral antidiabetic drugs; SU, sulphonylurea; TZD, thiazolidinedione; T1, type 1 diabetes; T2, type 2 diabetes; * Study with extension Mean±SEM; FAS; LOCF Comparisons: Estimates adjusted for multiple covariates In the following results presentations, p-values are shown for results that show statistically significant differences, and not for results that are not statistically significant Heller S et al. Lancet 2012;379:1489-97 IDeg OD (n=773) IGlar OD (n=257) Treatment difference: non-inferior Time (weeks) Mean±SEM; FAS, full analysis set; LOCF, last observation carried forward Comparisons: estimates adjusted for multiple covariates Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 Mean±SEM; FAS; LOCF Comparisons: Estimates adjusted for multiple covariates In the following results presentations, p-values are shown for results that show statistically significant differences, and not for results that are not statistically significant Garber A et al. Lancet 2012;379:1498-507 10.5 IDeg OD (n=744) IGlar OD (n=248) 10.0 FPG (mmol/L) 9.5 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 0.0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 Time (weeks) Heller S et al. Lancet 2012;379:1489-97 32 36 40 44 48 52 Heller S et al. Lancet 2012;379:1489-97 IDeg OD (n=773) IGlar OD (n=257) Time (weeks) Mean± Mean±SEM; FAS; LOCF Comparisons: estimates adjusted for multiple covariates Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 FPG (mg/dL) Treatment difference: –0.43 mmol/L (–7.74 mg/dL), p<0.05 IDeg OD (n=766) IGlar OD (n=257) 36% lower rate with IDeg, p<0.05 Time (weeks) Mean± Mean±SEM; FAS Comparisons: estimates adjusted for multiple covariates Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 10.0 9.5 FPG (mmol/L) 9.0 8.5 8.0 7.5 7.0 6.5 6.0 5.5 5.0 0.0 0 4 8 12 16 20 24 28 Time (weeks) Garber A et al. Lancet 2012;379:1498-507 32 36 40 44 48 52 Garber A et al. Lancet 2012;379:1498-507 BMI: body mass index; IGlar: insulin glargine; OAD: oral antidiabetic antidiabetic drug; OD: once daily; Flex, flexible Birkeland et al. IDF 2011:P2011:P-1443; Bain et al. IDF 2011:O2011:O-0508; Birkeland et al. Diabetologia 2011;54(suppl. 1):S423; Atkin et al. Diabetologia 2011;54(suppl. 1):S53; Meneghini et al. Diabetes 2011;60(suppl. 1A):LB10 Mon Tue Wed Thu 8h morning Sun morning 40h evening Sat 8h morning 40h Fri 40h evening 24h evening evening Birkeland et al. IDF 2011:P2011:P-1443; Bain et al. IDF 2011:O2011:O-0508; Birkeland et al. Diabetologia 2011;54(suppl. 1):S423; Atkin et al. Diabetologia 2011;54(suppl. 1):S53; Meneghini et al. Diabetes 2011;60(suppl. 1A):LB10 IDeg Flexible (n=229) IDeg Fixed (n=228) IGlar (n=230) IDeg Flexible/IDeg Fixed Non-inferior IDeg Flexible/IGlar Non-inferior Mean± Mean±SEM; FAS; LOCF Comparisons: estimates adjusted for multiple covariates Birkeland et al. IDF 2011:P2011:P-1443; Bain et al. IDF 2011:O2011:O-0508; Birkeland et al. Diabetologia 2011;54(suppl. 1):S423; Atkin et al. Diabetologia 2011;54(suppl. 1):S53; Meneghini et al. Diabetes 2011;60(suppl. 1A):LB10 SAS n, number of patients with events; %, proportion of patients with with events; rate, rate of hypoglycaemia in episodes per 100 patientpatient-years; RR, rate ratio for IDeg Flexible/IDeg Fixed or IGlar once daily (FAS) Birkeland et al. IDF 2011:P2011:P-1443; Bain et al. IDF 2011:O2011:O-0508; Birkeland et al. Diabetologia 2011;54(suppl. 1):S423; Atkin et al. Diabetologia 2011;54(suppl. 1):S53; Meneghini et al. Diabetes 2011;60(suppl. 1A):LB10 Glucose Variability Fasting Hyperglycemia SMBG (CGM) Hypoglycemia Post-prandial Hyperglycemia Study design IDeg OD* + metformin ± DPP-4 (n=773) Insulin-naïve patients with type 2 diabetes (n=1030) IGlar OD§ + metformin ± DPP-4 (n=257) Inclusion criteria • Type 2 diabetes ≥6 months • Insulin-naïve treated with metformin ± SU, DPP-4 or acarbose for ≥3 months • HbA1c 7–10% • BMI ≤40 kg/m2 • Age ≥18 years 0 52 weeks Randomised 3:1 Open label Treat-to-target trial *With evening meal Any time of day but same time every day (as per label) § BMI, body mass index; DPP-4, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor; IDeg, insulin degludec; IGlar, insulin glargine; OD, once daily; SU, sulphonylurea Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 Published online before print, doi: 10.2337/dc12-1205 Endpoints Primary endpoint: HbA1c Key secondary endpoints • Fasting plasma glucose (FPG) • Insulin dose • Weight • Patient-reported outcomes (PRO) • Hypoglycaemia • Adverse events Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 Published online before print, doi: 10.2337/dc12-1205 Titration algorithm: insulin degludec and insulin glargine Pre-breakfast plasma glucosea a Mean Adjustment mmol/L mg/dL U <3.1b <56b –4 (If dose >45 U, reduce by 10%) 3.1–3.9b 56–70b –2 (If dose >45 U, reduce by of 5%) 4.0–4.9 71–89 5.0–6.9 90–125 +2 7.0–7.9 126–143 +4 8.0–8.9 144–161 +6 ≥9.0 ≥162 +8 of 3 consecutive days’ measurements for up titration there is obvious explanation for the low value, such as a missed meal b Unless Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 Published online before print, doi: 10.2337/dc12-1205 0 Participating countries Norway Canada Denmark Finland Belgium France Germany Czech Republic United States Spain Austria Serbia & Montenegro Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 Published online before print, doi: 10.2337/dc12-1205 Subject disposition Screened 1597 Failed screening criteria 567 Randomised 1030 IDeg OD 773 IGlar OD 257 Withdrawals: 166 (22%) AE: 20 (3%) Non-compliance: 46 (6%) Ineffective therapy: 7 (1%) Other: 93 (12%) Completers 607 (79%) Withdrawals: 60 (23%) AE: 5 (2%) Non-compliance: 18 (7%) Ineffective therapy: 2 (1%) Other: 35 (14%) 3:1 randomisation AE, adverse event Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 Published online before print, doi: 10.2337/dc12-1205 Completers 197 (77%) Baseline characteristics Characteristic IDeg OD IGlar OD 773 257 39.1/60.9 35.0/65.0 88.0/7.4/2.3/2.3 89.9/6.2/1.2/2.7 16.7 18.7 Age, years 59.3 (±9.7) 58.7 (±9.9) Weight, kg [lb] 89.4 (±17.7) [197.1 (±39.0)] 91.8 (±15.8) [202.4 (±34.8)] BMI, kg/m2 30.9 (±4.8) 31.6 (±4.4) Duration of diabetes, years 9.4 (±6.3) 8.6 (±5.7) HbA1c, % 8.2 (±0.8) 8.2 (±0.8) 9.6 (±2.6) [172.8 (±46.8)] 9.7 (±2.6) [174.6 (±46.8)] Full analysis set (FAS), n Female/Male, % Race: White/Black/Asian/Other, % Ethnicity: Hispanic or Latin American, % FPG, mmol/L [mg/dL] Values are mean (±SD) unless otherwise stated Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 Published online before print, doi: 10.2337/dc12-1205 Daily insulin dose Mean insulin dose (±SD) Number of patients, n Basal insulin End of trial, U/kg Basal insulin End of trial, U IDeg OD IGlar OD 766 257 0.59 (±0.35) 0.60 (±0.32) 56 (±39) 58 (±34) SAS, safety analysis set; LOCF Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 Published online before print, doi: 10.2337/dc12-1205 Weight change Change in weight from baseline (lb) Treatment difference: 0.28 kg (0.62 lb) (ns) Baseline IDeg OD (n=766) IGlar OD (n=257) 89.4 kg 197.1 lb 91.8 kg 202.4 lb SAS; LOCF Comparisons: estimates adjusted for multiple covariates Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 Published online before print, doi: 10.2337/dc12-1205 Hypoglycaemia classification Suspected hypoglycaemia or routine PG measurement Yes No Not classified as confirmed hypoglycaemia in this trial PG <3.1 mmol/La (56 mg/dL) Patient able to treat self? No Yes Minor hypoglycaemia Severe hypoglycaemia Confirmed hypoglycaemia With or without symptoms; PG, plasma glucose A nocturnal episode is any confirmed episode with time of onset from midnight to 05.59 am a Confirmed hypoglycaemia IDeg OD (n=766) IGlar OD (n=257) 18% lower rate with IDeg (ns) Time (weeks) SAS Comparisons: estimates adjusted for multiple covariates Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 Published online before print, doi: 10.2337/dc12-1205 Hypoglycaemia Randomisation 3:1 (IDeg OD:IGlar OD) IDeg OD IGlar OD (n=766) (n=257) Incidence % patients (# patients) Severe 0.3% Confirmed 46.5% (2/766) (356/766) Rate episodes/P YE 0.00 1.52 Incidence % patients (# patients) 1.9% (5/257) 46.3% (119/257) Rate episodes/P YE 0.02 1.85 SAS; % patients, proportion of patients with events; # patients, number of patients with events; PYE, patient-years of exposure Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 Published online before print, doi: 10.2337/dc12-1205 Hypoglycaemia Randomisation 3:1 (IDeg OD:IGlar OD) IDeg OD IGlar OD (n=766) (n=257) Incidence % patients (# patients) Severe 0.3% Confirmed 46.5% Nocturnal confirmed (2/766) (356/766) 13.8% (106/766) Rate episodes/P YE 0.00 1.52 0.25 Incidence % patients (# patients) 1.9% (5/257) 46.3% (119/257) 15.2% (39/257) Rate episodes/P YE 0.02 1.85 0.39 SAS; % patients, proportion of patients with events; # patients, number of patients with events; PYE, patient-years of exposure Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 Published online before print, doi: 10.2337/dc12-1205 Hypoglycaemia Randomisation 3:1 (IDeg OD:IGlar OD) IDeg OD IGlar OD (n=766) (n=257) Incidence % patients (# patients) Severe 0.3% Confirmed 46.5% Nocturnal confirmed (2/766) (356/766) 13.8% (106/766) Rate episodes/P YE 0.00 1.52 0.25 Incidence % patients (# patients) 1.9% (5/257) 46.3% (119/257) 15.2% (39/257) IDeg vs. IGlar Rate episodes/P YE Rate ratio ΔRisk 0.02 0.14* -86% 1.85 0.82 -18% 0.39 0.64* -36% * p<0.05 SAS; % patients, proportion of patients with events; # patients, number of patients with events; PYE, patient-years of exposure Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 Published online before print, doi: 10.2337/dc12-1205 Clinical interpretation of the hypoglycaemia evidence Type of event Risk reduction (significance) To avoid 1 hypoglycaemic episode you would need to treat If you treat 100 patients for 1 year with IDeg Nocturnal confirmed 36%, p<0.05 (in favour of IDeg) 8 patients for 1 year 13 fewer episodes Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 Published online before print, doi: 10.2337/dc12-1205 Adverse events Randomisation 3:1 (IDeg OD:IGlar OD) IDeg OD IGlar OD All patients 766 257 Patients with events 572 182 74.7% 70.8% Number of events 2688 837 Adverse event rate per 100 PYE 403 384 Number of patients with serious AEs 62 26 8.1% 10.1% Number of events 78 33 Serious adverse event rate per 100 PYE 12 15 Number of patients withdrawn due to AEs 20 5 2.6% 1.9% Percentage of patients Percentage of patients with serious AEs Percentage of randomised patients withdrawn Only treatment-emergent events occurring after first exposure and no later than 7 days after last exposure SAS; PYE, patient-years of exposure Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 Published online before print, doi: 10.2337/dc12-1205 Conclusion In a treat-to-target trial: • Insulin degludec administered OD effectively improved HbA1c in patients with type 2 diabetes similarly to insulin glargine • Despite a significantly lower FPG with insulin degludec as compared with insulin glargine: – a lower risk of both nocturnal confirmed hypoglycaemia (36%) and severe hypoglycaemia (86%) were observed for insulin degludec compared with insulin glargine • Insulin degludec was generally well tolerated Zinman et al. Diabetes Care October 5, 2012 Published online before print, doi: 10.2337/dc12-1205 Type 1 diabetes Coester et al., Diabetologia 2012; 55 (Suppl. 1): S373 (Abstract 909-P) Type 2 diabetes Korsatko et al., Diabetologia 2012; 55 (Suppl. 1): S379 (Abstract 924-P) Disegno dello studio Simulated IDeg pharmacokinetic profiles at steady state in subjects with normal renal function and subjects with renal impairment (IDeg 0.4 U/kg). Total exposure of IDeg vs. creatinine clearance in subjects with normal renal function and subjects with mild, moderate and severe renal impairment following a single dose of IDeg (0.4 U/kg) Haahr et al., Diabetologia 2012; 55 (Suppl. 1): S379 (Abstract 923-P) Disegno dello studio Cooper et al., Diabetologia 2012; 55 (Suppl. 1): S374 (Abstract 911-P) Disegno dello studio Rodbard et al., Diabetologia 2012; 55 (Suppl. 1): S378 (Abstract 920-P) Rate (number of episodes per PYE) and incidence (% of patients) of hypoglycaemic episodes in patients with T2D or T1D Gough et al., Diabetologia 2012; 55 (Suppl. 1): S253 (Abstract 615-P) Kurtzhals P, Diabetes July 2011; vol 60 (Supplement 1): 4242-LB aCalculated, not measured FPG, fasting plasma glucose Birkeland et al. IDF 2011:P2011:P-1443; Bain et al. IDF 2011:O2011:O-0508; Birkeland et al. Diabetologia 2011;54(suppl. 1):S423; Atkin et al. Diabetologia 2011;54(suppl. 1):S53; Meneghini et al. Diabetes 2011;60(suppl. 1A):LB10 Birkeland et al. IDF 2011:P2011:P-1443; Bain et al. IDF 2011:O2011:O-0508; Birkeland et al. Diabetologia 2011;54(suppl. 1):S423; Atkin et al. Diabetologia 2011;54(suppl. 1):S53; Meneghini et al. Diabetes 2011;60(suppl. 1A):LB10 Birkeland et al. IDF 2011:P2011:P-1443; Bain et al. IDF 2011:O2011:O-0508; Birkeland et al. Diabetologia 2011;54(suppl. 1):S423; Atkin et al. Diabetologia 2011;54(suppl. 1):S53; Meneghini et al. Diabetes 2011;60(suppl. 1A):LB10 Garber et al. The Lancet 2012;379:1489-97 9.5 IDeg Flexible/IDeg Fixed Treatment difference: –0.05 [–0.45; 0.35] 9.0 FPG (mmol/L) 8.5 8.0 IDeg Flexible/IGlar Treatment difference: –0.42 [–0.82; –0.02] 7.5 7.0 6.5 IDeg Flexible (n=229) 6.0 IDeg Fixed (n=228) 5.5 IGlar (n=230) 5.0 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 Time (weeks) FAS; LOCF Comparisons: Estimates adjusted for multiple covariates Meneghini L, Diabetes July 2011; vol 60 (Supplement 1): 3535-LB 18 20 22 24 26 Duration of action, peak profiles and intra-patient variability NPH insulin (0.4 U/kg) Insulin glargine (0.4 U/kg) Glucose infusion rate (mg/kg/min) Insulin detemir (0.4 U/kg) Time (hours) Heise et al. Diabetes 2004;53:1614–20 Subcutaneous Omental Subcutaneous Omental HI (100 nM) Detemir (100 nM) Detemir (1000 nM) No Ins Cignarelli A et al, manuscript in preparation Cignarelli A et al, manuscript in preparation Garber A et al. Lancet 2012;379:1498-507