K. Polanska, M. Sc. Eng., T. Sukowski, Dr Sc. Eng. J. Sawicki, Asst
Transcription
K. Polanska, M. Sc. Eng., T. Sukowski, Dr Sc. Eng. J. Sawicki, Asst
Bulletin of the Maritime Institute Gdansk, 1993, 20, 2 K. Polanska, M. Sc. Eng., T. Sukowski, Dr Sc. Eng. Department of Environment Protection The Maritime Ins titute in Gdansk J. Sawicki, Asst. Prof. Dr hab. Eng. Technical University of Gdansk HYDROGEOLOGICAL METHOD OF GROUND WATER PROTECTION Abstract A special hydrogeological method of groundw'ater protection is presented. It has an application in the case of local pollution caused b.Y industrial w'aste storage yards, especially in the case of vertical gradient of pollution concentration. The method · vertical, gravitational drainage barrier - each time should be based on carefully recognized hydrodynamical and h .vdrochemical conditions of groundwater. The paper describes two barriers installed up to now. INTRODUCTION Two types of sources of ground water pollution are usually described: regional caused by agricultural activity, and local caused by industrial wastes storage yards. Below local type of the source of ground water pollution is described. K. Polanska, T. Sukowski, J. Sawicki 54 On fig. 1 typical example of the type is presented. crec ~ ~. - . in i ti~l . ·. . water table 0 &"" .- ;;;:.. .- - .- '--.:. -~:-/]a_'"~·~ ·. ~· y.- · , · -:-_ migration of 1 - po ~ lutonts Figure 1. Industrial factory's influence on ground water Eluted from srored industrial wastes chemical compounds moved by infiltration of rain water caused pollution of ground water. Besides of pollution , changes of ground water regime occur such like arising of ground water level, and swampy surface around the storage yard. Elution and washout of wastes is always long-term process so the danger to ground water pollution is serious. METHOD OF PREVENTION Two groups of method of prevention of ground water pollution could be distinguished, geotechnical and hydrogeological. Both could be used together or separately. The essence of the geotechnical methods IS based on isolation of ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION 55 wastes, and waste polluted water from ground on which storage yard is located. Different of protective screens are used, plastic film on the bottom of the yard [fig.2a] or sheet pile wall, separating in vertical, storage yard and ground, down to impermeable strata [fig.2b ]. Isolated area should have been drained by system of dewatering to remove surplus of water or waste water. insu l a hng storage toil draining yard /well sheet pilling _LC:,LJic::.:::::..:::=-:=-:=-=.111.~>....:.29_~. . ;J ----- ermeob~ e ld_ye r" ~• • • •• • • • • • •• ·. IT/ . ~ ' I ' • TTITT/ TT! .r(f tTl! 1 mpermeoble , • laye r Figure 2. Examples of geotechnical methods Geotechnical methods have some disadvantages, they a re very expensive, often ineffective [problems connected with tightness] , influence on geotechnical parameters of waste [stability of slopes of waste saturated with water]. Geotechnical method not always could be used e.g. installing plastic film in old existing storages, or sheet pile walls when impermeable strata lies on big deep. Hydrogeological method are: open ditches, drainage systems, dewatering wells. They are used to keep polluted water as close as possible to waste storage yard, preventing from outside migration and removing water to treatment installation . K. Polanska, T. Sukowski, J. Sawicki 56 Ditches and shallow drainage systems have some limitation in using, because of collecting mainly rain water, usually less polluted as deeper ground water. Meanwhile in ecological point of view, infiltration of rain water washes polluted ground, which is the positive process, so as to protect environment, deeper more polluted ground water collecting is needed. Therefore wells are more effective than shallow, drainage system. But using wells it has to be taken in consideration that important intluence on wells effectiveness has got relation between parameters of well Q = f(s), and characteristic of pomp and pipes Q = f(H), where: Q- yield of water, s - depression, H - effective head. Because of hydrogeological conditions changes, e.g. rainfall, changes of exploitation parameters occur, which could have negative intluence on results of system work. It should be emphasised that the main condition for proper functioning of hydrogeological system of water protection is stability of ground water level. Below, solution is presented which takes advantage of positive characters of wells and in the same time secures stability of water level. HYDROGEOLOGICAL BARRIER Mentioned above solution consists of needed quantity of wells located perpendicularly to ground water flow direction. Depend on waste storage terrain situation, barrier would be located as one line of wells [fig. 3a] or even all around the storage yard [fig. 3b ]. ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION 1 57 outflow - ( P) ~._~~~-=~~~ of drain water (c l · storage -----yard direchon of _./'--- catchwater linear barrier ot draining wells circular barrier Figure 3 Schemes of barrier locations wcter well · s t a rage yard water table caused by the storage yard water in.it i a l /- . water table final water ta ble we ll mmrniTTm rn mmmn- Figure 4 Cross-section of barrier -- K. Polanska, T. Sukowski, J. Sawicki 58 Each wells is drilled in the same way as the hydrogeological well for water supply is drilled, but water outflow is trough circural orifice cut in filter pipe on the level on which needed water level is designed. To the orifice collector is attached connected with main outflow pipe, located parallel to the line of wells [fig. 4). Diameter and decline of collector and main pipe is designed with using classical hydraulic methods, so as to be sure, that gravitational water flow is achieved. Collected water is removed to reservoir of pumping station from where could be send to next step of treatment. The solution secures to keep very steady ground water level. Even much bigger flow could be carry away, because the collector and main pipes could temporarily work as a pressure pipes. Parameters of barrier exploitation should be designed very carefully, because when barrier is done, it works by itself, and correction of work parameters is difficult to perform. Especially ground water level, quantity and spacing, localisation of wells, predicted yield should be designed exactly. As it shown by hitherto existing barriers, there is no need in solving equation of three dimensional filtration of ground water. Satisfactory results could be achieved using numerical solution of Boussinesq equation [method of finite element). aH a aH Sat= ax [Kxx (H-z) ax] where: + a iJy [Ksutyy (H-z) H -water potential, S- effective porosity, K- coordinates of transmissivity tensor. uH ayl + W(x,y,t) (I) ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION 59 Velocity field , according to Darcy Law is described by relation: U=-[K] VH (2) Important to get good final solution is exact reproducing of area geometry and parameters, and precise determination of boundary conditions. In our calculations we used boundary condition as follows: - boundary condition such like lakes, river: H = f(x,y) (3) - . open boundary: (4) Working conditions of barriers should be established to gain as big as possible polluted water flow from direction of waste storage yard, and as small as possible less polluted water flow from outside area, and keep ground water level on level which it was before waste storage yard was erected. Reasonable is to solve dispersion equation, which allow to prognoses migration of polluted ground water before and after barrier is applied: (5) where: C - concentration of pollution Dx, Dy - coefficients of dispersion 60 K. Polanska , T. Sukowski , J. Sawicki EXAMPLES OF APPLICATIONS c ~N· 2 3 km @) piezorre\er 7.91 lr:,9 . 6 l - ------~ N l Figure 5. Location of working barriers Up to now two barriers were installed: Janikowo Soda Factory [fig.5a]- barrier consist of25 wells. Exploitation started in 1990. Result of water level, and chloride concentration decrease is shown on fig. 6. Inowrodaw Chemical Factory [fig. 5b]- barrier consist of 10 wells. Exploitation began in November 1992. So it is to ea rly to discuss the results. Designing works of next barriers are in progress . ENVIRONMENT PROTECTION I JANlKOWO --41 H[m] Hltl ' '.,., .... " \ C N~u lt) -:: "' \ 64 ~ • \ \ u <=Q) ~ <11 ~ .E I I Q) 0 T II\\' \ Q_U"l X - ~ , - I E=<l..i ·:v ~ Vl a_ .:?. E ~ Vl r s l~: 60 0 \ \ 81 ! 1Piezometer291 I )\ 64 82 61 ~ • r I I \I )~;A 55 50 45 \ I\ .., 0 "' .D Figure 6. Effects of barriers work in Janikowo LITERATURE Burzynski K. and Sadurski A. 1990: the Ground Water Exchange Rate of The Southern Baltic Coastal Lowlands. Journal of Hydrology. Vol. 119. pp. 293-306. Fundamentals of Transport Phenomena in Porous Media. Development in Soil Science 2. IAHR, Elsevier Publication Company. Amsterdam - London -New York. 1972.