years - Daily Commercial News
Transcription
years - Daily Commercial News
1.866.354.7264 www.lipanigroup.com info@lipanigroup.com SODDING TERRASEEDING HYDROSEEDING SOIL AMENDMENTS BLOWER TRUCKS SERVICES 50 Y E A R S Page D-2 Demolition & Environmental Engineering Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 COMPLETE DECOMMISSIONING Complete & Selective Demolition Equipment Recovery & Sales Plant Decommissioning Site Remediation Abatement Recycling 160 Vinyl Court Woodbridge, ON L4L 4A3 (416) 494-9898 www.delsan-aim.com Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 Demolition & Environmental Engineering Page D-3 Demolition & Soil Remediation – Caravelle Mississauga, Ontario Delsan-AIM was contracted to demolish a Former Xerox Building in Mississauga Ontario. This on-going project requires the abatement of asbestos, hazardous building materials and the removal of contaminated soils. Dow Chemical – Petromont Inc., Varennes & Montreal East, Quebec Delsan-AIM was awarded a contract with Pétromont Inc. (a subsidiary of Dow Chemical Canada Inc.) to perform the turn-key decommissioning and demolition of two petrochemical plants in Québec – one located in Varennes and the second in Montréal East. Bruce Nuclear Generation Station Tiverton, Ontario Delsan-AIM was contracted to undertake the transportation and demolition of heavy equipment – which includes steam turbine and overhead crane components – that are being removed from one of the operating units of the Bruce Nuclear Generating Station. 160 Vinyl Court Woodbridge, ON L4L 4A3 (416) 494-9898 www.delsan-aim.com Page D-4 Demolition & Environmental Engineering Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 Assessments Archaeology a necessary preconstruction tool DAN O’REILLY W CORRESPONDENT ith approximately 22,000 documented archaeological sites in Ontario, archaeological assessments are an important and mandated preconstruction activity. Legislated by the province for the past 30 years, they help preserve remnants of both pre-European contact and early Euro-Canadian history, says Ron Williamson, managing partner of Archaeological Services Inc. (ASI). “What right do we have to destroy their heritage,” says Wil- liamson, explaining that most of those sites are indigenous ones. Assessments are required when land that is to be developed either has an archaeological site or the potential to have one. Under the Planning Act, municipalities have the authority to require them when a developer submits a housing subdivision or other development application. But they can also be triggered by power projects, highway or road construction, or sewer installation. Renewable energy projects such as wind farms and solar farms may also require assessments in order to obtain a Renewable Energy Approval Economic Snapshot Despite lower energy prices, western provinces to increase infrastructure spending Given the sharp (50%) drop in oil prices since plans to boost spending on highway rehabilitation mid-2014, attention has been focussed on the from $193 in the fiscal year just ended to $213 milpotential impact of a significant decline in energylion a year through 2018. derived tax revenues and corporate profits on both In addition, spending on transit infrastructure is public and private investment primarily in Alberta projected to rise from $163 million in fiscal 2014-15 and to a much lesser extent in Saskatchewan over to over $200 million per year in 2015/16 and 2016/17, the near term. largely due to Evergreen Line Rapid Transit work which At the same time, there is growing evidence that will link Coquitlam to Vancouver via Port Moody. the impact of low energy prices is having a positive There is no doubt that lower oil prices will exert John Clinkard impact on activity in British Columbia as well as a drag on the Saskatchewan economy over the near in Manitoba. term. Nevertheless, we expect that the combination of Turning first to Alberta, against the headwind of a prostronger global demand for potash and a rebound in agriculjected 11.4% drop in consolidated revenues in fiscal 2015-16 tural output will cause the province’s economy to grow by 2.0% stemming primarily from a 21% drop in future corporate to 2.5% in 2015 compared to an estimated gain of 1.1% in 2014. income tax revenues, the province announced plans, in the Factoring in the impact of lower energy revenues, the 2015-16 Budget, to spend $29.5 billion on capital projects provincial government scaled back its forecast of total revover the next five years. enues and expenses in fiscal 2015/16 and 2016/17. HowIn the previous 2014-15 Budget, the government planned ever, despite this scaling back of growth of total spending, to spend $19.2 billion over the ensuing three year period. the government announced plans to boost its core capital Comparing the previous capital plan to the current one, spending by 50% to $1.3 billion. on average, the government now projects that it will invest According to the provincial budget, $581 million is coma total of $6.3 billion per year in fiscal 2015-16 and fiscal mitted to transportation projects including the next phase of 2016-17 — essentially the same amount that it projected in the Regina Bypass (estimated at $221 million) and the twinthe final two years of the 2014-15 fiscal plan. ning of Highway 16 east of Saskatoon. Also, the government However, it is worth noting that over the next three years plans to spend $74.5 million on new schools and education the Alberta government plans to spend slightly more on capand $74.5 million on municipal infrastructure. ital projects than it has since 2009. Major projects scheduled After posting relatively modest growth of 1.8% in 2014, include $2.9 billion on the Calgary/Edmonton Ring Roads; we expect that the impact of stronger exports, due to the $926 million on planning and increasing the capacity of combined impact of the weaker Canadian dollar and a metro centre; $3.8 billion on the municipal sustainably inistrengthening U.S. economy, will cause growth in Manitoba tiative; $526 million for water and waster management projto accelerate from 1.8% in 2014 to between 2.8% and 3.2% in ects; and $4.1 billion on building and modernizing schools. 2015, its strongest showing since 2012. Against the background of a relative improvement in Consistent with the stronger pattern of overall growth British Columbia’s economic health in 2014 and the prosand the concomitant rise in government revenues, the Manpect for above national-average growth in 2015, the provinitoba government recently announced plans to invest $78 cial government’s 2015-16 budget projects that total capital to upgrade its roads and bridges which are, according to a spending over the next three years will remain close to the recent planning and performance report, among the oldest $6.2 billion it planned to spend in fiscal 2014-15. in the country. According to the report, Manitoba has 110 bridges on Although the size of the total spending envelope is prothe national highway system and 67% of them are over jected to remain roughly constant, spending on primary and 40 years old and close to the end of their 50-year design life. secondary school construction is projected to increase from In light of the province’s heightened concern about the age of $405 million in fiscal 2014-15 to $550 million per year over its transportation infrastructure, we anticipate the province the next three years. will continue to increase its spending on bridge and road Planned projects over the next three years include a New repair in the near term. Clayton North Secondary School in North Surrey, BC, the replacement of the Oak Bay High School in Victoria and a seismic upgrade to Lord Strathcona Elementary School in Vancouver. Although the government plans to hold its total John Clinkard has over 30 years’ experience as an economist in international, spending on transportation projects over the next three years national and regional research and analysis with leading financial institutions and media outlets in Canada. at close to the $1.01 billion it spent in 2014-15, it announced ©2015 CanaData. All rights reserved. Vol. 13, Issue 8 from the Ministry of the Environment, he says. Most assessments are a three-stage process combining both mental and physical effort. Using geographic, land use, and historical information—such as old maps and documents—archeologists inspects the property and contacts the Ontario Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Sport to find out whether or not there are any known archaeological sites on or near the property. If the review determines that might be the case, the archaeologists, move literally and figuratively into the field for Stage Two. “For a ploughed field, they will walk back and forth over it looking for artifacts on the surface. In forests, overgrown pasture areas or any other places that cannot be ploughed, they will dig parallel rows of small holes, called test pits, and sift the soil.” If artifacts of cultural value or interest are discovered, the assessment moves into a very site-specific third stage which includes determining the size of the site and an evaluation of its cultural heritage value or interest, he says. A fourth stage may be necessary if special strategies are needed to protect and conserve it, says Williamson. “Conserving archaeological sites does not mean stopping development,” says Williamson, explaining it can involve putting long-term measures to protect it while development proceeds around it. “This is called ‘in situ’ and is always the preferred option for mitigation of development.” If that is not possible, the site may have to be excavated and the artifacts documented and removed before construction begins. An example is the excavation ASI conducted on behalf of York Region when remnants of a 14th-century Huron-Wendat settlement were discovered on a section of Bathurst Street. “The road couldn’t be diverted.” After an assessment has been completed, a report has to be submitted to the Ministry of Culture, Tourism and Sport. Founded in 1980 in response to “increasing public awareness of the importance of Ontario’s heritage,” ASI is a Canadian owned multi-disciplinary firm with offices in Toronto and Burlington and is the largest archaeological consulting firm in Ontario, he says. Some of its most complex projects have included the removal and reinterment of more than 600 graves from the early 19th century Elmbank Cemetery which was in the middle of Pearson International Airport and the detection and repatriation of 28 American soldiers from the War of 1812. Apart from the actual assessments, ASI provides a number of other services including the creation of archaeological management plans for municipalities. They document where archaeological sites are located and predict where others may be. With the exception of Peel Region, most municipalities in the Greater Toronto Area have such plans. “We’re very curious why it (Peel) doesn’t.” “Neither does Simcoe County and it should,” says Williamson, pointing out the county is the home of a number of Huron villages. If there was a time archaeological assessments were resented or hindered by developers or contractors, that time has passed, says Williamson. “We rarely run into anyone now in the land development business who questions it (assessments) and we work with contractors almost every day, especially in urban environments, recording what they encountering and keeping them are moving while we document the heritage record,” The firm has, in fact, received excellent assistance from excavators and other heavy equipment operators during its multi-year and multi-phase assessment of Toronto’s Queen’s’ Wharf in advance of redevelopment. Built along the city’s original shoreline in the 1830s, it was eventually buried when the area was landfilled. “Those guys are amazing,” says Williamson, explaining the operators have to carefully partially lifting the wooden cribbing so the field archaeologists can document what may be buried there. After the assessment is completed, the wood is excavated and sold. Canada’s most advanced indoor Construction & Demolition Recycling Facility z Up to 90% recycled We want you r Co n s t r u c t i o n & D e m o l i t i o n M a t 900 Nebo Rd., Hamilton z We source separate wood, cardboard, metal, aggregate z Tipping is inside our 60,000 sq. ft. plant eri al !!! Toll Free 1-855-293-7499 905-679-7499 www.countrywiderecycling.ca Like us on face book z 8 min from QEW in Hamilton (off Red Hill Valley Parkway) z LEED reporting z Municipal opportunities z We can handle any size truck on our clean floors (no flat tires) z Competitive pricing z Construction bins z Walking floor trailers Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 Demolition & Environmental Engineering Page D-5 Standing Tall How best to bring down Sudbury’s Superstack? IAN HARVEY D CORRESPONDENT epending on how you see it, Vale S.A.’s 1,250 foot tall Sudbury Superstack is either an eyesore or a monumental icon which ties the past to the present. Both are an accurate depiction but Vale is now mulling taking it down among its options moving forward. It hasn’t made a decision yet and there’s no timeframe but a $1 billion investment in improvements to smelter operations to reduce and eliminate emissions has vaulted operations into the modern age, leaving the Superstack as an obsolete reminder of different time. Kelly Strong, Vale vice–president of U.K. and Canadian operations, broke the news to the Sudbury Chamber of Commerce last November and said the company is studying its options, including demolishing it. Should Vale opt to take it down – which seems the most logical move – there are more than a few challenges ahead, said experts interviewed by Daily Commercial News. “There are probably two ways to do it,” said Tristan Rakowski, who is a third-generation controlled demolitions and explosives expert working out of Winnipeg in the family business, Rakowski Cartage and Wrecking, founded in 1964. “You can set charges or you can build a scaffold and take it down piece by piece from the top.” Both come with challenges, he said. The first option will require careful planning and a clear drop zone to put the millions of tonnes of masonry and steel liners down in a controlled blast. “It’s certainly the most affordable option but you have to make sure you have somewhere to put it down and that the masonry doesn’t fall in the middle and block everything up,” he said, stressing he hadn’t talked to Vale about the project and had no detailed knowledge of the materials and structure involved. However, he’s been blowing stacks across Canada all his life, whether at his father’s knee or in charge of crews and while they differ in size, they’re much the same in general. What’s different about the Sudbury Superstack is the size and age. It will also be contaminated with heavy metals and other toxins which will have to be contained and disposed of, making the planning stage even more challenging. Built in 1972, it was raised to such heights by the original owner Inco to disperse sulphur dioxide and nitrogen dioxide emissions, from its Copper Cliff smelter, over a wide area and to lessen the smelter’s environmental impact. It’s also a reminder that environmental standards are much different today and technology has also improved. Vale has spent $1-billion on its Clean AER Project to cut sulphur dioxide emissions to 20 kilotonnes per year, well below the provincial regulatory limit of 66 kilotonnes per year. P199/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS Removal options for the Vale nickel smelter Sudbury Superstack are currently being considered. 5 DEMOLITION & SITE REMEDIATION 5 HAZARDOUS MATERIALS 5 ASBESTOS ABATEMENT 5 EXCAVATION 5 INSURED AND BONDED 5 OVER 90 YEARS OF EXPERIENCE SPANNING OVER 5 GENERATIONS P199/WIKIMEDIA COMMONS “I am not familiar with this stack directly or worked on it, but generally the first thing you’d have to do is test samples from the inside to see what you’re dealing with,” said Brajesh Dubey, University of Guelph School of Engineering professor, where his research focuses on hazardous waste management and environmental technologies. “There are two things. One, the dust which you will have to be careful with and then what you are going to do with it afterwards. Certainly there will be sulphur and heavy metals. These must be contained and a safe disposal plant will have to be engineered.” Weather conditions on the day of the demolition could also be a factor, he said, because if the sulphur residues include sulphur-dioxide, which mixes with rainwater with oxygen from the air, a mild form of sulphuric acid could form which, while not fatal, could cause damage and discomfort. He added any study and resulting explosive demolition plan would have to take the geology and the geography of the area under consideration for environmental impact. There would also be planning, design and construction of a suitably engineered landfill site in the frame. The Superstack was, at one time, the biggest structure in Ontario until the CN Tower eclipsed it at 1,833 feet when it was topped off in 1975. Rakowski said the structure is most likely masonry with a steel liner. The lower part would be carbon steel while the upper is probably stainless. Both steel liners can be recovered and smelted down, despite contamination from 40 years of use. The walls at the bottom are probably up to 36 inches thick he said, so there would have to be staging and disposal plans in place before anything happens. “If there’s an issue with a drop point, then you’d have to build a scaffold and use robots to chip away at it, picking up the debris falling down daily. It’s expensive and it could take years to complete.” He oversaw the demolition of a 650-foot double-walled stack in Murchochville, Que. and said the visual spectacle is stunning. Vale’s Sudbury Superstack, as seen across Ramsey Lake, dominates the city’s skyline. To some it is an eyesore, to others it is an icon tying the city’s past to the present. “The displacement of air alone is worth watching and experiencing,” he said, noting there would likely be a crowd on that day at Sudbury. “You also have to worry about vibrations but with the rock in that area you should be alright. The stack picks up velocity as it falls.” CCI GROUP SCIENCEENGINEERINGSOLUTIONS CCI GROUP COVERS ALL STAGES OF THE LIFECYCLE OF A BUILDING (QYLURQPHQWDO6LWH$VVHVVPHQWV +D]DUGRXV0DWHULDOV0DQDJHPHQW 3UH'HPROLWLRQ6XUYH\V www.ccigroupinc.ca 1.888.348.8991 info@ccigroupinc.ca 280 Commissioners Street Toronto, ON M4M 1A4 Phone: 416-466-3800 Fax: 416-463-3633 Sean Teperman Consulting Corp. www.tepermandemo.com info@tepermandemo.com Page D-6 Demolition & Environmental Engineering Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 Remediation Leslie Street Spit transformation set to continue DAN O’REILLY A CORRESPONDENT popular man-made environmental landform on Toronto’s waterfront will be receiving another environmental feature, although it’s not going to happen overnight In December work began on transforming the second of three confined disposal facilities at the Leslie Street Spit—officially known as Tommy Thompson Park—into a nine-hectare wetland. There are three such cells and they were created years ago by the Toronto Port Authority to safely stored sediment dredged from the Keating Channel at the bottom of the city’s Don River. In 2007 the port authority and the Toronto Region Conservation Authority (TRCA) completed the conversion of the filled-tocapacity Cell 1 into a wetland which is now home to marsh birds, including nesting Common Terns, turtles, amphibians, small mammals and native fish. Now, the two agencies are focusing on Cell 2. It’s an undertaking which requires sealing the 9.3-hectare, two-metre- (6.5-foot) deep cell—essentially a deep pond—with approximately 21,000 truckloads of excavated soil and clay. Staff from both agencies are managing the project, although there are different areas of responsibility. Access roads are now being built through the cell by the port authority to enable heavy equipment operators to seal the cell, as well as lifting an array of wetland material such tree stumps and vegetation on top. The Toronto Region Conservation Authority is responsible for the wetland creation and a number of restoration initiatives, says authority project manager Karen McDonald. “Since Cell 2 is so large it has to be divided into manageable units or phases” says McDonald, pointing out some capping and wetland work will be concurrent. After a given area is capped and dewatered, the TRCA adds “structure” to that area with aggregate and wood materials -ANUFACTURERAND$ISTRIBUTOR OFHOTFORGEDBOLTSSPECIALTYTHREADEDPRODUCTSANDFASTENERS INACCORDANCEWITHTHEHIGHESTQUALITYSTANDARDSn.IAGARA&ASTENERS /URMANUFACTURINGRANGEISFROMTO DIAMETERAND-TO- ,ARGERDIAMETERBLANKSANDALLCOMMONGRADES ARESTOCKEDANDREADYFORTHREADINGTOYOUR SPECIFICATIONS !LL-AJOR(EAD#ONFIGURATIONS (EX(EAVY(EX3QUARE#ARRIAGE'UARD2AIL 3PECIALS -ATERIALS 3!%'RADES!34-'RADES!" !""!,!!"#OR"$ !!3TAINLESS 4HREADING &ULLYTHREADEDRODSANDSTUDSFROMTODIAMETER5.#5.& !#-%-ETRIC"RITISH2OPE !NCHOR"OLTS #USTOMTOYOURSPECIFICATIONSSTRAIGHTBENTREBARMULTIUNIT )3/ 2EGISTERED 433!1! #3!: PORTS TORONTO The Leslie Street Spit Cell 2 perimeter capping has started and access roads have been built. Cell 2 is so large that it has been divided into manageable phases. to provide habitat opportunities for both aquatic and terrestrial wildlife. “Once the structure is in place water, water will be slowly allowed back into the area and it will be planted and seeded with native vegetation.” Some of the wetland features will include spawning shoals and fish cribs to target fish spawning and fish nurseries, plus shoreline logs for basking turtles, and plants such as giant burreed, soft stem bulrush, arrowhead and white water lily, she says. “We’re going to be working backwards,” says McDonald, explaining one of the last details of the project will be ripping up the roads and then depositing the road material into the wetland. In fact, determining the reach of excavators and other pieces of heavy equipment was one of the factors incorporated into the design which got underway in 2013, with the final design being completed in June of 2014, she says. The design was done by inhouse conservation authority personnel. At various stages of the project, several specialized professions have and will be providing input and assistance. Included in that list are freshwater fisheries biologists, fisheries research scientists, terrestrial biologists, landscape architects, coastal engineers and land surveyors, she says. The TRCA will be using a number of construction firms and some of the tradespeople who will be on site will include heavy equipment operators, pre-cast concrete trades, and metal fabricators who will be erecting a pre-built fish and water level control structure to prevent carp, a nonnative fish, access, while allowing native fish passage. It also allows for water levels to be controlled, which is essential during the vegetation establishment phase, she says. “We estimate that the cap will be completed by the end of 2016,” says McDonald, who estimates the thickness will range from 0.5 metres to about 1.5 metres (1.6 to 4.9 feet). Other elements of the project, which should be wrapped up by the winter of 2017/18, also include a trail system and a fishing node. The approximately $2.5 million project is being partially funded by the City of Toronto, Coca Cola Canada, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, and Environment Canada. Raising funds for the project was a major challenge and a primary reason it was delayed so long after the Cell 1 wetland was finished, says McDonald. The new wetland will be located about 2.5 kilometres into the park. Located at the foot of Leslie Street just minutes from downtown Toronto, the park is the culmination of decades long landfilling operations. Approximately 500 hectares in size, it has been designated as an environmentally significant area and was declared a globally significant Important Bird Area by Birdlife International in 2000. Precision Machining We have CNC lathes with live tooling and bar feeding capabilities, and a fully equipped machine shop with presses, benders, saws, drills and mills, welders and conventional lathes. With our in house capabilities and our standard off the shelf fasteners we are able to offer a complete line of structural bolting, on time and at a competitive price. 6095 Progress Street, P.O. Box148, Niagara Falls, ON Canada L2E 6S8 905.356.6887 www.niagarafasteners.com 1.800.263.3602 fax 905.356.5747 nfsales@niagarafasteners.com TRCA Cell 2 perimeter capping with the Toronto skyline in the background at the Leslie Street Spit. Once work is completed, it will be the second of three disposal areas transformed at the site. Bringing Life To Land. Bringing Life To Land. Bringing Life To Land. Bringing Life To Land. FORMERLY METRUS DEVELOPMENT FORMERLY METRUS DEVELOPMENT FORMERLY METRUS DEVELOPMENT FORMERLY METRUS DEVELOPMENT Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 Demolition & Environmental Engineering SKILLS. TO BUILD ON. The labour management partnership of the Unionized ICI Construction Industry has invested $260 million into 95 joint union/employer training centres across Ontario. This investment in apprenticeship training, skills upgrading and health and safety awareness is a key driver of the superior quality of work delivered to buyers of construction. That’s why Unionized Construction Works. Page D-7 Page D-8 Demolition & Environmental Engineering Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 Scrappy Idea Tundra Take-Back targets remediation of northern waste dumps PETER KENTER I CORRESPONDENT n much of Canada, operators are willing to pay for the privilege of towing scrap vehicles to wrecking yards and recyclers. Not so in the north, where it costs so much to recycle end-of-life vehicles (ELVs) that they’re just as likely to be parked at waste dumps, where they eventually leech toxic substances into the soil. Tundra Take-Back is a program designed to tackle the problem head-on, by de-polluting and recycling ELVs—including abandoned construction vehicles—found in Canada’s north. The program was devised by Toronto-based not-for-profit Summerhill Impact (SI), an organization focusing on projects that create positive environmental and health impacts. “In northern Manitoba, for example, people will buy a vehicle further south and drive it up on ice roads,” says Janet Taylor, account manager with SI. “There’s no economic value to ship an ELV back at a huge cost by barge or sealift, so they’re typically parked at waste dumps. Compounding the problem is a large number of total loss vehicles that were bought at substantially discounted rates and driven to the north unlicensed and unsafetied before the provinces assumed responsibility for ice roads.” When ELVs deteriorate, they release a multitude of toxins, including oil and lubricants, antifreeze, lead from batteries and wheel weights, windshield washing fluid, refrigerants and mercury from electrical switches. Decommissioning the vehicles and shipping them to recyclers in the south is the most direct method of ensuring that environmental conditions at northern dump sites don’t deteriorate further. While some communities operate excavated garbage pits, SI chose a pilot project targeting low-hanging fruit by offering to remove vehicles from two surface dump sites in Nunavut. The first was located near the hamlet of Arviat on the western shore of Hudson Bay and the second near the hamlet of Gjoa Haven, more than 1,000 kilometres north. The pilot took place last August, with financial support from Environment Canada and partnerships with businesses, including recyclers, manufacturers, and transportation and hospitality service providers. “Initially, we considered removing the vehicles by ice road,” says Taylor. “But the timing of the pilot didn’t allow for that. Instead, we got an offer from Arctic Cooperatives Limited to fill empty sea cans that had previously been used to ship goods north with the material we were collecting.” In addition to taking part in the cleanup, five citizens from each hamlet received instruction from representatives of the Automotive Recyclers of Canada on how to properly decommission and recycle ELVs. “Some of the vehicles dated back to the 1950s, including a construction truck identified as a contractor to the DEW Line defense initiative,” says Taylor, who took a direct role in site clean-ups. “We removed tires, batteries, chemicals and mercury switches from each vehicle, and drained the oil, transmission fluids and antifreeze. We then bashed in the vehicles using a front end loader so that we could fit as many as possible into the sea cans using a forklift.” In all, the pilot program netted 31 tons of recyclable material and hazardous waste, including more than 700 lead-acid batteries, 1,400 tires, 24 drums of automotive fluids and 20 mercury switches. The steel was ultimately delivered to the Whitby, Ont. recycling operations of Gerdau, a global steel company, where it was shredded and recycled. Chemicals were recycled or sent for proper disposal. Recognizing that there are no codes of practice or resources available on vehicle decommissioning that translate well into a northern context, SI also produced its own guideline: Protecting the Land — A Practical Guide to ELV Recycling in the North. SI is looking to secure funding to expand the program into 2015, including the possible acquisition of a metal shredder and crusher to allow even more scrap metal to be packed into sea cans. “We were successful enough with the vehicles we decommissioned, and we identified a lot of other items, from ATVs and snowmobiles to appliances that we could address to reduce the metal pile,” says Taylor. “And while our first efforts targeted communities in the far north, there are plenty of communities south of 60 tied to ice roads where we expect that dumping problems are far worse.” SUMMERHILL IMPACT Tundra Take-Back is a program designed to tackle the problem of reducing the number of end-of-life vehicles that are sometimes left as waste dumps in Canada’s north. Earthworks Archaeological Services Archaeological assessments are an increasingly common requirement in advance of Ontario development. We operate anywhere in Ontario, and offer the following services to all development sectors: Stage 1–4 Archaeological Investigations Historical Research | | Historic Building Surveys Cultural Heritage Assessments | | Archaeological Monitoring First Nations Engagement 2365 Watts Road Haliburton, ON K0M 1S0 (416) 937-8832 anto@earthworksarchaeology.com www.earthworksarchaeology.com We offer free initial consultation and pricing. Structural Demolition Asbestos Abatement Soil Remediation Mould Remediation Environmental Managers (Established in 2000) salandria.com Tel: 905.707.6568 Fax: 905.707.9095 info@salandria.com Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 Demolition & Environmental Engineering Page D-9 THE FUTURE IS BRIGHT FOR THOSE WHO STAND OUT At Aquatech we strive to be a recognized leader in the industry by upholding superior environmental standards while embracing Best Management Practices (BMP) in all aspects of our business, from system design to project management and methodology to client service. Our business is built on the principle that we can support the growth of industry, infrastructure and community while protecting the integrity of the natural environment. FLOW METERS FILTRATION SOLUTIONS PUMPING SOLUTIONS - Easy to install - Indicates batch, cumulative totals & rate of flow - Displays in Gallons, Litres & Cubic Feet SPILL GUARDS Aqua-Kleen Self-Cleaning Filter Unit NEW Enviro Tanks - Protect floor & walls from the tire abrasion caused by skidding, turning & braking - Custom sizes are available RENTALS & SALES - Layflat discharge hose - HDPE pipe - Fusing Services - Suction Screens - Radar Levels - Sewage Plugs Sand Media Filters Oil/Water Separators Media for Hyrdrocarbon Treatment Diesel & Electric Trash Pumps Submersible Pumps Heavy Sludge Pumps Dredges Pitbull Pumps APPLICATIONS Dewatering Bypass Pumping APPLICATIONS Flood Control Fluid Transfer Industrial Pumping Environmental Servies Filtration/Treatment HDPE Pipe Fusing Services Wellpoint Systems Dredging Emergency Response Drilling Services Full service provider for dewatering, pumping, dredging and filtration with sales across Eastern Canada! MAPLE l OTTAWA l SUDBURY l THUNDER BAY 1-877-907-7852 Visit www.AquatechDewatering.com for more information. Page D-10 Demolition & Environmental Engineering Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 STATE OF THE ART EQUIPMENT Gm As one of Canada’s leading demolition contractors, Priestly Demolition Inc. is working hard to revitalize Ontario’s landscape for the future. Celebrating over 20 years in the industrial, commercial, institutional and private sectors of the demolition industry, we want to acknowledge our sincere appreciation and THANKS to our loyal customers, reliable suppliers and dedicated staff. Women’s College Hospital, Toronto Priestly Demolition Inc... A force to be wrecking with Serving private homeowners, real estate developers, multi-national corporations, general contractors and government agencies throughout Ontario. Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 Demolition & Environmental Engineering Page D-11 . VISIONARY LEADERSHIP . INNOVATIVE SOLUTIONS Safety First at Bay & Adelaide Plant, Oshawa PDI at the Bank of Canada, Ottawa Priestly Demolition Inc. is proud to provide the following services: Demolition Hazardous Material Abatement Asset Recovery & Salvage Brownfield Remediation Concrete Crushing Emergency Response Services Bridgepoint Health Network, Toronto 3200 Lloydtown-Aurora Rd., King ON L7B 0G3 Toll Free: 1-800-263-2076 Tel: 905-841-3735 Fax: 905-841-6282 info@priestly.ca www.priestly.ca Page D-12 Demolition & Environmental Engineering Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 Environmental Excellence Storm water reduction featured at IMAX parking lot DAN O’REILLY A CORRESPONDENT long-term initiative to reduce storm water impact on a local creek, one of the last coastal marshes in the Greater Toronto Area, and ultimately Lake Ontario received a major award earlier this year. Credit Valley Conservation (CVC) and IMAX Corporation received a Minister’s Award for Environmental Excellence from the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change for using innovative approaches and technologies in retrofitting the parking lot at IMAX’s Canadian technology headquarters in Mississauga. “It’s one of the first commercial parking lots in Ontario incorporating a variety of low impact technologies (LID),” says Phil James, the conservation authority’s manager of watershed protection and restoration. The runoff is collected, absorbed and filtered before entering Sheridan Creek which flows into Rattray Marsh, a provincially significant wetland and “one of the coastal marshes on the Great Lakes and ultimately into Lake Ontario.” Designed by Aquafor Beech and built by Aecon, those innovative features include permeable pavers and three specialized and different stormwater treatment trains incorporating some green and leading edge products. In one of the trains, for example, runoff from the asphalt parking lot flows into a “Jellyfish Filter” which removes oil and grease before entering into bio-retention units. Construction was completed in December 2012. However, a five-year monitoring process to measure the performance of the various technologies has been underway since 2013, says James. The roots of the project actually go back to 2007 when the conservation authority completed a sub-watershed study documenting the impact of sediment and untreated stormwater on Rattray Marsh. To help highlight the study’s findings, the conservation authority organized a bus tour for a number of stake holders including local companies to highlight the poor condition of the creek. The tour caught the attention of IMAX officials, especially after the bus stopped at the parking lot where authority staff explained impervious pavement directly channels stormwater into drains. “IMAX is a forward-thinking multi-national corporation and it is aware of the issues.” Apart from the fact the poorly functioning lot would need reconstruction at some point, the company knew some municipalities have enacted storm water utility charges, which is basically a levy on the amount of untreated stormwater flowing from parking lots, roofs, and other hard surfaces into drains, he points out. While the approximate $476,000 construction cost was borne by IMAX, the provincial funding helps cover the cost of the monitoring. A number of manufacturers also provided products at a discount, he says. As the project is intended to monitor and compare the effectiveness of the different retention and filtration technologies, a staged construction schedule was required, says James After ripping out the asphalt in the back portion of the parking lot, Aecon installed the permeable pavers using two different aggregates. Then the contractor installed the three specialized treatment trains underneath asphalt in the front portion of the 300-space lot. To cope with the phased construction and the temporary loss of spaces, IMAX implemented a bus shuttle service from nearby parking lots. “It (the shuttle) was a fairly seamless,” says the company’s facilities manager, Lorna Howieson. “We feel the project is a demonstration of our corporate responsibility and will produce result which can be measured.” At the heart of the project was the company’s willingness to allow conservation authority staff to come on to its property to inspect how the systems are performing, says James. “We were able to obtain a legal agreement with IMAX which allows the authority to monitor for a five-year period, with the possibility of a renewal. Not every corporation would do that.” Some of the benefits to the company include a better functioning and less-expensive-to maintain parking lot. Besides the environmental benefits, the project is also spurring the growth of Ontario green jobs through the use and promotion of the specialized stormwater management systems. And that’s the message the conservation authority was to spread, especially with the publicity generated by the Minister’s Award, he says. “We have a good story to tell.” CREDIT VALLEY CONSERVATION Top: Credit Valley Conservation’s Phil James demonstrating the performance of permeable pavers. Bottom: Three bioretention cells that absorb and filter runoff before it enters a nearby creek. ENVIRONMENTAL ENGINEERS For More Information Contact: Specialists In: Designated Substances Surveys for Renovation, Demolition and Construction Projects Asbestos and Hazardous Materials Surveys and Abatement Design and Supervision Mould Investigations and Remedial Design and Supervision Air Quality Testing Phase I and II Environmental Site Assessments, Site Cleanup and Risk Assessment Geotechnical Investigations Sales / Rentals / Installation / Training Rein Andre or Kelly Smith 121 Granton Drive, Suite 12 Richmond Hill, Ontario L4B 3N4 Tel: 905.882.5984 Web-Site: www.arcadis.com E-Mail: randre@arcadis-canada.com ksmith@arcadis-canada.com .HO¿HOG6WUHHW 7RURQWR210:$ T: (416) 248-6600 Toll Free: 1 (855) 248-6600 Email: info@ACEcorp.ca ZZZ$&(FRUSFD Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 Demolition & Environmental Engineering We can complete your project Page D-13 on time on budget; no matter what size and no matter how challenging, you can count on our expertise. and Æ Demolition Æ Environmental Services Æ Site Services 11 Dansk Court Toronto, ON M9W 5N6 Tel: 416.675.2280 Fax: 416.675.2209 www.mgicorp.ca Page D-14 Demolition & Environmental Engineering Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 Regulation New demo rules look at chemical exposure limits DON PROCTER L CORRESPONDENT arge demolition contractors that perform industrial/ commercial work in Ontario might be on a search to hire staff with chemical and industrial hygiene hazard experience this summer, if a proposed provincial regulation on allowable exposure limits to chemicals on construction sites is passed. Currently construction is the only sector exempt from Regulation 833 – Control of Exposure to Biological or Chemical Agents. “Demolition and construction sites have the potential for overexposure to many hazardous materials, including silica, lead, welding fumes and chemical residues from prior operations,” says Bruce Stewart, Pinchin Ltd. executive vice-president of technical services. “They (contractors) have lots of safety people who know rigging, scaffolding, safe demolition...but the skillsets of their safety people don’t extend to the kinds of issues presented by chemicals,” adds Stewart, a certified industrial hygienist who sits on a subcommittee to the Provincial Labour Management Health and Safety Committee (PLMHSC) that is behind the proposed new regulation. There are sound reasons for legislation. The cost of occupational disease represents about 40 per cent of the total cost of compensation, says Stewart. “When someone breaks their ankle, they are back to work soon, but if someone gets asthma from working with wood, this can lead to an expensive life-debilitating condition.” Jonathan Zuber, Priestly Demolition Inc. safety manager, says removing the exemption “removes the opinion factor of employers and workers, and provides a definitive measure of what will be acceptable.” He adds that enforcement by the Ministry of Labour should lead to “a market advantage for contractors with good safety programs.” Zuber is also a member of the subcommittee to the PLMHSC which is working on implementation guidelines to assist contractors with compliance of the legislation change. Zuber says that while Regulation 833 has exempted the construction sector for exposure limits, the Occupational Health and Safety Act has always contained general duties for employers to protect their workers. He adds that demolition contractors require a work culture that puts exposure protection as a priority. Although many demolition jobs only involve lowlevel hazardous materials such as drywall, fibreglass, brick, concrete and roofing materials, extended exposures can be harmful if workers are not properly protected. If passed, the regulation could especially impact the way demolition contractors bid on large projects. Pre-tender planning could be vital, explains Stewart. “A demolition project can be done with hot methods (cutting steel) or cold methods (with shears, for instance) and some of it can be subcontracted out, so there is INFRASTRUCTURE HEALTH AND SAFETY ASSOCIATION going to be a need for a fair bit of investigation and planning before you begin the Proposed provincial legislation in Ontario could require demolition contractors to look at hiring staff with chemical and industrial hygiene experience. demolition process.” Zuber points out that building owners must provide contractors with a Designated Substance sur- which safe work procedure packages are set or standardized vey detailing where those substances are. The application of for various chemical scenarios. Regulation 833 to construction sites extends the protection to “We (the committee) are going to write some industry about 700 potentially hazardous substances. practices so contractors don’t have to go through the air samPreliminary investigations could also change the nature pling and assessing on a site by site basis.” of the demolition so contractors might have to stipulate an “There are precedents for this,” says Stewart, citing the open-ended price and schedule to deal with unknowns that asbestos regulation and provincial guidelines for lead, silica could hamper work. and other chemicals. These chemicals are categorized at variStewart points out, however, that chemical sampling won’t ous toxic levels so contractors can set best safety practices, be required on every construction or demolition project rather than deal with testing on every project. under the regulation. A rigorous safety monitoring program The Infrastructure Health and Safety Association is workfor workers based on a company’s experience or government ing on training materials to assist in the transition for the literature on chemicals might preclude the need for air moni- building industry, if the new regulation is passed. Legislation toring, for example. could be enacted as soon as June, or it could be phased in, The idea is to employ a “control banding” formula in says Stewart. Either way, it will be part of the industry’s future. A partner you can trust Managing the success of your construction business can be challenging in today’s evolving marketplace. When you partner with Aviva for your surety needs, you can count on us to provide you with: sExpert advice and consultation for your specific project sOur commitment to help you meet your business goals sA stable partnership focused on the long-term With more than 100 years of expertise behind us, you can trust Aviva as your valued business partner. Contact your broker to learn more. AvivaCanada.com Home | Auto | Leisure & Lifestyle | Business | Group | Surety Aviva and the Aviva logo are trademarks used under license by the licensor. Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 Demolition & Environmental Engineering Choose Dymin Steel plasma cutting for all of your structural needs. We offer stitch cutting, plasma cut bolt holes, slots, miters, notches, copes and bevels, to your specification. For further information & pricing please call our sales department: 905.840.0808 or 1 800 461.4675 www.dymin-steel.com Page D-15 Page D-16 Demolition & Environmental Engineering Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 Demolition Overthrowing the Guvernment: Toronto venue demolished PETER KENTER T CORRESPONDENT he demolition of the Guvernment/ Kool Haus entertainment complex near Toronto’s waterfront unleashed 30 years of memories — including those of the employees of ProGreen Demolition Ltd., which submitted the successful bid on the project. “Many of us attended performances there over the years,” says Keri Wellhauser, marketing manager with ProGreen. “One of our operators even performed a guest shot as a DJ in one of the club rooms at the complex.” The 67,000-square-foot complex is being demolished on behalf of Daniels CM Corp., which is redeveloping the entire bock into condominiums. The clubs started life as a series of former heavy industrial buildings at the foot of Lower Jarvis Street near the waterfront. A club named RPM was launched in 1985 and was soon joined by a second venue, The Warehouse. Entrepreneur Charles Khabouth purchased the buildings in 1995, rebranding RPM as Guvernment, and The Warehouse as Kool Haus. The complex has featured a slate of top-tier acts over three decades, including the Rolling Stones, Oasis, Coldplay, Lady Gaga, The Black Keys, David Bowie, Nine Inch Nails, Duran Duran, INXS and Justin Bieber. Although Khabouth submitted an offer to buy the buildings, he was outbid by the condominium developer. The demolition project began in early February, but was subject to some initial delays because waste services to the buildings couldn’t be shut down due to the extreme cold weather. “This project involves the demolition of two buildings including the slab, footings and foundations,” says Wellhauser. “Neither building has a basement—they’re both slabon-grade. An asbestos abatement program took place in The Guvernment prior to any demolition work and is now undergoing an interior strip out. We’re using bobcats and small excavators to remove material such as drywall, wood and finishes.” One operator noted that stripping the interior of the building was like peeling back history, as the paint job for the original Orange Room subvenue emerged. Demolition of the Kool Haus — a metal structure — is almost complete. The contractor brought four major pieces of equipment to the project: a Liebherr 964 excavator with a shear; a 650 Hitachi excavator with shear; and a Liebherr 944 High Reach excavator and 324 CAT with grapple to assist with the high reach work at the tops of the 30-foot buildings. While the site along Queens Quay East was once largely undeveloped, construction in recent years has seen the addition of the Corus Entertainment headquarters and the George Brown College Waterfront Campus, among other projects, which have ramped up both vehicular and pedestrian traffic. “The site is now a high-traffic downtown location,” says Wellhauser. “We’re very conscious of street activity on the west side of the PETER KENTER The Guvernment/Kool Haus entertainment complex, an iconic destination for Toronto’s music and dance lovers is being demolished by ProGreen Demolition Inc. project along Jarvis across from a Loblaws shopping centre. Part of the concrete structure is tight to the sidewalk on the south and west sides, so we installed overhead protection for pedestrians. Neighbouring businesses are a safe distance away from the work, although we employ a dust suppression program when required.” Demolition was completed according to an Ontario Ministry of the Environment Waste Reduction Plan and Audit. ProGreen is separating, salvaging and recycling various items such as electrical equipment, wood and metals, with as much debris as possible diverted from tra- ditional landfills. Salvage included sound equipment and Guvernment’s famous raised wood floor, which was originally installed to provide superior acoustics and replaced yearly. “Typically more than 90 per cent of the material on any project is recycled or reused,” says Wellhauser. “It’s likely that concrete and brick will be left on site for future use. Once both buildings are demolished above grade, we’ll go in and remove the footings and foundations from each facility.” The project is scheduled for completion by the end of April. SERVICES Asbestos Removal Infectious Control Mould Removal Interior Strip Out Lead Removal Full Structural Demolition PCB Removal Project Management Fire Damage Restoration General Contracting Water Damage Restoration (IICRC Certified) 215 Carlingview Drive, Unit 309/310 Toronto, ON M9W 5E8 Tel 416-848-0508 Fax 416-679-8512 glenn@alwaysavailable.ca www.alwaysavailable.ca Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 Demolition & Environmental Engineering Page D-17 Negotiate your heavy machinery purchases with confidence Secure your financing before it’s time to buy In the building and construction industry, ongoing equipment purchases can be a fact of life. Getting the right equipment at the right time – and the right price – is critical. So imagine: Accessing financing whenever you need it. Getting the interest rate you deserve. Avoiding an application process with every purchase. Now you can with the RBC Equipment PurchaseLine Open yours today so you have access to credit any time you need it. TM Call 1-855-561-6723 or visit rbc.com/flexiblefinancing TM ® / Trademark(s) of Royal Bank of Canada. RBC and Royal Bank are registered trademarks of Royal Bank of Canada. Subject to approval and certain conditions apply. VPS89599 TM 108518 (02/2015) Page D-18 Demolition & Environmental Engineering Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 Precision Demo College Street demo makes way for university housing PETER KENTER D CORRESPONDENT emolishing a Victorian warehouse and two smaller mixed-use buildings in downtown Toronto required surgical precision on the part of contractor Delsan-Aim, as it prepared the site for construction of a student housing complex. The buildings were located near the busy southeast corner of College Street and Spadina Avenue in the vicinity of a public library, storefront businesses, including a Booster juice franchise and a series of residential buildings in the rear. Making the job more complex—the site butted up to the sidewalk at the front and to existing buildings on the property lines to the east and west. Brookfield Multiplex plans to build a 28-storey student residence on the land, which is partly owned by the University of Toronto and leased to developer Knightstone Capital Management. The $65-million College & Spadina Student Residences project is being designed by Diamond & Schmitt Architects and is scheduled for completion by the beginning of the 2016 academic year. Site preparation work started in the first week of October as the demolition contractor began asbestos abatement, bringing in equipment through a residential entrance behind the buildings. “The neighbours were more than gracious giving us access through the first part of the project,” says Carmelo Pastore, a senior project manager with Delsan-AIM. “But we didn’t GALLOWAY PHOTOGRAPHY FOR DELSAN-AIM The demolition of a Victorian warehouse and two smaller mixed-use buildings in downtown Toronto required precision planning by Delsan-AIM. want to rock the boat by wearing out our welcome. Once we completed asbestos abatement and got our permits we moved in the heavy equipment through a construction entrance we carved out on College.” For the heavy work, the contractor mobilized three excavators—a John Deere 450, a Liebherr 944 and a CAT 320. Street-front scaffolding was installed by Don Fry Scaffold Service Inc. Delsan-AIM installed its own hoarding panels and kicker boards to protect pedestrians as interior demolition and salvage commenced. The smaller two-storey building on the eastern portion of the site, was constructed on footings shared with a neighbouring historic brick building. Engineering firm CSE Structural Forensics designed an approach that would retain the structural integrity of the remaining building. “The footing of the brick wall was built on native material,” says Pastore. “We worked carefully removing the structure along the property line with a Kubota K008 compact excavator outfitted with a hydraulic breaker. As we worked along the shared footing, we were almost working by hand at the lower levels to make sure we preserved the integrity of the building.” Demolition crews excavated along the property line, as GFL Excavating Corp. delivered shale imported from another site for strategic backfilling. As the site was prepared, Anchor Shoring Group drilled caissons to bedrock around the site perimeter in preparation for later excavation by GFL and construction of the new building foundations. “The most interesting building was the old five-storey storage warehouse in the centre of the site,” says Pastore. “It featured load-bearing brick construction, with steel tension rods and plates later added to retain the integrity of the brick walls.” The demolition of the warehouse resulted in a large harvest of reusable wood beams, wood columns and wood floors. American buyers typically snap up wood salvage, although the continuing weakness of the US economy has seen that market soften. “The beams and columns were really nice quality and the sub-floor was made up entirely of upright two-by fours nailed together, with hardwood installed on top of that,” says Pastore. “We were pleased to find people in London who were interested in this vintage wood.” Other demolition material was either reused or recycled. “The project has already been substantially completed,” says Pastore. “All we have to do now is come back and remove the small patch of asphalt that the Brookfield construction trailer is sitting on.” 1600 Major Mackenzie Dr. E., Richmond Hill, ON L4S 1P4 Tel: 905-883-4268 Fax: 905-883-4894 Toll free: 1-877-883-4268 Website: www.506tc.org Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 Demolition & Environmental Engineering Over 65 years… Atlas Dewatering Corporation s #/.3425#4)/.$%7!4%2).' s %-%2'%.#9"90!3305-0).' s -).%$%7!4%2).'DESIGNANDINSTALLATION s !4,!3%.6)2/4!.+3© s !4,!3!15!"!22)%2 ENVIRONMENTALLYFRIENDLYCOFFERDAMS s $)%3%,!.$%,%#42)#05-03 s ).#(4(2/5'().#('/$7).05-03 www.atlasdewatering.com 111 Ortona Court Concord, ON, L4K 3M3 T 905-669-6825 F 905-669-4036 24/7 EMERGENCY SERVICES 1-877-669-6825 Page D-19 Page D-20 Demolition & Environmental Engineering Daily Commercial News April 24, 2015 Replacement Work Timiskaming Dam work to get started this summer IAN HARVEY W CORRESPONDENT ork on the $20.9-million Timiskaming Dam replacement project is expected to get underway in earnest this summer once the necessary permits and approvals have been signed off. Doug Dally, North America Construction project control coordinator, said work was slated to start last year but was delayed because of the myriad of regulation and legislation at both the federal and provincial level governing waterways. Public Works Canada (PWC) is in the process of securing the necessary permits from the other agencies. “We’re now hoping to get the coffer dam started downstream of the existing dam around July this year,” he said. With the coffer dam in place, crews can start work on inspecting the apron around the front of the existing dam to ascertain its condition. “We think there’s some water leaking under the dam so there may have to be some grouting but that’s one of the unknowns for us right now. We won’t know until we get in there.” The project is funded by the federal government and Ontario governments and will replace the original dam section on the Ontario side built between 1909 and 1913. The permitting paperwork alone seems to be a project in itself. PWC’s website shows a long list of assessments, including archaeological, natural environment, environmental effects evaluation, a geotechnical investigation and analysis, a hydraulic analysis and study, a heritage assessment and a designated substance survey. SUBMITTED PHOTO Work on the $20.9-million Timiskaming Dam replacement will get underway this summer once the necessary permits and approvals are in place. Add in the Navigable Waters Act requirements and delays are hardly surprising. The project was never going be easy from the outset given its location and the challenge of working around the waterway. It’s one of two dams in the Timiskaming Dam Complex which maintain water levels to around Lake Timiskaming upstream and the downstream Ottawa River. The project is further complicated by a roadway which runs across the tops of the dams between Ontario and Quebec connecting Highway 63 with Highway 101. The road will also be realigned as part of the project and there’s also an adjacent pedestrian path- way and a natural gas pipeline. The complex is about 65 kilometres northeast of North Bay on the border between Quebec and Ontario. The two dams are on either side of Long Sault Island in the Ottawa River. The Quebec component is on that province’s side of the border and will be used for water control while the Ontario side dam is under construction and will be studied for future replacement as well. A proposal to install a hydro-generating turbine as part of the new dam structure was rejected when a KPMG study found it would not be economically viable. The existing dams are concrete structures featuring sluice bays with removable stop logs and because of their age need replacement. Obviously, the coffer dam is critical to creating some space to work, said Dally. The plan is to use commercial dive teams to install fabric across the coffer dam to trap any silt being stirred up from the river bed from spreading downstream. “There’s also a plan to capture and release any fish which get caught in the coffer dam as well,” he said. “After we inspect the apron and re-grout where needed we’ll look at tying the new dam into the existing abutments and looking at how much erosion there is.” With the new dam in place it is hoped demolition of the existing dam can start. “We don’t have the final proposal in place yet and they are still working on it but it’s hoped they can start demolition and use the rubble as a roadway for access and then scoop it all out,” he said. “It’s pretty old so we don’t know what materials are there and how much rebar there is or isn’t but we’re also hoping to recover some of that concrete to use as riprap along the shoreline.” Access is also somewhat restricted from March to July because of the high water runoff and the need to control the water flow, he added. Work will continue as long as possible over the colder months. “Whatever we do with the coffer dam it has to be out before March of next year for the season,” he said. The new dam will be built a few metres south of the existing dam and while construction was slated to wrap up by 2016, the delayed start will push that back.