Repair of Chronic Tibialis Anterior Tendon Ruptures
Transcription
Repair of Chronic Tibialis Anterior Tendon Ruptures
n tips & techniques Section Editor: Steven F. Harwin, MD Repair of Chronic Tibialis Anterior Tendon Ruptures Shawn S. Funk, MD; Bethany Gallagher, MD; A. Brian Thomson, MD Abstract: This article presents a novel technique for repair of chronic tibialis anterior tendon ruptures. All chronic tibialis anterior tendon ruptures reviewed were treated with this technique. Patients with chronic tibialis anterior tendon ruptures presenting to the authors’ institution from 2006 to 2012 had preoperative and postoperative Foot and Ankle Ability Measure scores. The average follow-up time was 2.1 years. The average Foot and Ankle Ability Measure score was 66.1% preoperatively and 87.1% postoperatively (P=.002). This technique offers theoretical improved strength and may help avoid the need for tendon graft often required by other techniques. [Orthopedics. 2016; 39(2):e386-e390.] T he tibialis anterior supplies 80% of the dorsiflexion power of the ankle. Deficiency results in a significant functional deficit.1,2 Tibialis anterior tendon ruptures occur traumatically and atraumatically. Atraumatic ruptures occur after the age of 45 years following eccentric loading of a degenerated tibialis anterior tendon against a plantarflexed ankle and often present delayed. Patients with inflammatory ar- The authors are from the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, Tennessee. The authors have no relevant financial relationships to disclose. Correspondence should be addressed to: A. Brian Thomson, MD, Elite Sports Medicine and Orthopaedic Center, 356 24th Ave N, Ste 200, Nashville, TN 37203 (andrew.thomson@vanderbilt.edu). Received: October 10, 2014; Accepted: February 13, 2015. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20160307-05 e386 thropathy, gout, and diabetes mellitus and patients receiving corticosteroid treatment are at risk for degeneration and atraumatic rupture of the tendon.1,3-8 Previous studies have identified a hypovascular zone as 45 to 65 mm in total length starting approximately 5 mm proximal to the insertion site.9-11 A significant number of ruptures are at the most distal 5 to 30 mm of the tendon, correlating with the hypovascular zone.10-12 Patients present with a triad of findings, including a pseudotumor at the anteromedial aspect of the ankle, loss of the contour of the tibialis anterior tendon over the ankle, and the use of the extensor hallucis longus and extensor digitorum longus to dorsiflex the ankle.1,7 Gait is typically foot slap or steppage with a propensity for toe dragging.1 Case studies have described these injuries and potential treatments, but there is no consensus regarding treatment.4,8,12-14 Direct repair of the tendon is ideal when possible with adequate healthy tendon stalk proximally and distally. Acute tendon laceration is often amenable to direct repair. However, atraumatic ruptures often occur at the distal end of the tendon at the site of bony insertion, and often present late due to the difficulty of diagnosis.7 Current repair techniques involve suture anchor and bone tunnel repair with the use of a tendon graft.4,8,12-14 These techniques frequently implement a graft, with associated morbidity of harvesting, and can result in a bulky repair. Repair with pull-out suture over a button on the plantar surface requires bone to tendon healing to afford repair strength once the button is removed, and the button can cause skin complications.13 Distal biceps ruptures are more common and have been thoroughly studied in relation to the biomechanics of differ- Copyright © SLACK Incorporated n tips & techniques ent repair techniques. In comparing repairs using suture anchors, bone tunnels, and the EndoButton (Arthrex, Naples, Florida), the EndoButton has been found to be biomechanically superior.15-17 Due to the distal nature of tibialis anterior ruptures, the distal biceps repair system offers an excellent solution and has lessened the need for tendon graft. In this article, the authors describe use of the EndoButton. Materials and Methods After obtaining institutional review board approval, the electronic medical records of all patients who had a tibialis anterior tendon rupture from 2006 to 2012 were evaluated. For each patient, demographic data and outcome data were de-identified and recorded in a REDCap database.18 The clinical outcome used for this study was the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM) score, which is a validated outcome measure for foot and ankle injury and disease.19 Seven patients were identified presenting 4 to 25 weeks after the injury. Patients were contacted and consented for inclusion in the study. A posttreatment FAAM tool was administered. This postoperative outcome was compared with preoperative results previously recorded in the medical record. The activity of daily living questionnaire of the FAAM was analyzed, excluding the sport questionnaire due to average patient age and activity level. Statistical analysis was performed with univariate analysis with the Mann-Whitney U test. Stata statistical software, release 11 (StataCorp, College Station, Texas), was used. Preoperatively, each patient was assessed for equinus contracture, which can be addressed with Strayer or Achilles lengthening. Operative Technique An anteromedial incision was made overlying the tibialis anterior tendon from the medial cuneiform to the level of the superior retinaculum. The proximal end of the ruptured tendon was retracted, and in the cases of chronic rupture, significant pseudotendon had usually formed. The distal stump was identified and was insufficient for direct repair. The tendon insertion site was debrided of the distal tendon remnant. The proximal tendon stump and pseudotendon was minimally debrided to healthy tissue that would hold suture, and length was assessed with traction. The medial cuneiform was the insertion site. Fluoroscopy was used to confirm the starting point of the bone tunnel and the trajectory to ensure adequate bone stock surrounding the graft/ bone tunnel (Figure 1A). Then, a 3.2-mm drill pin was used to create a bicortical tunnel and was left in place (Figure 1B). A 7-mm reamer was placed over the guide pin and a unicortical tunnel was reamed, ensuring adequate depth of the tunnel and that the far cortex was not reamed. The drill pin and reamer were removed and the bone tunnel was irrigated to remove any debris. Figure 1: Tibialis anterior rupture repair. Intraoperative anteroposterior radiograph identifying appropriate bony insertion site (A). Medial cuneiform is drilled with a 3.2-mm guide pin (B). Previously whip stitched tendon is prepared and EndoButton (Arthrex, Naples, Florida) is threaded (C). EndoButton is inserted into the bone tunnel (D). To confirm the tendon would pass through a 7-mm bone tunnel, the proximal tendon stump was sized with a 7-mm sizing block. The terminal 2.5 cm of the proximal stump of the tibialis anterior tendon was then whip stitched using No. 2 FiberLoop (Arthrex) with a straight needle in a locking fashion. The final throw was locked proximally prior to exiting the tendon end (Figure 1C). In most cases, pseudotendon was incorporated into the repair to extend the working length of the tendon. The suture was begun in healthy tendon, and only pseudotendon that would hold suture was used. Using a 7-mm reamer is a deviation from the technique for the distal biceps repair kit. The standard technique for the kit overdrills 1 mm. However, because the tarsal bones have a higher proportion of cancel- lous bone compared with the proximal radius, the authors have found that overdrilling leads to an inadequately constrained tunnel. The FiberLoop suture, which had been previously cut to remove the suture needle, was then threaded on to the BicepsButton (Arthrex), with each limb entering the opposite hole and exiting through the entry hole of the opposite suture. The EndoButton was then placed on the insertor (Figure 1D), which was guided through the medial cuneiform bicortically. After passing through the far cortex, the EndoButton was deployed and flipped into position and the tendon was pulled into the bony tunnel (Figures 2A-B). The authors’ goal was to place 15 to 20 mm of tendon into the tunnel with good tendon tension with the ankle at maxi- MARCH/APRIL 2016 | Volume 39 • Number 2e387 n tips & techniques as tolerated in a walking boot for 4 weeks and open chain physical therapy were initiated. At 2 months, regular shoes could be worn and physical therapy continued with impact activities. At 6 months, full activity could be resumed. Results Figure 2: Tibialis anterior tendon repair. The EndoButton (Arthrex, Naples, Florida) is deployed and the distal tendon end is pulled into the bone tunnel (A). EndoButton deployment is confirmed on radiograph with anteroposterior (B) and lateral views with intraoperative fluoroscopy. A Bio-Tenodesis screw (Arthrex) is placed while holding tension to further tighten and augment repair (C). Final repair (D). Final repair confirmed on intraoperative lateral radiograph (E). Figure 3: Illustration of tibialis anterior tendon repair. Anterior view showing starting point for bone tunnel on medial cuneiform (A). Anterior view of repaired tendon (B). Lateral view of the foot with small-diameter bone tunnel through both cortices and larger reamed tunnel ending before far cortex (C). Lateral view of tendon repair (D). mum dorsiflexion. A BioTenodesis screw (Arthrex) was then loaded on to the driver and one end of the FiberLoop suture was threaded through the driver with the screw loaded. Tension was maintained over both ends of the FiberLoop while driving the screw (Figure 2C). After the screw was seated, the Fi- e388 berLoop suture was tied over the tenodesis screw (Figures 2D-E). Tendon insertion and the final construct are illustrated in Figure 3. Postoperative Care Postoperatively, patients were immobilized and nonweight bearing for 6 weeks. After 6 weeks, weight bearing There were 6 female patients and 1 male patient with a tibialis anterior rupture (Table). All tibialis anterior ruptures were repaired using a distal biceps repair kit with an EndoButton and/or a BioTenodesis screw. Among the patients with rupture, 4 had comorbidities that could be associated with the rupture (Table). One rupture was traumatic, 2 ruptures were postoperative complications from a prior surgery, and 2 ruptures failed repair by other techniques. The Achilles lengthening procedure using either the Hoke or the Strayer technique was performed in all but 2 cases. The FAAM was used preoperatively to evaluate patients’ function. The FAAM was administered postoperatively for 1 case because of function prior to surgery. The average follow-up time was 2.1 years. The average FAAM score was 66.1% preoperatively and 87.1% postoperatively (P=.002). No comparative analysis was performed. Further details regarding mechanism of injury and presentation are provided in the Table. Discussion Tibialis anterior rupture, a rare injury that is commonly misdiagnosed and presents late, causes significant morbidity. This process was first described in 1905 by Bruning, and no consensus exists regarding treatment.7,20 Several techniques have been proposed with reasonable results.4,8,12-14 Techniques for tendon repair for other tendon injuries have been evaluated thoroughly, including strength comparisons; however, each pathologic condition represents a unique treatment dilemma.15-17 Tendon repair and reconstruction options for the tibialis anterior tendon include direct repair when possible; however, this is rarely possible for chronic tibialis anterior tendon ruptures because of their distal nature. Reconstruction options include direct repair of tendon-tendon, tendon-bone with or without auto/allograft tendon, or tendon substitution with extensor hallucis longus transfer.7 No biomechanical studies have been performed comparing repair techniques for the tibialis anterior; however, corollaries can be made to the distal biceps, which has had extensive biomechanical testing. The EndoButton has shown superior strength and a higher load to failure than bone tunnel, suture anchor, or interference screw in isolation.15-17 This study showed significant improvement in the FAAM.19 Limitations of the study included small sample size and lack of a control group. Because tibialis anterior tendon rupture is rare, studies have had small numbers Copyright © SLACK Incorporated n tips & techniques Table Follow-up, y Preop Postop Results of Tibialis Anterior Repair Surgical Technique 100% FAAM ADL Questionnaire Score Comorbidities 93% 94% Complications Presenting Symptoms 1.99 58% 71% Mechanism of Injury OA, prior foot surgery Repair to medial cuneiform with EndoButton (Arthrex, Naples, Florida) and Bio-Tenodesis screw (Arthrex) Strayer technique 0.66 41% 100% Weeks to Diagnosis Foot drop and frequent tripping DM Repair to medial cuneiform with EndoButton and Bio-Tenodesis screw Strayer technique 4.05 88% Patient Age, y/ Sex Dull pain for a month and mass anterior ankle OA 1.87 80% Unknown 4 Chronic instability and pain No identifiable injury Foot drop and pain along tibialis anterior tendon Repair with harvest of hamstring tendons for graft Bio-Tenodesis screw (no button) Hoke technique 61% 77.9/F 5 Chronic rupture No specific injury Discomfort and mass anterior ankle 2.77 70% 25 Postoperative pain and hyperesthesias anterior ankle Trip forward Repair to medial cuneiform with EndoButton and Bio-Tenodesis screw Strayer technique 61% Injured during podiatric surgery (1st TMT plantarflexion arthrodesis) Burning over anterior ankle and foot slap 2.63 10 Repair to medial cuneiform with EndoButton and Bio-Tenodesis screw 0.82 4 Repair to medial cuneiform with EndoButton and Bio-Tenodesis screw Strayer technique DM 95% Burning pain while riding a bus No identifiable injury Repair failure Revised to EndoButton and BioTenodesis screw with allograft augmentation 61% Failed tendon repair 5 years prior (suture anchor repair) 53.0/F 71.3/F 53.2/F 35.2/F 57.4/M 46.4/F Primary suture repair This failed and was revised Broken glass resulting in transverse laceration across dorsum of foot Obvious tendon laceration Decreased sensation dorsum of foot Immediate/revised after chronic re-rupture at 26 weeks Abbreviations: ADL, activity of daily living; DM, diabetes mellitus; F, female; FAAM, Foot and Ankle Ability Measure; M, male; OA, osteoarthritis; preop, preoperative; postop, postoperative; TMT, tarsometatarsal. MARCH/APRIL 2016 | Volume 39 • Number 2e389 n tips & techniques of patients. The largest study had 19 patients and was not restricted to chronic ruptures.7 Rare injuries motivate surgeons to use clinical corollaries to aid in the development of treatment methods. Conclusion The authors have presented a technique for tibialis anterior tendon repair using an EndoButton. This has proved to be an effective treatment and is preferred at the authors’ institution. This technique is biomechanically superior in anatomic corollaries. The straightforward method often alleviates the need for tendon graft by using robust pseudotendon. This technique would also permit placement of the tendon insertion in the navicular if tendon length was inadequate. Further studies validating this technique are warranted. e390 References 1. Porter DA, Schon LC. Baxter’s the Foot and Ankle in Sport. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, PA: Mosby Elsevier; 2008. 2. Jones DC. Tendon disorders of the foot and ankle. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 1993; 1(2):87-94. 3. DiDomenico LA, Williams K, Petrolla AF. Spontaneous rupture of the anterior tibial tendon in a diabetic patient: results of operative treatment. J Foot Ankle Surg. 2008; 47(5):463-467. 91(2):325-332. 8. Stuart MJ. Traumatic disruption of the anterior tibial tendon while cross-country skiing: a case report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992; 281:193-194. 9. Geppert MJ, Sobel M, Hannafin JA. Microvasculature of the tibialis anterior tendon. Foot Ankle. 1993; 14(5):261-264. 10. Petersen W, Stein V, Bobka T. Structure of the human tibialis anterior tendon. J Anat. 2000; 197(pt 4):617-625. 4. Kashyap S, Prince R. Spontaneous rupture of the tibialis anterior tendon: a case report. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1987; 216:159-161. 11. Petersen W, Stein V, Tillmann B. Blood supply of the tibialis anterior tendon. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1999; 119(78):371-375. 5. Kausch T, Rutt J. Subcutaneous rupture of the tibialis anterior tendon: review of the literature and a case report. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1998; 117(45):290-293. 12.Ellington JK, McCormick J, Marion C, et al. Surgical outcome following tibialis anterior tendon repair. Foot Ankle Int. 2010; 31(5):412-417. 6. Patten A, Pun WK. Spontaneous rupture of the tibialis anterior tendon: a case report and literature review. Foot Ankle Int. 2000; 21(8):697-700. 7. Sammarco VJ, Sammarco GJ, Henning C, Chaim S. Surgical repair of acute and chronic tibialis anterior tendon ruptures. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009; 13.Gwynne-Jones D, Garneti N, Wyatt M. Closed tibialis anterior tendon rupture: a case series. Foot Ankle Int. 2009; 30(8):758-762. 14.Meyn MA Jr. Closed rupture of the anterior tibial tendon: a case report and review of the literature. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1975; 113:154-157. 15.Greenberg JA, Fernandez JJ, Wang T, Turner C. EndoButtonassisted repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2003; 12(5):484-490. 16. King J, Bollier M. Repair of distal biceps tendon ruptures using the EndoButton. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2008; 16(8):490-494. 17. Mazzocca AD, Burton KJ, Romeo AA, Santangelo S, Adams DA, Arciero RA. Biomechanical evaluation of 4 techniques of distal biceps brachii tendon repair. Am J Sports Med. 2007; 35(2):252-258. 18.Harris PA, Taylor R, Thielke R, Payne J, Gonzalez N, Conde JG. Research electronic data capture (REDCap): a metadata-driven methodology and workflow process for providing translational research informatics support. J Biomed Inform. 2009; 42(2):377-381. 19. Martin RL, Irrgang JJ, Burdett RG, Conti SF, Van Swearingen JM. Evidence of validity for the Foot and Ankle Ability Measure (FAAM). Foot Ankle Int. 2005; 26(11):968-983. 20. Otte S, Klinger HM, Lorenz F, Haerer T. Operative treatment in case of a closed rupture of the anterior tibial tendon. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2002; 122(3):188-190. Copyright © SLACK Incorporated