Field Experience and Student Teaching Handbook
Transcription
Field Experience and Student Teaching Handbook
Field Experience and Student Teaching Handbook www.iuk.edu/education Field Experience and Student Teaching Handbook School of Education Indiana University Kokomo March 2012 Table of Contents Welcome 4 I. School Policies a. Policy Statements 6 b. Criminal History Background Checks 8 c. Confidentiality, Utilization of E-mail, Special Needs Disclosure 9 d. Dress Code for Field Experience & Student Teaching 10 e. Completion Policy 11 f. Coursework Repetition Policy 12 g. Admission to Student Teaching 13 h. Grading Policy 14 i. Attendance & Absenteeism Policy 16 j. Extracurricular Activities 17 k. Extracurricular Activity Approval Form 18 l. CPR Policy 19 m. Universal Precautions Policy 20 n. TB Test Policy 21 o. Teacher Candidate Grievance/Appeal Policy 22 p. Student Teaching Removal Policy 23 II. Student Teaching Requirements a. Student Teaching Application 26 b. Praxis II Exam Completion Date Policy 33 III. Responsibilities a. Student Teacher Guidelines 35 b. Cooperating Teacher Guidelines 38 c. University Supervisor Guidelines 40 d. Director of Student Teaching Job Description 43 IV. Evaluation of the Student Teacher a. Metastandard Completion Instructions 47 b. Metastandard Evaluation 49 c. 81 Dispositions V. Other Relevant Policies a. IACTE Award Information 84 School of Education Welcome to Field Experiences and Student Teaching! Field experiences are very important and pervasive components of the Education program at IU Kokomo. All students eventually complete a series of continuous and ongoing experiences in early childhood settings, elementary classrooms and secondary classrooms--including observations, practicums and student teaching. The student teaching semester is the capstone of a student’s Teacher Education program. It is a full day, school-based semester that affords the student an opportunity to demonstrate teaching competence under the supervision of an experienced teacher (in cooperation with the School). It has been carefully designed to be as realistic and as intensive as actual teaching. We trust that all the field-based experiences the students participate in during their Teacher Education program will be very meaningful ones for them. School of Education Section I School Policies PolicyStatements Initial Teacher Education Program (TEP) Benchmark Meeting Review, Evaluation and Notification Policies/Protocols The purpose of initial TEP benchmark meetings is to review the performance and progress of all TEP candidates, where relevant knowledge, skills, and dispositions are concerned. Benchmark meetings also allow School of Education faculty to monitor candidate growth relative to the Indiana Teacher Education Standards, NCATE program standards, and INTASC principles which guide the initial TEP. Benchmark meetings also provide a vehicle for informing candidates of their program performance, progress and status. Additionally, benchmark meetings allow faculty to monitor, aggregate and analyze candidate performance data, to inform decisions regarding program level strengths, weaknesses, changes, improvements, etc. Benchmark meetings are convened and chaired by the School of Education’s Assistant Dean for Assessment and Accreditation. Benchmark meetings are convened at least once per semester. However, the Assistant Dean may convene as many additional benchmark meetings as faculty determine are needed throughout the academic and calendar years. It is the responsibility of the Assistant Dean to schedule and organize all initial TEP benchmark meetings. The Assistant Dean is responsible for soliciting from TEP faculty and advisors data related to candidate performance, and preparing that data (which will include, but is not limited to, Fitness for the Teaching Profession reports, transcripts, course specific performance issues, field evaluations, advising recommendations, PRAXIS exam scores and summaries, etc.) for discussion and action. At least once each semester, the performance and progress of each active initial TEP candidate will be reviewed during a benchmark meeting. As a result of that review, candidate program status is determined to be either: In Good Standing: The candidate has met all relevant TEP requirements, as outlined in the Meta Standards Rubric, Dispositional Criteria checklist, Program Planning Guides, and other TEP evaluation instruments. Candidates who remain in good standing may or may not be informed of their status in writing. Candidates whose program status changes as a result of a benchmark review will be informed of that change in writing. Not in Good Standing: The candidate has failed to meet one or more program requirements. Candidates judged not in good standing will be notified in writing of their status. This notification will include the reasons or issues which explain or caused this status; actions, requirements, remedial experiences, etc. which the candidate should undertake to address specific issues, weaknesses, etc.; and a reasonable and specific date by which these issues, etc. must be satisfactorily resolved. Candidates whose program status remains not in good standing for an extended period of time, or who demonstrate continuous lack of progress or poor performance, risk dismissal from the TEP. (See also TEP Coursework Repetition Policy.) Candidates who wish to appeal a benchmark review/decision may do so by contacting the Dean of the School of Education in writing. Approved November 2004; Revised July 2010 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Criminal History Background Checks Effective November 1, 2009, all students enrolled in any School of Education initial teacher education program (TEP) course, or pre-TEP course, are required to have a valid expanded criminal history background check on file, prior to participation in any field experience that includes direct or indirect contact with P-12 students. See the School of Education Student Policy Manual for the complete policy and instructions on how to obtain an expanded criminal history background check. Approved November 2009 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Background Check Letters for Student Teaching Applications Effective August 1, 2012, a student teacher candidate who has details on an Expanded Criminal Background Check (ECBC) must write and submit a letter explaining the circumstances that led to his/her arrest and the results of that arrest. The letter will be submitted to the Director of Student Teaching and will be kept in a student teacher’s official file in the School of Education Office. The Director of Student Teaching and the School of Education Office will not submit a student teacher candidate’s application to a school prior to the submission of this required letter. Approved July 2012 Confidentiality Under the Family Educational Right to Privacy Act (Buckley Amendment), P12 students have specific rights associated with confidentiality. Schools are obligated to safeguard those rights. In permitting practica students and student teachers entry into the classroom, host schools entrust the practica student and student teacher with some of the responsibility for safeguarding those rights. Therefore, it is imperative that all practica students and student teachers understand and appreciate the importance of maintaining student confidentiality. For this reason and for ethical reasons, any information which could be used to identify a student (including name, parent’s occupation, specific characteristics, uncommon disabilities, birth date, Social Security Number, relationship to individuals within the school or community, publicly known accomplishments or activities, etc.) must be carefully omitted in any conversation with anyone other than the cooperating teacher or principal. It is the responsibility of the practica student and student teacher to omit identifying information when participating in group discussions in practica related classes or the student teaching seminar or in any other conversational situations. Discussion of P12 students with friends and/or relatives is discouraged. Practica experiences involving specific students should not be discussed in public places where they may be overheard by someone who could glean information from the discussion (e.g., in restaurants, stores, etc). Student records must always be maintained with strict adherence to confidentiality guidelines. If access to student records is deemed appropriate by school representatives, student teachers must keep the information therein absolutely confidential. Any practica student or student teacher notes, journals, course work or other forms of documentation and data gathering must also maintain the confidentiality of the P12 students. Photocopies of student work, individualized educational programs (IEPs), etc., to be used by the practica student or student teacher for course related purposes must have all identifying information blacked out with a permanent black marker. Approved August 2006 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Utilization of Email The School of Education considers email to be an appropriate mechanism for official communication with IU students unless otherwise prohibited by law. In accordance with IU Kokomo policy (Use of Email as Official Correspondence with Students, dated 12 January 2004), School faculty and staff reserve the right to send official communications to students by email with the full expectation that students will receive, read, and respond to these email messages in a timely fashion. Approved August 2006 ____________________________________________________________________________________ Special Needs Disclosure Any student with a documented disability (e.g., physical, learning, psychiatric, vision, hearing, etc) who needs to arrange reasonable accommodations must contact (765-455-9390) and schedule an appointment with the Coordinator of Disabilities Services and meet with the instructor regarding the necessary accommodations. Verification of a disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act is required prior to accommodations being granted. All discussions will remain confidential. Approved August 2006 School of Education Dress Code for Field Experience & Student Teaching As a student and guest in a public school, you need to present a professional appearance in order to reflect your transition from college student to educator. When attending field experiences and student teaching, conservative dress helps you establish authority and professionalism. Your dress should reflect modesty and should not draw attention to you or distract students. Considering comfort and ease of movement is also important when choosing your clothes and shoes. To help you dress in your best interest, the following dress code has been developed: ___You are responsible for knowing and following your school district’s dress code. In addition to your district’s code, Indiana University Kokomo dress code requires professional dress. Our dress code is based on good judgment about clean clothes, neat hairstyles, and acceptable hygiene. If a difference in dress codes between your district’s code and the IU Kokomo School of Education code exists, follow the more conservative guidelines. If you are not sure about the acceptability of a garment, check with your instructor or university supervisor or don’t wear it. ___The following are prohibited for all students attending field experiences and student teaching: Jeans, t-shirts, tight fitting clothes or clothes which fit poorly and/or draw attention, visible undergarments, caps or hats indoors, tennis/athletic shoes, flip flops or sports sandals, piercings other than conservative earrings. Unusually colored hair may not be worn and all tattoos must be covered. ___These additional guidelines apply for women: Skirt and dress length should allow you to bend and move without undue exposure. Garments should not be so low, loose or tight that they are revealing. Your midriff should not be exposed. Tops and/or hip huggers that expose the waist, back or chest when bending or leaning are not allowed. You should not wear leggings, pantsuits of t-shirt material, nor crisscross or spaghetti straps. ___These additional guidelines apply for men: Shirts and pants should cover the waist, back, and chest. No tank tops will be allowed. Additional requirements, such as belt and/or tie, may be imposed at the discretion of the instructor. ___Consequences of inappropriate dress are severe. Students will be asked to return home and change, and the time missed will count as an absence from field experience or student teaching. A second offense will lead to automatic dismissal from the field experience or student teaching. ___If the school has casual dress on Fridays or for field trips, students may wear appropriately fitted school logo T-shirts (school of assignment or IU Kokomo T-shirts only) and casual clothes acceptable for the public school casual days. The other dress code guidelines still apply. ___Some schools may have more informal or casual dress. However, IU Kokomo students must follow the policy adopted by the IU Kokomo School of Education, as outlined in this policy. Approved September 8, 2010 School of Education Teacher Education Program (TEP) Completion Policy Students are expected to complete their program of study within seven years of the date of formal admission into the Teacher Education Program (TEP). Students who extend their programs beyond seven years will have their coursework evaluated to ensure current professional and university standards are being met. Effective 1/1/05 School of Education Course Repetition Policy: Teacher Education Program (TEP) Students pursuing initial teacher education licensure—in elementary or secondary education— at Indiana University Kokomo must complete a series of Education (EDUC) courses. Students must successfully complete all EDUC courses with a grade of C+ or higher. In the event a grade of C+ or higher is not received, students may be eligible to repeat the course. Students may repeat the same EDUC course only once and may repeat a total of only two EDUC courses throughout their program of study. Additionally, a student who withdraws from a course after the automatic grade of “W” published date for the semester and has not demonstrated satisfactory performance in that course is also subject to the course repetition policy. This course repetition policy applies to all EDUC courses, even if a student chooses to transfer to another program within the School of Education. Please note that Student Teaching is separate from this repetition policy (see Student Teaching Removal Policy in the Field Experience and Student Teaching Handbook). Revised October 2010 Approved May 2007 Admission to Student Teaching 1. Satisfactory completion of all previous Decision Points upon entry into Student Teaching with a minimum grade point average (GPA) of 2.50. 2. Letter of Good Standing entering Student Teaching. 3. Pass certification exam(s) prior to student teaching semester (Elementary majors must pass Elementary Exam(s); Secondary majors must pass exam(s)in content major(s); and Special Education majors and minors must pass Special Education certification exam prior to Student Teaching). 4. Completion of ALL Education classes with grade of C+ or better. 5. For Secondary majors, completion of all teaching major content courses prior to Student Teaching with grades of C or better and a GPA of at least 2.50 in the teaching major content area(s). 6. For Special Education majors, completion of all Core Academic Subject (CAS) courses prior to Student Teaching with grades of C or better and a GPA of at least 2.50 in the Core Academic Subject. ***Only exception to #5 is that Secondary majors must have all content courses completed prior to Student Teaching, but can appeal to have no more than two completed after Student Teaching. Adopted March 2012 School of Education GRADING POLICY FOR IU KOKOMO STUDENT TEACHING The Director of Student Teaching is the instructor of record and as such determines the final grade for student teaching. The grade for student teaching is either S (Satisfactory) or F (Failure). That grade is based on the final evaluations of the Cooperating Teacher and University Supervisor. Any discrepancies between the evaluations of the Cooperating Teacher and University Supervisor are reconciled by the Director of Student Teaching. It is our expectation that such discrepancies will be rare, given the communication expected between the Student Teacher, Cooperating Teacher, and the University Supervisor. During the student teaching experience, students should demonstrate a sustained pattern of Mastery Level performance (rating of 3) on the 7 meta-standards and rating of Acceptable for all four Dispositions in order to earn an S (Satisfactory) grade in the student teaching course. Failure to obtain this level of performance constitutes a Failure in the student teaching course and will be graded as an F. To assist in the developmental growth of Student Teachers, Cooperating Teachers, Student Teachers, and University Supervisors are required to use the METASTANDARDS FOR COMPETENCY IN THE FIELD PROTOCOL. The evaluation process is detailed as follows: Cooperating Teachers are required to complete the META-STANDARDS FOR COMPETENCY IN THE FIELD PROTOCOL at both the mid-term and the end of student teaching. It is our expectation that the Cooperating Teacher will conference with the Student Teacher about the quality of performance at mid-term and plan accordingly. Both forms will be submitted to the Director of Student Teaching. Student Teachers are required to complete the META-STANDARS FOR COMPETENCY IN THE FIELD PROTOCOL at both mid-term and the end of student teaching. University Supervisors are required to complete the META-STANDARDS FOR COMPETENCY IN THE FIELD PROTOCOL at the end of student teaching. That form will be submitted to the Director of Student Teaching. In the event that there are substantive discrepancies in the mid-term or final evaluations of the Cooperating Teacher and Student Teacher, the University Supervisor will mediate. Revised October 2011 Your feedback on the META-STANDARDS FOR COMPETENCY IN THE FIELD PROTOCOL is greatly appreciated. That feedback will be used to refine the protocol for future use. Revised October 2011 School of Education Policy Regarding Student Teaching Attendance & Absenteeism All students enrolled in School of Education Teacher Education Programs (TEP) are required to complete a minimum 16-week student teaching experience; i.e., the full IU Kokomo semester in which the student teaching occurs. Where K-6 and 5-12 TEP students are concerned, this typically will involve placement in one school, under the direct supervision of one licensed, full-time Cooperating Teacher. Where Middle School TEP students are concerned, this typically will involve two 8-week placements, one in each core content area in grades 5-9. Where Fine Arts: Visual Arts TEP students are concerned, there typically will be two 8-week placements, one in an elementary school setting (K-5) and one in a middle school or high school setting. It generally is expected that Student Teachers will be at their respective assigned schools for the full school day, each day that school is in session during the 8- or 16-week placement. The School recognizes that circumstances may occasionally require students to be absent from their assigned school/classroom, due to (e.g.,) illness, family emergencies, or other unforeseen events. It nonetheless is the policy of the School that all absences must be made up before final grades are submitted and credit hours awarded for the student teaching experience. When absences occur, they must be reported in a timely manner to the Student Teacher’s University Supervisor. Supervisors will maintain a record of Student Teacher absences, and forward that information to the Director of Student Teaching for review. The Director will inform students of the number of days (as well as any other requirements or expectations associated with those days) that must be made up/addressed to fully satisfy the requirements and expectations of the student teaching experience, and the timeframe in which those days and activities must be completed. In general, absences will be made up by adding days to the end of the placement in which they occur; absences which occur within the first of two 8-week placements may result in a delay or postponement of the second placement. When absenteeism requires placements to extend beyond the regular IU Kokomo semester, final grades for the student teaching experience will not be determined until all absences/performance issues have been made up/resolved. School of Education Policy Regarding Student Teaching & Extracurricular Activities The student teaching experience is considered the capstone of the School of Education Teacher Education Programs (TEP). The primary purpose of the student teaching experience is to provide TEP students the opportunity to refine and demonstrate classroom competence, and other related professional skills, under the direct supervision of experienced Cooperating Teachers and the School’s University Supervisors. Student Teachers also are expected to participate with their Cooperating Teachers in all related school-based, professional activities, such as faculty meetings, in-service sessions, parent conferences, etc., that occur during the student teaching experience. Where feasible, Student Teachers also are encouraged to participate in school-related extracurricular activities in which their Cooperating Teachers are directly involved (e.g., coaching athletic teams, tutoring, or serving as a sponsor of student clubs and organizations, etc.). Student Teachers also may occasionally be invited to participate in school-related extracurricular activities in which their Cooperating Teacher is not directly involved. It is the policy of the School that Student Teachers will be permitted to engage in these extracurricular activities only if: a) it is determined that the activity will not compromise the student’s ability to meet the primary purpose, expectations and requirements of the student teaching experience, and b) students do not accept any monetary compensation for their participation. Student Teachers who wish to participate in these types of school-related extracurricular activities must complete an Extracurricular Activity Approval form, which describes the activity they wish to engage in, the duration of the activity, and the amount of hours per week they intend to devote to that activity. The request form must be signed by both their Cooperating Teacher and the activity director/coach involved, who will verify the details and circumstances of the extracurricular activity. Student Teachers then must forward the signed request form to their University Supervisor for review and approval. Supervisors will forward a signed copy of the request form to the Director of Student Teaching when they have completed their review. Adopted April 2009; revised October 2011 School of Education Student Teaching Extracurricular Activity Approval Form Student Teachers who wish to participate in school-based extracurricular activities must complete this form and submit it to their Cooperating Teacher and University Supervisor for review and approval. Note that: a) this form pertains only to extracurricular activities in which the Cooperating Teacher is not involved, b) the activity must not interfere with or compromise the primary purpose, requirements and expectations of the student teaching experience, and c) Student Teachers are to receive no monetary compensation for their participation in the activity. Student Teacher Name _______________________________ School____________________________ Fall _____ Spring ______ Year _______ Briefly describe in the space below the nature of the extracurricular activity, including the specific role the Student Teacher will play, the duration of the activity, and the number of hours per week the Student Teacher will be required to dedicate to the activity. (To be completed by the activity director/coach.) _______________________________________ Activity Director Signature _____________ Date Approval by the Coordinating Teacher and University Supervisor indicates that the requested activity has been discussed and reviewed with the Student Teacher, and that both the teacher and supervisor have concluded that participation will not compromise the primary expectations and requirements of the student teaching experience. _____ Approved _____ Not approved _____ Approved _____ Not approved Comments: _______________________________________ Cooperating Teacher Signature _____________ Date _______________________________________ University Supervisor Signature _____________ Date School of Education CPR‐HeimlichManeuver‐AEDCertificationRequirement In accordance with Indiana Code 20-28-5-3(c), the School of Education requires all teacher candidates in each of the baccalaureate degree programs and other initial licensure programs to complete CPR-Heimlich Maneuver-AED training. ________________________________________________________________________ Indiana Code 20-28-5(c) http://www.doe.in.gov/educatorlicensing/cpr.html Per IC 20-28-5-3(c), applicants applying for an initial teaching license must have successfully completed training in: Cardiopulmonary resuscitation that includes a test demonstration on a mannequin, removing a foreign body causing an obstruction in an airway, and the Heimlich Maneuver; and beginning July 1, 2011, the use of an automated external defibrillator (AED); and hold a valid certification in each of these procedures from either the American Red Cross or the American Heart Association or other providers as approved by the department. An initial teaching license is the first license issued to an applicant, regardless of content area or setting. Beginning July 1, 2012, the requirements above must be met for all license and permit renewals. Substitute teacher permits and educational interpreter permits are exempt. CPR-Heimlich Maneuver training may be delivered primarily on-line, but it must include a “hands-on” training/demonstration component with a mannequin. Approved Providers American Heart Association American Red Cross American Safety & Health Institute MEDIC First Aid Emergency Care and Safety Institute CPR Solutions, Inc. Revised October 2011 School of Education Universal Precautions Universal Precautions/Bloodborne Pathogens Training will be required prior to beginning the Teacher Education Program (TEP). During the Teacher Education Program Orientation, you will receive instruction from a qualified medical practitioner on specific Universal Precautions procedures you must follow to protect yourself and the students you will interact with. Evidence of successfully completing the Universal Precautions training will be logged into the School of Education database. If you fail to attend the TEP Orientation, you must make your own arrangements for such training and then provide evidence of completing Universal Precautions Training before beginning any field experience. You will not be permitted to undertake any field experiences without such documentation being provided to the School of Education Office. School of Education TB Test Policy Elementary Education Majors and K-12 Fine Arts: Visual Arts Majors The School of Education requires all students in the Elementary Education program to maintain a negative TB test on file in the School of Education (SoE) Office prior to E335 (Benchmark 4) through the completion of E336 (Benchmark 5). (After fall semester 2012, the Elementary Education program will not require E336.) If a report is not on file or if a report is allowed to expire,* a teacher candidate will not be allowed entry into a childcare facility (birth-preschool age children) under the SoE’s auspices, and thus the candidate will not be able to satisfactorily complete the practicum requirement portion of an education course. Fine Arts: Visual Arts (K-12) students taking E335 must also comply with this policy. (After fall semester 2012, the Fine Arts: Visual Arts program will not require E335.) To meet this requirement, Elementary (K-6) students and Fine Arts (K-12) students taking E335 must provide a TB test report to the SoE Office according to the following guidelines: SEMESTER DEADLINE NOT PRIOR TO Fall (entering Benchmark 4) August 1 July 15 Spring (entering Benchmark 4) December 1 November 15 *The TB test is valid for a period of time not to exceed 12 months; therefore if E335 and E336 are completed within a 12-month period, only one TB test report is required when entering Benchmark 4. If E335 and E336 are not able to be completed within a 12-month period, however, an additional TB test is required at the start of Benchmark 5, in accordance with the respective semester deadlines above. Additional TB Testing In conjunction with Board of Health regulations, the following occurrences increase risk of TB. Therefore, any education student subject to the TB Testing Policy (as stated above) must resubmit a TB Test if the following applies within a 12-month period of the last TB Test placed on file with the SoE: * If you or a household member has worked or been present in a jail/prison * If you have traveled outside the United States * If you or someone you are living with has lived in a community shelter * If a member of your household, a guest to your home, babysitter, extended family member, or friend has tested positive for TB * If a member of your family has been born outside the US (e.g., international adoption) * If you or a member of your household has tested positive for HIV/AIDS * If you are a foster parent Students who have not complied with TB Testing Policy are not allowed to begin a field/practicum assignment or enter a childcare facility (birth-preschool) and therefore will not be able to satisfactorily complete the practicum requirement portion of an education course. Approved February 11, 2008; Revised November 2011 Effective May 1, 2008 School of Education TeacherCandidateGrievance/AppealPolicy If a teacher candidate in any of the initial teacher education programs in the School of Education believes his/her Benchmark evaluation is biased, inaccurate, or has been unfairly reviewed, he/she may request an appeal, in writing, with the Office of the Dean of Education within 30 days of receiving the Benchmark Letter. The Dean of Education will conduct a review and address the problem as the situation warrants. Students should also be aware that there is an Indiana University Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities, and Conduct [The Code: Code of Student Rights, Responsibilities, and Conduct: Indiana University]. Procedures for administering the Code at Indiana University Kokomo can be found at www.indiana.edu/~code/kokomo/index.shtml. Approved 12/03/07 School of Education Student Teaching Removal Policy Student teaching is the culminating learning experience in the professional education sequence required for teacher certification. The purpose of student teaching is to provide guided opportunities for students to practice in a clinical setting those theories learned and studied in the university classroom. Student Teachers must have opportunities to move with deliberate speed from passive observers of the instructional process to productive participants under the leadership of highly qualified Cooperating Teachers and University Supervisors. Since student teaching is a learning experience, Student Teachers must have opportunities to succeed without failure. As a safeguard for all parties involved in student teaching, especially the Student Teachers, the Teacher Education Admission and Retention (TEAR) Committee has been organized. The TEAR Committee makes recommendation to the Dean of Education on problem cases involving Student Teachers. 1. Teacher education students will be admitted to student teaching only if they have met the published admission criteria. (Benchmark VI) 2. Student Teachers will be assigned to Cooperating Teachers who meet the selection standards as determined by Indiana University Kokomo and cooperating school corporations. 3. Student Teachers will be supervised by qualified university faculty members/instructors/adjuncts. a. Approximately one visit every two weeks will be made by the University Supervisors for the purpose of working with each of the Student Teachers and the Cooperating Teachers to improve the Student Teachers’ opportunities to succeed. b. Topical seminars may be scheduled by the University Supervisor on a regular basis. Mandatory seminars are also scheduled by the Student Teaching Office. The schedule for those meetings will be distributed at the opening student teaching meeting. 4. If the placement is deemed inadequate, a student can be reassigned from a placement by the University Supervisor and Director of Student Teaching. If any party objects to this reassignment, no action will be taken without a TEAR Committee hearing. 5. Students who are removed from student teaching during the first three (3) weeks of the student teaching experience may apply for readmission to student teaching the next semester only after a TEAR Committee meeting and approved by the Dean of Education. Students can also be reassigned at this time if the Director of Student Teaching determines that a TEAR meeting is not needed. 6. After the first three (3) weeks when evidence exists which indicates interference with a student’s ability to complete student teaching successfully, the following procedures will be followed: a. The three primary parties (Student Teacher, Cooperating Teacher, and University Supervisor) will meet to identify the problem and to determine a solution. Since student teaching is a learning experience for the student, every effort should be made to develop a written plan which will encourage the student to attempt to improve and successfully complete student teaching. The written plan will be filed immediately with the Director of Student Teaching. b. If the problem cannot be solved or a solution determined, the Director of Student Teaching or his/her appointee will work cooperatively with any or all of the primary parties to verify the problem and/or reach a decision concerning the solution. Any such meeting will be documented and filed by the Director of Field Placement and the Associate Dean. c. If the problem cannot be resolved or if the Cooperating Teacher(s) and University Supervisor agree on termination or the school district terminates the experience, the Director of Student Teaching will have the option to refer the case to the Teacher Education Admission and Retention (TEAR) Committee. All parties involved in a case must provide written documentation of the case to the Teacher Education Admission and Retention Committee before committee members will act. (a) If the recommendation of the TEAR Committee and decision by the Dean of Education are to withdraw the Student Teacher, or not reassign the Student Teacher to another placement during the present semester, then a written set of conditions will be developed by the TEAR Committee immediately following the student’s withdrawal. The student must meet these conditions and the Director of Student Teaching must verify that these conditions were met prior to the reapplication for admission to student teaching. 7. Students who receive a grade of non-satisfactory for student teaching must show evidence that the problem which caused the grade of non-credit has been solved prior to reapplication for admission to student teaching. The TEAR Committee or appropriate University personnel will work with the student to develop a growth plan for improvement. Conditions set by the TEAR Committee must be met prior to the reapplication for student teaching. 8. A student removed from a student teaching location will not be reassigned to that location when redoing his/her student teaching. 9. A student can also be removed from the student teaching site by the cooperating school corporation for various reasons. Any further action concerning this student will not be made without the approval of the TEAR Committee. 10. A STUDENT WHO IS REMOVED OR RECEIVES NON-SATIFACTORY IN STUDENT TEACHING A SECOND TIME WILL NOT BE ABLE TO REAPPLY FOR STUDENT TEACHING AT INDIANA UNIVERSITY KOKOMO WITHOUT THE RECOMMENDATION OF THE TEAR COMMITTEE AND APPROVAL OF THE DEAN OF EDUCATION. Adopted September 2010 SCHOOL OF EDUCATION Section II Student Teaching Requirements STUDENT TEACHING APPLICATION INFORMATION AND INSTRUCTIONS ALL APPLICATIONS ARE DUE: NOVEMBER 15 Elementary Education and Secondary Education for the following Fall Semester MARCH 15 Elementary Education and Secondary Education for the following Spring Semester (Note: If the 15th falls on a Saturday or Sunday, the application is due the very next Monday.) APPLICATION DOCUMENTS You must provide a complete application packet of error-free materials. All materials must be in MS Word document (doc.) form. Applications are available on the IU Kokomo School of Education Web site at http://www.iuk.edu/academics/majors/education/resources/student_teaching.shtml. Your application will be considered incomplete without the following items: ______ Application - typed (completed and signed) ______ *Resume (2 copies) ______ *Reflections on Teaching Document (2 copies) *It is highly recommend that you consult with the Career Services Office to assist in resume preparation. Please update the School of Education Office with any changes such as name, address, phone, or email address. 1 September 19, 2012 INDIANA UNIVERSITY KOKOMO — REFLECTIONS ON TEACHING DOCUMENT Guidelines Create a MS Word document (.doc) which will serve as an introduction to a school official who will be processing your Student Teaching Packet of materials for placement. This document will be sent to the appropriate school official in the form you submit. No editing from the School of Education will be provided. However, we do encourage all candidates to use the Student Success Center for assistance. Therefore, this document must be error-free (i.e., contain proper grammar and correct spelling) and printed on plain paper. All applications received that are not complete and/or copy-ready will be returned. Sample Bold and center the heading. INDIANA UNIVERSITY KOKOMO SCHOOL OF EDUCATION REFLECTIONS ON TEACHING Type each of the following, left aligned, and bold the categories. Add your personal information in regular font (Times New Roman, 12 pt.). Full Name: Phone: IU Kokomo Email Address: Type the first writing prompt. On the next line begin your response. Leave a space and then type in the second prompt. Enter your response and continue in this manner until your response to the fifth prompt is completed. Most students complete this document within two to three pages. 1. Describe one of your experiences in working with children or youth and discuss its impact on your decision to become a teacher. 2. Describe an experience you had with an inspirational teacher and discuss the qualities that person possessed which you believe are essential for effective P - 12 teaching and student learning. 3. What specific strengths do you possess that will help you become a highly qualified and effective classroom teacher? 4. List personal skills, talents, special interests, or hobbies that might facilitate your contribution to the instructional or extra-curricular programs of a school. 5. Identify your favorite subject area and discuss why this subject is of interest to you. Be sure to include how your interest in this subject will translate into your teaching in the classroom and impact student learning. 2 September 19, 2012 INDIANA UNIVERSITY KOKOMO — STUDENT TEACHING APPLICATION FORM Last Name: First Name: Please check one: Miss: Mrs.: Address: Ms.: M.I. Mr. City: Home Phone: State: Zip: IU Kokomo E-Mail Address: Cell Phone: Indicate the semester and year in which you plan to student teach: ☐ Fall Semester 2013 ☐ Spring Semester 2014 Please check the program below in which you will be student teaching: ======================================================================================= ☐ ELEMENTARY K - 6 PROGRAM EDUC-M 425 Student Teaching: Elementary (Grades K - 6, depending on the organization of the school in which student teaching is completed ☐ ELEMENTARY K – 6 PROGRAM with SPECIAL EDUCATION MINOR EDUC-M 425 Student Teaching: Elementary (half term) EDUC-K 488 Supervised Teaching in Special Education (half term) ======================================================================================= ☐ SECONDARY 5 - 12 PROGRAM EDUC-M 480 Student Teaching: Secondary (Grades 5 - 12, depending on the organization of the school in which student teaching is completed) Check the teaching areas that apply to your program: English/Language Arts Mathematics ☐ ☐ Science (Check all that apply): Chemistry Earth/Space Life Science Physics Social Studies (Check all that apply) : Economics Government & Citizenship ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ Historical Perspectives Psychology Sociology ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ☐ ================================================================================ 1 September 19, 2012 ☐ SECONDARY 5 – 9 PROGRAM Early Adolescence (Middle School) Generalist EDUC-M 470 Student Teaching: Middle School (half-term - Content Area 1) EDUC-M 470 Student Teaching: Middle School (half-term - Content Area 2) Check the two teaching areas that apply to your program: ☐ English/Language Arts ☐ Social Studies ☐ Mathematics ☐ Science ============================================================================== ☐ SECONDARY P - 12 PROGRAM Fine Arts: Visual Arts You are required to student teach in an elementary setting and in a secondary setting. EDUC-M 425 Student Teaching: Elementary (half term) (Grades P - 6, depending on the organization of the school in which student teaching is completed) EDUC-M 480 Student Teaching Secondary (half term) (Grades 5 - 12, depending on the organization of the school in which student teaching is completed) INDIANA UNIVERSITY KOKOMO — STUDENT TEACHING POLICY STATEMENTS PLACEMENT OF STUDENT TEACHERS Students are placed in a public school within the State of Indiana selected by the School of Education with the cooperation of local school corporations. In addition, student teaching is permitted in private or parochial schools which are accredited by the State of Indiana. However, such placement is not automatic and must be justified by the student and agreed to by the Director of Student Teaching. Evidence of private/parochial school accreditation must be provided. Students must not contact classroom teachers or school corporations to which they may be assigned. Such contacts are the sole responsibility of the University. The final decision of student teaching placement will be made by the IU Kokomo School of Education. Teachers selected to supervise student teachers must meet the requirements specified in the agreement between Indiana University and participating school corporations. OBLIGATION TO MEET STUDENT TEACHING TIME COMMITMENT Student teachers are expected to become immersed in the culture of their school. That means student teachers must be able to meet all the obligations of their cooperating teacher and school community. Student teaching requires a fulltime commitment on the part of every student teacher. As a result, normally no other courses are taken during this period of time. In addition, student teachers are discouraged from holding full-time or part-time, evening or weekend jobs, as these added demands will cut into time that should be spent planning and preparing lessons and materials and will diminish opportunities for involvement in after-school meetings and extra-curricular activities. Participation in education activities of the school in which a student teacher is assigned is regarded as an integral part of the student teaching experience and not as either optional or supplemental. Conflicts between work, family, and student teaching must be resolved so that all of your student teaching obligations are met. Conflicts that cannot be resolved may result in unsatisfactory student teaching performance. CONFIDENTIALITY Under the Family Educational Right to Privacy Act (Buckley Amendment), P-12 students have specific rights associated with confidentiality. Schools are obligated to safeguard those rights. In permitting student teachers entry into the classroom, cooperating schools entrust the student teacher with some of the responsibility for safeguarding those rights. Therefore, it is imperative that all student teachers understand and appreciate the importance of 2 September 19, 2012 maintaining student confidentiality. For this reason and for ethical reasons, any information which could be used to identify a student (including name, parent’s occupation, specific characteristics, uncommon disabilities, birth date, Social Security Number, relationship to individuals within the school or community, publicly known accomplishments or activities, etc.) must be carefully omitted in any conversation with anyone other than the cooperating teacher or principal. It is the responsibility of the student teacher to omit identifying information when participating in group discussions in the student teaching seminar or in any other conversational situations. Discussion of P-12 students with friends and/or relatives is discouraged. Student teaching experiences involving specific P-12 students should not be discussed in public places where they may be overheard by someone who could glean information from the discussion (e.g., in restaurants, stores, etc.). Student records must always be maintained with strict adherence to confidentiality guidelines. If access to student records is deemed appropriate by school representatives, student teachers must keep the information therein absolutely confidential. Any student teacher notes, journals, course work or other forms of documentation and data gathering must also maintain the confidentiality of the P-12 students. Photocopies of student work, individualized educational programs (IEPs), etc., to be used by the student teacher for course related purposes must have all identifying information blacked out with a permanent black marker. CONFLICT OF INTEREST An effective evaluation of your student teaching performance requires objectivity and neutrality. A Conflict of Interest arises from a personal connection with an individual Cooperating School, Cooperating Teacher or Cooperating School Corporation which can adversely affect objectivity and neutrality. A Conflict of Interest exists between you and a Cooperating Teacher if he or she is a relative, a former teacher, or if you know him or her personally before the inception of your Student Teaching experience. A Conflict of Interest exists between you and an individual Cooperating School if you have attended that school within the past ten (10) years or if you have a close relative who is an administrator or faculty member in that particular school. It is also a Conflict of Interest if you have children, siblings or other close family members attending the individual Cooperating School you are assigned to. You are required to list all schools in all school corporations in Indiana University Kokomo’s Center for Educational Partnership in which a potential Conflict of Interest may exist. ======================================================================================== Please list all corporations where a potential conflict of interest exists: Corporation Nature of Conflict Corporation Nature of Conflict Corporation Nature of Conflict Corporation Nature of Conflict 3 September 19, 2012 CRIMINAL HISTORY BACKGROUND CHECK All school corporations require student teachers to provide evidence of an expanded criminal history check. The student must comply with whatever process the school corporation requires for its student teachers. However, if a student has obtained an expanded criminal background check within five years of student teaching, the student might want to ask the assigned school corporation if a copy of that expanded criminal background check is sufficient. Students with a criminal record are advised that many school corporations, who will have access to all relevant criminal history information prior to placement, may not accept them for student teaching with such a record. The Director of Student Teaching will discuss the seriousness of any criminal charge(s) or other details on a student’s record with him/her. A student who cannot be placed in student teaching due to the seriousness of the charge(s) or conviction(s) listed on his/her background check will be unable to complete the program and will be advised to consider other degree programs and options. ======================================================================================== Have you ever been investigated for, charged with, or pleaded guilty or “no contest” to any crime involving the sexual misconduct or abuse of any person or indecency with a minor? ☐ Yes ☐ No Have you ever been convicted of a felony? ☐ Yes ☐ No Have you ever been charged with a crime, other than a minor traffic offense, where the court has deferred further proceedings without entering a finding of guilt and instead placed you on probation or in a public service or education program or assessed a fine or fee? ☐ Yes ☐ No Have you ever pleaded guilty, been convicted of, or otherwise been found in violation of the law by a court for any matter other than a minor traffic violation? ☐ Yes ☐ No If you are now working, is your conduct as an employee or the quality of your work the focus of any investigation by your current employer? ☐ Yes ☐ No Effective August 1, 2012, a student teacher candidate who has details on an Expanded Criminal Background Check (ECBC) must write and submit a letter explaining the circumstances that led to his/her arrest and the results of that arrest. The letter will be submitted to the Director of Student Teaching and will be kept in a student teacher’s official file in the School of Education Office. The Director of Student Teaching and the School of Education Office will not submit a student teacher candidate’s application to a school prior to the submission of this required letter. After reviewing current requirements and policy for student teaching at IU Kokomo, I hereby certify that the above information is, to the best of my knowledge, true, accurate, and complete, and will be updated as needed. All updates to the information provided on this application must be submitted to the Director of Student Teaching immediately. Any falsification of this information or failure to provide updated information about potential conflicts of interest or changes in criminal history may be sufficient cause for disqualification or administrative withdrawal from student teaching and dismissal from the Teacher Education Program. I am requesting permission to complete student teaching, based upon my belief that I will have met all such requirements prior to the student teaching semester requested, and based upon my willingness and commitment to adhere to all School of Education Student Teaching Policy Statements during my student teaching semester. I give permission for IU Kokomo to disclose information concerning my academic preparation (to include transcripts and criminal history records) and eligibility for student teaching to officials in prospective schools in which I may be assigned for student teaching. Applicant’s Signature Date 4 September 19, 2012 Indiana University Kokomo Center for Educational Partnership Clusters of School Corporations Cluster #1 Cluster #2 Cluster #3 Cluster #4 Cluster #5 Cluster #6 Cluster #7 Cluster #8 Cluster #9 Cluster #10 Sheridan; Tipton; Westfield Washington Clinton Central; Tri-Central; Western Clinton Prairie; Frankfort; Tippecanoe County Carroll; Rossville Logansport; Pioneer; Southeastern (Lewis Cass) Caston; North Miami; Rochester Peru; Wabash City Kokomo; Maconaquah; Northwestern Eastern Howard; Oak Hill; Taylor Overseas/American Indian Reservation SCHOOL PREFERENCES List three clusters where you prefer to student teach, and in which you do not have any potential conflict of interest. Although there is no guarantee that you will be placed in one of the clusters you identify, every effort will be made to place you within a 50-mile radius of your home, in a school corporation that participates in the IU Kokomo Center for Education Partnership. (See list of clusters on last page.) NOTE: Due to increased applications and competition from other campuses and universities, you will be expected to student teach where placements are available, regardless of your preferences. Cluster # Cluster # Cluster # Student Name (type) Student IU ID Number ============================================================================ Education Office Use Only Received by: ___________________________________________ Date: ____________September 19, 2012 5 6 September 19, 2012 School of Education Student Teaching Eligibility – Praxis II Policy Statement Note: After September 1, 2013, TEP candidates will take the Pearson Content and Pedagogy exams for licensure. Candidates may take Praxis II until August 31, 2013. A passing score on the relevant Praxis II test(s) is one of the requirements for a student to be eligible for student teaching. Teacher candidates planning to student teach must have passed Praxis II and have score(s) verified by December 15 for the Spring Semester and by July 20 for Fall Semester. The School of Education at IU Kokomo does not receive official score reports until 3 to 4 weeks after the testing date. Please check the Praxis Web site (www.ets.org/praxis) for exam dates/locations and all other information pertaining to Praxis exams. Approved 12-3-07; Revised 10-14-10; 11-18-11; 06-25-12 SCHOOL OF EDUCATION Section III Responsibilities School of Education STUDENT TEACHER GUIDELINES Student Teaching is the capstone experience for all teacher certification candidates in the Teacher Education Program (TEP). It gives the pre-service intern an opportunity to demonstrate teaching competence under the guidance of an experienced Cooperating Teacher(s) and an IU Kokomo University Supervisor. The following information is meant to assist you, our Student Teachers, in this endeavor. Please become very familiar with the content of this handout: 1. Prior to the start of Student Teaching, you need to contact your Cooperating Teacher(s). It is expected that you will maintain regular contact with your Cooperating Teacher(s), so that you receive pertinent and detailed information about teaching responsibilities, rules and procedures. This information should include expectations regarding: content and pedagogical requirements, classroom management, lesson planning, grading policies, technology resources, school meeting schedules and extra-curricular opportunities. A Student Teacher Initial Meeting Checklist has been included in your Student Teaching Packet and is also available in the Field Experience and Student Teaching Handbook at the School of Education website. 2. During the first week, you will work out a schedule with your Cooperating Teacher (in consultation with the University Supervisor) indicating when classes/subjects will be turned over to you. Lesson planning needs to be reviewed by the Cooperating Teacher prior to implementation and instruction, making sure appropriate objectives, assessments and standards are included and will be covered. Student Teaching will begin with Stage 1--a twoweek phase-in process involving school orientation and observation. Next is Stage 2--a twelveweek phase devoted to classroom instruction, full participation and observation. Finally, you will conclude with Stage 3--a two-week transition phase devoted to more observation and reflection on your professional development. This, of course, is modified for the Middle School and K-12 Fine Arts eight-week placements. 3. Make sure that outside time constraints do not interfere with student teaching, which needs to be your top priority. These constraints include working part-time paid positions, taking other classes (permission is needed in order for a student teacher to take a class during student teaching), and personal matters. 4. The key to successful teaching is organization, time management, flexibility and professionalism. Be prepared for class every period, knowing how you are going to help students learn the material and how you are going to encourage that process. Never be late for school, class, bus duty or any other assignment. Be ready to adjust your plans due to class interruptions, bad weather and other unforeseen circumstances. Always be professional in dress, speech and the way you present yourself to your students, other faculty members, the administration and the public. This may open doors for future job opportunities. Revised November 2011 5. Your primary contact with the School of Education during the student teaching semester is the University Supervisor. You will meet your assigned University Supervisor during the Student Teaching Orientation meeting (early to mid-August for fall student teachers and midDecember to early January for spring Student Teachers). 6. The University Supervisor will have an introductory meeting with the Cooperating Teacher and you early in the semester. After this meeting, he/she will make a number of visits/observations/evaluations (announced or un-announced). You need to inform your University Supervisor promptly of your teaching schedules, prep times, testing dates, when school is not in session and the like. You need to maintain regular contact with your University Supervisor, especially if an issue(s) arises during the semester. 7. You are expected by the conclusion of your experience to perform at a level of Mastery (rating of 3 or higher) on all seven metastandards in the “Metastandards for Competency in the Field” rubric on the final evaluation. Also, acceptable ratings on the four Disposition areas are needed, too, at the end of the semester. Satisfactory completion of these two areas normally will result in a Student Teaching grade of “S” (grading in Student Teaching is either “S” or “F”). Please familiarize yourself with the online metastandard rubric. 8. Student Teachers, Cooperating Teachers and University Supervisors will all submit a midsemester evaluation. Student Teachers, Cooperating Teachers and University Supervisors will all submit a final evaluation. The evaluations will be submitted electronically and can be found on the School of Education’s website: for elementary (K-6) and for secondary (5-12). Please familiarize yourself with the rubric. 9. When you complete Stage 2 and are phasing out, you should observe other teachers and classrooms (within the school corporation to which you are assigned) and continue to help your Cooperating Teacher(s) in any way you can. The last day of the student teaching semester is the last day of the IU Kokomo semester unless time has been added to your student teaching assignment due to absences. 10. If you want to provide copies of your evaluations to anyone outside of the School of Education, you will need to make copies of those evaluations. The School of Education office and the Director of Student Teaching will not provide those to anyone outside of the program. 11. You are expected to meet all the requirements and professional dispositions in the Student Teaching Seminar (a C+ or better is needed in the M440 seminar). 12. Application information for the IACTE Outstanding Future Educator Award is available in the Field Experience and Student Teaching Handbook. The deadline for fall Student Teachers is the 3rd Monday in October and the 1st Monday in March for spring Student Teachers. You are encouraged to apply for this award upon recommendation of the Cooperating Teacher and University Supervisor if you have demonstrated exemplary work. Finally, the School of Education’s faculty and staff trust that the Student Teaching Semester will be a very rewarding experience preparing you for a professional career in education. Revised November 2011 School of Education STUDENT TEACHER INITIAL MEETING CHECKLIST This is the basic information a Student Teacher should obtain from their Cooperating Teacher(s) in their first meeting prior to the start of Student Teaching. Much of this may be covered in the Cooperating School’s Faculty and/or Student Handbooks. Remember once you start your student teaching experience, you are a member of the Cooperating School’s faculty and are required to follow all of their guidelines and policies, unless exempted by the IUK School of Education or the Cooperating School’s administration. _____ School Calendar _____ Class Curriculum Including the Textbooks for the Courses You will be Teaching _____ Student Discipline Code _____ Faculty Dress Code _____ Available Technology for Class Use _____ Extra Duties that are Required (bus duty, faculty meetings, etc.) _____ Faculty Parking _____ Student Health Guidelines (School Nurse) _____ Guidance Policies _____ Photocopying Process and Policies _____ Class and Bell Schedule _____ Grading Policy and Recording System _____ Policy for Student Teacher Communication with Parents _____ Internet and Email Policies _____ Emergency Policies (Fire, Tornado, Weather “Snow” Emergency, etc.) _____ Lesson Plan Submission Policy (some schools require posting on a school website or submitting lesson plans to an administrator) _____ Teacher Illness Policy (whom do you contact, when and where your lesson plans should be located) _____ Extra-Curricular Opportunities _____ Other Faculty Rules, Responsibilities and Regulations Revised November 2011 School of Education COOPERATING TEACHER GUIDELINES The COOPERATING TEACHER assumes an important set of responsibilities in creating and sustaining a professional setting for student teachers. S/he plays an important role in making the student teaching experience a successful and satisfying one for the teacher candidate. To that end, the COOPERATING TEACHER gives instruction and guidance to move our teacher candidates from novice to skillful-level beginning teachers. By modeling effective practice, overseeing student teacher activities, and creating a collegial environment for candid assessment of progress, the Student Teacher can meet program requirements. The COOPERATING TEACHER is responsible for the following: 1. Prepare the classroom for the Student Teacher’s arrival with a designated space, introduce the Student Teacher to the class in such a way that her/his importance is established, introduce the Student Teacher to all personnel, and orient the Student Teacher to school and/or corporation policies, facilities, equipment, activities, etc. 2. Provide the Student Teacher with copies of all student and teacher handbooks, manuals, guidelines, relevant written documents, textbooks, cooperating materials, and schedules. Invite the Student Teacher to attend all meetings related to classroom duties, including faculty meetings, parent conferences, in-service workshops, etc. 3. Approach the first week as one of observation and participation. Assist the Student Teacher in her/his focus on instruction (techniques, questions, presentation styles, wait-time, etc.) and classroom management policies and practices. Discuss the Student Teacher’s observations in relation to goals and objectives. Activities appropriate for this period are working with individual students, small group activities, teaching the whole class with a pre-planned curriculum, preparing lesson plans, and assisting in team teaching with the cooperating teacher. This process may be shortened for Student Teachers who have been previously observed in the classroom. IU Kokomo students have considerable field experience prior to student teaching and should be prepared to move expeditiously into full-time teaching. 4. Arrange a schedule for the Student Teacher’s assumption of teaching responsibilities at the end of the first week. Often a single class subject or single activity is assigned for the morning and another for the afternoon. Develop the teaching sequence from single responsibilities to full instruction. Prior to teaching the first two lessons in each subject area, the Student Teacher should submit a detailed lesson plan for your review and critique. Lesson plans should include objectives, standards, materials, procedures, assessments, and other components required by the Cooperating Teacher. After receiving those initial, formal written lesson plans, determine the detail required for future instruction. continued on reverse side 5. Regularly review and critique the Student Teacher to ensure continued professional development (minimum of once a week). Time should be set aside to ensure continued dialogue between the COOPERATING TEACHER and Student Teacher about the quality of instruction, classroom management, interpersonal interactions between student teacher and students, and other professional requirements and expectations. 6. Monitor the Student Teacher’s progress in completing M440 Student Teaching Seminar requirements and make arrangements for attendance at the campus sessions. Seminar materials will be provided. Normally, there are four of these per semester (full-day sessions, held on Fridays). 7. Ensure that Indiana licensing requirements for full-time instructional responsibility are met. Student Teachers must complete a minimum of 35 days of full-time teaching (18 days of fulltime teaching for eight-week placements). 8. Contact the IU Kokomo University Supervisor for any issues that arise that may impact the quality of performance expected. 9. Make arrangements for the Student Teacher to continue working in your classroom, visit other classrooms, or engage in educational activities once their full-time teaching is completed. The Student Teacher is required to be in the classroom/school until the end of the placement (the last day of IU Kokomo’s fall or spring semester). 10. Complete mid-term and final evaluations utilizing the online “Metastandards for Competency in the Field” rubric. They must be submitted electronically. A rating of 3 (Mastery Level) on all seven metastandards in the “Metastandards for Competency in the Field” rubric—coupled with a rating of Acceptable for all four Professional Dispositions—is expected for students to successfully complete student teaching. Please meet deadlines, so grades can be finalized (information will be provided in regards to dates, etc.). 11. Encourage any Student Teacher who is performing at the exemplary level (ratings of 4) to apply for the Indiana Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (IACTE) Outstanding Future Educator Award. Guidelines and due date will be provided. We are available to assist you in making student teaching a successful and satisfying professional experience for all participants. Do not hesitate to contact us, at the following, should you require such assistance. Contact information is provided below: D. Andrew Robertson Director of Student and Field Experience danarobe@iuk.edu 765-455-9260 Fax 765-455-9503 Barbara Amos Secretary/Data Manager baamos@iuk.edu 765-455-9286 Fax 765-455-9503 Revised: October 2011 School of Education UNIVERSITY SUPERVISOR GUIDELINES The UNIVERSITY SUPERVISOR is a member of the School of Education who assumes responsibility for the supervision of student teaching activities. You work as a liaison between the Director of Student Teaching and the schools. Your responsibilities are as follows: 1. Visit cooperating schools frequently enough to provide assistance as needed, keeping abreast of any problems that may develop. Be sure to let the Student Teacher and Cooperating Teacher know how to reach you. The Student Teacher should provide you with a schedule of when he/she will be teaching, including days when the school is testing or not in session. 2. The initial pre-formal visit, to introduce yourself to the Cooperating Teacher and principal should be made within the first two weeks of the placement. The expectation is that the University Supervisor will make four to six formal visits (observing, conferencing, etc.) over the course of a sixteen-week placement (more, if need be). The Cooperating Teacher could be invited to participate in any of the Student Teacher/University Supervisor conferences. Set time aside to meet with the Cooperating Teacher to discuss teaching progress. 3. Evaluate observed lessons and provide the Student Teacher with 1) feedback and 2) a copy of the observation form. The “Metastandards for Competency in the Field” rubric is used for mid-term and final evaluations. Complete that form for each placement and submit it to the Director of Student Teaching by the deadline provided. Keep the Director of Student Teaching informed of the progress made by individual students and report any problems that occur. Student Teachers are expected to achieve the level of Mastery with ratings of 3 in all seven Metastandards (by the end of the assignment). 4. Make sure Student Teachers are in charge of their Coordinating Teachers’ full class schedule for at least 35 days (but should have well over 40 days of being in charge). After completion of the full-time teaching phase, student teachers are expected to remain in the classroom assisting and learning. Opportunities to observe other programs within the corporation are encouraged. Student Teachers should not be taking time off for other professional activities. 5. Create opportunities for communication from each Student Teacher for each full week of student teaching (by visits and e-mails); other arrangements may be made. Additionally, you may schedule cohort sessions with your Student Teachers, so that they may come together and discuss their experiences. continued on reverse side 6. Encourage Student Teachers who are demonstrating exemplary performance with ratings of 4 on the rubric to apply for the IACTE Outstanding Future Educator Award. Guidelines are appended. 7. Remind student teachers to meet all Student Teaching Seminar deadlines and requirements. You are invited to attend those sessions. 8. Submit your final evaluation(s), mileage records, and supervisory log to the Director of Student Teaching by the deadline required. Be sure to sign off on the “Documentation of Student Teaching” form that each Cooperating Teacher has. 9. Attend University Supervisor meetings prior to and during the semester. D. Andrew Robertson Director of Student Teaching and Field Experience danarobe@iuk.edu 765-455-9260 Fax: 765-455-9503 Revised: October 2011 Additional Information Pertaining to the Mid-Semester and End-of-the Semester Evaluations (and miscellaneous items) It is obvious that communication (with the Cooperating Teachers and Student Teachers) is a key during the student teaching semester. Listed here are a few thoughts and ideas as reminders (I am sure University Supervisors are already doing most of these): 1. Conference with the Student Teacher after an observation (if at all possible). 2. Conference with the Cooperating Teacher (on a regular basis) regarding progress and/or concerns. 3. Some Cooperating Teachers may not be forthcoming with information in the meetings with the University Supervisors. If, after asking some questions and not receiving fairly solid answers, the response might need to be, “Then I will assume that everything is going well for ______ in all of his/her areas and will note this in my report.” 4. The mid-semester evaluation is a collaborative effort between the Cooperating Teacher and the University Supervisor (which should basically eliminate any surprises at evaluation times). 5. The Cooperating Teacher and the University Supervisor, together, decide when they feel the Student Teacher should go ‘solo’ in the classroom, and they can also discuss the ‘ Cooperating Teacher out of the room’ area as well. Director of Student Teaching and Field Experience (Director of Clinical Experiences) The Director of Student Teaching and Field Experience will be responsible for all aspects of clinical experiences for teacher candidates (student teaching, practicum placements, and field experiences). The individual will work with public schools to develop internship sites; recruit, interview, supervise and support university supervisors; aggregate/disaggregate and report clinical experience data; work closely with School of Education Dean, faculty, and Center for Educational Partnership to develop the highest quality clinical experiences for teacher candidates. Responsibilities (include but not limited to) Coordinate and/or conduct all aspects of the student teaching placement process, including development of placements, assignment of university supervisors. and orientation of both students and supervisors. Counsel and mediate with student teachers, university supervisors, cooperating teachers regarding problems that arise during student teaching. Design, develop, attend, and supervise student teaching seminars. Update all student teaching information (including Field Experience and Student Teaching Handbook) and forms related to student teaching in compliance with the Department of Education Teacher Licensure Programs. Supervise university supervisors, students, and administrative assistant. Recruit, interview, and recommend university supervisors for hire to the Dean. Work with faculty to develop and coordinate field experience placements in concert with the Center for Educational Partnership. Prepare, conduct, and aggregate evaluations of the following: cooperating teachers, placement sites, and university supervisors. Verify teacher supervision of student teachers and field experience interns at the conclusion of each semester for the awarding of Professional Growth Points (PGP’s) in accordance with Indiana Department of Education policy. Conduct follow-up surveys of program completers and graduates. Assist in all phases of the School of Education re-accreditation processes related to clinical practice and be directly responsible for writing and follow-up on NCATE Standard 3 and its requirements during the accreditation approval site visit. Coordinate placement of students and oversee all clinical field experiences (pre-student teaching) each semester. Perform often related duties (i.e., teaching, supervision, etc.) as Dean of the School of Education may assign. Teach pre-professional undergraduate classes, courses/supervision (20-25% load per semester). Other duties assigned at the discretion of the Dean of Education. Revised January 2012 Coordination of Student Teaching Establish deadlines with School approval for application to student teaching. Review applications with School advisors to ensure application requirements and standards are met. This process is completed each semester. Organize and send out applications to school corporations for fall and spring semesters of the student teaching academic year. Continue to send out applications until all placements are approved by school corporations. Notify students of their placements, in a timely fashion, so that contacts with classroom teachers can be made. Make adjustments in placements when academic standards are not met, students withdraw from student teaching, or placements change in the corporation. Visit classrooms and/or assign an individual to observe and evaluate student teachers whose performance is below standards. Meet with the supervisor, cooperating teacher, student teacher, and building principal to resolve student teaching problems, make adjustments in the placement, and or refer unresolved issue to TEAR Committee. Schedule a student teacher orientation each semester to review assessment expectations, Student Teaching Seminar expectations, and student teaching policies and practices. Arrange for supervisors to meet with their student teachers during the orientation session. Assist in maintaining the student teaching database with the School staff to ensure accuracy in student teaching placements and to efficiently communicate placement requests. Maintain online contact with student teachers and student teacher applicants across the semesters from application to completion of student teaching. Oversee Student Teaching Performance Review mid-term evaluations from cooperating teachers, student teachers, and feedback from supervisors to determine status of student teacher performance. Contact supervisors when performance is not at the level of mastery expected in the Competency in the Field Rubric. Chair the selection process for the IACTE Future Educator Award for each semester and present the Committee recommendation to the School for their approval. Attend Benchmark meetings Review the final evaluations of supervisors, student teachers, and cooperating teachers to determine the final grade for each placement. Submit final grades for student teachers to the registrar. Supervise Indiana University Kokomo Student Teaching University Supervisors Recruit, interview, and recommend student teaching supervisors to the Dean based on materials to include: résumé, three letters of recommendation, official transcripts, and letter of interest. Schedule an orientation for supervisors at the start of each semester to review policies and practices, solicit input for program changes, and to discuss supervision issues and concerns. Schedule follow-up sessions as needed. Revised January 2012 Collaborate with staff to maintain a student teaching database on participating teachers to ensure accurate documentation of placements and compensation for supervision. Provide Leadership in the Development of the Student Teaching Component of the Teacher Education Programs Collect, analyze, and present assessment data from student teaching from classroom teachers, student teacher competency in the field outcomes as judged by student teachers, cooperating teachers, and supervisors for the School. Submit recommendations to improve student teaching to the School Dean to guide improvement, such as development of the Student Teaching Seminar, competency in the field protocols, guidelines for selecting outstanding student teachers for the IACTE Future Educator Award, and development of school/university partnerships. Develop, implement, and review policies and practices in student teaching for School Dean approval. Attend meetings of the Field Directors Forum of state-wide directors of student teachers and field placements to guide campus policies and practices. Maintain student teaching files of director activities. Revised January 2012 SCHOOL OF EDUCATION Section IV Evaluation of Student Teacher Instructions for Accessing and Completing the Metastandard Rubric Evaluation Online Submission Forms Elementary (K-6) Metastandards Online submission form is located on the Elementary Education Web page at http://www.iuk.edu/academics/majors/education/majors-minors-programs/elementaryeducation/index.shtml Secondary (5-12) Metastandards Online submission form is located on the Secondary Education Web page at http://www.iuk.edu/academics/majors/education/majors-minors-programs/secondaryeducation/index.shtml Scroll down the page to Student Teacher and Practicum Evaluation Forms. Click on Online Submission Form. You will be asked for a User name and Password. The User name is teacher. The Password is rubric. It is important that you DO NOT select either the “enter” key or the “back” button when completing this form. If this does occur, it may render the form invalid and will require that you start over. However, the “tab” button may be used with no problem. As you tab or scroll through the document, the window should continue to move down the form. Please fill out all the information for the Course Instructor or University Supervisor you are working with at IU Kokomo. If you are working directly with a Student Teacher (as opposed to a student doing a practicum or field experience for a course), you will need to have the name and e-mail address of the University Supervisor with whom you are working. If you are the University Supervisor, leave that section blank and fill in your name under “Please identify yourself.” Coorperating Classroom Teachers: When you complete the form, make sure your e-mail address is complete in order to receive a copy of this transcript via the e-mail address you submit here. Course Instructors should give Cooperating Classroom Teachers the information about the course number and benchmark number for the students in the class. 1 The benchmark for Student Teachers is 6. The course number for elementary student teachers is M425. The course number for secondary student teachers is M480. The course number for middle school (secondary) teachers is M470. The Professional Dispositions Rubric on this form may be ignored because the rubric has changed. A separate form for the Dispositions Rubric will be given to you to complete. There is a section at the end for written comments you may wish to make about the student. When you have completed this form, you must click the Submit button. When you receive a confirmation page, your form is complete. It may take a few minutes to receive your e-mail message. 2 Division of Education – Indiana University Kokomo Metastandards Rubric Early Childhood (P3) Initial Teacher Education Program Metastandard #1 Child Development and Learning Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Proficient (Application) Proficiency Candidate know and understand how children learn and develop and also that children differ in their development and approaches to learning. Candidate demonstrates and practice theoretically based teaching and learning strategies to promote cognitive growth and development of all children. Objective Candidate will be able to recognize and discuss the major concepts, principles, theories, and research related to the development of children Candidate will be able to practice theoretically grounded and researchbased teaching and learning strategies with their peers Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate use educational learning theories to plan developmentally appropriate curricula and create learning environments that promote positive social engagement and selfmotivation. Candidate will be able to create developmentally appropriate curricula and implement with all children sound theorybased instructional strategies Candidate determines the effectiveness of various theoretically based teaching and learning strategies for all children. Candidate will be able to evaluate the effectiveness of theoretically based teaching and learning strategies through action research. Components 1.1 Knowledge of major development theories and theorists across all domains (physical, cognitive, social, emotional, language, aesthetic) 1.2 Knowledge of developmental behaviors and needs across the early childhood lifespan. Candidate identifies the core domain developmental theories and theorists in the field Candidate shows adequate understanding of the major domain development theories and theorists in the field Candidate classifies major domain development theories and theorists in the field Candidate critiques major domain development theories and theorists and their contribution to the field Candidate identifies typical developmental behaviors and the needs of children Candidate compares and contrasts developmental behaviors and needs across the early childhood and middle childhood lifespan Candidate evaluates child development behaviors and needs across the early childhood age span 1.3 Knowledge of the multiple influences on children’s development and behavior (e.g., culture, language, economic Candidate defines the myriad influences on children’s development and behavior Candidate employs appropriate knowledge of developmental behaviors and needs across the early childhood and middle childhood lifespan Candidate demonstrates adequate familiarity with the various influences on children’s development and behavior Candidate analyzes the various influences on children’s development and behavior. Candidate debates the myriad influences that interact to affect child development and behavior. conditions, disabilities, health) 1.4 Knowledge of early intervention and related programs that support and improve children’s development 1.5 Ability to apply child development knowledge to create healthy learning environments for all children Candidate explains and describes how early intervention can affect a child’s social, emotional, cognitive, physical and linguistic development Candidate identifies the importance of healthy learning environments in promoting a child’s social, emotional, cognitive, physical and linguistic development Candidate shows knowledge of particular intervention programs and their purposes Candidate differentiates between specific intervention programs and their purposes Candidate critiques the various intervention programs and their typical outcomes Candidate employs planning and application to reflect appropriate knowledge of how child development principles and knowledge should be incorporated into the child’s program Candidate designs and plans environments to reflect child development principles for all children Candidate evaluates child development theory to create healthy learning environments for all children Metastandard #2 Diversity Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Proficiency Candidate knows and understands how children differ in their development and approaches to learning. Objective Candidate will be able to recall developmental stages and a variety of approaches to learning 2.1. Knowledge of the multiple influences on children’s development and behavior (e.g., culture, language, economic conditions, disabilities, health) 2.2 Knowledge of Students’ Cultural Identities Candidate begins to understand the myriad influences on children’s development and behavior 2.3 Valuing Cultural Diversity Candidate understands the importance of values, virtues, and ethical traits shared by Candidate understands the importance of the recognition of diverse identities of groups of students within the school and the classroom. Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Candidate demonstrates an understanding of diverse learning styles and impact of a supportive learning environment Candidate creates instructional opportunities that are adapted to diverse learners in an environment that encourages emotional, social, and moral development. Candidate understands the importance of the recognition of diverse identities of individual students within the school and the classroom. Candidate incorporates into the curriculum the values, virtues, and ethical codes Candidate understands the differences and tensions between ascribed and asserted identities, especially in light of unequal power relations between groups. Candidate utilizes best practice to incorporate into the curriculum the values, virtues, Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate understand the complexity of learners, nurturing and supporting the spectrum of learners in the environment including physical, emotional, social, cognitive, moral, aesthetic, cognitive, and language growth Candidate will develop Candidate will integrate Candidate will create an learning experiences which diverse instructional environment which supports address a variety of learning opportunities into a supportive and incorporates all learning approaches, exploring environment styles by appropriate aspects of diverse learning developmental means. environments Components Candidate demonstrates Candidate demonstrates Candidate demonstrates adequate familiarity with acceptable to advanced thorough knowledge of how the various influences on familiarity with the various the myriad influences interact children’s development and influences on children’s to affect and child behavior development and behavior. development and behavior. Candidate understands diverse identities of groups and individual students and incorporates diverse identities into the curriculum. Candidate creates new a curriculum in order to help students understand that no various cultural groups and individuals. shared by various cultural groups and individuals. and ethical codes shared by various cultural groups and individuals. 2.4 Complex Nature of Diversity Candidate understands the diversity of cultures and groups within the U.S. Candidate understands the complex characteristics of cultures and groups and attempts to work with all students to meet their education needs. 2.5 Culturally Sensitive Techniques Candidate is familiar with culturally sensitive techniques to assess complex cognitive and social skills. Candidate understands the complex characteristics of cultures and groups and the ways in which race, ethnicity, language, and social class interact to influence behavior. Candidate uses culturally sensitive techniques to assess complex cognitive and social skills. 2.6 Multiple Perspectives Candidate understands the limitations of having only one perspective on issues and the benefit of multiple perspectives. 2.7 Understanding Exceptionality Candidate understands that children with exceptionalities should integrate within the regular education classroom and are familiar with the state and federal statutes that guide that practice. Candidate applies multiple culturally sensitive techniques to assess complex cognitive and social skills. perspective is “value neutral” and that knowledge reflects the interests, cultural biases, power, positions, and histories of individuals or group involved. Candidate understands the complex characteristics of cultures and groups and effectively works with all students to meet their education needs. Candidate effectively integrates multiple culturally sensitive techniques to assess complex cognitive and social skills. Candidate provides a range Candidate provides multiple Candidate creates a new of multiple perspectives on perspectives to help students curriculum presenting various various issues within the develop strategies and skills to issues in a way that begins in classroom. engage with those who are not the voices of less powerful like themselves. groups without presenting their perspectives in an overly deterministic or stereotyped manner. Candidate understands that Candidate creates curriculum Candidate creates universally children with that affords children with designed curriculum that exceptionalities should be exceptionalities the affords children with included in the regular opportunity to participate in exceptionalities the education curriculum is able the overall community of life opportunity to participate in to develop curriculum that within the regular classroom. the overall community of life will reflect an inclusive Candidate work within the regular classroom. environment. collaboratively with special Candidate develops education teachers and staff. collaborative relationships with special education teachers and staff. Metastandard #3 Curriculum Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Proficiency Objective Candidate knows and understands ageappropriate curriculum for children and has central knowledge of content in Mathematics, English/Language Arts, Science, Social Studies, Fine Arts, Health Education, Physical Education and Technology. Candidate will be able to recall and master age appropriate information central to content areas expected to teach in addition to core knowledge Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate understands the role of curriculum and develop competence in strategies and tools for various development levels Candidate creates and modifies meaningful curriculum based upon knowledge of subject material, tools of inquiry and structures of each discipline, and age appropriate curriculum. Candidate incorporates and vary strategies and concepts in developing integrated curriculum based upon students, subject matter, community, and curriculum goals Candidate will be able to explain the role of curriculum and explore a variety of strategies and tools Candidate will be able to develop and adapt quality, ageappropriate curriculum utilizing content area information and specific key strategies for each. Candidate will be able to plan and create integrated curriculum encompassing student, school, and community goals Components 3.1 Knowledge of the myriad factors that influence curriculum choices (e.g., children’s individual needs, standards, professional values) 3.2 Ability to plan appropriate learning engagements that teach the necessary content, skills, and attitudinal outcomes for all children 3.3 Recognize the role of assessment in curriculum development Candidate identifies factors that influence curriculum choices Candidate demonstrates an understanding of the many factors that influence curriculum choices Candidate specifies factors that influence curriculum choices Candidate evaluates factors that influence curriculum choices Candidate identifies components necessary to plan for integrating content, skills, and attitudinal outcomes for all children Candidate demonstrates an ability to plan for integrating content, skills, and attitudinal outcomes for all children Candidate ability to plan for integrating content, skills, and attitudinal outcomes for all children Candidate evaluates and critiques their ability by planning for integration of content, skills, and attitudinal outcomes for all children Candidate identifies and describes various roles of assessment in the curriculum Candidate employs the various roles of assessment in the curriculum building Candidate differentiates and classifies the various roles of assessment in the curriculum Candidate justifies the various roles of assessment in the curriculum building process building process is slight or inadequate 3.4 Organize curriculum for Candidate identifies and instruction that builds upon explains components of spiraled curriculum children’s foundational knowledge and skills Candidate identifies 3.5 Ability to critique professional organizations’ organizations’ learning standards in terms of their standards and their applicability to young children applicability to young children’s learning needs 3.6 Ability to plan and teach from personally prepared lesson plans 3.7 Demonstrate commitment to providing all children with meaningful, relevant, and purposeful learning engagements Candidate identifies key components in their own lesson plans Candidate describes and reviews their commitment to providing individually appropriate and relevant learning experiences for all children process building process. Candidate applies and Candidate creates and demonstrates ability to organizes appropriate spiraled organize spiraled curriculum curriculum Candidate evaluates and assesses a spiraled curriculum Candidate demonstrates skills and strategies for critiquing organizations’ learning standards and their applicability to young children Candidate demonstrates an ability to plan and teach from their own lesson plans Candidate demonstrates commitment to providing individually appropriate and relevant learning experiences for all children Candidate analyzes organizations’ learning standards and their applicability to young children Candidate evaluates organizations’ learning standards and their applicability to young children Candidates design, plan and teach from their own lesson plans. Candidate outlines a commitment to providing individually appropriate and relevant learning experiences for all children Candidate designs, teaches and evaluates their own lesson plans Candidate critiques their commitment to providing individually appropriate and relevant learning experiences for all children Metastandard #4 Instruction Proficiency Objective Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate knows and understand a variety of teaching strategies using verbal, nonverbal and media communication techniques to encourage critical thinking, problem solving and performance skills. Candidate will be able to recall and explain a variety of instructional strategy through verbal, nonverbal and media communication techniques Candidate will understand the principles of instruction based on pedagogical principles, while developing their classroom performance skills. Candidate understands the principles of instruction based on knowledge of students, learning theory, subject matter, curricular goals, and community. Candidate obtains and understand multiple instructional strategies including technology to encourage critical thinking, problem solving and performance skills Candidate will be able to develop and deliver instruction based on sound pedagogical principles. Candidate will be able to implement instruction based on knowledge of students, learning theory, subject matter, curricular goals, and community Candidate will be able to integrate multiple instructional strategies, including technology, to encourage critical thinking, problem solving and performance skills Components 4.1Knowledge of core teaching approaches supported by research Candidate reviews the core researchbased teaching strategies 4.2 Knowledge of how children’s needs, characteristics, and interests affect choice of instructional approaches 4.3 Knowledge of how to plan for and support play in ECE, and challenging curricula in early childhood Candidate identifies and describes various factors affecting instructional approach choices. Candidate identifies importance of play to development and the importance of planning and developing a challenging curriculum for all children Candidate applies core researchbased teaching approaches Candidate shows professional understanding of the core researchbased teaching approaches Candidate demonstrates Candidate demonstrates appropriate awareness of the skillful awareness of the factors involved in choosing factors involved in choosing instructional approaches instructional approaches Candidate assesses their knowledge and mastery of the core researchbased teaching approaches Candidate evaluates their competence in incorporating the various factors into instructional choicemaking Candidate employs adequate familiarity with the role of play in the ECE setting and challenging curricula in early childhood and how to support these for learning and growth Candidate assesses the role of play in the ECE setting, as well as providing challenging curricula to support children’s learning and growth Candidate demonstrates familiarity with the role of play in the ECE setting and challenging curricula in early childhood and how to support these for learning and growth 4.4. Knowledge of appropriate guidance approaches for meeting children’s needs and addressing challenging behavior 4.5 Ability to use knowledge of the individual child in planning curriculum, instruction, and materials 4.6 Ability to vary instructional approaches 4.7 Ability to foster appropriate social interactions to promote learning 4.8 Demonstrate commitment to individualizing approaches, strategies, and tools for positively influencing children’s learning Candidate defines and describes guidance approaches as well as how to match them with particular guidance needs. Candidate implements a variety of guidance approaches as well as how to match them with particular situational needs. Candidate designs a variety of guidance approaches as well as how to match them with particular situational needs. Candidate critiques a variety of guidance approaches as well as how to match them with a particular situational needs Candidate identifies how planning, teaching approaches, and materials chosen in teaching ought to reflect the individual child’s learning needs. Candidate labels varying instructional approaches produce different educational results. Candidate identifies and discusses DAP that promote or foster social learning interactions Candidate identifies and states their commitment to individualizing teaching practices Candidate applies knowledge of individual children’s learning needs in planning, teaching approaches, and materials chosen Candidate constructs and applies varies instructional approaches as necessary Candidate creates planning, teaching approaches, and materials which reflects knowledge of individual children’s learning needs Candidate assesses their ability to provide for the individual child’s learning needs in all planning, teaching approaches, and materials Candidate utilizes DAP for fostering and promoting social learning interactions Candidate illustrates a commitment and/or inclination to individualize teaching practices Candidate creates varies instructional approaches as necessary Candidate selects a wide repertoire of instructional approaches consistent with best practices Candidate implements DAP Candidate selects vary DAP for fostering and promoting for fostering and promoting social learning interactions social learning theory interactions Candidate analyzes their Candidate evaluates and commitment and/or inclination critiques their commitment to to individualize teaching individualize teaching practices and modifies as practices. required Metastandard #5 Assessment Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Proficiency Candidate knows and understands a variety of assessment methods and understands the importance of multiple strategies. Candidate knows and Candidate is knowledgeable understands formal and about assessment methods and informal assessment plan curriculum appropriately. strategies to evaluate the development of the children. Objective Candidate will be able to recall a variety of assessment methods and the significance of multiple assessments. Candidate uses formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate the development of children. Candidate identifies core principles and goals of appropriate assessment Components Candidate employs core principles and goals of appropriate assessment Candidate analyzes core principles and goals of appropriate assessment Candidate applies core laws and professional standards and/or ethics involved in using assessment tools and practices and in communicating data Candidate differentiates core laws and professional standards and/or ethics involved in using assessment tools and practices and in communicating data Candidate demonstrates the use of current standardized/published assessment tools across the age/grade span and the ECE curriculum Candidate applies their familiarity with current standardized/published assessment tools across the age/grade span and the ECE curriculum 5.1 Knowledge of central goals, benefits, uses, and limitations of various assessments 5.2 Knowledge of key laws, basic ethics, and relevant professional standards in using assessments and communicating assessment data Candidate explains core laws and professional standards and/or ethics involved in using assessment tools and practices and in communicating data Candidate states the purpose 5.3 Awareness of current of particular assessment tools standardized and/or published assessment tools used with ECEage children and their purposes Candidate will be able to develop, implement, and utilize curriculum which encompass a variety of assessment methods Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate understands the role of assessment as feedback to parents and ensuring the continuous intellectual, social, and physical development of the learner. Candidate will be able to evaluate, utilize, and appropriately share assessment results to continue student progress intellectually, socially, and physically within their preservice capacity Candidate assesses their mastery of the core principles and goals of appropriate assessment Candidate critiques their awareness of the laws, ethical principles, and professional standards involved in assessing young children and communicating assessment data Candidate evaluates the efficacy of assessment tools thorough knowledge of currently used standardized/published assessment tools for young children 5.4 Ability to choose assessment tools and practices based on DAP principles, specific leaner characteristics and planning needs 5.5 Ability to use observation and documentation strategies to learn about the children in one’s care Candidate identifies assessment choices and matches with the learner's characteristics and/or planning needs Candidate uses an appropriate variety of tools and practices to understand children as individuals as well as to plan for them. Candidate analyzes a variety of tools and practices to understand children as individuals as well as to plan for them. Candidate uses observational strategies in learning about children and document in a systematic manner 5.6 Commitment to developing assessment partnerships with all stakeholders Candidate identifies the importance of creating assessment partnerships Candidate uses observational strategies as well as documents the data collected in order to plan curriculum and/or interventions Candidate shows a professional commitment to devising and tailoring assessment systems that include all stakeholders Candidate outlines and plans observational strategies as well as documents the data collected in order to plan curriculum and/or interventions Candidate creates their own professional commitment to devising and tailoring assessment systems that include all stakeholders Candidate assesses their competence in choosing and/or using an appropriate variety of tools and practices to assess individual children for particular planning needs Candidate originates and evaluates their own uses of observational data to inform practice and plan curriculum and or interventions Candidate evaluates their commitment to involving all stakeholders appropriately in assessing young children through a respectful and thorough system Metastandard #6 Professionalism / Learning Communities Proficiency Objective 6.1 Knowledge of the history of the early childhood field 6.2 Knowledge of core early childhood policies, values, and professional practices 6.3 Knowledge of the NAEYC Code of Ethical Conduct 6.4 Ability to reflect upon and critique one’s work and practices 6.5 Ability to communicate with all stakeholders Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate knows and understands practices and behaviors that identify and develop the competence of a professional career teacher. Candidate will be able to identify qualities of a professional teacher and act in appropriate professional ways. Candidate demonstrates professionalism through collegiality, peer support, and professional self assessment. Candidate will be able to demonstrate and assess their own professionalism with peers, instructors, host teachers, students, and other professional relationships. Components Candidate demonstrates a commitment to lifelong learning through reflection and professional behaviors. Candidate actively engages in professional growth and a variety of development activities which include monitoring student learning. Candidate will participate in professional experiences and opportunities which further their professional development include use of student learning as a professional gauge. Candidate locates and identifies knowledge of the history of the field Candidate locates and reviews knowledge of core NAEYC related policies, recommended practices, and values Candidate identify and label knowledge about the NAEYC Ethics Code Candidate demonstrates knowledge of the history of the field Candidate applies appropriate knowledge of core policies, values, and recommended practices Candidate illustrates knowledge about the core principles of the NAEYC Ethics Code Candidate employs appropriate work ethics and practices Candidate uses professional communication skills Candidate compares and contrasts knowledge of the history of the field Candidate analyzes core policies, values, and recommended practices Candidate identifies appropriate personal work ethics and practices Candidate identifies and discusses communication skills required of professionals Candidate will be able to reflect on practices in accurate ways and discuss continuing efforts in their professional development. Candidate specify the core principles of the NAEYC Ethics Code Candidate routinely analyze their work ethic and practices Candidate modifies their professional communication skills consistent with the specific stakeholders Candidate evidences a deep knowledge base for the historical roots of the field Candidate consistently demonstrates broad knowledge about professional policies, values, and practices Candidate demonstrates thorough knowledge about the content of the NAEYC Ethics Code Candidate demonstrates superior ability to reflect and critique their work /practices Candidate evaluates their communication skills and refine them to reach all stakeholders through varied means 6.6 Commitment to lifelong learning and maintaining an informed practice Candidate defines their own commitment to lifelong learning and future professional development Candidate demonstrates a commitment to lifelong learning and continuous professional development Candidate demonstrates strong commitment to lifelong learning and continuous professional development Candidate appraises their commitment to lifelong learning and professional development, based on professional situation and identified needs Candidate demonstrates strong Candidate priorizes an active commitment to the profession commitment to the profession and to one’s colleagues and one’s colleagues 6.7 Commitment to the early childhood profession and one’s colleagues Candidate summarizes their commitment to the profession and/or to one’s colleagues 6.8 Commitment to advocating for all young children and their families Candidate states a commitment to serving in an advocate position Candidate demonstrates a commitment to the profession and to one’s colleagues Candidate employs a commitment to advocating for young children and their families Candidate states strong commitment to advocating for young children and their families Candidate defends and supports their professional commitment to viewing themselves as an active advocate for all young children and their families Metastandard #7 Family/Community Involvement Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Exemplary (Evaluation) Proficiency Candidate knows and understands the influence of the family, community and culture on the learning and development of the growth of children. Candidate knows and understands multiple aspects of professional relationships and how to utilize and foster community services. Candidate understands the role of professional relationships, especially family, in promoting the academic, social, and emotional growth of children. Objective Candidate will be able to explain the role of family, community, and culture on learning and child development. Candidate will investigate the teacher’s role in mandatory and optional community services. Candidate understands the importance of positive working relationships with school colleagues, support services, and community members to support children’s wellbeing. Candidate develops and maintains positive working relationships with school and community connections. Candidate applies their understanding of the core family and community characteristics that affect ECE practice Candidate applies knowledge of the key family theorists and research Candidate evaluates their knowledge and mastery of the core family and community characteristics that affect ECE practice Candidate evaluates the key family theorists and issues in the field Candidate analyzes the various influences on family involvement in their children’s development Candidate evaluates the influences on families’ involvement to interact and affect young children’s development Candidate evaluates and reflects on the efficacy of applying family systems Candidate develops and maintains a positive collaborative relationship with families to promote student growth within their preservice capacity. Components Candidate demonstrates an understanding of the core family and community characteristics that affect ECE practice Candidate demonstrates 7.2 Knowledge of significant Candidate identifies sufficient knowledge of the family theory and research knowledge of family theory and research key family theorists and research Candidate states the myriad Candidate demonstrates 7.3 Knowledge of the influences on family adequate familiarity with multiple influences on involvement in their children’s the various influences on families’ involvement in development family involvement in their their young children’s children’s development growth and learning Candidate identifies factors Candidate applies 7.4 Ability to use family important to planning and appropriate knowledge of theory to plan appropriate matching the family’s and/or how family dynamics and support for parental and 7.1 Knowledge of family and community characteristics Candidate shows evidence of understanding core family and community characteristics Candidate suggests how family dynamics and involvement principles should community involvement in young children’s growth and learning 7.5 Demonstrate sensitivity and respect for the myriad factors and variances in family and community relationships with their children community’s needs in supporting their young children’s growth and learning Candidate states their respect for the variances in how families and communities relate to their young children involvement principles should be incorporated into programming efforts Candidate applies awareness and respect for diversity in how families and communities relate to their young children be incorporated into programming efforts Candidate desgins program initiatives that illustrates awareness and respect for diversity in how families and communities relate to their young children theory to creating healthy learning environments and programs for all children Candidate evaluates their sensitivity and respect for the diversity in how families and communities relate to their young children Components adapted from: Banks, J.A., Cookson, P., Gay, G., Hawley, W. D., Irvine, J. J. Nieto, S., Schofield, J. W., Stephan, W. G. (2001). Diversity Within Unity: Essential Principles For Teaching and Learning in a Multicultural Society. Phi Delta Kappan, , (83) 3, 196203. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA. Nitko, A.J. & Brookhart, S.M. (2007). Educational Assessment of Students. New Jersey: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall. Division of Education—Indiana University Kokomo Metastandards Rubric Elementary (K-6) Initial Teacher Education Program Metastandard #1: Child Development and Learning Proficiency Objective Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Candidate knows and understands how children learn and develop and also that children differ in their development and approaches to learning. Candidate will be able to recognize and discuss the major concepts, principles, theories, and research related to the development of all children. Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Candidate demonstrates and practices theoretically based teaching and learning strategies to promote cognitive growth and development of all children. Candidate uses educational learning theories to plan developmentally appropriate curricula and creates learning environments that promote positive social engagement and self-motivation. Candidate will be able to create developmentally appropriate curricula and implement with all children sound theorybased instructional strategies. Candidate determines the effectiveness of various theoretically based teaching and learning strategies for all children. Candidate demonstrates understanding of developmental theories and can develop curriculum within the classroom that reflects and incorporates a variety of theories. Candidate demonstrates knowledge of typical developmental behaviors of children and create developmentally appropriate curriculum. Candidate demonstrates understanding of developmental theories and can evaluate the effectiveness of curriculum that incorporates a variety of these theories. Candidate will be able to practice theoretically grounded and researchbased teaching and learning strategies with his/her peers. Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate will be able to evaluate the effectiveness of theoretically based teaching and learning strategies through action research. Components 1.1 Knowledge of major developmental theories Candidate demonstrates understanding of developmental theories and theorists in the field. Candidate demonstrates understanding of developmental theories and can utilize them in implementing curriculum for the elementary classroom. 1.2 Knowledge of behaviors Candidate demonstrates knowledge of typical developmental behaviors of children. Candidate demonstrates knowledge of typical developmental behaviors of children and can utilize developmentally appropriate curriculum. 1.3 Multiple influences on development and behavior Candidate understands that there are a variety of factors that will influence development of children. Candidate understands that there are a variety of factors that will influence development of children and can apply best practices to promote positive development and student learning. Candidate understands that there are a variety of factors that will influence development of children and can develop curriculum that incorporates best practices to promote positive development and student learning. 1.4 Healthy learning environments for all children Candidate understands the importance of healthy learning environments in promoting a child’s social, emotional, cognitive, physical and linguistic development. Candidate incorporates knowledge of healthy learning environments in the creation of lesson plans and classroom activities that promote social, emotional, cognitive, physical and linguistic development. Candidate incorporates a variety of best practices of healthy learning environments in the creation of lesson plans and classroom activities that promote social, emotional, cognitive, physical and linguistic development. Candidate demonstrates knowledge of typical developmental behaviors of children and can evaluate curriculum to determine if it meets the developmental needs of children within the classroom. Candidate understands that there are a variety of factors that will influence development of children and can evaluate curriculum to determine how effectively they employ best practices to promote positive development and student learning. Candidate evaluates the learning environment to determine how effectively it promotes social, emotional, cognitive, physical and linguistic development. Metastandard #2: Diversity Proficiency Objective Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Candidate knows and understands how children differ in their development and approaches to learning. Candidate will be able to recall developmental stages and a variety of approaches to learning. Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate demonstrates an understanding of diverse learning styles and impact of a supportive learning environment. Candidate creates instructional opportunities that are adapted to diverse learners in an environment that encourages emotional, social, and moral development. Candidate understands the complexity of learners, nurturing and supporting the spectrum of learners in the environment including physical, emotional, social, cognitive, moral, aesthetic, cognitive, and language growth. Candidate will develop learning experiences which address a variety of learning approaches, exploring aspects of diverse learning environments. Candidate will integrate diverse instructional opportunities into a supportive environment. Candidate will create an environment which supports and incorporates all learning styles by appropriate developmental means. Candidate understands the differences and tensions between these identities and can incorporate their diverse identities into the curriculum. Candidate can evaluate his/her effectiveness at incorporating the diverse identities of groups and individual students into the curriculum and can make any necessary adjustments. Candidate develops and evaluates curriculum that effectively addresses the values, virtues, and ethical codes shared by various cultural groups and individuals. Candidate evaluates the efficacy of curricular and instructional techniques in demonstrating the complex characteristics of cultures and groups and in attempting to meet the educational needs of students. Candidate can determine the effectiveness of culturally sensitive techniques employed in the classroom in addressing complex cognitive and social skills. Components 2.1 Knowledge of students’ cultural identities Candidate understands the importance of diverse identities of groups and individual students within the school and the classroom. Candidate understands the importance of diverse identities of groups and individual students and can identify the differences and tensions between these identities. Candidate uses curriculum that addresses the values, virtues, and ethical codes shared by various cultural groups and individuals. 2.2 Valuing cultural diversity Candidate understands the importance of values, virtues, and ethical codes shared by various cultural groups and individuals. 2.3 Complex nature of diversity Candidate understands the diversity of cultures and groups within the United States. Candidate utilizes curriculum to demonstrate the complex characteristics of race, ethnicity, gender, language, and social class interact to influence behavior. 2.4 Culturally sensitive techniques Candidate is familiar with culturally sensitive techniques to address complex cognitive and social skills. Candidate is able to utilize some culturally sensitive techniques to address complex cognitive and social skills. Candidate utilizes best practice to incorporate a variety of curriculum that addresses the values, virtues, and ethical codes shared by various cultural groups and individuals. Candidate makes use of a variety of curricular and instructional techniques to demonstrate the complex characteristics of cultures and groups in an attempt to meet the educational needs of students. Candidate can build upon many culturally sensitive techniques to address complex cognitive and social skills. 2.5 Multiple perspectives Candidate understands the limitations of having only one perspective on issues and the benefit of multiple perspectives. Candidate provides a range of perspectives for students on various issues within the classroom. Candidate provides multiple perspectives for students to help develop strategies and skills to engage with those who are not like themselves. 2.6 Understanding exceptionality Candidate understands that children with exceptionalities should be included within the regular education classroom and are familiar with the state and federal statutes that guide that practice. Candidate understands that children with exceptionalities should be included in the regular education curriculum is able to develop curriculum that will reflect an inclusive environment. Candidate creates curriculum that affords children with exceptionalities the opportunity to participate in the overall community of life within the regular classroom. Candidate is able to determine the effectiveness of providing multiple perspectives to help students develop strategies and skills to engage with those who are not like themselves. Candidate evaluates the efficacy of curriculum that affords children with exceptionalities the opportunity to participate in the overall community of life within the regular classroom. Metastandard #3: Curriculum/Content Knowledge Proficiency Objective Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Candidate knows and understands age-appropriate curriculum for children and has central knowledge of content in Mathematics, English/Language Arts, Science, Social Studies, Fine Arts, Health Education, Physical Education and Technology. Candidate will be able to recall and master age appropriate information central to content areas expected to teach in addition to core knowledge. Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate understands the role of curriculum and develops competence in strategies and tools for various development levels. Candidate creates and modifies meaningful curriculum based upon knowledge of subject material, tools of inquiry and structures of each discipline, and ageappropriateness. Candidate incorporates and varies strategies and concepts in developing integrated curriculum based upon students, subject matter, community, and curriculum goals. Candidate will be able to explain the role of curriculum and explore a variety of strategies and tools. Candidate will be able to develop and adapt quality, age-appropriate curriculum utilizing content area information and specific key strategies for each. Candidate will be able to plan and create integrated curriculum encompassing student, school, and community goals. Candidate can utilize their content knowledge effectively, illustrate interconnections to other parts of the discipline and other disciplines, and evaluate the effectiveness based on student learning. Candidate is able to utilize student feedback and input to determine effectiveness of methods that are utilized to represent content. Components 3.1 Knowledge of content Candidate demonstrates content knowledge required by the subject matter domain. Candidate demonstrates content knowledge required by the subject matter domain and can utilize their knowledge effectively within the curriculum. Candidate can utilize their content knowledge effectively and can illustrate interconnections to other parts of the discipline and other disciplines.. 3.2 Representation of content Candidate understands that content should be presented utilizing good examples. Candidate represents content well with examples that are linked to students’ knowledge and experience. 3.3 Knowledge of students’ misconceptions about content Candidate understands students’ may have misconceptions concerning concepts and relationships among concepts.. 3.4 Materials and resources Candidate understands the importance of choosing developmentally appropriate instructional materials and resources. Candidate understands students’ may have misconceptions concerning concepts and relationships among concepts and utilizes curricula that promote understanding. Candidate chooses developmentally appropriate instructional materials and resources that engage students cognitively. Candidate represents content incorporating a variety of methods that are appropriate and link students’ knowledge and experience. Candidate understands students’ may have misconceptions concerning concepts and relationships among concepts and creates curricula that promote understanding. Candidate creates relevant and developmentally appropriate instructional materials and resources which support and engage students cognitively. 3.5 Planning and supporting challenging curricula Candidate indicates an understanding of the importance of planning and developing a challenging curriculum for all children. Candidate can implement challenging curriculum support children’s learning and growth. Candidate can design curriculum that utilizes a variety of techniques that support and challenge children’s learning and growth. Candidate creates curricula that promote understanding concerning concepts and relationships among concepts and evaluates the effectiveness of that curriculum. Candidate evaluates the effectiveness of the instructional materials and resources to support and engage students cognitively by assessing student progress. Candidate uses a variety of assessment methods to determine if the curriculum implemented supports and challenges children’s learning and growth. Metastandard #4: Instruction Proficiency Objective Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Candidate knows and understands a variety of teaching strategies using verbal, non-verbal and media communication techniques to encourage critical thinking, problem solving and performance skills. Candidate will be able to recall and explain a variety of instructional strategy through verbal, non-verbal and media communication techniques. Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate understands the principles of instruction based on pedagogical principles, while developing her/his classroom performance skills. Candidate understands the principles of instruction based on knowledge of students, learning theory, subject matter, curricular goals, and community. Candidate obtains and understands multiple instructional strategies including technology to encourage critical thinking, problem solving and performance skills. Candidate will be able to develop and deliver instruction based on sound pedagogical principles. Candidate will be able to implement instruction based on knowledge of students, learning theory, subject matter, curricular goals, and community. Candidate will be able to integrate multiple instructional strategies, including technology, to encourage critical thinking, problem solving and performance skills. Candidate is able to make a judgment about the utilization of the core research-based teaching approaches within clinical experiences. Candidate explores a variety of instructional methods to determine the best instructional approach when delivering content to maximize student learning. Candidate assesses lessons structure and evaluates the format and the learning opportunities for students. Components 4.1 Core teaching approaches supported by research Candidate shows evidence of understanding the core research-based teaching strategies. Candidate utilizes some of the core research-based teaching approaches within practicum. Candidate synthesize many of the core researchbased teaching approaches within practicums and clinical experiences. 4.2 Choice of instructional approaches Candidate demonstrates awareness of the various factors affecting the choice of instructional approach. Candidate makes use of a variety of instructional approaches when delivering content. 4.3 Structure Candidate understands that lessons must be structured in a clear and organized format. Candidate structures lessons in a comprehensive format that clearly includes a defined beginning and ending. 4.4 Approaches for classroom management and addressing challenging behavior Candidate understands the importance of classroom management in addressing group and individual behaviors. Candidate can implement suggested classroom management techniques to address group and individual behaviors. 4.5 Knowledge of the individual child in planning curriculum, instruction, and materials 4.6 Ability to vary instructional approaches Candidate understands that teaching approaches and materials should address the child’s individual learning needs. Begins to recognize that varying instructional approaches produce different educational results. Candidate can utilize teaching approaches and materials that address the child’s individual learning needs. Adequately and appropriately varies instructional approaches as necessary. Candidate blends a variety of instructional approaches when delivering content to maximize student learning. Candidate structures lessons in a comprehensive format that clearly includes a defined beginning and ending and increases opportunity for student learning and discovery. Candidate can independently develop a variety of classroom management strategies to address group and individual behaviors. Candidate can develop teaching approaches and materials that address the child’s individual learning needs. Skillfully and appropriately varies instructional approaches as necessary. Candidate can monitor and alter a variety of classroom management strategies as needed to address group and individual behaviors. Candidate utilizes evidence to determine if teaching approaches and materials are addressing the child’s individual learning needs. Demonstrates a repertoire of instructional approaches consistent with best practice. Metastandard #5: Assessment Proficiency Objective Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Candidate knows and understands a variety of assessment methods and understands the importance of multiple strategies. Candidate will be able to recall a variety of assessment methods and the significance of multiple assessments. Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Candidate knows and understands formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate the development of the children. Candidate is knowledgeable about assessment methods and plans curriculum appropriately. Candidate uses formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate the development of children. Candidate will be able to develop, implement, and utilize curriculum which encompass a variety of assessment methods. Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate understands the role of assessment as feedback to parents and ensuring the continuous intellectual, social, and physical development of the learner. Candidate will be able to evaluate, utilize, and appropriately share assessment results to continue student progress intellectually, socially, and physically within his/her preservice capacity. Components 5.1 Assessment criteria and standards Candidate recognizes the importance of standards and assessment criteria Candidate can incorporate some standards and assessment criteria into lesson plans. Candidate can effectively integrate a variety of standards and assessment criteria into lesson plans. 5.2 Assessment of student learning Candidate identifies that assessment is used to determine long term and short term goals and can identify its importance in determining students’ strength and weaknesses in all subject content areas. Candidate uses assessment to determine long term and short term goals for students and is able to determine students’ strength and weaknesses in all subject content areas. 5.3 Using assessment to promote learning Candidate identifies that assessment can be used as part of the learning experience and understands the importance of appropriate, timely feedback. Candidate uses assessment as a learning experience and gives appropriate and timely feedback. Candidate creates assessment that is integrated into the curriculum and uses the results to analyze long term and short term goals and to determine students’ strength and weaknesses in all subject content areas. Candidate constructs their own assessments that reflects actual knowledge and guides the learning process for students. 5.4 Using assessment to inform teaching Candidate identifies that assessment can be used to inform their teaching and to improve the quality of their instruction. Candidate applies some assessment techniques that can be used to inform their teaching and to improve the quality of their instruction. Candidate actively uses a variety of assessment techniques that can be used to inform their teaching and to improve the quality of their instruction. Candidate can effectively integrate a variety of standards and assessment criteria into lesson plans and can carry out the assessment to determine the effectiveness of the plan. Candidate creates and evaluates assessment that is integrated into the curriculum and uses the results to analyze long term and short term goals and to determine students’ strength and weaknesses in all subject content areas. Candidate constructs assessment that reflects actual knowledge and guides the learning process for students and makes adjustments and changes based on analysis of student learning. Candidate evaluates the assessment techniques and materials used in the classroom and actively integrates this to inform teaching and to improve the quality of instruction. Metastandard #6: Professionalism/Learning Communities Proficiency Objective Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Candidate knows and understands practices and behaviors that identify and develop the competence of a professional career teacher. Candidate will be able to identify qualities of a professional teacher and act in appropriate professional ways. Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate demonstrates professionalism through collegiality, peer support, and professional selfassessment. Candidate demonstrates a commitment to lifelong learning through reflection and professional behaviors. Candidate actively engages in professional growth and a variety of development activities which include monitoring student learning. Candidate will be able to demonstrate and assess her/his own professionalism with peers, instructors, host teachers, students, and other professional relationships. Candidate will be able to reflect on practices in accurate ways and discuss continuing efforts in her/his professional development. Candidate will participate in professional experiences and opportunities which further her/his professional development, to include use of student learning as a professional gauge. Candidate seeks additional opportunities for reflection and self-analysis, solicits evaluation of her/his performance from varied sources, and utilize these analytic processes to improve her/his professional practice. Candidate assess his/her own effectiveness to institute change through the decision making processes within school settings (e.g., IEPs, 504 plans) Candidate consistently uses collaboration to effectively improve schools and student learning. Components 6.1 Reflection and selfanalysis Candidate demonstrates an understanding of the importance of reflection and self-analysis for improving professional practices. Candidate engages in reflection in an attempt to improve her/his professional practice. Candidate uses reflection and self-analysis to improve her/his professional practice in an ongoing manner. 6.2 Decision making Candidate understands the complexities of decision making processes within school settings (e.g., IEPs, 504 plans) Candidate participates in a variety of decision making processes within school settings (e.g., IEPs, 504 plans) Candidate analyzes the role of an educator in the complexities of decision making processes within school settings (e.g., IEPs, 504 plans) 6.3 Collaboration with other professionals Candidate demonstrates an understanding of the importance of collaboration with other professionals to improve schools and student learning. Candidate collaborates on a limited basis with other professionals for the purpose of improving schools and student learning. Candidate actively seeks collaboration with an expanding range of professionals, and uses these relationships to improve schools and student learning. 6.4 Participation in school and corporation activities Candidate demonstrates an understanding of the importance of participation in co-curricular activities. Candidate participates on a limited basis in cocurricular activities. Candidate participates in co-curricular activities in order to build a stronger learning community. Candidate uses knowledge gained from participation in co-curricular activities in order to build a stronger learning community improve the effectiveness of schools and corporations. Metastandard #7: Family/Community Involvement Proficiency Objective Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Candidate knows and understands the influence of the family, community and culture on the learning and development of the growth of children. Candidate will be able to explain the role of family, community, and culture on learning and child development. Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate knows and understands multiple aspects of professional relationships and how to utilize and foster community services. Candidate understands the importance of positive working relationships with school colleagues, support services, and community members to support children’s well-being. Candidate understands the role of professional relationships, especially family, in promoting the academic, social, and emotional growth of children. Candidate will investigate the teacher’s role in mandatory and optional community services. Candidate develops and maintains positive working relationships with school and community connections. Candidate develops and maintains a positive collaborative relationship with families to promote student growth within their preservice capacity. Candidate communicates effectively with parents through a variety of means. Candidate reflects on her/his communication with parents and evaluates the methods employed. Candidate communicates academic and behavioral expectations to the parents in a clear manner and can assess the effectiveness of this communication and its impact on student learning. Candidate uses a variety of means to bring parents and parental input into the classroom curriculum and instruction and reflects on the impact and success. Candidate appraise his/her effectiveness in carrying out the legal responsibilities of a wellinformed teacher (e.g., child protection and welfare, issues of confidentiality) Candidate evaluates the partnerships developed with stakeholders and determines optimal utilization to strengthen schools, families, and student learning Components Candidate understands the role of parent communication in relation to student success. Candidate understands the importance of communicating academic and behavioral expectations to the parent in a clear manner. Candidate explores a variety of ways to communicate effectively with parents. Candidate endeavors to communicate academic and behavioral expectations to the parents. 7.3 Parent involvement Candidate understands the value of involving parents as active participants in the classroom and school settings. Candidate attempts to incorporate parents through curriculum and instruction choices. Candidate uses a variety of means to bring parents and parental input into the classroom curriculum and instruction. 7.4 Advocacy Candidate understands the legal responsibilities of a teacher (e.g., child protection and welfare, issues of confidentiality) Candidate upholds the legal responsibilities of a teacher (e.g., child protection and welfare, issues of confidentiality) Candidate proposes ways to ensure that the legal responsibilities of a teacher are reflected in practice (e.g., child protection and welfare, issues of confidentiality) 7.5 Collaboration with community Candidate is familiar with the various stakeholder groups that comprise the school community. Candidate attempts to partner with stakeholders through curriculum and instruction choices. Candidate partners with stakeholders through curriculum and instruction choices and uses them to strengthen schools, families, and student learning 7.1 Communicating 7.2 Student learning Candidate communicates academic and behavioral expectations to the parents in a clear manner and can identify when this has been achieved. 7.6 Unity and diversity in communities Candidate understands the complex relationships between unity and diversity in communities. Candidate, through the use of curriculum, has the opportunity to compare and contrast the role of and relationships between unity and diversity in various communities. Candidate creates a new curriculum in order to help students understand the complex relationships between unity and diversity in their local communities. Candidate evaluates curriculum developed to help students understand the complex relationships between unity and diversity in their local communities and makes appropriate modifications Components adapted from: Banks, J.A., Cookson, P., Gay, G., Hawley, W. D., Irvine, J. J. Nieto, S., Schofield, J. W., Stephan, W. G. (2001). Diversity Within Unity: Essential Principles For Teaching and Learning in a Multicultural Society. Phi Delta Kappan, , (83) 3, 196-203. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA. Nitko, A.J. & Brookhart, S.M. (2007). Educational Assessment of Students. New Jersey: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall. Division of Education—Indiana University Kokomo Metastandards Rubric Secondary (5-12) Initial Teacher Education Program Metastandard #1: Adolescent and Young Adult Development and Learning Proficiency Objective Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Candidate understands the range of developmental characteristics of early adolescents and young adults within social, cultural, and societal contexts. Candidate will recognize and discuss the major concepts, principles, theories, and research related to the development of early adolescents and young adults. Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate uses an understanding of individual and group motivation and behavior to create a learning environment that encourages positive social interaction, active engagement in learning, and self-motivation. Candidate will practice theoretically grounded and research-based teaching and learning strategies with their peers Candidate facilitates student learning by utilizing the knowledge of early adolescents and young adults’ complex developmental characteristics and how these change in relation to family setting and society. Candidate considers the range of developmental characteristics of early adolescents and young adults to gage the effectiveness of a supportive, congenial, and purposeful learning environment. Candidate will create developmentally appropriate curricula and implement with all students sound theorybased instructional strategies. Candidate will evaluate the effectiveness of theoretically based teaching and learning strategies through action research. Candidate utilizes developmental theories in implementing curriculum for the middle school and secondary school classroom. Candidate utilizes developmentally appropriate curriculum. Candidate develops curriculum within the classroom that reflects and incorporates a variety of developmental theories. Candidate evaluates the effectiveness of curriculum that incorporates a variety of developmental theories. Candidate creates developmentally appropriate curriculum. Candidate evaluates curriculum to determine if it meets the developmental needs of early adolescents and young adults within the classroom. Components 1.1 Knowledge of major developmental theories Candidate can explain developmental theories and theorists in the field. 1.2 Knowledge of behaviors Candidate can explain typical developmental behaviors of early adolescents and young adults. 1.3 Multiple influences on development and behavior Candidate recognizes that there are a variety of factors that will influence development of early adolescents and young adults. Candidate applies best practices to promote positive development and student learning. Candidate develops curricula that incorporates best practices to promote positive development and student learning. Candidate evaluates curricula to determine how effectively one employs best practices to promote positive development and student learning. 1.4 Healthy learning environments for all early adolescents and young adults Candidate recognizes the importance of healthy learning environments in promoting an early adolescent’s and young adult’s social-emotional, cognitive-intellectual, physical, psychological, and moral development. Candidate incorporates knowledge of healthy learning environments in the creation of lesson plans and classroom activities that promote socialemotional, cognitiveintellectual, physical, psychological, and moral development. Candidate incorporates a variety of best practices of healthy learning environments in the creation of lesson plans and classroom activities that promote socialemotional, cognitiveintellectual, physical, psychological, and moral development. Candidate evaluates the learning environment to determine how effectively it promotes socialemotional, cognitiveintellectual, physical, psychological, and moral development. Metastandard #2: Diversity Proficiency Objective Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Candidate understands how early adolescent and young adult learners differ socially and culturally and in their approach to learning. Candidate will recall developmental stages, positions of difference, and a variety of approaches to learning. Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate uses his/her understanding of early adolescent and young adult challenges to provide opportunities to enhance students’ reflective decision making skills. Candidate uses his/her understanding of early adolescent and young adult diversity in learning, challenges, family setting, culture, and social settings to adapt instructional opportunities to meet students’ needs. Candidate understands the complexity of early adolescent and young adult development and how changes in social, cultural, and societal contexts affect development. Candidate will develop learning experiences that address a variety of learning approaches focusing on enhancing students’ reflective decision-making skills. Candidate will create learning opportunities to meet students’ diverse needs in regards to culture, family, learning, society, and adolescent/young adult challenges. Candidate will create supportive learning environments based on appropriate developmental means. Candidate evaluates his/her effectiveness at incorporating the diverse identities of groups and individual students into the curriculum and can make any necessary adjustments. Candidate evaluates her/her effectiveness of addressing the values, virtues, and ethical codes shared by various cultural groups and individuals. Components 2.1 Knowledge of students’ cultural identities Candidate recognizes the importance of diverse identities of groups and individual students within the school and the classroom. Candidate identifies the differences and tensions between identities of groups and individual students. Candidate incorporates students’ diverse identities of groups and individual students into the curriculum. 2.2 Valuing cultural diversity Candidate recognizes the importance of values, virtues, and ethical codes shared by various cultural groups and individuals. Candidate uses curriculum that addresses the values, virtues, and ethical codes shared by various cultural groups and individuals. 2.3 Complex nature of diversity Candidate recognizes the diversity of cultures and groups within the United States. 2.4 Culturally sensitive techniques Candidate identifies culturally sensitive techniques to address complex cognitive and social skills. Candidate utilizes curriculum to demonstrate the complex characteristics of cultures and groups within the United States and the ways in which race, ethnicity, gender, language, and social class interact to influence behavior. Candidate utilizes some culturally sensitive techniques to address complex cognitive and social skills. Candidate creates curriculum in order to help students understand that no perspective is “value neutral” and that knowledge reflects the interests, cultural biases, power, positions, and histories of individuals or group involved. Candidate creates curriculum to demonstrate the complex characteristics of cultures and groups and attempts to work with all students to meet their education needs. Candidate formulates many culturally sensitive techniques to address complex cognitive and social skills. Candidate evaluates her/his own efficacy to demonstrate the complex characteristics of cultures and groups and attempts to work with all students to meet their education needs. Candidate evaluates the effectiveness of the multiple culturally sensitive techniques employed within the classroom in addressing complex cognitive and social skills. 2.5 Multiple perspectives Candidate recognizes the limitations of having only one perspective on issues and the benefit of multiple perspectives. Candidate utilizes a range of perspectives for students on various issues within the classroom. 2.6 Understanding exceptionality Candidate recognizes that early adolescents and young adults with exceptionalities should be included within the regular education classroom and are familiar with the state and federal statutes that guide that practice. Candidate chooses curriculum that will reflect an inclusive environment. Candidate plans opportunities to provide multiple perspectives for students to help develop strategies and skills to engage with those who are not like themselves. Candidate creates curriculum that affords early adolescents and young adults with exceptionalities the opportunity to participate in the overall community of life within the regular classroom. Candidate determines the effectiveness of providing multiple perspectives to help students develop strategies and skills to engage with those who are not like themselves. Candidate evaluates the efficacy of curriculum that affords early adolescents and young adults with exceptionalities the opportunity to participate in the overall community of life within the regular classroom. Metastandard #3: Curriculum/Content Knowledge Proficiency Objective Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Candidate understands established state-mandated curriculum, key concepts, tools of inquiry and structure of his/her specific discipline (Language Arts/English, Science, Social Studies, Mathematics). Candidate will recall and master content knowledge and appropriate knowledge and skills related to statemandated curriculum. Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate uses his/her knowledge of the interdisciplinary nature of their subject matter to foster well-rounded student learning. Candidate uses his/her knowledge of subject matter, its interactions and interdisciplinary nature to provide meaningful learning for students. Candidate plans, implements, and modifies original curriculum and instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter, students, the community, and curriculum goals. Candidate will create interdisciplinary curriculum and lessons. Candidate will develop and adapt quality content appropriate curriculum utilizing content and pedagogical knowledge. Candidate will plan and implement integrated curriculum encompassing student, school, state, and community goals. Candidate evaluates the effectiveness of mastered content knowledge based on student learning. Candidate evaluates the effectiveness of the instructional materials and resources to support and engage students cognitively by assessing student progress. Candidate evaluates curriculum through a variety of assessment methods to determine the effectiveness of supporting and challenging early adolescents’ and young adults’ learning and growth. Components 3.1 Knowledge of content Candidate demonstrates content knowledge required by his/her specific discipline (Language Arts/English, Science, Social Studies, Mathematics). Candidate utilizes his/her specific discipline (Language Arts/English, Science, Social Studies, Mathematics) content knowledge effectively within the curriculum. 3.2 Representation of content Candidate recognizes that content should be presented utilizing good examples. Candidate represents content well with examples that are linked to students’ pre-knowledge and experience. 3.3 Knowledge of students’ misconceptions about content Candidate recognizes students’ misconceptions concerning concepts and relationships among concepts. Candidate utilizes curricula that promote conceptual understanding. Candidate illustrates interconnections to other parts of his/her specific discipline (Language Arts/English, Science, Social Studies, Mathematics) and other disciplines. Candidate describes content incorporating a variety of methods that are appropriate and link students’ pre-knowledge and experience. Candidate creates curricula that promote conceptual understanding. 3.4 Materials and resources Candidate recognizes the importance of choosing developmentally appropriate instructional materials and resources. Candidate chooses developmentally appropriate instructional materials and resources that engage students cognitively. Candidate creates relevant and developmentally appropriate instructional materials and resources which support and engage students cognitively. 3.5 Planning and supporting challenging curricula Candidate identifies the importance of planning and developing a challenging curriculum for all early adolescents and young adults. Candidate implements challenging curriculum supporting early adolescents’ and young adults’ learning and growth. Candidate designs curriculum that utilizes a variety of techniques that support and challenge early adolescents’ and young adults’ learning and growth. Candidate considers student feedback and input to determine effectiveness of methods that are utilized to represent content. Candidate evaluates the effectiveness of curriculum that promote conceptual understanding. Metastandard #4: Instruction Proficiency Objective Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Candidate knows and understands the teaching/learning research base and the breadth of instructional options available. Candidate will recall and explain a variety of instructional options and how each are related to educational research. Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate understands the effectiveness of using a variety of instructional strategies and applies knowledge of effective communication techniques via technology. Candidate employs a variety of instructional strategies as well as entertaining technological instructional resources to advance students’ into high level thinking skills. Candidate understands the value of using high quality instructional resources, including technology to encourage students’ development of critical thinking, problem solving, and performance skills. Candidate will develop and deliver instruction based on sound pedagogical principles using effective media communication techniques. Candidate will develop and implement instruction using a variety of strategies including technological instructional resources. Candidate will integrate multiple instructional strategies, including technology, to encourage critical thinking, problem solving and performance skills. Candidate synthesizes core research-based teaching approaches within developed curricula. Candidate creates curriculum utilizing a variety of instructional approaches to maximize student learning. Candidate constructs lessons in a comprehensive format that clearly includes a defined beginning and ending and increases opportunity for student learning and discovery. Candidate independently develops a variety of classroom management strategies to address group and individual behaviors. Candidate develops teaching approaches and materials that address the early adolescents’ and young adults’ individual learning needs. Candidate designs a wide repertoire of instructional approaches consistent with best practices. Candidate judges the utilization of core researchbased teaching approaches Components 4.1 Core teaching approaches supported by research Candidate recalls core research-based teaching strategies. Candidate utilizes core research-based teaching approaches. 4.2 Choice of instructional approaches Candidate recognizes various factors affecting the choice of instructional approach. Candidate utilizes a variety of instructional approaches. 4.3 Structure Candidate recognizes that lessons must be structured in a clear and organized format. Candidate structures lessons in a comprehensive format that clearly includes a defined beginning and ending. 4.4 Approaches for classroom management and addressing challenging behavior Candidate recognizes the importance of classroom management in addressing group and individual behaviors. Candidate recognizes that teaching approaches and materials should address the early adolescents’ and young adults’ individual learning needs. Candidate recognizes that varying instructional approaches produce different educational results. Candidate implements suggested classroom management techniques to address group and individual behaviors. Candidate utilizes teaching approaches and materials that address the early adolescents’ and young adults’ individual learning needs. Candidate adequately and appropriately varies instructional approaches as necessary. 4.5 Knowledge of the individual child in planning curriculum, instruction, and materials 4.6 Ability to vary instructional approaches Candidate determines the best instructional approaches to maximize student learning. Candidate assesses lessons structure and evaluates the format and the learning opportunities for students. Candidate monitors and alters a variety of classroom management strategies as needed to address group and individual behaviors. Candidate determines if teaching approaches and materials are addressing the early adolescents’ and young adults’ individual learning needs. Candidate evaluates instructional approaches in effectiveness of maximizing student learning. Metastandard #5: Assessment Proficiency Objective Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Candidate knows and understands a variety of authentic and equitable assessment strategies. Candidate will recall a variety of authentic and equitable assessment methods. Proficient (Application) Candidate understands how to use formal and informal assessments to obtain useful information about student learning and development. Candidate will use formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate the development of their students. Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate is knowledgeable about a variety of assessment strategies and utilizes multiple assessments in curriculum planning and implementation. Candidate will develop, implement, and utilize curriculum, which encompass a variety of assessment methods. Candidate uses a variety of assessment strategies to evaluate and ensures the continuous intellectual, social, and physical development of the learner. Candidate determines the effectiveness of lesson plans assesses by utilizing a variety of standards and assessment criteria. . Candidate evaluates assessment that is integrated into the curriculum specifically its usefulness of analyzing long term and short term goals and determining students’ strength and weaknesses in a specific discipline (Language Arts/English, Science, Social Studies, Mathematics).. Candidate judges assessment and makes alterations based on analysis of student learning. Candidate will evaluate, utilize, and appropriately share assessment results to continue student progress intellectually, socially, ad physically. Components 5.1 Assessment criteria and standards Candidate recognizes the importance of standards and assessment criteria Candidate incorporates standards and assessment criteria into lesson plans. Candidate effectively integrates a variety of standards and assessment criteria into lesson plans. 5.2 Assessment of student learning Candidate identifies that assessment is used to determine long term and short term goals and can identify its importance in determining students’ strength and weaknesses in a specific discipline (Language Arts/English, Science, Social Studies, Mathematics). Candidate uses assessment to determine long term and short term goals for students and students’ strength and weaknesses in a specific discipline (Language Arts/English, Science, Social Studies, Mathematics). Candidate creates assessment that is integrated into the curriculum and uses the results to analyze long term and short term goals and students’ strength and weaknesses in a specific discipline (Language Arts/English, Science, Social Studies, Mathematics). 5.3 Using assessment to promote learning Candidate identifies that assessment can be used as part of the learning experience and recognizes the importance of appropriate, timely feedback. Candidate identifies that assessment can be used to inform their teaching and to improve the quality of their instruction. Candidate uses assessment as a learning experience and gives appropriate and timely feedback. Candidate constructs their own assessments that reflects actual knowledge and guides the learning process for students. Candidate applies assessment techniques that can be used to inform their teaching and to improve the quality of their instruction. Candidate designs an assessment agenda using a variety of techniques that can be used to inform their teaching and to improve the quality of their instruction. 5.4 Using assessment to inform teaching Candidate evaluates e assessment techniques and materials used in the classroom and actively integrates this to inform teaching and to improve the quality of instruction. Metastandard #6: Professionalism/Learning Communities Proficiency Objective Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Candidate understands the unique philosophical foundations and organizational structure of secondary education and the role the teacher plays within this structure. Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate incorporates his/her knowledge of secondary schools into the design of educational programs that reflect sound principles of teaching and learning. Candidate demonstrates a commitment to lifelong learning through reflection and professional behaviors. Candidate is a reflective practitioner who continually evaluates the effects of his/her choices and actions on others, and actively seeks out opportunities to grow professionally. Candidate will recognize and explain the foundation and structure of secondary education including the role of the teacher. Candidate will construct sound educational programs conducive to the structure and foundation of secondary schools. Candidate will reflect on his/her own practice, on students’ performance, and on developments in the field to continue their own growth as teachers. Candidate will participate in professional experiences and opportunities that further his/her professional development and will use student learning as a professional gauge. Candidate selects opportunities for reflection and self-analysis, solicits evaluation of her/his performance from varied sources, to improve her/his professional practice. Candidate assess his/her own effectiveness to institute change through the decision making processes within school settings (e.g., IEPs, 504 plans) Candidate selects collaboration opportunities to effectively improve schools and student learning. Components 6.1 Reflection and selfanalysis Candidate recognizes the importance of reflection and self-analysis for improving professional practices. Candidate engages in reflection in an attempt to improve her/his professional practice. Candidate uses reflection and self-analysis to improve her/his professional practice in an ongoing manner. 6.2 Decision making Candidate recognizes the complexities of decision making processes within school settings (e.g., IEPs, 504 plans) Candidate participates in a variety of decision making processes within school settings (e.g., IEPs, 504 plans) Candidate analyzes the role of an educator in the complexities of decision making processes within school settings (e.g., IEPs, 504 plans) 6.3 Collaboration with other professionals Candidate recognizes the importance of collaboration with other professionals to improve schools and student learning. Candidate uses collaboration with other professionals for the purpose of improving schools and student learning. Candidate seeks collaboration opportunities with an expanding range of professionals, and uses these relationships to improve schools and student learning. 6.4 Participation in school, corporation, and other professional activities Candidate recognizes the importance of participation in school, corporation, and other professional activities. Candidate participates in school, corporation, and other professional activities. Candidate seeks participation opportunities in school, corporation, and other professional activities in order to build a stronger learning community. Candidate evaluates knowledge gained from participation in school, corporation, and other professional activities in order to build a stronger learning community Metastandard #7: Family/Community Involvement Proficiency Objective Basic (Knowledge and Comprehension) Candidate understands the importance and role of the family and community on the development of early adolescents and young adults. Candidate will explain the role of the family and community on the development of early adolescents and young adults. Proficient (Application) Mastery (Analysis and Synthesis) Exemplary (Evaluation) Candidate understands the importance of engagement with community resource persons and groups. Candidate understands how to facilitate and support the education of early adolescents and young adults with the knowledge of the impact of family structure and home life. Candidate understands the importance of fostering relationships with students, families, colleagues, community, and other school-related constituencies. Candidate will use community resources to build classroom environments and curriculum. Candidate will develop a classroom environment and curriculum that supports the unique impressionistic early adolescent and young adult learning. Candidate will develop and maintain positive working relationships with students, families, colleagues, community, and other school-related constituencies. Candidate reflects on her/his communication with parents/guardians and evaluates the methods employed. Candidate assesses the effectiveness and impact of parental communication strategies. Components 7.1 Communicating Candidate recognizes the role of parent/guardian communication in relation to student success. Candidate explores a variety of ways to communicate effectively with parents/guardians. Candidate communicates effectively with parents/guardians through a variety of means. 7.2 Student learning Candidate recognizes the importance of communicating academic and behavioral expectations to the parent/guardian in a clear manner. Candidate recognizes the value of involving parents/guardians as active participants in the classroom and school settings. Candidate endeavors to communicate academic and behavioral expectations to the parents/guardians. Candidate develops communication strategies to explain academic and behavioral expectations to the parents/guardians in a clear manner Candidate designs a variety of strategies to bring parents/guardians and parental input into the classroom curriculum and instruction. 7.4 Advocacy Candidate identifies the legal responsibilities of a teacher (e.g., students’ rights and welfare, issues of confidentiality) Candidate upholds the legal responsibilities of a teacher (e.g., students’ rights and welfare, issues of confidentiality) Candidate proposes ways to ensure that the legal responsibilities of a teacher are reflected in practice (e.g., students’ rights and welfare, issues of confidentiality) 7.5 Collaboration with community Candidate recognizes the various stakeholder groups that comprise the school community. Candidate partners with stakeholders through curriculum and instruction choices. Candidate designs partnership arrangements with stakeholders through curriculum and instruction choices to strengthen schools, families, and student learning 7.3 Parent involvement Candidate incorporates parents/guardians through curriculum and instruction choices. Candidate reflects on the impact and successof using a variety of strategies to bring parents/guardians and parental input into the classroom curriculum and instruction Candidate appraise his/her effectiveness in carrying out the legal responsibilities of a wellinformed teacher (e.g., students’ rights and welfare, issues of confidentiality) Candidate evaluates the partnerships developed with stakeholders and determines optimal utilization to strengthen schools, families, and student learning 7.6 Unity and diversity in communities Candidate recognizes the complex relationships between unity and diversity in communities. Candidate uses curriculum to compare and contrast the role of and relationships between unity and diversity in various communities. Candidate creates curriculum to help students understand the complex relationships between unity and diversity in their local communities. Candidate evaluates curriculum developed to help students understand the complex relationships between unity and diversity in their local communities and makes appropriate modifications Components adapted from: Banks, J.A., Cookson, P., Gay, G., Hawley, W. D., Irvine, J. J. Nieto, S., Schofield, J. W., Stephan, W. G. (2001). Diversity Within Unity: Essential Principles For Teaching and Learning in a Multicultural Society. Phi Delta Kappan, , (83) 3, 196-203. Danielson, C. (1996). Enhancing Professional Practice: A Framework for Teaching. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA. Nitko, A.J. & Brookhart, S.M. (2007). Educational Assessment of Students. New Jersey: Pearson/Merrill Prentice Hall. School of Education Professional Dispositions A classroom teacher must exhibit numerous qualities that are reflected in his or her professional dispositions. Just as there are certain dispositions expected of professional educators, so too are there dispositions expected of students or teacher candidates in the Teacher Education Program in the School of Education at Indiana University Kokomo. Teacher candidate dispositions are evaluated both formally and informally throughout the program. Formal Evaluation of Teacher Dispositions All Indiana University Kokomo School of Education courses are designed to build on the previous course knowledge and requirements. Therefore, as teacher candidates move through education courses in this developmental manner, more evidence of their ability to demonstrate personal and professional responsibility, appropriate communication skills, awareness of diversity, and classroom management techniques should be manifested. The School of Education has developed formal disposition criteria for students, or teacher candidates, enrolled in preprofessional courses and courses within the Teacher Education Program (TEP). This involves utilization of a Disposition Rubric that consists of characteristics expected of all students at all points in their program. The dispositions are developmental in nature—that is, there is an expectation of growth as teacher candidates progress through the program. While it is understood that the level of skill or performance will range between those at the beginning versus those later in their program, this rubric represents dispositions that should be performed at a developmentally acceptable level at all stages of a candidate’s program. Unacceptable ratings for teacher candidates who clearly do not fulfill the expectations of the field requirements will be subject to benchmark review and remediation. Professional Dispositions are as follows: PROFESSIONAL DISPOSITIONS RESPONSIBILITY -Demonstrates high standards in both the classroom and general school and professional settings including responsibility in meeting deadlines, managing time, following procedures and rules Acceptable Unacceptable -Displays ethical behaviors such as honesty, fairness, integrity COMMUNICATION -Communicates through clear, fluent, grammatically correct spoken and written language -Communicates through appropriate affect, emotions, and interpersonal skills DIVERSITY -Demonstrates behaviors consistent with equity and the belief that all students can learn -Displays tolerance for all individuals regardless of diverse backgrounds CLASSROOM CONDUCT -Developing skills necessary to maintain a safe and engaging classroom -Is a reflective practitioner able to accept feedback, analyze practices, and modify practices as appropriate Revised 05/15/2010 1 Informal Evaluation of Teacher Dispositions It is also important to note that embedded in our Unit Assessment System (UAS) is an informal evaluation of teacher candidate dispositions. Although most faculty and instructors within the School of Education do not use the rubric within the daily administration of course content, there is a system in place to attend to those individuals whose conduct is inappropriate or unprofessional. Behaviors such as attendance, academic honesty, integrity, etc. are monitored throughout the program. Many professors include such items within the course grade. Education faculty may also use the Fitness for the Teaching Profession Policy (see policy below) if such behaviors require closer scrutiny and/or review by the School of Education. A Fitness Report initiated by a faculty member is written documentation as to dispositional concerns. All Fitness Reports on teacher candidates are subject to evaluation through the Teacher Education Admission and Retention Policy (TEAR) and/or at School of Education Benchmark meetings. It is critical for the teacher candidates to adhere to the individual and professional code of ethics and conduct embodied in the Professional Dispositions Policy in order to participate in field practica or student teach in P-12 classrooms. As a result, the Dean of Education reserves the right to prevent a candidate’s entry into a school system if the situation warrants. Approved January 7, 2008; Revised May 15, 2010; Revised October 2011 Fitness for the Teaching Profession Policy A system is in place that is used by faculty to identify and report severe problems/behaviors exhibited by students in university classes/field experiences prior to and after admission to the Teacher Education Program (TEP) at Indiana University Kokomo. It is critical for teacher candidates to demonstrate and adhere to professional and dispositional skills in order to progress through the teacher certification programs (i.e., responsibility, communication, social relationships, ethics, etc.). Students who are reported two or more times for failure to meet Fitness for the Teaching Profession criteria may be subject to a hearing with the Teacher Education Admission and Retention (TEAR) Committee. The TEAR Committee will recommend to the Dean of Education appropriate action. The Dean of Education will make the final decision and the student will be notified in writing. January 2011 Revised 05/15/2010 2 SCHOOL OF EDUCATION Section V Other Relevant Policies IACTE OUTSTANDING FUTURE EDUCATOR AWARD APPLICATION GUIDELINES IACTE AWARD Each academic year the Indiana Association of Colleges for Teacher Education (IACTE) presents Outstanding Future Educators Awards to Student Teachers completing education programs at colleges and universities throughout Indiana. IU Kokomo School of Education selects up to 3 student teachers each academic year. The selected award winners are notified mid-Spring semester. These Awardees are invited to attend a professional meeting and recognition luncheon in April. ELIGIBILITY To be eligible for this award, the Student Teacher must complete the majority of her/his professional education work at IU Kokomo including student teaching. To be considered for this award, students must submit a complete application containing the documents attesting to exemplary student teaching performance to the Director of Student Teaching. The School of Education members will review each application and applicants are notified by mail of the decision. IACTE application deadlines are as follows: FALL STUDENT TEACHERS SPRING STUDENT TEACHERS 3rd Monday in October by 5:00 PM 1st Monday in March by 5:00 PM APPLICATION REQUIREMENTS All applications must include the following: 1. A cover letter written by the applicant, not to exceed 3 pages, that summarizes her/his student teaching experiences and activities as they apply and address 4 of the 7 MetaStandards (ex: Diversity, Curriculum, Assessment) which reflect exemplary levels of performance and demonstrate merit of this award. 2. At least 3 letters of recommendation from the following sources: 1) Supervising/Cooperating teacher (required) 2) University Supervisor 3) School Administrator -e.g. building principal, department chair, curriculum coordinator, lead teacher 4) University Faculty may also volunteer a letter of recommendation. 3. Excellence in professional dispositions must be demonstrated throughout the Teacher Education Program. This information will be cross-referenced through Benchmark information and/or may be addressed in a University Faculty letter. NOTE: All application materials must be typed and presented in a professional manner (e.g. resume folder) to the Director of Student Teaching by 5:00 p.m. on the designated deadline dates.