pdf - Publications
Transcription
pdf - Publications
WEED SOLUTIONS JULY 2011 Weed Solutions Issue No. 1. Winter 2011 (11/078) ISSN 1322-5227 Weeds Solutions is an information magazine for the RIRDC-managed National Weeds and Productivity Research Program. It is distributed by direct mail to subscribers from the research community, industry, government, as well as farmers, libraries and consultants. It is also available for free download from the RIRDC website at https://rirdc.infoservices.com.au/items/11-078. Editing and design by Cox Inall Communications, Level 2, 44 Mountain Street, Ultimo, NSW, 2007. The information contained in this publication is intended for general use to assist public knowledge and discussion and to help improve the development of sustainable regions. You must not rely on any information contained in this publication without taking specialist advice relevant to your particular circumstances. While reasonable care has been taken in preparing this publication to ensure that information is true and correct, the Commonwealth of Australia gives no assurance as to the accuracy of any information in this publication. The Commonwealth of Australia, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC), the authors or contributors expressly disclaim, to the maximum extent permitted by law, all responsibility and liability to any person, arising directly or indirectly from any act or omission, or for any consequences of any such act or omission, made in reliance on the contents of this publication, whether or not caused by any negligence on the part of the Commonwealth of Australia, RIRDC, the authors or contributors. The Commonwealth of Australia does not necessarily endorse the views in this publication. This publication is copyright. Apart from any use as permitted under the Copyright Act 1968, all other rights are reserved. However, wide dissemination is encouraged. Requests and inquiries concerning reproduction and rights should be addressed to the RIRDC Publications Manager on phone 02 6271 4165. Published by the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation July 2011 PO Box 4776 Kingston ACT 2604 Cover image: Dragi Markovic & the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities (DSEWPaC) 2 FOREWORD Weeds create many costly challenges for Australia’s agricultural and forest industries and have a significant impact on the natural environment. These challenges require us to continue to improve our knowledge of weeds and to adopt practices that prevent, mitigate or adapt to invasive weeds. Research plays a valuable role in developing the information, tools, management options and resources that will enable Australia to better manage invasive weeds. Increased knowledge will help to reduce the impact of weeds on farm and forestry productivity, and on biodiversity. The National Weeds and Productivity Research Program plays a valuable role in developing the information and resources that will enable Australia to better manage invasive weeds. The program is managed by the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC). Thirty nine projects have been completed under the first stage of the research program, managed by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry, and RIRDC is publishing the project reports. Fifty new projects under the program’s second stage are also underway, with funding of up to $12.4 million provided by the Australian Government for the first two years (2010–11 and 2011–12). These new research projects include the development of technology to kill weeds with microwaves; crush weed seeds such as annual ryegrass during grain harvest; and detect weeds from un-manned aerial vehicles fitted with hyperspectral remote sensing cameras. Extensive testing both here and overseas is identifying potential biological control agents. Several projects explore the possible impact of climate change on the distribution of weeds, and the attitude of land managers to weed control. The National Weeds and Productivity Research Program is doing great work to find innovative responses to Australia’s diverse weed problem. I commend the program and the work it will achieve into the future. The Hon. Dr Mike Kelly AM MP Parliamentary Secretary for Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry 3 CONTENTS Foreword ���������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 3 Federal Parliamentary Secretary for Agriculture Hon. Mike Kelly Welcome ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 5 RIRDC Weeds Advisory Committee Chairman Hon. John Kerin AM Weed solutions for Australia ����������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 6-7 A snapshot of the weeds research projects being funded by RIRDC and the priorities of the National Weeds and Productivity Research Program Image: Georgia Curry & DSEWPaC Understanding weeds and preventing their spread ��������������������������������������������� 8-9 Knowledge is power and will help land managers tackle potential weed issues as well as existing ones Image: Andrew Tatnell & DSEWPaC Finding new biological controls�������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 10-11 Under strict protocols, biological control is a cost effective way of managing weeds, particularly in inaccessible areas Image: Michael Marriott & DSEWPaC Thinking outside the weeds square �������������������������������������������������������������������������������������� 12-13 Innovative technology to provide new tools for weed managers Image: Andrew Tatnell & DSEWPaC Smarter herbicide use Integrated Weed Management practices are vital to ensuring we can continue to use important chemicals 14-15 Image: Dragi Markovic& DSEWPaC Better weeds policies 16 Understanding the knowledge, attitudes and abilities of land managers will ensure policies that encourage action Image: Dragi Markovic & DSEWPaC Weeds on Indigenous lands 17 Indigenous land managers are responsible for more than 12 per cent of Australia’s land mass Image: Dragi Markovic & DSEWPaC Phase 1 weeds research Research highlights from Phase 1 of the National Weeds and Productivity Research Program managed by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry Image: Birchip Cropping Group 4 18-23 WELCOME Weeds are one of the major threats to Australia’s primary production and to the natural environment. They compete with pasture and crops for natural resources, can poison livestock, contaminate produce, and often require costly chemicals to be removed. Weeds also out-compete native plants and degrade the habitats of native animals. While there are many possible definitions, put simply a weed is “a plant that requires some form of action to reduce its harmful effects on the economy, the environment, human health and amenity”1. The Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC) is leading the search for innovative and effective solutions to Australia’s weed problems, by managing the Australian Government’s National Weeds and Productivity Research Program. RIRDC’s vision for the Program is “an Australia with the knowledge, resources and technology to successfully prevent, mitigate or adapt to weeds in our agricultural systems, ecosystems and landscapes”. The Program is investing in projects that will provide additional understanding and tools for land managers to minimise the cost of weed control and restrict the spread of weeds – both new and existing. A priority for RIRDC is to establish collaborative relationships with other agencies to improve the long-term nature of weeds R&D activities for the benefit of productive land managers and the environment. Hon. John Kerin AM Chairman RIRDC Weeds Advisory Committee The Program is investing in projects that will provide additional understanding and tools for land managers to minimise the cost of weed control and restrict the spread of weeds – both new and existing. 1 The Australian Weeds Strategy – A national strategy for weed management in Australia, 2007, Natural Resource Management Ministerial Council 5 weed solutions for australia As manager of the Australia Government’s National Weeds and Productivity Research Program, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC) is leading the search for innovative and effective weed solutions. Weeds have a major impact on the national economy, costing farmers more than $4 billion annually in lost production and control measures. And the damage caused to Australia’s natural environment by weeds is also immense. Under Phase 2 of the Program, RIRDC is investing around $12.4 million in 50 weeds research projects. The projects began in March 2011 and run until May 2012. The new projects will be conducted by some of Australia’s leading research institutions and government agencies, and will provide a better understanding of weeds, as well as enhanced tools and techniques to reduce their impact on farm productivity and biodiversity. The projects address weed problems in all States and Territories, with a view to preparing for future incursions, developing better policies to tackle to weed populations, and improving the public’s knowledge of weed species and best-practice management techniques. The research will also address a number of Weeds of National Significance; assist the cropping and pastoral industries with problems like herbicide resistance and seed persistence; and promote new weed treatment technologies, new biological controls and remote sensing technologies. More information on the projects being funded is available on the RIRDC website, at www.rirdc.gov.au/weeds 6 The University of Western Australia will continue the development of the Harrington Seed Destructor, a new mechanical at-harvest weed seed management system. Image: Grains Research and Development Corporation (GRDC) Researchers will investigate weed invasion and management on Indigenous-owned lands in northern and central Australia to identify ways to improve the capacity of Indigenous owners to address weed issues. Rice weed control research being conducted at sites across Australia, including Mackay, Qld, will focus on new practices that assist production of aerobic rice crops with maximum potential economic yield. Image: Kerry Trapnell & the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities Image: John Baker & the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities Over 80 per cent of coastline habitats in NSW are invaded by bitou bush. The CSIRO is examining the cause of bitou bush Sudden Death Syndrome, which has been observed to rapidly kill large patches of the weed. Image: Hillary Cherry & the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities The University of Adelaide will attempt to define the extent of paraquat resistant annual ryegrass in pasture seed production fields. Image: Andrew Storrie, Agronomo Researchers will consider how stakeholders can better work together to improve their collective response to Victoria’s serrated tussock problem. Image: John Baker & the Department of Sustainability, Environment, Water, Population and Communities Sea spurge is the main weed of Tasmania’s coastal dune environments. The CSIRO will assess two fungi at its laboratory in France to determine if they are sufficiently specific and virulent to be investigated further as biological control agents. Image: South Gippsland LandCare Group 7 Gamba Grass, near Berrimah, NT. Image: Colin G Wilson DSEWPaC 8 Climate changes weed incursion front line Changing weather patterns could dramatically alter where weeds can thrive, posing a biosecurity challenge to land managers at the front line of the fight to stop new species taking hold. Having obtained a clearer picture of future weeds threats, the project will then develop preventative management strategies to reduce the impact. The development of predictive models to determine future weed threats will be essential for early intervention and to enable adaptation measures to be put in place. Similarly, in eastern Australia, Dr Rieks van Klinken of CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences will be assessing how climate change will alter weed invasion patterns in the Murray Darling Basin. As part of RIRDC’s National Weeds Program, 14 research projects are being funded which will improve our understanding of how weeds grow and spread, and how they can be treated to prevent their expansion into new areas. The project will predict habitat suitability and susceptibility across the entire Basin for key weed threats, including lippia, parthenium and Chilean needle grass, and how that would differ under the various climate change forecasts. Dr Pippa Michael, of the University of Western Australia, is leading one such project, assessing the current and future impact of agricultural weed species within the WA Wheatbelt based on various climate change scenarios. The information obtained from these research projects will have direct implications for land use policies, weed surveillance strategies, property management systems, weed control methods and research extension activities. As an industry, nurseries and garden suppliers believe they have to be environmental stewards and provide the right information to customers about which plants to use in particular situations. To do that, research is essential, and that’s why we applied for funding through RIRDC’s National Weeds Program to help us identify any plants which are likely to become problems. But it’s a collective issue – customers at one end asking questions so they can make informed choices and governments at the other end regulating when necessary. We all have a role in halting the spread of weeds. Dr Anthony Kachenko Environmental and Technical Policy Manager Nursery and Garden Industry Australia Understanding weeds and preventing their spread Understanding Cabomba ecology and dispersal – Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation (Qld) Climate change and the risks of weed invasions in the Murray Darling Basin – CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences Climate change impacts on agricultural weeds in Western Australia – Curtin University of Technology Improving decision–making to contain the spread of weeds – CSIRO Controlling parthenium and mother of millions in the Desert Uplands – Desert Uplands Committee Expanding the aquatic herbicide list – Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation (Qld) The genetic, reproductive and demographic factors of the Sagittaria invasion – CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences Containing the spread of serrated tussock – Roberts Evaluation Pty Ltd Identifying the gaps in weed management in vegetable crops – Scholefield Robinson Horticultural Services Pty Ltd Measuring the impact of the high biomass grass invasion – CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences Counting the cost of coastal weeds – University of Melbourne Understanding sudden death syndrome in weeds – CSIRO Measuring the impacts of vine infestations on plant health – University of Wollongong Weed risk assessment for Australia’s nursery and garden industries – Nursery and Garden Industry Australia Weeds web portal – Chris Auricht & Associates 9 Letting nature do the hard work Caption: Calligrapha pantherina leaf-beetle larvae, Berrimah, NT. Image: Colin G Wilson & DSEWPaC Weed control can be expensive, labour intensive and time consuming, which is why researchers are looking for natural organisms to do the hard work instead. Biological weed controls can include insects, fungi or disease pathogens – natural predators which often keep a species in check in their native environment, but without which weeds can thrive in new conditions. New biological controls are tested against strict quarantine rules to ensure they only damage the target weed species and do not have any detrimental effects on the native environment. Seven research projects are being funded as part of RIRDC’s National Weeds Program, aimed at identifying and testing new biological control methods for some of Australia’s most devastating weeds. Biological control offers a way of reducing the impact of weeds by using natural enemies such as insects, fungi and bacteria – often from the same country from which the plants were introduced to Australia. Dr Robin Adair, of the Department of Primary Industries Victoria, is leading a major, multi-institutional project aimed at developing seven new biological control agents to reduce the impact of 21 existing priority weeds, including eight Weeds of National Significance. 10 The target weeds include gorse, English broom, Montpellier (cape) broom, boneseed, bitou bush, blackberry, bridal creeper, salvinia, and cat’s claw creeper. Host specificity testing will be completed for four of those seven agents which, if successful, will pave the way for their release in south eastern Australia. These controls will offer a costeffective and environmentally friendly option for inclusion in Integrated Weed Management strategies, reducing land managers’ reliance on herbicides, as well as cutting energy and chemical inputs costs in agriculture. Across the range of RIRDC research projects, surveys and preliminary testing are being conducted in Argentina, eastern Bolivia, western Brazil, Mexico, New Zealand, India and France. In several other cases, approval has been granted for the importation of biological control agents for further testing in secure quarantine facilities in Australia. Finding new biological controls You tend not to notice a new weed until it’s well established, and then you need a big slab of research done very quickly to work out how to eradicate or control it. Indian prickly acacia predators – Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation (Qld) Because Australia has different agricultural systems and a different set of chemical techniques available, you’re basically starting from scratch. Testing new treatments for alligator weed – CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences Preventing weeds in the first place is by far the most cost-effective solution, which means cleaning machinery between properties and other biosecurity measures are vital. Branched Broomrape is so far confined to South Australia, and we’re putting a lot of effort into keeping it that way including investing $250,000 a year on research. Philip Warren Manager, Branched Broomrape Unit Biosecurity SA Controlling Crofton weed on Lord Howe Island – CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences The prickly question of Hudson Pear – Department of Primary Industries (NSW) Diving deeper into sea spurge – CSIRO Ecosystem Sciences Biological controls for South Eastern Australia’s worst weeds – Department of Primary Industries (Vic) Can fungus control giant Parramatta grass? – Department of Primary Industries (NSW) Paterson’s Curse as a model to measure the impact of climate change on biocontrols – Charles Sturt University 11 Thinking outside the weeds square The prototype system, which is based on a modified microwave oven, using a horn antenna to apply microwave energy to weeds: Paddy Melon plants immediately after microwave treatment and three weeks after treatment. Images: Graham Brodie, University of Melbourne The common, kitchen variety microwave oven is not a tool normally associated with weed control, but it is one of the many creative options researchers are considering as they look for new ways to counter Australia’s weed problems. Dr Graham Brodie, of the University of Melbourne, is leading a research project which hopes to develop a prototype machine which selectively destroys weeds at a cost comparable to conventional chemical methods. The concentration of microwave energy on weeds could collapse the structures that carry water through their stems, ultimately leading to plant death. While Dr Brodie’s initial trials will use a normal kitchen microwave oven, the research program will also test new techniques for applying microwave treatments. The research team hopes to develop a prototype carrying an industrial- 12 scale microwave system for use in field trials, prior to conducting an economic and environmental assessment of the procedure. As part of RIRDC’s National Weeds Program, a number of such creative research projects are being fonded. These vary from the use of a biodegradable weed mat made of hemp fibre, which both smothers weeds to death and adds organic matter to the soil; to the use of ‘suppressive plants’ to limit parthenium weed; to the use of aerial imagery to detect and monitor weed populations; and new machinery which destroys weed seeds at the point of crop harvest. Innovative Thinking A microwave system to kill weed seedlings – University of Melbourne Using agricultural wastes to create biodegradable weed controls – CSIRO Materials and Science Using DNA and aerial imagery to monitor golden dodder – South Australian Research and Development Institute Evaluating the Harrington Weed Seed Destructor – University of Western Australia CSIRO scientist Dr Menghe Miao with a roll of the biodegradable fibre mat being assessed for weed control Image: Menghe Miao Back to basics with Weed Mats With industry looking for cleaner and greener alternatives to conventional weed treatments, the team at CSIRO is trialling the novel approach of manufacturing ‘weed mats’ from agricultural waste. UVI polythene or polypropylene mats have been shown to provide effective weed eradication, but the materials are non-biodegradable and, in some cases, also impede rainfall soaking into the soil and inhibit worm activity through the soil. To counter this problem, CSIRO Principal Research Scientist Dr Menghe Miao is investigating the feasibility of the commercial manufacture of biodegradable weed mats in Australia. Biodegradable weed mats are an environmentally friendly attractive option. The mats suppress weeds while the plants are establishing and then slowly rot away as the plants take over the role of weed suppression. They retain moisture, allow rainfall to soak into the soil, reduce evaporation, and encourage worm activity. The CSIRO will produce 500 metres of weed mat from hemp, flax and kenaf fibres using nonwoven technology at its Fibre Science and Engineering plant in Geelong, Victoria. Dr Miao’s work, which is being supported by industry partners Richgro and Go Grow, will also include a survey of regional distribution of fibrous straw growth, fibre extraction technology, mat manufacturing technology, and mapping how the initiative developed through this project could create value in the regions. Mats will be provided to growers in the NSW Northern Rivers and Jandakot/Canning Vale in WA, to test their suitability to the horticulture, garden, truffle, landscape, and herb industries across Australia. Limiting weed competition when restoring native vegetation – Regional Development Australia-Murray Molecular control of reproduction in weeds – University of Melbourne Identifying summer weeds with precision sensing technology – University of Southern Queensland Managing parthenium weed with suppressive plants – University of Queensland Tackling the weed seed bank with the SeedPersistence Tool Kit – University of Western Australia Detecting weeds with hyperspectral remote sensing technology – Charles Sturt University Weed control in aerobic rice to increase water-use efficiency – Agropraisals Pty Ltd Managing weeds under dry seeding and permanent residue farming – Western Australian No-Tillage Farmers Association 13 Herbicide spraying warning sign on the dunes at City Beach, Perth, WA. Image: Dragi Markovic & DSEWPaC Managing chemical resistance in your backyard 14 Glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide for weed control in Australia – it offers broad spectrum weed control, has no soil residue, is easy to use and is relatively safe to users and the environment. Among them is a project led by Dr Christopher Preston, of the University of Adelaide, which is looking for tools to control glyphosate-resistant weeds that have emerged, particularly in non-agricultural areas such as roadsides, along waterways and railway lines. But its effectiveness is also its weakness, encouraging over-reliance that has led to resistance developing in five weed species at 120 different locations across Australia. The build-up of resistance in these areas has the potential to spread and impact the effectiveness of glyphosate in other areas, including broad-scale agriculture. This means researchers have to find smarter ways of using glyphosate to ensure it can continue to be an effective weed treatment. Dr Preston’s team will be educating managers at local councils, state transport authorities, railways and water utilities to improve their understanding of the risks of glyphosate resistance and how to manage its usage properly. As part of RIRDC’s National Weeds Program, eight research projects are investigating how chemical herbicides can be used more efficiently, and how plant resistance can be minimised. Preliminary research will also be conducted on glyphosateresistant weeds under controlled conditions to identify alternative herbicides or herbicide mixtures that may provide effective management alternatives. Smarter herbicide use New tools for detecting herbicide resistance – University of Western Australia Does herbicide tolerance change with elevated CO2? – University of Canberra Understanding herbicide resistance in annual ryegrass – University of Western Australia Alternatives to glyphosate for resistant weeds – University of Adelaide Herbicide availability for new plant industries Herbicides for small crops – Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation As a producer of olives, we encounter difficulty in accessing herbicides we need to control the weeds on our farm. Management of paraquat resistance in pasture seed – University of Adelaide It’s a similar situation for many small industries, such as green tea, herbs and spices, dates, essential oils, native grass seeds, and ornamental wildflowers – often the most suitable chemical for weed control may not be registered for use on their crop. Unfortunately chemical companies often do not undertake the trial work for small crops in order to achieve full registration of their herbicides, which leaves many farmers of these crops in the position that they may well be using herbicides for which there is no registration. New Rural Industries Australia (NRIA) has been commissioned by RIRDC to address high priority issues in the minor use of herbicides. This research will be vital in commencing the process to either achieve full registration of some chemicals on certain crops, or at least to gain minor use permits for those crops. Jim Rowntree Olive Grower Coonalpyn, South Australia Are wheat-selective pre-emergent herbicides sustainable in a changing climate? – University of Western Australia Improving adoption of best practice weed management strategies – CSIRO Alternative approaches to chemical weed control measures – New Rural Industries Australia The use of weed sensors for variable rate herbicide application – Birchip Cropping Group 15 Caption: Camp for field staff near the Bendora Reservoir, ACT. Image: Andrew Tatnell & DSEWPaC Working together to control weeds The actions of every Australian land manager can dramatically impact how far and wide weeds can spread, as well as the wider community’s ability to control weed problems. But what are the social and economic factors which motivate land managers to understand weed threats and to take action to limit their impact? RIRDC’s National Weeds Program is funding a project headed by University of Queensland researcher Dr Yvonne Buckley which will answer the question of how decisions by individual stakeholders affect weed distribution across the wider landscape. Dr Buckley’s work is one of four RIRDC-funded research projects aimed at delivering better weeds policies and control programs. Given that weeds do not respect property boundaries, the challenge for policy makers is to bring together thousands of individual land owners, each confronting just a small part of a weed invasion, in a united and coordinated approach to a common threat. Dr Buckley’s research will look at how an individual’s land management motivations fit in with such wide-scale ecological protection. By understanding how individual land managers make their decisions, Dr Buckley’s team hopes to improve the adoption of existing control measures. 16 Removing weeds by hand can be hard physical work, but it’s often the only method available when working in sensitive native bushland reserves where chemicals cannot be used. You have to love the bush and understand the value of native bushland to want to do this work, and it is great to see government programs take environmental weed threats seriously. Our group has 18 volunteer members, most of whom have a Certificate IV in Conservation and Land Management. We remove weeds like coastal tea tree (Leptospermum laevegatum), Sydney golden wattle (Acacia longifolia), blackberry (Rubus spp) and Salvinia infestation in Magela Creek, Kakadu National Park, NT. Image: Colin G Wilson & DSEWPaC Asparagus scandens, so that native species can naturally regenerate. The support of Local, State and Federal Government programs helps us to be consistent and persistent in our approach, and to re-visit important areas like drinking water catchments for follow up treatments. We want to make sure good bushland stays in good condition by preventing weeds from encroaching, so educating the public is also an important part of our activities. Diane Harwood Denmark Weed Action Group Denmark, WA Better weeds policies Future proofing our national borders – Department of Primary Industries (NSW) Improving regional coordination of weed control – University of New England Innovation in weed management strategy – University of New England How your decisions affect weed distribution – University of Queensland Systematic review of weeds surveys – ABARES Collation of information on weeds into the National Plant Health Status Report – Plant Health Australia Weeds on Indigenous lands Indigenous land owners are responsible for more than 12 per cent of Australia’s land mass. Weeds are a major concwern as they threaten cultural, environmental and resource values. However, until now, there has been little research conducted into the knowledge, attitudes and abilities of Indigenous land owners to manage weeds, and there is currently no longterm strategy for weed management on Native Title lands. In the past, partnerships between researchers and Indigenous land managers usually focused on single weed species, rather than the development of a comprehensive and integrated approach to non-native plants built on an understanding of Indigenous land management practices and their capacity to eradicate problem species. As part of RIRDC’s National Weeds Program, two projects are addressing this knowledge shortfall. The first will consider the implications of the changing nature of land ownership for Australia’s weed management; the weed management priorities of Native Title holders; and the opportunities and limitations of current weed institutions, policies and programs with respect to Native Title holders. The second will work with Indigenous land owners in a case study approach to describe weed problems; identify Indigenous perspectives and compare and contrast them with non-Indigenous perspectives; and identify ways to improve the capacity of Indigenous owners to address weed issues. 17 Phase 1 research Caption: Spinyhead Sida, Beatrice Hill, lower Adelaide River, NT. Image: Colin G Wilson & DSEWPaC building knowledge and embracing innovation 18 Nationally coordinated weeds research is vital in tackling one of Australia’s most pressing natural resource management issues. The projects were selected to build on existing weeds knowledge and to enhance the innovation of approaches to management of weeds. Phase 1 of the National Weeds and Productivity Research Program funded 39 research projects worth nearly $3.6 million, with a view to reducing the impact of weeds on productivity and the environment. As manager of Phase 2 of the National Weeds Program, the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation (RIRDC) is now publishing the findings of these 39 research projects. This phase of the program, which ran from 2008 to 2010, was managed by the Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry (DAFF). The final reports from the Phase 1 DAFF-managed research projects are available online at the RIRDC website at www.rirdc.gov.au/weeds Phase 1 research The impact of heliotrope at different populations on soil nutrient and moisture levels was found to have a significant effect on crop yields Photo: Birchip Cropping Group Controlling summer weeds protects winter wheat yields A clearer picture has emerged of the exact toll summer weeds take on soil moisture and nutrient availability in Victorian cropping areas. It also drew on historical rainfall data and modern yield modelling software to calculate the estimated impact on Mallee crops. Failure to control summer weeds could cost Mallee wheat growers up to one tonne per hectare in lost crop yields, according to the research by the Birchip Cropping Group (BCG) conducted under Phase 1 of the Australian Government’s National Weeds and Productivity Research Program. The report estimated that the return on investment of conducting weed control – calculated from the cost of herbicide and its application compared to the return in extra grain yield – was between one in five and one in nine depending on the price of wheat. In his report BCG researcher Harm van Rees states that wheat crops planted in paddocks where summer weeds were left uncontrolled averaged 2.8t/ha in the Mallee, compared to 3.8t/ha in paddocks where summer weeds had been treated. “Summer weeds have an adverse effect on farm viability in southern Australian cropping regions, because they use water and nutrients that could otherwise be used by ensuing crops,” he said. “For example, this research project found that summer weeds such as heliotrope, at high density, used 50 millimetres of stored soil water that would otherwise have been available to the following crop.” The research project measured moisture and nutrient use of both heliotrope and camel melon – the two major summer weeds in the region – at different populations in the sandy clay loam soils north of Birchip. “This clearly demonstrates the importance of early and effective summer weed control,” he said. Mr van Rees said the forecast climate change scenarios indicated that summer weed populations were likely to become worse as more rain falls in southern Australia during summer and less rain is likely in winter and spring. “This research will help farmers make decisions about the profitability of controlling summer weeds,” he said. “Our research clearly demonstrates the importance of early and effective summer weed control.” The model used by the research team has since been further tested by the Grains Research and Development Corporation water use efficiency project and in the weed field trials carried out by the Birchip Cropping Group during the summer of 2010–11. 19 Phase 1 research Before and after: timely use of fire is an effective control tool for para grass Image: Tony Grice, CSIRO Protecting wetlands with fire Many Northern Australian wetlands have been invaded by naturalised pasture species, including para grass, but the timely use of fire could hold the key to restoring these environments. Research undertaken by the CSIRO as part of Phase 1 of the National Weeds and Productivity Research Program found that burning in the mid– to late–dry season can create ‘windows’ in space and time when the aboveground biomass of para grass (Urochloa mutica) is reduced and native plant species can recover. Para grass occurs in coastal areas from north-eastern New South Wales, along much of the east coast of Queensland and into the Top End of the Northern Territory. 20 Their report, Using Fire to Restore Australian Wetlands that have been Degraded by Invasive Grasses, states the timing of fire, and the timing and depth of the wet season inundations which follow, are crucial to the success of the strategy. Typically, northern wetlands are seasonally inundated as a result of the region’s pronounced wet and dry seasons. The timing and duration of inundation vary from year to year depending on the amount and temporal distribution of rainfall. “Burning as late as possible in the dry season maximises the likelihood of post-fire inundation, which disadvantages the para grass at a time when its population is recovering from the fire,” the report states. Among the important habitats it occupies are seasonally inundated coastal wetlands, where it often forms a near monoculture over extensive areas. In trials at the 72-hectare site within the Townsville Town Common Conservation Park, which is typical of the type of wetlands found across northern Australia, fires reduced the total above-ground biomass by 72‑100 per cent. Lead researcher Tony Grice said these structural changes have major flow-on effects for native fauna of wetlands, especially water birds. In November 2009 the proportional contribution of para grass to above-ground biomass ranged from 55‑100 per cent; by April 2010 the range was 0-47 per cent. “However, fire shows promise as a tool for restoring wetlands that have been degraded by the invasion of para grass,” Dr Grice said. “Our research aimed to test and improve the application of these experimental burning techniques at the landscape scale.” Ground and aerial photographic evidence shows that large areas of the wetland that had been dominated (more than 90 per cent) by para grass had been converted to open water with a mix of native plant species, a habitat type preferred by many water bird species. Phase 1 research Predicting the spread of weeds Understanding the factors that encourage the spread of weeds is crucial to predicting future invasion hotspots and limiting the damage exotic species do to the landscape. Research conducted by the University of Melbourne and Victoria’s Department of Sustainability and Environment during Phase 1 of the National Weeds and Productivity Research Program has developed the first multi-species model for predicting weed spread. Lead researcher Jane Catford, of the School of Botany at the University of Melbourne, said the new model was based on historical occupancy and abundance data, and took weed forecasting beyond single-species predictions. “The approach is flexible and can be applied in different biomes, at multiple scales and to different groups of taxa,” Dr Catford said. “Quantifying general processes of plant invasion and predicting invasion risk will improve the efficiency of weed surveillance and control.” Using spatially referenced historical data on the locations of non-native plant species, the research team modelled the species’ expected cover as a function of environmental conditions and the geographic location of a site. Testing the model in a case study region covering Victoria’s Corangamite catchment, researchers found that weed invasion was highest near areas of human activity and near A lesser known alien wetland plant water primrose (Ludwigia peploides) Image: Dr Jane Catford, University of Melbourne the edges of vegetation fragments where native vegetation cover was relatively low. Sites with high vegetation cover had a greater probability of weed occupancy, but a lower proportional abundance of invaders. The other areas most vulnerable to general exotic plant invasion, for both presence and abundance, were near towns and along roads. “This work holds out the promise that, by quantifying processes that influence the distribution and abundance of exotic plants, it is possible to predict habitats and regions that are vulnerable to invasion irrespective of geographic region,” Dr Catford said. “Given the threat posed by increasing numbers of invaders, such a general approach to invasion risk might be an extremely valuable tool for ecologists, land managers and regulators. “Moving beyond species-based predictions will enable more efficient management and surveillance; will ensure that the majority of species causing an exotic plant incursion are dealt with; and can suggest areas vulnerable to future invasion by functionally similar species.” Mapping of weed coverage in Victoria’s Corangamite catchment. Image: Dr Jane Catford, University of Melbourne Funding for this project was provided by the National Weeds and Productivity Research Program and the Applied Environmental Decision Analysis, Commonwealth Environmental Research Facility. 21 Phase 1 research Managing weed spread after cyclones Tropical cyclones regularly leave a swathe of destruction through North Queensland’s tropical rainforests, opening the way for incursion by numerous weed species. Research undertaken by the CSIRO as part of Phase 1 of the National Weeds and Productivity Research Program found that the impact of weeds on rainforest environments could be seen for several years after a cyclone, but that native species also show remarkable resilience in recovering from the damage. The report, Weed response to cyclones in the Wet Tropics rainforests: Impacts and adaptation, summarises nearly four years of monitoring work that was conducted in rainforests near Innisfail, Qld, following Tropical Cyclone Larry in 2006. Led by CSIRO scientist Helen Murphy, the research team found weed populations boomed as more sunlight entered the rainforest, although some weed species were suppressed by the increased amount of forest litter and debris on the ground. “Larger woody weeds and vines were found to be more persistent, which has longer-term implications for rainforest composition and structure and highlights where management effort should be focussed.” Dr Murphy said. “As light levels decrease with time the level of mortality of these species will probably increase. In the meantime, however, the effect of the presence of these species is to usurp space, reducing the rate of recruitment and succession of native species in the understorey.” Researchers monitored the recruitment, growth and mortality of native and invasive species every three to four months near El Arish, south of Innisfail. In the immediate aftermath of Cyclone Larry some 23 species of weeds from 13 families were recorded. By 2009, however, both the population and variety of weeds had fallen, with just 11 species of weeds from eight families recorded. Damage sustained at El Arish field site as a result of Cyclone Larry in April 2006. Image: Travis Sydes, Biosecurity Queensland. Image: T Sydes, Biosecurity Queensland 22 “If the future impacts of weeds in tropical rainforests are to be reduced it is essential to understand the dynamics of weed invasion following cyclones and the long-term effects of weeds on forest composition and structure,” the report states. “Importantly, the research identified that if another cyclone causes significant disturbance before the canopy recovers, fast-growing and early reproducing woody weeds will have the capacity to spread rapidly through the landscape and increase their contribution to the rainforest community.” Climate change scenarios predict an increasing intensity of cyclones in the tropics. This research and its recommendations will help inform the response of policy makers and land managers. This work was funded by the Weeds Cooperative Research Centre, Biosecurity Queensland, the National Weeds and Productivity Research Program, the Marine and Tropical Sciences Research Facility and CSIRO. Near the same site after Cyclone Yasi in May 2011. Image: Biosecurity Queensland. Phase 1 research Phase 1 Weeds Research Projects Overcoming paraquat resistance: the potential for herbicide mixtures to reverse paraquat resistance – University of Western Australia Developing best practice methods to manage invasion pathways of gamba grass – Department of Natural Resources, the Environment, Arts & Sport Molecular control of reproduction in weeds – CSIRO Quantifying aquatic weed impacts and reducing herbicide use through seasonal efficacy trials – Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries Predicting ecosystem invasibility: towards spatial prioritisation of weed management – University of Melbourne Biological control of weedy Sporobolus species by the fungus Nigrospora oryzae – Royal Melbourne Institute of Technology Estimation of investment required to achieve weed eradication – Queensland Department of Primary Industries & Fisheries Best practice for making strategic decisions about weeds of commercial value – CSIRO Using UAVs and innovative classification algorithms in the Detection of Cacti – University of Sydney Managing weeds and herbicides in a genetically modified farming system – NSW Department of Primary Industries Developing novel diagnostic tools for weed identification – Victorian Department of Primary Industries Fencelines and roadsides as invasion sites for problematic weed species – Birchip Cropping Group Does clonality facilitate rapid invasion of the aquatic weed Sagittaria platyphylla? – CSIRO Integrating adaptive weed management and biodiversity conservation in the Blue Mountains – Blue Mountains City Council Livestock grazing: a practical tool to control exotic grasses in remnant vegetation – CSIRO Host testing of the gorse pod moth, Cydia succedana, for the biological control of gorse in Australia – University of Tasmania Seed banks of weed-invaded wetlands: implications for biodiversity and restoration – CSIRO Field host range of high priority potential biocontrol agents of Parkinsonia aculeate – CSIRO Summer weeds – counting the costs for a climate changed future – Birchip Cropping Group Establishment of a National Weed Surveillance Mapping Portal – Christopher Auricht Maximising knowledge for adoption: building on recent weeds research – Land & Water Australia Ecological approach to landscape restoration of wetlands degraded by invasive grasses – CSIRO Phytotoxins produced by Phomopsis spp. with potential herbicidal activity against Carthamus lanatus – Charles Sturt University Biological control and ecology of cabomba and alligator weed – CSIRO Introduction of lacy-winged seed fly for Chrysanthemoides monilifera biological control – Victorian Department of Primary Industries Pollen-mediated gene flow in weed species from adjacent farms into organic farms – University of Western Australia Overcoming and avoiding metabolism based herbicide resistance in Lolium rigidum – University of Western Australia Identifying the basis of dual glyphosate and paraquat resistance in Lolium rigidum selected at reduced rates of glyphosate – University of Western Australia Web-enabling the National Weed Incursion Toolkit for coordinated weed management – Bureau of Rural Sciences Weed response to cyclones in the Wet Tropics rainforests: impacts and adaptation – CSIRO Lippia biological control – CSIRO Implementation of biological control of Chilean needle grass and serrated tussock – Victorian Department of Primary Industries Weed seed retention at crop maturity of major south-eastern Australian weed species – Birchip Cropping Group Protecting agricultural production and iconic Australian grasslands from herbicide resistant serrated tussock – Victorian Department of Primary Industries Management of creeping lantana – Stage 2 – University of Queensland Improved detection and eradication of Hieracium: experiments and 2nd generation dispersal models – University of Melbourne Climate change impacts on agricultural weeds in Western Australia – Curtin University of Technology National bellyache bush (Jatropha gossypiifolia) best practice manual – Queensland Department of Primary Industries and Fisheries The impact of boneseed invasion on biodiversity – University of Wollongong 23 National Weeds and Productivity Research Program Advisory Committee The strategic direction of the National Weeds and Productivity Research Program and the research investments made by RIRDC is overseen by the Weeds Advisory Committee. Chaired by former Federal Primary Industries Minister John Kerin AM, the committee is comprised of representatives from RIRDC, the agricultural and Indigenous communities, and leaders in the fields of biosecurity and weed management. Chairperson Hon John Kerin AM The Honourable John Kerin AM is a former Federal Treasurer, Minister for Trade and Overseas Development, Minister for Primary Industries and Energy and Minister for Transport and Communications. Mr Kerin is currently on the board at CSIRO and chaired the interim Steering Committee for Stage 1 of the National Weeds and Productivity Research Program. T: 02 6285 2480 / 0417 252 785 A: P.O Box 5003, Garren, 2605 E: kerrier5@bigpond.net.au Members Dr John Virtue Dr John Virtue is Manager of the NRM Biosecurity Unit in Biosecurity SA. Prior to his current role Dr Virtue was the Senior Weed Ecologist in the South Australian Government and was also associated with the selection of Weeds of National Significance. T: 08 8303 9502 / 0428 112 943 A: GPO Box 1671, Adelaide, 5001 E: John.Virtue@sa.gov.au Mr John Thorp 24 Mr Matthew Kennewell Aunty Virginia Robinson Matthew Kennewell is the Invasive Species Coordinator for South Coast Natural Resource Management in Western Australia. He has worked for over ten years in National Parks, focusing on invasive species control and promoting ecological restoration of flora and fauna. Virginia Robinson is an Aboriginal woman of the Yuwaalaraay tribe of north-west NSW and currently works as the Aboriginal Cultural Heritage (ACH) Officer and the Yuwaalaraay-Gamilaraay Language teacher for the Dharriwaa Elders Group at Walgett. T: 08 9845 8520 / 0447 928 434 A: 39 Mercer Road, Albany, WA, 6330 E: MattK@southcoastnrm.com.au Prof. Roger Cousens Roger Cousens is a Professor in the Department of Resource Management and Geography at the University of Melbourne. His major research area over 27 years has been the ecology and biology of weeds. Professor Cousens published the book Dynamics of Weed Populations in 1995 and places particular emphasis on population dynamics of weeds and competition between weeds and crops. T: 03 8344 9749 / 0407 338 097 A: School of Land and Environment, Melbourne, 3010 E: rcousens@unimelb.edu.au Dr Rohan Rainbow Dr Rohan Rainbow is the Manager for Crop Protection with the Grains Research and Development Corporation, and has over 20 years’ experience in agricultural research and communication. John Thorp is an agricultural scientist and extension officer who currently acts as a National Weeds Management Facilitator. Mr Thorp was Project Manager for the implementation of the National Weeds Strategy and Executive Officer to the Australian Weeds Committee. He also facilitated the development of the Weeds of National Significance and their subsequent management. Dr Jeanine Baker is Director of the Weeds and Pest Animals Section, Department of Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry. Dr Baker has more than 10 years of experience working in the area of invasive weed species. T: 03 6344 9657 / 0419 323 400 A: PO Box 96, Newstead, Tasmania, 7250 E: jthorp@jta.com.au T: 02 6272 4579 A: GPO Box 858, Canberra, ACT, 2601 E: jeanine.baker@daff.gov.au T: 02 6166 4500 A: PO Box 5367, Kingston, ACT, 2604 E: R.Rainbow@grdc.com.au Dr Jeanine Baker More information: National Weeds and Productivity Research Program Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation PO Box 4776 KINGSTON ACT 2604 Phone: 02 6271 4100 Fax: 02 6271 4199 Email: weeds@rirdc.gov.au Website: www.rirdc.gov.au/weeds A: PO Box 174, Walgett, NSW, 2832 E: virginiarobinson@ dharriwaaeldersgroup.org.au Philip Reader Philip Reader is a Bishopsbournebased industrial hemp producer and the chairperson of the Tasmanian Farmers and Graziers Association (TFGA) Weeds Standing Committee. T: 03 6397 3199 A: RMB 1939, Bishopsbourne, as, 7301 E: pj.reader@bigpond.com Craig Burns Craig Burns is Managing Director of the Rural Industries Research and Development Corporation. T: 02 6271 4100 E: craig.burns@rirdc.gov.au Ken Moore Ken Moore is the RIRDC Senior Research Manager responsible for the National Weeds and Productivity Research Program. T: (02) 6271 4127 / 0418 107 196 A: Level 2, 15 National Circuit, Barton ACT 2600 E: ken.moore@rirdc.gov.au