Emerging Markets: From Discovery to Distinction
Transcription
Emerging Markets: From Discovery to Distinction
October 2015 Emerging Markets: From Discovery to Distinction Emerging-market equities are at an interesting crossroads. In this wide-ranging interview, Portfolio Manager Gaurav Patankar talks to Senior Portfolio Strategist William J. Adams about opportunities Gaurav Patankar Managing Director, Portfolio Manager William J. Adams Managing Director, Senior Portfolio Strategist in the asset class and where he’s finding potential winners. Emerging Markets: From Discovery to Distinction As an asset class, emerging-market equities are at an interesting crossroads, with a debate raging between those who believe it will experience a “lost decade” and those who advocate for greater exposure amid recent underperformance. We believe that there are still plenty of opportunities to make money in emerging markets, but the approach to investing will have to be very different than it has been for the past 20 years. ■■ Being nimble to take advantage of special situations/ dislocations in a post-quantitative-easing world, where all moves are amplified. First, the emerging-markets asset class has evolved from a “discovery” phase to a “distinction” phase. The discovery phase broadly occurred after the Asian financial crisis and continued through 2010 with the rise of the BRIC economies and particularly China’s industrialization. This phase resulted in unprecedented demand for commodities, robust sovereign balance sheets resulting from deleveraging, cheap currencies, stable inflation, falling real interest rates and obviously robust absolute returns for those who allocated to emerging-market equities. Optically, we also saw significant productivity improvements in most emergingmarket countries, including commodity exporters, but what remained masked was capital misallocation into the state sector, minuscule structural reforms and the “underbelly” of a weak national infrastructure, in some cases. This approach is embraced by Gaurav Patankar, who manages the Global Research Emerging Markets Equity strategy at The Boston Company. His portfolio is fairly concentrated, with wide parameters around country and sector relative positioning. Holdings are largely determined by Global Research sector experts, although the portfolio manager can add value through opportunistic/macrooriented investment ideas. Gaurav recently sat down with Senior Portfolio Strategist Bill Adams to discuss his views on emerging markets as well as the related impact of developing trends. All of this has contributed to a shrinking growth differential versus the developed markets, as shown in Exhibit 1, and to a stall – and ultimately a reversal – in emerging-market returns. Exhibit 1: Where the GDP Growth Is 8 6 US$tn 4 2 0 (2) (4) 2009 2010 Advanced economies 2011 2012 2013 2014 Emerging & developing economies We believe that over the next decade, investors cannot generate alpha by being simply “long” emerging markets as an allocation decision or taking small relative bets versus the index. Instead, the winning approach will likely combine these three key tenets: ■■ Focusing capital on countries with the highest potential for and traction in structural change. Bill: With the current backdrop, what is so attractive about emerging markets today? Over a five-year period, the S&P 500 gained more than 13%, while the MSCI Emerging Markets Index is down roughly 3% in U.S. dollar terms, as of this September. Gaurav: It’s hard to ignore the unrelenting stream of emerging-markets headlines, which can make it difficult to maintain a balanced view. Over the next 18 to 24 months, I believe emerging markets are heading into one of the most turbulent times in history, with corporate defaults, significant currency devaluation and forced selling. All of this sounds ominous, but I see a significant opportunity to make money. First, for U.S. investors, emerging markets have always been and will always be about “growth differential.” If the growth engine is broken or a path to its sustainable resuscitation doesn’t look good, investors will stay away. Not all emerging markets are created equal. This asset class encompasses more than 20 different countries that are geographically, politically and financially diverse. We loosely define the group as one, but I believe we are in the early phase of a multi-year regime change that will drive vastly different outcomes for individual markets. QE in developed economies and China’s structural move to a lighter and slower growth trajectory have translated into lower commodity demand, out-of-sync monetary and fiscal policies for most emerging markets, poor terms of trade, weaker currencies and higher dollar debt. www.thebostoncompany.com Source: CLSA, IMF. Annual increase in world nominal GDP in US dollar. ■■ Focusing much more on owning fundamentally sound companies with strong governance standards and a sustainable moat. I would broadly classify emerging markets into three categories of countries: 2 Emerging Markets: From Discovery to Distinction ■■ Proactive Reformers: Markets that can and will take advantage of this regime change to make tough structural reforms and follow a path to strong relative growth momentum. India, Mexico, China, Colombia and the Philippines are well ahead of the curve. South Korea and Indonesia can also be loosely classified as such. dispersion in stock prices. Plus, many dislocations arising from recent volatile moves in foreign-exchange rate curves and commodity prices are creating tailwinds for specialsituations investing in emerging markets. So the opportunity set for active investing is actually quite robust, given a longerterm view. Bill: Coming down a level from country selection, how does an investor identify winning and losing stocks and themes? What traits do you look for? What is interesting for the next three years? ■■ Forced Followers: These countries have the structure and construct to make change, but will not do so until the markets force their hands from time to time. These include Brazil, Turkey, Malaysia, Chile and Peru. Gaurav: I have always looked for three key characteristics in a winning business: strong corporate governance, a sustainable moat and a tight circumference around core competence. More thematically, looking out 24 to 36 months, I find the following four themes particularly exciting: ■■ Willful Laggards: Such countries choose to limp along, showing minimal if any positive growth differential vs. the developed world. They have neither the capacity to create true structural reform nor any visible catalysts to force their hands. Russia and South Africa certainly fall into this category. 1. Exporters with a moat. Despite significant currency weakening already, I expect the dollar to continue strengthening in the medium term, which will be a nice tailwind for exporters. I am not talking about commodity or low-end manufactured-goods exporters, but more export-oriented names with a “moat,” meaning that these companies have a differentiated/specialized product or are embedded in a key supply chain, which serves as a buffer against competition or having to pass on the currency tailwind to the buyer. Some examples might include handsetcomponent makers and precision auto-parts manufacturers. These companies are poised to benefit from multiple factors, including a currency advantage, lower labor costs, better trade dynamics and thus improving margins. Another pocket of opportunity is anything connected to travel and leisure, especially as inbound foreign leisure travel picks up. So, to make money, fundamental allocation in combination with theme decisions will matter more in the first category, tactical macro and sector bets in the second, and pure stockpicking in the third. Stock dispersion, though, is quite high overall. Among emerging-market stocks, a far greater number of winners and losers emerge, as evidenced by the consistently wider performance dispersion in the MSCI Emerging Markets Index vs. the S&P 500, creating more attractive stock-picking opportunities. (See Exhibit 2.) Furthermore, the most widely followed indexes capture only a fraction of emerging-market listed stocks, which feeds Exhibit 2: Heightened Dispersion in Emerging Markets 350% 250% 200% 150% 100% 50% 0% 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 MSCI EM 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 www.thebostoncompany.com Quintile % Return Spread (USD) 300% S&P 500 Source: Thomson Quantitative Analytics, MSCI, TBCAM. MSCI EM v. S&P 500: 12/31/95 - 12/31/14. Top - Bottom quintile % Return Spread. 3 Emerging Markets: From Discovery to Distinction 2. Acquisition targets. There are two angles here. First, Western corporations with a large base of offshore cash will have a greater desire to acquire long-term growth opportunities in emerging markets and also play defense by right-shoring their manufacturing base into countries with competitive currencies. Among companies in the S&P 500 for example, more than 46% of sales were produced outside the U.S. in 2013, almost flat with the two preceding years.1 A strengthening dollar makes these companies less competitive on a global scale, and they certainly have the balance sheets and cash on hand to snap up emerging-market firms that can help them regain some advantage. Second, emerging-market companies with a large burden of U.S. dollar-denominated debt and slowing revenues will recognize the need to partner. It will be difficult to pick winners, but I see some interesting opportunities within this theme in the Industrials and Consumer sectors. 3. Power passed down to millennials in family-owned companies. A significant number of Western-educated millennial heirs (especially in Asia) are assuming command of their family empires. This generation is much more capital-disciplined, anti-conglomerate and metrics-focused. While this is a generalization, thematically many companies are ripe for significant value-unlocking, especially with some engaged ownership. 4. Forced sell-downs in less-liquid quality franchises: Active emerging-market inflows into managers over the past four to five years have been very concentrated. Given my expectations of systematic capital withdrawal by allocators from the space, I see forced sell-downs in some highquality but less liquid names; this opportunity set is getting progressively interesting. Exhibit 3: Buying Picks Up Within India Bill: India stood out last year as a consensus buy for many in the investment community. Why do you still like it? What are you watching there? Gaurav: The easy money has been made in India, but there’s a very long runway ahead. I see India as the best-performing market with a 3-, 5- and 10-year view. India’s monetary policy is in a good place, as Raghuram Rajan, governor of the Reserve Bank of India, has worked decisively against inflation and has brought considerable stability to the currency markets. This, in conjunction with the government’s fiscal restraint, has made the economy much less vulnerable to external shocks. As shown by Exhibit 3, domestic Indian investors are warming up to Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s agenda. The commodity cycle is a strong fiscal tailwind, and the government has evolved strategies for state-ownedenterprise (SOE) banks, improved bureaucratic efficiency, enhanced transparency in auctions, and cracked down on black-market proceeds. That said, there is more heavy lifting to be done. What I am most keenly watching right now are the Goods and Service Tax Bill, the bankruptcy code and the land bill. The upcoming Bihar state elections this fall will be a significant binary event. A strong win by the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) should shift the pace of structural reforms into overdrive, but a loss can quickly change the political momentum. I put the odds of a BJP win at 50/50, with a slight positive tilt. From a valuation perspective, the markets are not expensive, especially as corporate profitability is currently at cycle lows with utilization far below capacity. Depreciation of the currency is already driving earnings in export-oriented sectors, which when combined with a cyclical upturn in economic activity, should provide substantial tailwinds for earnings growth. India domestic mutual funds monthly net buying of Indian equities 2.0 1.5 US$bn 0.5 0.0 (0.5) (1.0) (1.5) (2.0) Jan 07 Jul 07 Jan 08 Jul 08 Jan 09 Jul 09 Jan 10 Jul 10 Jan 11 Jul 11 Jan 12 Jul 12 Jan 13 Jul 13 Jan 14 Jul 14 Jan 15 Jul 15 www.thebostoncompany.com 1.0 Source: CLSA, Bloomberg, as of 9/14/15. 4 Emerging Markets: From Discovery to Distinction At a macro level, the markets have never been so bipolar, disproportionately benefiting sectors/companies with clean balance sheets, high return on capital employed, profit growth and visibility while punishing those that are more cyclical, highly regulated and closely tied to the investment cycle. As India’s political landscape changes and a structural recovery takes hold, I believe the investment universe will expand considerably. As the state strengthens and the policy environment improves, SOEs and companies related to the infrastructure/investment cycle value chain should become interesting. The one landmine to avoid is family-owned companies that enjoyed disproportionately high returns on equity due to political patronage. I see the best risk-reward in SOE banks, as explained further in the sidebar. The Case for Public-Sector Banks India’s public-sector banks, which account for more than 70% of outstanding loans, are facing a capital shortfall.2 However, we see four reasons for optimism on the sector: 1. The extraordinarily cheap valuations of these banks seem to question their status as a going concern. The government, which is a majority owner, recently announced plans for capital deployment/efficiency at the SOEs, and it probably would not raise capital at way below book value and dilute itself. 2. Significant synergies would come through sector consolidation, which is likely to happen slowly but surely over the next 36 to 48 months as the government starves some of the poor utilizers of capital. 3. With a keen focus on eliminating directed lending and meritocratizing these institutions with new CEOs, incremental problem-loan creation will slow, if not stop. In conclusion, we believe the potential upside substantially trumps the downside in at least five or six of these banks. Gaurav: In evaluating a country’s investment potential, I look at three competencies: efficiency, productivity delta, and innovation possibilities. For most Middle Eastern countries, you can’t check the box on more than one of those attributes. But one country may have a chance – over the very long term -- to fire on all three cylinders. If you are really prepared to think with a 10-year horizon, consider Iran. I believe the nuclear deal, in which economic sanctions are going to be lifted in exchange for long-term limits on Iran’s nuclear program could result in a slow but steady “mainstreaming” of what may be the most dynamic economy in the Middle East and perhaps EMEA. With favorable demographics, skilled manpower, a strong naturalresource basket and a strategic geographic position, Iran can be a winner. It won’t be a straight line up, nor will it be easy to access that market and there will be difficult rhetoric from many sides but thoughtful investors will find ways to make money. Bill: You can never discuss emerging markets without mentioning China. Investors’ appetite for China seems to be rather varied at the moment, with many typically avoiding government-owned entities, while others view the economy’s slowdown as potentially hazardous – particularly for the property market. Are there interesting developments and investment ideas that the market may be overlooking? Gaurav: I am not a believer in an existential crisis or blow-up in China. That said, I do see serious issues of overleverage and a lack of competitiveness. At a very high level, sociopolitical evolution has lagged economic evolution, and that’s hindering progress. First, China, unlike the U.S., has not been able to build an ecosystem for innovation and innovation-driven productivity gains, which are necessary to transform a maturing lower-middle-income country to a high-income country. Second, many industries dominated by SOEs are plagued with overcapacity in areas that were driven by the fixed asset and construction boom over the past two decades; they now must be restructured and reformed, just as the economy slows and diversifies more toward domestic consumption. Third, there is a legacy of mal-investment and, as mentioned, overleverage in certain areas of the property market, but that can’t be changed overnight. One way to release some pressure is through the currency, and that’s exactly what they have done. www.thebostoncompany.com 4. Perhaps most important, these banks sit on trophy real estate and subsidiaries. There are several banks where our assessment of their real estate value (branches and offices) is several times their market capitalization and/or capital shortfall. Some have highly successful insurance/assetmanagement subsidiaries that can be monetized. Bill: What is the next big thing in emerging markets — a left-field idea with a 10-year runway? 5 Emerging Markets: From Discovery to Distinction Most importantly, Xi Jinping has very shrewdly assumed political and structural power, unlike his predecessor, Hu Jintao. The highest political level has a clear understanding of the issues, but there is no easy switch from being a manufacturing-driven economy to a services-driven one. The country is going through the motions of settling down into a 4-5% growth, services-dominant, middle-class economy. Bill: Finally, can you talk a bit about where you foresee the most risk? Gaurav: I am worried about a couple of things. First and foremost, I’m worried about emerging-market debt. (See Exhibit 4.) During the global hunt for yield, the market for emerging-market corporate bonds denominated in dollars and other hard currencies has more than doubled to $1.5 trillion, exceeding the amount of outstanding U.S. high-yield bonds.3 The relative attractiveness will dissipate if rates go higher here and there’s no liquidity in this market. Declining market maker (broker) inventory is going to be a big problem. Exhibit 4: Rising Debt Levels of the sovereign wealth funds in the Middle East and Asia have been big investors in emerging markets, but the recent volatility in oil prices may have weakened these traditionally strong hands. This could create some vulnerability in those funds where most of the money is concentrated. Bill: In conclusion, what is your general view on emerging markets right now? What are you watching? Gaurav: I’m maintaining a favorable view on the asset class for long-term investors, but I think investors need to be very selective in picking their spots. I’m keeping a close eye on credit spreads in emerging markets, especially corporate, foreign-exchange fluctuations and, of course, economic data points from China. Despite the widespread recent disenchantment with emerging markets, I’m still finding many compelling opportunities in the space. It’s a large asset class that has been trading like a busted growth stock, and there are good opportunities for select companies to fire on all cylinders here. 2.1 1.8 US$tn 1.5 1.2 0.9 0.6 0.3 0.0 Non-financial corporations Banks Non-bank financial institutions Source: BIS, BCA Research. Emerging market private-sector international debt securities outstanding. International debt securities outstanding by nationality of issuers. Although I don’t anticipate a cataclysmic capital withdrawal, it is worth watching this segment for signs of weakness. According to data analysis from JPMorgan Chase & Co., the VIP stocks have recently been underperforming the benchmark. For the 20 most illiquid names, the trend is similar over recent weeks, although stronger over a three-month period. This makes sense, as building redemption pressure likely results in the sale of widely held/liquid stocks. Some www.thebostoncompany.com Second, I also have some concerns about the concentration of emerging-market funds. Five asset managers control about 40% of the U.S. diversified emerging-market mutual fund market, and roughly 50 emerging-market names — we call them “VIP stocks” — are commonly held across their portfolios. As such, significant redemptions could cause major problems for their investors. 6 Emerging Markets: From Discovery to Distinction End Notes 1. Howard Silverblatt, “S&P 500 2013: Global Sales Year in Review,” S&P Dow Jones Indices, McGraw Hill Financial, August 2014. 2. M. Rochan, “India needs reforms in banking sector, says finance minister Arun Jaitley,” International Business Times, January 3, 2015. http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/india-needs-reforms-banking-sector-says-finance-minister-arun-jaitley-1481716 3. Carolyn Cui, “Investors Grow Wary of Emerging-Market Debt,” The Wall Street Journal, April 19, 2015. http://www.wsj.com/articles/investors-grow-wary-of-emerging-market-debt-1429473506 Disclosure Any statements of opinion constitute only current opinions of The Boston Company Asset Management, LLC (TBCAM), which are subject to change and which TBCAM does not undertake to update. Due to, among other things, the volatile nature of the markets and the investment areas discussed herein, they may only be suitable for certain investors. This publication or any portion thereof may not be copied or distributed without prior written approval from TBCAM. Statements are correct as of the date of the material only. This document may not be used for the purpose of an offer or solicitation in any jurisdiction or in any circumstances in which such offer or solicitation is unlawful or not authorised. The information in this publication is for general information only and is not intended to provide specific investment advice or recommendations for any purchase or sale of any specific security. Some information contained herein has been obtained from third party sources that are believed to be reliable, but the information has not been independently verified by TBCAM. TBCAM makes no representations as to the accuracy or the completeness of such information. Listed securities are being presented for illustrative purposes only. This is not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold these securities. No investment strategy or risk management technique can guarantee returns or eliminate risk in any market environment. www.thebostoncompany.com 7 About the Authors Gaurav Patankar Managing Director, Portfolio Manager Gaurav is a portfolio manager and senior research analyst on The Boston Company’s Global Research team. Before joining The Boston Company, Gaurav was a portfolio manager of Global Absolute Return and Emerging Markets strategies at Lockheed Martin Investment Management Co. Prior to Lockheed, he served as a sector strategist focused on emerging markets and global financial institutions, at Millennium Management, LLC, a global multi-strategy hedge fund. Before this, he was an equity research analyst at SuNova Capital and Citigroup Investment Research, covering large- and mid-cap banks. Previously, Gaurav was a corporate strategist and senior research analyst at M&T Bank and a co-founder of Information Interface India, which went on to become one of India’s largest treasury network platforms. Gaurav received a bachelor’s degree in electrical engineering from the University of Mumbai, India, an M.B.A. in finance and strategy from the University at Buffalo, and a Ph.D. in corporate governance and social economics from TMV, University of Pune, India. He received the 2011 Institutional Investor “Rising Star in Hedge Funds” award. William J. Adams Managing Director, Senior Portfolio Strategist Bill is a senior portfolio strategist for The Boston Company’s Non-US and Emerging Markets investment disciplines, involved in the daily activity of the investment teams without stock decision-making responsibility. He is responsible for communicating the teams’ strategies to clients, prospective clients and consultants, serving as the critical interface between client-facing staff and investment teams. In this role, Bill guides the messaging and positioning of investment strategies, helping to create marketing materials and content, responding to investmentrelated client inquiries, and ensuring that relevant investment insights of the portfolio-management teams are delivered internally and externally in a timely and effective way. Prior to joining The Boston Company, Bill was an associate at Deutsche Bank, where he was responsible for European equity research sales. Before that, he was a senior account officer at Putnam Investments, where he managed 401(k) relationships, and a senior account administrator at State Street Research and Management Co. Bill earned a B.A. in political science from Boston College and an M.B.A. in finance from the University of Maryland. For more market perspectives and insights from our teams, please visit http://www.thebostoncompany.com/web/tbc/literature