23rd Electromagnetic Induction Workshop

Transcription

23rd Electromagnetic
Induction Workshop
14 - 20 August 2016
www.emiw2016.org
Program Book
WELCOME
23rd Electromagnetic
14 - 20 August 2016
The Empress Convention Center
Dear Colleagues,
On behalf of the IAGA Division
VI Committee, it is a pleasure
to welcome you to the 23rd
International Electromagnetic
Induction Workshop in Chiang
Mai, Thailand.
This is the first workshop in
our new life as IAGA Division
Ian Ferguson
Chair, IAGA Division VI Committee
and Past Chair IAGA Working Group I.2
VI Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth and Planetary
Bodies, an incarnation which began at the 2015 IUGG General
Assembly. This is a very exciting occasion for us! Our new
role reflects our great success as the previous IAGA Division
I Working Group 2. In particular, in our previous existence we
held 22 international electromagnetic induction workshops,
which contributed greatly to the growth and evolution of our
sub-discipline. During this meeting we should take the time to
remember the enormous contributions of our past members
who established our foundation and built our history.
Please also take a few moments to consider our supporting
scientific structure. We are a sixth division of the International
Association of Geomagnetism and Aeronomy. IAGA is itself
one of eight associations of the International Union of Geodesy
and Geophysics, and IUGG is one of 32 scientific unions of the
International Council for Science. We are one branch of a large
scientific family.
On behalf of Division VI, I extend a heart-felt thank you
to members of the Local Organizing Committee and its chair,
Weerachai Siripunvaraporn for the organization of the 23rd
workshop. They are the reason we are able to be here in Chiang
Mai eagerly awaiting the coming scientific and social events. I
acknowledge our sponsors whose support has enabled many
aspects of the workshop including the attendance of many
of our participants. The LOC, Ute Weckmann, Gary Egbert
and other members of the financial support committee have
coordinated the fund raising and the distribution of funds. I
thank the members of the Division VI Committee, Program
Committee and the session conveners who have put together
an exciting and interesting program for the workshop. Finally, I
thank the scientific reviewers and, of course, everyone who has
contributed posters or oral presentations for the workshop.
You are the continuation of the endeavor that has led us to
becoming IAGA Division VI.
Please enjoy new ideas and science at this workshop
and continue to challenge existing ideas and science. Don’t
just listen to talks and read posters, you must interact: talk to
each other, meet new colleagues, and break international and
intergenerational barriers. This is a workshop, not a conference.
So let’s work.
Gathering
Around 300 EM geoscientiests from over 40
countries around the world participate the
workshop in Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Copyright © 2016 by the Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University
Printed in Thailand
272, Rama VI Road, Ratchathewi District, Bangkok 10400, THAILAND
www.emiw2016.org
Cover photos by Weerachai Siripunvaraporn, Puwis Amatyakul, and Shutterstock licenses (238423759, 284505194, and 295351910)
2
EMIW2016 | Chiang Mai, Thailand
Induction Workshop
Chiang Mai, Thailand
www.emiw2016.org
Dear Participants of EMIW2016,
On behalf of the Local Organizing
Committee (LOC), I would like to
take this opportunity to welcome
all of you to Chiang Mai, Thailand
for the 23rd Electromagnetic
Induction Workshop (EMIW2016)
Chiang Mai was the capital of the
Lanna Kingdom back in 1296 and
Weerachai Siripunvaraporn
Chair, Local Organizing Committee of
EMIW2016, Chiang Mai, Thailand
is currently the largest city in the northern part of Thailand.
It is known for the rich and unique northern scenery, Lanna
culture, and Thai food.
The Electromagnetic Induction Workshop (EMIW) is
held every two years under the auspices of the IUGG and
IAGA Division VI Electromagnetic Induction in the Earth and
Planetary Bodies. Thus, we have so far enjoyed 46 years of
knowledge sharing, exchanging and debating ideas, inspiring
the young, admiring the old, and farewell to the legends. For
the Chiang Mai workshop, the atmosphere is still the same as in
the previous 22 occasions. The local organizing committee has
Local Organizing Committee (LOC)
Weerachai Siripunvaraporn1, Pisanu Wongpornchai2,
Suwimon Udphuay2, Niti Mankhemthong2,
Puwis Amatyakul1, Songkhun Boonchaisuk1,
Chatchai Vachirateinchai4, Tawat Rung-arunwan4,
Kriangsak Pirarai3, Kurt Strack5, Mark Everett6
Mahidol University
2
Chiang Mai University
3
Thailand Department of Groundwater Resources
4
Curl-E Geophysics Co., Ltd.
5
KMS Technologies
6
Texas A&M
1
worked assiduously to ensure that the workshop is a success.
Besides maintaining the high standard of the workshop, we
blend the atmosphere with Thai smiles, Thai hospitality, Lanna
culture, and delicious Thai food. We will also be bringing all of
you outside to explore the unique natural environment, Lanna
culture and food during a one-day excursion.
We would like to thank all of our sponsors: Phoenix
Geophysics, Institute of Electronics, Chinese Academy of
Sciences (IECAS), Irkutsk Electroprospecting Company
(IERP), Metronix Geophysics, KMS Technologies, Nord West,
Tierra Tecnica, ModEM Geophysics, 3JTech, Moombarriga
Geoscience, Panya Consultants, Earth, Planets and Space,
TechnoImaging, Curl-E Geophysics, IMAGIR, Siripyra, Geonics,
IAGA, IUGG, NSF and Hohmann Trust, and donations from
participants who have made the workshop possible. Most of
the support is for students and young scientists from many
different countries. We would like to thank Ian Ferguson,
Nikolay Palshin, Gary Egbert, Ute Wekmann, and everyone in
the Financial Support Committee and the Program Committee
for their hard work.
I hope all of you enjoy what should turn out to be a truly
memorable workshop.
Advisory to the Local Organizing Committee
Sittiwat Lertsiri Dean, Faculty of Science, Mahidol University
Adichat Surinkum Director, CCOP Technical Secretariat
Scientific Program Committee (SPC)
Ian Ferguson, Weerachai Siripunvaraporn, Nikolay Palshin,
Pisanu Wongpornchai, Gerard Muñoz, Ahmet Basokur,
Kiyoshi Baba, Yuguo Li, Gary Egbert,
Svetlana Kovacikova, Bulent Tank, Agata Siniscalchi,
Anna Kelbert, Jan Vozar, Prasanta Patro,
Maria Garcia Juanatey
Financial Support Committee (FSC)
Ute Weckmann, Gary Egbert, Ian Ferguson, Nikolay Palshin,
Weerachai Siripunvaraporn, Ahmet Basokur,
Kristina Tietze, Puwis Amatyakul, Kurt Strack
3
SESSIONS AND DESCRIPTIONS
Session 1: Instrumentation, Sources, and Data Processing
Description
This session solicits contributions on EM data processing,
source field analysis, instrumentation, and field practice. We
welcome contributions on all aspects of data processing,
including theory, new approaches to estimation of transfer
functions and their uncertainty. Development and application
of time lapse observations (monitoring) of transfer functions
and other parameters can be presented here as well. We also
solicit studies on source fields, including characterization
of external source spatial structure and temporal variability,
and effects of finite spatial-scale sources (natural and
anthropogenic) on transfer functions. Contributions on new
instrumentation and field practice and related methodological
developments are also appropriate for this session.
1.1 Instrumentation Development
1.2 Source Fields
1.3 EM Data Processing
1.4 EM Model and Data Sharing
Sub-sessions
Conveners
Gary Egbert (Oregon State University, Oregon, USA)
Maxim Smirnov (Luleå University of Technology, Sweden)
Session 2: Theory, Modelling and Inversion
Description
We invite you to submit abstracts to the session related to
theory, modeling and inversion of electromagnetic data. The
session will cover both theoretical advances and case studies.
We would like to see contributions presenting new ideas in
the theory of the electromagnetic method, the latest results in
numerical and physical modelling, and recent achievements
in inversion methodologies, including approaches to integrate
various electromagnetic or multi-disciplinary geophysical
datasets. The session is intended to cover all practical aspects
of electromagnetic modelling and inversion. Studies leading
to improved conductivity images of the Earth’s subsurface
due to incorporation of bathymatry/topography information,
considering galvanic distortion effects or electrical anisotropy
or taking into account the source effects are also warmly
invited.
2.1 Theory
2.2 Modelling
2.3 Inversion (general)
2.4 Joint and Constrained Inversion
2.5 3D Inversion in Practice
2.6 Inversion Frameworks
Svetlana Kováciková (Czech Academy of Sciences, Prague, Czech Republic)
Anna Avdeeva (University of Leicester, Leicester, United Kingdom)
Tawat Rung-Arunwan (Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand)
Naser Meqbel (GeoForschungsZentrum, Potsdam, Germany)
Sub-sessions
Conveners
Session 3: Exploration, Monitoring and Hazards
Description
EM methods are widely used for obtaining electrical
conductivity images of the underground ranging from the
near-surface to the upper mantle. Different techniques and
their combinations are applied for different tasks in exploration,
monitoring and hazard assessment. We are pleased to invite
researchers to submit abstracts of their studies related to recent
developments in the hydrocarbon exploration, gas hydrates
imaging, fresh water and geothermal exploration, mineral
exploration and environmental studies. We will appreciate
contributions on different aspects of EM methods application
to fracking, fluid injections and sequestration studies. We
warmly solicit contributions that emphasize and evaluate
the role of EM methods to hazard assessment through EM
monitoring both in seismic and volcanic environments and
in natural resources exploitation. Finally we also encourage
contributions addressing interpretation aspects of EM
exploration techniques aimed at lithological characterization
as well as at determination of petrophysical and hydrophysical
properties of rocks.
3.1 Geothermal Energy
3.2 Groundwater and Environment
3.3 Mineral Exploration
3.4 Hydrocarbon Exploration including Gas Hydrates
3.5 Fracking, Fluid Injection, and Sequestration Studies
3.6 Induction Hazards
Sub-sessions
Conveners
Nikolay Palshin (Sirshov Institute of Oceanology, Moscow, Russia)
Gerard Muñoz (GeoForschungsZentrum, Potsdam, Germany)
Agata Siniscalchi (University of Bari, Bari, Italy)
Puwis Amatyakul (Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand)
Session 4: Tectonics, Magmatism, Geodynamics
Description
Electromagnetic (EM) methods play an important role
in geophysical studies of major geodynamic processes
in the Earth. We invite a wide range of crust and mantle
studies for presentation during the workshop, including
4
ones in which electric conductivity information and
models contribute to improved understanding of active
continent collision zones and margins, subduction zones
and volcanic areas. Southern Asia exhibits a wide range
of interesting tectonic processes, and provides
an opportunity for presenters to demonstrate the importance
of EM studies in this region for better understanding global
geodynamic processes. We encourage submission of multiparameter geophysical-petrological studies, in which
integrated geoelectrical information is used alongside other
geophysical methods to provide new insights into tectonics,
magmatism and geodynamics. Presentations within session
4 can demonstrate the boundaries of the EM methods and
try to stretch these boundaries with modern techniques and
approaches for different problems on different media.
Sub-sessions
4.1 Crust and Upper Mantle Studies
4.2 Plate Boundary, Fault, and Volcano Studies
4.3 Continental Tectonics
Jan Vozar (Dublin Institute of Advanced Studies, Dublin, Ireland)
Bulent Tank (Bogazici University, Istanbul, Turkey)
Prasanta Patro (National Geophysical Research Institute, Hyderabad, India)
Hao Dong (China University of Geosciences, Beijing, China)
Conveners
Session 5: Marine EM
Description
This session solicits all contributions on marine EM studies. We
welcome contributions on active/passive source explorations/
observations, synthetic/real data analysis and interpretations
as well as inherent problems for marine EM. This year is the
Conveners
Yuguo Li (Ocean University of China, Qingdao, China)
Description
12th anniversary of the Sumatra Earthquake and the fifth
anniversary of the Tohoku Earthquake that raised serious
Tsunami disaster, studies on motional induction problems
due to tsunami and other ocean flows are also solicited as the
memorial.
Kiyoshi Baba (University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan)
Chatchai Vachiratienchai (Curl-E Geophysics Co., Ltd., Bangkok, Thailand)
Session 6: Rock and Mineral Resistivity, and Anisotropy
The electrical properties of the rocks are key diagnostic
geophysical parameters when trying to characterize the Earth.
In this session we welcome contributions that further our
understanding on the electrical resistivity properties of the
subsurface. We invite studies with laboratory measurements,
empirical and/or theoretical models, of resistivity and other
electrical properties (e.g. induced polarization). We also
cordially solicit contributions on the relationship of resistivity
Conveners
Maria Garcia Juanatey (Uppsala University, Uppsala, Sweden)
Jana Börner (Technical University Bergakademie Freiberg, Freiberg, Germany)
with other mechanical or geophysical properties (e.g.
permeability, hydraulic conductivity, and seismic velocities),
and other important parameters like water/mineral content,
saturation and temperature. Finally, investigations of the
anisotropic behavior of resistivity and other electrical
properties are particularly encouraged. We expect to receive
contributions at all scales, ranging from microscopic (e.g.
single minerals) to macroscopic studies considering full rocks
and rock assemblages.
Steven Constable (Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California,
San Diego, USA)
Session 7: Global and Planetary Studies
Description
We solicit all contributions that shed light on the progress in
our understanding of global electrical conductivity structure
and variations in the Earth’s mantle. This session will include
interpretations of global or regional electrical conductivity
variations, as well as new methods, including but not limited
to the use of non-traditional transfer functions for inversion
of geomagnetic field data, interpretation of satellite magnetic
Conveners
field data, and joint inversion methods for ionospheric sources
and mantle conductivity, among others. New methods that
incorporate space physics constraints on the sources of
electromagnetic induction at periods relevant to the Earth’s
mantle conductivity structures are particularly welcome.
Studies related to magnetism and induction on other planets
are also solicited.
Takao Koyama (University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan)
Anna Kelbert (USGS, Colorado, USA)
Session 8: Global and Planetary Studies
Description
In addition to the advancement and application of
electromagnetic induction science, members of IAGA Division
VI play critical roles in education and outreach. In terms of
education, this work may involve teaching undergraduate or
graduate students, supervision of undergraduate or graduate
research, or training new scientists how to use electromagnetic
equipment. In terms of outreach, it may involve promoting
large-scale electromagnetic projects to senior officials or other
Conveners
Ian Ferguson (University of Manitoba, Manitoba, Canada)
scientists, writing statements on the socioeconomic importance
of electromagnetic induction studies, or providing entertaining
visits to high school students. This session, a first of its kind at
our electromagnetic workshops, is intended to collect posters
highlighting novel, interesting, and/or important experiences
from the teaching and outreach of electromagnetic induction.
The sharing of ideas and information in these areas will help
contribute to the overall public understanding of electromagnetic
induction studies.
Liejun Wang (Geoscience Australia, Canberra, Australia)
5
KEYNOTE REVIEWS
Session 2
18 Aug, 13:15 - 14:00
Integrating electromagnetic data with other
geophysical observations for enhanced
imaging of the Earth
Max Moorkamp is currently a Lecturer
at the University of Leicester. He
received a Ph.D. from the National
University of Ireland, Galway in 2007
and then moved to Geomar in Kiel,
Germany for a postdoc for three and a
half years. Since 2011 he is working at
the University of Leicester.
His main research interest is the
quantitative combination of different
types of geophysical data through
joint inversion. In particular, he has worked on combining
electromagnetic and seismic data for a wide range of
applications from hydrocarbon exploration to imaging the
crust and lithosphere of cratonic regions. He is currently an
associate editor for JGR Solid Earth and co-editor of the book
“Integrated Imaging of the Earth”.
Session 2 & 4 19 Aug, 08:00 - 08:45
Joint modelling of conductivity and other
geophysical and petrological observables to
infer the structure of the lithosphere and
uppermost mantle
Javier Fullea is currently a Marie
Skłodowska-Curie post-doc Fellow
at the Dublin Institute for Advanced
Studies (DIAS), Ireland. He received
his Ph.D. in Earth Sciences from the
Institute of Earth Sciences “Jaume
Almera” (CSIC)-University of Barcelona,
Spain, in 2008. From 2009 to 2011 he
joined the EM group in the DIAS as a
post-doc. After that he moved to the Institute of Geosciences
(IGEO, CSIC-UCM) in Madrid, Spain, as a JAE-DOC programme
post-doctoral fellow. He has a general geophysical background
with an emphasis on computational modelling (e.g. geosoftware development and processing of geophysical data).
His research interest is focussed on integrated petrologicalgeophysical modelling of the thermal and compositional
structure of the lithosphere and sub-lithospheric upper
mantle using a wide variety of data sets. Over the last
years, he has been developing, together with relevant
collaborators, different forward and inverse modelling tools
providing a bridge between laboratory-based studies (e.g.,
solid solution models, thermodynamics, mineral physics,
etc.) and geophysical terrestrial and satellite observations/
models (e.g., seismic tomography, gravimetry, satellite data,
magnetotellurics etc.). The codes have been successfully
applied to study the lithospheric structure in different
tectonic environments, from young Phanerozoic terranes
(e.g., Atlas Mountains, Alboran basin, Central Mongolia) to old
Precambrian cratons (Kaapvaal), using different data sets (e.g.,
topography, potential fields, surface heat flow, Rayleigh- and
Love-wave phase velocities, and MT responses).
6
Session 2 18 Aug, 08:00 - 08:45
Application of 3D EM inversion in practice –
challenges, pitfalls and solution approaches
Marion Miensopust is currently
research scientist and coordinator of
the multidisciplinary junior research
group dealing with subrosion processes
at the Leibniz Institute for Applied
Geophysics in Hannover (LIAG),
Germany. After receiving her diploma
in Geophysics at the WWU Muenster,
Germany (2003), she worked at the
University of Hamburg in the area of
marine geophysics (2004/2005). In 2010, she received her
Ph.D. from the National University of Ireland, Galway based
on research carried out at the Dublin Institute for Advanced
Studies (DIAS), Ireland as part of the Southern African
Magnetotelluric Experiment (SAMTEX). From 2010 to 2012
she had her own PostDoc project at DIAS (MT and TEM at
Eyjafjallajoekull, Iceland) while gaining teaching experience
at the WWU Muenster, Germany. Subsequent she worked at
the German Federal Institute for Geosciences and Natural
Resources (BGR) in Hannover, Germany, in the area of airborne
geophysics (2012-2014). Since 2014 she is at LIAG and engaged
in the investigation of karst systems and subrosion structures
using EM methods. One of her research interests is to close
the gap between the numerical aspects (i.e., the code writer’s
side) and the applicability (i.e., the code user’s side) of EM
modelling and inversion. From beginning on, she is part of the
organising committee of the series of MT3DINV workshops
bringing code writers and users together and approaching
those challenges. Beside that she has experience with a broad
range of EM methods (primarily MT, TEM, HEM, ERT, GPR) and
land-based, airborne and marine work.
Session 4
19 Aug, 13:15 - 14:00
A review of recent developments in the study
of regional lithospheric electrical structure of
the Asian Continent
Letian Zhang is currently a Lecturer
in the School of Geophysics and
Information
Technology,
China
University of Geosciences, Beijing
(CUGB). He obtained his Ph.D. from
CUGB in 2013, and finished his
postdoctoral research on the Altyn
Tagh Fault bounding the northern
margin of the Tibetan Plateau in the
same institution from 2013 to 2015.
As a member of CUGB MT group, he has participated MT
component of projects INDEPTH and SinoProbe, as well as
many other projects investigating diverse tectonic features
over the Asian continent mainly by using the MT method. His
major research interest lies in investigating the lithospheric
electrical structure of the Tibetan Plateau from both INDEPTH
and SinoProbe MT data.
Session 3
Prasanta Patro is currently working as
Principal Scientist & Head Magnetotelluric
and Deep Resistivity Sounding Division
in CSIR-National Geophysical Research
Institute, Hyderabad, India. He received his
Ph.D. degree in 2002 in the Department
of Geophysics, Osmania University based
on his research on magnetotelluric study
of crustal geoelectric structure in western
India in relation to seismotectonics of the Deccan Trap region.
He has held postdoctoral positions at Free University, Berlin;
Oregon State University, USA; Earthquake Research Institute,
Tokoy, Japan. He is the recipient of Krishnan Gold Medal from
Indian Geophysical Union.
Dr. Patro’s research interest focuses on land magnetotellurics
for resource (both hydrocarbon and geothermal) exploration
and regional tectonic studies. His recent studies provided
insights into understanding subsurface electrical structure in
several key areas including Himalayan Collision zone, Deccan
Volcanic Province (for hydrocarbon and Tectonic studies),
Southern Granulite Terrain and several geothermal areas. Dr.
Patro is also associated with development of new modeling
and interpretation techniques. Besides these, his currently
engaged in several research projects including investigation
of possible plumbing geometry of Deccan Volcanic eruptions
in the Narmada Son Lineament of Central India using 3D MT
modeling studies, identification of zones of interest for drilling
in the Tatapani geothermal area based on his 3D sub-surface
models, MT studies of Koyna seismic zone for the ongoing
deep drilling experimental project.
Session 6
Session 1
15 Aug, 08:45 - 09:30
MT studies for petroleum and geothermal
resources: Examples with emphasis on
Asian region 16 Aug, 08:00 - 08:45
Electromagnetic monitoring of hydraulic
fracking: relationship to permeability,
seismicity and stress
Stephan Thiel is a Senior Geophysicist
at the Geological Survey of South
Australia and an Affiliate Lecturer at
the University of Adelaide. He obtained
his PhD from the University of Adelaide
in 2008 and was a Postdoctoral Fellow
there until 2014. His research focusses
mainly on magnetotellurics applied to
lithospheric-scale imaging and geothermal studies. He has
applied his research from Archaean/Proterozoic terranes in
Australia to younger tectonic areas in Oman and Ethiopia.
Throughout his Post-doc, his research focused on monitoring
fluid fracking of enhanced geothermal systems in Australia.
Together with the relevant co-workers, the research was
recognized through the Australian Innovation Award for
the Minerals and Energy category. Stephan currently works
on mapping the lithospheric architecture of the Gawler
Craton through the AusLAMP SA array program to unravel
the tectonic history of the Australian continent and develop
paradigm shifts in mineral exploration in cratonic areas.
16 Aug, 13:15 - 14:00
Estimation of the magnetotelluric response
function: the path from robust estimation
to a stable MLE
Alan Chave is a Senior Scientist
in and Laboratory Head for the
Deep
Submergence
Laboratory,
Department of Applied Ocean Physics
and Engineering at the Woods Hole
Oceanographic Institution. He received
a Ph.D. from the MIT/WHOI Joint
Program in Oceanography in 1980,
and then spent six years at Scripps
Institution of Oceanography as a
Postdoctoral, Assistant and Associate Research Geophysicist.
Alan was the J. Robert Oppenheimer Fellow at Los Alamos
National Laboratory in 1985-6. He moved to the Physics
Research Division of AT&T Bell Laboratories at the end of 1986,
and then to Woods Hole in 1991. He has been a Chartered
Statistician since 2003. His research interests include marine
magnetotellurics and controlled source electromagnetics,
developing new technologies to observe the ocean,
developing in situ chemical sensors for use in the ocean, and
the application of statistics to geosciences problems. He is the
co-editor of the recent book “The Magnetotelluric Method by
Alan Chave and Alan Jones”, and the author of a forthcoming
book on computational statistics in the earth sciences from
Cambridge University Press.
Session 5
20 Aug, 13:15 - 14:00
Recent progress in studies on EM fields
generated by oceanic flows including
tsunamis: Their properties and applications
Takuto Minami studied geophysics and
electromagnetism in the Department of
Geophysics, Graduate School of Science,
Kyoto University, where he completed his
Ph.D. in March 2014, under supervision
of Assoc. Prof. Hiroaki Toh. The title of
his thesis is “Numerical simulation of
the tsunami-induced electromagnetic
field using a time-domain finite element
method: application to the 2011 Tohoku Earthquake tsunami”.
After graduation, he spent 10 months at NASA Goddard Space
Flight Center collaborating with the geomagnetic group there
led by Dr. Weijia Kuang. In April 2015, he went back to Japan
and started to study active EM monitoring techniques for
volcanos in Aso Volcanological Laboratory, Kyoto University.
He is supposed to move to Earthquake Research Institute,
University of Tokyo, as a JSPS (Japan Society for Promotion of
Sciences) Postdoctoral fellow, in April 2016.
Takuto Minami’s research interests encompass EM variations
caused by tsunamis and other oceanic flows, land/marineMT/CSEM methods, and associated simulation/modelling
techniques. He is interested in the physics underlying
tsunami-EM phenomena, which is quite similar to that for
CSEM modellings. He recently developed a three-dimensional
finite element code for simulating tsunami-generated EM
fields. On the other hand, he is now in charge of developing
CSEM modelling techniques for monitoring volcanic activities,
in Kyoto University.
7
EXCURSION
1. Elephant Safari Tour
Our trip starts from the Empress hotel then direct to Mae Tang
District, where one of Chiang Mai’s largest elephant camp is
located. You will see elephant shows such as painting, football,
music dance, etc. You are going to experience riding on the
back of the elephant through the jungle for viewing the
beautiful jungle sites and visiting the Lisu Village. We will be
back at the camp by the oxcart for lunch (buffet, Halal food).
Another exciting activity is rafting with a bamboo raft along
Mae Taeng River enjoying beautiful scenery along the way.
After leaving the camp, we will stop by a beautiful orchid farm
(and if time available another temple, Wat Pa Darapirom) on
the way back to the city.
Schedule
08.00 AM : Depart from the Empress Hotel to Elephant Camp
09.15 AM : Arrive at the elephant camp – elephant show
10.00 AM : Enjoy elephant ride / ox-cart ride
12.00 PM : Have lunch at the elephant camp (halal buffet)
13.00 PM : Enjoy bamboo rafting
14.00 PM : Visit the long-neck tribe village
14.45 PM : Head for the orchid farm
15.15 PM : Visit the orchid farm
16.00 PM : Visit Wat Pa Darapirom
16.30 PM : Depart from Wat Padarapirom
17.30 PM : Arrive at Khum Khan Tok
21.00 PM : Back to the Empress Hotel
3. Doi Suthep Temple / Hmong Village / Home Industry
We will start the day by visiting the Hmong village on the
hillside spot and see the Hmong tribesmen dressed in their
colorful traditional costumes. After that we visit one of the
most famous temples of Chiangmai - Wat Phrathat Doi Suthep,
located on hilltop in Lanna architecture style and containing
holy relic of Lord Buddha and enjoy seeing panoramic view of
the whole Chiang Mai city. We then head to the city to have
lunch at one of the famous restaurants in Chiang Mai. After
that, we will stop by the local home industry shops on both
sides along Sankampaeng Road. The factories manufactures
sell various types of handicrafts including, Lacquer ware,
silverware, silk, celadon, teak-wood carving and famous
handmade cotton umbrellas and paper parasols hand painted
in wide varieties of floral and animals designs.
8
Schedule
08.00 AM : Depart from the Empress Hotel to Doi Suthep
08.45 AM : Arrive at Doi Suthep. Go to Doi pui by Song Taew
(Local pickup car)
09.30 AM : Reach Doi Pui Hmong village. Visit the garden
museum and walk around
11.00 AM : Visit Doi Suthep temple
12.00 PM : Head back to the city
13.00 PM : Have lunch at Plubpla restaurant
14.00 PM : Visit a handicraft center
- Umbrella painting, silverware, lacquerware, silk
2. Doi Inthanon National Park
We are going to Chomthong District where Doi Inthanon
National Park is located. Doi Inthanon is the highest mountain
in Thailand. Its peak is at 2,565 meters above sea level. We first
visit the summit point of the highest peak of Thailand to take
some short hiking. Next destination will be the King & Queen’s
stupa (Naphamethinidol and Naphapholbhumisiri stupa).
They were built by the Royal Thai Air Force for a celebration for
his majestic the king and her majestic the queen for their 60th
birthday. After that we continue the trip at Hmong Market
to see their life style and see handmade souvenirs. Thai (set
menu) lunch will be provided. After lunch, we will visit one of
the most beautiful waterfall, Wachiratharn waterfall.
Schedule
08.30 AM : Depart from the Empress Hotel to Doi Inthanon,
the highest peak of Thailand (2,565 m above sea level)
09.30 AM : Arrive at the bus station to take Song Taew
(local pickup car)
10.30 AM : Reach the summit of Doi Inthanon
- Enjoy Anga trek
- Visit King’s and Queen’s pagodas
- Shopping at Mhong’s market
13.00 PM : Have lunch at a local restaurant (Thai food)
14.30 PM : Enjoy Mae Klang Luang trek
16.00 PM : Visit Wachirathan waterfall
17.00 PM : Back to the bus station
Preparation: Rain can be expected during
the trip. Please bring rain jacket, waterproof
bag for your camera, and a good hiking shoe.
Mosquito repellent might be necessary for
those who are allergic to Mosquito bite.
4. Temple Tour
Heading from the Empress hotel to visit Wat Chedi Luang, a
Buddhist temple in the historic center of Chiang Mai, Thailand.
Not too far is Wat Phra Singha. King Ananda Mahidol, the older
brother of the present King Bhumibol Adulyadej, bestowed
it the status of Royal temple of the first grade in 1935. Wat
Lok Moli and Wat Sri Supan display beautiful architect. After
lunch at a famous Thai resteraunt in Chiang Mai, we head to
Wiang Kum Ka, a historic settlement and archaeological site
along the Ping River, which was built by King Mangrai as his
capital city before moved it to Chiang Mai. It was flooded and
abandoned more than 700 years ago; that move became more
understandable in 2005, when the ancient city was flooded
three separate times as the river overflowed its banks. After
that we visit Wat Suan Dok, a Royal Temple of the Third Class,
Wat Umong (translates as Tunnel temple), and Wat Jed Yod
(translates as seven peaks).
Schedule
09.00 AM : Depart from the Empress Hotel to visit
- Wat Chedi Luang
- Wat Pra Singha
- Wat Lok Moli
- Wat Sri Supan
12.00 PM : Have lunch at Plubpla restaurant
13.00 PM : Visit Wiang Khumkam
15.00 PM : Visit Wat Suan Dok
16.30 PM : Visit Wat U- Mong
17.30 PM : Visit Wat Jet Yod
For those who visit Thai temples or “Wat” in Thai (Tour 3 & 4),
please wear long pants. Short pants are not allowed inside
the temple.
9
PROGRAM AND ORAL SESSIONS
Sun, 14 August 2016
13:00 - 17:00
Registration and Poster Installation
17:00 - 20:00
Ice Breaker
Mon, 15 August 2016
Opening Remarks
08:00 - 08:45
08:45 - 09:30
Keynote
Session 3
MT studies for petroleum and geothermal resources: examples with emphasis on Asian region
Prasanta Patro
09:30 - 09:45
Poster Introduction: Session 3.1, 3.2
09:45 - 10:10
Coffee Break
10:10 - 11:45
Poster Presentation: Session 3.1, 3.2
11:45 - 13:15
Lunch
13:15 - 13:30
S3.1-O200
13:30 - 13:45
S3.1-O241
13:45 - 14:00
S3.1-O242
14:00 - 14:15
S3.1-O333
14:15 - 14:30
S3.1-O420
14:30 - 14:45
S3.2-O161
Links between volcanic, tectonic, and geothermal systems revealed with array MT data in
the Taupo Volcanic Zone, New Zealand
Edward A. Bertrand, Grant Caldwell, Wiebke Heise, Stewart L. Bennie, Neville G. Palmer, Garth C. Archibald
Characterizing geothermal resources with passive and active electromagnetic methods in
challenging EM environments
Mathieu Darnet, Nicolas Coppo, Francois Bretaudeau, Pierre Wawrzyniak, Sebastien Penz, Bernard Bourgeois,
Jean-Christophe Gourry, Bernard Sanjuan
Electromagnetic methods in geothermal exploration in Iceland
Knútur Árnason, Ragna Karlsdóttir, Arnar M. Vilhjálmsson, Gylfi P. Hersir
Audio magnetotelluric measurements over Bakreswar Geothermal Province, India
Shalivahan, Anuragh Tripathi, Roshan K. Singh, Akash Chandra, Ashok K. Gupta
Challenge and opportunity of applying magnetotelluric technology for geothermal
exploration in Indonesia
Yunus Daud, Wambra A. Nuqramadha, Fikri Fahmi
MT survey for groundwater exploration at Wadi Diit, SE Desert, Egypt
Gad M. El-Qady, Mohamed Abdelzaher, Mamdouh Soilman, A. Younes, I. Gaafar
Coffee Break
14:45 - 15:05
15:05 - 15:20
S3.3-O181
15:20 - 15:35
S3.4-O186
15:35 - 15:50
S3.5-O168
Seafloor massive sulfide exploration with the GOLDEN EYE marine electromagnetic profiler:
first results from the German license areas on the Central Indian Ridge
Katrin Schwalenberg, Hendrik Müller, Martin Engels
Deep-towed CSEM system for mapping shallow marine geology with applications for
gas hydrate exploration
Peter Kannberg, Steven Constable
CSEM monitoring in a producing oil field using cascaded inversion
Cedric Patzer, Kristina Tietze, Oliver Ritter
15:50 - 16:05
Poster Introduction: Session 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6
16:05 - 17:00
Poster Presentation: Session 3.3, 3.4, 3.5, 3.6
17:00 - 17:45
Discussion I
10
Tue, 16 August 2016
08:00 - 08:45 Keynote
Session 6
08:45 - 09:00 S6.1-O125
09:00 - 09:15
S6.1-O336
09:15 - 09:30
S6.1-O157
Electromagnetic monitoring of hydraulic fracking: relationship to permeability, seismicity and stress
Stephan Thiel
ANN-based prediction of cement-admixed soft clay permeability using the time-domain IP data
Khin M. Latt, Pham H. Giao
Effect of transverse anisotropy on MTEM data using FDTD-UPML approximation for anisotropic medium
Olalekan Fayemi, Qingyun Di, Oreoluwa B. Omisore
Electrical conductivity during CO2 – rock interaction under reservoir conditions
Jana Börner, Volker Herdegen, Jens-Uwe Repke, Klaus Spitzer
09:30 - 09:45
Poster Introduction: Session 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 6
09:45 - 10:10
Coffee Break
10:10 - 11:45
Poster Presentation: Session 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 6
11:45 - 13:15
Lunch
14:00 - 14:15
Keynote
Session 1
S1.1-O296
14:15 - 14:30
S1.1-O267
14:30 - 14:45
S1.2-O406
13:15 - 14:00
Coffee Break
14:45 - 15:05
15:05 - 15:20
S1.2-O140
15:20 - 15:35
S1.3-O113
15:35 - 15:50
S1.4-O375
15:50 - 16:05
S3.6-O256
16:05 - 17:45
Estimation of the magnetotelluric response function: the path from robust estimation to a stable MLE
Alan Chave
Multi-physics geophysical acquisition system for land, borehole and marine applications
Kurt M. Strack, Sonya Davydycheva, Tilman Hanstein, Valery Korepanov, Maxim Smirnov
Large-scale magnetotelluric data acquisition system based on ZigBee network
Xiaolu Xi, Haicheng Yang, Xuefeng Zhao, Hongchun Yao, Jieting Qiu, Hai Dong, Fabao Yan, Shenglong Tan, Ruijie Shen,
Hong Wu, Xin He, Rujun Chen
Turning noise into signal: electromagnetic exploration using impressed pipeline currents
Tobias Lindau, Michael Becken
An analysis of ionospheric versus oceanic tidal magnetic signals and implications for
electromagnetic sounding
Neesha R. Schnepf, Manoj C. Nair, Alexey Kuvshinov
Preserving the identity of VLF and LF transmitters for enhanced resolution of geoelectric models
from RMT data
Suman Mehta, Laust Pedersen, Mehrdad Bastani
European Magnetotelluric Data and Models (EMTDAMO) in the European Plate Observing System –
Implementation Phase (EPOS IP)
Toivo Korja, Maxim Y. Smirnov, Thorkild M. Rasmussen
USGS induction hazard science
Anna Kelbert, Paul Bedrosian, E. Joshua Rigler, Carol A. Finn, Jeffrey J. Love
Division VI Business Meeting I
Wed, 17 August 2016
08:00 - 21:00
Excursion & Authentic Northern Thai Dinner and Show at Khum Khan Tok
11
Thu, 18 August 2016
08:45 - 09:00
Keynote
Session 2
S2.2-O448
09:00 - 09:15
S2.2-O196
09:15 - 09:30
S2.2-O244
08:00 - 08:45
Application of 3D EM inversion in practice - challenges, pitfalls and solution approaches
Marion Miensopust
Hybrid finite element-finite difference method for solving two-dimensional magnetotelluric modelling
Tanakrich Tintan, Weerachai Sarakorn
Three-dimensional electromagnetic modeling using advanced Galerkin methods
Vladimir Puzyrev
Step-by-step: understanding the powerline problem in airborne electromagnetic data
Benjamin R. Bloss, Andrei Swidinsky, Paul A. Bedrosian
09:30 - 09:45
Poster Introduction: Session 2.1, 2.2
09:45 - 10:10
Coffee Break
10:10 - 11:45
Poster Presentation: Session 2.1, 2.2
11:45 - 13:15
Lunch
14:00 - 14:15
Keynote
Session 2
S2.3-O228
14:15 - 14:30
S2.6-O159
14:30 - 14:45
S2.3-O66
13:15 - 14:00
Integrating electromagnetic data with other geophysical observations for enhanced imaging of the Earth
Max Moorkamp
Inversion of magnetotelluric data using L1-norm regularization and wavelet dictionaries
Christian Nittinger, Michael Becken
The novel high-performance 3D MT inverse solver
Mikhail Kruglyakov, Alexey Geraskin, Alexey Kuvshinov
MARE3DEM: a three-dimensional CSEM inversion based on a parallel adaptive finite element method
using unstructured meshes
Yuxiang Zhang, Kerry W. Key
Coffee Break
14:45 - 15:05
15:05 - 15:20
S2.5-O299
15:20 - 15:35
S2.5-O414
15:35 - 15:50
S2.6-O209
Lithospheric conductivity anomalies imaged at the Proterozoic-Phanerozoic transition of Australia
using AusLAMP magnetotelluric data
Kate E. Robertson, Graham S. Heinson, Stephan Thiel
Challenges in modelling and inversion of sea-floor MT data
Max Moorkamp, Anna Avdeeva
Three-dimensional inversion of transient electromagnetic data and its numerical implementation in Julia
Ralph-Uwe Börner, Julia Weißflog, Oliver G. Ernst, Klaus Spitzer
15:50 - 16:05
Poster Introduction: Session 2.3, 2.5, 2.6
16:05 - 17:00
Poster Presentation: Session 2.3, 2.5, 2.6
17:00 - 17:45
Discussion II
12
Fri, 19 August 2016
08:00 - 08:45
Keynote
Session 2,4
08:45 - 09:00
S2.4-O238
09:00 - 09:15
S2.4-O312
09:15 - 09:30
S2.4-O372
Joint modelling of conductivity and other geophysical and petrological observables to infer
the structure of the lithosphere and uppermost mantle
Javier Fullea
Joint 3D inversion of magnetotelluric, receiver function and gravity data : application to
the study of the continental lithospheric break-up in the North Tanzanian Rift
Matthieu Plasman, Pascal Tarits, Christel Tiberi, Sophie Hautot, Stephanie Gautier, Cynthia Ebinger, Steve Roecker,
Julie Albaric, Khalfan Mtelela, Gabriel Mulibo, Remigus Gama
Joint inversion of on-lake radiomagnetotelluric and lake-floor direct current resistivity data and its
application
Shunguo Wang, Thomas Kalscheuer, Mehrdad Bastani, Alireza Malehmir, Laust B. Pedersen, Torleif Dahlin, Naser Meqbel
Self-consistent thermo-chemical Bayesian joint inversion modelling of the southern part of
the Ordos Block, North China Craton incorporating elevation, geoid, surface heat flow,
Rayleigh wave data and MT data
Alan G. Jones, Hao Dong, Wei Wenbo, Juan Carlos Afonso, Simon Klemperer, Tianze Liu
09:30 - 09:45
Poster Introduction: Session 2.4, 4.2, 4.3
09:45 - 10:10
Coffee Break
10:10 - 11:45
Poster Presentation: Session 2.4, 4.2, 4.3
11:45 - 13:15
Lunch
12:45 - 13:15
Division VI Business Meeting II
13:15 - 14:00
Keynote
Session 4
14:00 - 14:15
S4.2-O185
14:15 - 14:30
S4.2-O262
14:30 - 14:45
S4.2-O270
A review of recent developments in the study of regional lithospheric electrical structure of
the Asian continent
Letian Zhang
Imaging plate coupling at the northern Hikurangi subduction margin, New Zealand
Wiebke Heise, Grant Caldwell, Edward A. Bertrand, Yasuo Ogawa, Stewart L. Bennie
3D fluid distribution and co- and post-seismic deformation: MT imaging of focal zone of 2008
Iwate–Miyagi Nairiku Earthquake, Japan
Atsushi Suzuki, Yasuo Ogawa, Zenshiro Saito, Masashi Ushioada, Hiroshi Ichihara, Masahiro Ichiki, Masaaki Mishina
An amphibious magnetotelluric Investigation of the Cascadian Seismogenic and ETS zones
Blake A. Parris, Dean Livelybrooks, Paul Bedrosian, Gary Egbert, Kerry Key, Adam Schultz, Alex Cook, Max Kant,
Nick Wogan, Alexa Zeryck
Coffee Break
14:45 - 15:05
15:05 - 15:20
S4.3-O61
15:20 - 15:35
S4.3-O108
15:35 - 15:50
S4.3-O387
Probing the anisotropic asthenosphere beneath the Pyrenees in the presence of highly conducting oceans
Marcel Cembrowski, Andreas Junge, Joan Campanyà, Juanjo Ledo, Pilar Queralt
Electrical conductivity signature of the New York - Alabama Lineament as revealed by initial 3D inversions
of EarthScope magnetotelluric data
Benjamin S. Murphy, Gary D. Egbert
Three dimensional lithospheric resistivity structure of the Tibetan Plateau: a synoptic view
Hao Dong, Wenbo Wei, Sheng Jin, Gaofeng Ye, Jian'en Jing, Letian Zhang, Alan G. Jones, Chengliang Xie, Yaotian Yin
15:50 - 16:05
Poster Introduction: Session 4.1
16:05 - 17:00
Poster Presentation: Session 4.1
17:00 - 17:45
Discussion III
13
Sat, 20 August 2016
08:00 - 08:15
S4.3-O154
08:15 - 08:30
S4.3-O367
08:30 - 08:45
S4.1-O151
08:45 - 09:00
S4.1-O224
09:00 - 09:15
S4.1-O309
09:15 - 09:30
S4.3-O116
Magnetotelluric evidence for the 1.1 Ga Keweenawan mantle plume
Esteban Bowles-Martinez, Adam Schultz
The varying India crustal front in the South Tibetan Plateau as revealed by magnetotelluric data
Chengliang Xie, Wenbo Wei, Sheng Jin, Yuanyuan Fang
New data on the conductive layer of dilatant-diffusive nature (DD-layer) in the Archaean-Proterozoic
complexes of the Fennoscandian Shield.
Abdulkhai A. Zhamaletdinov, Aleksandr N. Shevtsov, Vitaly V. Kolobov, Vladimir E. Kolesnikov, Akersey A. Skorohodov,
Pavel A. Ryazantsev, Victor V. Ivonin, Michail A. Birulya
Geo-fluids distribution in mantle inferred from the electrical conductivity and simulated thermal
structures beneath Kyushu, in the Southwest Japan Arc
Maki Hata, Makoto Uyeshima, Shoichi Yoshioka, Nobuaki Suenaga, Takumi Matsumoto
The electrical conductivity structure of the Australian continental lithosphere
– an overview of a 10 year MT program
Jingming Duan, Tristan Kemp, Liejun Wang
Deep geoelectrical signature of the eastern segment of central India tectonic zone
Khasi Raju, Prasanta K. Patro, Ujjal K. Borah, Chinna Reddy
09:30 - 09:45
Poster Introduction: Session 5, 7, 8
09:45 - 10:10
Coffee Break
10:10 - 11:45
Poster Presentation: Session 5, 7, 8
11:45 - 13:15
Lunch
13:15 - 14:00
Keynote
Session 5
14:00 - 14:15
S5.1-O146
14:15 - 14:30
S5.1-O323
14:30 - 14:45
S5.1-O400
Recent progress in studies on EM fields generated by oceanic flows including tsunamis:
their properties and applications
Takuto Minami
Surface towed CSEM systems for shallow water mapping of Arctic permafrost
Dallas Sherman, Peter Kannberg, Steven Constable
Ocean bottom electric field variations associated with the 2011 Tohoku-Oki tsunami
Hiroshi Ichihara, Yozo Hamano, Takafumi Kasaya, Kiyoshi Baba
Electrical resistivity signature of the oceanic crust around hydrothermal vent sites on
East Pacific Rise at 9° 50’N
Takuya Teraoka, Nobukazu Seama , Rob Evans
Coffee Break
14:45 - 15:05
15:05 - 15:20
S5.1-O411
15:20 - 15:35
S7.1-O412
15:35 - 15:50
S7.1-O321
Significance of electrical anisotropy on marine CSEM data
Ronghua Peng, Xiangyun Hu, Jianchao Cai
Electromagnetic induction in a conductive planet due to stellar angular-momentum loss
Mark E. Everett
Improving ionospheric source models for imaging upper mantle/transition zone resistivity
Gary D. Egbert, Patrick Alken, Astrid Maute, Arthur Richmond
15:50 - 16:30
Closing Remarks
18:00 - 22:00
Farewell Dinner (Bye Bye Chiang Mai & See You in Turkey 2018)
14
POSTER SESSIONS
Session 1.1: Instrumentation Development
16 Aug,10:10 - 11:45
S1.1-P149
S1.1-P167
S1.1-P192
S1.1-P203
S1.1-P204
S1.1-P216
S1.1-P232
S1.1-P318
S1.1-P337
S1.1-P395
S1.1-P399
S1.1-P455
A micro ocean bottom E-field receiver
Kai Chen, Ming Deng, Xianhu Luo, Qingxian Zhao, Haifeng Wang
Acquisition and interpretation of the vertical electric field to monitor fluid flux with controlled-source electromagnetics
Kristina Tietze, Oliver Ritter, Cedric Patzer, Paul Veeken, Bert Verboom
Trends in the long-period magnetotelluric instrumentation development
Andrii Prystai, Vira Pronenko, Borys Ladanivskyy, Jingming Duan
Field test of CASTEM at DaWangzhuang iron mine of China
Xin Wu, Ling Huang, Bin Yan
The design of a compact three-axis induction magnetometer for AMT method
Bin Yan, Wanhua Zhu, Leisong Liu, Ling Huang, Xin Wu
A new semi-airborne system for mineral exploration (DESMEX project)
Maria Cherevatova, Christian Nittinger, Michael Becken, DESMEX Working Group
Further progress in flux-gate technology
Andriy Marusenkov, Andrii Prystai, Valery Korepanov
Improve the flexibility and quality for electromagnetic field acquirement
Huang Ling, Huang Jiangjie, Hu Jin
Research on real-time control technology of hardware parallelism of marine controlled-source electromagnetic
transmitter
Meng Wang, Ming Deng, Xian H. Luo, Kai Chen, Jian e. Jing
A new EM transmitter for marine controlled-source electromagnetic sounding and first results from the South China Sea
Yuguo Li, Fujun Qi, Zhanxiang He, Jianxin Pei, Shuangmin Duan, Zeyu Lu, Jing Zhang, Weibin Sun, Jie Lu, Jialin Chen
A new boardbrand ocean-bottom electromagnetic receiver
Jianxin Pei, Jialin Chen, Xinsheng Yu, Ming Li, Lanjun Liu, Jing Zhang, Yuguo Li
Large-scale audio-frequency magnetotelluric data acquisition system based on ZigBee network
Xiaolu Xi, Haicheng Yang, Xuefeng Zhao, Hongchun Yao, Jieting Qiu, Hai Dong, Fabao Yan, Shenglong Tan, Ruijie Shen, Hong Wu,
Xin He, Rujun Chen
Session 1.2: Source Fields
16 Aug, 10:10 - 11:45
S1.2-P100
S1.2-P176
S1.2-P322
Detection of geomagnetic pulsations using continuous wavelet transform in the framework of MT processing
Hugo Larnier, Aude Chambodut, Pascal Sailhac
Waiting for the storm geomagnetic activity and its influence on magnetotelluric transfer functions
Marcel Cembrowski, Andreas Junge, Philip Hering, Eloi Vilamajó
Combining EarthScope long period magnetotelluric data with geomagnetic observatories: hypothetical events at
continental scale
Gary D. Egbert
Session 1.3: EM Data Processing
16 Aug, 10:10 - 11:45
S1.3-P60
S1.3-P69
S1.3-P91
S1.3-P99
Multivariate evaluation of magnetotelluric data-processing methods and practical application
Philip Hering, Andreas Junge, Nynne Lauritsen
Array processing with broadband magnetotelluric data of South Africa
Anna Platz, Ute Weckmann
Space-time array difference magnetotelluric method
Cong Zhou, Jingtian Tang, Yuan Yuan, Zhengyong Ren, Xiao Xiao
Wavelet-based processing of AMT data exhibiting atmospheric waves based on their source properties
Hugo Larnier, Pascal Sailhac, Aude Chambodut
15
POSTER SESSIONS
S1.3-P119
S1.3-P171
S1.3-P183
S1.3-P187
S1.3-P210
S1.3-P220
S1.3-P226
S1.3-P251
S1.3-P319
S1.3-P427
S1.3-P462
S1.3-P463
Wavefield transformation of transient electromagnetic induction soundings data
Gleb Gretskov, Mikhail Epov, Evgeniy Antonov
3D modelling in West Greenland considering the influence of polar electrojet and fjord systems
Nynne L. Lauritsen, Philip Hering, Andreas Junge, Jürgen Matzka, Nils Olsen
Effective distances for remote reference in magnetotelluric method
Dmitry Epishkin, Andrey Yakovlev
Low signal-noise ratio GPR data process using FastICA
Qinyu Cheng, Qianwei Dai, Pan Li
Wide range MT response at Kakioka, Kanoya, and Memambetsu
Ikuko Fujii
Magnetotelluric time series enhancement with EMD and Hurst exponent
B Pradeep Naick, I Santi Prabha, K Naganjaneyulu, A Pratap, S Kusham
Integrated interpretation of electromagnetic and resistivity data for static shift correction, examples from eastern Polish
Carpathians
Michal Stefaniuk, Adam Cygal, Anna Kret, Grzegorz Lewinski, Marek Sada
Progress of MTpy: an open-source community-driven magnetotelluric software package written in Python
Jared R. Peacock, Lars Krieger, Alison Kirkby
Statistical modeling of EMI spatial data series and LiDAR-derived morphometrics to understand the large-scale framework
geology controls on barrier island transgression
Bradley A. Weimer, Mark E. Everett, Phil Wernette, Chris Houser
Improving the MT transfer function estimation by constraints given by the WAL normalized invariants
Agata Siniscalchi, Fabio Barracano, Gerardo Romano, Simona Tripaldi
Noise reduction method of marine electric field data by independent component analysis
Shinya Sato, Tada-nori Goto, Takafumi Kasaya, Yoshifumi Kawada
A time-domain principal component filter for identification and classification of magnetic pulsations in field data
Karl N. Kappler, Tom Bleier, Dan Schneider
Session 1.4: EM Model and Data Sharing
16 Aug, 10:10 - 11:45
S1.4-P84
S1.4-P253
S1.4-P436
Comparison of transient electromagnetic configuration in prediction of water bearing structures in tunnels
Kai Li, Huaifeng Sun, Shucai Li, Chuanxi Su
XML database for magnetotelluric transfer functions at IRIS DMC: update on data citation practices
Anna Kelbert, Chad Trabant, Mick Van Fossen
Grounded finite wire TDEM sounding data processing and modeling for CCS
Warsa Warsa, Wahyu Srigutomo, Donny Prasetyo, M. R. Sule, Trimadona Trimadona, Akira Saito, Keiko Nakayama,
Masami Hato, Djedi S. Widarto
Session 2.1: Theory
18 Aug, 10:10 - 11:45
S2.1-P77
S2.1-P114
S2.1-P178
S2.1-P266
S2.1-P331
S2.1-P396
16
Analytical investigation of the magnetotelluric strike estimation in 1D anisotropic layered media
Tomohisa Okazaki, Naoto Oshiman, Ryokei Yoshimura
Effect of evaluation frequency separation and station spacing on magnetotelluric resolution
Ujjal K. Borah, Prasanta K. Patro
Detecting galvanic distortion
Tawat Rung-Arunwan, Weerachai Siripunvaraporn, Hisashi Utada
Fractional progress toward understanding the fractional diffusion limit: the electromagnetic response of spatially
correlated geomaterials
Chester J. Weiss, G. D. Beskardes, Mark E. Everett
Application of the matrix logarithm to interpretation of magnetotelluric impedance tensor data
Benjamin S. Murphy, Gary D. Egbert
Turn-off waveforms of large and small transmitter loop currents
Nikolay Kozhevnikov, Maxim Sharlov, Rodion Sharlov, Sergey Stefanenko, Yuri Agafonov
Session 2.2: Modelling
18 Aug, 10:10 - 11:45
S2.2-P76
S2.2-P79
S2.2-P80
S2.2-P87
S2.2-P147
S2.2-P160
S2.2-P169
S2.2-P170
S2.2-P211
S2.2-P230
S2.2-P231
S2.2-P237
S2.2-P268
S2.2-P283
S2.2-P293
S2.2-P306
S2.2-P324
S2.2-P346
S2.2-P352
S2.2-P355
S2.2-P360
S2.2-P370
S2.2-P373
S2.2-P381
Identifying salt domes with magnetotelluric synthetic models
Natalia Foltyn, Katarzyna Slezak, Krzysztof Nowozynski
Comparison of CSEM data for marine, land and borehole transmitter-receiver arrays
Cem Demirel, Emin M. Candansayar
Model study for phase rolling out of quadrant magnetotelluric data
Guihang Shao, Qibin Xiao, Guo Yu
A volume-surface integral equation approach for 3D CSEM modeling problem with topography
Feng Zhou, Zhengyong Ren, Jingtian Tang, Chaojian Chen, Shuanggui Hu
Two-dimensional basement modeling of central loop transient electromagnetic data from the central Azraq basin area,
Jordan
Pritam Yogeshwar, Bülent Tezkan
The novel high-performance 3D MT forward solver
Mikhail Kruglyakov, Alexey Geraskin, Alexey Kuvshinov
3D CSEM forward modelling and inversion in the presence of steel cased wells
Cedric Patzer, Kristina Tietze, Oliver Ritter
Model study of the impact of fjords on induction arrows
Nynne L. Lauritsen, Philip Hering, Andreas Junge, Jürgen Matzka, Nils Olsen
Influence of steel infrastructure on transient electromagnetic fields
Matthias Bär, Ralph-Uwe Börner, Klaus Spitzer
Customizable 3D CSEM modeling using the finite element library FEniCS
Raphael Rochlitz, Thomas Günther
Modelling the ocean influence for onshore EM transfer functions
Andreas Junge, Bo Yang, Yixian Xu
3D anisotropic modelling and EM transfer functions
Andreas Junge
The infinite source CSAMT finite element simulation in the two-dimensional anisotropic formation with topography
Zhitao Xiong, Dandan Li, Xingong Tang
Approximations for the 2D coast effect on marine MT data in anisotropic conductivity structures
Xin Hui, Xiaoping Wu
Three-dimensional finite element modelling of magnetotelluric fields in general anisotropic media
Zhenhuan Xu, Yuguo Li
Comparative study of 2D model response for Controlled Source Audio-frequency Magneto-telluric (CSAMT) and AMT
Ashok Babu Ganjam, Satyachari Kattoju, Satheesh Sangem, Arvind Kumar Gupta, Shivakrishna M
Topography correction in magnetotelluric data
Sushil Kumar, Prasanta K. Patro, Bhagwan S. Chaudhary
Meshfree local Petrov-Galerkin method for the magnetotelluric forward problem in 2D conductivity structures
Jie Lu, Yuguo Li
Three-dimensional marine CSEM forward modelling and sensitivity computation in fully anisotropic conductivity
structures
Bo Han, Yuguo Li, Gang Li, Ronghua Peng
2.5D H-Hz wide field electromagnetic modeling using finite element method
Shunguo Wang, Bin Xiong, Qiyun Jiang
A new shape function for electromagnetic induction problems using finite element method
Yusuke Kinoshita, Yasuo Ogawa, Atsushi Suzuki
3D CSEM modelling in object oriented framework with multi-resolution grid
Maxim Y. Smirnov, Maria Cherevatova
The 3D forward DTM3 models benchmark studies for different MT forward solvers
Jan Vozar, Pilar Queralt, Alan G. Jones, Marion Miensopust, Gerardo Romano, Agata Siniscalchi, the 3D MT modellers
Can you obtain negative apparent conductivities at low induction numbers?
Marco Perez-Flores
17
POSTER SESSIONS
S2.2-P389
S2.2-P403
S2.2-P407
S2.2-P408
S2.2-P425
S2.2-P453
Development of flexible object oriented MATLAB codes for 3D EM modeling
Gary Egbert, Maxim Smirnov, Charovatova Maria, Zeqiu Guo, Huiqian Zhang
A finite element approach for 3D TEM modeling based on Schur complement theory
Yajun Liu, Xiangyun Hu, Jianhui Li, Jianchao Cai
Three-dimensional frequency-domain EM modelling using aggregation-based algebraic multigrid method
Hui Chen, Changchun Yin, Juzhi Deng, Yunhe Liu, Min Yin
Modeling of 3D magnetotelluric using vector finite element
Rudy Prihantoro, Doddy Sutarno, Nurhasan Nurhasan
A proposal for a common MT model format
Alexander Grayver, Randall Mackie, Marion Miensopust
Modelling near-surface metallic clutter without the excruciating pain
Chester J. Weiss, Jeffrey A. Bach, Jeffery T. Williams
Session 2.3: Inversion (general)
18 Aug, 16:05 - 17:00
S2.3-P73
S2.3-P74
S2.3-P94
S2.3-P121
S2.3-P130
S2.3-P164
S2.3-P191
S2.3-P202
S2.3-P206
S2.3-P213
S2.3-P229
S2.3-P248
S2.3-P252
S2.3-P259
S2.3-P264
S2.3-P272
S2.3-P273
S2.3-P278
18
Inversion of MT and resistivity data sets using Grey Wolf Optimization (GWO)
Akash Chandra, Aayush Agarwal, Shalivahan Srivastava, Roshan K. Singh, Ashok K. Gupta
Parallel genetic algorithm for magnetotelluric inversion with GPU
Miao You, Xiaoping Wu, Wei Du, Yinhan Xu
Development of two-dimensional inversion of marine DC resistivity survey
Keiichi Ishizu, Chatchai Vachiratienchai, Weerachai Siripunvaraporn, Tada-nori Goto
Magnetotelluric measurements along the coastal areas of Odisha, India
Gaurav Kumar, Sudha Agrahari
The importance of the starting model structure in the joint 3D inversion of MT and MV data in mining applications
Pavel V. Ivanov, Ilya N. Lozovsky, Ivan M. Varentsov
Inversion of array lateral logging based on trust region method
Kejia Pan, Jingtian Tang
A novel 2D meshless inversion algorithm for magnetotelluric data
Jan Wittke, Bülent Tezkan
The TDIP parameters extraction and applications
Jianzhong Cheng, Qing Liu, Liangjun Yan, Lei Zhou, Xinbing Xie, Fengming Jing
Two-dimensional Bayesian stochastic inversion of magnetotelluric data
Bin Yin, Xiangyun Hu, Jianchao Cai
On the effectiveness of 1D inversions of TEM Data affected by induced polarization
Marc Seidel, Bülent Tezkan
Efficient computation of adjoint field for 3D CSEM inversion
Pravin K. Gupta, Rahul Dehiya, Mohammad Israil, Arun Singh
A pseudo-MT formulation for 3D CSEM inversion with a single transmiter
François Bretaudeau, Nicoals Coppo, Pierre Wawrzyniak, Sebastien Penz, Jean-François Girard
Data analysis of simultaneous data sets based on ionospheric current and electromagnetic fields on Earth’s surface
Naoto Imamura, Adam Schultz, Russell Cosgrove
Study on sensitivity of 3D marine controlled-source electromagnetic method
Yong Luo, Yixian Xu, Bo Yang, Ying Liu
Smooth 2D modeling of magnetotelluric data using particle swarm optimization
Gökhan Karcioglu, Aysan Gürer
The effect of the Siberian flood basalts magnetic viscosity on a TEM sounding response
Kozhevnikov Nikolay, Agafonov Yuri, Buddo Igor, Kompaniets Sofya
Interpretation of 3D IP-affected TEM Data from southern Siberian craton, with implications for oil exploration
Kompaniets Sofya, Kozhevnikov Nikolay, Agafonov Yuri
A two-stage 3D inversion approach for marine MT data on the basis of an integral equation solver
Pengfei Liang
S2.3-P298
S2.3-P301
S2.3-P390
S2.3-P405
S2.3-P434
S2.3-P459
S2.3-P465
Research on LBFGS and LBFGS-B method in MT inversion
Kunpeng Wang, Handong Tan, Jianlong Yuan
Three-dimensional MT forward modeling and inversion based on a secondary field approach
Ce Qin, Xuben Wang, Ning Zhao, Jun Zhou
1D magnetotelluric data inversion using multi-objective dragonfly algorithm
Pramudiana Samsul, Sungkono Sungkono, Bagus J. Santosa
Advancement in 2D interpretation approach in very low frequency electromagnetic measurements
Shashi P. Sharma, Anand Singh
Development of inversion method for electromagnetic survey data in fictitious wave domain
Tada-nori Goto, Kei Kusuda
Quasi-3D inversion of horizontal MV responses: methodical developments and applications for the KIROVOGRAD sounding
array
Ivan Varentsov
Multiple hypothesis testing and inversion: an essential combination
Anna Avdeeva, Alan Chave, Alan Jones, Jessica Spratt, Shane Evans
Session 2.4: Joint and Constrained Inversion
19 Aug, 10:10 - 11:45
S2.4-P193
S2.4-P214
S2.4-P225
S2.4-P245
S2.4-P282
S2.4-P285
S2.4-P329
S2.4-P338
S2.4-P342
S2.4-P347
S2.4-P358
S2.4-P365
S2.4-P368
S2.4-P417
2D joint inversion of DCR and MT/RMT data by using structured and unstructured mesh: comparison study
Ãzcan Ãzyildirim, M. Emin Candansayar
Laterally and spatially constrained inversion of transient electromagnetic data from sedimentary basins in the East
African Rift Valley
Marc Seidel, Bülent Tezkan, Pritam Yogeshwar
Mineral physics and surface observation constraints on the topographic uplift of the southern African plateau due to the
African superswell
Alan G. Jones, Juan Carlos Afonso, Javier G. Fullea
Joint inversion of MT data with T and H responses: results from a synthetic case study and real data
Joan Campanyà, Xenia Ogaya, Alan G. Jones, Volker Rath, Jan Vozar, Naser Meqbel
Inversion of small-loop FDEM data using bathymetrical input to monitor a sub-aqueous layer
Samuel Delefortrie, Daan Hanssens, Philippe D. Smedt, Marc V. Meirvenne
Integrated inversion of electromagnetic, gravity and seismic data for recognizing subsurface zone in the Polish
Carpathians
Adam Cygal, Michal Stefaniuk, Tomasz Mackowski, Anna Kret
Pareto-optimal multi-objective joint inversion of geophysical data
Sebastian Schnaidt, Graham Heinson, Lars Krieger
Three-dimensional inversion of magnetotelluric resistivity structure with galvanic distortion
Li Xin, Bai Denghai, Yan Yongli, Ma Xiaobing, Kong Xiangru
Joint MT-Gravity inversion in a complex geological environment: example of the western Greenland margin
Sophie Hautot, Pascal Tarits
Two-dimensional joint inversion of magnetotelluric and passive seismic data on GPU
M. Emin Candansayar, Ismail Demirci, N.Yildirim Gündogdu, Deniz Varilsüha, A. Egemen Yilmaz
A magnetotelluric profile over part of the Scandinavian Caledonides
Ping Yan, Maria A. Garcia Juanatey, Thomas Kalscheuer
Joint inversion of direct current resistivity, radiomagnetotelluric and seismic refraction data: its implementation on
hydrogeological problems
Ismail Demirci, M. Emin Candandsayar, Pantelis Soupios, Antonis Vafidis
Compositional and thermal structure of the crust from geophysical and petrophysical data: a case study of the Galway
Granite, Ireland
Thomas Farrell, Javier Fullea, Nickolai Bagdassarov, Mark Muller, Martin Feely, Jan Vozar, Colin Hogg, Raffaele Bonadio
2D adaptive unstructured grid based guided grouping inversion for plane wave EM methods and geologic separation using
fuzzy c-means clustering
Anand Singh, Shashi P. Sharma
19
POSTER SESSIONS
S2.4-P423
S2.4-P445
S2.4-P456
Joint inversion of ERT and AMT data for mineral exploration
Victor Kulikov, Elena Aleksanova, Aleksandr Kaminsky, Andrey Yakovlev
3D individual and joint inversion of DC resistivity and electromagnetic data
Julia Weißflog, Felix Eckhofer, Ralph-Uwe Börner, Michael Eiermann, Oliver G. Ernst, Klaus Spitzer
2D inversion of magnetotelluric soundings constrained by results of reflection seismic data interpretation for recognizing
of complex geological structures, some examples from Poland
Michal Stefaniuk, Adam Cygal, Tomasz Mackowski, Marek Sada
Session 2.5: 3-D Inversion in Practice
18 Aug, 16:05 - 17:00
S2.5-P62
S2.5-P78
S2.5-P103
S2.5-P107
S2.5-P127
S2.5-P148
S2.5-P166
S2.5-P199
S2.5-P215
S2.5-P219
S2.5-P249
S2.5-P260
S2.5-P286
S2.5-P292
S2.5-P343
S2.5-P344
S2.5-P356
S2.5-P371
S2.5-P388
20
Tridimensional modeling Paniri-Toconce volcanic system, using magnetotelluric
Renzo A. Mancini, Daniel A. Díaz
Conductivity structure mapping of Proterozoic Archean greenstone belts of eastern Indian Craton: an approach Of 3D
inversion of AMT data
Roshan K. Singh, Shalivahan Srivastava, Ved P. Maurya, Shailendra Singh
New methodologies for reservoir characterisation: electromagnetic study in the Northwest Carboniferous basin (Ireland)
Xènia Ogaya, Joan Campanyà, Alan G. Jones, Volker Rath, Derek Reay, Rob Raine, Brian McConnell, Juanjo Ledo
3D investigation of magnetotelluric data from Spitsbergen, Svalbard
Thomas Beka, Maxim Smirnov, Yngve Birkelund
Joint 3D inversion of MT and MV data along the ZHIZDRA profile (KIROVOGRAD array at the Voronezh Massive)
Pavel V. Ivanov, Svetlana Kovacikova, Ilya N. Lozovsky, Ivan M. Varentsov
3D inversion of a magnetotelluric profile data from Garhwal Himalayan region, India
Mohammad Israil, Paramjeet Mamoriya, Pravin K. Gupta, Sanjeev K. Varshney
3D inversion of controlled-source electromagnetic survey data in the presence of steel-cased wells
Kristina Tietze, Cedric Patzer, Oliver Ritter, Paul Veeken, Bert Verboom
3D electromagnetic inversion at low-induction numbers
Marco Perez-Flores
Comparison of the 3D inversion results with different type of MT data and model parametrizations
Katarzyna A. Slezak, Krzysztof Nowozynski, Waldemar Jozwiak, Heinrich Brasse
Understanding the BC87 dataset: Imaging the enigmatic Nelson batholith conductor
Alan G. Jones, Hao Dong
Application of 3D inversion of single transmiter CSEM data for geothermal prospection using a pseudo-MT tensor
François Bretaudeau, Nicolas Coppo, Pierre Wawrzyniak, Thomas Jacob
Imaging electrical structure of western Junggar, NW China
Sheng Zhang, Yixian Xu, Bo Yang
Magnetotelluric imaging of crustal fluids and seismicity at the East Anatolian collision zone, northeastern Turkey
Ozlem Cengiz, Ahmet T. Basokur, Elif Tolak-Ciftci
Inversion of 3D magnetotelluric data using the developed 3DINV algorithm: synthetic study
Vishal Khatri
Three-dimensional electrical structure of the crust and upper mantle in Argentine between 26S and 32S
Cristina Pomposiello, Alicia Favetto, John Booker
Conductivity distribution beneath Damavand volcano inferred from magnetotelluric data
Behrooz Oskooi, Safieh Omidian
Magnetotelluric imaging along the western part of the North Anatolian fault zone, Turkey
Elif Tolak-Ciftci, Naoto Oshiman, Sabri B. Tank, Ryokei Yoshimura, Yasuo Ogawa, Yoshimori Honkura, Masaki Matsushima, Mustafa K.
Tuncer, Cengiz Celik
The 3D secret model DSM3: model geometry, responses, and comparison of inverted models from MT code writers and code
users
Alan G. Jones, Jan Vozar, Pilar Queralt, Marion Miensopust, Agata Siniscalchi, Gerardo Romano, Randy Mackie, The 3D Modellers
3D inversion of an amphibious 3D array: MOCHA
Bo Yang, Gary Egbert, Paul Bedrosian, Kerry Key, Dean Lievelybrooks, Blake Paris, Adam Schultz
S2.5-P430
S2.5-P460
S2.5-P464
3D Data-Space Occam's Inversion on the Application of Direct Current Resistivity Survey
Chatchai Vachiratienchai, Weerachai Siripunvaraporn
Large-scale 3D inversion of AMT data with application to mineral exploration
Rujun Chen, Mingke He, Fuguo Chang, Pei Zeng, Xuefeng Zhao
Three-dimensional electrical resistivity structures within the Tarim Basin
Yang Xiang, Leuolei Zhang, Peng Yu
Session 2.6: Inversion Frameworks
18 Aug, 16:05 - 17:00
S2.6-P110
S2.6-P129
A MATLAB based 3D modeling and inversion code for MT data
Arun Singh, Nitin Kumar, Pravin K. Gupta, Mohammad Israil
The problem of the model recovery in a complex geological medium: synthetic COMMEMI-3D3 dataset inversion
Pavel V. Ivanov, Michail Y. Smirnov, Ivan M. Varentsov
Session 3.1: Geothermal Energy
15 Aug, 10:10 - 11:45
S3.1-P83
S3.1-P95
S3.1-P97
S3.1-P98
S3.1-P106
S3.1-P109
S3.1-P115
S3.1-P144
S3.1-P155
S3.1-P189
S3.1-P190
S3.1-P227
S3.1-P243
S3.1-P284
S3.1-P300
Geophysical and geothermal investigation for exploration and sustainable thermal water in tourism development in
Tunisia
Badiaa Chulli
Investigating the local geological structures and geothermal characteristics of Alasehir (Gediz) Graben (Western Turkey)
inferred from magnetotelluric data
Ozge Tekesin-Cankurtaranlar, Okan Tüysüz, Ali Riza Kiliç
Subsurface resistivity modeling related to ocean effect from MT data of the Parangwedang geothermal field data
Daniel S. Tompson, Sintia W. Niasari
Audio magnetotelluric data analysis; study case: Parangwedang geothermal field, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Selvi M. Irawati, Sintia W. Niasari
Integrating electromagnetic data with seismic and gravity observations for enhanced imaging of geothermal resources in
the Kenyan Rift
Charles M. Lichoro, Knutur Arnason
Application of electromagnetic method for geothermal reservoir mapping in Indonesia
Dwirianda R. Ghani, Widodo Widodo
Magnetotelluric investigation of geothermal anomaly in the Seulawah Agam Volcano, Aceh, Indonesia
Dian Darisma, Agung Prastyo, Wahyu Srigutomo, Nazli Ismail
Electrical conductivity imaging of the Bakreswar geothermal by audio magnetotelluric data
Anurag Tripathi, Shalivahan Srivstava, V. P. Maurya, S. Singh, A. K. Bage, B. B. Bhattacharya, R. K. Sinharay
High resolution controlled source audio-frequency magnetotelluric (CSAMT) study near Tatapani geothermal area,
Chhattisgarh State, India
Ashok Babu Ganjam
Phase 2 activities to improve a 2015 Play Fairway Analysis of geothermal potential across the State of Hawaii
Graham Hill, Erin Wallin, Nicole Lautze, Donald Thomas, Robert Whittier, Stephen Martel, Garrett Ito, Neil Frazer, Nicholas Hinz
Magnetotelluric exploration in San Felipe (Mexico) for geothermal purposes
Diego Ruiz-Aguilar, Bülent Tezkan, Claudia Arango-Galván
Magnetotelluric joint inversion applied to deep geothermal exploration
Jean-Michel Ars, Pascal Tarits, Sophie Hautot, Jean-Luc Auxietre, Marcia Maïa, Olivier Coutant, Mathieu Bellanger
Basin characterization by means of joint inversion of electromagnetic geophysical data and borehole data: a case study
from the Loop Head Peninsula, western Ireland
Joan Campanyà , Xenia Ogaya, Alan G. Jones, Volker Rath, Brian McConnell, Peter D.W. Haughton, Juanjo Ledo
AMT monitoring of EGS water recharge at the Okuaizu geothermal area, NE Japan
Yusuke Yamaya, Shinichi Takakura, Hiroshi Asanuma
Improving resistivity estimate accuracy in 3D inversion of MT data with airborne EM data
Robert Delhaye, Volker Rath, Alan G. Jones, Mark R. Muller, Derek Reay, The IRETHERM Team
21
POSTER SESSIONS
S3.1-P311
S3.1-P315
S3.1-P363
S3.1-P369
S3.1-P374
S3.1-P401
S3.1-P415
S3.1-P416
S3.1-P421
S3.1-P429
S3.1-P466
MT imaging of anomalous hot spring signatures in the Tatapani geothermal area, India
Prabhakar Eknath Rao S., Prasanta K. Patro, K. Chinna Reddy, Kashi Raju, Ujjal K. Borah, Sivamallaiah Sana, S.V.S. Sarma
Play Fairway Analysis for structurally-controlled geothermal systems in the eastern Great Basin Extensional Regime, Utah,
USA
Philip E. Wannamaker, Kristine L. Pankow, Joseph N. Moore, Gregory D. Nash, Virginie Maris, Stuart F. Simmons, Christian L. Hardwick
Global optimization algorithms for parameter estimation of MT data and their application to the geothermal exploration:
preliminary results from the Larderello geothermal system (Italy)
Alessandro Santilano, Adele Manzella, Alberto Godio
Three-dimensional magnetotelluric characterization of Tuzgle – ocomar Geothermal System
(Puna plateau, NW Argentina)
Alicia Favetto, Maria F. Ahumada, Cristina Pomposiello, José Viramonte, Liliana Guevara
Lough Neagh Basin data geophysical modeling based on joint inversion and Archie law
Jan Vozar, Max Moorkamp, Alan G. Jones, Volker Rath, Mark Muller, Derek Reay, the IRETHERM team
Utilization of magnetotelluric data for evaluation of geothermal reservoir condition associated with EGS water injection
at Okuaizu geothermal area, Japan
Hideaki Hase, Tatsuya Sato, Takashi Okabe, Toshihiro Uchida, Shinichi Takakura, Yasuyuki Abe, Takayuki Ohishi
Virtual 3D conductivity model of Gediz Graben geothermal area: synthetic and field data examples
Erhan Erdogan, Mehmet E. Candansayar
Preliminary results of Turgutlu geothermal area magnetotelluric survey
Erhan Erdogan
Continuous MT monitoring for small fluid injection volume at Rittershoffen Geothermal Project, northern Alsace – France
Yassine Abdelfettah, Pascal Sailhac, Eva Schill, Hugo Larnier, Pierre-Daniel Matthey
Geothermal system of eastern Campi Flegrei caldera (Italy) by AMT-MT survey
Agata Siniscalchi, Simona Tripaldi, Gerardo Romano, Marianna Balasco, Luca D'Auria, Zaccaria Petrillo
A 3D magnetotelluric survey to explore the shallow geothemal reservoir of Fang geothermal field, Chiang Mai Province,
northern Thailand
Puwis Amatyakul, Songkhun Boonchaisuk, Tawat Rung-Arunwan, Chatchai Vachiratienchai, Spencer H. Wood, Kriangsak Pirarai, Aranya
Fuangswasdi, Weerachai Siripunvaraporn
Session 3.2: Groundwater and Environment
15 Aug, 10:10 - 11:45
S3.2-P70
S3.2-P71
S3.2-P81
S3.2-P85
S3.2-P96
S3.2-P117
S3.2-P153
S3.2-P184
S3.2-P201
S3.2-P313
22
Geoelectric study of Santiago Basin using transient electromagnetic (TEM)
Barbara N. Blanco, Daniel A. Díaz, Andrei Maksymowicz
CSEM and MT data to investigate the subsurface geometry of Kharga Basin (New Valley Oasis)
Mahmoud Mekkawi, Olga Hachay, Magdy Atya
Underground river mapping using VLF data with topographic correction in Gunung Kidul, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Afta H. Zakiyyan, Sintia W. Niasari
The use of VLF-EM and electromagnetic induction methods for mapping the ancient fort of Kuta Lubok as tsunami heritage
in Aceh Province, Indonesia
Muhammad Yanis, Nazli Ismail
Ground water flow monitoring through probability tomography and wavelet analysis of self-potential data
Kaiyan Hu, Qinghua Huang
Delineation of overburden thickness using resistivity imaging at Dobra bridge site, Uttarakhand, India
Anita Devi, Mohammad Israil, Rathinam Anbalagan, Pravin K. Gupta
2D modelling of controlled source radiomagnetotelluric data: an example from Vuoksa Region, Russia
Imamal Muttaqien, Buelent Tezkan
In-phase and quadrature electromagnetic mapping of Arctic archaeological sites in southern Baffin Island, Canada
David Landry, Ian Ferguson, Brooke Milne, Mulu Serzu, Robert Park
Audiomagnetotelluric characterisation of groundwater contamination by gypsum dissolution in Central Mexico
Claudia Arango-Galván, José A. Ramos-Leal, Judith T. Aquino-Flores
Deep ground water prospecting by magnetotellurics
Nikolay Palshin, Elena Aleksanova, Alireza Liaghat, Farshad Javali, Mohammad Javad Bolourchi
S3.2-P330
S3.2-P351
S3.2-P394
S3.2-P439
S3.2-P457
Using the direct current resistivity method on leakage detection: a Tha Thung Na dam case study
Sarunya Chomchaiya, Weerachai Siripunvaraporn, Chatchai Vachiratienchai
Resistivity imaging of a salt dome by magnetotellurics
Elena Aleksanova, Nikolay Palshin, Alireza Liaghat
High-density shallow TEM surveys for groundwater prospecting in East Siberia
Yuri Agafonov, Aleksandra Aksenovskaya, Ilya Egorov, Dmitri Kolesnikov, Maxim Sharlov
Three-dimensional inversion of SNMR data
Warsa Warsa, Hendra Grandis, Wahyudi W. Parnadi, Djoko Santoso
The application of the set of geoelectric methods for evaluation of technical condition of river flood embankments
Adam Cygal, Michal Stefaniuk, Anna Kret, Monika Kurowska
Session 3.3: Mineral Exploration
15 Aug, 16:05 - 17:00
S3.3-P274
S3.3-P310
S3.3-P335
S3.3-P364
S3.3-P376
S3.3-P452
S3.3-P454
S3.3-P468
Long offset transient electromagnetics to investigate deep mineral deposits in Germany within the DESMEX project:
survey design and two dimensional modeling study
Wiebke Mörbe, Pritam Yogeshwar, Bülent Tezkan
Magnetotellurics: mapping basement through deep conductive cover
Jingming Duan , Wenping Jiang , Tristan Kemp , Liejun Wang
Crustal and mantle electrical resistivity heterogeneity: a vector to mineralisation?
Graham Heinson, Stephan Thiel, Paul Soeffky
Magnetotelluric study of Xiangshan Volcanic Basin, Southeast China
Juzhi Deng, Hui Chen, Min Chen
Airborne induction coil and fluxgate measurements above a grounded electric dipole
Christian Nittinger, Maria Cherevatova, Michael Becken, Annika Steuer, Raphael Rochlitz, DESMEX Working Group
Integrated EM sounding experiment across the Bushveld Massive (South Africa)
Ivan Varentsov
Improvements of 2D models of ore deposits by combination of audiomagnetotelluric ground and borehole measurements
Thomas Kalscheuer, Niklas Juhojuntti, Katri Vaittinen
New technology for delineation of resistive and polarizable kimberlite fissures using TEM method in South Africa
Valeriya Hallbauer-Zadorozhnaya
Session 3.4: Hydrocarbon Exploration including Gas Hydrates
15 Aug, 16:05 - 17:00
S3.4-P90
A new approach of hydrocarbon investigation using electromagnetic method in East Java, Indonesia
Widodo Widodo
S3.4-P158
Conductivity structure of the central part of the Parana Basin
Elena Aleksanova, Nikolay Palshin, Dmitry Epishkin, Roberto Breves Vianna
Feasibility study on the prediction for exploiting parameters of share gas reservoir with CSEM
Liangjun Yan, Kui Xiang, Xiaolong Tong, Xingbing Xie
Application of AMT in poor seismic areas of the NE regions of the east African rift basins
Shimeles Fisseha
Marine CSEM investigation of submarine gas hydrate targets in the Danube Delta, western Black Sea
Katrin Schwalenberg, Dennis Rippe, Romina Gehrmann, Sebastian Hölz
A 2D magnetotelluric investigation for a shale gas baseline in the eastern Karoo Basin, South Africa
Jade C. Greve, Anna Platz, Ute Weckmann, Moctar Doucoure, Naser Meqbel
The electrical anisotropy of natural gas hydrate in permafrost regions: AMT modelling and constrainted inversion
Yifan Huang, Xiangyun Hu, Jianchao Cai
Magnetotelluric data analysis for hydrocarbon exploration in South of Iran
Hajar Miri, Banafsheh Habibian Dehkordi, Gholamreza Payrovian
S3.4-P235
S3.4-P263
S3.4-P295
S3.4-P59
S3.4-P435
S3.4-P441
23
POSTER SESSIONS
Session 3.5: Fracking, Fluid Injection and Sequestration Studies
15 Aug, 16:05 - 17:00
S3.5-P180
S3.5-P195
S3.5-P302
S3.5-P328
S3.5-P334
S3.5-P422
S3.5-P458
Hydraulic fracturing EM monitoring: a Leapfrog-FEM algorithm applied to unconventional reservoirs
Ana Curcio
Repeat pre-injection magnetotelluric and controlled-source electromagnetic studies of Aquistore CO2 sequestration site,
near Estevan, Saskatchewan, Canada
Joe McLeod, Ian Ferguson, Jim Craven
Crosswell EM tomography for enhanced geothermal reservoir characterization
Friedemann Samrock, Alexander V. Grayver, Martin O. Saar
Magnetotelluric monitoring of hydraulic fracture stimulation at the Habanero Enhanced Geothermal System, Cooper
Basin, South Australia
Yohannes Didana, Graham Heinson, Stephan Thiel
MT monitoring of unconventional resource development: case studies from a deep shale stimulation and a coal-seam gas
depressurisation
Nigel Rees, Graham Heinson, Simon Carter, Lars Krieger
Monitoring fluid of hydraulic fracturing using controlled sourced electromagnetics
Mark Hickey, Jimmy Trevino, Mark Everett
Three dimensional analysis of ACTIVE data before and after the magmatic eruption of Aso volcano, in the center of Kyushu
island, Japan, in November 2014
Takuto Minami, Mitsuru Utsugi
Session 3.6: Induction Hazards
15 Aug, 16:05 - 17:00
S3.6-P218
S3.6-P255
Geomagnetically induced currents in the Irish Power Network during Kp8 and Kp9 storms
Sean P. Blake, Peter T. Gallagher, Joe McCauley, Alan G. Jones, Colin Hogg, Ciaran D. Beggan, Alan W. Thomson, Gemma S. Kelly, David Bell
Methodology for time-domain estimation of storm-time electric fields using the 3D Earth impedance
Anna Kelbert, Christopher C. Balch, Antti Pulkkinen, Gary D. Egbert, Jeffrey J. Love, E. J. Rigler, Ikuko Fujii
Session 4.1: Crust and Upper Mantle Studies
19 Aug, 16:05 - 17:00
S4.1-P52
S4.1-P72
S4.1-P75
S4.1-P111
S4.1-P112
S4.1-P122
S4.1-P123
S4.1-P124
24
Compilation of a regional conductivity structure of transition between the Pacific Ocean and Eurasia
Nikolay Palshin, Dmitry Alekseev, Noriko Tada
Deep electrical structure of Gaoligong shear zone in western Yunnan, China
Tao Ye, Qinghua Huang, Xiaobin Chen
Deep lithosphere structure under Polish part of the East European platform as a result of integrated MT and LMT 1D and 2D
data interpretation
Szymon Orynski, Anne Neska, Wojciech Klityski
Crustal electrical resistivity structure in the western Dharwar Craton in southern India
Pratap A., Pradeep Naick B., Kusham S., Naganjaneyulu K.
Electrical resistivity structure of Chitradurga shear zone, Dharwar Craton, India
Kusham S., Pradeep Naick B., Pratap A., Naganjaneyulu K.
Electrical conductance map for the Saurashtra region
P. V. Vijaya Kumar, P. B. Subba Rao, C. K. Rao, A. K. Singh
Electrical structure of crust and upper mantle beneath Ordos Block and Yinshan Mountains revealed by
magnetotelluric data
Li Chenjing, Bai Denghai, Xue Shuai, Li Xin
Lithospheric electrical resistivity structure of western North China Craton and its tectonic implications
Shuai Xue, Denghai Bai, Chenjing Li, Xin Li
S4.1-P131
S4.1-P135
S4.1-P137
S4.1-P182
S4.1-P194
S4.1-P233
S4.1-P239
S4.1-P265
S4.1-P280
S4.1-P294
S4.1-P314
S4.1-P345
S4.1-P350
S4.1-P357
S4.1-P379
S4.1-P380
S4.1-P409
S4.1-P410
S4.1-P418
S4.1-P419
S4.1-P424
S4.1-P426
Comparative study of geoelectric and potential field models at the Voronezh Massive (KIROVOGRAD experiment)
Ilya Lozovsky, Ivan Varentsov, Lyudmila Abramova, Natalya Baglaenko, Pavel Ivanov
Geoelectric structure dimensionality and strike direction estimated from MT data acquired in Chamoli Region, India
Nitin Kumar, Mohammad Israil, Pravin K. Gupta, Sanjeev K. Varshney
Geoelectric structure across northern most part of Cambay rift basin and Precambrian rocks using magnetotelluric study
Nagarjuna Danda, C. K. Rao, Amit Kumar
Magnetotelluric study across the Capricorn Orogen, western Australia: craton margins characterization
Perla Piña-Varas, Mike Dentith
Comparison of 2D and quasi-3D geoelectric models of the eastern Carpathians
Svetlana Kovacikova, Igor Logvinov, Victor Tarasov
Evidence for electrically anisotropic crust and mantle in the western Junggar, NW China from three-dimensional
magnetotelluric modeling
Ying Liu, Andreas Junge, Bo Yang, Alexander Löwer, Marcel Cembrowski, Yixian Xu
Electrical conductivity images across the Namibian passive margin: tectonic implications for the evolution of the Kaoko
Belt, the western Kongo Craton and the Walvis Ridge
Naser Meqbel, Ute Weckmann, Gerhard Kapinos, Marion Jegen, Oliver Ritter
Electromagnetic investigation of the Pärvie endglacial fault, northern Sweden
Jochen Kamm, Michael Becken, Björn Lund, Thomas Kalscheuer
Extensional extrusion: new insights of South-eastward expansion of Tibetan Plateau from magnetotelluric array data
Hao Dong, Wenbo Wei, Sheng Jin, Gaofeng Ye, Jian'en Jing, Letian Zhang, Chengliang Xie, Alan G. Jones
Two dimensional Lithospheric structure deduced from magnetotelluric profile across Tertiary rift basin
(Radhanpur-Patan profile) western India
C. K. Rao, Nagarjuna D., Subba Rao P., Amit Kumar, Purushotham Rao P.
Three-dimensional crustal structure of the Atlas Mountains of Morocco: constraints from the TopoMed
magnetotelluric data
Duygu Kiyan, Alan G. Jones, Juanjo Ledo, Agata Siniscalchi, Gerardo G. Romano
Three-dimensional resistivity structure beneath Payao Fault zone, northern Thailand: preliminary result
Songkhun Boonchaisuk, Benjawut Piromfong, Tawat Rung-Arunwan, Puwis Amatyakul, Weerachai Siripunvaraporn
On the influence of lunisolar tides on electrical conductivity of the Earth crust in the Kola Peninsula (review)
Abdulkhai A. Zhamaletdinov, Aleksandr N. Shevtsov, Tamara G. Korotkova
What can lithospheric electric conductivity images give us for understanding tectonics, magmatism,
and geodynamics (on example of Pamir and Tien-Shan conjunction zone)?
Anatoly Rybin, Vitaly Matiukov, Vladislav Batalev, Elena Bataleva
Contrasting water content of lithospheric mantle beneath the central and eastern North China Craton from long period
magnetotelluric data: implications for the mechanism of the Craton destruction
Zeyi Dong, Ji Tang, Xiaobin Chen, Yan Deng, Yuanzhi Cheng
Electrical resistivity structure under the western Cosmonauts Sea at the continental margin of East Antarctica
inferred via a marine magnetotelluric experiment
Tetsuo Matsuno, Yoshifumi Nogi, Nobukazu Seama
Three-dimensional resistivity image of off-shore magmatism at the Walvis Ridge and Rift Basin
Anna Avdeeva, Marion Jegen, Max Moorkamp, Gesa Franz
2D analysis of wide-band MT data across southern part of Tohoku, NE Japan, and evaluation of inter-station horizontal
component geomagnetic transfer functions
Makoto Uyeshima, Masahiro Ichiki, Shin'ya Sakanaka, Makoto Tamura
Electromagnetic imaging of the western Eger Rift area (W Bohemia) – Moffettes, Earthquake swarms and mid Pleistocene
volcanism
Gerard Muñoz, Ute Weckmann, Josef Pek, Horst Kämpf, Naser Meqbel, Svtlana Kováiková, Radek Klanica
A 3D conductivity model of the Northwest Yunnan using magnetometer array data
Yiren Yuan, Qinghua Huang, Qi Li, Yuntian Teng
Basement study in the Lut block, eastern Iran, from magnetometry and gravity forward modelling
Nastaran Ahanin, Mansoure Montahaei, Loghman Namaki
Quasi-3D geoelectical model of Fennoscandian Shield based on FENICS and BEAR experiments
Abdulkhai A. Zhamaletdinov , Maxim S. Petrishchev
25
POSTER SESSIONS
S4.1-P431
S4.1-P437
S4.1-P438
S4.1-P442
S4.1-P446
S4.1-P451
Preliminary results of the magnetotelluric study between Rio de la Plata craton/Nico-Perez Terrane (Uruguay) and the
Parana basin (Brazil)
Mauricio Bologna, Gabriel Dragone, Rossana Muzio, Elena Peel, Pablo Nuñez, Naomi Ussami
Resistivity structure beneath the Moriyoshi-zan volcano in Akita Prefecture, northeastern Japan: the area of enhanced
seismic activity after the 2011 off the Pacific coast of Tohoku earthquake
Shinya Sakanaka, Ryuhei Ito
The tearing of Indian lithosphere slab in southern Tibet – revealed by a magnetotellurics study across the
Yadong-Gulu rift
Gang Wang, Wenbo Wei, Letian Zhang
Frequency soundings with the use of industrial power lines (FENICS and NUR experiments)
Abdulkhai A. Zhamaletdinov, Aleksandr N. Shevtsov, Aleksey A. Skorokhodov, Boris V. Efimov, Vitaly V. Kolobov, Maxim B. Barannik , Vasily
N. Selivanov , Yury A. Kopytenko, Maxim S. Petrishchev, Pavel A. Sergushin, Maxim Y. Smirnov , Yury M. Yampolski, Gennady I. Druzhin
A magnetotelluric study of geoelectrical dimensionality of Zagros collision
Tahereh Layegh Hghighi, Behrouz Oskooi, Mansoure Montahaei
Characterising the lithosphere below the eastern Pyrenees by integrating geophysical and geochemical data
Joan Campanyà, Javier Fullea, Juanjo Ledo, Pilar Queralt, Alex Marcuello, Montserrat Liesa, Josep A. Muñoz
Session 4.2: Plate Boundary, Fault and Volcano Studies
19 Aug, 10:10 - 11:45
S4.2-P104
S4.2-P105
S4.2-P177
S4.2-P188
S4.2-P223
S4.2-P236
S4.2-P250
S4.2-P254
S4.2-P258
S4.2-P261
S4.2-P317
S4.2-P332
S4.2-P397
S4.2-P398
S4.2-P404
26
Chasing the fault zone conductor: the study of Ganos Fault, NW Turkey by magnetotellurics
Mustafa Karas, Bulent Tank, Sinan Ozaydin
Segmentation in the Andean subduction zone revealed by a resistivity model obtained from 3D inversion of
magnetotelluric and geomagnetic data
Jaime Araya Vargas, Oliver Ritter, Naser M. Meqbel, Ute Weckmann
From ‘shoulder to shoulder’ – a cross-rift magnetotellurics transect through Aluto volcano, Ethiopia
Juliane Hübert, Kathy Whaler, Shimeles Fisseha
Magnetotelluric imaging of an active phonolitic volcanic system: Mount Erebus (Ross Dependency – Antarctica)
Graham Hill, Phil Wannamaker, Virginie Maris, Michal Kordy, Erin Wallin, Martyn Unsworth, John Stodt, Yasuo Ogawa, Danny Uhlmann
3D electrical resistivity structure clarifying a system of magma chambers beneath Aso caldera
Maki Hata, Shinichi Takakura, Nobuo Matsushima, Takeshi Hashimoto
Mantle flow and deep electrical anisotropy – an MT investigation in Tierra del Fuego, South America
Lourdes González-Castillo, Fernando Bohoyo, Andreas Junge, Jesús Galindo-Zaldívar, Marcel Cembrowski, Pablo Torres-Carbonell, Ana
Ruiz-Constán, Pedro Ibarra, Adolfo Maestro, Antonio Pedrera, Patricia Ruano
Using magnetotellurics to image the Long Valley Volcanic System, California, in three dimensions
Jared R. Peacock, Margaret Mangan, Darcy K. McPhee
Magnetotelluric imaging of the subducting slab in Cascadia with constraints from seismology
Bo Yang, Gary D. Egbert, Anna Kelbert
Neotectonics of the Isparta Angle in Turkey by using two and three dimensional magnetotelluric imaging
Ümit Avsar, Tülay Kaya, Gokhan Karcioglu, Ilyas Çaglar, Yasuo Ogawa
3D magnetotelluric imaging of fluid distribution in a seismogenic region, Miyagi, NE Japan
Zensgiro Saito, Yasuo Ogawa, Masahiro Ichiki, Atsushi Suzuki, Yusuke Kinoshita, Puwis Amatyakul
Regional study of the Laguna del Maule volcanic field using magnetotellurics
Valentina Reyes, Daniel Diaz, Martyn Unsworth
Audio-frequency magnetotelluric surveys of active fault systems in Japan for better assessment of earthquake hazard
with – two case studies
Satoru Yamaguchi, Yusuke Oda, Shuhei Ito, Shin Kuramitsu, Yuhei Ouchi, Satoshi Ueda, Shigehiro Katoh, Hideki Mirakami
Imaging conductivity in the Southern Washington Cascades
Esteban Bowles-Martinez, Paul Bedrosian, Adam Schultz, Jared Peacock, Graham Hill
Processing and modeling magnetotelluric data at La Soufrière of Guadeloupe lava dome (France)
Pascal Sailhac, Hugo Larnier, Warden Sheldon, Nicollin Florence, Zlotnicki Jacques, Francis Bruère
Thermal, partial melt, and compositional controls on incipient rifting in the East Africa Rift
Kate Selway, Paul Bedrosian
Session 4.3: Continental Tectonics
19 Aug, 10:10 - 11:45
S4.3-P118
S4.3-P126
S4.3-P221
S4.3-P222
S4.3-P297
S4.3-P326
S4.3-P377
S4.3-P378
S4.3-P402
S4.3-P444
Crustal structure of the Southern Pamir –Insights from the TIPTIMON magnetotelluric experiment
Walburga Korolevski, Oliver Ritter, Ute Weckmann, Naser Meqbel, Anatoly Rybin, Vitali Matiukov
Geophysical mapping of the Extension of the Archaean Kraaipan granite-greenstone terrain, Kaapvaal craton, in
Southeast Botswana
Calistus D. Ramotoroko, Kevin Mickus, Elsiha Shemang
Electrical conductivity structure in the Dharwar Craton, India
K. Naganjaneyulu, B. Pradeep Naick, S. Kusham, A. Pratap
Multi-dimensional resistivity modelling of the lithospheric structure of the Baoulé-Mossi domain in West Africa
Florian Le Pape, Alan G. Jones, Mark W. Jessel, S. Perrouty, L. A. Gallardo, L. Baratoux, Colin Hogg, Luc Siebenaller, A. Touré, P. Ouiya,
Goran Boren, A. Mahamud
Electrical conductivity images of mobile belts
Ute Weckmann
Australian Lithospheric Architecture Magnetotelluric Project (AusLAMP)
Graham Heinson, AusLAMP Community
New geoelectrical model of Lake Ladoga conductivity anomaly: tectonic implications in correlation with potential fields
Nina Golubtsova, Victor Glaznev, Victor Kulikov, Maria Kosnyreva, Mikhail Mints, Mikhail Nilov, Pavel Pushkarev, Pavel Ryazantsev, Yana
Taran, Maxim Smirnov, Elena Sokolova, Andrey Yakovlev, Lyudmila Zolotaya
AusLAMP MT illuminates mantle fertility and mineral systems across the Gawler Craton, South Australia
Stephan Thiel, Anthony Reid, Graham Heinson
Magnetotelluric survey in Nepal after the Mw 7.9 Gorkha earthquake of April 25, 2015
Pascal Sailhac, Hugo Larnier, Bano Maksim, Lok Bijaya Adhikari, Laurent Bollinger, Frédéric Perrier, Paul Tapponnier
Deep electrical resistivity structure of the seismically-active Altai-Sayan region
Elena Aleksanova, Vladimir Rakitov, Andrey Yakovlev
Session 5: Marine Electromagnetics
20 Aug, 10:10 - 11:45
S5.1-P57
S5.1-P82
S5.1-P143
S5.1-P173
S5.1-P198
S5.1-P240
S5.1-P246
S5.1-P247
S5.1-P275
S5.1-P320
3D marine CSEM inversion
Mingxin Yue, Xiaoping Wu
Application of Perfectly Matched Layer for 3D marine CSEM modeling
Gang Li, Yuguo Li, Wenyi Hu, Bo Han
Comparison of electromagnetic response features of deployed and towed undersea dipole sources in marine CSEM
detection
Guang Y. Chen, Ming Deng, En J. Jing, Jing H. He, Zhuo Lei
First marine Differential Electrical Dipole application to study a sub-seafloor freshwater body in Bat Yam, Israel
Amir Haroon, Klaus Lippert, Bülent Tezkan
Resolution study of marine CSEM imaging of subduction zones
Chloe Gustafson, Kerry Key
3D electromagnetic tomography of the Marmara Sea by magnetotellurics
Tülay Kaya, Takafumi Kasaya, Yasuo Ogawa, Mustafa K. Tunçer, Yoshimori Honkura, Naoto Oshiman, Masaki Matsushima, Weerachai
Siripunvaraporn
On the Physics of frequency domain controlled source electromagnetics in shallow water
Alan D. Chave, Mark E. Everett, James Boon, Johan Mattsson, Jonathan Midgely
Electromagnetic monitoring and geoelectric model of the Baikal Lake
Sergey Korotaev, Darya Orekhova, Mikhail Kruglyakov, Nikolay Budnev
Marine magnetotellurics imaged no plume beneath the Tristan da Cunha hotspot in the southern Atlantic Ocean
Kiyoshi Baba, Jin Chen, Malte Sommer, Hisashi Utada, Wolfram H. Geissler, Wilfried Jokat, Marion Jegen
Interpretation of the high conductivity anomaly of the Society hotspot in the French Polynesia
Noriko Tada, Pascal Tarits, Kiyoshi Baba, Hisashi Utada, Daisuke Suetsugu
27
POSTER SESSIONS
S5.1-P353
S5.1-P382
S5.1-P392
S5.1-P433
3D frequency-domain MCSEM constrained inversion on VTI media
Ning Zhao, Gang Yu, Weibin Sun
Constraints on mantle anisotropy in the NoMelt area from an analysis of long-period seafloor magnetotelluric data
Tetsuo Matsuno, Rob. L. Evans
Enhanced and asymmetric melting beneath the southern Mariana back-arc spreading ridge, influenced by the subduction
of the Pacific plate
Tetsuo Matsuno, Nobukazu Seama, Haruka Shindo, Yoshifumi Nogi, Kyoko Okino
Three-dimensional simulation of tsunami-generated electromagnetic fields in the time-domain: applications and
possibilities
Takuto Minami, Hiroaki Toh
Session 6: Rock and Mineral Resistivity, and Anisotropy
16 Aug, 10:10 - 11:45
S6.1-P128
S6.1-P156
S6.1-P207
S6.1-P234
S6.1-P327
S6.1-P349
S6.1-P428
S6.1-P469
Mapping permeability distribution of Bangkok soft clay using integrated resistivity and time-domain IP measurements
Pham Huy Giao
Anomalous conductivity of black shale from the Himalayas of central Nepal
Jana Börner, Paul Sibilew, Frédéric Girault, Frédéric Perrier
Direct-current resistivity methods applied to rock samples for the reliable interpretation of resistivity structures
Takeshi Suzuki, Ryokei Yoshimura, Naoto Oshiman
Evidence of electrical anisotropy in the Rhenish Massif using the apparent resistivity tensor
Annika Rödder, Andreas Junge
Imaging fracture permeability using magnetotellurics
Alison Kirkby, Graham Heinson, Simon Holford
Measurement of resistivity property of seafloor sulfide deposits and the physical modeling
Yusuke Ohta, Tada-nori Goto, Koki Kashiwaya, Weiren Lin, Osamu Tadai, Takafumi Kasaya, Toshiya Kanamatsu, Hideaki Machiyama
Seismoelectromagnetic signals recorded during an active seismic experiment
Siniscalchi Agata, Romano Gerardo, Tripaldi Simona, Balasco Marianna, Piscitelli Sabatino, Rizzo Enzo
Different kinds of IP effect and laboratory measuring samples
Valeriya Hallbauer-Zadorozhnaya, Santarato G., Maré L.
Session 7: Global and Planetary Induction
20 Aug, 10:10 - 11:45
S7.1-P308
S7.1-P341
S7.1-P393
Sounding the Earth's electrical structure with satellite-detected ocean tidal magnetic signals
Alexander V. Grayver, Neesha R. Schnepf, Alexey V. Kuvshinov, Chandrasekharan Manoj, Terence J. Sabaka, Nils Olsen
Deep mantle conductivity inference from Bayesian inversion
Pascal Tarits, Hendra Grandis
Mantle transition zone beneath a normal seafloor in the northwestern Pacific: electrical conductivity, seismic thickness,
and water content
Tetsuo Matsuno, Daisuke Suetsugu, Hisashi Utada, Kiyoshi Baba, Noriko Tada, Hisayoshi Shimizu, Hajime Shiobara, Takehi Isse, Hiroko
Sugioka, Aki Ito, Masayuki Obayashi
Session 8: EM Induction Education and Outreach Poster Session
20 Aug, 10:10 - 11:45
S8.1-P179
S8.1-P305
S8.1-P325
28
The EM Model Toolbox – Probing the Numerical Space
Andreas Junge
Aleksandrovka Geophysical Field Camp
Elena Aleksanova, Victor Khmelevskoy, Victor Kulikov, Nikolay Shustov, Andrey Yakovlev
NExUS, UNCOVER and MTEC: a new Australian Mineral Exploration Undercover Summer School
Graham Heinson, Richard Lilly, Gavin Lind
TRUE BROADBAND MT
SYSTEMS
Faster, more
10 KHz to
10,000
seconds
simultaneous
New MTC150 sensor:
switch free,
low noise
floor
Lighter
system
accurate
single-run
recording /
processing
Improved
AMT data
quality
through
overnight
acquisition
29
INSTITUTE OF ELECTRONICS
CHINESE ACADEMY OF SCIENCES
Key Laboratory of Electromagnetic Radiation & Sensing Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences
• Ground-penetrating radar(GPR):
Series products with full frequency range from 100 MHz to 2 GHz
• Geophysical Exploration:
Magnetotelluric (MT) station, Transient electromagnetic (TEM) apparatus etc.
Part of our products:
Ground-penetrating radar
MT receiver
Induction magnetometer
TEM apparatus
Contact us to learn more about our products
Address: No. 19, North 4th Ring Road West, Haidian District, Beijing, P. R. China; Tel: +86-10-58887596-601; Fax: +86-10-58887496
E-mail: whzhu@mail.ie.ac.cn; Website: http://www.ie.cas.cn
IRKUTSK
ELECTROPROSPECTING
COMPANY
YOUR WAY TO SEE DEEPER
IERP is a service geophysical company,
an expert in electromagnetic surveys
ADVANTAGES
Unique technology of joint EM & Seismic data interpretation
www.ierp.ru
30
info@ierp.ru
www.geo-metronix.de MT Instruments
•
•
•
•
•
•
Magnetotelluricarraysystem
CSEMsystem
Highpowertransmitter
Seismic/EMmonitoring
ShallowboreholeEMarrayreceivers
Deepwateroceanbottomseismic/EMreceivers
www.kmstechnologies.com
RESERVOIRMONITORING
ARRAYElectromagnetics
•
Largechannelcount,
•
Wi-Fi,wirelessorLAN
•
3Cmagneticfield(DCto40kHz)
•
3Cmicroseismic
•
2Celectricfields
•
Shallowborehole(microseismic/EM)
195channelsCSE,monitoring
HighpowerCSEMtransmitter
•
100or150KVAtransmitterup-scalable
•
Flexibleinput.(DCto3phaseAC)
•
Arraysystemintegrated
•
Systeminstalled2016inAsia
31
Sponsored by
Organized by

23rd Electromagnetic Induction Workshop

Transcription

Similar documents

December 2011 - Child`s Dream

First zero carbon store in Thailand (Kom Chad Luek 15/02/2012

PowerPoint プレゼンテーション

PINE SAWFLIES IN NORTHERN THAILAND Roger A. Beavert

owner`s manual

Lanna Quarterly Issue 10 - Lanna International School

Presentazione standard di PowerPoint

Pure Fitness Inversion Table Model No. 8515IT Owner`s Manual

Mobile phones, radio waves and electromagnetic fields – how much