Teaching Strategies to Promote the Development of Students

Transcription

Teaching Strategies to
Promote the Development of
Students’ Learning Skills
Teaching Development | Wāhanga Whakapakari Ako
Dorothy Spiller & Pip Bruce Ferguson
Teaching Development| Wāhanga Whakapakari Ako
February 2011
Teaching Strategies to
Promote the Development of
Students’ Learning Skills
Introduction
Many course learning outcomes and the
associated assessment tasks require some level of
proficiency in a wide range of generic academic
skills. Some of these capabilities are so embedded
in academia that we may assume student
competency and not explicitly help students to
develop them. Academic reading, academic
writing and all its associated components,
research strategies and the ability to engage with
ideas critically are core expectations in most
fields of study. Teachers can help to enhance
these abilities by using simple
strategies that can form part of their
day to day teaching. Complementing
these generic competencies are the
unique requirements associated with
reading, writing and methods of
inquiry in particular disciplines.
Teaching and assessment approaches
can also integrate initiation and
coaching in the conventions and
nuances of particular disciplines. This
booklet suggests some strategies that
you may like to incorporate into your
teaching to help your students to
develop these important attributes. In
this booklet we cover academic
writing, reading and research skills,
TEACHING STRATEGIES TO PROMOTE THE
DEVELOPMENT OF STUDENTS’ LEARNING SKILLS • TDU
•2•
and critical thinking. These strategies are not
extra coaching but can be woven into your
teaching and also deepen your students‘
engagement with content.
Academic writing
Simple in-class strategies to
improve writing competency
Bean (2001) suggests a number of
simple in-class writing strategies.
These include asking students for a
written response to a question at the beginning of
a class, based on the readings or anticipating a
significant idea in the forthcoming class.
Similarly, Bean (2001) and Angelo and Cross
(1993) suggest inviting students to ask questions
about something that they have found confusing
or difficult to grasp mid-class. Bean (2001) also
suggests asking students to write something down
when discussion palls or when things become
overheated. Additionally, Angelo and Cross
(1993) and Bean (2001) recommend that students
can summarise their understanding of something
in writing at the end of a class. All of these
strategies help students to deepen their
intellectual grasp of a subject and develop the
capacity to manage complex ideas in writing.
They also offer the additional bonus of helping to
make the students‘ learning visible to the lecturer,
and prompt an appropriate response.
Task instructions
Students are often baffled by task instructions.
Discussion of typical assessment instructions can
be easily built into a lecture, tutorial or on-line
teaching component:
•3•
 A theme for a lecture or set of lectures can be
readily framed as a typical essay question,
such as inviting students to apply a theory to a
practical context, or compare and contrast
perspectives. The question can be asked at the
start of the lecture(s) and returned to at
different points in the discussion. Students
can also be invited to talk briefly in pairs at a
number of junctures in the lectures to share
ideas on how they would respond to the
question as the lecture unfolds. This simple
process can help students to get insights into
task instructions and deepen their engagement
with content by sharpening the focus and
forcing the students to take more of an active
questioning stance.
 In small group work, give all students some
content such as a section of a reading, a set of
data, a scenario or a case study. Get the
students to work in smaller groups - each
group has the same content but a different set
of instructions. The students can then share the
outcomes of their discussions. This exercise
can help students to get inside commonly used
instruction terms such as analyse, apply,
critique and evaluate.
 One of the most effective ways of helping
students to understand the requirements of an
assessment task is to spend time with the class
on task criteria. A helpful strategy is to
provide students with a range of past examples
of the task and ask them to evaluate the
examples in groups according to the given
•4•
criteria. Each group needs to explain their
decisions to the class and discuss how they
applied the criteria. The exercise helps
students to engage more deeply with task
criteria and requirements and may also enable
the lecturer to recognise criteria that are not
transparent or are ambiguous. This exercise
can be a process of learning for both students
and lecturer.
Writing a thesis statement
To encourage students to think in terms of a
thesis or position statement, a theme could be
introduced and a number of possible position
statements in relation to the content could be
given out at the beginning. Students are invited to
bear these statements in mind as they listen to the
lecture and take note of evidence which appears
to support a particular stance. The lecture could
be paused at intervals to invite students to keep
returning to the statements and assess possible
supporting evidence. At the end of the lecture or
series of lectures, students have to select a thesis
statement and list the supporting evidence that
they have found. In order to encourage student
participation in the exercise, students need to
hand in their thesis statement and evidence with a
related assignment and earn a small percentage
for completion. Students could also do this
exercise in groups in the lecture or in the tutorial.
The exercise will promote more thoughtful
engagement and improve students‘ understanding
of how to take a particular stance and support it
with appropriate evidence.
•5•
In a related strategy, Bean (2001) reports on an
alternative approach to writing assignments in
which students are required to write short essays
in which they must argue either the positive or
negative side in relation to a contentious topic.
The thesis statement involves students engaging
with core course concepts, using research skills to
access appropriate evidence, and providing a
logical and well-supported argument. Students
are given formative feedback and are not able to
undertake the next thesis assignment until the
lecturer has signed them off as meriting the set
allocated percentage.
Writing for an audience
One of the barriers to successful student writing
is that assignments are not directed towards a
particular audience. Students often try to write for
the lecturer which is problematic as it is difficult
to gauge the level of complexity and to know how
much one can assume. Conversely, one of the
best ways of promoting understanding of a
concept is to invite students to communicate the
concept to a specific audience. For example,
students can be asked to discuss an idea or
concept in the form of a letter to the newspaper,
materials for school learners, or a presentation to
a community body. A major advantage of this
strategy is that students are compelled to move
away from the borrowed vocabulary of lectures or
resources and distil the essence of an idea in their
effort to communicate it to a specific audience.
•6•
Marshalling evidence
Students can be divided into groups and given a
few materials on a course-related contentious
topic - for example, a sustainability issue, an
educational perspective or theory, a legal
decision. The volume of resources can be kept
relatively slim and readily accessible (newspaper
articles, simple statistics, etc). Students have to
make a decision on the issue and simply list the
supporting evidence in order of importance. This
exercise can be done in class or subsequently as
an early formative part of a more extended piece
of assessment.
Learning to structure ideas
To help students to develop a good grasp of
paragraph structure, students can be placed in
groups and each group can be given a paragraph
from a key reading. Each group needs to analyse
the structure of their paragraph and then explain
the content and structure of the paragraph to the
rest of the class. This exercise helps students to
see the principles of paragraph formation as well
as requiring them to engage actively with reading
content. To add to the incentive, the reading
could be one that is essential for a forthcoming
assessment.
The lecturer can frame up the content of a
particular lecture as a response to an assessment
question and then model the structure of a
response, that is, demonstrate the basic format
and ordering of ideas. A tutorial exercise could
follow this lecture exercise by inviting the
students to draw up a plan for a response to a
different task on the same topic. The task could
•7•
be discussed in class and could be used as the
first stage in an assessment task. The key
principles are to develop learning skills through a
combination of modelling, practice, conversation
and feedback. Students‘ interest and engagement
can be heightened by tying these preliminary
formative stages into the formal assessment.
Developing a logical progression
One of the simplest strategies to help students to
reflect on the order in which they present ideas is
to get them to work in groups on a short piece of
writing related to a current topic, pull out the key
ideas of each paragraph and then explain the
sequence in which they have been ordered (for
example, chronological, comparative, general to
particular). Another version is to give students a
short piece of writing on the topic in which the
ideas are organised in an arbitrary fashion and
invite them to arrange them in a more logical and
convincing sequence.
Editing and revision
Many of our assessment procedures tend to focus
on the final product. However, the editing and
revision process is a key part of effective written
communication. Students need to recognise that
an extended editing and revision phase is a core
part of developing written communication skills.
Teachers can model their own writing revision
process in the course of teaching a particular
piece of content, even by showing the differences
between an early draft and a final polished
product. This can be done easily using online
methods such as googledocs.
•8•
Organise students into groups and set up a peer
editing session. Provide a clear template for
feedback and require students to bring in a
specified piece of writing. This is most effective
when the draft is part of a larger assignment.
Students need to include an explanation of the
way they incorporated the feedback into the final
assessment. You can build a culture for peer
feedback gradually, for example, by getting
students to swap notes on a section of a lecture
and explain the key point to each other.
Academic integrity
There are numerous practical exercises that
students can undertake both to develop their
understanding of the concept of academic
integrity and to equip them with the requisite
skills. A very simple exercise which will also
invite them to engage more deeply with content is
to get students to practise writing passages of
texts or articles in their own words. The exercise
can be done in groups or individually and handed
in as part of a larger assignment.
Another strategy is to show students a range of
writing samples and get them to identify different
kind of plagiarism such as cutting and pasting
from the internet or books, paraphrasing
without acknowledgement, and
interweaving words from a source with the
writer‘s own words. Students can then be
asked to rewrite the relevant sections in ways
that avoid plagiarism.
•9•
For an early part of a larger assessment, students
can be invited to hand in two pages of writing
with a required number of references to be
woven into their discussion and an appropriately
laid out reference list. Students could also be
invited to comment on this process and any
questions or difficulties that they encountered.
The lecturer can then discuss sample issues on
line or in class before the students continue with
the assessment.
Referencing
Many lecturers tend to assume student familiarity
with different types of source material, their
particular conventions and uses for researchers.
Lecturers can readily make this transparent by
comparing the usefulness, relevance, merits, and
appropriateness of different sources of
information on a class topic. The benefits of
taking students behind the scenes like this are
numerous. Students will not only learn directly
about the different types of materials they can
consult, but they will also get an insight into how
materials are selected and evaluated and how the
evidence is used to build a position in relation to
a topic. The deliberate reference to multiple
sources can also deepen students‘ understanding
of a topic and invite critical engagement through
exposure to different perspectives.
A related assessment is to select a range of
different types of references on a topic and ask
students to write a short commentary on their
pertinence for the topic and their merits. This
exercise can be part of a larger assignment.
• 10 •
Research skills
Formulating a research question
For many students, there is an almost mysterious
process about the passage from reading to
writing. It is as though a random selection of
materials vaguely related to the topic and
extensive jottings will gradually shape themselves
up into a more or less acceptable response to the
assignment topic. One very useful suggestion is
to coach students to approach their sources with a
core question and associated sub-questions. In the
first year, this may simply involve getting
students to turn their assignment topics into a
question and sub-questions. Turning a topic into
questions and sub-questions is a process that can
be done regularly with students in large or small
class settings in relation to different class content.
In later years a class exercise can be to discuss a
particular concept in class with students and then
get them to work individually or in groups to
formulate a possible research question and subquestions. These exercises can be linked into a
subsequent assessment task and also tied into
library sessions on searching databases. From a
learning perspective, the practice of posing
research questions (in a discipline-appropriate
manner) is an important preparation for
postgraduate studies and for working life.
Your students might find mind-mapping a useful
concept in helping to organise ideas and
arguments. A mindmap can start with the central
question to be answered, and ‗branches‘ that list
the arguments for and against, complete with
references that support the points. Look for
Ingmar Svantesson‘s ―Learning Maps and
Memory Skills” (1998) or google ―mindmapping‖
for heaps of examples..
• 11 •
Making research notes
An equally important aspect of active and
focussed engagement with source materials is
taking notes in an organised and systematic
manner. It is easy to require students to hand
in a sample of their notes on readings in the
early stages of the assignment process and
give them an assigned percentage for the
satisfactory completion of this requirement.
Lecturers will probably advise students to
organise their notes according to a number of
suggested templates. One such system is to
organise notes in relation to the different subquestions or categories so that the assignment
materials are already organised around key points
or questions. Students need to note their
understanding of the relevance of the selected
material, its relation to the topic as a whole, and
how it may support or contradict other materials
encountered thus far. Students need to take down
all details of their source material and clearly
distinguish between quotes, paraphrasing and
their own commentary.
Evaluating material
This can be readily practised in the context of a
small or large class. Again the exercise can be
integrated into ongoing discussion of a topic and
can deepen engagement. The lecturer or tutor can
bring some short extracts from different resource
materials relating to the class topic. Students can
work individually or in pairs/groups and use a
few set questions to evaluate the material.
• 12 •
Examples of questions can include:

What details are available to confirm the
reliability of the material?

How current is the material?

Are the claims in the
source supported by convincing
evidence?

Is the material pertinent
for the particular topic and
context?

Is the argument presented
in a logical way?
Academic Reading
Introduction and general principles
Reading academic material is so interwoven with
the processes of academic life that it is difficult
for lecturers to remember the enormous
challenges that reading academic material poses
for most students. Students are unfamiliar with
the different forms of academic writing and their
unique conventions, formats and language.
Students will also not generally have any insight
into the way in which work in journal articles is
written for communities of scholars in different
fields. There are other more general factors to
bear in mind. Academic articles are completely
different from most students‘ prior experience of
reading and students may be baffled by the notion
of reading material that is not necessarily
immediately accessible and may need teasing out.
Furthermore, the current generation of students
have been nurtured on highly visual material and
instant messaging. This is a long way from the
level of travail often associated with making
sense of an academic reading.
• 13 •
Another difficulty for students is that they are
frequently required to evaluate reading materials
even in first year. This is extraordinarily
challenging for students when they are initiates in
the discipline and in the academic domain
generally. They may not know what is good and
what is inadequate material.
Bearing these challenges in mind there are some
useful principles for lecturers when trying to
develop students‘ academic reading competencies
within the context of their teaching and
assessment practices. Some general principles
are:
 Limit the amount of required reading to allow
students time and opportunity to develop their
reading competencies
 Model effective reading strategies in the
course of your teaching.
 Use in-class time to focus on sections of
reading as part of your engagement with the
content.
 Set assessments which help to coach students
in the development of reading competencies
 Be explicit about different types of academic
reading and their conventions
Types of material
Students can be exposed to different types of
reading material and their conventions in a range
of ways. One simple way is to show the particular
source in the context of a topic discussion in a
lecture. For example, the lecturer could show a
• 14 •
few slides of a particular journal, indicating the
layout, talk about the journal article selection
process, typical readers etc. It is also helpful to
draw attention to common article formats to help
students to focus their attention when they read
for themselves (for example, introductory/
contextual section, lit review, focus of research,
method, results and discussion). This can help
students recognise basic templates that lie behind
the words. The difference between a ‗think‘ piece
and a research investigation can also be shown.
Other kinds of reading, their respective uses and
strategies for making sense of them can also be
discussed— for example, text books, government
reports, statistical data, media reports. All of
these can be readily linked to the inclass discussion of content. A
follow-up assessment exercise can
require students to look at these
different materials and answer some
key questions in relation to the
lecture.
The reading process
Lecturers and tutors can model
their own reading process during
class by using a key piece of reading
related to the class content. One
strategy is to show students a copy
of a page or two of a reading with your own
annotated comments. These comments can
include basic questions such as:
▪ What is the main idea in this paragraph?
▪ What is the evidence used to support this idea?
Or you could include notes – such as links
with other course ideas, or comments about
unresolved ideas. You may want to give
▪
• 15 •
students a stage by stage set of guidelines as to
how you approached the reading of a key
course reading. In the process, you can
introduce them to notions such as using all the
cues like title and headings to get a ‗big
picture first‘ reading and then looking more
closely at how the different parts fit together.
Set students regular reading exercises as part of
their assessment and link them to ongoing class
content. A percentage should be given for the
completion of these exercises to encourage
students to take them seriously but the main focus
should be on formative feedback to
simultaneously promote better understanding of
content and enhance reading competencies. In
order to cultivate useful habits of reading and
appropriate question-asking, give some focus
questions for students to use with the readings.
These can invite them to perform different
reading tasks such as finding the central
argument, locating and defining core conceptual
terms, finding a number of supporting points and
identifying the corresponding evidence or
illustrations. At a later stage, the exercise could
be changed to ask students to set useful
reading questions. Keep the volume of reading Student Learning
Support offers students:
for these exercises limited as the aim is to
▪ Individual consultations
develop reading competencies and help
students to gain an in-depth understanding of ▪ Drop-in sessions
▪ On campus workshops
core course concepts. Reading exercises
▪ Mathematics support
followed by formative feedback can also be
articulated into a subsequent assessment task. ...as well as a wide range of
paper and online resources.
Visit: www.waikato.ac.nz/
pathways/learning-support
• 16 •
You may want your students to keep a reading
log. Reading logs require students to record their
responses as they engage with a reading. Bean
(2001) explains that in reading logs ―Students can
summarise the text, connect it to personal
experience, argue with it, imitate it, analyse it or
evaluate it‖ (p.144). A reading log is usually
relatively unstructured as the primary aim is to
elicit students‘ personal responses to a reading.
Evaluating reading
This is a very difficult process for students,
especially in their early stages of study. Students
are unfamiliar with academia and the discipline
and may also lack the more general academic
vocabulary with which to manage and articulate
evaluation and judgement. In the early stages of
study, students are more likely to see knowledge
as absolute (Perry, 1970). For all of these reasons
it can be difficult for students to respond
immediately with an evaluative and questioning
stance. The process of evaluation should be
introduced and coached very gradually, and
initially most effort should be directed to getting
the students to extract the essential meaning of a
reading. Evaluative tasks can be introduced
gradually through the use of one or two
questions— for example students can be asked to
find the evidence to support main points or to
examine the way in which certain key words are
used. It may be that in an entire course the
practice of and coaching in evaluation can focus
on just one or two key competencies.
• 17 •
Critical thinking
Introduction
Critical thinking and associated attributes (such
as evaluation, judgement, and reflection) feature
widely in accounts of the defining features of
higher education, in lecturers‘ accounts of their
aims, in graduate profiles and in assessment
instructions and criteria. However, we very
seldom incorporate the teaching of critical
thinking into our programmes. As Moon (2008)
observes, ―Although thinking must surely be at
the heart of education, it is not often explicitly
taken into consideration in pedagogy. Critical
thinking does, however, feature in the rhetoric of
education, particularly higher education‖ (p.vii).
Moreover, there are widely different
understandings of what the term means and also
possible disciplinary differences in the
understanding and usage of the term. It is
likely that for some of us the term critical
thinking is an inherited and relatively
unexplored part of higher education rhetoric.
Before we think about ways to help enhance
our students‘ critical thinking competencies,
we need to clarify our own understanding of
the term and any discipline specific
manifestations of it. Moon (2008) explores the
term critical thinking from a range of
perspectives - teachers‘ views, students‘
perceptions, what she terms ―the common sense‖
view (p.25) and extensive discussion of the term
in the literature. She uncovers a range of views,
considerable confusion as to its meaning,
different foci and emphases as well as certain
common themes. There also appears to be
crossover between conceptions of critical
• 18 •
thinking and forms of representation of critical
thinking. Moon provides a helpful overview
map of the territory of critical thinking and its
representation (p.30).
Critical Thinking and subsets of it—tools
for the manipulation of knowledge
Forms of Primary and Secondary
knowledge
Critical thinking—which includes critical:
Appraisal
Evaluation
Reflection
Understanding
Analysis
Review
Appreciation
Management
Awareness
Care
Oral representation—debate, discussion
and other oral representation
Critical Incident Analysis
Forms of action—assertive action; critical
or professional practice, reflective practice,
dramatic or theatrical representation, etc.
Written representation—critical reports,
reviews, critique, satire, essays, metaphor Graphic depiction—cartoon, pastiche,
sketch
Problem-solving and decision-making are Various forms of representation
forms that can be broadly similar to critical
thinking when there is no one fixed
solution to be sought
Table 1: Critical Thinking and its subsets (Moon, 2008, p.30)
Moon‘s explorations lead her to a summary
statement of the essential features of critical
thinking which she reminds readers is not
definitive. It is worth including her statement in
full as it provides a foundation for teachers to
clarify and articulate their own understanding,
communicate their expectations to students and
design their teaching and assessment activities
to align with these goals.
• 19 •
Towards a critical statement about critical
thinking (from Moon)
Critical thinking is treated here as a general term that tends to
be used to cover both the mental activities of thinking and the
various representations of the thinking that include action,
speech, writing and so on. We should see the various terms
such as ‘critical appraisal’, ‘evaluation’, ‘reflection’ and
‘understanding’ as elements of critical thinking where there is
an emphasis on specific kinds of mental activity.
Critical thinking is a capacity to work with complex ideas
whereby a person can make effective provision of evidence to
justify a reasonable judgement. The evidence, and therefore
the judgement, will pay appropriate attention to the context
of the judgement. Critical thinking can be seen as a form of
learning, in that new knowledge, in the form of the judgement,
is formed in the process.
The meaning of a ’judgement’ may relate to a judgement of
one thing against another or others (like a decision) or the
judgement of the merit of one thing (sometimes in relation to
a purpose or set of criteria that have been agreed). The idea
of effective judgement implies effectiveness in the thing,
reasoning or argumentation and in the quality of the
representation of the thing in writing, speech etc. It is an
important characteristic of deep crucial thinking that the
thinker takes a critical (metacognitive) stance towards her
actual process of critical thinking and its representation.
The fully developed capacity to think critically relies on an
understanding of knowledge as constructed and related to its
context (relativistic) and this is not possible if knowledge is
viewed only in a dualistic or absolute manner (i.e. knowledge
as a series of facts).
• 20 •
The notion of depth in crucial thinking is closely associated
with the level of epistemological development of the
thinker. Generally speaking, deep crucial thinking can be
equated with ‘good-quality thinking’ which involves
analytical thinking rather than surface description of issues.
The variation of depth and its association with
epistemological development indicate that critical thinking
develops as a capacity and that this development may need
to be taken into account in pedagogical thinking.
There is a sense of precision, good organisation, effective
reasoning, and the ability to work reflectively among other
skills in critical thinking, but it is much more than the
deployment of a set of skills. There is also a concern with
‘standards’. ‘Standards’ can be interpreted in relation to the
standard or quality of the thinking, or the sufficiency of the
quality of the outcome or conclusion to the thinking.
Critical thinking and its representations are affected by the
personal characteristics of the thinker. For example,
emotion is recognized to play a part in crucial thinking as it
does in all cognitive processing. There appear to be
different ways in which emotion interacts with cognitive
activity but the thinker should monitor its various influences,
articulating this where appropriate and where possible.
Similarly a person’s ability to use language skilfully is
relevant to the language-based representations of critical
thinking and the thinker needs to be sensitive to different
usages, connotations and understandings of words and
ideas. Intellectual curiosity and interest are relevant to the
willingness to pursue a line of critical thinking and in addition
the effective critical thinker will be reasonably effective in
the capacities that have been grouped under the term
‘academic assertiveness’ - having due courage and
effectiveness in the assertion of ideas and a willingness to
‘change her mind’ if necessary.
• 21 •
There are different representational activities within which
critical thinking is applied. They may include: the review of
someone else’s argument; the evaluation of an object; the
development of an argument; critical thinking about the self;
critical thinking about an incident; a constructive response to
the arguments of others; and the disposition of crucial
thinking as a habit of engagement with the world.
There are different approaches to the teaching or
presentation of critical thinking and its representations.
While as a whole the presence of various approaches
enriches the general conception of critical thinking, it also
contributes to confusion about its nature and identity. There
are approaches, for example, that focus on logic, on skills, on
pedagogy, on personal dispositions, and so on.
The notions of objectivity and subjectivity are not clear-cut in
critical thinking. The naïve view would say that critical
thinking yields objectivity—but a more sophisticated thinker
can comprehend that to be objective, she needs to take into
account the essential subjectivity of the process of knowing.
In a sense, objectivity is sought though the understanding of,
and ability to work with, subjectivity.
There should be a recognition that critical thinking and its
representation is a culturally influenced process. There is
evidence to suggest that it is essentially a Western way of
processing ideas, and that learners from other cultures may
confront difficulties in understanding it because they work in
different ways.
Moon, J. (2008), pp. 126,127.
• 22 •
Critical thinking enables learners to navigate and
manipulate knowledge, to transform ideas,
conceptions and processes, to challenge norms,
make decisions and forge new pathways. The
development of critical thinking requires a
corresponding pedagogical approach and teaching
and assessment strategies. Moon (2008) argues
that becoming a critical thinker also requires the
development of an accompanying dispositional
shift from learners who need to acquire what she
terms ―academic assertiveness‖ which is about
claiming one‘s own voice in academia.
Moon also links the development of critical
thinking to questions about academic
development. Starting with Perry‘s study with
Harvard students in the 1970s, numerous research
studies have documented the difficulty students
have in moving from absolutist to relativist
notions of the world. This needs to be an
important consideration for lecturers who are
frequently too optimistic about the level and
quality of critical thinking that students are able to
acquire in the early stages of their studies.
With this contextual framework in mind, some
strategies for promoting critical thinking (and
academic assertiveness) will be outlined on pages
28ff.
• 23 •
Pedagogies for Developing Critical
Thinking
Introduction - General strategies
Many of the in-class and assessment strategies
that are pertinent to the development of students‘
academic writing and reading ability are equally
appropriate for promoting critical thinking. If we
look at some of the attributes outlined by Moon
(2008) we need to ask ourselves whether our
teaching practices model the processes of testing,
rigorous evaluation, exploration of alternatives
and problem posing that characterise the critical
thinking process. Perhaps even more
fundamentally, do we actually share our thinking
processes with our learners and show them the
steps we take in a process of intellectual inquiry or
do we simply present them with the final product?
If we want students to become metacognitive, we
need to invite them to consider the nature and
sequence of our own thinking processes.
Using Examples
Give students a number of different examples of
writing about the same event/idea/or piece of
writing. The examples should display varying
degrees of critical engagement. Students can be
asked to identify examples of critical thinking in
the accounts, explain the reasons for the sections
they identify and possibly rank the different pieces
of writing according to the quality of their critical
engagement (adapted from Moon, 2008).
• 24 •
Use examples from everyday life
Moon suggests that a gradual understanding of
critical thinking can be developed by inviting
students to practise evaluative and questioning
skills in relation to examples from everyday life.
Create thinking time and spaces
Moon (2008) suggests that we can deliberately
design thinking time and spaces in our teaching
and learning environments to develop students‘
habits of more active thinking and
engagement. She suggests that teachers can
develop a recognisable terminology to alert
students to these moments, such as ―think
time‖ or ―stop and think‖ (p147).
Collaborative learning
According to Bean (2001), one of the most
effective ways to coach students in the
development of critical thinking skills is
through focussed small group work. Bean
suggests that small group work of this kind
needs to be carefully planned and usually
involves students having to work in groups to
respond to a discipline-related problem or issue,
record their process, their different perspectives
and conclusions and then report their findings.
This exercise can be linked to a subsequent
written assignment if desired. See attachment
from Bean (2001) on the next few pages for a
number of ways of posing questions or problems
for group discussion and resolution.
• 25 •
Creating dissonance
Creating a sense of discomfort/dissonance or
unease is a good stimulus to thinking. Sometimes
this can be done through very simple strategies
such as framing a lecture with a provocative
question, a problem scenario which needs to be
approached in the light of lecture material or
creating a critical incident. Other prompts can
include critical incidents, unresolved
questions, or an invitation to
respond to hypothetical
possibilities.
For an extended
list of strategies
and resources, see
Moon (2008).
• 26 •
Students’ Problem
Helping Strategy
Poor reading
problem
▪ Give tests or writing assignments on readings that
you don’t cover in class.
▪ Require students to write expressively in response
to texts (reading logs, summary/response
notebooks).
▪ Require marginal notes.
▪ Show students your own reading process.
Failure to
reconstruct
arguments as they
read
▪ Assign summary writing.
▪ Have students make outlines, flowcharts, or
diagrams of articles.
▪ Help students write “gist statements” in margins
summarizing main points as reading progresses.
▪ Go through a sample text with students, writing
“what it says” and “what it does” statements for
each paragraph.
Failure to assimilate
the unfamiliar;
resistance to
uncomfortable or
disorientating views
▪ Explain this phenomenon to students so that they
can watch out for it; point out instances in class
when students resist an unfamiliar or
uncomfortable idea; draw analogies to other times
when students have had to assimilate unfamiliar
views.
▪ In lectures or discussions, draw contrasts between
ordinary ways of looking at the subject and the
author’s surprising way.
▪ Emphasize the “believing” side of Elbow’s
“believing and doubting game”.
Limited
understanding of
rhetorical context
▪ Create reading guides that include information
about the author and the rhetorical context of the
reading.
▪ Through lectures or reading guides, set the stage
for readings, especially primary materials.
▪ Train students to ask these questions: Who is this
author? Who is he or she writing to? What
occasion prompted this writing? What is the
author’s purpose?
• 27 •
Failure to interact with
the text
▪ Use any of the response strategies recommended
in this chapter—reading logs, summary/response
notebooks, guided journals, marginal notations,
reading guides.
Unfamiliarity with
cultural codes
▪ Create reading guides explaining cultural codes,
allusions, historical events, and so forth.
▪ Show students the function of cultural codes by
discussing the background knowledge needed to
understand cartoons or jokes
Unfamiliar vocabulary
▪ Urge students to acquire the habit of using the
dictionary.
▪ Create reading guides defining technical terms or
words used in unusual ways.
Difficulty with complex
syntax
▪ Have faith that practice helps.
▪ Refer severe problems to a learning assistance
centre.
▪ Have students “translate” complex passages into
their own words; also have students practice
rewriting particularly long sentences into several
shorter ones.
Failure to adapt to
different kinds of
discourse
▪ Explain your own reading process: when you skim,
when you read carefully, when you study a text in
detail, and so forth.
▪ Explain how your own reading process varies when
you encounter different genres of text: how to read
a textbook versus a primary source; how to read a
scientific paper; how to read a poem; and so forth.
• 28 •
1. The Problem-Posing Strategy
In this approach, the instructor gives students a
disciplinary problem framed as an open-ended
question to which students must propose and
justify an answer. To keep students on task, I
often ask groups to summarise their answers in
one-sentence ―thesis statements‖, which they
write on the chalkboard. Recorders then present
justifying arguments supporting the thesis when
they make their reports. If groups cannot reach
consensus, I ask for a majority thesis and at least
on minority thesis.
We have examined four alternative approaches to
the design of a digital data-recording device for
Company X’s portable heart defibrillator. Which
solution should be chosen and why?
In what way, if any, is Jackson Pollack’s Autumn
Rhythm different from the results of a monkey
throwing paint at a canvas?
According to Fullinwider, three theories are
frequently used to define preferential hiring for both
African Americans and women: compensatory
justice, social utility, and distributive justice. Using
one or more of these theories, address this question:
Is the legislature’s proposed veterans preference law
just?
Your author has quoted Peter Berger, an important
American sociologist, to the effect that we are in
“bondage” to society. Elsewhere that same author
says, “In sum, society is the wall of our imprisonment
in history.” Your friend, I.M. Punker, rubs his hand
through his orange hair, touches his nose ring and
says, “Nonsense, I am my own person, free to do
• 29 •
whatever I want.” Which of these two views does
your group most agree with? Defend your choice
with arguments.
2. The Frame Strategy
Using this strategy, the instructor gives students
a mapping sentence that predicts the shape of a
short essay but not the context. Students have to
create content topic sentences to head each
predicted section and develop a supporting
argument for each one. Often the instructor can
include in the task a blank tree diagram or an
outline indicating the slots that students‘ ideas
must fit. This task requires not only that students
generate ideas but also that they place these ideas
within a clear structure. (For further examples of
frame questions, see Chapter Six, pages 115-116,
and Chapter Seven, pages 115-116, and Chapter
Seven, pages 115-117, and Chapter Seven, pages
126-127.)
Based on the data about the Pabst Brewing Company
that you studied last night, what do you now think
are the causes for this company’s precipitous loss of
market share? Place your solution into a frame that
begins with the following sentence:
“There are X main causes for Pabst’s loss of
market share. First, [state the cause and support
it… Second,… Third,…” Continue with as many
causes as your group determines.
Although Krauthammer’s argument for rebuilding
state mental institutions is persuasive in a number of
ways, our group finds potential problems with his
plan. First, … Second, … [Third,… Fourth,…]
• 30 •
3. The Question-Generating Strategy
This strategy is particularly effective for teaching
the art of question asking in a discipline. After
instruction in the kinds of questions asked by a
particular discipline, the teacher breaks students
into groups and has them brainstorm possible
questions related to topics that he or she
provides. After this phase, groups must then
refine their lists into the two or three best
questions and explain why each question is a
particularly good one. (This is the strategy used
in the earlier Crito example.)
Carefully observe this [poem, graph, statistical table,
painting, advertisement]. What aspects of it puzzle
you or intrigue you? As a group, pose three good
questions that emerge from your observation of the
item.
Now that you have studied the six levels of questions
in Bloom’s taxonomy, use the taxonomy to develop
test questions about Chapter Six in your text. Ask at
least two questions at each level of taxonomy.
Recorders should be prepared to explain why you
think each question fits its respective level.
Scientists often pose research questions that have
the following generic structure: “What is the effect of
X and Y?” For example, “What is the effect of varying
amounts of light on the growth of Escherichia coli?”
or “What is the effect of an improved freshman
advising system on students’ retention rate between
the freshman and sophomore years?” Using these
examples as models, develop three good research
questions that you could ask about each of the
following topics: steroids, day-care centres, the
human immunodeficiency virus, gangs.
• 31 •
4. The Believing and Doubting Strategy
The ―believing and doubting game‖, coined by
Elbow (1973, 1986), asks students first to enter
imaginatively into the possible truth of any
statement, arguing in its favour (the believing
game) and then to stand back from it, adopting a
healthy scepticism (the doubting game). To use
this strategy with small groups, the instructor
gives students a controversial thesis and asks
them to generate reasons and supporting
arguments for and against the thesis. Angelo and
Cross (1993, pp. 168-171) discuss a similar
strategy using pro and con grids. (For further
discussion of the believing and doubting game,
see Chapter Seven, page 124, and Chapter Eight,
pages 142-143.)
The overriding religious view expressed in Hamlet is
an existential atheism similar to Sartre’s.
Baccalaureate engineering programs should be
extended to five years.
The eighty-three-year-old stroke victim described in
the case study should be informed of her daughter’s
terminal cancer.
5. The Evidence-Finding Strategy
The instructor‘s goal here is to have students find
facts, figures, and other data or evidence to
support a premise. In my own discipline of
literature, this task often means finding textual
detail from a poem, novel, or play that might be
used to support an argument. In other
• 32 •
disciplines, it might mean using data from
library, laboratory, or field research. Such tasks
teach students how experts in a field use
discipline-appropriate evidence to support
assertions. (Note that this strategy is ineffective
if it leads simply to students thumbing through
their books or lab notes during a collaborative
session. I usually assign data-finding tasks
several days in advance so that students can find
the evidence as homework. Collaborative groups
then work to sort, classify, and evaluate the
evidence gathered in advance by participants.)
Our design group recommends the choice of air
bearings over conventional steel bearings for this
application because air bearings will give better
performance at a lower cost. Support this claim with
the evidence needed to make it persuasive to both
engineers and managers.
“Although Hamlet claims to be putting on an antic
disposition, at several places in the play he goes over
the line and seems to lapse into genuine madness.”
What places in the text could be used to support this
assertion?
Your textbook describes typical kinds of problematic
behaviours that children exhibit in kindergarten. You
believe that a particularly unruly child– we’ll call him
Martin— would benefit emotionally from repeating
kindergarten next year rather than entering first
grade. Martin’s parents are adamantly opposed to
holding Martin back. What evidence might you use to
help Martin’s parents appreciate your side of this
issue?
• 33 •
Note that in working on an evidence-finding task,
students usually discover what teachers already
know: that the evidence is ambiguous and that a
strong evidential case can often be made against
the thesis as well as for it. Such ambiguity
generally unsettles beginning college students,
who expect the ―experts‖ to know the right
answer and who have not yet realized the extent
to which arguers select and shape data to support
a point. (See the discussion of Perry‘s
developmental theory in Chapter Two.) Teachers
need to help students confront and endure such
ambiguity, confident that doing so helps them
move higher on Perry‘s scale of intellectual
growth.
6. The Case Strategy
Among the most popular ways to use small
groups is to devise cases that require decisionmaking and justification. If a case involves
different roles, each group can initially be
assigned one or two of the roles and asked to
devise the best arguments it can from the
assigned perspectives. (For further discussion of
cases and for an example, see Chapter Seven,
pages 130-131.)
7. The Norming Session Strategy
This strategy, which is also discussed in Chapters
Thirteen and Fifteen, helps students internalise
the criteria by which the instructor will judge
their formal essays. The instructor passes out
three or four student essays from previous classes
(with names removed) and lets students, in
groups, rank the essays and develop arguments
justifying their rankings. Later, in the plenary
• 34 •
session, the instructor reveals his or her own
rankings and initiates a general discussion of
grading criteria for essays. Often teachers
discover that students have erroneous notions
about what teachers look for in a formal essay,
particularly when they are learning the thinking
processes and stylistic conventions of new
disciplines. (See also Chapter Thirteen, page
219, and Chapter Fifteen, pages 259-262.) For an
excellent illustration of how a sociology
professor conducts a collaborative norming
session (complete with examples of student
essays on the topic of ethnocentrism), see
Bateman (1990), pp. 110-116. For examples of
norming sessions based on freshman placement
essays, see White (1973-1981, 1992).
8. The “Rough Draft Workshop” Strategy
Perhaps the most common use of small groups in
writing courses is the ―rough draft workshop‖, in
which students read and respond to each other‘s
work in progress. The goal of these workshops
is to use peer review to stimulate global revision
of drafts to improve ideas, organisation,
development, and sentence structure (Chapter
Thirteen, pages 222-225, gives detailed
suggestions for using small groups for peer
review.)
9. The Metacognitive Strategy
Another effective use of small groups, discussed
in detail by Bruffee (1993, p.47), is to ask
students to consider their own thinking and
negotiating processes metacognitively. This
strategy is especially useful when small groups
• 35 •
produce solutions that strike you as off-base or
just plain wrong. Our authoritarian impulse is to
tell the groups that their answers are wrong and
show them the right answer. Another approach,
however, is to say instead that the class‘s
solutions differ considerably from those of most
experts in this field. A subsequent metacognitive
task is to send students back into small groups to
analyse the differences in reasoning processes
between themselves and the experts. According to
Bruffee, ―The task is to examine the process of
consensus making itself. How did the class arrive
at its consensus? How do the students suppose
that the larger community arrived at a consensus
so different from their own? In what ways do
those two processes differ?‖ (p. 47). The effect of
this approach, in my experience, is to deepen
students‘ understanding of how knowledge is
created: instead of accepting (and perhaps just
memorizing) the ―right answer‖ based on the
teacher‘s authority, students struggle to
understand the principles of inquiry, analysis, and
problem solving used by the experts to arrive at
their views. They consider an answer not only a
product but also the result of a process of
disciplinary conversation.
Bean, J. C. (2006), pp. 146-148. 155-159.
• 36 •
References
Bean, J. C. (2001). Engaging ideas. San
Francisco: Jossey Bass.
Moon, J. (2008). Critical thinking.
Routledge: London & New York.
Perry, W. (1970). Forms of intellectual
and academic development in the
college years. New York: Holt,
Rhinehart & Winston.
Svantesson, I. (1998) Learning Maps and
Memory Skills (2nd Edition). London: Kogan
Page
• 37 •
Produced by:
Teaching Development Unit | Wāhanga Whakapakari Ako
Private Bag 3105
Hamilton 3240 New Zealand
Phone: +64 7 838 4839
Fax: +64 7 838 4573
tduadmin@waikato.ac.nz
www.waikato.ac.nz/tdu

Teaching Strategies to Promote the Development of Students

Transcription

Similar documents

5.11 tactical® pant– the only original

Canyon Ada Twin Falls Gooding

TDU 01 PDF Version - The Open University

April Ext PM News

Top Ten Tech Skills - Elmwood Park Public Schools

Silly Walk To The Moon

il\sNt*,U HE

Darwin Awards 2012 - Coconut Telegraph

JOHN BEAN V 501

THE AUTHENTIC 5.11 TACTICAL® PANT: AS TOUGH AND