San Rafael - Walk Bike Marin!

Transcription

City of San Rafael
Bicycle/Pedestrian Plan
Final Report
August 2001
Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) Members
Preston McCoy, Chair
Christopher Goff
Kristin Nute, Vice Chair
Wil Matthews
Noble A. “Rocky” Birdsey
Richard Schneider
Shawn Curtin
Andy O’Neill
Ashley Bettini
Former BPAC Members
Martin Peckins
Jonathan J. Toste
Dominique Goff
Joel Segura
Brian Walsh
Paul Curfman
Ralph Mihan
Consulting Assistance
Nelson\Nygaard Consulting Associates
Staff Acknowledgements
Nader Mansourian
Traffic Engineer
Bill Voight
GIS Technician
BPAC Committee Staff
Richard A. Landis
Public Works Administrative Supervisor
Lydia Romero
Assistant to the City Manager
Adopted by the San Rafael City Council February 2002
Table of Contents
Chapter 1 Introduction and Summary ............................................... 1-1
Chapter 2 Goals, Objectives and Policy Actions .............................. 2-1
Chapter 3 Existing Conditions ........................................................... 3-1
Chapter 4 Needs Analysis .................................................................. 4-1
Chapter 5 Proposed System and Improvements .............................. 5-1
Chapter 6 Implementation Cost Estimates........................................ 6-1
Appendix A
Appendix B
Appendix C
Appendix D
Detailed Trail Descriptions
Bicycle Parking & Restroom Facilities
Educational Programs
Bicycle Advocacy Groups
Table of Figures
Figure 1-1 Map of Existing and Proposed Bikeways ......................1-10
Figure 4-1 San Rafael Estimate of User Increases and Vehicle Trips
and Miles Saved................................................................................4-3
Figure 4-2 Comparison of Mode Share ............................................4-4
Figure 4-3 Reduced Daily Vehicle Trips/Miles ..................................4-4
Figure 5-1 Short Term Bicycle Improvements ..................................5-4
Figure 5-2 Medium Term Bicycle Improvements ..............................5-5
Figure 5-3 Long Term Bicycle Improvements ...................................5-6
Figure 5-4 Existing Sections.............................................................5-7
Figure 5-5 Specific Pedestrian Improvements ................................5-13
Figure 5-6 Pedestrian Priorities ......................................................5-17
Figure 6-1 SHORT TERM Cost Estimates (YEARS 1-5)..................6-1
Figure 6-2 MEDIUM TERM Cost Estimates (YEARS 1-10) ..............6-1
Figure 6-3 LONG TERM Cost Estimates (YEARS 1-20) ..................6-1
San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
PREAMBLE
The San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan is the product of a collaborative
effort of the San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC),
Nelson Nygaard Transportation consultants, and City staff. Its purpose is to
integrate proposed bicycle and pedestrian infrastructure improvements and into
San Rafael’s overall transportation plan. In terms of content and structure, the
Plan meets the requirements set forth in the California Bicycle-Transportation
Act, section 891.2 of the Streets and Highway Code.
Upon adoption of the Plan by the San Rafael City Council, each of the policies,
programs, and infrastructure improvement projects described herein will be fully
reviewed by City staff. The San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan is a
conceptual document in that the Council will have ultimate discretion and
authority to modify, reject, or implement any of the Plan’s elements.
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Chapter 1
Introduction and Summar y
Background
The San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committee (BPAC) was
established with the specific purpose of preparing a bicycle and pedestrian
plan for the City of San Rafael.
The Plan meets the requirements of the California Bicycle-Transportation Act.
Those requirements are contained in the Streets and Highway Code, Section
891.2, which state that “A city or county may prepare a bicycle transportation
plan, which shall include, but not be limited to, the following elements:” The 11
elements, (a) through (k), are treated in this section of the Plan.
Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan Process
This plan was developed with input from San Rafael neighborhood groups,
BPAC members’ expertise, and work done to create the Marin County Bicycle
and Pedestrian Master Plan (2000). BPAC meetings are held monthly, are
open to the public, and are properly agendized and noticed in compliance with
the Brown Act.
Previous Marin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Plans
The following studies or planning efforts have been reviewed and consulted,
studied for consistency, and where appropriate, folded into the San Rafael
Plan.
Marin County Bicycle Plan (1974 & 2000)
In 1975, Marin County’s Board of Supervisors adopted “A Bikeway Policy for
Marin County,” which emphasized the need for safe accommodation for
bicycling in all public streets and roads. However, the City of San Rafael did
not adopt this plan. The policies called for the County to design new road
construction and repair projects to safely accommodate bicycles, integrate
bicycle planning into transportation planning and construction, provide
recreational bikeways, develop uniform standards for bikeway design, and
support bicycle safety education and rules.
The 1975 plan called for the delineation of over 400 miles of bike routes, the
provision of bicycle parking at appropriate locations, the introduction of an
educational and safety program in all elementary schools, and the introduction
of a bicycle registration program to help recover stolen bicycles.
In May, 2001 the County approved the Year 2000 update to the Plan.
Page 1-1
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Marin County North-South Bikeway Feasibility Study (1994)
The purpose of the Marin County North-South Bikeway Feasibility Study was
to identify and develop safe and efficient north-south bikeways from the
Golden Gate Bridge to the Sonoma County line. It generally followed the old
Northwestern Pacific Railroad right-of-way, for commuters, but also
recommended a short-term alignment that runs mostly along existing streets
parallel to the right-of-way, with improvements in signing, striping, and
pavement. The Study was never officially adopted.
The Bay Trail Plan (1989)
The Bay Trail Plan proposes the development of a regional hiking and
bicycling trail around the perimeter of San Francisco and San Pablo Bays.
Important sections pass through San Rafael. This effort is supported by the
Association of Bay Area Governments. Contact ABAG at www.abag.org
Summary
Bicycle Section
Definitions
This plan refers to various classes of bikeways as defined by Caltrans in
Chapter 1000 of the Highway Design Manual:
Class I Bikeway: Referred to as a bike path or multi-use path. Provides for
bicycle travel on a paved right of way completely separated from any street or
highway.
Class II Bikeway: Referred to as a bike lane. Provides a striped and stenciled
lane for one-way travel on a street or highway.
Class III Bikeway Referred to as a bike route. Provides for shared use with
pedestrian or motor vehicle traffic and is identified only by signing and
(sometimes) stenciling.
Class III-b Bicycle Boulevard: is similar to Class III except that it is designed
to favor bicycles. Pioneered in Palo Alto, the Bicycle Boulevard is designed to
promote bicycle movement and to discourage through vehicle movement,
except for local stops. The effect is achieved by partial closures and lack of
coordinated traffic signals.
Overview of Proposed System Improvements
This plan proposes a continuous network of bikeways for travel within San
Rafael and to surrounding communities. Routes are designated either “northsouth” or “east-west.” North-south routes have odd numbers, and east-west
routes have even numbers. Two of the north-south routes connect San Rafael
Page 1-2
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
with other cities, as does one of the east-west routes. The other routes are
primarily for travel within the City.
Proposed New North-South Bike Routes
BPAC identified
seventeen northsouth routes in
San Rafael. Two
connect San
Rafael with
cities to the
north and south,
and the rest
provide
connections
within the city.
BPAC identified seventeen north-south routes in San Rafael. Two connect
San Rafael with cities to the north and south, and the rest provide connections
within the city.
North-south routes that connect with Novato and Larkspur are
01. From Novato to Bellam Blvd, via Las Gallinas, Northgate Dr, Los
Ranchitos, Lincoln, Irwin, Woodland.
07. From Novato to Larkspur, via Northwestern Pacific Railway right-of-way
through San Rafael.
(Sections of both of these routes are in the County-wide bicycle plan.)
Proposed new north-south routes primarily within San Rafael:
03. Los Gamos Dr from Lucas Valley Rd to Manual T Freitas Pkwy.
05. Redwood Hwy Frontage Rd and Civic Center Drive, from Smith Ranch
Rd to North San Pedro Rd.
09. From North San Pedro Rd to the Richmond Bridge, via Hwy 101
shoulder, Villa Ave, Grand Ave & Francisco Blvd. East. (proposed
alternative to Lincoln Ave. connection)
11. Recreational Shore Park Path and Bay Trail.
13. Baypoint Pathway from Spinnaker Point Dr to Andersen Drive
15. Kerner Blvd. from Bellam Blvd. to Grange Way.
17. Bay Trail spur from city line near Hamilton to McInnis Park.
19. Wolf Grade/ D Street from Fourth St to Larkspur.
21. Irwin and Tiburon from Woodland to Larkspur.
23. Nova Albion and Golden Hinde from Las Gallinas to Los Ranchitos.
25. Merrydale from Merrydale101 Overcrossing to Merrydale Pathway to
Los Ranchitos/Lincoln Ave..
27. Canal Neighborhood to Montecito connector from Third St to East
Francisco Blvd. To West Francisco Blvd. (and/or Andersen Dr).
Page 1-3
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
31. C St from First St to Fifth Ave.
33. A St from Fifth Ave to First St.
35. Knight Dr and Castlewood from Point San Pedro Rd to 25 West
Castlewood Drive.
Proposed New East-West Bike Routes
Twelve east-west routes the Committee identified in San Rafael. One
connects San Rafael with San Anselmo to the west and with San Quentin and
the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge to the east, and the rest are important
connections within the city.
East-west routes that connect with San Anselmo and San Quentin:
12. Greenfield Ave & Fourth St from City Limit to downtown. (see route
24 for alternative route)
East-west routes primarily within San Rafael are:
02. Lucas Valley Road from the Lucas Valley area to Redwood Hwy
Frontage Rd, and Smith Ranch to McInnis Park.
04. West end of Freitas Parkway from city limit to Las Gallinas Ave.
06. North San Pedro Rd, Point San Pedro Rd, Bay Trail Spur, Third.
08. Bay Trail Extension (Recreational & Park access).
10. West end of Fifth Ave from Mt Tamalpais Cemetery to H St.
14. Andersen Drive from Second St to Sir Francis Drake Blvd/Hwy 580.
(Completed)
16. Taylor St and Woodland Ave from D Street to Irwin St.
18. Gallinas Creek Pathway from Redwood to Smith Ranch Rd.
22. Walter Place and Las Gallinas from Corillo Dr. to Merrydale
24. (Alt. to Route 12) Greenfield Ave, Second, and others from City Limit
to Union St.
26. Francisco Blvd. West from Transit Center to new overcrossing near
Medway and Andersen Dr.
Page 1-4
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Pedestrian Section
The Pedestrian Improvements section encompasses two elements:
¾ Sidewalk, intersection, and crossing improvements.
¾ Multi-use paths (Class I bikeways).
See Chapter 5 for descriptions of proposed site-specific pedestrian
improvements.
School Commute
This Plan calls for
programs to
educate all users
of public rights of
way and of each
other’s respective
rights and
responsibilities in
order to foster
mutual respect
and safety.
The Plan prioritizes school commute safety, with many of the short to mid-term
projects providing enhanced connections to schools, plus a separate School
Commute Safety program. This program encourages more walking and biking
to school through in-class activities, contests and events, and organized
“school pools” of parents escorting children by foot, bike or carpool. Programs
of this sort are known as “Safe Routes to School” and are being implemented
throughout Marin County. Funding for such programs – especially capital
elements – is limited and there are generally more applicants than awards
given.
This Plan calls for programs to educate all users of public rights of way and of
each other’s respective rights and responsibilities in order to foster mutual
respect and safety. More details are given in the Appendix.
Caltrans Requirements
The eleven standard bike plan elements mandated by Caltrans are presented
in this section, but without complete detail. Full details appear later in the
document as warranted.
1. “(a) The estimated number of existing bicycle commuters in the plan
area and the estimated increase in the number of bicycle commuters
resulting from implementation of the plan.”
The Marin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan estimates that there are
approximately 5,700 daily bicycle and pedestrian commuters in San Rafael
and that they make 11,400 trips per day. (These figures are based on 1990
Census source data and adjusted and allocated based on San Rafael’s
population.)
Also according to the County plan, the potential increase in the number of
bicycle and pedestrian commuters is estimated to be 5,165 for a daily total of
Page 1-5
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
10,904 commuters making a total of 21,808 trips. This assumes the current
bicycle/pedestrian commute mode share can be increased from 3.7% to 7%.
2. “(b) A map and description of existing and proposed land use and
settlement patterns which shall include, but not be limited to, locations of
residential neighborhoods, schools, shopping centers, public buildings,
and major employment centers.”
The intent of this plan is to serve the entire city. San Rafael is a city of
suburban character with a well developed downtown area, some light industrial
areas, and several major shopping centers. This plan is integrated with
General Plan provisions which may be referenced for further information.
See Figure 1 – Existing & Proposed Bikeways Maps page 1-10.
3. “(c) A map and description of existing and proposed bikeways.”
¾ See Figure 1 – Existing & Proposed Bikeways Map. Page 1-10.
¾ See Chapter 5, Proposed System and Improvements.
4. “(d) A map and description of existing and proposed end-of-trip
bicycle parking facilities. These shall include, but not be limited to,
parking at schools, shopping centers, public buildings, and major
employment centers.”
¾ See Figure 1 – Existing & Proposed Bikeways Map, which includes
parking.
The plan recognizes that bicycle-parking facilities are inadequate in some
parts of San Rafael. A few locations, such as the Northgate Mall, currently
have enough quality bicycle parking. Most schools, parks, and the downtown
area have inadequate and/or substandard parking.
¾ See Bikeway Support Facilities in Chapter 3 for more about bicycle
parking.
5. “(e) A map and description of existing and proposed bicycle transport
and parking facilities for connections with and use of other
transportation modes. These shall include, but not be limited to, parking
facilities at transit stops, rail and transit terminals, ferry docks and
landings, park and ride lots, and provisions for transporting bicyclists
and bicycles on transit or rail vehicles or ferry vessels.”
Golden Gate Transit has installed bike racks at the Transportation Center and
other locations, and has installed bike racks on nearly all of its buses.
However, there is not enough bike parking at the Transportation Center and
bike racks on buses are often filled. Two of the three park and ride lots lack
Page 1-6
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
bicycle parking, and there is no “Bike Station” (secure, free parking with an
attendant) in San Rafael as there is at other Bay Area locations such as Palo
Alto and Berkeley. San Rafael has no active rail or ferry terminals.
¾ See Figure 1 –Existing & Proposed Bikeways Map page 1-10.
It is recognized
that changing and
storage areas and
locker, restroom,
and shower
facilities in major
employment sites
are a very
important
element in a
complete and
effective bicycle
infrastructure.
¾ See Bikeway Support Facilities in Chapter 3 for more about multimodal connections.
6. “(f) A map and description of existing and proposed facilities for
changing and storing clothes and equipment. These shall include,
but not be limited to, locker, restroom, and shower facilities near
bicycle parking facilities.”
The Committee recognizes that changing and storage areas and locker,
restroom, and shower facilities in major employment sites are a very important
element in a complete and effective bicycle infrastructure. This type of facility
is very limited at present but is addressed in the Plan.
¾ See Chapter 2 Goals Objectives and Policy Actions.
7. “(g) A description of bicycle safety and education programs
conducted in the area included within the plan, efforts by the law
enforcement agency having primary traffic law enforcement
responsibility in the area to enforce provisions of the Vehicle Code
pertaining to bicycle operation, and the resulting effect on accidents
involving bicyclists.”
No formal bicycle safety education programs are offered by the City of San
Rafael. However, the Bicycle Trails Council of Marin (BTCM) and Trips for
Kids offer skill and other education programs for adults and youth as well
as the “Safe Routes to School” Program, currently offered by the Marin
County Bicycle Coalition (MCBC) in the selected schools.
¾ See the Appendix.
8. “(h) A description of the extent of citizen and community
involvement in development of the plan, including, but not limited to,
letters of support.”
In developing this plan the BPAC used the input and data gathered for the
recent Marin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan as a starting point.
The BPAC also met with planners, bicycle advocates, neighborhood groups
and interested citizens. Committee members attended workshops and
participated in public hearings. In addition, members completed fieldwork
surveys taking an inventory of existing conditions including safety concerns
and identifying missing links to develop a coordinated citywide non-automotive
Page 1-7
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
recreational/transportation system. Various neighborhood plans and
documents were reviewed.
Community involvement for the Marin County plan was managed by Marin
County’s Congestion Management Agency (CMA) which hosted five public
workshops and also met with the Bicycle and Pedestrian Advisory Committees
in most of the towns. This was done as part of the effort to create the Marin
County Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan. These workshops were attended
by over 250 people and were advertised through the media, bicycle shops,
schools, city halls, and other means. Copies of the surveys and all comments
received are available through Marin County’s CMA. (Contact Public Works at
415/ 499-6570.) Surveys were targeted at individuals as well as elementary
and middle schools. Bicycle and pedestrian counts were conducted in San
Rafael by the Department of Public Works.
9. “(i) A description of how the bicycle transportation plan has been
coordinated and is consistent with other local or regional transportation,
air quality, or energy conservation plans, including, but not limited to,
programs that provide incentives for bicycle commuting.”
The San Rafael plan is consistent with the Marin County Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan (2000) prepared for the Marin County Congestion
Management Agency. Specifically, it supports the goals of:
¾ Making the bicycle an integral part of daily life in Marin,
¾ Encouraging walking as a daily form of transportation,
¾ Making Marin a model community for alternative transportation. The
San Rafael plan also supports the Bay Trail Plan (1989).
10. “(j) A description of the projects proposed in the plan and a listing of
their priorities for implementation.”
All items are prioritized as Short Term Priority (1 to 5 years), Medium Term
priority (1 to 10 years), and Long Term priority (1 to 20 years).
11. “(k) A description of past expenditures for bicycle facilities and
future financial needs for projects that improve safety and convenience
for bicycle commuters in the plan area.”
According to the BPAC’s measurements, there are now 2.7 miles of Class 1
pathways, 3.9 miles of Class 2 bike lanes, and no Class 3 bike routes. In
addition to these routes, which can be used by recreational and commuter
bicyclists, the City of San Rafael has a number of parks and open spaces that
can be reached by bicycle. Four of San Rafael’s ten parks and all three
recreation centers have bike racks but they are mostly sub-standard.
Page 1-8
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Figure 1-1
Existing & Proposed Bikeway Map
Page 1-9
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Chapter 2
Goals, Objectives and
Policy Actions
This chapter describes the Goals, Objectives and Policy guidelines that are
recommended for the City of San Rafael.
Relevant Legislation and Policies
The following legislative goals and policies are relevant to the San Rafael
Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan.
•
•
•
According to the California Bicycle Transportation Act (1994), all cities
and counties should have an adopted bicycle master plan. The
Caltrans Highway Design Manual contains specific, mandatory design
requirements. The San Rafael Plan meets these requirements.
Chapter 1000: Bikeway Planning and Design of the Highway Design
Manual sets the basic design parameters for on-street and off-street
bicycle facilities. As a matter of policy, the City of San Rafael follows
the Caltrans Highway Design Manual in the development of its
roadways, paths and sidewalks. As described in Chapter 300, Topic
308.1, of the Highway Design Manual, the city also uses the latest
update of the American Association of State Highway and
Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards as described in “A Policy
on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,” as well as AASHTO’s
“Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities,” for its local streets and
roads.
According to Liability Aspects of Bikeway Design, A Special Report
(John English, Legal Consultant, Bicycle Federation of America, April,
1986.), a city can incur liability by being negligent in the designation or
design of a bikeway, and by defects or hazardous conditions along the
route. By conforming to the design standards listed above, the city
significantly reduces exposure to liability.
Goals, Objectives and Policy Actions
The following goals, objectives, and policy actions will guide and facilitate the
City in the implementation, maintenance, and upgrade of the bicycle and
pedestrian infrastructure in San Rafael:
•
Goals set a long-term vision and serve as a foundation to this plan.
•
Objectives identify specific areas where effort is required.
•
Policy Actions guide day-to-day decision-making toward reaching
the goals.
Page 2-1
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Goals
The following Goals, Objectives and Policies are similar to those in the Marin
County Pedestrian Bicycle Master Plan but are tailored for San Rafael. There
are three major goals:
Goal 1 Bicycle Transportation
Encourage
walking as a
daily form of
transportation in
San Rafael, by
completing a
pedestrian
network that
accommodates
short trips and
transit,
improves the
quality of the
pedestrian
environment,
and increases
pedestrian
safety and
convenience.
Make the bicycle an integral part of daily life in San Rafael, particularly for trips
of less than five miles, by implementing and maintaining a bikeway network,
providing end-of-trip facilities, improving bicycle/transit integration, encouraging
bicycle use, and making bicycling safer.
Goal 2 Pedestrian Transportation
Encourage walking as a daily form of transportation in San Rafael by
completing a pedestrian network that accommodates short trips and transit,
improves the quality of the pedestrian environment, and increases pedestrian
safety and convenience.
Goal 3 Model Community
Make San Rafael a model community for alternative transportation. Aim for a
20 percent mode share of all utilitarian trips to be made by bicycling and
walking by the year 2020.
Objectives and Policy Actions
Objective A - Facilitation
Facilitate the implementation of this San Rafael Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan,
which identifies existing and future needs, and provides specific
recommendations for facilities and programs over the next 20 years.
Proposed Policy Actions for Objective A
What:
1. Approve this Bicycle and Pedestrian Plan.
2. Maximize coordination between the City and community
to facilitate citizen review and comment on issues of mutual
concern.
Who1:
City Council
Staff
1
Key to Abbreviations: Staff = City Staff (various departments as appropriate),
BPAC = Bicycle & Pedestrian Advisory Committee, DPW = Department of Public Works
Page 2-2
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Objective B - Bikeways
Complete a network of bikeways that provide bicycle-friendly connections
through travel corridors and to important destinations, especially for travel to
employment centers, schools, commercial districts, transit stations, parks, and
institutions.
Policy Actions for Objective B
What:
1. Where feasible, include planning and design of bikeway
and pedestrian facilities as an integral part of the process
for all transportation improvements.
2. Seek funding for bikeway projects through regional,
state, and federal funding programs.
3. Coordinate with multi-jurisdictional funding applications
when appropriate.
Who:
Staff
Staff
Staff
Objective C - Walkways
Complete a network of walkways that serves pedestrian needs, especially for
short trips to employment centers, schools, commercial districts, transit
stations, and institutions.
Policy Actions for Objective C
What:
1. Complete missing connections to establish direct routes
for walking.
2. Identify and mitigate impediments and obstacles to
walking to school, such as through a Safe Routes to
Schools program.
3. Ensure accessibility of pedestrian facilities to the elderly
and disabled.
4. Support the installation of appropriate pedestrian
facilities as part of all new transportation improvements,
development projects and transit facilities.
5. Identify funding for construction of ADA curb cuts.
6. Identify funding for ongoing maintenance of sidewalks
and pathways.
Who:
Staff
Staff
Staff
Staff
Staff
Staff
Page 2-3
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Objective D – Maintenance
Maintain and improve the quality, operation, and integrity of bikeway and
walkway network facilities.
What:
1. Undertake routine maintenance of bikeway and walkway
network facilities, such as sweeping bicycle lanes and
trimming bushes next to bike lanes and sidewalks.
2. Consider bicycle and walking facilities in the repair and
construction of roadways.
3. Provide an easy method (such as a hotline or email) for
the public to report road/walkway hazards, and create an
effective and appropriate response mechanism to correct
reported hazards.
Who:
Staff
Staff
Staff
Objective E – Bicycle Parking
Provide bicycle parking in employment and commercial areas, in
multifamily housing, at schools and colleges, and at transit facilities.
Policy Actions for Objective E
What:
1. Review existing zoning code ordinances that require
bicycle parking spaces are built as part of development
projects.
2. Encourage the installation of bicycle parking in the
public right-of-way as appropriate.
3. Coordinate with local businesses and schools to offer
improved bicycle parking.
4. Explore the adoption of zoning requirements for
lockers and showers to be added to new commercial
buildings.
5. Upgrade bike parking at City recreation facilities.
6. Consider that parking for bicycles is as essential as
parking for cars.
Who:
Staff
Staff
City Council;
staff
City Council
City Council,
staff
City Council,
staff
Page 2-4
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Objective F – Bike/Transit Coordination
Increase the number of bicycle-transit trips.
Policy Actions for Objective F
What:
1. Support and promote improved bicycle access to all local
transit facilities.
Who:
Staff
Objective G - Education
Increase public
awareness of the
benefits of
bicycling and
walking and of
available
resources and
facilities.
Develop and implement plans for bicycle and pedestrian education aimed
at youth, adult cyclists, pedestrians, and motorists. Increase public
awareness of the benefits of bicycling and walking and of available
resources and facilities.
Policy Actions for Objective G
What:
1. Add a San Rafael Transportation page to the San Rafael
website. The page should include a bike route map, plans, and
a list of bike organizations and events.
2. Develop adult and youth bicycle and pedestrian education,
encouragement and safety programs with the help of available
bicycle and pedestrian facility programs such as:
>Safe Routes to Schools
>Public Service Announcements
3. If feasible, require major City sponsored community events
to include convenient bicycle parking and publicize such
accommodations.
Who:
Staff,
BPAC
Staff
City
Council,
Staff
Objective H - Standards
Continue to use the latest versions of the Caltrans Highway Design
Manual, the American Association of State Highway and Transportation
Officials (AASHTO) “Policy on Geometric Design of Highways and Streets,”
and the AASHTO “Guide for the Development of Bicycle Facilities,” as
applicable, for streets, roads, highway and pathways in San Rafael.
Page 2-5
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Chapter 3
Existing Conditions
Bicycle Facilities
San Rafael’s existing bikeway system consists of approximately 2.7 miles of
multi-use pathways and 3.9 miles of bicycle lanes. While bicyclists are
generally prohibited from using freeways, they are allowed on the northbound
shoulder of U.S. 101 between and including the Villa Avenue and North San
Pedro off-ramps, and a short section of I-580 near San Quentin. Bicycles are
not allowed on the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge; bicyclists must use a bus to
make this crossing.
Existing Bikeways
The following are the known existing bikeways that have been identified by the
BPAC, with approximate measurements made by BPAC members:
1. Pacheco Hill Pathway: This paved path links Miller Creek Road in
Marinwood to Alameda del Prado in Ignacio, just north of the San Rafael city
limits.
2. Merrydale Hill Pathway: This paved pathway connects North San Pedro
Road to Lincoln Avenue by way of Merrydale Road to Merrydale Hill pathway.
This pathway is in the jurisdiction of Caltrans. In the near future, this pathway
will be relocated approximately 100 feet west of its present location. This new
class I pathway will be a 12 foot wide paved path with a 2 foot dirt shoulder on
either side. However, the steepness of both the pathway and Merrydale Road
connecting to the pathway will present an impediment to use by southbound
cyclists.
3. Baypoint Pathway: This pathway starts at the intersection of Bellam
Boulevard and Playa Del Rey and continues to Spinnaker Point Drive. The
length is approximately 0.4 miles and the width is 9 - 10 feet. The primary use
of this trail is recreational.
4. The Shoreline Park Path and Bay Trail: This recreational trail follows the
shoreline from Pickleweed park south to Francisco Blvd near Grange Way.
The length is about 1.9 miles of which one mile is paved. The width varies.
For a complete section-by-section description of this pathway, see the Appendix.
5. The Redwood Hwy. Frontage Rd to McInnis Park Pathway: This
pathway begins at Redwood Highway Frontage Road and continues east to
McInnis Park. The trail length is about 0.5 miles and width is 8 feet with a dirt
shoulder on either side.
Page 3-1
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
6. The Old Lucas Valley Road Pathway: This pathway starts at the
intersection of Lucas Valley Road and Mount Lassen Drive continuing to the
intersection with Upper Oak and Canyon Oak Drive. The length of this trail is
0.6 miles. The city of San Rafael and Marin County Open Space District have
jurisdiction of this pathway.
7. Walter Place Pathway: This pathway starts at the “T” intersection of Los
Ranchitos Road and Walter Place, just south of Mt. Olivet Cemetery. This
pathway is 180 feet long with a five to six foot width, and it crosses the
Northwestern Pacific Railway right-of-way.
Total length of Bikeways (Multi-Use Paths): approximately 2.7
miles
Existing Bike Lanes
The following street segments in San Rafael currently have bike lanes:
1. Andersen Dr: 2.0 miles.
This bike lane follows Andersen Drive from Lindaro St to Hwy. 580 at Sir
Francis Drake.
2. Las Gallinas Ave: 1.0 miles.
This bike lane follows Las Gallinas Ave. from Lucas Valley Rd. to Las
Colindas.
3. Bellam Boulevard: 0.1 miles.
This bike lane follows Bellam Blvd. from 24 Bellam Blvd to Andersen Dr.
both northern and southern routes.
4. Lincoln Avenue: 0.2 miles.
This bike lane follows Lincoln Avenue from where Lincoln Avenue and Los
Ranchitos Road merge at the top of the hill and runs south to Prospect
Ave.
5. Civic Center Drive and McInnis Parkway: Length 0.2 miles.
This bike lane follows Civic Center Drive from 400 Civic Center Drive to
330 feet north of McInnis Parkway.
6. Merrydale Overcrossing: Length 0.2 miles.
This bike lane follows the Merrydale Overcrossing (U.S. 101) from Civic Center
Drive to Las Gallinas Avenue.
7. Redwood Highway Frontage Road: Length 0.1 miles.
Page 3-2
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
This bike lane follows Redwood Highway frontage road from Professional
Center Drive to Marin Center Drive.
8. Bellam/Playa Del Rey: Length 0.1 miles.
This bike lane follows Baypoint Village Drive from Playa Del Rey to
Baypoint Drive.
9. Mahon Creek Path: Length 0.22 miles
This bike and pedestrian path way connects Lindaro to Francisco Blvd.
West
Total length of Bike Lanes: approximately 4.12 miles
Bike stations are
attended biketransit centers
that offer secure
valet bicycle
parking and other
transit amenities
such as rental
bikes, repairs,
and snacks.
Bikeway Support Facilities
Classification of Bicycle Parking Facilities
Class I: Class I bicycle parking facilities are provided in a secure, weatherprotected manner and location such as a bicycle locker, or a secure area like a
‘bike corral’ that may be accessed only by bicyclists.
Class II: Bicycle racks provide support for the bicycle and usually do not
have a locking mechanism. The cyclist provides his/her own lock(s).
Appropriate Class II racks should meet the following standards:
•
•
•
allow bicyclists to securely lock their frames and wheels,
secured to the ground,
located in highly visible areas.
Typically, variations on the “upside-down ‘U’” or “wave” racks meet these
standards. Racks that only support the front wheel of a bicycle do not.
Bike Stations
According to the
1990 Census
Journey to Work
data,
approximately
11% of San
Rafael residents
take transit to
work on an
average day.
“Bike Stations” can provide Class I bike parking. Bike stations are attended
bike-transit centers that offer secure valet bicycle parking and other transit
amenities such as rental bikes, repairs, and snacks. Such facilities are
currently in place at the Palo Alto Caltrain Station and Berkeley BART
Station and are currently under development at other major transfer centers in
the Bay Area.
Bicycle Parking – Existing Conditions
A field review found several locations in San Rafael with bike racks. Excluding
schools and parks, there is Class I parking at two locations, Class II at 11
locations, and sub-standard racks at three locations. Most of the schools
surveyed had sub-standard Class II racks (See the Appendix for details.)
Page 3-3
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Multi-Modal Connections
According to the 1990 Census Journey to Work data, approximately 11% of
San Rafael residents take transit to work on an average day. In San Rafael,
Golden Gate Transit (GGT) provides local bus service, regional bus service to
San Francisco, Santa Rosa and Richmond, and a shuttle to Larkspur to
connect with Golden Gate Ferry service to San Francisco. According to
Golden Gate Transit, approximately 88% of their buses had bike racks as of
mid-1999. They can be used day and night and at the same fare as a regular
passenger. Each rack holds two bicycles. The buses that do not have bike
racks are 45 feet long and state law forbids bike racks on them.
The #40 bus that links the San Rafael Transit Center with the City of Richmond
also allows bicycles inside the bus, as long as there is rear door wheelchair
access and room for the bicycles (passengers and wheelchairs take
precedence). The district runs a taxi shuttle for cyclist’s who are bumped from
buses that are filled with the maximum. The Golden Gate Transit ferries from
Larkspur Landing also accommodate bicycles: 25 bicycles are permitted on
the regular ferry, and 15 are permitted on the high-speed ferry. Golden Gate
Transit hopes to increase this number to about 20 bikes on both the existing
and future high-speed ferries.
While most of
San Rafael has
a continuous
sidewalk
network, there
are some
locations in the
city where
pedestrian
facilities could
be improved.
According to BPAC field surveys, Class II parking for about 16 bicycles exists
at the San Rafael Transit Center, but more than 16 bikes are typically found at
the center, many of them chained to posts or trees. Since almost the entire
population of San Rafael is within a five-mile bicycle ride of the Transit Center
– the upper limit of the distance that a typical cyclist will ride, according to
Bicycle Federation of America measurements – meeting bicycle parking
demand there should be a high priority.
Pedestrian Facilities
This section briefly describes the general conditions that exist in San Rafael
with regard to pedestrian facilities.
Sidewalks
While most of San Rafael has a continuous sidewalk network, there are some
locations in the city where pedestrian facilities could be improved.
There are places were sidewalks do not exist or end abruptly in some areas of
San Rafael. Examples are Sidewalks on Redwood Highway Frontage Road
and East Francisco Blvd. Also, there is no sidewalk on Mission St. from the
Library/City Hall area to Boyd Park. In some locations such as East Francisco
Boulevard, from Bellam Boulevard north, sidewalks are impacted by both
northbound and southbound bicyclists.
Page 3-4
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
There are places where wheelchair ramps do not exist or are in conflict with
sidewalk obstacles. Sidewalks are discontinuous in some places or are in
need of repair. Pedestrians may conflict with vehicle movements at certain
freeway on-ramps and off-ramps.
Page 3-5
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Chapter 4
Needs Analysis
This section presents material that provides the basis for the recommendations
made in Chapter 5.
As a community,
we need to
expand our
transportation
infrastructure in
the most
economical;
environmentally
responsible and
lowest impact
method available.
Bicyclists in San
Rafael include
employees who
ride to work,
children and
adults who ride
to school, and
people running
errands and
shopping.
As a community, we need to expand our transportation infrastructure in the
most economical, environmentally responsible and lowest impact method
available. As individuals, we need to commute to work, school and to
businesses in our neighborhoods while engaging in more exercise for
health and well-being. This plan attempts to address these needs through
sound transportation planning practice.
Commuter Bicycle Needs
According to a May 1991 Lou Harris Poll, it was reported that “...nearly
three million adults – about one in 60 – already commute by bike. This
number could rise to 35 million if more bicycle friendly transportation
systems existed.”
The parts of this plan that deal with bicycling focus primarily on the use of
bicycles for commuting – utilitarian trips made for the purpose of getting to
work or school, or for shopping, or other errands. It is therefore important
to understand the specific needs of bicycle commuters. Bicyclists in San
Rafael include employees who ride to work, children and adults who ride to
school, and people running errands and shopping. While recreational
cyclists often ride long distances and are not concerned with the time it
takes, commuting bicyclists are more interested in shorter trips. Typically,
they expect to ride less than three miles. Access to transit helps extend the
commute range of cyclists.
Bicycle commuters usually seek the most direct and fastest route available,
with regular adult commuters often preferring to ride on arterials rather than on
side streets or off-street facilities. Commute periods for bicyclists frequently
coincide with peak auto traffic periods, increasing exposure to potential
conflicts.
Rather than be directed to side streets, most commuting adult cyclists
would prefer to use bike lanes or wider curb lanes on direct routes.
Commuters generally prefer routes where they are required to stop as few
times as possible, thereby minimizing delay and conflict with other vehicles.
Besides traffic congestion, major concerns for bicycle commuters include
rain, riding in darkness, personal safety and security, and secure storage of
their bicycle at the end of the trip.
Page 4-1
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Traffic Congestion and Air Quality Benefits
A key goal of the Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan is to maximize the
number of local bicycle and pedestrian commuters in order to help reduce
traffic congestion and air pollution. In order to set the framework for these
benefits, national statistics and policies are used as a basis for determining
the benefits to Marin County.
The policy goal of this plan is for a combined bicycle and pedestrian mode
share of 20% of all local trips, including work, shopping and recreational
trips. While significantly higher than current rates, this goal is achievable
over the 20-year time frame of this plan if a comprehensive network of
bicycle and pedestrian facilities is completed as called for by project lists
herein. The goal is also supported by the following points:
The mild
climate of San
Rafael and the
residents’
health-oriented
lifestyle are
conducive to
walking and
biking.
•
According to the 1990 Census, 3.9% of San Rafael residents walk or
bike to work, and according to the Marin County Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan, 4.1% of Marin County workers walk or bike
to work.
•
In the Bay Area, Stanford and the City of Berkeley already
significantly exceed the 20%goal (not including student trips), and the
City of Calistoga comes close.
•
This is a 20-year plan.
•
The mild climate of San Rafael and the residents’ health-oriented
lifestyle are conducive to walking and biking.
•
Increased fuel costs and increased congestion over the next 20 years
will make walking and biking even more attractive.
Using figures from the Marin County Bicycle and Pedestrian Master Plan,
the BPAC estimated the impact of meeting various mode share goals.
Figure 4-1 below shows the effect on numbers of bicyclists and walkers,
daily vehicle trips and vehicle miles traveled if San Rafael can meet the
10.31% bike/walk mode split goal described in the County Bicycle and
Pedestrian Master Plan, and what happens if the city meets the 20% goal
described in this plan. To calculate the impact on San Rafael at 10.31%,
the BPAC simply took the countywide numbers and multiplied them by the
city’s share of the overall county population, 24.2%. For the 20% mode
share goals, the BPAC simply rounded up.
Page 4-2
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Figure 4-1 San Rafael Estimate of User Increases and Vehicle
Trips and Miles Saved
Scenario 1- Impact with 10.31% Bike/Walk Mode Share
When System is
Current
Completed
Increase
Mode Share
3.75%
10.31%
275%
Total Daily Bicycle/Walk
5,739
15,996
10,257
Commuters
Total Daily Bicycle/Walk Trips
11,479
31,992
20,514
Reduced Daily Vehicle Trips
7,820
22,134
14,192
Reduced Daily Vehicle Miles
13,996
39,011
25,014
Scenario 2 - Impact with 20% Bike/Walk Mode Share
When System is
Current
Completed
Increase
Mode Share
3.75%
20.00%
533%
Total Daily Bicycle/Walk
5,739
30,608
24,869
Commuters
Total Daily Bicycle/Walk Trips
11,479
61,221
49,742
Reduced Daily Vehicle Trips
7,820
41,707
33,887
13,996
74,645
60,649
Page 4-3
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Figure 4-2 Comparison of Mode Share
100.00%
96.25%
89.70%
90.00%
80%
80.00%
70.00%
60.00%
Walk/Bike mode share
50.00%
Automobile/Transit Share
40.00%
30.00%
20%
20.00%
10.00%
10.30%
3.75%
0.00%
Current
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Figure 4-3 Reduced Daily Vehicle Trips/Miles
80,000
74,645
70,000
60,000
50,000
39,011
40,000
10,000
Reduced daily vehicle trip
30,000
20,000
41,707
22,134
13,996
7,820
0
Current
Scenario 1
Scenario 2
Page 4-4
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Chapter 5
Proposed System and
Improvements
This chapter begins with the overall priorities of San Rafael residents, and
then describes the proposed infrastructure improvements that would meet
these priorities.
The most
frequently
requested
improvements
were for a
continuous
network of high
quality northsouth and eastwest bikeways
through the
County.
A. Community Priorities
The BPAC developed the following priorities list based on input to the Marin
County Bicycle Plan as well as additional comments from residents, cyclists
and pedestrians in San Rafael.
The most frequently requested improvements were for a continuous
network of high quality north-south and east-west bikeways through the
County. This includes San Rafael where a number of routes are needed
within the City. Other community priorities include the following:
•
The 1994 North-South Bikeway Feasibility Study provides the
framework for this ‘bicycle freeway’ envisioned as an unbroken path
following a combination of the railroad right-of-way and Highway 101.
The long-term alignment of this north-south bikeway would be
along the Northwestern Pacific Railroad right-of-way from Novato to
Larkspur, then along the existing path through Larkspur, then again
using the undeveloped right-of-way through Corte Madera, through
the partially collapsed Mill Valley Tunnel, and finally connect to the
existing Mill Valley-Sausalito path.
For certain segments, alternative alignments may be more feasible in
the short-term. One key segment is from Central San Rafael south to
Larkspur. It is desirable to connect the new bike lanes on Andersen
Dr. with the rail right-of-way near Bellam to form a Class I path to
Larkspur.
•
An equally high quality east-west bikeway is needed from San
Quentin through San Rafael to San Anselmo and Fairfax using
existing roads. East-West routes are also needed within San Rafael,
where several are necessary to serve the local population. The
routes would be mostly on street with limited off-street near West End
and perhaps Court Street. (See Chapter 5).
•
Requests for shoulder widening on many streets and roads. In San
Rafael these include Ranchitos Rd., Lucas Valley Road, and Lincoln
Ave.
Page 5-1
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
•
Requests for new Class II bicycle lanes on many existing roads,
such as Andersen Drive, Second and Third Streets, and Francisco
Blvd. East.
•
Improvements to existing bicycle lanes on Old Redwood Hwy.,
Civic Center Dr. and Bellam Blvd.
•
Improved pedestrian and bicycle crossings.
•
Allow bicycling over the Richmond-San Rafael Bridge.
•
Alternatives to sub-standard sidewalk/path along streets like East
Francisco Blvd., Mission near San Rafael High School, Grand Ave,
near the transit center, and along Redwood Highway in north San
Rafael.
•
Improve pedestrian access/safety and continuity on the main
arteries feeding the town center.
•
A bridge over the canal would make a much better connection
between the Canal Neighborhood and Downtown, San Rafael High,
and major employment and shopping centers.
A freeway crossover at Medway would greatly improve connectivity
between the canal area and the Woodland/Davidson school area.
•
•
Addition of curb cuts to meet ADA guidelines for pedestrians.
•
Improve pedestrian crossings through traffic calming, better
signage, enforcement, lighting and visibility, especially at crossings to
bus stops, libraries, schools, and other frequent destinations.
•
Create transit hubs in downtown areas that include bicycle parking
and storage, access to a park and ride lot, and a pedestrian plaza.
•
Two-way bicycle and pedestrian access to the Hammondale freeway
undercrossing at the top of Lincoln Ave.
•
A focus to encourage of safe and more frequent bicycling and
walking amongst school-age children.
•
The addition of a comprehensive destination–based bikeway and
walkway signing and/or marking system for Marin County.
•
The addition of high quality bicycle parking.
B. Bicycle Improvements in San Rafael – Specific Route
Projects
Proposed and existing bicycle routes are described in this section and
illustrated on the Bike Route Map. Each route is given a number and a short
general description is provided below as a supplement to the map.
Eighteen north-south routes are assigned odd numbers.
Page 5-2
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Thirteen east-west routes are assigned even numbers. The Committee
expects that a simplified system of route numbers may be needed for signage,
but the numbers shown here are useful during planning and development.
Bicycle improvements have been categorized as short term, medium term
and long term priority based on the following considerations:
Short Term: Bike route segments that are relatively low cost and require
only signage and striping/stenciling.
Medium Term: bike route segments that will require more work or require
further study. For example, in some cases parking may need to be moved,
or a median strip altered, or they may depend on the completion of some
other segment in order to be useful. For some Medium Term segments,
another jurisdiction may be involved, such as the County or the GGBHTD.
Long Term Bike Route segments all have some characteristic that makes
them difficult to complete. Reasons can include high cost, lack of space,
location outside of the city limits, uncertainty about plans by other agencies
or the need to build community support.
Short-term
projects require
only signage and
striping, and, if
feasible, be done
without
extensive
planning, design
work,
construction, or
high-level
decision-making.
Projects categorized as long term or medium term are no less important
than short term projects. In some cases, preliminary work needs to start
right away on medium and long term projects in order to assure completion
within the 10 or 20 year timetable. Therefore, the strategy is to do most or
all of the short-term priority improvements during the first five years and to
start planning and preliminary work soon on the top priority projects in the
medium and long categories. Projects are listed in priority order in Table
5.4.1, Pedestrian Priorities.
Within each category, the most important segments are listed first.
Individual Segments of each Route are listed below. The segments are
organized by priority as explained in the boxes below.
Short Term priority Segments (1 to 5 years)
•
These projects require only signage and striping, and, if feasible, be
done without extensive planning, design work, construction, or highlevel decision-making.
•
Projects with a priority “A” are recommended for completion in the 1st
year, “B” in the 2nd year, and so on.
•
The main north-south and main east-west routes are priority “A”.
Routes that are centrally located, and/or heavily used are priority “B”,
and the rest are “C”.
Page 5-3
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Figure 5-1
Priority
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
Short Term Bicycle Improvements (refer to Chap. 1 for a list of routes)
Route –
segment
01-01
01-03
01-11
01-13
01-21
01-23
06-07
09-02
09-03
09-04
09-05
12-01
12-03
12-05
14-01
32-01
05-01
05-05
05-07
05-09
B
B
B
B
B
B
06-05
06-09
13-05
13-07
13-09
19-03
B
B
B
B
B
C
C
24-05
24-06
24-07
24-09
24-11
01-15
01-17
02-07
C
C
C
C
C
02-09
03-01
04-03
04-501
SHORT Term Priority Segment: (1-5 years)
Miller Creek Rd. from Marinwood Ave. to Las Gallinas Ave.
(County route)
Las Gallinas Ave. from Miller Creek Rd. to Lucas Valley Rd.
(County route)
Northgate Dr. from Las Gallinas Ave. to Los Ranchitos Rd.
Los Ranchitos Rd. from Northgate Dr. to Lincoln Ave.
Irwin Ave. from Lincoln Ave. to Woodland Ave.
Woodland Ave. from Irwin Ave. to Bellam Blvd.
Point San Pedro Rd. from North San Pedro Rd. to Third St.
Villa Ave from the Hammondale Under-Crossing to Linden Ln.
Grand Ave. from Linden Ln. to Mission Ave.
Grand Ave. from Mission Ave. to Francisco Blvd East.
Grand Ave. from Villa to Mission
Greenfield Ave. from City Limit to Dunand Ave.
West End Ave. from Dunand Ave. to Marquard/Fourth St.
Fourth St from West End Ave. to Union St. [For an alternate,
see Route 24]
Andersen Dr. from Second St. to Lindaro St (south side only)
Harbor Dr. along Canal St. to the Bay Trail
Redwood Highway Frontage Rd. from Smith Ranch Rd. to
Professional Center Dr.
Redwood Highway Frontage Rd. and Civic Center Drive from
Marin Center Dr.
Civic Center Drive from Number 400
Civic Center Drive from 330 Feet north of McInnis Pkwy to
North San Pedro Rd.
North San Pedro Rd. from La Pasada to Point San Pedro Rd.
Third St. from Point San Pedro Rd. to Grand Ave.
Bellam Blvd. from Playa Del Rey to Kerner Blvd.
Bellam Blvd. from Kerner to Hwy. 580 interchange.
Bellam Blvd. from Hwy. 580 interchange to Andersen Dr.
Wolfe Grade from Antonette to Larkspur
[Route 24 is an alternate to Route 12, Segment 5]:
Second St. from West End Ave. to Miramar Ave.
Miramar Ave. and First St. from Second St. to E St.
First St. from E St. to D St.
First St. from D St. to B St.
First St. from B St. to A St.
Lincoln Ave. from Los Ranchitos Rd. to Prospect Ave.
Lincoln Ave. from Prospect Ave. to Fourth St.
Canyon Oaks Dr. from Old Lucas Valley Road to (new) Lucas
Valley Road.
Lucas Valley Rd. and Smith Ranch Rd. from Canyon Oaks Dr.
to Redwood Hwy.
Los Gamos Dr. from Lucas Valley Rd to Manual T. Freitas
Pkwy.
Manual T. Freitas Parkway from Marin Open Space to Las
Pavadas Ave.
Del Ganado from Terra Linda Open Space to Freitas Parkway
Class
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
3
3
3
2-3
3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
3
3
2-3
2-3
2-3
3
3
3
2-3
3
2-3
2-3
Page 5-4
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Priority
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
C
Route –
segment
10-01
10-03
16-01
16-03
21-01
23-01
23-03
23-05
35-01
35-03
Class
SHORT Term Priority Segment: (1-5 years)
Racquet Club Dr. from City limit to Fifth Ave.
Fifth Ave. from Racquet Club Dr. to K St.
Taylor St. from D Street to B St.
Woodland Ave. from B St. to Irwin St.
Irwin Ave. from Woodland Ave. to Tiburon Ave (at SR city limit).
Nova Albion Way from Las Gallinas Ave to Golden Hinde Blvd.
Golden Hinde Blvd from Nova Albion Way to Los Ranchitos Rd.
Nova Albion Way from Golden Hinde Blvd. to Northgate Dr.
Castlewood Drive form 25 Castlewood to Knight Drive
Knight Drive from Castlewood to Pt. San Pedro Rd.
3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
3
3
Medium Term Priority Segments (1 – 10 years)
•
These projects require moderate to extensive planning and design
work, minor to moderate construction and high-level approval. Most
do not involve other agencies or have an unusually high cost, but
may involve redesign of the median or intersections, the relocation of
parking, and other issues.
•
The “A” projects are probably easier to implement and should be
started right away, if feasible. “B” and “C” should be implemented
later during the 10-year Medium Term period, if feasible.
•
The main north-south and east-west routes are priority “A”. Routes
that are centrally located, and/or heavily used are priority of “B”, and
the rest are “C”.
Figure 5-2 Medium Term Bicycle Improvements
Priorit
y
A
Route –
segment
01-09
A
01-07
A
04-07
A
04-05
A
A
19-01
25-02
A
A
25-03
26-01
A
26-03
A
A
A
27-03
27-05
27-07
MEDIUM Term Priority Segment: 1-10 Years
Las Gallinas Ave. from Manual T. Freitas Pkwy. to
Northgate Dr.
Las Gallinas Ave. from Las Colindas Rd. to Manual T.
Freitas Pkwy.
Manual T. Freitas Parkway from Las Gallinas Ave. to
Northgate Dr.
Manual T. Freitas Parkway from Las Pavadas to Las
Gallinas Ave.
D St. from Fourth St. to Antoinette Ave.
Merrydale Rd. across the NWP right of way and across a
small creek to reach the continuation of Merrydale Rd. A
culvert or small bridge (bike/ped. access only) will be
needed.
Merrydale Rd. from NWP right of way to Las Gallinas Ave.
Francisco Blvd. West from Second Street to Medway
Overcrossing
Francisco Blvd. West from Medway Overcrossing to
Andersen Dr.
Canal from the Bridge to Harbor Drive
Harbor Drive from Canal St to Front St
Front St and Harbor Drive to Medway and Front St.
Class
3
2-3
2-3
2-3
3
1
2-3
1
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
Page 5-5
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Priorit
y
A
B
B
B
Route –
segment
27-09
06-01
06-03
09-01
B
B
B
B
B
B
10-07
10-09
10-11
10-12
10-13
15-01
B
15-03
B
B
B
15-05
15-07
25-01
B
25-05
B
C
C
C
22-03
02-01
02-03
02-11
C
04-09
C
C
C
04-11
09-07
09-09
C
C
C
10-05
31-01
33-01
MEDIUM Term Priority Segment: 1-10 Years
Mill St and Harbor Drive to Medway Rd
N. San Pedro Rd. from Los Ranchitos Rd. to Civic Ctr. Dr.
North San Pedro Rd from Civic Center Dr to La Pasada.
Hwy 101 east shoulder and off-ramp (northbound) from N
San Pedro Rd to Hammondale.
H St from Fifth Ave to Fourth St.
Fifth Ave from H St to Court St.
Fifth Ave from Court St to Grand Ave.
Court St from Fifth St to Mission Ave.
Mission Ave from Court St. to Grand Ave.
Kerner Blvd. from Bellam to the start of the Kerner Blvd.
gap.
Kerner Blvd. gap. This segment will close the gap north of
Shoreline
Kerner Blvd from Shoreline Pkwy to Grange Way.
Grange Way from Kerner Blvd from Francisco Blvd.
Merrydale Rd from Merrydale Overcrossing to NWP Rightof-way.
Merrydale Rd from Las Gallinas Ave to the existing
Merrydale Hill pathway.
Las Gallinas Ave from Corrillo Dr to Merrydale Rd.
Lucas Valley Rd. from Westgate Dr. to Mt. Lassen Dr.
Lucas Valley Rd. from Mt. Lassen Dr. to Canyon Oaks Dr.
Smith Ranch Rd. and Main Drive from Redwood Hwy.
Frontage to McInnis Park
Manual T. Freitas Pkwy. From Northgate Dr. to Las
Gallinas Ave.
Manual T. Freitas Parkway freeway overpass (Hwy. 101)
Francisco Blvd. East from Grand Ave. to Medway
Francisco Blvd. East from Medway to Main St. (Richmond
Bridge)
Fifth Ave from K St to H St.
A St from Fifth Ave to First St.
C St from Fifth Ave to First St.
Class
2-3
3
2-3
1-2
3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
2-3
Long Term Priority Segments (1 – 20 years)
•
These projects are very important but may be complicated, involve
other agencies, require community input, or need substantial funding,
extensive planning, and design and engineering work. They involve
major construction, road realignment, or other issues.
•
Priority “A” projects should be planned right away, and completed
first. “B” and “C” should be planned and implemented within 20
years.
Page 5-6
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
•
The main north-south and main east-west routes are priority “A”.
Other routes that are centrally located, and/or heavily used are
priority of “B”, and the rest are “C”.
Figure 5-3 Long Term Bicycle Improvements
Priority
A
A
Route –
segment
01-19
07-01
A
A
07-03
07-05
A
07-07
A
A
27-01
27-13
A
B
27-11
17-01
C
C
C
08-01
08-03
11-01
C
11-02
LONG Term Priority Segment:
1-20 Years
Lincoln Ave from Fourth Street to Irwin Ave.
NWP Right of Way from the San Rafael northern city limit to
Smith Ranch Rd.
NWP Right of Way from Smith Ranch Rd to the Transit Center
NWP Right of Way from the Transit Center to the San Rafael
southern city limit
NWP Right of Way from San Rafael southern city limit through
the Larkspur Tunnel.
Bridge over the San Rafael Creek from Third St to Canal St
Freeway Overcrossing from Francisco Blvd East to Francisco
Blvd West.
Medway Rd to Francisco Blvd. East.
Bay Trail spur from Hamilton to McInnis Park. The path from
the sewer plant to McInnis Park is paved.
Cantera Way from Point San Pedro Rd to the bay.
Bay Trail Spur from Cantera Way (end) to Point San Pedro Rd.
Bay Trail from Kerner Blvd to Shoreline Park (near Grange
Way).
Grange Way from Bay Trail to Francisco Blvd
Class
2-3
1
1
1
1
1
1
2-3
1
2-3
1
1
2-3
The following table lists the segments already completed or in the process
of being completed.
Figure 5-4 Existing Sections
01-0
01-05
02-05
04-01
05-03
13-01
13-03
14-03
14-05
18-01
18-03
22-01
24-15
Name of Existing Routes and Segments:
“Pacheco Hill Pathway” parallel to Hwy 101 from Novato to Miller
Creek.
Las Gallinas Ave from Lucas Valley Rd to Las Colindas Rd.
Old Lucas Valley Road from Mt. Lassen Dr to Canyon Oaks Dr.
Marin Open Space District pathway from City limit to Manual T
Freitas Parkway
Redwood Highway Frontage Rd from Professional Center Dr to
Marin Center
Baypoint Pathway from Spinnaker Point Dr to Baypoint Village Dr.
Baypoint Village Dr from Playa Del Rey to Baypoint Dr.
Andersen Dr from Lindaro St to Bellam Blvd segment (Existing).
Andersen Dr from Bellam Blvd to Sir Francis Drake Blvd/Hwy 580.
Gallinas Creek Pathway from Paul Drive to Yosemite Rd.
Gallinas Creek Path from Yosemite Rd to Smith Ranch Rd
Walter Place pathway from Los Ranchitos Rd to Corrillo Dr.
Mahon Creek Path from Lindaro St. to Francisco Blvd. West
Class
1
2
1
1
2 (partly done)
1
2
2
2
Path
1
1
1
Page 5-7
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
25-07
37-01
37-03
Merrydale Hill pathway from the south end of Merrydale Rd to Los
Ranchitos Rd.
Hwy 580 off ramp (westbound) from East Francisco Blvd to Sir
Francis Drake Blvd
Hwy 580 on ramp and Hwy 580 shoulder (eastbound) from Sir
Francis Drake Blvd to Main Street
1
2
2
C. Proposed County-Wide Gap Closure and Safety
Projects
The following section is a list of San Rafael projects from the Marin County
plan that are consistent with community priorities.
1. County Signing and Stenciling Program (A potential
countywide project)
Jurisdiction(s): County and local public works agencies
This project addresses one of the most common concerns expressed in
surveys and workshops: the lack of directional signage for bicyclists, and
signs warning and advising motorists of bicycles on the roadway. All
approved routes should be signed. This project could be implemented in
the following three phases:
a. Phase I: primary north-south and east-west routes
b. Phase II: rural recreational routes
Capital funding
for the projects
identified in this
Plan is available
through Federal
and State
sources, but
maintenance
funds are not
included.
c. Phase III: secondary routes
2. Bicycle and Pedestrian Maintenance & Development
Project
Jurisdiction(s): County and local agencies
Capital funding for the projects identified in this Plan is available through
Federal and State sources, but maintenance funds are not included. This
project would seek to establish a regular source of maintenance funds for
roadways and multi-use pathways in Marin County similar to the streetlight
agreement already in place.
In many cases, it would be more cost-effective to maintain and re-construct
facilities on a larger multi-jurisdictional level rather than have each local city or
town act independently. It should be noted that participation in such a program,
however, would be optional for the local jurisdictions.
Page 5-8
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Recommended minimum maintenance practices to be funded under this
project are presented below.
The annual maintenance cost of the bike path system is estimated to be
$90,000 countywide when it is fully implemented. Class I bike path and
sidewalk maintenance costs are based on $8,500 per mile, which covers
weekly trash removal, monthly sweeping, and bi-annual resurfacing and
repairs. Other maintenance costs include bike lane line and crosswalk restriping, sweeping debris, and tuning signals for bicycle and pedestrian
sensitivity.
3. Interchange Projects (Safety Projects)
Jurisdiction(s): Caltrans, local agencies
The City of San
Rafael should
continue to work
with Caltrans to
eliminate barriers
to walking and
bicycling from
one side of the
freeway corridor
to another.
U.S. 101 in Marin County acts as a major barrier for bicyclists and pedestrians
of all ages and abilities. This project recognizes both the complexity and the
similar nature of the issue from interchange to interchange. Many interchanges
share the same characteristics, meaning that prototype solutions probably
have wide applicability. Caltrans itself has modified interchanges in Marin,
notably the southbound East Blithedale off-ramp, partially to improve bicycle
and pedestrian safety.
The City of San Rafael should continue to work with Caltrans to eliminate
barriers to walking and bicycling from one side of the freeway corridor to
another, and to ensure that on- and off-ramps are as safe as possible for all
users.
4. Bellam-Francisco Bicycle/Pedestrian Project (Safety
Projects)
Jurisdiction(s): City of San Rafael, Caltrans
Staff, the public, and others consistently identified these two corridors in
San Rafael. Specifically, it was noted that this area has a high number of
people who are dependent on walking or bicycling as a primary mode of
transportation, plus numerous people riding bikes on sidewalks, and a
combination of heavy traffic volumes, numerous driveways, and
constrained roadway. Some surveys indicated specific problems with
school children in the Canal Neighborhood reaching Davidson Middle
School because of the traffic on Bellam at the I-580 ramps. People walking
or riding on East Francisco Blvd. towards the Montecito Shopping Center
was also identified as a high priority area.
Page 5-9
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
The corridor
between San
Anselmo and
San Rafael was
identified as a
major bicycling
route in public
workshops and
surveys.
Several potential solutions for this area are being explored, on of which to
explore the feasibility of a bicycle/pedestrian bridge connecting the east
side of US 101 to the west side.
Solutions on East Francisco Blvd. are more problematic due to the
constrained roadway. A drawbridge connection leading directly from the
Canal Neighborhood to San Pedro Rd. near San Rafael High School has
been proposed. While this project would help provide people
walking/bicycling on East Francisco Blvd. with a viable option, additional
feasibility work is required.
5. San Rafael – San Anselmo Connector (Safety Projects)
Jurisdiction(s): City of San Rafael/City of San Anselmo
The corridor between San Anselmo and San Rafael was identified as a
major bicycling route in public workshops and surveys. Bicyclists typically
use Greenfield as an alternative to the busy Red Hill/4th St. (Miracle Mile)
corridor. Specific problem areas include the crossing from West End to 4th
Street, and 2nd Street between West End and 1st Street. A feasibility study
is needed to identify the best and most effective improvements.
6. Safe Routes to Schools Projects (Safety Projects)
Jurisdiction(s): Local agencies, school districts, community
groups
School commute improvements were a major focus of public and staff
comments, partially out of concerns about current safety and impacts of
school-related traffic, and partially because of new State funding
opportunities.
7. San Rafael - Larkspur Gap Closure Project (Gap Assure
Project)
Jurisdiction(s): San Rafael, Larkspur, Marin County, GGBHTD,
Caltrans
Along with the two previous gap closure projects, this is a key project that
helps overcome one of the largest barriers in Marin County. Bicycle and
pedestrian movement between San Rafael and southern Marin is limited to
steep routes on Wolfe Grade or Via Cumbre, or very heavy traffic and an
unprotected crossing on East Sir Francis Drake (ESFD) and Andersen
Drive. This project would open up connections to the Larkspur Ferry
Terminal, and numerous schools, employment and shopping areas, and
virtually all movement in the north-south direction.
There are several approaches to this multi-jurisdictional project.
Page 5-10
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Option #1: construct shoulders or bike lanes on ESFD from the ferry
terminal to Andersen Drive. Signalize and improve this intersection, if
feasible, and provide new bike lanes on Andersen.
Option #2: construct a new Class I bike path on the north side of ESFD
from the Larkspur Landing Circle signalized intersection to Andersen
Drive. Provide new bike lanes on Andersen.
Option #3: construct a Class I pathway on the NWP right-of-way from
ESFD up to the tunnel portal, ramp up and around the portal to the U.S.
101 cut, connect through the cut, and then ramp back down to the NWP
right-of-way.
Option #4: construct a Class I path on the NWP right-of-way through the
tunnel and on to a connection with Andersen in San Rafael.
8. Puerto Suello Gap Closure Project (Gap Closure Project)
Jurisdiction(s): San Rafael, Marin County, GGBHTD, Caltrans
Unlike other gap closure projects in Southern or Central Marin, there are
existing direct, local streets (Lincoln Avenue and Ranchitos Rd) available to
bicyclists and pedestrians over Puerto Suello Hill. While these routes do
carry moderate to heavy traffic volumes, neither corridor was identified as a
major constraint by experienced bicyclists in surveys or workshops other
than the lack of bike lanes or shoulders. Marin County currently has plans
to provide bike lanes on a portion of Ranchitos Road. However, Class II
bike lanes cannot be accommodated on the full length of Lincoln because
of its constrained roadway width. It is recommended that the feasibility of a
contra-flow bike connection be explored to transition northbound cyclists on
Grand Avenue under US 101 (Hammondale undercrossing) at Villa Ave. to
connect to the West Side 101 Bike Path.
Use of the NWP right-of-way from Central San Rafael northward as a
bikeway is directly linked to future rail use. Due to the expansion of U.S.
101 through this area, the railroad corridor will be reduced to 30 feet total,
leaving no possibility of shared use. Expanding the right-of-way further
would require the removal of numerous additional homes in this corridor,
which is neither likely nor desirable. Should rail service not prove practical,
a bike path could use this corridor and possibly the existing Puerto Suello
tunnel. Other related components of this project could include:
Use of the NWP
right-of-way from
Central San
Rafael northward
as a bikeway is
directly linked to
future rail use.
•
re-construction of the Merrydale path as part of the U.S. 101 project
•
improvements to the North San Pedro Road/US 101 undercrossing
pathway
•
potential extension of Merrydale for bicycles and pedestrians only,
across the railroad tracks and over a small creek. The feasibility of
this option is dependent on approval by the California PUC and NWP
owners/operators.
Page 5-11
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
9. Regional Connection Projects (Gap Closure Project)
Jurisdiction(s): Marin County, Caltrans, Novato, San Rafael
North-South Bikeway (Shared Rail-with-Trail)
Should rail service
be implemented,
then a bike path
would need to be
located so that it
meets the latest
Federal Railway
Administration
and California
Public Utility
Commission
requirements.
Much of the proposed North-South Bikeway in central and southern Marin
is proposed to be located on the old Northwestern Pacific Railroad right-ofway. This right-of-way runs through San Rafael from the city line on the
north, through a tunnel at Puerto Suello Hill, through the center of town
(where it bisects the Transit Center), and continues south to the city line
where it enters the short Larkspur Tunnel. The corridor is held in trust by
the Golden Gate Bridge Highway and Transportation District (GGBHTD).
Width of this right-of-way varies from 37 ft to 100 ft throughout its length.
The San Rafael General Plan currently calls for this corridor to be
developed as a Class I multi-use path.
North of San Rafael, from Terra Linda through Novato and on to Petaluma
and Black point, the short- to mid-term recommendations are mostly
located on existing streets. As discussed earlier, the feasibility of sharing
the railroad right of way north of San Rafael is largely dependent on the
future of rail service in this corridor. Should rail service not prove practical,
then a bike path could be constructed on the right of way to Ignacio.
Should rail service be implemented, then a bike path would need to be
located so that it meets the latest Federal Railway Administration and
California Public Utility Commission requirements. Additional research
being conducted by the Federal Highways Administration and Federal
Railroad Administration points to a recommended setback of 25 feet, with
15 feet being a minimum setback when combined with fencing. For most of
the NWP right of way north of San Rafael, this would place a bike path in
the adjacent wetlands, or force it to climb the embankments through cut
sections. While both of these options are physically possible, they would be
expensive and politically challenging. The boardwalk option through the
wetlands requires extensive environmental analysis to determine potential
impacts.
10. Signals and Lighting Improvements and Upgrades.
Recommendation: Create a program to install and mark signal loop
detectors that are responsive to bicycles at existing and new intersections.
Such markings should show cyclists where to stand to trip lights. One
suggested site for bicycle-sensitive traffic signals is North San Pedro Road at
Merrydale Road.
Page 5-12
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
D. Pedestrian Improvements in San Rafael
Accessibility, continuity, and connectedness of pedestrian facilities are key
features of this element. Listed below are recommendations for pedestrian
improvements identified in field surveys conducted by BPAC members.
More improvements will be identified later by the Safe Routes to Schools
program and by neighborhood associations.
Safe Routes to School
Accessibility,
continuity, and
connectedness
of pedestrian
facilities are
key features of
this plan.
It is recommended that San Rafael embrace and encourage the Safe
Routes to Schools program. Among other things, it can provide valuable
suggestions for improved pedestrian facilities.
During the first months and years of this plan, we propose to take advantage of
the Safe Routes to Schools program to help identify additional specific
pedestrian improvements. Neighborhood associations will be invited to identify
problem areas for pedestrians and school children, and that input will also be
incorporated. Articles should be placed in the neighborhood newspapers to
stimulate more community involvement.
Safe Routes to Schools addresses the daily gridlock of school traffic through a
combination of education, activities, and engineering solutions. It encourages
more walking and biking to school through in-class activities, contests and
events, and organized “school pools” of parents escorting children by foot, bike
or carpool. It also identifies problem areas that need to be improved.
The following table (Figure 5-5) is a listing of pedestrian improvements in
priority order.
Figure 5-5
Specific Pedestrian Improvements
Location
Villa/Highway 101
Underpass
Issue
One way underpass.
Puerto Suello Hill to
North San Pedro
Road, on East side
of US 101
Narrow path next to busy
freeway lane.
Merrydale Road to
Civic Center Drive
(under US 101)
[see segment 025002 in figure 5.2]
Gap in Merrydale Rd
Project
Change travel under freeway from
one way to both directions for
better pedestrian and bicycle
access to west side of 101 and
Lincoln Avenue, by eliminating one
automobile travel lane.
Improve and construct pedestrian
(and bicycle) sidewalk
Pave over railroad tracks that split
Merrydale South of the Merrydale
Overpasses, and add a bridge over
the creek to make Merrydale Road
continuous for pedestrian and
bicycle access.
Page 5-13
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Location
D Street (Wolf
Grade):
Los Gamos and
Northgate at Freitas
Parkway
East Francisco
Boulevard
US101
Overcrossing at
Medway St
Canal Bridge
Francisco
Boulevard West.
Vallecito School:
Lucas Valley Rd at
Miller Creek.
Mission from
Tamalpais Ave to
San Rafael High
School.
Old Redwood Hwy
frontage road from
Smith Ranch Road
to Freitas Parkway
Grand & Elm
Issue
Busy road; lots of pedestrians
including children; and no
sidewalk
Offset intersection; pedestrians
crossing divided parkway; poor
visibility; and no crosswalks.
Narrow, incomplete, broken,
and heavily used sidewalk
situated next to a busy street
with no parking.
The freeway is a barrier to
pedestrians who sometimes run
across 6 lanes of traffic to cross
the freeway.
The canal separates bikes and
pedestrians from San Rafael
High School, Montecito
Shopping Center, and down
town, and forces them to use
busy Francisco Blvd East.
Sidewalks are missing in many
places and there are no bike
lanes. This is a major route to
Davidson Middle School.
Inadequate sidewalks on Nova
Albion Way.
Falling hazard. The bridge
railings are sub-standard, only
about 18” high, and the creek is
deep.
Narrow street and heavy traffic
during school hours. Bike and
pedestrian facilities are poor.
Irregular sidewalk made of
asphalt on sections.
Sidewalk from Mitchell Drive to
Professional Center Parkway is
broken, disjointed, narrow, and
missing altogether at some
locations.
There is only 1 curb cut and
bushes and dirt block the
sidewalk and impede access on
the northeast corner.
Project
Provide sidewalks or shoulders, as
feasible.
Redesign the offset intersection to
provide continuous north-south
pedestrian and bicycle movements.
Improve/construct (widen
sidewalks)
Construct a Pedestrian & Bicycle
over-crossing across the freeway at
the location of East Francisco and
Medway Street/Louise Street
connecting to West Francisco
Boulevard (and/or to Andersen Dr).
Construct a bridge over or under
the canal for easier
pedestrian/bicycle movement.
Improve and construct sidewalk
going from San Rafael Transit
Center out Francisco Boulevard
West to Andersen Drive.
Note: As part of the US 101
freeway widening HOV project,
Caltrans will put in a new 4 ft.
sidewalk along West Francisco
Boulevard.
Construct new sidewalk to reduce
pedestrian car conflicts.
Raise the height of the railing on
both sides of the Miller Creek
Bridge on Lucas Valley Road near
Canyon Oaks Drive.
Consider legal use of sidewalk for
bikes on Mission from Tamalpais
Ave to San Rafael High School.
Improve sidewalks. Add curb cuts
needed at Grand & Mission. Add
pedestrian and bike signage in this
section of Mission.
Repair broken sidewalk. Complete
all of the gaps on east side of street
to make continuous. Widen
sidewalk where the Fairchild
property is being redeveloped.
Add curb cuts, cut bushes, and
clean up dirt at north east corner.
Page 5-14
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Location
Los Ranchitos from
North San Pedro to
Hammondale &
Lincoln.
Civic Center Drive
from MT Freitas
Parkway Overpass
To North San Pedro
Road.
Merrydale Road at
the NWP tracks.
Larkspur Street
from Kerner To
Canal.
Mission and Grand
intersection
Canal from Harbor
to Medway
Hammondale &
Lincoln intersection.
Los Ranchitos Rd
from Northgate to
North San Pedro
Rd.
Francisco
Boulevard from
Grange Way to
Highway 580. (At
approximately 2165
E. Francisco Bld).
Issue
There is no place to walk along
this stretch. The fog lane
pinches out in places, and there
is only a ditch and
embankment, but no path or
sidewalk. (This is also a very
bad stretch for bikes.)
No sidewalk south of Gable
Court.
Project
Widen the northbound shoulder to
create a dirt path, and trim
branches.
Create a wide fog lane on the
southbound direction.
Reduce vehicle lane width to create
a wider paved shoulder.
Finish connecting missing gaps in
the sidewalk.
The railroad tracks and creek
form a barrier to pedestrians
(and bicycles). There is no
sidewalk on Merrydale between
the Merrydale OC and the NWP
RR tracks. This street would be
a great pedestrian & bike route
if it were continuous.
There are many pedestrians;
uncut bushes obstruct the
sidewalk; and only a few cross
walks exist.
Add a sidewalk or dirt/gravel path
on the west side of Merrydale (next
to the cemetery). Add a crossing
for the railroad right of way. Add a
bike and pedestrian bridge over the
small creek.
No traffic light, no cross walk
signs on Mission. This is a very
busy street.
No sidewalk on one side of
street.
Pedestrian facilities are missing
on southeast corner. Need
cross walk on Lincoln and on
Hammondale, east side of
intersection. Sidewalk is
broken or missing on southwest corner and blocked by
bushes. The Hammondale
under-crossing has a very
narrow sidewalk and is difficult
to access.
Install traffic calming devices
(roundabout & speed bumps) along
Larkspur at Larkspur & Canal. Cut
brush obstructing the sidewalk. Add
a few cross walks.
Add a traffic light and pedestrian
crosswalk signs.
Add sidewalk where missing.
Add a sidewalk to east side of
Lincoln approaching the
intersection. Add crosswalks with
lights and pushbuttons on east side
of intersection. Repair and
complete sidewalk on the
southwest corner of the intersection
& trim bushes. Improve pedestrian
access to the underpass and widen
the sidewalk.
No sidewalk (but has generous
fog line area.)
Add a sidewalk, or at least a dirt or
gravel path to the east side of the
road through here.
There is a bus stop sign, but no
shelter or bus pad here. There
is a small business center here
and this stop is a link to the
Richmond Bridge & Sir Francis
Drake Blvd. Sidewalk ends at
Bay Park.
Complete sidewalk on the east side
of the street.
Improve the bus stop at 2165 E.
Francisco Blvd.
Page 5-15
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Location
Grand and 5th Ave
intersection
Grand from Elm to
Villa.
Grand and 2nd
Street intersection
Grand from Locust
to Newhall
Grand from Jewel
to Locust
North San Pedro
Road from city limit
to Lincoln
East Francisco from
Pelican Way to the
end.
Davidson Middle
School access via
Woodland
Medway and Canal
from E Francisco
Blvd to Novato St.
Belvedere at Alto
and Tiburon streets
intersection
Tamalpais Ave at
Mission
Bellam and
Andersen Drive
intersection.
Mission Street from
the Library/City Hall
area to Boyd Park.
•
Issue
Curb cuts lacking on the west
side.
Gravel sidewalk on the east
side, paved sidewalk on the
west side. No sidewalk on the
east side of Grand, from Grand
& Elm part way to Grand Court
to Grand.
On the Northeast. corner at
Chevron station, the signal light
pole is in the sidewalk, and a
curb is needed.
Mountain View & Grand has no
curb cuts on east side. Area
varies from no sidewalk to dirt
or gravel sidewalks. Newhall &
Grand, no curb cuts. Sidewalk
is gravel and dirt.
No sidewalks in some parts.
No curb cuts at Grand & Watt,
Grand & Locust.
Sidewalks missing in many
areas. Pedestrians have
problems crossing the onramps at the freeway.
No sidewalk.
Project
Install curb cuts on the northwest
and southwest corners.
Add a sidewalk to the east side of
Grand.
Move stop light and install curb cut
on northeast corner.
Add sidewalks where missing
Add curb cuts at Newhall & Grand.
Add sidewalks where missing,
Add curb cuts at the Grand & Watt,
and Grand & Locust intersections
Add sidewalks on at least one side
of North San Pedro Road. Improve
pedestrian crossings of the freeway
on and off ramps.
Add a sidewalk on the east (nonfreeway) side of East Francisco.
Children walk along Woodland,
which is fast, narrow, and has
many parked cars, business &
driveways.
Narrow street, fast traffic,
parked cars, no crosswalks.
Educate kids on traffic safety &
safe routes. Slow Woodland traffic
with signs and speed humps.
No crosswalk. This is an oddly
shaped intersection with lots of
cars, bikes, and pedestrians.
Curb cut on east side of
Tamalpais.
Very busy intersection with no
pedestrian signal or curb cuts.
Add crosswalks.
There is no sidewalk.
Add crosswalks and more stop
signs along Canal and Medway.
Add a curb cut on the east side of
Tamalpais at Mission.
Add pedestrian signals with push
buttons.
Add curb cuts on all 4 corners.
Conduct a study to find the best
solution is this area. A standard
concrete sidewalk may not fit in
well at this location.
Pedestrian improvements are not grouped by time period, but are designated as
either “A”, “B”, or “C” with “A” the most important. Note that the bridge projects
Page 5-16
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
are included with the bike route segments because they serve both bicycles and
pedestrians.
Figure 5-6 Pedestrian Priorities
Priority:
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
B
C
C
C
C
C
C
Pedestrian Projects:
1. Villa/Highway 101 Underpass.
2. Puerto Suello Hill to North San Pedro Road, on East side of Hwy 101.
4. D Street (Wolf Grade)
6. East Francisco Boulevard.
10. Francisco Boulevard West.
14. Old Redwood Highway Frontage Road from Smith Ranch Road to Freitas Parkway.
16. Los Ranchitos from North San Pedro to Hammondale & Lincoln.
18. Merrydale Road from Merrydale Overcrossing to end at NWP tracks.
22. Hammondale & Lincoln intersection.
27. Grand and 2nd Street intersection.
34. Belvedere at Alto/Tiburon streets intersection.
36. Bellam at Andersen Drive intersection.
3. Merrydale Road to Civic Center Drive (under highway 101)
8. Hwy 101 Overcrossing at Medway
9. Canal Bridge (or tube or ferry)
11. Vallicito School sidewalk improvement
13. Mission from Tamalpais Ave to SR High School.
15. Grand & Elm
17. Civic Center Dr. from MT Freitas Parkway Overpass To N. San Pedro Road.
19. Larkspur Street from Kerner To Canal.
20. Mission and Grand intersection.
21. Canal from Harbor To Medway.
23. Los Ranchitos Rd from Northgate to N San Pedro Rd.
26. Grand from Elm to Villa.
28. Grand from Locust to Newhall
29. Grand from Jewel to Locust.
30. N San Pedro Rd from city limit to Los Ranchitos Rd.
32. Davidson Middle School access via Woodland.
33. Medway and Canal from E Francisco Blvd to Novato Street
37. Mission Street from the Library/City Hall area to Boyd Park.
5. Los Gamos and Northgate at Freitas Parkway
12. Lucas Valley Rd at Miller Creek, railings.
24. Francisco Blvd from Grange Way to Hwy 580. (At approx. 2165 E. Francisco Blvd).
25. Grand and 5th Ave intersection.
31. East Francisco from Pelican Way to the end.
35. Tamalpais
Page 5-17
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Chapter 6
Implementation Cost
Estimates
Figures 6-1, 6-2, and 6-3 show estimated costs for program elements.
Most improvements are eligible for funding through a variety of State and
Federal sources.
Figure 6-1 SHORT TERM Cost Estimates (YEARS 1-5)
Expense of Item
Signs
Striping
Stencils
Curb Cuts
Year(s)
2001-2004
2001-2004
2001-2004
2001-2004
Feet or #. of
Signs
590
195,450 Ft.
521
100
Type
Signs
Striping
Stencils
Curb cut
Cost
$55,500
$306,000
$130,000
$150,000
Figure 6-2 MEDIUM TERM Cost Estimates (YEARS 1-10)
Expense of Item
Signs
Striping
Stencils
Bridges
Curb Cuts
Class 1
Year(s)
2001-2010
2001-2010
2001-2010
2001-2010
2001-2010
Feet or #. of
Signs
359
116,000 Ft.
311
2
100
2001-2010
3,662 Ft.
Type
Signs
Striping
Stencils
Curb cut
Multiuse
Cost
$34,000
$183,000
$78,000
$2,000,000
$150,000
$13,500
Figure 6-3 LONG TERM Cost Estimates (YEARS 1-20)
Expense of Item
Signs
Striping
Stencils
Bridges
Curb Cuts
Rail Trail
Year(s)
2001-2020
2001-2020
2001-2020
2001-2010
2001-2010
2001-2010
Feet or # of
Signs
125
15,369 Ft.
41
2
50
45,137 Ft.
Type
Signs
Striping
Stencils
Curb cut
Multiuse
Cost
$12,000
$24,000
$10,000
$2,000,000
$75,000
$000,000
Page 6-1
APPENDIX A
Detailed Trail Descriptions
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Appendix A
Detailed Trail
Descriptions
The Shoreline Park Path and Bay Trail - Recreational:
(Note: this description runs from south to north.)
This trail starts in San Rafael at Shoreline Park and continues east for 982
feet before ending at H. and H. Storage at 2167 East Francisco Boulevard.
Then the Trail becomes a small dirt path for1238 feet, then is paved again
for 165 feet to a T-junction trailhead intersection at Pelican Way and
Glacier Point. The width is just over 9 feet. Benches are distributed
throughout this section of the pathway.
Continuing east, the paved path stops at 700 feet and becomes a dirt path
and continues for 980 feet to a T-junction. The pathway continues 1420
feet onto a breakwater levy multi-use dirt pathway, which varies in width
from 18 to 22 feet. This section ends at the Baypoint housing complex.
The next section measures 3300 feet in length, and is 11 feet wide with a
2-foot shoulder on the inland side and one-foot shoulder bayside. Benches
are provided alongside the trail. The total length of all paved sections of
this pathway is one mile.
Page A-1
APPENDIX B
Bicycle Parking & Restroom Facilities
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Appendix B
Bicycle Parking &
Restroom Facilities
•
San Rafael Transit Center - high quality racks exist that can
accommodate about 16 bicycles. Observations indicate that this is
inadequate to serve the existing and projected demand.
•
San Rafael City Hall - a Class 2 bike rack was recently installed.
•
Dominican College in San Rafael - there is a mixture of Class 2
and sub-standard bike racks.
•
Guide Dogs for the Blind - has Class 2 bike racks. Showers and
lockers are also part of their facility.
•
Fair Isaac - showers, lockers and Class 2 bike racks are provided
•
AutoDesk - Class 2 bike racks exist outside most of the buildings.
Showers and lockers are available through a gym membership,
which the AutoDesk Company subsidizes.
•
United Market - employees are allowed to bring their bikes into a
storage area.
•
Montecito Shopping Center - there are two separate substandard bike racks each holding one bicycle.
•
Northgate Mall - Five or six Class 2 bike racks exist.
•
Northgate I - One Class 2 bike rack but none near the Safeway
store or Starbucks.
•
San Rafael Public Library - bike racks exist but are substandard.
•
Jackson’s Hardware - One Class 2 rack.
•
Albert Park and Mary B Freitas Park - have Class 2 racks.
•
The Shamrock Center - Class 2 bike racks exist.
•
Whole Foods - has Class 2 bike racks
Page B-1
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Bicycle Parking
Note: To be effective, bicycle parking must be located in secure, visible,
and convenient locations.
•
Install adequate bike parking on busy commercial roads such as
Fourth St.
•
Expand and improve bike parking at the Transit Center.
•
Encourage operators of shopping centers, large businesses, and
employment centers, hospitals, schools, and public buildings to
install secure bike parking.
•
Install adequate amount of secure parking at all public parks and
recreation centers.
Bike Stations
Another approach to providing Class I bike parking is the creation of a Bike
Station. Bike stations are attended bike transit centers that offer secure
valet bicycle parking and other transit amenities to encourage the use of a
bicycle as a transportation mode. Three facilities are currently operating in
California cities including Long Beach, Palo Alto and Berkeley.
The Palo Alto Bike station is funded by the City of Palo Alto and a grant
from the Bay Area Air Quality Management District. Operating in an old
baggage building, it works like a coat check: People leave their bikes while
they commute on the train or bus, or while visiting Palo Alto. There is no
charge for bicycle storage. The facility is open weekdays from 6:00 AM to
8:00 PM, and on weekends from 9:00 AM to 6:00 PM.
In addition to bike storage there is a mechanic on duty to perform repairs
and adjustments. The bike station also offers a coffee bar and patio
seating, a changing area, and education programs including bicycle safety
and maintenance workshops. There is a corporate commute program
where companies can reserve bicycles for their employees to travel to and
from the transportation center.
Page B-2
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Restrooms & Bike Racks in City of San Rafael Parks and
Recreation Centers
Albert Park
Portable Restroom
1- Bike Rack
Boyd Park
Portable Restroom
0 - Bike Rack
Freitas Park
1- Bike Rack
Gerstle Park
0 - Bike Rack
Peacock Gap Park
0 - Bike Rack
Santa Margarita Park
1- Bike Rack
Sun Valley Park
Bike Rack
0-
Victor Jones Park
Bret Harte Park
Bike Rack
0 - Bike Rack
Portable Restroom (Seasonal)
1-
Pickleweed Recreation Center:
Building Restroom
2 - Portable Restrooms
1 - Bike Rack
San Rafael Recreation Center
Building Restroom
1 - Bike Rack
Terra Linda Recreation Center
Building Restroom,
1 - Portable Restroom (Seasonal) 1 - Bike Rack
Page B-3
APPENDIX C
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Appendix C
Skills Development Programs
This plan recommends that San Rafael develop safety programs for
cyclists and pedestrians such as Safe Routes to School and Trips for Kids.
For seniors, the plan describes "Walking Through The Years," a program
provided through the American Association of Retired Persons, American
Automobile Association, and the National Safety Council.
A National Safety Council pedestrian safety program for elementary (K- 6)
school bus riders is also available. The program contains materials for
teachers, parents, and bus drivers. Five videos, K-6 curricula, and
information pamphlets make up the program materials which are available
as the "Walk-Ride-Walk: Getting to School Safely" program. (Call 708-7752307.)
Administrators and Advocates
Programs also exist for administrators, bike and pedestrian advocates and
program administrators, and for the police. The National Highway Institute
provides a 3-day training program for government representatives and
public interest groups in the latest findings and foundations of the
pedestrian and bicyclist areas relative to safety and accommodations. The
course presents safety problems and provides countermeasure and
design information. The course number is 38061. (Call 703-235-0528.)
Police can get training on how to classify police crash reports into the
NHTSA/FHWA (Federal Highway Administration) pedestrian and bike
crash types. It is recommended that the SRPD obtain this training. The
same program then will serve to create an operational database that
identifies pedestrian and bicyclist safety problems at the local level.
Existing Bicycle Safety Education Programs
Local nonprofit organizations offer a variety of safety education programs in
San Rafael. Safe Routes Marin, Safe Routes to Schools, the Bicycle Trails
Council of Marin (BTCM), and Trips for Kids offer skill and other education
programs for adults and youth. Safe Routes to Schools also organizes walk
and bike pools and special events that promote walking and biking to
school.
Page C-1
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Safe Routes to Schools
Successful in Australia, Europe, and British Columbia, Safe Routes to
Schools increases the health and safety of children, reduces traffic around
schools, and fosters a stronger sense of community.
The program operates through a team building process, bringing together
parents, children, neighbors, teachers, police, public and school officials to
study the problem and create innovative solutions. The team begins with
identifying the road networks leading to the schools, recognizing the
hazardous areas, and recommending possible solutions. The local
jurisdiction works to find funding sources to implement feasible solutions.
Trips for Kids Marin
A Bay Area non-profit with facilities in San Rafael provides mountain bike
outings and environmental education for kids who would not otherwise be
exposed to these types of activities. Their goal is to combine lessons in
personal responsibility, achievement and environmental awareness through
development of practical skills and the simple act of having fun (including
riding bicycles).
The Trips for Kids Re-Cyclery program focuses on recycling used bikes
and bike parts through its thrift store, and provides job-training programs for
youth. These recycled bikes provide safe, environmentally friendly and
affordable transportation for both children and adults.
Page C-2
APPENDIX D
Bicycle Advocacy Groups
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Appendix D
Bike Advocacy
Groups that are active in San Rafael and seem relevant to this Plan are
included here.
•
San Rafael BPAC was created to develop a bicycle and pedestrian
master plan for the City of San Rafael and pursue grant funding.
The BPAC also promotes public involvement and support for biking
and walking as a viable alternative to driving. Contact: City
Managers office, (415) 485-3070
•
Safe Route to Schools offers bicycle and pedestrian safety and
educational programs in selected schools in San Rafael and plans
to expand to all interested schools. It establishes safe routes
“teams” of parents, neighbors, and other stakeholders. These
teams organize "walking school buses," bike pools, and special
events that promote walking and biking to school. They also work
with local jurisdictions to improve safety conditions on the streets
surrounding the school sites. Contact (415) 488-4101 or
wkallins@igc.org.
Bicycle Trails Council of Marin (BTCM), an informational and
educational non-profit founded in 1987 that sponsors free monthly
skill classes and other education programs. BTCM also helps
maintain and build trails. They can be reached at:
www.btcmarin.org or 488-1665.
•
•
Transportation Alternatives of Marin (TAM) a non-profit
organization that works to promote bicycling in Marin.
•
Trips for Kids is an organization based in San Rafael that 1) takes
inner city kids on mountain bike rides, 2) offers bicycle riding
classes, 3) recycles bikes, and 4) runs 2 shops with used cycles
and gear. Trips for Kids can be reached at 458-2986 or
tfkbike@pacbell.net.
Bike the Bridge! Coalition was founded in 1996 and is working to
secure bicycle access on all Bay Area bridges, including the
Richmond-San Rafael Bridge. They can be reached at:
www.bikethebridge.org.
•
•
Marin County Bikeways Committee provides recommendations to
the Board of Supervisors on bicycle policies and practices in Marin
County.
•
Cal Park Connection A citizens group that seeks to close the gap
for pedestrians and bicycles between San Rafael and Larkspur. Cal
Page D-1
CITY OF SAN RAFAEL
Park Connection favors opening the Larkspur tunnel as a Class I
bike path or install a Class I path parallel to Hwy 101. CPC can be
reached at cpc_gap@yahoo.com
•
Marin County Bicycle Coalition (MCBC), a non-profit organization
founded by cyclists in 1998 to unify bicyclists in Marin. The MCBC
has produced a countywide bicycle map, available at bike shops.
The MCBC can be reached at: www.marinbike.org or (415) 4563469.
•
Share The Road program, which includes signs, posters, and
educational programs, has the goal of making it safer to bicycle and
drive in Marin County. Contact: malcolm@sharetheroad.com or
visit: www.sharetheroad.com
.
Page D-2
ONE
DR
D MT
DR
A
TE
OP
E
O O D
E W
L
E
AC
I
ETTA
CT.
01003
E
AV
IN
AS
LL
GA
S
DE
RIV
D
LL
EY
RD.
TH
NO
IVE
DR
DR
DE
AY
W
IV
E
W
AY
DR
AY
W
AY
W
W AY
E
BR
YC
IT
A
AL
ER
G
DR
IV
E
SAN
W AY
DR
.
A
H
H
SID
NE
Y
AVEN
LEON
RT
NO
RIAN
AD
AN
LV
SY
CT
.
DR.
CH
C
C T AR
. M
DST
CT. OCK
CT.
Y
ILL
AD
W
LS
YH
IL
BA
OA
KC
RE
ST
06
-00
3
NO
LNRTH
. VIE
CIRCLE
W OO
PIC
V ILLA
GE
TU
CTDO
. R
O
BL
PA
RE
FI
UE
AV
EN
FIRE
LN
.
RO
AD
W
M
O
E
IV
DR
DO
MIN
IC
AN
AN
G EL
IC
CT A
.
AN
IC
TU
CK
IN
M
AQUINAS
DO
NE
LA
D
TO
N
ME
RI
G
I N
IA
N
IRONWOOD
DR.
DR.
CIE
N DA
E
MAN
LE
CO
U
NT
AIN
VIE
COURT
R
ED
DR
IV
AV
EN
UE
ALD
A
ND PI PER CT
SA
.
EL
AY
W
GLENSIDE
ET
ST
RE
V E
NETIA MEADO
W
E
D
R IV
SH
CT OR
ES
.
LAGOON CT.
CT.
EDGEWATER
E
AV
E
NU
E
GLEN
SID
Y
RD.
BA
D
AR
R
DA
VA
NE
AY
PALMERA
RO
AD
AV
EN
UE
Y
WA
LA
NE
LA
NE
SI
HA
PP
Y
W AY
VENDOLA
Y
A
W
GLAC IE R
NE
LA
IA
AD
AC
YO
SE
MITE
WAY
PA
RK
IV
E
DR
ARMORY
N
SA
NO
R
TH
AD
O
W
GE
AY
MA
YW
OO
D
EL
W
MW
CT OOD
.
AN
SH
RA
Y
W AY
D
VIST
AW
LA
NE
NO
N
UR
T
CO
E
NCO
N
RI
RO
AD
.
CT
ISL
E
ROA D
JU
DG
E
D
R
O
PE
N
SA
NO
R
TH
ROAD
R
O
CIR
CLE
W
RAI N BO RD
W AY
BL
BL
ES
NUE
AVE
S
LO
BL
C
O
FR
AN
C IS
SAN
T
R E C
I R
EL
OO
AV
A
R
RB
A
BA
SA
N
G
EL
AN
E DR
AY
CK
SI
DO
P
TA
I
CA
T
cI N
NIS
M
RT
CO
U
BLE
GA
OF
EN
UE
AV
CAN
CT. ADA
RO
AD
PASO
POCO
DR
.
S
TO
AL
LO
S
PASADENA
AV
E
AL
IC
SAN
TA
C
O
R ID
G
ST
ON
E
CO
UR
TETO
N
YO
SEMI
TE
WAY
CH
AN
NIN
G
TA
VIS
DRIVE
CORRILLO
07-003
WAY
KN
O LL
TOM
Y
W
FR
AN
C IS
I C
CT
RD
ON
GL
EN
AW
K
R
D
E A OW
DR
CIR
NS
IV
E
DR
RL
OS
CA
DR
IVE
AY
R
KW
PA
BLV
D.
AY
W
O
H AR
L
DE
AV
IN
DIA
N
C
ed i s k r a
P
CO
.
CT
TH
OR
IE
S
A
NN
BR
AD
CL
IFF
L
WIL
W
MILL WO OD
AVE.
D
OO
BIN
M
OU
NTA
IN
D
RO
M
W
DRIVE
E
DR
IV
RRI
LL
O
NO
VA
E
DR
IV
E
CO
E
DR
IV
ALB
IO
N
23
-0
05
NO
DO
N
CO TIM
UR OT
EO
T
LA
NE
NE
LO
MA
07
-0
03
35
-0
01
30-003
CT.
CT.
CO
ND
OR
EL
NG
NNI
DE
THE ALAMEDA
H
BR
A
CT
SIL
VEIRA
101
AY
PAUL
AT
E
NO
RT
HG
DR
FA
ISA
N
DEVON
CO
RT
PA E
CH
EC
O
CE
RM
CO
EN
UR
HO
T
AV
E.
HIGHW
E
DR
IV
01
-01
1
THORNDALE
TAMA
05-00
1
RO AD
FRONTAGE
HWY
REDWOOD
DE
AY
W
AL
BI
ON
NO VA
R ACK
DR
IVE
LOS
G AM
OS
23
-0
01
COU RT
TRELLIS
CARROLL
DRIVE
DRIVE
ELDA
L
PR
E SI
BL
DIO
VD
.
CT.
LO
S
LUIS
A CT
.
DR
LA
S
IV
E
TA
M
DRIVE
DR
IVE
A
ELDA
ELD
IV
E
DR
LE
A
FOX LN
O
A
K
C
R
E
S
R
O
O
H
WAY
CT .
GRAND
NE
LA
VE
.
E.
AV
DRI
AVE
RO
AD
LANE
OOD
FIRE
NN
MA
DR
.
AVE.
GLENW
RO
GE
R
IVE
DR
CT
LA
S PE
HILL
D
VI
DA
DR
T LE
YR
M
VIL
PR
O
T
T
UR
E.
AV
ARD
EY
DRI
VE
PARK
ON
VIN
GOLD
.
CT
GLEN
OA
KM
LW
ZE
A E
H AN
L
LIN D E NW
CT.
CO
E.
A
W
Y
AV
E
GOLD
NV
ENT
DRIVE
NT
UE
O
EN
UE
R
IA
FR
CO
A
MES
.
CT
ON
ON
MILT
HA
.
CT
HILL
LE
CO
U
RT
A
H
LN
ILS
DA
AV
ROAD
N
K
PAR
E.
LIA
LIL
#
LI
N
C
O
CO
NV
EN
T
E
FIR
#
ALE
W
DR
IV
OAK
S
##
D
ON.
MM CT
HA
00-502
03
-0
09
03
-0
07
AV
CASCAD
E DR.
NI
PR OSPECT
DR.
EDGE
WO
OD
ET
TR
IN I
UA
.
DRIVE
E
.
UE
M
LL
S
L L WY
EN
OA
K
VI
BA
Y
AV
IZA
.
CORTE
BROA
DMOO
IVE
AQ
BROO
KME
AD
CRESTA
DR
M OS
AVE
GALLINAS
LAS
E
W AY
A
R
AC
K
IVE
DR
LEA
MATEO
SAN
N DR
THE
GA
LOS
RK
PA
DA
S
VA
PA
TR
IN
ITY
ANA
LE
R
FO
W
CL
CIR
CO
U
RT
TRINIT
Y
NE
LA
W AY
R
HE
D
O
O
AVE
.
DRIVE
N
E
LA
SU
RR
EY
COURT
AC
E
RR
AN
UE
L
M
04-0
01
CT
EY
LL
VA
PAVADAS
IV
E
DR
U
T
TTE
RN
BU
T.
SL
EE
P
Y
FAW
T
BUTTER
FIELD
RD
DR
DR.
RD
ILLS
FIE
LD
BAYH
DOAKS
ROAD
TT ER
AD
RO
E
IV
DR
AY
W
T.
L
EL
I
BU
AY
AY
W
ELEN
A
CI
ZA
LU
DRIVE
LA
W
DR.
E
#
DR
FAIR
C
WILD
SO
S
BAYHILL
HI
H
GE
ED
TI
WAY
W
IN
D
I EW
C
D
AVE
.
EN
AV
S
U
R
WC
AS
TL
.
LN
WOOD
H
AS
M
RIA
ME
E.
AV
E.
A
O
R
ID
T
E
ILLS
LE
Y
AVE.
S
AV
T
DR.
NU
WA
Y
A
LL
VI
FAIRH
EL
MAY
W
IN
DS
O
R
ST
REE
EY
E
U
EN
AV
PINE
NO
CAR
E
E
AV
EY
VAL
AY
AK
O
LA
V
06-00
AD
Y
WA
AN
LE
E LT
V
AL
SO
HU
MB
OX
O
E
RD
FO
N
VALL
WAY
RO
AD
ROAD
GR
09-001
E
IV
OO
PE
CT. D
R
DR
IV
LE
G
E
W
ER
W
AY
YW
H
M
M
IT
EY
CAR
IVE
01-015
DR
MA
EC
H
PL O
.
W
SU
DRIVE
#
AVENUE
FIFT
H
RIV
D
O
N
CIR.
ER
DR
IV
A
OL
SC
IR
Y
O
N
TIL
DE
ALD
D
O
RID
D
D
AR
E
E
DR
IVE
E.
RA
C
E
#
ROCK
AVENUE
W
IE
V
AV
RT
PO
TE R
W
OD
MO
Y
RE
TE
B LE
V A
MO
N
IM
W
AV
EY
T
UR
CO
PT
ON
DR
IV
DR.
TH
BE
ER
NT
MO RR
TE
RD
HA
M
W
U
H
DRIVE
Av
OAKWOOD
T
EN
D
AR
G
A
FA
z
D
UR
EL
N
SA
AN
W
Y
NC
N
RO
AD
MONT
OAK RT
COU
LY
OO
OO
D
RT
WOO
E
AV
W AY
TREE
RA
D
CT
UR
M
LE
CO
Cru
Y
NE
BL
ta
ER
ALD
AKE
San
A
ER
RIVI ST
DR
VE
R
TW
CO
EST
CR
LO
VE
A
LIN
NE
LA
CT
.
VISTA
AV
BE
DG
EW
VE
DRI
UE
RI
CR
ES
U
E
AV
EN
U
E
LA
CT GE
.
ULA
AV
E
FR
AN
CIS
PILGRIM
RO
AD
IV
E
NA
S
EN
CT.
N
SA
LI
AV
E
STA
N
O
VIL
CH
D
AN
KL
OA
D
IV
R
DR
UE
N
MU
E
AV
Ct
DUR
CT
R
VIEW
SI
N
D
HA
M
DR
DR
AV
IS
AD
M
N
OO
E
SID T
OK C
O
BR
IVE
M
EN
TO
.
NO
DR
IV
TO
G
W
W
INGS
IDE
SACRA
SC
HM
E
IN
O
IDE
PEDRO
OAK
S
H
AS
BROO
KS
DR
DRI
VE
EW
I
V
WY
NY
SUN
W
LE
OB
OFT
MO
RN
N
IVE
R
OR
ELKH
AD
RO
LF
G E
NU
D
EN
MEAD
OAKS OW
DR.
1
-00 007
09
25
RID
#
101
E
DR
E
AVE
RD
E
AV
OD
WO
GE
R
CR
OA K
DR
RID
D
RANCHITO
S
RO
AD
CT
E
REN
VU
EL
ID
01
06-0
25
-0
05
RD.
AD
RM
CA
DR
OKS
CT
A
OK
BRO
UE
GA
R
#
RD
AV
N
AD
O
R
O
R
ED
P
AY
AL
YD
RR
ME
O
LL
INDIAN
MIW
SUNVIEW
N
VE
AY
W
E
LL
AV
E
TH
NOR
E
O
G
W
L
IA
R
O
IL LO
DRIVE
HW
HIG
E
IV
DR
RRI
CO
N
O
EM
M
W
E.
Y
D
M E
PL
WILL
AV OW
LE
W
RO
AD
O
O
R
LO
UPP
ER
GALL I NAS
AY
W
DR
IVE
E
AV
AV
E
R
.
DR
ó
_
Æ
AY
OK
TE
AC
RR
CLE
STE
SO
R
IVE
E.
AV
O
AD
PR
EL
5
-00
25
O
D
POINT
WAY
ESTANCIA
E
FF
JE
DR
AV
RO
AD
RO
DR
PE
SA
N
C IR
AY
SE
O
RO
BEHR
E.
A
E
CL
IR
C
BR
O
M AD
O
CT OR
E
BRO
OK MEA
BE
R
KE
IT
TIE
EY
AL
H
W
AD
IS
AD
M
MARIN
COUNTY
HIGH
IR
M
05-009
OOD
AV
ER
CIVIC
CENTER
AVE.
A
H
AV
E
ES
MED
K
AR
M
W
E.
S
FA
RM
CIRCLE
RIAN
DR
E
TH
OR
FL
THE ALA
AD
O
O
R
R
AV
E
FL
DW
RE
S
AD
OAKRIDGE
ARROYO
FIR
A
WAY
RIAN
AD
#
E VA
LA
NE
PETER
AV
RO
LINA
VAN
CT
L
AE
ME
AD
OW
LE
UE
N
VE
A
E
LA
GAL
VIA
CK
RS
CIRC
S
AG
CE NT
AL
YD
RR
ME
#
003
22S
S
LA
TA
ER .
HU CT
LA
COURT
E
IN
AR
TER
WA
GE
ID
BR
WATERSIDE
CIVIC
003
25-
S
Y
WA
WAY
AY
A
LA
ANGE
L
VE
CO
CT.
ANZA
CH
E
CL
AD
DA
W
AY
ED
AD
RO
C
01-013
DE
AR
IR
W
TVIEW
CRES
ES
LM
E
AN
WALTER
PL.
DR
A
S
KE
E
EX
SUSS
HIND
PA
SA
AY
W
W
AT
ER
SID
E
HO
AL
YD
RR
ME
EN
E
AG
OR
CH .
AN CT
3
23-00
C
E
#
#
LD
RD
VENDOLA
CT .
G
IN
SH
CU
E
HILL
SUMMER T
COUR
E
TRE
PINE CT.
CON ST
#
AY
W
O
G
WAY
IN
TE
LS
HO
CH
R
IV
DR
D
SUMMERHILL
O
R
TE AY
ES W
DIAS
q
DRIVE
DEVON
HA
W
TH
OR
NE
BI
TER
CEN
W
AY
ROA
S C AI
WAY
VI
WA
Y
007
05-
AY
W
LE
AV
#
AUG
U
CIRC
A
V
CK
RA
MA
ON
IVE
WA
Y
N
TW AIN
NI DR.
SCE TTRI
OVERCROSSING
3
01-01
AL
RE
NO
TA
ALBI
E
SAO
RT
DR
DRIV
THGATE
NOR
CI
AN
ADRIAN
A
OL
ND
VE
CIVIC
#
AN
IS
FA
L
SA
RO
AY
EST
AF
R
IN
MAR
01
25-0
RA
ND
RDE
ZIO
RIV
D
MERRYDALE
TOS
RANCHI
LO
A
VE
M
# 28-00#1 #
URT
O
LA
W
DRIVE
#
#
_
Æ
CO
PAV
COU
OR
MIN
DEER HOLLOW RD
ALAMEDA
CALETA
#
DIZ
PER
EL
EL
E
IV
BR
EA
N
YO
ME
SA
CA
RL
SB
CO
AD
UR
T
CEN
TER
05-003
04-00
9
LA
DRIVE
R
D
CAN
WAY
05
-0
05
DAIR
AS
CT.
CT
DR
D
R
HACIE
NDA
LA
LE
YA
O
R
MARIN CE
NT
DRIVE ER
ó
LEC
LA
CT. IRE
ES
ME
YE
R
AL
ION
ESS
PROF
# 30-0
01
NUE
E
EN
G
#
EL
_
Æ
a
ó
November 21, 2001
N
#
E
R IV
D
S
LO
CIL
VE
DRI
AD
RD
L
Route Points
# End Point
Bicycle & pedestrian related features
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
TRANSIT CENTER
RACK
LOCKERS
Bicycle Routes Status & Class
EXISTING I
EXISTING II
PROPOSED I
PROPOSED I-II
PROPOSED II
PROPOSED II-III
PROPOSED III
No Data
LLOW
W
E
IVE
#
_
Æ
#
CK
LBRO S
WEL IG HT
HE
W AY
HO
LANE
CIRCLE
AC
DR
M
LA
MO
NT
E
WALLACE
FA
E E R
SO
AVE
E
IV
ONE
IVE
DR
#
PARKW
AY
OS
CT
.
AL
WN
FA
LIN
DA
D
04
-00
7
ELE
NA
JOSEPH CT.
RR
TE
EL
DA
A
ST
Y
R
BL
S
TAHO
PLA
CE
OL YM PI C
DRIVE
WAY
HYACINTH
FAWN DR
NORTH
OW
LL
AN
DO
AH
PL.
MARK
WAY
FR
EITA
RO
TERR
YE
SHEN
AB
M
LANE
5
GALLIN
AS
DR
IVE
F
T
UR
CO
NING
AN
T.
ESMEYER
D
R
W H AR
18-001
CH
UEL
STRE
ET
AVE
.
.
CR
A
LA TE
W KE R
AY
E
IV
DR
SANTA CLARA
CT.
GINA
RE
CH
OR
MAN
Y
N
04
-00
D
TE
WA
W
HICKO
RY
ARIAS
AC
E
VD
ID
009
01-
FORD
NE
N
EE
FA
WAY
ROA
DRIVE
LEN
GLE
N
GR
HIBISC
US
ORANGE
TE
RR
DE
DRIVE
NE
T
#
HO LLY
E
AY
W
TANBARK
ILLO
TEC
MON
T
N
LA
NE
LA
DRIVE
TERRACE
Y
HO LLY
E
TL
IS
TH T.
C
IC
H
R
KO
ó
PL
AC
E
D
E
N
#
ME
O
O
LE
AR
ES
ES
RR
FO
IVE
DR
#
LN
AY
LA
RR
FO
WAY
VA
LLEY
LA
RKW
.
AY
W
IR
IS
PA
LEA
VIA
EN
D
OO
AS
L
SY
DR
LLE
DA NIE
HOLLO
W DR
HIDD
EIT
THY
W
N
R
O
TH
RT
OU
C
.
01-007
NE
.
FR
AG
MAIN
SAILMAK
ER
COURT
.
DR
CT
03
-0
04
R
R
TA
IVE
SAN
W
AY
DR
IVE
N
O
DR
DOLA
VEN
04003
_
Æ#
O
VE
A
IA
BL
BLOS SOM
D
OO
BO
AM
B
AD
ST
ER
S
E
HW
RO
W
AL
ND
SA
PE
C
DR AN
AT
DR
IV
E
WI
LA
N
LA
RC
BI
MO
NT
EC
ILL
O
RD
E
RY
UR
T
E
IV
DR
TLI
NG
DR
IV
NE
AD
M
WAY
TA
UE
RQ
HO
VIA
HE
LA
HIT
EW
O VEJAS
S
LA
O
ROAD
DRIVE
#
3
-01
02
#
CIR.
OVE
C
MITC
HEL
L
AL
CORTE
H
LIN
DA
S
INE
RD
BARB
ER
UT
AD
WOO
DB
N
AD
GAN
ER
OBI
RO
WAK
DEL
CO
HEAT HER
CO
LAS
RACE
W
TER
AD
IRVING DR
IVE
LA S
AVEN
UE
SERR
A
RO AD
BA
MB
OO
BEEC
HN
WINT
ER
GR
TER
EE
RA CE N
DR
RA
NC
DR
RD
RO AD
LAS
W AY
WOOD
BINE
02-0
11
SMITH
CT.
LANE
LANE
#
óq
KEE L
E
RT TO
CO
NI
N BE
SA
PIN
E
GA
NA
DO
RO
Bike Routes
North San Rafael
E
RT Z
CO PA
LA
Y
NORTH GATE
WA
L
MONTECILL
O
M
AR
RK
SA C
RA OR
TO TE
G
A
KNAB
OU
L
ROA
D
CT
WAY
OR
EN
DA S
RO YAL
DE
LVAD
SA
01-005
DR
DR
PA
S
CA
LU
AVE
KNOC
CO LIN
WA
Y
EO
ID
NTEV
MO
AD
Y
S
NU
E
LA
PENNY
OVEJAS
O DR.
DIEG
WA
BOLA
NOS
VAN TASSEL CT
RO
CORTE
CAPISTRANO
RT
TRA
LEE
RIDGE
DU
RAN
AY
W
WA
Y
CO
03-001
BRI
C T. LLO
AY
CA
PATR
ICIA
04501
E
LN.
W
DR
IV
CHERRY
HILL
DR.
CE
N
EO
O
EJ
CALAFI
A
NG
VI
IR
E MIGUEL
S
LA
MAPLE
WA
Y
N
LL
RAPOSAS
LAS
RA
RA
DO
IA
RA PO
PAS
PATR
IC
CT
.
GALWAY
DU
LL
GA
NA
TE
R
CO
RT
ES
GA
RO
AD
CO
VA
DR
IVE
L
DE
RA
CT.
PI
E
AC
AD
RO
ER
GU
LA
DE
W
RT
H
UE
GA
CT .
R
AVE NUE
LL
IN AS
L
VA
NO
AV
EN
L
HIL
HIL
H
LA PLA YA
DR
IV
E
OAK
E
IV
DR
PIN
E
C
AN
R
E
OO
D
PA
S
CA
#
LU
OAK
RK
CL
OV
HILL ER
CT
.
N
TA
ER
DR
VALLEY
CLE
CIR
02
-0
09
DR
SO
L
DE
SC
AN
Y
WA
VE
DRI
HIL
E
W AY
TWELVEOAK
D
TH
NOR
PARK
CAS
WE
LC
OM
TR
EE
CT
.
LU
SMITH
AR
D
CE
NT
I
AV
E.
K
AV
E.
AVE.
SA
PARKW
AY
NYO
N
CA
UP
PE
R
DO
GA
NA
NORTH
E
TE
COR
ANO
VER
DEL
DR
IV
E
OA
K
O
AG
OA
CANYON
RD
N
E
#
ROAD
LE
#
RO
AD
DR
IV
L
HIL
BLVD.
DRIVE
IVE
DRIVE
02-007
AK
O
T
AS
CO
LEY
VAL
02-005
LU
CA
S
DR
OAK
LU
CA
S
D
OL
OLD
EL
RRY
DRIVE
BE
N
DEL REY
LE
APP
IV
DR
#
FIRE
APPLEBERRY DRIVE
02-003
LE
CORTE
ELDERBERRY
RY
LEBER
HUCK
RD
RD
EY
EL
COURT
ELV A
DR
.
CT.
LL
A
CT
VALLEY
IN
REE
A
LIS
S VA
RA
UIE
RD.
CA
##
LUCAS
SEQ
LU
AJ
C
ELLEN
E
DRIV
FLAXBERRY LANE
DRIVE
NE
CT.
UR
T
ER
T.
C
LA
LANE
GREENBERRY LANE
LA
IN
RY
LANE
DR
T.
M
W
CO
RB ER
RY
ER
KB
AC
BL
DAR
MU
IR
DA
MILL
ER
CE
APPLE BER
RY
ROAD
ROAD
MT
MT LASSEN
SU
RY
ER
NB
DA
PA
LO
M
AR
LANE
IDYLBERRY
MT
.
SITN
CT
A
.
MT.
ROAD
ROAD
Y
RR
BE
DI
ID YL
K
ABL
O
LE
JUNIPERBERRY
M
IVE
CIRC
.
MT
MT. SHAS
CT.
CREE
T.
TE
NA
YA
MT DANA
DRIVE
DR
.
PIK
ES
PEAK
DRIVE
DRIV
E
DR
EN
SS
LA
MT.
TA
AC
R
TER
LL
ROU
NDTRE
E
CT
ROU
NDT
A CT
CT.
MT
. TA
DRIVE
BERR Y
KERN
RC
RO
AD
BERRY
MUL
IDYLBERRY
D
WOO
ET
QUI
MA JO
WI T
T E NBURG
.
MT
DR
DR
LOGANBERRY DR
DR
O
SE
PA
MT
HOOD
CT
LO
PUEB
DR
DE
T
C
LE
CT
AN
GR
R
ZEPHYR
E RD
TON
OD
O
T
FLA GS
VIL
SE
D
M
I
P
D R
W
L
T
C
N
DR
RE
DW
RY
IE
L
NN E T
LI
R
S H
R
ROAD
NE
KSTO
AC
BL
01
01-0
#
A
C
D
R
K
E
E
R
RO
A
R
NE
TO
YS
ER
EM
RIN
MA
BE
N
R
01
-0
02
RA
D
ONE
ST
AG
n
CL
UB
S
EY
ID YL
M OU N T
A
T
BE
07-003
L DR
N
IT
H
T
M
LYEL
O
CRESTA
MT
TE
CT
ROAD
AD
E DR
R
ER
W
DR
DR
MCKINLEY
RA
K
FL
RR
QUAIL
CT
PEAC
HSTONE
NLIN
CT
FO
one Dr
Queenst
MOUNT
RD
SHEL
DR
CT
AK
E
TONE
LS
EL CAPITAN DR
RAN
IE
R
CT
CT
DR
CT
LUC
AS VAL
LEY
K
OA
N
MT
MOUNT
BURN E
Y
EN
LD
GO
MT
TO
NE
M
Z CT
LIL
Y PL
OAK MTN CT
LUT
PL
MT
LILY
WIN
DS
NINESTONE
CT
DE
EP
ST
ON
TERR
CT
DU
CT
GA
TIO
VOGELSANG DR
SE
ER
LV
CT
CE
LA
AD
AL
PI
NE
KS
TO
NE
E DR
RE
BL
UE
OS
SO
M
CT
CK
RO
BL
RO
JASMINE LN
SI
RUBICON
T E
RO
AC
BB
LE
ST
ON
CIRCLE
E
UE
BL K
OA
CT
BL
CO
STONE CT
N
YNE
HO
CK LE
SU
CT
RD
I
VALLEY
LUCAS
LAS GALLINAS AV
R
P
CT
HE
AT
HE
RS
TO
NE
DR
E
BRID
GEGATE
S I
LV
CT
DAR
CE
RED
DR
CT
DR
E
CR
EE
KS
IDE
VE
RBE
NA
MI LL
LANE
DRIVE
BAY EL
LAUR
GO
LD
HILL
E
NU
AV
E
IV
E
DR
PHEASANT CT.
FIRE
P
OOD
DRIVE
ROAD
BISCAYNE
PEDRO
IV
E
DR
RIVIERA
OD
BRIA RWO
TWOOD
BREN
MAP LEW
OOD
SAN
PT
.
FAI RW
DRIVE
D
O
W
O
CK
LO
BEEC
HW O
E
DR
IV
OD
CT.
C T.
DRIVE
SILK
COURT
.
LN
TU
CK
W AY
CT
.
DG
E
RI
AN
DO
RI
DRIVE
SU
LL
DE
LE
YV
IE
W
DR.
BA
DRIVE
E
IN
AR
M
ND
LOMO
SAN
PEDRO
COVE
MA
R IN
E
LY
MAND
ER
E
11-0
01
WA
Y
BE
AC
H
DRIVE
TO
SO
RR
EN
BAHI
A
AY
M
XB
UR
Y
CO
VE
VE
D CO
BEDF
OR
GA
M
VE
HIN
CO
AG
AN
SE
CO
TT DU
VE
LE
VE
SA
CO
CK
PO
RT
VE
WA
Y
RT
PO
W
NE
W AY
LINA
PLAYA
TA
CA
ARD
VIEW
EGRET
WA
Y
NARR
REY
VISTA
13001
IA
BAH
DEL
L OMAVIS
PL. TA
ER
KE
RN
AVE.
RO
W INDW
CAST
BLVD
.
LAN
E
BAHIA
RO
CO
W
AC
E
PL
AY
W
NE
EL
AI
02
11-0
CENTRAL
MARIN
SANITATION
ST
.
PLANT
ID
E
BL
VD
.
DRIVE
_
Æ
E.
DRAKE
BLVD.
PIO
SIR
MB
O
PL.
O
SE
DR
15
-0
07
IS
FRANC
AY
LA
CIRC
DR
IV
E
ROA
D
E.
LUNA
DA
BLV
D.
DR
.
AR
LO
TT
E
CH
T
ST
REE
ON
LAN
NT
A
CE
CR
ES
LA
EET
STR
AL
TO
ST
RE
ET
LO
UIS
E
TIB
UR
VE
RD
I
E
PL
AC
VI
VIA
N
STREET
BLVD.
RF
WOO
D
RNE
SS
INVE
CASAS
RA
SER
AVE.
BALBOA
JUNIPERO
LAS
DR
IVE
ITA
GAR
MAR
CT
.
E
AV
SE
AV
IEW
AD
RO
AY
ME
DW
ES
T
W
.
BL
VD
CIS
CO
EE T
STR
GIL
BERT
07
-00
5
MARON
CU
M BR
E
_
Æ
G
W
IO
EL
IS
LA
ND
IN
GR
AN
G
E
SA
DE
RTE
CO
CAY
UG
A
CO
RTE
AY
MO
RP
HE
W
BL
A
ORA
DA
M
IRONWOOD
DR.
AR
IT
A
M
AR
G
RD.
N UE
PIDGEON
WEST
INT
CR
OW
CT N
. PO
ST
RE
ET
27
-0 3211 00
3
HO
AG
FR
STRE
ET
RN
AU
BU
VIA
A
VIA LERID
VIA
CORTE GRAC
ITAS
LA
LA
S
R
PU
N
CA
ER
RN
KE
S
RK
LA
AK
O
November 21, 2001
Y
K WA
05
-0
15
AS
IT
A
PAR
0
58
BE
LA
RD
O
#
E
LI
PE
N
SE
VIA
HOLLOW
AVEN
UE
ELL
IA
JEW
VA
LENC
E
LL
BE
ST.
ALICE
27
-0
01
ST
.
-0
05
R
EXT.
IVE
DR
EB
ER
NE
W
LA
LANE
WAY
LA
QU
ES
TA
Y
W
A
NA
D IN
AV
E
LA
N
EU
CA
LY
PTUS
BR
OA
D
CT VI
.
EW
CT.
AVEN
UE
UNI ON
PAR
K
27
HA
RBO
ST
.
AN
14
-0
05
TE
E
R
DE
C
RO
E
AD
GR
AV
EN
UE
PARK
DEER
FR
AN
C
IS
LL
HU
BBE
AVEN
UE
RIDGE
R
LV
E
BLO
DU
PAZ
EJO
E AL
CO
RT
DR
IV
AN
VIA
AD
W
EN
UE
AV
LM
PA
AVE NUE
RE
ET
ST
UNION
STR
EET
BAY
CU
STREET
IS
BO
M
BALBOA
CORTE
E
W
V IE
TA
IN
MO
UN
09005
YACHT
CLUB
DR.
RE
D
D
IN
G
Y
WA
G
DIN
D
RE
Y
W
A
AL
TU
R
N
E AN
ITA
CO RT
TIOGA RD
DA
M
O
CO
WAY
UE
AV
EN
AV
DR.
L
TER RAD I
STR
EET
MAR
Y
ND
GRA
.
DR
CE
RI
W
DR
ALMADO
CO
RT
E
R
D
R
A
NO
M
CO
RT
E
WE
LC
OM
EN
UE
NE
LA
D
AVENUE
09-007
IRWIN
STREET
BAYWOOD
SS
O
CO
RDO
VA
A
RT
E
C
O
CIELO
DR
R
E
LE
G
W
AV
#
#
N
O
TE
TA
RS
TE
AV
E
03
-0
15
R
DRIV E
E
IV
DR
q
IN
S
E
.
VD
BL
BE
REN
DRIV
ET
RE
ST
EN
IR
CO
CIS
AN
FR
LA
NC
AS
TE
R
U
NT
AIN
VIE
M
O
E
IV
DR
AQUINAS
NE
LA
D
A
R F I EL
LN
.
HE
EN
U
E
AV
BE
LLE
AN
WAY
GRE EN
STRE ET
TON
HETHER
IRWIN
ROAD
AY
VISTA GRADE
E
CO
RT
GRA
DE
OL
FE
CT
VIL
LA
GR
STRE ET
STEVENS
STREET
AVE NUE
TAMALP
AIS
01-021
RD.
IN
B AL
DW
N
TWAI
V
A
O
N
TS
ST
E
AV
E
AC
R
R
TE
ASH
AV
DO
MIN
IC
AN
AN
G EL
IC
CT A
.
AN
IC
IN
M
DO
D
LA
NE
AVE
NUE
LINCO
LN
ST.
CIJOS
01-019
LL
LO
VE
ST.
R
D
C
AN
YO
N
E
GR
AD
W
O
LF
E
O
LF
E
CYP RES
ME
RI
TO
N
STR
EET
DRIV
E
HILLCR
EST
NYE
ET
STRE
NYE
G ARDE
N LN.
PLACE
STRE ET
LINDA RO
T.
S
SPRI
NG
RO
AD
WO
OD
21
-0
01
R
AD
E
G
LF
E
O
W
H AR
TE
AV
LE
AP
M
W
AV
WOODROSE
CT.
RE
COURT
DA
CIE
N
EL
CA
MINO
E.
A
AV
EV
Y
LK
WA
PE
RR
M
D
R
AR
O
PL
P
S AV
AV
FLY
R
TTE
EL
M
AV
IA
OL
#
E
RIV
D
1
11-00
GN
E
O
IN
T
.
VD
BL
MA
DRI VE
W OO
EN
IC
SC
ST.
WILKINS
RD.
MARIP
OSA
EN
GL
W ALK
DY
RO
AD
HAN
R
EY
E
ARROYO
DR
HIL
L
AV
W
DO
MEA
24-513
LAND
CT.
PL.
WARNER
W OOD
C
D
GROVE
DR
HOTA
LING
CT
COURT
ST.
B
C
A
BROOKS
D
STREET
WILLOW
ST.
STREET
19-001
MARIN
STREE
T
CLAR K
AV
NE
M AD
RO
D
R
LOOTENS
STREET
33-001
E
STREET
STREET
31-001
STREET
STREE
T
STREET
ST.
HA
YE
S
SH
AV
ER
.
ST
H
TERRACE
WE
LC
STREE
T
24-505
STRE
ET
SS
RO
OO
D
DW
RE
GR
AD
E
N
MA
KI
HA
NK
EN
CIRCLE
V ILLA
GE
DR.
DR
R
CE
EL
FO
RB
COTTAGE
AVE.
STREET
F
AVE.
MIRAMAR
ST.
W OODS
ROAD
ST.
MADRONA
DR.
ES
G
H
STREET
ST.
G
ST.
EAS
T
RESERVOI
R
E
IV
DR
ES
RS T
LE
CT.
GE
OBL
STRE ET
U E
AV
EN
.
C IR
ER
RA
SI
DRIVE
QUA RRY
EN
OD
E
AVENU
STRE
ET
ST.
CU
LL
STRE
ET
LN.
10-007
IDA
EET
STR
ST
ST.
WE
HA RT
E
AN
ST
DET
TN
ER
.
RO
AD
ROAD
DRIVE
HILLS
FAIR
STRE
ET
PIN
E
EYE
AY
W
AV
E.
RQ
UA
RD
MA
E
GROV
SPRING
N
RD
GL
EN
E
DR
IV
MAN
LE
AVENU E
AL
L
C T EN
.
ST
K
.
WOOD CIR
LEA F
CT
.
KIN
EL
BE
LLOR
EI
AV D
E.
AVE NUE
GROVE
SPRING
LANE
DR.
D
OO
STW
TE RR
EN
CA
NYO
V
A
DST
CT. OCK
CT.
Y
ILL
AD
PIC
R
ED
CO
AY
W
T
BE
R
LN YL
.
AV
EN
UE
A
CA
LIFO
RNI
RE
E
ELIZA B
ETH
R
DRIVE
VALLEY
ROSS
L
HIL
E
FA
LL
IN
SS
AV
A
IR
AL
TA
M
U
B
AV
L
EL
VIL
UR
NT
TO
U
TUR
NST
WAY ONE
BA
YP
09
-0
09
D
IV
E
_
Æ
a
ó
INT
ITCHER
01
-0
15
.
VD
BL
A
O
R
DRIVE
W
Route Points
# End Point
Bicycle & pedestrian related features
PEDESTRIAN ACTIVITY
TRANSIT CENTER
RACK
LOCKERS
Bicycle Routes Status & Class
EXISTING I
EXISTING II
PROPOSED I
PROPOSED I-II
PROPOSED II
PROPOSED II-III
PROPOSED III
No Data
T
EE
STR
LA
GR
AN
D
AY
W
GLENSIDE
W AY
AY
W
OO
D
MA
YW
ET
ST
RE
DA
VA
W EST
RB
FO
C
C T AR
. M
EL
Y
WA
E
GLEN
SID
Y
RD.
BA
TU
CT DOR
.
AV
EN
UE
AD
R
O
O
W
GE
MW
CT OO
. D
EL
LA
NE
LA
NE
AR
D
HA
PP
Y
SI
NE
RAQU ET
TAMA L
AV
ES
AV
CA
RO
LIN
A
MADERA
AV
FI
D
R
O
PE
N
SA
NO
R
TH
ROAD
CIR
CLE
W AY
D
OO
VIST
AW
AN
SH
LN
HILL
TERR
AV
LON
GVIEW
TT AG
E
CO
08-003
D
E
AV
CT.
OO
W
IV
OD
D
DR
O
O
O
D
O
.
A
CO
IS
_
Æ
T
_
Æ
BRET
E
W
W
RN
FE
NORTH
DR
ER
AD
M
C
AN
LI
AD
RO
OCK
AC NE
PE LA
UTH
SO
S
NK
BA
007
06CH
LO
#
DOW
AG
ER
RN
IE
ALTENA
AD
HERMOSA
WAY
#
ON
GO
LA
D
OO
IE
LAN
BAY
OA
K
N
SA
NO
R
TH
CAN
CT. ADA
RO
AD
PASO
POCO
O
CORRILLO
ARMORY
JU
DG
E
DRIVE
07-003
WAY
KN
O LL
W
RAI N BO RD
BL
E
DR
IV
E
BLV
D.
AY
W
O
H AR
L
DE
DR
.
S
TO
AL
LA
NE
NO
N
UR
T
CO
RA
Y
AL TO
.
O
AVE
PL
W
SE
KNOLL
S
LAGOON
PL.
D
DR
LEITH
COVE
BAY PO
OI
07
13-0
INT
AVO
CET
CT.
HER
ON CT
# 13-005
PO
PLY
MO
UTH
CO
VE
FALM
OU
TH
CO
VE
TERN
CT
MAR
DRIVE
M
AN
D
ER
SE
N
CIR
VIA
VD
OO
HW .
CT
HT
IG
JORD
AN AV
LE
GA
TIN NE
NIGH LA
RO
NE
R
NANT
UC
KE
T
FR
O
AS
KN
AMBE
R
URT
NG AL
OW
CO
ST
D
BU
O
BELLO
VIA MONTE
O
O
S
LL
INO
MAR
PL.
W
DRIVE
E
DRIV
T
IF
7
06-00
GE
FLA MIN
GO
LANE
E
IV
DR
LA
AV
T
R
U
CO
BE
SAN
TA
MA
IN
ALLENSBY
IV
AN
T
PAR K
NTE
MO
PL.
CT.
K
OC
AC
PE
RIVIER A
KEN
D
OO
DR
T
KNIGH
OOD
RI
NE
LA
ST
URD
BAY
VIA
AC
BR
W
NW
HE
AD
RO
D
TERR ACE
K
N A
SPIN
L
BLVD.
KE
MS
STR
EE
GLOU
CEST
CO
ER
VE
3
-00
13
OO
D LN
IN
R
MA
RY
B ER
OW CT.
.
DR
Bike Routes
(South San Rafael)
LN
YP
BA
OO
KW
ROAD
SN
RN
FE
COTTO
PL.
LN.
O
IN
BR
RI
I VE
RT
DRIVE
#
N
SA
N
DU
WAY
LIDO
OF
RT
PO RD.
DO
D
HYAN
NI
CO S
VE
W AY
S
SITA
CA
S
ITA
CAS
N
AY
DRA
KE
S
Y
WA
PL.
#
H
UT
O
E
DE
ET
STRE
SIM
T
V IA
LO
E
Y
1
-00
08
I
PR
.
CT
E
IV
NE
UE
BELL EV
BAY
WAY
AVE .
AVEN
UE
CT.
CED
AR
SM
RT
PO
ST
RE
ET
ON
BELLA
NN
D
ROA
.
DR
AMA LFI
PL.
CA
LI
SB
#
_
Æ
.
DR
STREET
LANE
PE
DR
O
O
.
L CT
ST
AT
E
TE
GA
21-003
LO CH
E
IV
CI T O
YA
RO
TE
R
EN
LD
GO
RKS
O
OA
K
AY
AD
RO
ST
RE
ET
T
A
W
ST
RE
ET
CL
E
EE
STR
PA
O
W
LY
DR
TE
ON
M
_
Æ
EET
.
ST
RE
ET
M
03
BR
ET
AN
BL
RR
BA
A
ER
D
EST
WAY
0
LA
#
JACOBY
AN
GE
STR
SIR
W
O
NT
PICKLEWEED
PARK
CIR
MA
RIA
N CT
ST.
D.
LV
B
-0
07
RR
AN
CA
DR
E
CORTE REAL
CA
CA
NA
L
58
101
N
A
IN
AR
M
W
BA
WOO
DR
IV
E
ER
MARGARITA
DRIVE
AG
ST
RE
ET
09
-0
13
E
#
D
TERRACE
LO
CKS
LY
#
LL
SO
NO
MA
ST
RE
ET
MA
RKE
T
IN
PLAC
T
O
.
FA
IR
FAX
T
CE
RY
GA
AL
BIO
ER
A HO
O DR
ISE
DR
BE
VIEW
BOR CT.
HAR
EE
TR
S
BEL
EE
TR
S
MA ND
Y
T
DR
IV
E
E.
RTE
DR
AK
R VIA
PE
UP
VI
S
S EL
OR
Y
CO
TA
VIS
UR
ER
E
09
-00
9
AV
RS
CT.
A
UR
CO
HIGHW AY
VIA
CA
BARRAN
W
LO
O
RT
EG
A
FED
RTE
CO
W
EA
U
M
AR
CO
DR
IV
E
ES
BO
DA
ON
T LE
AS
C
ITA
BAY VIE
RO
AD
SAN
LIN
RE
O
SH
VIA
TO
CAN
EN
C
OR
TE
E
NZ
AN
DR
IV
E
POINT
SE
A
BAHIA
Y
AR
G
H A RTE
RT
WAY
A
BE
LV
ED
CI
BR
ET
AN
O
O
O
RT
PO
DA
ST
RE
ET
EAST
E
C
LIN
NO
VA
TO
LA
RK
SP
LA
P
AUBURN
OR
AR
GUE
LL
O
D
OA
R
AD
RO
007
06-
001
32-
_
Æ
BO
ULE
VA
RD
U
TIB
O
A
UA
LA
Y
DR
AR
DRIVE
L
W
IN
AR
M
P
W
FR
AN
CI
S
L DR
TE
COR
O
LG
HIDA
RTA
RR
IR
PL.
AVE.
I ON
MA
LO
#
DE
RS
EN
FR
I
WAY
AD
T
#
E
SS
INV
AR
OAK
DRIVE
#
EST
ND
LA
D
NO
CHAT
E
IN
AD
RO
SS
CIRCLE
BAY
RIN
MA
ST
RE
ET
O
HU
LO CH
KIN
D.
G
ST
REE
RO
RLY
DE
AN
M
BA
Y
ST
RE
ET
COR
NA
VA
FA
WAY
STRE ET
ON
T
O
W
GO
AL
O
RT
E
LA
PO
EL
PA
NE
Mc
.
CT
UE
EN
RK
JEWELL
STREET
C
SO
VIA
ETA
NO
DRIVE
AV
PA
EW
ET
BU
RO
N
.
LN
HID
CORTE
TE
DEL NOR
VIA
BR
MILL WOOD
NN
MA
RK
NE
PA
LA
D VI
JEWELL
BRO A
RE
ST
OAK
RT
ADA
TWE
R
D.
.
VIA
DR
MAR
DR
IV
E
DR
IV
CT .
UE
EN
COURT
27
-0
07
27
-0
09
NGE
HA
Y
WA
RTE
CO
O
IN
MAR
CT.
SA
N
DRIV
E
MA
I VE
DR
N
LN
SUM
MIT
SC
H
IR
AD
O
LV
B
DR.
RO
A
TI
S
IS
'L
M
ESTA
QU
OS
RR
CORTE
LAS SOMBRAS
VIA CASITAS
TAMALPAIS RD
WAY
VISTA
MO
OR
IN
R
O
ST.
IN
R
G
A
MADELINE
LANE
ORANGE
CT.
T
EE
TR
S
ROAD
MONC
IT
EC
NT
O
M
W
MIL
L
AN
C IS
CO
RO
HARTE
IE
AV
#
VD.
BL
CO
RT
E LE
NO
SA
CORTE
ORIENTAL
RD
AV
T.
RO SE
C
M
O
E
IVE
SUMMIT
N
MARINA
M
#
DRIVE
S CE
SIR
BAY
VIE
W
SO
IV
BAL BOA
CORTE LOYOLA
AV
RD
LANE
UE
IN
IR
W
ALTURA WY
CT
AIR
BON
EET
STR
S
LO
B
R
NA
ME
DR
BIN
T
UR
LIAMS
WIL
E.
ET
BR
MEN
AR
RO
CO
AV
T.
IR W
O
CORTE LODAT
AL
TW
OO
D
N
BA
YV
IEW
AVENUE
AVE NUE
#
DRIVE
C
RA
U
LT
A
LO
SHER WOOD
CT.
AV
E.
LL
VI
EW
L
T
UE
EN
AV
ALTA
AN
AY
MMI
UE
#
CIS
CO
BRET
NA
ELE
AN
SU
AV
E.
RK
PA
MISS
M
HI
W
FAIRW AY
AV
EN
26-003
E
CORTE
AV
AV
ST
ER
R
SOLA
HA
ZE
T
PASEO WY
GRAD
E
A
IVE
DRIVE
HAV EN
ITA
AR
WAY
WAY
RE
ET
IR
AL
D
CH
W
AY
E
NU
EM BAR CA DE RO
ST
O
ST
RE
ET
AV
E.
ND
DEER
DRIV E
BO
ULE
VA
RD
NA
GLE
VISTA
AC
LIL
LI
RE
ET
W
HA
RTE
RRO
ACAC IA
AL
FR
FR
01
-0
23
CORTE
DR
AV
EN
U
E
D
DR
R
DEE
BR
OD
EA
27
-0
0
# 3
00
3
CE
STREET
ENC IO
OO
MA
H L AN
HIG
SE
SS
CO
UR
MEA
DO
HLA
HIG
VE
A
MIS
SIO
FR
ET
STRE
RA
TER
HA R TE
CHEPA
LN
M
C
EN
AV
ST
COURT
VIA
SEBA
NK
ET
BLO
N
LYN
STRE
ET
A L E LN
CER
ROS
ND
BOIS
T
BRE
GW
KW T.
TEA C
ER
AV
EN
U
E
_
Æ
EST
DU
TE
AR
H
IRWIN
BROADWAY
OAK DR
E
RT
O
C
O
EN
R
SE
LO S
UE
_
Æó
AV
EN
UE
OU
BILL
ET
STRE
BL
D
EDN
A CT
RO
VE
OLI
Y.
S
ORE
DOL
W
T
TE PAT
COR
LA
H
T
EE
W
OAD
R
WY
E
AK
R
D
NT
FAY DR
AV
EE
T
14
-
D
GL EN
AV
SIR FRA
NCIS
DRA
KE BL
SEBA
NK
IVE
STR
IV
E
A
RO
WO L F
KE
RO
W
AVENUE
E
DR
McNEAR
W
RT
IG
H
EA
ST
BLV
D.
IRWIN
N
UR
CO
N
IA
D
IN
E.
AV
DR
CA
NA
L
D
CIS
CO
BRET
DO
RA
DO
S AV
INMAN AV
STADIUM WY
DR
DR
LOMA
LA
LL
DRIVE
UE
WOOD
LAND
A VE.
RES
E
AV
CIS
AN
FR
AV
E
AC
RR
TE
NT
S IR
KE
OAK
E
AC
RR
_
Æ
N DR
MAN
CYP
T
AN
ER
SE
N
E
C
FR
EN
06009
BO
IS
HART
L
TE
AN
D
OW
McCOY
DR
BO
ULE
VA
R
#
E.
AV
NA
SA
E
N
#
AVENUE
cC
M
ET
ISI
QU
AVEN
#
26
-0
01
UE
BR
SS
E
SIO
N
.
ST
RD.
BLV D.
LN
VE AV
U
MIS
BU NG
GRO
AV
R
U
CO
EL
L
BELLE
03
-0
AV
EN
DRIVE
MAR INO
TLE
AS
C
ST.
RE
ST
STRE ET
ST
RE
ET
DL
AN
D
NE
LA
AVEN
UE
DE
ED
W
C T. A R
D
07
W
O
O
T
BRE
LA
D
AN
GR
UE
FFY
PL
ACE
16
-00
3
AV
EN
U
E
HT
COURTRIG
REL
LAU
DAR
CE
R
ROAD
_
Æ
A L OW
H
RO
AD
BRUSH
OD
WO
REL
LAU
E
FIR
DU
IER
LE
RC
MIL
AN
#
E
EET
EN
UE
12-005
#
#
STRE ET
AV
EN
PI
CN
IC
HE IG
E
IV
DR
TS
STR
STREET
TH
IR D
OY
ME YE
R
IA
A
INIT
MAR
#
FOUR TH
SECOND
AN
RO
HILL
GN
OL
IA
AVE.
AVE.
LO
AVE .
.
HO
OD
ST
AVE NUE
ION
AVEN
UE
AL
NG
HERN
YO
N
CT
MISS
E.
NUE
ROAD
TO
AVE
03
ST
RE
ET
UPP
ER
CI
T
UR
LUPINE
CT.
O
JE
W
AV
FIFTH
THIRD
ST
RO
AD
U E
AVEN
STREET
L
10-011 #
AV
SOUT
W
AY
#
FOUR TH
BU
RD.
E.
EL
VE
DRI
RA FAEL
PLACE
E
RC
HT
NUE
AV
LANE
E
19-0
LF
O
N
YO
TO
KNIGHT
DR.
S
EL
IB
SE
GLEN
W
DR
AVEN
UE
DE LUCA
G
A
PE
AVENUE
ST.
D
AN
GL
AN E.
AV
RTS
BE
RI
AVE
AD
ANTONETTE
CO UR T
PLEASANT
#
ST
RO
LN
.
BELLE
WALTE
R LN.
ENS
DRIV E
RIV
CT.
RUSH
SA
CIRCLE
E
R IV
D
D
OO
MANOR
AVENUE
STR
LN
FO
STE
JEW
DU
AVE.
ALVINA
MA
O
C
T
MAR
E
AV
EN
UE
BLVD.
GE
AR
Y AV
RD
DRIVE
NUNAN
5
24-01
JO
RD
LOCU
AV
RAFAEL
IS
C
AN
FR
COURT
WO
ODLAN
D
STREET
ST
CU
AVE.
AVE
.
AVE .
FIFTH
PL.
24-509
16-001
LO
AC
AC
PLUM
LN.
PLAC
E
LANE
IVY LANE
MART ENS
OAK
NI
PALOM
A
EE T
101
PARK
NE
LA
STR
ION
_
Æ
FIRE
RIVIERA
OAK
.
R
D
MAGNOLIA
NU
E
_
Æ
ó
HIGHWAY
OCTAVIA
AVENUE
SAGEB
WAY
HILL
GR
AD
AVENUE
WA
TT
CLINTON
CT.
24-507
E
SID
GOLD
AV
E.
E
ALBERT
LD
AVENUE
YD
E
V
Y
L
D DR
LOCUST AV
AVE.
E.
W
B
OO
GE
CL
STREET
24-511
#
#
STREET
EL
.
VD
G
IN
D
IN
KE
RA
D
E
CT
MA PL
E
BL
W
CIS
AN
FR
PIN
PARK
AV
#
TAYLOR
STREET
GO
ALL
NE WH
AV
E
AVE NUE
LAUR
HILL
N
D
DRIVE
MISS
DR
IV
E
LIN
DE
VISTA
RIT
TE
R
ELFORD
ST.
#
SIR
AV
GRAN
ST.
24-009
STREET
24-007
PALM AV
AV
DW
RE
PLAR
PO
BR
ID
E
AL
#
TREANOR
D
DR
GLEN
KD
OO
#
STREET
ST.
STREET
SAN
VISTA
E
PLAC
E
AN
DE
RS
EN
W
G
I N
ST
RE
ET
_
Æ20-001 ó
a
ST.
PER
E
AD
BR
FRANCES
#
24
# -011
#
A
OAK
AV
MAK IN
ER
ALT
W
GR
E.
AV
#
ST.
GR
KIN
MA
LA
6
GOLD
BR
AD
CL
IFF
WA
Y
AR
COMMERCIA
L
STREET
_
Æ
SECOND
OOD
D
LW
E
D
WAY
A
NN
LINDEN
LINCOLN
BAYVIE
THIRD
N
RAFAEL
TO
YO
N
SKYLAND WY
VIL
#
#
AVENUE
TA
TES
SP
AN
EM
CLAY
TO
AVENU E
ES
UP
017
AV
E.
ROSS
GREENWOO
D
GR
AD
E
01-
DR.
2400
ST.
LIN D E NW
CT.
DRIVE
UE
RE
ET
# #
ó
JULIA
STREET
01
-0
14
DA
R IN
CLO
R
ST
FIR
ST
AVE.
.
WY
WINDING
TO
YO
N
GR
O
VE
EN
AV
ES
DR
AD
#
1
20-00
JONE
S
PL.
TH
OR
PALO
MA
T
EE
TR
S
O
O
HE
AR
IE
S
ELM
12 10
-013
-0
10
#
NV
ENT
A
MES
LN
OR
FL
V I STA
N O L L RO
E
STREET
24-502
CA LA
LOS
RE
L
CO
T
DA
AVENU
#
RIA
_
Æ 10-009
FOUR TH
AD
MIRA MAR
K
FIFTH
KN OL
DRIVE
RG
MA
CURTIS
LAUREL
LW
ZE E
A
H AN
L
D
VI
DA
N
# 09-0
05
DR
I
BERT
AVE.
LATHAM
MIRA
RO
LL
O
D
RO
MISSION
12-005
DR
GL
O
CLORINDA AV EXT DR
LA
U
LIN
BO N
ND
E
D RI V
PO
PLA
R
E.
ON
F
ESPALDA
CT.
RIN
AV
DRIV E
CO
RD
L
Y
UE
VE
SE
OIR
ERV
RES
O
IA
EN
ND
LI
DR.
RT
LUNNY
ST.
Y
AN
D
PAC
HE CO
TROS
T
ER FREMON T
SKYVIEW RD
YW
RR
EN
AV
DRI
UE
VI
O
X
W
GR
PA
M
DRIVE
LANE
24005
P
UE
EW
A
ER
EN
MAKIN
BE
03
-0
09
03
-0
07
SU
WA
UPP
POPLAR AV
UE
JES
FR
CLO
VE
RO
E LAND
AC
CT.
E
RD M
R
.
NT RD
E MO
UP
PE
R
AV
DRIVE
ó
#
AV
AV
PR
.
DR
UE
E
LA
O
IT
R
DRI
VE
.
CT
CO
L
MAW R
AVEN
CLORINDA AV EXT
LG
URE
LA
FOST
AVE.
GRAND
.
AE
END
L
BAYWOOD AV
A AV
RT
#
CAM
INO
EL
WE
ST
EN
ON
GT
OU
AVE
AND
RK
BR
A
ST
AV
LIN
R
G
TA
PA
YN
BR
#
ACE
GLENW
N
NIE
VI
AV
W EL
VE
STRE
ET
DR
IVE
12003
DUNAND
AVE.
W
CT
E
IV
R
D
STRE
ET
AVE.
e
AV
EN
UE
UE
YO
BA
TERR ACE
AV
AV
UE
EN
AV
EN
T
EET
SEN
A
TI N
Av
AF
LE
S
AK
O
ST
AV
EN
Y
UE
AV
D
E
HARC
WA
EN
CREST
O
O
IN
TR
R
TE
CEN
5
-00
10
T.
C
RT
PO
RA
AV
STR
E
UFF
W
AY
B
EH
A
WAY
TA
AVE
NUE
AVENUE
ve
G ro
AV
SID
IELD
E
.
AS
OM
EN
AV
D
VIS
CR
ES
C
DR
OOD
LS
O
OD
T
EE
RO
GE
R DR
.
T LE
YR
M
S PE
GR
BE
S
ET
YO
TI ER
EAST
e
in
g
AC
HIL
E
C
PLA
RE
VIS
TA
12-0
01
v
Spr
BA
ALE
XAND
ER
GRE ENF
RR
LE
W
J
SCENIC
ENT
ESC
W. CR .
DR
AVE
.
TE
PR
O
DRIV
CT
FOU
RTH
AV
TERRACE AV
HTS.
GREENFIELD CT
N
R
U
AVE .
g Gr
rin
o
ID
TW
FO
R
ST
PB
HE
ALEX
AND
ER
GREENFIELD
AV
IVE
CRE SC ENT
ARD
EY
DRIVE
E.
CT
AVE.
VIN
T
WAY
R
PEP PE
TE
R
TH
DR
NEAM
E
DRIVE
PARK WY
p
CE
N
RT
DR
MARGARITA
ND
ISLA
AV
ON
W
AY
AV
ET
STRE
SANTA
E
DR
AL
LD
HIL
DR
DRIVE
WAY
CLE
AV
SUNS
ET
CIR
JORD
AN
OA
KM
Y
.
FAIR
FIF
TH
MA RG
ARITA
EN
AV
E
E
SA
NTA
E
IA
B
A
W
SO
R
STR
DRIV
DR
SE
QUO
CT.
HAAF
LN
SC
D
EDGE
WO
OD
E.
GOLD
.
CT
AV
W
IN
D
#
AY
W
RO
E
O
EN
IV
E
TA
VIS
AL
O
LD
W
DR
HIL
W
H
UT
SO
D
OO
DR.
AV
EN
UE
R
IA
FR
E.
AV
DRIVE
E
WAY
E.
T
10
-0
03
E
MAN
LE
CO
O
E
E
IV
AV
ENU
R
DR
RI VE
JE
NS
OA K
DR
O
AV
ST
REE
AN
01
-0
10
A KS
JORDAN AV
O
CR
M
LE
CO
NO
LD
T
B
CT.
D
E
OK
IR
LA
WOOD
T
DR
IV
E
HU
MBO
MAY
W
IN
DS
O
R
EE
STR
FRANCIS LN
VI
NT
ON
ON
MILT
HA
.
CT
AVENUE
CLU
IZA
O
DRIVE
SO
#
DRIVE
D
OO
EL
M
ILS
AV
CO
U
RT
CO
LN
.
CT
W
DR
IV
WILD
WO OD
SEQUOIA DR
PINE
UT
ESTN
W
NG
LO
WAY
AL
CH
ED
ON
D
#
LI
N
C
O
AVE.
S
RO
AD
W
AY
WIM
BL
OO
C
OA
K
AY
AK
O
CIR.
LN
YW
TI
S
U
R
ILLS
LE
Y
WAY
EC
H
PL O
.
ER
D
N
FAIRH
VAL
W
RIV
B LE
TIL
DE
MA
EY
VALL
MONT
OAK RT
COU
IM
W
T
UR
CO
FIFT
H
O
N
E
ON .
MM CT
HA
W
Y
DR
IV
D
O
RID
DR
IVE
PR OSPECT
HILL
LE
A
H
FA
E
AVENUE
W
IE
V
LE
DA
00-502
DA
CO
NV
EN
T
CORTE
DR
IV
DR.
N
K
PAR
OAKWOOD
TH
BE
OD
MO
##
LIA
LIL
#
#
#
DRIVE
Y
WA
OO
U RT
O
C
UA
.
O
CT
.
BISC
AYN E
OD
WO
ALDERW
AQ
#
PE
DR
CT.
E
ID
GR EEN S
CO
CASCAD
E DR.
09-001
#
DR
FAIR
E
OCK
SILK
VISTA
OO
D
ET
TR
IN I
01-015
WA
Y
DG
SU LGRAV E
LN.
ROAD
SC
.
LN
TW
.
RA
C
E
#
N
RI DGE
L L WY
PI
NEC
CT. ON
A
LL
VI
D
LL
S
EL
TE R
SA
RT
I
UR
N
SA
ROCK
H
GE
ED
LA
CT
.
ULA
CR
ES
OO
HI
WC
AS
TL
E
CT
H
06-0
05
PA
DRIVE
NE
BIS CAY
N
LO
S
E.
AV
NE
CH
DG
EW
AVE
.
LE
G
RI
A
OL
RT
BA
Y
D
EN
PA
E
DR
IV
N
NO
IO
ALB
NO
VA
DO
N
CO TIM
UR OT
EO
T
23
-0
05
CO
RT
PA E
CH
EC
O
CE
RM
CO
EN
UR
HO
T
LA
NE
UE
NE
N
LO
E
E
U
EN
AV
MA
NU
N
E
AV
E
IV
E
E
AV
TO
G
U
NC
IN
N
OA K
OD
WO
GE
RA
E
AV
E
CL
IR
C
RID
DR
TREE
H
E.
RT
PO
MEAD
OAKS OW
DR.
1
-00 007
09
25
RO
AD
RO
AD
RO
AD
DRI
VE
LF
AD
O
W AY
RD
EW
H
AS
N
#
INDIAN
I
V
AV
.
EN
D
AR
G
A
LA
CT GE
.
101
R
PILGRIM
RO
AD
AD
GA
R
D
VIL
AY
E
OAKRIDGE
REN
VU
RANCHITO
S
LIN
O
R
ED
P
01
06-0
25
-0
05
RD.
FA
RM
CIRCLE
VE
A
AD
O
R
#
DRIVE
HW
HIG
AL
YD
RR
ME
O
LL
VAN
E
RO
SO
R
5
-00
25
E
IV
DR
VIA
FIR
IVE
AY
E.
W
L
IA
R
O
W
EL
IL LO
DR
EM
M
HIGH
AVE.
W
NO
O
G
OOD
AD
AV
E.
AV
A
RRI
CO
E
FF
JE
IVE
RO
E.
O
AD
PR
.
DR
ó
_
Æ
ES
AD
N
O
EY
AL
H
S
IR
M
IS
AD
M
DR
CIVIC
CENTER
E.
DW
RE
AV
S
OR
FL
S
S
LA
TA
ER .
HU CT
LA
COURT
LINA
ER
MARIN
COUNTY
E
S
Y
WA
AY
A
CT.
ANZA
WAY
VE
CO
LA
GAL
AV
01-013
DE
ANGE
L
S
KE
E
EX
SUSS
HIND
CH
LA
EN
WAY
AR
DR
A
#
003
22-
WALTER
PL.
LD
DIAS
3
23-00
AL
YD
RR
ME
AY
W
O
G
E
AG
OR
CH .
AN CT
DRIVE
DEVON
CE NT
05-009
BEHR
D
C
AN
CON ST
#
CIVIC
W
DEVON
#
003
25-
ROA
HILL
SUMMER T
COUR
SUMMERHILL
O
R
TE AY
ES W
E
TRE
PINE CT.
WA
Y
WAY
LE
IVE
SC
E LT
V
A
V
DR
ON
PETER
CIRC
NO
ALBI
SE
O
RO
AUG
U
3
01-01
AL
RE
SAO
AY
W
W
AY
AI
RRI
LL
O
THGATE
NOR
AN
IS
FA
EL
VI
CO
LA
IV
TOS
RANCHI
R
D
RT
FRANCISCO

San Rafael - Walk Bike Marin!

Transcription

Similar documents

fix-it-yourself bike stand 1693e, 624172

Untitled - Berkshire Maestros

Newsletter May 2014 - Resilient Neighborhoods

10 Marina Terra - Seaside Realty

REDMOND Bicycling Guide Regional Map

Traveler`s Guide

the PDF - Community Cycling Center

Bicycle Culture by Design

Bike Coalition Brochure - San Diego County Bicycle Coalition

HISTORY OF BICYCLING