"Parsifal / Druidess": Unfolding a Lithographic Metamorphosis by
Transcription
"Parsifal / Druidess": Unfolding a Lithographic Metamorphosis by
"Parsifal / Druidess": Unfolding a Lithographic Metamorphosis by Odilon Redon Author(s): Dario Gamboni Source: The Art Bulletin, Vol. 89, No. 4 (Dec., 2007), pp. 766-796 Published by: College Art Association Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25067360 . Accessed: 20/12/2013 12:05 Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at . http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp . JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact support@jstor.org. . College Art Association is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to The Art Bulletin. http://www.jstor.org This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions a Parsifal / Druidess: Unfolding Lithographic by Odilon Redon Metamorphosis Dario Gamboni In 1879, with an album of ten prints and one frontispiece en tided Dans le r?ve ("In theDream" or "Dreaming"), Odilon Redon started publishing lithographs. The album format proved and congenial three more successful: followed a clear distinction He made between the Jules Destr?e. isolated he introduced under which the title plates, generic as "not Pi?ces modernes but linked by any regarded special "in the author's the albums, and which, mind, relationship," form wholes, that cannot be broken down without groupings num his Pieces" betraying By then, these "Modern thought."1 to bered Redon continued al eight lithographs. produce critic as bums, books. In fact, his for prints and preparing of his catalog to so that in 1898, while rest mainly on his albums, so much a new for journals frontispieces as a continued lithographer reputation the prints, critic Andr? Mel lerio asked him why he had produced isolated pieces. Redon replied somewhat angrily that he had made them like "every other artist tion echoes from signaled and vidual the present the that the Mellerio's ques past."2 character of the albums, the sequential contrasts by Redon organized were within prints and between to his crucial them, the indi appreciation. Despite Redon's irritation, the insight provided by such an approach remains valuable. The 1885 album Homage toGoya, for instance, series and opens are and clearly tary: the firstone a dark on front closes with conceived as two that frame images and opposed the complemen (Fig. 20) shows a male head, seen from the a melancholic with background, and search ing expression, while a female profile (Fig. 21), described by as the caption sheet white We "severe in the October 1891, the organized which itself are prints the writer champion, with a note answered mutually received of Goya mail thanks that, ures strange confronted unfolded, created. you and Ah! gentle me But and they are suffering and with his had from written perfect with who Huysmans, to On unrelated. day: "My janitor brought me up thismorning once prints, according the sentence to Mellerio's clearly of which and minute in 1976, way when, unexpected a pretty roll the troubling fig so the one Redons, the other arrow, so catalog, were have been proofs version this unknown three only of comparison led to conclude them must considers them as a pair on a A preserved.6 I will (which subject." They must have been an undescribed not state of "printed from a different stone and a first, be therefore itwas that the latter but had been supposed a flaw in the of version rejected that the reason for Parsifal rejection a hori created "which stone, the this zontal black line through the entire composition, just above Parsifal's brow," and they argued for the equal quality but and of emotional "conception impact" a harsh, accents forms broken light divergent versions: seems he fate," merely the hero appear "pensive" nation of Parsifal II Extending the comparison the even same period, more recur can be easily elements seen illumi lithographs of a made Swenson that discovery: as in Druidess, one when second, observed that the fortuitous "apparently I of Parsifal of two the and is turned upside down (Fig. 4). McCullagh compositions Swenson to other Redon and McCullagh remarkable "tormented by soft, even in the two the dramat whereas ically in Parsifal I and makes his assemblage of lines on Parsifal's white collar is found inverted on the Druidess's white reconstruction headband." of the They proposed one from passage of Parsifal's neck and chin, her and the side her veil, elegant at the bottom of his helmet added of edge lithograph shaft of of "remnants the the They earring." of Druidess, that Parsifal's from the lighted him light beside is transformed in some right the print," following to the eye which impres can be cor now responds to the horizontal black line observed inParsifal! In other words, they suggested that after rejecting Parsifal I, Redon turned the stone upside down and, leaving out the smaller part of the lithograph divided by the aberrant line, transformed the larger initial to his returning new version of is a This editioned Suzanne henceforward call Parsifal I) with the impressions ofMellerio 116 (henceforward Parsifal IT) in the Art Institute collection discerned same Given the fact thatHuysmans received the three lithographs in one roll, it is only logical that he should have discussed them together, but his treatment of Parsifal and Druidess in same in an confirmed sions artist, build Folds McCullagh and Inge Christine Swenson, two art histo rians working at the Art Institute of Chicago, discovered a version o? Parsifal (Fig. 3) unmentioned inMellerio's catalog, into become the on had in 1892: Parsifal (Fig. 1), Druidess (Fig. 2), and a linear depic tion of two standing women entitled Mystical Conversation? the counterpart defines terriblyanimal with her crude profile and her shiny eye. And the two pale mystics!"4 This description identifies three which, of the former level, the gentleness to the hardness of the latter. This intuition of an intimate link between the two images area contention Destr?e's Joris-Karl of Homage promotion semantic other: "The priestess's profile is developed with disagree critical he detaches hard," the one.3 also individual 11, Redon's second however, may, that Redon's and from ing and a was until, in 1886, the artist began issuing individual sheets with Profile ofLight (Fig. 18). In April 1891, a first catalog of Redon's lithographs was published by the Belgian lawyer,writer, and as well formal it, Parsifal strange expected genesis canceled routinely not /was see, sufficient image, Druidess, an and creating composition a new on stone. II, and before entirely hardly corresponding a work. stones Lithographic run was a after regrained print procedure, from pleted, so thematerial Redon into a new part such to the were com loss represented by the failed Parsifal to call for a of "recycling" this kind. Was reluctant to lose the image completely? As we shall it would have been easy This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions to transfer the imperfect image A LITHOGRAPHIC UNFOLDING BY ODILON METAMORPHOSIS REDON 757 1 Odilon Redon, Parsifal [II], 1891, on mounted ivory China lithograph 12M> X 95/s in. (32.1 X paper, of 24.3 cm). The Art Institute the Stickney Collection, Chicago, 1920.1695 (artwork in the public domain; photograph provided by the Art Institute onto of Chicago) a new /is Parsifal improve into the II, which on takes it. The other, have therefore instances image from another," of a nude I of Parsifal must of Druidess transformation image in its own Redon right. In their brief and Swenson rightly pointed in which "created including an early etching of a galloping evocation of Parsifal to version of the rejected different radically attracted outcome obvious advantage additional article, McCullagh documented the more and stone, Redon one a in which to other new wholly he turned rider (Fig. 5) into the vague the mean woman (Fig. 6), transforming into a depiction lines of clouds of hair after turning dering on cases as "indicative saw such of its side. They the plate to see alternatives in his creations and of his Redon's ability one to pursue form from these visions, nurturing willingness can go even further and in this One another." ability identify a and of Redon's and willingness theory key element practice we of meta look at this process take a closer of art. Before morphosis, though, we must ask ourselves to what extent the identity of the two figures at stake, following the indications by Redon's given titles, are relation in the genetic involved binding them. Parsifals refers Parsifal ard Wagner's in sented er's read and which was iar to him the Le of chivalry had Redon had been many important that he had would write of his brothers he was de Troyes's ou le roman conte du Graal reasons himself played a fine to be to him been piano violinist. This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions his "born on wrote More pre the compos it, he knew could of de Perceval. attracted from and been its plot, famil have been already tale late-twelfth-century he case, and may discussed widely from Chr?tien had preceding seen not had in any and of Rich hero work the year Redon although libretto, This drama. in 1882, Bayreuth death, have to the eponymous unequivocally last musical to Wagner. Music and years, early a sound wave."7 music criticism, important, he had he One and de ART BULLETIN 768 LXXXIX 2007 VOLUME DECEMBER 4 NUMBER 2 Redon, 1891, Druidess, on mounted ivory China lithograph 9Vs X paper, 8 in. (23.1 X 20.2 cm). The Art Institute Collection, of Chicago, 1920.1698 the Stickney (artwork in the public domain; photograph provided by theArt Instituteof Chicago) himself fined on early as a "symphonist and painter," musical were devotees of model he on the thought that the future of the visual arts depended Many Wagner "suggestion."8 to him, Ernest Chausson the composer and close including to The latter was Henri Fantin-Latour. using lithography after Wagner, disseminate Parsifal compositions including and theFlowerMaidens (Fig. 12), and introduced Redon Redon, technique. to with interpret colors however, the as himself Wagner casions, however, admiration an In nature."9 for he also Wagner's unfulfilled?to he note, unpublished "yet another even On naturalist."10 world, his expressed as well work, interest as his dismissed even and his desire?which visit Bayreuth. were the in Paris, Wagnerites the mid-1880s advocating By other of the "total work of art." Like early proponents theory would remain of Symbolism, they participated heart, that of freeing The Revue naturalism. the visual on the Salon from of that de Wyzewa year the founded Wagn?riennewas and on May 8, 1886, Teodor pages in an effortdear to Redon's arts by constraints in June calling for a of 1885, commented descriptive" existing ciated ing in its peinture and the editor to musical," He painting.11 practitioners himself officially Redon, its among indeed, who, "sensational replace mentioned had already already asso cause the Wagnerian by accept an to create invitation Dujardin's with Edouard (Fig. 7) as a deluxe gift for subscribers image of Br?nnhilde to the Revue}2 The head of this Br?nnhilde bears a definite to the later Druidess (Fig. 2). also Redon exhib ited Br?nnhilde drawings in 1888 and 1890, and he would publish in 1894 a second lithograph with the same title, less more and dramatic oc several and resemblance attempt the musical "solely internal and without any support in which he deemed real of Fantin's disapproved of painting to this "emotional wagn?rienne, in character.13 Pre-Raphaelite Devoting a lithograph to the figure of Parsifal in 1891 was therefore place tation a not in a series of myths and Wagnerism Symbolism, of the center then ing by publicity may relevance more on Redon's It took choice part. surprising to of explicit references interpre Wagner's association with and reinforced the artist's that of syncratic and public raise a doubt should as Redon rejection two cultural be traditional at times about for his notions desultory This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions The love of occupy of dimension the degree to this choice granted is known movements attention. of of intrinsic title, all the his of indeterminacy, and his "illustration," treatment of idio iconography.14 A LITHOGRAPHIC UNFOLDING BY ODILON METAMORPHOSIS 769 REDON 3 Redon, Parsifal [I], 1891, lithograph on mounted ivory China 12% paper, X 9V2 in. (32.2 X 24 cm). The Art Institute of Chicago, Gift of Robert M. Light, 1975.493 (artwork in the public domain; photograph provided by the Art Institute The Mus?e thus of Chicago) d'Orsay, to have seems owns Paris, presented a that Redon drawing as and Saint Parsifal pastel alternately John (Fig. 8).15 Bearded, without helmet and spear but with a and coat, heavy amid standing a mountainous landscape, this figure has little in common with Parsifal I and Parsifal II, except meanor. for perhaps Still, John" Parsifal the is revealing could be oversize the hesitation placed eyes between of both and the for Redon "Parsifal" semantic and of de melancholic and context the artist's "Saint rous drawing and mystical, The "a kind seen of Parsifal, from the bard or or during and oriented I after its realization barba it. However, even "a kind than have of Parsifal" labeled ex post facto has something to do with its literaryand play" de Troyes the German tury by ourselves ask interest could in Wagner's libretto was what Redon. The worth already adapted poet Wolfram that noting in cen in the thirteenth early von Aeschenbach. and the 1860s?when It fascinated early stage which Wagner literature, by epic of mankind and with he associated the unadulterated is was writing the first sketch for his Parsifal poem?Redon an knight, rather Chr?tien manner front."17 festival inspired by the legend of the Holy Grail, as transmitted by been titleParsifal may thus have come to identify the figure of Parsifal preceded as so we must referent, "sacred in which of identifyingwhat he liked to call his "fictions."16 In May list of works an 1904, he described in his chronological earlier musical had with land scape and people of his beloved Pays Basque.18 His firstmajor painting, shown at the 1870 exhibition of the Soci?t? des Amis des century Arts de chanson was Bordeaux, de geste hero alone, youthful separated mass his red cape of a mountain, perhaps Parsifal, on based de Roland: Chanson from his forming troop a halo the the depicts the dark by and to his imminent sacrifice (Fig. 9). the son of a knight This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions killed in combat, eleventh it was alluding raised in ART 770 BULLETIN LXXXIX 2007 VOLUME DECEMBER 4 NUMBER ignorance of his origin and of knighthood by his mother have feared who Herzeleide, for to Redon appealed his element life?an in connection that may the with complex history of his own childhood.19 Following knights who pass Parsifal the woods, through reaches the castle Montsalvat, of theHoly Grail, and witnesses the drama unfolding within its walls without a it. Klingsor, understanding ma self-castrated gician rejected by the chaste Knights of the Grail, uses the Flower and Maidens the seductress to ensnare Kundry them; he has managed to take the Holy Spear from King Amfortas while the latter succumbed toKundry and to inflicton him a wound thatwill not heal, making him unfit to perform the holy office of theGrail. Attempting to regain theHoly Spear, Parsifal resists the maiden but is tempted by Kundry into a kiss. Instead ture of being of Amfortas's seduced, wound, the recovering Klingsor, he however, the na realizes and Kundry, vanquishes side. Christ's that had pierced rejects spear Cursed by Kundry, he does not reach Montsalvat again until a after the on long wandering, repentant Good heals Kundry, and Amfortas, he There, Friday. baptizes becomes of King the Grail.20 and purity have chastity the miracle, performed but not without the brief moment of weakness echoing the prophecy once heard by Amfortas: "Enlightened through the compassion, Tor].99 Wagner innocent for adopted [Durch Mitleid fool his wissend, name hero's der reine an assume Parsifal at the end imaginary of the artist who the role of Christ, becomes of capable with man redeeming of and isolation image many can male figures, their making this texts, private under the guise Expressed in his works inadequacy.23 be detected also in to resemblances of I Parsifal and Parsifal II significant. The Cask ofAmontillado (Fig. 10), for refers to the character example, short story but on a more Poe's as a victim.24 tilted The figure's eyes, closed found?amid lesser and lips, obvious extent, in Edgar Allan the fool shows of Fortunato generic head, melancholic level hard can expression in Parsifal II Apart to I differences?in and, Parsifal from more features, regular which bring it closer to Parsifal II, the same can be said of Head Crowned with Thorns (Fig. 11), a Christ-like representa tion of a "gentle" martyr, in which the dark eyes are empha sized even more by the light filling the lower part of the face and A with contemporary comparison is also artists fal by other illuminating. representations Under the of Parsi terms of a copyright obtained from King Ludwig II for Parsifal, written forWagner's newly built theater, Parsifal could not be per formed outside Bayreuth from its creation in 1882 to 1914. Nonetheless?or perhaps because of the restriction?images of it proliferated, generally based on Paul von Joukowsky's original sets and costumes.25 Joukowsky and most of his followers distinguished between the Parsifal of the first act, a more or less rustic simpleton Christ-like Parsifal who appeared in peasant's attire, and the after Kundry's kiss and the a gave Rochegrosse protocinematographic vaguely architectural forms in the first version secondary and figures, and the spear. a minimum only the Significantly, (Fig. 3)?no of attributes: closest helmet, antecedents of his Parsifal in compositional terms are icons of Saint George in the Byzantine tradition, where the closely framed saint a holds As that also spear to the remains reason the question a to inspire in this direction: points as tends Parsifal virgins, case another terminacy; an like looks transformation arrow. of Redon's Parsifal of whether Wagner's of change Iinto gendered Druidess, Parsifal had identity. My knight with Joan ofArc already like other to a characters young certain sexual is Saint in point seen Redon defined lability whom John, or inde we have equate with Parsifal. In addition, it isby rejecting that Parsifal transforms his initial "foolishness" into sexuality full-grown, spiritual purity. Among contem of Parsifal images porary with Redon's lithograph, the most interesting in this context is a slightly later drawing by Simeon Solomon in scribed A Design for a Motif from Parsifal (Fig. 14). It depicts twoheads in profile, the one on the left looking upward and Their the as for almost headdress their a veil with are features one's second appearance; is covered which one, wing, identically androgynous lends it a more feminine to relation a bird's and one drama, Wagner's is tempted to interpret them as Parsifal and Kundry, but they as well could same sen represent since person, by Solomon developments but also more the woodcut bust. amia into women, and Parsifal stand turning of Arc. These them like a male Joan Redon chose how the iconic comparisons emphasize clearly over as he had done in The Cask Amontillado. the narrative, of no His of Parsifal show no action, images setting?except but a as an him shown the flowers porn?of transfixed amid ing the other be all had rendering of the same scene (Fig. 13), with a literal evoca to mind Disney animation spiked with soft tion?calling downward. oversize features, himself comparison of Rochegrosse's the world.22 This combination of traits to the image of the artist thatRedon had corresponds closely in built for himself, part to justify and sublimate his feelings kind by renouncing Fantin-Latour Georges-Antoine any and he understood him as a Kundry playing Mary Magdalen, figure torments. ble semigod, gently making his way through the crowd of entreating maidens (Fig. 12). The late academic painter there etymology proposed by Johann Joseph von G?rres: a deriva tion from theArabic parsi (pure, chaste) and/?/ (fool).21 He had erotic temptations encountered by the hero than by his inner cape, Parsifal's also over to the sec is closer Redon's Parsifal triumph Klingsor. as the presence ond of the but his confirms, spear type, or melancholic in I, suffering Parsifal expression, particularly an a indicates The rather than quest. ongoing completed in what and artists who called "sensational Wyzewa indulged on the were more attracted art," contrary, by the descriptive the two aspects sparse and ambiguous Richard feminized artist?to of readings.26 the cho attributes Later in the twentieth century yield more explicit idiosyncratic expressions of this tendency: in as a Woman, Wagner Baselitz not only depicted Wagner's also two moments for both arguments give or the neutralize in composer, his love of for example, Georg head upside down but to order?according the pathos.27 The later interpretation most relevant to Redon by far is Hans J?rgen Syberberg's 1982 film Parsifal, inwhich the hero a man is played by same in the year, and the two egg. Then the In a "film a woman. director calls them essay" published I" and "Parsifal "Parsifal II" and explains their relationship as follows. During the overture, together in an briefly appear Parsifal united, I stands up as and if sleeping "enters the film" while Parsifal II continues to sleep, intimating that the This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions A LITHOGRAPHIC UNFOLDING BY ODILON METAMORPHOSIS REDON 771 4 Redon, Parsifal [I] presented upside down in the public (artwork domain; photograph provided by theArt Institute of Chicago) action is her following ture as "our dream."28 dream while The male I lives his Parsifal adven which remark Parsifal?looking lemical ably like Redon's Parsifal I at this point?is replaced by the female one (Fig. 15) when Kundry's kiss reminds him of Amfortas's wound, which of fusion cinematographic (Karen Krick) with themale an produces which for ment show of temptation in an inner herself. The practical, going rather than Kundry's gender doubling solution the biblical himself. The and body face actor's to "the visual-aural had the explained actor female of Kundry as man's monologue, visible beyond double Syberberg actor by the rejection within that enabled as mankind's resistance "better the resistance to woman?as part" was of Parsifal thus presented difficult conception intellectual of woman her to if, warning a task" of as evil, who sung "a to and cultural, po reportedly by Wilhelmine on improvement also Syberberg tenors disliked and updating that the thought and once Schr?der-Devrient, praised would have a of his Parsifal."31 image androgynous are further reasons to support In this assertion. good on that after noted 27, 1880, June diary, Cosima Wagner enjoyed There replace to him intended Weltanschauung, Wagner's Romeo "image," of "a chi effect to this In addition of for historical, attached reasons.30 composer, singer's voice (Reiner Goldberg) spectators-auditors the male Parsifal's feels the female unforgettable some a monster."29 mera, now he was Wagner female playing the first theme from Parsifal on the piano, Wagner explained to her that he had had certain words sung by a so choir that line. He they would further sound neither this device compared nor mascu feminine to Leonardo's depic tion of Christ in his Last Supper (Fig. 16), which amounted "an almost portray woman."32 feminine "the human It is worth head a beard" with features noting This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions in here and was meant man neither general, was that Redon a to to nor great ART 772 DECEMBER BULLETIN 2007 VOLUME LXXXIX NUMBER 4 on 5 Redon, 1866, etching light gray Galloping Horseman, to ivory wove chine affixed 214 X 5V4 in. (6.3 X paper, the Stickney Collection, 13.3 cm). The Art Institute of Chicago, 1920.1523 in the public (artwork domain; photograph provided by theArt Institute of Chicago) of Leonardo admirer that and to the resemblance latter's his Christ, Parsifal although turning point made career, popular numerous treatments "androgynous" a by litho have noted in Parsi graphed version (Fig. 17). Musicologists fal one explicit d'Orsay, Paris), a than the painting Closed Eyes (1890, Mus?e in the artist's a definite bears a less of timbre, rhythm, and voice, including the triple choir of the Grail ceremony (act 2, scene 2) in which the progressive spiritualization is expressed not only by a higher position in the cupola but also a desexualization by young of These boys.33 of "all the that of form sexual and racial of the "religion aimed at the by Parsifal and by Wagner future" preached abolition to the the knights the Canadian musicol from led have to consider Nattiez ogist Jean-Jacques voices the features distinction."34 Druidesses to a rich and referred topical clearly or inde the issue of sexual ambiguity al the case with Druidess, is less obviously thus Parsifal that included Redon's context This terminacy. though the latter subject is far from isolated in the artist's work. A charcoal drawing with this title (Kr?ller-M?ller Mu seum, side and trees oak in an Redon expression Druidess also nature.36 two particular, of the its takes form incarnations be standing of the same of the Druidic the connection being.35 Beyond forests female schematic if they were as tree, a shows Otterlo) a Druidesses between affinity place in the cult with for represented women long and of his series female profiles, one of which, entitled The Fairy (1882, col of Mrs. lection Bertram as served Smith), a model for the 1886 lithograph Profile of Light (Fig. 18).37 It shares with Druidess elaborate the as well veils, flowing in one forehead is different, "primitive" her as "so line. The and the Druidess harsh of and shape with nose profile their gazes, displays heavier with can be more to describe Huysmans some To crude profile." to that between the compared her 1885 and the 1894 versions of Br?nnhilde (Fig. 7). An entitled charcoal motif As seems with drawing the Druidess's for the reference to owe it to a Spring association to a Druidic comparison connects with priestess made the female trees and 1883 profile nature.38 in a title, Redon in passing domain; 1920.1524 Collection, photograph by provided in the (artwork the Art Institute of Chicago) the however, and the Stickney Chicago, public on wove and drypoint 1904, etching ivory in. (13.3 X 6.3 cm). The Art Institute of Bather, 5lA X 2?? and prompted animal terribly their difference extent, relatively direction which features, in conical headdress as a 6 Redon, paper, by the Belgian lawyer, art critic, and collector Edmond in his Picard "monodrama" Le jure (The Juror). In 1886, Picard had asked meant to be six drawings this text with interpret as the chosen passages Among "reproduced" lithographs.39 was of the hero's of a photograph the description by Redon in which and grandi distant mother she appeared "dramatic the artist to ose, with the hairdo [or the headgear] theatrical, filled imposing, with her of a Druidic priestess, factitious, luxurious and loud life,but with nothing motherly about her."40 In typical fashion, Redon?who had reasons This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions to complain about his own A LITHOGRAPHIC UNFOLDING 7 Redon, 4% paper, Brunnhilde, X 3% in. main; 8, (August Collection, photograph socialite into 8 Redon, 1914 in. in the public do (artwork the Art Institute of Chicago) 1920.1606 by provided mother?transformed distant this Picard, enigmatic profile.41 the following have noticed and year, must bought Spring this since he modified transformation, accepted accordingly the simplified quotation for the caption lithograph, from a fashionable detail from his text that he offered as a extending to the whole the Pays Basque, 1860s on, were widely had been early origins where Redon regarded least diluted to have suffered, historical conquerors, logic, and communion nirs eternal fairy-tale areas "the from where by subsequent the these history."43 where he and its soil was seemed to him "to have lived, "like an to have force, Ernest Renan child, with loved," he the Celts nature, et de jeunesse, the represented and the unconscious. which Redon irrational, read fantasy, In his Souve and annotated, told in 1883 of the legends he had heard as a and he contrasted the Greeks' achievements, with X 2bVi paper, des D?partement Paris, RF 36521 by Herv? race" and ability infinity"; what of it in touch kept was India, folly," the Celts' secrets "the including source of the of similar expressed feelings to their In opposition about continuity Brittany.44 the Romans, who stood for instrumental reason, d'enfance Breton that itive world," "an traveled of man "Celtic character In a semifictionalized account of his decisive 1863 trip to the declared the "Dramatic had as terized character: . . ."42 with her of a Druidic grandiose figure priestess. was a in Interest much of Celtic Redon 's very part things with origins and with fascination With the Ro the primitive. to which at mantic remained the artist movement, deeply the Celts and their the Druids, had been tached, class, priestly as the true ancestors hailed of the French nation. Brittany the Parthenon, symbolized by from the heart the "Druidic" and he Pays Basque, ancient homeland," 773 of a evocation imaginative female yet another or Saint on John, pastel du Louvre, cm). Mus?e Parsifal (64 X 49 Arts Graphiques, fonds du Mus?e d'Orsay, in the domain; (artwork public photograph ? the RMN) Lewandowski, who and REDON 1886, (11.8 8 Wagn?rienne the Stickney on white wove in black lithograph X 9.9 cm), in La Revue published 1886). The Art Institute of Chicago, BY ODILON METAMORPHOSIS idealism, access and with to extract charac the "prim disinterestedness, to the royaume de f?erie, kingdom.45 On August 15, 1891, shortlybefore Redon created Parsifal I and Druidess, Edouard Sch?re published in the widely read Revue des Deux in which claimed lost its "distinct live in the French as nation some genius," preparing In a later historical urrection."46 vival, the same soul" as "the feeling sense of the and the mantic sense of and soul." literature Les teaubriand's these a Druidess irrational, "Celtic the occult in Woman the Divine The had martyrs, soul" "deep sudden and about and re of the Celtic and as well in Love," res "splendid the Celtic of Nature powers and to continued consciousness study the three "arcanes defined clairvoyance between connection of author of the legends Brittany, race may the Celtic have "Celtic its superior of on a long essay that although the nationality," Mondes he Given the the as the intimate prophecy.47 ideas of femininity, the primitive, to be the ideal incarnation had most appeared ou Le influential druidess in Fran?ois-Ren? triomphe de la religion from de Ro Cha chr?tienne (The Martyrs, or The Triumph of the Christian Religion), of which Redon possessed a copy in the 1809 original edition.48 Inspired by the story of Vell?da, This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions a first-century Germanic 774 ART BULLETIN 2007 VOLUME DECEMBER LXXXIX 4 NUMBER 9 Redon, Roland 69, oil on canvas, 48.5 cm). Mus?e deposit Bordeaux, at Roncevaux, 1868 24 X 19V6 in. (61 X RF on Paris, d'Orsay, at the Mus?e des Beaux-Arts, in the (artwork 1984.47 public domain; photograph by Lysiane Gauthier, Mus?e ? des Beaux-Arts, Bordeaux) who priestess-prophetess revolt against the Romans, a third-century priestesses Gaul had last of Druidess, the ministering the Batavians' supported Chateaubriand gave the nine of sanctuary the failed name her oracular ends to virgin on ?le de Sein, which the Druids buried their dead.49 The hero of the book, the Greek-born mander of Christian Eudore, witnessed Brittany, appointed her attempt to raise a revolt cliff. As Eudore's his the Gauls touching itual charms condemns rose to avenge and innocence and in a dramatic resistance memorable the took as barbaric her figure, narrator pays and her own nighttime she honor, superstitious intention Chateaubriand's to prove the invention physical and a gave on the It is as shore. or drama entitled in the a spir he reference post-1871 is in line with the of the Christian faith. superiority became of the part quickly "leg fire cult and and of the through sources" find not may source he explained homage, although her beliefs, including her claim to be a fairy.This condemnation author's by proclaimed life. Vell?da is thus to whose vivid scene artists well its many inspired beyond the Breton Le 1883, painter Jules-Eug?ne a of Vell?da's first appear descriptive rendering ance in Les martyrs (Fig. 19) as witnessed by Eudore hidden teaubriand among her people and quickly put an end to itwhile taking her prisoner. She then fell in love with him and eventually overcame nepveu and remote from Redon as Roche 'sDruidess grosse's Knight with theFlowers is from his Parsifal. But Cha com Roman of Brittany" in Thus, time. been the In which Vercing?torix, cause of French or only even their "doctrine of 1887, attempted In his rejuvenation. vigor.50 and Vercing?torix Gwynfea, the of "weakness our is built Vercing?torix Gwynfea, a virgin were "the This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions of the soul world "old generation" two around free Hero priestess the and of B?len, preface, theAryans' of the heavenly origin to the divine such a published to enlist Vell?da its return possibility of existences": the cycle in which the main Sch?re that the Celts had brought to Gaul new Seer."51 have for Druidess. the . . . national might figures, inspired and predicts UNFOLDING The Cask of Amontillado, 10 Redon, 1883, 1414 X 123/h in. (36.2 X 31.4 cm). fonds des Arts Graphiques, D?partement paper, RF Paris, 35.822 by G?rard Blot, ? the supports rise of Vercing?torix, the Roman against rix, however, is not and pressures her she loses her content to who and powers but prisoner to ask refuses to him for and appears Gwynfea The between hero relationship on what to some extent Sch?re shining heaven. pends Druids' of doctrine the three circles is a bottomless Anoun) matter abyss life; Abred animal and laid the Gallic she he pardon, him the way and Woodner, New is sorrow! Fearful a aloud."54 to de prophetess to be explains of existence: Anhwn corresponding is the circle Sch?re Vell?da, utters while lets Gwynfea his goes out! It is not light of nothingness, herself tearing deserve after The kiss remorse and our on heaven darkness have away close the altar vanishes. and following her say, and from attention: death!"53 details One the with the words she arms the Fire heart! my of Parsifal crying after being kissed by Kundry: "Amfortas! The wound! The wound! It burns within my heart! O a sorrow! of my be resemblance writer prolific the depths can From fortuitous fervent and heart ruled Wagnerite, it cries out since had pub lished in 1875 a book entitled Le drame musical, the second of which was to Wagner's devoted "work and it idea"; It appears that Sch?re conceived Gwyn deliberately as a female to Parsifal, and (in some aspects) counterpart a as in Vercing?torix the kiss scene symmetrical?with gender fea inversion sorrow, of dramatic the climax Redon Les one the representing work. point Wagner's that had made the book the protagonists?to the turning and a of copy possessed name in 1889, Sch?re's in initi?s: grands de Thistoire Esquisse secr?tedes religions (The Great Initiates: A Study in the Secret History of Religions). Itwas inscribed with the dedication "en tr?s sympathique hommage" (in friendly homage), but when it is not On known.56 25, 1892, February of Vercing?torix with a letter of thanks in it learn for the gracious of the same We reception day.57 a set for one to that Redon had declared himself ready design at Paul to be that were of the two scenes of the staged play exactly Sch?re he received sent him a copy Fort's Th??tre d'Art, specifically, the Temple fourth Horror, abyss! is reminded Sch?re, A 1886.,0 it is on union it burns domain) volume power Vercing?torix's "The Fire, any more, ... I saw in the public (artwork was newly edited and augmented with a study of Parsifal in to unconscious his York (or of but in her case, her priesthood, virginity and abdicates a her and she obtains entreaty, redeeming protege's Chateaubriand after her self-inflicted death. Whereas shame on charcoal 1895, the transmigration to the human is the superior world; Gwynfyd corresponding circle of which inhabits until she steps Gwynfea happiness, a to catches down level and Vercing?torix's horrifying of the glimpse abyss.52 an In twist to Les Sch?re gave interesting Vercing?torix, source: like loses her his immediate Vell?da, martyrs, Gwynfea Eudore's ca. with Thorns, She is dead; while shows Crowned paper, 2214 X 1814 in. (50 X 37.5 cm). Collection of Dian consents, are defeated. his Head 11 Redon, Vercing?to communion kills herself in the belief that Vercing?torix made 775 d'Orsay, unites the Gauls REDON photograph occupation. their spiritual her love. When him tan BY ODILON METAMORPHOSIS Louvre, du Mus?e with give superior du domain; the RMN) in a revolt tribes in the public (artwork on charcoal Mus?e A LITHOGRAPHIC becomes scene of the third lover. Vercing?torix's for a small inspired drawing, on the program reproduced the act, one of of Fire for the in which In addition, by and This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions one Fort the asked Gwynfea Redon two scenes, in a forthcoming to be history of ART BULLETIN 776 2007 VOLUME DECEMBER LXXXIX NUMBER 4 14 Simeon Solomon, A Design for a Motif fromParsifal, 1894, on paper, 18% pencil Private collection (artwork blue X in. 25% X (47.5 in the public 64.5 domain; by Jos? Manuel Costa Alves, Lisbon) cm). photograph lilfrSgJ? ???M? 12 Henri Fantin-Latour, and Parsifal theFlower Maidens, 1885, lithograph, 17% X 12V&in. (45 X 30.7 cm) (artwork in the public domain; photograph provided by the Biblioth?que de Gen?ve, Charles Collection Geneva, Meunier 575, pi. 59) 15 Still Syberberg, replacing and directed from Parsifal, written by Hans J?rgen II Parsifal TMS Film Munich, 1981-82, showing I after Kundry's kiss Parsifal of appearance tion."60 the over, 13 Georges-Antoine Rochegrosse, 92M> X 147% 1894, oil on canvas, Paris, RF 898 (artwork ? d'Orsay, could The Knight with theFlowers, in. (235 X 375 cm). Mus?e photograph by Daniel Arnaudet, ? 2007, ProLitteris, the RMN) Sch?re d'Assas, Schur?'s the tice, For theater.58 the apparently sets were Redon's program of "may well have the an unknown eventually Druidess play.59 been led Ted to reason, created was Gott approach maybe by Paul the short S?rusier, dating Vercing?torix read have no but on the printed reproduced has that Sch?re suggested Redon by the fortuitous only publication of Huysmans's and Mellerio's receiving become Zurich; and creation 1891, the However, Redon's on the Druidess been it, or eve own of his produc evidence regarding chronological II?is of Druidess?and Parsifal catalog had the note dating available heard of of thanks to October 11, to 1892. More the prints since 1887, and Redon its story line, well before art had a the author. copy from By 1892, Redon's in which circles and occultist with the mystic popular were was in the Rue both 's greatest; living reputation has Leeman and Fred compared convincingly to Redon's of art of the conception goal syncretism and his fusion of Christian and Buddhist themes.61 Even if Druidess had appeared by chance just as Sch?re was planning a Redon of Vercing?torix and without staging seem not does the plausible?this play?which on shared interests. ideas and rested This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions being aware coincidence of A LITHOGRAPHIC UNFOLDING Head 16 Leonardo, S. Maria delle in Last study for The Supper di Brera, Milan, by photograph albumen silver print. Collection in the (artwork and photograph L?on G?rard, 1857-58, Dietmar Siegert, Munich public domain) Polarities and It is clear and that as had "the Druidess" in fin de on by si?cle tales. origins, de Bretagne This was a in the collective of legend Celtic transmitted orally populaires for Wagner, point significant of Perceval/Parzival legends especially this affinity was based derived from the the Grail since anciens de had and legends whose interest stimulated been it was a by 1842 Contes la Villemarqu?'s and Bretons, "Parsifal" entities, in common, features many some extent, his reading of Th?odore des cultural To France. their mati?re their Inversions now crucial one for Schur?, who insisted in his 1891 essay that the Celtic bards had given birth to the Arthurian legends culminating in Perceval's both roots?and dimension versal they of the Grail.62 the Druidess were also hopes condition specifically of a national expressed were not members typical of the Romantic a of to a powers. foolish or access to the Druidess's, but symmetry as a chaste identity: was Parsifal relatively "masculine" atively duct. and was boy reason of her seen, of and power exploited it explicit This direct. sexual of a seer, something was rel the Druidess and while "feminine," more in matters obvious young made was to action most by have as we Sch?re, access his inverted this con heroic complementary act and speak like a female Parsifal; he also let her define herself as na combining a uni renewal?with closed to reason however, superiority, a contradiction insane, the the differences world, and Symbolist image of the artist.63 their for as like the two them appear complementary, they made access to the of a Parsifal's halves symbol. spiritual yin-yang was more than and progressive thus mediated, unconscious idess, "primitive" forest, truths This As exerted. en by their endangered and by the attraction they Parsifal and the Dru between inevitably world character Parsifal syncretic religiosity. of and just part legend, myth, epic, caste of the select of heroes and superior and chastity, purity with the material gagement others, in a to 777 among Redon, the access prophets, having and possessing redeeming them appear could make And For therefore figures belonged in nature and steeped tional and quest REDON on cream in gray-green 17 Redon, Closed Eyes, 1890, lithograph X 914 in. (31.2 X wove to chine affixed 1214 paper, ivory of Chicago, the Stickney Collec 24.2 cm). The Art Institute in the public domain; tion, 1920.1672 (artwork photograph by the Art Institute of Chicago) provided of Christ, Museo Grazie, BY ODILON METAMORPHOSIS spiritual realm was the yes, twin of spiritual immortal your the hero by having Vercing?torix: Gwynfea "I am sister, your sister!"64 as in the two figures they existed to the between relationship genetic reason seems a to consider to me the two prints, compelling a double as Druidess and image. We forming together Parsifal This Redon's between relation time, in addition have seen in the album Homage Redon had had such a contrast to Goya (Figs. 20, 21) in mind for several that years. Beyond his work, Parsifal/Druidess is in good company: polar images or images of polarity, This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions combining traits from the two ART 778 DECEMBER BULLETIN 2007 VOLUME LXXXIX 4 NUMBER 18 Redon, Profile ofLight, 1886, lithograph on paper, 12 X 9V2 in. (30.4 Stickney photograph 24.2 of one common or Janus-like sical antiquity to motifs Institute of Chicago, in the (artwork public the Art Institute of Chicago) by several in most heads Art cm). The 1920.1597 provided elements are X Collection, dualities, if not all societies the domain; that of gender, including and periods, from the "the in Clas representing Dionysus Hybrid" to African bisexual anthropomorphic statues in popular visual culture.65 Many or to have been used the simultaneous techniques produce or two same of of alternative the presence aspects images it includes and the list is constantly image, expanding: paint on both same sides of the ing support?several Byzantine an on of the icons of Saint George have the image Virgin and back?and case of the still present on or zigzag-shaped T-shaped and Lamellenbilder)', Riefelbilder "composite ages on one so-called portraiture" negative); 3D-stereo industrial printing and, photomosaics; of direction change of particular the image, of often of the French typeof playing cards.66 and image relations between interpretations and can one of complementarity be manifold, the of ranging to one their from popular for our 180 degrees, two elements of diametric as re and topic, as a in of a double are combination a statement im with such as morphing relevance and such techniques particularly images, the (in supports photomontage of several superimposition (the ligious imagery; digital manipulations Semantic on 19 Jules-Eug?ne Vell?da, Moon Effect, 1883, oil Lenepveu, in. (231 X 131.5 cm). Mus?e des Beaux 91 X 51% canvas, in the Arts, Quimper domain) (artwork public of varied identity opposition to and mutual tion, truth, exclusion. they were appearance element in times Especially to be understood apt versus to the other was reality, of conflict and in terms the passage and of disrup lie versus from one as an unveil construed polemically or of direction In this context, the change ing unmasking. of the top/ associations benefited from the anthropological demon Bakhtin has bottom Mikhail famously opposition. of the dimension strated the subversive top carnivalesque and ritualized inversions of values, but temporary pling to the and reinforce tended confirm eventually ironically This is hierarchies they apparently particularly disrupted.67 in the case of the mundus evident inversus, a theme developed on in in and from the sixteenth still vivid century prints In the "world turned nineteenth-century imagery. popular and children their animals their masters down," whip upside men women The and and roles.68 parents, exchange gender inversion forms the center of This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions an early example of this ico UNFOLDING METAMORPHOSIS BY ODILON REDON 77g toil 'Ktv?tf ??-? in the Sky a Face ofMystery, 1885, in black on pi. lithograph light gray chine to ivory wove paper, affixed IIV2 X 9V? in. (29 X 23.9 cm). The Art Institute of Chicago, the Stickney Collection, I Saw In My Dream Redon, to 1 of Homage Goya, 20 A LITHOGRAPHIC 21 Redon, Upon Awakening I Saw theGoddess of theIntelligible with Her Severe and Hard on in black lithograph to 1885, pi. 6 of Homage Goya, to ivory wove affixed chine Profile, light gray paper, 1014 X 814 in. (27 X 21.5 cm). The Art Instituteof 1920.1587 (artwork in the public domain; photograph provided by theArt Instituteof Chicago) the Stickney Chicago, domain; public 1920.1593 Collection, photograph by provided in the (artwork the Art Institute of Chicago) a bearded man, 22): (Fig. wearing a distaff, kneels at the feet of a woman nography holding a sword, with a hen mounts The (and a lance; long dress a bit and passage garb in which image-devinette, question one ering most expressed or several common these in reproduced iconic device features?generally of direction change in the 1938 the of caption features employed one of or "paranoiac-critical and turbaned "reveals" The down the man's neck sultan/favorite heads" a favorite In an often also image printed the the 23).70 belongs on cards, upside It is worth of the bearded noting Parsifal/Druidess, the woman's to the type matchboxes, a in headdress. of and "upside so on, (Fig. each Spanish between of series male 1875 and the simultaneous 24), on and aspect female of presence is in me "What the uses / Once explicit: vanity, // If you fall in love with me, pretty gravity. that I am a one, / Be aware hermaphrodite."71 This has monstrous but in the features, "hermaphrodite" fin de si?cle, the figure of the androgyne became increasingly reversed, shows an one, ideal in connection traditional from with roles sexual the and social and final form of mankind, its ideal was approached This divide, with figures of young "archetype" and from both men and on Drawing de Balzac's to Honor? Plato's that changes identities. Symposium authors "Decadent" and Symbolist Seraphita, sion of male and female traits in one person defined as the fu the original its salvation.72 sides of the usual young women display seen in Parsifal symmetrical indeterminacy was in the Druidess. The evoked androgyne frequently the works of Gustave Edward Fernand Moreau, Burnejones, other in the "literary" and many artists, Khnopff, especially ing and down, A to oscillate is made challenged sources many conceal in such antecedents into a example, of the a member interpretation, considered sultan, turns to figures?was of (Fig. to answer undated Hugnet, similarity in Redon's compositional which of face that of his several image. by Georges asked the drawing by discov within it. The hidden draftsmen by Surrealist group who delighted method" were spectators sexes both on commenting to the other. analogy instance In one busts. joyed its heyday was the picture puzzle known in French as the captions from one the beard/hair further, saw a surge of double century images as an of and ones) part exploration exploita and by cartoonists independent, ambiguity A artists that then en alike.69 genre popular "avant-garde" two with late nineteenth multiple of visual tion on proudly leaning a rooster. a in man's the we have branch of Symbolism gathered from 1892 on by the flamboy ant "S?r" Jos?phin P?ladan around his Salons de la in Paris.73 Redon explicitly declined P?ladan 's Rose+Croix This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions ART BULLETIN 780 DECEMBER LXXXIX 2007 VOLUME 4 NUMBER LEGRAND TURC ETSA FAVORITE This Way Goes theWorld Turned Upside Down, late detail, on paper. Nationale de century, engraving Biblioth?que Cabinet des Estampes, Paris in the public France, (artwork 16th 22 CHERCHEZ LA FAVORITE? domain) 23 The and His Sultan late Favorite, to invitation in the first of participate there were time that Redon links indirect many created Parsifal these two men and Druidess?4 In a at hero" with same P?ladan of his that is compatible with male positivity" Marie Th?r?se whose Gastelier, pianist and Tristan had reminded P?ladan of in experienced head Bayreuth. "? la Correggio of a musical "hands the year, published La d?cadence latine under cycle of novels a This of "modern story 'androgyne. fifteen-year-old of appearance of nerves "all the femininity and androgyne."75 volume eighth the title L the This was to the dedicated execution of Parsifal sensations he had the to admire him enabled her and parsifalized' before kissing her . . ,"76 Druidess. Process the Given between inverted the cultural character widespread on symmetry existing of Parsifal figures of "upside-down a and semantic and one may the topicality of the androgyne, a to conclude that far from being meaningless I into Druidess the transformation of Parsifal dent, zles, and resulted from predetermined far in the warning a conscious program. opposite that Redon intention This, direction, gave Andr? and however, and we Mellerio level the Druidess, heads" the visual puz be tempted acci studio must have to a corresponded would must pay be going to heed a few years in published 35 (artwork the letter of January 10, 1891, to Edmond Picard, Redon defined the lithographed version of Closed Eyes (Fig. 17) as "the head of an In (1938): but exhibitions, the between 19th century, Minotaureb "Devinettes," Hugnet, Georges in the domain) public later too the as the latter was asked him hand. Such "relative preparing the about a abandoned quickly enchanting sovereign tions that lady, take us the role stressed concepts" could replied, Redon action" unexpected she who was and often "in the way along and the artist's "preliminary concept, indirect and of the catalog of paths to us reveals but an to a only initial plan follow the our imagination, seduc magnificent conquer by surprise?and and of the artistic materials, his guiding exert order the and prints us." Instead, confided he that he to a sheet of blank and needed by paper" or any other medium, it in charcoal, pencil, on life to it."77 He and this operation emphasized gives the of materials, several occasions this agency comparing it has "Matter reveals creative with divination: secrets, process was "horrified "scribble over its own genius; speak."78 These declarations show they Druidess artist as that it the is matter through prophetic not the will oracle our in two ways. First, subject the character of Parsifal and illuminate corresponded seer but also that only to his to Redon's image of the of the artistic understanding onto of a "way" opening "unexpected metaphor to the Parsifal? is similar "wandering" performed by paths" after in tales of chivalry?especially like so many knights curse: shall not find: "The way you seek, that / You Kundry's process. His / For the paths and ways / That This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions lead you fromme, / I curse UNFOLDING them for you: paths and interview as artistic theme she the by way domain was quest added BY ODILON METAMORPHOSIS REDON 7g1 "along his of of the implied by explicit by Joseph Beuys in an von Graevenitz, who pointed Antje common to the composer and with a sense, reaches eventually an with analogy wandering in a and, and would be made Wagner After Wander!"79 suffering" Parsifal wandering, Grail. The ing When / Wander! error of A LITHOGRAPHIC to wander the heroes that Wagner's artist.80 abandon wandering on the that Parsifal, contrary, replied to find the secret" and is led to the highest "wanders spiritual an of this quest aim. He gave interpretation epistemological con to contradict him Friedrich Nietzsche's that enabled control and of Wagner attainment demnation with fail, Beuys the to reconcile and of "spiritual a new is always or herself, and himself wanders is."81 really statements of searching someone who who being, keeps at the end of his or is never the Grail is what This ideal "In human there opposing her evolution. the truths": as we had imply already on I with started imagined, working Parsifal the intention of representing Parsifal but rather may have or him along the way. A discovered comparison "recognized" was with the "predeter with Parsifal II, which certainly begun confirms this hy mined of representing Parsifal, concept" Redon's Second, not he may original Redon composition, elements chitectural of and examination of Redon's additions and of drawing in a way Parsifal was ar vaguely rather left, which, left with itself more Max less on the extensive crayon, lithographic horizontal in Redon Ernst's especially already chain the used his imagination, the case of In since follow mentioned the grid also have order to avoid been design a onto impression transfer process selves, on tween the printer's the other printer. when guesses He newly hand, and stone. grained could travel the artist's nothing," have Redon in in back studio.84 and a role about the them forth be transforma The taken place played complained stones The an in the print in it. the harmful and latter's and he Plank double reversible head, in the public (artwork 1875, Spain. domain; the fact participation when deplorable on insisted the that as an "precious or it senses artist's nence: a union with "One makes temporary, badly matched should and get the printer, and it is sensible that one agree a work two of art is not made by people. along with him. But a One of them must The with marriage comparison yield."85 a was to comment that "Redon led Pat Gilmour essentially not of art as collaboration and loner who could conceive a inability with nineteenth-century conception An examination of Redon's relation?profes as not Falte does his wife Camille private?with if any at in any case, this contention, few artists but, this coupled of marriage."86 as well sional support the time would their artistic Redon from ing the preemi have trial proofs Redon's must sensitive The and especially a goes status. conclusion "matches" of a collaboration conceived authority. the printer truly participatory these lithographs had towork very closely with the defined intuitive, been of paper: autographic to it was pull scraping, possible a sheet and onto then shift it via the printer artist producing have may up, elements by way tion of Parsifal I may also have and workshop In retrospect, and this grid made extensive of a close "architectural" transformation of Parsifal I into Druidess spired by it. The could visible is clearly The part. with der photograph provided by Julian Rothenstein) properly prepared, the often exploited it beneath while placed frottages.83 a laid paper, marks upper cover Van liquid formed by the finely spaced vertical laid lines and the coarsely spaced 24 Matchbox Collection paper, Any that he lithographers' or effects anteceding I, it appears see. leading a close what of or of a support to stimulate and sheet textural we compositions lithographic onto then transferred and transfer, one the the process knowledge can yield. with scrapers.82 for the are stone the various for his which corrections used structure traits of the the of about a and drew autographic he stone; and the in favor methods working paper, on made be on top and explanation II, we Parsifal the prints generally tusche, the abandoned no gave to Druidess Redon at "paths" Redon could the main eliminated also to the Parsifal iconography, look like vestigial than belonging remains and have (Fig. 1): while reproducing pothesis Since that, long about be way the related challenging intuition from toward duration to his expected the master granting and relatively by pull a him success of frequent changes of printing partner. In early 1887, he had stopped working with the Lemercier firm,which had editioned all his lithographs stones from the his until 1894. Becquet's personality who start, in favor of Becquet, printed about is known Unfortunately, nothing The and his collaboration with Redon. This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions ART 782 BULLETIN DECEMBER 2007 VOLUME LXXXIX NUMBER 4 25 a Blue Bonnet, Young Girl in 207/h X 1890s, pastel, 39.5 cm). Mus?e Redon, probably 15V2 in. early (53 X d'Orsay, Paris, RF 40493 (artwork in the public domain; photograph by Herv? two must not be have I was that agreed editioned. Did Parsifal Redon chance a failure to see the and stone down in the studio and think of turning the unhappy into a new one, possibly encouraged by ible heads and visual puzzles?87 Did Redon Parsifal? "recycle" We have the result seen before that could image for revers the vogue the printer propose a new producing of orientation include changes "way" could of subject matter In fact, many (Figs. 5, 6). to be discovered: one to give only example and such that version of Redon's the meanders of creative redirections cases remain involving heads a second (prob and a reversal of 180 degrees, the pastel Young Girl in a Blue Bonnet (Fig. 25), turned upside down, reveals ably female) profile slightly to the right of the first one and running parallel to it,with the eye at the level of themouth and vice versa. Whether Redon intentionally left enough of this earlier is hard stage to say, of the work but he visible clearly for an expert relished the eye to notice ambiguity mystery created by and the RMN) of working in has layers, which method" "archaeological by Gert Mat in Stratis.88 depth by Harriet of one head into another is more this way been upside ? Lewandowski, the aptly named tenklott and analyzed The metamorphosis a in than in the case straightforward Young Girl in Blue Bonnet to each of I / Druidess: the faces Parsifal correspond closely are inverted. the passage from other and Conversely, "simply" as a I to Druidess is far from obvious, Parsifal comparison between the the Druidess's two demonstrates headdress with (Figs. 2, 4). The her veil emerges (and without significant modification) Parsifal's bust uncovered face her own which well and bust did not completely as his mouth, nose, of hindsight?the Parsifal I considered by his mantle, eyes. To of part effortlessly from the portion of but constructing required disregarding?and succeed?the outline and front sense?with her erasing, of his neck, as the benefit possibility of the Druidess pattern latent in upside down, This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions it is necessary to concen A LITHOGRAPHIC UNFOLDING on trate the tonal rather values on than to and the outlines ignore the representational functions of the forms while probing their iconic potential. In thisway, the ectoplasm-like bright zone formed by the illuminated side of Parsifal's neck and can dress, to connected face, coalesce crescent the a female into as interpreted a head profile. It is worth reflecting on the cognitive abilities and state psychological for abstraction capacity sentation but is what the studio process. to opposed it in the end. To serves and practice It is not that rather a in such involved art the some a requires iconic repre this extent, of notion theoretical macchia, the "blot" inwhich the nucleus of a composition is contained and out of which itmay develop, had been about In the Renaissance.89 since most sketches, spectacularly were which by the his used but have iconic or function defined in the 1857 childish perception "innocence of the as eye" sort "a of of what they some and signify," with a on gaze "pure was the evocative their eyes" and advocated most Redon interested What its disregard, iconic ability to stimulate invention that interpretations?aspects and explored in his works expressed things."92 virtue of this and lead to other had indeed Leonardo and the process he had initiated, which accounts for his letting successive shine layers traces and sighted through of the obliterating his of instead surface How "meandering." this attitude about was he articulate their he wrote, which, in the double within will The can be forms being produced active beholder; of the were artist's that are from called in fact, they delegated agency. is also This state onlooker's in this manner in a more doing to come about the what and explicit (images or into being of mind."93 for a particularly to the beholder part the images-devinettes deterministic way, and their popularity at the time both supported and attested to the of such availability an active, even manipulative using sense remarkable of the approach dynamism of to forms extract from the engraved lines of The Martyrdom of Saint Catherine the "hidden" figure of the already decapitated saint.94 Whereas the commercial designers of visual puzzles would normally start their drawings with the intention of hiding something Redon rials and and an idea of what they wanted to conceal, let himself be led by the suggestions of artisticmate associations of ideas. This means that the "way" seen have that front the of part the Dru from rest of the bust. Ifwe reconsider the inverted Parsifal I (Fig. 4) in this light,we understand that the outline of Parsifal's shoulder has actually disrupted another outline linking the headdress to her train; a new look at Druidess (Fig. shows that Redon had only to obliterate the rest of Parsi 2) Druidess's fal's bust for this of shapes to reappear. outline earlier leaves and flowers the Moreover, scattered throughout Parsifal I, which mostly disappear in Parsifal II, fit better into the Celtic Druidess iconography than into the Grail context. For all these it seems reasons, to logical that suppose began by drawing not a Parsifal but a Druidess of which there exists no impression. The hypothesis of this Druidess I lying buried in Parsifal I even helps to explain Redon uneven strangely his which shoulders, arm raised and awkward cloak do not suffice to justify.A composition recurs that in Redon's is which work, to his related certainly youthful infatuation with the landscape and women for her a with mountains, steep a female shows country, Basque head. Redon's in bust rising second of two in front profile sun setting or of the a halo forming A album, lithographic Edgar Poe, included a version of it in 1882 (Fig. 26), the 1885 Br?nnhilde (Fig. 7) significantly connected it to aWagnerian and warrior, another version would in 1896 appear in to Gustave Flaubert's Temptation of Saint Anthony (Fig. 27). The reference to Poe may have to resort Redon prompted while Flaubert's Idaean the Mountains" he close in the 1868-69 painting the female to Returning came the outlines the to delineate first of Melancholy," a him as "the gave opportu ready this image of divinized femininity. An revealingly and sun "black of the goddess Cybele in oil version contemporary to its bare approximately the composition hero to the evocation of Mother essentials paints for Roland's to that used reduces 28) (Fig. and the sun/halo cape/halo (Fig. 9): in this detail also, themale are relatives.95 quasi-goddess see that what inverted be I, we Parsifal of Parsifal's shoulders could have served two similar mountains. rays can Centrifugal be detected in several parts of what would have been the sky area (Parsifal's bust), most strikingly in the lower part of the Druidess's be it is as veil: woman to images. A few years later, in 1896, Alfred Jarry submitted a print by Albrecht D?rer to precisely this kind of reading, his the of Parsifal's the portion emerges easily more In fact, ifmakes his mantle. iconic bust uncovered by sense as headdress II Redon in than as shoulder, and Parsifal to open it into the has taken care and up this shape integrate in a red ambiguity, and triple aspects, hints of aspects images), their take works in continuous "consists We nity to reintroduce clear grasped from the definition he gave in 1902 of the "sense of mystery," into work given the third album devoted Redon wanted to preserve the possibility of multiple inter pretations in his finished works and to let the viewer continue the one from continue headdress female Moreover, writings. Druidess. and Parsifal's thing that the Impressionists, Claude Monet above all, had been pursuing.91 In 1895, Paul Val?ry expressed a radical epistemological version of this ideal in his Introduction ? la m?thode de L?onard de Vinci, in which he reproached most people for seeing "with their intellectmuch more often than as as well turn back, is also when he recommended of these flat stains of colour, merely as consciousness without stimuli of visual "meaning" 783 next one. It appears that this iswhat happened with Parsifal I numerous abstract nonobjective something that John Ruskin had such, in Moreau considered long was the macchia 1890s, to be connected with existing paintings.90 Disregard begun ing the Gustave REDON followed was not only winding but could also occasionally idess's the BY ODILON METAMORPHOSIS had detected here are the sun and to this device, if, thanks one. become The flowers generally absent and leaves from the the also "woman-bust but formula, against-sun-between-two-mountains" that can they are present inmany other images of female profiles with possible to Druidism, references such as the mentioned already Spring.The composition and proportions of the hypothetical Druidess I are almost identical with those ofHead ofa Woman (Fig. 28) if one leaves out its lower part, which was indeed canceled when passing from Parsifal I toDruidess. But before we all embark its Druidess on a final successive lis more reconstruction of this we try to stages, than a must hypothesis This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions metamorphosis establish or, worse, a whether retrospective in ART 784 BULLETIN DECEMBER 2007 VOLUME LXXXIX NUMBER 4 Here the Good Goddess, the Idaean Mother of the (3rd of Saint Anthony pi. 15 of Temptation on chine 5% X 5 in. (14.9 X series), appliqu?, lithograph d'Art et d'Histoire, 12.8 cm). Mus?e Cabinet des Geneva, in the (artwork domain) Estampes public 27 Redon, Mountains, Lenore Appears, Before the Black Sun ofMelancholy, 65/s X 5 in. [Allan] Poe, lithograph, pi. 2 of To Edgar of the Stickney (16.8 X 12.7 cm). The Art Institute Chicago, in the 1920.1571 Collection, domain; (artwork photo public 26 Redon, 1882, graph provided by theArt Institute of Chicago) and point, delivers all possible ones with paintings can help a "layers" chronological between them distinguish the the for used techniques even drawings.96 to confirm observations or scientific note neck of the corresponding that curved lines already appear. The in Druidess with a pen section faintly visible the spot where indicate of analysis however, Macrophotography, made with the naked eye. If we compare enlarged details of the Druidess those since, lithograph it im together, making or to retrieve the earlier its to latter, is this of (Fig. 29) with I Parsifal at the base we (Fig. 30), of Parsifal's the Druidess's eye will (re)imposition of this eye and other facial details was and in a distinctive fear projecting not drawn lithographic appearance the Druidess with but crayon lithographic which results tusche, fortunately one for the two stages. still Should onto the Parsifal I, a superimposition of the twodetails, each colored differently and slightly shifted (Fig. 31), should dispel any doubt: when drawing the Dru was and eye with a pen, Redon retracing accentuating a was that design already present.97 assume a We must therefore that Redon began by drawing of the type I called composition "woman-bust-against-sun elements with al between-two-mountains," probably vegetal some to an association At with Druidism. ready pointing idess's and I. The Parsifal tell us reasons for down upside onto can of Druidess I. What projection Parsifal an trace of the former in the unambiguous unless several states of it have been printed, Is 1896, transformation in happened a played studio, printer's as master in it, all the more earlier the to I Druidess I into from comparing presented upside "ghost the ability already a visual configuration Becquet and design that sometimes images" to discussed I may Parsifal have may have who were printers, of the stone, could process of a etching elements regain inten produce from result an he displayed at this insufficient regraining.99 As for Redon, stage and one, and for the chemically tionally from the part responsible nize support incipient about the passage of Druidess impression his Druidess to this earlier apply turned (Fig. 32) with Parsifal I (Fig. 3) can be illuminating.98 down This the I made observations I to Druidess Parsifal a particularly light he yet unknown, transformed and reinterpret reorga for instance, inverting, the the negative relation space by turning figure-ground between the mountains into the positive of Parsifal's shape bust. and He also spear, autographic the stone, this is, at eyebrows, to extend what it in this new pillar supporting rather ted, was space obtained the horizontal order of he paper: that sense more needed and completely, is what context, a vague for Redon result, this may be itmust one of be the admit reasons to edition Parsifal I. Another someone This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions it into a vertical turned The lintel. not that adding rather explains, head figure's new of piece than a flaw in at the level of Parsifal's running of the initial In top composition.100 had been the Druidess's veil and make awkward, be a line why the artist decided could the new the and reason for it by aware of this genesis, the UNFOLDING Druidess and Parsifal remained enmeshed in together A LITHOGRAPHIC BY ODII.ON METAMORPHOSIS REDON 735 this image, a bit like themale Parsifal I and the female Parsifal II at the his In any case, Redon's of Syberberg's film.101 to amounted them: he retraced separating the Druidess redrew her features, and figure, beginning solution eventual steps toward eliminated most the elements Then plant he drew under an altogether from the unsatisfactory in the process of metamorphosis. one vious dered but Synthesis a schematic have that we phenomenon, "accidental," requires Mellerio, Redon at look of psychoanalysis. process by German use that cesses to Eduard von as the sensation voluntary in 1877.103 was production described artists, mystics, creative "is also the mysterious in quota the Hartmann, on based with together con Hartmann to be it derived thought the substance of forming and 1869 Philosophie des Unbewussten artistic and lordly unconscious" "psychological mental life and lute unconscious" his and "unconscious" into French translated the its char development term the refers probably been conscious and of philosopher whose sidered held that this of letter of 1898 to the 'unconscious,' of himself of description la imagination, fantaisie, that His personage."102 tion marks by Redon and early In his already quoted adding of the messenger introduced the prehistory concluded engen view complete to the question or "unconscious" "intentional," term was last a brief but to return it is possible relatively acter. The features freed "Unconscious" Now had and also the landscape concealing a dark uniformly background. new Parsifal, on based the pre additions, the origin of from an "abso the universe. He unconscious martyrs, for a and it is un likely that he would already have heard of Sigmund Freud's of the unconscious. analysis numerous to be fortuitous concerns. to rable that accorded Parsifal, distinguished tent of dreams, and from he the manifest to the back The layers of the psyche. turned into a therapeutic don's of understanding fostering Freud the had free the to tion cryptography their author elements puzzles. request.106 revealing was unaware. could "unconscious ture automatic analyze at his be gave comparison to go of deepest which he ideas, similarities process, with Re toward geared "unconscious."105 in the visual, some and to science of his In images. of dream interpreta a French produced by drawings as a He these scribbles regarded a content in coded form of which found the has psychological the technique Vexierbilder,99 He also interest the new disciples applied Pfister used 1913, Oskar painter too with psychoanalysis to "unveil" the latent, creative the a of association tool, of "coming" an intense used repeatedly the effort to describe archaeology are however, parallels, sources to common and point and an gave compa sexuality importance in his works, by Wagner including a manifest a latent con and between who Freud, The Pfister further in works of argued art and the German using of a vulture example that similar them called name that, for pic inspired by Freud's Leonardo da Vinci and aMemory ofHis Childhood, he had discovered in the draperies of The Virgin and Child with Saint Anne and Saint John the Baptist in the Louvre (former collection), Bonger oil on 1896, Gogh Museum, S 467 N/1996 X 10% cardboard, Amsterdam in the (artwork public domain) a Redon but Bernheim, Hippolyte a Head Redon, of Woman, in. (27.7 X 25.5 cm). Van prophets, "fusion of principal repositories and hallucination."104 involuntary Charcot 10 pro must also have been aware of the highly publicized work of Jean-Martin 28 after giving to a turn 90-degree "vulture" derived is of observation of it (Fig. 33).107 Since the reproduction from a faulty translation used this Freud, by to Leonardo, little relevance but it demon a strates applied devinettes and oriented by mentioned Freud analysis. duced to approach was schooled turn-of-the-century to D?rer?that by Jarry the "unveiling" impulse Pfister's "discovery" study, the ing, resulted position in the dream densed "dream work" is the tung) of two being I Parsifal "109 most By far the in the same devised Among to Freud, by on her paint mother's "condensation" the Druidess influential repro lap con like badly together the operations of the the making could be said years psycho in the Louvre that seated of equivalent c figures. added "merged figures."108 Parsifal and together i dream he the Virgin according and images, in which of and in the 1919 edition of his its explanatory drawing Leonardo images?already by the images (Verdich or of double by analogy multiple to merge "like badly condensed use analytic the psychiatrist of images Hermann was Ror schach, a friend of Pfister, and made public in 1921.110 The and cultural origins of the Rorschach test still biographical need but an interesting explored, point in part from divination techniques, for us to be derived is that games, parlor in southern Germany and spiritualistic experiments popular Switzerland since the mid-nineteenth German-speaking to put the What Rorschach did was interpretation century.111 a tool that had tran of blots, been used for both ludic and and scendent analysis communication, of perception. in It would This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions the service take too of a long psychological to show how it ART 786 BULLETIN 2007 VOLUME DECEMBER LXXXIX 4 NUMBER 29 Redon, Druidess, detail, 1891, on mounted lithograph ivory China 9j/h X 8 in. (23.1 X 20.2 cm). paper, Art The Institute Collection, Stickney in the work public graph provided of Chicago) the widespread recourse artistic to was chance around A 1900.112 By "scribbling over" the sheet of paper to give it life and Redon iconic and of Druidess almost since the show that a surface a as materials to technique if were they his produce like I a semantic that the the image, as into Parsifal it functioned for projection. was to did "fictions." a Rorschach the Druidess involved like a mine transform to I, amounted or scribbling affinities between former he in Rorschach's oracles, the direction of the support and disregarding function putative work such developed Changing fal the artistic approaching the the his treating test?almost, and Parsi as (turned Gustav who Jung, domain; by the Art of Freud rival) psychological typology. who the (art photo Institute must be men the model for provided a child As in the mid 1880s, Jung had filled a whole notebook with ink blots and their "fantastic His later work, interpretation."113 would in a universal mus?e find anthropology, a to the "collective unconscious." This imaginaire pathway to Hartmann to Redon's notion relates and may be closer enjoyed on bordering of understanding its metamorphosis as much for extraction last disciple tioned is Carl of Chicago, 1920.1697 conception. the role of universal, the notoriously in the sexuality broke Jung primordial than unconscious vital libido, energy. This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions with which He also Freud's his mentor he saw reproached pansexual around as a more Freud UNFOLDING A LITHOGRAPHIC BY ODII.ON METAMORPHOSIS REDON 7g7 30 Redon, [I], detail, pre Parsifal in the sented upside down (artwork domain; public photograph provided by the Art Institute of Chicago) with "blind being ter of the contents to the paradoxical of the unconscious, that everything emerging inside and an outside."114 from In his it has 1912 and of a thing symbols on statues is hidden masculine The book into and connecting a "feminine individual an Metamorphoses of the presence nature" later developed anima, in the two "archetypes" of unconscious in the unconscious consciousness this with the dynamic tendency for example, anima turned preted, of man collective displeasure.117 The resemblance I / Druidess Parsifal out of much male to to attributed Jung to become Wotan's by the fact that "some goddesses woman as within just something the concepts of animus and a "masculine nature" personifying woman and unconscious.116 fact of feminine is hidden within man."115 He idea the ignorant a bottom, top and and Symbols of theLibido, Jung explained phallic charac ambiguous the Druidess like individual independent, between these ideas of he inter as Br?nnhilde to her father's the Druidess and I / transformation and is striking: Parsifal emerged out of Parsifal the Druidess very and their of have we attribute or and figure much a "others" hidden autonomous, Wagner's crystallizations But "unconscious." finally these male respectively from chance gone this metamorphosis collective? It is well This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions to "the known to fe design unconscious," that Freud, after ART BULLETIN 788 LXXXIX 2007 VOLUME DECEMBER 4 NUMBER P*#**' *%?*f?' m:4" <"%% of details Combination 31 from Redon, Parsifal [I] (1975.493) in purple and Druidess (1920.1697) in orange, slightly shifted, composite the Art Patzke, by Karin photograph Institute of Chicago (photograph by the Art Institute of provided *}& /. Chicago) and writers envying "endogenic" came to artists knowledge them as neurotics issue of the degree symptoms.118 was relevance of great creative process reasons to fear the good psychopathological and from convention artistic departures the more as his subject matter even included of their progressively their works over control to Redon, who as the had explanations common sense, dreams, of all hallucina critic the Morice to Goya, inwhich the caption to the first plate (Fig. 20) started with "In my dream," Morice wrote: "M. Redon's dream to the word Dream to be clear! The meaning given one in sleep), visions the popular (inevitable prosaic one nor it is visions when the rare poetic awake); (voluntary of it is strictly the dream and dreaming, both of them, awake a dream: of inevitable the voluntary visions."119 arrangement we can envision of Parsifal the creation this model, Using as a dialectical both chance and Druidess process involving Accidental and "the unconscious." consciousness and design, have factors must and unconscious subconscious) (or rather Let us be is not Charles 1885, young insanity. set the record in a way that pleased straight especially on the album Homage the artist. Commenting lithographic tions, and In as regarded psyche, to treat and regard The he for what the human of . . . played ration the greatest of Druidess into Parsifal hand while part I and I, whereas giving shape at the beginning, especially conscious to Druidess This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions during control and the elabo during its transformation took above the upper all Parsifal II. A LITHOGRAPHIC UNFOLDING METAMORPHOSIS BY ODILON REDON 789 32 Redon, Druidess, 1891 (1920.1697), presented down upside in the (artwork public domain; photograph provided by the Art Institute of Chicago) Among the agents artist, the materials, of we must this process, and count the printer, possibly not but to call the the British anthropologist Alfred Gell proposed that "prototype," art] represents declaration idess and is, "the entity This visually."120 to Mellerio and Parsifal which the is not only the also what index [the work to contradict an postulate existence as of of Dru belong superior that for Redon, seen, though, connected with the ideal image as a and function. social person Redon's identity be described equally This is sentation. closely 10, is therefore as one resembling of the artist's Fakir," description complex thus went of the clearly other artistic 11). One through fitting Parsifal's with Druidess, who access and mediate realm alter the as for of Wagner, the artist to it.We looks "gentle features. the active their "preliminary concepts" prior but to emphasize that the dynamic incarnation, lithographic as well as the outcome are nucleus of these images figures, or of the un The presences, quasi-persons. personification as a conscious and mysterious in Redon's "lordly personage" text testifies to this. Like the Druidess and Parsifal him, to a and what by her gender This apparent profile." paradox mentioned: symmetry already heroic Redon's to him have are also they as an individual As sides of so stake, this process can and self-searching case with Parsifal, projections in his egos crowd progress.121 shares with self-repre an image of Redon (Figs. "the early writings, a a sleepwalker," is more The matter "like Parsifal traits such the bond with nature and the prophetic giftbut isopposed as to the In longed.123 complementary same coin. this sense, and can While two an and creating Parsifal of his aspects personality that was neither identity nourished Wagner's from Sch?re Parsifal bears priestess had stressed genders. choice Tannh?user, tively.124The the Druidess also, be of legend a work exploring them through stable but was and negotiating nor individual and representations collective dimension and his had underlined that must Redon French poet defended oscillated be to corresponds as myth two was Redon Druidess, and to represent said collective The which Charles Baudelaire on and foolish he he are the Celtic "crude inverted and the "virile will" Parsifal while her to the of women Gauls.122 among high standing a model women had found in Basque for the social and sexual Other that attracted him, role for whom corresponds the chaste and suffering," Both Chateaubriand for Redon, tween at and called Huysmans subject matter, in his 1861 essay have read atten this choice with the in brain "the history of an individual represents on and he the history of the universal brain," gave a that occasion of his dualism: striking "Every expression well-formed brain carries within itself two infinites, heaven assertion that miniature and hell, and in every image This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions of one of these infinites it ART BULLETIN 790 DECEMBER LXXXIX 2007 VOLUME NUMBER 4 i su: t?-:M PSYCHO 33 Oskar The from Pfister, schematic drawing Virgin and Child with Saint Anne "Kryptolalie, Kryptographie," und psychopathologische Forschungen after Leonardo and Jahrbuch 34 H. da Vinci, the Baptist, Saint John Abraham, fur psychoanalytische on Baudelaire's remark brain to the bio refers spell.126 as such a back philosophical conceptions connected the process of metamorpho of metempsychosis, which he knew from he may ground, sis to the notion have his long familiarity with Indian texts and which Wagner had introduced in Parsifal by way of Kundry, who is hailed by as Klingsor dryggia.127 tany made that a We "doctrine the realm shapes We within looks it as feel of of 1896 equivalent to his essential have somewhat the process softer, of gentler?in that extent sifal I. To formal clarity, it does as if he that of a an that the as 34) certain country there exposed already, II Parsifal Its metamorphosis. short, more as represent Brit and saw by Sch?re, of souls."128 reinterpretation to Redon's art. and neglected as well Gun and "transmigration in the Symbolist that a caricaturist shows the trade not a concept popular (Fig. of and the Basque had lived the Druids," as was Metempsychosis and a cartoon of Herodias seen have Redon the human see reincarnation in Le Rire, December published Zimmerli Art by the Jane Voorhees The of New Jersey, New State University provided Museum, law?later the German naturalist genetic by popularized to which Ernst Haeckel?according "ontogenesis recapitu lates who been had fascinated from Redon, phylogenesis"; his youth transformism and also fell under evolutionism, by With Forst, Metempsychosis, 5, 1896 (artwork in the public domain; photograph by Jack Rutgers, Brunswick) half of itself."125 recognizes suddenly the "individual" and the "universal" its C. s l. and image "feminine" of era, could graphic its position the hero of than in Par its compositional and a return to a statu quo ante for but a further as ones, of expression masculine means step if Redon of elements integrating had been, like the Menschliches, Wagner, the properly can steps nor feminine. the thesis-antithesis-synthesis These from the preceding for an searching neither human, be described formula by associated with Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, which had been devel oped by Immanuel Kant and Johann Gottlieb Fichte and had already bet's French impacted art before 1860, with Gustave Cour re syst?me peintures (system Having paintings).129 to those of for the visual arts ambitions comparable aware literature and Redon could well have been philosophy, of the virtues of this dialectical In his operas, tool.130 Wagner a as had realized of various in and synthesis myths, Parsifal, Claude L?vi-Strauss he defined the Grail out, pointed king ? claimed dom and Klingsor's rically opposed the domain as two simultaneous aspects.131 Sch?re concluded and diamet his 1891 essay of Ancient science and synthesis that the of spirituality," insisting victory Christianity had not represented the destruction but a rejuvenation of the Druidic The notion of synthesis was also in topical religion.132 Redon's artistic circle around since Paul and 1890, Gauguin were a new "ism" Emile Bernard it to define using particularly to his own of relevant critique Impressionism. of this is not, however, The that Redon point comparison by evoking Christian may have had "harmonious the thesis-antithesis-synthesis This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions formula in mind A LITHOGRAPHIC UNFOLDING while working on Parsifal and Druidess. It is that the process I have been model, analyzing by or refuting when them. Hegel relations the this them without (Werden), he becoming in his Science ofLogic}2,2,Becoming means into both wrote, being (Entstehen)and passing coming over (Vergehen), and it consists of both being and nothing, each the includes of which as other a necessary reference. is contradictory"; that sinks restlessness transformation?or it can and what be as "an unstable defined into a motionless down to metamorphosis, the emphasize a note terminological to it.What that aufheben,which he defined dramatically as "one of the most important common of concepts two language the that of preserving meanings, opposite in possesses philosophy," something and that of putting an end to something. He proposed to reconcile the two by observing that what has been put an end to is still a result of what used to be and is of at the wonder by it.135 Hegel's us of can remind Jung's determined aufheben to the ness" the unconscious. Freud But the of in fact, himself, of expressions had been the most to which ancient were languages fasci devoid of the principle of contradiction and contained words with two words meanings, opposed and combining in the order reversals meanings, posed saw this absence Freud the of principle with elements the confirmed phonemes.136 of contradiction in dreams." pressed nature archaic "regressive, on Hegel, for self-reflexive than aufgehoben nated and yet possesses a usage of is aufgehoben in a different form. is, termi Redon's ap proach to images confronted him with the problem posed to Hegel by "becoming." The technique of lithography, by pre serving images new them with in the "memory" that may images of stone the turn out while replacing to perpetuate them form, provided him with a tool comparable to the word aufheben for the philosopher. This may have been inmodified one of dium the and reasons made why it such Redon an important to this me attached became part of his becoming lead on as a praxis of process differs from Hegel's in that it does to a "motionless "synthesis," the not?or result." oscillation does While only Parsifal between theory of temporarily? II can be seen the Druidess earlier reinterpretations in an ongoing debate, towhich artists own means, as art art twentieth-century students of who developed have to all But as well. contributed to is familiar process and art. and the role knowledge, to be still needs advent period interminable the students of and twenty-first not breed does familiarity in its late nineteenth century twentieth- this of the Other assessed. artists major the of to the one comparable practices dem onstrated by Redon include Edgar Degas, who worked in layers and occasionally changed the direction of his supports, and Auguste Rodin, own statues to his Balzac of who new produce been able have its complex to casts resorted of photographs of Ro Historians and works.139 to summarize genesis to process into reconstruc their a veritable and tree, family over is wonderfully product As the told by Ambroise Vollard.140 to find a small dancer, he which Degas's preference in an anecdote expressed dealer seemed disappointed to cast in bronze hoped finally after transforma its twentieth tion, turned back to the state of wax ball, the artist told him: 'You think above all ofwhat itwas worth, Vollard, but had you given me a hat full of diamonds, itwould not have given me the same pleasure starting been again."141 shows and the interest and tributed from ual to conceive developed Alfred Gell he suggested object" dispersed a "career-long are works stages of this by made a Many for from generate-and-test or in this stops These Husserl, have sequence."143 "cumulative instance, ear various proposal of Redon, methods of group notions oeuvre the artist's seeing in space and time and discovery," mutually future-oriented relations) is or extension, another the model of work the Surrealists connected ones). past-oriented of time of Edmund one a whole. to the working in relation Rodin: as this for the sake of extension from metamorphosis oeuvre artist's sources.142 is an that at stake story proposed lier I had in demolishing of special Degas, a "dis as resulting Individ of process or by protentions (prospective retentions (retrospective and terms derive from who wrote that which continuous modification, intrinsically carries in itself?a the of its past heritage for Druidess II and suit, Parsifal example, remark as or the philosophy retention "each is that to say could "retentions" (in various ways) of both Druidess I and Parsifal I144 Gell himself sketched an application of his model to the work of Marcel oeuvre. Extensions Redon's on shortly expressed that the recep Merleau-Ponty, and their of combinatorics, an representing in it, that the fruit preserved go with century of process to works idea isjam, which is aufhebenoften cited to illuminate Hegel's because and Maurice follows, notion This words by nihilo but participated ex the Druidess/ that similarly "thinking," of the common example An quality. believe rather metamorphosis, Parsifal/Druidess visual instance of "regressive" thought it "encour found language themselves" in as that it of the contrary, to find in the thought aging speculative a that possess meaning speculative the "sensible either/or."1371 beyond op of a distinctive trait of primitive thinking and believed death developments is the idea, this an made repeatedly to bear it is legitimately open change it only into itself."138 is that Freud or Jung did not invent their theories ex Another tion "blind nated by an essay written in 1884 by the linguist Karl Abel, according to which din's meaning" of Freud's critique ambivalence fundamental "double for a con It may evolution. I essay 79I as "wandering" never-ending this later of justification his The was him intrigued in of REDON tion of works of art unfolds their potential and that "it is the work itself that has opened the field fromwhich itappears in another light, it is the work that metamorphoses itselfand anal ogy with our object?was expressed by Hegel with the verb he found relevant enough to which sub?ate), (to aufheben devote One like Redon, This result."134 use becomes what Becoming "is the passing over of being into nothing, and of nothing into being"; it "contradicts itself,because it unites and self-opposition noted that "anachronistic" notion Beuys's been before and nothing, being, to is closer tinuous ones. a model such Parsifal have op mutually adopted between to analogous figures) and by going beyond annihilating discussing (here categories creating and dependent, posed in a way unfolded BY ODILON METAMORPHOSIS and Duchamp, while recognizing that his claim to a universal value could be diminished by the historical proximity be tween Duchamp's intellectual milieu and the "[William] James-Bergson-Husserl conception of consciousness.'"145 'stream This This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions of flux temporal objection to or universality the ART BULLETIN 792 not need prime of It takes art, one step or images tion," the contrary, link between the direct as LXXXIX and process NUMBER 4 is a Duchamp been more to conceive as artifacts, made with one of endless as notions and "intericonicity," the whole as diverse Dario world and process, "sampling." in the sense made last expression of sounds Dario this "appropria Robleto (b. popular and musical the disc by fragments, jockeys' a created recently the of a female rib. The powder pulverized this gender reversal and sexual metamorphosis, erate of the could be aspect procedure hardly from explicitness the delib of from Redon. But the man and older which woman, artist the re further have might of a genetic account thought of the biblical between also relationship transformation of Dru idess I into Parsifal I already turned upside down, and it is notable should same the in Robleto's that element be Another of symptom of cultural a tool the too, work, the production, its analysis, for called of substance and aufgehoben?annihilated the new one. time?in standing at being the first at preserved under increasingly processual which aims at the same time is the to approach literature critiqueg?n?tique (genetic criticism), which shifts the object of interpretation from the "final" text, known from authorized such to editions, forms of the in documented process writing as writers' avant-texte notes, sketches, drafts, and Since typescripts, proofs, correspondence.147 art to "avant-im has attention beginnings, given history as notes, and models, sketches, studies, ages" such maquettes, manuscripts, its but the distinction them between to be tends because Prints, this "public" a more of in literature the regard, of the works and what and complex us enables precedes affair.148 shifting come process, editioning which asking towhat extent Redon aware to closest to conclude by intended the public to become Druidess/Parsifal metamorphosis. Druidess and Parsifal II were published and thus made public, but as individual prints, and the recognition of their was relationship left to the spectators' perceptiveness. They could find clues in the formal echoes between the two litho graphs, sense of in the the semantic associations of formed "intericonicity" their titles, in a and oeuvre by Redon's and, within it, by the category of the Pi?ces modernes. This may sound like mans's and early a great deal asking comment shows Redon had very from one's that he was attentive and viewers, on the imaginative but Huys right track, beholders. Parsifal I, on the other hand, and within it the (faint) traces of Druidess I, remained and unpublished probably unseen? except by the printer?during Redon's lifetime; neither did the artist mention its existence to Mellerio, who did not include a reference to it in his 1913 catalog. However, Redon kept at least three proofs of it, which, after his death, duly found theirway into the hands of his collectors. By 1891, Jules Destr?e had already demonstrated to Redon how meticulous his admirers he knew to transmission posterity of a small could the value be, and his they attached short, by preserving commercial to the rare strategy shows impression.149 II, that In the trial proofs of Parsifal I, Redon at previously taught Reserve and University, who Gamboni, Case but precious Western the University the University ofLyon of Am sterdam, has been professor of art history at the University of Geneva since 2004. He has published numerous books and arti on nineteenth- cles, mainly ment work entitled Men Are theNew Women (2002, collection of Linda Pace, San Antonio), consisting of a male rib molded moved the late-nineteenth-century 1972), a young artist from theUnited States who employs the recycling ensured mystery. twentieth-century and artistic developments.146 but has step 2007 VOLUME on here; the oeuvre of philosophical of us detain example notions DECEMBER d'histoire 4, Switz., de Tart, and Universit? art twentieth-century de Gen?ve, CH-1211 [D?parte Geneva dario.gamboni@lettres.unige.ch]. Notes First versions of this essay were presented orally before the Institut National Genevois on September 14, 2005, and as a contribution to the 2005 annual conference of the Swiss Association of Art Historians "Inversions et transgres sions : 'Inversions' de genre dans les pratiques artistiques" in Lausanne; I thank Pierre Vaisse and Daniela Mondini for the invitations. My interpreta tion owes important information and suggestions to the following colleagues: Mayte Garcia-Julliard, Ted Gott, Antje von Graevenitz, Christophe Imperiali, Paul Lang, Fred Leeman, and Rainer Michael Mason. A special debt is due to of Prints and Douglas Druick, Peter Zegers, and the staff of the Department Drawings of the Art Institute of Chicago, particularly Suzanne Folds McCul lagh, Harriet Stratis, Kristi Dahm, and Karin Patzke, who realized the enlarge ments and the composite image of details of Parsifal and Druidess reproduced in the article: itwas a rare treat to be able to involve all of them in the detailed discussion of my argument in front of Redon's prints in September 2006.1 am also grateful to the Ryerson and Burnham Libraries of the Art Institute of Chicago for access to the Andr? Mellerio Papers. Finally, my text has bene fited fromMarc Gotlieb's encouragements and from the insightful remarks of the two anonymous reviewers of the manuscript. All translations are mine, unless otherwise indicated. 1. Jules Destr?e, L'oeuvre lithographique de Odilon Redon, catalogue descriptif (Brussels: Edmond Deman, 1891), 72. See Adrienne Fontainas and Luc Fontainas, Edmond Deman ?diteur (1857-1918): Art et ?dition au tournant du si?cle (Brussels: Labor, 1997), 138-41. 2. Odilon Redon, Lettres d'Odilon Redon 1878-1916 (Paris: Librairie Na tionale d'Art et d'Histoire; Brussels: G. van Oest, 1923), 32. 3. See an interpretation of this relationship in Dario Gamboni, La plume et lepinceau: Odilon Redon et la litt?rature (Paris: Minuit, 1989), 129. to Odilon Redon, October 4. Joris-Karl Huysmans 11, 1891, in Roseline Bacou, ed., Lettres de Gauguin, Gide, Huysmans, Jammes,Mallarm?, Ver haeren . . . ? Odilon Redon (Paris: Corti, 1960), 125: "Ah !mais elles sont du parfait Redon, l'une, si ?trange et douce et dolente avec sa fl?che, l'autre si terriblement bestiale avec son profil fruste, son oeil verni." Huysmans had simply dated his letter "Sunday morning," to which Redon added "October 11, 1891." 5. Andr? Mellerio, Odilon Redon (1913; reprint, New York: Da Capo Press, 1968), 110, nos. 116-18. Further references to this catalog will be to "M," followed by the catalog number. A proof of Druidess in to Huysmans and belonging to scribed with a manuscript dedication the collection of Dr. Frederick Mulder is reproduced in London in Ted Gott, The Enchanted Stone: The Graphic Worlds ofOdilon Redon, exh. cat., National Gallery of Victoria, Melbourne, 1990, 110, no. 52. 6. Suzanne Folds McCullagh and Inge Christine Swenson, "A New 'Parsi fal' by Odilon Redon," Print Collector's Quarterly 7, no. 3 (October toMellerio, fifty copies of Parsifal (M 116) 1976): 108-9. According and Druidess (M 117) each were printed by Becquet on chine applique and the stones were canceled; the copies were uneven for Parsifal, and Swenson knew of two proofs of the good for Druidess. McCullagh first version of Parsifal: one in the collection of the Hirshhorn Mu seum and Sculpture Garden, (66.4197), to which it Washington, D.C. had been given in 1966 by Joseph H. Hirshhorn; the other, donated to the Art Institute of Chicago by Robert Light (1975.493), had been purchased by him at the June 11, 1975, auction of Kornfeld and Klip stein in Bern (lot 838; R. M. Light, e-mail to the author, January 4, 2007). This second proof came from the collection of the Swiss Rich ard B?hler by way of his daughter-in-law Hanne B?hler (Eberhard W. Kornfeld, letter to the author, January 9, 2007); Redon's widow, Ca mille Redon, had sent to Richard B?hler in 1918 a series of litho (Camille graphs, including the last proof of Parsifal in her possession Redon toMrs. B?hler, January 18, 1918, private collection). A third impression, once mistaken for a charcoal drawing (Odilon Redon 1840-1916, exh. cat., Galerie des Beaux-Arts, Bordeaux, 1985, 92, no. 41 ), has reappeared since in another private collection; itwas ac This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions UNFOLDING quired from Camille Redon in 1919 by the Swiss art historian Hans R. son of the collector Arthur Hahnloser Hahnloser, (Margit Hahnloser Ingold, telephone call to the author, January 8, 2007). It had been cropped on all sides except the left one, probably by Redon himself, in Richard Wagner, visions d'artistes:DAuguste and iswell reproduced Renoir ? Anselm Kiefer, exh. cat., Mus?es d'Art et d'Histoire, Geneva (Paris: Somogy, 2005), 109. See also Gott, The Enchanted Stone, 96. 7. Redon to Edmond Picard, August 25, 1894, quoted inMellerio, Odilon Redon, 80; for biographical information, see Douglas W. Druick et al., Odilon Redon: Prince ofDreams, 1840-1916, exh. cat., Art Insti tute of Chicago (New York: Harry N. Abrams, 1994), 34ff. 8. See Bacou, Lettres . . . ? Odilon Redon, 88-89; Odilon Redon, A soi m?me: fournal (1867-1915); Notes sur la vie, l'art et les artistes (1922; Paris: Corti, 1961), 177 (1878). 9. Redon, ? soi-m?me, 156 (November Ryerson and Burnham et le Salon de de Wyzewa, "Notes sur la peinture wagn?rienne 1886," Revue Wagn?rienne 2 (May 8, 1886): 100-113, at 106. 12. Gott, The Enchanted Stone, 97, no. 41. 11. Teodor 130; see Gott, The Enchanted Stone, 97-98, no. 42; and Alec Odilon Redon: Catalogue raisonn? de l'oeuvrepeint et dessin?, Wildenstein, 4 vols. (Paris: Wildenstein Institute, 1992-98), vol. 2, no. 1043 (fur ther references to this catalog will take the form ofW followed by the 13. Mellerio catalog number). 14. See Gamboni, 15. W La plume et lepinceau, 26-30, 92-95, 146-50. 626. 16. See Redon, A soi-m?me,27, 128. 17. AMP, Chronology," 49. et al., Odilon Redon: Prince ofDreams, 41. 19. See Parsifal: Dichtung, Entwurf, Schriften (1914; Wal 21. See, for example, Paul Lindau, Bayreuther Briefe vom reinen Thoren: "Par 1883), 11-12. sifal" von Richard Wagner (Breslau: Schottlaender, "'Le dieu Richard Wagner irradiant un 22. See Jean-Fran?ois Candoni, sacre': ? propos de la religion de l'art dans Parsifal," in "Parsifal," ed. Christian Merlin, special issue, L'Avant-sc?ne Op?ra 213 (March-April 2003): 123-27; and Richard Wagner, "Religion und Kunst" (1880), in S?mtliche Schriftenund Dichtungen, 16 vols. (Leipzig: Breitkopf und H?r tel, 1911-14), vol. 10, 211-52. 23. See Gamboni, La plume et lepinceau, 19-30, 134-37; Odilon Redon: Prince ofDreams, 23-24, 71-72, 89-93. and Druick et al., Das Pass Amontillado: Der Traum eines Traumes 24. See Dario Gamboni, (Frankfurt: Fischer, 26. See Jean-David Jumeau-Lafond's entry for thiswork in Richard Wagner, visions d'artistes, 152, no. 37; and Love Revealed: Simeon Solomon and the and Art Gallery, 2006. Pre-Raphaelites, exh. cat., Birmingham Museum Another interesting element of comparison isJean Delville's androgy nous and mystical charcoal drawing Parsifal (1890, private collection), reproduced, for instance, in Richard Wagner, visions d'artistes, 127, no. 23. Mason's entry in Richard Wagner, visions d'artistes, 28. Hans J?rgen Syberberg, Parsifal: Ein Filmessay (Munich: Wilhelm Heyne, 1982), 69. "Par la faute d'une chim?re," Le Monde, May 29. Jacques Longchampt, 1982, reprinted inMerlin, "Parsifal," 187. 20, 30. Syberberg, Parsifal, 161. 31. Ibid., 35. 32. Cosima Wagner, fournal, ed. Martin Gregor-Dellin, vol. 3 (Paris: Galli mard, 1979), 592-93. A few years earlier, in 1877, Wagner was already thinking of using "a mixture of voices" to "express the immaterial ; itmust be neither a woman, nor a man, but spirituality of Christ... a neutral element in the highest sense of the word" (ibid., entry of September 33. See Merlin, 35. Druidess, W 609. See also W 627 and W 167, which, however, is enti tled Woman of theEast in Druick et al., Odilon Redon: Prince ofDreams, 203, fig. 10 (cropped). 36. See ibid., 62, 328ff. 37. W 266; ibid., cat. no. 71. 38. W 239; ibid., cat. no. 82. Lettres . . . ? Odilon Redon, 149-59. 40. Edmond Picard, Le jur?: Monodrame en cinq actes (1887; new ed., Brus and Vve Ferd. Larcier, 1904), act 4, 59: "Elle se sels: Paul Lacomblez montre ? lui, dramatique et grandiose, avec sa coiffure de pr?tresse th??trale, imposante, impr?gn?e de sa vie factice, luxueuse druidique, et bruyante, mais sans rien qui soit de la maternit?." 41. Dramatique etgrandiose avec sa figure de pr?tresse druidique . . . W , Mellerio 80. 42. Bacou, Lettres . . . ? Odilon Redon, 156: "Dramatique sa coiffure de pr?tresse druidique. ..." 43. Druick et al., Odilon Redon: Prince ofDreams, 40. 238, et grandiose, avec 44. Odilon Redon, "Un s?jour dans le Pays Basque" (ca. 1869), AMP, A-5, 2: "Le sol basque est pour moi comme une patrie ancienne o? ilme semble avoir v?cu, souffert, aim?"; and Claire Moran, Odilon Redon: ?crits (London: Modem Humanities Research Association, 2005), 29; see Druick et al., Odilon Redon: Prince ofDreams, 41-42. celtique (Paris: Perrin, 1914), 48. Bacou, "La biblioth?que 11. d'Odilon Redon," 32. 49. Fran?ois-Ren? de Chateaubriand, Les martyrs, ou Le triomphede la reli gion chr?tienne (1809; Paris: Garnier, n.d.), 153-75 (bks. 9-10). 50. Edouard merre, Sch?re, Vercing?torix:Drame en cinq actes (Paris: Alphonse iv. Le 1887), 51. Sch?re, La druidesse, 20; Sch?re referred here to Celtil and (again) the main characters of La druidesse (1914), an adaptation of Vell?da, his own Vercing?torix that enabled him to better reconcile Druidism and Christianity by setting it in the first century. is a major point for Sch?re, who found it inAdolphe Pictet, Le 1856). myst?redes bardes de l'?le de Bretagne (Geneva: Cherbuliez, 53. Sch?re, Vercing?torix, 77-78: "Le Feu, le Feu s'?teint!?Il n'est plus sur lumi?re du ciel / S'enfuit . . .j'ai l'autel, / Il me br?le le c ur!?La vu l'ab?me! Horreur, n?ant, t?n?bres / Et tr?pas!" 52. This 1988). 25. See Parsifal 1882-1982: Une documentation illustr?eautour du centenaire de la cr?ation de l'oeuvre de Richard Wagner (Geneva: Grand Th??tre de Gen?ve, 1982); and Merlin, "Parsifal," 144-59. 27. See Rainer Michael 220-22, no. 71. 793 46. Edouard Sch?re, "Les l?gendes de la Bretagne et le g?nie celtique," Revue des Deux Mondes 106 (August 15, 1891): 865-902, at 895. 47. Edouard Sch?re, La druidesse, pr?c?d?e d'une ?tude sur le r?veil de l'?me ibid., 21ff. 20. See Richard Wagner, luf: Sandig, 1973). REDON 45. Ernest Renan, Souvenirs d'enfance et de jeunesse (Paris: Calmann L?vy, d'Odilon Re 1883), 75, 78, 83. See Roseline Bacou, "La biblioth?que don," in Festschrift toErik Fischer: European Drawings from Six Centuries (Copenhagen: Royal Museum of Fine Arts, 1990), 29-37, at 36. "Mellerio-Redon 18. See Druick BY ODILON METAMORPHOSIS imMenschlichen Weibliche [AlsAbschluss von 'Religion und Kunst']," in R. Wagner, Dichtungen und Schriften,ed. Dieter Borch-meyer, vol. 10 [Frankfurt: Insel, 1983], 172-74), and he leftunfinished another one entitled "On the Masculine and the Feminine in Culture and Art." 39. See Bacou, 1882). 10. Andr? Mellerio Papers (henceforward, AMP), Libraries, Art Institute of Chicago, A-l, 7. A LITHOGRAPHIC 26, 1877). "Parsifal," esp. 17-19, 40. 34. Jean-Jacques Nattiez, Wagner androgyne (Paris: Christian Bourgois, 1990), 197. The question of the male-female relationship kept preoc cupying Wagner after Parsifal: shortly before his death in 1883, he wrote the essay "On the Feminine within the Human" ("?ber das 54. Merlin, "Parsifal," 63, line 307: "Amfortas!? / Die Wunde!?Die Wunde!? / Sie brennt inmeinem Herzen.? / O, Klage! Klage! Furchtbare Klage! / Aus tiefstem Herzen schreit sie mir auf." / 55. Edouard Schur?, Le drame musical, vol. 1, La musique et la po?sie dans leur d?veloppement historique, and vol. 2, Richard Wagner, son oeuvre et son id?e (Paris: Sandoz et Fischbacher, 1875); Le drame musical, nouvelle ?dition augment?e d'une ?tude sur Parsifal (Paris: Perrin, 1886). 56. Edouard Schur?, Les grands initi?s:Esquisse de l'histoire secr?tedes reli gions; Rama?Krishna?Herm?s?Mo?se?Orph?e?Pythagore?Platon? d'Odilon Re J?sus (Paris: Perrin, 1889); and Bacou, "La biblioth?que don," 33. 57. Edouard Schur? to Redon, February 25, 1892, in Bacou, Lettres . . . ? Odilon Redon, 244; Bacou quotes a very positive, undated note written by Redon after a discussion with Schur?: "Verymusical, he reminds me of Boiss? [a friend from Redon's youth]. Youthful soul in an age less body [Schur? was born in 1841, Redon in 1840]?and much reli giosity. He is charming." 58. This copy of Vercing?torix,on which Schur? had marked with a red pencil the two scenes selected for the Th??tre d'Art, is not mentioned in Roseline Bacou's description of Redon's library ("La biblioth?que d'Odilon Redon"). 59. A detail from what appears to be the program of the play, including a reproduction of Druidess, is reproduced without caption or source in Marcel Guicheteau, Paul S?rusier (Paris: SIDE, 1976), 83; see Gott, The Enchanted Stone, 111. 60. Gott, The Enchanted Stone, 111. This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions ART 794 BULLETIN DECEMBER 2007 VOLUME LXXXIX NUMBER 4 61. See "Redon's Spiritualism and the Rise of ibid., 98; and Fred Leeman, Mysticism," in Druick et al., Odilon Redon: Prince ofDreams, 215-36, at 227-30. Buddhism, especially its ideal of renunciation, was also impor tant forWagner's conception of Parsifal, which used material from an earlier, unrealized project of a "Buddhist" opera entitled The Conquer ors; see Merlin, "Parsifal," 6, 105, 111. "Parsifal," 101, 109; and Sch?re, tagne," 875-76. 62. Merlin, "Les l?gendes de la Bre 63. See, for example, Emile Hennequin, "Le pessimisme des ?crivains," in La Revue Ind?pendante, 2 vols. (Geneva: Slatkine Reprints, 1970-71), vol. 1, 445-55 (October 1884), vol. 2, 61-78 (November 1884). In Schur?'s "Les l?gendes de la Bretagne," Merlin is told that as a prophet, he will be persecuted by humans and demons, and that while he can expect the highest joys and the "divine ray of light" as a reward, "insanity, shame and solitude" will also watch out for him (882). 64. Sch?re, 65. See, for example, El?mire Zoila, The Androgyne: Fusion of theSexes (London: Thames and Hudson, 1981). A late-tenth- or early-eleventh century statue of this kind, from the Djenn? region inMali, was re cently acquired by the French state for the Mus?e du Quai Branly, in H?l?ne Leloup, Statuaire dogon (Strasbourg: Paris; reproduced shutter fasteners inVenice display a male Amez, 1994). Traditional head when the shutter is open and a female one when it is closed, the three-dimensional figure being designed in such a way that the male's bust becomes the female's hair and vice versa. Eser, SchiefeBilder: Die Zimmernsche Anamorphose und andere Augenspiele aus den Sammlungen des Germanischen Nationalmuseums, exh. cat., Germanisches Nationalmuseum, 1998; Bodo von Nuremberg, Dewitz and Werner Nekes, Ich sehewas, was Du nicht siehst!Sehmaschinen und Bilderwelten; Die Sammlung Werner Nekes, exh. cat., Museum Lud "Com wig, Cologne (G?ttingen: Steidl, 2002); and Dario Gamboni, Images and Political Representa posing the Body Politic: Composite inMaking Things Public?Atmospheres ofDemocracy, tion, 1651-2004," exh. cat., ZKM-Center for Art ed. Bruno Latour and Peter Weibel, and Media, Karlsruhe (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 2005), 162-95. 66. See Thomas Bakhtin, Rabelais and His World, trans. Helene (Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press, 1968). 68. See Fr?d?ric Tristan, Le monde ? l'envers (Paris: Hachette, 67. See Mikhail Iswolsky 1980). 69. See Dario Gamboni, Potential Images: Ambiguity and Indeterminacy in Modern Art (London: Reaktion Books, 2002), 68-130, 149-67. no. 11 (1938): 34-35. Hugnet, "Devinettes," Minotaureb, in 71. This image and two others from the same series are reproduced Redstone Matchbox No. 1 (London: Redstone Press; San Francisco: Chronicle Books, 1998); similar double heads can be found in Julian Rothenstein and Mel Gooding, The Playful Eye (London: Redstone 70. Georges Press, 1999). late but particularly lucid exposition isJos?phin P?ladan, De l'androgyne: Th?orie plastique (Paris: Sansot, 1910). Itmust be added that there was no necessary contradiction between "monstrous" and "ideal" in this context: see Evangh?lia Stead, Le monstre, le singe et le foetus: T?ratogonie et d?cadence dans l'Europefin-de-si?cle (Geneva: Droz, 2004). 72. A 73. See, for example, works by Armand Point and Alexandre S?on, in Jean-David Jumeau-Lafond, Les peintres de l'?me: Le symbolisme id?aliste en France, exh. cat., Mus?e d'Ixelles, Brussels (Antwerp: Pandora, 1999), 120-35, 168-76. 74. See Gamboni, La plume et lepinceau, 193-94; Gott, The Enchanted Stone, "Redon's Spiritualism," 215-36. Among persons 98-106; and Leeman, connected to both Redon and P?ladan were Emile Bernard, El?mir Bourges, and Antoine de la Rochefoucauld. La plume et lepinceau, 303. 76. Jos?phin P?ladan, La d?cadence latine: ?thop?e (1891; reprint, Geneva: Slatkine, 1979), vol. 4, Coeur en peine; L'androgyne, vii-xi, xvii. toAndr? Mellerio, Redon, 33-35. 77. Redon 78. Redon, ? 'ImWanderer steckt "Joseph Beuys im Gespr?ch mit Antje Graevenitz: stets ein neuer Mensch,'" in Der Raum Bayreuth: Ein Auftrag aus der Zukunft, ed. Wolfgang Storch (Frankfurt: Suhrkamp, 2002), 199-208, at 203; the interview had taken place in the fall of 1982 in Beuys's studio in D?sseldorf (Graevenitz, e-mail to the author, August 16, 2006). See also Antje von Graevenitz, "Erl?sungskunst oder Befreiung spolitik: Wagner und Beuys," in Unsere Wagner: Joseph Beuys, Heiner M?ller, Karlheinz Stockhausen, Hans J?rgen Syberberg;Essays, ed. Gabriele F?rg August 16, 1898, in Redon, Lettres d'Odilon soi-m?me, 128 (1913). 79. Merlin, "Parsifal," 71, line 320: "Den Weg, den du suchst, / dess' Pfade sollst du nicht finden: / denn Pfad' und Wege, / die dich mir entf?hren, / so verw?nsch' ich sie dir: / Irre! Irre!" In a remarkable comment on Wagner's interpretation of the Grail legends, Claude L?vi-Strauss suggested that the composer's "contribution to universal mythology" consisted precisely in Parsifal's requirement of "knowing and not knowing, that is, knowing what one ignores"; L?vi-Strauss, in the "De Chr?tien de Troyes ? Richard Wagner," first published program of the 1975 Bayreuth festival, reprinted inMerlin, "Parsifal," 100-107, at 107. (Frankfurt: Fischer, 1984). 81. "Joseph Beuys im Gespr?ch mit Antje Graevenitz," 208. in lithography, 82. For a detailed analysis of Redon's working methods see Gott, The Enchanted Stone, 27-36. 83. See Matthias Schatz, Der Betrachter imWerk von Odilon Redon: Eine rezep tions?sthetischeStudie (Hamburg: Kr?mer, 1988), 48. 84. Gott, The Enchanted Stone, 33, 36. 85. Redon, Vercing?torix, 17. 75. Gamboni, 80. ? soi-m?me, 129 (1913). The Head, the Hand, the 86. Pat Gilmour, "Lithographie Collaboration: Heart," in Lasting Impressions: Lithography as Art, exh. cat., Australian National Gallery, Canberra, 1998, 308-59, 378-81, at 322; see Gott, The Enchanted Stone, 42-44. 87. For evidence of Redon's tial Images, 153-54. interest in visual puzzles, see Gamboni, Poten 'monde obscur de 88. Gert Mattenklott, "Zum sozialen Inhalt von Redons in Selbstgespr?ch: Tageb?cher und Aufzeichnungen 1867 l'ind?termin?,'" 1915, by Odilon Redon (Munich: Rogner und Bernhard, 1971), 207 19; and Harriet K. Stratis, "Beneath the Surface: Redon's Methods in Druick et al., Odilon Redon: Prince ofDreams, 353-77. and Materials," 89. See Benedetto Croce, "Una teor?a della 'macchia'" (1905), in Problemi di est?tica e contribua alla storia dell'est?tica italiana (1909; Bari: Laterza, (1934), trans. 1923), 238-48; Hans Sedlmayr, "Bruegel's Macchia" Frederic J. Schwartz, in The Vienna School Reader: Politics and Art Histori calMethod in the 1930s, ed. Christopher S. Wood (New York: Zone Books, 2000), 323-76; Heinrich Schmidt, "Leonardos Macchia," Zeitschriftf?r ?sthetik und allgemeine Kuntwissenschaft 12 (1967): 70-89, no. 1; and Jean-Claude Lebensztejn, L'art de la tache: Introduction ? la nouvelle m?thode dAlexander Cozens (Paris: Limon, 1990). du 90. See Gustave Moreau 1826-1898, exh. cat., Galeries Nationales Grand Palais, Paris (Paris: R?union des Mus?es Nationaux, 1998), for "Hasard et example, 159, cat. nos. 72, 73; and Raphael Rosenberg, in Gustave de Gustave Moreau," abstraction: Les palettes d'aquarelle Moreau: Mythes et chim?res;Aquarelles et dessins secretsdu mus?e Gustave Paris (Paris: R?union Moreau, exh. cat., Mus?e de la Vie Romantique, des Mus?es Nationaux, 2003), 93-107. 91. John Ruskin, The Elements ofDrawing: In Three Letters toBeginners, with Illustrations Drawn by theAuthor (London: Smit, Elder, 1857), note to sec. 5; and see Richard Shiff, C?zanne and theEnd of Impressionism: A Study of theTheory, Technique, and Critical Evaluation ofModern Art (Chi cago: University of Chicago Press, 1984). 92. Paul Val?ry, Introduction ? la m?thode de L?onard de Vinci (Paris: Galli in La Nouvelle Revue 95 (Au mard, 1957), 25, 33, previously published gust 15, 1895): 742-70. 93. Redon, ? soi-m?me, 100: "Le sens du myst?re, c'est d'?tre tout le temps dans l'?quivoque, dans les double, triple aspects, des soup?ons ou qui le seront d'aspect (images dans images), formes qui vont ?tre, selon l'?tat d'esprit du regardeur." 94. Alfred Jarry, "Commentaire pour servir ? l'intelligence de la pr?c? dente image," Perhind?rion 2 (June 1896), in Oeuvres compl?tes,vol. 1, ed. Michel Arriv? (Paris: Gallimard, 1972), 998-99. See Dario Gam boni, "D?rer als Pataphysiker: Eine Bildlekt?re von Alfred Jarry," in vom Anden R?gime bis Jenseits der Grenzen: Franz?sische und deutscheKunst zur Gegenwart; Thomas W. Gaehtgens zum 60. Geburtstag, vol. 3, Dialog der Avantgarden, ed. Uwe Fleckner, Martin Schieder, and Michael F. Zim mermann (Cologne: DuMont, 2000), 29-41. 95. When he sold this small painting to Andries Bonger in 1898, Redon described it as "the small head of a woman standing out in profile sur ciel rouge]," and against a red sky [la petite t?tedefemme se profilant later in answer to a question from his Dutch patron and friend said that it had "no special title" (see Andr? Bonger en zijn kunstenaars vrienden Redon?Bernard?Van Gogh, exh. cat., Rijksmuseum, Amster dam, 1972, 16, no. 9). In his list of works sold to dealers and collec tors, he noted it as Head of a Woman and described the figure as red sun ... on a vague "pensive, in profile on an orange-colored (AMP, Mellerio Re background of [crossed out: "violet"] mountains" don Account Books [MRA], 1, 31). I thank Fred Leeman for giving me access to his catalog of the Bonger collection (Amsterdam: Van Gogh Museum, forthcoming). 96. See Stratis, "Beneath 97. The demonstrative the Surface." effect is even stronger ifone This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions shifts, as can be done UNFOLDING on the computer screen, the degree of coincidence of the superimpo sition. I thank Karin Patzke for having suggested and realized this ex periment. I am indebted to Rainer Michael Mason and Harriet Stratis on this to an isolated testimony, Redon "frequently fur point. According rowed the granite [sic] so deep that several millimeters had to be an unorthodox method that was "a source of annoyance to pumiced," the professionals"; Claude Roger-Marx, French Original Engravings from Manet to thePresent Time (New York: Hyperion Press, 1939), 31-32, 379 n. 53. quoted in Gilmour, "Lithographic Collaboration," 100. I owe this explanation to Harriet Stratis. 101. The cropped proof of Parsifal [I] (see n. 6 above) may have resulted from an attempt by Redon to reduce this tension by concentrating the image on the figure of Parsifal. 102. Redon, Lettres d'Odilon Redon, 33-34. et al., Odilon Redon: Prince ofDreams, 93, 104. von Hartmann, Philosophie des Unbewussten (1869; Berlin: Duncker, 1874), 239, 252. 103. See Druick 104. Eduard 105. See Dario Gamboni, "Im festen Zustand der suggestiven Betrachtung: Odilon Redon und das Schweben als Voraussetzung und Metapher f?r das k?nstlerische Schaffen," inDie Couch: Vom Denken imLiegen, ed. Lydia Marinelli, exh. cat., Sigmund-Freud-Museum, Vienna (Mu nich: Prestel, 2006), 123-42. 106. Oskar Pfister, "Kryptolalie, Kryptographie und unbewusstes Vexierbild bei Normalen," fahrbuch f?r psychoanalytische und psychopathologischeFor schungen 5 (1913): 117-56, esp. 129-41. 107. Ibid., 145-51. 108. Sigmund Freud, Un souvenir d'enfance de L?onard de Vinci /Eine Kind 1991), heitserinnerung des Leonardo da Vinci (1910; Paris: Gallimard, 206-7. On the "vulture" problem, see Meyer Schapiro, "Freud and Leonardo: An Art Historical Study" (1955/1968); and idem, "Further Notes on Freud and Leonardo," in Theory and Philosophy ofArt: Style, Artist, and Society; SelectedPapers (New York: George Braziller, 1994), 153-200. METAMORPHOSIS BY ODILON REDON 795 1899) devoted by its author, Th?odore Flournoy, to the young female medium ?lise Catherine M?ller ("H?l?ne Smith"). Among the several identi personalities she developed was a male spirit named Leopold, fied by participants in the s?ances as a reincarnation of the eigh im teenth-century occultist Giuseppe Balsamo (Cagliostro). While "became incarnated" inMiss pressed by the way in which Leopold M?ller, Flournoy remarked that the two personalities did not coexist but alternated and proposed a rational account of Leopold's "psycho genesis" in which this "austere and rigid mentor" represents "a very general psychological given" present in "every feminine soul of high birth" (75-134). 98. Ted Gott described this impression as "a proof of a first state of Dru idess,before the filling in of the background and additional tonal work on the face and head-dress" (TheEnchanted Stone, 110, no. 52), but a new comparison with the other proof in the collection of the Art Institute of Chicago (Fig. 2) showed only differences ascribable to the printing process. 99. A LITHOGRAPHIC 117. Jung, Symbole derWandlung, 628. We have noted a likeness between Redon's Br?nnhilde (Fig. 7) and his Druidess (Fig. 2). 118. See Sarah Kofmann, L'enfance de l'art: Une interpr?tationde l'esth?tique freudienne (Paris: Payot, 1970). 119. Charles Morice, "L'hommage ? Goya," Petite Tribune R?publicaine, April . . .Entendons-nous! 2, 1885: "Le r?ve de M. Redon L'acception qu'il faut donner au mot R?ve n'est ni celle vulgaire et de prose (visions fatales du sommeil), ni celle rare et de po?sie (visions volontaires de la veille); c'est ceci et cela, c'est la veille et le sommeil, c'est propre ment le r?ve d'un r?ve: l'ordonnance volontaire de visions fatales." On Redon's approval, see Ted Gott, "Silent Messengers?Odilon Re don's Dedicated Lithographs and the 'Politics' of Gift-Giving," Print Collector'sNewsletter 19, no. 3 (July-August 1988): 92-101, at 95. 120. Alfred Gell, Art and Agency: An Anthropological Theory (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1998), 26. 121. Odilon Redon, "Le Fakir," AMP, A-12, 1-33, at 4. See Druick et al., Odilon Redon: Prince ofDreams, 72; and Moran, Odilon Redon: ?crits, 91 114. Les martyrs, 153, 156, 161; Schur?, Vercing?torix, iv; and 122. Chateaubriand, idem, La druidesse, 10-11, 18, 20, 52-56. 123. See AMP, A-5 (Moran, Odilon Redon: ?crits, 29-46), et al., Odilon Redon: Prince ofDreams, 41-42. 124. Charles Baudelaire, Oeuvres compl?tes,ed. Claude Gallimard, 1976), 792. 125. B-2, 4; and Druick Pichois, vol. 2 (Paris: Ibid., 793, 795. 126. See Ernst Haeckel, Anthropogenic, oderEntwicklungsgeschichte desMen schen (Leipzig: Engelmann, scientific interests, the 1874). On Redon's most recent, book-length study is Barbara Larson, The Dark Side ofNa ture: Science, Society, and theFantastic in theWork ofOdilon Redon (Uni versity Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 2005). 109. In relation to his notion of "condensation," Freud refers not so much toman-made images as to Francis Galton's famous "composite photo graphs"; this notion has antecedents in earlier research on the dream, which had been available to the general public in France since the 1860s. See Jack J. Spector, The Aesthetics ofFreud: A Study inPsychoanal ysis and Art (New York: Praeger, 1972), 125-27; Stefanie Heraeus, Traumvorstellung und Bildidee: Surreale Strategien in derfranz?sischen Graphik des 19. Jahrhunderts (Berlin: Reimer, 1998); and idem, "Artists and the Dream in Nineteenth-Century Paris: Towards a Prehistory of Surrealism," History Workshop fournal & (1999): 153-68. 127. See Redon, ? soi-m?me, 18; and Merlin, "Parsifal," 46, 47, lines 131, and metempsycho 109, 111. The connection between metamorphosis sis was already established by Ovid in the Pythagorian introduction to bk. 15 of The Metamorphoses; see the entry "M?tamorphose" in Pierre Larousse, Grand dictionnaire universel du XIXe si?cle (1866-79; reprint, Geneva: Slatkine, 1982), vol. 11, pt. 1, 136. 110. Hermann "The Hegel Legend of 'Thesis-Antithesis-Syn 129. See Gustav E. Mueller, thesis,'" Journal of theHistory of Ideas 19, no. 3 (June 1958): 411-14; and Henri Dorra, "The 'System' in Courbet's 'System Paintings,'" Ga zettedes Beaux-Arts 121 (February 1993): 93-100. Mueller shows that Hegel himself feared the automatic and prescribed character of a "spiritless scheme" leading to "monotonous formalism" and attributes the association of this "triplicity" with Hegel to Karl Marx by way of Heinrich Moritz Chalyb?us. Rorschach, Psychodiagnostik:Methodik und Ergebnisse eines wahrnehmungsdiagnostischen Experiments (Deutenlassen von Zufallsformen) (Bern: Huber, 1921). 111. See Henri F. Ellenberger, "The Life and Work of Hermann Ror schach (1884-1922)," Bulletin of the Menninger Clinic 18 (1954): 173 219; Lebensztejn, L'art de la tache,Peter Galison, "Image of Self," in Things That Talk: Object Lessons from Art and Science, ed. Lorraine Das ton (New York: Zone Books, 2004), 257-94, 414-18; and Gamboni, Potential Images, 56-58, 189-90. "'Fabrication of Accidents': Factura and Chance 112. See Dario Gamboni, in Nineteenth-Century Art," Res: fournal ofAnthropology and Aesthetics (Autumn 1999): 205-25. 113. Carl Gustav Jung, Erinnerungen, Traume, Gedanken von C. G. fung, ed. (Zurich: Walter, 1971), 24. Jung uses the term Klecksogra Anielajaff? phien, which goes back to the nineteenth-century Swabian poet and physician Justinus Kerner; see his Kleksographien: Hadesbilder kleksogra phisch entstanden und in Versen erl?utert,ed. Horst Brandst?tter (Stutt in 1890. gart: Lithos, 1998), written in 1857 and first published 114. Jung, Erinnerungen, 157. 115. C. G. Jung, Symbole derWandlung: Analyse des Vorspiels zu einer Schizophre nie, 4th rev. ed. of Wandlungen und Symbole der Libido (Zurich: Rascher, 1952), 373. 116. Jung, Erinnerungen, 408-10. A partial antecedent can be found in the psychological monograph Des Indes ? la plan?te Mars: ?tude sur un cas de somnambulisme avec glossolalie (Geneva: Atar; Paris: Fischbacher, 128. Metempsychosis was generally recognized as an essential trait of the Druids' metaphysics: see, for example, Larousse, Grand dictionnaire universel, s.v. "Druide," vol. 6, pt. 2, 1301-2, and "M?tempsychose," vol. 11, pt. 1, 145-47. 130. See Gamboni, 131. L?vi-Strauss, 132. Schur?, La plume et lepinceau, 31-48. "De Chr?tien de Troyes ? Richard Wagner," "Les l?gendes de la Bretagne," 107. 867, 901. 133. Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel, Wissenschaft der Logik (1812-16), vol. 1,Die objektiveLogik, in S?mtliche Werke, ed. H. Glockner (Stuttgart: Frommann; Bad Cannstatt: Holzboog, 1965), vol. 4, 118-21. 134. Ibid., 119: "Das Werden ist eine haltungslose Unruhe, die in ein ru higes Resultat zusammensinkt. / Dies k?nnte auch so ausgedr?ckt werden: Das Werden ist das Verschwinden von Seyn in Nichts, und von Nichts in Seyn. ... Es widerspricht sich also in sich selbst, weil es solches in sich vereint, das sich entgegengesetzt ist. ..." 135. See Hermann Glockner, Hegel-Lexikon, 2nd aug. ed., vol. 23 of Hegel, S?mtliche Werke (Stuttgart: Frommann and Holzboog, 1957), 150; and in Vocabulaire europ?en des Philippe B?ttgen, "Aufheben, Aufhebung," philosophies: Dictionnaire des intraduisibles, ed. Barbara Cassin (Paris: Seuil / Le Robert, 2004), 152-56. 136. Sigmund Freud, "?ber den Gegensinn This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions der Urworte" (1910), in Studi 796 ART BULLETIN DECEMBER 2007 VOLUME LXXXIX enausgabe, vol. 4, Psychologische Schriften (Frankfurt: Fischer, 34. 137. NUMBER 1970), 227 Ibid., 234; and Hegel, Wissenschaft derLogik, 120: "F?r das spekulative Denken ist es erfreulich, in der Sprache W?rter zu finden, welche eine spekulative Bedeutung an ihnen selbst haben; die deutsche Sprache hat mehrere dergleichen"; quoted inGlockner, Hegel-Lexikon, 150. 138. Maurice Merleau-Ponty, L'oeil et l'esprit (Paris: Gallimard, 1964), 62: "C'est l'oeuvre elle-m?me qui a ouvert le champ d'o? elle appara?t et devient la suite, dans un autre jour, c'est elle qui sem?tamorphose les r?interpr?tations interminables dont elle est l?gitimementsuscepti ble ne la changent qu'en elle-m?me. ..." 139. See, for example, Richard Thomson, "On Narrative and Metamorpho sis," inDealing with Degas: Representation ofWomen and thePolitics of Vi sion, ed. Richard Kendall and Griselda Pollock (New York: Universe, 1992), 146-58; and Le corps en morceaux, exh. cat., Mus?e d'Orsay, Paris (Paris: R?union des Mus?es Nationaux, 1990), 201-18, 237-51. 140. 1898: Le Balzac 141. Ambroise de Rodin, exh. cat., Mus?e Rodin, Paris, 1998, 244-52. Vollard, Edgar Degas 1834-1917 (Paris: Cr?s, 1924), 112-13, quoted inAnne Pingeot, Degas sculptures (Paris: R?union des Mus?es Nationaux, 1991), 26: "Vous pensez surtout, Vollard, ? ce que ?a va 4 donn? un chapeau plein de diamants queje lait,mais m'auriez-vous n'aurais pas eu un bonheur ?gal ? celui que j'ai pris ? d?molir ?a pour le plaisir de recommencer." "Ars inveniendi et investigandi: Zur surrealisti 142. See Hans Holl?nder, schen Methode," Wallraf-Richanz-fahrbuch 32 (1970): 193-233. 143. Gell, Art and Agency, 232ff. 144. Edmund Husserl, Zur Ph?nomenologie des innerenZeitbewusstseins (1893 1917), quoted in ibid., 241, with reference to J. N. Findlay, "Husserl's Analysis of the Time Inner Consciousness," Monist 59, no. 1 (1975): 3-20. 145. Gell, Art and Agency, 243. 146. On Duchamp's debt to Redon specifically, see Gamboni, ages, 142-48. Potential Im 147. See Jed Deppman, Daniel Ferrer, and Michael Groden, eds., Genetic Criticism: Texts and Avant-Textes (Philadelphia: University of Pennsylva nia Press, 2004). "Formes," the recent issue of Genesis: Revue Internationale de Cri tique G?n?tique 24 (2004), devoted to the visual arts. 148. See 149. See Gott, "Silent Messengers," 92-101; This content downloaded from 129.194.8.73 on Fri, 20 Dec 2013 12:05:06 PM All use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions and idem, The Enchanted Stone.