- Rossland

Transcription

- Rossland

AGENDA
REGULAR MEETING OF COUNCIL
CITY HALL COUNCIL CHAMBERS
MONDAY, MARCH 7, 2016
6:00 P.M.
(1)
CALL TO ORDER
(2)
PUBLIC INPUT PERIOD
(3)
ADOPTION OF THE AGENDA
(4)
REGISTERED PETITIONS AND DELEGATIONS
a) Delegation from Fred Fontaine, Rossland Youth Soccer
Fred Fontaine, Rossland Youth Soccer President, will provide a presentation to
Council regarding an overview of the Rossland Youth Soccer Association, and the
utilization of Jubilee field in 2016.
(5)
ADOPTION OF THE MINUTES AND COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS
a) THAT the minutes of the Committee-Of-Whole Meeting held February 9, 2016 be
adopted.
b) THAT the minutes of the Regular meeting Held February 22, 2016 be adopted.
(6)
UNFINISHED BUSINESS
(7)
RECOMMENDATIONS FROM STAFF FOR DECISION
a) Street Light Conversion to LED, Interim Manager of Finance
That Council approves the conversion of up to 40 Street Lights in the Pinewood
Subdivision from Sodium Vapour to LED fixtures at a cost of up to $20,000,
funded by the existing CARIP reserve fund;
THAT Council selects the Phillips fixtures that were chosen by Kelowna following
an extensive trial;
1 of 129
THAT Section #5 of Policy #03-06, Purchasing, Consulting, and Publicly Tendered
Contracts, be hereby waived for the LED Street Light project, due to the fact that
the price for the LED fixtures has been established by the Province to encourage
Municipalities to convert.
b) Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Bylaw No. 1598 – Victims Assistance
Service Amendment Bylaw, Consulting Chief Administrative Officer
THAT the Municipal Council for the Corporation of the City of Rossland consents
to the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Board of Directors adopting Bylaw
No. 1598 being the “Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Victims Assistance
Service Amendment Bylaw No. 1598, 2016”.
c) 2016-2020 Capital Plan, Interim Manager of Finance
d) Development Permit for “The Crest” development on Lot C, Valhalla Tce, City
Planner
THAT the City issue a Development Permit for the proposed triplex on the
property legally described as LOT C TP 28 KOOTENAY DISTRICT PL NEP81732 (PID
026-784-505), located on Valhalla Terrace, subject to the following conditions:
(A) THAT the dimensions and siting of the building to be constructed shall be
in substantial accordance with the information shown on the application
drawings, dated February 25, 2016 as provided by the applicant and shall
comply with Development Permit Area 2: Red Mountain guidelines.
(B) THAT the applicant meet the requirements for sedimentation prevention,
drainage and erosion control plans, maintenance schedules, storm water
management, habitat management as described in the OCP.
(C) THAT the applicant post with the City a landscape performance security
deposit in the form of a letter of credit in the amount of 125% of the
estimated value of the elements shown in the Landscape Concept Plan dated
February 2016.
(D)THAT the applicant meet all geo-technical requirements as determined by
the City, as directed in Section 33.3. of the OCP.
(E)THAT the rear setback be reduced from 3 metres to 2 metres to integrate
the development with the site.
e) IT Acceptable Use Policy, Consulting Chief Administrative Officer
That Council adopts the IT Acceptable Use Policy in its present form.
2 of 129
(8)
BYLAWS
a) Bylaw #2607, Zoning Amendment – 2615A Railway Street, City Planner
The purpose of this bylaw is To advance the application for a zoning amendment
to allow the home to be used as a guest house.
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT Council advance the application for a zoning amendment for the property
legally described as LOT 1 SECTION 35 TOWNSHIP 9A KOOTENAY DISTRICT PLAN
8161, PID 013-371-193; located at 2615A Railway St by giving First and Second
Reading to Zoning Amendment Bylaw # 2607, and schedule a public hearing on
April 11, 2016 with the following condition:
1.
THAT a sign be posted by the applicant on the site stating the intent and
purpose of the rezoning application, within 7 days of the first reading of
Bylaw #2607 in accordance with the City of Rossland Development
Procedures Guidelines.
b) Bylaw #2608, Zoning Amendment – R-5 Residential Resort Mixed Density Zone,
City Planner
The purpose of this bylaw is to advance the application for a zoning amendment to
reduce the maximum parcel size and to reduce the interior side setback for a multiple
family dwelling.
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT Council provide First and Second Readings to Bylaw #2608 and set a Public
Hearing for April 11, 2016.
(9)
STAFF UPDATES AND REPORTS
a) Updated Task List
b) Youth Action Network Rainbow Flag and Crosswalk, Manager of Operations
c) Managing the Museum Project In-House, Manager of Operations
(10)
REQUESTS ARISING FROM CORRESPONDENCE
a) Letter From Mountain Market Society Regarding Miner’s Hall Fees
b) Letter from Jill Spearn Regarding the Sale of City Owned Land
THAT the letter drafted by the Consulting Chief Administrative Officer be
approved to send to Ms. Spearn.
3 of 129
(11)
INFORMATION ITEMS
a) 2016 AKBLG Conference, Kimberley.
Recommendation to receive and determine Council attendees for the
conference.
b) Miner’s Hall Renovation Matching Fundraiser.
Recommendation to receive and file.
c) West Kootenay Early Years Conference, Rossland, April 22 – 23: Request for Pins.
Recommendation to receive and approve the allocation of 150 City pins.
d) Columbia Basin Trust and City of Rossland Invitation to Celebrate the Launch of a
High-Speed Fibre Network in Rossland.
Recommendation to receive and direct any member of Council who wishes
should attend.
e) Tourism Rossland February 26, 2016 Update.
f) Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Regarding Reimbursement Program for
Area ‘B’ residents using Trail’s recreation facilities.
(12)
MEMBER REPORTS
(13)
RELEASE OF DECLASSIFIED IN-CAMERA MATTERS
(14)
RECESS TO IN-CAMERA MEETING
THAT the proceedings of the meeting of March 7, 2016 be closed to the public pursuant
Sections 90(a) Personal Information about an identifiable individual who holds or is being
considered for a position as an officer, employee or agent of the municipality or another
position appointed by the municipality; (c) Labour relations or other employee relations;
and (g) Litigation or potential litigation affecting the municipality of the Community
Charter.
(15)
ADJOURNMENT
4 of 129
THE CITY OF ROSSLAND
REQUEST FOR COUNCIL DECISION
DELEGATION
DATE:
TOPIC:
PROPOSAL:
March 3, 2016
File No: 0110.03/2016
Rossland Youth Soccer
To Eliminate Field Fees for Rossland Youth Soccer, Develop a Repair Plan to
Enusre the Field is Up to Standard and Assist in the Development of a Long
Term Plan to Bring a Turf Field to Rossland
SUBMITTED BY: Deputy Corporate Officer
SUMMARY:
Fred Fontaine, Rossland Youth Soccer President, will provide a presentation to Council
regarding an overview of the Rossland Youth Soccer Association, and the utilization of Jubilee
field in 2016.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Council receives the presentation and refers any issues for further discussion: Major issues brought
forward that may require further review and recommendations from Staff should be referred to
subsequent meetings for decision.
OPTIONS AND ALTERNATIVES:
1. Receive the presentation: Council and the public are provided with the information and briefed on
Rossland Youth Soccer plans and future considerations.
2. Receive the presentation and refer any issues for further discussion: Major issues brought forward
that may require further review and recommendations from Staff should be referred to subsequent
meetings for decision.
BENEFITS, DISADVANTAGES AND NEGATIVE IMPACTS:
Option 1: The main advantage to having representatives from Rossland Youth Soccer make a
presentation to Council is to answer questions and provide explanations on the submission.
Option 2: The key advantage is that the submission will receive additional review and recommendation
from the City Staff. The action and recommendations may be delayed due to referrals and further
discussions.
COSTS AND BUDGET IMPACT - REVENUE GENERATION:
There is no cost of making the presentation. Budget requests from Rossland Youth Soccer should be
referred to a subsequent meeting.
LEGISLATIVE IMPACTS, PRECEDENTS, POLICIES:
Council Procedures bylaw makes provisions for making presentations to Council.
______________________________
Reviewed by Consulting CAO/CO
5 of 129
6 of 129
Introductions, Board Members
Fred Fontaine
RYS President
KSYSA Chair/Select Program Director
Ian Johnson
RYS Past President and current Director
Kelly Acheson
RYS Director
KSYSA Director
Kootenay Zone Soccer Rep - BC Summer Games
7 of 129
Player Numbers 2015
Rossland Youth Soccer - 241
Compare that to:
BV-213
Trail-289
Castlegar-417
That’s nearly 1,200 youth playing soccer in the region
GTMHA – 56
Black Jack – 96
RMR - 80
8 of 129
+
BV Youth Soccer
+
Castlegar Minor Soccer
+
Trail Minor Soccer
=
9 of 129
Kootenay South Youth Soccer Association
Board of directors is made up of 2 board members from each
member association.
Each member association also has it’s own board of directors.
Each member association is responsible for managing its own
mini program (U6-U10) and contributing directly and through
the KS board to manage the youth soccer program (U11-U18
house program).
Kootenay South also manages a select (competitive) youth
soccer program made up of players from throughout the
region.
10 of 129
WHO PAYS FOR ROSSLAND YOUTH SOCCER?
Rossland Youth Soccer is entirely self funded
relying on no community grants. It is strictly
user pay and has asked for no handouts
Rossland Youth Soccer is trying to keep fees
affordable for all families
11 of 129
The Mini Program U6-U10
Each association provides 10 -12 weeks of
opportunity (1 hour twice a week)
This equals 20-24 hours of program in this age
group
12 of 129
The Youth Program U11-U18
Teams play from each community in various age groups from mid April
until the end of June
U12 Boys : Monday & Wednesday
U13 Boys : Tuesday & Thursday
U15 Boys : Tuesday & Thursday
U18 Boys : Monday & Wednesday
U12 Girls : Monday & Wednesday
U15 Girls : Tuesday & Thursday
U18 Girls : Monday & Wednesday
13 of 129
Select Program U11-U18
2015 - 165 regional youth participate in several
tournaments from Nelson, Cranbrook, Kelowna and
Revelstoke
2015 - return of the KS Eye of the Storm
Tournament which attracted 23 teams in its first
year.
14 of 129
Hours of Programing
Between the Mini and the house programs Rossland
Youth Soccer provides more than 5000 hours of
playing opportunity for the community youth.
Area youth enjoy nearly 30,000 hours of soccer
15 of 129
Area Fields
Rossland – 2
Centennial (mini soccer) available early May
(this is a shared field with limited availability )
Jubilee (not available until June 4 last season).
BV-2 dedicated fields available in April
Trail- 4 dedicated fields available in April
Castlegar- 4 dedicated fields available in April
16 of 129
Challenges facing RYS
• Short season due to location and
geography
• High field fees
• Poor shape of Jubilee
17 of 129
Short season due to location and
geography
•
Not much can be changed about that

18 of 129
High field fees $/child
• Castlegar Soccer $0
• BV Soccer $0
• Trail $3.60
• Rossland $8.50 per child for very limited field use
All other communities have more access to
considerably better fields for less cost than RYS pays
19 of 129
High Field fees
• All KSYSA clubs charge the same registration
fees
• That means that all other clubs have more $
•
available to them for their programs
For example all KS clubs have agree to hire the
Vancouver Whitecaps Kootenay to help support and
develop our volunteer coaches. This is a cost that
must be paid by the clubs and RYS must decide
between things like gear, jerseys because of the
higher cost we face
20 of 129
Poor shape of Jubilee
•
•
•
•
•
Low level locations leads to it being very wet
Playground for an elementary school leads to
the snow being hard packed and damaging to
the Turf
There are either several springs or there are
broken waterlines in the sprinkling system as
even during the heat of the summer there were
very wet and spongy locations
Less field time
Risk of injuries
21 of 129
So Why is Rossland Youth Soccer here and what do we
want?
1. To inform council what RYS is doing for the youth in our community &
bring awareness to the challenges that RYS faces
2. TODAY To ask council to bring RYS field fees in line with the other
communities in our association, waive fees for 2016 and refund 2015 fees
paid ($2150.93). This will cover 50% of the cost of our professional technical
direct for 2016
3. THIS YEAR Ask for the City of Rossland to commit to improving the fields
that we currently play on.
4. LONGER TERM Ask for the City of Rossland to support a long term
development goal of bringing a turf field to Rossland
22 of 129
Recap
• Please eliminate field fees for
• Please develop a repair plan to ensure
the Jubilee field is up to a certain
standard for play
• Support RYS to develop a long term
plan to bring a turf field for Rossland
23 of 129
THANKS
24 of 129
THE CORPORATION OF THE CITY OF ROSSLAND
COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE MEETING OF COUNCIL
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 9, 2016
PRESENT:
MAYOR KATHY MOORE
COUNCILLOR JOHN GREENE
COUNCILLOR MARTEN KRUYSSE
COUNCILLOR ANDY MOREL
COUNCILLOR ANDREW ZWICKER
ABSENT:
COUNCILLOR AARON COSBEY
COUNCILLOR LLOYD MCLELLAN
STAFF PRESENT:
CONSULTING CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER/
CORPORATE OFFICER
INTERIM MANAGER OF FINANCE
PLANNER
MANAGER OF OPERATIONS
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT
L. Burch
S. Ash
S. Lightbourne
D. Albo
A. Worsfold
GALLERY
CALL TO ORDER:
The Mayor called the Meeting to order at 4:01 p.m.
PUBLIC INPUT:
Nil
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION:
GREENE/ZWICKER
RESOLVED THAT THE FEBRUARY 9, 2016 COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE MEETING
AGENDA BE ADOPTED.
CARRIED.
25 of 129
OPERATIONAL DISCUSSIONS & PRESENTATIONS:
a) Asset Management Workshop, Mr. Doug Allin
Doug Allin, City of Grand Forks Chief Administrative Officer, provided a PowerPoint
presentation regarding asset management.
In response to questions from Council, Mr. Allin suggested the following:
• That the City host several public consultation periods to engage the public annually;
• That it may be effective to put the cost of taxes into perspective, such as by comparing to
other household bills;
• That having a Chief Administrative Officer who maintains a close working network with
other local governments could save a municipality money; and,
• That a municipality may be able to save money by contracting assets when needed, instead
of owning these assets and insuring them, depending on how often the asset is utilized.
Discussion ensued, and Council suggested the following:
• That most municipalities experience a capital gap, and there is often the need to upgrade or
implement a service; however, there is no funding to do so;
• That certain projects could be bundled within the municipality or inter-municipally, or
through multi-year bids; and,
• The City will be obtaining funds from grant money, which could aid in the development of
an asset management plan.
ADJOURNMENT
MOTION:
ZWICKER
RESOLVED THAT THE FEBRUARY 9, 2016 COMMITTEE-OF-THE-WHOLE MEETING BE
ADJOURNED AT 5:45 P.M.
CARRIED.
C E R T I F I E D C O R R E C T:
___________________________________
MAYOR KATHY MOORE
______________________________
DEPUTY CORPORATE OFFICER
CYNTHIA ANONUEVO
26 of 129
REGULAR MEETING OF COUNCIL
MONDAY, FEBRUARY 22, 2016
PRESENT:
MAYOR KATHY MOORE
COUNCILLOR GREENE
COUNCILLOR MOREL
COUNCILLOR MCLELLAN
COUNCILLOR ZWICKER
COUNCILLOR MARTEN KRUYSSE
ABSENT:
COUNCILLOR COSBEY
STAFF PRESENT:
CONSULTING CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER/
CORPORATE OFFICER
DEPUTY CORPORATE OFFICER
INTERIM MANAGER OF FINANCE
MANAGER OF OPERATIONS
EXECUTIVE ASSISTANT
L. Burch
C. Anonuevo
S. Ash
D. Albo
A. Worsfold
GALLERY
CALL TO ORDER:
Mayor Kathy Moore called the Regular Meeting of Council to order at 6:00 p.m.
PUBLIC INPUT PERIOD:
Mike Kent, Youth Action Network Coordinator, requested Council’s support for the Youth Action
Network and Rossland Skate Park’s joint submission to the Columbia Basin Trust Recreation
Infrastructure Grants Program.
ADOPTION OF AGENDA:
MOTION:
KRUYSSE/MCLELLAN
RESOLVED THAT THE MEETING AGENDA FOR THE FEBRUARY 22, 2016 REGULAR MEETING OF
COUNCIL BE AMENDED AS FOLLOWS:
• THE ADDITION OF ITEM B) UNDER RECOMMENDATIONS FROM STAFF FOR DECISION: 2016
– 2020 FIVE YEAR FINANCIAL PLAN, INTERIM MANAGER OF FINANCE.
CARRIED.
27 of 129
REGISTERED PETITIONS AND DELEGATIONS:
a) Delegation from BC Assessment
Ramaish Shah, Deputy Assessor for BC Assessment Kootenay Columbia Region, provided a
PowerPoint presentation to Council regarding how assessments are determined in Rossland
and how they compare to neighbouring municipalities’ assessments.
ADOPTION OF COUNCIL MINUTES AND COMMITTEE RECOMMENDATIONS:
MOTION:
MCLELLAN /GREENE
RESOLVED THAT THE MINUTES OF THE REGULAR MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 9, 2016 BE ADOPTED.
CARRIED.
MOTION:
ZWICKER/GREENE
RESOLVED THAT THE MINUTES OF THE SPECIAL MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 15, 2016 BE ADOPTED.
CARRIED.
MOTION:
KRUYSSE/MCLELLAN
RESOLVED THAT THE MINUTES OF THE COMMITTEE-OF-WHOLE MEETING HELD FEBRUARY 17,
2016 BE ADOPTED.
CARRIED.
UNFINISHED BUSINESS:
Nil
28 of 129
RECOMMENDATIONS FROM STAFF FOR DECISION:
a) Request for Council Decision, Columbia Basin Trust Recreation Grant, City Planner
MOTION: ZWICKER/ KRUYSSE
RESOLVED THAT COUNCIL SUPPORTS THE COMBINED YOUTH ACTION NETWORK/ROSSLAND
SKATE PARK SUBMISSION TO THE COLUMBIA BASIN TRUST RECREATION INFRASTRUCTURE
GRANTS PROGRAM BY ENDORSING THIS PROJECT AS THE PRIORITY RECREATION PROJECT FOR
ROSSLAND FOR THIS ROUND OF GRANT APPLICATIONS,
AND FURTHER;
RESOLVED THAT COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO PROVIDE SUPPORT TO THE YOUTH ACTION
NETWORK & ROSSLAND SKATEPARK FOR THEIR SUBMISSION TO COLUMBIA BASIN TRUST,
AND FURTHER;
RESOLVED THAT COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO APPLY TO BIKE BC FOR THE ACTIVE
TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE AS PROPOSED FOR THE WASHINGTON STREET CORRIDOR.
CARRIED.
b) 2016 – 2020 five year financial plan, Interim Manager of Finance
MOTION: MCLELLAN / KRUYSSE
RESOLVED THAT COUNCIL APPROVES THE ALLOCATION OF $280,000 TOWARDS COMMUNITY
SUPPORT GRANTS FOR 2016.
DEFEATED.
MOTION: ZWICKER/MOREL
DEFEATED.
29 of 129
MOTION: GREENE/KRUYSSE
CARRIED.
BYLAWS:
a) Request for Council Decision, Bylaw No. 2605, Water Rate Bylaw, 2016 & Bylaw No. 2606
Sewer Rate Bylaw, 2016 – Changes to Rates, Interim Manager of Finance
MOTION: MCLELLAN /MOREL
RESOLVED THAT COUNCIL ADOPTS BYLAW NO. 2605, WATER RATE BYLAW, 2016.
CARRIED.
MOTION:
MCLELLAN /MOREL
RESOLVED THAT COUNCIL ADOPTS BYLAW NO. 2606, SEWER RATE BYLAW, 2016.
CARRIED.
b)
Zoning Amendment Bylaw, No.2602, Zoning Amendment Bylaw, 2015(5), Planner
MOTION: KRUYSSE/MOREL
RESOLVED THAT COUNCIL ADOPTS BYLAW NO. 2602, 2015(5).
CARRIED.
STAFF UPDATES & REPORTS:
a) Memorandum from the Deputy Corporate Officer and copy of the Council Task Lisk beginning
January 2015
Discussion ensued, and Council requested that staff follow-up with the recommendation from
the September 28, 2015 Council meeting regarding the Street Light Policy No. 07-03.
30 of 129
b) Memorandum from Accounting Clerk II Regarding Invoices Paid for Municipal Services, January
2016
REQUESTS ARISING FROM CORRESPONDENCE:
Nil
INFORMATION ITEMS:
INFORMATION ITEMS NUMBERED (a) to (h):
a) Heritage Commission Minutes from the February 15, 2016 Meeting.
Recommendation to receive and approve any recommendations within.
b) Sustainability Commission Minutes from the February 16, 2016 Meeting.
Recommendation to receive and approve any recommendations within.
c) Request from J.L. Crowe Secondary School Re: City of Rossland Health Awareness Award
Scholarship in the amount of $250.
Recommendation to approve the request as presented.
d) Request from J.L Crowe Secondary School Re: City of Rossland Award Scholarship in the
amount of $350.
e) Press release from the Provincial and Federal government Re: 57 Projects in British Columbia
Communities to receive $73.3 million in federal Gas Tax Funds.
f) Correspondence and Resolution from AKBLG to UBCM Re: Income Assistance.
g) Application from Rossland Senior’s Association for a Fee Subsidy For the Use of Trail Facilities
for the amount of $1,174.
h) City of Rossland 2015 Annual Water Report.
MOTION:
ZWICKER/KRUYSSE
RESOLVED THAT COUNCIL TASKS THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TASK FORCE, IN
COLLABORATION WITH THE ROSSLAND/TRAIL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, TO ENGAGE WITH
BUSINESS OWNERS DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS LICENCE BYLAW.
CARRIED.
31 of 129
MOTION:
ZWICKER/MOREL
RESOLVED THAT COUNCIL DIRECTS ANDREW ZWICKER AND MANAGEMENT STAFF TO LIAISE WITH
THE RECREATON DEPARTMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE LOGISTICS OF THE RECREATION
DEPARTMENT AND HOW IT COULD BENEFIT FROM THE ASSETS OF THE MONASHEE INSTITUTE.
CARRIED.
MOTION:
KRUYSSE/ZWICKER
RESOLVED THAT THE CITY INCLUDE THE SUBJECT OF CIVIC DONATIONS, INCLUDING BURSARIES
AND AWARDS, THROUGHOUT THE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROCESS OF THE 2016-2020 FINANCIAL
PLAN.
CARRIED.
MOTION:
MOREL/MCLELLAN
RESOLVED THAT INFORMATION ITEMS (a) to (h) ARE RECEIVED AND ARE ACTED UPON AS
RECOMMENDED WITH THE EXCEPTION OF G) TO RECEIVE AND FILE.
CARRIED.
MEMBERS REPORTS (VERBAL)
Councillor Zwicker:
Councillor Zwicker reported the following information:
•
Tara Howse will assume the role of the Sustainability Commission Chair effective April 1,
2016;
•
Ken Holmes attended the BC Climate Leadership Event in Nelson;
•
The Community Sustainable Energy Society aims to educate realtors to highlight the
energy efficiency of homes throughout the sale process;
•
Kelly St. John is investigating the possibility of engaging in a project such as Kimberley’s
Sun Mine in Rossland;
•
Ann Damude is requesting ideas so that an Earth Day event can be organized for
Rossland;
•
The film ‘Jumbo Wild’ will be presented, in collaboration with the West Kootenay Eco
Society, on May 6, 2016 at 7:00 p.m. at the Miner’s Hall; and,
•
The Eco Society has expressed interested in organizing advocacy type events for the
City. The Society is currently undertaking a pilot project throughout the West Kootenay
region regarding municipalities going 100% renewable by a certain date.
32 of 129
Councillor Greene:
Councillor Greene reported on the following information:
•
Richie Mann, Shirley Vance, and Al Fisher, presented ‘Rossland Skiing Memories’ at the
Museum on February 18, 2016.
•
It was also noted that Jackie Drysdale, Heritage Commission Chair, is looking for
publications regarding Rossland’s first 50 years, as she would like to maintain a
collection of them.
Councillor Morel:
Councillor Morel reported the following information:
•
Attended a Library Board meeting on February 10, 2016;
•
The Board is proceeding with the Renewal Committee, noting that funding is secured to
move forward with Phase I of the project;
•
Due to recent changes to the Library Board, the Board is seeking a new Chair and
members;
•
The library now maintains a broadband network within its building;
•
Attended the Lower Columbia Community Development Team Society meeting last
week, noting that a new strategy for 2016 has been set, which includes the provision of
an economic strategy for the Columbia River.
Councillor Kruysse:
Nil
Councillor McLellan:
Councillor McLellan reported the following information:
•
The Seniors’ Centre entrance will soon be upgraded;
•
Has advised Terry Martin, Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Fire Chief, and the
Rossland Fire Chief about the Fire Service & Emergency Services Review Task Force;
•
Exploring the feasibility of the City entering into the District’s Emergency Preparedness
program; and,
•
The District is currently drafting stage two of the Liquid Management Plan.
33 of 129
Mayor Moore:
Mayor Moore reported the following information:
• Attended the Rossland Skiing Memories’ presentation at the Museum on February 18,
2016, noting that organizers may re-instate the ‘Grey Grind’ event at future Winter
Carnivals;
• The Museum is seeking volunteers to move assets from the archive area to a different part
of the museum as Phase I of the renovation;
• Attended the ‘Ted Talks’ library event that showcased broadband networking;
• Has posted on her Facebook page how citizens can get involved with the Provincial
consultation for climate change;
• Collecting donations for the Hospice Society’s Swim-A-Thon; and,
• The Miner’s Hall attic renovation 30 day matching fundraiser challenge has commenced.
RELEASE OF DECLASSIFIED IN-CAMERA MATTERS
Nil
RECESS TO IN-CAMERA MEETING
MOTION:
KRUYSSE/MOREL
RESOLVED THAT THE PROCEEDINGS OF THE MEETING OF FEBRUARY 22, 2016 BE CLOSED TO THE
PUBLIC PURSUANT TO SECTIONS 90(1)(C) LABOUR RELATIONS AND 90(1)(E) THE ACQUISITION,
DISPOSITION OR EXPROPRIATION OF LAND OR IMPROVEMENTS OF THE COMMUNITY CHARTER.
CARRIED.
ADJOURNMENT:
MOTION:
MOREL
RESOLVED THAT THIS REGULAR MEETING OF COUNCIL BE ADJOURNED AT 9:35 P.M.
CARRIED.
CERTIFIED CORRECT:
_________________________________
MAYOR KATHY MOORE
_____________________________________
DEPUTY CORPORATE OFFICER –
CYNTHIA AÑONUEVO
34 of 129
DATE:
TOPIC:
PROPOSAL:
SUBMITTED BY:
March 3, 2016
File No:
Street Light Conversion to LED
To Convert up to 40 Street Light in Pinewood to LED
Contracting CFO
SUMMARY:
LED street light technology has improved to the point where the economics of conversion has
become overwhelmingly in favor, with a relatively short payback. We have been following the
experience of Kelowna closely and they recently decided to convert all their street lights ASAP
on the basis that the energy savings alone justifies conversion. In addition, the existing Sodium
Vapour lamps have a life of 3-5 years compared to the LED with expected life of up to 15 years.
This greatly reduces the maintenance cost of the fixtures. Further the lumen output of the
sodium vapour lamps deteriorates substantially over its useful life whereas with LED
deterioration is more limited. This enables one to reduce the number of fixtures in place to
meet the level of lumen output desired.
DISCUSSION:
To reduce the cost of installation and allow issues related to dealing with the public and their
acceptance of the change, we propose to implement the conversion in a gradual manner and
test drive the process before returning to Council with an RCD for a complete conversion.
Trail recently had their electrician certified by Fortis for installation and we have discussed with
Fortis of having up to 2 Rossland qualified staff also certified. This would allow Rossland to
proceed in a timely manner and to test some of the features of LED lights. For example the
Phillips fixtures which Kelowna chose, following a year-long study, allow one to install “house
shields” which enable the light to be directed away from shining in peoples windows.
Further working with the light distributor we will need to verify that the light dispersion of the
LED fixtures is similar to the existing sodium vapour cobra heads.
Conversion is apparently relatively simple with the existing sodium vapour fixture being
removed and replaced with the LED. Fortis will insist that a fused disconnect be installed at the
same time but this is advisable in any event since the existing wiring is very old and should be
replaced. We will have a demonstration of what is involved in the next few weeks.
The cost of a 150 watt fixture is approximately $250 with the cost of installation being about
the same for a total installed cost of $500. The trial would obviously validate these costs and
the time required to install. The Pinewood subdivision has less than 40 street lights so the
estimated cost of this trial is less than $20,000.00. We suggest that a portion of the CARIP
funds set aside to encourage municipalities to move to carbon neutrality be used to fund this
study. Further we will include in the 2016-2020 capital budget the approximately $300,000
that may be required to convert all of Rossland street lights to LED.
It must be noted that some municipalities have gone the next step to install technology to
control the street lights with remote telemetry. This enables them to dim the lights at night
35 of 129
and have more control over the output and hence achieve greater energy savings. However,
not only is this a lot more expensive but requires technical resources which Rossland lacks. It is
suggested that for Rossland and similar small communities the simple conversion achieves the
majority of savings possible at the lowest cost. This could be further considered before we
bring the full conversion proposal to Council.
The price for the LED fixtures has been established by the Province to encourage Municipalities
to convert. It enables small communities such as Rossland to get the same buying power as
larger Cities. The distributor for Phillips fixtures for the Province is EBHorsman and it is they
that we have been dealing with to get a demonstration and various advice. In this regard,
Section #5 of the Purchasing, Consulting, and Publicly Tendered Contracts Policy #03-06, will
need to be waived by Council.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS: That Council approves the conversion of up to 40 Street Lights
in the Pinewood Subdivision from Sodium Vapour to LED fixtures at a cost of up to $20,000,
funded by the existing CARIP reserve fund;
THAT Council selects the Phillips fixtures that were chosen by Kelowna following an extensive
trial;
THAT Section #5 of Policy #03-06, Purchasing, Consulting, and Publicly Tendered Contracts, be
hereby waived for the LED Street Light project.
Option 1: To adopt the staff recommendation and approved the trial conversion to enable
any unforeseen issues to be identified before we recommend conversion of all street lights
in the City.
Option 2: To direct staff to prepare the plan to complete conversion of all street lights in
the City at a cost of approximately $300,000.
Option 3: To do no conversion. The existing street lights work fine but do involve high
maintenance costs. Also, as the cost of energy in real terms increases annual energy costs
are increasing.
Option 1: The cost benefit analysis for converting all of Rossland lights is attached and clearly it
supports the case to convert. As explained above, we suggest the trial will enable staff to gain
more information and work out the bugs before returning with the proposal for a complete
conversion.
Option 2: Completing the final proposal will take time and we do not want to delay getting
staff training and installing some lights as time permits.
Option 3: If Rossland does not convert the medium and long term costs to the City will be
higher than converting. As with all capital expenditures, the initial cash outlay results in higher
costs but in this case the immediate savings quickly out ways the capital cost and within 4 years
bring lower total costs.
36 of 129
Use of the CARIP funds should neutralize the capital cost of the conversion. Hence this trial
should have a positive impact by reducing the cost of operating the street lights.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. LED Project Evaluation – Cumulative Cost Comparison.
Prepared by:
Approved for Submission to Council:
______________________________
Consulting Chief Financial Officer
______
Consulting Chief Administrative Officer
37 of 129
38 of 129
DATE:
TOPIC:
PROPOSAL:
SUBMITTED BY:
March 2, 2016
File No: 0471.01
RDKB Bylaw No. 1598 – Victims Assistance Service Amendment Bylaw
To Consent To An Increase In the Maximum Annual Requisition
SUMMARY:
The City of Rossland is a participant in the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Victims
Assistance Service. The requisition required from all the service participants in 2015 was
$62,500. After a full review of the business case, the East End Services Committee has
approved funding that will allow for a 20 hour per week position. This will require an uplift in
funding for the service to a maximum annual requisition of $87,000 shared between all
participants. There are currently seven jurisdictions sharing the cost of this service, being
Electoral Area “A”, Electoral Area “B”, Rossland, Warfield, Trail, Montrose, and Fruitvale.
Increasing the requisition will require five out of seven consenting resolutions.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION – Option 1 - Consenting Resolution Required
That the Municipal Council for the Corporation of the City of Rossland consents to the Regional
District of Kootenay Boundary Board of Directors adopting Bylaw No. 1598 being the “Regional
District of Kootenay Boundary Victims Assistance Service Amendment Bylaw No. 1598, 2016”.
Option 1:
Adopt the Consenting Resolution:
“That the Municipal Council for the Corporation of the City of Rossland consents to the Regional District
of Kootenay Boundary Board of Directors adopting Bylaw No. 1598 being the “Regional District of
Kootenay Boundary Victims Assistance Service Amendment Bylaw No. 1598, 2016”.
Option 2:
Receive this Report for Information.
Option 1:
Adopting this resolution will see the City of Rossland support the uplift in funding required for the
regional Victims Assistance service. Victim Services is a well-received service provided for all area
residents in need of assistance resulting from being a victim of crime. The benefit of this option is that
Council will support a service that provides direct service to residents of Rossland. Currently the part
time position requires a total maximum of $62,500 from all the participating partners (East End
jurisdictions). In order to fund the program at the level of 20 hours per week, there is a need to increase
the maximum requisition from $62,500 per annum to $87,000 per annum. The disadvantage to this
option is that it will cost the City of Rossland a small increase in the annual requisition.
Option 2:
39 of 129
While the advantage to this option may be viewed as keeping the status quo, with no increase
in
requisition, realistically, majority will rule. Should five out of the seven jurisdictions consent to the
adoption of the bylaw allowing for the uplift in the maximum requisition, the City of Rossland will
automatically be billed for their share of the uplift in cost.
Option 1
This option will see the City of Rossland’s portion of the requisition increase from that which was paid in
2015.
Option 2
This option may also see the City of Rossland’s portion of the requisition increase from that which was
paid in 2015, should five of the remaining service partners agree to the increase in requisition and adopt
the consenting resolution.
The City of Rossland, as part of the Regional District of Kootenay Boundary, participates in regional
services from time to time, the authority of which is outlined in legislation.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Letter from Regional District of Kootenay Boundary outlining the parameters of Bylaw No. 1598.
2. Copy of Bylaw No. 1598, “Regional District of Kootenay Boundary Victims Assistance Service
Amendment Bylaw No. 1598, 2016”.
___________________________
40 of 129
41 of 129
42 of 129
43 of 129
44 of 129
City of Rossland
2016-2020 Budget
Notes to Capital Plan
Overview
AMP-The 2016- 2020 capital plan has been restructured by asset category to allow ready integration
into the asset management plan (AMP). The AMP will be updated later this year, assisted by the
$75,000 Government grant. An RFP will be issued to ensure we may engage some fully qualified party
to assist in this important task. The AMP will not assist in the decision regarding immediate capital
investments, however it will assist in prioritizing future capital investment. Further, it will enable the
City to determine the amount it should be setting aside annually to maintain the sustainability of the
system. Rossland is not unique in getting behind in the amount it invests annually to sustain its assets
and this is reflected in the 5 year plan where we must invest more to catch up.
Improve System Reliability. -While updating the AMP is important, even more crucial is that we make
the necessary investment to strengthen the integrity of the system. This capital plan will ensure that the
system is more reliable and easier to maintain. It will provide for greater single contingency and
ultimately ensure that water outages are less frequent and when problems occur they may be resolve
faster.
Context of Recent Capital Investment – The primary responsibility of a City is to provide safe and
reliable water and collect the waste and transport for treatment. In addition, it must provide a safe
transportation system that enables residents to go about their daily lives. With regards to water supply
Rossland has made some substantial investments which together with helpful topography ensure that
water may be delivered to town under many differing disaster scenarios.
The addition of Ophir Reservoir, together with improvements at Topping, Hanna and Murphy collection
points greatly enhance the stability of water supply. It also means that the system may be controlled to
operate on either reservoir enabling single contingency that would be the envy of many communities.
Following treatment, the water is pumped to the storage at Red that enables fire suppression even in
the event of a power outage. Finally, the assets that deliver water to town from Red Mountain are
relatively new and require little investment for many years. The upgrade of Washington Street furthers
this substantial investment to improve reliability of supply to the town. Once this is complete and
connected to Columbia upgraded facilities , we will have relatively new assets from water collection to
supply in the heart of the town.
Accounting Issues – An ongoing critique of accounting principles is that it only looks at historical data.
The provision for depreciation/amortization is derived by considering the historical investment and the
useful life of the asset to calculate a rate of consumption of the asset on an annual basis. This would
then be added to the annual O&M costs to derive the full annual cost of an asset. This is how you would
determine the cost of operating your vehicle. The problem is 2 fold, first you do not know exactly how
45 of 129
long your vehicle will last. Secondly, when you come to replace your vehicle the price of a new one will
have increased so that even if you have set aside depreciation funds you will be short.
This is the fundamental challenge of an AMP. The Municipality must calculate the amount it must
include in its cost structure to replace assets when they retire. In 2014, Rossland included in its
accounts $1.3 million for amortization to recognize the annual rate of consumption of the asset.
However this amount was likely low since the Current Replacement Cost of the asset will be a lot higher
than when it was installed 20/30 or more years ago.
Cyclical Nature of Capital Investment- On a year over year basis, capital investment due to major
projects, will often be rather lumpy and Rossland is experiencing a one off need for larger investment in
this 5 year plan. When you examine the rate of amortization it is somewhat low and this will likely be
validated by the AMP but it is likely less that the annual investment of $5 million called for in this plan.
Point being this surge in needed investment will likely reduce over time.
Preparation of the Capital Plan – the plan began with last year’s estimates updated with new
information. In 2016, it will be dominated by completion of the Washington Street Upgrade which will
go to tender in the next few days. Clearly the size of this project and the involvement of all senior staff
will affect the amount of other work that may be completed in the year.
Due to Washington Street and the Pipe Bridge, 2016 other projects will have to carefully consider
borrowing requirements and the effect in 2017 of the financing costs. The effect is that some projects
will be delayed from 2016 and the investment in 2017 will remain relatively high. 2019 and 2020
investment will be dominated by the Regional Sewer Investment. The project is absolutely essential, but
its timing and actual costs are uncertain particularly since the amount of grants for which it may qualify
is unknown..
Delay of Projects – Could certain projects be delayed and the obvious answer is Yes! The more
important question is what will be the consequence of the delay? In most cases, it will result in
increased O&M costs and the system will be less reliable. Further, it could lead to a backup of projects
limiting the ability to manage them with existing resources in a professional manner and ultimately
leading to higher cost.
Council must consider that staff has critiqued each projects with regard to cost and timing to ensure that
they are proposed in as efficient manner as possible.
Other important considerations as one considers the Capital Plan are as follows:1. Estimated Costs were developed from the best information available but obviously where
projects are tendered actual costs will only be known once the contract is awarded.
2. Regional Sewer -apart from the Washington St. Upgrade and the Regional Sewer Plant, we have
not included potential infrastructure grants. For Washington Street the grant is known but
actual cost not known until after tenders opened. For the sewer plant we have assumed up to a
46 of 129
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
50% grant but the numbers clearly are rather soft. Despite the uncertainty of the numbers it is
very important that it be placed in the capital plan due to its significance for the City financial
planning.
Spokane Street - has been considered as 3 projects and could be phased over 3 years.
However, it is expected that substantial savings may be derived by doing the project in one year.
Further by grouping it and presenting it as a shovel ready major project, it may enhance our
ability to qualify for grants.
System Stability - in addition to the major projects listed, it is important to improve the stability
of the mains water system. When crews go to shut a valve and it does not operate one
jeopardizes service to many customers which can be unacceptable. The budget provides for
gradual replacement of valves hence improving reliability and enabling greater control over the
system.
Bin Wall – If this road and wall are to be rebuild by Highways it makes economic sense to
upgrade the water and sewer this year. If not the project will cost significantly more when it
must be done in the next 2-5 years.
I&I Reconditioning – to further reduce the waste water flowing to the regional sewer system
and hence lower our cost allocation it is proposed to invest in ongoing upgrade to sewer pipes
and manholes. We will be able look to validate this investment by way of a simple business
case.
Star Gulch Recreation –the investment of $160,000 put in as a place holder in the event that
some grant money may be available.
Road Paving – this investment of $75,000 is somewhat discretionary but it is important to
maintain the streets in a reasonable state of repair. Due to the magnitude of the 5 year capital
investment some projects may have to be rescheduled by year due to capital constraints and
ability to borrow.
Lighting – we expect that the trial LED street light conversion will confirm that this project has a
high cost benefit and will result in net savings to tax payers. However we suggest it still may be
expedient to allocate the capital costs principally over 3 years.
Fleet – it is necessary to continually upgrade the fleet to provide for reliability and retire vehicles
at the end of their useful life. It may be necessary to consider returning to leasing the vehicles if
the City is capital constrained. Lease versus Buy analysis should be performed from time to time
in any event to ensure the City achieves the lowest cost of capital.
Buildings – the capital costs budgeted are more discretionary as to amount and timing.
However capital investment in the buildings is essential or they will fall into unacceptable state
of repair.
City Hall- the building is generally sound but the interior requires updating. One may appreciate
the public sensitivity to this issue but for example the flooring is becoming a safety issue, the
washrooms are unacceptable and with interior redesign additional offices could be created.
Miners Hall – the City contribution to this project was originally estimated at $350,000 but this
increased to $450,000. However, it is assumed that we use $100,000 from the land sale reserve
to offset this increased cost.
47 of 129
Public works – with the loss of the Emcon building presently used for storage, some facility will
need to be constructed at public works.
Museum – costs are uncertain until the state of the roof can be examined in the spring. The
$45,000 capital cost in 2016 will be taken from the reserve.
Arena – in the near while considerable capital will be required to operate the arena. This may
lead to reconsideration of its long term use but for capital planning purposes the potential
needs have been included.
12. Other - the retaining wall at 1st and Queen must be addressed but timing is uncertain.
Also the timing and cost of Red Mountain entrance and upgraded sidewalks have yet to be
finalized. Further the upgrade of the tennis courts on park street is a discretionary cost that
could be deferred.
Information Systems – this may require a study to determine City needs since the present
system is not as reliable as it should be. The cost estimate includes the purchase of new
computers etc. where necessary.
Summary
The total capital requirements of approximately $25 million over the next 5 years will present a real
challenge to a City with such a small tax base. The majority of the capital cost is essential and could only
be deferred by a short period if at all.
Funding of capital of this magnitude will require a delicate balance between increases in property taxes
and cost reductions. The size of the cost reductions are such that the extent of services offered by the
City will have to be reexamined. With taxes already relatively high, the public may have limited
tolerance for further increases that will be essential.
It may be helpful to develop a definition of critical essential services that must be delivered by the City
to ensure a reasonable quality of life. Viewed through such a lens one may be able to distinguish
between essential basic services (the reason why municipalities were formed in the first place) and
discretionary services. It is the discretionary services that may have to be reduced to ensure that taxes
are not increased above the tipping point where certain residents have no choice but to relocate to
neighboring communities with lower taxes.
48 of 129
City of Rossland ‐ 2016‐2020 Budget
5 year Capital Plan
Asset Category
Essential Infrastructure projects
2016
2017
3,400,000
100,000
550,000
500,000
350,000
2018
2019
2020
Water System Mains (Pipe)
Washington Street upgrade Spokane Street ‐ 1st to Columbia
1st Street ‐ Spokane to Washington
Spokane St ‐ 1st to 2nd
Spruce Ave‐ Cedar to Maple Crescent
Davies St. waterline ‐ Leroi ‐ Kootenay
Spokane St. Earl Connector to 1st Ave.
Georgia Street ‐ North End
Georgia Street ‐ 4th ave. to Columbia Kootenay Leroi Ave. Davies St ‐ Earl St.
Leroi Ave. Earl St ‐Spokane St.
General Upgrade
Lower water lines
Pipe Bridge
Valve Line Replacement
Hydrants, pressure reducing valve, water meters.
Water treatment Plant
Pressure reducing valve Redstone
Bin Wall water and sewer
220,000
100,000
100,000
100,000
300,000
20,000
400,000
20,000
0
0
175,000
250,000
450,000
300,000
20,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
25,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
0
20,000
1,440,000
25,000
30,000
26,000
30,000
117,000
Wastewater System
Regional Sewer Upgrade
Mains pipe(included above)
Main Service Line Upgrades
Cleanout/Sewer Manholes(I&I reconditioning)
Pumps and Equipment
Sewer move due to trespass
Camera
Drain Clean Machine
3,500,000
20,000
100,000
0
20,000
100,000
0
20,000
20,000
100,000
0
20,000
100,000
0
20,000
100,000 (Reserves)
0
15,000
6,000
Water reservoirs etc.
Star Gulch
Ophir ‐ legal
50,000
160,000
20,000
Stormwater System
Pipe included in above
Culverts
Catchbasins
Manholes
Storm Pipe
Total Pipe Infrastucture:
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
20,000
0
25,000
0
20,000
0
0
0
5,394,000
1,795,000
1,600,000
865,000
4,085,000
0
10,000
100,000
12,000
10,000
75,000
10,000
100,000
75,000
10,000
100,000
75,000
10,000
10,000
75,000 (Reserves)
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
Roadway System
roads
Sidewalks(railings)
Lighting
Decorative (discretionary)
Road Safety
49 of 129
Fleet
Light vehicles
Heavy Vehicles
Equipment
90000
190000
158000
86000
230000
57000
28000
7000
200,000
7000
200,000
7000
Total Transportation Infrastructure
570,000
568,000
230,000
312,000
312,000
50,000
75,000
20,000
50,000
20,000
Buildings‐General Government
City Hall
Public Works
Buildings ‐ Cultural
Miners Hall Museum
Library
350,000
58,000
300,000
20,000
100000
Buildings ‐ Recreational
Arena
Daycare
Senior Building
Pool
Total Building Projects
300,000
10,000
3,000
10,000
400,000
10,000
10000
10,000
500,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
500,000
10,000
10,000
10,000
458,000
738,000
500,000
530,000
630,000
50,000
5,000
40,000
300,000
0
0
15,000
15,000
0
350,000
170,000
25,000
15,000
25,000
15,000
300,000
15,000
380,000
10,000
15,000
20,000
Other Major Projects
Banner Arms @ Red Mtn.
Stair Replacement
Retaining Wall ‐ 1st & Queen
Red Mtn. Resort Entrance
Tennis Court on Park Street
Information System
Security Fencing ‐ Offir/Star Gulch
Worksafe compliance
Washrooms Jubilee Park
Landscaping
Parks
Bear proof bins
Sprinkler System Centennial Pk.
Wetlands Jubilee
Total Other Projects
Total Capital Less Present Amortization
Net Capital Impact on Operating Statement @ 6%
75,000
4,000
4,000
4,000
45,000
2,500
83,000
422,500
580,000
115,000
6,505,000
3,523,500
2,910,000
1,822,000
699,000
5,726,000 20,486,500
$ 1,400,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,400,000 $ 1,400,000
5,105,000
2,123,500
1,510,000
422,000
306300
127410
90600
25320
4,326,000 13,486,500
259560
809190
50 of 129
REPORT/RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL
DATE: February 26, 2016
FILE: 3060.20 / 01-2016
SUBMITTED BY: Stacey Lightbourne
SUBJECT: DEVELOPMENT PERMIT APPLICATION – THE CREST – LOT C – VALHALLA TCE
PURPOSE:
To review the Development Permit application (Attachment #1) for the proposed triplex on the
property legally described as LOT C TP 28 KOOTENAY DISTRICT PL NEP81732 (PID 026-784-505);
located on Valhalla Terrace.
RECOMMENDATION:
THAT the City issue a Development Permit for the proposed triplex on the property legally described
as LOT C TP 28 KOOTENAY DISTRICT PL NEP81732 (PID 026-784-505), located on Valhalla Terrace,
subject to the following conditions:
(A) THAT the dimensions and siting of the building to be constructed shall be in substantial
accordance with the information shown on the application drawings, dated February 25, 2016
as provided by the applicant and shall comply with Development Permit Area 2: Red Mountain
guidelines.
(B) THAT the applicant meet the requirements for sedimentation prevention, drainage and
erosion control plans, maintenance schedules, storm water management, habitat
management as described in the OCP.
(C) THAT the applicant post with the City a landscape performance security deposit in the
form of a letter of credit in the amount of 125% of the estimated value of the elements shown
in the Landscape Concept Plan dated February 2016.
(D)THAT the applicant meet all geo-technical requirements as determined by the City, as
directed in Section 33.3. of the OCP.
(E)THAT the rear setback be reduced from 3 metres to 2 metres to integrate the development
with the site.
OPTIONS & ALTERNATIVES:
1)
THAT Council issues the Development Permit for the proposed triplex, with additional
conditions.
2)
THAT Council refer the application back to staff for additional information on the application.
3)
THAT Council not issue a Development Permit for the proposed triplex.
51 of 129
Option 1: This option supports the staff recommendation but gives Council the opportunity to add
additional conditions that may not be addressed in the recommendation. Development Permit
conditions can only be imposed when they relate to the guidelines contained within the OCP.
Option 2: Referring the item back to staff would present the applicant with an unnecessary delay in
the application. A Development Permit application need only satisfy the guidelines set out in the
relevant Development Permit Area within the OCP. Staff have thoroughly reviewed the proposal to
ensure there are no issues with the application. The application is fairly straightforward in its intent.
Option 3: If the application meets the guidelines in the OCP then the City cannot deny a development
permit application.
ANALYSIS:
Proposed Development:
The applicant is proposing a residential building containing three apartments-one 3 bedroom
apartment per floor and basement parking. This will be the first building constructed on this site but
there is capacity for a second building & an area has been set aside for this future development.
The site is bounded by the Red Mountain ski run (Aladars Alley) on the south west and by Valhalla Tce
to the east. There is a moderate slope across the lot east to west following the slope of Valhalla Tce.
The lot has been cleared at some stage in the past and in recent years a mound of fill and rock has
been left on the southern end. There is alder and some large cottonwood trees on the site but as
cottonwoods are shallow rooted trees they are not suitable close to buildings so they will be
removed. It is possible the grade of the site has been altered over time and does not contain a stream
or fish habitat.
The proposal is located in Development Permit Area 2-Red Mountain, which is established for the
protection of the natural environment, its ecosystems and biological diversity; protection of
development from hazardous conditions; and to regulate the form and character of development in
the Red Mountain base area.
DP Form and Character
The 3 storey building with basement parking has been designed to reduce the overall building mass
via stepping the facade in and out & varying the roofline with multiple gables at different heights.
Also making use of the moderate slope the basement parking will be cut into the slope. The south
end will be below grade & the north ‘’daylight basement’’ end will have the garage doors. The access
from the road will be relatively level. Access to the ski hill will be via a landscape ramp.
Snow storage & visitor parking is adjacent to the driveway at this stage and when the remainder of
the lot is developed the location of the snow storage & visitor parking will be relocated. Screened
garbage & recycling bins will be provided at the entry on Valhalla Tce. The garbage and recycling
centre will also be used by the building proposed on the other lot.
All the roofs on the building will be asphalt shingle with snow anchors so all entry ways will be
protected. The materials proposed are horizontal hardie board (gray &chestnut), painted cement
board (cream) and metal siding (rust red) which reflect materials used at the base lodge but in this
52 of 129
case they are used with the more traditional building style and roofline which blends the more
modern material selection with a traditional gable roof building. All materials are chosen for low
maintenance.
The landscaping has been design to be native and have low water requirements. It will comprise of
granite boulders, a dry river bed and low shrubs. Low maintenance grasses will be used on the ski hill
side to blend the development into the surrounding.
The application was not sent to the City’s design consultant because the building design is very similar
to other buildings previously approved by the design consultant. Staff have reviewed the drawings
and have determined that the building complies with the Red Mountain Design Guidelines. (Schedule
H: Official Community Plan).
The Local Government Act (Section 920(2)) permits Council to vary regulations of a zoning bylaw
within a development permit providing that the variance does not alter use or density and is related
to OCP Guidelines. The applicant would like to vary the rear setback from 3 metres to 2 metres. This
will enable the building to integrate into the surrounding landscape and because the rear of the
property is adjacent to a ski run and a City Statutory Right of Way for the water line, the reduced
setback will not impact the surrounding uses.
DP Environmental protection
The lot is partially cleared and consists of a large mound of rock and soil with some cottonwood trees
that will be removed for the development.
There are no creeks that run through the property and there is a connection to the City’s storm water
system. Screenings and sedimentation controls will be in place where necessary to minimize off-site
impacts (mainly due to stormwater runoff during building).
DP Hazardous Conditions
As a building code requirement, the applicant will be required to provide a certified report from a
geo-technical engineer. Upon commencement of excavation activities, staff can determine whether
additional certification will be needed to satisfy the DP guidelines.
Conclusion
In conclusion, the application satisfies the applicable OCP Development Permit Area guidelines and
City Council should approve the Development Permit with the conditions identified in the
recommendation. City staff reminds Council that a Development Permit application need only satisfy
the guidelines set out in the relevant Development Permit Area within the OCP, and that
development permit conditions can properly be imposed with this limited range of guidelines. If the
application meets the guidelines in the OCP then the City cannot refuse a development permit
application. Staff will ensure compliance with zoning bylaw prior to the issuance of a building permit.
ATTACHMENTS:
1. Development Permit Application
2. Location Map
3. Site Photo
53 of 129
___________________________________
Stacey Lightbourne
_______________________
Acting CAO
54 of 129
‘The Crest’ DEVELOPMENT PERMIT application Description of proposed development. NEP81732 The proposed development is a 3 plex apartment building at the junction of Olaus way and the ski hill. This will be the first building constructed on this site but there is capacity for a second building & an area has been set aside for this future development. The site is bounded by the Red Mountain ski run (Aladars Alley) on the south west and by Olaus way to the east. There is a moderate slope across the lot east to west following the slope of Olaus way. The lot has been cleared at some stage in the past, in recent years a mound of fill and rock has been left on the southern end. There is alder and some large cottonwood trees on the site but as cottonwoods are shallow rooted trees they are not suitable close to buildings so they will be removed. It is possible the grade of the site has been altered over time, in general the site is not a pristine natural environment and does not contain a stream or fish habitat. For this site the aim has been to construct 2 smaller buildings rather than one large development. This enables a gradual transition from the ski hill to the residential area and allows sunlight & views between buildings instead of one large building blocking views to other homes & creating a massive shadow. The location of this first building is at the southern end of the lot maximising solar gain for the residents and views to the south. The 3 storey building with basement parking has been designed to reduce the overall building mass via stepping the facade in and out & varying the roofline with multiple gables at different heights. Also making use of the moderate slope the basement parking will be cut into the slope. The south end will be below grade & the north ‘’daylight basement’’ end will have the garage doors. The access from the road will be relatively level. Access to the ski hill will be via a landscape ramp. The main entry is at basement level so that it is convenient to the users arriving by car and to reduce exterior stairs that will need constant snow clearing. Skiers coming from the hill will also use this main entrance which will have ski storage. An alternative street level entry is provided at the second stair. All the roofs will be asphalt shingle and snow holding with snow anchors so there will be no snow falling from the roof at any of the entries. Snow storage & visitor parking is adjacent to the driveway at this stage, when the remainder of the lot is developed the location of the snow storage & visitor parking will be relocated. Screened garbage & recycling bins will be provided at the entry on Olaus way – see landscape plan. The landscaping has been designed to be native and have low water requirements. It will comprise granite boulders, a dry river bed and low shrubs which should also make it low maintenance. The use of the dry river bed will act as a retention pond and reduce run off at times of heavy snow melt. On the ski hill side grasses similar to those found on the ski run will be used blend the development into the surroundings. 55 of 129
‘The Crest’ DEVELOPMENT PERMIT application The materials proposed are horizontal hardie board (gray &chestnut), painted cement board (cream)& metal siding (rust red) which reflect materials used at the base lodge but in this case they are used with the more traditional building style and roofline which blends the more modern material selection with a traditional gable roof building. All materials are chosen for low maintenance 56 of 129
This map is a static output from the City of Rossland
and is for general reference only. Data layers that
appear on this map may or may not be accurate, current,
or otherwise reliable. THIS MAP IS NOT TO BE USED
FOR NAVIGATION, SURVEY OR BUILDING PURPOSES.
Location Map
¹
1:3,000
Meters
25
0
50
1081
1011
1080
Redstone
1009
M
O
1019
U
1017
1015
1013
F
E
D
C
1001
PARK
B
A
R
O
AD
HI
G
D
7 Units
HW
AY
4440
OLAUS WAY
G
RA
3B
NI
TE
RD
12 Units
4430
RD
1007
1011
A
B
IN
TA
102
1002
1004
VI
EW
UN
VALH
ALLA
TERR
A
1008
B
A
C
C
O
101
1006
D
M
103
H
E
D
104
18 Units
TA
IN
RE
105
106
A
1003
Cascade Lodge
CE
107
E D C B
1005
1014
N
IE
R
1007
RI
CH
1021
D
Powderview
4465
1009
4420
1013
Lot C - Valhalla Tce
4320
4310
1011
1001
K
MAR
TELE
4306
ROAD
1000
4300
57 of 129
1021
58 of 129
59 of 129
60 of 129
61 of 129
62 of 129
63 of 129
64 of 129
65 of 129
66 of 129
67 of 129
REVISIONS
N0.
ITEM
DATE
NOTES
R.L -1.0m
GROUND COVERS
R.L +3.0m
1.
KINNIKINNICK - arctostaphylos uva-ursi
2.
COMMON JUNIPER - juniperus
communis
SHRUBS
3.
FALSE BOX - paxtistma myrsinites
4.
OREGON GRAPE - mahonia nervosa
5.
MALLOW NINEBARK - Physocarpus
malvaceus
GARBAGE &
RECYCLING
WITH FENCED
ENCLOSURE
I
DR
E
OP
SL
R.L (RELATIVE LEVEL) 0.0m
TO
AY
W
E
V
AD
RO
1.
PROPOSED SUBDIVISION
2.
GARAGE
LEVEL
ENTRY
R.L +3.0m
5.
3.
STEPS
OUTLINE OF ROOF
R.L +3.52m
1.
ISSUED
N0.
ITEM
DATE
1
FOR ESTIMATE
28 NOV 2015
2
FOR ZONING AMENDMENT &
DESIGN DEVELOPMENT
19 FEB 2016
LEVEL 1
ENTRY PATH
R.L +2.55m
5.
5.
PROPOSED
APARTMENT
BUILDING
1.
RIVER ROCK
SWALE
SKI RUN
3.
RIVER ROCK
SWALE
STEPPED
RETAINING
WALL
O LAU S WAY
2.
ROCK RETAINING
WALL STEPPNG
DOWN TO DRIVEWAY
VISITOR
PARKING
2.
TEMPORARY LOCATION
OF SNOW STORAGE.
FINAL LOCATION TO BE
DETERMINED WHEN
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT IS
DESIGNED
RAM
P
RIVER ROCK SWALE
GRANITE BOULDERS
4.
FUTURE DEVELOPMENT
R.L +2.5m
NATIVE GRASSES
PROJECT NORTH
CLIENT:
PROJECT:
2.
R.L +2.55m
4.
R.L +2.55m
OLAUS WAY
RED MOUNTAIN RESORT
ROSSLAND BC
DRAWING TITLE:
LANDSCAPE PLAN
SITE
PLAN
1/8" =
1'-0"
SCALE: 1/4"=1' (50% on 11 x 17)
DATE:
STATUS:
DRAWN BY:
JOB NO:
DRAWING NO:
1524
PLOT DATE:
NOV 2015
CB
REV:
A.09
682016-02-29
of 129
69 of 129
DATE:
TOPIC:
PROPOSAL:
SUBMITTED BY:
March 1, 2016
File No:
IT Acceptable Use Policy
To Adopt An IT Acceptable Use Policy
SUMMARY:
On January 11, 2016 Council directed Staff to develop an Acceptable Technology Use Policy for the City
of Rossland. The proposed policy is attached for Council’s consideration.
The purpose of any Acceptable Use policy is to clearly communicate the City’s expectations of
acceptable use of the city’s computer networks and other electronic media and services. All electronic
communications carry a “signature” which can be traced back to the City and to the individual. It is
important therefore to ensure all users of City electronic equipment are aware that any action taken on
city equipment must be the highest of ethical standards.
The policy expressly outlines unlawful activity and unacceptable activity, and the user responsibilities,
for becoming familiar with this policy and adhering to it.
The policy will apply to all users of city electronic equipment, city networks and other electronic media
and services. The policy will apply to all bargaining unit employees, management staff, contractors, and
Members of Council. The City has an obligation to ensure compliance with this policy. The policy will
need to be signed off by every employee whose signature on the document will signify that they have
read the policy and agree to abide by it. In this regard, we have discussed the draft policy with all
employees, and even consulted with representative employees of the bargaining unit to ensure that the
City’s position will be acceptable. Each of these representative employees have responded that they
have no issues with the policy in its presented form.
STAFF RECOMMENDATIONS:
Option 1:
Option 1:
Option 2:
That Council refers the IT Acceptable Use Policy back to Staff for revision with Council’s identified
changes.
Option 1:
The benefit to this option is that the policy drafted, has been previously discussed with city staff to
ensure that the employees are comfortable with it. Discussing it ahead of time allows the employees to
70 of 129
have input into the policy and will ultimately allow for employee ownership of the policy itself. The only
disadvantage to this option is that may have a different view and want the policy amended. In this
regard Option 2 will be preferable.
Option 2:
The benefit to this option is that it will allow Council to make changes to the policy prior to adoption.
The only disadvantage would be if these particular changes were unacceptable to Employees for some
reason. Council could still proceed with the adoption of the policy; however, there may not be the same
acceptance from Staff.
Option 1
There is no direct cost to adopting policies. Implementing the policy as far as monitoring is concerned
may require services from IT professionals, the costs of which are unknown at this time.
Option 2
The same as Option 1.
The City adopts policies from time to time, which relate to expectations the City may have in regards to
employees and others who are involved in city operations.
___________________________
71 of 129
Policy Title:
IT Acceptable Use
Policy #:
Initially Approved:
Last Reviewed:
Scheduled to be Reviewed:
POLICY STATEMENT:
City of Rossland Employees, Management Staff and Members of Council all have
access to a number of electronic media and services, including but not limited to
telephones, computers, electronic mail, voice-mail, and the World Wide Web. Use of
the City’s electronic media and services by employees and others is permitted for
conducting business related to departmental programs and services; and for personal
use only when such use is on personal time, is not for financial gain, and does not add
to the costs of the City of Rossland.
POLICY PURPOSE:
The purpose of this policy is to clearly communicate the City’s expectations of
acceptable use of the department electronic networks, and to provide information and
examples about unacceptable or unlawful activity, which is not permitted. It is important
to note that generally all electronic communications carry a signature, in that it can be
traced back to the City and often to the individual. Therefore, anything which is done,
involving any of the electronic tools must bear this fact in mind. Communications should
be in the same tone and with the same professionalism that we would expect in face-toface discussions with any member or colleague. A further purpose of this policy is to
ensure that departmental electronic networks are used in a manner consistent with this
policy. Any violations of this policy will not be tolerated and will be dealt with quickly
and fairly.
POLICY APPLICATION:
This policy applies to all City employees, and others who have been provided a
departmental account to access the electronic networks, including specified period
employees and students, and contract workers. It extends to situations away from the
workplace such as telework or remote access, including home PC’s, during and outside
working hours where the departmental electronic networks are used.
72 of 129
POLICY OBJECTIVES:
1. Unlawful Activity
Unlawful activity is prohibited. “Unlawful Activity” is interpreted broadly to include
actions that could result in sanctions of different kinds in a court of law. The
following examples of “unlawful activity” on the city’s electronic networks considered
as “criminal offences” include but are not limited to:
•
Possessing, downloading or distributing any child pornography
•
Infringing on another person’s copyright without lawful excuse
•
Causing a statement to be read by others that is likely to injure the reputation
of any person by exposing that person to hatred, contempt or ridicule, or that
is designed to insult the person
•
Sending electronic messages, without lawful authority, that cause people to
fear for the safety or the safety of anyone known to them
•
Disseminating messages that promote hatred or incite violence against
identifiable groups
•
Distributing, publishing or possessing for the purpose of distributing or
publicly displaying any obscene material
•
Hacking and other crimes related to computer security, which include gaining
unauthorized access to a computer system, trying to defeat the security
features of the electronic networks; spreading viruses with the intent to cause
harm; destroying, altering, or encrypting data without authorization and with
the intent of making it inaccessible to others with a lawful need to access it;
and interfering with others’ lawful use of data and computers; and
•
Making use of the Internet for any of the above, including downloading child
pornography; publishing obscene material; or various other offences, for
example, fraud, extortion, bribery or illegal gambling.
The following examples of “unlawful (though not criminal) activity” on the
departmental electronic networks, in violation of federal and provincial statutes,
include but are not limited to:
•
Violating another person’s copyright or unauthorized use of trade-marks
and patents
•
Uploading or downloading commercial software in violation of its copyright
73 of 129
•
Spreading false allegations or rumours that would harm a person’s
reputation
•
Disclosing sensitive information without authorization which includes
disclosing personal information, business trade secrets, or sensitive
government information;
•
Unlawfully destroying altering or falsifying electronic records
•
Privacy infractions such as reading someone else’s e-mail or intercepting
e-mail in transit; and
•
Making use of the internet for any of the above, including violating another
person’s copyright; disclosing or collecting personal information without
authorization; or posting inaccurate information that causes harm or
results in damages.
2. Unacceptable Activity
Unacceptable activity is prohibited. The following examples of “unacceptable
activity” on the departmental electronic networks include but are not limited to:
•
•
•
•
•
•
Accessing, without authorization, sensitive information held by the City;
Causing congestion and disruption of networks and systems, through such
means as sending chain letters and subscribing to list server electronic mail
unrelated to a work purpose;
Sending abusive, sexist or racist messages to employees and other individuals
Attempting to defeat information technology security features through such
means as using someone else’s password, user identification or computer
account; or disclosing one’s password, network configuration or access codes to
others; and
Making use of the internet for any of the above, including intentionally interfering
with the normal operation of any departmental internet gateway; or using the
internet for private business, personal gain or profit, or political activity.
To use the departmental electronic networks to access or download Websites or
files, or send or knowingly receive electronic mail messages or other types of
communication that incite hatred against identifiable groups contained in
personal messages or whose main focus is pornography, nudity and sexual acts.
3. User Responsibilities
Adherence to this policy is mandatory for all City users, including employees,
contractors, Members of City Council and others persons who have authorized
access to the City departmental electronic networks or who use City technology
74 of 129
assets. Users are responsible for becoming familiar with this policy and adhering to
it every time they access the department electronic networks and/or use technology
assets.
4. City Responsibilities
The City’s Chief Administrative Officer (CAO) is responsible for establishing and
maintaining departmental practices required to verify adherence to this policy. The City
will report suspected illegal activity to the appropriate law enforcement agency.
5. Monitoring
The City has an obligation to ensure compliance with this policy. Because of this
obligation, employees should be aware that their internet usage patterns, along with the
sites they visit, may be logged and may be monitored from time to time by the City. The
department electronic networks are routinely monitored for operational reasons, which
is necessary to assess system or network performance, protect City resources or
ensure compliance with City policies.
6. Access to Information
Employees should be aware that the City’s firewalls, gateway and systems record which
web sites and electronic mail addresses were contacted and which computer within the
system made the visit or sent the message. The public could request access to these
records under the Freedom of Information Act. This access could embarrass both the
individual and the City, depending on the nature of the site visited. The City would have
to comply with the provisions of the Act.
Electronic Communications Systems - Employee Acceptable Use Form
I certify that I have read the Information Technology Policy for Acceptable Use of
Internet, Email, Password, and Information Transmittal & Remote Access (End User
Regulation) Statement and agree to act in accordance with it. I understand that any
breach of the foregoing provisions may be cause for disciplinary actions.
________________________________
Signature
•
•
__________________________________
Date
Original to be kept in employee’s file
Duplicate to be given to employee
75 of 129
FILE: 3360.20/01-2016
SUBMITTED BY: Stacey Lightbourne - Planner
SUBJECT: ZONING AMENDMENT – 2615A Railway St
PURPOSE:
To advance the application for a zoning amendment for the lot legally described as LOT 1 SECTION 35
TOWNSHIP 9A KOOTENAY DISTRICT PLAN 8161, PID 013-371-193; located at 2615A Railway St to
allow the home to be used as a guest house.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
THAT Council advance the application for a zoning amendment for the property legally described as
LOT 1 SECTION 35 TOWNSHIP 9A KOOTENAY DISTRICT PLAN 8161, PID 013-371-193; located at 2615A
Railway St by giving First and Second Reading to Zoning Amendment Bylaw # 2607, and schedule a
public hearing on April 11, 2016 with the following condition:
1. THAT a sign be posted by the applicant on the site stating the intent and purpose of the
rezoning application, within 7 days of the first reading of Bylaw #2607 in accordance with the
City of Rossland Development Procedures Guidelines;
1) THAT the City deny the request.
2) THAT the City refer the item back to staff for further review.
3) THAT the City advance the staff recommendation.
Option 1: Denying the request does not allow for fair consideration of applicant’s proposal.
Option 2: Referring the item back to staff would present the applicant with an unnecessary delay in
the application. Staff have thoroughly reviewed the proposal to ensure there are no issues with the
application. The application is fairly straightforward in its intent.
Option 3: Supporting the staff recommendation would set the public hearing, which in turn allows
the City an opportunity to hear from adjacent property owners and the general public. The
application fits OCP criteria for guest homes.
76 of 129
ANALYSIS:
Background:
Property Information:
Ownership:
Property Size:
Current Use:
Private
1,112 sq m (11,969 sq ft) – based on GIS.
Single Family Home with Suite
R2 – Two Family Detached
Current Zoning:
Proposed Zoning:
R1 GH – R1 Guest House
Current OCP Designation:
Residential
Surrounding Land Uses:
North
Use
Single Family Residence
Duplex
Zone
R1 – Single Family Residential
R2 – Two Family Residential
South
East
West
Road
Road
Summary of Proposal:
The applicant has a secondary suite (515 sq ft) and would like to rent it out as a short term vacation
rental.
Official Community Plan(OCP) and Zoning:
The zoning bylaw contains a sub-zone GH (Guest Home) which can be applied to any R1, R1 Infill and
R1 Rural Residential zone. A guest home means a residence not occupied by the owner that is rented
out for short term vacation stays. In evaluating Guest House rezoning applications, the OCP states:
18.3.14. Consider Guest House rezoning applications in those areas with the following criteria:
i. The density of Guest Homes in the vicinity of the property which is being proposed to be rezoned
for Guest Home use;
ii. The road network and parking issues that may exist or arise in the vicinity of the property which is
being proposed to be rezoned for Guest Home use; and
iii. Future land use changes which may occur in the vicinity of the property which is being proposed to
be rezoned for Guest Home use in light of objectives and policies of the Official Community Plan.
Density: The density of guest homes in a neighbourhood is an important consideration as empty
homes and numerous short term visitors can be a detriment to the neighbourhood. In this case,
there are no guest houses in the immediate area. The nearest home zoned for guest house use is
2410 Fourth Ave on the corner of Butte and Fourth but it does not appear that this home is actually
being used for this purpose. There are two homes zoned for guest house use on St Paul and Fifth but
neither are being currently used as a guest house. Lower Rossland contains four properties zoned as
a guest home, Upper Rossland contains ten and Happy Valley contains one.
77 of 129
Land Suitability and Neighbourhood Impact:
This is a newly constructed home accessed from a maintained alley off Railway St. The home has a
detached secondary suite (515 sq ft) with more than enough parking on site to accommodate both
the single family use and the guest suite. Rezoning this property to allow guest house use in this
location would not generate an increase in traffic substantial enough to disrupt the flow on this road
and alley.
This house is located within other residential zones so a guest house is a compatible use. Future
vacationers will enjoy its close proximity to the trails on KC and surrounding area.
Operations and Servicing:
The Operations Manager has no objections to the proposed zone.
Strategic Sustainability Plan Objectives:
One Focus Area of the Strategic Sustainability Plan supports this application.
1. Housing & Affordability: Affordability through diversity, efficiency, innovation and flexibility
Budget Implications
The new zone may increase assessed value on the property, therefore increasing the taxes received.
Guest House History
In 2003 the guest house subzone was introduced to the zoning bylaw as a way to control the use of
residential homes as vacation properties. Several properties were zoned for this use shortly after the
bylaw was introduced. In January 2007, Council passed a resolution imposing a moratorium on any
new applications for guest houses. The reasons for this were based on the number of guest houses
and also the fact that many of the homes with that subzone were not being used for such a purpose.
Currently there are 15 properties zoned as guest house and only a few are actually being used for this
purpose. Staff will be investigating alternative methods for regulating guest homes so that it reflects
actual use of the property.
Conclusion
This application fits the guest house criteria specified in the OCP and the property is a good fit for a
guest house. Staff recommends advancing this application for a zoning amendment and scheduling a
public hearing to hear directly from the neighbours and general public.
Attachments:
1. Subject Location Map
2. Site plan
3. Bylaw #2607
Prepared by:
Stacey Lightbourne
Approved for submission to Council:
Acting CAO
78 of 129
2350
2650
2615A
2380
2612
2605
2345
CH
2425
2601
2423
0
2460
AY
R
TE
N
OO
2471
2486
GEORGIA ST
2451A
2444
2410
2468A
1
CO
LU
250
1
25
0
2406
BUTTE ST
2471
2364
2356
2330
2316
2346
2384
R
2470
T
2315
2285
2267
25
4
YS
WA
L
I
A
2472
4TH AVE
D
3
2421
2505
2310
5TH AVE
2245
268
0
2641
25
9
2294
2276
2266
2691
2424
6TH AVE
271
4
MB
IAK
2323
Unit
2
Stair s
2285
2295
2275
Unit
1
2415
2615A Railway St
6TH AVE
CP
2425
2401
5
2621
2375
2333
276
3
271
1
23
5
2264
2310
2643
272
5
245
4
2690
2323
NS
CHA
2740
273
3
T
277
5
ARL
STO
BUTTE ST
MONTE CHRISTO ST
2285
275
5
278
7
2770
7TH AVE
2263
2267
2792
2370
2370
2251
2765
2334
279
5
8TH AVE
2769
2708
2440
ST
5
232
2291
2277
2707
2373
2750
30
2528
2420
2741
2710
E
E AV
2286
2790
2261
OR
ELM
TON
2350
2304
2270
2254
2390
Meters
15
0
2450
2225
2404
2386
¹
1:1,832
RLS
Location Map
79 of 129
80 of 129
81 of 129
BYLAW # 2607
A BYLAW TO AMEND THE CITY OF ROSSLAND ZONING BYLAW No. 2518, 2011.
WHEREAS Part 26 of the Local Government Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c.323 authorizes the
Council of the City of Rossland to establish and amend a zoning bylaw;
AND WHEREAS the Council of the City of Rossland deems it necessary and expedient to
amend the City of Rossland’s Zoning Bylaw No. 2518,2011.
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Rossland, in open meeting assembled,
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
SHORT TITLE
1.
2.
This Bylaw may be cited as the Zoning Amendment Bylaw, No.2607, 2016(1)
AMENDMENT
Zoning Bylaw #2518 is hereby amended such that the following property is rezoned from
R-2 TWO FAMILY DETACHED RESIDENTIAL to R1 GH – SINGLE DETACHED RESIDENTIAL
GUEST HOME:
LOT 1 SECTION 35 TOWNSHIP 9A KOOTENAY DISTRICT PLAN 8161, PID 013-371-193;
located at 2615A Railway St
as shown hatched on Schedule “A” attached to and forming part of this Bylaw.
3.
(1)
(2)
ENACTMENT
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Bylaw is for any
reason held to be invalid by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction,
the invalid portion shall be severed and the part that is invalid shall not affect the
validity of the remainder.
This Bylaw shall come into full force and effect on the final adoption thereof
READ A FIRST TIME
READ A SECOND TIME
PUBLIC HEARING
READ A THIRD TIME
FINALLY ADOPTED
______________________________
MAYOR
this 7th day of March, 2016
this th day of, 2016
this day of, 2016
this day of, 2016
______________________________
CORPORATE OFFICER
82 of 129
83 of 129
DATE: March 1, 2016
FILE: 3360.20/01-2016
SUBMITTED BY: Stacey Lightbourne-Planner
SUBJECT: ZONING AMENDMENT – R-5 RESIDENTIAL RESORT MIXED DENSITY Zone
PURPOSE:
To advance the application for a zoning amendment for the R-5 RESIDENTIAL RESORT MIXED DENSITY Zone to
reduce the maximum parcel size and to reduce the interior side setback for a multiple family dwelling.
STAFF RECOMMENDATION:
THAT Council provide First and Second Readings to Bylaw # 2608 and set a Public Hearing for April 11, 2016.
1. THAT Council provide First and Second Readings to Bylaw # 2608 and set a Public Hearing for April 11,
2016.
2. THAT Council refer the item back to staff so additional information can be provided.
3. THAT Council not provide First and Second Readings to Bylaw # 2608.
Option 1: Providing First and Second Readings to Bylaw #2608 and setting a Public Hearing advances the staff
recommendation and allows the City an opportunity to hear from adjacent property owners and the general
public.
Option 2: Referring the item back to staff allows for more time for staff to answer any questions that Council
may have.
Option 3: Not advancing the bylaw means the applicant will not be able to proceed with the current proposal.
COSTS AND BUDGET IMPACTS – REVENUE GENERATION: N/A
ANALYSIS:
Proposed Development:
The proposal for this site at the junction of Valhalla Tce and the ski hill is to construct 2 smaller buildings rather
than one large development. The first building is located on the southern portion of the lot and contains three
apartments; one 3 bedroom apartment per floor and basement parking.
In order to accommodate this development the applicant is asking to reduce the rear setback from 4m to 2m,
the interior side setback from 4m to 3m and to reduce the minimum parcel size from 750 m2 to 450m2. A
zoning amendment is required to alter the minimum parcel size, because density cannot be varied with a
development variance. The setbacks can be altered with a variance (or development permit) but when
evaluating the proposal it is prudent to analyze whether this is a variance that is just required because of
particular characteristics of the property or whether it is relevant to the entire zone.
The interior side setback change (4m to 3m) is relevant to the entire zone so forms part of this recommended
zoning bylaw amendment but the rear setback variance from 3 metres to 2 metres forms part of the
84 of 129
Development Permit application because it is relevant to the OCP Development Permit Guidelines and is only
appropriate to this property (not the whole R5 Zone) because the rear of the property is adjacent to a ski run
and a City Statutory Right of Way for the water line.
Proposed R5 Zoning Amendments:
The intent of the R5 zone is to allow mixed housing types within a common neighbourhood featuring short
term tourist accommodation. The R5 zone is located on the built up area along Olaus Way and on unbuilt lots
on Valhalla Tce as well as near the clubhouse at Redstone. (Attachment #1)
R5 zone permits single family, duplex and multiple family uses. The proposed changes only impact the
multiple family developments so these are the regulations outlined below.
Parcel Size:
The existing minimum parcel size is 750 sq m (8073 sq ft). While this parcel size is common to most of the
other multiple family zones, reducing it to 450 sq m will not have a negative impact. The current lot size of
1235.87 sq m (13,303 sq ft) enables a large multifamily building or several smaller multiple family buildings,
depending on the configuration of the buildings. Locating more than one multiple family dwelling on one lot,
each built at a different time, can require costly legal and logistically complicated phased strata
documentation.
The density of the zone is not related to the size of the parcel; rather it is a total number that can be
distributed in any way over a number of parcels. Other regulations in the zone such as setbacks, height,
building parcel coverage and floor area ratio act to limit the density and therefore the impact on neighbouring
properties. Lowering the minimum parcel area to permit a smaller subdivision does not alter the density of
the development and allows the developer to proceed with a simpler process.
Setbacks:
The existing setbacks are:
The applicant is requesting an interior side setback reduction from 4m to 3m. As this zone is intended to be
more dense with mixed housing types, reducing the interior setback to 3 metres should not negatively impact
existing or future developments. There will be an interior setback on either side of adjoining parcels so the
separation between developments will still be sufficient for privacy, views and sun exposure.
Permitted uses: The permitted uses in the zone have not changed.
Height: Height (13m) has not changed.
Coverage: The building parcel coverage (50%) and surface parcel coverage (60%) have not changed.
Floor Area Ratio: The floor area ratio(1.0) has not changed.
Official Community Plan(OCP):
Land Use Designation:
The R5 zone is located within the Resort Residential land use designation. The intent of this land use
designation is to support mixed density residential and small scale commercial that supports the ski and golf
resort.
85 of 129
The following policies from the Resort Residential Land use designation are relevant and support this proposal.
• Encourage development that supports and enhances resort recreation opportunities and experiences
• Encourage development that is clustered to promote protection of sensitive lands.
• Encourage integration of alternate transportation methods such as walking, skiing and cycling, into the
design of developments.
Development Permit Area:
This particular development is located in the Red Mountain Development Permit Area (OCP-Section 33) which
is established for the protection of the natural environment, its ecosystems and biological diversity; protection
of development from hazardous conditions; and to regulate the form and character of development in the Red
Mountain Resort Area.
The applicant has applied for a Development Permit which is the subject of another report for Council to
consider. The rear setback variance from 3 metres to 2 metres forms part of the Development Permit
application because it is relevant to the OCP Development Permit Guidelines and is only appropriate to this
property (not the whole R5 Zone). The rear of the property is adjacent to a ski run and a City Statutory Right of
Way for the water line, so the reduced setback will not impact the surrounding uses.
Operations and Servicing:
The proposed zoning amendment will not impact operations and servicing.
Initial Internal and External Referrals:
Regional Fire Chief: No concerns.
Operations Manager: No concerns.
Building Inspector: No concerns. Setbacks are still adequate for limiting distance between buildings.
Attachments:
1. R5 Zone Map
2. Application Site Plan and Description
3. Bylaw #2608
Prepared by:
Stacey Lightbourne
Approved for submission to Council:
Acting CAO
86 of 129
R5 Zone Map
¹
1:19,653
Meters
165
0
10 11
10 80
Red sto n e
10 09
HIE
R
D
Po wd e rvi ew
10 21
RICHIE RD
RIC
10 07
10 19
10 17
10 15
ED C B
10 05
10 14
10 13
10 6
18 Uni ts
10 5
H
10 4
10 3
10 06
B
A
10 02
10 04
A
10 03
Cas ca d e L od g e
E
D
10 01
F
E
D
C
10 7
A
B
C
C
B
A
D
44 40
10 08
10 2
PARK
7 Un it s
10 07
10 1
10 11
12 Uni ts
44 30
44 65
10 09
44 20
10 13
43 20
10 01
43 06
10 11
10 21
HI
G
10 00
43 00
11 0
10 6
HW
AY
3B
11 4
10 2
11 8
12 2
12 6
20 3
21 1
20 2
21 9
20 6
21 0
22 3
FEENEY
'S RD
43 10
21 4
22 7
22 2
21 8
39 25
39 15
26 90
B
A
26 61
26 51
25 66
6
253
26 90
23 10
23 50
23 70
265
1
20 35
20 47
23 23
23 45
259
3
irs
ta
S
2500
25 01
24 71
24 51 A
24 70
24 54
24 10
24 44
23 30
23 64
23 56
23 84
24 06
22 54
24 53
24 44 A
23 52
23 36
23 02
23 34
24 64 A
23 25
23 49
23 37
23 65
23 93
24 09
22 37
23 16
23 03
22 13
22 57
22 25
22 93
22 83
22 16
24 44
23 42
23 22
23 96
21 60
24 59
24 45
25 76
20 87
26 06
26 14
25 66
25 44
20 10
29 18
241
4
22 57
23 17
20 63
20 97
247
3
248
1
241
0
238
1
20 54
1508
23 9
3
249
1
15 02
9
150
20 58
19 50
12 66
20 51
20 55
27 11
1505
249
9
1504
1503
2609
26 13
260
7
2602
25 23
13 85
27 07
26 13
26 1
1
23 99
20 60
27 09
27 40
26 11
1506
25
2607
51
26 01
1403
12 20
29 16
27 22
27 20
25 95
247
6
246
7
148
6
13 20
20 52
29 14
29 10
26 90
242
6
245
5
8
164
7
285
3
281
271
5
16 04
25 70
26 15
21 90
6
169
7
280
8
169
7
169
272
6
2601
20 10
8
280
2
270
2603
13 01
0
281
26 80
26 45
16 70
261
1
21 90
22 10
22 30
22 20
21 89
19 95
19 50
26 80
18 10
26 30
26 45
17 60
17 81
25 50
26 26
26 15
16 11
243
8
21 50
25 55
25 51
2
162
23 92
244
2
21 69
21 49
23 76
28 55
2605
13 10
26 85 A
25 65
26 15
26 45
26 65
26 05
2585
26 41
18 80
26 25
19 62
25 43
25 31
25 34
25 46
25 16
24 85
24 90
24 74
25 55
25 55
24 47
24 25
24 0 7
18 32
23 82 A
24 56
23 59
23 46 A
22 46
22 88
22 65
22 83
22 98
22 70
21 93
22 37
24 63
23 05
23 37
21 75
21 91
18 10
22 22
17 44
17 41
22 20
25 70
23 93 B
23 93 A
19 60
24 31
24 13
23 76
24 14
24 26
24 44
22 75
22 47
22 93
22 33
22 42
22 50
21 84
21 96
21 44
21 26
21 06
21 56
21 25
25 20
17 40
23 74
21 07
23 30
23 56
22 94
20 33
21 90
21 97
22 07
21 05
20 71
21 67
21 23
21 25
21 27
21 29
20 67
20 65
21 37
21 53
21 53
21 68
21 30
21 10
21 09
21 29
21 65
26 70
23 73
24 29
23 55
21 90
Éco le des S
ep t -s om m e
ts
21 90
21 83
21 61
21 55
21 77
23 74
24 36
23 18
23 06
24 04
23 24
22 24
23 05
22 56
21 84
21 78
22 48
21 21
21 83
21 11
21 91
21 92
20 66
21 08
235
5
25 90
22 75
22 95
22 67
22 85
22 76
22 94
23 15
22 67
22 85
25 93
20 51
20 97
20 59
21 11
21 33
20 77
20 80 A
21 21 A
20 61
20 63
20 90
20 76 , 20 8 0
20 70 ,2 07 2
20 60
20 56
20 42 ,4 4
20 40
16 10
21 50
19 95
20 12
20 34
20 50
17 17
19 00
3
26 0
14 01
18 51
21 30
9
210
23 25
20 29
14 15
25 10
24 90
26 77
26 65
0
150
12 80
24 50
1644
23 62
9
236
17 50
20 59
12 44
11 91
11 90
11 47
11 44
11 09
11 80
11 02
10 08
17 63
17 91
17 40
20 75
PL A N 2 1 5 6
0
185
26 83
25 73
2704
23 36
0
238
17 45
18 57
26 73
24 85
16 69
23 14
3
AY
HW
HIG
TENN IS
COURT
26 30
19 91
11 47
17 40
10 10
11 90
18 11
12 80
18 58
12 20
25 15
25 20
24 89
22 90
8
236
17 90
11 89
26 22
19 20
22 65
6
235
17 80
20 49
22 21
4
234
17 60
11 90
11 70
11 50
21 75
20 46
20 43
1501
13 45
12 75
24 65
241
0
16 87
23 09
19 29
18 91
18 63
18 35
20 80
20 60
20 51
20 41 A
20 50
24 71
24 09
14 44
20 20
21 52
20 62
20 53
19 61
19 01
14 64
19 68
12 99
12 52
11 97
18 67
23 31
23 41
23 51
19 50
21 02
20 70
20 65
24 80
24 32
25 21
14 18
19 02
18 34
18 35
19 70
22 90
21 11
20 74
20 90
20 44
24 14
23 96
5
156
18 30
22 64
22 66
20 23
13 40
13 15
20 57
20 43
22 09
15 20
11 77
11 45
20 13
19 90
1979
20 45
18 82
18 91
12 71
22 60
2
233
18 11
17 81
13 04
17 47
19 80
14 65
17 50
13 36
12 88
19 77
25 44
245
4
18 63
18 24
24 85
20 74
CP
23 56
5
239
13 01
19 83
19 54
19 57
21 10
18 51
18 20
22 11
22 06
21 57
21 39
24 86
24 52
24 33
20 69
20 50
22 88
22 36
21 94
22 07
21 40
23 75
20 85
20 76
20 64
20 26
0
232
18 11
19 30
20 62
19 10
15 30
18 75
17 70
17 50
21 95
21 60
21 53 A
21 31
24 32
246
6
18 54
18 20
14 45
14 40
18 65
21 50
24 04
247
2
18 14
18 45
23 65
20 80
20 54 A
20 46
22 14
21 90
21 24
21 21
23 53
20 90
13 80
17 80
19 47
19 27
20 90
21 70
20 20
20 52
17 70
20 24
20 12
19 93
19 80
19 24
18 30
18 25
20 95
20 70 A
20 74
17 58
17 46
17 38
18 15
20 86
20 74
20 45
21 30
18 14
17 55
21 41
21 29
21 24
21 10
20 40
20 05
20 46
19 14
19 44
18 00
17 40
17 45
20 32
19 60
2002, 2004 2006- 20 20
19 73
19 92
19 96
20 10 A
19 86
20 20
19 92
19 81
21 37
18 80
18 93
18 74
15 90
17 25
17 35
21 85
21 78
21 90
19 11
17 30 17 32
17 21
20 92
21 42
19 53
19 58
19 70
21 19
20 20
19 60
19 72
19 88
20 14
19 20
19 34
19 08
19 50
19 80
16 85
16 97
16 92
16 50
16 89
15 07
14 23
12 03
19 73
18 81
19 93
19 95
19 97
18 41
18 20 A
18 08 A
17 90
19 09
18 07
17 65
17 52
17 60
16 84
16 88
16 90
19 60
19 47
19 25
20 31
16 45
Par ki ng
Lot
18 54
18 70
17 78
17 40
17 64
19 83
19 60
17 22 A
17 30
16 68
16 63
16 75
16 81
18 97
16 72
18 29
18 66
18 73
21 93
21 07
19 36
19 20
19 11
16 43
19 52
16 78
16 84
18 46
18 70
16 15
16 65
16 62
16 20
17 37
15 77
16 18
FERR ARO
FO ODS
22 01
24 17
22 43
5
237
15 41
15 90
21 80
23 02
22 02
24 56
21 48
21 18
20 63
21 16
21 18
22 97
24 95
24 09
23 79
21 40
21 36
20 41
20 61
23 45
21 80
23 24
18 87
18 65
18 28
21 59
20 75 ,7 7
20 20
21 04
23 92
23 02
23 33
19 30
18 80 A
17 65
17 53
14 95
16 21
15 99
17 60
14 89
15 70
13 70
14 45
15 85
19 90
B
A
24 90
24 05
24 86
24 77
23 09
22 90
22 76
21 80
18 75
18 60 A
18 23
17 55
17 66
14 07
15 50
17 65
13 98
13 91
17 43
17 31
17 71
13 75
18 17
COOKE AVE
BAL L PARK
B
24 71
24 68 A
24 60
2733
13 51
15 44
18 45 A
18 40 A
16 19
15 43
15 59
15 20
D
19 38
C
24 21
22 09
21 45
20 54 A
29 61
3
273
13 33
16 90
16 02
15 96
16 24
16 14
15 80
16 38
15 41
14 90
16 73
16 51
16 61
16 41
16 21
16 46
16 06
16 84
15 41
14 73
14 46
15 10
16 91
16 89
14 19
14 27
15 33
13 12
17 36
15 63
15 85
16 41
16 53 A
15 84
15 86
16 27
16 33
16 13
16 51
15 55
15 57
14 30
16 15
15 72
12 85
16 81
13 61
12 83
19 10
CIT Y
HALL
18 99
19 19
18 27 A
14 85
14 47
12 53
16 33
14 50
12 41
15 81
12 21
13 88
15 02
14 67
12 01
13 50
15 07
17 64
17 42
18 06
16 80
16 08
18 90
23 46
30 33
29 07
11 73
16 73
16 25
Uni t
4
20 54
30 80
28 07
25 01
25 03
29 09
11 69
12 75
111 0
13 75
12 20
13 50
15 83
17 18
15 46
14 44
17 19
15 58
21 17
30 40
26 01
254
1
29 11
111 5
11 67
11 90
17 95
18 55
17 30
20 70
a se A
e
L
re a
' A
'
20 55
Uni t
2
26 41
24 24
24 23
24 21
29 15 29 13
13 65
11 60
17 66
17 51
17 07
17 08
20 55
28 20
26 80
25 10
21 43
21 10
21 46
Uni t
1
Uni t
3
26 12
30 63
27 28
27 14
26 91
22 44
22 30
21 49 A
21 40
21 15
20 50
Uni ts 1 -4
21 55 A
21 52
21 45
21 31
20 54 A
20 25
20 80
26 15 A
23 80
24 25
26 50
29 17
11 45
19 24 A
17 22
.P
C
20 86
20 79
20 63 ,2 06 9
20 58
18 90
15 45
11 83
11 30
16 50
16 53
15 06
15 17
17 40
14 32
17 15
16 26
16 36
14 53 14
73
15 48
15 32
14 72
14 36
14 11
17 45
13 54
13 14
14 93
17 71
17 85
11 94
18 77
r p
a
C
o rt
14 92
14 06
18 66
111 2
16 10
18 08
17 87
14 85
18 59
21 30
19 63
1953
20 44
17 28
17 06
14 45
16 68
14 15
16 55 A
16 52
18 89
18 63
18 01
16 44
15 58
15 42
15 06
14 04
14 56
14 32
14 82
131
5
130
5
5
129
12 53
12 23
1931
A
16 03
15 24
12 01
12 73
14 94
19 25
15 37
15 21
14 49
19 90
14 81
0
136
1340
14 95
11 9
9
89 1
1917
20 64
21 60
21 53
21 48
21 31
1905
20 65 A
20 53 A
17 44
15 54
15 96
20 34
16 42
16 24
15 62
16 06
15 82
14 80
B
99 0
2181
21 67
24 15
Uni t
2
26 05
22 75
22 35
22 04
21 75
21 68
21 60
21 11
18 60
20 77 A
20 66
20 63 A
22 03
22 23
21 12
27 25
27 63
24 25
24 01
25 05
23 10
20 96
21 72
21 67
20 91 A
20 88
20 66 A
21 69
21 53
17 86
17 71
20 49
20 32 A
19 16
17 60 A
20 90
20 80
20 34
20 99
21 70
21 31
17 10 A
16 11
NI CK LE PLA TE
A PT' S
20 33
15 46
19 9
9
14 50
1111
98 0
14 92
95 0
18 30
21 13 A
21 05 A
S
AP T'
20 42
20 85 A
93 5
15 18
80 7
20 03
B
21 42
A
21 42
18 15
15 10
EW
NVI
15 05
20 85
94 0
82 1
20 59
20 44
FIR E
HA LL
A
19 99
C
21 46 A
21 55
21 43
PO OL
18 69
n
92 6
21 67
21 47 A
17 17 A
18 44
21 40
21 35
18 66 A
i
re B
O
ZO
HO RI
91 2
90 1
16 40
21 62
21 43
21 65
18 42 A
ra c
T
s
k
21 89
18 94
ab le
T
82 0
83 1
16 50
21 65
20 15
22 15
Rest au ra nt
19 47
21 73
21 89
r
18 15
SC ALE
s so
mb
A
.
18 15
l l
e
B
12 25
Com
pre
MUSEUM
WEIGH
19 37
19 13
Uni t
1
8
22 9
94 1
19 38
GO LD EN CI
TY M A NO R
18 45
17 77
22 36
23 30
E
22 53
19 10
17 67
WAR EH O US
AR EN A
21 82
20 35
17 60
17 40
19 25
18 60
17 04
21 81
21 73
21 57
21 20
17 41
17 31
22 44
22 37
16 77
16 33
26 21
23 75
30 15
27 40
23 70
23 33
24 72
21 86
21 64
RO SS LA ND
S U MM I T SC
H OO L
22 62
22 41
16 68
17 30
16 44
16 53
95 6
93 2
23 23
24 25
24 18
27 05
27 33
27 11
22 85
26 43
22 45
2342
20 20
23 34
27 08
27 55
27 87
27 75
24 80
23 85
19 13
16 85
91 2
89 4
20 58
24 93
24 27
24 15
22 63
22 66
24 61
2390
24 39
19 34
209
0
19 73
19 75
19 61 A
19 52
19 30
27 92
27 70
22 34
25 30
U n it 2 -U
p p e r
U n it 1 -L o
w e r
24 83
29 08
27 95
CP
22 45
25 50
25 49
24 59
24 52
23 01
22 88
17 21
26 30
25 51
25 31
20 54
18 43 A
19 55
18 56
19 66
19 30
24 32
23 63
18 15 A
17 15
20 30
S
24 57
23 20
16 73
22 51
22 35
22 64
25 38
25 26
24 90
24 77
24 93
18 67 A
18 50
25 35
25 11
19 67
24 64
18 48
1947
18 92
18 76
18 72
18 09
18 34
18 42
18 58
18 50
18 30
25 38
CI TY WO R KS
YAR D
18 40
25 98
25 53
25 46
25 53
20 80
20 62
28 10
24 40
27 69
27 65
27 07
27 40
22 21
20 50
20 32
17 78
17 54
17 02
16 78
25 76
25 67
18 67
18 10
18 03
19 57
26 41
18 70
18 60
18 50
18 40
18 17
26 02
20 40
19 36
0
18 74 -7 6
348
18 07
18 66
EPP
24 20
23 73
27 50
27 41
27 10
26 71
26 41
26 59
22 61
27 20
27 75
26 50
19 76
19 73
19 36
19 30
26 65
26 55
19 70
195
3
26 76
19 63
1
19 63
194
1
TS
24 04
EN
24 50
TM
25 20
25 28
22 86
22 70
27 90
27 32
21 46
27 86
22 54
22 40
22 24
21 86
21 70
21 54
21 40
27 91
27 95
22 77
AR
22 05
22 08
27 40
20 81
20 61
20 53
20 31
20 21
22 91
AP
16 -18
13 -15
19 94
19 91
19 83
27 35
OI
26 71
10 -12
20 90
20 50
20 10
19 77
22 31
18 55
1873
18 00
LER
1-5
20 55
20 25
19 97
19 91
19 88
19 80
19 68 19 74
19 60
19 60
23 90
23 50
23 04
23 25
19 38
19 14
19 52
19 50
19 83
19 75
19 63
19 44
19 32
22 25
24 70
19 70
19 58
19 50
19 26
5
24 2
24 15
23 95
23 86
PU
HOUMP
SE
6
250
2360
23 20
22 90
22 16
21 50
20 75
26 41
25 77
25 50
2390
2380
23 40
22 70
20 70
19 80
26 42
26 31
26 21
26 11
26 01
25 69
24 24
26 71
26 32
26 22
26 12
26 02
24 20
26 80
26 70
26 60
26 50
26 02 -2 64 8
10 89
10 85
20 07
10 84
10 06
10 05
10 04
17 94
10 57
10 01
17 09
10 02
17 25
91 3
10 15
10 30
83 0A
91 8
97 7
98 1
82 0A
91 4
90 9
10 05
10 09
10 11
88 8
92 2
17 99
91 7
10 10
81 0A
91 0
10 08
80 4
A
10 06
80 0
A
90 8
77 4
76 4
76 5
76 0
90 2
75 5
75 0
72 2
72 0
71 0
91 2
10 07
10 09
10 11
10 24
90 4
90 6
90 3
90 5
90 8
10 21
10 13
10 17
92 0
92 2
90 9
91 1
91 3
91 5
91 7
91 9
92 1
94 0
94 6
94 8
94 1
93 7
95 0
97 3
93 9
93 5
92 3
92 5
80 1
80 2
92 9
90 7
93 8
93 6
93 4
93 0
92 8
92 4
93 3
80 4
92 7
80 3
80 6
81 2
71 5
93 2
10 19
92 6
91 8
91 6
73 5
72 5
10 23
10 28
10 26
10 15
91 4
74 5
74 0
73 0
87 1
90 1
10 05
91 0
10 22
10 02
75 4
74 4
10 03
10 20
10 01
10 04
77 0
90 1
10 18
10 16
10 14
10 12
95 3
80 5
80 8
81 0
80 7
80 9
81 4
81 3
81 6
81 7
81 1
81 5
70 5
87 of 129
B
330
88 of 129
89 of 129
90 of 129
BYLAW No. 2608
A BYLAW TO AMEND THE ZONING BYLAW No. 2518
WHEREAS Part 26 of the Local Government Act R.S.B.C. 1996, c.323 authorizes the
Council of the City of Rossland to establish and amend a zoning bylaw;
AND WHEREAS the Council of the City of Rossland deems it necessary and expedient
to amend the City of Rossland’s Zoning Amendment Bylaw No. 2518, 2011.
NOW THEREFORE, the Council of the City of Rossland, in open meeting assembled,
ENACTS AS FOLLOWS:
SHORT TITLE
1.
This Bylaw may be cited as the Zoning Amendment Bylaw, No. 2608, 2016(2)
AMENDMENT
2.
(i)
Schedule “A” of Bylaw No. 2518 is hereby amended by deleting Section 6.10
R-5 Residential Resort Mixed Density and replacing it with a new Section 6.10 R5 RESIDENTIAL RESORT MIXED DENSITY the regulations of which are
shown in Schedule “1” attached to and forming part of this bylaw.
ENACTMENT
3.
(1)
If any section, subsection, sentence, clause or phrase of this Bylaw is for any reason
held to be invalid by the decision of any court of competent jurisdiction, the invalid
portion shall be severed and the part that is invalid shall not affect the validity of the
remainder.
(2)
This Bylaw shall come into full force and effect on the final adoption thereof.
READ A FIRST TIME
READ A SECOND TIME
PUBLIC HEARING
READ A THIRD TIME
FINALLY ADOPTED
______________________________
Mayor
this day of, 2016
this day of, 2016
this day of, 2016
______________________________
Corporate Officer
91 of 129
6.10 R-5 RESIDENTIAL RESORT MIXED DENSITY
1. INTENT
The intent of this Zone is to allow mixed housing types within a common
neighbourhood featuring short term tourist accommodation.
2. PERMITTED USES
The following uses only shall be permitted in the R-5 Residential – Resort
Mixed Density Zone:
a) Bed and Breakfast Accommodation;
a) Recreation Facilities;
b) Two Family Detached Dwelling;
c) One Family Detached Dwelling;
d) Multiple Family Dwelling;
e) Tourist Accommodation;
f) Home Occupation;
g) Secondary Suite; and
h) Accessory Buildings and Uses.
3. CONDITIONS OF USE a) A Secondary Suite Dwelling shall be permitted subject to the
provisions of Section 4.1.2 (b);
b) An Home Occupation shall be permitted subject to the provisions of
section 4.1.2 (d);
c) A Bed and Breakfast Accommodation shall be permitted subject to
the provisions of section 4.1.2 (e)
d) Off Street Parking and loading requirements are subject to the
provisions of Section 11.
92 of 129
4. PARCEL SIZE
On a Parcel located in an area Zoned R-5, no plan of subdivision shall be
approved which contravenes the regulations set out below.
For One Family Detached Dwelling:
Min
Parcel
Area
Max
Parcel
Area
Min
Building
Width
275 m2
750 m2
4.5 m
For Two Family Detached Dwelling Use:
Min
Parcel
Area
Max
Parcel
Area
Min
Building
Width
400 m2
1,250 m2
4.5 m
For Multiple Family Dwelling Use:
Min
Parcel
Area
Max
Parcel
Area
450 m2
2,400 m2
93 of 129
5. COVERAGE
For One Family Detached Dwellings with a Parcel Area less than 550
square meters:
Max Building Parcel
Coverage
Max Surface Parcel
Coverage
40%
50%
For One Family Detached Dwellings with a Parcel Area equal to or
greater than 550 square meters:
Max Building Parcel
Coverage
Max Surface Parcel
Coverage
35%
40%
For Two Family Detached Dwellings:
Max Building Parcel
Coverage
Max Surface Parcel
Coverage
40%
50%
For Multiple Family Dwellings:
6. FLOOR AREA RATIO
Max Building Parcel
Coverage
Max Surface Parcel
Coverage
50%
60%
a) For One Family Detached Dwellings, with a Parcel Area less than
550 square meters, the floor area ratio shall not exceed a factor of
0.6.
b) For One Family Detached Dwellings, with a Parcel Area equal to or
greater than 550 square meters, not to exceed the maximum Parcel
Area, the floor area ratio shall not exceed a factor of 0.5.
c) For Two Family Detached Dwellings the floor area ratio shall not
exceed a factor of 0.6.
d) For Multiple Family Dwellings the floor area ratio shall not exceed a
factor of 1.0.
7. HEIGHT
a) The maximum Height for Principal Buildings is 10.0 m;
b) The maximum Height is 13.0 m for a Multiple Family Dwelling.
c) The maximum Height is 4.5 m for Accessory Buildings.
94 of 129
8. SETBACKS
The minimum Setbacks from Parcel lines are as follows:
Front
Rear
Interior Side
Exterior Side
4.0 m
2.0 m
1.8 m
3.0 m
The minimum Setbacks from Parcel lines for Multiple Family Dwellings
are as follows:
9. DENSITY
Front
Rear
Interior Side
Exterior Side
4.0 m
3.0 m
3.0 m
3.0 m
Equivalent units permitted in the R-5 Zone are separated into specific
areas as shown on Diagram 6.8 below, the map entitled “R-5 Zone
Equivalent Units”.
Diagram 6.8 – R5 Zone Equivalent Units
95 of 129
96 of 129
Meeting Date
February 22, 2016 ‐ Reg
February 17, 2016 ‐ COW
February 17, 2016 ‐ COW
Feb 9, 2016 ‐ Reg
Feb 9, 2016 ‐ Reg
Feb 9, 2016 ‐ Reg
Directive
COUNCIL SUPPORTS THE COMBINED YOUTH ACTION NETWORK/ROSSLAND SKATE PARK SUBMISSION TO THE COLUMBIA BASIN TRUST RECREATION INFRASTRUCTURE GRANTS PROGRAM BY ENDORSING THIS PROJECT AS THE PRIORITY RECREATION PROJECT FOR ROSSLAND FOR THIS ROUND OF GRANT APPLICATIONS,
AND FURTHER;
COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO PROVIDE SUPPORT TO THE YOUTH ACTION NETWORK & ROSSLAND SKATEPARK FOR THEIR SUBMISSION TO COLUMBIA BASIN TRUST,
AND FURTHER;
COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO APPLY TO BIKE BC FOR THE ACTIVE TRANSPORTATION INFRASTRUCTURE AS PROPOSED FOR THE WASHINGTON STREET CORRIDOR.
COUNCIL APPROVES THE ALLOCATION OF $287,500 TOWARDS COMMUNITY SUPPORT GRANTS FOR 2016.
COUNCIL TASKS THE ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT TASK FORCE, IN COLLABORATION WITH THE ROSSLAND/TRAIL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE, TO ENGAGE WITH BUSINESS OWNERS DURING THE DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS LICENCE BYLAW.
COUNCIL DIRECTS ANDREW ZWICKER AND MANAGEMENT STAFF TO LIAISE WITH THE RECREATON DEPARTMENT WITH RESPECT TO THE LOGISTICS OF THE RECREATION DEPARTMENT AND HOW IT COULD BENEFIT FROM THE ASSETS OF THE MONASHEE INSTITUTE.
THE CITY INCLUDE THE SUBJECT OF CIVIC DONATIONS, INCLUDING BURSARIES AND AWARDS, THROUGHOUT THE PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROCESS OF THE 2016‐2020 FINANCIAL PLAN.
COMMITTEE‐OF‐THE‐WHOLE SUGGESTS THAT COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO PREPARE A PLAN TO REDUCE ANNUAL EXPENSES BY UP TO $250,000 FOR 2017.
COMMITTEE‐OF‐THE‐WHOLE SUGGESTS THAT COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO PRIORITIZE A BUSINESS PLAN FOR THE FOLLOWING OPERATIONS:
• ARENA;
• MUSEUM;
• RECREATION PROGRAMMING; AND,
• DAYCARE.
STAFF INVESTIGATE THE FEASIBILITY OF PERMITTING YAN TO FLY A RAINBOW FLAG AT CITY HALL, EITHER PERMANENTLY, OR DURING KOOTENAY PRIDE WEEK IN SEPTEMBER 2016
STAFF INVESTIGATE THE FEASIBILITY OF PERMITTING THE YAN TO PAINT A RAINBOW CROSSWALK IN ROSSLAND
BYLAW NO. 2607, BUSINESS LICENCE BYLAW, 2016 BE REFERRED BACK TO STAFF TO ADDRESS ALL COMMENTS RAISED BY COUNCIL. Notes
Assigned to
Stacey
Status
In Progress. Helping Mike with grant. Bike BC meeting scheduled for April 14.
Steve
Budget Discussions ‐ coming to next COW Meeting
Councillor Zwicker/Stacey Stacey to forward Bylaw and liaise with Councillor Zwicker. Stacey will also send copy of Bylaw and resolution to EDTF.
Lynne
Need claification from Councillor Zwicker. Lynne will talk to the Mayor.
Steve
Budget Discussions/Public Input
Steve
Budget Discussions
Steve
Steve to start preparing an outline for a business plan for the arena.
Darrin
Coming to Council as Staff Update on March 7
Darrin
To be addressed in 2017 when Washington Street is completed ‐ Checking with ICBC
Need report to Council in the future. Councillor Zwicker to follow‐up with EDTF.
Lynne
Feb 9, 2016 ‐ Reg
COUNCIL DIRECTS THE CHIEF ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICER ESTABLISHES A MEMORANDUM OF UNDERSTANDING WITH THE MUSEUM OUTLINING THE ALLOCATION OF FUNDS TOWARDS THE MUSEUM RENOVATION PROJECT.
Lynne
Lynne has drafted MOU, and has met with Darrin and members of Museum Committee to discuss. Need to gather some info. Before finalizing. Report to Council in March.
Feb 9, 2016 ‐ Reg
COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO INVESTIGATE THE OPTION OF MANAGING THE MUSEUM RENOVATION PROJECT IN‐HOUSE.
COUNCIL APPROVES THAT THE CITY OF ROSSLAND JOINS THE KOOTENAY CAR SHARE AND DIRECTS STAFF TO REGISTER UP TO FOUR EMPLOYEES AS MEMBERS.
COUNCIL DETERMINES TO COMPLETELY RE‐DRAFT THE BUSINESS LICENCE BYLAW, AND THAT STAFF IS DIRECTED TO BRING FORWARD A NEW BYLAW FOR COUNCIL’S CONSIDERATION WHICH SIMPLIFIES THE REGULATORY CLAUSES AND REPLACES THE FEE SCHEDULE WITH A SIMPLIFIED FEE SCHEDULE, WHICH REDUCES THE NUMBER OF CATEGORIES AND SUB‐CATEGORIES NOW IN EXISTENCE.
Darrin
Report to Council on March 7 Stacey
Will be done when new CAO &CFO hired
Feb 9, 2016 ‐ Reg
Feb 9, 2016 ‐ Reg
Jan 11, 2016 ‐ Regular
COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO DEVELOP AN ACCEPTABLE TECHNOLOGY USE POLICY FOR THE CITY OF ROSSLAND.
Dec 14, 2015 ‐ Regular
COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO BRING FORWARD A BYLAW AMENDMENT, CHANGING THE ZONING FROM LIGHT INDUSTRIAL TO PARK SPACE FOR THE EASTERN HALF OF THE EMCON SITE.
COUNCIL ENDORSES THE LOWER COLUMBIA AFFORDABLE HOUSING SOCIETY’S PURCHASE OF AFFORDABLE HOUSING UNITS IN ROSSLAND WITH A LETTER OF SUPPORT, AND FURTHER; COUNCIL CONSIDERS THE SOCIETY’S REQUEST FOR A PERMISSIVE TAX EXEMPTION DURING THE 2017 PERMISSIVE TAX EXEMPTION BYLAW DISCUSSIONS.
Nov 24, 2015 ‐ Regular
Nov 10, 2015 ‐Regular Oct 13, 2015 ‐ Regular
Lynne
Lynne to have conversation with Lynne
CUPE regarding implementation
Referred back to Staff on Feb 9. Councillor Zwicker to liaise with EDTF. Will come back to Council at a later date.
All drafted and will meet with Union rep to discuss. Stacey In Progress
New CAO/Manager of Finance
for permissive tax bylaw 2017 Follow‐up Spring 2016
COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO WORK WITH THE COMMUNITY ENERGY Stacey
ASSOCIATION ON THE CORPORATE GREENHOUSE GAS (GHG) REDUCTION PLAN PROJECT.
COUNCIL DIRECTS THE MAYOR TO LIAISE WITH THE WEST KOOTENAY Staff to review recommendation Lynne
SMOKE‐FREE COALITION TO MAKE A RECOMMENDATION TO COUNCIL REGARDING A SMOKE FREE PLACES BYLAW.
In‐Progress For Follow‐up when permanent staff in place
In‐Progress, Mayor has provided draft copy of Bylaw ‐ coming to future Regular Meeting. Lynne to start RFD. Policy to include enforcement of Bylaw to be signage? COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO AMEND THE CITY OF ROSSLAND ROAD, SIDEWALK & STAIR SNOW REMOVAL POLICY (#06‐05) IN ORDER TO CLARIFY THE CRITERIA PERTAINING TO (PRIVATE) DRIVEWAYS AND BRING TO COUNCIL BY JANUARY 1, 2016.
Stacey & Darrin
In‐Progress. Will come to Council in June/July 2017.
COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO EXPLORE OTHER OPTIONS TO REGULATE GUEST HOMES.
Stacey/Corporate Officer Low Priority Item to be completed by the end of the year. New CAO/CO.
97 of 129
Sept 28, 2015 ‐ Regular
COUNCIL ADOPTS THE STREET LIGHT POLICY NO. 07‐03; COUNCIL APPROVES A REDUCTION (THROUGH DISCONNECTION OR REMOVAL) OF MID‐BLOCK STREET LIGHTS AS WELL AS AT CORNERS WHERE MORE THAN ONE STREETLIGHT ILLUMINATES THE CORNER AREA. COUNCIL ADOPTS THE STREET LIGHT POLICY NO. 07‐03 WITH THE FOLLOWING AMENDMENTS TO POLICY OBJECTIVE 1TO READ “TO SAFELY ILLUMINATE THE CITY OF ROSSLAND”.
COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO DEVELOP AN IMPLEMENTATION STRATEGY FOR THE POLICY AS AMENDED.
COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO ORGANIZE A PUBLIC ENGAGEMENT PROCESS FOR BYLAWS 2600 – WATER SERVICE RATE BYLAW AND BYLAW 2601 – SEWER RATE BYLAW,
AND FURTHER;
COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO CONTACT PROPERTY OWNERS THAT MAY BE SIGNIFICANTLY AFFECTED BY THE PROPOSED RATE CHANGES WITH AN INVITATION TO THE PUBLIC CONSULTATION.
COUNCIL APPROVES THE ADDITIONAL INCENTIVE OF $100 PER APPROVED WOOD STOVE EXCHANGE.
Sept 14, 2015 ‐ Regular July 30, 2015 ‐ Special
July 13, 2015 ‐ COW
July 13, 2015 ‐ COW
COUNCIL DEFERS ANY AMENDMENTS TO THE CITY OF ROSSLAND POLICY: PURCHASING, CONSULTING AND PUBLICLY TENDERED CONTRACTS POLICY (NO. 03‐06).
THE COMMITTEE‐OF‐THE‐WHOLE RECOMMENDS TO COUNCIL TO DIRECT STAFF TO INVESTIGATE THE COST AND DIGITAL APPS REGARDING BYLAW ENFORCEMENT.
THE COMMITTEE‐OF‐THE‐WHOLE RECOMMENDSTO COUNCIL TO DIRECTS STAFF TO INVESTIGATE OPTIONS FOR ON AND OFF‐LEASH DESIGNATIONS FOR BUSY TRAILS IN ROSSLAND.
THE COMMITTEE‐OF‐THE‐WHOLE RECOMMENDSTO COUNCIL TO DIRECT STAFF TO INVESTIGATE OPTIONS, COSTS AND AVAILABILITY FOR BYLAW ENFORCEMENT. (can you add parking tickets etc. to tax bill)
July 13, 2015 ‐ COW
July 13, 2015 ‐ COW
July 13, 2015 ‐ COW
July 13, 2015 ‐ Regular
July 13, 2015 ‐ Regular
THE COMMITTEE‐OF‐THE‐WHOLE RECOMMENDSTO COUNCIL TO DIRECT STAFF TO INVESTIGATE OPTIONS FOR DESIGNATED TIE‐UP AREAS FOR DOGS.
THE COMMITTEE‐OF‐THE‐WHOLE RECOMMENDS TO COUNCIL TO DIRECT STAFF TO INVESTIGATE OPTIONS FOR CAT ISSUES.
COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO RESPOND TO THOUGHEXCHANGE AND THAT COUNCIL WILL DISCUSS INCREASED ALLOCATION FOR BIKE RACKS DURING BUDGET DISCUSSIONS FOR 2016.
COUNCIL REQUESTS STAFF TO PROVIDE A REPORT ON AN OVERALL BAN TO PESTICIDES AND HERBICIDES BY NOVEMBER.
COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO PROVIDE A STAFF REPORT TO PROVIDE THAT COST OF AN ARBORIST TO IDENTIFYING DANGEROUS TREES.
June 22, 2015 ‐ Regular
April 13, 2015 ‐ Regular March 23, 2015 ‐ Regular
March 10, 2015 ‐ COW
March 9, 2015 ‐ Regular
Jan 21, 2015 ‐ COW
Will come to Council on March 21, 2016
Darrin/Steve
Darrin/Steve
Manager of Finance
In‐progress‐ waiting for model from consultants expected end of March 2016
Ongoing ‐ RDKB Rep has been notified of top‐up subsidy Program runs to May 30, 2016 Cynthia/Finance & Front Actual reimbursment process has not been End
addressed
Refer to new Manager of Finance to report to Council at the end of 2016
Finance
Budget Discussions. Michele Skuce is contact at ThoughtExchange.
Darrin
COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO PROVIDE FURTHER INFORMATION ON THE CURRENT DANGEROUS TREE PLAN AND IDENTIFICATION. COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO PROVIDE A FURTHER REPORT ON COMPLIMENTARY SPEED LIMIT CONTROLS. COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO BRING FORWARD A REVIEW OF BYLAW NO. 1977 ‐ TRAFFIC AND HIGHWAYS REGULATION BYLAW.
COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO BRING FORWARD A REVIEW OF BYLAW NO. 2472, 2009 – OFFICER’S BYLAW.
COUNCIL DIRECTS THE MAYOR TO INVESTIGATE THE FIRE HYDRANT AGREEMENT BETWEEN THE CITY OF ROSSLAND AND THE REGIONAL DISTRICT OF KOOTENAY BOUNDARY.
$2500 in budget for 2016 THAT THE CITY OF ROSSLAND HOSTS THE 2016 AKBLG CONFERENCE attendance ‐ need to confirm AND ANNUAL GENERAL MEETING.
who will attend this year
THE COMMITTEE‐OF‐THE‐WHOLE RECOMMENDS TO COUNCIL TO REVIEW THE EXISTING INCENTIVE POLICY 05‐01 ‐ INNOVATIVE REWARD POLICY.
COUNCIL APPROVES THE ROSSLAND TENNIS SOCIETY TO LIAISE WITH CITY STAFF AND, IN PARTICULAR, TO WORK DIRECTLY WITH ROSSLAND RECREATION WHEN PREPARING GRANT APPLICATION FORMS AND LETTERS OF SUPPORT,
AND FURTHER;
COUNCILLOR ZWICKER SERVE AS A LIAISON BETWEEN THE ROSSLAND TENNIS CLUB AND CITY COUNCIL.
COUNCIL APPROVES TOURISM ROSSLAND’S PROPOSAL TO FORM A COMMITTEE TO LOOK INTO THE FEASIBILITY OF A ROSSLAND SWIMMING BEACH.
COUNCIL DIRECTS STAFF TO REQUEST ISL ENGINEERING TO EXPLORE FURTHER OPTIONS FOR THE REPAIR OF THE QUEEN STREET RETAINING WALL ONCE THE LIST OF PRIORITIZED CAPITAL PROJECTS HAS BEEN PROVIDED TO COUNCIL.
WHEN USING A REAL ESTATE AGENT IN REGARDS TO POLICY 03‐01 LAND SALE POLICY, THE CITY WILL ROTATE AMONGST THE MOST COMPETITIVELY PRICED AND QUALIFIED REALTORS IN ROSSLAND.
Feb 23, 2015 ‐ Regular
Feb 23, 2015 ‐ Regular
Darrin/Steve
COUNCIL REFERS THE REVIEW OF POLICY 03‐01 ‐ LAND SALE POLICY TO STAFF TO ADDRESS COUNCIL’S CONCERNS.
THE COMMITTEE‐OF‐THE‐WHOLE RECOMMENDS TO COUNCIL TO SET A RATE OF 7% FOR COMMUNITY GRANTS IN 2015 WITH A TARGET TO REDUCE THE PRECENTAGE IN SUBSEQUENT YEARS. Darrin
New CAO/Manager of Finance/Stacey
New CAO/Stacey
New CAO
Lynne/Steve
Follow‐up
Lynne/Alison
Deferred to host in 2017 and planning for should commence soon
New CAO
Recreation/Councillor Zwicker
To Follow‐up in Spring 2016
New CAO
Follow‐up with Tourism Rossland
Darrin/Stacey
Project on hold
New CAO
Ongoing
New CAO
Steve
See February 22 resolution 98 of 129
MEMORANDUM
FILE: 110.04/2016
TO: Mayor and Council
SUBMITTED BY: Darrin Albo, Manager of Operations
SUBJECT: Rainbow Crosswalk and Flag
The City will permit a flag to be hung at City Hall as long as the flag is supplied to the City and
replacements are supplied when required.
In regards to a rainbow crosswalk, it will need the key elements of standard width white
reflective bordering so it is recognized by motorists and the traffic line paint must be used with
an anti-skid material to avoid slippery wet conditions. During installation to ensure a safe
working area for the painters, they will need to hire flaggers to direct traffic.
Council should also be aware of the increased maintenance costs of the crosswalks as paint
usually only lasts one summer and needs to be re-done every year. If council wants to continue
with the rainbow colors in the future years then the group must be aware of the ongoing
commitment to the project.
Thank you
99 of 129
MEMORANDUM
DATE: March 3, 2016
FILE: 110.04/2016
SUBMITTED BY: Darrin Albo, Manager of Operations
SUBJECT: Museum Renovation Contract Administration
The Museum Capital that is scheduled for 2016 will require a Contract Administrator to
oversee the renovations. The City will have the availability to provide this service in-house as it
is a fairly small project that requires many short inspections that can be achieved with a cost
advantage by one of the City’s employees. Conducting this service in-house will save the City
paying travel time and wages to Fairbanks Architect as what they have proposed.
Thank you
100 of 129
For the Attention of: Mayor Kathy Moore & Council
From: The Rossland Mountain Market Society
February 5th, 2016
I am writing this letter to you on behalf of the Rossland Mountain Market Society and in regards
to our 2015 – 2016 Winter Farmers’ Market series held at the Miner’s Hall this winter. We hosted three
fabulous events in November, December and January. This letter is to request support from the City of
Rossland for these events by assisting us with our rental fees for the Hall. Our total rental cost for these
three events is $547.50. We are asking that the City of Rossland consider supporting our Winter
Farmers’ Market by waiving these fees, thereby providing the Hall as a donation of support.
Our Winter Farmers’ Market series is extremely successful, very well attended and recently
rated by our vendors as one of the best, if not the best, winter farmers’ market in the Kootenay’s.
November’s event brought in approximately 700 visitors, December approximately 700 visitors and
January approximately 1000+ visitors. These visitors join us not only from the community of Rossland,
but also from Trail, Montrose, Fruitvale, Castlegar, Christina Lake and Grand Forks. Folks come to visit
this indoor farmers’ market because it is one of only a few places to access locally grown and produced
foods throughout the winter.
We surveyed our vendors after our January 30th market, in an attempt to paint a vivid picture of
the benefits this market series provides. Of particular note, are the economic benefits our vendors are
experiencing. Our local Farm vendors are making $700 - $1000 profit per busy market (busy markets
vary per vendor, but this was typically November and January’s markets), and are making a minimum of
$350 profit per slower market. Each Farm vendor explained how beneficial it is to them to have an
outlet to sell their product in the winter months, as often they don’t have an outlet and thus can’t sell
their product very successfully, and essentially lose a source of income for much of the year.
To further express the importance of this Winter Market Series, many, if not all, of our regular
attending local Farms are now planning to have product available in the winter months because we have
provided them with a consistent and excellent outlet to sell to the community. We have spoken multiple
times with Farms who are planning their winter crops right now for next year’s indoor market series.
Our Farmers’ Market is strengthening the food security of Rossland and nearby area by providing
consistent access to local food year round for community members and by providing a consistent outlet
for Farmers and Food Producers to sell their products. Our Winter Farmers’ Market will continue to
improve and grow as we begin to see more and more locally grown and produced foods throughout the
winter.
Our Winter Farmers’ Market series has been so successful, that there are now 2 other
communities who have created monthly winter farmers’ markets based on the way we at the Rossland
Mountain Market have organized and established our events. These communities are Nelson and
Creston, typical leaders in the Kootenay farmers’ market world. Our Market Society is striving to provide
101 of 129
the absolute best farmers’ market that we can for our community, and it is apparent that in many
regards we are proving to be successful in achieving this goal.
The 2014 – 2015 Winter Farmers’ Market series included 5 events, rather than 3. With the
closing of the Miner’s Hall for renovations we have lost our market venue for February, March and April.
We have tried without much success in finding a new location, and our vendors have voiced their
concern for this – they’re sad to miss their market in Rossland for the next few months. Due to a lack of
location for Feb, Mar, and April we lose our market revenue for these months, which would total $1380.
Our first season of indoor winter markets saw a total revenue of $2300. This indoor winter
season, 2015 – 2016, saw a total revenue of about $1300. We use this revenue to pay for advertising;
miscellaneous supplies for signage, clean up and the RMMS table; musicians / entertainment; and when
possible, for an honorarium for our Market Manager and volunteers.
As we stand at this point, we have just enough leftover revenue to pay the rental fees for these
3 events, should we not receive support from the City of Rossland. This is with only paying out an
honorarium to our Market Manager for the month of November. As we stand, December’s and January’s
events were organized and run strictly on volunteers, who collectively donated more than 85 hours of
their time to make these events successful.
Last year, with the extra revenue we gained from having the ability to host 3 extra indoor
markets, not only were we able to pay the remaining portion of the hall rental fees after the gracious
and much appreciated support offered by the City of Rossland, we were also able to pay our Spring /
Summer market ‘business’ expenses, which included our Business License ($50), BCAFM Membership
Fee ($200) and insurance for the year ($350), and on top of all of that we still had remainder left over to
payout an honorarium to the Market Manager for all 5 markets. This year we are just shy of being able
to afford our Spring/Summer business expenses, and that is if our rental fees for the Miner’s Hall are $0.
We realize that we have the ability to apply for grants to help us cover these ‘business’ type
expenses this year. We don’t want to do that. We are working so hard to become a sustainable Farmers’
Market and we believe we can better utilize granting opportunities for this year to make that happen.
Our plan is to use the grants we apply for this year to create a new revenue stream for our Market by
creating a supply of Rossland Mountain Market Society merchandise that we can sell to raise money for
our market. This supply of merchandise will also be used to provide one of a few benefits we are coming
up with for new members who join our Society. We are hoping to begin a RMMS Membership drive
during the summer of 2016. By creating an annual revenue stream through memberships to our Society,
and with the added bonus of a revenue stream through RMMS merchandise, we will begin to enhance
the sustainability of our market. Currently our main source of revenue is through vendor fees, but
because we are such a small market (average = 20 vendors) this revenue is not large enough to support
Market operations. We need another consistent and reliable revenue stream, and we believe we can
begin to obtain this through these other avenues.
By offering sponsorship to the Rossland Mountain Market through waiving of the rental fees for
the Miner’s Hall, the City of Rossland is creating a form of support that aligns with what we receive in
the summer season – namely, a venue to hold our market. It is our suggestion that the City of Rossland
waive the fees from the 2015-2016 season and add the Miner’s Hall as a venue for our Winter Market
Season into our yearly contract commencing with our contract renewal in 2016, thereby providing us
102 of 129
with a consistent venue for our farmers’ market every winter. This would include 5 market events, one
per month from November through March. The City of Rossland would then become a year round
sponsor of our Farmers’ Market by providing our venues at no charge. From the perspective of the
Farmers’ Market, this is an easy way for the City of Rossland to show support for access to local food,
and in the process would be immensely helping us become a more sustainable operation.
Please find attached with this letter our invoice from Rossland Recreation detailing our rental
fees for our events in November, December and January. We are very grateful for your consideration of
our request. We look forward to the potential of establishing this consistent, year round, supportive
relationship with the City of Rossland.
Thank you for giving us your time. We look forward to hearing from you, and we encourage open
communication and feedback from you – we would love to hear your thoughts on our Market and how
we’re doing!
Sincerely,
On behalf of the Rossland Mountain Market Society,
Miche Warwick
RMMS Chair
250.362.7737
rosslandmountainmarket@gmail.com
103 of 129
Invoice Number: 1790-1
Submit payment to:
Rossland Recreation
Bill to:
PO Box 1179
1899 Columbia Avenue
Rossland, BC V0G 1Y0
Phone: 250-362-2327
Fax: 250-362-5451
Email: recreation@rossland.ca
Winter Market
Attn: Miche Warwick
Box 2166
Rossland, BC V0G 1Y0
Invoice No. Invoice Date
1790-1
02-Feb-16
Due Date
16-Feb-16
Invoice Amt
$547.50
Payments
$0.00
Credits
$0.00
Amount Due
$547.50
Please return this part with your payment.
Date Printed: 02-Feb-16
Keep this part for your records.
Date Printed: 02-Feb-16
Invoice No. Invoice Date
1790-1
02-Feb-16
Tran Dates
Day Description (Cmplx/Fac.)
51881 02-Feb-16
Tue
Due Date
16-Feb-16
Permit #
Tue
Tue
Start Dur.
Time (Min.)
Rate
Credits
$0.00
Other
Chg
Unit Price Txbl
25.00
150.00
Qty UOM
1 Booking
1
Ext Price
25.00
150.00
Unit Price Txbl
25.00
150.00
Qty UOM
1 Booking
1
Ext Price
25.00
150.00
Unit Price Txbl
25.00
150.00
Qty UOM
1 Booking
1
Ext Price
25.00
150.00
Gen-January 30, 2016
Other Charges: Item
RCAC Chair fee
Rental - Minors Hall
Total Duration:
(hours)
Amount Due
$547.50
Balance
Invoiced
Amount
Paid
Gen-Dec. 19, 2015
Other Charges: Item
RCAC Chair fee
51883 02-Feb-16
Payments
$0.00
Gen-Winter Market Nov. 7
Other Charges: Item
RCAC Chair fee
51882 02-Feb-16
Invoice Amt
$547.50
$0.00
$182.50
$0.00
$182.50
$0.00
$182.50
Tran Subtotal:
$525.00
Invoice Total
$547.50
Total Tax:
$22.50
Payments
$0.00
Tran Total:
$547.50
Credits
$0.00
Prepaid Amount:
$0.00
Amount Due
$547.50
Powered by MaxEnterprise®, a product of Maximum Solutions, Inc.
104 of 129
Feb. 24, 2016
Dear Stacey, City Council, and acting CFO,
I am sending this correspondence to voice my discontent with the sale of
parcel Section 26, Plan#NEPX62, Land District 26, Township 9A, Subsidy Lot, 63
(see 53431) owned by the City of Rossland. This acreage is immediately
adjacent to my property Lot 45, SECtion 26, :Plan # NEPX62, LAND DISTRICT
26, TOWNSHIP 9A (See 5343I).
I understand that over the winter months, this property was sought out by
Mr. Andrew Bennett in order to lease or buy the property. I also understand that I
was in no way informed by the City of this potential ‘sale’. At the time, and in
hindsight, the rules of this sale changed from the original conditions made by the
City. After the rules changed, and during this time, I may have been interested in
this property (as were other buyers), being as I have lived there for 25 years and
am the only neighbour directly impacted. My back yard that has been gardened,
for both food and decorative plants is within this property, now sold. I am miffed
as to why the City of Rossland did not inform me of this sale, so that I had the
same opportunity to enter this potential transaction. The rules changed in mid
stride, during the negotiations. I have now lost my back yard area and am
unclear as to how the City could sell this property without having it
surveyed, legally, prior to this sale.
I am requesting that I be given an opportunity to purchase the area
adjacent to my home of 25 years, without having agriculture developed
immediately adjacent to my back deck and living area of the house. I have been
overlooked in this process and look forward to discussion regarding this sale by
the City of Rossland. If nothing else, it would have been courteous for the City
staff to inform me and make the sale upfront, especially after the rules changed
with regard to the City retaining a ROW for future infrastructure.
I am also unclear of the setbacks that I should be able to have as the
house is in the far, South West corner. I would be happy to have a subdivision
and be allowed to build another house on another portion of the property,
however the infrastructure does not allow any changes on my property. I own an
105 of 129
acre of land and am now stuck with neighbours close enough to see in windows,
due to the siting of my house and this current sale.
I look forward to a conversation with the Mayor and other City councillors
to glean a clearer understanding of the process, the legal aspects of this sale
with no surveys, the lack of communication to myself from the City, and how this
drastically changes my situation and the lifestyle I have enjoyed.
I am requesting that this letter is formally attached to the next Council
Package correspondence and that I will receive a letter from the City with
explanation of the process. I do know that with the MANY changes at City Hall
this mixup is an example of interrupted and inconsistent levels of staffing.
Regards,
D. Jill Spearn
2007 Princess Ave.
106 of 129
File No:
D. Jill Spearn
2007 Princess Avenue
Rossland, BC
March 7, 2016
Dear Ms Spearn:
RE: Your Letter of February 24, 2016 – Queen Street Property
Thank you for your letter of February 24, 2016 wherein you outline your concerns as to
the disposal of “Sublot 63 – Queen Street property”, which was owned by the City of
Rossland.
I have requested that City Staff provide me with an outline of the events that took place,
for my review of the matter, and subsequently for your information. I am advised that
in June 2015 Council directed Staff to list the subject property for sale. Staff then
worked with a local Realtor to determine an appropriate listing price, and addressed
issues regarding easements. This information was passed onto Council during the
summer of 2015, resulting in Council directing Staff to list the property for the asking
price of $160,000. At the end of September, 2016, Council directed Staff to negotiate
with an interested party on the proposed statutory right –of-way. On October 13, 2015,
Council received and declined an offer to purchase the property. Council then directed
Staff to contact the Real Estate agent to change the listing to reflect the requirements
for the statutory right-of-way. A conditional offer was received and accepted by Council
at a meeting held on October 26, 2015. There was an extension to the original closing
date to adjust for the required GST on the sale of the property. And finally it is my
understanding that the matter was finalized by the middle of December, 2015.
The City chose to utilize the services of a Realtor to dispose of the property. Some
municipalities choose to dispose of property in this way, and in doing so, I am advised
107 of 129
that a real estate “for sale” sign was erected on the property. This was to ensure that it
was widely known in Rossland that the property was for sale. The City would normally
not formally notify the adjacent property owners of their intent, when a “for sale” sign
is erected on the property. A municipality is obligated to notify adjacent property
owners when it intends to sell property to a particular adjacent property owner and the
intent is to consolidate the purchased property with this particular property owner’s
property. In that case, the other adjacent property owner is to be notified, as the
property would not be publicly tendered and there is provision in the Community
Charter for this type of transaction. This was not the case in the disposal of the Queen
Street property. While it may be argued that it may have been courteous for someone
to have contacted you, in regards to the sale of property directly adjacent to you, legally
there was no requirement to do so. It was publicly listed through a real estate broker
and a real estate sign was erected on the property to indicate to the public at large that
the property was for sale.
In regards to obtaining a legal survey of the property, I wish to advise that there is no
legal requirement to formally survey a parcel of land prior to listing it for sale.
In your comments to “the rules changing” for the sale of the property, am I correct in
assuming that this was in regards to the change in the listing, in view of the required
statutory right-of-way? If so, from what I have read from the file, I believe that it was
Council’s intent, when it was discovered that the right-of-way size should be changed,
they insisted that the Realtor change the listing so that any interested party would be
aware. When Council chose to utilize the services of a real estate agent, they signed an
agreement that all contact with perspective purchasers would be with the realtor, and
not directly with the City. The sale is now complete and there is no opportunity for the
City to offer you an opportunity to purchase a portion of this property adjacent to your
home.
I regret, that you feel negatively impacted by the sale of this property. My hope is that
the new property owner will do their best to ensure that any impact on you from their
use of their new property is minimal.
I know that I may not have addressed your concerns to your satisfaction, but I am
hopeful that you can understand the City’s position in this regard. Thank you for the
opportunity to explain this matter from the City of Rossland perspective.
Sincerely,
Lynne Burch
cao@rossland.ca
108 of 129
Correspondence Consent Calendar
Date:
Agenda:
Proposal:
Proposed by:
March 3, 2016
March 7, 2016
To Receive the Items Summarized for Information
Deputy Corporate Officer
Staff Recommendation:
1. General recommended motion:
THAT information items numbered (a) to (f) be received and acted upon as recommended.
2. Alternative motion if an item needs further consideration:
THAT information items numbered (a) to (f), except for items numbered --- be received and
acted upon as recommended.
ITEM
SUBJECT MATTER
(a)
AKBLG
2016 Conference
(b)
Miner’s Hall
Renovation Matching Fundraiser
(c)
West Kootenay Early Years
Request for 150 City Pins
Conference
Columbia Basin Trust and City of Invitation to Celebrate the Launch
Rossland
of a High-Speed Fibre Network in
Rossland
Tourism Rossland
February 26, 2016 Update
(d)
(e)
(f)
Regional District of Kootenay
Boundary
RECOMMENDATION
Receive and determine
Council attendees for the
conference
Receive and file
Receive and approve the
allocation of 150 City Pins
Receive and direct any
member of Council who
wishes should attend
Receive and file
Reimbursement Program for Area Receive and file
‘B’ Residents Using Trail’s
Recreation Facilities
109 of 129
MEMORANDUM
SUBJECT: AKBLG 2016 Conference, Kimberley BC
SUBMITTED BY: Deputy Corporate Officer
FILE: 0110.03/2016
AKBLG Attendance:
The 2016 AKBLG Conference is scheduled for April 27, 2016 to April 29, 2016 in
Kimberley BC. There is currently $2500 in the 2016 budget for Council attendance. Staff
estimates that this will cover the cost for two attendees from the City of Rossland to
attend. The draft conference agenda was included in the February 18th Council
Information Package with the request for members of Council to respond to staff if
interested in attending: Councillor Kruysse has expressed interest in attending.
Early Bird Registration (prior to March 25, 2016) is $425 + GST
Two and three bedroom condos are available for accommodation close to the Kimberley
Conference Centre.
A copy of the registration schedule is attached. Once attendees have been chosen,
registration information indicating which sessions to be registered for should be
forwarded to the Executive Assistant.
Rossland is the host city for the 2017 AKBLG Conference.
Recommendation: That Council chooses two representatives to attend the 2016 AKBLG
Conference in Kimberley, BC and that Council directs Staff to complete the registration
process.
Attachments:
AKBLG Registration information
________________________
Deputy Corporate Officer
110 of 129
2/26/2016
CivicInfo BC 2016 AKBLG Conference
2016 AKBLG Conference
Kimberley, BC April 27 29, 2016
Date:
April 27 29, 2016
Location:
Kimberley Conference and Athlete Training Centre
290 North Star Boulevard
Kimberley, BC
Payment
Methods:
Credit Card payments will be accepted with your online registration.
Cheques should be made payable to “AKBLG” and sent to: City of Kimberley
C/O Nicole Thurman
340 Spokane St
Kimberley, BC
V1A 2E8
Registration
Deadline:
April 15, 2016
Refund
Policy:
Full refunds will be available until April 12, 2016. No refunds after this date, except for certain circumstances.
Substitutions are allowed, in the event of a substitution please email nthurman@kimberley.ca
(mailto:nthurman@kimberley.ca) prior to April 15, 2016 with the applicable information.
For your information, please see the following excerpt from the AKBLG AGM Policy:
'Notice of nonattendance at the Annual General Meeting/Conference and requests for registration refunds must
be made two weeks prior to the Conference, except in emergency circumstances, where refunds will be at the
sole discretion of the Executive.'
Documents:
View Agenda
(http://akblg.ca/sites/akblg.civicwebcms.com/files/media/Draft%20Agenda%202016%20AKBLGfor%20website.pdf)
View Partner Program (/event/2016/docs/AKBLG_Partner_Program.pdf) Instructions
1. Complete the entire online form. Fields marked with * are required. Once the form is complete, click the "Register"
button at the bottom of this page.
111 of 129
https://www.civicinfo.bc.ca/event/2016/AKBLG
1/4
2/26/2016
2. After clicking "Register", your registration will be confirmed.
3. After you have registered, refer to the onscreen instructions for your payment options. Payment is accepted by credit
card or cheque.
If you experience any difficulties with this form, please contact CivicInfo BC at 2503834898.
Registration Type
Select your Registration Type
Delegate
Delegate Information
* First Name
* Last Name
* Organization
* Position / Title
* Mailing Address
* City
* Province
* Postal Code
* Cell Phone
* Email
* Confirm Email
112 of 129
2/4
2/26/2016
Support Staff Email
Dietary Needs
None Specify:
Mobility Needs
None Specify:
Delegate Registration Options
Registration Fees (Includes $25 Dinner Voucher).
Early
Bird
After March
25, 2016
$425
$450
Tuesday, April 26, 2016
Pre Conference (9:00am 4:00pm)
Ministry of Jobs, Tourism and Skills Training: Economic Development Building Blocks ((Registration Limited))
Wednesday, April 27, 2016
Morning Tours
Tour A: SunMine / Mark Creek Naturalization
Tour B: Mark Creek Naturalization / SunMine
No Tour
Wine and Cheese Reception (Evening)
Session A: Sean Campbell, Community Futures East Kootenay: Sources of Capital
for Small Business in Rural BC
Session B: Murdy & McAllister, Lynda Stokes: The 411 on 420: Local Governments
and Marihuana Regulation
Session A: Michael Hoher, Entrepreneur: Doing Business in the Kootenays
Session B: Dr. Terri MacDonald, Rural Development Initiative: Innovations in Food
and Agriculture, Examples from our Region.
Thursday, April 28, 2016
Concurrent Sessions, 11:30am 12:15pm
Concurrent Sessions, 3:15pm 4:00pm
Gala Banquet (Evening)
Complimentary Code:
Submit Code
113 of 129
3/4
2/26/2016

Payment Information
Registration Fees:
$425.00
GST 5% # 10693 0241 RT 0001:
$21.25
Total Payment Due:
$446.25
Submit Registration
Need Assistance?
Please contact the Event Administrator.
Nicole Thurman
Phone: 250.427.9658 (tel:#)
Email: nthurman@kimberley.ca (mailto:nthurman@kimberley.ca)
Copyright © 2016 CivicInfo BC (http://www.civicinfo.bc.ca/)
114 of 129
4/4
Rossland Council for Arts & Culture
Box 405, Rossland BC
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
February 16, 2016
Media Contact:
Ann Damude, Co-chair RCAC Miners Hall Renovation Committee
adamude@telus.net
250-362-5617
Miners Hall Attic Reno challenges community to match $25,000 pot of gold!
For almost 120 years the Rossland Miners Union Hall has been the heartbeat of our community. It’s
here that we’ve gathered to dance, to sing, to marry, to celebrate, and to say goodbye. Now the grand
old girl is entering an exciting new phase in her life and the life of our community. And she needs your
help!
The Attic Renovation Project – slated to begin this summer – is entering its last stages of fundraising.
With $310,000 of $491,000 secured, the Rossland Council for Arts & Culture (RCAC) is pushing hard to
secure the last of the funding needed to transform the existing cold and dusty attic space to a warm
and inviting gathering spot. The renovation will create a multi-purpose room, meeting lounge,
kitchenette, storage, washrooms, as well as a performers green room.
“We were contacted by a community member last month, who offered to contribute $10,000 to the
Attic Renovation if the community would match that amount. Since then several other donors have
added to the pot, and we now have $25,000 available for matching”, explains Renate Fleming, RCAC
President.
The Attic Reno Matching Fundraiser launches February 17th and will only run for 30 days.
“Coincidentally, our final donation day is March 17th - St Patrick’s Day”, laughs Ann Damude, who is
volunteering with the campaign. “So we’re telling folks that for every dollar donated, some generous
local leprechauns will match their donation, dollar for dollar, from their $25,000 pot of gold.”
And RCAC, working with the City of Rossland is making it easy for the community to donate! Donations
can be made through local on-line fundraising site YODEL http://minershall.yodel.org/ or you can walk
into City Hall or Nelson & District Credit Union and deliver your donation. Any donations over $25 are
eligible for a tax receipt.
“This is a great opportunity for community members to make their contribution really count. Together
we can turn $25,000 into $50,000 ,” states Fleming, “And create new spaces in the Miners Hall that will
benefit the whole community for another 120 years.”
For more information on the matching campaign, contact Ann at 250-362-5617 or adamude@telus.net
More information on the Miners Hall Renovation & Restoration project can be found at
http://rosslandartscouncil.com/Miners-Hall
-0 Photo attached. Photo Credit Larry Doell
115 of 129
116 of 129
117 of 129
From:
To:
Subject:
Date:
Cynthia Anonuevo
Executive Assistant
FW: You"re Invited to Celebrate Rossland"s New Broadband Network
February 26, 2016 8:34:01 AM
Hey Alison, Please include this in the info pkg under "Coming to Council"....Info items.
Cynthia
From: Tourism Rossland [info@tourismrossland.com]
Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 3:31 PM
To: Cynthia Anonuevo
Subject: You're Invited to Celebrate Rossland's New Broadband Network
You are invited:
Come see what high-speed looks like!
Join Columbia Basin Trust and the City of Rossland to celebrate the completion and launch of a
high-speed fibre network in downtown Rossland.
Participate in a live speed demonstration (and other cool stuff), learn how it will help you meet
your business needs and how you can get connected.
When: March 23, 2016
Where: Rossland Public Library 2180 Columbia Ave
Time: 7:00 to 8:30 p.m. Get high-speed Internet
Sign up for one year of service with an Internet service provider and receive a FREE fibre
connection from the Rossland network to your business. This service offers up to 100mbps
symmetrical service (yes, both up and down!), which means that your business will be able to:
respond to customers' needs faster
take advantage of quicker data transmission (i.e. file transfer, cloud-based applications
or payment processing)
118 of 129
offer new services or expand online sales
employ remote workers
boost productivity and efficiency with your everyday online tasks.
For more information on how to access the network and to see if you are located within the
service area, visit www.cbt.org/RosslandBroadband Forward this email
This email was sent to cynthia@rossland.ca by info@tourismrossland.com | Update Profile/Email Address | Rapid removal with SafeUnsubscribe™ | About our service provider.
Tourism Rossland | 1960 Columbia Ave | Box 1385 | Rossland | BC | V0G1Y0 | Canada
119 of 129
120 of 129
121 of 129
122 of 129
123 of 129
124 of 129
125 of 129
126 of 129
127 of 129
128 of 129
129 of 129

- Rossland

Transcription

Similar documents

I`m helping to end MS by participating in the 2016 Jayman BUILT MS

The Board of Directors of Qatar Fuel (WOQOD) is pleased to invite

5 `S` Training Program at ABV-IIITM, Gwalior on 21.07.2016

4 star ALOE HOTEL, PAPHOS

Annual Report 2014 - Rossland Public Library

loyola institute for ministry on-campus open house thursday, may 12

HALF OFF - Bavarian Inn

The Magic Wizard

KMEA Standards Handout

2016 MW Alliance Raffle - Manitowish Waters Alliance LTD

HERE - Perfect Shots Photography