Patriotic americans Fight AMNESTY again
Transcription
Patriotic americans Fight AMNESTY again
Californians For Population Stabilization CAPS NEWS Spring 2013 • VOLUME 54 • NUMBER 1 Patriotic Americans Fight Amnesty Again By Joe Guzzardi, CAPS Senior Writing Fellow T the nation’s population and social woes, including American job displacement. he gloves are off again. Patriotic Americans find themselves in the midst of yet another battle to save the nation from an amnesty that would create disastrous fiscal and environmental consequences. During the 2007 McCain-Kennedy amnesty debates, the Heritage Foundation estimated that amnesty would cost taxpayers $2.5 trillion in the first ten years. The Foundation now calculates that the fiscal impact of this year’s “Gang of Eight” amnesty would be even higher. The Federation of Americans for Immigration Reform sets the annual expense directly related to education, health care and law enforcement at $100 billion. Our 2006 and 2007 victories were hard fought but successful. This time around, emboldened by the 2012 November election results, immigration advocates are more demanding, better organized and have deeper pockets. One thing is certain: amnesty proponents never give up. Since the 1986 Immigration Reform and Control Act, six additional legislative amnesties have been passed that granted amnesty to at least 3 million illegal aliens. As a result, federal, state and local governments have absorbed—to the point of bankruptcy in some California cities—heavy fiscal and tax burdens. The adverse consequences of unchecked immigration are obvious, and the motives of those who drive it, ignoble. Pandering politicians, cheap-labor-lobbying corporations, biased media and elitists have combined to create what they hope will be the perfect storm: amnesty for 11 million illegal aliens. Each of these seven amnesties opened up avenues for chain migration that have compounded Americans need to join in the effort to ensure that the voices of reason—our voices—prevail. CAPS ADS TARGET PRO AMNESTY SENATORS IN THIS ISSUE ‘Baby Bust’ Blues Page 2 2012 Annual Report Summary Page 3 Short on Water Again Page 4 New Board and Advisory Members California Then and Now Page 5 Tackling the Taboo Page 6 S ince January when a new amnesty proposal was put forth by what’s been billed as a bipartisan effort led by four Democratic and four Republican senators, CAPS has been working full throttle to oppose legalizing the estimated 11 million people who are in the country illegally. The campaign is CAPS’ opening salvo in the debate on this plan. Through it, we plan to further the discussion and show that the plan is against the best interests of American citizens and taxpayers. Now is a “line in the sand” moment. Amnesty legislation is here. We encourage you to pull out all the stops in calling, writing and emailing elected officials with your concerns about the proposal. Let them know what you think realistic solutions are and what needs to change. The CAPS website has lots of background information, facts and figures, if you need it. If enacted, the plan would give immediate provisional status for those here illegally to live and work in the United States, thus competing with the estimated 25 million Americans out of work or underemployed. As we write, CAPS is launching a campaign directed to Sen. John McCain (R-AZ), one of the eight senators driving the amnesty. Arizonans are being asked to contact Sen. McCain and tell him to stop pushing for both a large increase in the number of immigrant workers admitted to the U.S. and an amnesty for 11 million illegal aliens. With TV, radio and online ads in Phoenix, the campaign is focused on McCain, because he’s been a long-time amnesty advocate and pusher for increasing immigration, despite broad opposition among the constituents in his state to amnesty and increased mass immigration. As the campaign proceeds, other spots will be rolled out, targeted to additional senators supporting the plan, including Sen. Jeff Flake (R), also of Arizona, and Sen. Marco Rubio (D-FL). In addition to the jobs issue, legalizing millions of people will put additional pressure on already stressed welfare and entitlement programs. The plan also will contribute to more unsustainable population growth, not just by way of legalizing 11 million, but through the impacts of continuing chain migration. Please don’t stop there. Send letters to the editors of newspapers, and go online and post comments to articles and commentary pieces about immigration. Also, talk with your business colleagues, friends, neighbors and family. Educate them about the issue if they’re not up to speed on it, and ask them to get involved to fight amnesty. While the amnesty plan will impact all states— because all states are border states now, that is, all face challenges from illegal immigration—California will be disproportionately affected because more immigrants settle here than in any other state. Let us know if you are successful in getting an editorial placed, have a letter to the editor printed or have other good news to share in this fight. We’ll keep you posted through online updates and emails. Let’s fight this amnesty plan! This year alone there were 12.1 million applicants to the U.S. Diversity Lottery Program, also called the U.S. population was estimated at 315,412,705 on March 1, 2013. U.S. Census Bureau Green Card Lottery. U.S. State Department CAPS Fact 1 Californians For Population Stabilization ‘Baby Bust’ Blues, Board of Directors Or How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Population Bomb* Dick Schneider, M.S. By Leon Kolankiewicz, CAPS Senior Writing Fellow Chairman of the Board Ben Zuckerman, Ph.D. Vice President Otis L. Graham, Jr., Ph.D. Secretary Kenneth Pasternack, J.D. Treasurer Tim Aaronson, M.S. Kim Fletcher Edward Tabash, J.D. Staff Jo Wideman Executive Director Gretchen Pfaff Marketing & Communications Director Katie Patrykus Development Director Mary Bahnken Membership Services Director Allison Allen Administrative Services Assistant Advisory Board Denice Spangler Adams, M.S. Carolyn Pesnell Amory Allan F. Brown Benny Chien, M.D. Robert Gillespie Helen Graham Victor Davis Hanson, Ph.D. Leon Kolankiewicz, M.S. Richard Lamm, L.L.D. Martin Litton Keith Mautino Nancy Pearlman Karen Peus Winifred W. Rhodes Michael Tobias, Ph.D. Paul Scott George Sessions Jacob Sigg Louis F. Villanueva John D. Weeden Charles Westhoff, Ph.D. Wendy Yager CAPS News is published by Californians for Population Stabilization 1129 State Street, Suite 3-D Santa Barbara, CA 93101 Phone: 805-564-6626 Fax: 805-564-6636 E-mail: CAPS@CAPSweb.org www.CAPSweb.org Editor: Maria Fotopoulos, APR Produced by: Jo Wideman Art Direction: Garcin Media Group Californians for Population Stabilization is a nonpartisan, nonprofit, public interest organization that works to formulate and advance policies and programs designed to stabilize the population of California at a level which will preserve a good quality of life for all Californians. W hat planet does he live on? I found myself wondering in recent weeks. At every turn, it seemed, I encountered one Jonathan V. Last, senior writer at The Weekly Standard, insisting that America is heading over a demographic cliff because we’re not making enough babies. And the masters of the media were listening. Respectfully. Intently. Earnestly. Rather than falling out of their chairs with guffaws. In his Wall Street Journal article, Mr. Last channels the late economist and guru of growth, Julian Simon, when he claims that “…growing populations lead to increased innovation and conservation. Think about it: Since 1970, commodity prices have continued to fall and America’s en- The Wall Street Journal, The Daily Beast, The Los Angeles Times, The Weather Channel (!!!) and CBS Sunday Morning, among others, all gave him a forum. Would that they be half as receptive to our message! NewsMax issued a national declaration of war on low birth rates with the headline: “U.S. Battles Declining Fertility.” Our country has relentlessly added 2 to 3 million people per year for decades —33 million in the 1990s, 27 million in the 2000s. We added more than 100 million in the last 40 years, and in the next 40 to 50 years, according to the U.S. Census Bureau, we will add another 100 million, most of it directly and indirectly from immigration. Our population continues to grow with no end in sight, if at a somewhat slower pace than the breakneck speed of the 1990s, which set a record for the greatest growth of any decade in our history. This in a country that already—with our current bloated population of 315 million—runs a substantial ecological deficit that is pushing us ever deeper into ecological debt, according to the Global Footprint Network, the Oakland-based think tank that tabulates the ecological footprint of most nations on earth. According to the Network, if every country in the world were as overpopulated and resourceintensive as the United States, it would take more than four Earths to support us all. Alas, all we have is one Earth, and all we will ever have is one planet, Buzz Lightyear fantasies of “to infinity, and beyond!” notwithstanding. And one is enough, if we know how to care for it. Part of caring for it is having the collective wisdom to live within limits, including limiting the size of our families and population. But growthmaniacs like Jonathan Last deny that there are any limits to growth that the infinitely clever human mind can’t overcome, as long as government doesn’t stifle individual initiative and ingenuity. Unfortunately, all too many delusional people deny a simple, profound truth: that all we have is one planet at our disposal, and if we continue to dispose of it as we have been, all that will be left eventually is a wasteland filled with weeds, trash and toxics. and droughts, record temperatures, fewer fish, less de facto wilderness, more threatened and endangered species, more harmful invasive species, higher carbon dioxide emissions, and more crowded parks and beaches than ever before. The climate is becoming more erratic; sea level is rising, and the oceans are becoming more polluted and acidic. I could go on, but any one of these conditions is not sustainable. Before he died in 1998, Julian Simon and I were both interviewed by one of National Public Radio’s science reporters for a segment on the topic of carrying capacity for The Morning Edition. I later spoke with Simon at a news conference in the Capitol at which he released a study arguing for more immigration and faster U.S. population growth. In private conversation afterwards, among other things, he also let on that he thought the idea that manmade CFCs were harming the ozone layer was a bunch of nonsense. He apparently knew better than the two scientists at the University of California-Irvine—Sherwood Rowland and Mario Molina—who had just been awarded the Nobel Prize in Chemistry. They shared the Nobel for working out the chemical reactions by which chlorofluorocarbons consumed ozone molecules in the stratosphere, which protect us and all other organisms from damaging ultraviolet-B radiation. But it was all nonsense, Simon assured me. Hysteria? Or merely hysterical, as in totally absurd and comical? It is a classic illustration of what the pioneering ecological economist Herman Daly once called “growthmania” on the part of those who worship at the altar of growth, growth forever, growth at all costs. Human beings are rapidly and inexorably degrading the biosphere that the entire human economy 2 CAPS Fact resides within and depends upon utterly in countless ways. We are busily sawing off the limb upon which the entire human enterprise rests—degrading and squandering the “natural capital” that makes sustainable economic prosperity possible. vironment has become much cleaner and more sustainable—even though our population has increased by more than 50%. Human ingenuity, it turns out, is the most precious resource.” This is a whopper. But like Julian Simon, who once wrote an outlandish article in the journal Science entitled, “Population, Resources, Environment: An Oversupply of False Bad News,” Last is deft at spinning whoppers that are partially true. Thanks to the efforts of environmentalists (fought every step of the way by polluters), it is indeed true that our air and water are cleaner, in general, than they were 40 years ago; there is also more land set aside as national parks, wildlife refuges and wilderness areas. These are achievements worth celebrating. Commodity prices—think gasoline at the gas pump—did fall from 1970 to 2000, but in the 2000s, as author Chris Clugston has shown in his compelling new book, Scarcity, prices for almost all raw materials have increased sharply. Clugston concludes that Americans mistook temporary abundance of nonrenewable natural resources (NNRs) like the fossil fuels and metals as permanent sufficiency. It’s a miscalculation with monumental consequences. “More sustainable?” One would have to be a deluded ignoramus, or dare I say, an ecologically challenged economist, to think so. We have fewer wetlands, fewer free-flowing rivers, less available surface and groundwater, less open space, fewer remaining fossil fuels and high grade metal and mineral ores, fewer arable soils, fewer healthy and more diseased forests, more wildfires Julian Simon once bragged: “We now have in our hands—in our libraries, really—the technology to feed, clothe, and supply energy to an ever-growing population for the next 7 billion years.” Rarely has rank hubris ever been so distilled! Physicist Al Bartlett looked into Simon’s claim. Bartlett calculated that after just 17,000 years (only 0.00024% of 7 billion years), a population growing at the underwhelming but steady rate of 1% annually—about equal to the U.S. growth rate—would produce as many humans as atoms in the known universe. Bartlett also quipped that our de facto national creed has morphed from “In God We Trust” to “In Growth We Trust.” Treating a slight dip in the birth rate as a cause for alarm rather than a tentative step in the right direction is an expression of this creed. Bartlett said that Julian Simon belonged to what amounted to a “New Flat Earth Society,” because only a flat Earth extending infinitely in all directions could accommodate infinite human expansion. I hereby propose that for his recent contributions to such delusions of grandeur, Jonathan Last be accorded honorary membership in the New Flat Earth Society. * With apologies to Stanley Kubrick, Peter Sellers and the classic Cold War era film Dr. Strangelove. Leon Kolankiewicz is an environmental scientist and CAPS advisor. He was the vice president and coordinator of Carrying Capacity Network (CCN) in the late 1990s, when University of Colorado physics professor Al Bartlett and University of Maryland ecological economics professor Herman Daly served on the CCN Board of Directors. Scientific studies link fine particulate air pollution to premature deaths of those with heart or lung disease. Environmental Protection Agency Californians For Population Stabilization ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARY 2012 In 2012, CAPS continued to be on the frontlines in a fight for a sustainable California and a sustainable country. It was a challenging year. The United States continued to experience the most rapid population growth of any country in the developed world. On average, the U.S. now adds 1 million legal immigrants annually, and it’s estimated that between 900,000 and 1 million have come to the country illegally each year in recent years. Projects and Activities Overpopulation Awareness Campaign CAPS’ educational and media work continued to emphasize California’s escalating overpopulation-related problems. In 2012 we worked to inform the public, elected officials and the media about the destructive impacts resulting from overpopulation, primarily driven by massive legal and unchecked illegal immigration, including a compromised environment, loss of biodiversity, weakened infrastructure, stressed educational and medical systems and overall diminished quality of life. CAPS reiterated its belief that the U.S. needs a population policy that limits the overall numbers of immigrants legally admitted. Within those limits, CAPS recommends that consideration be given for admitting immigrants with needed skills, rather than merely having quotas on a country-by-country basis or a random lottery system. Through live interviews and outreach with print materials, along with continuous updating of our website content, Facebook, YouTube and Twitter pages, we spent the year fully engaged in getting out our messages. We continued to use the Action Alert system to notify members of proposed legislative actions and other relevant news, and to offer an easy way to contact legislators. Using this variety of tools enabled us to broadly communicate our clear and consistent messages that a decrease in all legal immigration is needed; illegal immigration must come to an end, and birthrates must be reduced by voluntary means. As part of this campaign we ran a series of TV ads in various markets nationally and in California (all ads can be viewed on CAPS’ website, CAPSweb.org): • During the Republican Presidential Debate in Arizona, we ran a TV ad which aired on CNN in Sacramento, Los Angeles, Fresno, Bakersfield and Santa Barbara markets. This ad laments the federal government admitting millions of legal immigrants and temporary workers to take jobs while more than 2 million Californians are unemployed. More legal immigrants reside and settle in California permanently than in any other state, and the flow of workers has not stopped since the recession hit. The ad illustrates the lack of attention to legal foreign workers by first presenting the word “illegal,” since illegal immigrants have been the primary media focus. The spokesperson then separates “il” from the rest of the word to show the word “legal,” saying, “But what about these workers; legal foreign workers?” The spot ends by combining the letters to form the word “ill” to describe California’s economy and joblessness, partly attributable to legal and illegal immigration. • An Earth Day TV ad ran nationally and showed that immigration-driven population growth in the U.S. fuels environmental degradation here and abroad. Mass immigration to the U.S. is expanding the country’s already massive carbon footprint and driving population growth that will add 100 million people to America in the next 40 years. This ad was shown and then spoofed on The Colbert Report which has a viewership of 1.5 million. • A Memorial Day TV ad, which ran nationally on FOX and also during the RNC and DNC conventions, asked why the U.S. is admitting millions of immigrant workers when one in three young veterans is jobless. More veterans settle in California than any other state, and California continues to experience some of the highest unemployment rates in the country. In 2011, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that recently returning veterans between the ages of 18 and 24 had an unemployment rate of 29.1% and that young AfricanAmerican male veterans had an unemployment rate that topped 40%. • We ran another TV ad in the Los Angeles, Bakersfield and Sacramento markets calling on specific politicians (Barbara Boxer, Kevin McCarthy and John Garamendi) to slow mass immigration and save jobs for unemployed Californians. The campaign launched as California continued to experience unprecedented levels of unemployment and immigrant workers continued to pour into the state looking for jobs. In-house, we produced 60-second and 15-minute YouTube PSAs featuring one of our renowned Advisory Board members, Michael Tobias. He is an author, ecologist, mountaineer and filmmaker and his more than 45 books and 170 films have been distributed, translated and broadcast internationally. Tobias discussed the convergence of population and environmental issues as they relate to any biological bottom line, from habitat preservation and biodiversity conservation to human and animal rights at home and worldwide. Additionally, we conducted a survey of 1,000 likely voters in California which showed among other things that 76% of Californians thought that, rather than bringing in new immigrant workers, any new jobs created in California should go to unemployed Californians. The poll findings also showed that 65% opposed the Visa Lottery; 66% opposed chain migration and 70% favored mandating that all California employers electronically verify that their workers are in the country legally and have a work visa. As well, 52% polled disapproved of the job Senator Barbara Boxer is doing to create new California jobs and get unemployed Californians working again. We completed the California Population Awareness Awards (CAPAs) program; awards were granted and outstanding young winners feted. The CAPAs, a statewide contest, asked California’s college and university students to create a short video, radio spot, editorial, Facebook initiative or Twitter campaign that focused on the causes of overpopulation in California and effects on education, the environment and future prospects for a sustainable state and a good quality of life. The purpose of the project was to increase awareness among California’s 3 million college students that the state’s population has nearly doubled in only 40 years and continues to rise rapidly. CAPS Contact: We believed that this important demographic group, which can and will influence the future of California, is largely unaware of how rapid population growth has impacted California’s economy, our environment, our public schools, health care facilities, prisons, highways, wetlands, biodiversity, water resources, energy consumption, and state and national parks. We hoped to begin remedying this lack of awareness about these issues by starting educational outreach to college students by way of this contest. Our campaign in support of the program was anchored by Facebook ads, along with targeted college newspaper print and online advertising. We also shared contest information with online scholarship and contest sites. The combined efforts resulted in more than 39 million impressions and more than 6,000 site visits to capaawards.com, with the CAPA Awards Facebook page generating more than 5,000 click-throughs. We are considering running this contest again with an emphasis on overpopulation’s relationship to carrying capacity. We completed a new project, Population Education for Environmental Scientists: The Need to Go Where They Are. We exhibited at the Headwaters to Oceans (H2O) Conference in San Diego in May where we were able to present information on the nature of U.S. population growth and of the clear feasibility of curbing it. We also exhibited at the Society for Conservation Biology (NACCB) in Oakland in July and the Ecological Society of America (ESA) in Portland in August. At the ESA meeting, CAPS held a half-day symposium, Population, Environment and Sustainability Issues in the U.S., attended by nearly 100 people. Organized by Stuart Hurlbert and moderated by Robert Costanza, the meeting had a full slate of speakers. Marilyn DeYoung spoke on U.S. Population Policies, Trends and Projections: 1900-2050; Madeline Weld on Pernicious Myths Drive Canada’s Population Growth; Robert Dietz on Moving Toward Ecological Economics: Why Are We Still Haunted by the Ghosts of Adam Smith, Milton Friedman, and Julian Simon? and Philip Cafaro on Developing an Environmental Impact Statement for U.S. Immigration Policy. David Schindler discussed Oil Sands Operations, First Nation Peoples and a Sustainable Canada; Gerardo Ceballos González talked about Continental Ecology, Connectivity, and the Conservation of Biodiversity in the Mexico-U.S. Border Region; and Hal Michael and Robert Lackey spoke on Past, Present and Future of Salmonid Stocks in the Pacific Northwest. Ben Zuckerman also spoke on Population Growth and Projection of Future U.S. Greenhouse Gas Outputs; Stuart Hurlbert on Sustainability, Censorship and Unholy Left-Right Alliances; and Robert Costanza on Population, Environment, Economy and Sustainability: Toward an Integrated Synthesis and a Desirable Future. CAPS began implementation of a new project: The California We Are Losing—Views of our Golden State’s transition from pristine to imperiled. The project goal is to educate the public to population growth’s long-term effects on special places near and dear to Californians through visual juxtapositions of yesterday’s and today’s changed landscapes, while serving as a call to action. The project will include: • Rotating, dramatic dedicated page on the CAPSweb.org website, which already gets more than 90,000 page views per year • Concise video documentary for CAPS’ active YouTube channel, boasting more than 41,000 views • Television ad to run in the Golden State, showing the plight of cherished statewide locales • New CAPS’ Pinterest presence, and emotive content for CAPS’ Facebook presence, as well as powerful imagery for a speakers’ bureau PowerPoint presentation • Replicable format to share with other states sharing these same struggles to use as they tell their own “then and now” stories. We anticipate that these juxtapositions of yesterday’s and today’s California places will offer contrasting and vivid portraits of changing landscapes across the 20th century to today. Our focus on landscape change will depict the “natural” environments of redwood groves, meadows, oak-studded hills, wildlife and pristine beaches of yesterday turning into sprawling towns, cities and suburbs, with the supporting infrastructure to house and accommodate California’s still-growing population, now at nearly 39 million people. Further, we hope to stimulate discussion and learning to discover what the engines of these dramatic changes have been. We will invite the public to comment and to share materials of their own depicting California places of the past as seen and experienced in diaries, books, albums, photos and maps. Communications Audit An extensive review of CAPS communications efforts was concluded, which included suggestions for a major revamping of our website, all collateral materials and outreach methodologies. Advertising with Google AdWords We continued in 2012 utilizing an online service that allows us to reach people searching the Internet for specific key words and phrases or visiting a website that has content aligned with CAPS’ mission, which brought thousands of new visitors to our website, CAPSweb.org. 1129 State Street, Suite 3-D, Santa Barbara, CA 93101 Phone: 805-564-6626 Fax: 805-564-6636 www.CAPSweb.org 3 2012 ANNUAL REPORT SUMMARY (cont.) Work with the State Legislature and Congress CAPS engaged in lobbying, education and advocacy programs designed to influence elected officials in California and at the federal level. CAPS members who joined our Action Alert Team were notified whenever urgent action was needed— giving them a chance to do something important for their state and nation by expressing their concerns to elected officials. In 2012, our activists sent more than 145,000 messages to legislators through our website, and thousands wrote, faxed and called legislators directly. Gridlock in Washington, Amnesty Efforts in Sacramento Open Dialogue Program In January, CAPS Senior Fellow Michael Cutler, a renowned immigration expert and retired INS Senior Special Agent, spoke in Santa Barbara to a large group of CAPS members on “Profiles in Cowardice: Immigration, Illegal Aliens & Idiocy.” CAPS staff, board and member volunteers staffed Earth Day booths in Santa Barbara, Thousand Oaks and San Diego where we emphasized that overpopulation and overconsumption are the root causes of environmental destruction. We noted that since the first Earth Day in 1969 world population has doubled to more than 7 billion and quoted Gaylord Nelson who said, “In this country, it’s phony to say ‘I’m for the environment but not for limiting immigration.’ It’s just a fact that we can’t take all the people who want to come here.” Political deadlock and impending elections produced inertia in the federal legislative session this year— many bills on both sides of the immigration issue were introduced, but no significant legislation passed. By contrast, the California legislature considered a number of bills designed to promote amnesty or otherwise blur the distinction between legal and illegal immigration. Two of these passed, and one was signed into law. During 2012 CAPS spokespersons appeared on television news and radio talk shows, were quoted in newspapers, magazines, and hundreds of blogs discussing nearly every aspect of U.S. population growth and immigration policies. Legislation in Congress is much more dependent upon House and Senate leadership than it is in the California legislature. While House Republican leaders expressed support for mandatory E-Verify legislation, they did nothing to move HR 2885, the Legal Workforce Act, to a floor vote after it passed the Judiciary Committee. Print Media Bakersfield Californian Breitbart Columbia Daily Tribune East Valley Tribune Environmental News Today Fox News Latino The Jersey Journal Las Vegas Review-Journal Lodi News-Sentinal Los Angeles Daily News New York Daily News North County Times Sacramento Bee San Francisco Weekly Santa Barbara Independent Wisconsin State Journal Judicial and administrative actions on immigration proved more consequential. In June, the Obama Administration implemented much of the DREAM Act amnesty by administrative action even though the legislation had repeatedly failed in Congress. Two weeks later, the Supreme Court upheld a crucial portion of Arizona’s SB 1070. It validated the requirement that police check a person’s immigration status while enforcing other laws if “reasonable suspicion” exists that the person is in the United States illegally, even as it struck down some other parts of the law. California passed the TRUST Act, AB 1081, an attempt to gut the DHS’s Secure Communities program. The legislation would bar police in California from detaining an illegal alien for ICE unless the alien has a previous, specified felony conviction. Even illegal aliens with multiple drunken driving convictions or a history of domestic violence would be released. MEDIA COVERAGE (partial list) The legislature also passed AB 2189 to make aliens eligible for California driver’s licenses if they receive “deferred action” status and work permits from the Obama administration under its administrative amnesty. Initially, the DMV said it needed no additional statutory authority, but then retreated into a more ambiguous position. Governor Jerry Brown signed AB 2189, but vetoed AB 1081, the so-called TRUST Act. Brown expressed his concern that the Trust Act did not cover some major crimes and, unfortunately, indicated that he would work with the legislature on a slightly different version to sign. Online Presence Website Our website, CAPSweb.org, had more than 47,000 visitors and 92,000 page views between January 1 and December 31, 2012. CAPS blog CAPS-blog.org focused on population issues, including immigration (both legal and illegal), jobs, crime, the environment and more. The blog tackles current events, debunks opposition arguments and encourages comments and discussions about the topics raised. CAPS’ blog had more than 123,000 visitors and 413,000 page views from January 1 to December 31, 2012. The main contributors to the blog were Joe Guzzardi, CAPS Senior Writing Fellow, and Michael Cutler, CAPS Senior Fellow. Other contributors have included Senior Writing Fellows Maria Fotopoulos, Inger Eberhart, D.A. King and Leon Kolankiewicz, as well as CAPS Board and staff members and guest commentaries by members and like-minded bloggers. Social Media CAPS continued to use social media as a tool to reach out to our activists and supporters by linking our blog, website articles and Action Alerts to our Facebook and Twitter pages, while providing one-click access to those and other social media sites such as Digg, FriendFeed, LinkedIn and StumbleUpon. Our online presence was greater than ever in 2012 with the help of other blogs, YouTube and other social media sites. During the year CAPS received more than 41,000 views of various uploaded videos on YouTube, and was discussed, quoted in interviews or mentioned in more than 200 blog posts. This resulted in even more notice of our positions and issues on Twitter and Facebook. We currently have 1,700 individual “likes” on Facebook, and 220 followers on Twitter. CAPS Senior Writing Fellows Program Our fellows (Joe Guzzardi, Michael W. Cutler, Maria Fotopoulos, Leon Kolankiewicz, Ric Oberlink, Inger Eberhart and Rob Sanchez) were published in various media forums. With the particular assistance of Joe Guzzardi and Michael W. Cutler, TV, radio, print and Internet exposure continued increasing, with coverage in more than 200 blogs. We also produced and distributed widely three new CAPS Issues pieces, Overpopulation and the Ocean, Overpopulation Overwhelms Salmon and Cassandra’s Heirs— Can We Improve on Her Fate? 4 CAPS Fact Radio The Alana Burk Show The Armstrong Williams Show Bordering on Insanity The Helen Glover Show KQED News Lou Dobbs Radio Show The Rick Johnson & Mike Agnello Show The Savage Nation with Michael Savage Second Opinion with Don Griffin Talk Back with Chuck Wilder The Wells Report with Don-David Wells York’s Morning News with Gary Sutton Television CBS47, Fresno, CA KERO23, Bakersfield KGET17, Bakersfield, CA MSNBC, National NBC-11, San Jose, CA Telemundo, Bakersfield Univision, Bakersfield & Los Angeles, CA Short on Water—Again A fter a recent federal report was released, U.S. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar warned that Arizona, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Nevada, Utah and Wyoming can expect less water from the Colorado River. These seven states rely heavily on the river for agriculture, the biggest water consumer in the West, as well as for residential use. Demand for Colorado River Basin water will greatly outstrip supply in the decades ahead, according to the study. In less than 50 years, there will be an estimated 3.2 million acre-feet shortfall from the Colorado River. This is about five times more than what’s used in Los Angeles now. The Secretary called for more planning, which might include greater conservation and desalination, he said, to try to address the future shortfall. Climate change will contribute to the crisis, because of higher evaporation rates and decreased snowpack, both of which will contribute to drought. Population growth will put even more pressure on water supplies. In fact, increasing population was viewed as the prime driver of water demand by the study’s authors. Interestingly, according to the L.A. Times, which reported on the story, some environmental groups, apparently operating in denial, said the report overestimated population growth and, thus, they believed the estimates for future water demand were inflated. California’s population alone, currently at almost 39 million, is expected to grow to 50 million by 2049 and to 52.7 million by 2060, according to California’s Department of Finance. That’s nearly a 40 percent increase from the state’s population now. The estimated 15.4 million increase between 2010 and 2060 is greater than the current population of either Illinois or Pennsylvania. Put another way, currently a state with 15.4 million people would make it the fifth largest in the United States. Conservation and technology may offer some mitigation, but any real planning for the coming water crisis has to include discussion on how to achieve sustainable populations in the Western states and throughout the country. Otherwise, any gains achieved through smarter water approaches in farming and by more waterconscious consumers will be lost to the demands of more and more people. There are more unemployed people in California than any other state, by more than double. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics CAPS Welcomes New Board and Advisory Board Members Ensure Your Legacy By Katie Patrykus CAPS Director of Development Providing for CAPS through your estate allows you to create your own personal legacy that reflects your dreams for the future of California and our nation. Here are two easy and smart ways to help support CAPS: Charles K. (Kim) Fletcher, Jr. has been elected to the CAPS Board of Directors. He was born in Hollywood and moved to San Diego with his family during the middle of the Depression. Charles Westhoff, Ph.D., emeritus professor of Demographic Studies and Sociology at Princeton University, has joined the CAPS Advisory Board of Directors. The CAPS Advisory Board of Directors also welcomes Keith Mautino, who currently is a trustee of the Santa Barbara Courthouse Legacy Foundation and of the Pacific Asia Museum in Pasadena. Kim graduated from Stanford University and served in the U.S. Army in World War II. He joined Home Federal as a management trainee in 1950 and was chairman of the board when he retired in 1992. He also served as director of the Federal Home Loan Bank of San Francisco. Kim is currently president of Investors Leasing Corporation, a real estate investment company. A former director of the Office of Population Research, Charles has studied fertility and family planning in the United States and developing countries, as well as population policy. He served as director of the Office of Population Studies at Princeton and has written several books, including Family Growth in Metropolitan America and The Later Years of Childbearing. Keith attended Occidental College, Westmont College and UCSB graduate school in Asian Studies. He has been a trustee of the Santa Barbara County Horticultural Society and a trustee and Secretary of the Santa Barbara Historical Museum. Active in many nonprofit organizations, Kim is a member of the San Dieguito Boys & Girls Clubs and a lifetime member of The Salvation Army Advisory Board. A founding director of the San Diego Economic Development Corporation, Kim also was a trustee of the University of San Diego and served a two-year term as president of the United Way of San Diego. Charles is a fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences and a member of the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences. He was executive director of the Commission on Population Growth and the American Future in Washington, D.C. and was on the Committee on Population of the National Academy of Sciences. Formerly a Santa Barbara County Historic Landmarks Commissioner, Keith also serves on various committees for The Lotus Society, Ganna Walska Lotusland, Community Arts Music Association Legacy Society and the Westmont Museum Arts Council. In his professional career, Keith has been a fine art dealer and Asian art specialist for more than 25 years. Additionally, Charles has been a consultant to the World Fertility Survey, UNESCO, the UN Population Division Demographic and Health Surveys, and the African Development Bank. He earned a Ph.D. at the University of Pennsylvania. Calling All Californians—Former and Current E very day we hear from Californians like you who are proud of, and cherish the beauty of, our “Golden State.” In the same breath, we also hear your deep sense of loss and a shared conviction that we must stop the relentless population growth degrading our quality of life. CAPS listened. In response, we’ve launched a “then and now” project, “The California We Are Losing: Views of Our Golden State’s Transition from Pristine to Imperiled.” Now, we need your help. The goal of this project is to increase awareness about relentless population growth’s long-term effects on special places near and dear to our hearts. We hope that a visual juxtaposition of yesterday’s and today’s changed landscapes will help inspire public action to help save our Golden State from further irreversible environmental degradation. Previous “then and now” projects have rarely touched on the driving issue—population. CAPS will be among the first to focus on the more honest, and actionable, prism of population growth. Your memories and personal/family archives are needed to illustrate the changes in our state’s special places through the 20th century to today. Please send CAPS your photos and/or memories of special places you love, with evidence of how they have changed. 1. Charitable Gift Annuity Tired of low CD rates? Consider a charitable gift annuity that provides fixed payments for life at higher rates than a bank can offer. In addition to guaranteed payments, you receive an income tax deduction. After all your payments are made, the remaining funds will benefit CAPS. 2.A gift that costs nothing during your lifetime! Gifts to CAPS in your will may include cash, securities, real estate, mineral rights, royalties or art collections. For example, you may give your house to CAPS and continue to reside in it for your lifetime, while you receive a current income tax deduction. Please contact me at 805-564-6626 or development@CAPSweb.org for more information. Thank you for your commitment to future generations by considering CAPS in your estate planning. Claremont, Then and Now Please forward your submissions to CAPS in one of the following ways: 1940 1. Email info@capsweb.org (please attach photos in jpg format). 2. Mail to: CAPS 1129 State Street, Suite 3D Santa Barbara, CA 93101 (please include your name and address on the back of any photos so that we may return them to you). Your materials may be featured on the new CAPS website launching soon, in a documentary on YouTube and/or through CAPS’ social media outlets. Funding permitting, we may develop a television campaign to elicit more interest, action and support. Thank you for joining us help a place we so dearly love. 2012 Dreaming About Lost Orange Groves On the way to Claremont, there is an abandoned orange grove, weeds almost as tall as the trees are, growing between the ranks of the trees. For five years now I have looked at them—tried not to look at them—as I drive past. One day they will be cleared, and a shopping mall or condominiums will take their place. Meanwhile, they stand, in hopeless rows, gray and dead. - M.S. 1986 For the first time since the dinosaurs disappeared, humans are driving animals and plants to extinction faster than new species can evolve. International Union for the Conservation of Nature CAPS Fact 5 Printed on Recycled Paper Using Environmentally Safe Inks Is your name or address wrong? Please let us know. Address Service Requested CAPS • 1129 State Street, Suite 3-D Santa Barbara, CA 93101 Phone: 805-564-6626 Fax: 805-564-6636 www.CAPSweb.org NONPROFIT ORG US POSTAGE PAID LOS ANGELES, CA PERMIT NO. 3344 Californians For Population Stabilization Tackling the Taboo Leading environmental activists, scholars take on population in new book CAPS Survey Results By Leon Kolankiewicz, CAPS Senior Writing Fellow W hen it comes to human overpopulation and the war it is waging on nature, the American environmental establishment has been AWOL for several decades. Now comes a refreshing new anthology published by the University of Georgia Press that seeks to remind environmentalists of all that is at stake and make them reconsider their dereliction of duty. In Life on the Brink: Environmentalists Confront Overpopulation, coeditors Phil Cafaro and Eileen Crist marshaled a veritable who’s who of environmental and conservation leaders, scholars and activists in a collection of essays that tackles this touchy topic head on. Cafaro is a professor of philosophy at Colorado State University, president of the board of Progressives for Immigration Reform and the author of two prior books on environmental ethics. Crist is an associate professor in the Department of Science and Technology in Society at Virginia Tech and author of Earth Ethics in an Age of Crisis. In addition to Cafaro and Crist, more than two dozen of today’s best thinkers on environmental and population issues contributed to Life on the Brink. Among them are Albert Bartlett, professor emeritus of physics, University of Colorado; Joseph Bish, Population Institute; Anne and Paul Ehrlich, authors of the groundbreaking The Population Explosion and many other books; and Dave Foreman, cofounder of Earth First! Former three-term Colorado governor, Richard Lamm, also contributed to the book, along with bioregionalist and fellow at the Post Carbon Institute, Stephanie Mills; William Ryerson, president of the Population Media Center; Captain Paul Watson, cofounder of Greenpeace and founder of the Sea Shepherd Conservation Society; and Don Weeden, executive director of the 6 CAPS Fact Weeden Foundation and a 25-year veteran of work in the international population field. As CAPS members know all too well, population isn’t ignored because it’s boring or passé, but because it touches on a plethora of compelling, but emotionally fraught and politically divisive issues, including sex, contraception, abortion, immigration, ethnicity, race, religion, culture, language and limits to growth. While the environmental establishment opted to avoid population and being called nasty names, it cannot avoid overpopulation’s many environmental impacts. As the most populous state in America, as a place blessed with phenomenal natural beauty and rich biodiversity, and as one of the cradles of the conservation movement in America (the Sierra Club was founded here in 1892), it is not surprising that California has generated more than its fair share of population activism. And indeed, no less than seven of the 26 contributors to Life on the Brink are or were based in California and/or are associated with CAPS. In their foreword to the book, Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich of Stanford University contend that, “If projected rates of population and economic growth are fulfilled in the next several decades, safeguarding Earth’s precious store of living natural capital, and thereby permitting the support of further billions, will be virtually impossible.” In his essay “Confronting Finitude,” Richard D. Lamm, a member of CAPS’ advisory board, writes: “The hardest challenge in public policy is to change a policy that has been successful.” Lamm cites immigration as just such a policy. Why change it then, he asks. Because the world has changed, he answers. “Americans now live in a cash-wage industrial society with no more virgin land,” Lamm writes. And this new reality compels us to “no longer blindly assume that all immigrants benefit America.” Lamm goes on to urge Americans to urgently reconsider their public policies, which falsely assume infinite resources in a finite world. In “Overpopulation versus Biodiversity: How a Plethora of People Produces a Paucity of Wildlife,” I examine the increase in human popula- tion and the corresponding decrease in wildlife in North America, concluding that “Our species is unique, because here and now only we have the ability to destroy, or to save, biodiversity. Limiting human population will not guarantee success, but not doing so means certain failure.” Life on the Brink is recommended for all who truly want to save an America and an Earth worth living on. As coeditor Phil Cafaro cogently writes, the contributors to this anthology: …are committed to the idea that the human race can be more than an evergaping mouth swallowing the world. We want to work toward a future in which humanity limits its appropriation of the biosphere, and wild nature continues to flourish. In this way, I believe, we stand up for what is best in humanity. Life on the Brink: Environmentalists Confront Overpopulation can be ordered at Amazon.com or the University of Georgia Press. Leon Kolankiewicz is a CAPS advisory board member and CAPS senior writing fellow. A professional wildlife biologist and environmental planner, Kolankiewicz is the author of Where Salmon Come to Die: An Autumn on Alaska’s Raincoast and also contributed to Life on the Brink. The response to a recent CAPS survey was overwhelming. Thanks to those of you who took the time to tell us a little more about yourself. Here are a few selected stats from the survey: • More than 1,200 of you responded • Your top concern (nearly 93% of you) is that population growth driven by illegal immigration is too high, particularly when so many Americans are out of work • Nearly half of you (48%) felt California’s size should be 20-30 million people (currently estimated at 38 million), while 57% of you felt the United State’s size should be 200 million (estimate currently 315 million) Many of you also offered your further help to advocate for a stabile population. Thank you! There are many ways to help—from referring your friends to CAPS’ FREE Action Alert Team to serving as a media watchdog. Visit CAPSweb.org, click on the “Take Action” tab and choose “Activist Tool Kit” or contact CAPS at membership@CAPSweb.org or 805-564-6626. Legislative Action One Click Away! Did you know we have a federal level component to our online Action Alert advocacy system? Anyone across the country can e-mail or fax their elected federal officials for free, see key bills and votes in Congress, and contact members of the media directly. Simply click on the CAPS Take Action Now! box on our home page, www.CAPSweb.org. Our website also features legislative and congressional directories, targeted messages, access to representatives, status of legislation and media messages. If you are not an Action Alert member and would like to join, visit our website, call CAPS at 805-564-6626, or e-mail us at membership@CAPSweb.org. If you need a specific Action Alert for your local county or state officials, please contact us and we will set it up. Crowding is a chronic source of stress, constitutes a major threat to psychological well-being and contributes to considerably increased aggressive behavior. Crowding Stress by Peter Csermely