The Balanced Scorecard and the Strategic Plan
Transcription
The Balanced Scorecard and the Strategic Plan
3/27/14 The Balanced Scorecard and the Strategic Plan Building a Process for Alignment and Accountability The Higher Learning Commission Chicago April 2014 Introductions Tim Veenstra Director of Institutional Research & Analysis Cleary University Norma Simons Adjunct Faculty Cleary University President, Performance Innovation LLC Outline v Background Information v Feedback from AQIP v The Journey - Alignment Process v The Balanced Scorecard v The Strategy Map v The Deployment Matrix (Hoshin Kanri) v The Deployment Process v Measures v Summary 1 3/27/14 Focus - Alignment v Vision – Where are we going? v Strategy – How are we going to get there? v Balanced Scorecard – What measures should we focus on to ensure that we are moving in the right direction v Deployment – What methods should we use to ensure that there is consistency throughout the institution. v Key Processes – How we work Focus - Alignment STRATEGY DEPLOYMENT VISION BALANCED KEY PROCESSES SCORECARD Feedback Report “Cleary’s approach to strategic planning, reliance on data driven decisions and investment in training for Six Sigma certifications as noted in Category 5 are commendable. . . . What is less evident from the materials provided is how the Six Sigma methodology has been used to improve outcomes at Cleary. The University has an opportunity to develop and document formal processes used in setting and aligning its mission/vision/values to program objectives stakeholder needs, and learning outcomes” System Portfolio 2 3/27/14 The Team The Team Tim Veenstra Norma Simons Dawn Fiser Sheila Thompson Kathy Spring An Organization with Vision but Poor Alignment Gallop Poll of 1.7 million workers found that 67% could not answer “Strongly agree” with the statement “I know what is expected of me at work” “Great Performance is 1% vision and 99% Alignment” Jim Collins, author of Good to Great Importance of Alignment v Waste Reduction v Ease of Communication v Ability to Respond Quickly v Improve Efficiency v Promotes Collaboration across Functional Silos v Ensure that the Right Results are Achieved Remember that Alignment is not staJc Alignment is conJnuous 3 3/27/14 The Journey: Aligning the Balanced Scorecard with the Strategic Plan Review Current Strategic Plan Review Current BSC Start Summarize performance metrics and problem solve Review of metrics by process owners Collect data Interview stakeholders for input and feedback Establish BSC Template Conduct Training Select Process Owners Develop BSC metrics Develop Integration Matrix (Hoshin Kanri) Report results and action plans to cabinet The Balanced Scorecard The Balanced Scorecard focuses on the indicators that drive performance, as well as the financial measures. Cleary University Balanced Scorecard Mission -‐-‐To provide students the knowledge, skills, and credentials to advance their careers. Vision-‐-‐Cleary University will be America's foremost applied-‐business university, providing practical, project-‐based education that enriches student l ives and enables an i mmediate alumni contribution to employers, families, and communities. CUSTOMER SATISFACTION OPERATIONAL EXCELLENCE To understand customer expectations and how well the expectations are being met To understand the internal processes and their performance * Student Satisfaction (Course Evaluations) * Learning Outcomes (UG-‐-‐Includes Trad & Non-‐Trad, Grad, Core + Major + Project) * Retention Index (Persistence & Completion Rates) * Product Relevance (Currency) * New Student Enrollment (On-‐ground (Blended) and Online Enrollment) * Career Advancement * Enrollment by Major (New & Existing Enrollment by Major) LEARNING AND ORGANIZATIONAL DEVELOPMENT FINANCIAL HEALTH To understand how employees acquire skills and knowledge to advance the University To understand the fiscal viablity of the University * Employee Satisfaction * Financial Ratios (HLC & Compliance Ratios) * Employee Training & Development * Expense & Revenue Percentage (Monthly Departmental Expense Reports) 4 3/27/14 Strategy Map For the Balanced Scorecard Vision: America’s Foremost Applied –Business University Customer Sa<sfac<on Increase student sa<sfac<on on the Noel Levitz survey Improve comple<on and persistent rate Increase new student enrollment Improve new and exis<ng enrollment by major Opera<onal Excellence Achieve currency in product porJolio Improve student learning outcomes in all courses Improve job placement rate of graduates Learning and Organiza<onal Development Improve employee Sa<sfac<on Achieve a well-‐ trained employee base Financial Health Generate sufficient revenue to meet preferred status Monitor & maintain expenses & revenue in each department Deployment Matrix Legend Strong Correlation Medium Correlation Weak or No Correlation Metric Owners Processes Strategies Action Projects BSC Metrics Accountability 7 4 6 9 1 5 2 3 8 10 5 3/27/14 Deployment Matrix Legend Strong Correlation Medium Correlation Weak or No Correlation Improvement of Institutional Scorecard Reducing Students on Academic Probation Integration of Adjunct Faculty to University What i s Important to Students Institutional Benchmarking Action Projects Assistant Controller Dean, CBIAT AVP -‐ Academic Services Director, Admissions Dean, College of Management Dean, Graduate and Professional College Director, Career Services Personnel Coordinator Exec. Director, Communications & Marketing Curriculum Integration Coordinator Processes Strategies 1.0 -‐ Acquire Students 2.0 -‐ Teach Students 3.0 -‐ Support Students 4.0 -‐ V alue People 5.0 -‐ Manage Processes 6.0 -‐ Lead and Plan (S1) Expand Brand Recongition (S2) Improve Product and Services (S3) Increase Enrollment (S4) Improve Financial Condition Metric Owners BSC Metrics Accountability (CS) Student Satisfaction (CS) Retention Index (CS) New Student Enrollment (CS) Enrollment by Major (OE) Learning Outcomes (OE) Product Relevance (OE) Career Advancement (LOD) Employee Satisfaction (LOD) Employee Development (FH) Financial Ratios (FH) Revenue & Expense by Department Cleary University Process Inventory Using the Deployment Matrix at every level A3-X correlation correlation / contribution accountability ( s process strategies A matrix is developed at each level and main area, integraCng acCviCes of the area with the strategic plan team members tactics results Revenue $0 Development costs Material costs Legend $0 Conversion costs Value stream profit $0 = strong correlation or team leader $0 = member r = $0 correlation important correlation or core team w eak correlation or rotating team member correlation / contribution A3-X correlation correlation / contribution A3-X accountability correlation accountability ( s $0 Development costs Material costs results Legend $0 = r = $0 $0 correlation Revenue = strong correlation or team leader $0 Conversion costs Cabinet process results Revenue Value stream profit team members tactics strategies process strategies ( s correlation / contribution team members tactics important correlation or core team member w eak correlation or rotating team member correlation / contribution $0 Development costs Material costs $0 Conversion costs $0 Value stream profit Legend $0 = strong correlation or team leader $0 correlation = important correlation or core team member r = w eak correlation or rotating team member correlation / contribution TacCcal Teams A3-X A3-X correlation / contribution accountability process results Revenue Development costs Material costs Conversion costs Value stream profit correlation accountability team members tactics strategies ( s correlation / contribution ( s team members tactics strategies correlation process correlation results $0 Revenue Legend Development costs Material costs $0 = strong correlation or team leader $0 = r = $0 $0 correlation / contribution important correlation or core team member Conversion costs Value stream profit w eak correlation or rotating team member correlation $0 Legend $0 = strong correlation or team leader $0 = r = $0 $0 important correlation or core team member OperaConal Teams w eak correlation or rotating team member correlation / contribution 6 3/27/14 Determine the f actors i nfluencing timely registration Process Metrics AVP -‐ Academic Services Records Office Academic Advisors Counselor Financial Aid Office Business Office Information Technology Processes Re t e n t io n Process Owners Continuing Student Registration Orientation Completed Academic Goal Updated Academic Plan Transcript Audit Finanical Aid Packaging Input of Student Registrations (Add/Drop) Officially register students Degree Clearance Student Complaints Strategies Register students unofficially by deadline (S2) Register students officially by deadline (S2,S4) Improvement Projects Accountability Persistence Rate Completion Rate (Leading Indicator) Completion Rate Orientation Pass Rate Percent of students unofficially registered by deadline Percent of students officially registered by deadline Percent of Up-‐to-‐date Academic Plans Comparison of Academic Plan to Actual Percent of Advisor-‐Auditted Transcripts Timely Packaging of Financial Aid Timely Input of Student Registrations Accurate Input of Student Registrations Percentage of Class Changes Attrition Reason Report Risk Analysis Report Counseling Reason Report Department Call / Ticket Log ( TBD) 7 3/27/14 8 3/27/14 The Journey: Aligning the Balanced Scorecard with the Strategic Plan Review Current BSC Start Review of metrics by process owners Summarize performance metrics and problem solve Review Current Strategic Plan Collect data Interview stakeholders for input and feedback Conduct Training Establish BSC Template Select Process Owners Develop BSC metrics Develop Integration Matrix (Hoshin Kanri) Report results and action plans to cabinet Summary v Alignment is built on having a process for Strategic Management v The process is Hoshin Kanri (Policy Deployment) v Promotes total involvement v Employees are able to see their job in relation to the overall strategy and direction of the institution v Fosters a methodology of change v Demonstrates measures at every level v Shows the process of alignment and accountability v Provides a method of communication across the institution Questions Tim Veenstra Director, Institutional Research & Analysis Cleary University 517.586.3014 Norma Simons Adjunct Faculty President Performance Innovation LLC 248 417 0762 9