Manage hydrogen sulfide hazards with chemical
Transcription
Manage hydrogen sulfide hazards with chemical
® Originally appeared in: December 2014, pgs 73-76. Used with permission. Safety Developments G. KENRECK, GE Water & Process Technologies, The Woodlands, Texas Manage hydrogen sulfide hazards with chemical scavengers Hydrogen sulfide (H2S) and its associated hazards are well known in the oil and gas production and refining industries. Legislation has been in place for years, imposing strict regulations on H2S levels of hydrocarbon streams in pipelines, and in storage and shipping containers and in marine fuels. A variety of chemical scavengers are available to reduce both the concentration and corresponding hazards of H2S in produced water, produced gas, crude oil and refined products. There are several pros and cons for the most common chemistries used to scavenge H2S. The associated effectiveness and the potential downstream impacts of these scavengers will be explored here. Guidelines will be presented to facilitate the selection of the most appropriate scavenger chemistry and application method to reduce H2S efficiently and in a cost-effective manner. of which can potentially lead to leaks or spills of petroleum products and the subsequent exposure of personnel to H2S. Furthermore, the presence of water (H2O), salts or carbon dioxide (CO2 ) can increase the corrosivity of H2S. Toxic gas. H2S is a highly toxic, flammable and corrosive gas Fluid H2S equilibrium ratios Naphtha, gasoline 1,000, vapor/1, liquid Crude oil 100–200, vapor/1, liquid Gasoil (GO), #6 oil 5–10, vapor/1, liquid Oil/water 3.0–4.1 H2S, oil/ 1 H2S, water 1 that dissolves in hydrocarbon and water streams, and it is present in the vapor phase above these streams. It is found in natural gas. Also, it occurs naturally in oil and gas production and is produced during refining processes. Therefore, safety precautions must be observed during extraction, storage, transportation and processing of crude oil or natural gas. Partitioning of H2S to the oil, water and vapor phases is influenced by temperature, pH and pressure. Typical partitioning ratios are listed in TABLE 1. Hazards. In a gaseous state, H2S is extremely hazardous to health. It is heavier than air and will, therefore, collect in low places, such as the bottom of storage or shipping vessels. The human odor-detection limit ranges from 3 parts per billion (ppb) to 20 ppb—meaning that its presence may be detected long before it reaches a hazardous level. Once concentrations exceed 150 parts per million (ppm), H2S will cause olfactory fatigue, affecting the sense of smell such that the hazard is not recognized.2 Acute effects of exposure to H2S include headaches, nausea, convulsions, coma and death. The health effects at various exposure levels are shown in TABLE 2. The flammability limits for H2S range from a lower explosive limit (LEL) of 4% to an upper explosive limit (UEL) of 44%. Again, as it is heavier than air, H2S can collect in low places, where any ignition source poses a significant danger of fire and explosion. Finally, H2S is a corrosive acid that can cause embrittlement or sulfide stress cracking (FIG. 1) or pitting (FIG. 2), all MANAGEMENT MORE REGULATED Because exposure to H2S can have such dire health consequences, including death, regulations have been promulgated to manage H2S and minimize personnel exposure. Where exposure to H2S is possible, personnel are required to wear portable detection devices and appropriate personal protection equipment (PPE), taking precautions if an “action-level” conTABLE 1. H2S equilibrium ratios TABLE 2. Health effects at various H2S concentration levels2 H2S concentration < 20 ppb 5 ppm 5–10 ppm 10 ppm–30 ppm > 30 ppm 100 ppm 150 ppm–200 ppm 100 ppm–1,000 ppm > 1,000 ppm 5,000 ppm HYDROCARBON PROCESSING DECEMBER 2014 Health effects Olfactory threshold (begin to smell) Increase in anxiety symptoms (single exposure) Relatively minor metabolic changes in exercising individuals during short-term exposures. Long-term exposure could result in headaches, insomnia, nausea, eye or throat irritation, or shortness of breath Moderate irritation of the eyes Short-term exposure can result in olfactory fatigue (sense of smell is significantly impaired) Immediately dangerous to life and health concentration Olfactory nerve paralysis, eye irritation, potential damage to cornea Serious respiratory, central nervous and cardiovascular system effects Loss of consciousness and possible death Immediate death Safety Developments centration is detected.3 In addition, specifications are being established to reduce levels of H2S in petroleum products and to subsequently reduce the hazard of handling and transporting these products around the world. TABLE 3 lists some of these regulations and specifications. It is important to note that regulations, such as CFR 1910.1000, are enforceable by law. Other specifications, however, such as ISO 8217, are not regulated by law but are commercial requirements. PROS AND CONS Several classes of chemicals effectively lessen the hazards associated with H2S. Selection of an appropriate chemical H2S scavenger, combined with its proper application, can help meet product specifications and comply with the regulations now encountered in the oil industry. As each application may be unique, characteristics to be considered when selecting an H2S scavenger should include treatment economics, ease of handling and use, efficiency of reaction, selectivity for H2S and irreversibility. Selecting the wrong scavenger can result in negative downstream impacts. For example, if a metal salt is used in a fuel oil, it may result in the ash content limit being exceeded and require the fin- ished fuel to be discounted in price or reprocessed. Detailed descriptions of several types of H2S scavengers are provided here: Triazine has been the benchmark H2S scavenger for decades, especially in the oil field. Triazine is a reaction product of an amine (nitrogen-based) and formaldehyde. Although formaldehyde is a listed carcinogen, in this form, the formaldehyde reactivity is retained without the adverse health impact. Amines, such as methyl amine (MA) or monoethanolamine (MEA), are used to produce water-based triazines; whereas higher-molecular-weight amines, such as methoxypropylamine (MOPA), are used to produce a water-free (oil-soluble) version. Triazine reactions are well documented. The primary reaction product is dithiazine. One mole of triazine, regardless of the amine used to produce the triazine, will generally react with two moles of H2S and liberate two moles of amine. The weight of amine released will vary depending on the amine, but the moles of nitrogen released are identical. This is important to know since the nitrogen contribution on a weight basis to the treated fluid will be the same regardless of the amine used to create the triazine. In some cases, when a crude oil has been treated with triazine, the amines released in the reaction can stabilize emulsions and deteriorate desalter performance. They can also contribute to chloride salt formation and deposition in distillation towers, with subsequent increases in corrosion and fouling potential. The nitrogen released can ultimately end up at the wastewater treatment plant (WWTP) and negatively impact the equalization basin performance and microorganism health. Triazines generally are more effective at higher pH ranges because, as illustrated in FIG. 3,4 triazine half-life is exponentially reduced as pH decreases. Because triazines release amines that increase the pH of a system, it has been shown that the use of triazine in oil production can negatively impact the performance of scale inhibitors by decreasing the solubility of calcium carbonate TABLE 3. Regulatory history for H2S 29 CFR 1910.1000 (7/1/98) 29 CFR 1915.1000 Maritime sub regulation FIG. 1. Example of sulfide stress cracking. NIOSH; Occupational Exposure to Hydrogen Sulfide (1977) DHEW (NIOSH) Publication 77-158 US Department of Transportation, 2000 Emergency Response Guidebook, RSPA P 5800, 8th Ed. MARPOL Annex VI ISO 8217 H2S in marine fuels Triazine half-life as a function of pH 1,000 Triazine half-life, sec 100 10 1 0.1 0.01 0.001 0.0001 0 FIG. 2. Localized corrosion, typical of sulfide pitting. 2 FIG. 3. Effect of pH on triazine.4 HYDROCARBON PROCESSING DECEMBER 2014 4 pH 6 8 10 Safety Developments (CaCO3 ) in produced water.5 This, in turn, can lead to an increase in the scale inhibitor needed to achieve the desired inhibition. Finally, findings presented by the Esbjerg Institute of Technology at Aalborg University6 have shown that various side reactions can occur when H2S is the excess reactant in scavenging applications. Dithiazine can undergo further reaction to form an amorphous dithiazine (FIG. 4) and can contribute to deposition and equipment fouling. These reactions can be avoided when using the correct treatment level of triazine in the application. Due to its long-standing industry acceptance, combined with its perceived economic benefit, triazine will most likely continue to play a significant role as an H2S scavenger for years to come. However, as crudes become more sour and the H2S content increases, triazine treatment levels will escalate as well. When this happens, the potential negative downstream impact associated with triazine may encourage the use of other types of chemistries. Metal salts of organic acids (iron, zinc and magnesium) typically react with H2S to form nonvolatile byproducts. In general, metal salts are water-free. Water-free scavengers may be desirable in applications where temperatures exceed 350°F. Although reaction kinetics may be slower, compared to other types of scavengers, these metal salts may blend more easily into hydrocarbon streams. However, metals and their byproducts can contribute to fouling in exchangers or reactors, as well as increase the ash content in finished fuels. Therefore, this class of scavenger is generally used for reducing H2S levels in bitumen, but would not be appropriate for use in refinery feedstocks and fuels. Formaldehyde and acrolein are very reactive with H2S, however, they are typically not recommended as scavengers because of the health hazards associated with their use and handling. Formaldehyde is a listed carcinogen, and acrolein is a highly toxic gas. Reaction products may decompose in the refinery furnaces to form methyl sulfides or carbon disulfide (CS2 ), which may have deleterious downstream impacts, such as catalyst poisoning during processing of treated petroleum products. Mixing oxidizers and organics is generally restricted by best practices; therefore, the use of oxidizers, such as hydrogen peroxide or nitrites/nitrates, to scavenge H2S is not appropriate for petroleum streams but they can be used in water systems. However, they are not considered to be economically effective, and the handling of hydrogen peroxide presents additional risk of fire or explosion. Amines are relatively safe to handle, less expensive and fairly effective chemicals for scavenging H2S. In fact, gas desulfurization units use various amines to remove H2S from the gas. Unfortunately, the reaction with H2S is reversible as temperatures increase or pH decreases. Amines also react with CO2 and certain acids. In many cases, these aspects limit the application of amines. The low solubility of amines in fuels and their reaction byproducts also tend to limit their use. Oil-based aldehyde derivatives can be used for scavenging H2S in gas or high-temperature applications. This class of chemicals may not truly be oil-soluble but are water-free and are delivered in a polar organic solvent to prevent the introduction of water. The overall treatment cost of these products is generally higher than water-based alternatives. Non-amine chemistry is the final class of scavengers addressed here, and this class includes aliphatic aldehydes that react effectively with H2S. The treatment cost is similar to that of triazines. These scavengers are relatively safe to handle and do not produce amines from their reaction with H2S. This avoids the problems associated with the use of triazines—specifically, nitrogen impact at the WWTP and corrosive amine chloride formation in refining process equipment. This chemistry also minimizes the formation of CS2 and similar sulfur compounds that have been found to migrate to naphtha cuts and poison process catalysts. Non-amine H2S scavengers are especially beneficial in treating crude oils and refinery feedstocks. They have also been used in light distillate fuels to scavenge H2S when nitrogen contamination is a concern. SCAVENGER SELECTION The proper selection of the chemistry and application methodology is determined by the fluid to be treated, the system where the scavenger will be injected into the fluid, and the end use of the fluid to be treated. There are several applications and treatment options worthy of exploration. Crude oil may be treated as it is produced to prevent personnel exposure to H2S. Treatment at the wellhead, or as oil is transferred to tankage, or as containers are being loaded or unloaded, is essential to reducing the risk of exposure to H2S. However, the production of more sour crudes and highersulfur crudes results in increased scavenger levels in the crude oil. This may amplify the negative downstream impacts. The oil producer may understand the value of treatment, but may not fully grasp the magnitude of the downstream impacts that those chemicals can have in the refining process and even in finished fuel quality. Triazines have been successfully used to reduce H2S in crude oil, but, they can also contribute to multiple downstream issues. The use of non-amine scavengers can help avoid many of these problems. Gas produced at the wellhead may be high in H2S. However, treatment at the point of production can be costly, and can also cause fouling, corrosion or scale deposition in gas processing and transmission systems. Typically, natural gas is deOH + SH HO N S O N S S SH S H2O SH HS O N + S SH O S S S SH OH HS HN S S OH O N S S S S S S S S HN S FIG. 4. Formation of amorphous dithiazine.6 HYDROCARBON PROCESSING DECEMBER 2014 S Safety Developments TABLE 4. Applications and typical treat rates for various H2S scavenger chemistries Chemical family Applications Water-based triazine Crude, GO, LPG, finished fuel, gas streams Water-free triazine Hot streams: bitumen, GO, fuel oil 1.6 Metal salts Bitumen 2.5 Amine GO, LPG, gas streams 0.33 Water-free aldehyde derivatives Hot streams: bitumen, GO, fuel oil 1.15 Non-amines: Water-based aliphatic aldehydes Crude, naphtha, GO, finished fuel, water 0.9 a Relative treat rate, l/kg H2Sa 1 The values shown in Table 4 are normalized such that water-based triazine, considered a benchmark for H2S scavenging in the oil industry, is 1. sulfurized in amine absorbers. Where this is not possible, scavengers may be needed. In this case, attention should be given to the potential downstream impacts. Triazines have been used in gas systems, but, when they are injected into an H2S-rich environment, they may form amorphous dithiazine or trithiane. This, in turn, can cause fouling or deposition in control valves or compressors. Oil-based scavengers have been used in these applications; however, proper liquid removal equipment is required downstream of the application to prevent the reaction products from carrying down the pipeline. Triazines and amines have been successfully used in liquefied light petroleum fractions where water-based reaction products are easily removed and the H2S is effectively reduced. GO and heavy cuts of petroleum products, such as fuel oils, are processed at elevated temperatures. Application of scavengers above 350°F may require water-free chemistry. Amines can be used, provided the fluid will not be further processed or refined, due to the deleterious effects previously described. Water-based triazines have been successfully used in high-temperature applications when the injection point is located in a rundown line and the temperature is below 350°F. Since these hot streams are usually below the saturation limit for water, the water from the scavenger can solubilize, thus minimizing the potential for steam formation and the associated pressure and flashing or foaming in the storage tanks. Distribution of the scavenger into viscous fluids is also a challenge; therefore, a properly installed injection system that distributes the additive into the fluid to be treated is essential for effective performance. Gasoline and naphtha occasionally require treatment to reduce H2S levels. In some cases, the petroleum fluid is well below the saturation limit for water. In these cases, special attention must be taken to ensure efficient reaction and prevent dehydration of the scavenger. Amines, triazines and non-amines have been used to effectively scavenge H2S in these streams. The different H2S scavenger chemistries are summarized in TABLE 4, along with application areas and typical treat rates. APPLICATION METHODOLOGY The application methodology for H2S scavengers is very important for effective performance, and each application is unique. Therefore, site-specific application methodologies and dose requirements should be established by an application expert. Proper treatment levels for H2S scavengers depend on many factors such as system size, unit operating conditions and system design. In most cases, for consistent effectiveness, H2S scavengers should be fed continuously by a chemical propor- tioning pump. Injection location and feedrates vary depending on system design and stream composition. For best performance, H2S scavenger programs should be conscientiously evaluated by routinely recording critical unit parameters including feed composition, temperature and program targets. Use this information to make adjustments to the chemical feed rate and the measured H2S concentrations in the treated fluid. The application methodology is critical for both effective performance and optimum economics. For example, either under-treatment or overtreatment with triazines can have serious consequences. Either case could occur if the application system for the scavenger is not properly designed to optimize the amount of scavenger that is to be used. Under-treatment could leave H2S residuals and not fully mitigate the risks associated with H2S. Overtreatment can stabilize emulsions, negatively impacting desalter performance. If additional amine content is added, this increases the potential for chloride salt formations in process equipment. It also boosts nitrogen loading to the wastewater plant. MAKE THE FINAL DECISION Proper selection and application of H2S scavengers can effectively lower H2S levels in hydrocarbon fluids and reduce the risk of personnel exposure to the potentially lethal hazards of H2S. The properties, effectiveness and impacts of chemicals used to reduce H2S are important factors to consider when selecting an H2S scavenger. Selecting the proper injection system and location can improve the efficiency of the treatment of H2S and the performance of the application. An experienced application specialist who understands the aspects of scavengers and appropriate application methodology can design an efficient and effective program that can reduce the overall treatment cost and risks associated with H2S, while also meeting H2S specifications. LITERATURE CITED 1Eden, B., P. J. Laycock and M. Fielder, Oil Field Reservoir Souring, HSE Books, ISBN 0-7176-0637-6, 1993. 2Skrtic, L., “Hydrogen Sulfide, Oil and Gas, and People’s Health,” May 2006. 3Wanek, R., “Monitoring H2S to meet new exposure standards,” Drager Safety. 4Bakke, J. M., J. Buhaug and J. Riha, “Hydrolysis of 1,3,5-Tris(2-hydroxyethyl) Hexahydro-s-triazine and its Reaction with H2S,” Ind Eng Chem Res, 2001, 40, 6051-6054. 5Sumestry, M. and H. Tedjawidjaja, “Case study: Calcium carbonate-scale inhibitor performance degradation because of H2S scavenger injection in Semoga field,” Oil and Gas Facilities, February 2013. 6 Soegaard, E. G., “Investigation of Fouling Formation during H2S Scavenging with 1,3,5-tri-(2-hydroxyethyl)-hexahydro-s-triazine,” Maersk Oil and Dansk Shell, Esbjerg Institute of Technology at Aalborg University, 2012. Eprinted and posted with permission to GE Water & Process Technologies from Hydrocarbon Processing December © 2014 Gulf Publishing Company