lok sabha secretariat new delhi

Transcription

lok sabha secretariat new delhi
8 EXPRESS NEWS SERVICE
EXPRESS
NEW DELHI l FEBRUARY 5 l 2012
Our stand vindicated, BJP
should say sorry: Sibal
WHAT THE COURT SAID
On the decision
not to revise prices
THE COMPETENT authority is
always at liberty to decide in
its discretion not to revise the
prices or fee for any goods or
services. The same entry fee/
spectrum charges continued
even after 2007-08. Same is
the case with dilution of equity by a company. It is not
per se illegal nor was it prohibited at the relevant time.
However, such acts may acquire criminal colour/ overtones when done with criminal intent.
‘Incriminating acts’
THE SUBVERSION of the
process of issuance of letters
of intent, UAS licences and
allocation of spectrum included arbitrary fixation of
the cut-off date, filing and
procuring of applications for
UAS licences on behalf of ineligible companies, violation
of first-come first-served policy in the issuance of LOIs,
UAS licences and allocation
of spectrum and payment
and receipt of bribe. All these
incriminating acts were allegedly done by the minister/
officials of Department of
Telecommunications, Ministry of I&B, Government of
India and by private persons.
‘Taking decisions is
not criminal’
A DECISION taken by a public servant does not become
criminal for the simple reason that it has caused loss to
the public exchequer or resulted in pecuniary advantage to others. Merely attending meetings and taking
decisions therein is not a
criminal act. It must have the
taint of use of corrupt or illegal means or abuse of his official position by public servant for obtaining pecuniary
advantage by him for himself
or for any other person or obtaining of pecuniary advantage by him without any
public interest.
EXPRESS NEWS SERVICE
Verdict will end
‘unrest’ in govt
NEW DELHI I FEBRUARY 4
B
ATTERED by a spate
of unfavourable judgments in the last few
days, the trial court’s verdict
in Home Minister P Chidambaram’s case brought
much-needed cheer in the ruling establishment, which described it as a vindication of its
stand, and demanded apology from the BJP for running a
vilification campaign
against
Chidambaram.
“We always
knew that our
colleague (Chidambaram) was
absolutely not culpable for anything in
the allegations made by Subramanian Swamy. I know the
Subramanian Swamy talks to reporters after the court verdict,
in New Delhi on Saturday.
OINAM ANAND
evidence and sifted
through the evidence
and there is absolutely no responsibility that can be
foisted on my colleague,” Telecom Minister Kapil Sibal said after Justice O P Saini dismissed
Swamy’s petition seeking to
make Chidambaram a co-accused in the 2G spectrum allocation scam.
Attacking the BJP for repeatedly demanding Chidambaram’s resignation on
this issue, Sibal said the BJP
leaders must now tender a
public apology to him. “In
fact, they should go to his
PUNE: Union Agriculture
Minister Sharad Pawar on
Saturday said the dismissal of
the plea against Home Minister P Chidambaram will end
“unrest in the government”.
“There was a kind of unrest
among members of the UPA.
Chidambaram is a minister
with a clean image and there
was a concern when allegations were made against
him,” Pawar said. “The decision of court should be accepted,” he said.
ENS
house and apologise to him.”
In Kolkata, Finance Minister Pranab Mukherjee said, “It
is a relief (for the government) because someone was
unnecessarily being perse-
cuted. Even in the Supreme
Court judgment it is very
clearly mentioned that the advice of the Finance Ministry
was not heeded.”
The Congress, which is
running a poll campaign in UP
on the graft issue, said Saturday’s verdict had settled the issue and the opposition parties
must put a stop to their attempts to vilify Chidambaram
and the party. “Political parties
especially the BJP, owe an
apology to the nation for the
calumny, vilification and innuendo, which they have carried
out over the past one year,”
party spokesperson Maneesh
Tewari told reporters. “Now
that both courts have spoken,
the Supreme Court and the
trial court on substantively the
same issue, the matter should
be allowed to rest.”
WHAT THEY SAID
I am surprised
...very, very
strong case
(against
Chidambaram)....
I will go to another court.
This order deserves to be
reserved. I will certainly
appeal against it.
— SUBRAMANIAN SWAMY
Janata Party president
●●●
This verdict will not change
the corrupt image of the
government or
the intensity of
our campaign....
The issue of
Chidambaram’s
political accountability
remains alive.
— RAVI SHANKAR PRASAD
BJP spokesperson
●●●
This is a relief for the
government.
Someone was
unnecessarily
being
persecuted.
— PRANAB MUKHERJEE
Finance Minister
●●●
TIMELINE
SEPT 15, 2011: Swamy tells
court he will bring new facts
that Chidambaram and Raja
had a role in deciding 2G
spectrum prices and entry fee
SEPT 22, 2011: CBI defends
Chidambaram in SC, blames
Department of Telecom
OCT 10, 2011: SC reserves
order on Swamy's plea for a
probe into the alleged role of
Chidambaram in the 2G scam
JAN 7, 2012: Swamy places
on record certified copies of
the documents in support of
his private complaint against
Chidambaram
JAN 21, 2012: Special Court
reserves order for February 4
FEB 2, 2012: SC refuses to
ask CBI to probe role of Chidambaram in 2G case and
leaves it to the Special Court
to decide the matter
FEB 4, 2012: Special Court
dismisses Swamy's plea to
make Chidambaram a
co-accused
PTI
Will continue to target Chidambaram, says BJP
EXPRESS NEWS SERVICE
NEW DELHI I FEBRUARY 4
WITH Special CBI Judge O P
Saini having taken the wind
out of its campaign against
Home Minister P Chidambaram, a disheartened
BJP on Saturday harped on
his “political accountability”
in the 2G spectrum scam.
Party spokesperson Ravi
Shankar Prasad, who was extremely combative in attack-
ing the government just two
days ago following the
Supreme Court’s order cancelling 122 telecom licences,
said that the party would
continue to seek “accountability” of Chidambaram and
the government in the case.
“This verdict is not going
to change the corrupt image
of this government. Neither
are we going to bring down
the intensity of our campaign
against this corrupt govern-
ment. The issue of political
accountability of Chidambaram remains as alive
as ever,” he said.
“We will raise this matter
in Parliament and also with
the people outside,” he said.
Prasad said the order of
the trial court was not the final word on the issue in any
case. “This is the decision of a
lower court which would be
appealed. The High Court is
there, the Supreme Court is
there. This is not over,” he
said. “We cannot lose sight of
the fact that the Supreme
Court has cancelled 122 licences because it was a scam
and there was corruption.
The licences were allotted arbitrarily and through manipulation,” he said.
“We are very clear that
there is enough evidence
against Chidambaram in
public domain.... The BJP
shall continue to pursue the
matter before the people of
the country. The nation
seeks a reply,” he said.
Senior party leader
Jaswant Singh agreed that
Saturday’s order was disappointing for the party but
said this was not the end of
the story.
“But nobody in this government is still ready to answer on the loss of moral authority and credibility they
have suffered,” he said.
It is premature to
conclusively say who is
wrong and who is right.
— SUKHENDU SEKHAR ROY
Trinamool Congress
●●●
All irresponsible individuals
and political parties who
obstructed
Parliament...
should now
apologise to the
nation, then to
the Congress, then to
Chidambaram.
— ABHISHEK SINGHVI
Congress spokesperson
Congress’s first list
out, all ministers in
EXPRESS NEWS SERVICE
MUMBAI I FEBRUARY 4
Suresh Kalmadi arrives at Pune airport on Saturday. His supporters crowded the airport to
greet him, shouting ‘Sabse bada khiladi, Suresh Kalmadi’.
PAVAN KHENGRE
PARLIAMENT OF INDIA
LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT
NEW DELHI
PARLIAMENT OF INDIA
LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT
NEW DELHI
STANDING COMMITTEE ON FINANCE
INVITES SUGGESTIONS ON “THE COMPANIES BILL, 2011.”
The Companies Bill, 2011 has been referred to the Departmentally Related Standing
Committee on Finance of Parliament for detailed examination and Report.
2. Considering the fact that some new proposals have been included in the Bill, the
Committee under the Chairmanship of Shri Yashwant Sinha, M.P., has decided to
invite memoranda containing views/suggestions on these new proposals contained
in the Bill from various Individuals/Experts/Institutions/Organisations interested in the
subject matter of the Bill.
3. All those desirous of submitting their views/suggestions to the Committee on these
new proposals may send their written memoranda either in English or Hindi on the
Bill to Joint Secretary (AK), Lok Sabha Secretariat, Room No. 018, Ground Floor,
Parliament House Annexe, New Delhi-110 001. (Tel. No. 23034180, 23034049
and Fax No. 23018129) or can e-mail at comfinance@sansad.nic.in within fifteen
days of publication of this advertisement. The suggestions that were submitted earlier on the various provisions of the Companies Bill, 2009 are not required to be submitted again. The Bill has been uploaded for ready access at the website of Lok
Sabha viz. loksabha.nic.in.
4. The Memoranda submitted to the Committee would form part of the records of the
Committee and would be treated as `confidential’ and would enjoy privileges of the
Committee.
5. Those who wish to appear before the Committee, besides submitting Memoranda,
are requested to specifically indicate so. However, the Committee’s decision in this
regard shall be final
davp 31201/11/0037/1112
STANDING COMMITTEE ON FOOD, CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND PUBLIC
DISTRIBUTION - INVITE VIEWS/SUGGESTIONS ON THE NATIONAL
FOOD SECURITY BILL, 2011
The National Food Security Bill, 2011 as introduced in Lok Sabha on 22nd December, 2011
has been referred on 5th January, 2012 by the Hon’ble Speaker to the Parliamentary
Standing Committee on Food, Consumer Affairs and Public Distribution headed by Shri
Vilas Muttemwar, MP for examination and report to the Parliament. The text of the Bill as
introduced in Lok Sabha is available at the website http://www.parliamentofindia.nic.in.
2. The National Food Security Bill, 2011 has been introduced in Lok Sabha by the
Government in pursuance of its constitutional obligations and obligations under the international conventions. Article 47 of the Constitution also provides that the State shall regard
raising the level of nutrition and the standard of living of its people and the improvement of
public health as among its primary duties. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights and
International Covenant of Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, to which India is a signatory, also cast responsibilities on all State parties to recognize the right of everyone to adequate food. Eradicating extreme poverty and hunger is one of the goals under the
Millennium Development Goals of the United Nations as well. The Bill, therefore, proposes
to provide for food and nutritional security in human life cycle approach by ensuring access
to adequate quantity of quality food at affordable prices to people to live a life with dignity.
the proposed legislation thereby marks a paradigm shift in addressing the problem of food
security from the welfare approach to a right based approach.
3. Considering the importance of the Bill, it has been decided to invite the views/suggestions
on the Bill from public in general, Experts and Associations / Agencies interested in the subject matter in particular. All those interested may send their views/suggestions in the form of
Memoranda in English or Hindi to the JOINT SECRETARY, COMMITTEE ON FOOD, CONSUMER AFFAIRS AND PUBLIC DISTRIBUTION, LOK SABHA SECRETARIAT, ROOM
NO. “F-014”, ``G’’ BLOCK, PARLIAMENT LIBRARY BUILDING, NEW DELHI-110001, by
Fax No. 23017732/23010756, Tel Nos., 23034588 and 23035390, E-mail
comfood@sansad.nic.in within fifteen days of the publication of this Notice.
4. The memorandum which might be submitted to the Committee would form part of the
records of the Committee and would be treated as confidential and would not be circulated
by anyone, as such an act would constitute a breach of privilege of the Committee.
5. Those who are desirous of giving oral evidence before the Committee, besides sending
memoranda, are requested to intimate this to the Lok Sabha Secretariat for consideration of
the Committee.
davp 31201/11/0036/1112
CHIEF Minister Digambar Kamat and his Cabinet colleagues, including controversial
minister
Antasio
Monserrate, are among those
who figure in the first Congress list of candidates for the
Goa Assembly polls to be held
on March 3.
The Congress is contesting
33 of the 40 seats and its alliance partner NCP the rest.
Education Minister Monserrate, who was detained at
the Mumbai airport last year
for allegedly carrying foreign
currency beyond permissible
limits, will contest from St
Cruz instead of his earlier constituency of Taleigao.
Besides the nine Congress
ministers, Speaker Pratapsinh
Rane, state Congress chief
Subhash Shirodkar and Panaji
Mayor Yatin Parekh figure in
the first list.
Kamat, Home Minister
Ravi Naik, Health Minister
Vishwajit Rane, PWD Minister Churchill Alemao, Urban
Development
Minister
Joaquim Alemao and Forest
GOA
DEC DES
2012
BJP’S DAYANAND
Sopte and Rajesh
Patnekar, who had
recently joined the
party, have also
been given tickets
Minister Filipe Nery Rodriques will contest from their
earlier constituencies.
Two BJP MLAs Dayanand
Sopte and Rajesh Patnekar,
who had recently joined the
Congress, have also been
given tickets in their respective constituencies.
Youth Affairs Minister
Manohar Ajgaonkar will contest the election from Pernem
instead of his earlier constituency of Dhargolim while
Power and Environment Minister Aleixo Sequeira will contest from Nuvem, instead of
Loutolim segment.