Stylized Vs Tomographic Models: Experience At RPI
Transcription
Stylized Vs Tomographic Models: Experience At RPI
STYLIZED vs TOMOGRAPHIC: AN EXPERIENCE AT RPI X. George Xu Nuclear Engineering and Engineering Physics Program, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York, USA 1 Introduction Radiation protection dosimetry relies on fluence-todose-equivalent conversion coefficients that are affected by three major factors: 1) human anatomy and tissue properties; - stylized models that are based on surface equations - tomographic models that are based on medical image 2) Monte Carlo code; 3) Algorithms to derive dose quantities. 2 Stylized Models Developed for MIRD Had Been the de facto Standard for 30 Years 3 - Stomach - Small Intestine - Upper Large Intestine -Lower Large Intestine Stylized Pregnant Woman Models Existing models are crude, simplified shape, size and locations of organs (Stabin’s 1995) 6-month model 3-month model 9-month model 4 From Stylized To Tomographic The past decade saw the emergence of a new class of human models called tomographic (or voxel) models The Hypothesis was: The greater realism in anatomical models would improve the radiation dosimetry. Questions remain today: - Are dose estimates really improved? - How much improvement? - Is it worthy the effort? 5 Objective of This Presentation To compare the effective doses from the stylized and two tomographic models for exposures to photons, as well as selected electrons, neutrons and protons 6 The Visible Human Project® - National Library of Medicine Spitzer, V.M., and Whitlock, D.G. Atlas of the Visible Human Male. Jones and Bartlett Publishers, 1998. Color Photography Computed Tomography (0.33mm x 0.33mm x1mm) (1mm x 1mm x 1mm) Magnetic Resonance Imaging 7 (4mm x 4mm x 4mm) Challenges With Tomographic Models Segmentation is laborious - At least months or years are needed Computer Memory - VIP-Man (0.33mm x 0.33mm x 1mm) is 3.7 GB data set - The max. allowable RAM is < 2 GB Monte Carlo Codes - EGS4 and MCNP4b/MCNPX had to be enhanced for handling such huge voxel data Computer Timing - The smaller the voxel size, the longer to run (~several hours) 8 An adult male whole-body voxel model, called Visible Photographic Man (VIP-Man), has been constructed and adopted for Monte Carlo calculations Xu, X. G. et al (2000). VIP-Man: An image-based whole-body adult male model constructed from color photographs of the visible human project for multi-particle Monte Carlo calculations. Health Physics, 78(5):476-486. EGS4 Photon / Electron 0.286 mm x 0.286 mm x 0.946 mm (scaled voxel size) MCNP And MCNPX Photon/Electron/ Neutron/Protons 3.45 mm x 3.45 mm x 3.785 mm (scaled voxel size) Images shown here are plotted from input data in EGS4 and MCNP/X, respectively. 9 Stylized vs. Tomographic 10 Method: External Parallel Beams • Particle types – photons, electrons, neutrons and protons • Energy ranged from 20 keV to 10 GeV • Standard irradiation geometries (vacuum for electrons) AP PA RLAT LLAT 11 ROT ISO Results: Effective Dose for Photon Beams ED (Stylized) ED (Scaled VIP-Man) AP PA RLAT LLAT ROT ISO 2 1.8 1.6 1.4 1.2 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 10 100 1000 10000 Photon Energy (keV) • Data for stylized model were from ICRP 74/ICRU 57 • Above 1 MeV, EDs within 10% • Between 0.1 –1 MeV, EDs differ within 20% • Below 0.1 MeV, ED differ up to 80% • In agreement with Jones (1995, 1997), Zankl et al. (2002) and Kramer et 12 al (2004) Segmentation of Organs for the pregnant woman model (Shi and Xu 2004) 34 organs and tissues have been segmented 13 SAF RESULTS FOR PHOTON, SOURCE=UTERUS 14 The Hypothesis: The greater realism in anatomical models would improve the radiation dosimetry. Questions: - Are dose estimates really improved? - How much improvement? - Is it worthy the effort? 15 Problems with Voxels • Many internal organs difficult to segment in CT images • Small structures (e.g., skin,eyes) difficult to model • Geometric uncertainty and computational tradeoffs inherent to voxel use remain • Difficult to standardize • Very difficult to deform Moving organs Different voxel sizes show variation in shape 16 The Future ? Advanced Boundary Representation Vol: 317.54 ml Deformable Organ Models Using NURBS Segars et al (2001) Vol: 211.72 ml CAD Deformation of Lung 17 Conclusions • For external photon, the scaled VIP-Man model does not have practical impact on the radiation protection dosimetry • Any single tomographic model is not representative enough • Tomographic models only provide info on anatomical variations • Future models will have advanced surface representations 18 Acknowledgements Technical Supports • National Library of Medicine on VHP Images • Los Alamos National Laboratory on MC Codes Grants • NSF, CAREER/Biomedical Engineering (BES-9875532) 19992003 • EPRI, 2003-2005 • NIH, NLM/R03 (1 R03 LM007964-01) 2003-2005 19