April 18, 2003 - Virginia Law Weekly
Transcription
April 18, 2003 - Virginia Law Weekly
Virginia Law Weekly The Newspaper of the University of Virginia School of Law Since 1948 “Freedom of religion, freedom of the press; freedom of persons under the protection of the habeas corpus; and trial by juries impartially selected, — these principles form the bright constellation which has gone before us, and guided our steps through an age of revelation and reformation.” THOMAS JEFFERSON Around North Grounds Thumbs up to the new WhisperRidge Behavioral Modification Center on Arlington, formerly the Brown Schools of Virginia. The bright and shiny new logo makes ANG think happy thoughts, without the benefit of electrodes. Ever work on a yearbook, or a website? Sign up for the SBA Yearbook and Website Committees. This is your chance to make us all look good. Contact jht3k for more information. Thumbs up to Admissions for letting ANG into U.Va. Law. ANG is still not sure how it happened, but ANG will run with it. ANG would like to thank the maintenance staff for coming to the Law Weekly’s office to replace the ceiling tiles. Unfortunately, we now have another leak for you guys to fix. Seriously. You can still look sharp in a softball tournament shirt — Catherine Connor (cec3g) or Jon Woodruff (jsw3f) are selling short sleeves for $12 and long sleeves are $16. Vol. 55, No. 25 Friday, April 18, 2003 Faculty Members Emerging from Tenure Process by Michael Spitzer ’04 This spring, the Law School faculty have recommended two professors to join them as permanent members of the institution. Professors Caleb Nelson and Jennifer Mnookin have received the nod from their fellow academics to join the ranks of the tenured. Professor Julia Mahoney also is in the process and expects her candidacy to be voted on soon. According to Professor Elizabeth Scott, the Chair of the faculty’s Lateral and Tenure Appointments Committee, the tenure process begins when the Dean appoints a subcommittee for each candidate. Each subcommittee consists of professors knowledgeable in the candidate’s area of expertise, whether it be constitutional law or torts. The subcommittee then evaluates the candidate in three areas: teaching, scholarship, and service. The teaching component reflects student evaluations of the candidate over the years, interviews with current students, and classroom evaluations by subcommittee members themselves. The second component, scholarship, requires subcommittee members to seek out the opinions of colleagues at other law schools and to evaluate the candidate’s work. Finally, the third component, service, is based on how well the candidate participates in school governance, advises students, and demonstrates intellectual collegiality, among other fac- tors. While no one candidate probably will excel in all areas to the same degree, a serious deficiency in one area will probably be fatal to a candidacy. Typically a professor has to be on the faculty at the Law School for at least five years to be considered as a candidate for ten- Thumbs down to the University for ruining Dean Harmon’s beautiful back yard with construction, only weeks before Graduation. Thanks to Mary at the SFC for cutting ANG a little slack and letting ANG bring the lunch money a couple days later. ANG loves the Community of Trust. Thumbs up to Professor Earl Dudley for staying on course enough to end his Evidence class earlier than scheduled. This only shows that you cannot stop Professor Dudley. You can only hope to contain him. In this issue: Tom O’Grady Hurt Himself .......................... p. 5 The Joys of WWE Wrestling ............... p. 7 denied a recommendation by the faculty for tenure. Professor Caleb Nelson graduated from Yale Law School and was Articles Editor of the Yale Law Journal. After graduating from law school, Professor Nelson clerked for the Honorable Stephen Williams of photos courtesy law.virginia.edu Professors Mnookin, Nelson, and Mahoney ure. After making its assessment, the subcommittee then sends its report to the Appointments Committee. The Appointments Committee meets twice per candidate to debate the merits of the candidacies, and it makes changes and recommendations to the subcommittee report. The final report from the Appointments Committee then goes to the faculty for a vote. Once the faculty approve, the candidates for tenure go to the Provost of the University for final approval. According to Professor Scott, the Provost has rarely if ever the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit, and then went on to clerk for Justice Clarence Thomas on the U.S. Supreme Court. Nelson also worked as an editor for The Public Interest, a public policy journal, and as an associate at a law firm prior to joining the faculty at U.Va. in 1998. Professor Nelson focuses his scholarship and teaching on constitutional law, federal courts, and civil procedure. Professor Jennifer Mnookin is also a graduate of Yale Law School, where she was a Senior Editor for the Yale Law Journal. She also received a Ph.D. in History and Social Study of Science and Technology from MIT. She has focused her scholarship on scientific evidence, particularly handwriting identification, DNA, and fingerprint identification. When contacted by the Law Weekly, Professor Mnookin said that she was “truly honored by the confidence that my colleagues are showing in me through their decision to award me tenure. When I heard the news I was absolutely thrilled — and more than a little relieved.” Professor Mnookin also had high praise for her fellow academics and the students at U.Va. Law School. “I’ve got fabulous colleagues and fabulous students; it’s a great combination. In fact, with the blend of high intellectual standards and collegial support that we offer here at U.Va, I think this is probably the best place to be a junior faculty member in the entire country.” Preofessor Julia Mahoney is also a graduate of Yale Law School. She joined the faculty in 1999, and teaches courses in corporations and property. She has previously taught at the University of Southern California Law School and at the University of Chicago School of Law. Because Professor Mahoney began teaching a semester after Professors Nelson and Mnookin, each step of her candidacy for tenure is occurring behind the others. Becaues it reflects a factual correction, his story differs from the print version. Justice Kennedy Chats with Students Thumbs up to the new organizers of the Fifth Annual Conference on Public Service and the Law, Co-Chairs Carrie Apfel and Trent Packer, Panel Director Tenaya Scheinman, Conference Manager Katie Bagley, and Fundraising Director Jake Olcott. Thumbs up to NGSL for donating $8,000 from the Softball Tournament to Children, Youth and Family Services, Inc., a private non-profit agency serving Charlottesville and surrounding counties. Subscriptions Available photo by Sam Young Chief Justice Rehnquist Lectures amid Protest by Gretchen Agee ’04 On Friday evening, Chief Justice of the United States William H. Rehnquist delivered the Fifth Annual Abraham Lecture in Caplin Auditorium. Professor Barbara A. Perry from Sweet Briar College welcomed the guests and acknowledged the patron of the lecture series, Henry J. Abraham, Professor of Government Emeritus at the University of Virginia. Professor Robert O’Neil, Founding Director of the Thomas Jefferson Center for the Protection of Free Expression, introduced the Chief Justice. O’Neil noted that the Chief Justice has visited the Law School on numerous occasions, and that this must “attest to his comfort at being among us and to his generosity.” For the lecture, Rehnquist spoke about the extra-judicial activities of the Court, a subject on which he is currently writing a book. Rehnquist showed himself a student and devotee of history as he discussed various events from the Court’s past, beginning with the commission of the first Chief Justice, John Jay, as special envoy to Great Britain and concluding with the Warren Commission, which investigated the assassination of President John F. Kennedy. The focal point of Rehnquist’s remarks was the participation of several justices on a commission that decided the election of 1876. These justices were later criticized for being included in such a political event, but Rehnquist thought they should “be commended rather than criticized for their participation,” because it “saved the nation from armed conflict.” He further noted that their participation “may have tarnished the reputation of the Court,” but that their involvement was necessary. Some observers wondered whether Rehnquist’s focus on this commission stemmed from criticism generated after the Supreme Court’s decision in Bush v. Gore and his clear support of the prior justices’ action as implicit justification for the Court’s ruling in that case. Earlier in the evening, about 22 people marched outside the entrance to Caplin Auditorium see REHNQUIST page 2 Printed on recycled paper the Court. Kennedy traced the daily by Gretchen Agee ’04 Last Thursday, the Law School activities of the justices, from readawarded Justice Anthony ing briefs, to hearing oral argument, Kennedy the Thomas Jefferson to writing opinions. He noted that Foundation Medal in Law. Since the Court only takes cases “when the University of Virginia does we think our guidance would be not give honorary degrees, a helpful,” and usually waits until Jefferson Medal is the institution’s the circuits have split and academics have considered how various lehighest honor. gal rules would J u s t i c e play out in the Kennedy has legal system. been an AssociAfter oral arguate Justice on ment, Kennedy the Supreme said, there is alCourt for the ways “a mopast 15 years, ment of awe as having previwe see the sysously served on tem working.” the Court of ApIn writing opinpeals for the ions, he noted Ninth Circuit. the importance Kennedy was of finding a ranominated to tionale that will the highest unite a majority court by Presiof the Court as dent Rea gan afwell as “comter the nominamand the alletions of two giance of the other candipeople to the dedates — includcision and the ing famously conservative photo courtesy us.courts.gov Constitution.” Kennedy Judge Robert Justice Anthony Kennedy graciously anBork — were contested fiercely and ultimately swered questions from members of rejected by the Senate. Dean John the audience on subjects ranging Jeffries, in his introductory remarks, from television programs about the noted that this political history led Supreme Court — which he thought to the nomination of Kennedy as a had plots that were “less than vacumore “pragmatic” candidate. ous” — to his private practice in Jeffries further described Kennedy California, to his experience with as being “conservative in the sense the Senate confirmation process. of being a traditionalist” and hav- Kennedy particularly cautioned ing a “distinctly American style” that legislators’ insistence during that embraces both the past and the confirmation process on certain views may be jeopardizing the indefuture of American law. In his public address, Justice pendence of the judiciary. To the law students in the audiKennedy spoke to students, admitted students, and faculty members see KENNEDY page 2 about the practical functioning of 2 News Virginia Law Weekly Friday, April 18, 2003 Admitted Students Flock to School have handled the situation any bet- we couldn’t have the BBQ and Hung by Laurie Ripper ’05 Jury outside,” Cantrell explained, This past weekend, more than ter.” Admitted students this year re- “but thankfully a lot of students 250 admitted students descended upon Charlottesville to visit what ceived a more personalized intro- hosted informal gatherings at their may very well become their future duction to U.Va. Law. According to apartments before Bar Review.” home and alma mater — consider- Cantrell, admitted students appre- Also on account of the inclement ing that historically, 70% of those ciated the more informal “Contracts weather, “we had to have almost who attend Admitted Students to Clinics” subject-area panels, not- every meal in Scott Commons and Weekend ultimately choose U.Va. ing that “students seemed to enjoy every single event inside, but the Law. One couldn’t help but notice having “classes” directed at them staff did a great job of making sure the Law School still the name-tagged looked great.” newbies being shown According to around Grounds and the Cantrell, it was unfresh faces appearing at fortunate that the Bar Review — especially Hung Jury show had because there were to be cancelled benearly a hundred more cause it was one of students this year than the main events that in previous years. had been planned in The Admitted Stuorder to downplay the dents Weekend coprominence of Bar chairs, first-years MarReview. “We had garet Cantrell and hoped that would Natalie Kernisant, were provide an alternaup to the challenge of tive event for those such increased numbers, students that did but said they couldn’t not want to go to have done it without the Bar Review,” she help of fellow First Year said. Because the Council members and evrain cancelled that eryone else who particievent, “There were pated to help make the not as many options weekend a success. for students on “Many hosts were enthusiastic about taking more graphic by Sam Young Thursday night.” The admitted than one admit and acThe Five Elements of Life in Charlottesville students were also tually kept coming back with time for their questions,” were exposed to one thing that for more!” Kernisant said. The co-chairs also praised the rather than just being able to sit in wasn’t on the schedule, but administrators who helped plan on a first year course. Admitted might very well be the deciding the weekend — traditionally more students also received the student factor in their decision to choose of a student-initiated event — es- activities fair, receptions, and the U.Va. According to Cantrell, “they particularly commented on pecially Deans Palmer and Bergen, student panel well. It can’t be said that everything how friendly the students and Director of Donor Relations Laura Pietro, and Teri Johnson of the went off without a hitch — the faculty were and how much evDean’s Office. “As in any transition weather, after all, caused almost eryone seemed to enjoy being year, there were things that can be all events to take place at a rain here.” Kernisant added, “Speakimproved upon for the future,” site — but luckily, everyone stepped ing one-on-one with the Cantrell admitted, but considering up to overcome the obstacles posed prospectives gave me a renewed that “[t]here were a lot of variables, by increased numbers and bad vigor and excitement about just including the weather and the in- weather. “There was a lull in the how truly great and unique our creased attendance, they couldn’t schedule on Thursday night when community is.” Virginia Law Weekly ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ Editor-in-Chief Christopher Colby Victor Kao Executive Editor Production Editor Mike Spitzer Managing Editor Gretchen Agee News Editor Columns Editor Lorre Luther Features Editor Claudia Gee Sarah Levine Reviews Editor Business Editor Sam Young Scott Pluta Photography Editor Treasurer Associate Editors Tom O’Grady Associate Columns Editor Laurie Ripper Associate News Editor Brian Green Illustrator Nick Benjamin Associate Reviews Editor To the Editor: We, as Admitted Students Co-Chairs, would like to express our sincere gratitude to the entire student body for all their patience, enthusiasm, and assistance in helping make this year’s Admitted Students Weekend one of the greatest and best-attended ever! With a record-setting 252 confused prospectives roaming the halls, this year’s process ran extraordinarily smoothly, largely due to the efforts of the administration, the faculty, the students, and the staff. It has been our pleasure to work on a project that so many were eager to assist in. Admitted Students Weekend was a success thanks to the efforts of the entire community and we wanted to say thank you. Sincerely, Natalie Kernisant and Margaret Cantrell Co-Chairs, Admitted Students Weekend 2003 REHNQUIST continued from page 1 and chanting slogans as attendees of Rehnquist’s speech filtered into the building. One protester had a megaphone and led calland-response chants that included “Integration now, segregation never!”; “Rehnquist says ‘Jim Crow,’ we say ‘Hell, no!’”; and “‘Separate but Equal’ is a lie, affirmative action must not die.” As protesters circled on the sidewalk opposite Caplin, a pair of U.Va. police officers observed their activities. The march was sponsored by the Coalition to Defend Affirmative Action by Any Means Necessary (“BAMN”). Tanya Troy, a national organizer of the group and not a U.Va. student, said BAMN plans to organize a gathering everywhere a Supreme Court Justice speaks until the Court hands down its decision in Grutter v. Bollinger. Troy identified several of the marchers outside Caplin as students attending Michigan schools, some from the BEET Sowing sarcasm at the Law School Scott Meacham Drew Larsen Letter to the Editor Allison Haddock Associate Features Editor Staff COLUMNISTS : Sarah Baker (SBA Notebook), V ANGUARD. CONTRIBUTORS : Rob Boller, Adam Greene, Brent Olson, Justin Park, David Sergenian, Laura Williams, and David Zetoony. R EVIEWERS: Sabrina Hassan and T.K. Wingfield. Published weekly on Friday except during holiday and examination periods and serving the Law School community at the University of Virginia, the Virginia Law Weekly (ISSN 0042-661X) is not an official publication of the University and does not necessarily express the views of the University. Any article appearing herein may be reproduced provided that credit is given to both the Virginia Law Weekly and the author of the article. Advanced written permission of the Virginia Law Weekly is also required for reproduction of any cartoon or illustration. Entered as second class matter at the Post Office at Charlottesville, Virginia. One year subscriptions are available for $25.00. Subscriptions are automatically renewed unless cancelled. Address all business communications to the Managing Editor. Subscribers are requested to inform the Managing Editor of change of address at least three weeks in advance to ensure prompt delivery. Mailing Address: Virginia Law Weekly, 580 Massie Rd., University of Virginia School of Law, Charlottesville, Virginia 22903-1789 Phone: (434) 924-3070 Fax: (434) 924-7536 E-mail Address: Va-Law-Weekly@virginia.edu Website: http://lawweekly.student.virginia.edu/ Printed on recycled paper by the Virginia Law Weekly and the University of Virginia Printing Office. © 2002-2003 Virginia Law Weekly Editorial Policy The Virginia Law Weekly publishes letters and columns of interest to the Law School and the legal community at large. Views expressed in such submissions are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the Law Weekly or the Editorial Board. Letters from organizations must bear the name, signature, and title of the person authorizing the submission. All letters and columns must either be submitted in hardcopy bearing a handwritten signature along with a disk containing the file, or be mailed from the author’s email account. Submissions must be received by 5 p.m. the Monday before publication and must be in accordance with the submission guidelines posted on the door to the Law Weekly office in Rooms SL277 & SL279. Letters over 500 words and columns over 700 words may not be accepted. The Editorial Board reserves the right to edit all submissions for length, grammar, and clarity. Although every effort is made to publish all materials meeting our guidelines, we regret that not all submissions received can be published. Washington, D.C., and a number from the University of Virginia. According to Troy, the group is “determined to hold onto affirmative action everywhere in the country” and marched at U.Va. Law “to make [their] message clear to Rehnquist.” KENNEDY continued from page 1 ence, Kennedy had a clear message: “I hope you get the most out of your law school experience. You have more time to reflect on the law now than you will ever have in private practice.” The law is like a language, with its own “grammar, logic, rhetoric, restraint, and constraint.” He urged students to “learn the language of the law, which is one of the great national resources of this country.” Finally, Kennedy said he looked forward to “having you as colleagues in this noble profession.” As part of his visit to the Law School, Justice Kennedy also taught Constitutional Law to the entire first-year class and had lunch with selected students. ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ ○ Administration Looking For New Kind of Law Student by Stu Shapley ’03 Overrated and fundamentally unsound. The buzz around North Grounds after Admitted Students Weekend is that the class of ’06 promises to be one of the weakest rookie classes ever. The most prestigious of the three-day minicamps put on by legal institutions around the country to screen young talent, Admitted Students Weekend ’03, affectionately dubbed “The Combine,” provided a long-overdue wakeup call to legal educators. “Too long we have been snoozing and trying to nap through the problem of college graduates who lack the basic skills necessary to be real players at U.Va. Law,” said Dean Bergen, the event’s administrative overseer. From their arrival Thursday afternoon to their Saturday morning departure, prospective students submitted to a battery of tests designed to gauge their potential at Virginia. Keeping with tradition, the evaluation began with the Pork Products Endurance Test, in which candidates were to continuously gorge themselves on Big Jim’s BBQ, cole slaw, and beer for three hours while enduring condescending banter from snooty Yalies who won’t come here anyway. By 5:30, the double ’Hoos, heavily favored to win the event, had already succumbed to food coma while the Yalies had shanghaied the keg and begun a long and wanky discussion of LSAT scores, Serbo-Croatian cinema, Con Law, and LSAT scores. This shameful first chukker per- formance hinted at the mediocre spectacle to unfold over the next 48 hours. In decidedly un-Virginian fashion, the admits got up as early as 8:30 on Friday to register and attend seminars and mock photo courtesy Eurobasketball.com Newly-Admitted Students. classes, and had the temerity to ask questions and take notes, despite their hosts’ generous invitations to play FreeCell and surf www.cameltoe.org. At that night’s party, the new blood bagged on a final opportunity to prove themselves worthy of Thomas Jefferson’s law school, and instead hit the trifecta of social failure. No man or woman from the class of ’06 — if the school even bothers to have one — will hook up, win at pong, or seize upon the opportunity to drink and act like British soccer fans. With the college graduate pool long since run dry, and the practice of offering scholarships to strongly interested students with work experience wholly discredited by the class of ’03, Admissions has chosen to go with a still different kind of law student by turning to high school and international talent for the fall of 2004. Reliable sources close to Dean Harmon report that next year’s top recruits include prepsters LeLearned Hand and Chad Thorgood V, as well as mysterious Serbian phenom Zlobodan Zglllgh. An academic unknown quantity, but six-foot-eight and still growing, Hand has law school scouts drooling over his unteachable height, a basic requirement for any aspiring champion moot court oralist, Libel Show Director, Head Commisioner, or former SBA president — measured circumfrentially. An eight-year junior at Choate with a negative GPA and single-digit PSATs, Thorgood V already drinks and destroys furniture at a third-year level, prompting speculation that he will be the first high school junior to make the leap straight to Alderman Road. As for Zglllgh, little is known of him other than that he currently works as a research assistant at Legal Beograd LLP, and is a deadly gunner who can hit the in-class question all the way from the back row without betraying a complete lack of preparation. Virginia Law Weekly Friday, April 18, 2003 News Briefs “ SBA Art Show in Progress Ritter Committee to Select Scholars by David Zetoony ’03 The SBA is sponsoring an Art Show featuring works by students, staff, and faculty in the Klaus Reading Room on the second floor of the library. The Art Show features fourteen artists and contains fifty works ranging from sketches, caricatures, and photography to digital art that uses the natural lighting of windows to replicate LCD displays. The pieces were solicited from the community last semester and went on display two weeks ago. The display will continue through the end of the semester and will culminate with a wine and cheese reception this Wednesday at 6 p.m. The reception is open to the public, will last about an hour, and will be an opportunity to meet the artists and to make informal bids for the exhibited works. Both the SBA and some of the artists have indicated a desire to make this an annual event, so students are encouraged to look for a chance to submit more pieces next semester. The organizers of the Art Show thank Professor Lilly and the Law School’s Art Committee for their help. They also thank Taylor Fitchett and Micheal Klepper in the library for donating the use of the Klaus Reading Room and sponsoring the reception. by Scott Meacham ’04 The Ritter Scholar Selection Committee currently is soliciting nominations from members of the Law School for second-year law students who will receive $2,000 tuition awards in the fall. Up to four students will receive awards; anyone who is a student, faculty member, staff member, or alumna/alumnus may nominate a potential recipient. Nominees must be current second-year students. Joint JD/MBA students also are eligible to receive the tuition award, but must be in their third year of study. The goal of the Ritter Scholar program is to recognize the extraordinary “honor, character, and integrity” of rising third-year law students. The nomination process is not particularly extensive, as each nomination requires only a pair of supporting letters. Nomination forms are available in the Student Affairs Office and are due by 5 p.m. on May 2. C. Willis Ritter ’65 created the Ritter Scholar program in memory of his parents, Mary Claiborne and Roy H. Ritter. Among past Ritter Scholars are current faculty members Elizabeth Magill and Barbara Armacost. Range Residents Select Rooms Virginia ABC Bears Down on Foxfield by Chris Colby ’04 The first graduate students selected under a new process met Apr. 6 to select their rooms in the Ranges, the buildings that line the exterior of Jefferson’s Lawn at the center of the University. The 51 new residents were chosen from among 71 applicants through a new process that graduate students created, a change from the earlier first-come, firstserved system. Now each would-be resident must submit 500-word essay on how he or she would encourage a greater sense of community on the Range and among graduate students. A selection committee of 17 current Range residents read the applications, which included some poems and one dialogue between the applicant and Thomas Jefferson. The Range residents have formed themselves into a Range Council, modeled after a neighborhood association or house council concept, which plans to meet the first Sunday of every month when classes resume. The Council will be in charge of overseeing financial and administrative aspects of the Range, planning informal programs, managing the selection process, and working for better living conditions on the Ranges. Programming ideas include a Lawn-Range football rivalry, the provision of informal career advice to Lawn residents, and the hosting of gettogethers for TAs and their classes. Next year’s Range will house approximately four Darden Business School residents, six residents in the Curry School of Education, seven Medical School residents, eight residents from the Engineering School, 15 residents in the Graduate School of Arts and Sciences, 11 Law residents, and one resident from the Schools of Ancient and Modern Languages. by Michael Spitzer ’04 This past Tuesday, the Virginia Alcoholic Beverage Control Board held a hearing to determine the future status of the annual Foxfield races. At the meeting, the Board decided to suspend Foxfield’s Sporting Event for 15 months. The races can continue as planned if Foxfield complies with three conditions: First, one uniformed security officer is required for every 200 tickets sold at the event. Second, all violations of public intoxication must be addressed by Foxfield’s private security force, and Foxfield must pay $8,000 to the Virginia ABC for the cost of the investigation. Organizers of the Foxfield races set for Apr. 26 believe that the timing of the Virginia ABC’s decision is designed to deter ticket sales. The Virginia ABC accused Foxfield of allowing noisy and disorderly conduct in addition to allowing persons believed to be intoxicated to loiter on the premises. One of the main pieces of evidence in the hearing was a videotape taken by Virginia ABC agents showing intoxicated individuals on the grounds of Foxfield. According to the organizers of the Foxfield races, the majority of attendees act responsibly with alcohol. However, in order further to encourage people to act responsibly, Foxfield will be having programs designed to encourage safe drinking and transportation to and from the event. “As a result of this settlement, Foxfield is saved. The races will go on next week and there will be a race held next fall — unless the undergrads ruin it for us,” said second-year Wyeth Ruthven, who has campaigned to “save Foxfields.” SBA Notebook: I Have Been Sick, How about You? Natalie Kernisant and Margaret Cantrell are goddesses. What they pulled off last week during Admitted Students Weekend was nothing short of miraculous. They deserve all the credit in the world. Sarah Baker, a second-year law student, is SBA president. What many of you don’t know is that Rebecca Peters used to handle much of Admitted Students Weekend. What many of you might know is that Rebecca Peters is no longer here. This meant that an extraordinary burden fell on Margaret and Natalie and they handled it beautifully. So thank you from the bottom of my heart — and from the bottom of the Law School’s heart too. Your efforts did not go unnoticed. Other than that, I am not sure what else happened in the Law School last week as I was a touch under the weather. I was diagnosed by a friend of a friend last night as having been struck by the Norwalk Virus. For those of you who are unfamiliar with the Norwalk Virus, it is the virus that was causing many cruise-going folks to get sick last fall. They’d get on board, set sail, grab a $12 piña colada, set out for the shuffleboard deck to whale-watch and then, bam! They would get very very ill. I, however, was lucky enough to get it not from recirculated cruise-ship air, but recirculated Law School air — and I didn’t even have to travel to any tropical locations to get it. I say, if you are going to get sick, best have it be convenient. So last Tuesday night, in the midst of a dazzling trial ad performance, I lurched out of my seat, ran to the bathroom, and spent much of the next 12 hours throwing up, both here at the Law School and then in the comfort of the U.Va. Medical Center. It was a fun-filled night. I found it very exciting to sit in the waiting room and puke into the mustard-yellow plastic container provided for me by the fine folks at the Hospital. But as night turned to morn, I tired of the waiting room audience and yearned for new people to watch me vomit — people who could make it stop, medical professionals — people like doctors or nurses. After my insistent complaining and moaning left me still waiting in the room named for said activity, the nice friend who accompanied me came up with a little plan. He wheeled me over to the registration desk where I proceeded to rest my head while I continued to throw up into my mustard yellow plastic bin. It sped things up quite a bit. I was suddenly number one on the list of people to get a bed. Never mind the pregnant ladies and the people having strokes. As long as they weren’t doing it on the registration desk, the Hospital was going to take me first. So, needless to say, I don’t really know what went on here at the Law School last week. My plan, though, is to continue to be ignorant so that I can actually start studying for exams. Seems that in my quest to get parking for 40 more people, to clean the fridge — perhaps the origin of the Norwalk Virus — and [stop reading, squirmy boys] to get disposal bins in the Scott Commons women’s bathroom stalls, I have forgotten that I am a law student. So, my plan is to remain somewhat in the dark about the goings-on of the Law School so that I can concentrate on school for the next four weeks. If you need to talk to me, shoot me an email and we can set up a time to meet. And as much as I know that I am here to serve you, I offer a request: think about what you are asking before you ask it. Think: is Sarah the right person to come to with my question? Should I e-mail John-David? Or Erik? Or Adam? Or Dean Bergen? Or my mom? Should I solve this problem myself since I am an adult? Okay, so I am a little harsh. Realize that I still haven’t eaten solid food since Tuesday. I am hungry and a touch cranky. And, really, truly, if you need something, let me know. I will be happy to set up a time to meet. I don’t mean to scare you. Should I not hear from you, good luck on finals and have a fantastic summer. Not that you or the majority of this nation necessarily care, but the Men’s Lacrosse ACC Semifinals will occur at 6 p.m. and 8:30 p.m. at Klöchner Stadium. If you like living in Charlottesville and wear a dirty white baseball cap with a curved brim, you’ll feel right at home. Saturday Sunday If you are up for a physical challenge, head on over to the 20th Annual U.Va. Share 5K fun run to benefit summer camps for children with medical conditions. Sign-up will occur at 9 a.m. in the Newcomb Hall Plaza. Registration is $15. Try not to wheeze too loudly. For a good workout, try going swimming. The AFC has the Olympic-sized pool open for lap swimming between 11:30 a.m. and 8 p.m. Before you start paddling away though, we have a bit of advice: Get rid of that shrunken pair of Speedos you insist on wearing. Monday In case you haven’t noticed, it’s hard to find anything to do in this alcoholic cesspool of a town. If you haven’t seen Harry Potter and the Chamber of Secrets or Two Weeks Notice, both are playing this week at the Jefferson Theater. Harry Potter starts at 6:40 and 9:35, and Two Weeks Notice is playing at 7 and 9:10. 3 Faculty Quotes A. Malani: “See, what I’m trying to do here is pit you guys against each other. So when you get called on because your whole section is not here, you’ll get mad. Hopefully, then you’ll beat the crap out of the guy who skipped.” G. Robinson: “It’s amazing how much opportunity there is for serendipitous shopping on one [eBay] webpage. I’m looking for cars, but I see, oh my god, they’ve got dolls and bears!” A.Malani: “I encourage you all to attend this conference on Saturday morning at 9 a.m. I’d be there, but I have a previous commitment... to sleep.” V. Blasi: “I read my fair share of Playboys, and didn’t spend that much time on the articles, I admit.” G. Slynn: “It doesn’t look anything like you. You’re much better looking in your photograph.” G. Rutherglen: “Mr. Shapley?” S. Shapley ’03: “Umm, pass.” G. Rutherglen: “Yes, pass... one hopes, one hopes...” G. Lilly [on Skinner v. Oklahoma]: “This case gives new meaning to the term ‘three strikes and you’re out.’ If the person has committed three felonies of a certain nature, he gets sterilized.” T. Wu: “I started to like the IRS better than TurboTax. Now I feel that my oppressor is TurboTax.” A. Malani: “My job is to make you understand these terms, not just to use them to impress you.” R. Brooks: “Remember how crayons had that flesh color? It was like the color of a Caucasian corpse.” J. N. Moore [after dimming lights for his PowerPoint]: “It’s dark enough to eat popcorn now, so you can have a really good time.” T. Wu: “What does England export? Master’s degrees? Everyone seems to have an English master’s degree.” E. Dudley: “If you don’t give me an answer, I’m going to take you down.” This Week in Hooville Friday Student Life ” Tuesday Wednesday Thursday We’re in the midst of spring, and that means it’s time to turn your attention from basketball to other sports. U.Va. Baseball takes on George Mason at 7 p.m. at the University Baseball Field. Take a break from studying and support the Hoos! Check out the wine and cheese reception for the SBA Art Show at 6 p.m. in the Klaus Room on the second floor of the library. Nothing beats outlining after a few glasses of wine! You not only read slower, but you read multiple times. It’s the best way to get to know the material. Honest. Do you like running? Do you tell people you like running to convince them and others that you actually exercise? Drive to Philly and see the Penn Relays! The U.Va. track team will be participating. Real runners need love too. 4 Features Virginia Law Weekly Friday, April 18, 2003 Fore and Score: U.Va’s Hidden Gardens We’re Not in New York Anymore, Toto species and there are even free ford University given to Jefferson by Adam Greene ’05 As a Double Hoo, I have experi- tours of the Gardens during His- back in the day. Garden IV has a enced much of what the Univer- toric Virginia Gardens Week in tree that is perfectly fitted as a sity has to offer. For example, I April. seat and is great to study in or sing have streaked the in on a nice spring day. GarLawn, eaten at den VII is part of the ColonLittlejohn’s at 3 nade Club and is expansive a.m., and taken a and gorgeously geometric. Garclass from our residen III, Dean Harmon’s own, dent political guru features part of an old sandLarry Sabato. stone capital from the Rotunda True, some law stu— which, for those who don’t dents have surely know, burned on Oct. 27, 1895. also had the joy of Finally, Garden V has the most frolicking naked on unusual western wall among the verdant pasthe 10. tures of nearby Something further you may Central Grounds, not have known is that you — and I am sure most yes, you, as a U.Va. student — of us have wanhave the ability to reserve the dered into our sogardens for functions at no cost. called “New York courtesy virginia.edu You can have receptions there Delicatessen” in or just casually have a picnic. Miracle-Gro Worked for this Place! the wee hours of The Gardens also make a Besides all the eye-pleasing great Frisbee-golf course. There is the morning — but I doubt that a substantial number of law stu- beauty the Gardens have to offer, a historical layout course and a dents have found their way into there is more to be had in our little new-age course as well. Both feamy favorite part of the University: hideaways than actually meets the ture plenty of challenging holes eye. For starters, each Garden is with steep drops, impeding arbor, the Gardens. The Gardens of the Academical unique. Each of the 10 has its own and outhouse hazards. Village, just off the Lawn, offer distinct style, foliage, and layout. Lastly, besides yelling “fore” much to be explored. during a Frisbee-golf For starters there are, game, one could be so of course, flowers and lucky to score in a Gartrees, but that is obviden. Yes, that’s right, ous. What you may not score. What could be notice is the exquisite more like getting back architectural landto nature and the Garscaping that we owe in den of Eden than scorpart to Jefferson — not ing in a Garden? to mention the small Not that I have been army of so lucky, but I imagine groundskeepers we the experience is quite employ. exotic and possibly You may not realize heavenly. If you are so that the Gardens’ serinclined, I would pentine walls exhibit highly recommend courtesy virginia.edu both form and function. Garden X for its reU.Va’s Secret Gardens Are Ideal for Lovers. They are aesthetically moteness, high walls, pleasing, yet their design also Garden VI, for example, has the and apparent privacy — it makes helps nurture young plants. There oldest object at the University — a the perfect patch of grass to get are hundreds of different plant spire from Merton College at Ox- some ass. Teaching Evaluations Open Faculty to Students’ Righteous Anger by Alison Haddock ’05 It’s almost that time again. You have probably been practicing witty metaphors and literary allusions in a preemptive attempt to best capture what you did and did not like about the format of your corporations class, the material covered in evidence, or the haphazard style of your professor in trial advocacy. But have you ever wondered what exactly happens to those class evaluation forms once they are turned in? And have you ever had an occasion to wish that you had been afforded the opportunity to offer feedback at some time before the end of the semester? Dean John Jeffries noted the particular ways in which course evaluations feed into the U.Va. system. He explained, “Course evaluations have three distinct audiences. The first is students. As you know, most classes are elective. Students deserve the best information we can provide about how their colleagues evaluated particular courses and professors. Course evaluation results are therefore freely available to students so that they can make informed decisions about the courses they choose to take. “The second audience is the individual professor. Each professor receives his or her course evaluations. It’s probably impossible to say categorically how much professors care around course evaluations, but it’s my impression that most professors do care, a great deal, about what students think. “The third audience is, for want of a better term, the Law School administration. Right now, that means Paul Mahoney and me, both of whom receive statistical summaries of the teaching evaluations of all courses and all professors. We use them as a way of identifying problems that can be addressed, but we also use them to award and applaud outstanding performance.” Dean Jeffries also notes that teaching evaluations have the potential to be an important part of the administration’s decisions in the tenure process. “[T]enure forces institutions to make very serious decisions about continued employment, and in those decisions teaching is taken fully into account.” In hiring decisions, Jeffries admits that “unacceptable teaching — which usually involves a high degree of unconcern — is disqualifying, but even very good teaching would not, by itself, carry the case for permanent hire.” Some teachers proactively solicit mid-term evaluations from students in an attempt to improve their teaching styles or course content before the semester’s end. Professor Elizabeth Magill, for example, passed about a simple one-page questionnaire to her Constitutional Law and Administrative Law students in February. First-year Will Nee remarked on this practice, Professor “Magill must have had thick skin to do what she did. After the mid-term evaluations came back, she changed the tenor of her teaching style from extended cold-call dialogues that could often break the flow of the class to a more lecture-oriented approach that at the very least kept people typing for more of the class. The mid-term evaluation greatly improved the class, but you have to wonder if other Law School professors would be able to respond to constructive criticism as well.” First-year Grant Wiens expressed a slightly more skeptical outlook. “I think the students do appreciate the mid-semester evalu- ation process. It presents an opportunity for professors to improve upon their lectures and discussion, ideally tailoring the class a bit better to the needs of the specific students. However, different professors react differently to the evaluations and some merely provide lip service to any requested changes. It seems to be a very hit-or-miss process.” Of course, the most direct way for a student to offer feedback is to posit suggestions to the professor himself or herself. Although this may seem a daunting task, Dean Mahoney suggests, “The principal advice I would give students who feel that the instructor could convey the material more effectively is to first have a conversation with the instructor. If the student has a concrete suggestion — ‘You’re going a little too fast for me to follow,’ or ‘There’s a lot of detail in this class; would you mind writing the most important points on the board?’ — we’d prefer to hear it early rather than in the course evaluations. Obviously, different students prefer different instructional styles, so no professor can satisfy everyone all the time. But I think our faculty try very hard to teach effectively and are willing to listen.” Too often it is easier to complain and gripe to classmates about a professor’s ineffective style or a course’s awkward organization. By voicing your concerns in whatever mechanisms are available and appropriate, however, you can both better your own classroom experience and enhance the learning of others. So combat the beer-and-softball image — spend quality time this semester on your evaluations. But maybe you should save the metaphors and allusions for your novel-in-progress. guess everyone can’t be happy all by Rob Boller ’05 Before enrolling at U.Va. Law, of the time. I can’t complain. I’m I had never spent any significant from New York, where unhappitime in the South. Never came ness has been elevated to an art down to visit friends at college. I form. But there are certain things had never made it to Graceland. I had never even gone as far as D.C. about the South that drive me on a school trip. Aside from a fam- nuts. What is the strange obsesily vacation to Disneyworld when sion with the bowtie? And guys in I was 10, the only time I had spent pink and plaid pants? Most of my around Southerners had been dur- other complaints have been mening Spring Break and the tioned ad nauseum. No one knows Preakness Stakes. Surely, I what to do when it snows. The thought to myself, the South can’t relaxed pace down here means that be populated exclusively by driving anywhere is frustrating. Christine Meiers, a first-year shirtless lunatics. So when I applied to law schools from Connecticut, explains, “my almost exclusively in the South, biggest pet peeve is that people my friends and family in New York here drive too slowly… [and they] take so were very long to confused. make a “So why normal would you r i g h t want to go h a n d live with a turn… [I]f bunch of we were in rednecks C a m for three bridge, years?” p e o p l e “How are would hurl you going obscenito watch ties and the Jets run into games?” courtesy CNN.com their car.” “Where Restauare you “What? This Doesn’t Look like Queens.” rant sergonna get your hair gel?” After assuring my vice takes too long. Since everyfriends and family that I just one is so friendly, I can’t run into wanted to spend a few years out- the store for a pack of cigarettes side of New York, I took off for without getting into a fiveminute discussion about the Dixie. Driving down I-95 on my way to weather. Minor criticisms aside, my bigAdmitted Students Weekend last year, I had no idea what to expect. gest fear about going to school in And I realized I had some con- the South was having to deal cerns of my own. Would I stick with instances of racism. I’m not out? What would they think of my alone. One Northerner, who repreference for black shirts? Where quested that his name not be given, commented that was I going to get my hair gel? Thankfully, my weekend in “Charlottesville is a pretty diCharlottesville went well, and af- verse town, but outside of the ter eight months here, I feel confi- University, it’s pretty well segdent in my ability to make blanket regated. The professional class statements about the entire com- here seems to be pretty exclumunity. Julie Jordan pointed out sively white.” The attack on Daisy Lundy in her column last week that, as far as many Southerners are con- seemed to confirm those fears, cerned, Charlottesville does not but the response of the Univerqualify as the South. I would like sity, and the Law School commuto reply by saying that, as far as nity particularly, showed me that many Northerners are concerned, while perhaps not completely unyes it does. The South is the South founded, my assumptions about is the South. Once you’re in Waffle Southern racial attitudes may House/Arby’s/Chik-Fil-A Country, have been overstated. After all, you have officially hopped the line. New York has had more than its I like it here. Don’t get me share of racial incidents in rewrong. It’s quiet at night. They cent years too. Aside from the claim the winters are generally nagging problem of too many conmild. We’ve had some gorgeous servatives, Charlottesville is like days this spring. And while not as many Northern suburbs — with chirpy as I expected, Southerners floppier hair. So I guess Julie was right. The on the whole seem pleasant. Columbia Warren, a first-year from South isn’t as red as I thought it Vermont, commented that “before was. At least not this part. And coming here I thought Southern- this is as far South as I’m willing ers were pathologically nice...”. I to go for now. Baby steps, kids. Baby steps. Virginia Law Weekly Friday, April 18, 2003 Columns & Features 5 I Hurt Myself Today to See if I Still Feel The first time I heard Johnny Cash’s acoustic rendition of Nine Inch Nails’ “Hurt,” I nearly threw up in my own mouth, I thought it was so good. The second time I heard it, I had an existential crisis that lasted the whole of the weekend. Fortunately, the third time I heard the tune I kind of just thought Cash sounded old and tired and just got over it. Tom O’Grady, a second-year law student, is Associate Columns Editor I say fortunately because I was about one step away from painting my fingernails black and scrawling a large NIN in whiteout on my binder. I also say fortunately because I was just about determined to let my existential demons loose on these pages with an exploration into my own selfloathing. I was all set to poke and pry into the pain that drives me to make people like me. To come to terms with the facts that the pain can only leave me hollow inside, and that even when I do achieve some measure of success, some level of normalcy, the people who love me will be too normal to realize that they have become involved with an unfeeling, uncaring cyborg. If I could do it all again, would I keep myself? Would I find a way? Yeah, I shouldn’t listen to that song anymore. Thankfully, I’ve decided not to go the existential route. In fact I’ve decided to abandon any pretense of writing a column and to finish my year in style with the old reliable ramblings article. Who needs inner demons when I have Tina Yothers and Pedro Cerrano on my mind? Oh and by the way, I’m just kidding, I really don’t hate myself. And really, I’m not just an unfeeling and uncaring cyborg. I swear. (Nervous laughter.) I was just playing with all that…uhmmm yeah. Most important thing I learned from the Who’s the Boss episode where Tony bought Samantha her first training bra: Tony Danza purchasing women’s underwear = comedy. Things I want to see that I know will never happen: Eminem rapbattling David Silver at the Peach Pit in a very special 90210. Things I want to see that I know certainly will happen: Trishell from Real World Las Vegas hooking up with Eric Neis, Nate from Real World Seattle, and Johnny Mosely himself, on the next Real World/Road Rules Challenge. One of the top four proudest moments of my life: learning how to play Led Zeppelin’s “Over the Hills and Far Away” on guitar in the eighth grade. Not among my top four proudest moments: purchasing the accompanying Robert Plant codpiece that came with the sheet music. Robert Plant wore a codpiece? Well no, but he should have… he should have. Is Balki Bartokomous’ “Don’t be rah-dick-hulous” still a valid reference? Can I continue to work that into conversations? In other TGIF-related queries, is it normal to still be haunted by Coach Lubbock’s belly-shaking dance from the opening credits of Just the Ten of Us. Ahhh never mind. Sample question on application quiz I send out to prospective friends: Milano: Fear A) Dushku: Bring It On; B) Doherty: 90210; C) Gellar: Cruel Intentions; D) Matheny: Survivor 2-Australian Outback; E) All of the Above. You know you are watching a lame movie when somebody parks his car in front of an airport terminal and comes sprinting out of it as an inept policeman screams “Hey, you can’t park here!” I just wish somebody would have told Blossom that an ugly girl in ugly clothes is still ugly. Yeah! Wicked burn of Blossom, dude! It always creeps me out to see my professors in street clothes when they administer my final exam. They’re like “It’s cool, baby. I don’t always wear suits. I’m hip. I wear jeans. I tuck my shirt in with no belt, whatever.” I like how my friends from high school do an impression of me doing an impression of Dana Carvey doing an impression of John Travolta. “It’s like so weird!” God I am great at doing that. Is it weird that I own four fulllength Living Colour albums and one Living Colour EP? You never really see a girl just start jamming out on air guitar, do you? I’m not saying they can’t do it. I’m just saying they choose not to. Being called “the Vance Law of the NGSL” has really made me reconsider wearing glasses and think about upgrading to contacts. When they make the E! True Hollywood Story of my life, I hope they leave out that time I dressed up as a cowboy for the Section L “El Paso” Dandelion Parade float. Best porn name ever: Michael J. Cox. Just invented that; 1-0 me. For the record, prior to M.J.C. my previous porn name was Dick Logan. Also for the record I hate the whole porn name joke thing. “Oh really, my porn name is the name of my pet followed by the name of the street I grew up on? Sweet! Can I now knife myself to death?” One of the top nine reasons why I hate myself is that I have not yet seen Beverly Hills Ninja. Least favorite songs always included in 40-minute classic rock blocks: Lynyrd Skynyrd’s “Gimme Three Steps” and every Eagles song ever. I will never admit to watching an episode of Hey Dude. Not even the one where Danny must choose between his friends and his Native American heritage. Law Students Go Clubbing... Book Clubbing, That Is by Laura Williams ’05 What sane law student would voluntarily take on extra reading? Some sun-deprived 1L gunner? Yes, but also the members of several book clubs that are springing up all over the Law School. Students have been forming the groups as a way to escape the intense school environment, and to share a love of reading. Third-year Sarah Berger is a book lover who reads every night before bed. As she already indulged in the “break from law reading to read fiction and unwind,” joining a book club was a natural for her. Others find that a club compels them to make time for interests outside of school. “It is hard to fit in pleasure reading when we have so much reading to do for class as well. Being in the book club forces me to read a little of my novel every day,” says first-year Christine Meiers. First-year Brooke Everly is in a book club with several members of her section, as well as section spouses. Her club formed this fall when “we realized that so many of us loved to read — we thought that sharing this passion would be a great way to spend time together outside of Law School events.” The meetings also offer a way for spouses and students to find common ground, and to discuss issues beyond the latest gossip. “Participating in a book club allows me to get to know some of my husband’s classmates in a new way, and to have a girls’ night out, as well as to stretch my mind a little bit outside of the world of blocks, diapers and strollers, which dominate my day,” says Mary Alice Teti, the wife of one of Everly’s sectionmates. Everly stresses that “being well-rounded is key to a strong understanding of law and human nature, [and] reading is an excellent way to increase that.” As Meiers put it, “now I read court cases, so reading novels is quite a treat.” The clubs are loose associations, meeting about every other week to allow time for the members to finish courtesy library.fullerton.edu the selection. Meetings are held at members’ houses, and in Berger’s group they spend “about half the time talking about the book and half the time talking about other things.” Most groups focus exclusively on the fiction, though Meiers is “going to attempt to turn the book club into a cooking club as well at the beginning of next semester.” The member hosting the meeting usually picks the book for that session, which allows for a wide array of literature. In Meiers’ group they The Public Interest Law Association Would Like to Congratulate The 2003 Recipients of Student-Funded Fellowships. They appreciate your support! Second-years Angela Caldwell Miriam Cho Rachel Doughty Carmen Elliott Sharon Garner Jim Hicks Davis Kim Corban Klug Elizabeth Lang Lawrence Lee Saejung Lee Nikki Salunga Jessica Shapiro Althea Smiley Craig Warner James Whitehead Kathleen Zvarych First-years Katie Bagley James DiTullio Mandy Doyle Sarah Geddes Debbie Huang Arthur Koski-Karell Pat Lavelle Jamie Lisagor Tracey Orick Trent Packer Karen Pogonowski Kimberly Porcaro have recently read Mrs. Dalloway, by Virginia Woolf, followed by a novel it inspired, Michael Cunningham’s The Hours. One of the members had the idea to read the novels in that order, so as to see the intersection of the two pieces more clearly. Teti noted that “it was a great suggestion because I never would have picked up the Virginia Woolf on my own, and I really got a lot out of reading the two books together.” For the most part, book club enthusiasts do not find that their legal studies influence their readings. They enjoy what different members’ viewpoints add to the discussion. As Teti says, “As a wife and a mother, I bring a different perspective to a discussion…and it [is] neat to share that, as well as to have my reading enhanced by the perspectives of the other women in the group who are single or dating.” Other book club participants find that reading a book with the chat in mind enhances their experience, “You also just get so much more out of a book if you have others to discuss it with and provide additional insights,” says Everly. In fact, most participants emphasize that the intersection of fellowship and intelligent discussion is what makes their groups so pleasurable. While the majority of clubs are winding down with the approach of exams, some members are actually increasing their load of fiction reading. Teti’s brother, who will be a first-year law student in the fall, has organized a special group that she will participate in this summer reading 29 of Shakespere’s plays. Unlike her current club, the members of this summer group live in different cities, “so there is going to be an online discussion group.” She is not sure if the “test of endurance” will be successful but is willing to give it a try. 6 Columns & Reviews Virginia Law Weekly Friday, April 18, 2003 Phidippides, a Jester, and John Deere Come Together If you had to pick someone out of the entire Law School student body who might run a marathon, whom would you pick? Would you choose a stocky, slow guy who is constantly harassed about his lack of speed around the softball field? Probably not, but you would be wrong. U.Va. Law’s own Jeremy Moffit decided to dedicate his final semester of law school to training for the San Diego Marathon. In an exclusive review for the Law Weekly, I have joined Jeremy in his quest. The Marathon Man by T.K. Wingfield The beginning: Some may ask what prompted Jeremy (AKA: Chet the Jet or Chester the Jester) to take on this mighty endeavor. Well, after a night of a bit too much booze, he and T.K. Wingfield made an agreement that they would run the San Diego Rock n’ Roll Marathon. Fortunately, or perhaps unfortunately, both the individuals involved in the agreement are stubborn and not about to use the excuse that it was just a lot of loose, drunk talk. See, Hastily planned trip by Moffit and T.K. to Atlantic City after night at St. The Running Group: Chester Maarten’s. Training began the marathon, Moffit enlisted the advice of an expert. Enter Amy knew he would be unable to get next week. Moffit’s Running Style: When Garvey. Garvo was more than up to 15 miles a week by himself, so he brought together an elite Chet the Jet and his running group of runners. Jeremy’s partner began training, it was core group of running partobvious that some things would ners consisted of T.K., Amy have to change. First, Chester Garvey, and Melissa Rickard. thought he could train for the Along the way, Moffit almarathon indoors on the treadlowed guest runners to join mill because, in his words, “It’s him. Some of the guest runtoo cold outside to run.” T.K. ners included Matt “I’ve run quickly shot down this idea, three marathons and never and after calling the Jet’s mantrained for them” Atlas, hood into question, convinced Warrenton’s Finest, Melissa the Jester that training had to Lloyd, and Nick “I’m the best be done by pounding the paveblock-shedder in the Law ment. School” Madden. Of the guest Second, Chet the Jet needed runners, Nick was the most to revamp his entire running surprising. Although he is a style. After the first couple of big man, he can truck down runs, T.K. noticed that Chet the street like an 18-wheeler. ran like Carsten Reichel wrote Run Like a Deere: Moffit — clunkily and slow-wittedly. and his running partner Chet ran on his toes the entire adopted John Deere as their time. After the concept of heelunofficial sponsor. You may to-toe running was explained have seen hats around the to him, Chester was still a little Law School, or occasionally suspect. He decided to get a running by the Corner. The second opinion on this “alternative” running style. Once photo courtesy time-to-run.com hats have garnered more attention than the runners. For Melissa Rickard and Amy Pounding 26.2 Miles of Pavement some reason, people love John Garvey stopped laughing at him, they told Chester that no one happy to help, and she set up Deere hats. Moffit’s Diet: Against the wishes in his right mind would attempt to Chester with a program. Reading run an entire marathon on his the program carefully, Chet the of everybody involved in training Jet realized that the program Chester for the marathon, Chet toes. The Training Program: Having called for the runner to be running decided to go on the “Hershel Walker Diet” for the month of April. no idea about how to train for a 15 miles a week by Feb. 10. According to this diet, Moffit only eats one real meal a day, and the rest of the day he eats fruit. This diet provides him with absolutely no fuel, so at the end of the run he is like a “Fratters On” column — he falls completely flat. Although T.K. and Coach Garvo have told him repeatedly that his diet is idiotic, Moffit insists on keeping it up. Well, as of this writing, Moffit’s longest run has been 16 miles. This is a big accomplishment considering where he started. In this reviewer’s eyes, Chester the Jester should be victorious in his goal to complete the San Diego Marathon. So, on June 1, take a moment to stop and think about Moffit. He’ll be pounding the pavement in San Diego. This is my final “review” for the Virginia Law Weekly. Thanks for reading my columns, which were never really reviews but more like slices of life at U.Va. Law. Here are some topics that I wish I could have reviewed, but never got the chance: League Bowling: Naked Scooters Rule, The c-LOSERS suck. The Kearney Cup: Can Scoot ever win a game? Vegas Baby: Where T.K. loses his tax refund. Sir Charles Basset Moore: Hootsma thinks that guy’s great. West Virginia: The Hawk comes to roost. U.Va. Law Students Take Moot Court to International Stage young attorneys interested in international commercial law, it is the Who’s Who event of the practice. Not only is the competition sponsored by every well-known arbitration organization —including the AAA, the ICC, the DIS, and the London Court of Arbitration — but because it takes place next door to both the United Nations Commission on International Trade and the International Arbitral Centre, some of the world’s most esteemed international law commentators and arbitrators rub shoulders with the teams that compete. In this year’s problem, two hypothetical companies entered into a contract for the sale of plastic film. A second transaction between the companies resulted in the dispute once a disagreement as to the price of the shipment arose. The resulting issues included challenges to the tribunal’s jurisdiction, disqualification of arbitrators, questions as to the applicable law, and questions as to the interpretation of the contract. To prepare for the competition, U.Va. team members had to acquaint themselves with not only the CISG, but also with the contractual regimes of other countries and the procedural issues arising out of the rules of private arbitration organizations. Though all six of the team mem- bers hoped to attend the competition, the combination of the timing of the competition two weeks before finals and the advent of budget cuts permitted U.Va. to send only two representatives: Scott Nilsen and Hiren Patel. The size of U.Va.’s team is a severe handicap when confronting the other schools, most of which give full funding to eight- and ten-person teams. “Last year the Vis team spent over 60% of its time fundraising and was able to send three people to the competition,” Brugger said. “Though they were at a big disadvantage compared to most American law schools — which sent six to eight people to Austria — they ended up being one of the highestranking American teams in the competition. This year, we had to reduce our number to two, which creates an even greater challenge, but we have every confidence in our teammates.” As of the writing of this article, Nilsen and Patel had advanced to the next round of the competition after winning their first elimination round (as respondent) against Frankfurt and losing their second elimination round (as claimant) against Cologne. Based on those performances, Nilsen and Patel estimate that they are probably the fourth or fifth seed going into the next round. A Brian Green Cartoon “Through the first two elimination rounds, 17 respondents won, while only seven claimants won,” Patel said. “This is partly due to some difficulties in claimants’ substantive case. But in the overall competition, at this point our finish means we’re tied for ninth place out of the 128 schools competing this year.” The Vis team members wish to thank their sponsor, Professor Walt, for providing help and insight in drafting briefs, and Professor Kraus for his consultation. The team also wishes to thank Professor Moore for assisting with last-minute funding. The Alumni Association Welcomes the Class of 2003 Officers: Erica Paulson, President Lise Adams, Vice-President Rees Morgan, Secretary/Treasurer and Class Agents: John Blair Monique Moore Elaina Blanks Valerie Nannery Kate Brennan Hiren Patel Dalton Courson Courtenay Seabring Amanda England Ryan Shores Chris Farrell Laura Soong Andrea Hamilton Janet Stocco Nessa Horewitch Karen Stringer Carlos Kuri Kelly Vásquez Aaron Longo Gina Vetere Melissa Meana Will Webb Sharon Yuan CROSSWORD SOLUTION by David Zetoony ’03 One of countless pieces of advice given by Professor Kraus to his Contracts class two years ago was this: “change your conception of the practice of international law.” Kraus characterized law students’ stereotype of the international lawyer as a suave, welldressed, young Sean Connery sipping martinis in a trendy Paris hotel. According to Kraus, the reality of “international law” means being jet-lagged, over-worked, and locked away in a windowless office of a Paris high-rise doing American law. Unwilling to give up the dream of international intrigue, six U.Va. students (Kristiana Brugger, Scott Nilsen, Tracey Orick, Hiren Patel, Tenaya Scheinman, and David Zetoony) sought to prove Professor Kraus wrong. They decided to brave the world of international law by participating in the William C. Vis International Commercial Arbitration Moot Court. The competition, which is held in Vienna, Austria from Apr. 10 to Apr. 17, involves a hypothetical dispute under the Convention on Contracts for the International Sale of Goods (CISG). Over 120 law schools from across the globe compete in the moot, making it the largest and most prestigious private international law competition in the world. Indeed, for Virginia Law Weekly Friday, April 18, 2003 Reviews 7 Kind Reader, Please Remain A Man Apart From This Flop I think I remember hearing that Vin Diesel had no formal training before he began his film career. Judging by the quality of Diesel’s latest film, A Man Apart, neither did any of the other actors. Or the director. You get the picture. Better Taste Than You Have by Sabrina Hassan In a nutshell, A Man Apart is a predictable, underdeveloped, and poorly-acted action movie whose forgettable explosions and gratuitous gore try, but fail, to provide any redeeming entertainment value. This is really all you need to know about the flick. But to cement the impression of just how bad it is — lest you forget by the time it’s released on video next month — I’ll elaborate. The plot is nothing new. Diesel’s character, Sean, is a DEA hotshot who undertakes a personal mission to avenge his wife Stacy’s death. She is killed subsequent to Sean’s long-awaited capture of the head of Mexico’s leading drug cartel. Instead of realizing when most of the audience does who is behind Stacy’s death, Sean goes on a wild goose chase for the killer, flexing his muscles and killing some people, while the real mastermind gets away. Then, for the surprise ending, he (gasp) catches the bad guy. The only good thing about a movie this bad is the fun of ridiculing it, and I’ll try my best to get my money’s worth now. The challenge is deciding what is worst about this disaster. The actors’ performances are definitely in the running. Diesel’s showing in particular merits comment. His slow-paced, monotonous narration of the opening scene is not a warm-up to what he can really do but rather a showcase of Diesel’s best acting talents. In fact, the whole movie would probably be better if it ended just after his voice-over. The flat, stereotypical characters are also laughable. Even without knowing a thing about the movie, the average viewer would figure out during the first scene in which Stacy appears that she is destined to perish. She is the perfect adoring wife, at home in the kitchen wearing her hero- courtesy moviehole.net “What’s My Motivation Again?” husband’s football jersey. She pauses in her dishwashing to welcome him home with open arms from his hard-won battle against the drug lords. The other two scenes in which she appears alive are equally sappy. They necessarily involve her gushing over Sean with lingering smile and blowing hair so that he can have something to flash back to later, when she is dead. There are a couple of character attributes that the otherwise trite formula does not explain. For example, Memo the kingpin threw me for a loop when Sean first visited him in jail. While Sean tries to bully Memo into spilling his secrets by shouting repeatedly and with increasing volume, “Did you kill my wife?” cold-blooded Memo sits sullenly on his cot and reads his book like a teenager getting a lecture about the detention slips his Mom found in his backpack. For a second, I thought Memo might cover his ears and hum. One of the drug dealers, Hollywood Jack, also breaks the mold with his juvenile charms. Sean confronts Jack in his Porsche and compliments the car. Jack, clad from head to suede Tod’s loafers in sky blue, retorts with, “I like your truck. I was think- ing about trading this in for about seven of them.” Good one, Jack. Not all of the drug dealers in the picture are so petulant, though. Sean’s informant friend, Sexy, actually has quite a big heart, demonstrated in the Full House style scene when all of the non-Hispanic characters come to Sean’s aid and assure him that they won’t fail him in one of his final attempts to make good on his vow. Sexy is, after all, just a regular guy. We know this because we saw him earlier at his crib, yelling at his drug-dealing colleague for drinking directly out of the milk carton. Despite the enigmatic idiosyncrasies in a few of the characters, A Man Apart takes full advantage of all of the stale formulaic maneuvers you’ve seen in other bad action films. My favorite is in the final scene, when Sean throws back a line that Memo used on him an hour earlier: “If I wanted you dead, you would be.” Of course Diesel’s delivery is so slow that by the end of the sentence I’d almost forgotten how it began. God willing, I’ll soon forget the rest of the movie as well. My Amigos Got Me Drunk: The Corner Mexican Restaurant In general, despite the fact that I sometimes might shave my chest and cover it with coconut oil, I think I’m a pretty masculine guy. Though I sometimes gaze with longing in my heart when a pierced belly button passes me by, I’m pretty sure it’s a possessive rather than a jealous type of longing. I wear my Britney Spears T-shirt not because I dream of being Britney and lying in a bed of Justin Timberlake, but because I look pretty good in pink — it’s slimming. C’ville Dining in a Nutshell by Nick Benjamin What I’m trying to say here is that I don’t think you should read too much into the fact that I drink more like a debutante than a lumberjack. I like Smirnoff Ice, and something called orgasmo de piña — it’s hard to find, green, and tart, but worth it all the same — and I really like margaritas. Which brings me to Amigos, a Mexican margarita- day nights, when margaritas are the sizzling fajitas or the large serving restaurant on the corner $2 and $2.50, respectively, and plate of undifferentiable beany of 14th and Main which, shock- the sorority girls gather like meat arrives, I’m usually so ing as it may seem, is the subject blond Southern moths to the drunk as to be totally incapable lime-tequila light. I don’t know of caring what the food tastes of this ramble. There are a lot of good things about you, but I’m happy when like. This is a good thing, because the food about Amigos. really isn’t very The first — not good. in order of imporI’ve been to tance, since I’m Amigos a numwith Romeo — is ber of times, the name. and once or Amigos means twice I’ve even friends, and been sober that’s nice. Evenough to tell erybody, except what I’m eatfor the 18 yearing. Those were old who wouldn’t not such happy let me into Sigma times. The Chi on Saturday Amigos staff, night, should which is very have friends. graphic by Sam Young f r i e n d l y , Friends are like Mental Clarity Comes When You Least Expect It. though a bit the rubber on tires — they make the road of life I’m in a room filled with attrac- hard of English, likes to start smooth and keep you from get- tive, soon-to-be-drunk girls. So you out with a basket of tortilla ting all scraped up by the fric- happy, in fact, that I’m willing to chips and a saucer of salsa. The overlook long waits and medio- chips are warm, and the salsa is tion. piquant, and they both make for Friction reminds me of the sec- cre food. Which brings me to the third a nice contrast with the sweet, ond thing that I like about Amigos. Though there are cer- positive thing about Amigos. tangy margaritas. So far, so good. tainly exceptions, the clientele They serve the margaritas really I’ve only ordered two of the hunat Amigos is pretty hot. Espe- fast and the food really slowly, dreds — if not thousands — of cially on Wednesday and Satur- which means that by the time entrees on the Amigos menu, most of which are some variation on the usual chimichanga-enchilada-taco theme, and neither one was very good. But let’s not waste time on unimportant details — who really cares about the food anyway? It’s Mexican. Let’s leave it at that and get back to the more important things. Booze and chicks. That’s why I go to Amigos, and it’s why you should, too. There’s really no combination like it, not even ham and cheese, or monkeys and monkeys — sorry, Alex, for bringing you into this, you hairy monkey man. Now, I realize that I’ve probably lost the female audience again, but what can I do? Oh Law-School women, why can’t we relate? I try to see the world through your eyes, to share your hopes and dreams, to walk in the shoes of female lawyerness, but there are some walls I cannot penetrate, some bridges I cannot cross. But don’t worry, I won’t give up hope. Maybe some day, after a few margaritas and perhaps a tequila shot ($2.75) or two, we can be amigo and amiga, united by the blissful bonds of inebriation, which, after all, taste a lot like love. Stomp His Head GOOD! A Scholarly Perspective on the WWE Ever since the ancient Greeks were not yet ancient, mankind has been fascinated by wrestling. Wrasslin’ Review by Brent Olson Who can forget classic bouts such as the mighty yet illegitimate Hercules against the likewise illegitimate Antaeus, or Achilles against that one guy in the Iliad — or if not Achilles, then someone else. Anyway, the important thing is that men enjoy watching other men beat each other up. They also enjoy watching women beat each other up, but I’ll get to that later. And so it came to pass that on Sunday I attended the World Wrestling Entertainment (“WWE”) live event at U-Hall. WWE used to be known as the WWF, but the World Wildlife Fund won a trademark dispute over the WWF acronym last year, leading to “rebranding” on the part of the losing wrestling federation. Normally I wouldn’t even have known a WWE event was taking place or spent money to attend, but a 1L whom I’ll call “Tim Clinton” invited 1L “Stephen Strosnider,” myself, and his “pastor” to go. It seems that “Tim’s” good friend Christopher Nowinski, who was on the Harvard “football team” with “Tim,” is now a rising star in the WWE and provided “Tim” with several complementary tickets to the show to come see him perform. But wrestling isn’t just about wrestling. It’s about guys with huge orange block letters on their chests. It’s about guys with shirts that say, “I beat anorexia,” and who shout “Stomp his head in!” And it’s about the women and children, some of whom looked to be about three years old, who attend such spectacles with the aforementioned men. The first bout was between Goldust and Steven Richards, the latter of whom was accused by the former of wearing “pink panties,” an accusation that rang hollow coming from a guy wearing a platinum blonde wig and more makeup than the entire state of Montana. Goldust finally felled Richards in an almost Shakespearian manner — Richard’s manager, Victoria, accidentally rammed her head into Richard’s… loins, knocking him cold. Then came the match we were waiting to see, “Tim’s” Harvard chum Nowinski against Spike Dudley. Before starting the match, Nowinski explained that while he hadn’t really liked Virginia in the past, now he did — in fact, to show his love for the state, he put on a Hokies shirt, which the crowd failed to appreciate. It didn’t help matters that his opponent was the 150-pound Spike Dudley, a likeable underdog if there ever was one. To show their dislike of Nowinski, the crowd began chanting “Harvard sucks,” which so irritated “Tim” that he leapt to his feet and repeatedly proclaimed “Harvard rocks” with a steely gaze that indicated he was willing to back up his words with a pair of ivy-covered fists. Fortunately, no one took him up on the offer and Nowinski managed to beat his opponent through a healthy dose of Vitamin C — cheating. But the evening had more to it than cheating Harvard graduates. It had a three-way match for the tag team championship place, featuring Kane and Rob Van Dam defending their title against the Dudley Boyz and Lance Storm and Chief Morley. Kane, a rather quiet fellow with an ominous black-and-red mask, used his trademark “Chokeslam” to lead his team to victory after overcoming adversity — the other two teams kicking him on the knee for pain infliction purposes. Sore losers Storm and Morley took their overwrought aggression out on the Dudley Boyz before the Boys put Storm through a table; the Dudley Boyz apparently have made a career out of putting people through tables. And who could forget localboy Maven teaming up with Hurricane to beat 3-Minute Warning by … er … um … come to think of it, I don’t remember how they beat 3-Minute Warning, just that they did. Other wrestlers gracing the ring on Sunday included Ric “the Nature Boy” Flair, Booker T, and Chris Jericho, all of whom participated in the “introduction” match where the issue at question seemed to be who had the loudest and longest theme song. Though a good time was had by all, one poor fan had his free speech rights infringed when his sign proclaiming “Wrestling Sucks” was confiscated — on Thomas Jefferson’s birthday, no less! Do I smell a muzzle award for 2003? 8 Law School Life NGSL’S Virginia Law Weekly VANGUARD Friday, April 18, 2003 Attracting a Different Kind of Student OF DEMOCRACY Ah, to have your initials included osterone matched only by the colin the VANGUARD OF DEMOCRACY and lective manhood of the 3L males all that it represents as the voice who made a pilgrimage Friday to and conscience of Southern social- the strip bar of Martinsburg, W.V. ites — it is flattering. Time is tick- Indeed, the full nudity of Appalaing down, too, as in next week’s chia forged the unexpected union of issue we reveal ourselves and take macho 3Ls J.M., N.M., T.T., Pork time to reminisce. This could be Chop, C.R., V.R., and the Hawk. VG your last chance, so, instead of our learned that Kennedy tried to stow usual unanswered plea for gossip, away in the way back of their rented VG this week urges the following: if Ford Windstar, but responsible J.M. your initials, or some friend’s ini- growled: “Hey, Tony — seven tials, haven’t appeared in VG this seatbelts, seven passengers,” and year, and you’d like them to, please dragged the man out by his heels in send along any story about you or D-3. Rumor has it that Kennedy, this friend that you think is worthy thus scorned, shuffled back to the of mention on this hallowed, hal- school, grumbling about the anticilowed page. The address is pated yawnfest awaiting him at Rehnquist’s speech. Notwithstandvinnyvanguard@yahoo.com. Some students were lucky ing J.K.’s departure, highlights of enough to witness first hand Jus- the trip included a lap dance for the tice Kennedy’s strapping thighs Hawk, the loss of J.M.’s hat in an strolling the corridors of the Law orifice, and a witching-hour attempt School last week — those khakis to consume consortium… maybe were tight, baby — reminding VG of those were lowlights. For those who stayed behind, battered drumsticks. J.K.’s visit treated students to a taste of test- Friday night offered a keg party at Alderman, ostensibly held in honor of the admitted students, who were apparently too captivated by the aforementioned Rehnquist yawnfest to party. Any admits in attendance were, however, treated to feats of drinking by 3Ls S.B., B.J., and G.F., and the impressive behavior of the beer-pong Nazi, 3L C.C., who regulated the beer-pong ladder and commanded at least one 1L team to step away from the table. Way to show those incoming students the way, C.C. Meanwhile, Justice Rehnquist spoke to the “different kind of student” at Caplin Auditorium, in an attempt to show prospectives that many of us don’t actually long to spend Friday evening drinking foamy beer and playing pong in the basement of the Law School’s version of a frat house… Hmm… Will this really work? Can you revamp the image of the school successfully? Will they come? Does Euro Disney still exist? The French won’t go near that place — and the intellectuals ain’t coming here, but VG digresses… Beyond Friday night, last week included Commissioner Song Night at the Biltmore on Wednesday: the coveted Golden Softball award went to 2L D.Z., who hammed it up with “Girls Just Wanna Get Ass,” a slutty parody of the Cindy Lauper fave. On Saturday night, Lewis Mountain, led by out-of-control drunk 3L E.V., held its last chance party — the last chance to hook up with that bombastic guy or gal from your section whom you never got around to screwing. VG doesn’t know if the party lived up to its creed, but VG knows this: the school’s most adorable couple is officially 3L N.F. and 1L C.D. They are going to have some smiley-ass kids. Who knew that Long Island plus Louisiana equals lust? Admiring their foreplay Saturday, one 3L mused: “Aw, look at that, with those pet names and cuddling and all, how cute are those little people?” But then many PHOTO GALLERY How to Relax... the Right Way How to Relax... the Cute and Compact Way How to Relax... the Incredibly Awkward and Aesthetically Unpleasing Way photos by Sam Young The Weekly Crossword Edited by Wayne Robert Williams Top Ten Things that Would Raise Us in the Rankings by David Sergenian ’03 SPINOFFS By Josiah Breward, Scranton, Pennsylvania ACROSS 1 Brits’ raincoats 5 Hole-making tools 9 Port __ cheese 14 Segal movie, “Where’s __?” 19 Arthur of tennis 20 Slangy affirmative 21 “Crazy” singer Patsy 22 Bradley and Sharif 23 Series and spinoff 27 Hot jewelry? 28 Biblical boat 29 Fish eggs 30 Buenos __ 31 __ Dhabi 32 Scandinavian country: abbr. 33 Angler’s tool 34 Highland hats 36 Lapdog, briefly 37 Projecting edge 38 Latin handle 40 Moslem veils 43 Position 45 Departed 46 Series and spinoff 48 Gadgeteer Popeil 50 Dawn’s early light 51 Dynamic leader? 52 CIA’s Soviet counterpart 53 Stuck one’s neck out 56 Former 1/2 country 58 Arista 60 Poisonous shrub 64 Tenants 66 Lipstick trees: var. 70 Whip 71 Cycle starter? 72 Series and spinoff 76 Compass pt. 77 Overly submissive 79 Feminist pioneer Elizabeth 80 Caches 82 Juan of Argentina 84 Gradual bend 85 Fruit drink 88 European ermines 89 Neurological test letters 91 European river 94 Old-time high note 96 Word extension: abbr. 97 Series and spinoff 103 School orgs. 106 Herzog film, “__: The Wrath of God” 107 Able to read 108 Evening in Roma beers and much foreplay later, the same 3L offered: “God, look at that, with those pet names and cuddling and all, how disgusting are those little people?” Perhaps this 3L was jealous, but something had to be said — VG has kept this relationship under wraps for a while. Saturday’s display was simply the straw that broke VG’s back. VG also knows that 3L A.R. walked into Lewis Mountain and immediately started freedom-kissing his drunk, on-again, off-again grad student. She was on him like Sigourney Weaver possessed in Ghostbusters. Before you could say Oy!, they had vanished into A.R.’s former room, only to emerge disheveled and rosy-cheeked. A.R.’s matted ’fro reminded VG of helmetoff post-game shots from vintage NFL films. Finally, all this lust seems cheap next to the true love expressed last week by 2L J.S., who apparently dropped the L-bomb on M.B. After saying “I love you,” J.S. soon departed and, in a fit of post-commitment confusion, left his wallet at her place. Smooth. So in closing, to all you 3Ls reading along: Be forewarned that this is essentially your last dose of the comforting maternal affection called VG. Cherish the joy, gossip, and good cheer VG has brought each Friday. Find solace in the fact that love is in the air in Spies and that lounging 1Ls are gazing into each other’s eyes before Con Law and thinking: this person is mediocre-looking up close, but looks okay from far way. And then they’re off to Chesepeake Bagel Bakery, where she dares him to eat a fatty cookie… And so we conclude with these images not of petty gossip, but of true love, U.Va. Law-style, because that’s what VG is all about. 109 Floating cooler? 110 Turkish title 112 Brass instrument 113 Cellular letters 115 Fam. member 116 Passive, female cosmic principle 117 French floor 119 Marina del __, CA 120 Will Smith movie of 2001 121 Half a Kenyan rebel? 122 Series and spinoff 127 __-ski 128 Ammonia derivative 129 Trumpetshaped flower 130 Actor Morales 131 Discernment 132 Lecherous man 133 Stone and Stallone 134 Part of P.E. DOWN 1 Of the morning 2 Volcanic formation 3 Series and spinoff 4 But, to Brutus 5 One of the Blues Brothers 6 Nine-to-five times 7 __ Cruces, NM 8 Pitman system 9 Outlines 10 In imitation of 11 Judy’s daughter 12 Disunite a fly? 13 Yellowish pink 14 Whale groups 15 Cockney’s abode 16 Faisal I’s nationalist movement 17 Uprightness 18 Takes for granted 24 G.A. Nasser’s short-lived nation 25 Creates froth solution p. 6 10. More people who both brag about never going to class and then write 300-page outlines. 9. More breast surgery. 8. More stress in the curriculum on those aspects of legal education that really translate into things that judges want to hear about, like the transaction costs of the judicial system and how it would be better if economists ran the world. 7. More cattiness. 6. Stronger NGSL presence? Oh sorry, I’m getting redundant. 5. More of the first-year joke formula: take ordinary phrase, substitute arcane legal term, laugh loudly. Continue until graduation. 4. Fewer Armenians. 3. Expansion of all PR classes to five credits. 2. Cloning of Dean Hopson. 1. Two words: Daily VANGUARD. Hey. You claim you’re funny, but your mom told us something different. Prove her wrong and submit your list to Va-LawWeekly@virginia.edu. 26 Lee of “The Running Man” 35 Terrier type 37 Persian nightingale 39 Egyptian solar discs 41 Close-fitting 42 Wide, flat river valley in Scotland 44 Glad rags 47 Words in self-help titles 49 Requirement 53 Clustered mass 54 Actress Taylor 55 __ ex machina 57 Captivated 59 Entre __ (between us) 61 Series and spinoff 62 Balance-sheet item 63 Fischer’s game 65 Stiff hair 67 Modern: pref. 68 “__ Christie” 69 Mach 2 breakers 73 Ankle bones 74 At the ready 75 Dines 78 Walter of “Star Trek” 81 83 86 87 90 Liquid courses __-do-well Payments Lamb’s pen name Revolve around a fixed point 92 Dismounted 93 One who comes back 95 In the manner of stars 97 Tended tots 98 Herod __ 99 Undoers 100 Ancient Greek district 101 Violin of the Middle Ages 102 Beth and Don 104 Passage between buildings 105 Slender Arabian dogs 111 Long-tailed lizard 114 Assistance 117 Latin being 118 Give off 123 Court divider 124 Even one 125 Abner’s size? 126 Cadence count word