conoscere e ri-conoscere i disturbi del comportamento
Transcription
conoscere e ri-conoscere i disturbi del comportamento
CONOSCERE E RI-CONOSCERE I DISTURBI DEL COMPORTAMENTO ALIMENTARE NELL'INFANZIA E NELL'ADOLESCENZA PARMA 18 SETTEMBRE 2015 IN VOLO RESIDENZA SOCIO RIABILITATIVA ACCREDITATA PER DCA VIA I MAGGIO,8 PELLEGRINO P.SE CONTATTI: TEL 0524594927 FAX 0524594607 EMAIL involo@gruppoceis.org SITO www.involodca.it INFO RESIDENZA 3931549740 INFO CONSULENZE 05211562148 Residential ED rehabilitation in young patients: rationale and effectiveness Dr. Monica Baiano M.D., PhD Psychiatrist Center for Eating and Weight Disorders, Portogruaro (Ve), Italy ED in adolescents: problematic nodes for treatment interventions 3 1. Early diagnosis and treatment 4 Espie and Eisler, Adolescent Health, Medicine and Therapeutics 2015; 6: 9-16 2. Novel clinical features Stice et al., 118(3):587-597 J Abnorm Psychol 2009; Hopwood et al., Compr Psychiatry 2010; 51(6): 585-591 Neumark-Sztainer et al., J Am Diet Assoc 2011; 111(7): 1004-1011 5 3. Body weight history 4. ED derivability and development N % AOR Nessun disturbo 34 3.1 1.00 MDD 10 20.0 5.92 2.61-15.33 GAD 7 4.3 4.67 1.75-15.59 CD 4 2.9 0.48 0.12-1.84 OPD 0 0 - - ADHD 1 20.0 1.26 0.18-8.75 4.7 1.51 0.37-6.25 AUD 95%CI 7 Modificato da Shivola et al., Compr Psychiatry 2009; 50(1): 20-25. 5. Psychiatric and behavioral complications Peebles et al., J Adolesc Health 2011; 48(3): 310-313 Greydanus & Apple, J Multidisc Healthcare 2011; 4: 183-189 8 6. Treatment setting Who seeks residential treatment? ….for both ED adolescents and adults thein SF-36 showed average •Inpatients treatment of AN adolescents does population scores for the physical butanorexic very low mental scores… not significantly modifyscale core thoughts and perceptions. This may explain high relapse rates. Twohig et al., Eat Dis 2015; 23 (1): 1-14 •Changes in core psychopathology may be crucial for recovery and prevention of recurrences in adolescents Fenning et al., 2015 Early Interv Psychiatry doi 10.111 Madden et al., Psychological Medicine 2015; 45: 415-427 9 7. Best treatment choices Pharmachological management AN BN BED SSRI/NRI Ongoingtherefore studies ? should also be? viewed and incorporated SGA Ongoing studies ? as one? component of a ? CBT ? ? multidisciplinary IPT ? ? ? comprehensive treatment plan FBT “strong research Partial research ? support” (APA) support for specific requirements Van den & Jordaan, J Child Adolesc Ment Health 2014; FBTHeuvel is the only well established treatment for AD adolescents (Lock,26(2): J Clin Child Adolesc Psychol 2015: 44(5):707-721 125-137 10 Modificato da Brown & Keel, Substance Abuse: research and treatment 2012; 6: 33-61 Rehabilitation in ED: talking points 11 1. Developing an individualized treatment plan Level 4: Residential treatment center • •Medical To our knowledge, few studies status with no need of intravenous fluids, NTF, multiple day lab tasting exploring the clinical effectiveness of •Suicidal behavior: inpatient monitoring and treatment may be residential treatment programs in ED needed depending on the estimated level of risk haveasbeen •Weight < 85% ofconducted. healthy body weight: •Poor-to-fair motivation to recover, intrusive thoughts, cooperation influenced by highly structured programs •Co-occurring psychiatric disorders •Structure needed to gain weight •Constant meal supervision •Require help and support as well as use cognitive-behavioral skills to avoid purging •Environmental stress (unsupportive or conflictual family) •Geographical distance APA Guidelines 2. A possible answer to unmet needs: the RPPTM model COOPERATION MINDFULLNESS MOTIVATION THERAPEUTIC ALLIANCE 3. RPPTM : philosophy • Specialized multidisciplinary team treating ED and comorbid psychiatric disorders • Evidence-based treatment + continuous outcome monitoring • Favorable cost/effectiveness ratio • Care - continuum model • To avoid/prevent hospitalization especially in paediatric subjects 4. RPPTM : specific goals • Weight restoration • Control or remove weight and food phobias • Body acceptance • Enhance motivation to change • Self-discipline of bingeing/purging • Prevention of body weight fluctuations • Development of awareness regarding thought patterns and emotional dysregulation sustaining abnormal eating behaviors Stepped and targeted refeeding strategies (assisted Flexible meals, staffprotocol supervision in the kitchen) Tolerance of periods of weight + maintenance Psychotherapeutic and psychosocial interventions Initial abstention + from eating fearful foods Pharmachological treatment when necessary + Gradual increase of caloric Constant monitoring of physical status intake and experience of new foods Increased exposure and responsibility (preparation of meals, outside snacking, spending time at home) 5. RPPTM : admission criteria to intensive residential/hemiresidential treatment program The RPP™ program was applied to outpatients referring to our outpatient service after a close assessment of clinical and psychopathological conditions Exclusion criteria • Severe physical complications (i.e.: serum potassium levels < 2.0 mEq/L, very low BP < 60/30 mmHg) • Life-threatening behaviours (i.e. reiterative self-harming, suicide attempts) or acute comorbid psychiatric condition requiring hospitalization RPP™ outcomes in a sample of adolescents admitted to the residential facility “Casa delle Farfalle” 18 2007-2015 Tot 108 DCA diagnosis EDNOS BN M/F: 6/102 BED 0,93% AN sub t ype n=1 9,26% n=10 12,96% n=14 76,85% n=83 AN 19 Year s 20 7,41% n=8 3,70% n=4 discharge ordinary self-discharge discharge for other reasons 88,89% n=96 21 Clinical features AN (83) BN (14) EDNOS (10) Statistics p Age at onset 13.53 1.52 14.15 1.07 14.90 1.10 Χ2=8.66 0.013 Age at admission 15.26 1.41 16.15 0.90 16.40 0.84 Χ2=11.83 0.003 Lenght of illness 1.74 1.31 2.00 1.08 1.50 1.08 Χ2=2.01 0.365 Lenght of stay 117.43 65.02 86.08 69.69 99.50 30.18 F=1.047 0.375 §Kruskal-Wallis test, with α set at p<0.05 22 *one-way ANOVA, with α set at p<0.05 Neuropsychiatric records Psychiatric comorbidity at admission pd_type * DCA code Crosstabulation Count Count AN pd_type schizoid schizotypal histrionic narcissistic borderline OC nos and mixed disorders Total 13 0 7 2 2 2 3 29 DCA code BN EDNOS BED Total AN 3 0 1no 17 32 0 1 0yes 1 48 0 1Total 0 8 80 2 0 0 4 3 1 0 6 0 0 0 2 0 0 0 3 8 3 1 41 DCA code BN EDNOS 3 2 11 8 14 10 BED Total 0 1 1 37 68 105 Depressive disorder Personality disorder 23 Self-harm behaviors Case Processing Summary N self-harm * psichiatric comorbidity Valid Percent 75 69,4% Cases Missing N Percent 33 30,6% Total N Percent 108 100,0% self-harm * psichiatric comorbidity Crosstabulation type SH * DCA code Crosstabulation Count self-harm Total Count no yes psychiatric comorbidity no yes 24 34 1 16 25 50 Total type SH Total AN self scratching/ cutting 58 suicide attempt 17 75 5 1 6 DCA code BN 2 0 2 EDNOS 2 0 2 Total 9 1 10 25 Within group analyses: BMI trend BMI trend AN Wilcoxon’s Test: Z=-7.50 p<0.001 19 18,5 18 17,5 17 16,5 16 15,5 15 14,5 14 BMI_T0 BMI_T1 BMI trend BN Paired Sample T Test: t=-1.22 p=0.248 22,50 22,00 21,50 21,00 20,50 BMI_T0 BMI EDNOS Wilcoxon’s Test: Z=-1.43 p=0.153 22 21,5 21 20,5 20 BMI_T0 BMI_T1 BMI_T1 Within group analyses: caloric intake trend AN Paired Sam ples Statistics Pair 1 KcalT0 KcalT2 Mean 1426,2429 1997,7143 N Std. Deviation 382,86186 305,59124 70 70 Std. Error Mean 45,76074 36,52514 T test: p<0.001 2500 2000 1500 Kcal T0 1000 Kcal T1 500 0 Kcal T0 BN Kcal T1 Paired Samples Statistics T test: p=0.089 1800 1750 1700 1650 1600 1550 1500 Pair 1 Kcal T0 Kcal T0 Kcal T2 Mean 1608,18 1760,9091 Kcal T0 Kcal T2 Mean 1437,14 1900,0000 11 11 Std. Deviation 362,762 283,17678 Kcal T1 EDNOS Paired Samples Statistics Pair 1 N N 7 7 Std. Deviation 359,013 211,89620 Std. Error Mean 135,694 80,08924 T test: p=0.018 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Kcal T0 Kcal T1 Std. Error Mean 109,377 85,38101 Menstrual cycle at admission primary amenorrhea 3,13% irregular menses/spotting n=2 1,56% no data n=1 15,63% n=10 6,25% regular menses n=4 73,44% n=47 Menstrual cycle at discharge secondary amenorrhea primary amenorrhea 5,33% irregular menses/spotting n=4 13,33% n=10 4,00% no data n=3 22,67% n=17 regular menses 54,67% n=41 secondary amenorrhea Within group analyses: EDI-2 EDI AN Wilcoxon’s: all p<0.001 14,00 12,00 10,00 Surviving Bonferroni’s 8,00 T0 6,00 T1 4,00 2,00 EDI-2 BN 0,00 Wilcoxon’s: all p<0.05 DT 22,00 20,00 18,00 16,00 14,00 12,00 10,00 8,00 6,00 4,00 2,00 0,00 BU BD IN P IS A MF ASC IM SI Not surviving Bonferroni’s T0 T1 EDI-2 EDNOS All Wilcoxon’s but * (paired T test) DT BU BD IN P IS A MF ASC IM Not surviving Bonferroni’s SI 16,00 14,00 12,00 10,00 8,00 6,00 4,00 2,00 0,00 T0 T1 * * DT BU BD IN P IS A MF ASC IM SI Within group analyses: SCL-90 SCL-90 AN Surviving Bonferroni’s Wilcoxon’s: all p<0.001 2 1,5 Wilcoxon’s: all p<0.001 T0 1 T1 0,5 0 SOM OC IS DEP ANX AH PHO PAR PSY SLE GSI SCL90 BN All p <0.05, only Bonferroni’s All paired T test but * (Wilcoxon’s) surviving 2,50 2,00 1,50 1,00 0,50 0,00 T0 T1 * SOM OC INS * DEP ANX AH * * PHO PAR PSY SLE GSI SCL90 EDNOS 2,50 2,00 1,50 1,00 0,50 0,00 All paired T test but * (Wilcoxon’s) T0 T1 * INS * SOM OC DEP ANX AH * * PHO PAR PSY SLE GSI p <0.05, but not surviving Bonferroni’s Take home messages: Intensive RPP™ delivered in residential/hemiresidential setting: a) reduces core ED psychopathology, b) reduces general psychiatric symptomatology c) Induces weight recovery/stabilization especially in AN patients 31 Take home messages: d) Treating adolescent ED patients in a highly specialized ED unit admitting also adult patients can be an effective treatment setting Naab et al., Eat Weight Disord 2013; 18(2): 167-173 e) Day programs can assist in weight and psychological restoration in adolescents Green et al., Australas Psychiatry 2015; 23(3):249-253 32 Grazie a voi per l’attenzione e grazie a tutti i colleghi del DCAP per il loro costante, paziente lavoro 34