Examiners` Report - National Board of Accountants and Auditors
Transcription
Examiners` Report - National Board of Accountants and Auditors
(NBAA) THE NATIONAL BOARD OF ACCOUNTANTS AND AUDITORS TANZANIA EXAMINERS’ AND PERFORMANCE REPORT 83RD EXAMINATION SESSION – MAY 2016 NBAA, Mhasibu House, Bibi Titi Mohamed Street, P.O. Box 5128, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania. 30TH JUNE 2016 Telephones: (022) 2211890/9 Mobile: 0713 320423 Fax: (022) 2151746 Email: info@nbaa-go.tz Website: www.nbaa-go.tz TABLE OF CONTENTS Foreword & Acknowledgement ……………………………………… PAGE (i) Executive Summary of 83rd Examination session …………………… (v) CHAPTER 1 Analysis of Candidates’ Performance in the 83rd Examination Session 1 CHAPTER II Performance Evaluation Subject-Wise …………………..................... • Accounting Technician Examination Level I ……….................. • Accounting Technician Examination Level II …………………. • Foundation Level ………………………………… • Intermediate Level …………………….................. • Final Level ……………………………………….. 4 4 17 31 48 83 CHAPTER III Examiners’ Recommendations to Tutors & Students ………………... 105 CHAPTER IV Institutional Performance Evaluation ………………………………... 113 CHAPTER V Accounting Manpower Created by the Board up to May 2016 129 CHAPTER VI TheThe NBAA NBAA Special Special Awards Awards Programme Programme forfor Candidates Candidates with with Meritorious Meritorious Examination Examination Achievements Achievements ……………......................... ……………........................ 134 1 FOREWORD AND ACKNOWLEDGEMENT ________________ The current examination scheme has been tested for the fourth time in May 2016. The first time was in November 2014. Unlike the phased out examination scheme the current examination scheme is basically designed to test competencies rather than understanding of knowledge. To realise this goal there is a need to streamline the whole process from teaching of the students, setting of examination questions as well as marking of the examinations. Here it means that the trainers, learners, examiners as well as examination markers need to speak the same language. If there is any mismatch between these stakeholders the aim of competence based examination scheme cannot be realised. Lecturers are required to change their teaching orientation to match with competence approach. They are required to guide learners to acquire competencies rather than knowledge. Learners are supposed to change their learning styles from rote learning to active learning that will enable them to learn the required competencies. Those who are setting examination questions should also consider the fact that they are testing understanding of skills and competencies rather than understanding of information. How to orient all these stakeholders to have the same orientation has remained a challenge in implementing the competence based examination scheme. But as we move forward the situation is changing into better through trainings and acquisition of experiences. The current examination scheme has eight subjects in the Accounting Technician Levels I and II as shown below: Code Name Accounting Technician Level I T01 Book keeping and Accounts T02 Elements of Business Maths and Statistics T03 Introduction to Information and Communication Technology T.04 Business Communication Skills Accounting Technician Level II T.05 Principles of Accounting and Auditing T.06 Elements of Cost Accounting and Procurement T.07 Elements of Commercial Knowledge and Taxation T.08 Accounting for Public Sector and Cooperatives i The Professional Examination Scheme has three level structures as follows: (i) Foundation (Knowledge and Skills) Level, having five subjects, (ii) Intermediate (Skills and Analysis in Context )Level, having six subjects, and (iii)Final (Professional Analysis, Application and Evaluation) Level, having four subjects. In total the Professional Examination Scheme has 15 subjects as shown hereunder: Foundation (Knowledge and Skills Level) Exam Subject Name Code A1 Quantitative Techniques A2 Business and Management A3 Accounting A4 Business Information A5 Business Law Intermediate (Skills and Analysis in Context Level) Exam Subject Name Code B1 Financial Management B2 Financial Accounting B3 Auditing Principles and Practice B4 Public Finance and Taxation I B5 Performance Management B6 Management, Governance and Ethics Final (Professional Analysis, Application and Evaluation Level) Exam Subject Name Code C1 Corporate Reporting C2 Auditing and Assurance Services C3 Business and Corporate Finance C4 Public Finance and Taxation II ACCOUNTING MANPOWER Since the inception of the Accounting Technician examinations the Board has been able to produce 13,901 Accounting Technicians. This category of Accounting Technicians covers 3,647 Accounting Technicians Certificate (ATEC) graduates, 2,971 Basic Book-keeping Certificate (BBC) graduates, 5,746 National Book-keeping Certificate (NABOCE) graduates and 1,537 National Accountancy Diploma (NAD) graduates. The Board has also been able to produce 7,171 CPA (T) graduates since it started conducting these examinations in May, 1975. In total, the Board has been able to produce 21,072 accounting personnel (manpower) of different levels and categories serving both in public and private sectors inside and outside Tanzania. ii EXAMINATION CENTRES During the 83rd examination session, examinations were held in 11 examination centres located in Tanzania Mainland and Zanzibar. These centres accommodated 6,499 candidates sitting at different levels of the Board’s examinations. The examination centres were as shown here below: Dar Es Salaam Centres 1. 2. 3. Patel Brotherhood Diamond Jubilee Hall Lamada Hotel Upcountry centres 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Arusha – Institute of Accountancy Arusha (IAA) Dodoma – College of Business Education (CBE) Kilimanjaro –Young Men Christian Association (YMCA) Moshi Mbeya – Mkapa Conference Centre Morogoro – CCT Women’s Training Centre Mwanza –St. Dominic Pastoral Centre Tanga – St. Joseph’s Commercial School (SJCS) Zanzibar – State University of Zanzibar (SUZA) OBJECTIVES OF THE REPORT The Report is intended to avail to trainers and candidates, the examinations’ overall general performance, specific areas of weaknesses and suggestions for improvement. It is an important guide to candidates as well as trainers, setters, markers and moderators of the Board’s future examinations. Analysis of the examination performance is presented in Table 3 of this report while a detailed analysis indicating the performance of candidates registered by the recognized Tuition Providers is shown in Tables 10 to 11 of the report. Analysis of performance in each subject is presented in Tables 5.1 to 9.1.8. Comments and observations in the Examiners' and Performance Report are supported by relevant statistical analysis of the candidates' performance in each examination layer. The last chapter of the Report comprises a list of prizes offered by NBAA and other prize donor institutions. These prizes will be awarded to candidates who have excelled in their examinations during the graduation ceremony to be held in October 2016. iii ACKNOWLEDGEMENT On behalf of the Board and on my own behalf, I wish to convey my very sincere appreciation to all persons who willingly supported the Board in this demanding professional task. I am indeed particularly thankful to all Tuition Providers who devoted their energy and time to guide the candidates and preparing them for the examinations. I am also delighted to acknowledge the contribution of Board’s Examiners, Markers, Invigilators, and the Board’s Secretariat, the Education and Publications Committee and the Governing Board for their much appreciated cooperation during the whole process of the NBAA’s 83rd examination session. Last but not least, I congratulate all examination candidates who studied hard and sat for the 83rd examinations of the Board. Once again, I would like to reiterate that the Examiners' Report is prepared to help trainers and the Board’s candidates to improve on their future performance by learning from previous experiences. I, therefore, call upon readers of this Report to come up with constructive suggestions on how to improve further the examination process and reports arising therein. Yours sincerely, CPA Pius A. Maneno EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR iv EXECUTIVE SUMMARY TO THE 83RD EXAMINATION SESSION – MAY 2016 1.0 PREAMBLE: The Board conducts its examinations twice in a year during the months of May and November. This session is the 83rd examination session in which the examinations were conducted from Tuesday 3rd to Friday 6th May 2016. There were 7,106 candidates who applied for the examinations, out of whom 607 (8.5%) were absent, 6,499 sat for the examinations at different levels. The candidature distribution this session is as shown below: EXAMINATIO CANDIDATES N LEVELS APPLIED TECHNICIAN LEVELS 115 ATEC I: ATEC II: 168 CANDIDATES ABSENT % CANDIDATES SAT % 5 4.3 110 95.7 8 4.8 160 95.2 PROFESSIONAL LEVELS Foundation 484 39 8.1 445 91.9 Intermediate 3898 403 10.3 3495 89.3 Final 2441 152 6.2 2289 93.8 7,106 607 8.5 6,499 91.5 TOTALS v 2.0 TREND OF THE EXAMINATION CANDIDATURE 2.1 Candidature Exam Sitting Candidature enrolment this session has slightly increased by 713 candidates (11.0%) compared with the May 2015 examination session. There were 6,499 candidates who sat for the May 2016 examinations against 5,786 candidates who sat for the May 2015 examinations. Table 1 and Chart 1 shows candidature trend (candidates who sat for the examinations) for the eight examination sessions: November 2012 to May 2016. Table 1 EXAMINATION CANDIDATURE TREND FOR THE PRECEDING EIGHT EXAMINATION SESSIONS NOVEMBER 2012 TO MAY 2016 EXAMINATION ATEC ATEC I II FOUNDATION INTERMEDIATE FINAL TOTAL A B C D E F 76th Session November, 2012 132 117 65 109 156 131 2,033 1,110 3,853 77th Session May, 2013 125 142 61 93 168 108 2,048 1,297 4,042 78th Session November, 2013 111 162 59 125 168 83 2,556 1,487 4,751 79h Session May, 2014 83 161 68 85 174 90 2,109 1625 4,395 80th Session November, 2014 159 125 372 3,109 2,021 5,786 83rd Session May, 2015 159 119 36537 3,163 2,011 5,817 82nd Session November, 2015 111 134 364 3,114 1,956 5,679 83rd Session May, 2016 110 160 445 3,495 2,289 6,499 vi 2.2 Candidature Distribution – May 2016 Candidature distribution for the May 2016 examination session shows that majority of the candidates who sat for these examinations were in the Intermediate level examinations. The Chart below shows the candidature distribution Chart 1 Candidature Distribution – May 2016 ATEC I,110,2% ATEC II,160,2% FINAL, 2,289,35% FOUNDATION, 445,7% ATECI ATECII FOUNDATION INTERMEDIATE, 3,495,54% INTERMEDIATE FINAL Candidature in Intermediate level is highest as most of the candidates who enrol at this level are those who have completed a three years’ bachelor degree programme or its equivalent in accounting and enjoy exemptions to sit for the Intermediate Level examinations. Currently, the Board has recognized 19 accountancy training institutions whose programmes enjoy such exemption. A tertiary institution which offers bachelor degree courses related to accountancy courses has to apply to NBAA for its graduands to be given exemption in the Board’s examinations. Furthermore, majority of the candidates at this level were those who sat for B5Performance Management subject who were referred in P19 Management Accounting in the previous syllabus. Out of 3,495 candidates who sat for the Intermediate Level examinations 2,526 (72.3) sat for Performance Management subject. vii 3.0 EXAMINATION PERFORMANCE 3.1 Pass rates for examination levels tested in May 2016 Table 2 (i) below shows pass rates in May 2016 examination session EXAMINATION LEVEL NUMBER OF PASSES ATEC I Passed Part passed PERCENTAGE 34 32 30.9 29.1 ATEC II Passed Part passed FOUNDATION Passed Part passed 41 61 25.6 38.1 233 171 52.4 38.4 INTERMEDIATE Passed Part passed 366 1135 10.5 32.5 FINAL Passed Part passed 300 708 13.1 30.9 974 2,107 15.0 32.4 TOTAL PASSES Passed Part passed NOTE: Among the candidates who passed Intermediate and Final Levels there were ten (10) candidates with foreign qualifications. Table 2 (ii) below shows number of candidates with foreign CPA –equivalent qualification who sat and cleared the subjects with local contents Subject Number of entries 00 09 10 A5 Business Law B4 Public Finance and Taxation I C4 Public Finance and Taxation II These candidates are eligible for the award of letters of success and certificates to enable them register as members. viii 3.2 Examination Performance by Gender: Examination performance by gender in the five examination levels is as indicated on Table 3 below: Male No. % ATEC Level I Passes Female No. % Total Male No. % No. % Partial Passes Female No. % No. % No. % Failures Female No. % Total Male Total No. % Male No. % Total Female No. % No. % Total 26 76 8 24 34 100 19 59 13 41 32 100 25 57 19 43 44 100 70 64 40 36 110 100 32 78 9 22 41 100 40 66 21 34 61 100 30 52 28 48 58 100 102 64 58 36 160 100 155 67 78 33 233 100 99 58 72 42 171 100 20 49 21 51 41 100 274 62 171 38 445 100 223 61 143 39 366 100 708 62 427 38 1135 100 1257 63 737 37 1994 100 2188 63 1307 37 3495 100 Final Level 202 67 98 33 300 100 443 63 265 37 708 100 817 64 464 36 1281 100 1462 64 827 36 2289 100 TOTAL 638 66 336 34 974 100 1309 62 798 38 2107 100 2149 63 1269 37 3418 100 4096 63 2403 37 6499 100 ATEC Level II Foundation Level Intermediate Level ix CHAPTER I ANALYSIS OF CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE IN THE 83RD EXAMINATION SESSION – MAY 2016 OVERALL CANDIDATES' PERFORMANCE During the 83rd examination session, 7,106 candidates were registered for the Board’s examinations held in May, 2016, out of whom 607 (8.5%) candidates were absent from the examinations, 6,499 candidates sat for the examinations. Of the 6,499 candidates who sat for the examinations, 974 (15.0%) candidates passed while 2,017 (32.4%) candidates part passed and a total of 3,418 (52.6%) candidates failed the examinations. (See Table 4 on page 3). ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN CERTIFICATE (ATEC) - LEVEL I The May 2016 examination session was the 4th session since the review of the examinations structure and syllabi of ATEC. 115 candidates registered themselves for the examination. 5 (4.3.0%) candidates were absent. 110 candidates sat for the examination, out of whom 34 (30.9%) passed hence becoming eligible for a STATEMENT OF SUCCESS at this level. 32 (29.1%) candidates are part passed while a total of 44 (40%) candidates failed the examination. (See Table 4 on page3). ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN CERTIFICATE (ATEC) - LEVEL II This examination was conducted for the 4th time since the review of the examination structure and syllabi of ATEC II. Out of 168 candidates who registered for the examination, 08 (4.8%) candidates were absent leaving a total of 160 candidates who wrote the examination. 41 (25.6%) candidates passed and hence are recommended to be issued with CERTIFICATES OF COMPLETION of the Accounting Technician Certificate Examination. 61 (38.1%) candidates have part passed while a total of 58 (36.3%) candidates failed the examination. (See Table 4 on page3). FOUNDATION LEVEL The Foundation Level examinations consist of five subjects. These subjects were tested for the second time this session following the review of the examination structure and syllabi. In this examination, 484 candidates registered themselves for the examination out of whom 39 (8.1%) candidates were absent. Of the 445 candidates who wrote the examination, 233 (52.4%) candidates passed hence becoming eligible for a STATEMENT OF SUCCESS at this level. 171 (38.4%) candidates have part passed while a total of 41 (9.2%) candidates failed the examination. (See Table 4 on page3). 1 INTERMEDIATE LEVEL The Intermediate Level examinations consist of six subjects. As with the Foundation Level examinations, these subjects were tested for the second time this session following the review of the examination structure. In this examination, 3,898 candidates registered themselves out of whom 403 (10.3%) candidates were absent. Of the 3,495 candidates who wrote the examination, 336 (10.5%) candidates passed hence becoming eligible for a STATEMENT OF SUCCESS at this level. 1,135 (32.5%) candidates have part passed while a total of 1,994 (57.1%) candidates failed the examination. (See Table 4 on page3). FINAL LEVEL The Final Level examinations consist of four subjects. These examinations were tested for the second time following review of the examination structure. In this examination, 2,441 candidates registered themselves for Final Level examinations, out of whom 152 (6.2%) candidates were absent. Of the 2,289 candidates who wrote the examination, 300 (13.1%) candidates passed, hence becoming eligible for a STATEMENT OF SUCCESS at this Level. 708 (30.9%) candidates have part passed while a total of 1,281 (56.0%) candidates failed the examination. (See Table 4 on page3). CANDIDATES QUALIFYING FOR THE PROFESSIONAL CERTIFICATE OF COMPLETION In this examination session, 40 candidates qualify for the certificate of completion of the ATEC programme, comprising 09 (22.5%) female candidates and 31 (77.5%) male candidates. On the other hand 282 candidates qualify for the certificate of completion of the CPA programme, comprising103 (36.5%) female candidates and 179 (63.5%) male candidates. 2 TABLE 4 GENERAL STATISTICAL ANALYSIS OF EXAMINATION RESULTS 83RD EXAMINATION SESSION – MAY 2016 EXAMINATION ATEC I ATEC II FOUNDATION INTERMEDIATE NO. % NO. % NO % NO. % 115 100 168 100 484 100 3898 100 5 4.3 8 4.8 39 8.1 403 CANDIDATES WHO SAT 110 95.7 160 95.2 445 91.9 PART PASSED 32 29.1 61 38.1 171 PASSED 34 30.9 41 25.6 FAILURES 44 40 58 TOTAL 110 100 160 ENTRIES ABSENTEES FINAL % NO. % 2441 100 7106 100 10.3 152 6.2 607 8.5 3495 89.7 2289 93.8 6499 91.5 38.4 1135 32.5 708 30.9 2107 32.4 233 52.4 366 10.5 300 13.1 974 15 36.3 41 9.2 1994 57.1 1281 56.0 3418 52.6 100 445 100 3495 100 2289 100 6499 100 3 NO TOTAL CHAPTER II PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SUBJECT-WISE INTRODUCTION This chapter provides a detailed analysis of performance of candidates in each subject at each level of the Board’s examinations. General evaluation and assessment of candidates’ performance at each level and specific assessment of candidates in each topic examined is analyzed. The Board hopes that this report will provide necessary guidance to trainers and students for the better results in the Board’s future examinations. The May 2016 examination is the fourth examination session under the revised examination scheme and syllabi. The scheme has a two tier system of five different levels: two at the Accounting Technician level and three at the Professional level. A total of 23 examination papers were attempted this session as detailed hereunder: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Accounting Technician Level I with four papers; Accounting Technician Level II with four papers; The Foundation Level with five papers; The Intermediate Level with six papers; The Final Level with four papers. ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN LEVEL I GENERAL PERFORMANCE 110 candidates sat for the ATEC I examinations. The performance indicates that 34 (30.9%) candidates passed and therefore become eligible for the STATEMENT OF SUCCESS for ATEC I 32 (29.1%) candidates have passed some of the subjects in this level while 44 (40.0%) candidates failed the examinations. The general performance subject-wise is as shown in Table 5.1 TABLE 5.1 ATEC I SUBJECT-WISE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS: MAY 2015 AND MAY 2016 Paper Code T.01 T.02 T.03 T.04 Performance Subject Bookkeeping and Accounts Elements of Business Maths and Statistics Introduction to Information and Communication Technology Business Communication Skills May 2015 May 2016 Entries Pass % Entries Pass % 72 51 70.8 55 37 67.2 81 45 55.6 80 31 38.8 148 82 55.4 90 45 50.0 71 55 77.5 61 30 49.2 4 GENERAL COMMENTS T.01 - BOOK-KEEPING AND ACCOUNTS I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this paper is to enable candidates to apply knowledge of Book keeping and Accounts for recording, posting business transactions in the book of accounts and preparation of accounting statement in private and public sector accounts. II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER The paper comprised of three questions whereby candidates were required to answer all questions. Question one was an objective question which carried 60%. III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE QUESTION 1: VARIOUS TOPICS - MULTIPLE CHOICES Candidates were required to choose the correct answers among the given four alternatives. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 55 candidates who answered the question, 36 (65.5%) candidates passed while the remaining 19 (34.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 33 (60.0%) and 03 (5.5%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. There were no major weaknesses noted in this question. QUESTION 2: A. INTRODUCTION TO BOOKEEPING AND ACCOUNTING B. PREPARATION OF TRIAL BALANCE Candidates were required to: (a) Define cheque. (b) Explain distinguishing features of cheque. (c) Use the given information to prepare journal entries for rectification of errors and prepare suspense account Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 55 candidates who answered the question only 20 (36.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 35 (63.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 15 (27.3%), 02 (3.6%) and 03 (5.5%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Some candidates were incompetent in the correction of errors particularly double entry. 5 QUESTION 3: PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Candidates were required to use the provided information to (a) Prepare income statement for the given year. (b) Prepare statement of financial position for the given year. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 55 candidates who answered the question, 42 (76.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 13 (23.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 21 (38.2%), 5 (9.1%) and 16 (29.1%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. Some candidates failed to know which items should go into the income statement and which ones should go into the statement of financial position. IV: (a) (b) GENERAL OBSERVATIONS Assessment of the paper The panel of examiners observed that the questions were clear and fair. Also they commented that the Paper was of the standard and rigour required and could be answered within the allocated time. Candidates’ overall performance Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 55 candidates who answered the examination, 37 (67.3%) candidates passed while the remaining 18 (32.7%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 30 (54.5%) and 07 (12.7%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this examination paper The over-all candidates’ performance in the subject is as shown in table 5.1.1 TABLE 5.1.1 T01 – CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS Classification of Marks 0-49 50-69 70-79 80-100 TOTAL 18 30 07 00 55 32.7 54.5 12.7 0.0 100 No. of Candidates (Frequency) Percentage TABLE 5.1.2 T.01.COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 No. of candidates passed % 51 70.8 No. of passed May 2016 candidates % 37 6 % decrease 67.3 15.9 T.02 - ELEMENTS OF BUSINESS MATHEMATICS AND STATISTICS I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME The principal learning outcome of this paper is to build basic skills in the collection, processing, presentation and interpretation of simple numerical and statistical knowledge and skills as a tool of learning and understanding related subjects at higher levels. II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER The paper comprised of four questions whereby candidates were required to answer all questions. Question one was an objective question which carried 40%. III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE Candidates were tested on the following topics: QUESTION 1: MULTIPLECHOICE – VARIOUS TOPICS Candidates were required to choose the correct answers from the given alternatives. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 80 candidates who answered the question, 38 (47.5%) candidates passed while the remaining 42 (52.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 30 (37.5%), 05 (6.3%) and 03 (3.7%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. Major weaknesses were noted in the arithmetic sequence, annuity, and on the use of simple harmonic mean. QUESTION 2: A. ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS B. EQUATIONS AND INEQUALITIES C. MATHEMATICS OF FINANCE Candidates were required to:(a) Find the selling price at a given rate of commission and the owner’s amount. (b) Solve ‘’a’’ for the given equation. (c) Find the range of final examination scores for a student to score an A, given final average and midterm examination scores. (d) Find exact simple interest for the given days, loan amount and interest rate per annum. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 80 candidates who answered the question only 25 (31.3%) candidates passed while the remaining 55 (68.7%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 10 (12.5%), 08 (10.0%) and 07 (8.8%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively 7 Most of the candidates failed algebraic expressions, equations and inequalities specifically on how to solve specified variable, formulate equations and inequalities and the use of appropriate formula for solving simple interest. QUESTION 3: A. ELEMENTARY MATHEMATICS B. INTRODUCTION TO STATISTICS AND DATA COLLECTION Candidates were required to: (a) Calculate the population in the current year given same growth rate. (b) Find the time that given men can take to weed given acres. (c) Find out the representative fraction, length and the area of a dam with given properties. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 80 candidates who answered the question only 15 (18.8%) candidates passed while the remaining 65 (81.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 09 (11.3%), 02 (2.5%) and 04 (5.0%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. Majority of the candidates failed to apply the compound interest formula Pn = Po (1 + i) n. Also they did not manage to deal with units’ conversion (centimetre to kilometre, kilometre to centimetre) in the given scales of units. QUESTION 4: A. MEASURES OF CENTRAL TENDENCY B. MEASURES OF DISPERSION C. INTRODUCTION TO STATISTICS AND DATA COLLECTION D. PERMUTATION AND CONTRIBUTION Candidates were required to: (a) (b) (c) (d) Define the median. Justify conclusion on the mode. Use the given data to:(i) Calculate mean deviation (ii) Interpret the results (iii)Define population of interest. (i) Determine the number of possible permutations (ii) Use the given data to calculate the expected profit Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 80 candidates who answered the question only 11 (13.8%) candidates passed while the remaining 69 (86.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 09 (11.3%) and 02 (2.5%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. 8 Some of the candidates failed to identify mode and median and majority could not manage to apply the expected profit formula E(x) = ∑x P(x). IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the paper The panel of examiners in assessing the questions was of the opinion that the question paper was having a mixture of both easy and difficult questions which demanded the skills and knowledge of the candidate. The question paper was fair in terms of marks awarded, time allocated, and length of questions for the level of candidates. Marks distribution was done evenly to each question. (b) Candidates’ overall performance Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was not satisfactory. Out of 80 candidates who answered the examination only 31 (38.7%) candidates passed while the remaining 49 (61.3%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 24 (30.0%), 04 (5.0%) and 03 (3.8%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 5.1.3 TABLE 5.1.3 T.02 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS Classification of Marks 0-49 No of Candidates 49 (Frequency) 61.3 Percentage 50-69 24 30.0 70-79 04 80-100 03 5.0 3.8 TOTAL 80 100 TABLE 5.1.4 T.02. COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 No. of candidates passed May 2016 % No. of candidates % decrease % passed 45 55.6 31 9 38.7 28.2 T.03 – INTRODUCTION TO INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME The principal learning outcome of the paper is to enable candidates apply knowledge and skills in information technology to solve problems in the business environment. II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER The paper comprised of three questions whereby candidates were required to answer all questions. Question one was an objective question which carried 60%. III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE QUESTION 1: VARIOUS TOPICS – MULTIPLECHOICE Candidates were required to; (a) (b) (c) Choose the best answer from the four given alternatives (A, B, C or D) State whether the given statements were true or false. Match each phrase from LIST A with the phrase from LIST B appropriately Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 90 candidates, 49 (54.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 41 (45.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 45 (50.0%), 03 (3.3%) and 01 (1.1%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively There were no weakness noted in this question. QUESTION 2: A. INTRODUCTION TO INFORMATION AND COMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGY B. HARDWARE C. COMPUTER SOFTWARE D. INTERNET AND E-COMMERCE E. COMMONLY USED APPLICATION PACKAGES Candidates were required to:(a) Explain uses of intranets and extranets in supporting organization communication. (b) Explain the most likely cause of printer failures to work and how to fix it. (c) Give reasons to why digital products are great fit for consumer focused (B2C) e-commerce. (d) Distinguish between a software suite and an integrated package. (e) Differentiate between what-if analysis as it applies to spreadsheet programs and recalculation. (f) Explain how ICTs can build new businesses. 10 Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 90 candidates who answered the question, 06 (6.7%) candidates scored pass marks while the remaining 84 (93.3%) candidates failed. There were neither credit nor distinction marks in this questions Majority of the candidates could not distinguish how intranets and extranets can support communication in organizations. They also failed to differentiate ‘’what-if’’ and ‘’recalculation’’, stating causes of printer failure and explaining ‘’software suite’’ and ‘integrated package’’. QUESTION 3: A. HARDWARE B. COMPUTER SOFTWARE C. COMMONLY USED APPLICATION PACKAGES Candidates were required to use the provided information to; (a) (b) (c) Differentiate application software and system software; network operating system and stand-alone operating system; transistors and integrated circuits; hacking and cracking; static RAM and dynamic RAM. Mention five benefits of an integrated accounting to a typical business. Explain practical limitations that organizations will likely to encounter when using integrated accounting systems. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 90 candidates who answered the question, 46 (51.1%) candidates passed while the remaining 44 (48.9%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 35 (38.9%), 05 (5.6%) and 06 (6.7%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Majority of the candidates were unable to provide the meaning of standalone operating system, transistors and integrated circuits, hacking and cracking, static RAM and dynamic RAM. 11 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the paper The panel of examiners in assessing the paper were of the opinion that the paper was fair and the questions tested covered a wide range of the syllabus. The mixture of the questions was adequate and the distribution of marks was fair in relation to the time allocated. (b) Candidates overall performance Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 90 candidates, 45 (50.0%) candidates passed while the remaining 45 (50.0%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 40 (44.4%) and 05 (5.6%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this examination paper. The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 5.1.5 TABLE 5.1.5 T.03 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS Classification of Marks 0-49 No. of Candidates (Frequency) 50-69 70-79 80-100 TOTAL 45 40 05 00 90 50.0 44.4 5.6 0.0 100 Percentage TABLE 5.1.6 T.03 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS MAY 2015 No. of candidates passed 82 May 2016 % No. of candidates passed 55.4 45 12 % decrease % 50.0 29.1 T.04 – BUSINESS COMMUNICATION SKILLS I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this paper is to enable candidates to master Basic English language skills and be able to use them for communicating effectively in business environment. II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER This paper consisted of six compulsory questions. III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE Candidates were tested on the following topics: QUESTION 1: A. WRITING SKILLS IN BUSINESS CORRESPONDENCES B. DEMONSTRATE A MASTERY USE OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE The question was in two parts and candidates were required to: (a) (b) Read a passage and (i) Suggest a suitable title for the passage. (ii) Summarize the passage given with at least 150 words. Punctuate and use capital letter in the given paragraph. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 61 candidates, 46 (75.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 15 (24.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 20 (32.8%), 13 (21.3%) and 13 (21.3%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most candidates failed to use original sentences from the passage to write the required summary such that, it was difficult to determine their competence in grammar. QUESTION 2: DEMONSTRATE A MASTERY USE OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE Candidates were required to use the given information to:(a) Rewrite the given sentences with personal pronouns. (b) State functions of the underlined nouns in the given sentences. (c) Revise the given sentences to establish subject-verb agreement. (d) Identify the types of sentences in terms of structure. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 61 candidates who answered the question only 13 (21.3%) candidates passed while the remaining 48 (78.7%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 10 (16.4%), 01 (1.6%) and 02 (3.3%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most candidates were unable to relate pronouns and nouns, use of tenses correctly based on a number and identifying sentences by their structure. 13 QUESTION 3: A. DEMONSTRATE A MASTERY USE OF ENGLISH LANGUAGE B. DEMONSTRATE LISTENING SKILLS Candidates were required to use the given information to: (a) Define video conference, conversation, meeting, encoder and nonverbal communication. (b) Explain how a sender can be an obstacle in communication process. (c) Mention five differences between listening and hearing. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 61 candidates who answered the question, 46 (75.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 15 (24.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 14 (23.0%), 20 (32.8%) and 12 (19.6%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Some candidates gave too short responses to be understood by the examiner. QUESTION 4: A. DEMONSTRATE VISUAL AND ORAL COMMUNICATION SKILLS B. DEMONSTRATE READING SKILLS Candidates were required to use the given information to:(c) Explain lateral, vertical and diagonal communication patterns as used in the organization. (b) Distinguish between ‘scanning’ and ‘skimming’. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 61 candidates who answered the question only 11 (18.0%) candidates passed while the remaining 50 (82.0%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 03 (5.0%), 03 (5.0%) and 05 (8.2%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Majority of candidates were unable to answer this question. Obviously, this content was not attempted at all. Most of them skipped it and those who attempted scored zero. QUESTION 5: WRITING SKILLS IN BUSINESS CORRESPONDENCES The candidates were required to use the given information to; Write a letter to the Executive Director of the given company requesting him to deal with the issue of being paid salary. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 61 candidates, 49 (80.3%) candidates passed while the remaining 12 (19.7%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 21 (34.4%), 24 (39.3%) and 04 (6.6%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. 14 Some candidates were unable to punctuate especially when writing addresses. Much weaknesses were noted on how to write correct title, location of a name, writer signature and grammar. QUESTION 6: VARIOUS TOPICS – MULTIPLE CHOICE AND MATCHING ITEMS Candidates were required to read the case study and: (a) Choose the most correct answer among the four given alternatives (b) Match the items in column A with those in list B to produce complete and meaningful sentences. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 61 candidates, 53 (86.9%) candidates passed while the remaining 08 (13.1%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 11 (18.0%), 26 (42.6%) and 16 (26.2%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively There were no major weaknesses noted in this question. Most of them scored it well. 15 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the paper The panel of examiners found the paper to be fairly set, clear and well spread within the syllabus. They found the questions to be within reach of well-prepared candidates. The questions were also fair in relation to the time allocated. (b) Candidates’ overall performance Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 61 candidates who answered the examination, 30 (49.2%) candidates passed while the remaining 31 (50.8%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 26 (42.6%) and 04 (6.6%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this examination paper. The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 5.1.7 TABLE 5.1.7 T.04 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS Classification of Marks No. of Candidates (Frequency) Percentage 0-49 31 50.8 50-69 26 70-79 04 42.6 6.6 80-100 00 TOTAL 61 0.0 100 TABLE 5.1.8 T.04 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 No. of candidates passed 55 May 2016 % 77.5 No. of candidates passed 30 16 % decrease % 49.2 29.4 ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN EXAMINATION LEVEL II GENERAL PERFORMANCE In this level, 160 candidates sat for the examinations, out of whom 41 (25.7%) passed, 61 (38.1%) candidates passed various subjects in this level while 58 (36.3%) failed the examination. The 41 candidates who passed are eligible for the Board's award of the STATEMENT OF SUCCESS FOR ATEC II. The general performance subject-wise is as shown on table 6.1 TABLE 6.1 ATEC II SUBJECT-WISE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS: MAY 2015 AND MAY 2016 Paper Code No. Subject Performance Entries T.05 T.06 T.07 T.08 Principles of Accounting and Auditing Principles of Cost Accounting and Procurement Elements of Commercial Knowledge, Management Practices and Taxation Accounting for Public Sector and Cooperatives May 2015 Pass % Entries May 2016 Pass % 97 37 38.1 126 50 39.7 72 44 61.1 113 48 42.5 65 44 67.7 92 53 57.6 90 40 44.4 116 54 46.6 17 T.05 - PRINCIPLES OF ACCOUNTING AND AUDITING I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this paper is to test candidates on application of basic concepts and principles of accounting in preparing and interpreting statements and reports on a practical context as per IAS 1 and apply audit knowledge in appraising data and assisting audit staff during audit undertakings. II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER The paper consisted of four compulsory questions. Question one was an objective question which carried 40%. III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE In this paper, candidates were tested on the following topics: QUESTION 1: VARIOUS TOPICS Candidates were required to: (a) Choose the most correct answer among the four given alternatives. (b) Write whether true or false for each of the given statements. (c) Match the phrases given in List B with that best explain the meaning of items in List A. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 126 candidates who answered the question 79 (62.7%) candidates passed while the remaining 47 (37.3%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 70 (55.6%), 08 (6.3%) and 01 (0.8%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. The noted weakness on this question was that candidates who failed in this question seemed to guess instead of making computation in order to get the correct alternative, as a result ended up getting wrong answers. QUESTION 2: TRIAL BALANCE AND ERRORS. Candidates were required to: (a) Define a trial balance and list the objectives of preparing it. (b) Use information given to audit the account of the given client for the given year. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 126 candidates who answered the question, only 50 (39.7%) candidates passed while the remaining 76 (60.3%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 19 (15.1%), 15 (11.9%) and 16 (12.7%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively The major weaknesses noted in this question is that most candidates who failed this question seemed not to understand clearly what trial balance is, also did not understand the requirement of the part (b) of question, instead of auditing they prepared income statement and financial position. 18 QUESTION 3: BANK RECONCILIATION Candidates were required to use the given information to: (a) Explain main purposes of preparing a bank reconciliation statement (b) Use given information to:(i) Bring the cash balance up to the given date (ii) Draw a bank reconciliation statement as at a given period. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 126 candidates, 82 (65.0%) candidates passed while the remaining 44 (35.0%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 49 (38.8%), 13 (10.3%) and 20 (15.8%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most of candidates who performed poorly in this question were not able to prepare bank reconciliation. QUESTION 4: RECORDING OF AUDIT WORK Candidates were required to use the given information to: (a) (i) Outline five contents of audit working paper (ii)Outline circumstances in which auditors are required to provide access of the audit working papers. (b) Mention preparatory procedures which auditor should consider when carrying out audit planning. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 126 candidates who answered the question 8 (6.3%) candidates passed while the remaining 118 (93.7%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 7 (5.5%) and 01 (0.7%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively Majority of candidates completely failed this question despite the fact that the question was very clear and straightforward. It seems that during the study candidates concentrate more in accounting and put less efforts in auditing. 19 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the Examination The panel of examiners was of the opinion that the examination was fair, clearly worded and appropriately spread within the syllabus. (b) Candidates’ overall performance Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was not satisfactory. Out of 126 candidates who answered the examination, only 50 (39.7%) candidates passed while the remaining 76 (60.3%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 41 (32.5%), 5(4.0%) and 4 (3.2%) candidates scored pass, and credit marks respectively The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 6.1.2 TABLE 6.1.2 T.05 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION OF MARKS NO. OF CANDIDATES (FREQUENCY) PERCENTAGE 0-49 50-69 70-79 80-100 TOTAL 76 41 05 04 126 60.3 32.5 4.0 3.2 100 TABLE 6.1.3 T.05 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 May 2016 No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates passed % % increase 37 38.1 50 39.7 14.9 20 T.06 - PRINCIPLES OF COST ACCOUNTING AND PROCUREMENT I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome for this paper is to test candidates on application of terminologies, methods, techniques and principles of Cost Accounting and Procurement for providing management with information for decision making, planning and controlling business operations. II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER The paper comprised of four questions. Question one was an objective type which carried 40%. III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE In this paper, candidates were tested on the following topics: QUESTION 1: VARIOUS TOPICS Candidates were required to: (a) Choose the most correct answer among the four given alternatives. (b) Write whether is true or false for each of the given statements (c) Match the phrases given in List B with that best explain the meaning of items in List A Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 113 candidates who answered the question 77 (68.0%) candidates passed while the remaining 36 (32.0%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 61 (54.0%), 5(4%) and 11 (10.0%) 4 candidates scored pass, and credit marks respectively. There was no major weakness observed. Majority of candidates attempted well this question and offered a good range of issues. QUESTION 2: SIMPLE BUDGETS Candidates were required to use the given information to prepare: (a) (b) (c) (d) (e) Sales revenue budget Production budget in units Materials consumption budget in units Direct material purchase budget in units and value Direct manufacturing labour budget Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 113 candidates who answered the question, only 31 (27.4%) candidates scored pass marks while the remaining 82 (72.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 10 (8.8%), 5 (4.4%) and 16 (14.2%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. Most candidates showed weaknesses in the preparation of direct manufacturing labour budget. 21 QUESTION 3: INTRODUCTION TO PROCUREMENT Candidates were required to: (a) (b) (c) (d) Highlight advantages of global sourcing Mention contents of purchase requisition document for materials Differentiate single tender from limited tender Identify criteria used in evaluating the supplier. Candidates’ performance in this question was fairly satisfactory. Out of 113 candidates only 66 (58.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 47 (41.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 32 (28.3%), 18(15.9%) and 16(14.2%) scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. No specific weakness noted in this question QUESTION4: PROCEDURES FOR ACCUMULATING LABOUR COSTS. Candidates were required to use the given information to: (a) Calculate (i)Normal piece rate (ii)Below standard piece rate (iii)Above standard piece rate (b) Calculate (i) Wages paid to given machine’s operator process on that date. (ii) Calculate the wages paid to second machine’s operator on that date. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 113 candidates, only 11 (9.7%) candidates passed while the remaining 102 (90.3%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 07 (6.2%), 02 (1.8%) and 02 (1.8%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. The major weakness noted on this question is that majority of the candidates failed to calculate labour rate required. Furthermore, most of them lacked adequate knowledge on labour cost and efficiency computations. 22 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the Examination The panel of examiners found the examination to be fair, clearly worded and within the prescribed syllabus. The examination questions were well mixed, containing computational as well theoretical questions and could have easily been answered by an average prepared candidate within the allocated time of three hours. (b) Candidates Overall Performance Candidates’ performance in this question paper was satisfactory. Out of 113 candidates who answered the examination, 48 (42.5%) candidates passed while the remaining 65 (57.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 35 (31.0%), 06 (5.3%) and 07 (6.2%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this examination paper. The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 6.1.4 TABLE 6.1.4 T.06 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION OF MARKS NO. OF CANDIDATES (FREQUENCY) PERCENTAGE 0-49 65 57.5 50-69 35 31.0 70-79 06 5.3 80-100 07 6.2 TOTAL 113 100 TABLE 6.1.5 T.06. COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 No. of candidates passed 44 May 2016 % No. of candidates passed 61.1 48 23 % increase % 42.5 4.3 T.07 - ELEMENTS OF COMMERCIAL KNOWLEDGE, MANAGEMENT PRACTICES AND TAXATION I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome for this paper is to test candidates’ ability to apply knowledge of commerce, commercial law, management and taxation in managing business functions. II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER The paper comprised of four compulsory questions. Question one was an objective type which carried 40%. III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE In this paper, candidates were tested on the following topics: QUESTION 1: VARIOUS TOPICS: MULTIPLE CHOICE Candidates were required to: (a) Choose the most correct answer from the four given alternatives. (b) Write whether is true or false for each of the given statements. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 92 candidates who answered the question, 76 (82.6%) candidates passed while the remaining 16 (17.4%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 51 (55.4%), 14 (15.2%) and 11 (11.9%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively No specific weakness observed on this question. QUESTION 2: (i) TAX ADMINISTRATION (ii) LAW OF CONTRACT Candidates were required to use the given information to: (a) Discuss powers of TRA. (b) Differentiate between ‘tax evasion’ and ‘tax avoidance’. (c) Name and explain types of vitiating factors that undermine business contracts. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 92 candidates, only 19 (20.7%) candidates passed while the remaining 73 (79.3%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 10 (10.8%), 06 (6.7%) and 03 (3.3%) candidates scored pass, and credit marks respectively Weakness observed on this question was that majority of candidates were not able to discuss powers of TRA as provided in marking guide, likewise candidates were unable to explain vitiating factor that undermine business contracts. 24 QUESTION 3: (i) INTRODUCTION TO INCOME TAX PRINCIPLES (ii) OFFICE MANAGEMENT AND MECHANIZATION Candidates were required to use the given information to: (a) (b) (c) (d) Identify and explain principles of taxation system Explain conditions under which one can claim tax refund. Name and explain importance of control function in an office Identify two main qualities of a manager Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 92 candidates, 48 (52.2%) candidates passed while the remaining 44 (47.8%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 29 (31.5%), 10 (10.9) and 09 (9.8%) candidates scored pass, and credit marks respectively. Most of candidates who failed this question did not comprehend its requirements, however the question was clear. QUESTION 4: (i) INTERNATIONAL TRADE (ii) LAW OF AGENCY Candidates were required to use the given information to: (a) (b) State at least five disadvantages that characterise international business. Enumerate five methods of terminating an agency Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 92 candidates, 56 (60.9%) candidates passed while the remaining 36 (39.1%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 22 (23.9%), 04 (4.3%) and 30 (32.6%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. The major weakness is that majority of candidates seemed to guess answers and were unable to provide sufficient explanation as required by the question. 25 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the Examination The panel of examiners found the examination to be fair in relation to the level of candidate examined, with mixture of easy and difficult questions and could be answered within the allocated time of three hours by an average prepared candidate. (b) Candidates’ Overall Performance Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 92 candidates who answered the examination, 53 (57.6%) candidates passed while the remaining 39(42.4%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 42(64.7%) and 2 (3%) candidates scored pass and distinction marks respectively. The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 6.1.6 TABLE 6.1.6 T.07 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION OF MARKS NO. OF CANDIDATES (FREQUENCY) PERCENTAGE 0-49 39 50-69 42 70-79 04 80-100 07 TOTAL 92 42.4 45.7 4.3 7.6 100 TABLE 6.1.7 T.07 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 No. of candidates passed 44 May 2016 % No. of candidates passed 67.7 53 26 % increase % 57.6 9.1 T.08 ACCOUNTING FOR PUBLIC SECTOR AND COOPERATIVES I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this paper is to test candidates’ ability to apply public sector and cooperative accounting knowledge and skills to manage government and cooperative funds economically, efficiently and effectively in accordance with the constitution, laws, rules and regulations in one or more specialised fields. II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER The paper comprised of four compulsory questions. Question one was an objective type which carried 40%. III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE In this paper, candidates were tested on the following topics: QUESTION 1: VARIOUS TOPICS: MULTIPLECHOICE Candidates were required to choose the most correct answer among the four given alternatives. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 116 candidates who answered the question, 69 (59.5%) candidates passed while the remaining 47 (40.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 67 (57.7%), 1 (0.9%) and 1 (0.9%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. The noted weakness was that candidates showed poor mastering of concepts of the tested topic particularly on government accounting. QUESTION 2: (i) GOVERNMENT GENERAL CASH MANAGEMENT AND CONTROL (ii) TERMINAL BENEFITS AND PENSION CALCULATION Candidates were required to use the given information to: (a) Prepare statement of cash flows for the given company for the given year. (b) Identify pillars of the social security system in Tanzania. (c) Explain mandatory social security scheme that are regulated by Social Security Regulatory Authority in Tanzania. Candidates’ performance in this question was poor as all 116 (100%) candidates failed. All candidates showed poor mastery and knowledge on the tested topic. 27 QUESTION 3: (i) ACCOUNTING FOR GOVERNMENT REVENUE AND EXPENDITURE (ii) ANNUAL FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND ACCOUNTS Candidates were required to use the given information to: (a) (i)Explain key sources of revenue available to the council from the central government and two sources of council’s internally generated revenue. (ii) Mention bases that are used to classify expenditures in local government authorities. (b) Prepare a Statement of Financial Performance of given council for the given year. (c) Explain the meaning of the term “accrual basis of accounting’’ Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 116 candidates, 41 (35.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 75 (64.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 29 (25.0%), 06 (5.2%) and 06 (5.2%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. Major weakness observed in this question was that majority candidates had poor competency and understanding of performance statement. QUESTION 4: ACCOUNTING FOR COOPERATIVES Candidates were required to explain the statement below in relation to the establishment and managing the cooperatives in Tanzania:(i) The differences between cooperatives and other forms of business (ii) Spirit of cooperation and equity (iii) Cooperatives rules have their own rules (iv) Rules and regulations on using cooperative funds Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 116 candidates, 73 (62.9%) candidates scored pass marks while the remaining 43 (37.1%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 45 (38.8%), 13 (11.2%) and 15 (12.9%) scored pass, credit and marks respectively. The noted weakness was that some of the candidates were not familiar with cooperative principles. 28 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the Examination The panel of examiners found the paper to be fairly set, well balanced containing a mixture of computational as well as theoretical questions. It was further found to be within the syllabus and that it could have been done within the time allocated of three hours. (b) Candidates’ Overall Performance Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was not satisfactory. Out of 116 candidates who answered the examination 54 (46.6%) candidates passed while the remaining 62 (53.4%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 51 (44.0%) and 03 (2.6%) candidates scored pass, and credit marks respectively. The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 6.1.5 TABLE 6.1.8 T.08 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION OF MARKS 0-49 62 50-69 51 70-79 03 80-100 00 TOTAL NO. OF CANDIDATES (FREQUENCY) PERCENTAGE 53.4 44.0 2.6 0.0 100 116 TABLE 6.1.9 T.08. COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 No. of candidates passed 40 May 2016 % No. of candidates passed 44.4 54 29 % % 46.6 increase 14.9 INTRA-LEVELS ANALYSIS OF CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE – ATEC I AND ATEC II LEVELS Under the revised examination scheme and syllabus, the Board does not allow its candidates to attempt both levels. However, it allowed those who were caught in transition from the phased out syllabus to the new syllabus during the transitional period. The analysis below shows performance of the 42 candidates who sat examination papers in the ATEC I and II Levels. Their performance is as indicated hereunder: S/No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 COMBINATION Pass Both Pass ATEC I, Partial Pass ATEC II Pass ATEC I, Fail ATEC II Partial Pass ATEC I, Pass ATEC II Partial Pass Both Partial Pass ATEC I, Fail ATEC II Fail ATEC I, Pass ATEC II Fail ATEC I, Partial Pass ATEC II Fail Both Total 30 ATEC I & II Number Percent 2 4.8 9 21.4 6 14.3 0 0.0 0 0.0 0 0.0 1 2.4 7 16.6 17 40.5 42 100.0 PROFESSIONAL LEVEL EXAMINATIONS FOUNDATION LEVEL EXAMINATIONS This is the first level of the Board’s three tier professional examination scheme which leads to the Certified Public Accountant [CPA (T)] award. The Foundation level examinations comprise of five subjects as indicated hereunder: A1 A2 A3 A4 A5 Quantitative Techniques Business and Management Accounting Business Information Business Law The examinations draw candidates from two main sources, namely:(a) Those candidates who have successfully completed the Board’s Accounting Technician Level examinations. (b) Those candidates who have acquired non-accounting first degree (or its equivalent) qualifications awarded by institutions of higher learning in the country recognized by the Board. During the May 2016 examination session, a total of 445 candidates sat for Foundation Level examinations. The figure indicated above includes 140 candidate who sat for both Foundation and Intermediate level examinations, whose performance analysis is shown at the end of Intermediate Level Report. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS In this examination 445 candidates sat for the examination out of whom 233 (52.4%) passed and therefore become eligible for the STATEMENT OF SUCCESS for the Foundation Level. 171 (38.4%) have passed some of the subjects while 41 (9.2%) candidates failed the examination. The general performance subject-wise is as shown on Table 7.1 TABLE 7.1 SUBJECT-WISE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS: MAY 2015 AND MAY 2016 Performance Paper Code No. Subject A1 Quantitative Techniques 193 133 68.9 182 128 70.3 A2 Business and Management 147 122 82.9 160 150 93.8 A3 Accounting 226 209 91.6 303 221 72.9 A4 Business Information 251 202 80.5 321 254 79.1 A5 Business Law 138 81 58.7 180 127 70.6 May 2015 Entries Pass 31 % May 2016 Entries Pass % QUESTION -WISE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS A1 – QUANTITATIVE TECHNIQUES I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this paper is to examine candidates’ ability to apply knowledge and skills of mathematical and quantitative techniques, concepts and tools in the day to day accounting, business functions and decision making. II: STRUCTURE OF THE QUESTION PAPER The paper consisted of three compulsory questions. Question one was an objective question which carried 60%. III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE In this examination session, candidates were tested on the following topics: QUESTION 1: VARIOUS TOPICS: MULTIPLE CHOICE For each of the statements provided candidates were required to use the given four alternatives to choose the most correct answer:Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 182 candidates who answered the question, 134 (73.6%) candidates passed while the remaining 48 (26.4%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 97 (53.3%), 30 (16.5%) and 7 (3.8%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively The multiple choices provided were clear, fair and appropriately set based on the syllabus to the extent that majority did well and thus no major common weakness was observed in this question. QUESTION 2: LINEAR PROGRAMMING, TRANSPORT AND ASSIGNMENT MODELS AND INVENTORY PLANNING AND CONTROL. The candidates were required to: (a) (b) (c) From the data given, they were required to: (i) Calculate how the named item could be moved between sites in order to minimize the distance travelled. (ii) Determine the minimum total distance travelled. From the data given, they were required to: (i) Write down three inequalities to represent the condition given. (ii) Determine the number of each item given that could be purchased to realize a maximum profit. (iii)Determine the greatest profit. From the data given, they were required to: (i) Find the optimum quantity to minimize inventory costs. (ii) Determine the number of orders placed per year. (iii)Determine the length of inventory cycle. 32 Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 182 candidates who answered the question only 27 (14.8%) candidates passed while the remaining 155 (85.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 18 (9.9%), 07 (3.9%) and 02 (01.1%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Not only most of the candidates failed to use the applicable methods when solving questions but also they failed to formulate the required three inequalities as the key component of the entire question. QUESTION 3: LINEAR REGRESSION AND CORRELATION ANALYSIS PROBABILITY AND RANDOM VARIABLE, PROBABILITY DISTRIBUTION AND ELEMENTS OF DECISION ANALYSIS The candidates were required to: (a) (b) (c) Use the data given to: (i) Find the mean of the given variables. (ii) Calculate the correlation of the variables. Use the data given to: Find expected value of a given random variable with probability distribution. Use the data given to: (i) Find the probability of a given event if the two given events are mutually exclusive. (ii) Find the probability of the same given event if the two given events are independent. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 182 candidates who answered the question only 30 (16.5%) candidates passed while the remaining 152 (83.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 17 (9.3%), 10 (5.5%) and 03 (1.7%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Despite of the fact that the question was clear and within the scope of the candidates’ level, they did not do it satisfactorily as candidates seem to be not very much familiar with the topic tested. 33 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the Paper The panel of examiners found the paper to be fairly set, well balanced with a good mixture of theoretical and computational questions. Time allocated to the questions was adequate to enable an average candidate to complete the examination. (b) Candidates’ performance Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 182 candidates who answered the examination, 148 (70.3%) candidates passed while the remaining 54 (29.7%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 102 (56%), 24 (24.0%) and 02 (1.1%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively The candidates’ overall performance in the subject is as shown on Table 7.1.1 TABLE 7.1.1 A1 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION OF MARKS 0-39 40-59 60-79 80-100 54 102 24 02 182 29.7 56.0 13.2 1.1 100 NO. OF CANDIDATES (FREQUENCY) PERCENTAGE TOTAL TABLE 7.1.2 A1 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 May 2016 % decrease No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates passed % 133 68.9 127 70.6 34 2.3 A2 – BUSINESS AND MANAGEMENT I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this subject is to test candidates’ ability to apply concepts and principles of business and management in business environment. II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER The paper consisted of three questions which were compulsory. Question one was an objective question which comprised of 60%. III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE In this examination session, candidates were tested on the following topics: QUESTION 1: VARIOUS TOPICS: MULTIPLE CHOICE For each of the statements provided candidates were required to use the given four alternatives to choose the most correct answer:Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 160 candidates, 142 (88.8%) candidates passed while the remaining 18 (11.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 76 (47.5%), 50 (31.3%) and 16 (10%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Majority of candidates attempted the question correctly, though few, who failed, provided guess answers. QUESTION 2: BASIC CONCEPTS OF COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGE AND BASICS OF GOVERNANCE, SUSTAINABILITY, CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS Candidates were required to: (a) (i) Explain the meaning of competitive advantage. (ii) Identify and describe the importance of competitive advantage to a company. (iii) Critically discuss three factors to work on to ensure that competitive advantage is attained for a particular business. (b) (i) Explain the meaning of corporate governance. (ii) Identify and describe key principles of corporate governance that managers have to exercise. (iv) Describe four major responsibilities of the Board of Directors. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 160 candidates who answered the question, 109 (68.1%) candidates passed while the remaining 51 (31.9%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 44 (27.5%), 46 (28.8%) and 19 (11.8%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively 35 Despite that a good number of candidates did this question very well, majority of them were unable to describe key principles of corporate governance and major responsibility of the Board of Directors. QUESTION 3: BASICS OF GOVERNANCE, SUSTAINABILITY CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND ETHICS Candidates were required to:(a) (i) Explain four responsibilities of a business entity towards the society. (ii) Examine four common objectives of most business organizations in the country and critically discuss how a manager may obtain each objective and beat his competitors. (b) (i) Identify and explain five benefits of the strategic planning systems. (ii) Describe any five major problems associated with the strategic planning systems which are encountered by managers. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 160 candidates who answered the question, 30 (18.8%) candidates passed while the remaining 130 (81.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 47 (29.4%), 66 (41.2%) and 17 (10.6%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. The question was clear and fair in such a way that majority of them did well consequently no major weakness was identified. 36 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the Paper The panel of examiners found the paper to be well spread within the syllabus which resulted to the candidates’ good performance. (b) Candidates’ overall performance Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 160 candidates, 150 (93.7%) candidates passed while the remaining 10 (06.3%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 66 (41.3%), 67 (41.9%) and 17 (10.6%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on Table 7.1.2 TABLE 7.1.3 A2 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION OF MARKS 0-39 40-59 60-79 80-100 TOTAL NO. OF CANDIDATES (FREQUENCY) 10 66 67 17 160 PERCENTAGE 6.3 41.3 41.9 10.6 100 TABLE 7.1.4 A2 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 May 2016 % No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates passed % increase 122 82.9 150 93.8 10.3 37 A3 – ACCOUNTING I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this paper is to examine candidates’ ability to apply knowledge and skills in recording financial transactions and preparing financial statements for an entity including not for profit entities in accordance with the IFRSs and IPSASs, II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER The paper comprised four compulsory questions. Question one was an objective question which carried 40%. III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE The A3 – Accounting subject this session tested candidates on the following topics: QUESTION 1: VARIOUS TOPICS: MULTIPLE CHOICE For each of the statements provided candidates were required to use the given four alternatives to choose the most correct answer:Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 303 candidates, 216 (71.3%) candidates passed while the remaining 87 (28.7%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 191 (63.0%), 16 (5.3%) and 09 (3.0%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively No major weakness was noted in this question. QUESTION 2: PREPARATION OF TRIAL BALANCE AT THE END OF AN ACCOUNTING PERIOD. Candidates were required to: (a) (i) Use the given information to prepare the journal entries to correct the errors identified. (ii) Use the given information to prepare suspense account showing the original difference in the trial balance. (b) Use the given information to prepare Receipts and Payment account for the year ended. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 303 candidates who answered the question, 283 (93.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 20 (6.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 116 (38.3%), 113 (37.3%) and 54 (17.8%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. Some candidates showed weaknesses on the preparation of journal entries to correct the identified errors. 38 QUESTION 3: PREPARATION OF ACCOUNTS FROM INCOMPLETE RECORDS Candidates were required to: (a) (b) (c) Use the given information to compute the figure of sales for inclusion in the entity’s financial statements for the year ended. Use the given information to determine the value of stock which was destroyed by fire. Use the given information to: (i) Calculate the entity’s own drawings (ii) Calculate the profit or loss of the business for the period ended. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 303 candidates who answered the question, only 46 (15.2%) candidates passed while the remaining 257 (84.8%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 33 (10.9%), 10 (3.3%) and 03 (1.0%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. Most of the students failed to calculate mark up and value of stock destroyed by fire. They also failed to calculate the unknown values using T- accounts and equation. QUESTION 4: PREPARATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS IN ACCORDANCE WITH IFRS Candidates were required to: (a) Briefly explain two basic reasons as to why a business can be making profits as shown in the statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income but still be running short of cash. (b)Use the given information to prepare the Statement of Cash Flow for the year ended using the indirect method. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 303 candidates who answered the question only 126 (41.6%) candidates passed while the remaining 177 (58.4%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 86 (28.4%), 37 (12.2%) and 03 (1.1%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Above average candidates failed to prepare the statement of cash flow which was a very direct question. 39 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the Paper The panel of examiners found the paper to be fair with adequate coverage of the syllabus. The panel also observed that candidates could manage to complete the examination within the allocated time. (b) Candidates’ Performance Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 303 candidates, 221 (72.9%) candidates passed while the remaining 82 (27.1%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 186 (61.3%), 32 (10.6%) and 03 (1.0%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. The candidates’ overall performance in the subject is as shown on Table 7.1.5 TABLE 7.1.5 A3 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION OF MARKS NO. OF CANDIDATES (FREQUENCY) PERCENTAGE 0-39 82 27.1 40-59 186 61.3 60-79 32 10.6 80-100 03 1.0 TOTAL 303 100 TABLE 7.1.6 A3 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2016 No. of candidates passed 209 May 2016 % increase % No. of candidates passed % 91.6 221 72.9 40 2.8 A4 – BUSINESS INFORMATION I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this paper is to examine candidates’ ability to apply knowledge of cost analysis and awareness of information technology to produce accurate and useful information to support management in decision-making and its application in performance management. II: STRUCTURE OF THE QUESTION PAPER: The paper comprised four compulsory questions. Question one was an objective question which carried 40%. III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE In this examination session, candidates were examined on the following topics: QUESTION 1: VARIOUS TOPICS: MULTIPLE CHOICE For each of the statements provided candidates were required to use the given four alternatives to choose the most correct answer:Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 321 candidates who answered the question, 157 (48.9%) candidates passed while the remaining 164 (51.1%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 84 (26.2%), 71 (22.1%) and 02 (0.6%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively No common weakness was observed. QUESTION 2: REGRESSION ANALYSIS From the cost structure given, students were required to: (a) Use regression analysis to identify: (i) Variable cost per unit. (ii) Monthly fixed cost (b) Estimate the cost of production for the given period and comment on the accuracy of the estimate Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 321 candidates who answered the question only 70 (21.8%) candidates passed while the remaining 251 (78.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 48 (14.9%) and 22 (6.9%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Most candidates failed to use regression analysis to identify variable and fixed costs. 41 QUESTION 3: COSTING Candidates were required to: (a) Prepare process A and B accounts from the given details (b) Calculate the Net Present Value at a cost of capital given Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 321 candidates who answered the question, 274 (85.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 47 (14.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 62 (19.4%), 77 (24%) and 135 (42%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively No common weakness was observed. QUESTION 4: FORECASTING AND BUDGETING Candidates were required to: (a) Describe four ways in which an organisation can improve its cash cycle (b) (i) Prepare a quarterly and annual cash budget for the given period of time. (ii) Suggest four ways that one may consider for improving cash management for the given period. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 321 candidates who answered the question, 177 (55.1%) candidates passed while the remaining 144 (44.9%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 129 (40.2%), 47 (14.6%) and 01 (0.3%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Candidates were weak in expressing themselves and reasoning. They were memorizing answers from the materials given. 42 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the paper The panel of examiners found the examination to be fair, well balanced containing both easy and moderate questions which were relevant to the candidates’ level and was well within the prescribed syllabus. It was examiners view that the paper could have been well attempted within the allocated time of three hours by an average candidate. (b) Overall Candidates performance Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 321 candidates who answered the examination, 254 (79.1%) candidates passed while the remaining 67 (20.9%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 170 (52.9%), 79 (24.6%) and 05 (1.6%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively The candidates’ overall performance in the subject is as shown on table 7.1.7 TABLE 7.1.7 A4 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION OF MARKS NO. OF CANDIDATES (FREQUENCY) PERCENTAGE 0-39 67 40-59 170 60-79 79 80-100 05 TOTAL 321 20.9 52.9 24.6 1.6 100 TABLE 7.1.8 A4 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 No. of candidates passed 202 May 2016 % increase % No. of candidates passed % 80.5 254 79.1 43 11.4 A5 – BUSINESS LAW I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this paper is to examine candidates’ ability to apply theories, practices and laws governing business in providing accounting services and protecting business against unnecessary litigations. II: STRUCTURE OF THE QUESTION PAPER: The paper comprised seven questions. Candidates were required to answer five questions. III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE In this examination session, candidates were examined on the following topics: QUESTION 1: LEGISLATIVE PROCESS Candidates were required to: (a) (b) Define Law Mention and explain steps involved in the legislative process after a bill is presented in the Parliament. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 139 candidates who answered the question 79 (56.9%) candidates passed while the remaining 60 (43.1%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 45 (32.4%), 25 (18%) and 09 (6.5%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. Most of the candidates who failed in this question were unable to explain in chronological order the stages which the bill passes until it becomes a law. QUESTION 2: SOURCE OF LAW AND THE LEGAL SYSTEM Candidates were required to: (a) (b) Mention and explain any four sources of business law in Tanzania. Discuss at least two rights and duties of the parties to a transaction in any four legislations relating to business law Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 150 candidates who answered the question, 87 (58.0%) candidates passed while the remaining 63 (42.0%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 60 (40.0%), 19 (12.7%) and 08 (5.3%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most candidates who failed this question were not able to understand the requirements of part (b) of this question. 44 QUESTION 3: THE NATURE AND CHARACTERISTICS OF AGENCY Candidates were required to: (a) (b) (c) Discuss the legal differences between an “agent” and “subagent”. (i) Explain the concept of “delegatus non protest delegare” (ii) Mention any three (3) exceptions to “delegatus non protest delegare” Mention and explain any three types of agencies. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 101 candidates who answered the question, 60 (59.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 41 (40.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 48 (47.5%), 11 (10.9%) and 01 (1.0%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Candidates failed to relate the Latin Maxim “delegates non protest delegare” with the law of agency. QUESTION 4: INTRODUCTION TO PUBLIC PROCUREMENT Candidates were required to: (a) (i) Define a ‘tender’. (ii) Mention and explain stages in the tendering process. (b) Use the given case to explain under circumstances in which an accounting officer of procuring entity loses his power to entertain a complaint or a dispute arising out of procurement proceedings (c) Use the given case to advise the procuring entity on the best method of procurement they should use in order to get the best solution to their problem given. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 108 candidates who answered the question only 34 (31.5%) candidates passed while the remaining 74 (68.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 31 (28.7%) and 03 (2.8%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. No candidate was able to advise on the best procurement method basing on the given scenario. 45 QUESTION 5: COMPANY LAW AND INSOLVENCY Candidates were required to: (a) Briefly identify and explain duties and responsibilities of an auditor of a company. (b) State the difference between an Annual General Meeting (AGM) and an Extraordinary General Meeting (EGM). (c) In relation to winding up of companies; (i) Define an “administration order” (ii) State at least two (2) purposes that an “administration order” is intended to achieve. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 170 candidates who answered the question, 144 (84.7%) candidates passed while the remaining 26 (15.3%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 50 (29.4%), 57 (33.5%) and 37 (21.8%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively No common weakness observed. QUESTION 6: COMPANY LAW AND INSOLVENCY Candidates were required to: (a) (b) Mention and explain the exceptions to the given general rule. Read the given scenario and discuss issues relating to the formation of a company and effects of incorporation. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 74 candidates who answered the question 26 (35.2%) candidates passed while the remaining 48 (64.8%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 21 (28.4%), 4 (5.4%) and 1 (1.4%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively No major common weakness was identified in this question. . QUESTION 7: PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND CONDUCT Candidates were required to: (a) Mention and explain the fundamental principles underlying the conduct of accountants and auditors while undertaking professional assignments. (b) Use the given scenario to:(i) Identify and explain ethical issues which can impede the given accountant from taking the assignment with the given bank (ii) Explain the validity and the legal implications arising from the partnership relations between to the accountants in the auditing firm in relation to capital ownership Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 159 candidates who answered the question, 139 (87.4%) candidates passed 46 while the remaining 20 (12.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 68 (42.8%), 57 (35.8%) and 14 (8.8%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. No major weakness was identified in this question IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the paper The panel of examiners found the examination to be fair, well balanced containing both easy and moderate questions which were relevant to the candidates’ level and was well within the prescribed syllabus. It was examiners view that the paper could have been well attempted within the allocated time of three hours by an average candidate. (b) Overall Candidates performance Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 180 candidates who answered the Examination, 127 (70.6%) candidates passed while the remaining 53 (29.4%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 110(461.1%) and 17 (9.4%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this Examination. The candidates’ overall performance in the subject is as shown in table 7.1.9 TABLE 7.1.9 A5 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION OF MARKS NO. OF CANDIDATES (FREQUENCY) PERCENTAGE 0-39 40-59 60-79 80-100 TOTAL 53 110 17 00 180 29.4 61.1 9.4 0.0 100 TABLE 7.1.10 A5. COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 No. of candidates passed 81 May 2016 % increase % No. of candidates passed % 58.7 127 70.6 47 22.1 INTERMEDIATE LEVEL EXAMINATIONS The Intermediate level examinations are the second level of the Board’s professional examinations under the current examination scheme and syllabus. This examination level consists of six subjects as shown hereunder:B1 B2 B3 B4 B5 B6 Financial Management Financial Accounting Auditing Principles and Practices Public Finance and Taxation I Performance Management Management, Governance and Ethics Under this examination scheme and syllabus, a candidate is required to complete Foundation Level before moving to Intermediate Level. However, candidates who were caught in the transition from the phased out syllabus to the current syllabus were allowed to cross the levels. During the May 2016 examination session, a total of 3,495 candidates sat for Intermediate Level examinations. The figure indicated above includes 1,485 candidate who sat for both Intermediate and Final level examinations, whose performance analysis is shown at the end of these levels’ report. 48 GENERAL OBSERVATIONS The examination draws candidates from the following sources: (a) Candidates who have been referred previously in the respective corresponding subjects. (b) Candidates who have majored in accounting in their bachelor degree programmes from recognized institutions. GENERAL PERFORMANCE In this session 3,495 candidates sat for the Intermediate Level Examinations out of whom 366 (10.5%) have passed this level and therefore become eligible for the STATEMENT OF SUCCESS, 1,135 (32.5%) have passed some of the subjects while 1,994 (57.1%) candidates have failed the examination. The general performance subject-wise is as shown on Table 8.1 TABLE 8.1 INTERMEDIATE LEVEL SUBJECT-WISE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS: MAY 2015 AND MAY 2016 Paper Code No. Performance Subject May 2015 May 2016 Entries Pass % Entries Pass % B1 Financial Management 754 205 27.2 1,227 441 35.9 B2 Financial Accounting 745 318 42.7 1,109 502 45.3 B3 Auditing Practices 662 355 53.6 916 415 45.3 B4 Public Finance & Taxation I 701 556 79.3 1,087 444 40.8 B5 Performance Management 2,567 754 29.4 2,526 316 12.5 B6 Management, Governance & Ethics 560 526 93.9 733 539 69.7 Principles and 49 B1 FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this examination paper is to test candidates’ ability to apply financial management knowledge and skills in valuing various assets as well as businesses, in evaluating investment opportunities, in forecasting and planning financial needs of a firm, in deciding on the level of debt financing to use relative to equity capital, in determining the level of working capital to carry in a business and in deciding on the share of the earnings after tax between retained earnings and shareholders. II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER The paper had two sections A and B, with seven questions carrying 20 marks each. Candidates were required to answer question one in section A and any other four out of six questions in Section B. III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE The following topics were tested in this paper:- QUESTION 1: INTRODUCTION TO CORPORATE FINANCIAL DECISION; ENVIRONMENT; INVESTMENT DECISION Candidates were required to:(a) Explain any three ways in which the management of a corporate firm can be encouraged to achieve the objective of maximization of shareholders’ wealth. (b) Use the given information about a person who was working as an assistant adviser at one finance company to prepare a brief note for given person which covers on the following issues to advise him on his proposed investment: (i) Explanation of the terms portfolio theory, systematic and unsystematic risk (ii) The expected return and risk as measured by standard deviation for each share and the proposed portfolio (iii) The Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) on the efficiency of the proposed portfolio considering that its beta(s) is likely to be 0.843 Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 1227 candidates who answered the question 851 (69.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 376 (30.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 379 (30.9%), 320 (26.1%) and 152 (12.49%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively No major weakness was observed 50 QUESTION 2: FINANCING DECISIONS Candidates were required to:(a) (b) Explain any three (3) factors that determine the capital structure of a corporation. Use the given information relating to a company which was planning to raise TZA 15 million as new finance for major expansion; to: (i) Evaluate the financial performance of given Company. (ii) Analyse and discuss the extent to which the company has achieved its stated corporate objectives of maximizing the wealth of its shareholders and achieving continuous growth in earnings per share. (iii) Calculate and comment on the effect of the right issue on the share price, the earning per share and the debt equity ratio if the new finance is raised using a right issue priced at TZS.7.50 per share and the expansion has not yet started, Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 815 candidates who answered the question only 85 (10.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 730 (89.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 80 (9.8%) and 05 (0.6%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Most candidates failed to state factors that determine the capital structure of a corporation and objectives of maximizing the wealth of its shareholders and achieving continuous growth in earnings per share QUESTION 3: INVESTMENT DECISIONS: Candidates were required to use the given information to concerning one company which is listed on a major stock exchange; to:(a) Estimate the value of given Company using the price-earnings ratio method and discuss the usefulness of the variables that you have used. (b) Calculate the correct cost of equity of given Company Ltd and, using this value, calculate the value of the company using the dividend valuation model. (c) Calculate the current weighted average after-tax cost of capital of given Company Ltd and the weighted average after-tax cost of capital following the new debt issue. Comment on the difference between the two values. (d) Identify the objectives of working capital management and discuss the central role of working capital management in financial management 51 Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 631 candidates who answered the question, 303 (48.0%) candidates passed while the remaining 328 (52%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 212 (33.6%), 77 (12.2%) and 14 (2.2%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively No major weakness was observed. QUESTION 4: INVESTMENT IN SECURITIES AND PORTFOLIO THEORY AND THE CAPM (a) Candidates were required to use the given information concerning a given company’s capital structure at a given period; to calculate the reformatted capital structure at a given period assuming that the company declared a 5% stock dividend at the given period. (b) Use the given statement on the company which has a policy of paying out 70% of its earnings dividends to evaluate the policy, assuming that most stockholders are:(i) Senior citizens (old people) in low tax brackets. (ii) High network individual in high tax brackets. (c) Examine any four factors which determine a company’s dividend policy Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 952 candidates who answered the question, only 150 (15.8%) candidates passed while the remaining 802 (84.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 145 (15.2%), 04 (0.4%) and 01 (0.1%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most candidates were weak in establish new capital structure of the given company and to explain factors which determine a company’s dividend policy. QUESTION 5: WORKING CAPITAL MANAGEMENT (a) Candidates were required to use the given statement about the net working capital of a business which is related to the concepts of overtrading and undertrading to explain the meaning of ‘overtrading’ and ‘undertrading’ and briefly discuss the major causes of each. (b) Use the given information concerning one company’s sales that are expected to increase at a given period to: (i) Calculate given company’s additional funds needed for the given year end (ii) Calculate the value of assets for the given year end. (iii) Calculate the amount of notes payable at the end of the given period if the additional funds are to be raised through notes payable. 52 (c) Use the given assumption about the cost of a four year university first degree education to:(i) Find the rate of interest that the given investment earn to pay the cost of the four year university education (ii) Find the annual payments assuming that in order to accumulate the sum required under (i) have planned to make equal payments at the end of every year Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 944 candidates who answered the question, 102 (10.8%) candidates passed while the remaining 842 (89.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 86 (9.2%), 14 (1.5%) and 02 (0.2%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Candidates failed to understand the question requirements. Few who tried to attempt failed to link the topic of working capital in practical scenario of change in working capital QUESTION 6: DIVIDEND POLICY AND INVESTMENT DECISIONS (a) Candidates were required to use the given information concerning one company which purchased a special machine one year ago at a given cost to calculate: (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (b) (c) The cost of initial investment of the new machine The incremental cash inflow after taxes The Net Present Value (NPV) of the new investment; and The Internal Rate of Return (IRR) of the new investment. Use the given information about one company which has developed a new type of digital recorder to explain if the discount rate of 15% would make the firm to conduct the test marketing or go directly to the market Discuss any four ways of incorporating risk into the investment appraisal process. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 865 candidates who answered the question, only 64 (7.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 801 (92.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 62 (7.2%) and 02 (0.2%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Those who failed were not able to calculate the NPV and IRR according to the requirements of the question 53 QUESTION 7: INVESTMENT DECISIONS: (INVESTMENT APPRAISAL: CAPITAL BUDGETING) (a) Candidates were required to identify the problems faced when undertaking investment appraisal and explain how these problems can be overcome in the following areas: (i) Assets with replacement cycles of different lengths; (ii) An investment project that has several internal rates of return; (iii) The business risk of an investment project is significantly different from the business risk of current operations. (b) Explain the effect of leverage on the value of the firm: (i) In a perfect market without taxes and financial distress. (ii) In a world with taxes and financial distress. (c) Use the given information about a successful UK based multinational company which was considering to raise funds for project in Tanzania during the following year; to establish the best option for the company to raise finance. Compute the resulting average cost of capital Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 592 candidates who answered the question only 17 (2.9%) candidates passed while the remaining 575 (97.1%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 15 (2.5%) and 02(0.3%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Candidates failed to answer the question in accordance to the requirements. 54 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the Paper The panel of examiners found the paper to be quite adequate in terms of the questions examined and time allocated for each question. The panel of markers also found the paper to be well balanced, covering almost eighty percent of the topics in the syllabus. The paper had a good mixture of theoretical and computational questions. (b) Candidates’ overall performance Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was not satisfactory. Out of 1227 candidates, only 441 (35.9%) candidates passed while the remaining 786 (64.1%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 418 (34.1%) and 23(1.8%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 8.1.1 TABLE 8.1.1 B1 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION MARKS OF NO. OF CANDIDATES (FREQUENCY) PERCENTAGE 00-39 40-59 60-79 TOTAL 23 80100 00 786 418 64.1 34.1 1.8 0.0 100 1,227 TABLE 8.1.2 B1 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 No. of candidates passed 205 May 2016 % No. of candidates passed 27.2 55 441 % increase % 35.9 36.5 B2 FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this examination paper is to test candidates’ ability to apply knowledge and skills in preparation of financial statements for a separate entity and a group in accordance with the IFRSs and IPSASs and analyse financial statements to examine the suitability of the business entity. II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER The paper had two sections A and B, with seven questions carrying 20 marks each. Candidates were required to answer question one in section A and any other four out of six questions in Section B. III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE The following topics were tested in this paper:- QUESTION 1: PREPARATION OF CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS: Candidates were required to use the given information which was about a group of accounts which were already prepared with the exception of consolidating the parent’s interest in the new joint; to prepare the consolidated statement of financial position and the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income of a given group of company at a given period. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 1109 candidates, only 112 (10.1%) candidates passed while the remaining 997 (89.9%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 54 (4.9%), 26 (2.3%) and 32 (2.9%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most candidates failed to prepare the consolidated statement of financial position and the consolidated statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income. QUESTION 2: ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING CONCEPTS, FRAMEWORKS AND PRACTICES Candidates were required to use the given information about the trial balance for the given company to: (a) Prepare the statement of Profit or Loss & Other Comprehensive Income for given company for the year ended given period. (b) Prepare the statement of changes in equity for given company for the year ended given period. (c) Prepare the statement of financial position of given company as at given period. 56 Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 811 candidates who answered the question only 66 (8.1%) candidates passed while the remaining 745 (91.9%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 42 (5.2%), 15 (1.8%) and 09 (1.1%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most candidates failed to prepare statement of financial position and statement of profit or loss and other comprehensive income QUESTION 3: PREPARING SINGLE ENTRY AND SINGLE COMPANY FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (a) Candidates were required to use the given information to concerning the financial statement of one company for its most recent two years to calculate the following for year ended at the given period: (i) Equivalent ratios (all six) to the given company based on its reported figures; and (ii) Equivalent ratios to the first four only for given company excluding the effects of the purchase of given company. Note: Assume the capital employed for given company is equal to its purchase price of TZS.50 billion. (b) Assess the comparative financial performance and position of given company for the year ended given period. Note: The answer should refer to the effects of the purchase of given company. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 711 candidates who answered the question only 273 (38.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 438 (61.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 165 (23.2%), 86 (12.1%) and 22 (3.1%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most of candidates failed to compute equivalent ratios as per the question requirements. 57 QUESTION 4: FINANCIAL STATEMENTS ANALYSIS AND EVALUATION (a) Candidates were required to use the given information to concerning consolidated financial statements to explain the justification for such a treatment for subsidiaries whose equity is not fully owned in the group, and state why this is normally not the case for associates (b) Use the given information about one plc company which had 1,500,000 ordinary shares in issue and a give profit after tax to calculate the basic and diluted Earnings per Share for the given period Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 762 candidates who answered the question, 137 (17.9%) candidates passed while the remaining 625 (82.0%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 94 (12.3%), 32 (4.2%) and 11 (1.4%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most of candidates failed to compute basic and diluted earnings per Share. QUESTION 5: ACCOUNTING CONCEPTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (a) Candidates were required to use the given information to concerning one company’s Statement of Profit or Loss for the year ended 31st December 2015 to prepare a statement of cash flows of given company for the given period using Indirect Method. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 971 candidates who answered the question, 711 (73.2%) candidates passed while the remaining 260 (26.8%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 289 (29.8%), 292 (30.1%) and 130 (13.4%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively No major weakness was noted in this question QUESTION 6: ACCOUNTING AND REPORTING CONCEPTS FRAMEWORK AND PRACTICES (a) Candidates were required to use the given information to concerning one public listed company that operates a number of leather products factories to: (i) Define a qualifying asset using examples (ii) Explain the circumstances when, borrowing costs and the amount at which, borrowing costs should be capitalized in accordance with IAS 23. (iii) Explain when capitalization of borrowing costs commences. 58 (b) Use the given information about the details of one company constructing a new factory to calculate the net borrowing cost that should be capitalized as part of the cost of the new factory and the finance cost that should be reported in the Statement of Profit or Loss for the year ended 31st March 2016 Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 604 candidates who answered the question, 105 (17.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 499 (82.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 66 (10.9%), 27 (4.5%) and 12 (1.9%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most of candidates failed to define a qualifying asset and explain the circumstances when, borrowing costs and the amount at which, borrowing costs should be capitalized in accordance with IAS 23 QUESTION 7: ACCOUNTING CONCEPTS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (a) Candidates were required to take prudence as the main consideration to discuss under what circumstances, if any, revenue might be recognized at the following stages of a sale:(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) (vi) Goods are acquired by the business which it confidently expects to resell very quickly. A customer places a firm order for goods. Goods are delivered to the customer. The customer is invoiced for goods. The customer pays for the goods. The customer’s cheque in payment for the goods has been cleared by the bank. (b) Use the give information about a company that signed a contract to design and build a new golf course at one hotel, to calculate the total contract revenue and costs that should be included in the financial statements at a given year end. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 607 candidates who answered the question, 417 (68.7%) candidates passed while the remaining 190 (31.3%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 145 (243.9%), 201 (33.1%) and 71 (11.7%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively No major weakness was noted in this question 59 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the Paper The panel of examiners found the paper to be quite adequate in terms of the questions examined and time allocated for each question. The panel of markers also found the paper to be well balanced, covering over seventy five percent of the topics in the syllabus. The paper had a good mixture of theoretical and computational questions. (b) Candidates’ overall performance Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 1,109 candidates who answered the examination, 673 (45.3%) candidates passed while the remaining 607 (54.7%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 457 (41.2%), 43 (3.9%) and 02 (0.2%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 8.1.1 TABLE 8.1.3 B2 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION OF MARKS NO. OF CANDIDATES (FREQUENCY) PERCENTAGE 00-39 607 40-59 457 60-79 43 80-100 02 TOTAL 1,109 54.7 41.2 3.9 0.2 100 TABLE 8.1.4 B2 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 No. of candidates passed 318 May 2016 % No. of candidates passed 42.7 502 60 % increase % 45.3 22.4 B3 AUDITING PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this examination paper is to test candidates’ ability to apply auditing principles and standards in executing external audit assignments (carrying out audit procedures) and coming up with appropriate reports, as well as implementing entity’s internal control policies in carrying out internal audits. II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER The paper had two sections A and B, with seven questions carrying 20 marks each. Candidates were required to answer question one in section A and any other four out of six questions in Section B. TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE III: The following topics were tested in this paper:QUESTION 1: THE NATURE OF AUDIT EVIDENCE AND THE SELECTION OF SUFFICIENT APPROPRIATE EVIDENCE (a) Candidates were required to use the given information to concerning a company which manufactures a range of motor vehicles and its year end on 30th June, to: (i) Evaluate the factors that a given Associates should consider when placing reliance on the work of the independent valuer (ii) Describe the substantive procedures the auditor should perform to obtain Sufficient and appropriate audit evidence in relation to: 1. 2. (c) The revaluation of land and buildings and the recently purchased warehouse. The valuation of work in progress. Use the given information related to information given in part (a) above that the auditing team has established that the given company has applied some outdated information that lead to unrealistic assumptions, to advise the given associates on steps to be taken and the impact on the audit report in relation to the directors’ refusal to amend the financial statements Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 916 candidates, only 323 (35.5%) candidates passed while the remaining 593 (64.7%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 240 (26.2%), 78(8.5%) and 05 (0.5%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively 61 Most of candidates failed to explain factors that an external auditor should consider when placing reliance on the work of the independent valuer and substantive procedures the auditor should perform to obtain sufficient and appropriate audit evidence QUESTION 2: BASICS OF ASSURANCE REPORTS (a) Candidates were required to use the given information concerning an (b) audit report which has to be produced by auditors after gathering evidence, to:(i) (ii) (c) Identify and explain any five shortcomings in the above draft audit report and suggest the necessary amendments to be made. Explain the meaning of an unmodified audit opinion in accordance with ISA 700: Forming an opinion and reporting on financial statements. Use the give information about the International federation of Accountants (IFAC) as a global organization for accountancy professionals to explain briefly the five (5) fundamental principles of the IESBA Code of Ethics for professional accountants. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 852 candidates who answered the question, 630 (73.9%) candidates passed while the remaining 222 (26.1%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 300 (35.2%), 282 (33.1%) and 48 (5.6%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively No major weakness was observed QUESTION 3: THE NATURE OF AUDIT EVIDENCE AND THE SELECTION OF SUFFICIENT APPROPRIATE EVIDENCE Candidates were required to use the given information which was about one external auditing firm for the given period where an auditor senior had carried out preliminary assessment of the business to use the event given in this case to: (a) Describe the additional audit procedures you should carry out. (b) With reasons state whether the financial statements for the yearend will need to be amended. (c) Discuss, with reasons, the impact on the audit report and indicate the type of report that would be appropriate. 62 Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 413 candidates who answered the question only 163 (39.5%) candidates passed while the remaining 250 (60.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 119 (28.8%), 42 (10.2%) and 02 (0.5%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. Most of the candidates failed to identify if the event occurred after the balance sheet date would cause changes on statements or not as per the requirements IAS 10 and their impact on auditors report as requirements of ISASs 700 and 702 QUESTION 4: PROFESSIONAL ETHICS AND CONDUCT (a) Candidates were required to use the given statement concerning client confidentiality which underpins the relationship between auditors and their clients explain the circumstances in which NBAA’s Code of Ethics permits or requires external auditors to disclose information relating to their clients to third parties without the knowledge or consent of the client (b) Use the given information concerning external auditors of a disposal company which had breached various regulations to describe how one would respond to the types of requests given in that case. (c) Use the information given about one company which manufactures bottled drinks and has been an audit client for six years, to identify and explain the ethical and professional matters rose during the inventory count of given company. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 752 candidates who answered the question only 223 (29.7%) candidates passed while the remaining 529 (70.3%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 188 (25.0%), 31 (4.1%) and 04 (0.5%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most of the candidates could not identify in which circumstances the NBAA’s Code of Ethics permits or requires external auditors to disclose information relating to their clients and ethical and professional matters rose during the inventory count. 63 QUESTION 5: OBJECTIVES, PROCESS AND NEED FOR EXTERNAL AUDIT AND ASSURANCE Candidates were required to use the given information about Certified Public Accountant firm which has recently obtained a new audit client, to:(a) Explain how this new internal audit function can assist a given company to deal with risk of fraud and error. (b) Explain the responsibilities of external auditors in respect of the risk of fraud and error in an audit of financial statements. (c) Identify the additional roles the internal auditors may have within the given company Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 571 candidates who answered the question only 187 (32.7%) candidates passed while the remaining 384 (67.3%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 144 (25.2%), 37 (6.5%) and 06 (1.1) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. Most candidates could not explain how this new internal audit function can assist a given company to deal with risk of fraud and error. QUESTION 6: OBJECTIVES, PROCESS AND NEED FOR EXTERNAL AUDIT AND ASSURANCE-PUBLIC SECTOR EXTERNAL AUDITING (a) Candidates were required to use the given information to prepare five questions that one would think an auditor should consider prior to accepting a new client under each of the following headings: (i) Questions related to Industry/client knowledge (ii) Questions related to Independence of Auditors (b) Use ISA 200 to explain the overall objectives of the auditor as provided for in this standard (c) Use the give statement about Article 143 of the constitution of the United Republic of Tanzania to explain to which matters the Controller and Auditor General has responsibility over as enshrined under Article 143 of the Constitution cited in the given statement. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 615 candidates who answered the question only 219 (35.61%) candidates passed while the remaining 396 (64.39%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 154 (25.04%), 58 (9.43%) and 7 (1.14%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most candidate failed to state the responsibility of Controller and Auditor General as enshrined under Article 143 of the Constitution and questions auditor should ask to understand the client as requirement of ISA 315. 64 QUESTION 7: BASICS OF ASSURANCE REPORTS Candidates were required to use the given information concerning the definition of assurance engagement to:(a) Briefly explain the contents of an assurance engagement report. (b) Give four reasons that make it impossible to reduce assurance engagement risk to zero. (c) Explain when accepting the assurance engagement what factors would determine the extent of your planning activities. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 465 candidates who answered the question 317 (68.2%) candidates passed while the remaining 148 (31.8%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 166 (35.7%), 122 (26.2%) and 29 (6.2%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. No major weakness was observed 65 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the Paper The panel of examiners found the paper to be quite adequate in terms of the questions examined and time allocated for each question. The panel of markers also found the paper to be well balanced, covering almost eight five percent of the topics in the syllabus. The paper had a good mixture of questions. Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 916 candidates, 415 (45.3%) candidates passed while the remaining 501 (54.7%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 398 (43.4%) and 17 (1.9%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Candidates’ overall performance The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 8.1.5 TABLE 8.1.5 B3 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION OF MARKS NO. OF CANDIDATES (FREQUENCY) PERCENTAGE 00-39 40-59 60-79 80-100 TOTAL 501 398 17 00 916 54.7 43.4 1.9 0.0 100 TABLE 8.1.6 B3 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 No. of candidates passed 355 May 2016 % 53.6 66 No. of candidates passed 415 % increase % 45.3 7.8 B4 PUBLIC FINANCE AND TAXATION I I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this examination paper is to test candidates’ ability to apply knowledge of public finance, tax laws and principles in the computation of tax liabilities, preparation and filing of tax returns; and in administering compliance with the tax laws; both in the public sector and in the private sector. II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER The paper had two sections A and B, with seven questions carrying 20 marks each. Candidates were required to answer question one in section A and any other four out of six questions in Section B III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE The following topics were tested in this paper:- QUESTION 1: INCOME TAX LAW: DETERMINATION OF TOTAL INCOME AND TYPES OF ASSESSMENT (a) Candidates were required to use the given statement to briefly state the contents of the notice of assessment. (b) Use the given statement which says that there is no clear definition of trade in the Income Tax (R.E. 2014) to briefly explain at least five objectives tests. (c) Use the given information concerning a tour company which runs tourist resort in one of the regions in Tanzania to compute the company’s business income for the given year as per Income Tax Act (R.E. 2014). Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 1087 candidates who answered the question only 220 (20.2%) candidates passed while the remaining 867 (79.8%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 195 (17.9%), 23 (2.1%) and 02 (0.2%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most candidates could not provide the contents of the statement of assessment as per the Income Tax Act (R.E. 2014). 67 QUESTION 2: TAXATION: TAX LAW, ADMINISTRATION AND PRACTICE INCOME TAX LAW: PROCEDURES FOR PAYMENT OF TAX (a) Candidates were required to use the given information concerning the establishment of Tanzania Revenue Authority to analyse the role of the (TRA). (b) Candidates were required to use the information about a company which conducts business and investment to: (i) Compute tax to be paid in instalments. (ii) Determine the Penalties according to S.98 (1) if instalments paid. (iii) Compute interest according to S.100 if instalments not paid. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 783 candidates who answered the question only 33 (04.2%) candidates passed while the remaining 750 (95.8%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 31 (04.0%) and 02 (0.2%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Most candidates were unable to determine penalties and to compute interest as required. QUESTION 3: INCOME TAX LAW – DETERMINATION OF TOTAL INCOME. (a) With examples the candidates were required to explain how business activities differ from investment activities. (b) Discuss briefly the tax treatment of the following items of income as per the Income Tax Act (R.E. 2014): (i) Dividend (ii) Rent (iii) Interest (iv) Distribution from a resident trust (c) Use the given information about a person who disposed various assets during the tax year ended 31st December 2015 to calculate the chargeable investment capital gain. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 584 candidates who answered the question only 114 (19.5%) candidates passed while the remaining 470 (80.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 106 (18.2%) and 08 (1.4%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Candidates were failed to calculate key issues required by the particular question. 68 QUESTION 4: CUSTOM AND EXCISE DUTY (a) (b) Explain important procedures which a person is required to go through when goods are imported. Use the given information concerning a business man who imported a saloon car with 1,000cc on the given date for business, to determine the Total duties/tax paid to the TRA. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 447 candidates who answered the question only 83 (18.6%) candidates passed while the remaining 364 (81.4%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 77 (17.2%) and 06 (1.3%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Most candidates did not have a clear understanding of the importation procedures instead they answered by highlighting importation steps without taking into consideration the custom procedures as per the Custom Management Act. QUESTION 5: PUBLIC FINANCE Candidates were required to:(a) Explain the functions of the government in public finance. (b) Extricate Public Finance from Private Finance (c) Differentiate between ‘public goods’ and ‘private goods’. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 1,020 candidates who answered the question, 614 (60.2%) candidates passed while the remaining 406 (39.8%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 351 (34.4%), 219 (21.5%) and 44 (4.3%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. Some candidates failed to understand the question hence failed to answer appropriately. 69 QUESTION 6: INCOME TAX LAW – DETERMINATION FROM TOTAL INCOME (a) Candidates were required to use the given information which was about the Tanzanian new government which has been tough on tax evasion and to cub insufficient tax revenue collection describe procedures to recover unpaid tax. (b) Use the information about a person who had been working for one company in Arusha since 2010 and received a bonus of 10% of his annual salary; to calculate the taxable employment income and income tax payable. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 940 candidates who answered the question only 235 (25.0%) candidates passed while the remaining 705 (75.0%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 216 (23.0%) and 19 (2.0%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Many candidates failed to calculate the taxable employment income and income tax payable in the section (b) of the question. QUESTION 7: TAXATION – VAT AND OTHER INDIRECT TAXES (a) Candidates were required to state the current registration thresholds for VAT purposes. (b) With reference to VAT Act 2014 to state the tax point for the supply of goods and services. (c) Use the given information about a trading company which is a VAT registered trader dealing with building materials, to: (i) State the due date for lodging VAT return. (ii) Calculate the amount of VAT payable or refundable. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 598 candidates who answered the question, only 59 (9.9%) candidates passed while the remaining 539 (90.1%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 58 (9.7%) and 01 (0.2%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. No major weakness was noted. However those who failed were unable to calculate the amount of VAT payable or refundable. 70 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the Paper The panel of examiners found the paper to be quite adequate in terms of the questions examined and time allocated for each question. The panel of markers also found the paper to be well balanced with excellent spread of the topics in the syllabus. The paper had a good mixture of theoretical and computational questions. (b) Candidates’ overall performance Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was not satisfactory. Out of 1,087 candidates who answered the examination only 444 (40.8%) candidates passed while the remaining 643 (59.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 439 (40.4%) and 05 (0.4%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 8.1.1 TABLE 8.1.7 B4 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION OF MARKS NO. OF CANDIDATES (FREQUENCY) PERCENTAGE 00-39 643 40-59 439 60-79 05 80-100 00 TOTAL 1,087 59.2 40.4 0.4 0.0 100 TABLE 8.1.8 B4 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 May 2016 % decrease No. of candidates passed % No. of candidates passed % 556 79.3 444 40.8 71 11.2 B5 PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this examination paper is to test candidates’ ability to apply knowledge and skills of financial and non-financial data analysis in providing information and decision support to management for decision-making, performance evaluation, and control. II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER The paper had two sections A and B, with seven questions carrying 20 marks each. Candidates were required to answer question one in section A and any other four out of six questions in Section B III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE The following topics were tested in this paper:- QUESTION 1: DECISIONS-MAKING TECHNIQUES (a) Candidates were required to use the given information concerning one company which produces a variety of cosmetic creams and lotions; to round all working to two decimal places using linear programming to;(i) Calculate the optimum number of products. (ii) Calculate the total contribution. (b) Calculate the shadow price for the given silk powder and the slack for silk amino acids. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 2,526 candidates who answered the question only 449 (17.8%) candidates passed while the remaining 2077 (82.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 216 (8.6%), 177 (7.0%) and 56 (2.2%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. Most candidate failed to formulate the linear programing module and also they failed to calculate shadow price. QUESTION 2: BUDGETARY PLANNING AND CONTROL. (a) Candidates were required to use the given information concerning a company which is based in Dar es Salaam and owns an island which is located off coast of Dar es Salaam; to prepare the budgeted statement of profit or loss. (b) Calculate the percentage of maximum capacity of maximum capacity at which the given zoo would break even during the given period. 72 Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 1,384 candidates who answered the question only 12 (0.9%) candidates passed while the remaining 1,372 (99.1%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 09 (0.7%) and 03 (0.2%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Most candidates were not conversant with the topic tested in this question. QUESTION 3: VARIANCE ANALYSIS (a) Candidates were required to use the given information concerning a business company which based its budget on the activity measure during the given period and planned to serve 30,000 customers; to prepare a performance report. (b) Use the given information concerning a company which produces three types of products where the CEO had discovered the total contribution margin for the 1st quarter came in lower than expected; to calculate all of the Contribution Margin variances and explain what happened. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 2,155 candidates who answered the question, 04 (0.2%) candidates scored pass marks while the remaining 2,151 (99.8%) candidates failed. There were neither credit nor distinction marks in this questions. Most candidates demonstrated poor understanding on sales margin variance and most candidates didn’t understand the concept of performance report and poor presentation of answers. QUESTION 4: COST ACCOUNTING TECHNIQUES – INCOME EFFECTS OF ALTENATIVE COST ACCUMULATION SYSTEMS Candidates were required to use the given memo about the briefing that was sent to the given person recently about variable costing and absorption costing to write a memo in response to the given General Manager’s concerns that he had raised. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 1,583 candidates who answered the question only 244 (15.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 1339 (84.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 177 (11.2%), 40 (2.5%) and 27 (1.7%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. The use of report confused most of candidates and majority were not able to distinguish between direct and variable costing. 73 QUESTION 5: PERFOMANCE MEASUREMENT AND CONTROL – DIVISIONAL PERFOMANCE AND TRANSFER PRICING. Candidates were required to use the given information concerning two subsidiary companies where one company produces components form manufacturing finished products; to:(a) (b) Analyse the advantages of coercing a subsidiary to transfer a component at a specified price and advice management on the best course of action. Point out the dysfunction effect of coercion and suggest how it can be avoided. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 1,964 candidates who answered the question only 32 (1.6%) candidates passed while the remaining 1,932 (98.4%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 31 (1.5%) and 01 (0.1%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Most candidates were weak in terms of the computation of net realizable value, they ended up giving generic advantage and disadvantage of transfer pricing. QUESTION 6: DECISIONS-MAKING TECHNIQUES: DECISION MAKING UNDER ENVIRONMENT OF UNCERTAINITY AND RISK. Candidates were required to use the given information to concerning two persons who were planning their own wedding which was expected to take place 5 months from then; to;(a) Draw a decision tree and calculate the expected number of invitees. (b) Calculate which venue is expected to be hired and what is the expected return obtained. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 1,171 candidates who answered the question only 14 (01.2%) candidates passed while the remaining 1157 (98.8%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 13 (1.1%), and 01 (0.1%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. Most candidate did not know how to calculate expected number of invitees, also most candidate did not know the use of decision tree. 74 QUESTION 7: COST ACCOUNTING TECHNIQUES – THROUGHPUT ACCOUNTING. (a) Candidates were required to use the given information concerning a private university which offers three types of CPA (T) review classes; to;(i) Calculate the throughput accounting ratio. (ii) Calculate optimum product mix and the maximum profit. (b) Use the given information assumption to discuss whether the overall profit of the company could be improved by equipping and using the extra given lecture room. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 1,638 candidates who answered the question, only 187 (11.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 1,451 (88.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 101 (6.2%), 62 (3.8%) and 24 (1.4%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most candidates failed to understand the requirement of the question and could not even find appropriate way to approach the question. Hence answers were completely wrong. 75 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the Paper The panel of examiners found the paper to be quite adequate in terms of the questions examined and time allocated for each question. The panel of markers also found the paper to be well balanced. The paper had a good mixture of theoretical and computational questions. (b) Candidates’ overall performance Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was not satisfactory. Out of 2,526 candidates who answered the examination only 316 (12.5%) candidates passed while the remaining 2,210 (87.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 280 (11.1%) and 36 (1.4%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 8.1.9 TABLE 8.1.9 B5 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION MARKS NO. OF CANDIDATES (FREQUENCY) PERCENTAGE OF 00-39 40-59 60-79 80-100 TOTAL 2,210 280 36 00 2,526 87.5 11.1 1.4 0.0 100 TABLE 8.1.10 B5 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 No. of candidates passed 754 May 2016 % 29.4 76 No. of candidates passed 316 % decrease % 12.5 40.9 B6 MANAGEMENT, GOVERNANCE AND ETHICS I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this examination paper is to test candidates’ ability to apply principles of strategic management, good governance and business ethics management and administrative functions of an organisation. II: STRUCTURE OF THE PAPER The paper had two sections A and B, with seven questions carrying 20 marks each. Candidates were required to answer question one in section A and any other four out of six questions in Section B III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE The following topics were tested in this paper:- QUESTION 1: SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS STRATEGIES, MITIGATION OF CONFLICTS BETWEEN MANAGEMENT AND BOARD OF DIRECTORS, AND UNETHICAL PRICING STRATEGIES. (a) Candidates where required to use given statement concerning the need of companies to redefine their business strategies; to give practical solutions to business companies as to why sustainable business strategies are extremely important. (b) Use the give case about discussion that went on in one of the Board of Directors meeting; to discuss five ways of mitigating conflicts between management and board of directors. (c) Use the given information about the nature of competitive business environment to discuss five unethical pricing strategies. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 773 candidates who answered the question, 482 (62.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 291 (37.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 309 (40.0%), 159 (20.6%) and 14 (1.8%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively No major weakness was noted in this question. 77 QUESTION 2: INDUSTRIAL ANALYSIS (MARKETING ANALYSIS) (a) Candidates where required to use the given information which was about the Mhasibu Bookshop which is a leading company with a monopoly in the market in selling CPA (T) books; to:(i) Explain the meaning of an ideal industry. (ii) Describe the bases of industrial markets segmentation. (b) Use the given information regarding a furniture company which is a listed manufacturing company based in Dar es Salaam; to:(i) Explain the concept of asymmetric information in the context of agency theory. (ii) Generally explain what is meant by agency theory. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 438 candidates who answered the question, 265 (60.5%) candidates passed while the remaining 173 (39.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 169 (38.6), 78 (17.8%) and 18 (4.1%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. Some candidates failed to give out the practical explanations rather they listed and guessed the answers. QUESTION 3: STRATEGIC IMPLEMENTATION (a) Candidates were required to use the given statement regarding several ways managers can use to improve the operations of a company; to state reasons that might force a manager to restructure a company. (b) Use the given phrase concerning a certainty of a company whether it was pursuing best strategy or not; to briefly describe the purpose of conducting and approach used to perform external and internal analysis. (c) Name and explain the characteristics of a good strategic decisions. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 591 candidates who answered the question only 117 (19.8%) candidates passed while the remaining 474 (80.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 111 (18.8%) and 06 (1.0%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. No major weakness was noted in this question, however, those who failed did not know how internal analysis is conducted. 78 QUESTION 4: BOARD OF DIRECTORS, ORGANISATION CULTURE, AND AUDITING (a) Candidates were required to use the given information regarding the study of corporate governance which focuses on the processes, mechanisms and structures; to: (i) Account for components of corporate governance approaches. (ii) Analyse Board of Director’s responsibilities that are involved in policy formulation. (b) Discuss five main responsibilities of an audit committee as audit committee is a key element of ensuring good governance. (c) Analyse key advantages of culture to an organization by assuming that one has been appointed to address a forum which was attended by human resource officers on the importance of culture in bringing about health organization. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 649 candidates who answered the question, 531 (81.8%) candidates passed while the remaining 118 (18.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 236 (36.3%), 210 (32.4%) and 85 (13.1%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. No major weakness was noted in this question, most of those who failed did not understand the requirement of the question. QUESTION 5: GOVERNANCE: AUDITING WORK; ROLE OF BOARD OF DIRECTORS (a) Candidates were required to use the given quotation that ‘Auditors are enemies of management; to discuss factors that affect external auditors’ independence when executing their roles as auditors. (b) Discuss how the board of directors oversees the functions of management in an organization as one of the major roles of the Board of Directors is to oversee the management of the organisation. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 734 candidates who answered the question, 513 (69.9%) candidates passed while the remaining 221 (30.1%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 263 (35.8%), 217 (29.6%) and 33 (04.5%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most candidates had problem with question number 5 (b). They were just answering on how the board of directors oversees the functions of management. They simply did not know the answers. 79 QUESTION 6: ETHICS Candidates were required to:(a) Briefly identify and explain fundamental principles and criteria which show that corruption is immoral. (b) Illustrate how probity operates at the level of an individual and at the level of the organization. (c) Discuss five main unethical practices in business operations on the basis that ethical and unethical business depends on how someone defines these terms and the environment where business operates. . (d) Explain the difference that exist between moral duties and legal duties. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 370 candidates who answered the question only152 (41.1%) candidates passed while the remaining 218 (58.9%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 141 (38.1%) and 11 (3.0%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Most candidates attempted question like guessing the answers, some of them listed the points and not explaining as the question demanded. QUESTION 7: STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT: STRATEGIC EVALUATION. Candidates were required to use the given information to:(a) Analyse the stages and steps in evaluating business plan concept on the basis that business concept is an important factor in any business undertaking. (b) State the categories of responsibilities that the company has fulfilled by taking the measures mentioned in the given case. The case is about one small company which deals with designing shows for women. . Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 316 candidates who answered the question only 65 (20.6%) candidates passed while the remaining 251 (79.4%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 60 (19.0%) and 05 (1.6%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Most candidates who failed this question were not prepared themselves enough for this topic. 80 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the Paper The panel of examiners found the paper to be quite adequate in terms of the questions examined and time allocated for each question, with a wider spread of topics within the syllabus. (b) Candidates’ overall performance Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 773 candidates who answered the examination, 539 (69.7%) candidates passed while the remaining 234 (30.3%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 516 (66.7%) and 23 (03.0%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this examination paper. The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 8.1.11 TABLE 8.1.11 B6 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS CLASSIFICATION OF MARKS NO. OF CANDIDATES (FREQUENCY) PERCENTAGE 00-39 234 40-59 516 60-79 23 80-100 00 TOTAL 773 30.3 66.8 3.0 0.0 100 TABLE 8.1.12 B6 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 No. of candidates passed 526 May 2016 % 93.9 No. of candidates passed 539 81 % increase % 69.7 1.2 INTRA LEVELS ANALYSIS OF CANDIDATES’ FOUNDATION AND INTERMEDIATE PERFORMANCE – Under the revised examination scheme and syllabi, the Board does not allow its candidates to sit both levels. However, it allowed those who were referred to sit for a referral paper and a full level, during the transitional period. The analysis below shows performance of the 258 candidates who sat for examination papers in both Foundation and Intermediate levels. The performance is as indicated hereunder: S/No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 FOUNDATION AND INTERMEDIATE Number Percent 26 10.1 102 39.5 87 33.7 0 0.0 11 4.3 16 6.2 0 0.0 3 1.2 13 5.0 258 100% COMBINATION Pass Both Pass FOUND, Partial Pass INTER Pass FOUND, Fail INTER Partial Pass FOUND, Pass INTER Partial Pass Both Partial Pass FOUND, Fail INTER Fail FOUND, Pass INTER Fail FOUND, Partial Pass INTER Fail Both Total 82 FINAL LEVEL EXAMINATIONS The Final Level examinations are the last level of the three-tier professional examination system of the Board. The final level examinations consist of four subjects as mentioned hereunder:C1 C2 C3 C4 Corporate Reporting Auditing and Assurance Business and Corporate Finance Public Finance and Taxation II These examination papers have been tested for the fourth time in this examination session. The examination draws candidates from:(a) Candidates who were referring P15 Financial Reporting II and P20 Contemporary Issues in Accounting in the phased out syllabus where these candidates sat for C1 Corporate Reporting in the current syllabus (b) Candidates who were referring P18 Auditing and Assurance Services in the phased out syllabus where these candidates sat for C2 Auditing and Assurance Services (c) Candidates who were referring P16 International Finance in the phased out syllabus where these candidates sat for C3 Business and Corporate Finance in the current syllabus and (d) Candidates who were referring P17 Public Finance and Taxation in the phased out syllabus where these candidates sat for C4 Public Finance and Taxation II in the current syllabus The performance of the candidates who attempted both modules is shown at the end of the level’s report. GENERAL OBSERVATIONS During the May 2016 examination session, 2,289 candidates sat for Final Level examinations out of whom 300 (13.1%) have passed this level and therefore eligible for the award of STATEMENT OF SUCCESS, 107 (30.9%) have passed some of the subjects while 1,281 (56.0%) have failed the examinations. The general performance subject-wise for the Final level examination in this session is as shown on Table 9.1 TABLE 9.1 MODULE E SUBJECT -WISE PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS: MAY 2015 AND MAY 2016 Code Subject Performance May 2015 C1 C2 C3 C4 May 2016 Entries Pass % Entries Pass % 1288 1211 672 777 539 596 212 563 41.8 49.2 31.5 72.5 1,296 1,095 1,050 880 376 399 291 465 29.0 36.4 27.7 52.8 Corporate Reporting Auditing and Assurance Business and Corporate Finance Public Finance and Taxation II 83 C1 CORPORATE REPORTING I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this paper is to test candidates’ ability to financial reporting standards and corporate law in preparing, analysing and evaluating corporate reports by entities, both in the private and public sectors. II: STRUCTURE OF THE QUESTION PAPER This examination paper comprised two sections with six questions. Candidates were required to answer four questions. Question one which carried 40 % was compulsory III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE In this paper, topics examined and candidates’ performances were as follows: QUESTION 1: PREPARATION AND REPORTING INFORMATION FOR FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND NOTES Candidates were required to use the given information to concerning a group which consists of a parent entity and subsidiaries to: (a) Explain why consolidated financial statements are useful to the users of financial statements as opposed to just the parent company’s separate (entity) financial statements. (b) State and explain any four practical reasons why parent company’s own financial statements cannot show the full picture of the parent investments, unless presenting consolidated financial statements. (c) Use the given information about one company which is a multinational group which carries on a business as a distributor to prepare a consolidated statement of financial position of the given company at the given period of time using the full goodwill method. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 1,296 candidates who answered the question only 117 (9.1%) candidates passed while the remaining 1,179 (90.0%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 99 (7.6%) and 18 (1.4%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Major weakness in this question was that candidates mixed between the usefulness of consolidated financial statements and practical reasons as to why parent company accounts alone cannot show the full picture of the parent investment. Otherwise there were a lot of entries that could be picked straight away form the question without any workings. 84 QUESTION 2: REPORTING THE FINANCIAL PERFORMANCE OF ENTITIES: FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS Candidates were required to use given information to:(a) Evaluate whether each of the listed items (i) to (v) is a financial instrument and whether it should be accounted for under IAS 32: Financial Instrument Presentation. (i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) Cash deposited in banks. Prepaid expenses Gold bullion deposited in banks Finance lease receivables or payables Trade accounts receivable (b) Use the given extract from a trial balance of one company to prepare the extracts o that company in a given period of time in terms of:(i) Statement of Profit or Loss and other comprehensive income (ii) Statement of financial position Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 935 candidates who answered the question only 116 (12.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 819 (87.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 109 (11.7%) and 07 (0.7%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Most candidates failed to identify the financial instruments as per IAS 32. Most failed to prepare the required financial statements. QUESTION 3: IFRS 8-OPERATING SEGMENTS Candidates were required to use the given information which was about a group of company incorporated in Tanzania and operates in other countries to:(a) Determine and show the reportable segments of the given company following other criteria(s) set by IFRS 8: Operating segment (Round all percentages to the nearest whole number). (b) Prepare a segment report for the given company for the year ended 31st December 2015 that complies with IFRS operating segment. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 490 candidates who answered the question only 30 (6.1%) candidates passed while the remaining 460 (93.9%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 25 (5.1%) and 05 (1.1%) 85 candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Most candidates expressed poor understanding of IFRS 8. Those who answered the question gave descriptive reports rather than financial statements as required by IFRS 8 and section (b) of the question. QUESTION 4: IAS 37-PROVISIONS, CONTINGENT ASSETS, CONTINGENT LIABILITIES; IAS 10 EVENT AFTER REPORTING PERIOD Candidates were required to use given information concerning one company which was a regional brewer in East Africa to assess and advise how each of the given scenarios should be treated in the accounts of the given company for the year to 30th June 2015. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 872 candidates who answered the question only 75 (8.6%) candidates passed while the remaining 797 (91.4%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 59 (6.8%), 13 (1.5%) and 03 (0.4%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most candidates were not aware about the application of IAS 37 and IAS 10 in the treatment of various scenarios stated in the question. QUESTION 5: REPORTING FRAMEWORK AND CREATIVE ACCOUNTING (a) Candidates were required to use the given information related to creative accounting to:(i) Describe the methods used in creative accounting and the ways to curb creative accounting (ii) Analyse four objectives management tries to achieve through creative accounting (iii) Explain the extent to which creative accounting can be practised in line with IFRSs. (b) Use the given information regarding the International Accounting Standards Board, to:(i) Discuss the main principles of fair value management as set out in IFRS 13: Fair Value Measurement (ii) Describe the three-level hierarchy for fair value measurements used in IFRS 13: Fair Value Measurement 86 Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 984 candidates who answered the question, 451 (45.8%) candidates passed while the remaining 533 (54.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 307 (31.2%), 99 (10.1%) and 45 (4.6%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively No major weakness noted in this question. QUESTION 6: IAS PRESENTATION OF FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Candidates were required to use the given information related to IAS 8: Accounting Policies, to:(a) Present the extract from the statement of Profit or Loss and other comprehensive income so as to reflect the change in accounting policy, in accordance with IAS 8. (b) Compute the company’s retained earnings at 31st December 2015 and the restated retained earnings as at 31st December 2013 and 2014. (c) Evaluate how Statement of changes in equity for the year ended 31st December 2015 should be presented in the company financial statements. Candidates’ performance in this question was fairly satisfactory. Out of 481 candidates who answered the examination, 191 (39.7%) candidates passed while the remaining 290 (60.3%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 136 (28.3%), 52 (10.8%) and 03 (0.6%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most candidates had problems with computing retained earnings for the years 2013 and 2014. 87 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the Examination The panel of examiners found that the question had an appropriate mixture of questions, the distribution of marks and the time allocated was adequate. The paper had easy and difficult questions which were all within the prescribed syllabus. (b) Candidates’ overall performance of the paper Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was not satisfactory. Out of 1,296 candidates who answered the paper only 376 (29.0%) candidates passed while the remaining 920 (71.0%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 356 (27.5%) and 20 (1.5%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this examination paper. The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 9.1.1 TABLE 9.1.1 C1 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS Classification of Marks 0-39 40-59 60-79 80-100 Total No. of Candidates (Frequency) 920 356 20 00 1,296 Percentage 71.0 27.5 1.5 0.0 100 TABLE 9.1.2 C1 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS May 2015 No. of candidates passed 539 May 2016 % No. of candidates passed 41.8 376 88 % % 29.0 decrease 17.8 C2 AUDITING AND ASSURANCE SERVICES I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this paper is to test candidates’ ability to apply auditing and assurance standards and relevant laws in undertaking and managing auditing and assurance engagements in complex auditing and reporting situations. II: STRUCTURE OF THE QUESTIONPAPER This examination paper comprised two sections with six questions. Candidates were required to answer four questions. Question one carried 40% was compulsory III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE In this paper, topics examined and candidates’ performances were as follows: QUESTION 1: ACCEPTING ENGAGEMENT AND MANAGING ASSIGNMENT; DRAWING CONCLUSIONS AND REPORTING; OBJECTIVE, PROCESS AND NEED FOR EXTERNAL AUDIT ASSURANCE; ASSESSMENT OF RISK, INTERNAL CONTROL AND FINANCIAL CONTROLS (a) Candidates were required to use given information concerning one audit firm operating in Tanzania and in other countries; to give a brief advice to the given partners on the possibility of undertaking both, external and internal audit, assignments in the given city and Da es Salaam. (b) Use the given information relates to an audit manager for two of the clients in the audit firm and he is reviewing audit files and audit draft reports submitted by two subordinates to comment on the suitability of the recommended audit opinions clearly stating the arguments for or against the recommendations. (c) Use the given information about the auditors of one company which deals with insurance services and hence regulated by TIRA to describe the elements of an assurance engagement such as the one which firm has got into with the given company. (d) Distinguish between an ‘emphasis of matter paragraph’ and ‘any other matters paragraph’ in an auditor’s report. (e) Use the given statement about internal control to explain briefly the process of designing and operating the internal controls. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 1,095 candidates who answered the question only 09 (0.8%) candidates scored pass marks while the remaining 1,086 (99.2%) candidates failed. There were neither credit nor distinction marks in this questions. Most candidates demonstrated a very weak understanding of auditing and assurance concepts. Further and more importantly they did not understand how to apply the auditing and assurance knowledge in an audit case. 89 QUESTION 2: PLANNING AND UNDERTAKING AUDIT WORK (a) Candidates were required to use given information about one company which operates two coal mines which has been listed in the National Stock Exchange, to:(i) Describe the matter that your firm will consider before placing reliance on the work of the internal audit department of the given company (ii) State how reliance on internal audit would be applied by the firm. (b) Evaluate the composition of the Board of Directors of the given company and give recommendations you consider necessary in this set up. (c) Explain what is meant by independent non-executive directors and state their importance to companies such as that of the given company. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 853 candidates who answered the question only 156 (18.3%) candidates passed while the remaining 697 (81.7%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 148 (17.4%) and 08 (0.9%) candidates scored pass and credit respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Most candidates failed to state how reliance in internal audit would be applied by a firm instead most of them were explaining the reasons for either reliance or not reliance to the work of the internal audit. Others failed to evaluate the composition of Board of Directors and good practice on corporate governance as per the case that has been given. QUESTION 3: LEGAL, REGULATORY AND ETHICAL ISSUES; ACCEPTING ENGAGEMENTS AND MANAGING ASSIGNMENTS Candidates were required to use given information which was about a staff training session on internal control organised by one company to discuss the possibility that the given company had impaired their independence or otherwise acted unprofessionally in each of the situations described. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 944 candidates who answered the question only 326 (34.5%) candidates passed while the remaining 618 (65.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 273 (28.9%), 52 (5.5%) and 01 (0.1%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. Most candidates failed to put the theories that have acquired into practical situations as each section’s case required. They just explained, mentioned and discuss those theories as they were -instead of linking them and state clearly and briefly how can they be applied in each section. 90 QUESTION 4: PLANNING AND UNDERSTANDING WORK (a) Candidates were required to use given information concerning an extract from the statements for the year ended 31st December 2015 to base on the given information, perform analysis on the sales, wages, salaries and debtors by using the following analytical procedures: (i) Comparison (ii) Ratio analysis (iii) Reasonableness test (b) Use the given information about ISA 710 which has been restructured to explain the following terms as applied in the ISA 710: (i) Corresponding figures (ii) Comparative financial statements. (iii) The auditor’s responsibilities for corresponding figures. (c) Explain any four generally accepted objectives for statement of financial position/balance sheet audit. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 311 candidates who answered the question only 15 (4.8%) candidates passed while the remaining 296 (95.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 12 (3.9%) and 03 (1.0%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Most of candidates did not know how to perform analytical procedures. Some did not know even the formula of gross profit margin. Many candidates demonstrated poor understanding of generally accepted objectives for statement of financial position audit. Many of them answered the question out of the context of audit. QUESTION 5: EXTERNAL AUDIT IN PUBLIC SECTOR (a) Candidates were required to use the given information concerning the role of government agencies in assisting the Controller and Auditor General (CAG) to identify and explain stages involved in developing performance indicators. (b) Use the information about the requirement of CAG to report to the Parliament on the spending of audited entities to describe the main approaches used by public sector auditors in performing value for money audit, depending on the information available, nature of the entity’s operations and other factors. (c) Use the given information about the general framework of auditing standards for the International Organisation of Supreme Auditing 91 Institutions (INTOSAI) to describe and explain general standards required by INTOSAI. (d) With examples discuss challenges of auditing public sector entity in Tanzania. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory as all 431 candidates who answered the question failed. Most candidates failed to distinguish between weaknesses faced by public sector auditors from those faced by public sector organisations. QUESTION 6: NATURE OF AUIDT EVIDENCE AND THE SELECTION OF SUFFICIENT APPROPRIATE EVIDENCE; PLANNING AND UNDERSTANDING WORK (a) Candidates were required use the information about various ways which the auditors employ in the process of gathering audit evidence to:(i) Discuss the meaning of ‘management representations’ giving six items that could be included in a management representation letter. (ii) Distinguish between ‘management experts’ and ‘auditor experts’, stating clearly the extent of the auditor expert’s responsibility over the audit opinion. (b) Use the given information concerning a company which engages in the passenger transportation services to:(i) Comment on the matters that you should consider in respect of the audit of finance lease assets and expenses. (ii) State the audit evidence you should obtain to verify the figure of finance lease assets in the financial statements of the given company. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 735 candidates who answered the question, 357 (48.6%) candidates passed while the remaining 378 (51.4%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 222 (30.2%), 113 (15.4%) and 22 (3.0%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Those who failed this question they kept on explaining the balance sheet and income statement assertions instead of answering the question. They also failed to use the various audit procedures to obtain audit evidence in verification of finance lease assets in financial statements. 92 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) (b) Assessment of the Examination The panel of examiners found that the question had an appropriate mixture of questions, the distribution of marks and the time allocated was adequate. The paper had easy and difficult questions which were all within the prescribed syllabus. Candidates’ overall performance of the paper Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was not satisfactory. Out of 1,095 candidates who answered the paper only 399 (36.4%) candidates passed while the remaining 696 (63.6%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 369 (33.7%) and 30 (2.7%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this examination paper. The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 9.1.3 TABLE 9.1.3 C2 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS Classification of Marks 0-39 40-59 60-79 80-100 Total No. of Candidates (Frequency) 696 369 30 00 1,095 Percentage 63.6 33.7 2.7 0.0 100 TABLE 9.1.4 C2 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS MAY 2015 No. of candidates passed 596 May 2016 % No. of candidates passed 49.2 399 93 % % 36.4 decrease 19.8 C3 BUSINESS AND CORPORATE FINANCE I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this paper is to test candidates’ ability to apply business and financial theories, concepts and analytical frameworks in evaluating and assessing business strategy, business and financing options as well as financial engineering products and provide advice based on such assessments. II: STRUCTURE OF THE QUESTIONPAPER This examination paper comprised two sections with six questions. Candidates were required to answer four questions. Question one carried 40% was compulsory III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE In this paper, topics examined and candidates’ performances were as follows: QUESTION 1: (a) Candidates were required to use given information about one company which manufactures sports equipment to:(i) Identify and explain the strategic position of each of product within the given city. Assess the implications of this positioning within the city, in determining the extent that should be invested in each of its products. (ii) As an external consultant write a memorandum to the directors of ME outlining the merits and demerits of each of the following joint development strategies in respect of Raba shoes: • • • • (b) FINANCING ANALYSIS Licensing Franchising A joint venture A merger Use the given information regarding one company which is an all equity financed listed companied which develops customised software for clients to: (i) (ii) (iii) Calculate, using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM), the required rates of return on equity of the given two companies Calculate the beta of Imelda Co. assuming its required annual rate of return on equity is 17% and the stock market uses the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) and explain the significance of the beta factor. Help the Finance Director to write a memorandum to the Chairman in language understandable to a non-finance manager. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 1,050 candidates who answered the question only 38 (3.6%) candidates passed while the remaining 1,012 (96.4%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 37 (3.5%) and 01 (0.1%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. 94 Candidates did not understand the question clearly as they rushed to answer it in a wrong way and very brief. QUESTION 2: DIVIDEND POLICY AND SHARE EVALUATION (a) Candidates were required to use given information about company’s dividend decisions and their implications for both its investment and its financing decisions to:(i) Describe the alternative dividend policies that companies can adopt and their significance. (ii) Discuss the dividend relevance and dividend irrelevance schools of thought. (iii) Explain any two alternatives other than cash dividends of rewarding shareholders. (b) Candidates were required to given information about a company which could afford to pay TZS.5 per share dividend annually forever to determine:(i) (ii) The current value of the share. The cost of the resolution not to pay dividend for the next 20 years for each shareholder. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 641 candidates who answered the question only 222 (34.6%) candidates passed while the remaining 419 (65.4%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 140 (21.8%), 69 (10.8%) and 13 (2.0%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most candidates failed to determine the current value and the cost of resolution not to pay dividend. QUESTION 3: BUSINESS ANALYSIS (a) Candidates were required to use given information about a company which is a food-processing firm that was considering an investment opportunity to:(i) Evaluate the project using the Adjusted Present Value (APV) method and suggest whether it should be undertaken or not. (ii) With calculations and reasons, suggest whether or not you would recommend the project assuming the firm pays no corporate tax. (iii) Based on the answers above, briefly explain why it is important to consider taxes in project evaluation. (b) Discuss how sensitivity analysis can help managers to assess the risk of an investment project. 95 Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 215 candidates who answered the question, 12 (5.6%) candidates scored pass marks while the remaining 203 (94.4%) candidates failed. There were neither credit nor distinction marks in this questions. Candidates were weak in calculating the Present Values with and without tax. QUESTION 4: FINANCIAL ENGINEERING AND PLANNING (a) (b) Candidates were required to use given information concerning a bank branch which had surplus funds to invest to explain at which centre will the investment be made and what will be the net gain (to the nearest TZS.) to the bank on the funds. Candidates were required to ignore brokerage and other expenses. Candidates were required to use the given information about someone who had been appointed as a financial analyst to assist estimating the firm’s cost of capital for use to prepare a brief note for the managing director to include:(i) (ii) Details on the estimation of the market value weighted average cost of capital of the given company. A discussion of why the cost of equity is greater than the cost of debt. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 759 candidates who answered the question only 86 (11.3%) candidates passed while the remaining 673 (88.7%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 59 (7.8%) and 24 (3.2%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Most candidates failed to notice that the exchange rates were to be adjusted for the discounts and premiums and therefore they did not make adjustments. Others also had little idea of how to perform calculations on weighted average cost of capital. 96 QUESTION 5: MANAGING RISK (a) Candidates were required to use the given information to concerning the Financial Director of one company based in the UK who is concerned that interest rates could become more volatile to illustrate the possible results of hedging interest rate risk using interest rate futures if interest rate in six months’ time increase by 3% and the September future-market price increases by 2%. (b) Use the given information about one company that manufactures footwear for the past ten years to advise company’s board whether it should use forward contract or money market hedge when managing the above dollar transaction over the next six months. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 783 candidates who answered the question, 353 (45.1%) candidates passed while the remaining 430 (54.9%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 289 (36.9%), 58 (7.4%) and 06 (0.8%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Candidates failed to apply knowledge on hedging to calculate hedge position and efficiency. ’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 300 candidates who answered the examination only 08 (2.7%) candidates passed while the remaining 292 (97.3%) candidates failed. There was neither credit nor distinction marks in this question. QUESTION 6: FINANCIAL ANALYSIS (PORTFOLIO THEORY) (a) Candidates were required to use the given information concerning one company which engages in the printing business to:(i) Explain in what proportion of available investment funds should the company invest in the projects in order to have the best possible capital allocation? (ii) Determine what will the risk and return of such a portfolio be (iii) Explain if is it a good idea to invest in portfolios that are positively correlated (iv) Describe to the given company the meaning of an optimum portfolio. (b) Critically discuss any three factors that a corporate treasurer of a multinational company needs to consider in managing a debt portfolio. 97 Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 650 candidates who answered the question only 42 (6.5%) candidates passed while the remaining 608 (93.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 41 (6.3%) and 01 (0.2%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Candidates showed weakness in doing the required calculations. IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the Examination The panel of examiners found that the question had an appropriate mixture of questions, the distribution of marks and the time allocated was adequate. The paper had easy and difficult questions which were all within the prescribed syllabus. (b) Candidates’ overall performance of the paper Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was not satisfactory. Out of 1,050 candidates who answered the paper only 291 (27.7%) candidates passed while the remaining 759 (72.3%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 286 (27.2%) and 05 (0.5%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this examination paper. The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 9.1.5 TABLE 9.1.5 C3 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS Classification of Marks No. of Candidates (Frequency) 0-39 40-59 60-79 80-100 Total 759 286 05 00 1,050 Percentage 72.3 27.2 0.5 0.0 TABLE 9.1.6 C3 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS MAY 2015 No. of candidates May 2016 % No. of passed candidates % increase % passed 212 31.5 291 98 27.7 15.7 C4 PUBCLI FINANCE AND TAXATION II I: PRINCIPAL LEARNING OUTCOME Principal learning outcome of this paper is to test candidates’ ability to apply knowledge of public finance, tax laws and Financial Reporting Standards and Corporate Law in preparing, analysing and evaluating corporate reports by entities, both in the private and public sectors. II: STRUCTURE OF THE QUESTIONPAPER This examination paper comprised two sections with six questions. Candidates were required to answer four questions. Question one carried 40% which was compulsory III: TOPICS EXAMINED AND CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE In this paper, topics examined and candidates’ performances were as follows: QUESTION 1: PUBLIC FINANCE (a) Candidates were required to use given information concerning Gross National Product (GDP) per person to explain any five limitations of GNP as a measure of a person’s welfare. (b) Use the given information about the national income figures for a particular country in the given period to calculate the following: (c) (i) GDP at factor cost (ii) GDP at market price (iii) GNP at market price if net factor income from abroad was negative 37 million. Use the given information which is about major government efforts of the current regime in Tanzania in reducing government expenditure to explain main principles of public expenditure. (d)(i) What do you understand by ‘Taxable capacity’? (ii) Discuss the determinants of taxable capacity of an individual or a nation. (e) Use the given statement concerning the experience that shows less developed countries face deficit budget to discuss the features of deficit budget using an example of any country of your choice. (f) Use the given information which was about the issue of Less Developed Countries that are facing persistent increase in public debts to discuss the given contention. 99 Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 880 candidates who answered the question only 172 (19.5%) candidates passed while the remaining 708 (80.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 163 (18.5%) and 09 (1.0%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Many candidates failed to explain the limitations of GNP as a measure of person’s welfare. They also failed to state clearly the main principles of public expenditure. QUESTION 2: INCOME TAXATION (BASIC PROVISIONS OF THE INCOME TAX ACT) Candidates were required to:(a) Identify who is required to file return of income under section 91(1) and what are the exceptions under Section 92 of Income Tax Act (ITA) (Cap 332) ? (b) Enumerate the contents of a return of income as provided under section 91(2) of Income Tax Act, (Cap 332) . (c) Use the information given about Section 39 of the Tax Administration Act, 2015 which gives powers to Commissioner of Income Tax to grant extension of time to the person who is required to file return of income to state the limitations of the powers (provided) to the Commissioner as stipulated in the law (on granting the extension of time. (d) Use the given information about one company which is established in the URT since 1990s to:(i) (ii) (iii) (iv) (v) Explain what was the due date for filling the provisional returns for the company as per S.89 of the ITA, Cap 332, State the due date for filling the final return for the company as per the provisions under the ITA, Cap. 332. Compute the amount of income tax paid by the company on 1st instalment and 4th instalment. Compute the amount of income tax paid by the company on 30th June 2015 (ignore any interest and/or penalty thereof). Ascertain the amount of penalty payable by the company as per S.78 of the Tax Administration Act, 2015 (if any). Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 326 candidates who answered the question only 93 (28.5%) candidates passed while the remaining 233 (71.5%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 56 (17.2%), 31 (9.5%) and 06 (1.8%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most candidates failed to make necessary computations. 100 QUESTION 3: BASIC PROVISIONS OF INCOME TAX ACT Candidates were required use the given information concerning one Professor of accounting and head of research and publication committee; to calculate the employment income, business income, investment income and total taxable income of the said Professor for the year of income 2014. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 628 candidates who answered the question, 377 (60.0%) candidates passed while the remaining 251 (39.9%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 302 (48.1%), 71 (11.3%) and 04 (0.6%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively. The major weakness was related with proper categorisation of income between employment, business and investment. QUESTION 4: INTERNATIONAL TAXATION Candidates were required to:(a) Explain “the test of residence of an individual” as enshrined under Section 66 of the Income Tax Act, Cap. 332. (b) What is the significance of classifying a person as resident in the United Republic of Tanzania (URT) for income tax purposes? (c) Candidates were required to study the three given scenarios to state whether the person mentioned in the scenarios was a resident in the United Republic of Tanzania for the given year of income. Candidates’ performance in this question was satisfactory. Out of 819 candidates who answered the question, 376 (45.9%) candidates passed while the remaining 443 (54.1%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 356 (43.5%) and 20 (2.4%) candidates scored pass and credit and marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks. No major weakness noted in this question. 101 QUESTION 5: TAXATION AND ECONOMIC EFFICIENCY Candidates were required to use the given statement about a common practice for government revenue authorities to discuss the implication of changes in taxes on each of the following: (a) (b) (c) (d) Demand and supply of goods and services. Savings of individuals and companies. Producer and consumer surplus. Tax impact on consumption on wages and employment. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 693 candidates who answered the question only 222 (32.0%) candidates passed while the remaining 471 (68.0%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 173 (25.0%), 44 (6.3%) and 05 (0.7%) candidates scored pass, credit and distinction marks respectively Most candidates were unable to identify key requirements of the question, failure to argue and express points clearly and poor graphical representation. QUESTION 6: TAXATION OF SPECIALISED ENTITIES: MINING COMPANIES (a) Candidates were required to use the given information about a resident mining company which has been engaged in mining operations since 2010 to calculate taxable income and tax to be paid by the company during the year ended 30th June 2014. Assume corporate income tax rate is 30%. (b) Use the given information which was about the assumption that after the discovery, the mining company mentioned in part (a) above did not carry business of mining during the given year; to indicate and quantify all tax consequences to the parties concerned due to the sale of the mines. Candidates’ performance in this question was not satisfactory. Out of 174 candidates who answered the question only 23 (13.2%) candidates passed while the remaining 151 (86.8%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 19 (10.9%) and 04 (2.3%) candidates scored pass and credit marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this question. Candidates expressed poor understanding of the treatment and identification of allowable and non-allowable expenditures for mining companies. 102 IV: GENERAL OBSERVATIONS (a) Assessment of the Examination The panel of examiners found that the question had an appropriate mixture of questions, the distribution of marks and the time allocated was adequate. The paper had easy and difficult questions which were all within the prescribed syllabus. (b) Candidates’ overall performance of the paper Candidates’ performance in this examination paper was satisfactory. Out of 880 candidates who answered the paper 465 (52.8%) candidates passed while the remaining 415 (47.2%) candidates failed. Out of those who passed 435 (49.4%), 30 (3.4%) candidates scored pass marks respectively. No candidate scored distinction marks in this examination paper The candidates’ over-all performance in the subject is as shown on table 9.1.7 TABLE 9.1.7 C4 CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE ANALYSIS Classification of Marks 0-39 40-59 60-79 80-100 Total No. of Candidates (Frequency) 415 435 30 00 880 Percentage 47.2 49.4 3.4 0.0 100 TABLE 9.1.8 C4 COMPARISON OF PASS RATE WITH MAY 2015 EXAMINATIONS MAY 2015 No. of candidates passed 563 MAY 2016 % No. of candidates passed 72.5 465 103 % % 52.8 decrease 9.5 INTRA-LEVELS ANALYSIS OF CANDIDATES’ PERFORMANCE – INTERMEDIATE AND FINAL LEVELS Under the revised examination scheme and syllabus, the Board does not allow its candidates to attempt both levels. However, it allowed those who were caught in transition from the phased out syllabus to the new syllabus during the transitional period. The analysis below shows performance of the 1485 candidates who sat examination papers in the Intermediate and Final Levels respectively. Their performance is as indicated hereunder: S/No. 1 2 3 4 5 7 8 9 10 COMBINATION Pass Both Pass INTER, Partial Pass FINAL Pass INTER, Fail FINAL Partial Pass INTER, Pass FINAL Partial Pass Both Partial Pass INTER, Fail FINAL Fail INTER, Pass FINAL Fail INTER, Partial Pass FINAL Fail Both Total 104 INTERMEDIATE & FINAL Number Percent 55 3.7 112 7.5 60 4.0 1 0.1 90 6.1 35 2.4 66 4.4 275 18.5 791 53.3 1485 100% CHAPTER III EXAMINERS’ RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE TUTORS AND STUDENTS In each examination session, the panel of examiners come up with suggestions to both Tutors and Students which are aimed at improving future candidates’ performance. These recommendations arise from shortcomings observed in the course of marking the candidates’ scripts. RECOMMENDATIONS TO TUTORS Guidance to the candidates 1. Tutors should encourage their students to create a habit of reading current issues and keeping themselves abreast with the issues taking place within and globally. This will assist them in answering the questions that are of general nature and at the same time improve their vocabulary. 2. Tutors should encourage their students to put more efforts in their studies while preparing for the examinations. They should ensure that only those students who have performed well in the class tests and mock examinations are allowed to sit for the Board’s examinations. 3. Tutors should encourage their students to read extensively and do a lot of exercises. They should discourage students from cramming the questions and their solutions as this will not assist them during the examinations. 4. Tutors should encourage students to devote more time in their studies and help them to obtain relevant materials and reference books for the particular subjects. 5. Tutors should expose their students to examination techniques including how to tackle a question in on examination room. Teaching and learning materials 6. Tutors should prepare and update their teaching notes (competence based) that can be made available to their students. 7. Tutors should introduce an ‘examination technique’ topic during the course of training. The examination techniques in one of the crucial areas that play a vital role to students when it comes to answering examination questions. 8. Tutors should devote their time to prepare appropriate case study questions and orient students especially those at higher levels on how to tackle case study questions. 105 9. Tutors should make sure that they concentrate on teaching using NBAA Learning Materials and other supplementary relevant learning materials to cover the syllabus adequately. It is important that the tutors should prepare work-plans that guide them in covering the entire syllabus of the subjects they teach. 10. Tutors should devote their time to attend NBAA seminars, workshops and Training of Trainers workshops in order to be aware of current emerging professional issues. Evaluating the candidates 11. Tutors should at a certain point of time, prepare mock examinations that would test the students understanding and segregate weak from strong students whom should be given more exercises and attention before they can be allowed to register for the examinations. The mock examinations should cover typical examination questions in an examination atmosphere thereby familiarizing the students to similar conditions that they would encounter when taking their examinations. Effective teaching 12. Tutors should prepare scheme of works/lesson plans that will guide them during the teaching process. Teaching plans have to be provided to enable the students be aware of what has to be covered and at what time. 13. Tutors should ensure that they are using relevant and up-to-date teaching materials in order to avoid misleading the students. 14. Tutors should ensure that they attend short courses regarding teaching methodologies in order to improve their teaching styles and acquire modern teaching methodologies. 15. Tutors should take time to read comments prepared by markers which have been summarized in the Examiners’ and Performance Report. By so doing they will understand their shortfalls and improve in the respective areas mentioned by the markers. 16. For the subjects which need practical orientation like auditing, it would be much better for the trainers to invite practicing auditors to teach some of the topics. 17. Tutors should avoid spoon feeding the students, instead they have to apply various participatory teaching methods in order to bring about effective learning among the students. 18. Tutors should in as much as possible try to observe the weaknesses of their students and address them by equipping them with different skills on the subject matter especially on new statutes. 106 19. Tutors should at all times be up-to-date with emerging teaching techniques and should apply them. Tutors should also apply the techniques that make the learner think more rather than cramming. 20. Tutors should ensure that they equip themselves with knowledge and skills that are required to teach effectively the students under competence based syllabi 21. Tutors should assist students on how to use the learning materials for effectively learning RECOMMENDATIONS TO STUDENTS Applying appropriate learning styles 22. Students should develop a culture of reading NBAA Learning materials, various textbooks and journals in order to get an in depth knowledge and understanding of the subject matter. 23. Students should develop study schedules that will guide them during the preparations for the examinations and ensure that they have covered each and every topic in the syllabus. 24. Changes taking place in the accounting, auditing, tax, law regimes are vast and hence students should keep up-to-date with those changes. For example definitions and terminologies in accounting and auditing have been modified since the adoption of the International Accounting/Auditing Standards. Students need to know these changes in order to be able to apply them in their course of study and in their work places. 25. Students should put more effort on Public Sector Accounting/Auditing as it seems they do not give special attention on the area. 26. Students should work hard, think critically and do more practice to enhance their competence and confidence. 27. Students should make sure that they respond to the requirements of the question asked rather than answering what has not been asked. They should not formulate their own questions and provide their own answers. 28. Students are required to do comprehensive preparations. They should not base their preparations on occurrence of topics on past examinations. 107 Self motivation towards learning 29. Students need to take personal initiative to improve their mastery of English Language. This can be achieved in many ways – through reading daily newspapers, magazines, books and through speaking the language. Language limitations has affected majority of candidates as they fail to express themselves properly let alone giving them flexibility in answering the questions. 30. Students should take an initiative of improving their case study analysis. Should seek assistance from their trainers on how to analyze a case study questions. 31. Students should develop their own learning strategies; they should not depend entirely on their trainers. Assurance of knowledge mastery 32. Students should work hard and not rush to sit for the examinations before they have assured themselves that they are ready for the examinations. They should not take chances and play a game of chance (doing examination is not gambling), hoping that they will find the examinations questions they are familiar with. They need to ensure that they get value for the money they have used as tuition and examination fees. 33. Students to take seriously initiative and effort to cover the whole syllabus requirement material through reading various books, journals and published articles not to concentrate mostly in teaching questions and answers of past examinations. 34. Students should avoid attempting the examination unless they have covered a major part of the respective syllabus; also devote more time in private and group discussions study rather than considering the examination as “going concern”. 35. Students should make a good use of the learning materials in order to improve their learning 36. Students should ensure that they avoid learning through memorisation, instead they have to study and understand subject matters in details Appropriate preparation for examinations and examination techniques 37. When attempting the examinations, students/candidates are urged to first read the instructions, and then read the questions properly before they start attempting the question. Make a viable choice in case there are optional questions or even the choice of questions they should start attempting. 38. Students should learn how to organize their answers during the examination attempts. This can be achieved through practice. 108 39. Students should have extensive course contents coverage and attempt many questions in the preparation of their examination in the form of self exercise to build their ability to tackle questions properly and to be able to understand different term used in examinations. 40. Students should ensure that they attend review classes without giving any excuses for not enrolling to these reviews. 41. Students should take time to read about examination techniques that are published regularly in the NBAA Students’ Newsletters and other publications in order to acquire rightful techniques in dealing and answering examination questions. 42. Students should make use of the syllabus outlines during their preparations in order to countercheck that they have adequately covered the syllabus. 43. Students should make use of group discussions in order to enhance their understanding through such discussion. 44. Students should orient themselves with different type of questions, theoretical and computational type of questions and do thorough preparations during the study sessions. They should also equip themselves with analytical skills, especially as at the higher levels in order to be tackle questions that require such skills. 45. Students should change their reading behaviour of memorizing various questions and answers by devoting their time in reading various books and get an insight of the subject matters. 46. Students should make thorough preparation for the examination by reading extensively the recommendations text books to supplement what they are getting from the review classes. 47. Students are advised to apply the following techniques among others in order to pass their examinations. 47.1 Ensuring that the syllabus is well covered Candidates are required to use the syllabus as their base of determining whether they are ready to sit for the examinations or not. The problem of most candidates is total dependence on the trainers. It is not funny to find a candidate attending a review class without having a syllabus. It is difficult for such a candidate to know what has been covered by the trainer and what has been left out. Some candidates instead of ensuring that they have covered the syllabus adequately they rely on Question and Answers (Qs and As) booklets. Questions and Answers of previous examinations are good but they are not supplements of the syllabus. By reading Question and Answer booklets students cannot get sufficient knowledge about the subject matter. The best way of making use of Qs and as is after the completion of the syllabus to see how examination questions are set and the best ways to approach them. 109 47.2 Active participation in the classroom sessions The education system of most countries including Tanzania does not prepare students/candidates to take active role in the classroom. The predominant teaching method used i.e. lecturing is characterized by various shortcomings including: subject experts are not always good teachers, students are passive, learning is difficult to gauge and communication is one way i.e. students are just listening to lectures and do not participate actively. If a student goes to the class waiting for a trainer to come and dish information to be grasped, automatically learning becomes impaired. An effective learning to take place requires the learners to take effective role in the learning process. Experience shows that students who ask questions and pose challenges during the learning process they do well in their examinations. Asking a question or posing a challenge to a trainer does not come from nowhere, it come only if a student is interested to what he is learning. An interested student in the learning process is the one who takes trouble to read what is going to be taught before entering the class. Therefore trainers are required to prepare course outlines derived from the prescribe syllabus so as to enable students to follow. Students can make use of the course outline to prepare on their own before they go to the classroom. The lesson becomes enjoyable when both students and the trainers are prepared before entering the classroom. The secret behind this is that, if trainers know that the students are prepared in advance, they also do extra work. They ensure that they are well prepared before they enter into the classroom. In short, student’s active role in the class is fundamental factor in the effective learning process. 47.3 Review class attendance Review classes are quite different from formal schooling. In the formal schooling context trainers exercise authority of controlling students’ attendance. They can penalize students who miss classes without genuine reasons. This does not happen in the review classes because those who are attending review classes are heterogeneous. Some are employees, some are self employed, and others are fresh graduates from colleges while others are occupied with various social responsibilities. It becomes difficult for the trainers to control attendance of such categories of learners. But we should bear in mind that at higher level education, classroom attendance is not a responsibility of the trainer. If there is any candidate who misses classes just because there is no one to question about it, such a student must have some problems. No one is expecting to see a student missing a class without having genuine reasons at this level of education. But, generally there is lack of seriousness among most candidates especially in the case of classroom attendance. Candidates are therefore reminded that attending classroom sessions appropriately should be self motivated. 110 There is a good number of candidates who never attend review classes with confidence that they know each and every thing. They register themselves for examinations as private candidates. Experience shows that candidates who are attending review classes have a far better chance to pass their examinations than those who do not attend. Some of the candidates attend review classes only when they sit for the examinations on the first time but when they are required to refer or re-seat the examinations they neglect to register for review classes. They claim to have adequate and sufficient materials and therefore they can study on their own. This is not always a good decision. Human brain is characterized by the nature of forgetting. A famous study on forgetting textbook materials compared the percentage of material remembered after different intervals of time. The results were as follows: After 1 day After 7 days After 14 days After 21 days After 28 days After 63 days 54% was remembered. 35% was remembered. 21% was remembered. 18% was remembered. 19% was remembered. 17% was remembered. Remembering what you have heard in lectures is even more difficult to recall because you are not able to slow down, pause, reflect, or to reread unless you take excellent notes! In a study on recall after listening to a lecture, students forgot more than 90% of the points from the lecture after 14 days! (Engle, Susan: Context is everything: The nature of memory. W.H. Freeman & Co, 1999). If that is the case then there is no way a candidate may decide not to attend review classes. 47.4 Group discussions By not sharing ones knowledge of understanding about a particular subject matter a candidate may think that he knows much about the subject but when it comes into examination, such a candidate fails! It is very easy for someone to cheat himself that he knows much about a particular subject matter due to lack of sharing knowledge with others. Going to the library daily or doing daily selfstudy is not a direct ticket to pass examinations. There is a belief that when you are taught something by your fellow student who understands the subject matter, the knowledge sticks into your mind than being taught by a trainer. Group discussions are said to be a good source of learning and sharing of knowledge and experiences due to its nature of open interaction. Although most candidates who are preparing for the professional examinations are facing limited time to organize group discussions, they should not ignore it at all. They should be aware that sometimes it is far better to discuss a subject/topic in a group than going to the library for self study. Group discussion is a potential source of learning but it is ignored by most candidates. Candidates are therefore obliged to form group discussions to discuss various topics especially those which are most difficult or complicated. 111 47.5 Practise learning of materials in deep One of the major factors that lead to poor performance in the examinations is learning things in shallow. Most candidates have ample time to study but they do not do it until the ‘late hours’. They keep on saying ‘there is enough time to study’. But since time does not on the favour of anyone in this universe they find themselves running shortage of time. What follows after this is to make ‘ad hoc’ preparations. In this case therefore they practise what the psychologists call ‘rote learning’. By definition rote learning is a learning technique which avoids understanding the inner complexities and inferences of the subject that is being learned and instead focuses on memorizing the materials so that it can be recalled by the learner exactly the way it was read or heard. In other words, it is learning "just for the test". The major practice involved in rote learning techniques is learning by repetition, based on the idea that one will be able to recall the meaning of the material the more they repeat it. However, in many fields, especially mathematics and related disciplines, this can often produce poor results. Rote learning is not the best way of studying. Students are required to study a subject matter in deep. This will make them to own what they have learnt and express it in their own words. In rote learning a student tries to reproduce what he has read as it was read. ‘If a student reads something with the aim of reproducing it as it is, that is not understanding. This method limits a student to learn many things because memory capacity for human beings is also limited. Students should also be aware that rote learning does not develop interest to learn. As you memorize new materials the old ones fade out. 47.6 Conclusion Candidates should take trouble to read various techniques for passing examinations rather than concentrating only on studying topics that will appear in the examinations. Those who have been able to make use of various study techniques have found themselves enjoying learning and finally pass their examinations. Studying for the examinations should be enjoyable rather than becoming cumbersome to the candidates. This is possible if the candidates apply appropriate techniques in their studies. 112 CHAPTER IV CANDIDATURE DISTRIBUTION The Board’s examination candidature comes from various training institutions (Tuition Providers) in the country. The May 2016 examination session drew candidates from the following institutions as per Table 10: TABLE 10 NAME OF INSTITUTION PRIVATE PT ATTITUDE PT CCA PT CORNERSTONE PT DBC PT EXCELMOSHI PT FANI PT KAS PT PAC- ARUSHA PT PTC MWANZA PT REHOBOTH CONSULT. PT SJCS PT PERFECTSONGEA PT PERFECT – FUTURE PT RUTER PT FC PT BRIGHT MOROGORO PT INSPIRE PT EVIN PT MMK DODOMA PT NAO PT WAME PT WETA PT APT PT BHC PT WADE ARUSHA PT ZIBCO PT BETA ATEC I 16 ATEC II 29 20 15 23 42 NO. OF CANDIDATES FOUNDATION INTERMEDIATE LEVEL LEVEL 71 495 3 172 6 7 1 45 203 2 1 FINAL LEVEL 348 116 2 TOTAL 105 418 959 291 50 4 1 1 14 75 62 153 19 12 1 32 11 8 30 30 3 5 17 164 22 1 2 78 10 14 100 295 36 1 1 1 2 6 2 7 9 5 16 3 2 5 3 41 6 2 11 41 3 15 76 37 131 1 8 8 52 552 21 474 83 1035 2 3 56 29 90 20 18 6 7 10 17 7 4 1 4 37 30 10 12 14 11 8 25 17 17 12 10 29 27 2 5 2 2 3 3 113 NAME OF INSTITUTION PT B&P PT COVENANTFC PT UPTAKE PT AFC PT ACG PT FILADEFIA F.C DODOMA PT FTC PT ZENJI PT CCU PT TCCG PT IDIANA CONSULT. PT PYTHAGORAS F.C TOTAL APPLIED ABSENTEEISM TOTAL SAT ATEC I NO. OF CANDIDATES ATEC FOUNDATION INTERMEDIATE LEVEL LEVEL II 1 19 25 115 5 110 KEY 1 PRIVATE 2 PT ATTITUDE 3 PT CCA 4 PT CORNERSTONE 5 PT DBC 6 PT EXCEL- MOSHI 7 PT FANI 8 PT KAS 9 PT PAC- ARUSHA 10 PT PTC MWANZA 11 12 PT REHOBOTH PT SJCS 13 PT PERFECT- SONGEA 14 PT PERFECT – FUTURE 15 PT RUTER 16 PT FC - TOTAL 1182 659 2044 11 468 35 10 288 32 21 756 67 9 60 31 100 2 1 2 3 13 1 75 4 159 168 8 160 - FINAL LEVEL 1 484 39 445 2 33 5 26 2 110 13 7 24 14 10 24 3898 403 3495 2441 152 2289 7106 607 6499 13 Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Attitude Financial Consultants Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Commercial College of Arusha Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Cornerstone Financial Consultants Part-Time Review Classes Conducted by Delve Business Consultants Co. Ltd. of DSM Part-Time Review Classes Conducted by Excel Financial & Tax Solutions of Moshi Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Fani Business Consultants Part-Time Review Classes conducted by KAS Institute of Professionals (T) Ltd. – DSM. Part-Time Review Classes Conducted by PAC Consultants of Arusha Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Professional Training Centre Mwanza Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Rehoboth Consultancy - DSM St. Joseph’s Commercial School – Tanga Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Perfect Trainers and Business Consultants Part-Time Review Classes conducted by The Perfect Future Consultants Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Ruter Business and Management Services Part-Time Review Classes Conducted by First Contact Institute of Business Administration & Information Technology 114 18 PT BRIGHT MOROGORO PT INSPIRE 19 PT EVIN 20 21 22 PT MMK DODOMA PT NAO PT WAME MWANZA 23 PT WETA - KIGOMA 24 PT APT 25 PT BHC ARUSHA 26 PT WADE ARUSHA 27 PT ZIBCO 28 29 PT BETA PT B&P 30 PT COVENANT- FC 31 PT UPTAKE 32 PT AFC 33 35 PT ACG PT FILADEFIA F.C. DODOMA PT FTC 36 PT ZENJI 37 PT CCU 38 PT TCCG 17 34 39 40 PT IDIANA CONSULTANCY MBEYA PT PYTHAGORAS F.C. - Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Bright Professionals Tanzania Morogoro Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Inspire Consultants Ltd - DSM Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Evin School of Management DSM Part-Time Review Classes conducted by MMK - Dodoma Part-Time Review Classes Conducted by National Audit Office – DSM Part-Time Review Classes Conducted by WAME Investment - Mwanza Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Western Tanganyika College Kigoma Part-Time Review Classes conducted by APT Financial Consultants – DSM Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Business Horizon Consultants Arusha Part-Time Review Classes conducted by WADE Through Financial Consultants Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Zanzibar Intellectual and Business Consultants Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Beta Business Consultants - DSM Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Inter Consultant Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Covenant Financial Consultants DSM Part Time review classes conducted by UPTAKE Business Resources (T) Ltd - DSM Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Accountants and Financial Consultants Ltd Part-Time Review Classes Conducted by Accountant General’s Office Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Filadefia Financial Consultancy - Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Financial Training Centre Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Zenji Review and Consultancy Zanzibar Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Chuo cha Uchumi Zanzibar Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Tanzania Centre for Corporate Governance DSM Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Idiana Consultancy Mbeya - Part-Time Review Classes conducted by Pythagoras Financial Consultants - 115 INSTITUTIONAL PERFORMANCE The assessment of institutional performance is done using two approaches: 1. Best Candidate Approach: The best institution under this approach is the one which produces the “NBAA Best Level Candidate”, a candidate who obtained the highest marks in aggregate, at a single examination attempt. Using this approach, the best candidate for each of the Board’s examination levels is as follows: Examination Best Candidates came from ATEC Level I PT KAS ATEC Level II PT CORNERSTONE FOUNDATION LEVEL: PT CORNERSTONE INTERMEDIATE LEVEL: PT CONVENANT F.C FINAL LEVEL: PT CONVENANT F.C 2. Performance Approach: Under this approach, the best institution is that which obtains the highest Grade Point Average (GPA) in relation to the total number of A ,B, C, F grades obtained by candidates in comparison with total number of papers sat by candidates in that level. The following formula is applied Subject GPA = Where Na = Total Number of Candidates who have scored A in an institution at that level Nb = Total Number of Candidates who have scored B in an institution at that level Nc = Total Number of Candidates who have scored C in an institution at that level Nf = Total Number of Candidates who have scored F in an institution at that level Pa = The weight of Grade A = 3 Pb = The weight of Grade B = 2 Pc = The weight of Grade C = 1 Pf = The weight of Grade F = 0 116 Arising from the above, the best three institutions under this approach for each examination level are as indicated hereunder: (See tables 15.1 to 15.5(b) on pages 145 to 154 of this report). Examination Level ATEC I: Category A: 1-5 Candidates Category B: Above 5 Candidates ATEC II: Category A: 1-5 Candidates Category B: Above 5 Candidates FOUNDATION LEVEL: Category A: 1-20 Candidates Category B: Above 20 Candidates INTERMEDIATE LEVEL: Category A: 1-20 Candidates Category B: Above 20 Candidates FINAL LEVEL: Category A: 1-20 Candidates Category B: Above 20 Candidates Best Institution 1st 2nd 3rd - PT SJCS PT INSPIRE DBC & PTC MWANZA 1st 2nd 3rd - PT CORNERSTONE PT PAC ARUSHA PT COVENANT.FC 1st 2nd 3rd - PT EXCEL - MOSHI PT BRIGHT-MOROGORO PT MMK-DODOMA 1st 2nd 3rd - PT CORNERSTONE PT COVENANT F.C PT KAS 1st 2nd 3rd - PT SJCS PT PTC MWANZA PT IDIANA CONSULT. 1st 2nd 3rd - PT CORNERSTONE PT COVENANT F.C PT FC 1st 3rd - PT APT & FANI PT RUTER 1st 2nd 3rd - PT COVENANT F.C PT MMK DODOMA PT PTC MWANZA 1st 3rd - PT APT & PT FANI PT RUTER 1st 2nd 3rd - PT EXCEL MOSHI PT COVENANT F.C PT TCCG 117 TABLE 11.1 SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY EXAMINATION LEVEL AND INSTITUTION WISE 1-5 CANDIDATES - ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN LEVEL I Institution PT - SJCS PT - INSPIRE PT - DBC PT - PTC MWANZA PT - EXCEL MOSHI Subtotals Entered Absent Sat No of papers No of A % of A No of B % of B No of C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking 1 2 1 0 0 0 1 2 1 4 8 4 0 1 0 0.0% 12.5% 0.0% 2 1 0 50.0% 12.5% 0.0% 2 3 2 50.0% 37.5% 50.0% 0 3 2 0.0% 37.5% 50.0% 1.50 1.00 0.50 1 2 3 1 0 1 2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0.50 3 1 1 0 0 5 18 0.0% 5.6% 0 3 0.0% 16.7% 0 8 0.0% 44.4% 0 6 0.0% 33.3% 5 1 0 1 0.00 6 RANKING 1ST 2ND 2ND - PT SJCS PT INSPIRE PT DBC & PTC MWANZA Key: Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of No of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers) Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level. 118 TABLE 11.1 SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY EXAMINATION LEVEL AND INSTITUTION WISE ABOVE 5 CANDIDATES - ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN LEVEL I Institution PT Cornerstone PT - PAC ARUSHA PT - Covenant F. C. PT - KAS PT - CCA Subtotals Entered Absent Sat No of papers 23 0 23 59 12 0 12 35 19 0 19 52 19 20 93 3 1 4 16 19 89 35 53 234 No of A % of A No of B % of B No of C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking 1 1.7% 5 8.5% 25 42.4% 28 47.5% 0.64 1 0 0.0% 1 2.9% 20 57.1% 14 40.0% 0.63 2 0 1 0 2 0.0% 2.9% 0.0% 0.9% 3 3 2 14 5.8% 8.6% 3.8% 6.0% 24 7 17 93 46.2% 20.0% 32.1% 39.7% 25 24 34 125 48.1% 68.6% 64.2% 53.4% 0.58 0.46 0.40 3 4 5 RANKING 1ST 2ND 3RD - PT Cornerstone PT PAC Arusha PT Covenant F. C. Key: Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of No of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers) Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level? 119 TABLE 11.2 SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY EXAMINATION LEVEL AND INSTITUTION WISE 1-5 CANDIDATES - ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN LEVEL II Institution PT - EXCEL MOSHI PT-BRIGHT MORO PT - MMK DODOMA PT - WADE ARUSHA PT- PERFECT SONGEA PT - EVIN PT - APT Subtotals Entered Absent Sat No of papers 1 0 1 4 3 0 3 12 2 0 2 8 3 0 3 6 2 0 2 6 1 2 14 1 1 2 0 1 12 0 2 38 No of A % of A No of B % of B No of C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 100.0% 0 0.0% 1.00 1 1 8.3% 1 8.3% 5 41.7% 5 41.7% 0.83 2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 50.0% 4 50.0% 0.50 3 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 4 66.7% 0.33 4 0 0 0 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.6% 0 0 0 1 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 2.6% 2 0 0 17 33.3% 0.0% 0.0% 44.7% 4 0 2 19 66.7% 0.0% 100.0% 50.0% 0.33 0.00 0.00 4 6 6 RANKING 1ST 1ST 3RD - PT EXCEL MOSHI PT BRIGHT MOROGORO PT MMK DODOMA Key: Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of No of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers) Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level. 120 TABLE 11.2 (b) SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY EXAMINATION LEVEL AND INSTITUTION WISE ABOVE 5 CANDIDATES - ACCOUNTING TECHNICIAN LEVEL II Institution PT Cornerstone PT - Covenant F. C. PT - KAS PT - CCA PT - PAC ARUSHA Subtotals Entered Absent Sat No of papers 42 2 40 136 25 0 25 70 32 15 2 1 30 14 88 37 11 0 11 24 125 5 120 355 No of A % of A No of B % of B No of C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking 17 12.5% 9 6.6% 60 44.1% 50 36.8% 0.95 1 0 0 0 0.0% 0.0% 0.0% 5 1 0 7.1% 1.1% 0.0% 29 27 11 41.4% 30.7% 29.7% 36 60 26 51.4% 68.2% 70.3% 0.56 0.33 0.30 2 3 4 0 17 0.0% 4.8% 0 15 0.0% 4.2% 6 133 25.0% 37.5% 18 190 75.0% 53.5% 0.25 5 RANKING 1ST 2ND 3RD - PT Cornerstone PT Covenant F. C. PT KAS. Key: Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of No of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers) Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level. 121 TABLE 11.3 (a) SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY EXAMINATION LEVELS AND INSTITUTIONS 1- 20 CANDIDATES - FOUNDATION LEVEL Institution PT- SJCS Entered Absent Sat No of papers No of A % of A No of B % of B No of C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking 6 2 4 9 3 33.3% 1 11.1% 5 55.6% 0 0.0% 1.78 1 PT - PTC Mwanza PT – IDIANA CONSULT. 3 4 0 0 3 9 7 0 0.0% 3 33.3% 6 66.7% 0 0.0% 1.33 2 4 0 0.0% 3 42.9% 3 42.9% 1 14.3% 1.29 3 PT - RUTER 3 0 3 9 0 0.0% 3 33.3% 5 55.6% 1 11.1% 1.22 4 PT - TCCG 2 0 2 5 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 2 40.0% 1 20.0% 1.20 5 PT - MMK Dodoma PT - INSPIRE 3 8 0 2 3 5 20 1 20.0% 0 0.0% 3 60.0% 1 20.0% 1.20 5 6 1 5.0% 5 25.0% 11 55.0% 3 15.0% 1.20 5 PT - EXCEL - MOSHI 14 0 14 41 1 2.4% 12 29.3% 20 48.8% 8 19.5% 1.15 8 PT - FANI PT - BRIGHT MOROGORO PT- WADE ARUSHA PT-REHOBOTH CONSULT 8 0 8 32 0 0.0% 7 21.9% 21 65.6% 4 12.5% 1.09 9 15 1 13 43 1 2.3% 9 20.9% 23 53.5% 10 23.3% 1.02 10 3 0 3 6 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 4 66.7% 1 16.7% 1.00 11 1 0 1 2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0 0.0% 1.00 11 PT - FTC PT - EVIN 2 8 1 2 1 1 9 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1.00 11 6 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 6 66.7% 2 22.2% 0.89 14 PT - WAME MWANZA 5 0 5 17 1 5.9% 0 0.0% 11 64.7% 5 29.4% 0.82 15 PT - FILADEFIA PT - CCA 9 6 1 1 8 0 0.0% 1 5.6% 12 66.7% 5 27.8% 0.78 16 5 18 15 0 0.0% 1 6.7% 8 53.3% 6 40.0% 0.67 17 PT - DBC 2 0 2 6 0 0.0% 1 16.7% 2 33.3% 3 50.0% 0.67 17 PT - APT 2 1 1 5 0 0.0% 1 20.0% 1 20.0% 3 60.0% 0.60 19 PT - ATITTUDE 3 0 3 5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 0.40 20 1 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0.00 21 265 8 3.0% 51 19.2% 148 55.8% 58 21.9% PT - CCU 1 0 1 Subtotals 108 11 96 RANKING 1ST PT SJCS 2ND PT PTC MWANZA 3RD PT IDIANA CONSULT. Key: Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of No of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers) Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level. 122 TABLE 11.3 (b) SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY EXAMINATION LEVELS AND INSTITUTIONS ABOVE 20 CANDIDATES - FOUNDATION LEVEL Institution PT Cornerstone PT - Covenant F. C. PT - AFC PT - KAS PT- PAC ARUSHA Subtotals Entered Absent Sat No of papers 45 5 40 117 159 9 150 391 41 30 2 0 39 30 84 91 30 4 26 68 305 20 285 751 No of A % of A No of B % of B No of C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking 14 12.0% 30 25.6% 52 44.4% 21 17.9% 1.32 1 5 0 0 1.3% 0.0% 0.0% 77 19 15 19.7% 22.6% 16.5% 229 45 59 58.6% 53.6% 64.8% 80 20 17 20.5% 23.8% 18.7% 1.02 0.99 0.98 2 3 4 0 19 0.0% 2.5% 15 156 22.1% 20.8% 25 410 36.8% 54.6% 28 166 41.2% 22.1% 0.81 5 RANKING 1ST 2ND 3RD - PT Cornerstone PT Covenant F.C PT FC Key: Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of Number of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers) Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level. 123 TABLE 11.4 (a) SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY EXAMINATION LEVELS AND INSTITUTIONS 1-20 CANDIDATES - INTERMEDIATE LEVEL Entered Absent Sat No of papers No of A % of A No of B % of B No of C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking PT - FTC 3 2 1 1 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1.00 1 PT - RUTER 6 1 5 9 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 66.7% 3 33.3% 0.67 2 PT - APT 7 2 5 11 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 63.6% 4 36.4% 0.64 3 PT - WETA 6 0 6 9 0 0.0% 1 11.1% 4 44.4% 5 55.6% 0.60 4 PT - FANI 5 1 4 10 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 50.0% 5 50.0% 0.50 5 PT - B&P 1 0 1 1 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0.00 17 PT-WADE ARUSHA 11 0 11 28 0 0.0% 1 3.6% 11 39.3% 16 57.1% 0.46 6 PT-WAME MWANZA PT - IDIANA CONSULT. PT-KAS 18 0 18 47 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 15 31.9% 32 68.1% 0.32 7 13 3 10 24 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 7 29.2% 17 70.8% 0.29 8 17 2 15 38 0 0.0% 1 8 21.1% 29 76.3% 0.26 9 PT-ZIBCO PT-PYTHAGORAS F.C PT - NAO 17 2 15 33 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 8 24.2% 25 75.8% 0.24 10 14 0 14 38 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 9 23.7% 29 76.3% 0.24 11 20 6 14 23 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 17.4% 19 82.6% 0.17 12 PT - BETA 17 0 17 26 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 15.4% 22 84.6% 0.15 13 PT - CCA 7 0 7 19 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 10.5% 17 89.5% 0.11 14 PT - ZENJI PT - PERFECTSONGEA PT-UPTAKE 13 3 10 12 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 8.3% 11 91.7% 0.08 15 9 2 7 12 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 8.3% 11 91.7% 0.08 15 11 1 10 11 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 11 100.0% 0.00 17 PT - BHC PT - PERFECTFUTURE PT - CCU 10 1 9 16 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 16 100.0% 0.00 17 3 0 3 6 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 100.0% 0.00 17 1 0 1 4 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 4 100.0% 0.00 17 PT REHOBOTH 1 0 1 2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0.00 17 PT - DBC 1 0 1 1 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0.00 17 Subtotals 211 26 185 381 0 0.0% 3 0.8% 93 24.4% 286 75.1% Institution 124 RANKING 1ST 3RD - PT APT & PT FAN PT RUTER Key: Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of Number of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers) Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level. 125 TABLE 11.4 (b) SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY EXAMINATION LEVELS AND INSTITUTIONS ABOVE 20 CANDIDATES - INTERMEDIATE LEVEL Institution PT - COVENANT F.C Entered 1182 Absent 79 Sat 1103 No of papers 2832 No of A % of A No of B % of B No of C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking 2 0.1% 86 3.0% 1135 40.1% 1609 56.8% 0.46 1 PT - MMK DODOMA 56 3 53 117 0 0.0% 2 1.7% 50 42.7% 65 55.6% 0.46 2 PT - PTC MWANZA 22 5 17 36 0 0.0% 1 2.8% 14 38.9% 21 58.3% 0.44 3 PT - EXCEL MOSHI 75 4 71 141 0 0.0% 1 0.7% 56 39.7% 84 59.6% 0.41 4 PT - FILADEFIA FC 60 6 54 120 0 0.0% 3 2.5% 42 35.0% 75 62.5% 0.40 5 PT- CORNERSTONE 203 15 188 428 0 0.0% 6 1.4% 156 36.4% 266 62.1% 0.39 6 PT - TCCG 75 8 67 130 0 0.0% 5 3.8% 38 29.2% 87 66.9% 0.37 7 PT - INSPIRE 52 7 45 115 0 0.0% 2 1.7% 38 33.0% 75 65.2% 0.37 8 PT - ATTITUDE 172 12 160 318 0 0.0% 6 1.9% 99 31.1% 213 67.0% 0.35 9 PT-BRIGHT MORO 76 8 68 169 0 0.0% 3 1.8% 49 29.0% 117 69.2% 0.33 10 PT - EVEN 552 101 451 842 0 0.0% 14 1.7% 232 27.6% 596 70.8% 0.31 11 PT - AFC 468 48 420 863 0 0.0% 6 0.7% 244 28.3% 613 71.0% 0.30 12 PT - PAC ARUSHA 164 10 154 403 0 0.0% 1 0.2% 115 28.5% 287 71.2% 0.29 13 PT - ACG 35 8 27 32 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 9.4% 29 90.6% 0.09 14 Subtotals 3192 314 2878 6546 2 0.0% 136 2.1% 2271 34.7% 4137 63.2% RANKING 1ST 2ND 3RD - PT Covenant F. C. PT MMK DODOMA PT PTC- MWANZA Key: Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of No of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers) Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level. 126 TABLE 11.4 (a) SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY EXAMINATION LEVELS AND INSTITUTIONS 1-20 CANDIDATES - FINAL LEVEL Entered Absent Sat No of papers No of A % of A No of B % of B PT - APT 1 0 1 1 0 0.0% 0 0.0% PT - FANI 1 0 1 1 0 0.0% 0 PT - RUTER 2 0 2 3 0 0.0% PT - PERFECT- FUTURE 2 0 2 2 0 PT - PERFECT- SONGEA 5 1 4 5 PT - WETA 4 0 4 5 PT - BHC 4 0 4 6 PT - PYTHAGORAS F.C 10 0 10 21 PT - ZIBCO 12 0 12 18 PT - PTC MWANZA 10 2 8 PT - WAME MWANZA 7 0 7 PT - IDIANA CONSULT. 7 1 PT - BETA 10 PT - UPTAKE Institution % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1.00 1 0.0% 1 100.0% 0 0.0% 1.00 1 0 0.0% 2 66.7% 1 33.3% 0.67 3 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 50.0% 1 50.0% 0.50 4 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 0.40 5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 40.0% 3 60.0% 0.40 5 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 33.3% 4 66.7% 0.33 7 0 0.0% 1 4.8% 5 23.8% 15 71.4% 0.33 7 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 33.3% 12 66.7% 0.33 7 19 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 6 31.6% 13 68.4% 0.32 10 19 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 5 26.3% 14 73.7% 0.26 11 6 12 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 25.0% 9 75.0% 0.25 12 1 9 16 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 12.5% 14 87.5% 0.13 13 10 2 8 11 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 9.1% 10 90.9% 0.09 14 PT- ZENJI 13 2 11 25 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 8.0% 23 92.0% 0.08 15 PT - WADE ARUSHA 8 0 8 14 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 7.1% 13 92.9% 0.07 16 PT - NAO 17 1 16 32 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 6.3% 30 93.8% 0.06 17 PT - B & P 1 0 1 1 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 1 100.0% 0.00 18 PT - CCA 2 0 2 3 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 3 100.0% 0.00 18 PT - KAS 2 0 2 2 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 2 100.0% 0.00 18 128 10 118 216 0 0.0% 1 0.5% 44 20.4% 171 79.2% Subtotals No of C RANKING 1ST 3RD - PT APT & PT FANI PT RUTER Key: Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of No of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers) Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level. 127 TABLE 11.5 (b) SUMMARY OF RESULTS BY EXAMINATION LEVELS AND INSTITUTIONS ABOVE 20 CANDIDATES - FINAL LEVEL Entered Absent Sat No of papers No of A % of A No of B % of B No of C % of C No of F % of F GPA Ranking PT - EXCEL MOSHI 62 4 58 127 0 0.0% 4 3.1% 62 48.8% 61 48.0% 0.55 1 PT - COVENANT F.C 659 33 626 1274 0 0.0% 54 4.2% 562 44.1% 658 51.6% 0.53 2 PT - TCCG 33 6 27 60 0 0.0% 1 1.7% 28 46.7% 31 51.7% 0.50 3 PT - CORNERSTONE 105 9 96 168 0 0.0% 5 3.0% 65 38.7% 98 58.3% 0.45 4 PT- FILADEFIA F.C 31 4 27 44 0 0.0% 3 6.8% 10 22.7% 31 70.5% 0.36 5 PT - ATTITUDE 116 4 112 219 0 0.0% 3 1.4% 69 31.5% 147 67.1% 0.34 6 PT - AFC 288 16 272 499 0 0.0% 6 1.2% 151 30.3% 342 68.5% 0.33 7 PT- PAC ARUSHA 78 1 77 169 0 0.0% 1 0.6% 52 30.8% 116 68.6% 0.32 8 PT- INSPIRE 21 0 21 41 0 0.0% 1 2.4% 11 26.8% 29 70.7% 0.32 9 PT- MMK DODOMA 29 1 28 50 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 15 30.0% 35 70.0% 0.30 10 PT - EVIN 474 29 445 817 0 0.0% 3 0.4% 222 27.2% 592 72.5% 0.28 11 PT - ACG 32 0 32 82 0 0.0% 0 0.0% 18 22.0% 64 78.0% 0.22 12 PT - BRIGHT MORO 37 4 33 64 0 0.0% 1 1.6% 9 14.1% 54 84.4% 0.17 13 1965 111 1854 3614 0 0.0% 82 2.3% 1274 35.3% 2258 62.5% Institution Subtotals RANKING 1ST 2ND 3RD - PT EXCEL MOSHI PT COVENANT F. C. PT TCCG Key: Total No of Papers Attempted – Is calculated as sum of No of Candidates times Papers Attempted (∑ of Candidates x No of Papers) Number of Grades – Is Number of Grades (A-F) scored by that Institution in all papers in that particular level. 128 CHAPTER V ACCOUNTING MANPOWER CREATED BY THE BOARD UP TO MAY 2016 In an effort to meet the demand of the highly needed accounting personnel in the country, the Board has been able to create cumulatively 21,072 accounting manpower since its inception in May 1975. These qualified accounting personnel created are categorized in the following groups: (1) (2) (3) (4) (5) Certified Public Accountants (CPA) National Accountancy Diploma (NAD) (Phased out in November 1991) 7,171 1,537 National Book-keeping Certificate (NABOCE) (phased out in May 1991) Basic Book-keeping Certificate (BBC) (phased out in November 1990) 5,746 2,971 Accounting Technician Certificate (ATEC) 3,647 Table 12 below shows the statistics of graduates per session and cumulatively since May 1975 to November 2013 NBAA GRADUATES – CUMULATIVE STATISTICAL ANALYSIS MAY 1975 –MAY 2015 TABLE 12 EXAMINATION SESSION 1ST SESSION MAY 1975 2ND SESSION NOV. 1975 3RD SESSION MAY 1976 4TH SESSION NOV. 1976 5TH SESSION MAY 1977 6TH SESSION NOV. 1977 7TH SESSION MAY 1978 8TH SESSION NOV. 1978 9TH SESSION MAY 1979 10TH SESSION NO. BBC CUM. NABOCE NO. CUM. ATEC NO. CUM. NO. NAD CUM. NO. CPA CUM. TOTAL NO. CUM. - - 04 04 - - 01 01 NE NE 05 05 - - 32 36 - - 10 11 NE NE 42 47 - - 158 194 - - 25 36 02 02 185 232 - - 73 267 - - 43 79 02 04 118 350 - - 174 441 - - 36 115 08 12 218 568 - - 98 539 - - 17 132 03 15 118 686 - - 193 732 - - 57 189 13 28 263 949 - - 172 904 - - 56 245 11 39 239 1188 - - 199 1103 - - 46 291 27 66 272 1460 - - 75 1178 - - 31 322 13 79 119 1579 129 EXAMINATION SESSION NOV. 1979 11TH SESSION MAY 1980 12TH SESSION NOV. 1980 13TH SESSION MAY 1981 14TH SESSION NOV. 1981 15TH SESSION MAY 1982 16TH SESSION NOV. 1982 17TH SESSION MAY 1983 18TH SESSION NOV. 1983 19TH SESSION MAY 1984 20TH SESSION NOV. 1984 21ST SESSION MAY 1985 22ND SESSION NOV. 1985 23RD SESSION MAY 1986 24TH SESSION NOV. 1986 25TH SESSION MAY 1987 26TH SESSION NOV. 1987 27TH SESSION MAY 1988 28TH SESSION NOV. 1988 29TH SESSION MAY 1989 30TH SESSION NOV. 1989 31ST SESSION MAY 1990 32ND SESSION NOV. 1990 33RD SESSION MAY 1991 34TH SESSION NOV. 1991 35TH SESSION MAY 1992 36TH SESSION NO. NAD CUM. NO. - 22 344 22 101 167 1746 - - 24 368 20 121 163 1909 1649 - - 53 421 13 134 295 2204 124 1772 - - 23 444 21 155 168 2372 - 172 1945 - - 37 481 19 174 228 2600 - - 236 2181 - - 36 517 20 194 292 2892 - - 248 2429 - - 47 564 21 215 316 3208 - - 200 2629 - - 28 592 14 220 242 3450 - - 199 2828 - - 36 628 17 246 252 3702 - - 215 3043 - - 37 665 12 258 264 3966 18 18 306 3349 - - 41 706 12 270 377 4343 40 58 194 3543 - - 44 750 09 279 287 4630 62 120 123 3666 - - 54 804 21 300 260 4890 86 206 168 3834 - - 48 852 11 311 313 5203 64 270 205 4039 - - 25 877 06 317 300 5503 93 363 129 4168 - - 40 917 14 331 276 5779 298 661 175 4343 - - 32 949 14 345 519 6298 292 953 179 4522 - - 72 1021 22 367 565 6863 332 1285 201 4723 - - 40 1061 16 377 589 7452 446 1731 232 4955 - - 78 1139 31 414 787 8239 482 2213 235 5190 - - 118 1257 17 431 852 9091 758 2971 211 5401 - - 114 1371 40 471 10214 - 2971 345 5746 - - 111 1482 61 532 112 3 517 - 2971 - 5746 56 56 55 1537 64 596 175 10906 - 2971 - 5746 136 192 - 1537 - 596 136 11042 - 2971 - 5746 186 378 - 1537 11 607 197 11,239 NO. BBC CUM. NABOCE NO. CUM. - - 123 1301 - - - 119 1420 - - 229 - - - 130 ATEC NO. CUM. CPA CUM. TOTAL NO. CUM. 10731 EXAMINATION SESSION NOV. 1992 37TH SESSION MAY 1993 38TH SESSION NOV. 1993 39TH SESSION MAY 1994 40TH SESSION NOV. 1994 41ST SESSION MAY 1995 42ND SESSION NOV. 1995 43RD SESSION MAY 1996 44TH SESSION NOV. 1996 45TH SESSION MAY 1997 46TH SESSION NOV. 1997 47TH SESSION MAY 1998 48TH SESSION NOV. 1998 49TH SESSION MAY 1999 50TH SESSION NOV. 1999 51ST SESSION MAY 2000 52ND SESSION NOV.2000 53RD SESSION MAY,2001 54TH SESSION NOV. 2001 55TH SESSION MAY 2002 56TH SESSION Nov. 2002 57TH SESSION MAY 2003 58th SESSION NOV. 2003 59th SESSION MAY 2004 60TH SESSION NOV. 2004 61ST SESSION MAY 2005 62ND SESSION NOV. 2005 NO. BBC CUM. NABOCE NO. CUM. ATEC NO. CUM. NO. NAD CUM. NO. CPA CUM. TOTAL NO. CUM. - 2971 - 5746 119 497 - 1537 12 619 131 11,370 - 2971 - 5746 104 601 - 1537 12 631 116 11,486 - 2971 - 5746 110 711 - 1537 16 647 126 11,612 - 2971 - 5746 207 918 - 1537 19 666 226 11,838 - 2971 - 5746 122 1040 - 1537 28 694 150 11,988 - 2971 - 5746 117 1157 - 1537 29 723 146 12,134 - 2971 - 5746 87 1244 - 1537 36 759 123 12,257 - 2971 - 5746 111 1355 - 1537 53 812 164 12,421 - 2971 - 5746 109 1464 - 1537 28 840 137 12,558 - 2971 - 5746 107 1571 - 1537 40 880 147 12,705 - 2971 - 5746 124 1695 - 1537 40 920 164 12,869 - 2971 - 5746 60 1755 - 1537 29 949 89 12,958 - 2971 - 5746 80 1835 - 1537 52 1001 132 13,090 - 2971 - 5746 80 1915 - 1537 47 1048 127 13,217 - 2971 - 5746 104 2019 - 1537 42 1090 146 13,363 - 2971 - 5746 91 2110 - 1537 71 1161 162 13,525 - 2971 - 5746 45 2155 - 1537 77 1238 122 13,647 - 2971 - 5746 64 2219 - 1537 33 1271 97 13,744 - 2971 - 5746 41 2260 - 1537 28 1299 69 13,813 - 2971 - 5746 42 2302 - 1537 53 1352 95 13,908 - 2971 - 5746 55 2357 - 1537 49 1401 104 14,012 - 2971 - 5746 58 2415 - 1537 55 1456 113 14,125 - 2971 - 5746 85 2500 - 1537 165 1621 250 14,375 - 2971 - 5746 113 2613 - 1537 134 1755 247 14,622 - 2971 - 5746 65 2678 - 1537 142 1897 207 14,829 - 2971 - 5746 75 2753 - 1537 131 2028 206 15,035 131 EXAMINATION SESSION 63RD SESSION MAY 2006 64TH SESSION NOV. 2006 65TH SESSION MAY 2007 66TH SESSION NOV. 2007 67TH SESSION MAY 2008 68TH SESSION NOV. 2008 69TH SESSION MAY 2009 70TH SESSION NOV. 2009 71ST SESSION MAY 2010 72ND SESSION NOV. 2010 73RD SESSION MAY 2011 74TH SESSION NOV. 2011 75th SESSION MAY 2012 76th SESSION NOV. 2012 77th SESSION MAY 2013 78th SESSION NOV. 2013 79th SESSION MAY 2014 80th SESSION NOV. 2014 81st SESSION MAY 2015 1st Mid-SESSION AUGUST 2015 82nd SESSION NOVEMBER 2015 2ND MIDSESSION FEBRUARY 2016 83rd SESSION MAY 2016 NO. BBC CUM. NABOCE NO. CUM. ATEC NO. CUM. NO. NAD CUM. NO. CPA CUM. TOTAL NO. CUM. - 2971 - 5746 62 2815 - 1537 92 2120 154 15,189 - 2971 - 5746 35 2850 - 1537 83 2203 118 15,307 - 2971 - 5746 102 2952 - 1537 97 2300 199 15,506 - 2971 - 5746 61 3013 - 1537 177 2477 238 15,744 - 2971 - 5746 21 3034 - 1537 184 2661 205 15,949 - 2971 - 5746 49 3083 - 1537 97 2758 146 16,095 - 2971 - 5746 45 3128 - 1537 179 2937 224 16,319 - 2971 - 5746 61 3189 - 1537 146 3083 207 16,525 - 2971 - 5746 32 3221 - 1537 164 3247 196 16,722 - 2971 2971 - 5746 5746 33 29 3254 3283 - 1537 1537 176 185 3423 3608 209 214 16,931 17,145 - 2971 - 5746 31 3314 - 1537 268 3876 299 17,444 - 2971 - 5746 35 3349 - 1537 259 4135 294 17,738 - 2971 - 5746 23 3372 - 1537 188 4323 211 17,949 - 2971 - 5746 26 3398 - 1537 468 4791 494 18,443 - 2971 - 5746 36 3434 - 1537 377 5,168 413 18,856 - 2971 - 5746 46 3480 - 1537 478 5,646 524 19,380 - 2971 - 5746 43 3523 - 1537 369 6,015 412 19,792 - 2971 - 5746 42 3565 - 1537 600 6,615 642 20,434 - 2971 - 5746 - 3565 - 1537 03 6,618 03 20,437 - 2971 - 5746 42 3607 - 1537 270 6,888 312 20,749 - 2971 - 5746 - 3607 - 1537 01 6,889 01 20,750 - 2971 - 5746 40 3647 - 1537 282 7,171 322 21,072 132 Table 13 below shows the statistics of CPA (T) equivalent graduates per session and cumulatively since May 2015 to May 2016. TABLE 13: CPA (T) EQUIVALENT CERTIFICATES FROM MAY 2015 – MAY 2016 EXAMINATION SESSION 80TH SESSION NOVEMBER 2014 81ST SESSION MAY 2015 1ST MID-SESSION AUGUST 2015 82ND NOVEMBER 2015 2ND MID-SESSION FEBRUARY 2016 83RD SESSION MAY 2016 TOTAL NO. 01 08 04 03 08 10 133 CUM. 01 09 13 16 24 34 CHAPTER VI CANDIDATES WINNING THE SPECIAL PRIZES – MAY 2016 EXAMINATION SESSION 1.0 PRIZES OFFERED BY NBAA NBAA offers prizes in the following categories: 1.0.1 Best Level Performance Prize 1.0.2 Single Subject Prize 1.0.3 Best Female Prizes 1.1 Minimum Requirement to Win the Prize In order to win any of the above prizes offered by NBAA, the minimum requirement is for a candidate to obtain an overall pass in a level, having attempted whole set of subjects in that level and passing at a single examination attempt. 1.2 Amount offered in each Examination level: 1.2.1 NBAA Best Level Performance Prize This prize is awarded to the best candidate who completes an examination level in the first attempt and scores highest marks in aggregate in that level. Accounting Technician Levels I & II Foundation Level Intermediate Level Final Level 1.2.2 Exam Paper Amounts Codes Tshs. T01 – T08 50,000 A1 – A5 60,000 B1 – B6 80,000 C1 – C4 100,000 Single Subject Prize (Subject to Subject) Performance Prize The prize is awarded to the best candidate who has excelled in a subject by attaining at least a credit mark – 70% or above in the Accounting Technician Examination Scheme, 60% or above in the Professional Examination Scheme. Accounting Technician Levels I & II Foundation Level Intermediate Level Final Level 134 Exam Paper Amounts Codes Tshs. T01 – T08 40,000 A1 – A5 50,000 B1 – B6 60,000 C1 – C4 70,000 1.2.3 Best Female Prizes In motivating female candidates to work harder in their studies and perform better in the Board’s examination, two categories of prizes are offered to female candidates as follows: 1.2.3.1 Best Level Female Performance Prize: This prize is offered to a female candidate as long as the score in aggregate in a level is 70% and above in ATEC examinations and 60% and above in professional examinations. Accounting Technician Level I Accounting Technician Level II Foundation Level Intermediate Level Final Stage Level Exam Paper Amounts Codes Tshs. T01 – T04 50,000 T05 – T08 50,000 A1 – A5 60,000 B1 – B6 80,000 C1 – C4 100,000 1.2.3.2 Best Female Graduate Prize: The second category of prize is the Best Graduate Prize which is offered to the female candidate who scores highest marks in aggregate among female candidates in ATEC II or CPA (T). Best ATEC Female Graduate Prize Award Best CPA (T) Female Graduate Prize Award 1.3 Exam Paper Amounts Codes Tshs. T05 – T08 250,000 C1 – C4 500,000 Prizes won by Candidates: 1.3.1 NBAA Best Level Performance Prize: Code and Subject Name Name Accounting Technician Level JAMES, JERLINE I Accounting Technician Level GEORGE, GIDEON II Foundation Level SONELO, ERASTO 1027538 Amount Tshs. 50,000/= 2027484 50,000/= 3025227 60,000/= Intermediate Level SOMBOI EMMANUEL 4027414 80,000/= Final Level RICHARD, GLADY’S 5026445 100,000/= 135 Index No. 1.3.2 Subject to Subject Performance Prize The prize is offered to the best candidate who has excelled in a subject by attaining at least a credit mark -70% or above in Accounting Technician Examination Scheme or 60% or above in professional examination scheme. The following candidates qualify for the prizes in each examination layer: Accounting Technician Level I Code and Subject Name Name T.01 - Bookkeeping and Accounts T.02 - Elements of Business Maths and Statistics KIHIYO, DISMAS L. 1027802 Amount Tshs. 40,000/= JAMES, JERLINE 1027538 40,000/= T.03 - Introduction to Information and Communication Technology T.04 - Business Communication Skills KIHIYO, DISMAS L. 1027802 40,000/= KIMBALI, JOHN P. 1027539 40,000/= Accounting Technician Level II Code and Subject Name Name Index No. T.05 - Principles of Accounting and Auditing BUCHEYE, JONAS 2027807 Amount Tshs. 40,000/= T.06 – Principles of Cost Accounting and Procurement GEORGE, GIDEON 2027484* 20,000/= RUKOKERWA, DICKSON E. 2026281* 20,000/= T.07 – Elements of Commercial Knowledge, Management Practices and Taxation RAMADHAN, BAKARI 2027485* 20,000/= UBWE, SHANNA N. 2027502* 20,000/= T.08 – Accounting for Public Sector and Cooperatives LUSUBILO, DANIEL 2027483 40,000/= 136 Index No. FOUNDATION LEVEL Code and Subject Name Name Index No. A1 – Quantitative Techniques SONELO, ERASTO 3025227 Amount Tshs. 50,000/= A2 - Business and Management SONELO, ERASTO 3025227 50,000/= A3 – Accounting A4 - Business Information SONELO, ERASTO JAMES, EUTROPIA N. 3025227 3024638* 50,000/= 25,000/= SONELO ERASTO 3025227* 25,000/= SAMSON, ABESTER B. 3027007 50,000/= A5 - Business Law INTERMEDIATE LEVEL Code and Subject Name Name Index No. B1 - Financial Management BYEMERWA, KENNETH 4026805* Amount Tshs. 20,000/= MASKINI, OLIMPIA P. 4026853* 20,000/= SOMBOI,EMMANUEL E. 4027414* 20,000/= B2 - Financial Accounting SOMBOI,EMMANUEL E. 4027414 60,000/= B3 - Auditing Principles and Practice B4 - Public Finance and Taxation I PASCHAL, EDSON 4026975 60,000/= B5 - Performance Management MWAKAJE, FAHAD A. 4027221 60,000/= B6 - Management, Governance and Ethics PASCHAL, EDSON 4026975 60,000/= No Candidate qualified for the award 137 60,000/= FINAL LEVEL Code and Subject Name Name Index No. C1- Corporate Reporting DOMINICK, AGNESS 5026713 Amount Tshs. 70,000/= C2 - Auditing and Assurance NYAISARA, EZEKIEL K. 5025111 70,000/= 5026679 70,000/= 5026445 70,000/= C3- Business and Corporate DAMAS, LEONARD Finance C4 - Public Finance and RICHARD, GLADY’S Taxation II 1.3.3 NBAA Best Female Prizes: In motivating female candidates to work harder in their studies and perform better in the Board’s examinations, two categories of prizes shall be offered to female candidates. 1.3.3.1 NBAA Female Prizes: This prize shall be offered to a female candidate as long as the score in aggregate in a level is 70% and above in ATEC examinations and 60% and above in professional examinations. Code and Subject Name Name Index No. 1027537 Amount Tshs. 50,000/= Accounting Technician Level I ALWANI, AAMNA A. Accounting Technician Level No candidate qualified for the II prize Foundation Level No candidate qualified for the prize Intermediate Level No candidate qualified for the prize Final Level RICHARD, GLADY’S 5026445 50,000/= 138 60,000/= 80,000/= 100,000/= 1.3.3.2 NBAA Best Graduate Female Prizes The second category of prize is the Best Graduate Prize which is to be offered to the female candidates who scores highest marks in aggregate among female candidates in ATEC II or CPA (T). The following female candidates qualify for the award: Level Name Amount Tshs. 250,000/= 5026445 500,000/= ATEC GRADUATE CPA GRADUATE No candidates qualified for the prize (T) RICHARD, GLADY’S Index No. 139 2.0 PRIZES FROM SPONSORING INSTITUTIONS In support of the Board’s effort to improve candidates’ examination performance a number of professional progressive institutions have willingly offered different prizes for the best performers. The names of organizations and amounts offered in each examination session are indicated hereunder: 2.1 PricewaterhouseCoopers Prizes: 2.1.1 2.1.2 PricewaterhouseCoopers: Auditing and Assurance (C2) Prize PricewaterhouseCoopers: Best CPA (T) Graduate Prize Tshs.1,000,000 2.1.3 Best Female CPA (T) Graduate Ths.500,000 2.2 Tanna Sreekumar & Co: Best CPA (T) Graduate Prize Tshs.400,000 2.3 STANBIC Tanzania Ltd: Best CPA (T) Graduate Prize US$ 100 2.4 TAC Associates: Auditing and Assurance (C2) Prize Tshs.200,000 2.5 Khatri & Company: Corporate Reporting (C1) Prize Tshs.200,000 2.6 Ernst & Young: Auditing and Assurance (C2) Prize Tshs.310,000 2.7 IPP: Best CPA (T) Graduate Prize Tshs.200,000 2.8 TaxPlan Associates: Best Public Finance and Taxation II Tshs.400,000 Tshs.600,000 (C4) Prize 2.9 TIB INTERNATIONAL FINANCE PRIZE 1st TIB: Business and Corporate Finance (C3) Prize Tshs.500,000, 2nd TIB: Business and Corporate Finance (C3) Prize Tshs.350,000 & Tshs.200,000 3rd TIB: Business and Corporate Finance (C3) Prize 2.10 Dar es Salaam Stock Exchange: Business and Corporate Tshs.150,000 Finance (C3) Prize 2.11 Deloitte &Touche: Auditing and Assurance (C2) Prize Tshs.500,000 2.12 Tshs.100,000 2.13 Capital Markets and Securities Authority: Best Financial Management (B1) Prize KPMG: Best CPA (T) Graduate Prize 2.14 Accountant General’s Office Prize Awards: 140 US$ 100 2.14.1 Best CPA (T) Graduate Overall Prize Tshs.800,000 2.14.2 Auditing and Assurance (C2) Prize Tshs.500,000 2.14.3 Performance Management (B5) Prize Tshs.500,000 2.14.4 Best Core Subject Prizes: 2.14.4.1 Accounting (A3) Prize Tshs.30,000 2.14.4.2 Auditing Principles and Practice (B3) Prize Tshs.30,000 2.14.4.3 Business Information (A4) Prize Tshs.30,000 2.14.4.4 Financial Accounting (B2) Prize Tshs.50,000 2.14.4.5 Financial Management (B1) Prize Tshs.50,000 2.14.4.6 Public Finance and Taxation II (C4) Prize Tshs.100,000 2.14.4.7 Business and Corporate Finance (C3) Prize Tshs.100,000 2.14.4.8 Corporate Reporting (C1) Prize Tshs.100,000 2.15 2.16 NEXIA SJ Tanzania Accountants & Business AdviserPrize Awards: NEXIA SJ Tanzania Accountants & Business Adviser: Best Public Finance and Taxation II (C4) Prize NEXIA SJ Tanzania Accountants & Business Adviser: Best Performance Management (B5) Prize Innovex Prize Awards: 2.16.1 Innovex Best CPA(T) Graduate Prize Tshs.150,000 2.16.2 Innovex Best CPA(T) Female Graduate Prize Tshs.150,000 2.17 CAG Prize Awards 2.17.1 CAG: Auditing and Assurance (C2) Prize Tshs.300,000 2.17.2 CAG: Best CPA (T) Graduate Prize Tshs.100,000 2.18 Peoples Bank of Zanzibar: Best CPA (T) Graduate Prize Tshs.500,000 2.19 BM Associates Prize Awards 2.19.1 Best CPA(T) Female Graduates Prize 2.19.2 Best ATEC Female Graduates Prize 2.20 TAA Best Candidates’ Prizes 2.20.1 TAA Best Two ATEC Candidates Prizes 2.15.1 2.15.2 141 Offer of Employment Offer of Employment Tshs.100,000 Tshs.50,000 Tshs.100,000 2.20.2 TAA Best Two CPA (T) Candidates Prizes 2.21 RSM Ashvir: Best CPA (T) Graduate Prize 2.22 Cornerstone Financial Consultants 2.22.1 Overall Best Candidate in ATEC II Level Prize Tshs.100,000 2.22.2 Overall Best Candidate in Foundation Level Prize Tshs.100,000 2.22.3 Overall Best CPA (T) Candidates Prizes Tshs.100,000 1. PRICEWATERHOUSECOOPERS PRIZES Name of Prize Name of Winner PWC: AUDITING AND NYAISARA, EZEKIEL K. ASSURANCE (C2) PRIZE PWC BEST CPA (T) RICHARD, GLADY’S GRADUATE PRIZE 2. TANNA SREEKUMAR & CO. PRIZES Name of Prize Name of Winner TANNA SREEKUMAR RICHARD, GLADY’S BEST CPA (T) GRADUATE PRIZE 3. STANBIC TANZANIA LIMITED PRIZES Name of Prize Name of Winner STANBIC TANZANIA RICHARD, GLADY’S LIMITED BEST CPA [T] GRADUATE PRIZE 4. TAC ASSOCIATES PRIZES Name of Prize Name of Winner TAC ASSOCIATES: NYAISARA, EZEKIEL K. AUDITING AND ASSURANCE (C2) PRIZE 5. KHATRI AND COMPANY PRIZES Name of Prize Name of Winner KHATRI AND COMPANY DOMINICK, AGNESS FINANCIAL: CORPORATE REPORTING (C1) 142 Tshs.200,000 Tshs.500,000 & Employment Index No. 5025111 Amount 600,000/= 5026445 1,000,000/= Index No. 5026445 Amount 400,000/= Index No. 5026445 Amount US$100 Index No. 5025111 Amount 200,000/= Index No. 5026713 Amount 200,000/= 6. ERNST & YOUNG PRIZES Name of Prize Name of Winner ERNST & YOUNG: NYAISARA, EZEKIEL K. AUDITING AND ASSURANCE (C2) PRIZE 7. IPP BEST CPA (T) GRADUATE PRIZES Name of Prize Name of Winner IPP BEST CPA (T) RICHARD, GLADY’S GRADUATE PRIZE Index No. 5025111 Amount 310,000/= Index No. 5026445 Amount 200,000/= Index No. 5026445 Amount 400,000/= Index No. 5026679 Amount 500,000/= 8. TAXPLAN ASSOCIATES PRIZES Name of Prize TAXPLAN ASSOCIATES: PUBLIC FINANCE AND TAXATION II (C4) PRIZE Name of Winner RICHARD, GLADY’S 9. TANZANIA INVESTMENT BANK PRIZES Name of Prize Name of Winner TIB: BUSINESS AND DAMAS, LEONARD CORPORATE FINANCE (C3) PRIZE No candidate qualified for the prize No candidate qualified for the prize 10. DAR ES SALAAM STOCK EXCHANGE PRIZES Name of Prize Name of Winner DSE: BUSINESS AND DAMAS, LEONARD CORPORATE FINANCE (C3) PRIZE 11. DELOITTE & TOUCHE PRIZES Name of Prize Name of Winner DELOITTE & TOUCHE: NYAISARA, EZEKIEL K. AUDITING AND ASSURANCE (C2) PRIZE 350,000/= 200,000/= Index No. 5026679 Amount 150,000/= Index No. 5025111 Amount 500,000/= 12. CAPITAL MARKETS AND SECURITIES AUTHORITY PRIZES Name of Prize Name of Winner Index No. CMSA: BEST FINANCIAL BYEMERWA, KENNETH 4026805* MANAGEMENT (B1) MASKINI, OLIMPIA P. 4026853* PRIZE SOMBOI, EMMANUEL E. 143 4027414* Amount 33,333.3 33,333.3 33,333.3 13. KPMG PRIZES Name of Prize KPMG: BEST CPA (T) GRADUATE PRIZE Name of Winner RICHARD, GLADY’S Index No. 5026445 Amount US$100 14. ACCOUNTANT GENERAL’S OFFICE PRIZES The Office of the Accountant General offers special prize awards to candidates with excellent performance in the Board’s examinations. The awards worth Tshs.2,440,000 are offered in each examination session. The conditions of winning the prizes are: A candidate must obtain an overall pass at a single sitting in the first examination attempt and must score a credit pass (60%) or above either overall, or in the subject be awarded a prize in the professional examinations as the case may be. Candidates winning the prizes for the May 2016 examinations are as shown below: Name of Prize AG’S: BEST CPA [T] GRADUATE PRIZE Name of Winner RICHARD, GLADY’S AG’S: AUDITING AND ASSURANCE (C2) PRIZE AG’S: BEST PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT (B5) PRIZE Index No. 5026445 Amount 800,000/= NYAISARA, EZEKIEL K. 5025111 500,000/= MWAKAJE, FAHAD 4027221 500,000/= 3025227* 15,000/= 3024638* 4066805* 15,000/= 16,666/= 4026853* 16,666/= 4027414* 4027414 16,666/= ACGEN’S BEST CORE SUBJECT PERFORMANCE PRIZES ACCOUNTING (A3) PRIZE BUSINESS INFORMATION SONELO ERASTO (A4) PRIZE JAMES, EUTROPIA N FINANCIAL BYEMERWA, KENNETH MANAGEMENT (B1) MASKINI, OLIMPIA P. PRIZE SOMBOI, EMMANUEL FINANCIAL ACCOUNTING (B2) PRIZE SOMBOI, EMMANUEL.E 144 50,000/= AUDITING PRINCIPLES AND PRACTICE (B3) PRIZE CORPORATE REPORTING (C1) PRIZE BUSINESS AND CORPORATE FINANCE (C3) PRIZE PUBLIC FINANCE AND TAXATION II (C4) PRIZE PASCHAL, EDSON 4026975 50,000/= DOMINICK, AGNESS 5026713 100,000/= DAMAS, LEONARD 5026679 100,000/= RICHARD, GLADY’S 5026445 100,000/= 15. NEXIA SJ TANZANIA ACCOUNTANTS & BUSINESS ADVISERS PRIZES: Name of Prize NEXIA SJ TANZANIA ACCOUNTANTS & BUSINESS ADVISER:PUBLIC FINANCE AND TAXATION II (C4) PRIZE NEXIA SJ TANZANIA ACCOUNTANTS & BUSINESS ADVISER:Best Performance Management (B5) Prize 16. INNOVEX PRIZES Name of Prize INNOVEX BEST CPA (T) GRADUATE PRIZE INNOVEX BEST CPA (T) FEMALE GRADUATE PRIZE Name of Winner Index No. Amount RICHARD, GLADY’S 5026445 Employment MWAKAJE, FAHAD A. Employment Name of Winner RICHARD, GLADY’S Index No. 5026445 Amount 150,000/= RICHARD, GLADY’S 5026445 150,000/= 17. CONTROLLER AND AUDITOR GENERAL PRIZES Name of Prize Name of Winner CAG: AUDITING AND NYAISARA, EZEKIEL K. ASSURANCE (C2) PRIZE CAG: BEST CPA (T) GRADUATE PRIZE 4027221 RICHARD, GLADY’S 145 Index No. 5025111 5026445 Amount 300,000/= 150,000/= 18. PEOPLE’S BANK OF ZANZIBAR PRIZE Name of Prize Name of Winner PBZ: BEST CPA (T) RICHARD, GLADY’S GRADUATE PRIZE 19. BM ASSOCIATES PRIZES Name of Prize Name of Winner BM ASSOCIATES: BEST CPA RICHARD, GLADY’S (T) FEMALE GRADUATE PRIZE BM ASSOCIATES: BEST ATEC FEMALE GRADUATE PRIZE Index No. 5026445 Amount 500,000/= Index No. 5026445 Amount 100,000/= No candidate qualified for the prize 50,000/= 20. TANZANIA ASSOCIATION OF ACCOUNTANTS PRIZES Name of Prize Name of Winner Index No. TAA: BEST ATEC II GEORGE, GIDEON 2027484 CANDIDATE PRIZE TAA: BEST CPA (T) RICHARD, GLADY’S 5026445 CANDIDATE PRIZE 21. RSM ASHVIR PRIZES Name of Prize Name of Winner RSM ASHVIR: BEST CPA RICHARD, GLADY’S (T) GRADUATE PRIZE 22. CORNERSTONE FINANCIAL CONSULTANTS PRIZES Name of Prize Name of Winner CORNERSTONE: OVERALL GEORGE, GIDEON BEST CANDIDATE IN ATEC II LEVEL PRIZE CORNERSTONE:OVERALL SONELO, ERASTO BEST CANDIDATE IN FOUNDATION LEVEL PRIZE CORNERSTONE :OVERALL RICHARD, GLADY’S BEST CPA (T) CANDIDATES PRIZES ___________p_________ 146 Index No. 5026445 Amount 50,000/= 100,000/= Amount 500,000/= & Employment Index No. 2027484 Amount 100,000/= 3025227 100,000/= 5026445 100,000/=