Military Family Fitness Model - Human Performance Resource Center
Transcription
Military Family Fitness Model - Human Performance Resource Center
Military Family Fitness Model Col Stephen Bowles1, Ph.D. Monique Moore2, Ph.D. Colanda Cato2, Ph.D. Liz Davenport Pollock3, MS, LGMFT Mark Bates2, Ph.D. Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences1 Defense Centers of Excellence2 Human Performance Resource Center3 Forging the Partnership: 2011 DoD/USDA Family Resilience Conference, 27 April 2011, Chicago, IL Agenda • Organizations Overview • Background • What is Fitness and Total Force Fitness? • Military Demand-Resource Model (MD-RM) • Military Family Fitness Model (MFFM) • Strength Building Exercises • Case Example • DoD Resources • The Way Ahead With You and Others Disclaimer: Opinions in this presenta2on are those of the presenters and do not necessarily represent the opinions of DCoE, USUHS, the Army, or DoD. Acknowledgements • The Defense Centers of Excellence • Force Health Protection and Readiness, Psychological Health Strategic Operation • Military Community & Family Policy • Headquarters, Air Force Air Education and Training Command • Military Family Research Institute • The Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences DCoE Overview • Created in November 2007 Structure Mission • Six directorates and six component centers • Partners and collaborates with the Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) and other military and national civilian networks, agencies, leaders, clinical experts, and academic institutions Assess, validate, oversee, and facilitate prevention, resilience, identification, treatment, outreach, rehabilitation, and reintegration programs for psychological health and traumatic brain injury (TBI) Ensure the Defense Department meets the needs of the military community, warriors and families USUHS Overview • Chartered September 1972 Structure • Students include members of the Army, Air Force, and Navy • Education paid for by the Department of the Defense • University includes the F. Edward Hébert School of Medicine and the Graduate School of Nursing Mission To provide the Nation with health professionals dedicated to career service in the Department of Defense and the United States Public Health Service and with scientists who serve the common good To serve the uniformed services and the Nation as an outstanding academic health sciences center with a worldwide perspective for education, research, service, and consultation Human Performance Resource Center The HPRC provides information and resources online that enable our warriors and their families to enhance and sustain their physical, mental, and relational performance to carry out their mission as safely and effectively as possible. Deployment and Stress in Military Families • Active duty service members prefer some deployments to none at all (Hosek, 2004; Hosek et al., 2006; Karney & Crown, 2007) • Families adapt better to deployments if they understand the value and purpose of the mission (Booth et al., 2007; Rohall & Martin, 2007; Weins & Boss, 2006) • Longer deployments (i.e., beyond one year) are more difficult and increase family problems (Booth et. al., 2007; Hosek et al, 2006; Karney & Crown, 2007; Kirby & Naftel, 1998) • Adverse effects of stress are caused by differences between expected and actual length of deployment (Hosek et al., 2006; Hosek & Totten, 2002) • Deployment and duty-related separations are challenging for families, and stress is expected (Burrell, et al., 2006; Hosek et al., 2006; Wiens & Boss, 2006) • More active duty spouses report experiencing higher levels of stress than normal in 2008 (47%) than in 2006 (41%) (ADSS 2006; ADSS 2008) Source: OUSD(Military Community & Family Policy) Briefing, "Impact of Deployment on Military Families: Recent Research Highlights & Current DoD Research", January 2010 Social Support and Communication • Supportive social relationships are a resilience factor critical to healthy family coping (Spera, 2008; Wiens & Boss, 2006) • Children and adolescents who feel supported by others cope better (Perkins & Borden, 2003) • Sense of community is predicted by unit support and informal community support (Bourg & Segal, 1999;Bowen et al., 2000; Burrell et al., 2003; Rohall & Martin) • National Guard and Reserve families are widely dispersed and typically do not have access to the same level of informal community support (Carroll et al., 2008; Faber et al., 2008; Wisher & Freeman, 2006) • Consistent and regular communication of service member to family while on deployment is critical to sense of connection and family resiliency (Bell et al., 1999; Wiens & Boss, 2006) • Problems communicating with family while on deployment predicts greater stress for the service member and his/her family (Ender, 1995) Source: OUSD(Military Community & Family Policy) Briefing, "Impact of Deployment on Military Families: Recent Research Highlights & Current DoD Research", January 2010 Financial Well-Being Summary of Findings 2008 ADSS • Nearly two-thirds (62%) described their financial condition as comfortable; 12% described it as not comfortable – No percentage point differences over time for not comfortable for total, Service, or pay grade • Over two-thirds (69%) of spouses reported having $500 or more in emergency savings • About half (46%) reported their spouse contributes to the Thrift Savings Plan • More than one-quarter (26%) of spouses indicated having at least one financial problem in the past 12 months (excluding paying overdraft fees) Source: DMDC Briefing, "Family Program Needs: Select results from the 2008 Ac2ve Duty Spouse Survey (ADSS2008) and Reserve Component Spouse Survey (RCSS2008)", January 2010 Military Family Fitness Model What is “Fitness”? Total Force Fitness A state in which the individual, family, and organization can achieve and sustain optimal well-being and performance under all conditions Source: Bates & Bowles (2010) Psychological Fitness The integration and optimization of mental, emotional, and behavioral abilities and capabilities to optimize performance and strengthen the resilience of Warfighters Source: Bates & Bowles (2010) Total Force Fitness Environment Source: Jonas, O’Connor, Deuster et al., (2010); CHAMP, USUHS, Samueli Ins2tute Total Force Fitness Domains Social Social support Task cohesion Social cohesion Psychological Coping Awareness Beliefs/appraisals Decision making Engagement Total Force Fitness Total Fitness Heat/Cold Altitude Noise Air quality Access Food quality Immunizations Nutrient requirements Screening Supplement use Prophylaxis Service values Food choices Dental Positive beliefs Meaning making Ethical leadership Accommodate diversity Spiritual Source: Jonas, O’Connor, Deuster et al., (2010); CHAMP, USUHS, Samueli Ins2tute Environmental Substance abuse Hygiene Risk mitigation Strength Endurance Flexibility Mobility Military Demand-Resource Model Basis Conservation of Resources (Hobfoll, 1989) & Job Demand Resource Model (Demourti et al., 2001) Definition A high-level heuristic model for leaders, policy makers, and program managers to see the full picture and give equal attention across a variety of ways health can be improved (Bates et al., 2010) Military Demand-Resource Model Resource Environment Desired Psychological Fitness End State Internal Resources Resilience Enhancing Outcomes Posi2ve Performance Outcomes External Resources Resilience Undermining Outcomes Nega2ve Performance Outcomes Demands Source: Bates et al., 2010 Military Demand-Resource Model Internal Resources Description Beliefs & Appraisals Coping Thoughts and behaviors a person uses to manage the demands of stress and to maintain optimal levels of energy and capacity to work Decision Making Thoughts and behaviors used for evaluating and choosing courses of action to solve a problem or reach a goal Engagement Sustained experience of strong identification with unit members, unit, and mission characterized by high levels of energy and full involvement in mission tasks Awareness & Attention Source: Bates et al., 2010 What a person notices about his/her inner states and surroundings What a person holds to be true and how a person interprets what is happening Military Demand-Resource Model External Resources Description Communicate and model constructive beliefs/ behaviors, provide clear expectations, etc. Provide esprit de corps, motivation, satisfaction, caring, teamwork, group pride, and status etc. Leadership Unit Support Training to span lifecycle; establishes standards and expectations, creates safe and supportive Training, Policy & Research environment, provides structure with compliance with legislation, establishes basis for behavioral accountability Programs & Services Culture Source: Bates et al., 2010 Established and new programs (chaplain, family support, medical, recreation) Underlying shared values (e.g., towards psychological health symptoms and resources) Military Family Fitness Model Basis ABC-X Model (Hill, 1949; McCubbin & Patterson, 1983) & Ecological Framework (Bronfrenbrenner, 1977) Definition A process oriented, multi-level systems model for Service Members, their families, leaders, policy makers, and program managers to see how family fitness can be achieved/maintained Case Example #1 Army medic Staff Sgt. Megan Krause knew the warning signs of depression and post-‐trauma2c stress disorder, yet didn't recognize them in herself a\er returning home. She was drinking a bo^le of wine “just to go to sleep” and to avoid intrusive deployment memories. Fortunately, others in her chain of command and family recognized the signs and helped her see that she needed help and that it was okay to seek treatment. DCoE Real Warriors Campaign Military Family Fitness Model " Resource Environment Source: Bowles, Pollock, Cato, et al. (in prepara2on) Work-‐Life Integra>ve Health Demands External Resources Family Resources Individual Resources Desired Family Fitness End State Posi>ve Outcomes Nega>ve Outcomes Military Family Fitness Model Demands • Deployment • Operations tempo • Deployment tempo • Finances • Relationship stressors • Separation • Under/unemployment Military Family Fitness Model Individual Resources • Awareness • Appraisals and Beliefs • Stress Management and Coping • Decision-making • Individual Traits and Skills • Communication Military Family Fitness Model Family Resources • • • • • • • • • • Communication Cohesion Flexibility Appraisals and Beliefs • locus of control • mastery of environment Coping Problem Solving Rituals/Routines/Narratives Parenting Styles Couples Relationship Financial Stability/Literacy Military Family Fitness Model External Resources • Leadership • Interpersonal Relationships (support) + • Programs and Services (Community and military) • Community Involvement Military Family Fitness Model Outcomes Positive • Communication • Adaptation • Reintegration • Family strengths • Enhanced resilience • Military readiness • Total Force Fitness Negative • Maladaptation • Family strife/violence • Suicide/homicide • Job loss • Emotional distance • Non-reintegration • Cohesion Break & Practical Exercises Military Family Fitness Model " Resource Environment Source: Bowles, Pollock, Cato, et al. (in prepara2on) Work-‐Life Integra>ve Health Demands External Resources Family Resources Individual Resources Desired Family Fitness End State Posi>ve Outcomes Nega>ve Outcomes Practical Skills Individual Skills Mindfulness Deep Breathing Guided Imagery Cogni>ve Restructuring Family Skills Communica>on Skills Problem Solving Skills Military Family Fitness Model Individual Skills • Awareness • Appraisals and Beliefs • Stress Management and Coping • Decision Making • Individual Traits and Skills • Communica2on What are mind-body skills….? • A cornerstone of a new approach for enhancing resilience and effectively preventing and treating stress-related illnesses • Things you can do on your own, without equipment or a therapist, to improve health and performance • Examples: mindfulness meditation, yoga, tai chi, breathing training, and imagery • Over 35 million U.S. adults use mind/body practices • Use of mind-body therapies in the military is equal to or greater than in the general population BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 2007, 7:16 Regula>ng the Autonomic Nervous System Most mind-‐ body therapies evoke a “relaxa2on response” that directly counters the stress response Source: Benson, Fricchione, et al. Benefits of Deep Breathing • Induces relaxation response • Enhances management of – Stress (Hoffman, Benson, et al.; 1982). – Anxiety (Kirkwood, Rampes, et al.; 2005); (Krisanaprakornkit; 2006). – Depression (Pilkington, K., G. Kirkwood, et al., 2005). – Pain (Nespor, K.;1991); (Morone and Greco; 2007) Meditation in a nutshell 2 common features: 1. Self regulation of ATTENTION 2. Establishment of INTENTION 2 main types: 1. Concentration meditation: • Goal: Stabilize the mind 2. Mindfulness meditation • Goal: Watch the mind Meditation: Benefits • Improves attention stability, emotion regulation, flexibility in thinking, negative thoughts (through reducing task effort) • Protects against functional impairments in working memory capacity, which is involved in managing cognitive demands and emotion regulation Source: Jha AP, Krompinger J, Baime MJ. Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci. Jun 2007;7(2):109-‐119.; As2n JA. Psychother Psychosom. 1997;66(2):97-‐106.; Slagter HA, et al. PLoS Biol. Jun 2007;5(6):e138; Jha AP, et al. Emo@on. Feb 2010;10(1):54-‐64. What is Guided Imagery? • Using all the senses to create an experience in the mind • Brain interpreting images similarly to actual situations • Replaces negative thoughts with peaceful scenes. • Allows person to escape for brief periods. • Desensitizes body to stressful stimuli. • Body is able to recharge. Potential Applications of Guided Imagery • Anxiety • Depressive symptoms • Goal-setting • Grief issues • Pain management • Post-traumatic stress disorder • Preparation for surgery and medical procedures • Rehabilitation • Relaxation training • Sleep disorders • Smoking cessation • Stress management • Survivors of abuse • Weight management Typical Guided Imagery Session Focus on the Breath Progressive Muscle Relaxation Rehearsal or Relaxing Imagery Relationship Techniques for Building Individual, Couple, and Family Fitness/Skills Practical Family Skills Family Resources Communication Cohesion Flexibility Appraisals & Beliefs Coping Problem Solving Rituals/Routines Parenting Styles Couples Relationship Financial Stability Individual Skills Cognitive Restructuring Deep Breathing Guided Imagery Family Skills Communication Skills Problem Solving Skills Communica2on & Decision Making Military Tailored Understanding • Consistent and regular communication between SM and family while on deployment leads to: Connection & family resilience (Bell et al., 1999; Wiens & Boss, 2006); Better child coping (ADSS & RCSS, 2009). • Problems communicating = greater stress • Couples create their own optimal deployment communication routines (Merolla, 2010): Balance talk of everyday with more meaningful conversations • Lowered stress • Families with a SM with PTSD who deal directly with problems and focus on positive, progressive steps predict better family functioning (Tiet et al., 2006). The Expresser & The Listener Expresser: 1) 2) 3) 4) Makes I-statement (with an emotion) Specific Only one main idea Pick a good time and place for expressing Listener: 1) Summarize and restate what you heard (reflection) 2) Do not ask questions; react to what your partner said, offer solutions, or interpret the meaning 3) Assess tone of voice, facial expressions, and posture 4) Put yourself in the expresser’s shoes Source: Epstein & Baucom, 2002 Decision-Making Skills 1) State the issue clearly 2) Clarify why it is important/your needs 3) Discuss possible solutions 4) Decide on a solution that is agreeable to both of you 5) Decide on an amount of time to try the solution 6) Modify solution as needed Source: Epstein & Baucom, 2002 Debrief • Can integrate individual and relational skills for optimal outcomes • SM and family members can model integrative skills and family skills for their children • Individualize these skills for each relationship & situation • Can use these skills to anticipate military specific stressors Military Family Fitness Model Resource Environment Source: Bowles, Pollock, Cato, et al. (in prepara2on) Work-‐Life Integra>ve Health Demands External Resources Family Resources Individual Resources Desired Family Fitness End State Posi>ve Outcomes Nega>ve Outcomes Group Breakout Case Example #2 VigneMe Not long a\er returning from his third deployment, MSGT Smith, an Air Force Security Forces First Sergeant, knew that something "wasn't right." He was having trouble sleeping due to intrusive memories of young Airmen his unit lost in a convoy ambush in Iraq, and began to wonder “why he was spared." His spouse no2ced the changes first as he began to withdraw from normal ac2vi2es he used to enjoy, like going out with his friends, reading, and working out. They argued all the 2me about things that never bothered them in the past. His spouse believed that he was withdrawing to avoid being around her and the kids and that he was angry at her. Source: Cato (in prepara2on) Family Fitness Exercise • Imagine you are a: • Service member • Spouse • Child • External Social Support (Best Friend…) • Mental Health Clinician • Leader • Community Member Family Fitness Exercise Given your role and guided by this model, what could you do? Are there specific strategies that you could use to foster family fitness? Utilize all resources discussed in the model Military Family Fitness Model Resource Environment Source: Bowles, Pollock, Cato, et al. (in prepara2on) Work-‐Life Integra>ve Health Demands External Resources Family Resources Individual Resources Desired Family Fitness End State Posi>ve Outcomes Nega>ve Outcomes Conclusions for Exercise • Empowering approach for ways that EACH member can get involved • Each part of the system important – Interconnec2ons within every level of the system – Model is not reliant solely on clinicians and providers. • What was your experience? The Way Ahead Understanding that “Total Force Fitness” and “Military Family Fitness” will likely be key drivers in Defense Department resilience efforts Partnering among federal and civilian agencies will help synergize efforts and further identify, define, and establish a consensus on key topics such as family fitness Conclusions The MD-RM and MFFM are tools to help leaders, mental health providers, and families better understand the complex interplay between demands, resources, and outcomes. Key Takeaways Individual, family, and external resources help families overcome challenges and prevent adverse outcomes. DoD resources are available to assist military families. Adaptive, strength based, non-prescriptive model with joint-service application. DoD Resources What are we doing? • Developing clinical practice guidelines (VA/DoD, DCoE) • Identifying protective factors related to resilience (DCoE) • Real Warriors Campaign (DCoE) • afterdeployment.org (T2) • Deployment Health Clinical Center, Specialized Care Program and RESPECT-mil (DHCC) • Training in evidence-based treatments (CDP) • inTransition (DCoE) • Annual Conferences (DCoE/NIH/VA) DCoE Resources DCoE Outreach Center http://www.nationalresourcedirectory.gov Mind-Body Skills for Regulating the Autonomic Nervous System Paper http://www.dcoe.health.mil/ForHealthPros/ IntegrativeHealthWellness.aspx Resources For applied strategies and informa2on on rela2onship skill building, visit h^p://humanperformanceresourcecenter.org/family-‐ rela2onships QUESTIONS? Feedback on model and use? Follow-up meeting with interested meeting participants? Contact Informa2on COL Stephen Bowles, Ph.D. Department of Medical & Clinical Psychology Uniformed Services University Colanda R. Cato, Ph.D. Defense Centers of Excellence (DCoE) for Psychological Health & TBI Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs Monique Moore, Ph.D. Defense Centers of Excellence (DCoE) for Psychological Health & TBI Office of the Assistant Secretary of Defense for Health Affairs Liz Davenport Pollock, MS, LGMFT Human Performance Resource Center Uniformed Services University