Appendix E.B - March Joint Powers Authority

Transcription

March AR #
2757
Page 1 of 201
FINAL
2012 ANNUAL LANDFILL
REMEDIAL ACTION-OPERATION (RA-0) REPORT
IRP SITES 4 (LF004), 5 (LFOO5), 6 (LFOO6)
MARCH AIR RESERVE BASE AND
FORMER MARCH AIR FORCE BASE
Prepared for:
Air Force Civil Engineer Center (AFCEC)
2261 Hughes Avenue, Suite 155
Lack land Air Force Base, Texas 78236-9853
Contract No. FA8903-09-D-8547-0007
CDRL No. A001a
Prepared by:
AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (AECOM)
999 W. Town and Country Road
Orange, California 92868
July 3, 2013
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
AIR FORCE CIVIL ENGINEER CENTER
JOINT BASE SAN ANTONIO LACKLAND TEXAS
3 July 2013
MEMORANDUM FOR: SEE DISTRIBUTION
FROM
AFCECiCIBW
2261 Hughes Ave. Suite 155
JBSA Lack land, TX 78236-9853
SUBJECT:
Final 2012 Annual Landfill Remedial Action-Operation (RA-0) Report, IRP Sites 4
(LF004), 5 (I.F005), 6 (LF006), March Air Reserve Base and Former March Air Force
Base, CA
Transmitted herein for your review are copies of the document listed above. There were 'no
comments' by RWQCB on the draft document. Courtesy copies of the draft document were also
submitted to DTSC and USEPA. Historically, comments on the draft landfill documents are not
provided by DISC and USEPA.. If comments are given by USEPA and DTSC, they are typically
incorporated into the next version of the document.
2.
Concurrence from RWQCB on the final document is requested by 5 August 2013.
3.
If you have any questions or comments, please feel free to contact me at (210) 395-8240.
ERRY W BINGII.AM, P.E.
Environmental Program Manager
Attachment:
Final 2012 Annual Landfill Remedial Action-Operation (RA-0) Report. IRP Sites 4 (LF004), 5 (LF005).
6 (LE006), March Air Reserve Base and Former March Air Force Base. CA
DISTRIBUTION:
John Lucey, U.S. EPA, Region 9 (two copies)
Stephen Niou, California DISC (two copies)
Patricia Hannon, California RWQCB, Santa Ana. Region (one copy)
An Adobe Acrobat version of this document is available for download from the March PBR Project
Website.
I
1
Form Approved
OMB Na, 0704-0188
REPORT DOCUMENTATION PAGE
1
The public reporting burden for this Collection of information is estimated to average 1 hour per response. including the lime for reviewing instructions. searching eitsting data sources,
gathering and maintaining the data needed, and completing and reviewing the collection of information. Send comments regarding this burden estimate or any other aspect of this
collection of information. including suggestions for reducing the burden, to Department of Defense. Washington Headquarters Services, Dirstclorate for Information Operations and Reports
(0704-01881, 1215 Jefferson Davis Highway, Suite 1204, Arlington, VA 22202-4302. Respondents should be aware that notwithstanding any other provision of law, no person that be
subject to any penalty for faiting to comply with a collection of information if it does not display a Currently valid OMB control number.
PLEASE DO NOT RETURN YOUR FORM TO THE ABOVE ADDRESS.
1. REPORT DATE (DD-MM-YYM
2. REPORT TYPE
3. DATES COVERED(From - To)
Not Applicable
Find
03-07-2013
4. TITLE AND SUBTITLE
Final 2012 Annual Landfill Remedial Action-Operation (RA-0) Report
IRP Sites 4 (LF004), 5 (LF005), and 6 (LF006)
March Air Reserve Base and Former March Air Force Base, California
5a.
CONTRACT NUMBER
FA8903-09-D-8547-0007
5h.
GRANT NUMBER
N/A
5c.
PROGRAM ELEMENT NUMBER
NIA
6. AUTHORS)
5d.
PROJECT NUMBER
60271680
5e.
TASK NUMBER
AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (AECOM)
0009
5f.
WORK UNIT NUMBER
7. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
AECOM
999 West Town and Country Road
Orange, CA 92868
B. PERFORMING ORGANIZATION
REPORT NUMBER
9. SPONSORINGIMONITORING AGENCY NAME(S) AND ADDRESS(ES)
Air Force Civil Engineer Center
2261 Hughes Avenue
Lackland Air Force Base, TX 78236-9853
10.
SPONSORIMONITOR'S ACRONYM(S)
AFCEC
11.
SPONSORIMONITOR'S REPORT
NUMBER(S)
N/A
N/A
12. DISTRIBUTION/AVAILABILITY STATEMENT
Distribution is limited.
13.
SUPPLEMENTARY NOTES
NIA
14. ABSTRACT
This Final 2012 Annual Landfill Remedial Action-Operation (RA-01 Report includes descriptions of 2012 RA-0 tasks
conducted: inspections, site
maintenance, and sampling of media associated with landfill closure.
15. SUBJECT TERMS
16. SECURITY CLASSIFICATION OF:
Unclassified
a. REPORT
b. ABSTRACT
c. THIS PAGE
17. LIMITATION OF
ABSTRACT
18. NUMBER
OF
19a. NAME OF RESPONSIBLE PERSON
Leticia Walton
PAGES
19b. TELEPHONE NUMBER (include area code)
209
WPMtuch AFB r forma AM:2013,5 itLs 45,8<&2012 Annual RA-0..1,4-07(213BA.docx
I
210-395-8196
Standard Form 298 (Rev. 8/98)
Prescribed by ANSI Std. 239.18
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LF004, LF005, and LF006 RA-0 Report
March ARB and Former March AFB
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Section
Title
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
Page
vi
INTRODUCTION
1.1
PURPOSE AND ORGANIZATION
1.2 SITE DESCRIPTION AND BACKGROUND
1.2.1
IRP Site 4, Landfill No. 6
1.2.2
1.2.3
1-1
2.0
LANDFILL REMEDIAL ACTION-OPERATION REQUIREMENTS
2-1
3.0
LANDFILL REMEDIAL ACTION-OPERATION RESULTS
3.1 LFOO4 REMEDIAL ACTION-OPERATION ACTIVITIES
Landfill Operations and Maintenance
3.1.1
3.1.2
Landfill Gas Perimeter Probe Monitoring
3.1.3
Post-Disaster Systems Inspection
Restrictionsllnstitutional Controls
3.1.4
3.2 LFOO5 REMEDIAL ACTION-OPERATION ACTIVITIES
3.2.1
3.2.2
Restrictions/Institutional Controls
3.3 LF006 REMEDIAL ACTION-OPERATION ACTIVITIES
3.3.1
3.3,2
Leachate Control System and Subdrain System Monitoring
3.3.3 Groundwater Monitoring
Upgradient and Downgradient Statistical
3.3.3.1
Comparison.
3.3.4 Landfill Gas Perimeter Probe Monitoring
Post-Disaster Systems Inspection
3.3.5
3.3.6
Restrictions/Institutional Controls
3-1
4.0
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
4 -I
5.0
REFERENCES
5-1
1.0
WPMan.h Are (Immo- A Rei.120131Slics 4,546k2013 Annual RA-OW e ONCI3BA dna
II
1-1
1-1
1-1
1-3
1-3
3-1
3-1
3-2
3-3
3-3
3-3
3-3
3-4
3-4
3-4
3-5
3-6
3-6
3-7
3-8
3-8
July 2013
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LFOO4, LFOO5, and LF006 RA-0 Report
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A
Inspection and Maintenance Forms
Appendix B
Photographic Documentation
Appendix C
Laboratory Analytical Results and Validation Reports
Appendix D
Leachate Nonhazardous Waste Manifests
Appendix E
2012 Statistical Analysis Results
Appendix F
Summary of Historical Landfill Gas Probe Results
W M axh An LfmTricr A RI31120 13%Siirs 4,5,&612012 A "IOWA RA-CAFV2-07021313A.ducx
V
July 2013
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LFOO4, LFOO5. and LFOO6 RA-0 Report
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS
AWL
AECOM
AFB
AFCEC/CZRB
less than
and
section
micrograms per liter
AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Air Force Base
Air Force Civil Engineer Center/Environmental Center of Excellence/Base
ARB
ASTM
Aug
Ave
Realignment and Closure (BRAC) Support
Air Force Reserve Command
Air Force Real Property Agency
Analysis of Variance Analysis
Air Reserve Base
American Society for Testing and Materials
August
Avenue
hgs
Blvd
below ground surface
Boulevard
CCR
CCTV
CDRL
CDC
CZRB
California Code of Regulations
Closed Circuit Television
Contract Deliverables Requirements List
contaminant of concern
Environmental Center of Excellence/Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC)
Support
DCE
dichloroethylene
December
Drive
Department of Toxic Substances Control
AFRC
AFRPA
ANOVA
Dec
Dr
DTSC
etc.
Expy
Earth Tech, Inc.
for example (exempli gratia)
and so forth (et cetera)
Expressway
Feb
February
GW
groundwater
HDPE
high density polyethylene
Earth Tech
e.g.
WRMath AFB trunalcr A Rall2013 Sitro 4,5.&612012 AMAMI RA 01F12-070213RA Sou
Vi
July 2013
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LFOO4, LF005, and L.F006 RA-0 Report
March ARE and Former March AFB
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS (Continued)
IT Corp.
institutional control
identification
international
Installation Restoration Program
International Technology Corporation
Jan
Jul
Jun
January
July
June
LCRS
LFG
LTL
LUC
leachate collection and removal system
landfill gas
lower tolerance limit
land use control
mg/L
MH
mil
MTBE
MWH
milligrams per liter
manhole
millimeter
methyl tertiary-butyl ether
Montgomery Watson Harza, Inc.
NA
NFA
No.
Nov
not applicable
no further action
number
November
Oct
OM&M
OU
October
operations, monitoring, and maintenance
Operable Unit
PCE
pH
POC
tetrachloroethene
negative log of the hydrogen ion concentration
point of compliance
Q1
First Quarter
Second Quarter
Third Quarter
Fourth Quarter
IC
ID
Int'I
IRP
Q2
Q3
Q4
WN14iuvh A FB (former ARBA20.13sSitcs
5.&0.2/11 2 Annul RA 0,.F12 -GRUB BA akrx
Vil
July 2013
AECOM
LIST OF ABBREVIATIONS AND ACRONYMS (Continued)
RA-0
remedial action-operation
Rd
RI/FS
RPD
ROD
RWQCB
remedial investigation/feasibility study
relative percent difference
Record of Decision
Regional Water Quality Control Board
Road
St
September
IRP Site 4 Landfill No. 6
State Land Use Covenants
Street
TBD
TCB
TCE
TDS
Tetra Tech
TO
TOC
to be determined
trichlorobenzene
trichloroethene
total dissolved solids
Tetra Tech, Inc.
Task Order
top of casing
USAF
USEPA
UTL
United States Air Force
United States Environmental Protection Agency
upper tolerance limit
VC
VOC
vinyl chloride
volatile organic compound
Sep
Site 4
Site 5
Site 6
SLUG
WP.March AFD ifmmer AR9iA101351Aes 4,501612012 Amaral RA-0+F12 0702 13BA.docx
Viii
July 2013
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LF004, LF005, and LF006 RA-0 Repori
March ARB and Farmer March AFB
Regulations (CCR) and long-term OM&M was initiated.
The landfill encompasses a total area of
approximately 8.2 acres that is divided into three main areas:
The North Flag, comprising an area that is approximately 250 feet wide and 650 feet long.
The Strip Landfill, comprising an area that is approximately 150 feet wide and 1,900 feet
long.
The South Flag, comprising an area that is approximately 260 feet wide and 370 feet long.
Waste was deposited at the site from 1955 to 1963 in trenches at depths of 6 feet to 25 feet below
ground surface (bgs), with total waste deposited estimated at 150,000 cubic yards. Material in the
landfill consists of sanitary waste, construction debris, rubble, medical waste, and empty petroleum
containers (IT Corp. 1994).
The engineered cap consists of a 30-millimeter (mil) high density
polyethylene (HDPE) liner with bentonite backing overlain by 9 inches of screened native soil and
9 inches of a vegetative layer (IT Corp. 1995a).
The site is suspected of being one of the potential
sources of tetrachloroethene (PCE) and trichloroethene (TCE) contamination in the groundwater
(Tetra Tech 1998).
Groundwater has begun to infiltrate the waste on the northern end of the landfill due to rising
groundwater levels. CCR Title 27, Chapter 3, Subchapter 2, Article 3(c), Section (§) 20240, states that
landfill waste must be at least 5 feet above the surface of the groundwater in order to prevent potential
contamination of the groundwater. The Air Force evaluated corrective actions and costs of remediation
in order to bring LF004 landfill back into compliance with CCR Title 27, Chapter 3, Subchapter 2,
Article 3(c), § 20240 (AECOM 2009).
Additional groundwater sampling was performed by
Montgomery Watson Harza, Inc. (MWH) from 2007 through 2008, which determined that the
submerged waste in the north end of the LF004 landfill was not a continuing source of contamination
(AFRC 2009a; MWH 2009).
During the April 2009 Remedial Project Managers' Meeting, the
Regional Water Quality Control Board (RWQCB) agreed that the existing remedy was adequate and
that further action at the site would not be necessary (AFRC 2009b). A discussion of the remedial
options and the final determination is available in the Revised Final Operable Unit 1, IRP Site 4,
Landfill No. 6 Rising Groundwater Evaluation Report, which was published in December 2009
(AECOM 2009).
WPWArch AF8 IfisTacr A P.I110 I31Niteh
&612012 Annual RA-01F12-002136A Alocx
1-2
July 2013
AECOM
In order to insure that the remedy for LF004 is maintained, Institutional Controls (ICs) that run with the
land are included in the property transfer deed as land use restrictions (see Section 3.1.4).
1.2.2
IRP SrrE 5, LANDFILL No. 3
IRP Site 5, Landfill No. 3 (LF005) is located near the eastern boundary of March ARB, adjacent to the
Heacock Channel and Heacock Street (Figure 1-2).
The landfill encompasses a total area of
approximately 5 acres. The landfill has a non-engineered soil cover that is approximately 4 feet thick.
Waste was deposited at the site from the late 1940s to approximately 1960 in trenches at depths of
4 feet to 21 feet bgs, with total waste deposited estimated at 18,500 cubic yards. Material in the landfill
consists of glass, scrap metal, wood construction debris, and newspapers as described in the OU1
remedial investigation/feasibility study (RI/FS) (The Earth Technology Corporation 1994).
The site
was extensively investigated during the OU1 RI/FS. Soil samples from boreholes, test pits, and surface
locations as well as soil gas and groundwater samples were collected and analyzed. Based on the
analytical results no significant levels of contamination were found in the soil or soil gas. A portion of
the OU1 groundwater volatile organic compound (VOC) plume is situated beneath the site. The site is
not a suspected source area for the plume. Based on the results of OU1 RI/FS LF005 was designated a
no further action (NFA) site in the OU1 ROD (USAF 1995). No ICs or land use controls (LUCs) were
identified as part of the remedy for Site 5; however, since landfill materials remain in place the LUC
objective is to maintain a record of the landfill (see Section 3.2.2).
1.2.3
IRP SrrE 6, LANDFILL No. 4
IRP Site 6, Landfill No. 4 (LF006) is in the western area of the former March AFB, just south of
Van Buren Boulevard (Blvd) (Figure 1-2).
The landfill was closed in 1997 (IT Corp. 1997) in
accordance with Title 23 of the CCR. The remedy as described in the OU2 ROD (USAF 2004) was
ICs, and included long-term OM&M provisions. See Section 3.3.6 for further information on LF006
ICs. The site was previously a group of quarry pits that were backfilled with various wastes such as
petroleum contaminated soil, construction debris, lime ash, munitions debris, and domestic debris.
Disposal of wastes at LF006 ended in the early 1980s. The site encompasses approximately 15 acres.
Two separate, lined waste cells (Cells A and B) were constructed as a part of site closure
(IT Corp 1995b).
The landfill contains a leachate collection and removal system (LCRS) that was
WP,March AFB Moller AkBA21113 \ Sites 4,5,&612012 Amami RA-OTC-07021313A Afoot
1-3
July 2013
110.1 L 11
L 1\
Tr
Z..
IJ/
J
L./ J
L ,J_L
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LF004, LFOO5, and LFOO6 RA-0 Report
installed to accumulate leachate from the two cells, and prevent potential groundwater contamination
(IT Corp. I995c). In addition, a sub-drain system was installed to prevent groundwater from entering
the waste.
W? / March AFT rforrncr A RB1120131Siles 4..5.&612012 Annual RA-01FL2-070212BA.docx
1-4
July 2013
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LF004, LFOO5, and LF006 RA-0 Report
March ARB and Fortner March AFB
2.0
LANDFILL REMEDIAL ACTION-OPERATION REQUIREMENTS
The post-closure operation, maintenance, and monitoring program for LF004 and LF006 provides
maintenance, monitoring, inspection, and reporting for the in place closed and capped landfills. The
program is designed to preserve (and restore, if necessary) the function of the landfill caps and drain
systems and to monitor groundwater quality. In 2003, the program began to monitor vadose zone gas
migration originating from the closed landfills LF004 and LF006. No ICs or LUCs were identified as
part of the NFA remedy described in the OU1 ROD for LF005; however, since landfill materials
remain in place, the LUC objective and semiannual inspection is to maintain a record of the landfill.
Routine inspection, maintenance, and monitoring activities are to be performed and documented for a
40-year and 43-year post -closure period at LF004 and LF006, respectively.
These requirements are
documented in the Closure and Post-Closure Maintenance Plan for Sites 4 and 6 (IT Corp. 1994,
1995b, and 1995c) and other documents that detail post-closure OM&M of the sites including As-Built
Documentation and Closure Certification Reports (IT Corp. 1995a and 1997), operations and
maintenance work plans (Black & Veatch 1999a and 1999b, and AECOM, 2010), landfill gas sampling
work plans (Black & Veatch 2002, 2003a, and 2003b; Earth Tech 2004; and AECOM, 2010), and
groundwater sampling plans (Tetra Tech 1998 and AECOM 2010).
The selected remedies for LF004 and LF006 as established in the OU I and OU2 RODs, respectively,
are cap maintenance and system monitoring (USAF1995 and 2004).
In order to insure that the
remedies are maintained, ICs that run with the land are included in the property transfer deed as land
use restrictions (March Joint Powers Authority 2006, and Moreno Valley Community Service District
2008). As part of landfill OM&M, the Air Force conducts an annual inspection to confirm that the ICs
that are part of the remedy have not been violated. IC Monitoring Checklists are located in the Landfill
OM&M Work Plan Addendum (AECOM 2010) for LF004 and LF006; and located in Land Use
Control Implementation Plan, Sites 1, 5, 11, 18, 29, 31, and 33 (AECOM 2012a) for LF005.
LFG monitoring probes monitor vadose zone gas migration at LF004 and LF006.
Probes are
monitored to determine if methane concentrations at the perimeter of the landfills remain below the
5 percent regulatory threshold established in CCR Title 27. Groundwater monitoring at LF006 is
WPAlarch AFB ifonner A RBA2B1315iirs 4,5,&62012 Annual RA-0+-12-070213BA.docx
2-1
July 2013
uyc
AECOM
conducted as part of the post-closure compliance with the Code of Federal Regulations (CFR), Title 40,
Part 258 and Title 27, Subchapter 3, Article I of the CCR.
Groundwater sampling at LF004 and LF005 is being conducted and reported under the March ARB
Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Programs and is not included in this annual report.
The
groundwater wells at LF004 and LF005 are monitored semiannually and information will be available
in the 2011-2012 and the 2012-2013 Annual Monitoring Reports prepared for AFCEC Groundwater
Monitoring Programs, March ARB, California (AECOM, 2013a and 2013b).
Presented below is an outline of proposed basic requirements of the inspection, maintenance, and
monitoring activities, and the timeline for those activities from the Landfill RA-0 Work Plan
Addendum (AECOM 2013c).
Semiannual Activities:
Formal inspections of the landfill cap, vegetative surface, subdrain system, drainage
ditches, channels, LCRS, groundwater extraction and monitoring wells, LFG probes,
settlement monuments, site security, and roads as applicable at LF004, LF005, LF006.
Locations are presented on Figure 2-1, Figure 2-2, and Figure 2-3, respectively.
Conduct maintenance if necessary at LF004, LF005, and LF006 identified during
inspections.
Monitor LFG perimeter probes at LF004 and LF006 for LFGs (measured as methane)
using field instruments.
Monitor and sample LF006 leachate collection system leachate levels at the two LCRS
risers (LCRS-1 and LCRS-2). Monitor and sample LF006 subdrain groundwater from
manhole (MH)-2.
Remove leachate at LF006 as identified during monitoring to prevent leachate levels from
making contact with the waste mass.
Monitor and sample LF006 groundwater from two upgradient background monitoring wells
(5M6MW5, 6M6MW3) and three downgradient point of compliance (POC) monitoring
wells (6M6MW5, 6M6MW6, and 6M6MW7).
Produce a semiannual report (first and second quarters) documenting the RA-0 activities
performed at LF004, LF005, and LF006.
W PMarch AFB lrurm= A P.B1s20 !Mks 5,&60B12 AIII1141 RA -01FS2-070213BA.d0,14
2-2
July 2013
AECOM
Annual Activities:
Complete the IC Monitoring Checklists for LF004, LF005, and LF006 to confirm that the
ICs that are part of the landfills remedy have not been violated.
Produce a report documenting the RA-0 activities performed at LF004, LF005, and LF006
during the calendar year.
After Major Rain Events:
Inspect the same parameters as during semiannual activities to ensure proper operation after
major rain events. Inspect landfill caps for excessive/significant ponding due to settlement.
Every 5 Years:
Survey settlement monuments at LF004 and LF006 to determine the extent the surface of
the engineered cap membrane has settled due to degradation of the underlying collected
waste. The last settlement monument surveys were conducted in April 2008 and the next
settlement monument surveys will take place in 2013.
%V RN larch AFB rfornuT A RB1120I1Sitts 4,5.8612012 Maud
3BA.docx
2-3
July 2013
AECOM
3.0
LANDFILL REMEDIAL ACTION-OPERATION RESULTS
LF004 and LF006 quarterly RA-0 inspections and LFG perimeter probe monitoring were conducted in
March 2012, May 2012, September 2012, and December 2012 by AECOM.
LF005 semiannual
inspection was conducted in December 2012. Sampling of LF006 groundwater compliance monitoring
wells took place in May 2012 and December 2012. Completed inspection and maintenance forms,
photographic documentation of inspections and maintenance performed, laboratory analytical results,
leachate non-hazardous waste manifests, and statistical analysis results are included in Appendices A,
B, C, D, and E, respectively.
3.1
LF004 REMEDIAL ACTION-OPERATION ACTIVITIES
3.1.1
LANDFILL OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE
AECOM personnel conducted quarterly inspections of LF004 in March 2012, May 2012,
September 2012, and December 2012.
See Appendices A and B for completed inspection and
maintenance forms and photographic documentation of inspections and maintenance performed.
The
following summarizes the significant findings and observations from the inspections and the
maintenance activities.
Final Cover and Parking Area: The landfill cap and parking area were found to be
generally in good condition throughout the year.
Subdrain System, Drainage Ditches, and Channels: A small amount of mud, brush, and
litter was noted in the 8th Street rain gutter and daylight channel at the south end of the strip
landfill during the September and December 2012 inspections. Cleanup of debris was
conducted in October 2012 and January 2013 to prevent blockage of stormwater runoff.
The south flag daylight drainage was found to be filled with dirt in September 2012.
Maintenance and repair occurred in October 2012; ditch was dug from the daylight to the
channel that drains to the south drainage ditch. The subdrain cleanout risers were inspected
and found to be intact. Stormwater in the drainage ditch immediately to the north of
LF004occasionally overflows into the overflow channel to the west of the north flag,
flowing south along the 8th Street gutter. The overflow channel was designed to produce a
sheet flow across the expanse of the channel; however, a smaller preferential flow channel
has developed over time along the western edge of the overflow channel. A review of
historic aerial photographs shows that the smaller channel was likely developed from a low
spot created by a dirt road that was established in the overflow channel a few years after the
w
Mai,11
ionner A R131,..20iY,Sitem 4.5.&612012 Annual RA.01R2.070Z1313A.dOCI
July 2013
AECOM
landfill was closed. There is no evidence that the smaller channel is affecting the integrity
of the landfill. This area will continue to be monitored.
Vegetative Cover: The vegetative cover was found to be generally in satisfactory
condition and previous bare areas on the cap due to drought and light vehicular traffic
during routine RA-0 activities now have growth.
Security Controls: Fences, gates, dummy security cameras, motion sensor lights, and
signs were in satisfactory condition.
Settlement Monuments: Settlement monuments remain in satisfactory condition.
Groundwater Extraction and Monitoring Wells:
All of the wells appear to be in
satisfactory condition and no deficiencies were noted. Overgrown brush was cleared from
around the extraction and monitoring wells as needed.
LFG Perimeter Probe: The probes, the concrete skirts, and covers were intact and in
good condition except for the concrete skirt around perimeter probes LFG-8a and LFG-8b.
During a rain event in August 2012 soil was washed away exposing the casing around
perimeter probes LFG-8a and LFG-8b. Soil was added around and under the concrete skirt
around LFG probes LFG-8a and LFG-8b in September 2012. Overgrown brush was
cleared from around the monitoring probes as needed.
No other deficiencies were
identified.
3.1.2
LANDFILL GAS PERIMETER PROBE MONITORING
LFG monitoring samples were collected directly from the perimeter probes around the perimeter of the
landfill (LFG-6a, LFG-6b, LFG-7, LFG-8a, LFG-8b, LFG-9, and LFG-10), using a CES-LANDTEC
GEM-2000, a field instrument used for measuring LFG composition. Table 3-1 summarizes the results
from the 2012 quarterly sampling events at LF004. During 2012, methane concentrations measured in
the perimeter probes were well below the 5 percent regulatory threshold limit at 0.0 percent by volume
during the quarterly sampling events. LFG6a was submerged during the second quarter and a reading
could not be obtained. LFG-6a and LFG-10 were submerged in water during the fourth quarter and
readings could not be obtained. Methane concentrations measured in the perimeter probes since 2002
have been below the 5 percent regulatory threshold limit, except LFG-9 (See Appendix F-1). Methane
concentrations measured in LFG-9 have exceeded the regulatory threshold limit in March 2003,
March 2005, March 2010, and March 2011 at 14 percent by volume, 7 percent by volume, 32 percent
by volume, and 34 percent by volume, respectively. Based on a review of historical rainfall data the
elevated methane readings in LFG-9 follow major rain events which cause stormwater from the
WP1Masvh AFB Mourner ARBA2:03 \Sim 4,5.&612012 Amiga! RA-0 \ F\ 2-070213BA AlocA
3-2
July 2013
AECOM
Heacock Channel to flow into the overflow channel situated along the west side of the landfill where the
probe is located. The methane levels in the perimeter probes at LF004 will continue to be tracked.
3.1.3
POST-DISASTER SYSTEMS INSPECTION
A visual inspection of the landfill systems is to be conducted after a major meteorological or other
major natural event. A major meteorological event is defined as 2 or more inches of rainfall over a
24-hour period.
The September 2012 quarterly inspection was also considered a post major
meteorological event inspection. There was more than 2 inches of rainfall on 30 August 2012. The
final cover, subdrain system, drainage channels, monitoring wells, fences and gates, LFG probes, and
settlement monuments were inspected in September 2012.
Based on the September inspection the
integrity of the landfill did not appear to be impacted by the rainfall event. See previous sections for
further information on inspection results.
3.1.4
RESTRICTIONS/INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS
The IC inspection was performed by AECOM on 26 September 2012, and the inspection results are
shown in Table 3-2. No violations of any of the ICs were noted during the inspection.
3.2
3.2.1
AECOM personnel conducted a semiannual inspection of LF005 in December 2012. See Appendices A
and B for completed inspection and maintenance forms and photographic documentation of inspections
and maintenance performed. The following summarizes the significant findings and observations from
the inspections and maintenance activities.
Non- Engineered Cover: The cover was generally in good condition and intact. Settlement
was noted in areas associated with the former landfill trenches. The vegetation present at
LF005 is currently mowed by the Base ground maintenance subcontractor. Small animal
burrows were also noted. The non-engineered cover will continue to be monitored and
repairs will be done if waste is exposed. No additional maintenance activities were
performed or required on the cover.
Groundwater Monitoring Wells: All of the wells appear to be in satisfactory condition
and no deficiencies were noted except for paint touch up.
WIAMarch AFB aotmet A RBP,201MBel, 4.5, &61:012 Annual RA ,OlF 2,070213BA.docx
3-3
July 2013
AECOM
3.2.2
The IC inspection was conducted by AECOM on 27 December 2012; the inspection results are shown
in Table 3-3. No violations of any of the ICs were noted during the inspection.
3.3
3.3.1
AECOM personnel conducted quarterly inspections of LF006 in March 2012, May 2012,
September 2012, and December 2012.
See Appendices A and B for completed inspection and
maintenance forms and photographic documentation of inspections and maintenance performed. The
following summarizes the significant findings and observations from the inspections and the
maintenance activities.
Cover Surface: The landfill cap and cover surface were found to be generally in good
condition. Small amounts of litter were noted and picked up. Minor animal burrowing was
also noted. Animal burrows generally targeted for repair activities during the operations
and maintenance process includes those that pose a threat to the integrity of the landfill cap.
Examples of animal burrows subject to the digging and refilling process include burrow
complexes created by the California ground squirrel and pocket gopher.
Drainage and Subdrain System: The subdrain and perimeter drain cleanout risers were
found to be intact and generally in good condition. Vegetation was cleared around cleanout
risers. Vegetation was noted and removed from the perimeter drain daylight and the Van
Buren Boulevard subdrain outfall. Manhole (MH)-2 was in good condition and shows a
clear and steady flow of subdrain groundwater. The locations of the cleanouts, MH-2,
perimeter drain, and Van Buren Boulevard subdrain outfall are shown on Figure 2-3. The
surface drainage is also shown on Figure 2-3.
Vegetative Cover: The vegetative cover was generally in good condition. Small animal
burrows were noted and some litter was noted as well. Litter was removed and animal
burrows were filled in as necessary. Animal activity will continue to be monitored and
repairs will be done before the integrity of the cap is compromised. No additional
maintenance activities were performed or required on the vegetative cover.
Security Controls: Fences, gates, and signs were in good condition.
Settlement Monuments: Settlement monuments remain in good condition.
Groundwater Monitoring Wells: All of the wells appear to be in satisfactory condition
and no deficiencies were noted. Brush was cleared from around monitoring wells.
VIRMatvh APB I fon= A R10120131Siics 4.5.&612012 Annual RA-01R1-070213BA,ciacx
3-4
July 2013
AECOM
Landfill Gas Perimeter Probe: The probes, concrete skirts, and covers were intact and in
good condition. Overgrown brush was noted and cleared from around probes. No other
deficiencies were identified.
3.3.2
LEACHATE CONTROL SYSTEM AND SUBDRAIN SYSTEM MONITORING
AECOM personnel conducted quarterly leachate control system and subdrain system water level
measurements in March 2012, May 2012, September 2012, and December 2012. The riser distance to
leachate was measured at LCRS-1 and LCRS-2 and the water level was measured at MH-2.
Measurements are presented in Table 3-4.
compared with rainfall accumulation.
Table 3-5 presents LCRS-2 average recharge rates
Based on the comparison leachate recharge rates were
significantly higher during months following elevated rainfall accumulation at LF006. The increase in
leachate production during the rainy season is indicative of rainwater infiltration through imperfections
(e.g., small tears, rodent burrows, gas vents, poor finer seam welds) in the top liner of Cell B.
Leachate will continue to be pumped out of LRCS-2 on an ongoing basis to keep leachate from coming
in contact with landfill waste.
Leachate depths above 18 inches require sampling, analysis, removal by pumping out, and appropriate
disposal. An evaluation of the as-built engineering drawings of the leachate sumps establishes distances
from the sump riser entrance to the leachate of 60.5 feet or less for LCRS-1 and 137.5 feet or less for
LCRS-2 as the trigger levels.
During 2012, Ieachate was pumped from LCRS-2 in two separate events. Leachate was pumped in
March and June 2012. Approximately 15,000 gallons of leachate was drawn out of LCRS-2 during
2012. Approximately 1,000 gallons of leachate was pumped from LCRS-1 in 2012 (see Appendix D
for waste manifests). Additional removal of leachate is scheduled to occur the second quarter of 2013.
Leachate samples from LCRS-1 and LCRS-2and a subdrain water sample from MH-2 were collected
during the second quarter and fourth quarter of 2012. Each sample was analyzed for VOCs and general
minerals, i.e., total dissolved solids (TDS), chloride, nitrate, sulfate, and alkalinity. Analytical results
are presented in Table 3-6 and laboratory results are included in Appendix C. Analytical results of
leachate samples were compared to the analytical results of subdrain water samples. Based upon these
comparisons no releases have occurred from the landfill.
WI". Muth AFB (former A RB113)131Sires d,5, &6+2012 ADMAN" RA. CrAF12,071:C13BA.ducx
3-5
July 2013
AECOM
3.3.3
GROUNDWATER MoNrromNG
AECOM personnel conducted quarterly groundwater elevation monitoring in March 2012, May 2012,
September 2012, and November 2012.
The 2012 groundwater elevation readings are presented in
Table 3-7 and summarized in Figures 3-1 through 3-4. The groundwater surface maps for LF006,
developed from quarterly depth to groundwater readings, indicate northeasterly direction of
groundwater flow during 2012. Groundwater elevation at LF006 has stayed fairly constant over the last
five years. See Figure 3-5 for a summary of groundwater elevation levels.
AECOM personnel conducted semiannual groundwater sampling during the second quarter and fourth
quarter of 2012.
Sampling events followed the sampling protocol outlined in the Landfill OM&M
Work Plan Addendum (AECOM, 2010) and recommended in the 2011 Sites 4 and 6 Annual OM &M
Report (AECOM, 2012b).
A no purge HydraSleeveTM sampling technique was used to sample
groundwater at LF006 during the semiannual groundwater sampling event. Groundwater samples were
analyzed for VOCs and general minerals, i.e., TDS, chloride, nitrate, sulfate, and alkalinity.
A
summary of the 2012 groundwater sampling results are presented in Table 3-8, and the 2012 laboratory
results are included in Appendix C.
3.3.3.1
Upgradient and Doi% ngradient Statistical Comparison.
Statistical comparisons between COC concentrations in the two upgradient background wells and the
three downgradient monitoring wells were made in accordance with the United States Environmental
Protection Agency (USEPA) guidance document, Statistical Analysis of Groundwater Data at Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act Facilities (USEPA 1989). This comparison was done using several
techniques from the guidance document; calculation of the 95 percent upper tolerance levels (UTLs),
Analysis of Variance Analysis (commonly known as ANOVA), and the Bonferroni T-statistic Test.
The statistical tests are described in detail in Appendix F of the Final 2003-2004 Annual Monitoring
Report, AFRC and AFRPA Groundwater Monitoring Programs, March AFB, California (MWH 2005).
The 95 percent UTLs for 2012 were calculated using current and historical data collected from
background Wells 5M6MW5 and 6M6MW3, located upgradient from the landfill.
A spreadsheet of
95 percent UTL calculations for background wells is included in Appendix E-1. Data collected from
three downgradient monitoring Wells 6M6MW5, 6M6MW6, and 6M6MW7 were then compared to the
WPMalch A FB I former ARB)1201Miles 4,5,W/12012 Animal RA, 01F12-070213BA .doce
3-6
July 2013
AECOM
calculated 95 percent UTL. Table 3-9 summarizes the historical general mineral and VOC data of the
five sampled monitoring wells and the corresponding 95 percent UTL from the two upgradient
background wells.
The results of these analyses demonstrate that concentrations of chloride, nitrate,
TDS, and PCE detected downgradient of the landfill and in the landfill subdrain water are below the
95 percent UTL of chloride, nitrate, TDS, and PCE calculated from upgradient of the landfill. Sulfate
concentrations in downgradient Wells 6M6MW5 and 6M6MW6 were greater than the 95 percent UTL
of sulfate calculated from upgradient of the landfill. The sulfate concentrations detected in monitoring
Wells 6M6MW5 and 6M6MW6 have historically been above the calculated 95 percent UTL.
The data sets shown in Table 3-9 were statistically tested to determine if there was a significant
difference between analyte concentrations in the background wells and downgradient wells.
Also
included in this test was the subdrain data set (MH-2 samples) to determine if there was a significant
difference between analyte concentrations in the background wells and the landfill subdrain water.
Summary spread sheets of the statistical analysis are included in Appendix E. The results of these
analyses demonstrate that the mean concentrations of chloride, nitrate, and PCE detected downgradient
of the landfill and in the landfill subdrain water are not statistically different from the corresponding
mean concentrations of chloride, nitrate, and PCE detected upgradient of the landfill.
This analysis performed for sulfate in downgradient wells demonstrates that the mean concentration of
sulfate in downgradient Wells 6M6MW5 and 6M6MW6 is statistically greater than the mean
concentration of sulfate detected upgradient of the landfill.
The sulfate concentrations detected in
monitoring Wells 6M6MW5 and 6M6MW6 have historically been above the calculated 95 percent
UTL. The results of these analyses demonstrate that the mean concentration of sulfate detected in the
landfill subdrain water is statistically equal to the corresponding mean concentration of sulfate detected
upgradient of the landfill. The mean TDS concentration in downgradient Well 6M6MW5 is statistically
greater than the mean concentration of TDS detected upgradient of the landfill; however, the mean
concentration is less than the mean concentration of one of the upgradient wells.
3.3.4
LANDFILL GAS PERIMETER PROBE MONITORING
LFG monitoring samples were collected directly from the perimeter probes around the perimeter of the
landfill.
LFG perimeter probe locations are identified on Figure 2-3. LFG samples were collected
WF,Mant AFB Iformer ARB),..2013'Soles 4.5.646',2012 Annual RA -01P2-070213BA dexx
3-7
July 2013
AECOM
directly from the probes using a CES-LANDTEC GEM-2000. Table 3-10 summarizes the results from
the 2012 quarterly sampling events at LF006 and includes all of the currently sampled monitoring
probes.
The methane concentrations measured in all of the LFG probes during the 2012 sampling
events were between 0.0 and 0.1 percent by volume; well below the regulatory threshold limit of
5 percent by volume. Therefore LF006 is considered compliant with CCR Title 27 since all perimeter
probes show methane concentrations below the 5 percent methane limit. Methane concentrations have
not been above the regulatory threshold limit since perimeter probe monitoring began at the new probe
locations at LF006 in 2004 (see Appendix F-2).
3.3.5
POST-DISASTER SYSTEMS INSPECTION
A visual inspection of the landfill systems is to be conducted after a major meteorological or other
major natural event. A major meteorological event is defined as 2 or more inches of rainfall over a
24-hour period.
The September 2012 quarterly inspection was also considered a post major
meteorological event inspection. There was more than 2 inches of rainfall on 30 August 2012. The
final cover, subdrain system, drainage channels, monitoring wells, fences and gates, LFG probes, and
settlement monuments were inspected in September 2012.
Based on the September inspection the
integrity of the landfill did not appear to be impacted by the rainfall event. See previous sections for
further information on inspection results.
3.3.6
The IC inspection conducted by AECOM on 25 September 2012, and the inspection results are shown
on Table 3-11. No violations of any of the ICs were noted during the inspection.
WR,Alards . AFB (hvrrner A FtS)',2013Sites 4,5,802012 Animal RA-OT12.010213BA.ducx
3-8
July 2013
AECOM
4.0
CONCLUSIONS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
This program is designed to preserve (and restore, if necessary) the function of the landfill caps and
drainage systems, and to monitor groundwater quality and vadose zone gas migration originating from
the closed landfills.
During 2012, quarterly monitoring and inspections indicated minor maintenance and repair needs at
LF004; the majority resulted from rain events. Rain events have caused minor erosion and deposition
of drainage channels, fence lines, and around monitoring points. These were investigated to ensure the
integrity of the landfill caps and drainage systems remain intact. No evidence of damage to the landfill
cap or drainage system was found and repairs and maintenance due to erosion and deposition were
performed. During 2012, quarterly monitoring and inspections indicated minor maintenance needs at
LF006; the majority resulted from vegetation growth.
The Site 6 Post Closure Maintenance Plan (IT Corp. 1995b) indicates that leachate generation from the
waste is expected to be very low. The quantity of leachate removed from LCRS-2 in the last two years
does not reflect this. In 2012, approximately 15,000 gallons of leachate were drawn from LCRS-2.
Approximately 1,000 gallons were drawn out of LCRS-1 due to leachate levels above trigger levels in
2012.
The frequency of measuring leachate levels in LCRS-2 was increased to evaluate the rate of leachate
recharge in the sump. The relatively small quantity of leachate pumped from LCRS-1 has maintained
the leachate level below the action level (60.5 feet), but the far greater quantity pumped from LCRS-2
has not kept the leachate level from exceeding the action level (137.5 feet) several times. Despite
quantities up to 7,500 gallons of leachate being removed at a time, leachate levels persistently return to
the trigger level in a few months. Leachate recharge rates were significantly higher during months
following elevated rainfall accumulation at LFOO6 (see Table 3-5). The increase in leachate production
during the rainy season is indicative of rainwater infiltration through imperfections (e.g., small tears,
rodent burrows, gas vents, poor liner seam welds) in the top liner of Cell B. Leachate will continue to
be pumped out of LRCS-2 on an ongoing basis to keep leachate from coming in contact with landfill
waste.
WIT.Mach AFB (former ARB1120±3%Siws 4,S,&6121311 Annual RA-01F52.071L213BA.docx
4-1
July 2013
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LFOO4, LF005, and LF006 RA-0 Report
The LF006 groundwater Detection Monitoring Program commenced shortly after the site was closed in
1997. Analytical results and statistical comparisons of the groundwater monitoring wells and subdrain
system (MH-2) do not indicate any significant impacts to groundwater have occurred during the past
15 years of monitoring.
it
is recommended that the Detection Monitoring
4-2
July 2013
Based on these results
Program be discontinued at this time.
WPWarch AFB llama ARB)12013 \Sites 4,54.63012 Annual RA-On2-070213BA.docx
AECOM
March ARB and Former Mardi AFB
5.0
REFERENCES
Revised Final Operable Unit 1, IRP Site 4,
Landfill No. 6 Rising Groundwater Evaluation Report, Former March Air Force Base,
California. December.
AECOM Technical Services, Inc. (AECOM).
2009.
2010. Landfill Operations, Maintenance, and Monitoring Work Plan Addendum, IRP Sites 4
and 6, Former March Air Force Base, California. December.
Draft Land Use Control Implementation Plan, Sites 1, 5, 11, 18, 29, 31, and 33,
March Air Reserve Base, California. June.
2012a.
2012b. 2011 Annual Operations, Monitoring, and Maintenance Report Operable Unit 1,
IRP Site 4, Landfill No. 6, and Operable Unit 2, IRP Site 6, Landfill No. 4, March Air Force
Base, California. May.
2013a. 2011-2012 Annual Monitoring Report Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Programs,
March Air Reserve Base and Former March Air Force Base, California. TBD.
2013b. 2012-2013 Annual Monitoring Report Long-Term Groundwater Monitoring Programs,
March Air Reserve Base and Former March Air Force Base, California. TBD.
.
2013c. Landfill Remedial Action-Operation (RA-0) Work Plan Addendum IRP Sites 4 (LF004),
5 (LF005), and 6 (LF006), March Air Reserve Base and Former March Air Force Base,
California. TBD.
Air Force Reserve Command (AFRO). 2 009a. March Air Reserve Base/Former March Air Force Base
Annual Groundwater Meeting Minutes, 14 January. January.
.
March Air Reserve Base/Former March Air Force Base Remedial Project Managers
Meeting Minutes, 23 April. April.
2009b.
Black & Veatch Special Projects Corp. and Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech). 1999a. Final Operations
and Maintenance Work Plan, Operable Unit 1, Site 4, Landfill No. 6, March Air Force Base,
California. July.
Final Operations and Maintenance Work Plan, Operable Unit 2, Site 6, Landfill No. 4,
March Air Force Base, California. July.
1999b.
2002. Methane Gas Sampling Work Plan, OU1, Site 4, March Air Force Base California.
September.
LFG Sampling Report and Work Plan Addendum, OU1, Site 4, Landfill No. 6,
March Air Force Base, California. February.
2003a.
WPStarch AFB gamer ARB1120131Siles 4.5.&01012 Annual RA-WV-07021313A Alucx
5-1
July 2013
AECOM
2003b. Landfill Gas Sampling Report. OU2 Site 6, Landfill No. 4, March Air Force Base,
California. April.
Earth Tech, Inc. (Earth Tech). 2004. Draft Work Plan, Installation of Soil Gas Monitoring Probes
and Possible Remedial Action at IRP Site 6, March Air Force Base. June.
International Technology Corporation (IT Corp.) 1994. Final Closure/Post Closure Maintenance Plan
Site 4 (Landfill 6), OU-1 March Air Force Base. July.
1995a. As-Built Documentation and Closure Certification Report, Site 4 (Landfill 6), OU-1,
March Air Force Base. June.
1995b. Closure/Post Closure Maintenance Plan, Site 6, OU-2. March Air Force Base.
Project No. 760825. May.
1995c.
Final Closure/Post Closure Maintenance Plan, Site 6, OU-2, Cell B Expansion,
March Air Force Base. September.
1997.
As-Built Documentation Construction Report, OU-2 Site 6a, March Air Force Base.
September.
March Joint Powers Authority. 2006. Quitclaim Deed, Environmental Restrictions, and CERCLA
120(h) Notice (Parcel 1-3, Former March AFB), Doc # 2006-0807392. November.
Montgomery Watson Harza, Inc. (MWH).
2005. Draft 2003-2004 Annual Monitoring Report,
AFRC and AFRPA, Groundwater Monitoring Program, March Air Force Base. May.
.
2009. Final 2007-2008 Annual Monitoring Report, AFRC and AFRPA Groundwater Monitoring
Programs, March Air Force Base. June.
Moreno Valley Community Service District. 2008. March Air Force Base, Parcel 1-2 Quitclaim Deed,
Doc# 2008-0520569, City of Moreno Valley. September.
Tetra Tech, Inc. (Tetra Tech). 1998. Final Proposed Monitoring Strategy for March ARB, Landfill
Sites 4, 6, and 24Y/24, March Air Reserve Base, California. April.
The Earth Technology Corporation. 1994. Installation Restoration Program, Remedial Investigation/
Feasibility Study for Operable Unit 1, Volume I, March Air Force Base, California. July.
United States Air Force (USAF). 1995. Record of Decision, Operable Unit 1, March Air Force Base,
California. December (Signed in June 1996).
.
2004. Operable Unit 2 Air Force Real Property Agency Record of Decision Former March Air
Force Base, California. April.
United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA).
1989.
Guidance Document on the
Statistical Analysis of Ground-Water Monitoring Data at RCRA Facilities.
Malch AFB (formig A RBNCBPSites 4.5.8c6 \ 2012 Annual RA -CAF12-070213BA.docx
5-2
July 2013
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LF004, LF005, and LF006 RA-O Report
LIST OF TABLES
>
3-1
LF004 Landfill Gas Probe 2012 Sampling Results, Former March Air Force Base
> 3-2
LF004 Restrictions/Institutional Controls, Annual Evaluation/Monitoring/
Inspection Report
3-3
LF005 Restrictions/Institutional Controls, Annual Evaluation/Monitoring/
Inspection Report
> 3-4
LF006 2012 Depth to Water in LCRS Risers and Subdrain Manhole
>
3-5
LF006 LCRS-2 Leachate Recharge Rate
3-6
LF006 MH-2, LCRS-1, and LCRS-2 2012 Analytical Results Summary
> 3-7
3-8
LF006 Groundwater Monitoring Well 2012 Groundwater Depth Measurement and
Elevation
LF006 Summary of 2012 Groundwater Monitoring Well Analytical Results
> 3-9
Summary of LF006 Landfill Compliance Statistics
> 3-10
LF006 Landfill Gas Probe 2012 Sampling Results
>
LF006 Restrictions/Institutional Controls Annual Evaluation/Monitoring/Inspection
Report
3-11
WPAlarch AFB former ARBB20131Sium 4,5,&612012 Annual RA-01F12-070213BA.dnca
July 2013
=I ill MN
IIIIII
arc ..R
111. M2 7 51.
IM
PagPit
#F
a
1
AECOM
TABLE 3-1. LF004 LANDFILL GAS PROBE 2012 SAMPLING RESULTS
LFG Perimeter
Probe No.
Screen Depth
(feet below grade)
Quarter
LFG-6a
LFG-6b
9.5 - 10
LFG-8a
LFG-7
9.5 - 10
6.5 - 7
9,5 - 10
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
NA
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
Q2
0.0
Q3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.9
NA
2.5
NA
1.1
1.0
2.9
1.1
2.4
1.9
2.1
1.9
1.3
0.9
1.1
1.4
Oxygen
19.2
NA
17.1
NA
18.5
17.8
16.5
17.3
16.8
16.7
17.1
16.0
18.5
18.9
18.7
16.8
Balance
79.9
NA
80.4
NA
80.4
81.2
80.6
81.6
80.8
81.4
80.8
82.1
80.2
80.2
80.2
81.8
Methane
Carbon
Dioxide
(% by
volume)
LFG Perimeter
Probe No.
LFG-8b
LFG-9
LFG-10
19.5 - 20
9.5 - 10
9.5 - 10
Screen Depth
(feet below grade)
Quarter
Qi
Q2
Q3
Q4
Qt
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Methane
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
6.8
4.8
8.4
8.3
11.4
15.2
13.1
14.6
5.0
6.7
7.0
NA
Oxygen
12.3
13.0
9.3
10.9
10.8
7.7
10.1
6.0
16.5
13.0
35.7
NA
Balance
80.9
82.2
82.3
80.8
77.8
77.1
76.8
79,4
78.5
80.3
77.3
NA
Carbon
Dioxide
(% by
volume)
Notes:
=
LFG
NA
No.
Q I , Q2, Q3, Q4
=
=
=
-
percent
landfill gas
Not Available. The screened portion of the perimeter probe was submerged in water.
number
First, Second, Third, and Fourth Quarters
wp,March AFH {Puma A RH)1201315itns. 4.5,&fi12012 Annual RA-cro,247o213RA.aock
July 2013
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LF004, LF005, and LFOOO RA-0 Report
TABLE 3-2.
LF004 RESTRICTIONSIINSTITUTIONALCONTROLS
ANNUAL EVALUATION/MONITORING/INSPECTION REPORT
(Page 1 of 4)
Installation: Former March AFB
DTSC Site Code: 400090
Site or Operable Unit (OU): Site 4, OU-1
Record of Decision (ROD)/Date: OU-1 ROD dated December 1995 (signed in June 1996)
Parcel: 1-2
Owner: Moreno Valley Community Services District
Inspected By: Tony English, AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Date: 26 September 2012Time: 1500
Reviewed By: Jerry W Bingham, AFCEC/CZRB
Date: 25 February 2013
Point of Contact/Telephone/email: Jerry W Bingham, 210 536-5978, jerry.bingham@us.af.mil
Observations Performed By:
Site Visit during Operations
(e.g., drive by, fly over, walk in, etc.)
and
Maintenance of Landfill
LF004 was inspected for compliance with the restrictions/institutional controls (ICs) as stated in the
Early Transfer Deed which are part of the remedy specified in the OU-1 ROD. Steps to bring into
compliance are described for any violations noted.
Restriction/Control
Violation
Noted
(Yes/No)
Steps to Bring Violation into
Compliance
No
Not Applicable
No
Not Applicable
No
Not Applicable
No
Not Applicable
Site 4 shall not be used for any of the following
purposes:
A residence, including any mobile home or
factory built housing, constructed or installed for
(a)
use as residential human habitation.
(b) A hospital for human care.
(c)
A public or private school for persons under
18 years of age.
(d) A day care center for children.
WPAlarcli AFB gunner A RBY,2013kSites 4.5401012 Annual RA-MFC1-070,213BA .ducx
1
July 2013
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LF004, LF005, and LF006 RA-0 Reparr
TABLE 3-2. CONTINUED
LF004 RESTRICTIONS/INSTITUTIONALCONTROLS
(Page 2 of 4)
Violation
Noted
Restriction/Control
(Yes/No)
Compliance
No
Not Applicable
No
Not Applicable
No
Not Applicable
No
Not Applicable
No
Not Applicable
No
Not Applicable
Soil Management for the Property.
(a) The Owner shall not conduct or allow others to
conduct at the Site 4 any construction, excavation,
drilling, grading, removal, trenching, filling earth
movement, mining, or planting that would disturb
the soil or the landfill cover, including the cap,
without the prior written approval of the DTSC.
(b) The Owner shall not conduct or allow others to
conduct at the Site 4 injection or release of water or
other fluids except for the purpose of monitoring
groundwater or landfill gas, without the prior
written approval of the DTSC.
(c) The Owner shall not conduct or allow others to
conduct at the Site 4 activities resulting in any
contaminated soils brought to the surface by
grading, excavation, trenching or backfilling,
without the prior written approval of the DTSC.
After approval by the DISC, these activities shall
be managed in accordance with all applicable
provisions of state and federal law.
(d)
The Owner shall provide the DTSC written
notice at least fourteen (14) days prior to conducting
any construction, grading, excavation, drilling,
filling, removal, trenching, backfilling, earth
movement, mining or planting at the Property.
Prohibited Activities. The following activities shall
not be conducted at Site 4:
(a) use or extraction of groundwater from the Site 4
for any purpose other than groundwater monitoring.
(b)
activities that would cause disturbance or
removal of fencing or signs intended to exclude the
public from the Site 4 or a portion of the Site 4.
1
WFAMarch AFB i former A RB)12013,S]ses 4,546S2.012 Alumni RA 0+Fma 0702138A de=
July 2013
1
AECOM
LF004 RESTRICTIONS/INSTITUTIONALCONTROLS
Page 3 of 4)
Violation
Noted
(Yes/No)
Compliance
No
Not Applicable
(d) injection of water or other fluids at the Site 4 that
might affect groundwater flow direction.
No
Not Applicable
activities that would cause disturbance of any
No
Not Applicable
(f) activities that limit access to any landfill equipment
and systems, including the leachate collection system,
the groundwater monitoring systems, and settlement
monuments, or the drainage, sub-drainage, or erosion
controls for the landfill cover.
No
Not Applicable
(g)
activities that will disrupt required remedial
investigation, response actions, or oversight activities
at Site 4.
No
Not Applicable
DTSC or other regulatory agencies have reasonable
right of entry and access the Site 4 for inspection,
monitoring, and other activities consistent with the
purposes of this SLUC as deemed necessary by the
DTSC in order to protect the public health or safety,
No
Not Applicable
Restriction/Control
(c) activities that would cause the surface application
to the extent that the
of water (e.g., irrigation)
integrity of the landfill or landfill cap is impacted.
(e)
landfill equipment and systems, including the leachate
collection system, the groundwater monitoring
systems, and settlement monuments, or the drainage,
sub-drainage, or erosion controls for the landfill
cover.
or the environment.
WRMarch AFB (former A RB)S20131Sin% 4.5A612012 Annual RA-OSF12,070213BA.docx
I
July 2013
AECOM
LEON RESTRICTIONSIINSTITUTIONALCONTROLS
1
(Page 4 of 4)
Violation
Noted
Restriction/Control
Access for Implementing Operation and Maintenance.
The Air Force, which is implementing the Final
Operations and Maintenance Work-Plan, Operable
Unit I. Site 4, Landfill No. 6, March Air Force Base,
(Yes/No)
Compliance
No
Not Applicable
1
California, dated July 1999, (Operations and
Maintenance Work-Plan) shall have reasonable right of
entry and access to the Site 4 for the purpose of
implementing the Operations and Maintenance WorkPlan until the Department determines that no further
Operation and Maintenance by the Air Force for both
the landfill and for groundwater is required.
Notification of Discovery of Activities Affecting
Groundwater Monitoring and Extraction Systems.
No
Not Applicable
The Owner or Occupant shall notify the Department
and the Covenanter of the discovery of any activities
conducted by the Owner or Occupant interfering with
or adversely affecting any groundwater extraction,
treatment or monitoring installation for the Site 4.
The Owner or Occupant shall provide the notification
within seven (7) working days after the discovery of
the activity and shall include information regarding the
type of activity, date of activity, and location of the
activity on the Site 4.
Other Remarks or Comments: No violations of ICs included in the Early Transfer Deed were noted.
Notes:
AFB
AFCEC/CZRB
=
DTSC
e.g.
etc.
SLUC
=
=
=
=
Air Force Base
Air Force Civil Engineer Center/Environmental Center of Excellence/Base Realignment
and Closure (WRAC) Support
Department of Toxic Substances Control
for example (exempli gratis)
and so forth (et cetera)
State Land Use Covenants
WPI March AFB I former A RB)+2)13% Sites 4.5, &6\212 Annual PA .PSFL2 .070213BA.docz
July 2013
1
AECOM
TABLE 3-3.
LF005 RESTRICTIONS/INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS
(Page 1 of 2)
Site or Operable Unit (01;1:
L.F005
Owner: United States Air Force Reserve Command (AFRC)
Point of Contact/Telephone/email: Eric Lehto/951 655-5060/ericlehto@us.af.mil
Inspected By:
Brent Adair
Reviewed By:
Eric Lehto
12 December 2012
Date:
Date:
Time: 1500
20 February 2013
Observations Performed By Site walk (e.g., drive by, fly over, walk in, etc.)
LUC Restriction/Contro
Inspection
Residential Land Restrictions
Has residential development occurred within (No) Describe:
this restricted area?
Groundwater Restrictions
Is groundwater being accessed for any reason
(No) Describe:
other than monitoring or treatment?
Is there any evidence of damage or tampering to
site groundwater monitoring wells?
Are the monitoring wells locked?
Digging Permits
Has digging or excavation taken place on the (No) Describe:
property?
Did the Base Engineer approve of this action
through a dig permit?
Utility Maintenance or Replacement
Have the existing utilities been replaced or (No) Describe:
modified?
Has any new utility construction occurred?
Annual Inspection
Is last year's annual inspection available for this (Yes):
site?
WIAMorrh AFB (forma A RBIO20131Sito 1,5,&412012 Ammall RA-OW12-070213BA.domt
July 2013
AECOM
March ARB and Former March APB
TABLE 3-3. (CONTINUED)
LIFOO5 RESTRICTIONS /INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS
(Page 2 of 2)
Engineered Measures
Are there any engineered measures currently in (No) Describe: Site is restricted from access by
place to restrict site access? (signs, fences, etc.) the general public by Base perimeter fence.
Is there any evidence of damage or tampering?
Land Use Change
Have any major land use changes occurred?
(No) Describe:
Notes.:
e.g.
etc.
= for example (exempli gratia)
= and so forth (et cetera)
LUC =
land use control
Vin March AFB I (culla ARB)12013,Sites 45,62.612012 Annual RA -01-12-070213BA.docX
July 2013
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LF004, LF005, and LF(106 RA-0 Report
TABLE 3-4.
LF006 2012 DEPTH TO WATER
IN LCRS RISERS AND SUBDRAIN MANHOLE
LCRS-1
Depth
(feet)
LCRS-2
Depth
MH-2
Depth
(feet)
(feet)
84.11
180.56
NA
60.5
137.5
NA
3/8/2012
61.10
138.00
20.00
5/17/2012
60.25
140.15
20.85
9/25/2012
61.15
135.20
19.90
12/12/2012
60.95
133.40
19.70
Length of riser
Trigger Level /
Date
Notes:
Bolded values exceed the trigger level.
MH
= manhole
LRCS = leachate collection and recovery system
= not applicable
NA
WRINucli AFB (runner ARBAMITSBes 4,5,k6I2D12 Annual RA-DsP2.0B3213BA Alocx
July 2013
1 "1Q11.11
1\
Tr
Z..
1J/
(a
_L
L V _L
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LF004. LF005, and LF006 RA-0 Report
TABLE 3-5.
LFOO6 LCRS-2 LEACHATE RECHARGE RATE
Time Period
Average Recharge Rate
(gallons per day)
Total Rainfall Accumulation
90
7.9
20
1.2
12/31/2009 - 03/24/2010
08/03/2010 - 12/01/2010
12/01/2010 -03/31/2011
03/31/2011 - 06/23/2011
06/23/2011 - 09/22/2011
10/10/2011 - 12/21/2011
12/21/2011 - 03/26/2012
03/26/2012 - 06/28/2012
06/28/2012 - 09/25/2012
09/25/2012 - 12/12/2012
(inches)
122
12
60
50
0.66
0.25
70
1.6
76
1.7
70
48
0.86
2.49
38
0.51
LCRS = leachate collection and removal system
W %March AFB (former ARIO1201315irm 4,5.8efiL012 Annual RA01F.2-07C2l3BA.doex
July 2013
A ECOM
Final Annual 2012 L1004, 11005, and LF006 RA-0 Report
TABLE 3-6.
LF006 MI1-2, LCRS-1, AND LCRS-2
2012 ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
(Page 1 of 2)
_
Sample Collection Point /
Date Sampled
Component Analyzed
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
Carbonate Alkalinity
Chloride
Cyanide, Total
Nitrate
Nitrite
pH
Total Dissolved Solids
Sulfate
Calcium
Magnesium
Arsenic
Lead
Mercury
Selenium
MTBE
VOCs
Ten-butanoI
vinyl chloride
chlorobenzene
cis-1,2-DCE
acetone
chloroethane
methylene
chloride
naphthalene
toluene
1.2,3-TCB
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
unit
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
MH-2
5/17/2012
12/19/2012
180
245
10U
5,OU
144
150
0.0010U
14.6
0,0310U
6.99
812
68.1
0.0020U J B
77
77
33.1
0.0115
0.00370U
0.012U
0.0025U
15
0.080U
7.66 H HF
610
68
33
0.00010 U .1
tg /L
0.000332
0.00410U
0.50U
AWL
10U
lig/L
pg/L
0.18U
0.16U
0.19U
AgIL
p.g/L
--
pg/L
0.72U
ggIL
0.66U
0.50U
0.14U
0.50U
1..ig/L
kig/L
pg/L
0.013U
0.18U
LCRS-1
5/17/2012
12/19/2012
3,170
680
IOU
5.0U
546
560
0.0010U
0.0020U J
0.0360U
0.11U
0.18
0.080U
6.61
6.71 H HF
2,500
1,900
1.6
0.25U
275
250
124
120
0.0226
0.0120 J
0.00370U
0.0025U
0.00010 U
0.0000370U
J
0.0202
0.013U
L
499
490
0.00IOU
0.0360U
0.16
6.83
3,170
73.2
0.0020U J
0.11U
0.080U
6.92 H HF
2,400
241
290
290
350
0.0151
0.00370U
0.0000370
U
0.012U
0.0025U
0.00010U
0.013U
0.18U
0.078U
0.076U
0.36 J
0.13U
0.72U
9.9 J
0.48 J
0.39 J B
0.28 J
0.23 J
0.22 J B
0.66U
0.50U
0.14U
0.50U
17
--
10U
--
0.078U
0.076U
0.098U
1.6U
0.13U
4.8
0.37 J
0.60 J
2.7
0.076U
0.72U
0.39 J B
0.25U
0.66U
0.50U
0.14U
0.25 J
24
0 -50U
85
0.0159
0.50U
ao
0.18U
0.16U
0.37 J
29
0.068U
0.16U
LCRS-2
5/17/2012
12/19/2012
2,500
1,400
10U
5.0U
--
0.40 J B
0.25U
0.068U
0.16U
Laboratory-Assigned Qualifiers:
B
Compound was found in the blank and sample.
H
Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specified holding time,
HF
Field parameter with a holding time of 15 minutes.
J
Estimated analyte value between the method detection limit and reporting limit.
U
Analyte not detected above indicated method detection limit.
W Miami] APB I furincr A RB 10.20131Sges 4,5461217n Amaral RA DW12--070213BA.dmx
I
July 2013
AECOM
LF006 MH-2, LCRS-1, AND LCRS-2
2012 ANALYTICAL RESULTS SUMMARY
(Page 2 of 2)
Notes:
= analyte detected
= analyte not analyzed
= micrograms per liter
tig/L
DCE
= dichloroethylene
LCRS = leachate collection and recovery system
mg/L = milligrams per liter
MH
= manhole
MTBE = methyl tertiary-butyl ether
TCB
= trichlorobenzene
VC
= vinyl chloride
VOC
= volatile organic compounds
Bold
WP,Malch AFB lIorrner A R131120131Sites 4.5.&61M12 Amiss! RA-MP:2.070a] 313A.docx
July 2013
IMM1
1111 " 1111
1111
11111
11111
11111
r crit lam
75
AECOM
mi.
a
g
en. a !lb
TABLE 3-7.
LFOO6 GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL 2OI2GROUNDWATER DEPTH
MEASUREMENT AND ELEVATION (IN FEET)
March-12
Water
Depth
September-12
May-12
Water Depth
(feet)
GW Elevation
(feet amsl)
Water Depth
(feet)
GW Elevation
(feet amsl)
November-12
Water Depth
(feet)
GW Elevation
(feet amsl)
(feet)
GW Elevation
(feet amsl)
Well ID
TOC
(feet amsl)
5M6MW2
1,643.12
24.52
1,618.60
24.73
1,618.39
24.93
1,618.19
24.91
1,618.21
5M6MW5
1,696.33
46.51
1,649.82
46.70
1,649.63
47.12
1,649.21
47.41
1,648.92
6M6MW1
1,676.04
43.42
1,632.62
43.55
1,632.49
43.75
1,632.29
43.86
1,632.18
6M6MW3
1,688.13
32.17
1,655.96
32.34
1,655.79
32.90
1,655.23
33.10
1,655.03
6M6MW5
1,644.31
24.19
1,620.12
24.32
1,619.99
24.52
1,619.79
24.50
1,619.81
6M6MW6
1,644.39
25.19
1,619.20
25.51
1,618.88
25.90
1,618.49
25.83
1,618.56
6M6MW7
1,647.94
27.2
1,620.74
27.48
1,620.46
28.04
1,619.90
27.99
1,619.95
Notes:
amsl = above mean sea level
GW = groundwater
ID
= identification
TOC - top of casing
WP,March AFB iirma A14012013+Sitrs 4,5,&5212 Anziot RA -01P.2.002133A.docx
Iuty 2013
1
MI MN INN
111111
gel, a ril)
11! #01 mo
51=
1
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LFOO4, LFOO5, and LF006 RA-0 Report
March ARB and Fortner March APB
TABLE 3-8.
LF006 SUMMARY OF 2012 GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELL ANALYTICAL RESULTS
Sample Collection Point / Date / Type
5M6MW05
6M6MW03
5/17/2012 12119/2012 5/17/2012 12/19/2012
Units
Analvte
6M6MW05
6M6MW07
6M6MW06
5/17/2012 12/19/2012 5/17/2012
5/17/2012
12/19/2012
12/19/2012
M11-2
5/17/2012
12/19/2012
5/17/2012
12/1912012
N
N
6.67 HY
N
6.52
6.99
N
7.66 H HF
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
D
1114
pH units
7,16
7.29 HF
7.06
7,11 HF
6,89
6.96 HF
6.96
6.97
N
7.03 HF
6.98 HF
TDS
mg/L
628
480
1010
900
928
710
806
842
690
690
598
480
812
610
Chloride
mg/L
77
75
195
190
128
130
133
132
150
150
46.5
56
144
150
Nitrate
mg/L
20.3 1
20
8.1
8.4
9.30 M
8.9
14.9 3
14.6 1
15
15
15.3 1
16
14.6
15
Nitrite
mg/L
<0,0310
<0,016
<0.0310
<0.080
<0,0310
<0.080
<0.0310
0.17
1.1
<0.080
<0.0310
<0.016
<0.0310
<0.016
Sulfate
mg/L
57.7
54
81.3
79
118
100
89.7
89.7
100
100
59.2
57
68.1
68
Bicarbonate Alkalinity
mgJL
105
120
405
390
295
260
240
245
200
200
165
170
245
180
Carbonate Alkalinity
mgJL
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<5.0
<10
<5.0
Cyanide
mg/L
<0.0010
0.020
<0.0010
0.19
<0.0010
0.067 M
<0.0010
<0.0010
<0.0020
<0.0020
<0.0010
<0.0023 1 8
<0.0010
<0.0034 .1 B
VOCs
tg /L
<1.0
<0.66
0.39 1 B
<1.0
<0.66
13.64 I B
<1.0
<0.66
<1.0
<0.66
0.38 I B
<1.0
<0.66
0.391 B
<0.25
<0.50
<0.25
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0.16
<0.50
<0.50
<0.50
<0,25
<0.16
<0.16
<0.50
methylene
chloride
ug/L
<1.0
<0.66
0.37 I B
naphthalene
pgIL
<0,50
<0.25
1,2,3-TCB
ug/L
<0.50
<0.16
<0.50
<0.50
Laboralary-Assigned Qualifiers:
B
H
HF
M
Compound was found in the blank sample.
Sample was prepped or analyzed beyond the specific holding time,
Field parameter with a holding time of 15 minutes
estimated analyte value between the method detection limit and reporting limit
matrix effect
wpm arch AFB glimmer A REB2B1.11Snes 4,5,&e101 2 Annual RA-01F12-0702130A.Lk=
D
0.38 1 B
0.40 I B
0.263 B
<0.25
0.25 3 B
<0.16
W
<1.0
<0.66
<0.50
<0.50
Notes:
non detect results = < method detection limit
= less than
ug/L
= micrograms per liter
mg/L
= milligrams per liter
MH
= manhole
N
= normal sample type
pH
= negative log of the hydrogen ion concentration
TCB
= trichlorobenzene
TDS
= total dissolved solids
VOC
volatile organic compound
July 2013
<0.25
<0.16
AECOM
March ARB and Former March APR
TABLE 3-9. SUMMARY OF IRP SITE 6 LANDFILL COMPLIANCE STATISTICS
FORMER MARCH AFB, CALIFORNIA
(Page 1 of 3)
Analyte
Chloride
Background Wells
Compliance Wells
5M6MW5 I 6M6MW3 6M6MW5 I 6M6MW6 I 6M6MW7
95% UTL
Analyte Concentration
Sample
Date
Units
Jun-99Oct-99
mg/ L
383
64.9
Jan -00
59
May-00
Jun-01
75
78.9
Dec-01
112
Jul-02
76.3
Nov-02
81.6
May-03
88.5
87,7
Nov-03
May-04
85.8
May-05
81.3
Nov-05
59.3
Feb-06
58.6J
Aug-06 57.1158.8
70.7
Feb-07
73.7
Dec-07
Feb-08
85.9
Dec-08
89.5
Jun-09
79
Sep-09
89.6
Dec-10
83.9
May-11
92.5
N 111-atC
11111
I
1
1
I
93.52
99.4
96.4
8.7
14.3
13.2
10.3
9.41
Dec-01
20.1
13.8
13.6
16.5
15.7
15.6
16.6
17.9
130
113
123
112
128
130
U. 884
2_63
10_1
2.24
3.6
4.74
3.4
2.66
6.28
9.4
10.8
11.8
9.65
--
5_17
9.7
9.9
9.4
8.8
9.2
8.9
9.2
9.9
7.1
20.7
21.7
10
8.4
1I
Jun-09
19.3
Sep-09
Dec-10
May-11
Dec-11
May-12
Dec-12
20.8
9.3
9.8
9.1
7.3
-0 W-Q-0702138A ..rlifa
91.2
99.7
108
Jun-99
Oct-99
Jan-00
May-00
Jun-01
WP. Much AFB iforrna A P.B)121113%Sucs 4.2,&62112 Au= I
290
280
276
270
265
260
257
255
253
86.2
1053
19(1
18.6
20
19.2
20.3
20
60.9
60.7
70.5
73.9
47,3
52.4
28.4
49.3
54.9J
51.6
48.6
45.3
55,3
59.2
174
173
167
75
Dec-OS
301
93.4
82
77
19.8
77_6
86_6
May-12
Dec-12
17.6
18.5
79
95.1
95
102
166
159
180
156
175
169
190
2.4
9
8.2
8.9
7.2
5.4
8.1
371
111
l75
117
121
105
135
105
10
56.6
59.9
347
328
313
93.7
187
195
19.1
114
110
140
136
149
160
168
74
Jul-02
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
May-04
May-05
Nov-05
Feb-06
Au8-06
Feb-07
Dec-07
Feb-08
123
108
124
113
133
115
132
93
126
111
157
151
135
150
151
Dec-11
14
16
13.2
160
190
89.5
91.8
251
511,
250
247
245
244
242
240
238
238
238
238
238
4.41
1_2
23
4.97
4.49
5.3
7.89
8.31
7.09
7.74
7.09
7.3
7.4
I1.1
10.8
23
8.76
8.3
9.3
7,48
9.03
8.37
19
18
92.1
96,7
96.3
82.8
43.1
96.6
87.7
97.4
50.8
30.3
103
133
150
27.9
46.5
10.1
11,4
15
15.6
16.2
15.6
35
19
22
21
20
9_07
21
8
20
20
20
20
8.4
12
10.4
10.5
11.4
21
21
21
21
11.1
12.5
13.3
14.3
11.5
13.1
9
4.2
11
9.6
22
22
22
23
23
9.1
12.9
8.1
9.3
8.9
12.9
14.9
13.4
11.7
15.3
23
23
23
15
16
8
7.8
8.1
8.4
A
15
12.6
13.9
13
,
23
July 2013
1
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LF004, LF005, and LFOO6 RA-0 Report
(Page 2 of 3)
Background Wells
Analyte
Sulfate
Units
mgfL
Compliance Wells
Sample 5ai6mvv5 1 61116MVV3 6M6MW51 6M6MV1/6 I 61116114141
95% UTE,
Anat., le Concentration
Date
70.4
Jun-99
29.2
6.17
158
9.84
138
43.7
179
148
73.1
138
69.1
Oct-99
Jan-00
40.5
63.3
160
145
70.7
138
May-00
Jun-01
Dec-01
Jul-02
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
Ma/-04
May-05
Nov-05
Feb-06
Aug-06
Feb-07
Dec-07
Feb-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Sep-09
Dec-10
May-11
Dec -li
May-12
Dec-42
'MS
nit: I.
Jun-99
Oct-99,_
Jan -00
May-00
Jun-0l
Dec-01
Jul-02
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
May-04
May-05
Nov-05
Feb-06
Aug-06
Feb-07
Dec-07
Feb-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Sep-09
Dec-10
May-11
Dec-11
May-12
Dec-12
H'AManh A FR tfornu:r ABS X113 ;Sim. .5, &6ag12 Annual
43
69
59.8
67.1
60.1
63.3
127
42.3
39.3
48.9
76.2
45.6
67.3
67.5
68.4
68.4
47
46
47.7
48.2
49.2
69
67.4
72.5
70.3
74.7
51.3
54.8
60.7
54.4
57.4
55.9
61.8
79.1
69.1
72.4
72
77.5
79.2
81.3
56.1
57.7
54
360
384
389
352
426
423
550
525
462
424
450
481
459
433
451
490
440
485
472
470
508
488
455
686
628
480
79
709
702
695
707
740
696
840
i
-o+F-12-om I 3BA Lhaali
741
755
814
845
814
855
876
805
824
836
828
814
812
882
1470
1010
900
180
180
127
126
139
160
130
141
136
135
135
129
120
116
125
124
119
109
100
118
110
118
100
828
847
858
804
810
830
990
885
784
786
829
809
796
801
825
841
625
720
741
752
742
716
714
940
928
710
150
159
143
151
161
167
135
132
115
103
104
99.8
113
116
114
122
73
77.9
66.5
68.8
67.1
63.8
72.3
65.2
69
60.7
58.7
57.3
61.7
57
98
93
89
87
86
84
87
86
85
85
84
83
83
83
83
84
84
84
89.7
60.7
63.5
53.9
55.4
56.3
60.4
60.3
59.2
1110
57
85
758
791
760
776
696
896
298
920
795
759
643
733
648
634
636
730
743
680
678
659
588
600
594
612
752
806
690
755
1007
982
961
951
945
933
95.3
106
98.6
83.7
87
761
450
664
755
925
775
682
739
679
680
562
533
580
603
589
571
573
502
598
438
526
1150
598
480
84
84
85
85
1
948
936
925
922
920
926
935
939
946
955
955
957
960
961
962
962
965
973
986
992
July 2013
-
`-"
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LF004, LF005, and LF006 RA-O Report
March ARS and Fortner March AFB
1
(Page 3 of 3)
Analvte
PCE
Units
L
Background Wells
Compliance Wells
Sample
5M6MW5 I 6M6MW3 6M6MW5 I 6M6MVV6 1 6M6MW7
Anal e Concentration
Date
Jan-00
ND
0.08
ND
ND
ND
May-00
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Jun-01
Dec-01
0.84
0.52
0.58
0.41
0.41
Jul -02
1.2
0.79
0.65
0.79
Nov-02
ND
ND
ND
ND
May-03
ND
ND
ND
ND
Nov-03
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
May-04
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
May-05
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Nov-05
ND
ND
ND
0.58J
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Feb-06
Aug-06
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Feb-07
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dec-07
ND
ND
ND
ND
Feb-OS
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dec-08
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Jun-09
ND
ND
ND
ND
Sep-09
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dec-10
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
May-11
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
Dec-11
ND
ND
ND
ND
May-12
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
ND
D t.:- I 2-4-ND
1
-
95% 1.11I.,
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
1
I
1
Laboratory- Assigned Qualifiers:
J = Estimated analyte value between the method detection limit and report limit.
Notes:
1
Bolded data exceeds 95% UTL
percent
ng/L.
=
micrograms per liter
not sampled
Aug
=
August
Dec
=
December
Feb
=
February
January
=
Jan
July
=
July
June
=
June
mgIL
=
milligrams per liter
ND
=
not detected
Nov
=
November
Oct
October
tetrachloroethene
PCE
=
September
=
September
TDS
=
=
upper tolerance limit
UTL
P11,1 arch AFB IformerAR8112.0I3%5iles 4,50P-612012 Annual RA .0;f-12-0702138A Ann%
I
July 2013
MI MI =I OM
Ell
1111111
INN
ow gm NI 51No 4111.1k #40' am
0101,61
AECOM
March ARB and Fortner March AFB
TABLE 3-10.
LF006 LANDFILL GAS PROBE 2012 SAMPLING RESULTS
LFG Perimeter
Probe No.
Screen Depth
LFG-3
LFG-4
LFG-6
LFG-11
LFG-12
LFG-13a
LFG-13b
4-9
4-9
13 - 18
17.5 - 22.5
14.0 - 19.0
7.0 - 12.0
27.0 - 32.0
(Feet below
grade)
Quarter
Methane
Carbon
Dioxide
(% by
volume]
Q2
Q1
Q3
Q4
QI
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q3
Q4
Q2
Q3
0.0
0.0 - 0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0 0.0
6.3
1.1
0.9
1.1
2.9
3.0
2.2
2.3
12.9
19.5 17.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0,0
1.7
1.9
2.2
1.8
2.2
3.3
3.6
2.8
9.4
9.0
10.1
9.4
2.3
1.6
1.8
2.2
6.4
5.8
5.9
16.5
18.1
18.1
12.0
11.0 13.1
Q2
Oxygen
18.4 16.7 18.3 17.8 18.2 15.2
Balance
79.9 81.4 79.5 80.4 79.6 81.5 80.7 79.9 78.6 79.8 79.1 78.7 79.9 81.9 80.1 79.7 81.6 83.1 81.0 80.8 79.4 81.3
LFG Perimeter
Probe No.
Screen Depth
(feet below
grade)
Quarter
Methane
Carbon
Dioxide
(% by
volume)
15.7 17.3 12.0 11.2
10.8 11.9 17.8
19.8 17.9 17.3 16.3
79.1 79.2 79.7
LFG-14
LFG-15
LFG-16a
LFG-16b
LFG-17a
FG-17b
4.8 - 9.8
10.0 - 15.0
4.0 - 9.0
13.0 - 18.0
5.5 - 10.5
15.5 - 20.5
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
Q1
Q2
Q3
Q4
0.0 0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.5
0.5
4.7
3.5
2.9
3.0
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.6
2.2
1.6
1.6
1.9
4.7
1.4
1.7
2.2
1.0
4.3
4.6
4.9
18.1
19.7
13.5 15.1
15.1
Q2
Q1
1.1
Oxygen
19.8 17.8 19.9 19.6 16.4 15.9 17.9 17.7 20.4 18.6 20.6
Balance
79.3 81.3 79.6 79.9 78.9 80.6 79.2 79.3 79.2 81.0 79.0 79.5 78.9 81.2 78.9 78.9 80.8 81.3 79.4 79.7 79.3 82.2 80.3 80.0
19.9 18.9
17.2 19.5 19.2 14.5
17.3 18.9
QI
Ql, Q2, Q3, Q4
=
=
=
=
81.5 79.8 79.5
percent
landfill gas
number
First, Second, Third, and Fourth Quarters
wrklarch Ara cionnel A Raa20115iies 4,5,&6\21112 Annual 11A-01r12.07E12BA
1.1
17.9 19.4
Notes:
LFG
No.
Q4
July 2013
.1_ _LC,. J_
1
.1_
1.1_
11
I
/
i cxyc
Z
v vl tvl
AECOM
TABLE 3-11.
LFOO6 RESTRICTIONS/INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS
(Page I of 2)
DTSC Site Code: 400090
Site or Operable Unit (OU): Site 6, OU-2
Record of Decision
dated April 2004
Parcel: 1-3
Owner: March Joint Powers Authority
(ROD)IDate:
OU-2 ROD
Inspected By Tony English, AECOM Technical Services
Date: 25 September 2012
Time: 1135
Reviewed By: Jerry W. Bingham, AFCEC/CZRB
Date: 25 January2013
Point of Contact/Telephone/email: Jerry W. Bingham, (210) 536-5978, jerry.binghamOus.af.mil
Observation Performed By: Site Visit during Operations and Maintenance of Landfill (e.g., drive-by,
fly over, walk in, etc.)
Site 6 was inspected for compliance with the restrictions/institutional controls (ICs) as stated in the Early
Transfer Deed which are part of the remedy specified in the OU-2 ROD. Steps to bring into compliance
are described for any violations noted.
Violation
Noted
(Yes/No)
Steps to bring Violation
into Compliance
(Write Not Applicable if
No Violation)
Prohibited Uses: A residence, including mobile homes or factory
built housing, constructed or installed for use as residential human
habitation, a hospital for human care, a public or private school for
persons under 18 years of age, or a day care center for children.
No
Not Applicable
The Owner shall not conduct or allow others to conduct at Site 6 any
construction, excavation, drilling, grading, removal, trenching, filling
earth movement, mining, or planting that would disturb the soil or the
landfill cover, including the vegetative cap, or the injection or release
No
Not Applicable
No
Not Applicable
Restriction/Control
of water or other fluids except for the purpose of monitoring
groundwater or landfill gas.
The Owner shall not conduct or allow others to conduct at Site 6
activities resulting in any contaminated soils brought to the surface by
grading, excavation, trenching or backfdling.
WP1Maxti A1'
foi-in, ARE11120I3l5ites 4.3,&612012 Arum! RA-0+12-070213M ..rk3cx
July 2013
IPIPMJIPM111111.1
AECOM
LFOO6 RESTRICTIONS /INSTITUTIONAL CONTROLS
(Page 2 of 2)
(Yes/No)
Steps to bring Violation
into Compliance
(Write Not Applicable if
No Violation)
No
Not Applicable
Violation
Noted
Restriction/Control
Prohibited Activities at Site 6:
a)
Extraction of groundwater from the property for any purpose
other than monitoring.
b)
Activities that would cause disturbance of or removal of fencing
or signs intended to exclude the public from the landfill.
No
Not Applicable
c)
Activities that would cause the surface application of water (e.g.,
irrigation) to the extent that the integrity of the landfill is
impacted and injection of water or other fluids that might affect
groundwater flow direction.
No
Not Applicable
d)
Activities that would cause disturbance of any landfill
No
Not Applicable
Activities that limit access to any landfill equipment and systems,
including the leachate collection system, the groundwater
monitoring systems, and settlement monuments, or the drainage,
sub-drainage, or erosion controls for the landfill cover.
No
Not Applicable
Air Force and regulatory agencies have reasonable right of entry and
No
Not Applicable
No
Not Applicable
equipment and systems, including the leachate collection system, the
groundwater monitoring systems, and settlement monuments, or the
drainage, sub-drainage, or erosion controls for the landfill cover.
e)
access.
Access for Implementing Operation and Maintenance of Site 6.
Other Remarks or Comments: No violations of ICs included in the Early Transfer Deed were noted.
AFB
AFCEC/C2RB
=
DISC
=
IC
=,
OU
ROD
=
=
Air Force Base
Air Force Civil Engineer Center/Environmental Center of Excellence/Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC)
Support
Department of Toxic Substances Control (State of California)
Institutional Control
Operable Unit
Record of Decision
AFS (former A R131120131Sito 4,5,14612012 Aortal RA-01F12-070,21313A.liocx
July 2013
1
1
AECOM
LIST OF FIGURES
1-1
Vicinity Map of March ARB
1-2
Sites LF004, LF005, and LF006 Location Map
2-1
LF004 Site Map
D 2-2
LF005 Site Map
2-3
LF006 Site Map
3-1
LF006 Groundwater Surface Map March 2012
D 3-2
D.
LF006 Groundwater Surface Map May 2012
3-3
LF006 Groundwater Surface Map September 2012
3-4
LF006 Groundwater Surface Map November 2012
3-5
LF006 Summary of Groundwater Elevation
WRMarch AFB {former ARB)12013+Siles 4.5,86%2012 Annual RA OLF12.4:1702138A.Liou
July 2013
002751m Narclit P11 um illagrR 01.010m
RANCHO
943)
CUCAMONGA
SAN BERNARDINO
FONTANA
Los Angeles
60 Miles
San Bernardino
International Airport
ONTARIO
Ontano
International Arrport
CHINO
Palm Springs
20 Miles
Central Avenue
BEAUMONT
NORCO
6'44f d40/4,7.0
(46.fr
CORONA
913
Nuevo Road
PE RIS
Explanation
HEMET
- - .- Former March Air Force Base
I
1
Property Retained by
Air Force Reserve Command
Sites LF004, LF005, & LF0D8 Landfill Annual Report
Site LF004
Vicinity Map of March ARB
AECOM AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
AFB
Air Force Base
ARB
CA
Air Reserve Base
California
NORTH
LAKE
0
2$
ELSINORE
San-Diego
90 Miles
SCALE IN MILES
I
43
Date 2-13
Project No.
60271680
A=COM
March ARB and Former March AFB, CA
Figure
1-1
Cactus Avenue
Iris
Avenue
-SITE LFOO6
Nanciirta
Avenue
a
Explanation
Site Boundary
-a
AECOM AECOM Technical Services. Inc.
AFB
ARB
CA
Sites LF004. LF005, & LFOO6 Landfill Annual Report
Base Boundary
Sites LFOO4, LFOO5, and LFOO6
.1.
Location Map
NORTH
Air Force Base
Air Reserve Base
California
0
1650
SCALE IN FEET
2300
Date 2-13
Project No
6027t680
A=COM
1----
Figure
1 -2
44
.
A.
.
_
I
4;
,
.
so
li
-11,
4
"
_
I
COMMISSARY
1
"1-4
4
--.`"...f. 174Pf
7,
TN.
NOR
FLA
ft
, .
f
... .
I
e
4
.
.
4111....1--._!..
11,
, .*roc
....,
4
..._.
.ig 4.,
STRIP LANDFILL
A LFG-;".
Sal-4
4Pg
CO4 <::>
4PZ9
4EX02
LFG-3
4PZ1G
a
Z12
dlEXIM
LFai
STRIP LAND
4
It
a
RIP-RAP
PROTECTIVE
LAYER
Y STREET
Subdrain Daylights
Flow into South
SOUTH FLAG
Drainage Di ch le
SM-1
Explanation
GI
Monitoring Well Location
3
Monument Location
Perimeter Subdrain Cleanout
LFG Probe
Site Boundary
Perimeter Subdrain System
Sites LFOO4. LFOO5. & LF006 Landfill Annual Report
Fence
AECOM AECOM Technical Services. Inc
AFB
Air Force Base
ARB
Air Reserve Base
CA
LFG
California
Landfill Gas
LF004 Site Map
Tc
Perrisyarley
Storm Drain
Date 2-13
Project No
80271680
A:COM
Figure
2-1
Explanation
Extraction Well Location
14if
Site Boundary
Sites LF004. LF005, & LF006 Lanofik Annual Report
Fence
LF005 Site Map
AFB
Air Force Base
ARB
Air Reserve Base
CA
California
SCALE IN FEET
A:COM
Figure
2-2
VAN BU
BOULEVARD
DRAIN OUTFALL
a
r
eroANHoLE
LFG -1
RS -2
LFG-13a
C01
LFG-136 0
-
0
61Vri%
A D S, .5
.
.100.11
SM-7
LFG-15
CO3
e'EMGMW1
St ;HORAN
PERIMETER DRAIN
OUTFALL
SM-6
LFG-12 Op ADS5
SM-8
SM -S
'
SUBDRAIN 2
ADS3
SM-4.5
SLIBDF?.AIN 3
SUBDRAIN
c
SM-3
Sm4
LFG -1
LFGA
SM-1
LFG-11
COT ,4
Ka
MAIN GATE
VVF,
C.
-410t
C06
Ler.,5-1
LFG-17an,
LFG-176
cps
2
4.
176-4
suBDRA
C
Explanation.
s
O
3
POC Well
Background Well
LCRS Monitoring Point
Perimeter Subdrain Cleanout
Monument Location
LFG Monitoring Point
Landfill Subdrain Cleanout
Gate
Fence
Perimeter Subdrain System
Landfill Subdrain System
Site Boundary
AFB
Air Force Base
ARB
Air Reserve Base
California
CA
LCRS
Leach ate Collection and
Removal System
LFG
Landfill Gas
POC
Point of Compliance
11
Sites LF004 LF005. & LF006 Landfill Annual Report
LF006 Site Map
Date 2-/3
SCALE IN FEET
,c4
i
Project No
60271680
A.:COM
March ARO and Former March AFB. CA
Figure
2-3
March-12
TOC
Water
Depth
OW
Elevation
Well ID
(feat amsl)
(feet)
(feet amsn
5M6MVV2
1643.12
24.52
1618.60
5M6MVV5
1696.33
46.51
1649.82
43.42
1632.62
32.17
6106MW1
6M6MVV3
1688.13
1644.39
25.19
1655.96
1620.12
1619.20
1647.94
27.20
1620.74
6M6MW5
6M6MW6
6M6MW7
24.19
"252
MAIN GATE
30' FIRE BREAK
Explanation
ei)
-1855- Groundwater Surface Contour
-40.- Groundwater Flow Direction
Gate
Fence
AECOM
AFB
F
)7)
arnsl
ARB
CA
OW
ID
TOC
Site Boundary
AECOM Technical Services. Inc
Air Force Base
above mean sea level
Air Reserve Base
California
Groundwater
Identification
Top of Casing
Sites LF004. LF005. & LF006 Landfiil Annual Report
LFOO6 Groundwater Surface Map
March 2012
Date 2-13
Project No
60271680
A.:COM
Figure
3-1
May-12
TOC
vVaier
Depth
GW
Elevation
Well ID
(feel auks!)
(roan
(feet am sl)
5M6MW2
1643.12
5M6MVV5
1698.33
24 73
46.70
1618.39
1649.63
6M6MW1
1676.04
43.55
1632.49
6M6MW3
1688.13
6M6MW5
1655.79
24.32
1619.99
6M6M1M3
1644.39
25.51
1618.88
6M6MW7
1647.94
27.48
1620.46
30' FIRE BREA
Explanation
19
-1655- Groundwater Surface Contour
-IP- Groundwater Flow Direction
Gate
Fence
Site Boundary
AFB
Air Force Base
amsl
ARB
Air Reserve Base
CA
California
GW
Groundwater
ID
Identification
TOC
Top of Casing
Sites LF004. LF005. & LF006 Landfill Annual Report
LF006 Groundwater Surface Map
May 2012
Date 2-13
SCALE IN FEET
10.
60271680
Figure
3-2
September-12
Well ID
TOC
Water
Depth
OW
Elevation
OW amen
Veen
(teal arnsh
1643.12
16 8 19
5M6MVV5
1696.33
6M6MW1
1676.04
43.75
1632.29
6M6MW3
6M6MW5
6M6MW5
6M6MW7
1688.13
32.90
1855.23
24.52
1619.79
1644.39
1647.94
1649.21
1618.49
1619.90
SITE 6
30' FIRE BREAK
Explanation
1655- Groundwater Surface Contour
-P.- Groundwater Flow Direction
Gate
-m-x- Fence
Site Boundary
AECOM AECOM Technical Services, Inc.
Air Force Base
AFB
emsi
ARB
Air Reserve Base
CA
California
GW
Groundwater
LID
Identification
TOC
Top of Casing
I
Sites LF004, LF005, & LF006 Landfill Annual Report
September 2012
Date 2-13
AXOM
60271680
March ARB and Former March AFB. CA
Figure
3-3
November-12
TOC
Water
Depth
GW
Elevation
Well ID
(feet amse
SM6MW2
1643.12
24.91
1618.21
5M6MW5
1696.33
47.41
1648.92
6M6MW1
1676.04
43.86
1632.18
6M6MW3
6M6MW5
1688.13
33.10
1655.03
1644.31
1619.81
5M6MV1.16
1844 39
24.50
25.83
6M5MW7
1847.94
27.99
16/9.95
{feel amsil
1618.56
611,161IAW5
;I: chief,/ v,r3
le/e_56
30'
IRE BR
Explanation
19
- +655- Groundwater Surface Contour
-IN- Groundwater Flow Direction
ti
Gate
Fence
Site Boundary
Air Force Base
AFB
amsi
ARB
Air Reserve Base
CA
California
GW
Groundwater
ID
Identification
TOC
Top of Casing
Sites LF004. LF005. & LF006 Landfill Annual Report
November 2012
Date 2-13
60271680
Figure
March ARB and Former March AFB. CA
3-4
March AR #
Page 58 of 201
2757
Groundwater Elevation (feet above mean sea level)
c
i-"
tcn
n.)
c
1--k
cn
cn
o
vii
c= 1
cn
U
0
U,
February-06
August-06
December-06
February-07
May-07
IP-
September-07
December-07
February-08
June-08
Vi
October-08
3
3
Decem ber -08
March-09
o -n
0
June-09
tb
September-09
12.
Decem ber -09
-Ti
- 8
March-10
47
August-10
m
eD
rt
December-10
0)
5
March-11
May-11
October-11
November-11
March-12
May-12
September-12
November-12
t
E
if
1I
E
EEEE2EE
AECOM
LIST OF APPENDICES
Appendix A Inspection and Maintenance Forms
Appendix B Photographic Documentation
Appendix C Laboratory Analytical Results and Validation Reports
Appendix D Leachate Nonhazardous Waste Manifests
Appendix E 2012 Statistical Analysis Results
Si,
Appendix F Summary of Historical Landfill Gas Probe Results
WP;March APS (fanner ARE)L2011LSiLes 4.5.46)2012 Annual RA -OWS4-1:170213BA.donx
July 2013
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LF004, LFX15, and LFC106 RA-0 Report
APPENDIX A
INSPECTION AND MAINTENANCE FORMS
WPMarch AFB garner A RBB-2/3131Sites 4,5,&61-2011 Annual RA-01F12,070213BA.cloca
July 2013
IRP Site 4 - March ARB, California
Landfill No. 6 Field Inspection Log
Page 1 of 4
Groundwater Monitoring Wells, Landfill Gas Perimeter Probes, Securit Fencin
11 0 0
Date.
Time:
inspected by:
Signed: c- .7
4".
Inspection Requirements: Quarterly, or after significant weather or other major eients.
Quarterly
Post Disaster
Groundwater Monitoring Wells:
Type
Yes
No
Remarks
Wells 4PZ01, 4PZ02, 4PZ03, 4PZ04, 4PZ05, 4PZ06, 4MW1, 4PZ9, 4PZ10, 4PZ11, 4PZ12, 4EX01, and 4EX02.
Monitoring Wells Inspected?
V
Inspection of Casing?
Inspection of Caps?
Inspection of Locks?
Inspection of Concrete Aprons?
Lubricate Well Hinges?
Other Damage? Repairs Necessary?
Photo Documentation?
Landfill Gas Probes:
V
yr'
4/7 A
7
---------4ek
V
Yes
-
Remarks
No
Probes: LFG4-1, LFG4-2, LFG4-3, LFG 4-4, LFG4-5, LFG4.6 (a, b), LFG4-7, LFG4-8 (a, b), LFG4-9, LFG4-10.
Landfill Gas Probes Inspected?
Inspection of Caps?
ty
tit
Security Fencing:
Yes
Remarks
No
Damaged Fencing or Posts?
Gates in Good Working Condition?
v".
Gate Locks Secured?
Locks in Good Working Condition?
Debris Buildup along Fence?
,
e.st.
VF
-e
1 4\--S ico,,woa-c;
.\42.41.
r."--
Warning Signs Secure and in Place?
.Sp..cskty
L" "
,r .v4 eso , t. k
r.4 ie
IRP Site 4 March ARB, California
Landfill No. 6 Field Inspection Log (Continued)
Page 2 of 4
Landfill Cover, Heacock Channel Rip Rap Layer,
Date:
/i-b-t--
1-5-1
Inspected by:
Channel 8th Street Drain
(. 'CO
Time:
, .- .7 ,,,,.....
Signed:
.'"- -T, -E. : i5 t t .S(,./
I
I
'
Inspection Requirements: Quarterly, or after significant weather or other major everds_
Quarterly
Ct
Type
Post Disaster
Cover Inspection:
Top Erosion/Cracking?
/
Yes
Remarks
No
4.
AtkL A
An, 0 4-
...S41/4
Membrane Liner Exposed?
Vegetation Cover Intact?
Riprap Erosion?
Animal Burrows?
//
X-
Woody Vegetation?
4-
,
Settlement Monuments?
Ponding of Water?
Slope Stability/Failures?
Presence of Trash or Litter?
7
Alcslz
y
0
,
Heacock Channel Rip Rap Layer
t/
I
No
Remarks
Damaged? Repairs Necessary?
Overflow Channel
I
I
V
Disturbance? Repairs Necessary?
i
1
V/
Yes
-
A 0J-
4--(=-A
I
.t/
Slumping?
li:ASe._
Yes
No
Remarks
Yes
No
/
Remarks
I
Channel Blocked?
Erosion or Other Damage Noted?
8111 Street Drain
Drainage Ditches Blocked?
/
I
I
Page 3 of 4
Drainage and Subdrain System: South Flag and Strip_Landfill/North Flag
Date:
3- S-
Inspected by:
Time:
gnit.c
/
30
Signed,
;07-'
Inspection Requirements: Quarterly, or after significant weather or other major ev
Quarterly 1/1-1 )
Post Disaster
Type
Drainage and Subdrain System: South Flag
Yes
No
Remarks
Break Away Gates in
Working Condition?
Cleanout Risers Intact?
Cleanout Risers Cleaned?
L.7-
V7i----
Subdrain Blocked?
Drainage Ditches/Channels Blocked?
--
V
Drainage and Subdrain System: Strip Landfill/North Flag
Yes
No
Remarks
Break Away Gates in
Working Condition?
1.7
7-
Subdrain Blocked?
Note: Clear vegetation and debris from cleanout risers when they are being inspected v7--
IRP Site 4 March ARB, California
Page 4 of 4
General Remarks and items Requiring Corrective Action
Date:
-5-
4
Time:
Inspected by.
/1
Signed:
Inspection Requirements: Quarterly, or after significant weather or other major ev6rits.
Quarterly( I
Post Disaster
Type
General Remarks and Items Requiring Corrective Action:
kkk
r
'4w1A-
k._.34ta_
liek\s&S) cAk4
cP4,0,Nvk
..01.
e) 5
` Ns
-
43+;
-__14EARS
MI WU Mt Mt MIN Mk NW MN OM 111. 2 7 1111, Wit criR 4:fin NO OMPage11,05 atgap
201 sum
1RP Site 4 - March ARS, California
Landfill No. 6
Perimeter Probe Field Monitorin. L
Monitoring Date:
Well ID
..3_ 1 1D
j Time
Sampling performed by:
1 CH4
02
CO2
Bel
E its ift
Stet Pres
Comments
MRCHLFG4-6a
i '44i6
0,Q
nup
0,0
13
0,0
i_-_,Z4.5
01.0
rk5 1
0.0 0,1441.4.,
6, ,1 ilo.ti
fro, ,g?
i la ...2 /PC-0
MRCHLFG4-6b
MRCHLFG4-7
MRCHLFG4-8a
MRCHLFG4-8b
MRCHLFG4-9
MRCHLFG4 -1O
Hos 0, 0
lq, I
go, (_)
o e 6-.)
IS ','
go, el
o,0
;3Y
I 6 ,g
fc t
0 p
1 ,Q
/ &_,-5
8a. "
0E
4::),
if
ii
I
44.7.6-
ke.,zi-
4,5-, ,,/ 416,
.9-97476.
CI
0
.0
0.---0
,
Landfill No. 4 - Field Inspection Log,
Page 1 of 4
Groundwater Monitoring Wells, Landfill Gas Probes, Securi
j/10
Time
Date:
Inspected by: j
I
Fencing
Signed:
5t
Inspection Requirements: Quarterly, or after significant weather or other Major ev nts,
Quarterly k,
I
Post Disaster
Type
Yes
Remarks
No
Well 5M6MW2, 5M6MW5, 6M6MW1, 6M6MW3, 6M6MW5, 6M6MW6, 6M6MW7
Inspection of Caps?
Inspection, Lubrication of Locks?
V.--
Other Damage? Repairs necessary?
Yes
No
Remarks
Probes: LFG6-3, LFG6-4, LFG6-6, LFG6-11, LFG6-12, LFGB -13 (a, b), LFG6-14, LFG6-15, LFG6-16 (a, b)
LFG6-17 (a, b).
Inspection of Caps?
v""--
4//4
Security Fencing:
Yes
No
Remarks
Gate Locks Secured?
i1600.44.. AVol'AIZ4-
`.4.4"N.S24..
Landfill No. 4 - Field Inspection Log (Continued)
Page 2 of 4
Landfill Cover, Drainage arid_Syydrain Systenl, RipRaplzp,or
Date:
L:4- /9- /3--/=-1)-
Inspected by:
Time:
"./, F.,,k lt,cIN
Signed.
-,3
- ',,,_,,,,
Inspection Requirements: Quarterly, or after significant weather or other
Quarterly
Post Disaster
--.7 od
ajar eve4s.
Type
Cover Inspection:
Yes
Remarks
No
Slumping?
Riprap Erosion?
Animal Burrows?
ca.v.
Woody Vegetation?
=.tr a c. ct 4645
V
Pending of Water?
Slope Stability /Failures?
V
ti
Drainage and Subdrain System:
Yes
Collect Subdrain Sample?
Remarks
No
00/
Location of Sampling Point? Depth?
MH-2
Confined Space Entry Completed?
tV/14
Condition of Subdrain? Is it Blocked?
Cleanout Riser Pipe Intact?
Vegetation in Ditches/Channels?
Damage or Repairs Necessary?
Rip Rap Layer
4
/
vr/
Yes
/
/
No
/
Remarks
Note: Clear vegetation and debris from cleanout risers when they are being inspected.
sr-
Page 3 of 4
Leachate Collection Recovery System
Date:
Time:
0d
,re
Inspected by:
Signed:
Fns ti $.1.4
CF:
Inspection Requirements: Quarterly, or after significant weather or other major evoi'lts.
Quarterly y7 L
Type
Post Disaster
Leachate Collection Recovery System Checks:
LCRS-1
LCRS Inspected? Condition?
Depth of Water Collected in System?
Damage or Repairs necessary?
Photo documentation?
Yes
/
7
Remarks
No
-----
9c
(...:, /. 46
___
V
If depth of water is greater than 18" answer the following
LCRS Sample Collected?
Initial Pumping Time (min)?
Initial Pumping Volume?
Recovery Time?
Subsequent Pumping Time?
Subsequent Pumping Volume?
LCRS-2
/
Yes
V/
7
initial Pumping Time (min)?
Recovery Time?
AI /!
No
Remarks
s.n.firt
7
fa8:a
Page 4 of 4
General Remarks and Items Re ttutM3Soractiye Action
Time:
EA,
Inspected by.
sIA.
I
PM,
'4 rya
(.?
Signed:
Inspection Requirements: Quarterly, or after significant weather or other n1ajor evens.
Quarterly I
Type
Post Disaster
I
A
\.`'.440. C"k
ckl-QtA...itvk 0
oi.ss
C
ozji,
Iv)
...2_,EulickkLixttes
wkre.)
$14:271:AV
ca
kNt.
is
March AR #
2757
Page 70 of 201
Landfill No. 4
Perimeter Probe Field Monitoring La
Peri I
Probe Monitoring Data
Monitoring Date:
Well ID
MRCHLFG6-3
5 -7 __i_.
Time
1 CH4
tY.S4
0
/_;;e,c)
o, o
/Si()
0,0
March ARB Site 6, Landfill #4
CO2
i
1 02
1
iik 1
e
Bal
4-7-; an
:
0
'
MRCHLFG6-11
,11.7
LCS6
0 .0 4117;7-a-'14
itpos-
0a
6Y
4)11/
0,0
0,0
3,o
MRCHLFG6-12
MRCHLFG6-13a
MRCHLFG6-13b
.
lig jr,i
ge 3
/6.p.c3
1.I
0.0
/Si g G:0
fep.)
MRCHLFG6-16a
MRCHLFG6-16b
MRCHLFG6-17a
is.
V, 7
0 .c")
8°-i
a, 0
a°
8
IC/S
i ?,3
'net
0,0
/21, 9
0,0
1f2, 3
c ,C)
MRCHLFG6-14
MRCHLFG6-15
0.0
i gia '24 6
,P ..g.
o ,/
ci 8
4.1
14,t/
Comments
Stat Pres
MRCHLFG6-4
MRCHLFG6-6
ft S tN
E
o: 0
e.) 6
'216-,9
l
1
0 ,t)
0 ,t1
i.S312jya
,; R
..QD,e1;
1"),S
/./i 9
Ige-71
1
00
i
1,,,,--e.
...4
,
Co a
--C
MRCHLFG6-17b
MB- -.
il
00
UM Mt MO
i. 0
19,7
]
'79,
1111
1111111
gm mg inn MN in
March AFB Site 6, Landfill 4
Groundwater Depth Log
Oct-11
Well ID
5M6MW2
5M6MW5
6M6MW1
6M6MW3
6M6MW5
6M6MW6
6M6MW7
1
TOC
a
1643.12
1696.33
1676,04
1688.13
1644.31
1644.39
1647.94
Water
Depth
24.68
46/5
43.30
31.54
24.30
25.39
27.42
GW
Elevation
1618.44
1650.08
1632.74
3 -12
Water Depth
3-9-i.1
9t.ip_s2
_5(9s/
a,a
1656.59
1620.01
1619.00
jg..17
1620.52
,z17..,20
gtidg
ASA
I
Table 2-2.
Groundwater Monitoring Wells, Landfill Gas Perimeter Probes, Security Fencing, and
Landfill Cover
Date:
/5-- 10.
/,r-/6-
13c,c'
Time:
Inspected by:
Signed:
Yes
Remarks
No
Wells 4PZ01, 4PZ02, 4PZ03, 4PZ04, 4PZ05, 4PZ06, 4MW1, 4PZ9, 4PZ10, 4PZ11, 4PZ12, 4EX01, and 4EX02.
I
_
Inspection of Caps?
V
LZ
V
II
4412 1 <<l
-
/1//A
0,4-ILA air.-.
V
I
V
Yes
No
I
Remarks
Probes: LFG4-1, LFG4-2, LFG4-3, LFG 4-4, LFG4-5, LFG4-6 (a, b), LFG4-7, LFG4-8 (a, b), LFG4-9, LFG4-10.
I
I
I
Inspection of Caps?
1
I
(Vi ilt
2-10
V/r
IRP Sites 4 & 6 OM&M Work Plan Addendum
I
WP/5/1 5/121069-10
1
I
Table 2-2. (Continued)
Landfill Cover
Date:
S-/S- /0,
Inspected by:
Time:
Signed:
t_s L
Security Fencing:
Yes
/ c)C3
e=7----.,,r"
Remarks
No
Gate Locks Secured?
V
Nae.--0
1/F
urilcAV VVe-vP vu.A.Aoss 53.
40. ilea..
.
Cover Inspection:
Yes
Remarks
No
of
oor
etc
Slumping?
Riprap Erosion?
Animal Burrows?
/14414(CM
S
l
Cr
;11Clt, tv
S.C.AQ'r
Woody Vegetation?
Ponding of Water?
VP/5115/121069-10
2-11
March ARB, California
Landfill Cover
IRP Site 4
Date:
5--
Inspected by:
Time:
/ 0.3 :)
Signed:
). Ed.51
/
Inspection Requirements: Quarterly, or after significant weather or other major events.
Quarterly
Type
Post Disaster
I
Yes
Remarks
No
7
,..
...
11,=,11.zN Qt.oritZt-Vi.se, --V-vs
....,...li `ktr<e)
\- ...
V
e. A.5
1 xi Cili-e.- 1.--%
I
i
Drainage and Subdrain System: South Flag
Yes
No
Remarks
Break Away Gates in
Working Condition?
v"
I
I
17-
Subdrain Blocked?
I/
V
I
I
2-12
1IRP Sites 4 & 6 OM&M Work Plan Addendum
WP/5/1 5i1 21069-10
Landfill Cover
Date:
57-/6"-
Time:
/..1 Oc.)
Signed:
Inspected by:
Yes
No
Remarks
Break Away Gates in
117
Working Condition?
VV.
Subdrain Blocked?
Quarterly
V
Post Disaster
Type
WP/5/15/121069-10
2-13
Landfill Cover
Time:
Date:
1-7FJC\)(t55 14
Inspected by:
/ S-0 c,
Signed:
--L
e
e
N, COlAckAN
ctsLakC r /An...111
sv.A.31 41\\."J
2-14
LA.
X
1;rx
e.I,eJ
341.1.4.7
cOtaatik
A-3
ut_
Vidsc,u
N01%
rh
4-1/4.cro
L.44
e
)
V.2 k1
1RP Sites 4 & 6 OM&M Work Plan Addendum
WP1511511 21069 1 0
Table 2-3.
Groundwater Monitoring Wells, Landfill Gas Probes, Security Fencing, and Landfill Cover
Date:
f?
Inspected by:
irc,f)
Time:
Signed:
11-5 11
Yes
No
Remarks
Inspection of Caps?
V
Other. Damage? Repairs necessary?
V
Yes
No
Remarks
Probes: LFG6-3, LFG6-4, LFG6-6, LFG6-11, LFG6-12, LFG6-13 (a, b), LFG6-14, LFG6-15, LFG6-16 (a, b)
LFG6-17 (a, b)-
V
Inspection of Caps?
V
W/4-
(v,
-------
WPI511 5112J069-1 0
V
1RP Sites 4 & 6 OM&M Work Ran Addendum
2-15
I
Groundwater Monitoring Wells, Landfill Gas Probes, Security Fencing, and Landfill Cover
Date:
Time:
....1.--.6>""
Inspected by:
(us Li
Security Fencing:
!lot' 0
1
SignecL
Yes
Remarks
No
Gate Locks Secured?
t,..---
Cover Inspection:
4
V
Yes
V
Atk!,0 AIL. 4-40c_ti-e_ Oria.Ae_
ed.A.4142.- -rd C. A.,
V
t.7.--
_______
I
Remarks
No
a
i
17-
Slumping?
17--
v"--
Riprap Erosion?
Animal Burrows?
tf7
Woody Vegetation?
..,
0 i-A. 5
5
------- 1
111
Ponding of Water?
I
7,
1
1./
tr7
I
2-16
wpistisi127069-1
1
Groundwater Monitoring Wells, Landfill Gas Probes, Security Fencin
Date:
_S--30-
rL
Time:
Inspected by:
and Landfill Cover
e Ord
Signed:
I LS k-k
%.)
4e-N.C1,A.
LA.; -:.tic,
C. CA*,
4\13
/..Se
c3
L
c:c-""
J ilt..r
c . o. 13AS
ikt-t
Q_
CeUel-
"A
Cr
ecyke
vo-kr's
ar A
-e7.-
A04114`
4
e orke_r=k-
Quarterly
V"
Post Disaster
Type
WM/15/12/069-10
2-17
Landfill No. 4 - Field Inspection Log
LCRS S stem, Subd rain, and Drainage System
Date: 3 /V-Inspected by:
Time:
-77-4itt-c
Signed:
V
LCRS-1
Yes
Remarks
No
66:
V
/1740-?-
Recovery Time?
2-18
WP/5/15/12/069 -1 0
LCRS System, Subdrain, and Drainage System
Date:
/"1-- 49"-
Inspected by:
---77
Time:
Cied c?'
I(S L
Signed:
LCRS-2
Yes
V
/-
Remarks
No
ac,
V
/ye
.
Recovery Time?
Drainage and Subdrain System:
Yes
No
Remarks
Collect Subdrain Sample?
MH-2
Condition of Subdrain? Is it Blocked?
WP/5/15/12/069-10
!RP Sites 4 & 6 OM&M Work Plan Addendum
2-19
LCRS S stem, Subdrain, and Draina e S stem
Time:
Date:
Ek2 J1 is
Inspected by:
/c5c.,42
Signed:
V
Rip Rap Layer
Yes
V
V
V
Remarks
tr.-4
Se}t:tri)
C rNe
-jiS
A
Quarterly
Post Disaster
2-20
7.
Type
INP/5/1511 2106910
1
1
-
Table 2-4.
Landfill No. 6
Perimeter Probe Field Monitoring Log
--
Perimeter Probe Monitoring Data
Monitoring Date:
,._4-±i6ja
Well ID
Time
MRCHLFG4-6a
1 Sampling performed by:
CH4
CO2
02
Stet Pies
Bal
--______-------
I0
,i k
Comments
--/,--k-r7c,;
u3cdt,
iino z erRANK3
MRCHLFG4-6b
1_44g
MRCHLFG4-7
.0
I
0
11.1(
elf 1
tio,"/40_
g' /, .3
0, 0
91
4,49--
i,-167,/.
6,0
/.. 0
1F,7
4-9-S/
0i0
8
/.
1126
89,0
nii
6.0
Ist,3
1,1
gl.
irt,
T0.
7
4y10
C)
MRCHLFG4-8a
MRCHLFG4-8b
MRCHLFG4-9
MRCHLFG4-10
I
VVP/Sf151121069-10
I
"
e..
-1-1._2
2ZL'I'
LI
C,
.
7
0
.t_p
/3 , tilt,
.
ac', 0
f
13
2-21
Landfill No. 4- Field Inspection Log
LCRS_Sysitrn, Subdrain, and Draina9e_Systern
Time
Date
Inspected by:
. 77
Signed
7
Yes
Rip Rap Layer
Remarks
No
7
General Remarks and Items Requiring Corrective Action
v
.t
ks
A,s.4.e.4,..
ve.Sia
2-20
1.\0e.
.30,3
A
A:
t,
rct.s.ilf&A tEksl_s;s42),Ay4-
lRP Sites 4 & 6 OM&M Work Plan Addendum
WP+12/15110,9)69.1 0
lRP Site 6
LCRS System, Subdrain, and Drainage System
Time:
Date.
Inspected by:
--7-ef, Esfl ((.5
/S13
Signed:
Quarterly V
Post Disaster
WP/1.N S 517 OrEf39- 1.0
Type
2-21
March AFB Site 6, Landfill 4
Groundwater Depth Log
1
Sep-12
Well ID
5M6MW2
5M6MW5
6M6MW1
6M6MW3
6M6MW5
6M6MW6
6M6MW7
TOC
1643.12
1696.33
1676.04
1688.13
1644.31
1644.39
1647.94
Water
Depth
24.73
46.70
43.55
32.34
24.32
25.51
27.48
Water Depth
GW
Elevation
1618.39
1649.63
1632.49
1655,79
1619.99
1618.88
1620.46
._
_A.q..93
ifidot
4c,73
..9
9._.
ITirt
A8.Qtr,
a
I 1cl
L.11
/
o
/
of
GU1
Table 2-5.
Landfill No. 4
Perimeter Probe Field Monitoring Lo
1
Monitoring Date:
Sampling performed by: -7'
.
_...
Well ID
Time
MRCHLFG6-3
MRCHLFG6-4
102
CO2
Stat Pres
Bal
44100411fry 4-% . 0
11:5- D o
.r21
Lg. t'l
.
3.4.
cii. --i-
is: e 86, 6
0, C)
0, 0
;3q0 6)0
10
to, i(
fl. 0
/WO
i2, O
5. ck
i.5, I
1. 0
iga5- 0,6)
__Lf,v;
Ici,v
e21, 0
0, 0
,;14(
tit 0
n '2
0,0
6 ,20 0
li --7
t%
MRCHLFG6-11
0t
MRCHLFG6-12
MRCHLFG6-13a
WIRCHLFG6-13b
/4'i9
0,O
idq-0
0.0
MRCHLFG6-14
6.
MRCHLFG6-15
MRCHLFG6-16a
Comments
13/5.
1
MRCHLFG6-6
CH4
/Slo
15,45 0 .0
c,
/11,11
.
.
0
-ir
,
0
Lg,c)
FM f
A0-
lc). 7
7 t, 9
,0
?R',, c
, c)
.a.1-er
c--_)
C)
MRCHLFG6-16b
MRCHLFG6-17a
MRCHLFG6-17b
WP/12i1
MSS 10
e) °a
I. '7
14,i-
/icy &a
I. k
(r 0
V9,3
0,
4,40
41:7
/
ea, :3
0,0
.1.5,15
0.0
RP Sites 4 & 6 OM&M Work Plan Addendum
2-23
rage oo of Lui
z
Table 2-2.
Landfill Cover
Date
ie." -FA
/
Time:
10- z
Inspected by:
MAO
/ 0 eoc>
Signed:
\A_
s.J
Yes
Remarks
No
Wells 4PZ01, 4PZ02, 4PZ03, 4PZ04, 4PZ05, 4P706, 4MW1, 4PZ9, 4PZ10, 4PZ11, 4PZ12, 4EX01, and 4EX02.
IP203.
kr/
/-
Inspection of Caps?
Wet
Yes
No
Remarks
Probes: LFG4.1, LFG4-2, LFG4-3, LEG 4-4, LFG4 -5, LFG4-6 (a, b), LFG4.7, LFG4-8 (a, by, LFG4.9, LFG4-10.
7
Inspection of Caps?
/
2-10
WP/12/15110r41%
Landfill Cover
IRP Site 4
Date:
9-d.6-
Inspected by
/
-7, 44,
7 taco
Time:
Signed:
(.4
#1/
Yes
Security Fencing:
Remarks
No
17-
Gate Locks Secured?
V
\tr.,
Akk
Cbtkc,
6... as
Cover Inspection:
Yes
No
Remarks
Slumping?
Riprap Erosion?
Animal Burrows?
Woody Vegetation?
Ponding of Water?
INPf1211511;406S-10
2-11
1RP Site 4 - March ARB, California
Landfill Cover
Date.
4i 1,,11."
Time:
r
Inspected by: 'Ti:E.:)41/
Signed
/000
;
v
/
Quarterly
Post Disaster
Type
Yes
Remarks
No
'Tcrak
SL lase t
Drainage and Subdrain System South Rag
Yes
Remarks
No
Break Away Gates in
Working Condition?
Subdrain Blocked?
81M
mutc.1
"1/4s--
IctrAt ,..,y_kk\krs
st;;.<-
2-12
1RP Sites 4 & 6 OM&1111 Work Plan Addendum
WP112/15(10/069-10
Landfill Cover
Time
Date
Inspected by:
Signet
'IT- 6.,r3 (LS
fi
Yes
No
Remarks
Break Away Gates in
Working Condition?
Subdrain Blocked?
/
Quarterly
Post Disaster
WPI12/15/10/00.10
Type
2-13
IRP Site 4- March ARB, California
Landfill Cover
Date:
/9-
1C
Inspected by:
Time:
-IT-ad-15 1-5(4
et."'
Signed:
\.,/\
-ti)
ti,.
t-)AwN4.1.,...,1Z '1/4S
V.....
.e.\\
A
;,Az.k
,&
S1-10
.rte..i
%:,..:4. r
\N)...:k
:Et?
tisk'
=3A1L,L,6"
61)
till
A-.5
irwy:'
CD A
2-14
k.c.
m.101'4
+.04A.Altei.w.5
Ar.-
WP121151F
-Th
Table 2-4.
Landfill No. 6
Perimeter Probe
1
Hem PnonitoriraL.ag__,___,.
Monitoring Data
Monitoring Date:
Well ID
v ,j, a
i
Time
CH4
MRCHLFG4-6a
c38S,n.
MRCHLFG4-6b
A 06
MRCHLFG4-7
OefiS
MRCHLFG4-8a
MRCHLFG4-8b
2-22
I
G, 0
CO2
02
a. S
1.1. L
1.-if.ri4i,aS LI
Slat Pres
Bal
gOcji jy..____...,....,12
16,C,
S'0. T
c , c)
00
19.. 1
eo.
0, 0
;1 .
i
i , ,A
il?.. K.
ea. _i
O. Q
Er, 5
'1 .41
2.1..a.
0,
/19, i
16, Si
00
,S_
17i,
ei.* (10
o,0
/6,;:0
0 0 jj
ieis'
0, 6
7
,
1
Comments
_
0
n,o 3, 0
0930 0 J2_
MRCHLFG4-9
MRCHLFG4-10
March ARE Site 4, Landfill #6
1?..Lrv 6 -fo 1.0 Ai.)
.-
1Wil 211 511
1
MIIMIIMII11111111111.1111==1
I
AECOM
Working Copy LF004, LF005, and LF006 RA-0 Work Plan Addendum
TABLE 2-2.
LF004 - FORMER MARCH AFB, CALIFORNIA
FIELD INSPECTION LOG
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS, LANDFILL GAS PERIMETER PROBES,
SECURITY FENCING, AND LANDFILL COVER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Date:
8
Inspected by:
Time:
-7, En. lisNi
/310
Signed:
Z-
9
10
11
Wells 4PZOI, 4PZ02, 4PZ03, 4PZ04, 4PZ05, 4PZ06, 4111W1, 4PZ9 41'210, 4PZIL 4PZ12, 4EX(11, and 4EX02.
12
13
14
Inspection of Caps?
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
Probes: LFG4-1, LFG4-2, LFG4-3, LFG 4-4, LFG4-5, LFG4-6 (a, b), LFG4-7, LF'G4-8 (a, b), LFG4-9, LFG4-10.
22
23
24
Inspection of4;afrof?It
25
26
27
28
29
Yes
No
Remarks
v/a
Yes
No
Remarks
4/4f-
/I/4
4/4 --V
ioveyme,vl A,FR (tmer ARR).,?oiltWP,I,ALIRRILIVAT RA -0 tardfill RI?.$
Novmber 2012
U
AECOM
1
2
3
4
5
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS, LANDFILL GAS PERIMETER PROBES, SECURITY
FENCING, AND LANDFILL COVER
6
I
I
/4- it- i--4.
7
Date:
8
Inspected by:
Time:
4,2_,0.0
Signed: ---...7.;,.-
-74cf 1 i y 14
9
10
Security Fencing:
11
12
17
13
Gate Locks Secured?
$7.-
14
17
15
16
17
18
Yes
Remarks
No
0
lexxis,A.e.;.tc _r-
/-
7
19
I
I
20
Cover Inspection:
21
22
23
Slumping?
24
25
Riprap Erosion?
26
Animal Burrows?
27
Woody Vegetation?
28
29
Pending of Water?
30
31
Presence of Trash or Liner?
32
33
Yes
PCASJPGrouV,WPtMecli Ai^h jrUltnel ARIO.,1012+5,Yrki-aPti5114D:WC RA-0 Land1:11 Suss WP.dcx
N
7V'
Remarks
t..-
_____Z.
/
?la vembet 2012
imimmilmniipmpipmpoimm
AECOM
Working Copy Ln704, LF005, and LFC)6 RA-0 Work Plan Addendum
1
2
3
4
5
111
LFOO4 - FORMER MARCH AFB, CALIFORNIA
1
6
7
Date:
8
Inspected by:
Time:
c:
1 I
Signed:
(-)
10
Inspection Requirements: Semiannual, or after significant weather or other major events.
11
Semiannual
12
Post Disaster
t.g.tCst I
Type
13
14
15
16
17
Yes
No
Remarks
No
Remarks
1
18
19
Drainage and Sub drain System: South Flag
20
Yes
21
Break Away Gates in
22
Working Condition?
23
24
Clcanout Risers Cleaned'?
25
Sub drain Blocked?
26
27
28
rusrp1Vi Rhi.smf t AF7 Tiara. A RiVt2117.
E.AW11/1,1)`:
ltA
LIMN.
November 2£712
I
AECOM
Working Copy LF0404, LOOS, and LF006 RA-0 Work Plan Addendum
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS, LANDFILL GAS PERIMETER PROBES,
SECURITY FENCING, AND
LANDFILL COVER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
Date:
9
Inspected by:
J.
Time:
ti
Signed:
/C_5".5-'''"-i77;:
10
11
Drainage and Sub drain System: Strip Landfill/North Flag
12
1
Yes
No
Remarks
13
Break Away Gates in
14
Working Condition?
15
Ctcanout Risers Intact?
16
17
Sub drain Blocked?
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Semiannual
25
Post Disaster
Type(
26
N,,,WIN;r00.5N4" Alard, A FI3 I,A>zriner ARA 2042`.ViP51-aidrit5rAWC RA-0 Lraill sites WP ,Axs.
November 2012
AECOM
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Date: _fa_ 1 3
Time:
8
Inspected by:
Signed:
/Oeto
9
10
II
Lc-Av.
IA/1
'441
312.
e
S.),1
c_40.
"46 St.A09,-,
4LklxaN5
C
"..<4
Us,leA
text_i_A
t-ttA \eN
71-1kC544-A
C. P t k\" t---\k
k
%A. t
ti
0 V.A.
\)1341,1
.ecket,<1"
c)
ee),
t
12
APR (Rxmcr A RirkMIZWPtiiosidfaa.WC KA 9 Larali'd Sm VIP
due.x.
No ml.
20 12
J
AECOM
Working Copy LF004, LP005, and LF005 RA-0 Work Plan Addendum
TABLE 2-3.
LF005 - MARCH ARB, CALIFORNIA
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS, SECURITY FENCING, AND LANDFILL COVER
1
2
3
4
5
i
6
Date:
7
Inspected by:
IC
Time:
-7;: Eocj
Signed:
71-110
-
dj
8
9
10
Semiannual
11
Post Disaster
12
13
Wells 9MW02, OUIMWO8, 5MW28, 5MW06, EXOI, OUIGEW02, 5MW29, 5MW30, 5MW01, EX02.
14
15
16
Inspection of Caps?
17
18
19
20
21
Type
Yes
No
Remarks
7
'v/It
22
23
Security Fencing:
24
25
26
Gate Locks Secured?
27
28
29
30
31
N.!WPGus.pFw7.04arth. Arfii (fonn&r. ARK,2f!12iVtMLIAI6nti,..D1wc
Yes
Landdia.W.As WP doo.
No
Remarks
No vernber 2012
1
AECOM
Working Copy LYON. 117005, and LP006 RA-0 Work Plan Addendum
March ARB and Former March AF13
TABLE 2-5.
PERIMETER PROBE FIELD MONITORING LOG
2
3
Perimeter Probe
Monitoring Data
Monitoring Date: 040_41 , -7" e,
Well ID
Time
CH4
LF004
Sampling performed by: ,---)72:
CO2
02
Bal
Stat Pres
Comments
t,..)0
MRCHLFG4-ba
.4:-ci-N.r.itiA5 --i-11,,
1
MRCHLFG4-6b
t/ VS-
0,0
Ira
ii---5-
0,0
0.10
0 to
1/..4.
8/,
,,,s , CD
ifq
16,0
g,4, I
0.c-)
if, if
/Of?
86i e
MRCHLFG4-7
MRCHLFG4-8a
MRCHLFG4-8b
MRCHLFG4-9
A, "2
isi, i
MRCHLFG4 -1O
A ite----
------
---
No -,:. Q,,r4s41...5
'1-.:'
'--1
A
PC rwpWIFIMacla A 1-11. (former AR9A2012WPVIAnrifill101.WC RA-0 LIAR-ill Si ees W P doex
1,,koe.L.42
November 2012
62_
411
AECOM
1
2
3
4
5
6
Date:
7
Inspected by:
Time:
7,----E4_51/
1k
Hi 0
Signed:
8
9
10
Cover Inspection:
11
12
Slumping?
13
14
Animal Burrows?
15
Woody Vegetation?
16
Ponding of Water?
17
18
19
20
N:IWPGrcilir1VP'INItur,34 AFB glow= AMMIZ v lAnxi60,131Vil: RA.-0
Yes
No
Remarks
!Of
SW, WP.gucK
November 2012
AECOM
LFOO5 - MARCH ARB, CALIFORNIA
I
2
3
4
5
6
Date:
7
Inspected by:
Time:
-41/' /,=;)
--7;"Fni 1LS
.0.3C)
Signed:
,./
-
9
10
1
-,*
kli tok,,,,,. ,:k,1-1,,
,1ais mmNRK \tvAa--:.
-
41,,zu-.,--
Vvo,1/4,."\ -t
-
JACroup,.WP:Mar: L:
I 1,3= AHIPIZJE7kWAlandfiAenwc RA-0 Cann Sits. WP dom.
Noverntwr 2912
1
AECOM
Working Copy LF004, LFOO5, and LFC
RA-0 Work Plan Addendum
TABLE 2-4.
FIELD INSPECTION LOG,
GROUNDWATER MONITORING WELLS, LANDFILL GAS PROBES, SECURITY FENCING,
AND LANDFILL COVER
1
2
3
4
5
6
a-ba
7
Date:
8
Inspected by:
fTE4:1
Time:
/
Signed:
1 tS 1rt
9
10
11
12
13 -
14
Inspection of Caps?
15
lb
17
18
Other Damage? Repairs necessary?
19
Remarks
No
Yes
o /4
if
20
Remarks
No
21
22
23
Probes: LFG6-3, LFG6-4, LFG6-6, LFG6-11, LFG6-12, LFG6-13 (a, b), LFG6-14, LFG6-15, LFG6-16 (a, b)
LFG6-17 (a, b).
24
25
26
Inspection of Caps?
27
28
29
30
31
Yes
N/A-
All
G
4//
-----"
__if
1.
N.;,WPCtissipiWP'NtsteD AFB /lean, A IWY,ZOIPM-rilaszliiie. MIMI.: RA-0 Lea Itili Sites WP time
Ni vernbet 2012
AECOM
Working Copy LAZA IF005, and LF006 RA-0 Work Plan Addendum
March ARB and Fanner March APB
LEM - FORMER MARCH AFB, CALIFORNIA
AND LANDFILL COVER
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Date:
8
Inspected by:
1--La
1,.
Time:
Signed:
Li
//-
9
10
Security Fencing:
11
12
13
Gate Locks Secured?
14
15
16
17
18
Remarks
Yes
14, J.--
e_
V
4.4 t.,
f4,2L
19
20
Cover Inspection:
21
Top Erosion./Cracking?
22
23
Slumping?
24
25
Riprap Erosion?
26
Animal Burrows?
27
Woody Vegetation?
28
29
Ponding of Water?
30
31
32
33
N
.10,VOIMkra
Yes
7
Na
7
Remarks
V
lr
V
erArziRaVir.: RA -0 Landrill $:k;$ SVP.sInc.
7
utter her 2I2
4ECOM
Working Copy LFOO4, LFOO5, and LF006 RA-0 Work Plan Addendum
AND LANDFILL COVER
1
2
3
4
5
6
-
4.9 -
7
Date:
8
Inspected by:
c)
Time:
.-1
Signed:
iS
9
10
4
..SCDC-te
sPv-&
1,01
S.x
0 kJ. t4--4:,..
Lt-e,+//k
$.44OL CktS
\Kos Ste. o
CAJ,C
CV\ici t
42, - VAIA e-NT..4.+,,A. I
11.AL.
e,
7c-kLP.c-V-1
11
12
Semiannual
13
Post Disaster
Type
V. PrcraWATIMata AF.#1.(fotems. A.Atirl.2012,WPIk.a.rit1tigt:),Nit.: RA
ietAtr k tr.
au, -b.4.__Lq..6z la,
isodfiil &in WpA,..
Novt.mber 2012
AECOM
Working Copy LF004. LFOOS. and LF006 RA-0 Work Plan Addendum
March ARE and Former March AM
I
2
3
4
5
AND LANDFILL COVER
6
7
Date:
8
Inspected by:
Time:
---77En3 1 iskr.,
te..c)c,
Signed:
9
10
11
LCRS-1
Yes
12
13
14
15
16
No
Remarks
60. 9.5-
17
18
19
20
21
22
Recovery Time?
23
24
MWrItletb APB(fmrpFei hkaya1ZkVelLaaffil9kilAWC: PA-0 Licail.3 sins Wrdlwx
November 2O12
Li
I
AECOM
AND LANDFILL COVER
1
2
3
4
5
6
_Lg.-
7
Date:
8
Inspected by:
jj.
Time:
Signed:
9
10
LCRS-2
Remarks
No
11
12
13
14
15
eq(
z
16
17
18
19
20
21
Recovery Time?
22
23
24
25
Drainage and Sub drain System:
Yes
26
27
Collect Sub drain Sample?
28
29
30
Condition of Sub drain? Is it Blocked?
31
32
N..:WPOroop:WtAMs:ch M-II ((tome, ARlip.2012,.wPaArdarmwe RA-0 1..1AVIR Sim WP tier.*
Remarks
No
MH-2
November 2012
AECOM
1
2
3
4
5
LFIX16 - FORMER MARCH AFB, CALIFORNIA
AND LANDFILL COVER
6
IAz-.-Le
7
Date:
8
Inspected by:
Time:
Signed:
-----71 4F4/4.:.5 ti
1/ .1"-e=7
77 Al,
64.--4_
9
10
11
12
V
13
Remarks
14
Rip Rap Layer
15
16
17
18
19
e
Yes
kiltoc
ok
20
21
22
Semiannual
23
Post Disaster
TyPe
N `WKRMIAWI'SIRMI ASH {(timer Attif}12012kWrkLaiRIRR:01WC RA-0 LaultiZI goprg WY RhAt
November NY?
AECOM
Working Copy LF004, LF005, and 1.F006 RA-0 Work Plan Addendum
TABLE 2-6.
PERIMETER PROBE FIELD MONITORING LOG
1
2
3
LF006
Monitoring Date:
OtP.161.-
Well ID
Time
CH4
02
CO2
Bat
Scat Pres
Comments
MRCHLFG6-3
34C,
040
1.
11, e
,F-0,--3
c.J, c>
MRCHLFG6-4
/.3.13,
C3 0
,-9 e
i. q
'29, 5
c-J, c.,1
/310-
0.0
`id ti
11.9,
1 e,
0 4 4.,
Pi_35-
0.0
I
q,$)-
71,
00
./a/V5-
0,0
13,9
5'0,2
,,,.0
/9 e'
%'9,_.3
0.0
1. L
/1, 'i
'79.. S
o,0
tn - -5-
/7,6 7i, 9
0,0
/ 9/7
c,. 0
MRCHLFG6-6
MRCHLFG6- 11
MRCHLFG6-12
6,3
MRCHLFG6-13a
0-/'? ®, 6) ,4.
MRCHLFG6- 13h
Pf-Te 0 . 0
MRCHLFG6-14
/ 6-0V
00
L3S.S
a , c)
MRCHLFG6-15
.3 4 0
4,
A .7,. :"'s
MRCHLFG6:16a
mRCHLFG6-16b
il 613 0 .c)
c..)
i9
Nit}
0,o
ig.Q0
°',0
lAt 9-C
0(0
.
c
rig
MRCHLFG6-17a
:
MRCHLFG6-17h
N.% W
1,4,6OLVA.March AFB tExal." AitiV:24): 2 iVE.
a
I 5'., 0
'1 ?
/5-1 /
.
T4A-0 Lartliil: SIMS 1k u
.7 g"
YO4()
0E0
o. c.)
November 2017
AECOM
APPENDIX B
PHOTOGRAPHIC DOCUMENTATION
WP1March AFB (former A RB)12013 Sites 4.5.84612012 Annual RA.0 \ P.2.070213BA.docx
July 2013
LF004 - March 2012. Monitoring wells after brush clearance.
LF006 - February 2012. Brush removal along western perimeter fence.
WPWarch AFB {former Arap2o131Sites 4,5.&612012 Ann uat RA-CARApp B - Photo Documenta lion.docx
LF004 - May 2012. Cleaning up debris in 8th Street Channel.
LF004 - September 2012. Soil replaced around and beneath concrete pad at LFG-8.
I
VVP1March AFB {former ARB)12011Saes 4,51612012 Annual RA-01FApp B - Pho In Documentattion.docx
LF006 - September 2012. Obtaining water level measurements at LCRS-2.
^-6!'-
.--:--''S.
il&
1
10.04.2012
ieatt
LF004 - October 2012. Daylight south of LF004 cleared of debris.
a
WPWarch AFB (former ARB)120131Siles 4,5,882012 Annual RA-01PApp B - Photo Documental lion .docx
LF005 - December 2012. Looking north across LF005.
LF006 - October 2012. Overgrown vegetation being removed in Van Buren Outfall.
WP1March AFB (former ARBP20131Sites 4,5.8.612012 Annual RA.DP.App 8 - Photo Documentatoon.docx
AECOM
APPENDIX C
LABORATORY ANALYTICAL RESULTS AND VALIDATION REPORTS
W %March AFB [runner ARBYL20131Sites
&612012 Annual RA 01F12.070213BA.docx
July 2013
March AR #
2757
Page 116 of 201
DATA VALIDATION MEMORANDUM
Date:
June 27, 2012
To:
Brent Adair
From:
Janet Tsukamoto
Subject:
March ARB, CA, - Site 6 Landfill - Laboratory Reports - May 2012 Sampling
Guidance Documents: AFCEE QAPP Final Version 4.0.02 (May 2006) and Variances to the
AFCEE QAPP
We have reviewed the following report from Spectrum Analytical Inc., for the March ARB Site 6
Landfill Project: 3506127.
One field duplicate was collected this sampling round. The agreement between the samples and
the duplicates was excellent.
Raw data of all analytical methods for sample 3506127-03 was reviewed at level D.
Qualifiers were assigned to the sample data as listed below.
3506127
8260B: the % recovery for t-butanol was below the acceptance criteria in the continuing
calibration verification standard and was non-detect (ND) in all samples. A al qualifier was
assigned to the t-butanol results for all samples except sample -09 (see sample -09 matrix
spike/matrix spike duplicate below).
8260B, sample -09 MS/MSD: the % recovery for sec-butylbenzene was above the acceptance
criteria in sample -09 MS/MSD: the % recoveries for tert-Butylbenzene, isopropylbenzene, npropylbenzene and o-xylene were above the acceptance criteria in sample -09 MS; the relative
percent difference was above the acceptance criteria for t-butanol in sample -09 MS/MSD. An M
qualifier was assigned to the sec-butyIbenzene, tert- butylbenzene, isopropylbenzene, npropylbenzene, o-xylene and t-butanol results (all ND) in sample -09.
300.1: Nitrate was originally analyzed within holding time for all samples and reanalyzed for
samples -03 through -07 and -12 due to required dilutions three days past holding time. A "J"
qualifier was assigned to the nitrate results for samples -03 through -07 and -12,
300.1, sample -09 MS/MSD: the % recovery for nitrate was below the acceptance criteria in
sample -09 MS/MSD. An M qualifier was assigned to the nitrate result in sample -09.
cc:
Matthew Hansen
Jennifer Hendricks
Bob Simpson
Nancy Carpenter
MARB Site 6 Landfill memo 062712
""' gm gig
im gm
1111
115 7
mg/Ph Arl
al
Afft 1111/0of
FINAL DATA - PRINTED 06126/2912
(Page 1 of 8)
Rase
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
PVC / Run
Status
Analyte
MARCH
NA
5M6MW05
05/1712012 11:50
MARCH
NA
6M6MW03
05/1712012 09:20
N1
N1
IRP6-5M6MW05-WG023
3506127-07
IRP6-6M6MW03-WG022
3506127-08
PR / 1
PR / 1
Validated
Validated
PH
Method
E150.1
Result
Units
pH units 7.16
E160.1
mg /L
628
chloride
nitrate (as N)
nitrite (as N)
suffate
E300.1
E300.1
E300.1
E300.1
mg/L
77.0
29,3
alkalinity, bicarb. (as CaCO3)
alkalinity, carb. (as CaCO3)
alkalinity, hydrox. (as CaCO3)
alkalinity, total (as CaCO3)
£310.1
mg/L
mg/L
NOR
mgiL
NOR
mg/L
cyanide
SW90128 mg/L
E310.1
E310.1
E310.1
mg /L
mg/L
mg/L
MARCH
NA
6M6MW03
05/17/2012 09:20
MARCH
NA
6M6MVV05
05/1712012 09.45
MARCH
NA
6M6MIN05
05117/2012 09:45
-
-
-
N1
N1
N1
IRP6-5M6MW03-WG022
3506127-08
PR / 2
Validated
IRPS- 6M6MW05 -WG024
3506127-09
PR / 1
IRP6-5M6MW05-WG024
3506127-09
PR / 2
Validated
Validated
MX. RL. D9
Resull
[MM. RL. DF)
Re501
[0, 0, 1]
7.06
[0, 0, 1)
-
(10.0. 20.0. 1]
1,010
[10.0, 20.0, 1]
[0.340. 1.00, 1]
(0.360, 1.00, 10]
[0.0310, 0.100, 1]
[0.320, 1.00, 1]
-
405
105
[5.00. 100, 10]
[5.00. 100, 10]
[5.00, 100, 10]
[5.00. 100, 10]
NOR
(0.00100. 0.0200. 1] NOR
NOR
57.7
105
QA
J
8.10
NOR
ClA
195
[0.0360, 0.100, 1]
[0.0310, 0.100, 1]
NOR
NOR
405
[5.00, 100, 10]
[5.00, 100, 10]
[5.00, 100, 10]
[5.00, 100. 10]
[0 00100, 0.0200. 1]
NOL. RI. 09
(1.70, 5.00, 5]
Result
(1.60, 5.00. 5]
928
[10.0. 20.0, 1]
-
M
[0.0360, 0.100, 1]
[0.0310, 0.100, 1]
295
[5.00, 100, 10]
[5.00. 100. 10]
[5.00. 100. 10]
[5.00, 100. 10]
NOR
(0.00100. 0 0200, 1]
NOR
W. IMDL. RL. 09
-
[1.70, 5.00, 5]
-
112
-
NOR
ReSUI
128
-
295
-
IMDL. RL. 1:19
[0, 0, 1]
NOR
-
QA
6.89
9.30
-
81.3
-
CIA
-
-
[1.60. 5.00, 5]
Page 118 of 201
March AR #
2757
(Page 2 of 8)
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
PVC /Run
MARCH
MARCH
NA
6M6MWO6
05/17/2012 10,30
NA
6M6MW06
05117/2012 10:30
Ni
N1
IRP6-6M6MW06-WG022
3506127-12
PR /
Validated
IRP6- 6M6MW06 -WG022
3506127-12
PR / 2
Validated
pH
Method
E150.1
Units
Rev.!'
pH units 6.96
E160.1
mg/L
806
chloride
nitrate (as N)
nitrite (as N)
sulfate
E300.1
E300.1
E300.1
E300.1
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
-
alkalinity. bicarb. (as CaCO3)
E310.1
E310.1
mglL
240
mg/L
NOR
E310.1
E310.1
mglL
mg/L
NOR
240
[5.00, 100, 10]
[5.00, 100, 10]
[5.00, 100, 10]
[5.00, 100. 10]
cyanide
SW90128 mg/L
NOR
10.00100. 0.0200, 11
Analyte
on ma me MR
MARCH
NA
NA
6M6MW06
05/17/2012 10:30
BM6MWO6
05/17/2012 10:30
MARCH
NA
6M6MWO7
05/1712012 11:30
-
1
Status
MARCH
OA
IMQL, RL
MI
Rosull
NDR
J
IIVIDL. RI. OF,
PR / 1
Validated
6.97
[10.0.20 0. 1]
842
[0.180, 0.500. 5]
-
10.0310. 0.100. 11
-
89.7
-
-
[1.70. 5.00.5]
1
FOI
IRP6-6M6MW06-VVG023
3506127-03
PR / 2
Validated
Resull
[0. 0, 1]
[10.0, 20.0, 1]
-
132
.J
[0.180. 0.500, 5]
[0.0310. 0.100. 1]
-
-
89.7
-
OA IRIDL. RI_ 09
N1
IRP6-13M6MW07-WG022
3506127-04
PR /1
Validated
Resin
QA
NM_ RI. 179
6.52
[0, 0, 1]
598
[10,0, 20.0. 1]
[1.70, 5.00, 5] 46.5
15.3
NOR
11.60, 5.00, 5] 59.2
J
[0.340. 1.00, 1]
[0.180, 0.500, 5]
[0.0310. 0.100, 1]
[0_320. 1.00, 1]
245
)15.00, 100, 10]
165
NOR
NOR
245
,[5.00. 100, 10]
[5.00. 100, 10]
[5.00, 100, 10]
165
[5.00, 100, 10]
[5.00. 100, 10]
[6.00. 100, 10]
[5.00, 100, 10]
NOR
.[0.00100, 0.0200, 1]
NOR
[0.00100, 0.0200, 1]
NOR
-
i
-
14.6
0.170
[1.60, 5.00.5]
IRA IIMDL. PL. ix].
Result
[0, 0, 1]
133
14.9
RA
FDI
1RP6-6M6MW06 -WG023
3506127-03
sum ES OM MB In r r
NOR
Mt MI =I -
MN MI
IMO
II la MI MI
111111
01571111
h
Aril
MIR
(Page 3 of 8)
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
PVC / Run
Status
MARCH
NA
WASTE
05/17/2012 11:05
MARCH
NA
WASTE
05/17/2012 11:05
N1
N1
IRP6-MH2-WL019
3506127-05
IRP6-Mli2-WL019
3506127-05
PR / 1
PR l2
Validated
Validated
Analyte
Method
Units
Resutl
pH
E150.1
pH units 6.99
[0, 0, 1]
E160.1
mgfL
[10.0, 20.0, 1]
chloride
nitrate (as N)
nitrite (as N)
sulfate
E300.1
E300.1
E300.1
E300.1
mgfL
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
alkalinity, carb (as CaCO3)
E310.1
E310.1
E310.1
E310.1
mgfL
245
rng/L
mgfL
NOR
mgfL
245
[5.00, 100, 10]
[5.00, 100, 10]
[5.00, 100, 10]
[5,00, 100, 10]
cyanide
SW9012B mg/L
NOR
[0.00100, 0.0200, 1]
QA IMOL. AL. OF]
812
Resulll
144
14.13
NDR
68.1
NOR
J
[0.180, 0.500, 5]
[0.0310, 0.100, 1]
[0.320, 1.00, 1]
QA
WI-, AL, 09
[1.70, 5.00, 5]
page
l
of
Inif
1111111
Page 120 of 201
March AR #
2757
[Page 4 of 8]
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
MARCH
NA
WASTE
05/17/2012 11:05
PVC /Run
PR 11
Status
Validated
N1
IRP6-MH2-W1_019
3506127-05
Anal to
Method
arsenic
calcium
lead
SW60108 mg/L 0.0115
mercu
SW7470A
Units Resuh
SWSOIOB mg/L 77.0
SW8010B mg/L NOR
magnesium SW601013 mg/L 33.1
selenium
SVA0108 mg/L NOR
in
Ns ow am gm
/L 0.000332
OA 'PAX RL. OF]
[0.00331. 0.0100, 1]
[0.0300. 1.10, 1]
[0.00370. 0.00800, 1]
[0.00980. 1.00, 1]
[0.00410, 0.0100, 1]
' 0.0000370. 0.000200, 1
L$ 11111 - 11111
Ins
MI Int - INN
ism
Aim
is
all "I
111111
11111.
1111111
1111.
MIT IT 57
arch AR
I
of
111111
.1
FINAL DATA PRINTED 06/26/2012
(Page 5 of 8)
Analyte
benzene
bromobenzene
bromochlaromethane
brornodichioromethane
bromotorm
bromomethane
tert-butanol (TBA)
n-butylbenzene
sec-butylbenzene
tert-butylbenzene
carbon tetrachloride
chlorobenzene
chloroethane
chloroform
chtoromethane
2-chlorotoluene
4-chlorotoluene
dibromochloromethane
1,2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
dibromomethane
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
dichlorodifluoromethane
1,1-dichloroethane
1,2-dichloroethane
1,1-dichloroethene
cis-1,2-ctichloroethene
trans-1,2-dichloroethene
1,2- dichloropropane
1,3-dichloropropane
2,2-dichloropropane
1,1-dichloropropene
cis-1,3-dichloropropene
trans-1,3-dichloropropene
ethyl tert-butyl ether (ETBE)
ethylbenzene
ethylene dibromide (EDB)
hexachlorobutadlene
isopropyl ether (OIPE)
isopropylbenzene
p-isopropyltoluene
methyl tert-butyl ether (MTBE)
MARCH
MARCH
MARCH
NA
NA
NA
511(161)AVV06
05/17/2012 10:30
6M6MW06
05/17/2012 10:30
-
MARCH
NA
6M6MW05
05/17/2012 09:45
-
6M6MW07
05/17/2012 11:30
-
N1
N1
N1
FD1
N1
NA
5M6MVV05
MARCH
NA
6M6MW03
05/17/2012 11:50
05/17/2012 0920
-
N1
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
MARCH
PVC /Run
PR / 1
PR / 1
PR / 1
PR / 1
PR / 1
PR / 1
Status
Validated
Validated
Validated
Validated
Validated
Validated
IRP6- 5M6MW05 -WG023 IRP6-6M6MVV03-VVG022 IRP6- 6M6MW05 -WG024 IRP6-6M6MVV06-WG022 IRP6-6M6M1N06-W0023 IRP6- 6M6MW07 -WG022
3506127-04
3506127-07
3506127-08
3506127-09
3508127 -03
3508127 -12
Units Resa QA
SW8260B pg/L NOR
SW8260B pgiL NOR
SW8260B pg/L NOR
SW82608 pg/L NOR
SW8280B pg/L NOR
SW8260B pg/L NOR
SW82606 pg/L NOR UJ
Method
IMDL. RI_ 019
Resta'
OA
NDR
[0,17, 0.40, 1] NDR
[0.21, 1 0, 1) NOR
[0.17, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.15, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0,19, 1,0, 1] NDR
[0.43, 3,0, 1) NOR
[10, 20, 1]
NDR UJ
[0.16, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.10, 1,0. 1) NOR
[0.20, 1,0, 1] NDR
[0.14, 1.0, 1) NDR
[0.16, 0.50. 1] NDR
[0.72, 1.0.1] NOR
[0.16, 0.34, 1] NDR
[0.32, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.25, 1.0. 1) NOR
[0.15, 1.0. 1] NDR
[0,13, 0.50, 1] NOR
NOR
(1.0, 2.0, 1]
[0,40, 1.0, 1] NDR
NOR
[0.75, 1 0,1]
NOR
NOR
[0.15, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.15, 0.50, 1) NOR
[0.60, 1,0, 1] NOR
[0.50, 1.0, 11 NOR
[0.15, 0.50, 1) NOR
[0.19, 1.0,1] NOR
[0,19, 1,0, 11 NDR
[0.33, 1,1, 11 NDR
[0.15, 1.0, 1) NDR
[0.30, 0.40, 1) NOR
[0.60, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.30. 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.40, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.30, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0,50, 1.0, 1] NOR
(0.22, 1.0, 1] NOR
NOR
[0M, 1.0, 1]
NOR
10.38, 0.82,11 NOR
[0.13, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.14, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.14, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.50, 5.0, 1] NDR
SW826013 pg/L
NOR
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg /L
SW8260B pglL
SW8260B pg/t.
SW8280B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L.
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pgit.
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pglL
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
SW1326013 pg/L
NOR
SW8260B pg/t
NOR
SW132608 pg/L
NOR
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/l.
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NDR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
WI. RL. DFI
Resuk OA
[0.17, atm, 1] NOR
[0.21, 1.0, 1) NOR
[0.17, 1.0, 1) NOR
(0.15. 0.50, 1] NOR
(0.19, 1.0, 1] NOR
(0.43, 3.0, 1] NOR
[10, 20, 1]
NOR M
[0.16, 1.0. 1] NDR
[0.10, 1.0, 1] NOR M
[0.20, 1 0. 1)
NOR M
[0.14, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0,15, 4.50, 1] NOR
[0.72. 1.0, 1) NOR
[0,16, 0.34, 1] NOR
[0.32, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.25, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.15. 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.13, 0.50, 1] NOR
[1.0. 2.0, 1]
NDR
[0.40, 1,0, 1] NDR
[0.25, 1.0.11 NDR
[0.15, 1,0, 1] NDR
[0.15, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.60, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0_50, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.15, 0.50. 1) NOR
[0.19, 1,0, 1] NOR
[0.19, 1.0. 1) NDR
[0.33. 1.1. 1) NDR
[0.15, 1.0, 1] NDR
(0.30, 0,40, 1) NOR
[0.60, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.30, 1,0, 1] NOR
[0.40, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.30, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.50, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.22, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.11, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.36, 0.82, 1) NOR
[0.13, 1.0, 1) NDR
[0.14, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.14, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.50, 5.0, 1] NOR
IMDL. RL. 09
NANO OA
[0.17, 0.40, 1] NOR
[0.21, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.17, 1.0.1] NOR
[0.15, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.19, 1.0,1] NOR
[0.43, 3.0, 1] NDR
[10, 20, 1]
NOR UJ
[0.16, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.10, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.20, 1,0, 1] NOR
[0.14, 1 0, 1] NOR
[0.16, 0.50, 1] NDR
[0.72, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.161 0.34,1] NOR
[0.32, 1,0, 1] NOR
10.28, 1.0,11 NOR
[0.15, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.13, 0.50, 1] NOR
NDR
[1.0, 2.0, 1]
[0.40, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.25. 1,0, 1] NOR
[0.15, 1,0, 1] NOR
M
[0.15, 0,50,1] NOR
[0.60, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.50. 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.15, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.19, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.19, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.33, 1.1, 1] NOR
[0.15, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.30, 0.40, 1] NOR
[0.60, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0,30. 1.0, 1) NOR
[0.40. 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.30, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.50. 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.22, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.11. 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.36, 0.82, 1] NOR
[0.13, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.14, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.14, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0,50, 5.0, 1] NOR
fivIOL. RL. DPI
Re sun
[0.17, 0.40, 1] NOR
[0.21, 1.0, 1) NOR
[0.17, 1 0, 1) NOR
[0.15, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.19, 1.0, 1] NOR
(0.43, 3.0, 1) NOR
[10, 20, 1]
NOR
[0.16, 1.0, 1) NOR
[0.10, 1.0, 1) NOR
[0.20, 1.0, 1) NOR
[0.14, 1.0, 1) NOR
[0.16, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.72, 1.0. 1) NOR
[0,16, 0.34, 1] NOR
[0.32, 1.0, 1) NOR
[0.25, 1.0, 1) NOR
[0,15, 1.0, 1) NOR
[0.13, 0.50, 1] NOR
[1.0, 2.0, 1)
NOR
[0.40, 1.0, 1) NDR
[0.25, 1.0, 1) NOR
[0.15, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.15, 0.50. 1] NOR
[0.60, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.50, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.15, 0.50, 1) NOR
[0.19, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.19, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.33, 1.1, 1] NOR
[0.15, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.30, 0.40, 1] NOR
[0.60, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.30, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.40, 0.50, 1] NDR
[0.30, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.50, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.22, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.11, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.36, 0.82, 1] NPR
[0.13, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.14, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.14, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.50, 5.0, 1] NDR
QA
Rest* QA
[0_17, OAO, 1) NOR
IMDL. RL DFI
[021. 1.0. 1]
NOR
[0_17, 1.0, 1) NOR
[0.15, 0,50. 1] NOR
UJ
/MM. Rt.. oFt
[0_17, 0.40. 1]
[0,21, 1.0, 1]
[0_17, 1.0, 1]
[0is, 0.50, 1]
NOR
[0.19, 1.0. 1]
[0.43, 3.0, 1]
NOR UJ
110, 20, 1]
NDR
10.16, 1.0, 1]
[0.10, 1_0, 1)
[0.20, 1.0, 1)
[0.14, 1.0, 1)
[0.19, 1.0, 1]
[0,43, 3.0, 1)
[10, 20, 1)
[0.16, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0_10, 1_0, 1]
NOR
[020, 1.0, 1)
NOR
[0.14, 1.0, 1) NOR
[0.16, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.72, 1.0, 1) NOR
[0.16, 0.34, 1] NOR
[0,32, 1.0, 1) NOR
[0.16, 0.50.1)
[0.72, 1.0, 1]
[0.16, 0.34, 1]
10,32, 1,0, 11
[0.13, 0.50. 1] NOR
(1.0, 2.0, 1)
NOR
[0.40, 1.0, 1) NOR
[0.25, 1.0, 1]
[0,15, 1.0, 1)
[0.13, 0.50, 1]
[1,0, 2,0, 1]
[0.40, 1.0, 1]
[0.25, 1.0,1]
NDR
[025, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 1_0, 1] NOR
[0,15, 0.50,11 NDR
[0.60, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.50, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.151 0.50, 1) NOR
[0.19, 1,0, 1] NOR
[0.19, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.33, 1.1, 1] NDR
[0.15, 1.0, 1]
[025, 1.0. 1)
[0,15, 1.0. 1]
NOR
NOR
[0.15, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.30, 0.40, 1] NOR
[0,60, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.30, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.40. 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.30. 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.50. 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.22. 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.11,1_0. 1] NOR
[0,36, 0.82, 1] NDR
[0.13, 1.0, 1] NOR
[014, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.14, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.50, 5.0,11 NDR
[0.15. 0.50,1]
[0.60, 1.0, 1]
[0,50, 1.0, 1]
30.15, 0.50, 1)
[019, 1,0, 1]
[0.19, 1.0, 11
[0.33, 1.1, 11
[0.15, 1.0. 11
[0.30, 0.40, 1]
[0.60, 1.0, 1]
[0.30, 1.0, 1]
[0.40. 0.50, 1]
[0.30,1.0, 1]
(0.50, 1.0, 1)
[0.22. 1.0, 1]
[0.11, 1.0, 1]
[0.36. 0.82, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0,14, 1.0, 1]
(0,14, 1.0, 11
[0.50, 5.0, 1]
1111
Page 122 of 201
March AR #
2757
FINAL DATA - PRINTED 06/26/2012
(Page 6 of 81
Analyte
methylene Chloride
naphthalene
n-propylbenzene
styrene
tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME)
1,1.1,2-tetrachloroethane
1,1,2,2-tetrachloroethane
tetrachloroethene (PCE)
toluene
1.2.3-trichlorotenzene
1,2.4-trichlorobenzene
1.1,1-trichloroethane
1,1.2-Mchloroethane
tnchloroethene (ICE)
trichlororluoromethane
1,2.3-trichloropropane
1 ,2,4-trirnethyihenzene
1,3,5-trimethylbenzene
vinyl chloride
m- & p-xylene
o-xylene
11111
IMO
11111
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
PVC / Run
Status
MARCH
NA
5M6MWO5
05/17/2012 11:60
MARCH
NA
6M6MWO3
05/17/2012 09'.20
MARCH
NA
6M6MW05
05/17/2012 09:45
MARCH
NA
6M6MW06
05/1712012 10:30
MARCH
NA
6M6MW06
05/17/2012 10:30
MARCH
NA
6M6MW07
05/17/2012 11:30
-
-
-
-
-
-
N1
N1
N1
N1
IRP6-5M6MVV05-VVG023
IRP6- 6M6MW03 -WG022 IRP6-6M6MW05-WG024 IRP6-6M6MW06-WG022
3506127-08
3506127-09
3506127-12
PR / 1
PR / 1
PR / 1
Validated
Validated
Validated
N1
F01
IRP6-6M6MVV06-WG023 IRP6- 6M6MW07 -WG022
3506127-03
3506127-04
PR / 1
PR / 1
Method
Re-sun
3506127-07
PR / 1
Validated
Units
SW82608 pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
NOR
SW1326013 pgIL
NOR
SW82608 pg/L
SW82608 poll_
SW82608 pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW82608 pg /L
NDR
GA
NIX, RL OF]
Rm.!' 4A
IMOL RL. 09
Res0
[0.66, 1,2, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1)
[0.14, 1,0, 1]
[0.12, 1.0, 1]
[0.20, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 0.50, 1]
[0.13, 0.50, 1]
[021, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.40, 1.0, 1]
[0.14. 1,0. 1]
NOR
[020, 1.0, 1]
[0.19, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.40, 1.0, 11
[0.35, 1.0, 1]
NOR
NOR
NOR
[0,66. 1.2, 1] NOR
[0.50, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.14. 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.12, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.20. 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.14, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0_13, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.21. 1.0, 1] NOR
NOR
[0_14, 1.0, 1]
NOR
NOR
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
NDR
SW826013 WI_
NOR
[0_40. 1.0, 1]
NDR
SW8260B pgIL
NOR
NOR
SW826013 pg /L
SW826013 pg/L
NOR
NOR
[0.14. 1.0, 1]
[020. 1.0. 1]
[0,19, 1.0, 1]
SW82608 pg/L
SW82608 pgIL
NOR
[0_40, 1.0, 1]
NOR
NOR
NOR
SW826013 pg/L
SW826013 pg/L
NOR
NOR
[0,35, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0,50, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
(0.50.1.0, 1]
SW82608 pg/L
SW62606 pg/L
SW82608 pgIL
NOR
[0_18, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0 113, 1.0, 1)
NOR
NOR
[0.23. 2.0, 1]
[0.50. 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.23, 2.0. 1]
(0.50. 1.0. 11
NOR
SIP
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
111
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
QA
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
Non
NOR
NOR
PA
IMOL, RL. DFJ
Resull
[0.66, 1.2, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1,0, 1]
[0.12, 1.0, 1]
[0.20, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 0.50, 1]
[0.13, 0.50, 1]
10.21, 1.0,11
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 1,0, 1]
[0.40, 1,0, 11
[0.14, 1,0, 1]
[0.20, 1.0, 11
[0.19, 1.0, 1]
10.40, 1.0, 1]
[0.35, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 1,0, 1]
[0.18, 1.0, 1]
[0.23, 2.0. 1]
NOR
M J0.50. 1.0, 1J
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
QA
Validated
IMOL RL, 09
Result
[0.66, 1,2, 11
[0.60, 1.0, 1]
[0,14, 1.0, 1]
NOR
NOR
NOR
[0,12, 1.0.1] NOR
[0.20, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.14, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.13, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.21, 1,0, 1] NOR
[0,14, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0,50, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.40, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0,14, 1,0, 1] NOR
[0.20, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.19, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.40, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0,35, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.13, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.50, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.18, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.23, 2,0, 1] NOR
[0 50, 1.0, 1] NDR
MK MI 11160 MP MI NM
QA
Validated
IMOL, RL, OF]
Resull
[0,66, 1.2, 1] NOR
[0.50, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.14, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.12. 1,0, 1] NDR
[0.20, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.14, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.13. 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.21, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.14, 1_0, 1]
NOR
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.40, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.20, 1.0, 1]
[0.19, 1.0. 1]
[0.40, 1.0. 1]
[0.35, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.18, 1.0, 1]
[0.23, 2.0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
NOR
11111
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
05
IMOL, RL, OH
[0.66, 1,2, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0,14, 1,0, 1]
[0.12, 1.0. 1]
[0,20, 1.0. 1]
[0,14, 0.50, 1]
[0.13, 0.50. 1]
[0.21, 1.0, 1)
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.50. 1.0, 1]
[0.40, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.20, 1.0, 1]
[0.19.1.0. 1]
[0,40, 1.0, 1]
[0_35, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 1,0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.18, 1.0, 1]
[0.23, 2.0, 1]
10.50, 1.0, 11
11111
NB NM
11112
111.
1112
lin IS
5
7.11
Allilh Pik mg dm
(Page 7 of 8)
Analyte
benzene
bromobenzene
bromochloromethane
bromodichloromethane
bromoform
bromomethane
tert-butanol (TBA)
n-butylbenzene
sec-butylbenzene
tert-butylbenzene
chlorobenzene
chloroethane
chloroform
chloromethane
2-chforotoluene
4-chlorotoluene
dibromochlorornethane
1.2-dibromo-3-chloropropane
dibrornomethane
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1.3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
1,1-dichloroethane
1,2-dichloroethane
1,1-dichloroethene
cis-1,2-dichloroethene
trans-1.2-clichloroethene
1,2-dichloropropane
1,3-dichloropropane
2,2dichloropropane
1,1-dichloropropene
cis-1,3-chchlornpropene
trans-1 .3-dichloropropene
ethylbenzene
hexachlorobutadiene
isopropyl ether (DIPE)
isopropylbenzene
p-isopropyltoluene
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
MARCH
NA
WASTE
05/17/2012 11:05
MARCH
MARCH
NA
FIELDQC
05/17/2012
NA
FIELDQC
05/17/2012
-
-
N1
TB1
IRP6-MH2-WL019
3506127-05
IRP6-TB-006
3506127-13
PVC /Run
PR / 1
PR / 1
Status
Validated
Validated
Method
Units
Result
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW8260B pgil.
SW82608 pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SVV82608 pg/L
NDR
SW8260B pg /L
NDR
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
swum,
OA
NDR
NDR
NDR
NDR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NDR
pg/L
NOR
SW82608 pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
NOR
SW8260B pcill..
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
NDR
SW82608 pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
SW8260B pg /L
NOR
NOR
NDR
NDR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NDR
NDR
NOR
NDR
NDR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
UJ
TB2
IRP6-TB-007
3506127-06
PR / 1
Validated
MX, RL, OFI
Result
NDR
NOR
[0.17, 0.40, 1]
[0,21, 1.0, 1]
[0.17, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 0.50, 1]
[0,19, 1.0, 1]
[0.43, 3.0, 1)
[10, 20, 1]
[0.16, 1.0, 1]
NDR
[0.10. tO, 1]
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
[0.20, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.16, 0.50, 1]
[0.72, 1.0, 1]
[0.16, 0.34, 1]
[0.32, 1.0, 1]
[0.25, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 0.50, 1]
[1.0, 2.0, 1]
[0.40, 1.0.1]
[0.25, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 1.0.1]
[0.15, 0.50, 1]
[0.60, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 0,50, 1]
NOR
[019, 1.0, 1]
NOR
NOR
(0.19, 1.0, 1)
[0.33, 1.1, 1]
[0,15, 1.0, 1]
[0.30, 0.40, 1]
[0.60, 1.0, 1]
[0.30, 1.0, 1)
[0,40, 0.50, 1]
[0.30, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.22, 1.0, 1]
[0,11, 1.0, 1]
[0,36, 0.82. 1]
(0.13, 1,0, 1)
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 5.0, 1]
NOR
IMOL. RL. OF!
Result
[0,17, 0.40, 1]
[0.21, 1.0, 1]
[0.17, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 0.50, 1]
[0.19, 1.0, 1]
[0.43, 3.0, 1)
[10, 20, 1]
[0.16, 1.0, 1]
[0.10, 1.0, 1]
[0.20, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.16, 0.50, 1)
[0.72, 1.0, 1)
[0.16, 0.34, 1]
[0.32, 1.0, 1)
[0.25, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 0.50, 1]
[1.0, 2.0, 1]
[0.40, 1.0, 1]
[0.25, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 0.50, 1]
(0.60, 1.0, 1)
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 0.50, 1)
[0.19, 1.0, 1)
[0,19, 1.0, 1)
[0.33, 1.1, 1]
[0.15, 1.0, 1]
[0.30, 0.40, 1)
[0.60, 1.0, 1]
[0.30, 1.0, 1]
[0.40, 0.50, 1)
[0.30,1.0, 1)
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.22, 1.0, 1)
[0,11, 1.0, 1)
[0.36, 0.82, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 5.0, 1]
NDR
QA
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
UJ
OA
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
UJ
IMOL, RL. DFI
[0.17, 0.40, 1]
[0.21, 1.0, 1]
[0.17, 1.0, 1]
[0,15, 0.50, 1)
[0.19, 1.0, 1)
[0.43, 3.0, 1)
[10, 20, 1]
[0.16, 1.0, 1]
[0.10, 1.0, 1]
[0.20, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.16, 0.50, 1]
[0.72, 1.0, 1]
[0.16, 0.34, 1]
[0.32, 1.0, 1]
[0.25, 1.0, 1]
[0.15. 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 0.50.1]
[1.0, 2.0, 1]
[0.40, 1.0, 1]
[0.25, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 1.0, 1]
[015, 0.50, 1]
[0.60, 1.0, 1)
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0,15, 0.50, 1]
[0.19, 1.0, 1]
[0,19, 1.0, 1]
[0,33, 1.1, 1]
[0,15, 1.0, 1]
[0.30, 0.40, 1]
[0,60, 1,0, 1]
[0.30, 1.0, 1]
[0.40, 0.50, 1]
[0.30, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.22, 1.0, 1]
[0,11, 1,0, 1]
[0,36, 0.82, 1)
[0,13, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1,0, 1]
[0,50, 5.0, 1]
e
11of
in mul
Page 124 of 201
March AR #
2757
(Page 8 of 8)
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
PVC I Run
Status
MARCH
NA
WASTE
05/17/2012 11:05
MARCH
NA
FIELDOC
05/17/2012
MARCH
NA
FIELDQC
05/17/2012
-
-
-
NI
TBI
IRP6-MF12-VVL019
3505127-05
IRP6-TB-006
3506127-13
PR / 1
PR / 1
Validated
Validated
TB2
IRP6-TB-007
3506127-06
PR /
Validated
Analyte
methylene chloride
naphthalene
n-propylbenzene
styrene
tert-amyl methyl ether [TAME)
toluene
1,2,3-trichlorobenzene
1,1,1-trichloroethane
1,1,2-trichioroethane
trichloroethene (TCE)
trichlorofluoromelhane
1,2,3-trichloropropane
1,2,4-Mmethylbenzene
vinyl chloride
Method
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pgIL
SW8260B pg IL
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
5WI3260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
5W82600 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NDR
YR- & p-xylene
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NDR
o-xylene
Units Rasa
NoR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NoR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
In ow am on as ow as am i
CA
Mt. Rt. ON
[0.66. 1.2, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.12. 1.0, 1]
[0_20, 1.0, 1]
[0.14. 0.50, 1 ]
[0.13, 0.50, 1 )
[0.21, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.40, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.20, 1.0, 1]
[0.19, 1.0, 1]
[0,40, 1.0, 1]
[0.35, 1.0, 1]
[0.13. 1.0, 1]
[0.50. 1.0, 1]
[0.10. 1.0. 1]
[0.23. 2.0, 1]
(0.50. 1.0, 1]
Rene
1
CA
(PADL. Rt. OFI
Resue
NOR
NOR
[0.66, 1.2. 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.14. 1.0, 1)
[0.12, 1.0, 1]
[0.20, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 0.50, 1]
NOR
NOR
[0.21, 1.0. 1]
(0.14, 1.0. 1]
(0.50, 1.0. 1]
(0.40, 1.0, 1)
(0.14, 1.0.1.1
(0,20, 1.0. 1]
[0.19, 1.0, 1)
[0.40, 1.0, 1)
[0.35, 1.0, 1)
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0. 1]
(0.18. 1.0, 1)
[0.23, 2.0. 1]
(0.50. 1.0, 1]
NoR
NoR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NoR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
CA
[MOL, RL. DR
NOR
[0.66, 1.2, 1]
(0.50. 1.0, 1)
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.12, 1.0, 1]
[0.20, 1.0, 1]
NOR
(0.14, 0.50, 11
(0.13, 0.50, 1 1 NOR
[0.13, 0.50, 1]
[0.21, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
(0.50, 1,0, 1]
(0.40, 1.0, 1]
(0.14. 1.0, 1]
[0.20, 1.0, 1]
[0.10. 1.0, 1]
[0.40, 1.0, 1]
(0.35, 1 0, 1]
[0.13. 1,0, 1]
(0.50, 1.0, 1]
(0.18, 1.0, 1]
[0.23, 2.0, 1]
[0.50. 1.0, 1)
-
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
ma mg Ns ma am or
QA Qualifiers
March AR #
Project
MARCH
Qualifier Description
J
M
UJ
Estimated value.
Matrix effect.
Reporting limit estimated.
1
Page 1
2757
Page 125 of 201
me ea sr am MN =I MI IMP
/rch !ri#
1.1 57
MIN
MI far, MN NI
Page
(Page 1 of 4)
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
MARCH
NA
WASTE
05/17/2012 11:05
MARCH
MARCH
MARCH
NA
NA
NA
WASTE
05/17/2012 11:05
WASTE
05/17/2012 12:40
WASTE
05/17/2012 13:30
-
-
-
N1
N1
N1
IRP6-MH2-VVL019
PVC /Run
IRP6-MH2-VVL019
3506127-05
PR / 1
PR / 1
PR / 1
Status
Not Validated
3506127-05
PR / 2
Not Validated
Ni
IRP6-LRCS2-WL018
3506140-02
Validation NIA
Validation NIA
Re5Ilit
IRP6-LRCS1-WL022
3506140-01
Method
E150.1
Units
pH units
Result
6.99
[0, 0, 1]
6.63
NM Pl. BF]
[0, G. 1]
ReIcult
pH
6.61
[0, 0, 1]
E150.1
mg/L
812
[10.0, 20.0. 1]
3,170
[10.0. 20.0, 1]
2,500
(10.0, 20.0, 1]
chloride
nitrate (as N)
nitrite (as N)
sulfate
E300.1
E300.1
E300.1
E300.1
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
(3.40. 10.0, 10]
(0.0360, 0.100.1]
[0.0310, 0.100, /]
[0.320, 1.00, I]
546
[3.40, 10.0, 10]
[0.0360, 0.100, 1]
[0.0310, 0.100, 1]
[0.320, 1.00. 1]
alkalinity. bicarb. (as CaCO3)
alkalinity. Garb. (as CaCO3)
E310.1
E310.1
E310.1
E310.1
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
245
245
[5.00, 100. 10]
[5.00, 100, 10]
[5.00, 100. 10]
[5.00, 100. 10]
cyanide
SW90128 mg/L
NOR
[0.00100, 0.0200, 1]
Analyte
OA IMOL. RL. OF]
-
14.5E
NOR
68.1
NOR
NOR
[0.0360, 0.500, 1]
[0.0310, 0.100, 1]
[0.320, 1.00, 1]
144
14.6
-
DA [FOOL. RL OFI
Rnsa
[1.70, 5.00, 5]
499
[0.180, 0.500. 5] niuR .1
0.160
73.2
-
1,580
-
NOR
-
NOR
-
1,580
NOR .1
QA
[25.0, 500, 50]
[25.0, 500, 50]
' [25,0, 500, 50]
[25.0, 500, 50]
[0 00100 0 0200. 1]
NOR ,)
0.180
1.60
IDA
[MIL RL. 09
715
[5.00, 100. 10]
[5.00, 100, 10]
[5.00, 100, 10]
[5.00. 100. 10]
NOR J
10.00100, 0.0200, 11
715
NOR
NOR
Page 127 of 201
March AR #
2757
[Page 2 of 4]
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
MARCH
NA
WASTE
05/17/2012 11:05
MARCH
NA
WASTE
05/17/2012 12:40
MARCH
NA
WASTE
05/17/2012 13:30
N1
N1
N1
IRP6-LRCS2-1/V1_018
IRP6-LRCS1-WL022
3506140-01
PVC /Run
IRP6-MH2-VVL019
3506127-05
PR /
Status
Not Validated
Validation NM
-
1
3506140-02
PR / 1
Analyte
arsenic
calcium
lead
magnesium
selenium
Method
SW8010B mg/L 0.0115
SW6010B mg/L 77.0
S1A6010B mg/L NDR
SVA30108 mg/L 33.1
SW3010B mg/L NOR
[0.00331. 0.0100, 1]
[0.0390, 1.10, 1]
[0.00370, 0.00800, 1]
[0.00980, 1.00, 1]
[0.00410, 0.0100, 1]
mercury
SW7470A mg/L 0.000332
[0.0000370, 0.000200, 1] :NOR
Units
IN MN MI NM ell NM
Resuil
co. imni_. RL. 09
11111
QA 1MOL. AL. 09
Firsult
0.0151
241
NOR
350
0.0159
MI
.i
[0.00331, 0.0100. 1]
[0.0390, 1.10. 1]
[9.00370, 0.00800, 1]
[0.0196, 2.00, 2]
[0.00410, 0.0100, 1]
PR / 1
Validation NIA
Rasuli
0.0226
275
NOR
124
0.0202
[0.0000370, 0.000200. 1] NOR J
IIIIII
111111
01 [MDL. AL. oFi
'[0.00331, 0.0100. 1]
[0.0780, 2.20, 2]
[0.00370, 0.00800, 1]
[0.00980, 1.00, 1]
[0.00410, 0.0100. 1]
[D.0000370. 0.000200,
1]
IMO OM OM MI IN
IIIIII
SUN In 617 5 7/11/
h 1111#
e
(Page 3 of 4)
Analyte
benzene
bromobenzene
bromochloromethane
bromoform
bromomethane
tert-butanol (TBA)
n-butylbenzene
sec-butylbenzene
tert-butylbenzene
chlarobenzene
thloroethane
chloroform
chloromethane
2-chlorotoluene
4-chlorotoluene
dibromomethane
1.2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1.4-dichlorobenzene
1,1-dichloroethane
1,2-dichloroethane
1,1-dichloroethene
cis-I ,2-dichloroethene
trans-1,2-clichloroethene
1.2-dichloropropane
1.3-dichloropropane
2,2-clichloropropane
1,1-dichloropropene
cis-1 .3-dichloropropene
ethylbenzene
hexachlorobutadiene
isopropyl ether (DIPE)
isopropylbenzene
p-isopropyltoluene
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
MARCH
NA
WASTE
05/17/2012 11:05
MARCH
NA
WASTE
05/17/2012 12:40
MARCH
-
-
-
N1
N1
N1
IRP6-MH2-VVL019
3506127-05
IRP6-LRCS1-WL022
3506140-01
PVC/Run
PR / 1
Status
Not Validated
IRP6-LRCS2-VVL018
3506140-02
PR i 1
Validation NIA
Units
Remo'
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg /L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
pg/L.
NOR
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg /L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
SVVI3260B pg/L
NOR
SW8260(3 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
5W826013 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
Method
SVV8260B
OA PAX, RL, DFI
Result
NOR
[0.17, 0.40, 1]
[0.21, 1.0, 1]
[0.17, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 0.50, 1)
[0.19, 1.0, 1]
[0.43, 3.0, 1]
[10, 20, 1]
[0.16, 1.0, 1]
[0.10, 1.0, 1)
[0.20, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.16, 0.50, 1]
[0.72, 1.0, 1]
[0.16, 0.34, 1]
[0.32, 1.0, 1]
[0.25, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 0.50, 1)
[1.0, 2.0, 1)
[0.40, 1.0, 1]
[0.25. 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 1.0, 1]
(0.15, 0.50, 1]
[0.60, 1.0, I)
NOR
[0_50, 1.0, 1]
NOR
NDR
[0.15, 0.50, 1]
[0.19, 1.0, 1)
[0.19, 1.0, 1]
[0.33, 1.1, 1)
[0.15, 1.0, 1]
[0.30, 0.40, 1]
[0.60, 1.0, 1]
[0.30, 1.0, 1)
[0.40, 0.50, 1]
[0.30, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.22, 1.0. 1)
[0.11, 1.0, 1)
[0.36, 0.82, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1)
[0.14, 1.0, 1)
(0.14, 1.0, 1)
[0.50, 5.0, 1]
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
MDR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
40
NDR
NDR
NDR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NDR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
0.37 J
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
IGA (M01, RL,
NA
WASTE
05/17/2012 13:30
PR / 1
Validation NIA
MI
Result
[0.17, 0.40, 1] NOR
[0.21, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.17, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.15, 0.50, 1) NOR
[0.19, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.43. 3.0. 1] NOR
[10, 20, 1)
NOR
[0.16, 1.0, 1) NOR
[0.10, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.20, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.14, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.16, 0.50, 1] 0.37 J
[0.72, 1.0, 1) NOR
[0_15, 0.34. 1)
[0.32, 1.0, 1)
[0.25, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 0.50, 1]
[1.0, 2.0, 1]
[0.40, 1.0, 1]
[0.25, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 0.50, 1)
[0.60, 1 0, 1]
NDR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
[0.50, 1.0.1] NOR
[0.15, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.19, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.19, 1.0, 1] 0.60 J
[0.33. 1.1, 1] NOR
NOR
[0.50, 1.0, 11
NOR
NDR
[0.22, 1.0. 1]
[011, 1.0, 1]
NOR
10.36, 0.82, 11
NOR
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 5.0, 1]
NOR
NOR
(0.11, 1 0, 1)
NOR
(0.36, 0.82, 1)
(0.13. 1.0, 11
(0.14. 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 5.0, 1]
NOR
NOR
NDR
NDR
NDR
NOR
[0.19,1.0, 1]
NOR
NOR
NDR
[0.17, 0.40, 1]
[0,21. 1.0, 1]
[0.17, 1.0, 1]
[0,15, 0.50, 1]
[0.19, 1.0, 1]
[0.43. 3.0. 1]
[10, 20, 1]
[0,16, 1.0, 1]
[0.10, 1.0, 1]
[0.20, 1.0, 1)
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.16. 0.50, 1]
[0.72. 1.0, 1]
[0.16, 0.34, 1]
[0.32, 1.0, 1]
[025, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 1.0, 1)
[0.13, 0.50, 1)
[1.0, 2.0, 1)
[0.40, 1.0, 1)
[0.25, 1.0, 1)
[0.15, 1.0, 1]
[0,15, 0.50, 1]
[0.60, 1.0, 1)
[0,50, 1.0, 1]
[0.15, 0.50, 1]
[0.19, 1.0, 1)
[0.33, 1.1, 1]
[0.15, 1.0, 1)
[0.30, 0.40. 1]
10.60, 1.0. 1)
[0.30, 1.0, 1]
[0.40, 0.50. 1)
[0.30, 1.0, 1]
[0.15,1_01 1) NOR
(0.30, 0.40, 1] NOR
(0.60, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.30. 1.0, 1]
[0.40, 0.50, 1]
[0.30, 1.0, 1]
(0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.22, 1 0, 1)
NOR
OA [MIX. RL, OFI
NOR
NOR
NOR
29
.1 of
MIN
IN
Page 129 of 201
March AR #
2757
(Page 4 of 4)
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Dale
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
PVC /Run
Status
IMO
1111111
MARCH
NA
WASTE
05117/2012 11:05
MARCH
WASTE
05/17/2012 12:40
MARCH
NA
WASTE
05/17/2012 13:30
-
-
-
N1
N1
Ni
fRP6-MH2-WL019
3506127-05
IRP6LRCS2-WL018
3506140-02
PR/ 1
Validation NIA
IRP6-LRCS1-WL022
3506140-01
Resuil
fRAOL.RL. OFI
ReMill
[0.66, 1.2, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0,14, 1.0, 1]
[0,12, 1.0, 1]
[0.20, 1.0, 1]
[0,14, 0,50, 1]
[0.13, 0.50, 1]
[0.21, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.40, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0,20, 1,0, 1]
[0.19, 1.0, 1]
[0,40, 1,0, 1]
[0.35, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0.1]
[0.18, 1,0, 1]
[0.23, 2.0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0. 1]
NOR
PR / 1
Not Validated
Anal&
Method
methylene chloride
naphthalene
n-propylbenzene
styrene
tert-amyl methyl ether (TAME)
1,1,1.2-tetrachloroethane
toluene
1.2,4-trichlorobenzene
1,1.1-trichlotoethane
1,1,2-trichloreethane
WO lorofluorarnethane
vinyl chloride
rn- & p-xylene
o-xylene
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pgfL
Sw8280B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pgfL
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pgfL
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pgfL
SW8260B pg/L
5W3260B pgfL
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
SW13250B pgfL
NOR
SW8260B pgfL
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
Units
Re %Ill
OA [VOL . RL. OF]
NA
NOR
[0.66, 1.2, 1] NOR
[0.50, 1.0, 1] NOR
(0.14, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.12, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.20, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.14, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.13. 0.50, 1] NOR
NOR
[0.21, /A 1]
NOR
NDR
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.40, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.20, 1.0, 1]
[0.19, 1.0, 1]
[0.40, 1.0, 1]
[0.35, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.18, 1.0, 1]
[0.23, 2.0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0. 1]
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
MN MI OE MI MIN OM MIN IN
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
OA
PR / 7
Validation NIA
OA
WDL. eL. On
NOR
[0.66, 1.2, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0_14, 1.0, 1]
NDR
NOR
[0.12. 1.0, 1]
[0.20, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 0.50, 1]
[0.13, 0.50, 1]
[0,21, 1,0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.50, 1.0, 11
NDR
[0.40, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.20, 1.0, 1]
[0.19, 1.0, 1]
[0.40, 1.0, 1]
[0.35, 1.0. 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
[0.18, 1.0, 1]
[0.23, 2.0, 1]
[0.50, 1.0, 1]
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
4.8
NOR
NOR
MO IMO I= NM I= El
I
March AR #
2757
Page 130 of 201
DATA VALIDATION MEMORANDUM
Date:
February 18, 2013
To:
Brent Adair
From:
Janet Tsukamoto
Subject:
March ARB, CA, - Site 6 Landfill - Laboratory Report
Sampling
December 2012
Guidance Documents: AFCEE QAPP Final Version 4.0.02 (May 2006) and Variances to the
AFCEE QAPP
We have reviewed the following report from TestAmerica, West Sacramento Laboratories., for
the March ARB Site 6 Landfill Project: 320-1336.
Two field duplicates were collected this sampling round. The agreement between the samples and
the duplicates was excellent.
Nitrite was detected at 1.1 mg/L for sample -04 and non-detect (ND) in the 5x dilution for sample
-05. TAMS stated nitrite was not analyzed without dilution for sample -05 due to the levels of
chloride and sulfate present in the sample; although nitrite was analyzed without dilution for
sample -04 which contained the same levels of chloride and sulfate.
Qualifiers were assigned to the sample data as listed below.
6010B
Trace, below the reporting limit, lead was detected in the laboratory method blank (LMB) and
sample -08. A "13" qualifier was assigned to lead in sample -08.
8260B
Trace methylene chloride, naphthalene, 1.2,3-trichlorobenzene and , and 1,2,4-triehlorobenzene
was detected in the LMB. 1,2,4-trichlorobenzene was ND in the associated field samples. Trace
methylene chloride was found in the trip blank (TB) as well as all the associated field samples.
Trace naphthalene and 1,2,3-trichlorobenzene were found in sample -04. A "B" qualifier was
assigned to methylene chloride in the TB and all samples; and to naphthalene and1,2,3trichlorobenzene in sample -04.
9012B
Trace cyanide was in the LMB and samples -01, -02, -03, -06 and -07. Cyanide in samples -01
through -03 were greater than 5 times the value in the LMB, no qualifier was required. A "B"
qualifier was assigned to cyanide in samples -06 and -07.
MARE Siie 6 Landfill memo 0218 2013
March AR #
2757
Page 131 of 201
Cyanide % recoveries were below the acceptance limit in sample -03 matrix spike and matrix
spike duplicate (MS/MSD). An "M" qualifier was assigned to cyanide in sample -03 due to
matrix effect.
cc:
Matthew Hansen
Jennifer Hendricks
Nancy Carpenter
MARB Sitc 6 Landfill memo 0218 2013
'm
mi
im
6117 5 711.
h
#
In 1.
111, o f
11.1
(Page 1 of 7)
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
PVC i Run
Status
36 - 39
MARCH
Site 6
6M6MW05
12/19/2012 13:55
27.25 - 33.25
MARCH
Site 6
6M6MWO6
12/19/2012 14:35
29 - 35
MARCH
Site 6
6M6MW06
12/19/2012 14:35
29 - 35
N1
N1
N1
N1
FD1
IRP6-5MBMVV05-WG024
320-1336-01
PR / 1
Validated
IRP6-6M6MW03-W6023
320-1336-02
IRP6-6M6MW05-1NG025
320-1336-03
IRP6-6M6MW06-WG024
320-1336-04
IRP6-6M6MW06-WG025
320-1336-05
PR / 1
Validated
PR / 1
PR /
Validated
PR / 1
MARCH
Site 6
5M6MW05
12119/2012 15:25
52 - 55
MARCH
Site 6
6M6MWO3
Re-sult
alkalinity, hydlox. (as CaCO3) A23206
A23206
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
A2540C
chloride
nitrate (as N)
nitrite (as N)
sulfate
E300.0
E300.0
E300.0
E300.0
cyanide
51N901213 mg/L
pH
5W90400 pH units 7.29 HF
Analyte
alkalinity. bleat (as CaCO3)
alkalinity. carb. (as CaCO3)
Method
A2320B
A2320B
01
12/1912012 13:20
1
Validated
IMC41.. RL. OFI
Result
11.40L. RI_ OF r
Rosull
MOL RL, OF]
Resin
390
[5.0, 10, 1]
260
(5.0, 10, 1]
200
NOR
[5.0, 10, 11
NOR
(5.0, 10, 11
NOR
NDR
390
[5.0, 10, 1]
[5.0, 10, 1]
NOR
120
[5.0, 10. 1]
[5.0, 10, 1]
[5.0, 10, 1]
[5.0, 10, 1]
260
(5.0. 10. 1]
[5.0, 10, 1]
mg /L
480
15.4, 20. 1)
900
[5.4, 20, 1]
710
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
75
20
190
8.4
[0.74, 20, 20]
[0.11, 5.0, 5]
(0.080, 5.0, 5]
[0.25, 5.0. 51
130
8.9
54
[0.37. 10. 101
[0.22, 10, 10]
(0.018, 1.0, 11
[0.49. 10, 10]
0.020
(0.0020, 0.020, 1] 0.19
120
NOR
NOR
NOR
i
1[0.100, 0.100. 1]
NOR
79
7.11 HF
OA
NOR
100
(0.0020. 0.020, 11 0.067
[0.100, 0.100, 1]
OR
6.96 HF
M
Validated
OA [MI. RL OF1
Result
(5.0, 10, 1]
(5.0. 10, 1]
NDR
(5 0, 10, 11
200
(5.0, 10, 1]
[5.4, 20, 1]
690
[5.4. 20, 1]
[0.37, 10, 10]
[0.11, 5.0, 5]
[0.016, 1.0, 1]
[0.25, 5.0. 5]
150
15
(0.37. 10, 10]
(0.11, 5.0, 5]
[0.080, 5.0. 51
[0.25, 5.0, 5]
200
NOR
200
15.0, 10, 1]
[5.4, 20, 1]
690
[0.74, 20, 20]
(0.11. 5.0, 5]
[0.080, 5.0, 5]
[0.25, 5.0, 5]
150
15
1.1
100
OA POOL RL. OF]
NOR
[5 0, 10, 1]
[5.0, 10, 1]
[5.0, 10. 1]
NOR
100
[0.0020, 0.020, 1] NOR
[0.0020. 0.020, 11 NOR
[0.0020, 0.020, 1]
[0.100, 0.100. 1]
10100,O100,
[0.100, 0.100, 1]
7.03 HF
,
1]
6.98 HF
Page 133 of 201
March AR #
2757
(Page 2 of 7)
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
MARCH
Site 6
6M6MW07
12/19/2012 15:05
32.5 - 35.5
MARCH
N1
N1
IRP6-6M6MW07-WG023
320-1336-06
PVC /Run
PR / 1
Status
Validated
IRP6-MH2-WG020
320-1336-07
PR / 1
Validated
Analyte
Method
A23206
alkalinity, cat. (as CaCO3)
A23200
alkalinity. hydrox. (as CaCO3) A23206
A23206
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
R.01
170
A2540C
chloride
nitrate (as N)
nitrite (as N)
sulfate
E300.0
E300.0
E300.0
E300.0
cyanide
SW901213 mgIL
0.0023 J
pH
SVV904013 pH units
6.67 HF
OA
NA
LF4-MH2
12/1912012 11:50
20 - 20.5
OA
pADL. RL. OF]
[MEIL. RL. OF]
Re soli
180
170
(5.0, 10, 1)
[5.0. 10, 1]
[5.0, 10, 1]
[5.0, 10, 1]
180
[5.0, 10, 1]
[5.0, 10, 1]
[5.0, 10, 1]
[5.0, 10, 1]
mgIL
480
[5.4, 20. 1j
610
[5.4, 20, 1]
mgIL
mg/L
mg/L
mgIL
56
16
[0.19, 5.0. 5]
[0.11, 5.0, 5]
150
15
[074, 20, 20]
'[0.11, 5.0, 5]
NOR
[0.016, 1.0.1]
NOR
.10.016, 1.0, 1)
57
[0.25, 5.0, 5]
68
'[0.25, 5.0, 5]
NUR
NOR
B
NOR
NOR
[0.0020, 0.020, 1] 0.0034 J
(0.100 0 100. 1]
7.66 H HF
B
[0.0020, 0.020, 1]
[0.100 0.100 1]
OM Nil INN MI UN MI INS #r RR gin MI INS WI 1M11 r SI IMO
MI
IIIII
INN
AI lin
RIO
5711111,
ih
NM or
(Page 3 of 7)
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
PVC I Run
Status
Analyte
arsenic
calcium
MARCH
NA
LF4-MH2
12/19/2012 11:50
20 - 20.5
MARCH
NA
LF4-MH2
12/19/2012 11:50
20 - 20.5
N1
FD1
IRP6-MH2-WG020
320-1336-07
IRP6-MH2-WG021
320-1336-06
PR /
Validated
PR / 1
1
Validated
lead
magnesium
selenium
Method
Units ReSult
SW3010B mg/L NOR
SW6010B mg/L 77
S\/ 0108 mg/L NOR
SVV6010B mgfL 33
SVV60106 mgfL NOR
mercury
SW7470A mgfL
0.00011 J
'OA
0.101. RL. OFF
Resell
[0.012, 0.030, 1]
[0.050, 1.1, 1]
[0.0026. 0.025. 1)
[0.040, 1 0, 1)
[0.013, 0.030, 1)
NOR
QA
MR RI_ OF]
B
[0.012, 0.030, 1]
[0.050, 1.1, 1]
[0.0025, 0.025, 1]
[0.040, 1.0, 1]
[0.013, 0.030, 1]
81
0.0044 J
34
NOR
[0.00010. 0.0010, 1j 0.00010 J
[0.00010, 0.0010, 11
ire is, of
In
Page 135 of 201
March AR #
2757
(Page 4 of 7)
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
PVC / Run
Status
MARCH
Site 6
MARCH
5M6M1N05
12119/2012 15:25
6M6MWO3
12/19/2012 13:20
611,46MWO5
52 -55
Ni
36 - 39
27.25. 33.25
MARCH
Site 6
6M6MW06
12/19/2012 14:35
29 - 35
N1
N1
Ni
IRP6-5M6MW05-VVG024
320-1336-01
IRP6-6M6MW03-WG023
320 -1336 -02
IRP6-6M5MW05-WG025
320-1336-03
PR / 1
PR / 1
PR/1
Validated
Validated
Validated
IRP6-6M6MW06-VVG024
320-1336-04
PR / 1
Validated
Analyte
acetone
benzene
brornobenzene
bromochloromethane
Method
Resin
Units
SW82608 pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
SW826013 pg/L
NDR
tromoform
SW82608 pg/L
NDR
bromomethane
2-butanone (MEI()
n-butylbenzene
sec-butylbenzene
tert-butylbenzene
chlorobenzene
chloroethane
chloroform
1-chlorohexane
chloromethane
2-chlorotoluene
4-chlorotoluene
1,2-dibrorno-3-chlompropane
dibromomethane
1,2-diohlorobenzene
1,3-diohlorobenzene
1,4-clichtorobenzene
1,1-dichloroethane
1.2-dichloroethane
1,1- dichloroethene
1,2-dichloropropane
1,3-dichloropropane
2.2- dichioropropane
1,1 -dichloropropene
cis-1,3-dichloropropene
trans-1,3-clichloropropene
ethylbenzene
ethylene dibromide (ED81
hexachlorobutadiene
isopropylbenzene
p-isopropyltoluene
methyl tert-butyl ether [MTBE)
SW828OB pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
SW62608 pg/L
SW82606 lag/
NOR
SVVI3260B pg/L
NOR
SW62606 pg/L
NOR
pg/L
NOR
SW82606 pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
NOR
SVV62608 pg/L
NOR
SW82606 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
SW132608 pg/L
NOR
SW82808 pgiL
SW82608 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
SW8260B WW1.
NOR
SW8260B pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NDR
NOR
SW626013 pg/L
NDR
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW82609 pg /L
SW82608 pg/L
NOR
SW826013 pg /L
NOR
SVVI326013
MARCH
Site 6
Si le 6
QA ; [MOL. RI OF]
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NMI MI- UN
11.6, 10, 1]
[0.13, 0.40, 1]
[0.066. 1.0. 1 ]
[0.21, 1.0, 1]
[0.21. 0.50, 1]
[0.22, 1.0, 1]
[0.19, 3.0, 1]
[1.2, 10. 1]
[0.12, 1.0. 1]
[0.19, 1 O. 1]
[0.099, 1 0, 1]
[0.11, 0.50. 1]
[0.076. 0.50, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0 052, 0.30. 1]
[0.11, 1.0,1]
[0.083, 1.0, 1]
[0.088, 1.0, 1]
[0.083, 1.0, 1]
[0.047, 0.50, 1]
10.71, 2.0, 1]
[0.17, 1.0, 1]
[0.11. 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0 12, 0.50, 1]
[0.049, 1.0, 1]
[0.057, 1.0, 1]
[0.068, 0.50. 1]
[0.075, 1.0.1]
[0.098, 1.0, 1]
[0.056, 1.0, 1]
[0.078, 1,0, 1]
[0.077, 0.40, 1]
[0.18, 1.0, 1]
[0.080, 1.0, 1]
[0.078, 0.50, 1]
[0.065, 1.0, 1]
[0.099, 1,0, 11
(0.18, 1.0, 1)
[0.17, 0.60, 1]
10 12, 1.0, 1]
(0.10. 1 0, 1]
[0.18. 5.0. 1]
CtA
12/19/2012 13:55
[MDL. RI OF]
Resol
NOR
NOR
[1.6, 10. 1]
[0.13, 0.40, 1]
[0.066, 1 . 0 , 1 ]
NOR
[0.21. 1.0, 11
NOR
NOR
[0.21, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.22, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.19, 3.0, 1]
NUR
[1.2, 10, 1]
NOR
[0.12, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.19, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.099, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.11, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.076. 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.13, 1.0. 1]
NDR
[0.052, 0.30, 1] Noll
[0.11, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.083, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.088, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.083, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.047, 0.50. 1] NOR
[0.71, 2.0, 1]
NOR
[0.17, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.11, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.12, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.049, 1.0.1] NOR
[0.057, 1.0. 1] NOR
[0.068, 0.50. 1] NOR
[0.075, 1.0.1] NOR
[0.098, 1.0. 1] NOR
[0.056, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.078, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.077, 0.40, 1] NOR
[0.18, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.080, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.078, 0.50, 1] NOR
Re-sa
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NUR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
. [0 065, 1.0, 11
NDR
NOR
NOR
[0.099, 1.0, 1]
[0.18, 1.0, 1]
[0.17, 0.60,1]
1[0.12. 1.0, 1]
[0.10. 1.0, 1]
.[0 18. 5 0. 1]
11111
NO IBM
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
I
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
OA
[MX. RI. OF]
Resill[
[1.6. 10. 1]
[0.13. 0.40, 1]
[0.066, 1.0, 1 ]
10.21, 1.0, 1]
[0.21, 0.50, 1]
10.22, 1.0. 1)
(0.19, 3.0, 1]
[1.2, 10, 1]
[0.12, 1.0. 13
[0 19, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0099, 1.0, 1]
[0.11, 0.50.1]
[0.076, 0.50, 1]
NOR
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.052, 0.30. 1]
[0.11. 1.0. 1]
[0.083, 1.0. 1]
NOR
[0.088. 1.0,1]
[0.083, 1.0, 1]
[0.047, 0.50, 1]
[0.71, 2.0.1]
NOR
[0.17. 1.0, 1]
[0.11, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.12, 0.50, 1]
[0.049, 1.0, 1]
[0.057, 1.0, 1]
[0.068, 0.50. 1]
NOR
[0.075, 1.0.1]
[0.098, 1.0, 1]
NDR
[0.056, 1.0, 1]
[0.078, 1.0, 1]
[0.077, 0.40, 1]
[0.18, 1.0, 1]
[0.080, 1.0, 1]
[0.078, 0.50, 1]
[0.055, 1.0, 1]
[0.099, 1.0,1]
[0.18, 1.0, 1]
[0.17, 0.60, 1]
[0.12, 1.0, 11
[0.10, 1.0, 1]
[0.18, 5.0, 1]
NOR
111111
CiA
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NUR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
!
PR / 1
Validated
[MDL. RL. OFf
R,5Uti
[1 6, 10, 1]
[0.13. 0.40, 1]
[0.065, 1 . 0 , 1 ]
[0.21, 1.0, 1]
10.21, 0.50, 1]
[0.22, 1 0, 1]
[0.19, 3.0, 1]
[1.2, 10, 1]
[0.12, 1.0, 1]
[0.19, 1 0, 1]
[0.099, 1.0, 1]
[0.11. 0.50, 1]
10.076, 0.50, 1]
10.13. 1.0, 1]
[0.052, 0.30, 1]
[0.11, 1.0, 1]
[0.083, 1.0, 1]
(COBB. 1.0, 1]
[0.083, 1.0, 1]
[0.047, 0.50, 1]
[0.71, 2.0, 1]
[0.17, 1 0, 1]
[0.11, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.12, 0.50, 1]
[0.049, 1.0, 1]
[0.057. 1.0, 1]
[0.068. 0.50, 1]
[0.075. 1.0, 1]
[0.098. 1.0. 1]
[0.056, 1.0, 1]
[0.078, 1.0, 1]
[0.077, 0.40, 1]
[0.18. 1.0. 1]
NOR
.
NOR
MARCH
Site 6
6M6MWO6
12/19/2012 14:35
29 - 35
F01
IRP6-6M6MVV06-VVG025
320-1336-05
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
[0.080, 1.0.1]
'[0.078,0.50. 1]
NOR
[0.065, 1.0, ]
[0.099, 1.0. 1]
[0.18, 1.0. 1
[0.17, 0.60. 1]
[0.12, 1.0, 1]
[0.10, 1.0, 1]
,[0.18. 5.0, 1]
NDR
NM MI ON
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
QA
[friDL. RI. OF]
[1.6, 10, 1]
[0.13. 0.40, 1]
[0.066, 1.0, 1]
[0.21, 1.0, 1]
[0.21. 0.50, 11
[0.22, 1.0, 1]
[0.19, 3.0, 1]
[1.2. 10. 1]
[0.12, 1.0, 1]
[0 19, 1.0, 1]
[0.099, 1.0, 1]
[0.11, 0.50, 1]
[0.076, 0.50, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.052, 0.30, 1]
[0,11, 1.0, 1]
[0.083, 1.0, 1]
[0.088, 1.0, 1]
[0.083, 1.0, 1]
[0.047, 0.50, 1]
[0.71, 2.0, 1]
[0.17, 1 0, 1]
[0.11, 1,0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.12, 0.50, 1]
[0.049, 1.0, 1]
[0.057, 1.0, 1]
[0.068, 0.50, 1]
[0.075. 1.0, 11
[0.098, 1.0, 1]
[0,056, 1.0, 1]
[D.078, 1.0.1]
[0.077, 0.40. 1]
[0.18, 1.0. 13
[0.080, 1.0. 1]
[0.078, 0.50, 1]
[0.065, 1 0, 1]
![0.099, 1.0. 1]
[0.18, 1.0, 1]
[0.17, 0.60, 1]
NOR
[4:).12, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.10, 1.0, 1]
![0.18. 5 0, 1]
NDR
111111
IIIIIII
nil MI MI NO'
EN IN
"Me 1.1
h
;1117 5 71111
(Page 5 of 7)
Analyte
4-methyl-2-pentanone (MIRK)
methylene chloride
naphthalene
n-propylbenzene
styrene
1,1.1.2-tetrachloroethane
1,1,2.2-tetrachloroethane
toluene
1,2.3-trichiorobenzene
1.1 ,2-trichloroethane
trichlorofluoromethane
12,3-trichloropropane
vinyl chloride
m- & p-xylene
o-xylene
xylenes, total
12/19/2012 15:25
52 - 55
MARCH
Site 6
6M6MW03
121191201213:20
36 - 39
MARCH
Site 6
6M6MW05
12/19/2012 13:65
27.25 - 33.25
MARCH
Site 6
6M6MW06
12/19/2012 14:35
29 - 35
MARCH
Site 6
6M8MWO8
12/19/2012 14:35
29 - 35
N1
N1
N1
N1
FD1
IRP6-5M6MW05-W0024
IRP6-6M6MW03-WG023
320-1336-02
PR /
Validated
IRP6-6M6MVV05-WG025
320-1336-03
IRP6- 6M6MW06 -WG024
320-1336-04
PR / 1
Validated
IRP6-6M6MW013-WG025
320-1336-05
PR /
Validated
IMDL, RI_ OF)
Restill
[POOL Pt. OF]
R..0
[1.1, 10, 1]
[0.21, 2.0, 1]
[0.25, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.066, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 0.50, 1]
[0.15, 0.50, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.068, 1.0, 1]
[0.16, 1.0. 1)
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.053, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0,10, 1.0, 1]
[0.067, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[1.1, 10, 1]
NOR
10.21, 2.0, 1]
10.25, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.068, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 0.50, 11
[0.15, 0.50, 11
0.40 J
NOR
[0.27.1.0, 1]
[0.081, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.14, 1.0, I]
[0.068, 1.0, 1]
[0.16, 1.0.1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.053, 1.0. 1]
[0.13, 1.0. 1]
[0,10, 1.0.1]
[0.067, 1.0.1]
[0.27, 1.0,1]
[0.081, 1.0, 1]
[0.083, 1.0, 1]
[0.078, 0.50. 1]
[0.10, 2.0. 1]
[0.087, 1.0, 1]
[0.11, 2.0, 1]
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
PVC I Run
Status
MARCH
Site 6
Method
5M6MVV05
320-1336-01
PR / 1
Validated
Units
Resurt
5W8260B on_
NOR
SVV826013 pg/L
9.37 J
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
SW826013 pg/L
NOR
SW8260B pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
1
MI_ Rt. OF]
Res' N
[1.1, 10, 1]
[0.21, 2,0, 1]
[0.25, 1.0.1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
NOR
NOR
NOR
[0.066, 1.0.1]
[0,14, 0.50. 1]
[0.15, 0.50, 1]
NOR
[0.14, 1.0, 11
NOR
NOR
[0.068, 1.0, 1]
NOR
SW826013 pg/L
SW826013 pg/L
NOR
[0.16, 1.0, 11
NOR
NOR
NOR
SW82606 pg/L
NOR
SW826013 pg/L
SW826013 pg/L
SW826013 pg/L
NOR
SW82606 pg/L
NOR
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.053, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.10.1.0, 1]
[0.067, 1.0, 1]
[0.27, 1.0, 1]
SW826013 pg/L
SW826013 pg/L
NOR
NOR
[0,0131, 1.0, 1]
(0.083, 1.0, 11
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
SW326013 pg/L
SW82600 pg/L
svve26013
pgIL
PR / 1
Validated
MI_ RI. DF]
Result
[1I, 10, 1]
NOR
[0,21.2.0, 1]
[0.25, 1.0, 1]
[0.13. 1.0, 1]
[0.066. 1.0, 1]
[0.14. 0.50, 1]
[0.15, 0.50, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
0.64 J
NOR
NOR
[0.068, 1.0, 1]
[0.16, 1.0,1]
[0.14, 1.0,1]
[0.053, 1.0,1]
[0.13, 1.0,1]
[0.10, 1.0, 1]
[0.057, 1.0, 1]
[0.27, 1.0, 1]
[0.081, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[13.083, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0,078, 0.50, 1]
NOR
NOR
(0.10, 2.0, 11
NOR
NOR
NOR
[0.087, 1.0, 1]
[0.11, 2.0, 1]
NOR
[0.078, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.10, 2.0, 1]
NOR
[0.087, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.11, 2.0, 1]
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
I
OA
B
0.39 J
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
CIA
B
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
OA
B
0.38 J
B
0.26J
B
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
0.25J
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
[0_083, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.078, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.10, 2.0, 1]
NOR
[0.ota, to,
1]
[0.11, 2.0, 1]
OA
NOR
NOR
B
1
CA
Wit RI. OF].
[1.1, 10, 1]
B
[0.21, 2_0, 1]
NOR
[0,25, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0,066, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 0.50, 1)
(0.15, 0.50, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.068, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.16, 1_0, 1]
NOR
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.053, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1)
[0.10, 1.0, 1]
[0.067, 1.0, 1]
[0.27, 1.0, 1]
[0.081, 1.0, 1]
[0.083, 1.0, 1]
[0.078, 0.50, 1]
[0,10, 2.0, 1]
[0,087, 1.0, 1]
[0.11, 2.0, 1]
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
Page 137 of 201
March AR #
2757
(Page 6 of 7)
Analyte
acetone
benzene
bromobenzene
bromochloromethane
bromoform
bromomethane
2-butanone (MEK)
n-butylbenzene
sec-butylbenzene
tert-butylbenzene
chlorobenzene
chloroethane
chloroform
1-chlorohexane
chioromethane
2-chlorotoluene
4-chlorotoluene
ciibromomethane
1,2-clichrorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1,4-dichlorobenzene
1,1-dichloroethane
1,2-dichloroethane
1,1-dichloroethene
1,2-dichloropropane
1,3-dichloropropane
2,2-dich[oropropane
1,1-dichloropropene
cis-1.3-dichloropropene
ethylbenzene
hexachlorobutadiene
;sopropylbenzene
p-isOpropylIoluene
NIP IN OM
11E11
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
MARCH
Site 6
6M6MVV07
12/1912012 15:05
32.5 - 35.5
MARCH
NA
LF4-MH2
12/1912012 11:50
20 - 20 5
MARCH
NA
FIELDQC
N1
N1
IRP6-6M6MVV07-WG023
320-1336-06
IRP6-M1-12-WG020
TB1
IRP6- TB-008
PVC /Run
PR / 1
PR / 1
Status
Validated
Validated
Method
Units
[M:11_, RL. OF]
Result
NOR
NOR
[1.6, 10. 1]
[0.13, 0.40, 1]
[0.066, 1.0, 1]
(0.21, 1.0. 1]
[0.21, 0 50, 11
[0.22. 1.0. 1]
[0.19. 3.0, 11
[1.2. 10, 1]
[0.12. 1.0, 1]
(0.19, 1.0, 1]
[0.099, 1.0, 1]
[0.11, 0.50. 1]
(0.076, 0.50, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.052, 0.30, 1]
(0.11, 1.0, 1]
[0.083, 1.0, 1]
NoR
[0.0813, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.083, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.047. 0.50. 11 NOR
[0.71, 2.0, 1]
NOR
[0.17. 1.0. 11
NOR
[0.11. 1.0, 11
NOR
Re suit
SW82606 pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
NOR
SW826013 pgfL
5W826013 pglL
NOR
SW8260B pgIL
NOR
SW826013 pg/L
NOR
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
NOR
NOR
pg/L
NOR
SW826013 pg/L
NOR
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
SW826013 pg/L
NOR
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pglL
NOR
SW826013 pg/L
NOR
SW8260B pglL
NOR
SW826013 pg /L
SW826013 pgfL
SW826013 pgIL
SW826013 pg/L
SW826013 pg/L
NOR
SW82606 pg/L
SW8260B pglL
SW82606 pg/L
NOR
SW1326013 pg/L
NOR
SW82606 pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
SW826013 pglL
NOR
SV1/1326013
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
SW82606 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
NOR
SW826013 pg/L
NOR
SW82606 pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
SW82606 pg/t.
SW82606 pglL
NOR
SW826013 pg/L
NOR
SW82606 pg/L
SW82605 pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
NOR
SOO
NOR
NoR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
OA
320-1336-07
NOR
320-1336-09
PR / 1
Validated
*la, RL. OF]
[1.5. 10. 11
1(0.13, 0.40, 1]
[0.066, 1.0, 1]
[0.21, 1.0. 1]
[0.21, 0.50, 1]
[0.22, 1.0. 1]
[0.19, 3.0, 1]
[1.2, 10, 1]
[0.12, 1.0, 1]
[019. 1.0, 1]
[0.099, 1.0, 1]
[011, 0.50, 1]
[0.076, 0,50, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 11
[0.052, 0.30, 1]
[0.11, 1.0, 1]
[0.083, 1.0, 1]
NOR
NOR
NOR
NoR
NOR
NoR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
(0.14. 1.0.1]
[0.12. 0.50, 1]
[0.049, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.057, 1 0, 1]
[0.068, 0.50, 1]
[0.075, 1.0, 1]
(0.098. 1.0, 1]
(0.056, 1.0, 1]
(0.078. 1.0.1]
(0.077. 0.40, 11
[0.18. 1.0, 1]
(0.080, 1.0, 1]
[0.078. 0.50, 11
(0.065, 1.0, 11
[0.099, 1.0, 1]
(0.18, 1.0, 1]
(0.17, 0.60, 1)
(0.12, 1.0. 1]
[0.10. 1.0, 1]
[0.18, 5.0, 11
NOR
MIN ME NM
QA
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
11.1
1211912012
R65011
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
I
I
I
1
IMDL. RL PF1
[1.6. 10, 1]
[0.13, 0.40. 1]
[0.066, 1.0, 1]
[0.21. 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.21, 0.50.1]
NOR
[0.22, 1.0, 1]
[0.19, 3.0, 1]
[1.2, 10, 1]
[0.12, 1.0, 1j
[0.19, 1.0, 1]
[0.099, 1.0, 1]
[0.11, 0.50, 1]
[0.076, 0.50, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 11
[0.052, 0.30. 1)
[0.11, 1.0. 1]
[0,083, 1.0, 1]
[0.088, 1.0, 1]
[0.083, 1.0. 1]
[0.047, 0.50, 1]
[0.71, 2.0, 1]
[0.17, 1.0, 1]
[0.11, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.12, 0.50. 11
[0.049, 1.0, 1]
[0.057, 1.0, 1]
[0.068, 0.50, 1]
[0.075, 1.0, 1]
[0.098, 1.0, 1]
[0,056, 1.9, 1]
[0.078, 1.0, 1]
[0.077, 0.40, 1]
[018, 1.0, 1]
[0.080. 1.0, 1]
[0.078, 0.50, 1)
[0.065, 1.0, 11
[0.099, 1.0, 1]
[0.18, 1.0, 1]
[0.17, 0.60, 1]
[0.12, 1.0, 1]
[0.10, 1.0, 1]
[0.18, 5.0, 1]
NOR
NoR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
1[0.0138, 1.0.1]
1[0.083. 1.0, 11
NOR
[0.047. 0.50, 1]
,[0.71, 2.0, 1]
l[0.17, 1.0, 1]
NOR
1[0.11, 1.0, 11
NOR
i[0.14, 1.0, 1]
1[0.12, 0.50, 1]
,[0.049, 1.0, 11
NOR
[0.057, 1.0, 11
[0.068, 0.50, 11
[0.075, 1.0, 11
1[0.098, 1.0, 1]
`[0.056, 1.0, 1]
1[0.078. 1.0, 1]
[0.077. 0.40, 1]
[0.18. 1.0, 1]
[0.080. 1.0. 1]
[0.078. 0.50, 1]
[0.065, 1.0, 1]
[0.099, 1.0, 1]
[0.18, 1.0, 1]
[0.17. 0.60, 11
[0.12. 1.0, 1]
[0.10. 1.0, 11
[0.10, 5.0, 1]
NoR
I
I QA
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NoR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
MDR
NDR
OM MN MN MI UM ME SIM
IN
a" 11" "'I '1" '1"
1"
f7 5
i h#
7"'
um ire
iPaue 7 of 71
Anaiyte
4-methyl-2-pentanone (MiBK)
methylene chloride
naphthalene
n-propylbenzene
styrene
toluene
1.1,2-trichloroethane
tnchloroethene (TCE)
trichlor0fluoromethane
vinyl chloride
m- & p-xylene
o-xylene
xylenes. total
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
MARCH
Site 6
6M6MWD7
12/19/2012 15:05
32.5 - 35.5
MARCH
NA
LF4-MH2
12/19/2012 1 1:50
20 - 20 5
MARCH
NA
FIELDQC
12/19/2012
N1
N1
TB1
IRP6-6M6MVV07-WG023
320-1336-06
IRP5-MH2-WG020
320-1336-07
IRP6-TB-008
320-1336-09
PVC /Run
PR / 1
PR /
PR / 1
Status
Validated
Validated
Method
Units atmot
oa
MDL. RI- DFI
Rgsull
NOR
NOR
[1.1, 10, 1]
[0.21, 2.0, 1]
[0.25, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.066, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 0.50, 1]
[0.15, 0.5D, ]
[0.14, 1.0, 1 ]
NOR
[0.068,1.0, 1]
NDR
SW826013 pg/L
SVV82606 pg/L
5W826013 pg/L
SW826013 pg/L
SW826013 pg/L
NOR
NOR
sw82608 pg/L
NOR
SW82608 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
SVV13260B pg/L
NOR
SW826013 pg/L
SW826013 pg/L
NOR
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
[0.16, 1.0. 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.053, 1.0. ]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.10, 1.0, 1 ]
[0.067, 1.0, ]
[0.27, 1.0, 1 ]
(0.081, 1.0, ]
(0.083, 1.0.
[0.078. 0.50, 1]
[0.10. 2.0, 1]
[0.087, 1.0, 1]
[0.11, 2.0, 1]
SW82608 pg/L
NDR
SW8260B pg /L
SW8260B pgiL
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW826013 pg/L
0.38 J
SW82606 pg/L
NOR
SW826013 pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
.8
1
1
0.39 J
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NoR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
_
Validated
QA
8
NM. R1_. 091
P.csult
(1.1, 10, 1]
[0.21, 2.0, 1]
(0.25, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.066. 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 0.50, 1]
[0.15. 0.50, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.068, 1 0, 1]
[0.16, 1.0, 1]
[0.14. 1.0, 1]
[0.053. 1,0, 1]
[0.13. 1.0, 1]
[0.10, 1.0, 1]
[0.067, 1.0, 1]
[0.27, 1.0, 1]
[0.081. 1.0, 1]
[0.083, 1.0, 1]
[0.078, 0.50, 1]
[0.10, 2.0, 1]
[0.087, 1.0, 1]
[0.11, 2.0, 1]
NOR
0,44 J
NOR
NOR
NDR
QA
B
INIDL. RL. OFI
[1.1, 10, 1]
[0.21, 2.0, 1]
(0.25, 1.0. 1]
[0.13, 1,0, 1]
(0,066. 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0,14, 0.50,1]
[0.15, 0.50, 1]
[0,14, 1.0, 1]
[0.068, 1.0, 1]
[0.16. 1.0, 1]
[0.14. 1.0, 1]
[0.053, 1.0, 1]
[0.13. 1.0, 1]
[0.10, 1.0, 1]
[0.067, 1.0, 1]
[0.27, 1.0, 1]
[0,081, 1,0, 1]
[0.083, 1.0, 1]
[0.076, 0,50, 1]
[0.10, 2.0, 1]
[0.067, 1.0, 1]
NOR
(0.11, 2_0, 1]
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
l
of
Si In.
MI OM MI
MI MI
SIM
Th 1111#
7IINI
11117
MI II.
Fre 1111,11
(Page 1 of 4)
MARCH
NA
LF4-LCRS1
12/19/2012 09:25
70 - 70
MARCH
NA
LF4-LCRS2
12/1912012 10:45
160 - 160
N1
N1
PVC /Run
IRP6-LCR 51-W1_023
320-1337-01
PR / 1
IRP6-LCRS2-VVL019
320-1337-02
PR 11
Status
Not Validated
Not Validated
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
Analyte
Method
A2320B
A2320B
A2320B
Units
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
A2540C
mg/L
1,900
[11, 40, 1]
2,400
[11, 40, 1]
chloride
nitrate (as N)
nitrite (as N)
sulfate
E300.0
E300.0
E300.0
E300.0
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
mg/L
560
490
NOR
[1.9, 50. 50]
[0.11, 5.0, 5]
[0.080, 5.0, 5]
[0.25, 5.0, 5]
85
[1.9, 50, 50]
[0.11, 5.0, 5]
[0.080, 5.0, 5]
p.26, 5.0, 5]
cyanide
SW9012B mg/L
NOR J
[0.0020, 0.020, 1]
NOR J
[0.0020, 0.020, 1]
pH
SW0040B pH units 6.71 H HF
[0.100, 0.100, 1]
6.92 H HF
(0.100, 0.100.11
alkalinity, hydrox. (as CaCO3) A23200
RADL. RL, Of]
Resuli
1,400
680
[5.0, 10, 1]
[5.0, 10, 1]
[5.0, 10, 1]
[5.0, 10. 1]
1.400
[5.0, 10. 1]
[5.0, 10, 1]
[5.0, 10, 1]
[5.0, 10, 1]
Result
680
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
OA
NDR
NDR
NOR
NDR
QA
1.MOL, RL. OF]
1111
March AR #
2757
Page 140 of 201
[Page 2 of
MARCH
NA
LF4-LCRS1
12/19/2012 09:25
70 - 70
MARCH
NA
LF4-LCRS2
12/19/2012 10:45
N1
N1
IRP6-LCRS1-W1023
320-1337-01
IRP6-LCRS2-W1019
320-1337-02
PVC /Run
PR / 1
PR / 1
Status
Not Validated
Not Validated
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
160 -160
Analyte
arsenic
calcium
lead
magnesium
selenium
Method
SW6010B rng/L.
NOR
[0.012, 0.030, 1]
[0.050, 1.1.1]
[0.0025, 0.025, 1]
[0.040, 1.0, 1]
[0.013. 0.030, 1]
mercury
SW7470A mg/L
NOR J
[0.00010, 0.0010, 1. NOR
Units
Resull
SW6010B mg/L NOR J
SW6010B mg(L 250
SW6010B rng/L NOR
SW6010B mg/L 120
MI NMI OM MI MI MS EMI MD
RA PAM. RL. DFI
IIIMI
Result
NOR
290
NOR
290
NOR
1111
OA
MX, RL, OF1
[0.012, 0.030, 1]
[0.050. 1.1, 1]
[0.0025, 0.025, 1]
[0.040, 1.0, 1]
[0,013, 0.030, 1]
[0.00010, 0.0010, 13
MN IMO
IIIIIII
ma um
I=
ME MID
111117
h
ONN
Irk In OM
(Page 3 of 4)
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
PVC I Run
Status
MARCH
NA
LF4-LCRS1
12/19/2012 09:25
70 - 70
MARCH
N1
N1
IR P6-LCRS1-WL023
320-1337-01
PR / 1
Not Validated
IRP6-LCRS2-VVL019
320-1337-02
PR / 1
Analyte
acetone
benzene
bromobenzene
bromochloromethane
Method
Units
SVV8260B pg/L
SVV826013 pg/L
Result
SW82606 pg/L
NOR
SW826013 pg /L
NOR
bromod ichloro methane
bromoform
bromomethane
2-butanone (MEK)
n-butylbenzene
sec-butylbenzene
tert-buty !benzene
chlorobenzene
chloroethane
chloroform
1-ch lorohexane
chloromethane
2-chlorotoluene
4-chlorotoluene
dibromochlorornethane
dibromomethane
1,2-dichlorobenzene
1,3-dichlorobenzene
1 ,4-dichlorobenzene
, 1-dichloroetha ne
1,2-dichloroethane
1,1- dichloroethene
SW82608 pg/L
NDR
SVV82608 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NDR
SW82606 pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
pg/L
SVV826013 pg/L
NOR
NOR
[1.6, 10, 1]
9.9 J
[0.13, 0.40, 1] NOR
[0.068, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.21, 1.0, 1]
NDR
[0.21, 0.50, 1] NDR
[0.22, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.19, 3.0, 1]
NOR
[1.2. 10, 1]
NDR
[0.12, 1.0, 1]
NDR
NOR
[019, 1.0, 1]
[0.099, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.11, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.076, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
0.48 J
[0.052, 0.30, 1] NOR
SW8260B pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SVV82608 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NDR
10.11. 1.0, 1]
NDR
SW826013 pg/L
NOR
SW8260B pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
SVV826013 pg/L
NOR
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
SW82600 pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
SW82600 pg/L
SW82800 pg/L
SVV82606 pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
0.25 J
NOR
[0.083, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.088, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.083, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.047, 0.50, 1] NOR
NDR
[0. 71.2.0, 1)
[0.17, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.11, 1.0, 1)
NDR
NOR
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.12, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.049, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0_057, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.068, 0.50, 1] NOR
[0.075, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.098, 1.0, 1] 0.36.1
[0.056, 1.0, 1] NDR
[0.078, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.077, 0.40, 1] NOR
[0,18, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0_080, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.078, 0.50, 1] NOR
(0.065, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.099, 1.0, 1] NOR
[0.18, 1.0, 1]
NOR
(0.17, 0.60, 1] NOR S
(0.12, 1.0, 1]
NDR
[0.10, 1.0, 1]
NOR
17
[0_18, 5.0, 1]
1
1 ,2-dichloropropane
1
, 3-dich loropropane
2,2-dichloropropane
1,1-dichloropropene
cis-1 .3-dich/oropropene
trans-1,3-d ichlo rop ro pe n e
ethy Ibenzen e
hexachlorobutadiene
isopropylbenzene
p-isopropyltoluene
SVV826013
24
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR 3
NOR
OA
WI, RL, DP]
NA
LF4-LCRS2
12119/2012 10:45
160 - 160
Not Validated
Result
NOR
NOR
QA
NOt. RI. OF)
[1.6, 10I 1]
[0.13, 0.40, 1]
[0.066. 1.0, 1]
[0.21, 1 0, 1]
[0.21, 0.50, 1]
[0.22, 1.0. 11
[0.19, 3.0, 11
[1.2, 10,11
[0.12, 1.0, 1]
[0,19, 1.0, 1]
[0.099, 1.0, 1]
[0.11, 0.50, 1]
[0.076. 0.50, 1]
(0.13. 1.0, 1]
[0.052, 0.30, 1]
[0.11, 1.0, 1]
[0.083, 1.0, 1]
[0.088, 1.0, 1]
[0.083, 1_0, 1]
[0,047, 0.50, 1]
[0.71, 2.0, 1)
[0.17. 1.0, 1)
(0.11, 1.0, 1)
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.12, 0.50, 1]
(0.049, 1.0, 11
[0.057, 1.0, 1]
[0,068, 0.50, 1]
(0.075, 1.0, 1)
[0.098, 1.0, 1]
[0.056, 1.0, 1]
[0,078, 1.0, 1]
[0.077, 0.40. 1]
[0.18. 1.0, 1]
[0.080, 1.0, 11
[0,078, 0.50, 1]
[0.065, 1,0, 1]
[0.099, 1.0, 1]
[0,18, 1.0, 1]
[0.17, 0.60, 1]
[0,12, 1.0.1]
[0.10, 1.0, 1]
[0.18, 5.0, 1]
Rife Ilia of
2757
Page 142 of 201
March AR #
(Page 4 of 4i
Base
Site
Point
Sampling Date
Sample Depth
Sample Type
Field Sample
Lab Sample
PVC Run
Status
MARCH
N1
N1
IRPB-LCRS1-W1023
320-1337-01
PR / 1
Not Validated
IR PB-LC RS2-VVL019
Analyte
Method
4- methyl- 2- pentanone (MIBK)
methylene chloride
naphthalene
SW82606 pg/L.
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
NOR
SVV826013 pg/L
NDR
tetrachloroethene ( PC E)
toluene
1 ,2,4-trichlorobenzene
1 ,1, 1-trichloroethane
1 .1 .2-trichloroethane
SW8260B pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
NOR
SVV8260B pg/L
SVV8260B pg/L
NOR
tichloroethene (TCE)
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
SW82606 pg/L
SW82608 pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW8260B pg/L
SW82606 p9/1.
NOR
n-propylbenzene
styrene
, 1, 1,2-tetrachlo roetha ne
1, 1,2, 2-tetrachloroetha n e
1
trich loran uorometh a n e
1 ,2,3-tri chic ropropane
1 ,2,4
methylbe nzen e
1 ,3,5-tri methylbenz ene
vinyl chloride
m- & p-xylene
o-xylene
xylenes, total
INN
MARCH
NA
LF4-LCRS1
12/1912012 09.25
70 - 70
Units
ResuN
OA IMOL RL. OF]
NA
LF4-LCRS2
12119/2012 10:45
160 - 160
320-1337-02
PR /
Not Validated
1
Resa
QA
[MIX. RL. OF]
[1.1, 10, 1]
[0.21, 2.0, 1]
[0.25, 1.0, 1]
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.066. 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 0.50, 1]
[0.15, 0.50, 11
[0,14, 1.0, 1]
[0.068, 1.0, 1]
[0,16, 1.0, 1]
[0.14, 1.0, 1]
[0.053, 1.0, 11
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
[0.10, 1.0, 1]
[0.067, 1.0, 1]
[0,27, 1.0, 1]
[0,081, 1.0, 1]
[0.083, 1.0, 1]
NOR
NOR
[1.1, 10, 1]
[0.21, 2.0, 1]
[0.26, 1.0, 11
[0.13, 1.0, 1]
NOR
[0.066, 1.0.1]
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
[0.14, 0.50, 1 ]
[0.15, 0.50, 1]
[0.14, 1 0. 11
[0.068, 1.0. ]
[0.16, 1,0, 11
[0.14, 1.0, 11
[0.053, 1.0, 1 ]
[0.13, 1.0, 11
[0.10, 1.0, 11
[0.067, 1.0,
[0.27, 1.0, 1
[0.081, 1.0, ]
[0.083, 1.0, 1 ]
[0.078, 0.50, 1]
[0.10, 2.0, 1
[0.087, 1.0, 1 ]
NOR
(0,078, 0.50, 11
[0.10, 2.0, 11
[0.087, 1.0, 11
NOR
ram, 2.0, 11
NOR
[0.11, 2.0, 1]
0.39 J B
0,28 J
0.23 J
0.22 J B
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
2.7
NOR
MN MI= MIN Ell MI
11111
0.40 J B
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NDR
NOR
NOR
NOR
NOR
MMI MN NM MI NO gm so
II1 MIN OM MI MO um ma
X57! Ih
TestAmerica West Sacramento Lab Qualifiers
Method
Group
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
Qualifier Footnote
$
Analyte analyzed for but was not detected.
Results or reporting limits flagged with a ** have not been corrected for dry weight.
est
Estimated value. See narrative for details.
One or more quality control criteria failed
q
x
More then five qualifiers used for this result
A
Result from Aldol-condensation product.
AF
Analyte was detected, but the result is estimated due to a QC failure.
AP
Altered Pattern
BB
Sample > 4x spike concentration.
Reporting limits raised due to high level of non-target analytes.
BH
Sample analyzed after holding time expired.
BU
BV
Sample received after holding time expired.
BY
Sample received at improper temperature.
BZ
Sample preserved improperly
CB1
CB1 Initial Calibration Blank
CB2
CB2 Continuing calibration blank No. 1
CB3
CB4
CB5
CB6
CB7
CB8
CB9
See narrative.
CI
Hydrocarbon response in gasoline range but does not resemble gas.
CO
Confirmation analysis.
CON
CQ
Analyte conc. greater than 10 times the blank conc.
CV1
CV1 Initial calibration verification
CV2 Continuing calibration verification No. 1
CV2
CV3
CV4
CV5
CV6
CV7
CV8
CV9
0
Result was obtained from the analysis of a dilution.
DF
Reporting Limits Elevated due to matrix Interference
The concentration is estimated or not reported due to dilution or the presence of interfering analytes.
DIL
1.ge 11.0f
2757
Method
Group
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
*
March AR #
Page 144 of 201
Qualifier Footnote
DU
Insufficient sample quantity for matrix spike/dup matrix spike.
EST
Estimated value. See narrative for details.
ET
Sample was extracted past end of recommended max. holding time.
EY
Result exceeds normal dynamic range; reported as min. est.
FL
Fail @ 24 Hours.
Elevated reporting limit. The reporting limit is elevated due to matrix interference.
G
GB
Matrix spike recovery not within control.
GR
Internal standard recovery is outside method recovery limit.
GY
Analyte assoc. with sample processing and analysis in lab environ.
IA
Results are valid even though CCV recovery outside of limits.
IB
CCV recovery above limit; analyte not detected.
IDL
Any positive detection reported is greater than or equal to the instrument detection limit.
See Corrective Action Report
IG
IH
Calibrtn verif. recov. below method CL for this analyte.
1J
Calibrtn. verif. recov. above method CL for this analyte.
IM
Method does not include this analyte as part of the compound list.
Contract limits originate from BP-GCLN Technical Requirements
10
IS
Insufficient Sample
The associated internal standard is outside laboratory acceptance criteria due to confirmed matrix interferences.
ISA
Estimated result. The associated internal standard is outside laboratory acceptance criteria.
ISB
Temperature during TCLP extraction exceeded SW1311 range.
IT
The analyte was positively identified. but the quantitation is an estimate.
JA
J=EPA Flag - Esitmated value; DX = Value< lowest standard (MQL). but > MDL.
JDX
Confirmatory analysis was past holding time. Original result not confirmed.
LB
LCA
This analyte is not considered to be an "analyte of concern" for the evaluation of process control.
LD
Confirmatory analysis not performed as required by the method.
LG
Surrogate recovery below the accceptance limits_
LH
Surrogate recovery above the acceptance limits.
LM
MS and/or MSD above acceptance limits. See Blank Spike (LCS).
LN
MS and/or MSD below acceptance limits. See Blank Spike (LOS).
LO
MS and/or MSD result unavailable. Batch accept. based on LCS rec.
LP
LOS rec. above meth. control limits. Analyte ND Data not impacted.
LQ
LOS recovery above method control limits
LR
LCS recovery below method control limits.
Analyte %RSD>meth. calib. limits. Avg %RSD for all meet SW846
LS
RPD calc. does not provide useful info due to sample weight variation.
LT
LU
Unquant. hydrocarbons in sample. outside reported carbon range.
LV
Non-fuel pattern present.
MA
MS/MSD results unavail. due to failed CCV: batch accepted per LCS.
MBA
This analyte is present at a reportable level in the associated method blank.
MBB
This analyte is present at a reportable level in the associated method blank but is less than 5% of the sample amount.
MN OM MI -- ii
MIMI NM- OM
mil mg gm -- - gm
IN
IIIII I
Method
Group
*
MN
1111
MI OM
OM
2 57
/1.1h
111111,
NOM
"le
1
of
Qualifier Footnote
MBC
This analyte is present in the associated method blank at an amount that is less than five times the reporting limit.
MBD
This analyte is present in the associated method blank at an amount that is less than two times the reporting limit.
MBE
This analyte is present in the associated method blank.
Any positive detection reported is greater than or equal to the method detection limit.
MDL
ME
The percent recovery of the analyte is outside the control limits but within marginal exceedance limits.
MM
MS and/or MSD acceptance criteria not met.
MSA
The recovery and RPD were not calculated because the sample was diluted beyond the ability to quantitate a recovery.
MSB
The recovery and RPD were not calculated because the sample amount was greater than four times the spike amount,
MSC
The percent recovery of this analyte in the associated laboratory control sample is within control limits.
MSD
This analyte is not considered to be an "analyte of concern" for the evaluation of process control.
MSH
Due to the negative recovery obtained in the spiked sample, the percent recovery and RPD were not calculated.
NC
The recovery and/or RPD were not calculated.
ND
NEG
NJ
0
PC
PF
POS
PR
PRI
PS
PV
Q
OCA
QCM
QNC
R
RA
RB
RLA
RLB
RP
SRA
SRB
SRC
SRD
SRE
TA
T7
U
Negative
Unnamed tentatively identifed compound.
AFCEE sample result is over the
calibration range.
Sample taken from VOA vial with air bubble > 6mm diameter.
The percent difference between the original and confirmation analyses is greater than 50%.
Positive
Preferred Result
Primary analysis.
Pass @ 24 and 48 Hours.
Hydrocarbon result partly due to indivi, peak(s) in quant. range
Elevated reporting limit. The reporting limit is elevated due to high analyte levels.
Quantitation begun immed. before RT of tert-Butanol (TBA)
Quantitation began immediately following methanol peak.
Quantitative second column confirmation not conclusive.
The data is rejected,
Results are from a second analysis of the sample.
RPD exeeded method control limit; % recoveries within limits,
The reporting limit for this analyte is elevated due to sample dilution.
The reporting limits for these analytes were elevated due to dilution.
Results are from a second preparation and analysis of the sample.
The surrogate recovery in the sample is outside control limits due to confirmed matrix effect,
The surrogate recovery in the sample is outside control limits. Thus, the target analyte concentrations are estimated.
Recovery for decachlorobiphenyl is outside control limits. Recovery for tetrachloro-m-xylene is within control limits.
The surrogate recovery was not calculated because the extract was diluted beyond the ability to quantitate a recovery.
The reported surrogate recovery was calculated from a diluted extract and may not accurately depict matrix effects,
Confirmatory analysis was past holding time.
Sample result is less than reported value
Analyte analyzed for but was not detected.
NM di
2757
Method
Group
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
DIOXIN
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
March AR #
Page 146 of 201
Qualifier Footnote
UJ
The analyte was not detected, but the detection limit is uncertain due to analyte-specific QC failures.
U1
This sample has GC/FI characteristics that are similar to the water soluble fraction of gasoline.
V
Elevated reporting limit. The reporting limit is elevated due to limited sample volume.
V1
This sample has GC/FID characteristics for which reliable identification of a product could not be achieved.
X
Recovered amount of spike is less than the project reporting limit.
Z
Estimated result. The associated internal standard did not meet the specified method criteria.
Surrogate recovery is outside stated control limits.
a
Spiked analyte recovery is outside stated control limits.
a
a
a
p
Relative percent difference (RPD) is outside stated control limits.
p
B
Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level.
Co-eluting isomer.
C
DW
Results and reporting limits have been adjusted for dry weight.
E
Estimated result. Result concentration exceeds the calibration range.
ED
Result concentration exceeds the calibration range.
GO
Elevated reporting limits. The reporting limits are elevated due to matrix interference.
HO
The sample was prepared or analyzed after the EPA recommended holding time had been exceeded.
Matrix interference.
Estimated result. Result is less than the reporting limit.
J
M
Matrix spike recovery outside of limits.
NR
Not reportable.
C
Estimated maximum possible concentration (EMFC).
S
Ion suppression.
X
See project narrative.
YO
The sample was received without proper preservation for this analysis. The sample was preserved in the laboratory.
*I
Quantitation suspect due to hydrocarbon interferences
=
This compound was found but not quantified due to the presence of multiple coeluting PCBs which prevent accurate result.
a
a
a
a
p
p
AZ
Surr. recovery outside of acceptance limits due to matrix interf.
B
I
MB Ell MI IMO =I INN OM
MI Mei =i
N.
II
IMMI
IMON
Method
Group
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCSEMI
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
MIN MO 1.7 71.1 MIL .111#
1,11
Qualifier Footnote
Reporting limits raised due to high hydrocarbon background
BF
Result was confirmed using a GC/MS analytical technique.
C
CHI
More than 40% RPD between primary
and confirmation column results. The higher of the two results is reported.
OLD
Although Technical Chlordane was not reported,components of Chlordane were detected(eg:alpha-Chlordane, gamma-Chlordane)
COL
More than 40% RPD between primary and confirmation column results. The lower of the two results is reported.
DL
Quantified using 30-weight motor oil standard.
DW
E
ED
Concentration of total analyte ND: therefore this analyte is ND.
GO
HA
Quantit.of unknown hydrocarbon(s) in sample based on diesel.
HB
Quantit. of unknown hydrocarbon(s) in sample based on gasoline.
HD
HO pattern does not match JP-4/Diesel. UEH as JP-4 quantitated as 08-010 and UEH as Diesel quantitated as C10-C24.
HE
HO pattern does not match JP-4/Diesel. UEH as Diesel quantitated as C18-C24 andUEH as JP-4 quantitated as C8-C18.
HE
HO pattern matches Diesel. UEH as JP-4 quantitated as 08-010.
HG
HO pattern matches JP-4. UEH as Diesel quantitated as 018-C24.
HO
HYA
The reported UNKOWN HYDROCARBON was quantified as diesel.
HYB
The reported UNKOWN HYDROCARBON was quantified as JP-4.
HYC
The reported UNKOWN HYDROCARBON was quantified as motor oil.
J
Estimated result. Result is less than RL.
JP!
JP-4 may be present.
JP?
JP-4 is not present.
LA
Lab Accident
LX
Quantitated against diesel fuel.
M
MSG
Positive result may represent quantitation of Arocior interferent. Listed target may not be present.
N1
Spike sample recovery is outside control limits.
P
PA
The %Difference between the primary and confirmation columns exceeds 50%. The lower of the two values is reported.
PB
The %Difference between the primary and confirmation columns exceeds 50%. The primary column value is reported.
PC
The %Difference between the primary and confirmation columns exceeds 50%.
PD
The identification and quantitation of compound(s) may be suspect because the difference between analyses is > 25%.
PE
The %Difference between the primary and confirmation columns exceeds 40%. The higher value is reported.
PG
PI
Primary and confirm results varied by > 40% RPD
YO
Quantitation suspect due to hydrocarbon interference.
I
2757
Method
Group
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
GCVOC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
Mill
OM
Page 148 of 201
March AR #
Qualifier Footnote
a
a
a
a
p
p
unknown hydrocarbon with a single peak
AE
AZ
B
BF
Reporting limits raised due to high hydrocarbon background.
BX
Sample stored at improper temperature
CHI
CLE
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether is susceptible to degradation in acid conditions, The quantitation may not be reliable
CLV
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether is susceptible to degradation in acid conditions. No quantitation is available.
COL
and confirmation column results. The lower of the two results is reported.
DW
E
ED
Concentration of total analyte ND; therefore this analyte is ND.
GO
HO
IL
RPD exceeds laboratory control limit
J
JDX
K
This sample has GC/FID characteristics that are similar to gasoline.
Quantitated against gasoline.
LW
M
This sample has GC/FID characteristics that are similar to weathered gasoline.
MSE
Due to sample volume limitations, the sample volume used to perform the MS/MSD was different than the original sample.
MSF
Due to limited sample volume, the required MS/MSD was not performed. For precision control, an LCS/LCSD was performed_
N1
P
PG
U
This sample has GC/FID characteristics that are similar to the water soluble fraction of gasoline.
V
This sample has GC/FID characteristics for which reliable identification of a product could not be achieved.
YO
a
a
a
a
I
MEI MI MO
10111
MB MO IMO
1111
an
1111111
MI
i= MO MN OM MI
Method
Group
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
HPLC
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MO WM 5 7
Fah
A
INN
S
111.0 f
Qualifier Footnote
p
p
AZ
B
CHI
COL
More than 40% RPD between primary and confirmation detector results. The lower of the two results is reported.
DW
E
GO
HO
J
M
NR
Not reportable.
P
PB
The %Difference between the primary and confirmation columns exceeds 50%. The primary column value is reported.
The identification and quantitation of compound(s) may be suspect because the difference between analyses is > 25%.
PD
PE
The %Difference between the primary and confirmation columns exceeds 40%. The higher value is reported.
PG
YO
+
Estimated result. The Method of StandardAdditions (MSA) correlation coefficient was less than 0.995.
AZ
B
Bi
Estimated result. Result is less than RL and greater than or equal to the IDL
BI
Estimated result. Result is less than RL and greater than or equal to the IDL.
BLK
The metal was found in an associated blank, as well as in the sample.
BX
DW
E
F
Analyte detected in asociated method blank above the IDLIMDL.
HI
The sample was prepared or analyzed after the EPA-recommended holding time had been exceeded.
HO
J
Serial dilution of a digestate in the analytical batch indicates that physical and chemical interferences are present.
L
M
Duplicate injection precision was not met.
N
N
N
I
"
I
2757
Method
Group
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MET
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
MSSEMI
March AR #
Page 150 of 201
Qualifier Footnote
N
N1
RA
RPD exceeds limit due to matrix interf.: % recovs. within limits
S
The result was determined using the Method of Standard Additions (MSA).
T
The analyte was detected in the associated method blank above the IDL/MDL
T1
T3
T4
T5
T6
W
Wa
Wb
WA
WB
YI
a
a
a
a
p
p
AZ
B
COL
OW
E
EMC
GO
HO
I
ID
J
M
N
NRS
N1
,PH
YO
Result was obtained from the analysis of a dilution; Analyte detected in method blank above the IDL/MDL.
Result was obtained from the analysis of a dilution; spike sample recovery outside control limits.
Analayte detected in method blank above the IDL/MDL; spike sample recover outside control limits.
Result obtained from dilution; analyted detected in blank; spike recvoery outside limits.
Post digestion spike recovery is outside control limits.
Post digestion spike recovery fell between 40-85% due to matrix interference.
Benzo(b) and Benzo(k)fluoranthene were unresolved due to matrix. Combined results reported as Benzo(b)fluoranthene.
Estimated minimum concentration. Calibration range was exceeded. The reported value is the upper cal. pt. concentration.
Analyte identified by RT & presence of single mass ion.
Estimated result. Analyte is a Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC).
Not reportable due to sample matrix.
Phthalic acid is being measured as Phthalic anhydride.
MO MO I= MO I= I= MN MO I= NM OM MI NM MI MI NM NM UM IN
"II "I
Method
Group
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
' MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
MSVOC
RAD
RAD
RAD
RAD
RAD
RAD
RAD
WET
WET
11111
111111
1"/
.7
57
M.
Ich#
am
raigle
Alrof
Qualifier Footnote
a
a
a
a
p
Relative percent difference (RFD) is outside stated control limits.
p
Relative percent difference (RFD) is outside stated control limits.
AX
Sample too dilute to quantify surrogate
AY
Matrix interference suspected
AZ
B
BX
Sample stored at improper temperature
CL
Initial analysis within holding time but required dilution
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether is susceptible to degradation in acid conditions. The quantitation may not be reliable.
CLE
CLV
2-Chloroethyl vinyl ether is susceptible to degradation in acid conditions. No quantitation is available.
DW
E
GO
HO
ID
Analyte identified by RT & presence of single mass ion.
J
JDX
M
N
Estimated result. Analyte is a Tentatively Identified Compound (TIC).
NR
Not reportable.
N1
S
Mass spectrometer saturation.
TN
T2
Confident identification
Major Ions and ratios Largely agree
YO
x
Tracer yield is outside control limits.
Tracer yield is outside control limits.
a
Spiked analyte outside of stated QC limits.
B
Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a level greater than the CRDL.
J
Result is greater than sample detection limit but less than stated reporting limit.
U
Result is less than the sample detection limit.
X
presumptive evidence that the analyte is not present.
+
Estimated result. The Method of StandardAdditions (MSA) correlation coefficient was less than 0.995.
W
I
W
mil
III
2757
Method
Group
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
WET
March AR #
Page 152 of 201
Qualifier Footnote
AF*
High Stream Water Inundates Sample Site
AH
No Flow
B
Estimated result, Result is less than RL.
BI
Estimated result. Result is less than RL and greater than or equal to the IDL.
BM
Sustains ignition.
C
TOX exhibited carryover
CN
There is no detectable Total Cyanide at the stated reporting limit, Amenable and Dissolved Cyanide by definition are ND
DW
E
F
The analyte was detected in the associated method blank above the IDL/MDL
H
Initial dilution due to High Conductivity
HC
HI
The sample was prepared or analyzed after the EPA-recommended holding time had been exceeded.
HO
IC
Diluted due to high inorganic chloride.
Method blank contamination. The associated method blank contains the target analyte at a reportable level_
J
Concentration observed is above the instrument's capability. Actual concentration is greater than value reported.
K
M
MSF
Due to limited sample volume, the required MS/MSD was not performed. For precision control, an LCS/LCSD was performed.
N
N
N
N
NR
Not reportable.
NRS
Not reportable due to sample matrix.
N1
PO
Dilutions for BOD failed criteria of 1mg/L resid. diss. 0
Dilutions for BOD failed criteria of 2mg/L diss. 0 depletion.
PP
RA
RPD exceeds limit due to matrix intert; % recovs. within limits
S
The result was determined using the Method of Standard Additions (MSA).
T
TDS/COND ratio is outside window
TNC
To numerous to count.
I
T2
T3
T4
T5
T6
W
YI
Mil NM MI
Result was obtained from the analysis of a dilution: Analyte detected in method blank above the MDL/IDL.
Result was obtained from the analysis of a dilution; spike sample recovery outside control limits.
Analyte detected in method blank above the MDL/IDL: spike sample recovery outside control limits.
Result obtained from dilution; analyte detected in blank: spike recovery outside limits.
Constant weight not achieved within three weighings.
I= MO MI
MI ME MI
111111
NM
U
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LF004, LF005, and LF006 RA-0
March ARB and wormer March AFB
h AR #
2757
Page 153 of 201
APPENDIX D
LEACHATE NONHAZARDOUS WASTE MANIFESTS
1
1
WPMarch AFB (former ARB)120131Snes 4,5,&612012 Annual RA -01F12.070213BA.docx
July 2013
March AR #
2757
Page 154 of 201
773/
AIR FORCE REAL PROPERTY AGENCY
tamE
IsLAN;Ft$1- NUMBER
3411
OLSON SIREEF
McCLELLAN,
956524
CA
21p
STATE
916-643-0830
EXT. 228
7a
EPA NUMBER:
LIST COMPONENTS:
LEACflATE FROM LANDFILL
Die
a
H
PHYSICAL STATE:
0 Solid
irf
1.ANDFT.LI,L L-At ATE
WASTE DESCRIPTION:
GENERATING PROCESS:
TANDFI7
4
SPECIAL INFORMATION:
THE GENERA7OR CERTIFIES THA'T
THE WASTE AS DEsCRIsL7D ISio%
NON- Hia2% RDOUS.
TR UCX #
PM DATE: 0_3- ./Z/ -/ 2-P.O. Box 512
San
Bern2rdiro, CA 92412
889 -5507
f909j 889-550
CRIV5R
D.O.H.S. 401 I S r EPA #CAT 0800) 2800
SPECIAL
DUNG
OR DISPOSAL ME-ri-loo
MARCH RESERVE BASE
DATE
SITE 31
RIVERSIDE
WATER TREATMENT PAC=
CA
ZIP
PH.
I=HomE
EPA NUMBER:
AUThORZED AGENT
QUANTITY
ar
iZ
of 201
March AR
WORIORDER 155 67732
tans INC.
230 E. Dumas Street
L:'.0
Mil 1 1 5
San Bernardino, CA 92408 off /9091 889-5607 P Fax 1909) 884-8966
tnc,ustrii:11 Waste Reinoval
EPA #CAT
JOB INFORMATION
CTORMER MARCH AFE
#3062
ADDRESS
CITY
on)
BILLING INFORMATION
'AVM TECHNICAL SERVI ES
.1firttEts COOLY DRIVE, STE 'IOC
(Si
STATE
STATE
ZSP
i:C61..-for,4, (IA 92324
CONTACT
e.
JAThJ
,Z0
f CONTACT
P HONE-
ZIP
PHONE
-RENT ADAIR
P.O. NO.
C.O.D.
UNIT NO.
CHARGE
7.Z04004WORK DESCRIPTION
PttMP tb-tT-:t-tATE---ANfr ¶RAN ON 5;TE TREk ZFMET PLAN
.
1
DESCRIPTION
:UNIT PRICE
START ARRIVE
{DEPART; STOP
:
1 TOTAL HOURS
i
1
-
,
I
DISPOSAL FEE DESCRIPTION
QUANTITY
I
RECEIVED BY X
PRICE
SUS TOTAL
March AR #
2757
Page 156 of 201
27 3?
AIR FORCE REAL PROPERTY AGENCY
I.
!
NAME
MANIFEST 14:JMEIER
341 a
OLSON STREET
ADOP-ESS
McCLELLAN
,
956524
CA
CiTY. STATE
916-643-0830
DA,717
EXT. 228
-Cr
EPA NUMBER:
LIST COMPONENTS:
0/0
LEACHATE FROM LANDFILL1-1
I
42Z
7J?
aJANTITY
E.
1
F.
Fri
in(.7
H.
-`:
1-6.4
PHYSICAL STATE:
Sod
:At
TANDFILLL L
_TE
WASTE DESCRIPTION:
GENERATiNG PROCESS:
7
Tvr-r
7
SPECIAL INFORMATION:
THE 3ENERA.70E-i CE:-:TIFIES THAT
THF_VVASTE AS DLSCRIBED !S /009r
NON-HAZAP:DOUS.
x
-
TRUCK #2,9
rang
Pa.)
INE.
P.O. Box 5729
5an Bernardino, CA 92412
909) 889-5607
DVE
D.O_H.S. #0115 a EPA #CAT 080012800
SPECIAL f-;ANDLINC-
?ARCH RESERVE BASE
0Fi DISPOSAL /.,=t-30.7)
DATE
NAME
SITE 31
WATER TREATMENT FACILIT
RIVERSIDE,
CA
z.
CrT-Y, STATE
PH.
EPA NUMBER:
#
X
AUT".-{ORLZED AGENT
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LF004, LF005, and LF006 RA-01R4)ffah
AR #
2757
Page 157 of 201
APPENDIX E
2012 STATISTICAL ANALYSIS RESULTS
P;Msuch AFB gamer A RFB1201315Bes 4,5,8402012 Annual RA01F12,070213BA.clacx
July 2013
MI We WS IMP. Mt MI
girl°
111111
)5
I
h
NIMT[
6.11
1.,!e 1.110of
jai
Appendix E-1. Upper Tolerance Limit Calculations
Background Well 6M6MW3
Censored
Censored
-
Surrogate
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Chloride
Sample Date
Dec-94
Mar-95
Jun-95
Sep-95
Jun-99
Oct-99
Jan-00
May-00
Jun-01
Dec-01
Jul-02
Nov-03
May-04
May-05
Nov-05
Feb-06
Aug-06
Feb-07
Dec-07
Feb-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Sep-09
Dec-10
May-11
Dec-11
May-12
Dec-12
Concentration
160
180
160
190
157
Concentration
160
180
160
190
157
151
151
135
150
135
150
151
151
140
136
149
160
168
175
174
173
167
166
159
180
156
175
169
190
187
195
190
140
136
149
160
168
175
174
173
167
166
159
180
156
175
169
190
187
195
190
Sample Date
Concentration
Jun-93
Sep-93
Dec-93
Mar-94
Jun-94
Mar-95
Mar-96
Jun-99
Oct-99
Jan-00
May-00
Jun-01
Dec-01
Jul-02
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
May-04
May-05
Nov-05
Feb-06
Aug-06
Feb-07
Dec-07
Feb-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Sep-09
Dec-10
May-11
Dec-11
May-12
Dec-12
80.25
80.75
76
71.6
68
79
64
383
64.9
59
75
78.9
Concentration
80.25
80.75
76
71.6
68
79
64
383
64.9
59
75
78.9
112
112
76.3
81.6
88.5
87.7
85.8
81.3
59.3
58.6
76.3
81.6
88.5
87.7
85.8
57.1
57.1
70.7
73.7
85.9
89.5
79
89.6
83.9
92.5
74
77
75
70.7
73.7
85.9
89.5
79
89.6
83.9
92.5
8L3
59.3
58.6
74
77
75
Count
Mean
Variance
St. Deviation
Coef. Of Variance
Distribution
Tolerance Factor
95% UTL
61
122.990
3287.463985
57.336
0.466
Normal
2.014
238.443
116.
a
Page 159 of 201
March AR #
2757
Background Well 6 M6M W3
Censored
Surrogate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Nitrate
Censored
Sample Date
Concentration
Concentration
Sample Date
Jun-99
Oct-99
Jan-00
May-00
Jun-01
10.1
10.3
9.41
10.1
Jun-99
Oct-99
Jan-00
May-00
Jun-01
Dec-01
Jul-02
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
May-04
May-05
Nov-05
Feb-06
Aug-06
Feb-07
Dec-07
Feb-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Sep-09
Dec-01
Jul-02
Nov-03
May-04
May-05
Nov-05
Feb-06
Aug-06
Feb -07
Dec-07
Feb-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Sep-09
Dec-10
May-11
Dec-11
May -I2
Dec-12
10.3
9.41
9.4
9.4
10.8
11.8
10.8
11.8
9.65
9.7
9.9
9.4
8.8
9.2
8.9
9.2
9.9
9.65
9.7
9.9
9.4
10
10
8.8
9.2
8.9
9.2
9.9
11
11
9.3
9.8
9
9.1
7.8
9.3
9.8
7.8
Dec- I 0
8.1
8.1
8.4
8.4
May-11
Dec-11
9
9.1
=I me um gar Ns. RN um slit
Concentration
8.7
14.3
13.2
Concentration
8.7
14
16
14
20.1
13.6
13.6
16.5
15.7
15.6
16.6
17.9
20.1
13.6
13,6
16.5
15.7
15.6
16.6
17.9
19.1
19.1
17.6
18.5
19.8
17.6
18.5
19.8
20.7
21.7
20.7
21.7
May-12
Dec-12
mus3 MS
14.3
13.2
16
19.3
19.3
20.8
20.8
18.6
20
19.2
20.3
20
18.6
Count
Mean
Variance
St. Deviation
Coef. Of Variance
Distribution
Tolerance Factor
95% UTL
50
13.607
20.887
4.570
0.336
Normal
2.065
23.045
20
19.2
20.3
20
ustw
wit IMO MI
11111 r ell
MI °la
11111/
11.1
1111
111111
el' .57
All 'Mt
1111
!!" 1.0f IS
Censored
Surrogate
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
TDS
Censored
Sample Date
Concentration
Concentration
Sample Date
Concentration
Concentration
Dec-94
Mar-95
Jun-95
Sep-95
Jun-99
Oct-99
Jan-00
May-00
Jun-01
Dec-01
Jul-02
Nov-03
May-04
May-05
Nov-05
Feb-06
Aug-06
Feb-07
Dec-07
Feb-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Sep-09
Dec-10
May-11
Dec-11
May-12
Dec-12
870
620
700
670
709
702
695
707
740
696
840
870
620
700
670
709
702
695
707
740
696
840
410
390
400
380
410
390
360
384
389
410
390
400
380
410
390
360
384
389
352
352
741
741
755
814
845
814
855
876
805
824
836
828
814
812
882
912
1010
900
755
814
845
814
855
876
805
824
836
828
814
812
882
912
1010
900
Sep-93
Dec-93
Mar-94
Jun-94
Mar-95
Mar-96
Jun-99
Oct-99
Jan-00
May-00
Jun-01
Dec-01
Jul-02
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
May-04
May-05
Nov-05
Feb-06
Nov-06
Feb-07
Dec-07
Feb-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Sep-09
Dec-10
May-11
Dec-11
May-12
Dec-12
426
423
550
426
423
550
525
462
525
462
424
450
424
450
481
481
459
433
459
433
451
451
490
440
485
472
470
508
490
440
485
472
470
508
488
455
526
488
455
526
628
480
628
480
Count
Mean
Variance
St. Deviation
Coef. Of Variance
Distribution
Tolerance Factor
95% UTL
60
611.050
35673.33644
188.874
0.3091
Normal
2.017
992.009
"I I.
2757
Page 161 of 201
March AR #
Censored
Surrogate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Sulfate
Censored
Sample Date
Concentration
Concentration
Sample Date
Concentration
Concentration
Jun-99
Oct-99
Jan-00
May-00
Jun-01
70.4
70.4
69.1
69.1
63.3
69
67.1
60.1
63.3
67.3
67.5
Jun-99
Oct-99
Jan-00
May-00
Jun-01
Dec-01
Jul-02
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
May-04
May-05
Nov-05
Feb-06
Aug-06
Feb-07
Dec-07
Feb-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Sep-09
Dec-10
43.7
40.5
43.7
40.5
Dec-01
Jul-02
Nov-03
May-04
May-05
Nov-05
Feb-06
Aug-06
Feb-07
Dec-07
Feb-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Sep-09
Dec-10
May-II
Dec-i 1
May-12
Dec-12
63.3
69
67.1
60.1
63.3
67.3
67.5
68.4
68.4
69
67.4
72.5
70.3
74.7
68.4
68.4
69
67.4
72.5
70.3
74.7
79.1
69.1
79.1
69.1
72.4
72.4
72
77.5
72
77.5
79.2
81.3
79.2
81.3
79
79
May -11
Dec-11
May-12
Dec-12
43
59.6
59.8
45.4
42.3
39.3
48.9
76.2
45.6
47
46
47.7
48.2
49.2
51.3
54.8
60.7
54.4
57.4
55.9
61.8
56.1
57.7
54
43
59.6
59.8
45.4
42.3
39.3
48.9
76.2
45.6
47
46
47.7
48.2
49.2
51.3
54.8
60.7
54.4
57.4
55.9
61.8
Count
Mean
Variance
St. Deviation
Coef. Of Variance
Distribution
Tolerance Factor
95% UTL
50
60.878
140.379
11.848
0.195
Normal
2.065
85.344
56.1
57.7
54
Notes:
1. Tolerance Factors taken from Appendix B, Table 5 of EPA1530-SW-89-026, p B-9 and correlates tolerance
factors (K) and number (n) of data points. As of 12102/2008 n=40, K=2.126; n=47, K=2.081
2. The censored concentration is the detected concentration or 1/2 the detection limit for non-detects.
MI MI NW Mg
Mon
NM NO MI NE Ma ENO No
%at
Ow Om me mg mu
11.11
101 111, 5 711111
1.11/
11.11
1411. h
#
"P.
1.11
111110of
11,
°MI
Appendix E-2. Parametric ANOVA for Nitrate Concentrations
Ste ) 1
Jun-99
Oct-99
Jan-00
May-00
Jun-01
Dec-01
Jul-02
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
May-04
May-05
Nov-05
Feb-06
Aug-06
Feb-07
Dec-07
Feb-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Sep-09
Dec-10
May-11
Dec-11
May-12
Dec-12
COUNT
SUM
MEAN
Ste v 2
[Sum'/Count
Descriptive Statistics for Total Data Set:
11.2
Mean =
Concentration {mg /L}
5M6MW5
6M6MW3
8.7
14.3
13.2
14
16
10.1
20.1
13.8
13.6
16.5
15.7
15.6
16.6
17.9
19.1
17.6
18.5
19.8
20.7
21.7
19.3
20.8
18.6
20
19.2
20.3
20
6M6MW5 [
6M6MW6
6M6MW7
MH2
--
0.884
2.63
2.24
3.6
4.74
3.4
2.66
6.28
5.17
9.7
7.1
7.09
7.74
7.09
7.3
9.9
9.4
8.8
9.2
2.4
7.4
8.4
9
11.1
12
8,2
8.9
7,2
5.4
10.1
10.4
13.7
11.4
10.5
11.4
14.8
11.1
13.5
12.5
13.3
14.1
14.3
11.5
14.5
13.1
14.5
9.6
13.4
11.7
13.8
10.3
9.41
9.4
10.8
11.8
9.65
--
8.9
9.2
9.9
4.41
1.2
4.97
4.49
5.3
7.89
10.8
8.76
6.3
9.3
7.48
9.03
8.37
9.07
12.7
8
13.5
13.6
8.31
15
10
8.4
15.6
16.2
15.6
11
9.1
15
9.3
9.8
7.3
8
12.6
13.9
9
4.2
11
9.1
12.9
12.9
7.8
8.1
13
8.1
9,3
8.9
14.9
8.4
8.1
15
15.3
16
0.1
13.4
1707.664
16.3
13.7
13
13.6
15.4
14.6
14
0.1
14.6
15
24
26
26
26
25
228.96
9.54
164.104
6.311692308
275.29
10.58807692
274.81
10.5696154
312.9
12.516
5M6M W 5
6M6M W3
6M6MW5
6M6MW6
6 M6M W7
MH2
2914.791696
2904.636
3916.2564
SSwells=Sum (Sum2/Count) for each we 1-(Sum of all points` /Total County-
TOTAL COUNT =
SUM OF ALL POINTS=
13.8
26
2184.2784 [1035.773954
Normal
3.2
13.4
451.6
17.36923077
7843.944615
21.6
4,7
0.42
Variance =
Standard Deviation =
Coef. Of Var =
Distribution:
153
1740.097169
111
Ste P 3
5M6M W5
1SUM
6M6M W3
Page 163 of 201
March AR #
2757
Concentration2
6M6M W5
6 M6MW6
6M6M W7
MH2
75.69
102.01
0.781456
19.4481
1.44
204.49
106.09
6.9169
24.7009
116.64
0.01
174.24
88.5481
5.0176
20.1601
76.7376
179.56
161.29
196
88.36
12.96
28.09
68.89
10.24
256
116.64
22.4676
62.2521
86.49
179.56
404.01
139.24
11.56
69.0561
55.9504
190.44
190.44
93.1225
7.0756
50.2681
81.5409
265.69
184.96
39.4384
59.9076
70.0569
187.69
272.25
26.7289
50.2681
82.2649
182.25
184.96
246.49
94.09
50.41
53.29
64
243.36
98.01
5.76
54.76
70.56
169
275.56
88.36
8i
123.21
144
187.69
320.41
77.44
67.24
102.01
108.16
219.04
364.81
84.64
79.21
129.96
110.25
184.96
309.76
79.21
51.84
225
129.96
182.25
342.25
84.64
29.16
243.36
123.21
198.81
392.04
98.01
65.61
262.44
156.25
237.16
428.49
100
70.56
243.36
176.89
210.25
470.89
121
82.81
225
204.49
213.16
372.49
86.49
53.29
158.76
132.25
210.25
432.64
96.04
64
193.21
171.61
196
345.96
81
17.64
121
92.16
190.44
400
82.81
166.41
166.41
179.56
0.01
368.64
60.84
65.61
169
136.89
213.16
7271.87
2066.5906
1083.496456
2854.9211
2640.2507
4153.87
SUM TOTAL =
20070.99886
SStotal = Sum (Square of each point) - (Sum of all points` /Total Count)
SStotalStep 4
SSerror = SS total - SS wells
SSerror
ow ma int on am
1011.41495
-728.682214
aIL
11111
la
NM
so gm.
IMP
ma um ism in to
iNN NM
NW II. INF IRO glich alt# 1.11 la ire F,ofr,
fiM
5
Step 5
Degrees of Freedom
6
P=
153
N
p
N-p=
where:
5
147
p = number of wells
N - total number of data points
Mean Square Ouantitics
MS well - SSwe11/(p-1) MS error =- SSeffor/(N-p)
348.0194337
-4.957021863
4.95702186
Step 6
F-Statistic
Calculated F-statistic = MSwelis/MSerror Tabulated F-statistic (App B, Table 2) =
Step 7
Result:
-70.21
2.29
Do not reject hypothesis of equal means
'`
Bonferroni T-statistic Test for Site 6 Nitrate Concentrations (See Section 5.2.1 of EPAJ530-SW-89-026 for procedure)
background
background
well
well
Ste I1
5M6MW5
6M6MW3
6M6MW5
6M6MW6
6M6MW7
MH2
MEAN
17.36923077
9.54
6.311692308 10.58807692 10.5696154
12.516
i
COUNT
26
24
26
26
26
25
b=
50
13.45461538
Xb
STD. ERROR - SQRT [MS error * (1 /13 + 1/0]
where:
b = # of background samples
1= # of samples in compliance well
Xb = average concentration of background wells
STD. ERROR
DOE
T-stat
D value
Step 2
EANwerMEANhkx
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.538326225
0.538326225
0.53832622
0.54536347
147
2.21
147
2.21
147
2.21
147
2.21
I .189700957
1.189700957
1.18970096
1.20525326
-2.885
-0.93861538
Pass
Pass
DOF = degrees of freedom = N-p
where:
N = total # of samples
p - total number of wells
1 -7.14292308 1 -2.866538462 1
Step 3
Result
Pass
Pass
D value = STD. ERROR X T-stat
where:
T-stat - taken from App. B, Table 3
m = # of compliance wells
1. F-Statistic is taken from Appendix B, Table 2 of EPA/530-SW-89-026, p B-5 and correlates 95th percentiles with the F- distribution and the
degreesof freedom defined by the number (p) of wells (p-1) and and the number (N) of data points(N-p).
Currently p-1=5, N-p>120, Tabulated F-statistic =2.29
mi
11111
"I IMP MI UM' "I WS fill
IMMI
75
1111 c h
11
#
e'
11111
linage 1111 ()fail
Appendix E-3. Parametric ANOVA for Chloride C oneent rat ion!
6M6MW3
5M6MW5
COUNT
SUM
MEAN
1Sum2/Count
6M6MWS
6M6MW6 1 6M6MW7
N1112
Jun-99
383
160
13.2
114
10
149
Oct-99
Jan-00
May-00
Jun-01
64.9
190
123
110
30
59
157
108
95
56.6
59.9
139
75
151
124
111
79
146
78.9
135
150
76.3
81.6
151
115
140
136
132
149
126
160
111
93.4
86.2
91.2
99.7
89.5
91.8
77.6
60.9
60.7
70.5
73.9
47.3
52.4
146
112
113
133
95.1
Dec-01
Jul-02
168
93.7
82
129
59.3
58.6
175
102
174
105
57.1
173
108
70.7
73.7
85,9
89.5
167
117
86.6
93.5
99.4
96.4
166
121
92.1
159
105
180
135
79
156
105
43.1
141
89.6
83.9
175
130
96.7
96.3
82.8
96.6
28.4
49.3
54.9
51.6
48.6
45.3
55.3
59.2
140
169
113
87.7
50.8
30.3
190
123
97.4
35
149
Dec-11
92.5
74
167
112
103
27.9
135
May-12
Dec-12
77
75
195
190
128
133
144
130
150
46.5
56
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
May-04
May-05
Nov-05
Feb-06
Aug-06
Feb-07
Dec-07
Feb-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Sep-09
Dec-10
May-11
Step 2
Mean =
109.3
Concentration (m_g/L)
Step 1
88.5
87.7
85.8
81.3
26
2339.8
89.99230769
4303
165.5
5M6MW5
6M6MW3
210564.0015
712146.5
26
93
26
2918.9
112.2653846 98.8615385
6M6MW5
6M6MW6
327691.4312 254113.698
SSwells=Sum (Sum2/Count) for each well-(Sum of all points2 /Total Count)=
TOTAL COUNT =
SUM OF ALL POINTS=
17050.1
47.1
0.43
142
160
137
142
140
140
161
137
137
141
139
140
134
150
51.1923077
6M6MW7
M1-12
68136.9615
494868.038
1331
Normal
2216.6
139
26
3587
137.961538
26
2570.4
Variance =
Coef. Of Var =
Distribution:
156
204021.208
March AR
2757
SIep
3
5M6MW5
6M6MW3
146689
4212.01
25600
36100
3481
24649
22801
18225
5625
6225.21
12544
5821.69
6658 56
7832.25
7691.29
7361.64
6609.69
3516.49
3433.96
3260.41
4998.49
5431.69
7378.81
8010.25
6241
8028.16
7039.21
8556.25
5476
5929
[sum
Concentration'
6M6MW5
6M6MW6
22500
174.24
15129
11664
15376
12769
17689
22801
13225
19600
18496
22201
17424
25600
28224
30625
30276
29929
27889
27556
25281
32400
24336
30625
28561
12996
12100
9025
12321
8649
15876
12321
8779.69
10404
11025
11664
13689
18225
16900
12769
15129
12544
5625
36100
34969
38025
36100
303676.06
719469
341399.93
16384
16900
22201
3203.56
900
3588.01
6241
19321
21316
21316
6021.76
3708.81
19321
7430.44
8317.44
9940.09
8010.25
8427.24
6724
7499.56
8742.25
9880.36
9292.96
3684.49
4970.25
20164
25600
6855.84
9331.56
7691.29
9486.76
11025
MH2
100
9044.01
8723.56
8482.41
9350.89
9273.69
14641
11025
6M6MW7
10609
17689
,
22500
259744.6
5461.21
18769
2237.29
2745.76
806.56
2430.49
20164
3014.01
2662.56
2361.96
2052.09
3058.09
3504.64
19600
16641
19600
25921
18769
18769
19881
19321
2580.64
918.09
19600
19881
19600
17956
1225
778.41
22201
18225
2162.25
3136
20736
22500
74510.54 I
508273
1857.61
Page 166 of 201
#
f
SUM TOTAL =
2207073.13
SStotal = Sum (Square of each point) - (Sum of all points /Total Count)
343573.707
SStotal =
Step 4
Step 5
SSerror= SS total - SS wells
SSerror =
139552.499
Degrees of Freedom
P
N=
6
156
p-1
--
N-p=
5
150
where:
p = number of wells
N = total number of data points
Mean Square Ouantities
MS well -- SSwellAp-1)
MS error ---- SSerror /(N -p) =
40804.2416
930.349992
- Mil NW IIIII 11111 NO NM IMP MI Ma Si mg gm mg am gig gm
Imp
gm
Ile MI
Step 6
Step 7
111111
111.7 I= 111.ch
11115
1111111
F-Statistic
Calculated F-statistic = MSwells/MSerror =
Tabulated F-statistic (App B, Table 2) =
111
image
oi., UM Al
43.86
2.29
Reject the hypothesis of equal means
Result:
Bonferroni T-statistic Test for Site 6 Chloride Concentrations (See Section 5.2. I of EPA/530-SW-89-026 for procedure)
background background
Step 'I
MEAN
COUNT
b=
Xb =
well
5M6MW5
89.99230769
well
6M6MW3
26
52
26
6M6MW5
6M6MW7
51.1923077
6M6MW6
1 12.2653846 98.8615385
26
26
165.5
26
MH2
137.961538
26
7.32625675
7.32625675
150
2.21
150
2.21
127.7461538
STD. ERROR = SORT [MS error * (1/b f 111)1
where:
I = # of samples in compliance well
STD. ERROR
DOF
T-stat
D value
Step Z
MEAN,IrMEANb,,,,
Step 3
Result
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
I
NA
NA
r
NA
7.326256753 7.32625675
150
2.21
16.19102743
150
2.21
16.1910274. 16.1910274
16.1910274
where:
p = total number of wells
I -15.4807692 J -28.884615 -76.55384621 10.2153846
Ilos
where:
T-stat = taken from App. B, Table 3
1. F-Statistic is taken from Appendix B, Table 2 of EPA1530-SW-89-026, p B-5 and correlates 95th percentiles with the F- dig in = # of compliance wells
the degrees of freedom defined by the number (p) of wells (p-[) and and the number (N) of data points(N-p).
1
Currently p- I =5, N-p> l 20. Tabulated F-statistic ,---2.29
NA
]
Pass
Pass
1
Pass
111 1"
111.
11.1
II"
Ilia
1111-7 5
/MI
111/#
111111
Ire "II °fa'
11.1
Appendix 1E-4. Parametric ANOVA for Sulfate Concentrations
Step l
5M6MW5
Jun-99
Oct-99
Jan-00
May-00
29.2
43.7
40.5
MEAN
Step 2
ISuml/Count
Mean =
84.1
MH2
70.4
6.17
158
9.84
69.!
179
148
73.1
160
145
70.7
83
43
63.3
69
180
150
73
59
58.3
67.9
61.8,
55
Jun-01
59.8
67.1
180
159
127
60.1
127
143
Jul-02
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
May-04
May-05
Nov-05
Feb-06
Aug-06
Feb-07
Dec-07
Feb-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Sep-09
42.3
39.3
48.9
76.2
45.6
47
46
47.7
48.2
49.2
51.3
54.8
60.7
54.4
57.4
55.9
61.8
63.3
126
151
77.9
66.5
68.8
139
161
67.1
67.1
160
167
67.3
67.5
68.4
68.4
69
67.4
72.5
70.3
74.7
130
135
141
132
136
115
135
103
135
129
104
99.8
120
113
63.8
72.3
65.2
69
60.7
58.7
57.3
61.7
116
116
57
66.6
61.6
64
64.6
67.6
67.8
63.5
62.5
70.2
125
114
79.1
124
122
69.1
119
95.3
72.4
109
106
72
100
77.5
79.2
81.3
79
118
118
98.6
83.7
87
89.7
100
100
60.7
63.5
53.9
55.4
56.3
60.4
60.3
59.2
57
May-11
Dec-11
May-12
Dec-12
SUM
Concentrati m img/L)
6M6MW5
6M6MW6 I 6M6MW7
Dec-01
Dec-1
COUNT
6M6MW3
56.1
57.7
54
110
36.1
0.43
Normal
64.1
69.6
66.3
68.1
68
24
1697.4
70.725
3322.17
127.775769
26
3196.1
122.926923
26
1599.34
24
1571.6
61.5130769
65.4833333
6M6MW3
6M6MW5
6M6MW7
5M6MW5
6M6MW6
M1-12
75137.12654
120048.615
424492.827
392886.739
98380.3244
102913.607
SSwells=Sum (Sum2/Count) for each well-(Sum of all points2 (Total Count)-
1300.6
66.3
63.7
65
26
1397.7
53.75769231
26
Variance =
Coef. Of Var =
Distribution:
TOTAL COUNT
SUM OF ALL POINTS-
152
12784.31
138605,4087
.111
Step 3
Concentration
5M6MW5
6M6MW5
4956.16
4774.81
4006.89
1849
4761
4502.41
3612.01
3576.04
16129
1789.29
1544.49
2391.21
5806.44
2079.36
2209
2116
2275.29
2323.24
2420.64
2631.69
3003.04
3684.49
2959.36
3294.76
3124,81
3819.24
3147.21
3329.29
2916
ISUM
6M6MW3
852.64
1909.69
1640.25
82821.47
2
6M6MW6
38.0689
32041
25600
32400
32400
24964
21904
21025
22500
16129
15876
20449
4006.89
0
19321
22801
25921
0
25600
27889
4529.29
4556.25
4678.56
4678.56
16900
19881
18225
17424
18496
18225
18225
13225
10609
10816
16641
9960.04
14400
13456
15625
15376
12769
13456
12996
14884
14161
9082.09
4761
4542.76
5256.25
4942.09
5580.09
6256.81
4774.81
5241.76
5184
6006.25
6272.64
6609.69
6241
25281
11881
11236
10000
13924
12100
13924
10000
9721.96
7005.69
7569
8046.09
10000
409758.87
452620.069
120731.98
Page 169 of 201
March AR #
2757
6M6MW7
96.8256
5343.61
4998.49
5329
6068.41
4422.25
4733.44
4502.41
4070.44
5227.29
4251.04
4761
3684.49
3445.69
3283.29
3806.89
3249
3684.49
4032.25
2905.21
3069.16
3169.69
3648.16
3636.09
3504.64
3249
102172.256
MH2
3025
0
6889
3481
3398.89
4610.41
3819.24
4502.41
4435.56
3794.56
4096
4173.16
4569.76
4596.84
4032.25
3906.25
4928.04
0
4395.69
4057.69
4225
4108.81
4844.16
4395.69
4637.61
4624
103547.02
SUM TOTAL -=
1271651.665
SStotal =-- Sum (Square of each point) - (Sum of all points 2 /Total Count)
196397.834
SStotal =
Step 4
1111111
SSerror -= SS total - SS wells
SSerror
111 MN 1E1
57792.4257
OOP NW 11111
1111111,
lift
MEI
IMF
WWI
IMO
INS I=
111011
11111
I= MN
Step 5
is
OM MI
IIIIII
111111
11111
Mich ill* 411N1
57
111,e 11110
INN
Degrees of Freedom
6
P
N=
152
p
where:
5
N-p=
146
p = number of wells
Mean Square Quantities
MS well = SSwell/(p-1) =
27721.0817
395.838532
MS error = SSerror /(N -p) =
Step 6
Stet) 7
F-Statistic
70.03
2.29
Reject the hypothesis.of equal means
RestlIt:
Bonferroni T-statistic Test for Site 6 Sulfate Concentrations (See Section 5.2.1 of EPA1530-SW-89-026 for procedure)
background background
b
well
5M6M W5
53.75769231
26
50
Xb =
62.24134615
Step 1
MEAN
COUNT
well
6M6MW3
70.725
24
6M6MW5
127.775769
6M6MW6
122.926923
6M6MW7
61.5130769
MH2
65.4833333
26
26
26
24
STD. ERROR = SORT [MS error * (11b + IA)]
where:
1= # of samples in compliance well
Xb --- average concentration of background wells
STD. ERROR
DOF
T-stal
D value
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
4.81054359
Step 2
MEANwca-MEANb&g.
NA
Step 3
Result
NA
4.81054359 4.81054359
4.94065207
146
2.21
146
2.21
146
2.21
10.6313013
10.6313013
10.6313013
NA
65.5344231
60.6855769 -0.72826923 I 3.24198718
NA
.'
I
Fail':
146
2.21
10.9188411
where:
D value = STD, ERROR X T-stat
where:
1. F-Statistic is taken from Appendix B, Table 2 of EPA/530-SW-89-026. p B-5 and correlates 95th percentiles with the F- distribution and the
degrees of freedom defined by the number (p) of wells (p-1) and and the number (N) of data points(N-p).
Currently p-l=5, N-p>120, Tabulated F-statistic =2.29
111
111
"'
MI lige al °fill
ms r175.11 Rich 111/#
6mt
1.1
.kupendi. E-5. Parametric ANOVA for TDS Concentrations
Step 1
5M6MW5
COUNT
SUM
MEAN
Step 2
ISum2/Count
6M6MW3
Concentration (mg/L)
6M6MW5
6M6MW6
6M6MW7
MH2
Jun-99
Oct-99
Jan-00
May-00
360
709
828
758
791
384
702
847
760
755
389
695
858
776
761
574
352
707
804
696
450
Jun-01
426
740
810
896
664
Dec-01
423
696
830
298
755
603
597
556
Jul-02
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
May-04
May-05
Nov-05
Feb-06
Aug-06
Feb-07
Dec-07
Feb-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Sep-09
Dec-10
May-11
Dec-11
May-12
Dec-12
550
840
990
920
925
551
885
784
786
829
795
759
775
682
739
679
630
525
462
424
741
450
490
755
814
845
814
855
876
440
805
485
824
836
828
814
812
882
1470
1010
900
481
459
433
451
472
470
508
488
455
686
628
480
643
733
648
634
636
730
743
809
796
801
825
841
680
678
659
588
600
594
612
752
806
690
625
720
741
752
742
716
714
940
928
710
625
651
612
627
1260
632
680
562
533
580
603
589
1730
655
662
680
610
57i
573
502
598
598
557
575
640
438
526
1150
598
480
562
872
812
6101
832.083333
26
20911
804.269231
26
18084
695.5384615
26
16959
652.269231
699.24
5M6MW5
6M6MW3
6M6MW5
6M6MW6
6M6MW7
MH2
5697432.346
16616704.2
16818073.9
12578117.54
11061833.9
12223414.4
12171
26
24
19970
468.1153846
SSwells-Sum (Surn2/Count) for each well-(Sum of all points2 /Total Count)-
690.0
Mean =
36619.9
Variance =
191.4
Coef. Of Var =
0.28
Normal
Distribution:
25
17481
TOTAL COUNT =
SUM OF ALL POINTS=
153
105576
2143996.025
Step 3
5M6MIN5
'
Concentration2
6M6MW6
6M6MW5
6M6MW7
MH2
129600
502681
685584
574564
625681
147456
492804
717409
577600
570025
0
151321
483025
736164
602176
579121
329476
123904
499849
646416
484416
202500
363609
181476
547600
656100
802816
440896
356409
178929
484416
688900
88804
570025
309136
302500
705600
980100
846400
855625
303601
275625
0
783225
632025
600625
396900
213444
0
614656
576081
465124
423801
179776
549081
617796
413449
546121
374544
202500
570025
687241
537289
461041
393129
231361
662596
654481
419904
462400
1587600
210681
714025
633616
401956
315844
399424
187489
662596
641601
404496
284089
2992900
203401
731025
680625
532900
336400
429025
240100
767376
707281
552049
363609
438244
193600
648025
390625
462400
346921
462400
235225
678976
518400
459684
326041
372100
222784
698896
549081
434281
328329
357604
220900
685584
565504
345744
252004
310249
258064
662596
550564
360000
357604
330625
238144
659344
512656
352836
191844
409600
207025
777924
509796
374544
276676
315844
470596
2160900
883600
565504
1322500
760384
394384
1020100
861184
649636
357604
659344
5041001
476100
230400
372100
230400
IS UM
6M6MW3
Page 172 of 201
March AR #
2757
5830685
810000,
17175044
I
16976705
I
12927654
1
11669049
390625
13838673
SUM TOTAL =
78417810
SStotal = Sum (Square of each point) - (Sum of all points2 /Total Count)
SStotai=
5566229.76
Step 4
SSerror =
3422233.74
MO MO NM MI Mt =I IMO MEP ME
1111111
imp gm
im
am go
11101
Ili MI SIM MR MI Mk NM 617 .1 Rich 11/
Step 5
5
Degrees of Freedom
p=
N=
6
153
p -1 =
N-p=
#
11111
age
11111
where:
5
147
S ofl
111
p = number of wells
MS well - SSwell/(p-1) =
MS error = SSerror/(N-p) =
Step 6
Step 7
428799.205
23280.50163
F-Statistic
18.42
2.29
Reject the hypothesis of equal means
Result:
Bonferroni T-statistic Test for Site 6 Nitrate Concentrations (See Section 5.2.1 of EPA1530-SW-89-026 for procedure)
background
background
well
5M6MW5
468.1153846
26
50
650.099359
well
6M6MW3
832.083333
24
NA
NA
NA
NA
36,8919224
36.89192244
36.8919224
37.3741903
T-stat
D value
NA
NA
NA
NA
147
2,21
147
2.21
147
2.21
147
2.21
81.5311486
81.53114859
81.5311486
82.5969605
MEANwcii-MEANhkg
NA
NA
154.169872 1 45.43910256
2.16987179
49.140641
Step I
MEAN
COUNT
b=
Xb
6M6MW5
804.269231
26
6M6MW6
695.5384615
26
6M6MW7
652.269231
26
MH2
699.24
25
STD. ERROR -- SQRT [MS error * (1 /13 + 1/i))
where:
Xb = average concentration of background well:.
STD. ERROR
DOF
Step 2
r
DOF - degrees of freedom = N-p
where:
where:
T-stat - taken from App. B, Table 3
1. F-Statistic is taken from Appendix B, Table 2 of EPA/530-SW-89-026, p 13-5 and correlates 95th percentiles with the F- distribution and the
degreesof freedom defined by the number (p) of wells (p-1) and and the number (N) of data points(N-p).
Currently p-1=5, N-p>120, Tabulated F-statistic =2.29
Step 3
MB MB 1111 IN UM NE MI
11111c 11#
1.1)7 5-
--
1 11
I la! e
1
! l a o fill.1
Appendix E-6. Parametric ANOVA for PCE Concentrations
Step 1
Concentration (mg /L}
6M6MW5
6M6MW7
5M6MW5
6M6MW3
Jun-99
Oct-99
Jan-00
May-00
Jun-01
Dec-01
Jul-02
Nov-02
May-03
Nov-03
May-04
May-05
Nov-05
Feb-06
Nov-06
Feb-07
Dec-07
Feb-08
Dec-08
Jun-09
Sep-09
Dec-10
0.35
0.08
0.044
0.25
0.52
1
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
May-11
Dec-11
May-12
Dec-12
COUNT
SUM
MEAN
Step 2
ISum2/Count
0.25
0.08
0.044
0.25
0.58
0.79
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
25
11.494
0.25
0.08
0.044
0.25
0.41
0.79
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.25
0.08
0.044
0.25
0.84
I.2
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.41
0.65
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.5
0.46976
0.45976
0.45296
6M6MW3
6M6MW5
6M6MW7
5M6MW5
5.51686144
5.28448144
5.12931904 5.91851584
25
11.324
0.25
0.08
0.044
0.25
0.51
25
12.164
0.48656
25
11.744
6M6MW6
Mean =
0.5
0.0
Variance =
0.2
Coef. Of Var =
0.36
Distribution:
Normal
25
11.184
0.44736
TOTAL COUNT =
SUM OF ALL POINTS=
125
57.91
6M6MW6]
5.00327424
SSwells=Sum (Sum2/Count) for each well-(Sum of all points2 /Total Count)=
0.0239072
Step 3
6M6MW3
i 6M6MW5
Concentration'`
6M6MW7
5M6MW5
0
0
0
0
0.1225
0.0064
0.001936
0.0625
0.2704
0.0625
0.0064
0.001936
0.0625
0.3364
0.6241
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
5.843836
0.0625
0.0064
0.001936
0.0625
0.1681
0.6241
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
5.675536
0.0625
0.0064
0.001936
0.0625
0.7056
1
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
6.213736
1
Page 175 of 201
March AR #
2757
1.44
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
7.028936
6M6MW6
0
0.0625
0.0064
0.001936
0.0625
0.1681
0.4225
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
0.25
5.473936
SUM TOTAL =
30.23598
SStotal = Sum (Square of each point) - (Sum of all points- (Total Count)
SStotal=
3.4074352
Step 4
NMI
SSerror =
3.383528
MIN NM
i1111
MN IMO la IMO MIN OM- MO WI ill OM INN
111111
MN IN
MI NM NM IN MB MI
Step 5
11111)1751.
11110
h
an al
#
Degrees of Freedom
p-
5
p -1 -
N=
125
N-p=
where:
4
120
p = number of wells
MS well = SSwell/(p-1)
MS error = SSerror/(N-p) =
Step 6
Step 7
0.0059768
0.02819607
F-Statistic
Result:
0.21
2.49
Do not reject hypothesis of equal means
Bonferroni T-statistic Test for Site 6 PCE Concentrations (See Section F.3.3 for procedure)
Step I
MEAN
COUNT
b
Xb
STD. ERROR
DOF
T-stat
D value
Step 2
Step 3
5M6MW5
0.46976
6M6MW5
0.45976
6M6MW7
0.45296
5M6MW5
0.48656
6 M6MW6
25
25
25
25
25
0.44736
50
0.46476
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.041131059 0.04113106 0.04113106
120
2.21
120
0.09089964
-0.0068
120
2.21
2.21
0.09089964 0.09089964
I
0.0268
I
STD. ERROR = SQRT [MS error * (1/b + 1/i)]
where:
where:
-0.0124
where:
1. F-Statistic is taken from Appendix B, Table 2 of EPA/530-SW-89-026, p B-5 and correlates 95th percentiles with the F- distribution and the
degrees of freedom defined by the number (p) of wells (p-1) and and the number (N) of data points(N-p).
Currently p-1=4, N-p=120, Tabulated F-statistic =2.49
I
Page 177 of 201
March AR #
2757
95th
PERCENTILES
OF
THE
F-DISTRIBUTION
WITH
TABLE 2.
vl AND v2 DEGREES OF FREEDOM, Fv10,2,0.95
,
161.4
911,5i
1
10.13
4
7.71
6.61
4
7
E
Id
5.99
5.59
5.12
2.11
12
13
4.96
4.94
4.75
4.67
14
4.60
15
4
5
6
9.01
234.0
19.33
8.94
199.5
19.00
9.33
6.94
215.7
19.16
9.28
6.39
224.6
19 25
9.12
6,39
230.2
19.30
6.26
6,16
8.89
6,09
1.79
5.14
4.74
4.44
4-16
5.41
1,14
4.53
5.05
4.39
3.97
3.69
3.44
4.95
4.81
4.76
4.31
4.07
3.84
412
1.14
3.63
1.81
3.74
3.41
1.41
1.36
3.26
3.18
3.34
3.11
4 54
4.49
4.45
161
3,29
3.06
18
4.41
19
4-39
20
4.35
4.32
11
16
21
7
4,10
3.71
3.71
3.59
1.49
1.39
233
1.20
421
3.17
3.51
3.37
3.22
3.09
236.1
19.35
4.21
3.79
3.50
3.29
III
244,9
19.40
8.79
243.9
19.38
3.81
6,04
6.90
5.96
S.91
4.12
4.15
3.73
4.77
4.10
4.74
4.04
3.64
4.64
3.44
1.39
3.23
1_11
236.9
10 37
2.58
1.45
2.34
2.14
216
2.77
2.65
1.34
2.74
L61
2.70
164
2.51
253
246
2.46
2,39
2.42
2.35
7-47
2,18
2.31
2.53
2.43
2.34
2-17
2.29
2.24
2.25
2.19
2.91
285
172
3.22
1.01
L1'
L45
L42
3_19
2.35
2.32
2,28
2.20
2.2.5
2_11
2,077
2.32
2_27
2_13
2.05
2.42
236
2.30
2.25
7.23
2.20
2.11
1,15
1_44
2.40
2.37
1_34
130
2.12
2.10
2.11
2_34
2_32
2.31
2.24
122
2.16
2.15
2-20
2.13
2.09
2.07
2.06
2.29
2.21
2-21
2.27
2.25
2.24
2.21
219
211
2.12
2.111
2.27
2.21
LIS
2-12
2.04
1.96
1.11
2.01
1.90
3.19
3.10
3.07
2-71
7-68
2.60
2.57
2-31
2.61
2.80
2.71
2.66
2.64
262
2.55
2.33
2.51
1.54
2,49
2.44
4.24
4.23
4.21
4.20
4.11
3.19
3.17
2.99
2-98
2-99
176
2.60
149
140
2.74
2.73
3_59
2.47
2_46
3.34
3.33
2-95
2.93
2.71
L37
2.16
2.55
2.41
2.70
243
7-39
2,37
2.36
2.15
417
404
3.32
192
269
2.53
2-42
2.3I
2.114
2.61
234
2_15
1.76
LEA
2.80
253
2.2.5
2.37
7.17
209
2-02
2.01
1.94
V2:
2.71
2.62
1.49
2.90
3.53
2.16
2-117
vl:
2.75
3.12
3.31
3.04
3.57
3.21
3.07
2.23
163
25
NOTE:
2.73
2.79
3.41
4.46
3.77
3.14
3.04
2.13
2.41
1.46
2.63
2.10
2-911'
430
2.46
2.42
2.77
2.74
2.58
2.90
2.66
3.01
3.14
3.01
4.53
3.14
2.51
2_41
2-93
2.45
2.32
4.36
4.56
3.17
3.44
1.15
2.94
5.80
1.21
2.23
3.13
241
237
229
221
4.46
3.70
3.27
4.62
3.94
2.33
2.31
3.52
3.15
3.07
1.00
4.43
1.74
1.30
4.70
5.86
2.42
2.34
3.35
I.23
8.57
3.69
2_49
2_45
2-81
3.40
4.00
3.92
1.59
5.72
2.33
3.03
40
251.1
19.47
9.62
2.40
3.05
60
320
250.1
19.46
8.64
5.77
2.411
5.42
30
249.1
19.41
11.66
2.54
3.44
29
19.45
40
2.59
7-71
L77
L70
4.30
4.21
4.24
:11
4.00
241.0
LIS
2.10
3.02
254
L49
L37
131
1.91
1.13
2-62
60
10
24
2.64
2.59
2.55
2.92
2.85
2.96
3.15
3.35
3.34
8.74
245.9
19,45
20
2.60
3.00
3.03
2.96
3.07
2.95
2.85
22
23
24
21
27
3.68
19.41
15
2..65
3.11
3.01
114
12
2.79
2.69
2.60
2.33
3.14
3.20
3.16
3.47
2403
10
2.91
2.85
2.75
2.67
3.01
2.91
2.13
2.76.
2.70
2.74
2.70
3.59
9
2.90
2.80
273
1.14
2-90
2.85
3.61
1
5.75
3.81
117
252.1
19.41
320
253.3
19.49
8.55
2_38
5.66
2.10
L25
2-22
2.11
116
2.11
2.11
2.20
2.35
2.10
2.06
2.07
2.01
2.01
2.04
1.16
2.03
2.01
1.91
2.01
1.99
2_04
1.97
1.94
203
2.09
2.00
234
231
3.92
1.83
1.75
Wiley and Sons, New York.
1.67
5,23
140
:,30
2.23
Li)
/04
2.06
2.02
Lot
1.97
2137
2,01
1.96
1.92
203
E.91
1.93
1. Si
1.95
1 92
1.90
1.87
1.14
1.34
1.11
1.79
1,76
1.94
1.99
1.96
1.94
1,91
1.69
1.96
1.92
1.17
1.92
1.90
1.11
3.15
1.84
1.79
1.87
112
1.94
1.90
I.15
1.11
3.77
1.73
1.77
1.75
1,73
1.71
1.71
3.95
1.93
1.93
1.70
1.64
2.01
1.93
1.84
1.14
1.74
3.64
1.61
1.58
1.75
3.39
1.66
1.61
1,53
1.63
1.47
1.75
1.67
1.65
1.15
1.35
1.22
1.25
1.52
1.46
1.70
1.69
1.59
1.50
1.19
1.62
1.92
1.14
1.89
1.79
1,70
227
219
3.17
LIS
103
215
2.01
1.91
1.74
1.19
1.16
1.84
tee
1.32
1977. Statistics and Experimental
Design in Engineering and the Physical Sciences. Vol .
254.1
19.50
8.33
1.63
2.13
1_39
Degrees of freedom for numerator
Degrees of freedom for denominator
SOURCE: Johnson, Norman L. and F. C, Leone.
43.
I.
Second Edition.
John
1,111
1.11
1.73
1.69
1.67
1.65
1.31
1.00
Page 178 of 201
2757
95th PERCENTILES OF THE BONFERRONI
March AR #
TABLE 3.
t-STATISTICS, t(v, ac/m)
where v = degrees of freedom associated with the mean
squares error
m a number of comparisons
a m 0.05, the experimentwise error level
1
2
3
4
5
0.05
0.025
0.0157
0.0125
0.01
7
1.90
8
9
10
15
1.86
2.78
2.57
2.45
2.37
2.31
2.26
2.23
2.13
2.09
2.04
1.96
3.20
2.90
2.74
2.63
2.55
2.50
2.45
2.32
2.27
2.21
2.13
3.51
3.17
6
2.13
2.02
1.94
3.75
3.37
3.14
3.00
2.90
2.82
2.76
2.60
2.53
2.46
2.33
4
5
20
30
1.83
1.01
1.75
1.73
1.70
1.65
2.97
2.83
2.74
2.67
2.61
2.47
2.40
2.34
2.24
SOURCE:
For a/M = 0.05, 0.025, and 0.01, the percentiles
were extracted from the t-table (Table 6, Appendix 8) for
values of F=1-.3. of 0.95, 0.975, and 0.99, respectively.
For a/M = 0.05/3 and 0.05/4, the percentiles were
estimated using "A Nomograph of Student's t" by Nelson,
L. S.
1975.
JournolorQualityTechnobagy, Vol. 7,
pp. 200-201.
B-6
I
Page 179 of 201
March AR #
2757
TABLE 5. TOLERANCE FACTORS (K) FOR ONE-SIDED NORMAL TOLERANCE
INTERVALS WITH PROBABILITY LEVEL (CONFIDENCE FACTOR)
Y = 0.95 AND COVERAGE P = 95%
K
n
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
:
:
:
:
:
:
'
'
1
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
30
35
40
45
50
55
60
65
70
1
7.655
5.145
4.202
3.707
3.399
3.188
3.031
2.911
2.815
2.736
2.670
2.614
2.566
2.523
2.486
2.543
2.423
2.396
2.371
2.350
2.329
2.309
2.292
2.220
2.166
2.126
2.092
2.065
75
100
125
150
175
200
225
250
275
300
325
350
375
400
425
450
475
500
525
550
575
600
625
650
675
700
725
750
775
800
2.036
2.017
2.000
1.986
825
850
875
900
925
950
975
1000
1.972
1.924
1.891
1.868
1.850
1.836
1.824
1.814
1.806
1.799
1.792
1.787
1.782
1.777
1.773
1.769
1.766
1.763
1.760
1.757
1.754
1.752
1.750
1.748
1.746
1.744
1.742
1.740
1.739
1.737
0.736
1.734
1.733
1.732
1.731
1.729
1.728
1.727
SOURCE:
(a) for sample sizes s 50: Lieberman, Gerald F.
1958.
"Tables for
One-sided Statistical Tolerance Limits." Industrial Quality Control. Vol. XIV,
No. 10.
(b) for sample sizes 1. 50:
K values were calculated from large
sample approximation.
B-9
1
AECOM
Final Annual 2012 LF004, LF005, and LF006 RA-01)46iF h
AR #
2757
Page 180 of 201
APPENDIX F
SUMMARY OF HISTORICAL LANDFILL GAS PROBE RESULTS
Wlx,Maach APR Iformer A RD1k2013 \ Sites 4.5.&612012 Annual RA-OlF12.07021311A.doca
July 2013
I
March AR #
2757
Page 181 of 201
Table F-1. IRP Site 4 Landfill Gas Probe Sampling Results Summary Former March Air Force Base
(Page 1 of 7)
LFG No.
LFG-6a
Screen Depth
(feet below
grade)
Date
10/8/2002
1/22/2003
9.5 - 10
0.1
11512-003
(5.0
2-.2-
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
15.7
NA
NA
NA
80.7
82
2/20/2004
NA
NA
5/2172004
0.6
1.4
181
86.5-
8/20/2004
11/23/2004
3/2/2005
5/26/2005
9/8/2005
11/17/2005
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
0.0
NA
2.3
NA
16.8
NA
80.9
NA
NA
NA
NA
NA
0.0
2.5
16.7
80.8
0.1
3.1
0.0
0.5
14.5
19.5
20.5
82.3
80.5
79.0
NA
NA
NA
NA
1.1
NA
19.4
NA
79.5
0.6
0.0
20.3
20.2
79.1
0.2
9/13/2007
12/12/2007
NA
NA
0.0
0.0
19.8
20.6
79.8
79.4
3/13/2008
6/18/2008
0.1
0.8
0.7
18.5
19.9
80.6
9/5/20-08
0.2
NA
3.2
NA
14.6
NA
0.0
0.8
18.9
0.0
0.0
-
NA
NA
-0.0
0.0
0.3
*
NA
79.6
79.1
0.0
2.3
16.6
82.0
NA
80.3
81.1
911-41fe6
070
2.-S
11/23/2009
3/18/2010
9/8/2010
0.0
0.5
2.6
14
15.8
17.4
12.6
81.g
80.0
85.4
0.0
2.2
14.6
83.0
1/5/2011
3/24/2011
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
NA
NA
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
0.0
NA
NA
NA
4.3
3.0
1.3
0.9
NA
2.5
NA
NA
NA
14.7
17.4
17.8
19.2
NA
NA
NA
81.0
79.6
80.8
79.9
NA
80.4
NA
1/8/2009
3/10/2009
6/5/2009
-
Balance
15.2
NA
9/22/2006
12/8/2006
3/13/2007
6/1/2007
\ FIAAO F
Oxygen
(% by volume)
NA
NA
NA
3.5
3/12/2003
9/11/2003
\WPGIV,ONI'VvIhrch Ai& lia,rnef AF SN0:A58. ,-,A$N201Z AnNOP AA'
Carbon
Dioxide
Methane
limancal LOG Resulti/App i de4-15-1341PIVAND.noll.F-1. sice I P,OIW
17.1
NA
-.
March AR #
Page 182 of 201
2757
(Page 2 of 7)
LFG No
LFG-6b
Screen Depth
(feet below
grade)
6.5 -7
Methane
11123/2004
3/2/2005
5/26/2005
9/8/2005
11/17/2005
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
9/22/2006
12/8/2006
3/13/2007
6/1/2007
9/13/2007
12/12/2007
3/13/2008
6/18/2008
9/5/2008
1/8/2009
3/10/2009
6/5/2009
9/14/2009
11/23/2009
3/18/2010
9/8/2010
1/5/2011
3/24/2011
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
Oxygen
Balance
((Yu by volume)
Date
10/8/2002
1/22/2003
3/12/2003
9/11/2003
12/5/2003
2/20/2004
5/21/2004
8/20/2004
Carbon
Dioxide
NI
NI
NI
NI
NI
NI
Ni
0.0
0.3
5.7
17.3
12.7
9.6
NA
17.2
15.3
NA
NA
NA
11.6
16.5
20.1
12.7
17.9
16.7
18.2
18.4
17.9
19.9
14.7
19.6
82.4
81.5
86.3
NA
0.1
0.0
NA
0.0
0.0
NA
NA
NA
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.1
NA
1.7
3.2
NA
NA
NA
3.8
2.0
0.5
5.3
1.8
1.7
12
1.0
1.4
0.3
1.5
0.8
0.8
0.6
1.4
2.5
3.5
3.3
1.6
3.2
1.3
1.4
2.8
3.4
1.8
1.1
1.0
2.9
1.1
NAVVP.relup WPW1.0, AFN Oorour A6ILK2013,,Sir 4 4.5- &6\20I2 Annual R.A.CM1A1 ap F HOWolcal LFG Results \AM F rew2-2513a1uMppendie F -1. um I Probe
18.1
17.6
16.4
16.4
12.4
16.7
10.1
13.1
10.1
16.5
14.7
16.9
16.2
18.5
17.8
16.5
80.6
NI
81.1
81.5
NA
NA
NA
84.5
81.5
79.4
83.0
80.1
81.6
80.6
80.4
80.3
79.8
83.8
79.4
80.9
81.7
82.2
81.1
84.1
80.0
87.7
83.6
88.5
82.1
82.5
79.7
82.0
80.4
81.2
80.6
81.6
I
I
March AR #
2757
Page 183 of 201
(Page 3 of 7)
LFG No.
LFG-7
Screen Depth
(feet below
grade)
9.5 - 10
N. WAGFouRNWIIAMarcl, 4F9 Owner/W*112013161mi 4.5.8412012 Annul RA01rOpp
Methane
Date
10/8/2002
1/22/2003
3/12/2003
9/11/2003
12/5/2003
2/20/2004
5/21/2004
8/20/2004
11/23/2004
3/2/2005
5/26/2005
9/8/2005
11/17/2005
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
9/22/2006
12/8/2006
3/13/2007
6/1/2007
9/13/2007
12/12/2007
3/13/2008
6/18/2008
9/5/2008
1/8/2009
3/10/2009
6/5/2009
9/14/2009
11/23/2009
3/18/2010
9/8/2010
1/5/2011
3/24/2011
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
Carbon
Dioxide
Oxygen
Balance
(% by volume)
0.5
2.8
1.8
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.6
16.4
15.3
13.5
9.4
7.0
8.1
9.2
8.0
8.4
3.7
0.1
5.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.3
0.0
3.2
2.9
4.0
10.0
3.9
4.6
2.4
4.2
0,1
0.2
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
5.7
5.5
4.3
5.6
0.6
3.9
4.1
4.8
3.8
3.7
3.8
5.9
3.6
3.2
3.2
1.7
0.0
1.4
0.5
9.9
11.3
7.5
5.6
9.4
9.6
15.9
15.2
16.2
16.5
13.8
6.9
16.0
13.7
17.9
83.1
80.5
84.2
80.6
81.7
84.4
85.0
82.6
82.0
79.8
79.6
80.5
80.6
82.2
83.0
79.9
81.7
79.7
15.1
13.5
11.3
13.2
15.8
18.5
14.3
14.3
14.2
80.4
80.5
83.2
82.4
78.4
80.7
81.7
81.6
81.0
16.1
80.1
79.9
86.9
1.9
16.4
8.9
9.9
10.3
14.8
15.6
18.9
14.9
16.8
16.7
2.1
17.1
1.9
16.0
3.1
2.4
LFG ReswIlsApp F rev]-25-13.KRAAppendke F-1.50 4 Frogs
84.1
86.0
82.0
81.2
79.4
82.0
80.8
81.4
80.8
82.1
March AR #
2757
Page 184 of 201
(Page 4 of 7)
LFG No.
LFG-8a
Screen Depth
(feet below
grade)
9.5 - 10
Methane
Oxygen
Balance
0/0 by volume)
Date
10/8/2002
1/22/2003
3/12/2003
9/11/2003
12/5/2003
2/20/2004
5/21/2004
8/20/2004
11/23/2004
3/2/2005
5/26/2005
9/8/2005
11/17/2035
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
9/22/2006
12/8/2006
3/13/2007
6/1/2007
9/13/2007
12/12/2007
3/13/2008
6/18/2008
9/5/2008
1/8/2009
3/10/2009
6/5/2009
9/14/2009
11/23/2009
3/18/2010
9/8/2010
1/5/2011
3/24/2011
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
Carbon
Dioxide
0.1
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
1.1
16.8
19.2
1.1
18.1
1.0
0.7
0.8
0.6
0.5
0.7
1.3
0.1
4.6
0.1
1.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.9
0.9
18.9
18.8
19.6
19.2
19.2
18.7
16.8
12.3
18.8
18.8
19.4
18.4
18.8
19.4
20.4
19.1
19.2
19.0
18.7
19.6
19.2
0.1
1.1
1.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.0
1
1
0.8
0.8
0.8
0.7
19.1
80.1
19.7
14.2
14.2
12.0
17.9
17.0
19.9
17.7
18.5
18.9
18.7
16.8
79.6
89.2
84.2
87.0
81.2
79.8
79.2
0.2
0.9
1.1
0.1
1.5
0.1
0.9
0.9
3.2
0.9
NAWAGIaupWPWarch A{8 {forma.. AR Bru2013Sitgs 4,5,86/1012 Annual PA-CA PkApp F aCsioncal LFG Aesults/App F real-25 13
lAppendiu
79..5
18.2
17.8
1.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
80.5
79.6
80.2
80.3
80.6
81.4
83.0
81.0
80.3
79.7
80.5
80.0
1.3
1,0
1.0
1.3
1.1
0.0
0.5
80.1
78.8
79.9
79.5
79.7
80.2
79.2
80.5
80.9
80.5
81.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
-
82.2
79.7
80.8
1.2
1.3
0.9
1.1
1.4
SiFe 4 Probe
18.1
81.1
80.2
80.2
80.2
81.8
I
March AR #
Page 185 of 201
2757
(Page 5 of 7)
LFG No
LFG-8b
Screen Depth
(feet below
grade)
19.5 - 20
1
NAWPGrocip \ V./12\March And iformv ARBP62013 /Wes 43,&01,2012 benua.
Methane
Oxygen
Balance
(% by volume)
Date
10/8/2002
1/22/2003
3/12/2003
9/11/2003
12/5/2003
2/20/2004
5/21/2004
8/20/2004
11/23/2004
3/2/2005
5/26/2005
9/8/2005
11/17/2005
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
9/22/2006
12/8/2006
3/13/2007
6/112007
9/13/2007
12/12/2007
3/13/2008
6/18/2008
9/5/2008
1/8/2009
3/10/2009
6/5/2009
9/14/2009
11/23/2009
3/18/2010
9/8/2010
1/5/2011
3/24/2011
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
Carbon
Dioxide
Ni
NI
NI
NI
NI
NI
NI
NI
0.0
14.0
11.8
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.6
3.6
5.6
6.4
3.7
2.3
5.4
4.4
3.8
82.4
82.5
80.5
80.6
0.1
1.4
0.1
7.2
9.1
6.9
5.1
6.9
8.5
6.1
5.8
7.7
9.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
6.1
6.1
0.2
7.8
6.7
6.1
7.8
8.8
4.5
8.2
1.3
0.6
5.9
9.9
10.3
6.8
4.8
8.4
8.3
.0F/Abb F HaioricOl LFG Pemells \Apo F rev2.25-13.eloMiapentbs F-1 Siie 4 Probe
13.1
15.7
13.6
84.1
83.5
81.3
82.5
11.1
14.3
13.1
-
18.4
8.7
9.5
80.1
12.1
12.2
10.2
10.8
7
14.1
11.8
10.9
11.6
12.1
10.7
19.3
11.9
12.0
10.7
12.6
11.9
9.6
8.3
12.4
18.8
10.3
10.7
9.8
12.3
13.0
9.3
10.9
'
83.9
81.4
81.0
82.8
82.8
80.7
79.8
82.1
81.2
79.4
81.8
83.0
19.3
80.1
81.3
83.2
79.6
79.3
85.4
83.3
86.2
80.6
83.8
79.4
79.9
80.9
82.2
82.3
80.8
March AR #
Page 186 of 201
2757
I
(Page 6 of 7)
LFG No
LFG-9
Screen Depth
(feet below
grade)
9.5 - 10
Methane
Date
10/8/2002
1/22/2003
3/12/2003
9/11/2003
12/5/2003
2/20/2004
5/21/2004
8/20/2004
11/23/2004
3/21/2005
5/26/2005
9/8/2005
11/17/2005
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
9/22/2006
12/8/2006
3/13/2007
6/1/2007
9/13/2007
12/12/2007
3/13/2008
6/18/2008
9/5/2008
Oxygen
Balance
(% by volume)
0.1
0.0
13.8
1.1
0.2
0.0
0.8
0.2
4.5
7.2
1.6
0.2
0.2
3.4
0.7
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.0
2.3
0.1
0.2
1/812009
1.1
3/10/2009
6/5/2009
9/14/2009
11/23/2009
3/18/2010
3/26/2010
9/8/2010
0.9
0.0
0.0
0.0
31.9
17.9
1/5/2011
3/24/2011
NA
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
Carbon
Dioxide
0.1
34.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
19.6
16.7
19.0
23.8
13.4
19.6
17.2
23.1
23.5
16.3
19.7
9.3
16.3
23.9
23.1
15.9
10.1
12.2
14.5
12.6
19.5
23.6
19.9
12.6
22.4
22.0
13.1
10.7
8.0
35.7
35.0
19.8
NA
35.1
18.4
9.2
4.9
7.5
0.3
4.1
11.2
6.6
6.4
2.6
0.0
11.4
7.1
11.7
7.2
0.0
0.0
6.5
13.4
11.9
9.3
11.3
4.0
0.3
5.4
10.5
0.1
0.8
8.7
12.7
15.2
0.0
0.1
11.4
15.2
6.3
NA
0.2
6.8
14.4
10.5
10.8
7.7
13.1
10.1
14.6
6.0
10.1
75.4
75.8
66.9
71.0
75.2
74.8
75.6
74.1
72.0
65.1
71.6
78.8
76.3
72.7
77.8
77.4
76.5
75.9
76.0
76.0
76.5
73.8
74.6
76.7
76.4
76.3
78.2
76.6
76.8
32.6
46.8
73.6
NA
30.3
74.8
76.4
79.4
77.8
1
77.1
76.8
79.4
1
rtIwPG.r.p1wP1march AF9 IfOrnler ARM \ 2013 VSieS 4,5,0.612012 An.al 0.A-01F1App F - Hi erica' LFG ResullskApp F rew2-25-13.xts,AAppendis F.
She 4 P,Obe
1
1
March AR #
2757
Page 187 of 201
(Page 7 of 7)
LFG No
LFG-10
Screen Depth
(feet below
grade)
9.5 - 10
1
Methane
Date
10/8/2002
1/22/2003
3/12/2003
9/11/2003
12/5/2003
2/20/2004
5/21/2004
8/20/2004
11/23/2004
3/2/2005
5/26/2005
9/8/2005
11/17/2005
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
9/22/2006
12/8/2006
3/13/2007
6/1/2007
9/13/2007
12/12/2007
3/13/2008
6/18/2008
9/5/2008
1/8/2009
3/10/2009
6/5/2009
9/14/2009
11/23/2009
3/18/2010
9/8/2010
1/5/2011
3/24/2011
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
Carbon
Dioxide
Oxygen
(°/0 by volume)
0.1
11.1
10.1
78..7
0.0
0.0
7.5
3.7
17.2
11.2
2.5
14.3
12.8
3.2
2.6
12.0
12.0
9.6
7.4
10.9
10.2
6.8
4.7
6.5
8.9
2.3
3.6
8.5
8.7
5.4
6.3
8.5
6.9
5.4
5.0
6.0
10.5
11.2
7.0
10.0
5.9
10.0
10.0
10.0
11.8
11.3
6.8
11.0
14.7
16.4
13.7
12.4
18.3
17.4
13.8
87.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.1
NA
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
NA
4.6
7.0
9.7
2.3
NA
9.3
5.8
5.8
5.0
6.7
7.0
NA
12.1
14.7
14.6
11.7
14.6
16.8
7.9
10.4
10.3
NA
12.1
17.8
16.1
16.5
13.0
15.7
NA
Notes:
Bolded values exceed the 5% methane threshold
LFG = landfill gas
NA = Not Available. The screened portion of the perimeter probe was submerged
in water.
NI = Not installed
H. \WPGroupW4P/March AFB dormer AlLfiLL2013L5des 4.5.86%2012 Annual ILAGF \AI7P
Balance
HILLOntal LFG AtsultL/App F feV2-25.13ALAAppendaL F-1
it I PI0b0
91.3
76.7
78.3
86.3
78.7
77.2
90.9
87.0
77.9
77.7
78.6
81.3
82.1
78.7
78.5
78.9
79.5
78.5
79.4
79.0
77.7
79.0
79.8
79.1
79.8
78.5
78.6
84.6
79 7
87.2
NA
78.6
76 4
78.1
78..5
80.3
77.3
NA
I
March AR #
Page 188 of 201
2757
(Page 1 of 13)
Screen
Depth
LFG No
LFG-3
(feet below
grade)
4 -9
11.1WAGF06AVAFAIMArch AFB Former A R0h2(113Voes 4.6,6,61;2062 An mg.!, RA-VAApp
Methane
Carbon
Dioxide
Oxygen
Balance
(% by volume)
Date
3/31/2003
5/21/2003
9/10/2003
0.0
12/4/2003
2/19/2004
5/21/2004
8/19/2004
0.3
2.8
3.8
12.8
13.6-
84.4
82.3
0.0
2.9
15.6
81.5
0.0
3.2
15.7
81.1
0.0
0.0
2.9
3.2
17.1
16.8
80.0
80.0
0.0
2.0
17.5
80.5
11/2172004
0.0
2/25/2005
5/25/2005
9/7/2005
0.0
0.0
2.9
3.6
4.8
15.9
3.0
14.6
81.2
93.4
0.0
3.1
16.4
11/18/2005
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
9/22/2006
0.0
6.0
17.0
16.8
16.3
0.0
2.5
2.4
2.4
2.5
18.3
80.5
80.8
81.3
79.3
12/11/2006
3/13/2007
6/7/2007
9/24/2007
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
1.3
1.5
19.4
79.1
f9.4
18.8
79.3
79.7
0.0
1.4
18.9
79.7
12/11/2007
3/13/2008
0.0
1.3
79.8
0.1
2.1
8f.0
6/f /2008
0.1
1.8
18.9
16.8
17.6
9/5/2008
1/8/200g
3/10/2009
6/9/2009
9/14/2009
11/23/2009
0.2
0.0
20.1
79.7
0.0
2.7
16.4
80.9
0.0
3.1
15.8
81.1
0.0
0.0
2.0
17.4
1.8
18.0
80.6
80.2
0.0
0.4
1.4
3/472-010
9/8/2010
0.1
2.8
18.6
11.9
13.2
1/5/2011
0.1
1.6
12.3
83.9
86.0
3/24/2011
0.0
2.6
17.1
80.3
6/15/2011
0.0
2.7
16.3
81.0
9/30/2011
0.1
2.2
19.2
78.5
12/1/2011
0.0
2.0
17.8
80.2
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
0.0
1.7
18.4
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.9
16.7
2.2
18.3
1.8
17.8
79.0
81.4
79.5
80.4
0.0
-NMAricAILFG Resolv0ApP ,,,n0-2 1
3.5
ISAAPPtrA.
6,1A 6 ArAAA
80.6
80.4
80.5
80.0
84.1
March AR #
Page 189 of 201
2757
I
(Page 2 of 13)
Screen
Depth
LFG No.
LFG-4
(feet below
grade)
4 -9
Methane
Date
3/31/2003
5/21/2003
9/10/2003
12/4/2003
2/19/2004
5/21/2004
8/19/2004
11/21/2004
2/25/2005
5/25/2005
9/7/2005
11/18/2005
3/8/2006
Carbon
Dioxide
Oxygen
Balance
(% by volume)
0.0
0.3
4.1
5.7
10.7
11.2
85.2
82.8
0.1
5.0
13.6
81.3
0.0
3.7
15.2
81.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.5
3.5
2.7
17.1
16.8
16.7
79.4
79.7
80.6
0.0
3.2
14.9
81.9
0.0
2.1
00
0.0
6.6
4.6
11.4
11.6
14.7
86.5
81.8
80.6
0.0
4.0
15.4
80.6
0.0
0.0
15.8
15.2
80.6
81.3
-7.g.4
9/22/2006
12/11/2006
CO
3.6
3.5
3.3
0.0
2.4
18.7
78.9
3/13/2007
6/7/2007
9/24/2007
12/11/2007
3/13/2008
6/19/2008
9/5/2008
1/8/2009
3/10/2009
6/9/2009
9/14/2009
11/23/2009
3/4/2010
9/8/2010
0.0
2.3
2.3
2.3
79.2
80.0
80.2
0.1
3.5
4.5
3.3
2.6
2.5
3.5
5.2
18.5
17.6
17.4
18.0
16.0
16.2
19.9
14.9
13.9
1/5/2011
3/24/2011
0.1
2.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.0
4.7
5.4
3.5
2.2
3.3
3.6
2.8
5/17/2006
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
1.9
3.2
0.1
2.4
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.1
f7.2
16.1
17.2
17.2
11.6
11.1
12.6
17.4
12.7
14.6
15.6
18.2
15.2
15.7
17.3
80.1
80.7
81.3
79.7
81.6
81.6
80.6
80.2
80.3
84.4
83.6
85.1
80.6
82.6
80.0
80.9
79.6
81.5
80.7
79.9
1
\ WPGFPI.AWPWartry AFfilf.r.ner ARRIVD135Aes 4.5.h6/2012 AnnI.13111A-0 F \ADP F Histo oral ILFG FttsultsIAPp
Site 6 probe
I
March AR #
Page 190 of 201
2757
(Page 3 of 13)
1
Screen
Depth
LEG No.
LFG-6
1
1
(feet below
grade)
13 - 18
Methane
Date
12/4/2003
2/19/2004
5/21/2004
8/19/2004
11/21/2004
2/25/2005
5/25/2005
9/7/2005
11/18/2005
3/8/2006
5/17/2006.
9/22/2006
12/11/2006
3/13/2007
6/7/2007
9/24/2007
12/11/2007
3/13/2008
6/19/2008
9/5/2008
1/8/2009
3/10/2009
6/9/2009
9/14/2009
11/23/2009
3/4/2010
9/8/2010
1/5/2011
3/24/2011
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
Carbon
Dioxide
Balance
(% by volume)
2.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.8
1.0
2.3
2.0
0.7
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
24.0
21.0
0.1
13.1
0.2
0.0
15.4
13.2
12.5
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
19.0
20.9
20.9
19.9
19.7
22.9
22.7
17.8
14.9
19.2
5.2
13.4
12.1
0.0
13.9
12.4
12.2
11.2
9.7
11.4
13.3
6.2
10.4
11.0
12.2
12.3
9.4
9.0
0.0
2.5
2.8
1.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.6
5.3
3.8
16.5
9.1
8.8
6.6
9.2
7.6
9.0
20.2
8.5
7.5
9.2
10.0
11.5
6.7
6.7
10.6
7.6
7.1
9.6
9.1
10.1
12.0
11.2
10.8
9.4
11.4
1
rt./WPGrevAUVP/March Are ifprmer Agi9A2013/511.es 4.5.1E612012 Annual NA-CIRAOP g
Oxygen
WgwaULFG Rt[LOAApp F .w]4,A.LuAppend4FI.Mir 6 Probr
74.0
76.5
78.2
77.9
78.3
79.1
78.0
75.0
76.6
78.6
79.9
76.9
78.3
77.5
78.0
77.8
77.6
79.8
78.7
79.6
77.6
80.1
78.6
78.8
78.8
81.4
79.6
83.1
82.0
81.9
78.2
78.6
78.6
79.8
79.1
78.7-
March AR #
Page 191 of 201
2757
I
(Page 4 of 13)
Screen
Depth
LFG No
{feet below
grade)
LFG-11
17.5 - 22.5
Date
8/19/2004
11/21/2004
2/25/2005
5/25/2005
9/7/2005
11/1.8/2005
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
9/22/2006
12/11/2006
3/13/2007
6/7/2007
9/24/2007
12/11/2007
3/13/2008
6/19/2008
9/5/2008
1/8/2009
3/10/2009
6/9/2009
9/14/2009
11/24/2009
3/4/2010
9/8/2010
1/5/2011
3/25/2011
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
Methane
Carbon
Dioxide
0.0
0.0
1.3
1.6
0.1
2.2
0.1
1.9
1.9
2.2
2.1
1.6
Oxygen
Balance
(% by volume)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.3
2.5
2.1
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.7
1.6
0.0
2.3
1.9
1.8
1.9
2.2
2.1
2.3
2.5
2.4
1.6
1.9
2.3
2.3
1.6
1.8
2.2
17.6
17.7
16.6
15.3
15.5
15.7.
16.1
15.5
17.0
17.4
17.9
17.3
17.6
18.5
17.6
18.0
20.2
18.0
17.2
17.1
17.8
17.9
14.5
13.5
13.0
17.5
16.3
19.2
17.4
17.8
16.5
18.1
18.1
81.1
80.7
81.1
82.7
82.4
82.1
81.8
83.0
80.6
80.1
80.0
80.8
80.5
79.7
80.6
80.2
79.6
79.7
80.6
81.1
80.3
79.9
82.8
84.1
84.4
80.1
82.0
78.9
80.3
79.9
81.9
80.1
79.7
1
1
1
1
Pi:/WPGroup 41, WriMarch AFB [forme, AN Etra
2012 Amami RA- p\//AN, F Hine nr,416Fa Results \App F ,e61-2-11.11ss'Appe.neloc F- 2 -'&de 6 Orphe
1
March AR #
Page 192 of 201
2757
(Page 5 of 13)
Screen
Depth
1
LFG No.
(feet below
grade)
LFG-12
14.0 - 19.0
Carbon
Dioxide
Methane
Balance
(% by volume)
Date
8/19/2004
11/21/2004
2/25/2005
5/25/2005
9/7/2005
11/18/2005
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
9/22/2006
12/11/2006
3/13/2007
6/7/2007
9/24/2007
12/11/2007
3/13/2008
6/19/2008
9/5/2008
1/8/2009
3/10/2009
6/9/2009
9/14/2009
11/24/2009
3/4/2010
9/8/2010
0.0
0.0
8.9
0.1
9.4
7.9
7.9
8.0
7.7
4.8
7.6
7.5
6.8
6.8
6.8
6.8
5.6
6.4
0.0
7.5
7.0
6.6
6.8
7.0
1/5/2.011
0.1
3/25/2011
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
0.0
0.0
Pi: WPGFOup \ WA/Meech ARP [rumor AR6I\20131LIes 4,5.8612612 Annual RA .01F1App F - 1-1111011.11FG Results1App F
Oxygen
9.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
7.1
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
2.154
,,
8.2
7.9
8.0
5.9
6.3
7.3
6.4
5.8
5.9
6.3
\ Appendix F-2 Site 6 Probe.
9.6
9.5
5.8
4.1
7.6
9.0
9.7
11.3
11.1
12.1
11.7
11.5
12.1
13.1
12.5
12.1
20.2
11.8
10.4
11.6
12.3
12.4
8.5
8.0
7.7
8.2
8.3
13.2
11.2
12.0
11.0
13.1
12.9
81.5
81.4
84.7
87.9
84.0
83.0
82.6
83.8
81.2
80.4
81.5
81.5
80.9
80.1
81.9
81.2
79.8
80.6
82.6
81.8
80.9
80.6
84.0
83.7
84.3
83.8
85.8
80.4
81.5
81.6
83.1
81.0
80.8
March AR #
Page 193 of 201
2757
(Page 6 of 13)
Screen
Depth
LFG No.
(feet below
grade)
LFG-13a
7.0 - 12.0
Methane
Date
8/19/2004
11/21/2004
2/25/2005
5/25/2005
9/7/2005
11/18/2005
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
9/22/2006
12/11/2006
3/13/2007
6/7/2007
9/24/2007
12/11/2007
3/13/2008
6/19/2008
9/5/2008
1/8/2009
3/10/2009
6/9/2009
9/14/2009
11/24/2009
3/4/2010
9/8/2010
1/5/2011
3/25/2011
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
Carbon
Dioxide
Oxygen
Balance
1
(% by volume)
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
1.2
1.0
1.6
1.7
2.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
2.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
2.1
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0,0
0.0
0,0
1.3
1.3
1.6
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.2
0.9
1.4
0.0
1.2
1.0
1.5
1.6
1.3
1.2
2.1
1.4
1.4
1.4
1.7
1.4
1.1
0.9
1.1
2.9
P1 /WPGPePplve %Mani+ 6i6 Praernee AnEI)/2013,s.t. 43,80012 Annual RACAF/App i - Fneteneal LFG ResnakApp F ITO- 243 On/Appendix F. Site 6 Probe
18.6
18.3
16.3
15.8
17.0
17.8
18.5
16.7
18.6
19.5
19.9
18.8.
19.1
19.6
18.0
19.2
20.2
19.0
17.1
18.0
19.2
19.5
14.9
14.6
14.1
17.5
16.7
21.3
19.2
19.5
17.8
19.8
17.9
80.2
80.7
82.1
82.4
80.2
80.1
80.2
82.0
79.2
78.9
79.0
79.8
79.4
79.2
81.1
79.1
79.7
79.8
81.9
80.5
79.2
79.2
83.5
83.2
84.3
81.1
81.9
77.0
79.4
79.4
81.3
79.1
79.2
1
March AR #
Page 194 of 201
2757
(Page 7 of 13)
Screen
Depth
LFG No
LFG-13b
(feet below
grade)
27.0 - 32.0
8/19/2004
11/21/2004
2/25/2005
5/25/2005
9/7/2005
11/18/2005
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
9/22/2006
12/11/2006
3/13/2007
6/7/2007
9/24/2007
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.3
3/13/2008
6/19/2008
9/5/2008
1/8/2009
0.1
0.1
3110/2009
0.1
6/9/2009
9/14/2009
11/24/2009
3/4/2010
9/8/2010
1/5/2011
3/25/2011
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.1
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
PGroupt.WP March APO tforreer AF(0)/1013ASiles 4.5.81E07012 11.n.1 rlikCArtApp F
Oxygen
Balance
(% by volume)
Date
12111/2007
N
Carbon
Dioxide
Methane
j
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
-,
3.0
0.3
4.0
2.5
2.6
2.5
3.3
2.9
3.5
3.9
3.2
3.0_
2.7
1.4
1.9
2.7
0.0
3.0
2.9
2.6
2.6
2.8
2.2
2.3
3.2
3.2
2.1
2.4
2.6
3.0
2.2
2.3
1.1
Histonral LFG PesteliM,Rop F rev7.2-13. eler/Appengbe F-2. Site 6 Probe
16.7
18.6
16.3
15.7
15.2
15.9
16.0
14.8
16.2
16.9
17.7
16.8
17.6
19.3
18.1
17.3
20.2
18.2
17.0
16.8
17.7
18.1
14.8
14.0
13.2
17.7
15.6
18.9
17.3
17.3
16.3
17.9
19.4
80.3
81.1
79.7
81.7
82.0
81.6
80.7
82.3
80.1
79.2
79.1
80.0
79.4
79.3
80.0
79.7
79.7
78.7
80.0
80.6
79.7
79.1
82.4
83.6
8.5
79.1
82.3
78.7
80.1
79.7
81.5
79.8
79.5
March AR #
Page 195 of 201
2757
(Page 8 of 13)
Screen
Depth
LFG No.
(feet below
grade)
LFG-14
4.8 - 9.8
Methane
Date
11/21/2004
2/25/2005
5/25/2005
9/7/2005
11/18/2005
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
9/22/2006
12/11/2006
3/13/2007
6/7/2007
9/24/2007
12/11/2007
3/13/2008
6/19/2008
9/5/2008
1/8/2009
3/10/2009
6/9/2009
9/14/2009
11/24/2009
3/4/2010
9/8/2010
1/5/2011
3/25/2011
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12120/2012
Carbon
Dioxide
Oxygen
Balance
(% by volume)
0.0
0.0
1.0
1.9
0.1
0.2
0,1
4.8
1.9
1,5
0.0
0.0
1.1
0.1
1.3
0.8
0.7
0.5
0.5
0.6
0.4
1.6
1.2
0.0
0.8
1.8
1.3
0.7
0.6
1.8
1.0
0.1
1.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
3.1
2.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.3
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
N iMPGroup/WPMarch AFB iformer ARehZ0131Sites4.5.&/12 An nua I 166NRAPP F -14gt.FIF611FG A..Its0,66 F rev7-2-13-tinWoendfx
0.8
0_8
0.9
1.1
0.5
0.5
W*6 Frode
17.0
10,8
13.8
17.7
18.4
19.0
17.9
19.5
20.1
20.3
19.3
19.5
19.6
18.0
18.7
20.2
18.7
16.4
18.4
19.7
20,3
12.3
15.3
12.6
14.2
17.0
22.1
19.3
19,8
17.8
19.9
19.6
82.0
87.3
81.3
80.2
80.0
79.9
80.7
79.7
79.2
79.2
79.8
79.6
80.0
80.3
79.9
79.6
80.4
81.7
80_3
79.6
79.1
85.3
83.6
86.2
82.7
80.9
77.1
79_9
79.3
81.3
79.6
79.9
1
March AR #
Page 196 of 201
2757
Table F-2, IRP Site 6 Landfill Gas Probe Sampling Results Summary Former March Air Force Base
(Page 9 of 13)
Screen
Depth
1
1
LEG No
(feet below
grade)
LEG -15
10.0 - 15.0
Methane
Date
11/2112004
Carbon
Dioxide
Balance
(13/0 by volume)
2/25/2005
5/25/2005
9/7/2005
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
11/1812005
0.1
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
9/22/2006
12/11/2006
3/13/2007
6/7/2007
9/24/2007
12/11/2007
3/13/2008
6/19/2008
9/5/2008
1/8/2009
3/10/2009
6/9/2009
9/14/2009
11/23/2009
3/4/2010
9/8/2010
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.1
1/5/2011
3/24/2011
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
0.1
727202012
0.6
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
7.0
8.0
79.0
82.7
11.1
14.0
9.3
2.6
14.6
12.0
4.5
9.3
9.1
13.2
12.5
13.9
15.9
16.5
15.9
80.7
78.6
77.7
80.7
6.8
6.9
6.0
4.6
3.9
3.7
3.2
3.5
3.7
0.0
16.1
4.1
18.0
15.9
16.3
20.0
16.9
3.7
15.5
3.9
3.8
3.3
3.9
6.2
4.5
4.5
4.9
6.2
6.2
15.6
17.0
17.6
12.6
10.7
11.9
14.0
10.8
4.7
3.5
2.9
3.0
1
1
1
N:\WPGraup1WD\March AFB Itorrner AR 01/20131SRes 4.5.8612012 Annual RAO1FApp F
Oxygen
Hntoraal 154 Res.110,,App F rev7-2-13 NIsmVippendis F-1 gm 6 Pe a he
15.1
14.7
16.4
15.9
17.9
17.7
86.1
78.9
78.1
78.9
80.0
79.9
78.8
80.5
79.8
79.8
79.0
80.6
80.5
79.2
79.1
83.1
83.0
83.5
81.5
84.3
78.7
79.1
78.9
80.6
79.2
79.3
March AR #
Page 197 of 201
2757
(Page 10 of 13)
Screen
Depth
LFG No.
LFG-16a
Methane
(feet below
grade)
_
FlAWPGrouplaAn\nnarch FLF
11/21/2004
2/25/2005
5/25/2005
9/7/2005
11/18/2005
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
9/22/2006
12/11/2006
3/13/2007
6/7/2007
9/24/2007
12/11/2007
3/13/2008
6/19/2008
9/5/2008
1/8/2009
3/10/2009
6/9/2009
9/14/2009
11/23/2009
3/4/2010
9/8/2010
1/5/2011
3/24/2011
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
Oxygen
Balance
(% by volume)
Date
4.0 - 9.0
Carbon
Dioxide
0.0
0.0
0.2
0_3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.4
0.2
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.5
18.1
2.6
3.7
12.8
15.7
18.7
18.9
19.3
18.4
19.6
20.2
80.4
84.6
80.4
80.2
80.3
79.8
80.7
79.6
79.3
20.5
79.1
19.6
19.9
19.6
18.5
19.5
20.1
79.8
79.4
79.6
79.8
79.7
79.7
79.7
80.0
80.6
79.3
1.0
0.8
0.9
0.9
0.6
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.8
1.7
0.4
0.0
1.2
19.1
2.3
0.4
0.5
0.4
17.5
19.0
2.1
0.8
0.9
1.6
1.8
0.5
0.5
0.4
0.4
0.4
0.6
20.2
20.5
14.0
15.2
13.6
18.6
18.4
22.3
20.0
20.4
18.6
20.6
19.9
1
79.1
83.4
84.0
85.3
79.8
79.8
77.2
79.5
79.2
81.0
79.0
79.5
(Former AlF0111:1131Snes 4,s,awaot Annual PFL01F1Frop F - Hbrorkal LFG Fiesuirs1Aop F rte71 12 orlulAppeedie F-2 Sate 6 Probe
1
March AR #
Page 198 of 201
2757
(Page 11 of 13)
Screen
Depth
LFG No.
LFG-16b
1
(feet below
grade)
13.0 - 18.0
Methane
Date
11/21/2004
2/25/2005
5/25/2005
9/7/2005
11/18/2005
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
9/22/2006
12/11/2006
3/13/2007
6/7/2007
9/24/2007
12/11/2007
3/13/2008
6/19/2008
9/5/2008
1/8/2009
3/10/2009
6/9/2009
9/14/2009
11/23/2009
3/4/2010
9/8/2010
1/5/2011
3/24/2011
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
Carbon
Dioxide
(% by volume)
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.3
0.0
0.1
0.2
0.1
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.1
'
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.4
4.2
4.2
4.4
4.7
4.9
3.9
4.3
4.7
3.6
3.2
3.0
3.4
2.7
2.4
0.0
15.8
14.8
12.4
13.1
13.5
15.2
14.6
16.0
16.9
18.0
17.5
17.7
18.3
17.4
17.6
20.1
3.1
18.1
2.4
2.4
2.4
2.5
2.5
2.8
2.6
2.0
1.7
2.2
2.3
2.2
1.6
17.2
17.2
18.2
18.5
14.6
13.7
13.3
18.5
16.2
19.6
18.2
18.9
17.2
19.5
19.2
1.6
1.9
1
N VNRGFavp M A I O arth AIN Ilorrner ARM/2013\54;es A5.8.6 \ 21)11 Annual RA-0 \ FlApp F
Balance
Oxygen
Nnlorkal IFG ResuksIAPp
NIA 6 FFARR
-
79.8
81.0
83.3
82.3
81.8
79.9
81.5
79.6
78.4
78.4
79.0
79.0
78.3
79.8
79.8
79.8
78.8
80.1
80.4
79.4
79.0
82.4
83.8
84.0
79,5
82.0
78.2
79.5
78.9
81.2
78.9
78.9
March AR #
Page 199 of 201
2757
(Page 12 of 13)
Screen
Depth
LFG No
(feet below
grade)
LFG-17a
5 5 - 10.5
Methane
-
NWPGroupWP/Pstards AF9 !fume/ Aftfir.,20137,Se es 4.5,86V012 foeus I RA-rk App f
Oxygen
Balance
(% by volume)
Date
11/21/2004
2/25/2005
5/25/2005
9/7/2005
11/18/2005
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
9/22/2006
12/11/2006
3/13/2007
6/7/2007
9/24/2007
12/11/2007
3/13/2008
6/19/2008
9/5/2008
1/8/2009
3/10/2009
6/9/2009
9/14/2009
11/24/2009
3/4/2010
9/8/2010
1/5/2011
3/25/2011
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
Carbon
Dioxide
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.4
1.3
3.0
2.9
1.6
5.1
1.0
1.5
1.2
1.1
18.3
12.9
16.8
17.5
12.6
18.3
17.0
18.6
19.8
15.5
18,7
0.0
4.4
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.1
1.8
18.1
0.3
1.1
0.1
0.0
18.6
20.1
18.5
16.7
18.2
18.9
19.5
13.3
14.2
10.4
16.8
0.1
0.0
0.3
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.5
0.1
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
1.4
2.1
1.2
1.2
1,1
2.2
1.9
4.8
2.5
2.3
4.7
0.9
4,7
19.1
19.6
17.1
15.1
1.4
1.7
19.5
14.5
17.3
18.9
2.2
18.1
slid e ncal SIG ResuPtsApp f re-r7-2- 13 sissAispenem f-2 Site 6 Probe
80.4
84.1
80.1
80.6
82.3
80.7
81.5
80.0
79.1
80.1
80.0
79.9
79.5
80.0
80.0
79.8
80.1
80.9
80.6
79.9
79.4
83.9
83.8
84.8
80.7
80.6
80.2
79.6
80.8
81.3
79.4
79.7
March AR #
Page 200 of 201
2757
(Page 13 of 13)
Screen
Depth
LFG No.
(feet below
grade)
LFG-17b
15.5 - 20.5
1
1
Methane
Oxygen
Balance
(% by volume)
Date
11/21/2004
2/25/2005
5/25/2005
9/7/2005
11/18/2005
3/8/2006
5/17/2006
9/22/2006
12/11/2006
3/13/2007
6/7/2007
9/24/2007
12/11/2007
3/13/2008
6/19/2008
9/5/2008
1/8/2009
3/10/2009
6/9/2009
9/14/2009
11/24/2009
3/4/2010
9/8/2010
1/5/2011
3/25/2011
6/15/2011
9/30/2011
12/1/2011
3/7/2012
5/16/2012
10/2/2012
12/20/2012
Carbon
Dioxide
0.0
0.0
0.2
0.2
0.1
0,0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.3
0.2
0.0
0.1
0.3
0,2
0.0
0.2
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.1
0.1
'
.
'
0.0
0.0
0.1
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
0.0
4.8
14.7
13.4
12.6
11.4
18.6
4.1
3.5
5.0
1.3
5.3
3.2
5.0
5.2
4.8
3.7
3.8
0.0
4.8
4.2
4.0
4.3
4.8
4.3
5.0
1.3
5.2
NAWPGrouPIWPMatth AFB 6Iorrner APAIVIDIASUes. 4.5,6.6)2n12 Annual RA-116,F1App F - Plisnoricol LPG Revills/App F Few/ -2-13.bire/Appendte F-2.51te 6 Probe
86.0
81.5
83.5
77.4
81.2
79.3
82.2
80.3
80.0
15.1
4.1
1.2
5.3
1.0
LFG = landfill gas
84.1
12.6
13.3
12.4
21.3
13.5
19.7
13.5
14.0
13.9
15.0
19.7
14.6
15.7
16.0
15.2
15.2
20.2
15.4
14.4
14.5
4.1
3.6
Notes:
11.1
13.1
0.9
4.3
4.6
4.9
15.3
12.0
80.5
82.5
83.7
83.4
80.0
81.6
82.9
81.0
79.8
79.4
81.0
80.5
79.2
81.0
80.7
79.6
79.8
81.2
81.5
80.6
79.9
83.2
i
1
,
15.1
15.1
FINAL PAGE
ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD
FINAL PAGE

Appendix E.B - March Joint Powers Authority

Transcription

Similar documents

Küchen und Waschtische