Proceedings of a Symposium on Industry and
Transcription
Proceedings of a Symposium on Industry and
PROCEEDINGS A SYMPOSIUM OF ON INDUSTRY AND NATIONAL August 15. 1940 Waldorf-Astoria Hotel New York City Sponsored By The TAX FOUNDATION, INC. 30 Rockefeller Plaza New York. N. Y. DEFENSE s'(\~ TABLE OF CONTENTS Page },1orning Session Introductory Address. National Remarks and "Clarif~ring the Defense Problem." by Lewi s H. Brown 1 ! Addre~s. "A Review of Washington Developments," by Ellswortll C. Alvord 10 Address, "Emergency Taxation; and tl}.e National Econo~," py Dr. Alfred G. Buehler 15 Address, "Appropriate Yardsticks for Determining Normal Profits," by F. P. ~erly Address, "Administrative of an Excess Profits b~r Robert ~T. Miller 25 Problems Tax." 32 Afternoon Session Address. "Industry's Responsibility and the National ~fense Program." by Philip D. Reed 44 """"""".."'" Address. "Recovery of Costs," L. C. Weiss by , Address. "Administrative Problems Under Prior La'.vs and New Proposals, " bv , " L. H. Parlcer 51 60 , ==.,,~- ~"~" "",- MORNING SESSION A Conference Foundation. Astoria Inc., Hotel, C. Alvord on Industry 3a Rockefeller New York order and of the in a tangle around the tab1c in no roporters basic floor a bearing expross 194a, convened at lO:la by at a.m,. the the Mr. Tax Waldorf- Ellsworth very the you on this main to into however, to think it is is I problem, fecl but and to to the country in hot in order to take part to make a contr~bution of A\~lst at to of in one corpora- and we finally tho littlo hero nature. \vhich have we want of to There you are to spoakers diecussion anf character or any of set the tr~t these take to from of industry that is that the important of tho thinking experts that number weather, in this these have oxperts to thinking. by as evidence we wore representatives Chairman undorstood idea il1forma1 goipg your that some of some room, questions clarify of subject. representation. a certain the this interest our request twonty~fivo of industry raise ask about great bo we are to havo so many for the about a J.argor of at industi'y enlarge to on schedule. of have going symposium who said such havo and out discussion to ai'ranged free gonorally think is a symposium may h~lp and O~Ter It point, that to and had Wc have wo want importance, possible. It liko and move happy, of many instances, would conference country, to was of Chairman, the thiliking in and this started of a day apparently they discussion. all spend diecussion. viewpQints come from the CoI):)orat1on, we hope, conference corporations and call finish, And we oxpectod discussion this this acceptances outline I groat City, We will we can clarify matter present. tho and to said We are the lai'ger tablo two hundred part that problems. another conforencG in the a little aftor over so that and needod lefenso part sponsored Johns..Manville Gentlemen: stai'ted, of Now, take 15. BROWN (President, me sB:y' first officers national haa New York on August Inc.): get Let tion Defense. presiding. The ~ax Foundation, sit Plaza, City, MR. LEWIS H. to and National fact this that problem you a\vay from your is of men havo vacations in disc1J.ssion and, if of the country as to what we should do about it. First cL~led this I would li1;:e to say just meeting. mcmbcrs, even though it !t [\, word as to why tho Tax Foundation was at the direct falls has request of many of the Foundation's some,vhat outside tho scope of the Foundation's p11.rposes. The 'I'!:1.xFoundation has been engaged for tho past two years or mora, as many of you 10lOW,in a rather specialized 1... study of probloms of taxation as I . these affect the benefit of those approach to objective, that future of industry and who may not be familiar these problems on the non~partisan, is intended to some kind activitics bo thoroughly and helping state them community, trativo to to at in of 3~ per vary tho and safeguarding activities itsolf problem, Federal financcs. national defense crisos, is called billions to program of CO1Ultry and tho us porhaps huge expcnditures entire of economic over that this of billions is arisen takon service striving from It are the taxing aro is citizcns' assisting groups, community more to togethor, income. life, wide front, by efficient adminis- no\v recognized the as being been half weeks, profow1dly It the ",rill, The are bo1Uld to have sha~ of of the economic tax of th~ that cost the ton bcfore this equipping ncxt this ten consoquoncos our until Congress morc estimated a period the alterod. of original over dollars. is of has as a result appropriEl.tions defense. Foundation important recent has completed, of which, \~ich during ITI.airJ.tenance has It by county, equally situation is completely future, make unprecedented defense agency. national other national the the as a public voluntecr policies for that character. national co~nty our is supported that different state, fiscal this the fifty our However, to cost of roots with strengthen IlL'"J.tioMl units spread concerncd upon governmental by America's !"'.ow not being chaos stato sounder in present cent grass is a coordinating and many establish, the With cost o~t Tax Foundation and primarily organizations procedures vital is order close the constructive of l75,QQQ d~fforont now spending local of of and non-politicAl, The Foundation bring part the l~~tional economy. And with its work, let me add years, of repercussions upon is to ar~yze and pr~are for is to help co~ntry prqparo. those national economy. One of future that indust~J eventualities. is !I,bout the four Our main main problem. products for requiroments those problems just what DXC. and f.-hat the the tho in defense. products are quantities ilocessi nocessary of expansion natioruJl $econd, expedition objective Now, a sudden products determining tasl~s ty appear to me to consist p~d of production wanted, be indust~. fa,cilities Govornmont. -- ~- ~ s requirements Governrllent' And. this will for the -2... -. this such elements. First, trial I s present includes what the the of indus- necessity specifications for of those required. to co11vcrt in order or provide to turn with out these great Third. Government result a reasonable and industry a realistic expenditures control and I neod to the ri sl:s that in this than it program the huge the fall program vital these that area of by funds may the and tho dangors fall primaril~r should of the responsi- each. is taxes imposed industry Congress will there way. certain vlhich betwoen so that of and the are roarmarnent furnishing Government thero responsibility problem under wi thin The new taxes is the gets by of undertaken, financing program program is both assumption this c.ivision the properly gigantic ever. equitable concerns once fourth. think to which be considorod. finance Mora solution oxpenditures And bilities before required. of and to industry that now considcring upon not unduly is. can to industry. penalize or : I handicap industry, an expanding analysis is the bo givon up In il~ontivo those to who determine is nation's total already thnt take excess Thi s moans tain 1941 incomo before poriod-~in the fiscal one or stf'.te is bound roughly 52 cents if same :-.et profit by from words. the that 10 to base it by the 30 per income. once it of additional each period average COtit that cont of tho the nation!1l SUbcommitteo the had profit ir!creascd. by a typical the Unfortur~atoly. 75 par And under considered out to must rocognizc virtually bc recommended now being that to last that to po,vor. soldom of now bccomos dctorrcnts too and local. tho out businoss it motive another a corporation's tax, entcrprise. real in incomc. those its be paid seam obvious national policies form proposal and for only which would as possible. lodoral. the And it 11pon free depends in from taxos other far nation.s profits earned. for system Cowilittce. will as income. greater based percontago cxamplo. Ways and Means this system tax bill, For cent go ahead. paying ffiaorgency Committee. to as it national provide. provide tho huge a greater to ~'omovc. the bill. to an oconomic itidustry per and on ,vhich defonse of industry light important defense out to economy a green doubly the oconomy. it expand for in Joint is ovcr its to be used in is concerned House subjoct dollar company 1940, of it best to the in computing 40 profits oven main~ increase yoar House Senate and of i s to must tho its tho 1936-1939 excoss or normal the problem profits. In of m~ting other profits; No,v. it industry or tho \vords. it is is what industry concerned with not my purpose national economy. the problem to oA~lain for cert~in1y ,\'ith of is avoiding ~ not a tax ...3- - ---~~ ~~= c- - lo3ses. taxos will how these I not ~ expert affoct but mcrely ! a business the man like explanation I which of Shall ing experts for the this balance of at I all all in and where the we had ccrtainly to there makc such this to do is the of experts Ells\vorth who will And I on tode¥'s Alvord, Shall of leave program, one of be Chairman that tho the this rising outstand- meeting tho cycle, that exceed- this poriod the that that be very serious to financing by to rising after 25~, wages, war, lies We ahead. might the are our mountcd costs, avoid there we remember rising the be ,~ich commodities in on We must elements time would me to for was necessary can present \vhich of briefly inflation. cycle, prices, we possibly at seem to of index readjustment on hand commenting And certainly price of if which possj.bility ingredients. problems avoid tho to a ne,v inflationary when the myself situation is into war, the confine present these then arc Mr. the problem. well future of country. In armament tures addition program which dollars of of inflatiol1ary &~ taxation, necessary all and And yet, like last to go through, want in projected the to to this day. ~'ould being hand experience the \nth points a raoment count~r The first costs now at in phases grave. confronted technical o\'er in general ingly these turn What certain yourselves, e.lone for ta.~es taxes on passed cause are the that upon dra\vn Government WPA funds million today, quic?~y to regulatory are provide particularly be add for only inflation, controls must upon j.ndustry tho tho form of reserves to increased and the is the a gro,ving no long~r ,..~ by as must bc prices increasing are raw countries. credit the a billion this labor ox:pansion four fact hundred fall, there is shortage which can \vages. Pl'oscnce important they not,vithstanding to many be rogardod position unemployment higher million an unlimited O11e billion trades, hundrcd thus sales foreign And, in expendi- Mvancing an uncertain other tho Federal .only and prices. industry. risc four can make possible deffir~~ds for 'va recognize in Government, And furthermore, and prospective from skilled than costs, higher end ba.llk industr~r industrial contracts equally more leviod belligerent into total the additional spending. from many economy been a prospective in but will disrupted being tho we have to contracts translatod l~ot to~,ards what hedge Unprecedel1ted based of And lilcewise supplies into no\v being to deficit period conS'U.Iner in manufacturers material present inject They production. inventories. will on top which on to the an indefiJ.1ite a month, the to f~.ct e.blo to of theso that under deDI ,v1th factors \vhich existing those tend Governmont forces effectively. Govcrnmont supervi sion over busir..ess activi tho point where industry or, in many instances, tho new orbits cannot control even the prices of governmental even thc legitimate profits action; and flexible under the tax meast~es now pending. economy, "hich changing conditions, to influences that are political yardsticks. Wf),Sformerly is tending to the ebb and no" within and are to bo mado legislative As industry ~s dependence on Government has gro,,'!1, it less vulnerable costs, ru1d these are all ara being questioned to adjust labor while, is thl.\t our national and difficult costs, products, less than arbitrary in meetj.!Jg rapidly a."ld more rigid own production reEl,chad of its of industry to conform to What are nothing The result its ti es has already clastic to become more of the business tide. he,s become mora rather r[~ther than than economic in character. ~he prosent industry in connection and over what shall illustrates ,'!hat controversy with in Washington over the recovery the establishlllent be the dividing the point line that political of emergency should not be political .armament plants, oetwecn normal and excess profits, rather than economic ,...0should do to bring about a proper solution k~d it of costs by factors. factors are dotcrmining to this defense problom. We Should ke~ our mind definitely which is quicl: and adequate defanse. No", these factors. from the standpoint of industry, on thc end result, problems which arc only incidentally related; thom as if The quostiO11 of recovery they amortization order wore Siamese twins. affects yet Washington insists facilities supplies should be just as tho guns or tanks or other excess profits defense only tax, contracts. indirectly as much a part equipment it The vast majority I:1.Sthe Govornment' in oS!:>ecially to of tho dofense oxpenditure is designed to manufacture. on the other hand, affects all business of industrial s increased through Commission. It set ~p by the Defense Advisory would scem only common sensa that the cost of tho pla11t built produce war on joining of costs only companies which must expar.d their to meet the requirements are t,vo sevarate irrcspective companies will spending The of bonefit expands consumor purchas... ing pov,or. We aro naturally rosult of the be joined is in insistence tho pending the possibility industry for that this concerned over of Administration tax bill. which officials that have arisen thoso year an attempt slo,~down simply as a two situations But what is much more serious, in an election production tho delays in my view, may be made to blame because business men have been -5-. - - .. -"--~~- ,- - '" ~,,- ~ ~ _Co" al1Xious cal, to that tr:>T to avoid the business the economic and bccausc inflationary dcprossion privata enterpriso business t~~t the must bo no room mattors, which of industry position for rovival oithor of breakdo\vn wo are anciont Army all industry prcvious will tho oxpense of the cornponsation is functioning of nation's that of reasons industry of ratum which systan. ,,:,ith the spell the it important is to the public. lator end the \villingness There recriminations, "passing buck." to co~eratc. of the rules \vishas that businoss will All under which it and shattor to profiteer at soeks in the way of produce the maximUM effective on profits undor havo bean choerfully of the Vinson~Tr~.1mell acccpts that contracts acceptod by Act. Many business Den sot by the Govorn~ont are not comJonsurate protest, man today ra~ards it or othor quarters. the nocessity tho principle of i tsalf tho as his prioary to any foreign And for of an excess profits such a tt;!,X j.s in for these tax, oven a dcterrent to rocovory. one of the ~roasury's has been magnified, to the leading at Washington last short what tho nation profits, tarns percontages relationship If of Limitations Europoan dictators Tho quostion would fall today, in his po?:er to mako America impregnable today boliavos business hoarings cloar patriotism All evory Ai:1crican business ,vhethor fr~ true war, \'rall assumed, but they have bean acccptod without duty to do ovorything to its last dctormined Once those are reduced to tangible an ounco ontc~riso tho profit simple roason that full into fornulation necossity. ninimum and so have the though it been turn in a porformmlce rccord ,'mich will man with that tho vlith tho risks attack, nny or possibly awarded by tha ArMY and Navy D~artments may foel that the upon a practi~ precedents. No ousinoss business, non have of examino practico asks today is a cloar~cut form, to about industry's can cooporato in the defcnse progra~. practical bo placod systcm. bc made thoroughly Thcro is no qucstiOll that industry businass misundcrstandings that should tendencies of another On thoso any basis, Government dangcr froc or for with relationships common sense subsequent of thoir of throo is sotting tho tAXation defonse in my opinion, when tostifying weak, conceded that hundrcd nillions, there hns boon destroyod the a ncrc ~~ from Coml!1ittee this tax drop in tho bucket against ~ilitA.ry to confiscata incontivo befol"O tho Joint tho 1941 yield out to spend to achiove progrD.'!1 ntta-npts proportion This is shown by the fA.ct that progrOCl. experts, out of all and nnval lU1 o.bnomal security. portion to lower costs and improved of And once this incentive has baen lost, operatint; efficiencios. of tho pl"ime automatic wa~rin the direction prise business controls of the competitive of dostroying the basic system, a.nd.have gone a long elements of tho froo privata enter- s~Tstcm. What is the alternative? Washington who threaton that, ,vithout adeqtk~to provision throUf?jl a more latter conditions, one ,ve have lost unloss business for ~~ortization ,,1 thout Governmcnt ,~ill defense. '~e hear a lot Well, will for even having prices No\~, that threatens to hold up indofinitely taka contracts or tako contracts deteminoo. or Any othor and operate the plants is the kind of silly, childiSh of the to mako talk that our defonse program. What we neod is great national unity, assigned to its immediately or financing, take over business munitions from the burcaucrate in taslc to do its part, Govor~ent and business each with and m. th an understanding on both sides as to how the system must \,ork in order to get effective results. we must raake the first about of adequate defense, and eve17thil~ order of business else must move aside in favor :Even Mr. Hitler, must come first. army. but he knew that If eye on the objective industry them charge off time as they wished, them. Ins.tead, country, to do the job by in as short the plants ho,vever, we hold up production into a production increasingly prejudices incentive proposals the sad news in war \~rk, from our freo private agaj.nst business tho accompliShment of the main objective, defense. Tho rcal bottlenecl~ defense for taxes are going to boo and to malce it very removing tho carburotor And thus again those petty for \~e can impress everyone with there is not going to be any profit from the various men did not the Government would as amortization gotten for his over there, for his army coming out of thom, he levied as to how heavy the excess profits national plants, things supplies his Nazi Party he got industry and then, having quicltly three months, and maybe more. so that prevent first but the most nominal of profits. Hel"O in this effectively munition the cost of the plants and the flo'~ of supplies clear that of gettiryg had the "know how" and that the Government were to Quild heavy taxes on all ~"1deretood that had tho po,ver to take over and operate industry of course have to pay for letting of that. the Munich paperhanger, He kept his He certainly know how. the bringing In othel" words, at Washillgton, advanced for ontorprisc in high places thus machine. ,vork to ,vhich is preparodnoss as is generally amortization recognizod, for arises of costs of emergency -7... i , "-'--'C~ d armament plants. capi tal that loss. the That cost convertcd of to 'period of in addition, in last the with rather is commerci~"l the of the froe the the what progrron to the of is either capital for reopen its tax of this for subnormal the or after to expansion through returns kind ~o And I think went the ~ppoar quick defense. of or would to that reopening within returns no profits men that this off be and fair. inyestmonts, national cannot practical are hnndicaps wantod tho various the in that hazard that nation, is most of the in period trying war, is e. risks the and risk nationDl concern and only a benefits and must in of to economy fairlJr plant of such involved in basis latter to the the and play outlays for is to costs is of not a hugo promises tho ono Their E\, cost challenge of tho cqui tably. should raeeting the of hands assess of that thousands roquirements. from by economies essontially way and making is be understood ~~thin concerns economiccl tho industrial responsibility continuation in the It entirely industrial most botwoen by hundreds economical and hazards on the the difference program. It hero involved the average can be utilized. individual of the basic defense performed hazards the the usually p,~rts products of undor differences tho tho by The Governmoot's l'ogardless assumo emphasize undertaken purchaser, is required plenty may havo that to system trcmendous to be both had and Tho proposal be charged to many business like these Government. production, rather to on a matter undertaken The part assume a good should against request. value be permitted ,mich officials throughout socure ties recognition enterprise of agency, use unamortized business business individuals the the undorstanding role of I ,vould ordinary presont off it be protected oxperience. Finally, clear time it military appear no\v SO necessary Government sorry type write is \vould that be a ree.sonable a temporary a company which asked peacetime life, minds war, have and penal ,vhich meroly seem to industri,~l during haznrds of production deal which that to has certainly productivc order up undue to plants years, profits, the \vould suggosted, preceding of industry subsequent their alternative set Here I I to to current part provide sta.YJ.dpoint. most alort is There business man. ~e required and concerns ,rlll nation.9l in gover11lncnt ,vh~t quantity, provide also make certain cost. Particularly the that in in facilities the finished the latter must order to determine to assure produce articles respect \vill is it what manufactured articles individual industrial that these articlcs. bo provided dosirable for And they arc should at a minimum of the Government to -8- ; I - --7 ---~ - ~- _c, = ~~ ~ crCD.te a procurcmer.t policy th~,t will motive in kocping down production powcrful than tho relianco costs. within industrial skill rcasonable r.1anager a real in devising that will is more certain This involvos koep individual and. at the same time. incentive and a verJ dolicato negotiated that ,rill contract give tho to apply his usual peacetime ingenuity we come to industry's ~ont do trlree things. They provide produco the product. tho product. alone. upon the profit and tho most e conomic-'ll way of meeting the probler:1. And finally, tion limits adequate reliance for the latter upon patriotism bnlancing oetwoen tho safeguards prices permit Normally the necessary capital ~noy provide And they t~e part. tho talent the risks required inhere~t capitRl and manage~ and facili tics to manufacture in both the financing to and soll and produc- of the product. Private capital these neccssaIJ' special position in indic~ting utilizo is undou9tedly facilities.if costs to be recovered. ~on this for oconomicclly if it there are plenty can be cllowod of risks that proDise to prodl.).ce goods at a E,;iv~n price clear their can be brought its f~~ction. for the individual in the signing for this enter~ of contracts a given function. timc. plus c.bout through increased thc.t the progr~.1 can go forward to concontrate for and wi thin ~~~agcment can be assured of a minimum return se~6 ~nll managmnent c&~ be d~ended upon to produce to assume in mooting the promis$s inhercnt then it take a reasonable or at any rate permit problem and socure a nonnal minimum roturn of any cost savings that to furniSh as the sole purchaser. period. and expeditiously. As to the risks. prise a reasonable Industrial in most instances. the Gover!"1mentwill the eoctent to Which it. these facilities tho product ready. If BODOpart efficiencies. on a reasonably expcditious basi s. And. in my jud~ent. make cle~r fact it country. in thE) posi tion confront L1ore important than trJing us, it is trying and as a result paoplc and to all the of to avoid capita.llosses. to get this defGnsGprogr~,1 under way so that wc in the months or years that of France. to is not 'concerned in thi s r~1attor Moth tho m~ing is cor.cernod with the problem of trying And. above all, in this is nothing not only to tho poople in WaShington but to tho Ar,1erican public thn t American business profits, there lie inadeqUc"1.tcly prepared lose everything that ahead. will not find to meat the condi tions is precious ourselves that may to the American ~ of us. And no",. without ~ further words, 1: would lilce -9... to introduce Mr. Ellsworth I !. I i I Ji.lvord, one of the outstanding tax experts to tho Government in Washington, introduce who will act as Chair~an of this broad probloms than I aJ:l rlith the one that will classifiod-about huge undertaking. From the financial spcaking, A national defenso program, Fror.1 tho tochnical l::1ili tary I suspect I know nothing. aspcct, I supposo t~.at a national \~'e nocd an adoquate military, oquipped and fully defonse program rJould 00 naval, and air forco, adequately r,1annod. Second, we neod an industrial production of the adoquate military, ~ird--and this naval, problem hasn't progr~ can carryon that to pay. forco been discussed in ~:hat we might call is going \Wlich \~1ll p'roduce all and air \~e need some means by \miCh those not directly is the group tax measurc, as follows: First, requireocnts mora concornod with of al"1.Yparticular is no\v pcnding in Washington. I Itnow nothing. Broadly I am personally tho provisions l~no\v, is a. very sorious, aspcct, ~ceting, (Applause) CHAIRMANALVORD: Gontlomon: we all and a forr:1or a,dviser the othor speakcrs nnd conduct your progran. Mr. Alvordl including of tho country If and maintain very much, if ongaged in tho national peacetime activities, that group the it. at all-defense because that diminishes, payment must be sought from other sources. From a financial point of I would divide vie\v, our problons about as of our fully equipped, follows: we ~irst, fully manned array, f;1USt fin&~co the cost of acquisition navy, and air force. Second, we must fully manned army, navy, Third, national we ~ust finance tho cost and air force. finance those of r.laint~ining facilities defense progrwu and those facilities in the national I will equipped contribute and to the \mich ~re not so directly involved dofonse progrwn. will meroly priated $l4,70~,~~~,O~~ and air force. givo a few figures. to acquire Thero r.ave boon no official ostirJatos cost of r~aintenance. in you an offort I have erred, which our fully I havc TJado soma guesses So far tho that thnt tho natiol~l Congress defense But my guoss is, are necessarily rough, ~- navy. to but if \~,nich is probabq you have R.cquircd your completed army, s,ftor ...10- --- army, appro- I havo soen ~!i th respoct I thinl~ I havo errod on tho side of co:1servatism, on the wrong side. has ~ -- navy, and air I~orce, and if defonse oxpendituros, you continue on \vith YO1~ present your annual budgct ,rlll Government non- bo about fiftocn billions of dollars. In my fii'teen billion dollar estimate Washington has done in its fourteen have omitted which we all those matters have not yet been asked for. billion seven hundred million I moan, for examplo--and air forco thousand airplanos. of fifty is or what it and I don't Of me thing sit down and attompt to plan just that might well the expansion of private talre into considGration Wo now are certainly facing will be a period don't know. vcry economy into from an armament economy into effect tax bill will contain. wo arc facing. We soo ourselves being an armamont econom~r. Then \ve l:now there a peacetime oconomy. Certainly how long, \VO Whatevor financial l~cen apprecia ti on eras~ Coming more imr.1ediately to the excess profits includil'lg that program come a time \'non wc arc again convcrtcd upon o~ch of those throe is no one hero, and how we are I suggcst that program we devi se now ought to be ~:eighed wi th a rcasonably of its is. the national of time in \Vhich the armament economy prevails; Thcn. I hopo t:~crc will of the program ora ,vhich I think t~,o stages. to an soon somebody must maintenance, industry. a threotold the first convertod from a poacetimo somo d~ its calls program is or what it how ,vo arc going to finance defense program, how \ve are going to finance going to finance reforences lcnow whero the rest know ~:hcre the financial I am very certain, but Which or series of ~propriations. I don't I is only ono examplo We havo hoard frequent thousand planes. is, this ,vhich estimate; kno~r ,vil1 come in the future. of many--the $14,700,OOO,~~Oappropriation, for twenty...threc I have done the same thing tax, I suspect that there I..1yself. who h~s much of an idea \mat the excess profits Wo have a few general statomcnts. We have a few general purposes. Last Friday, a report and Means was r:1adepublic timo the hearings began. ~~ortization; of the Subco~~ittee at 10 0 'clock of the Co~ittee in the morning. The proposals were threefold; (2) an excess profits tax; At exactly (1) on Ways the same A provision for and (3) the suspension of the Vinson- Trammoll Act. The Govcr~~ent officials their position. It said, "First, \'.'0 !:1ust got rovonue frolJ thi s excess tax." 11... --~--~-==~~=~ and I Crol generalize was about ).ike thi s. 'l'hc Treasury profits appoarod on Friday, No~', in they Washington through that the an excess propos?~, didnlt say Troasury profits according so.publicly, tax to had but a progra~ a m~imuo newspaper of roports. it has undor been which two billion was, I gonerally it c~ected dollars. thiruc, rumored to ~hoir sovon hundred raise minimum and I fifty million. rr'rea6ur.r pronouncQ!:1cnt not "Wo ::lust two: intorfero with r entorpriso." This upon private they didn't entcrpri prograD.1I "Whether wa liko say: so to a very pl~~ Nor did thcy sv::{ that it important "We think or not, part in that private ,vc havc tho got national to roly : private nu.~ber dofense ontel1Jriso should be financed privatoly." The officials I l~eroly sumuarizo ,vhat I got out of their inaccurately, in my attoDpt Nur.1berone: industry becoDes advisod will industry. tered. profits be under We are merely tax, announced that to aoortization.I' not go ahoad unless tax." fo~ departments. the delays that ,~!Odo not have been encoun- facts." can't about Govor~~cnt they know defonse contracts what excess profits blame Congress, eight at lel:1.st with wcoks ago the there would be e~~excess profits thoy would decido About the proposed blame Qoni,ress stating bo appliod of Congress ,vhich Di&~t . thls will "We do not bl~~e they becausc respoct beforo thqy ontor into national we do not Certainly with "We thilll~ industry Nuqbor three: bl&~e and I ~aJ quote theo to sUmDarize briefly. spccifically with reasonablc certainty liabilities appoarances; "\10 cannot go aholld on our nationc~l defense progra~ until Nuober two: their dcfcnse progra~ then ~poarcd. chal'ged ,vi th tho nntional respect to tho cxcoss on Ways and Mev.ns Co~ittae rotrollctivOly; wbothor it should be or not, noxt Januar.r, I sovon ~'eeks ?~O, the Socretllr.r program met ,vi th the approval i tax enacted at tho noxt session! of the ~~d the pl~surc Troasury Ilnnouncod that i of tho Prosidont. i About six ivoolcsago, the confol'ees on the Rcvcnuo Act of 1940. ,vhich, as you gontlomcn }:now, was dosignod, al dcfonso prograr.1 as it instruc.tod profits the cxperts tax and report on Finance on tl"le first Nov;, that the TreaS11rY told had then bean preparod. us, to finance annou.'1ced that of the Cong'J;essf".i1dtho Trcnsury back to tho Co~itteo tho nation- "We havo to prepare an e~rcess on Ways and Moans and tho Co~~itteo of Octobor." takes care of tho situation eight woclcs ago And six wecl~s ...12- ---", ~-- I i I i i ago. And then, about five saying a stc~ly of Congress. graduated ~~t wcoks before ~Jooks ago, came an announce~ont from the White House statemont that--my to stato and tho frosidont the fact of time might not be accurate rn1nounced to the Co:mnittee that profi ts t~~ and rqport tax must be onactod at this was made noti~ithstanding periods Secretary of tho Treasury authorizod excess profits tho progra~ of having been proclaimed~~confronted itself~-the reasons for with the necessity I Imoiv is that if its of pr~aring, the job of drafting devolved in part upon me, I couldn't somebodyhad long before If pr~are an excoss s approval pr~ared do that all that position haven't drafting, tax, consider- and completing excess profits tax job in three wet;ksl time, the answors to the innumerable even if specific of policy. r am not outline to tho day--the had ~~o ~residont' ing the intricate policies and problems of an excess profits the impossible tasl{ in probably three weeks I timG. questions ti~O was vory happy about it. So Congress now finds All just on Finance thc~t he was tho experts back in Janue.ry of noxt year, that session going to explain them to you, and I think they ~.re not revealed the details their sufficiently, I of the proposal. will ,just dotaiJ.s ivill be revealed it because they ~re not known is either as ive proc oed. or b~cause the spoaker has not had an opportunity or because you gentlemen have boon too modest. You can shoot all at us you want. reserve the right to confess I don't tho quostions I alwe.ys know. I wil~ give you just a little more history. The original Treasury program, according to tho ncivspapors, was to computc "normal profits" solely with roforencc to invostod capital. You soo, tho big arc "normal profits." am concorncd, If job in an excess profits i'IO can ~roe upon normal profits, tho tax can talce a torl1ific slico The Treasury proposed to determine pre-wl:I-r rata of roturn edly, I hopo. 1936-37-38-39 then, so far ",rhat as ! of oxcoss profits, normal profits upon invQstod capital. Thoy callod tax is to detormine by comp~ting the ! usa tho i~rord "pro...wa:r" ill-advis- a b~so pcriod, i'1ith 1940 bcing tho first tDXablo Y°:1.r. Th~y s,~id, "If inll cut you down to t~1. !l.d.' if you fell provod. !I your rate If it of roturn was loss in between ton ffi1d four, -13- --c-c--c"" = ivas in excess of ton por cont, than four, ~!Owill let wo i,nll we take ~9u up to four. you got wh~t your expert enco It that happened mlS a fair measure normal profits years tho out of the Joint profits, that Committee and they as follows: realiZQ of tl'lreo staff of normal substantiEuly 1936~37-38~39; an avor~e that preparod Take tho actu~l '38 was a substantial of tho four yoars. didn't thirut a plan to determine c~rnings loss of the year, That avorf1,ge will that four and striko bo considorod normal profits. or didn't Further, they realizo normal e~ alternate invested yardstick capital ~e ~~in fact, committae it tho avorago is it profits of tr.e ontire V!o will the fact take that return Darn more than aarnlngs that, basis. cont is a fair prior tho last ton per if thcm up to four than Under represents the Sub- as one yardstick, even though but '38 was a bad year. We will they take those gave on invested tho e.varage earnings cent they of invested did, PQr cent that, they (six obviously yee.rs bit furthor. short-cut and then in capitDl would por method, cent if taka they the pre-war up to $5~O.~O~ because we think taxes our bast four por all avoid We shall history, and we shall capital. not embark upon We have cloven of not incomo, and we shall i~numere.blc solve shall ,vo all the p.~~inistrp.tive criticisms pl'ob- of all the by boiTJog'al'bitrary." procodure second, will have respoct have throe ~o invost~d the dcfinitioA We shall I hope wo Shall We naturally disregard tho ~ar yoars, of revamped ~othods. you mD;:f ~isl'1 with oconomic problQrns. "we shall a now definition eight a li ttlo I tl'link questions oarnings duplicates of courso, is less two plans. report for between ton per cent and four per cent of to ,vhat wo learned excess profits program, those their ~rere deadlockcd Subcommittee out What return this falls say the Troasury, of writing by taking Committee the propare roturn. pay much attention rovnmp it it that it although if "So," times in ~nd find we will exist on it.1t has bcen devis~d. them down to We raisa invested capital) the policy if We cut betwacn yardstick e~d, dospite capital. known that didn't them compute return yee.rs 1936~1939, pcriod invested l~s this per cent in f~ct p~riod, Wo willlat to use pre-war four \vhich four-year of the Joint compro~iso in the pr~,var capital, staff is proposed Then, as an altcrnative th~t profits. generally SO statos~~a report co~orations them an aight and the it those during normal and give I think "For profits for Treasury a fow days. s~id, be to continuo timQ before lm-.ch for to tl'le excoss profits basic pro~lo~s. yardstick probloos. on through the scheduled you to ask whatever tax propos&. One I have Tho third, reforrod to-- administration. I II -14... - -~~ c== Our progrom but at this loast morning tho probler:1s ~~ vary ~ is of Pennsylv~~ia, in happy those indoGd as your professor designed first to presont, three fields. to present Professor Pennsylvania): Mr. Chairman, remarks made by the two overlap. Taking not to ramarks planned It perhaps I, briof langu.'lg'o sQGr:1ad to resUlno~ of the to to Sccretary during the tho of five Federal a half year, ,nll fiscal tax find that say that purely of the may possibly cry remarks ~.ny referencos coincidental; problem of make my contribution I aspects position would the they were conforence, to best like to of tho of our or:1orgency of the Federal state that advantago start out dD:! tha.t ycar bo approximatoly ,'fill billion other seven hUl1dred i~undrcd million to about if I with a The FedarE1l expenditures dollars. billion dollars, By the f!.nd the dQficit end of the yoar, billion dollars. of course, today, must espocially, gova~~ents. million forty-nine progra~ Govcrnmont t,volve dollars. affairs a~amont and local the of world fina~.cial picture of forty-four dolll".rs, 1931, has grown darker of threo billion billion and rQvcnues tho deficits tho the In view estimates thl"eO nine six six dollars dollars of are approxirJately hundred two hundred million seventy~five ., \ -15... -- million by year. hundred billion. Tho million were nino and Yo.'J.r aftor debt has mo~~ted. a year, ~rhile expendi- or more a year. a billion sources of the new rovenuo will about = ====-- six and the billion billion yoar Expondituros under have accumulated boon around Tho chief dollars. a little at best havo boon only increases, increases~ I ty oven ts. In the new Revenue Act tax Uni versi tentativo~ have recently income ! might fundamontals. he.ve climbed ~'nd a debt arc provided. some of the ~rear 1940 closed with a deficit ~axes and estimated six three hi~ly billion Confere11ce: arc considering problems condition since tures in fiscal ~reas'l;l,rY The Federal dolle,rs, of the University Finance, the movies, speakers oconomic financial the tho unscttled fiscal the fin,c;'1.ncial prosent 'b~llion obviously of econor.lic be about dabt of speakers could ar.d the present Revenues will about me, recent The fiscal be rolated answers, way. soma of and also preceding as an economist, prosQnted the Buehler, of Publ ic Gontlemen made by preccding that not (Applause) DR. ALFRED G. BUEHLER (Professor here suspect, expert. BuehlerJ the I dollars; dollars; dollars bc: in ne~' taxes The corporation the individual gasoline income and oils, about one hundrcd twolve million; alcoholic bcvoragos, ono hundred twenty-two million. FundaJnon~~l As the economic social front tho totalitarian methods economic organization. 1. to equitably the to aggressors. our 'business for rowarded fairly scrvice tho in tho conscription not and certain tho peoplo. oxccssivcly to non-military pursuits. nor 2. expenditures gone to evaluate offocts all, tho factors in mind. and all of us must be univorsal, a mighw-cffort to to both? their groater ffilould they not entorpriso scrvicos. Thoso in sacrifices be to the ,~ith nc'1tion tho nation yet bccomo a should be activo military tha~ forced of tho shall War has and scction defcnd program, the ~pon defenso capital, undorgo be- onc or for be compcllcd has dofonse Labor, struggle the from the purses, in fundamental for in of their of on the a program attGnpting benefit The word organizing our defense, lost advance participant In for cost. to not is ground to powers. keop its !n America-,. but to coordinatod patriotism, should engago that well program and machines all appeal national in othor man,materials against financing the and an un,villing democratic is recover thirties the it to nineteen herself and of endeavors early The armaJl1ont sh~re country the she finds altornative ~ould States during roforms, tween United ~ac~2!:§ who those accept lessor rewards. War is its not productive oconomic, resourcos lands in tho and its and and indemnitios, man.'1cr. mile of non-mil:itary the commodities excessive rowards dependents ml'.Y obtain gonerous whole not does necossary. mont Yet it is ~!ar of makers of because of primarily it society is the into and commonwealth, and pension p!".yments. a con~ptivo, defensc rather of the tho of payment the its of In producers soma individuals voterans is, than cxhaust increascd. while and war l-:ational the certain and pres0~ ar.othor thercby scrvices, war. to may rob not consumption. resources tends one nation armaIaents their bonus but may be coerced we!uth for a nation's for and society indeed, thoir as a vitally a productive, employ- of men and materials. 3. as national paper prosper the may exploit may receive an outlay orge.nization, vanquished the tho ossontially m~y protcct During but some of It social con1batants. wealth, are itsolf. political. of opprossive like Armament money, Tod~r's arm~~ont dcfenso is financed forced labor. or costs must intornally. to taxation bo t10t from tod.ay's Whethcr wc resort to obtain -16- --== ~ -~~_c our a~ancnt. resourcos, so long to borrowing, it ,rlll be . 1 i necessary to arm \rlth our present ?lith tomorrow's soldiers than taxation, particular it resourcos. and tomorrow's may be possible to arm today with to face th~ situation 4. groups. resources The ne,tional income should, that wo might carry the additional if possible, tho lights outlays physical . does initiate nation, it capacities. is conceivablo defonse ,rl thout giving increasos a genoral in tho the dark be too sanguinc about the possibili- we fortify our continent. If, however, businoss boom and industry in is to be hoped that the costs of armament ,rill of other essentials. As wo gird not be oursolvos for ovory enorgy to provido dcfense and at the sarno time maintain the health, both and mGntal, of tho nation. a mighty that is, bo possible, 'va should increase oconomic bulwark for the income produced, ages to come, is tho result Since tho taxes ~ust be paid from capital responsibility of croating the resources as tho commoditios ncodod for by un,visoly suffors productive ,vith the foes of democracy, we should strain So far as it construct of of our trad.itional effectivoly, for national moreover, while so heavy as to compel sacrifices an adoquato national a part sufficiently of damocracy are to burn on through We cannot, general does prosper, it tho battle therefore. be incroased the sacrifice can be organizod more luxuriously armamont production not make it is wise, the armament program cannot ,vait for of world chaos. tics of living will commodities and services. Unfortunatoly, nights It America has vast potential capacities income, if other of armament and to avert and fra.'11dy and to meat as large If thcsc produ.ctive national to expedients from taxation. and conveniences. up other indispensable the costs today IS battles Eut these expedients to meet the heavy costs of armament without necossities Ey the resort not yet created. intelligently tho armamont costs as possible guns. to conceal taxes upon partic111ar possible Wecannot fight '!'he productivity of tho enterprises. or income, upon business required gover~~ental and tho sourcos of taxation and of business for our evcrJday existence. choson taxos or othcr our productivity disappear. nationn.l dofenso, If business rostre.il1ts, rests the as well is reprosscd the r~~tional income Governments should therefore mako certain that the taxes they impose and the servicos which the taxes fin~~ce \vill bring not gains to society rathor than net 10ssos, Dnd the.t they will not handicap our productivo orga.'1ization. During t4e last and has watched tho Fodoral sevoral deficits years, has lived accumulate \vithout ...17.- - tho nation in rele,tive comfort grave apprehensions. Tho timo has como, howovor, for us to pAmit tho gravity havo already boer~ increasod. They must bo increased have been imminent in the past, or have act~~ly has "been customary to adopt a fow addj.tional greator part of our sitUc~tion. of tho funds rcquirod for still Taxes further. When ~rars brol{en out in their taxos a..'1.dto raisc fury, it by fex the armamonts"by borrowing. The loan policy postpones the dEIY of unwolcomo taxos ~md scorns to le:;r tho costs of armamont upon futuro genorations. Tr~o disadvantagos of froo a.'1.dunrostrictod tho issuc of papor r.10noy sho"lud, howevor, be apparcnt Tho public dobt may pass out of control countrysido with worthless it may "Do carriod cancellod and tho pri11ting paper Doney. a Ii ttl() or thought. pressos Day flood tho Boca.use tho debt ca11not bE) paid off, as a pcl~otuaJ" burdon, it may bG repudiated, or it may be by inflation. The wihoalthy inflation, tical after borrowing boom of war prosperity must in time bo followod e.nd social inflation, disorganization indicato shv.ro equitably by jinancial, to the people the costs Hoavy taxation ratller, a time by ~dll ~ini~ize of armamont, and pon:1i t thaa to Tho danger is not that bc !:let by taxes; for ocor.oj,1ic, and perhaps poli- and collapse. in those costs. of arnrunent will \'mich is nourished it is that too moch of the expenses too much ,,;ill bG met by borrowing. It is assTh"J1cd rJ.oro that unnecessa~' fror:l Fodoral, state A.I"ldloco]. budgots. in sponcling was \visely exporJ.dituros The principle stL1.tod in the Constit"l1.tion should bo re~oved \.IJ1ich should be followec.. adopter.. by the Common\voalth of pennsylvania in i776, in tho critical days of tho Rovolution, tIThe purposo for \"hich a:'1Ytax is to be raised, n the Constit'ltio11 doclarcd, "ought to appear clearly to the Legislature tho coJ:.Ununitythan tho mO11CY ",ould bo if Any public c):pcndituro only When tho social social costs, \vill apparcntly new taxation not avcrt hcavior arc groater than tho arc bound to soar upward and the tax is imperativo in tho oxpenditurc of public taxation, that wasto. money. incfficiency, and Econor:lios in sponding out thoy \',rill lassen tho emount of requirod~ At c. timo of natione.l adcqu~to to providc tion. armament or othcr purposcs is justifiable At a time when cxpendituros 00 eliminatod to not collected." adva11tagos from thc oxpondi turcs load bocomos morc ourdonso!:lc, it graft for to 00 of more service o~orgoncy, tho revenuos r0quircd Past oxporicncc has shown that - it 18" tho tax system Ii1ust above all olse bc to keep tho budgot in a healthy condi- is r.ot cnough to ~qct mcroly tho intcrost , on the debt incurred for national dofonso. If futuro proservod and if tho budget is to bo kopt within control. In costs of aroaI:1ont must bo covered by taxation. might havo bean learned of their United States ,voro 25 par ccnt of tho total conflict, 13 par cant in France, In recent years l1ational tax policy So far plos of equity, cortainty, observGd. FedorRl. coordinated so that as possible, and local raoro effectively. aro only difforont incroasod be hs~stened if a fair and definite tho often repeated yet of ton ignored princi- convonioncc, financial tax liabilities and adequacy, should be and revenue prograns taxes ~ust. in the last should 00 rocognized should be analysis, that be now taxes tho old l'QvenUO sources. for the benefit upon a personal of tho federal and state go,TernDGnts ,vould go a long way toward makil1g tax paynents morG direct mora simple, and T.lore oquitablQ. The e~igonciqs hasten the advent of the day whon tax administration will to lay the revenuos as tho havc suggestod that marc reliance income t~~. to bo collected by the formor, of tho probloms pf tho should no" bo possiblo or incomo, it ways of tapping Many thcorists of can ostir;1e.te their Sinco Dll capital the pariod taxpayars simplic~ty, state, paid out of current obvious. It 'rIle defcnsc program will with certainty. be rationally unified for which mot only a Tainor part during thoro has boon much discussion can bo formulated tho lossons Taxos in England and the oxponditures of tho tax systeT;'I which could provido ncods DOunt. of the and only 10 por cant in GcrDany. Fodoral tax system and i1oodod rofo~s. broad basis of all' nations tho Wol'ld War by taxation. sources aro to be a largo part spite fro~ past Vlars, tho loading axpenditurasduring credit tho gro~tor of war finance in the United convoniellce and may States of governments and taxpayers. For tho present, governments, in particular, ago adoptod, reveals tho principle it may be expected that ,vill follow tho World War, individual General salas the principle of a diversity that many of o~r important ta~os originated taxes ,'fill dofenso. probably of the i;:U;led.iato futm'e ~ after During Tho hasty tho war, as tho nations ~.nother upon the bacl{s of the in tho United be adopted as Congress str'l:lggles -19.- of taxation taxos ,'rare extended. and comoodity taxes ~ultiplicd. vied wj.th oach other in lE1.Yingona tax after taxpv:;:Iors. The outlook The history ill tiQOS of ~lar. profits search for new revenues wont on with roilowed vigor groaning and state Which govcrnnents long of rovonuos. income and business taxes were introduced tho Fodoral with States is that tho worries now of national The Excess At upon the ence of excess there the excess the mushroom United of tax the of wore depression evasion After sequently generally World the of War. tolerated rule in it out observers most guidc impersonaJ.1y upon the status profi to ts. yield most earn It six and t,relve the value of tho any yield its rela- difficulties attcndant fell off in upon because burden, emergency hostilities. and That were per the the of and \~as sub- was a and a tax the stock upon the corporate profits as declared -20- by tax the m~y be weaknesses may of control. striking Some investments to pay of when when it it is is taxcs. the To individual is levied related especially whom mffY feol pnrticularly that dollars during to corporFttions. some of million tax The recent status profits, of the profits may seem fair returns was enterprises bu5iness is but as a method economic excess peace role business be inequitable persons, its price business \~hich upon it of favored indirect ~J many persons twenty~scvcn on tho of that been as a normal revenu~. an excess return of the malllf thirties, administrative indicate tax tax memories that of owners a heavy the has to although capital tax ma;;T prove believed cant nineteen inherent capacity and to only the to of not profits as an ordinary its rate ~~ll profits also excess quarters The the the of l8.rgo\rovenues, tax though business alluring is profits many corporations, theory during the as an instrument to of of be related in ratio of has proved to th~t profit The Recently The to inequalities of and countries. fervor as a wartime experi- revenues. administrativo complexities, the when war be attributed as its cessation ~r War, various patriotic collapsed the peace. and stockholders ~'dcked of feel personal the a new impost s1~ggested handsome in \WlOn the in be impracticable even profits the boom, for World provide War must was accepted and admitted times logical be sure, is the tax World tax after is wartime, also tax "ar to tax is in the much discussion World the It at monopoly the ~~s considered discussion war to calls movement~ There after the disregarded The during profits administrative shortly worldwide revenue loss avoidance. rejected excess the proposal SUC11 a tax nations during tho war, conditions, and general or tax developed the during moro other rapidly tax Tax discussed corporations. of the most and were revenues a war. \vaging States a revival growth large of taxes been tively the profits profits has moment, - Profits the ~ in in that sinful to excess profi prescnt 1939, excess corpol'ations. in of ten it ts periods, is obtain ml:\keshift ~en war high t~x coulcl excess tho per r~tes cent were of The war and excess productive profits tmln since were obtained in mind. profits however. tax are The aggregate national Thus. in total Federal. the rates of the World War period were very high and quite the rates during the rates are also income tax of these greater, taxes taxcs and local wore four taxes and a half income. while 1ederal billion dollars, the total Federal. state ~~d local billion dollars. and the income. just future profits estimates considered year load are was equivalent to estimate revenues to finance and the features three hundred million be obtained million for present taxes the billion and the dollars. or in 1938 were six taxes '~ere about fourteen cent of the national possibilities without might thereafter. been questioned, an armament program under of dollars of the excess concerning one of the proposals dollars admitting involving than outl~s in disputing one may agree that these revenues of five billion The now being be obtained iVithout that the first his important muld be ample dollars a this. An inherent and as yet insuperable taxation percentage bec'BUse of the uncertainties dollars or a sum even much larger ;',' period. which might be enacted in the tax law. hundred which have alrea~r could ekl.rlier billion to 22 per the present of the Treasury Secreta~J that the of 1919. the percentage difficUlt of the and five estimates, year tax tax as a source of revenue, profits in were seven and a half the national is and the normal and a higher of It One must keep taken in tnxos todaijr than during the era of the World being 1919 Federal twice were more substantial the war boom. of the personal than collections state taxes many industries now higher tax War. in that income is 11 per cent administrative difficulty limitations. in excess profits is that of separating excess from ordinary profits. If the rate oi tl~ return upon business investments llIIlSt be determined. how shall those investments be valued with reasonable l t" tr.is. profits " , :: accuracy and at a reasonable cost of appraisal? If the profits of one year or a period of years are taken as normal profits, as the period 1936-39 inclusive, in order to expedite were the be quite ., profits the during fn.voraole administration. that period it will always A given norroDl profits? to some corporations .'1Jld very remain unfavorable a question, base period for coI1Joro.tions. During tho WorJ.dWt1.r.tho English plfill of excess profits ':' was essentially one of comparing; the total those in the base period. profits Qpinion was quite -21- general in tho taxable may other taxation yer',r \'lith in England after the war . that the fairer and more qy determining comparing in the 1939 in of are .valued case, remains time. the profit with yearly, to variable those mB::! return again, as in a decision if the which allowances adjustment the long revenues quickly in profits may arise '~hey are not the prices, they failure to from during field success, occasional a government to of mB::! also The long the of peculiar throu&10ut risk. effects is tax continued high to pl~ if is each not industries, industry. when of the excess profits Even of peace the game fairly? -22- be faced. Here excess unfair each of however, of case, they of its in for however, profits, another, caBO. carefuJ.ly. The renders here and fruits a business of with excess at should a war boom. there monopoly from high rates of be distinguished unstable profits raise however, alternate investment a monopoly to Excess as during may be the of device an emergency, may be found a corporation ! in as well vent~resome profits also type taxeg~ definition be weighed fortunes mB::! follow ~here when plant must an emergency but m1ile ventures i~racticable. should war concerns and the profits individual a boom period. policies penalize many years. may be quite essentially prosperity they and a given taxation, circumstances to the arise and the difficult, tax run in tax profits tax other the determining rigl~ uncertain, profits invest- con- at for materials of particular An excess is the seldom investments war one corpor.!iion profits most amortizing in fluctuate ~nll in application investments made for an cxcoss administration needed the not upon excess of for onerous to business basis tax to the earned which,is profits needed in income if to country, according profits produce peculiar may be fair are of quantity altogether valuation to followed In this only as the of to be valued among concerns taken of and be found is principle is investments greatly problem changing may also upon uncertain is it return was levied investments, only armaments not of be especially perplexing the be imposed an excess qy a government is can ~'ears or the a tax to the are theory of profits period permitted. very inve$tmen.t, losses base of return value of demanded problem rate also and will the of new corporations tax several in may be related is since i with e~~ansion This i While the and of the The highly investment. The rates earnings investments the previous unless a period ratio upon profits many concerns Unless excess Which excess constant. for our a tax A true ments siderably for ascertaining the exceed abandon return base period. year of investments profits to method return tax 1 a,., , proposing rate of the English whether we are rate profits discover the the logical tax earnings. at a high If rate should be imposed only period of years. several Assuming that it is excess have rates tax of the in excess If and should the not the possible tax profits only the at would supplement the which apply and consistent with and to graduation according tho assumed attribute ability of ass~~e that measured will the rather it profits and the of middle The probable it should ~~ve rate of than by the and excess if manner, as profits it were earnings of an excess income tax return in tho normal a flat were revenue to impost the t~r to tho Ability tax. to corporation. investme.nt it a rata Rate PD;)' is an one wishes would if at is concerning If it tax tax confusion PB¥ taxes, the profits rate of indicates taxes. of upon probably could to be be de- pro!"'i ts~ tax further and p~ than a c~paci the cnough as an emergency eff~cts incomo to total provide \vay to tho the is also indispensable lowering of advancement in the of the personal the rate$ Federal tax exemptions, upon the lower incomes. tax that rates on the higher tax higher rates brackets would -23- I as well that individual not rates give not inco~ credits, here industry Taxo$ graduatod total the the the of of the high the that of tax. of rather individual as field distributed may be employed corporations We may anticipate lowering found tho individual by whole In view in gains makeshift. undistributed the them obviously rcquireraonts corporations The system. and of the best termined, systom to tax tho satisfactorily, enterprises, as long But 110rmal rovenue the true rates. tax illogical, the a may also as a revenue to as it only liruiting One may suggest Othor arbitrary only to reaches be solved over due moderation, and and in appliT as well for profits Tho present it to armament making. income basic that and lassos ,vi th revenue, can non~corporative an armament program~ financo should undistributed graduated and be defended it tB~ be uncalled steeply can costs employed profits corporations~ as individual An excess to to over is problems simply of s tax monopoly tax income profits as a wartime adopted, income treat tax levied is personal corporations profit baffling be confined apply to its of as possible, curbing profj,ts distributed should an excess Until tho excess may bo justified some advantages however, the administered it the profiteers. to that as fairly profits, upon should produce be raised more revenues, only if Which it is many of course vrould deny. Commodity The demand for is rather m~r ~so gasoline. inelastic. bootlegging t~~es taxes can tobacco. nnd high be kept [md advances be expected in rate under rates alcohol. taxes supply coffee. may be co~trol. in to sugar. the brackets revenues. And other collected to ~he exemptions some of greater of advantnge the would commodities. death provide if and gift additional revenues. A most World War Vias the imposed Which in revenue general sales many countries had and is ! important long held reported to criticized and also out against In in It has recently would produce eight form many of joining or our sales during and after another, states. tax. relatively that a Federal has England. has this it the been a count~J apparently capitulr.ted regressive and much been estimated \vith exemptions for hundred million dollars manuf,~cturers' food. annually; clothing. without sales and drugs. exemptions, more revenue could 00 obtained. The tax outlook I in the United States spending during the nineteen ~1irties apparently and the demands of of taxes for an indefinite requirements of the nation. The crushing burdens tho sources of taxation of revenue increasingly heavy for period. future. iDmediate methods taxation msv not ALVORD: Thank you very of plan for armament an increasing now for the tax and the more distant may bo alleviated and the proper call We should the The heavy heavier spending which will in view of the present the iwnediate both is indeed gloomw. and the still accompany the ninetee~l forties. requirement9 stream one a general be initiating tax at a rate of 2 pel' cent. : tax. was developed impost. l still ,i1ich by a judicial fu~ure. selection administration. of even if be averted, (Applause) CHAlm,~ You certainly and financial have given us a very accurate situation. But since I trust that Buehler Bome time in has also the courso indicated of the of an excess profits the rLLising In ~ opinion. your economic condition. .-24... - of our economic is based on common not be hcoded. what is tho truc pu~ose of revenue. picture what you have suggested sense. the chances are your remarks will Professor much. Dr. Buehler. several rather important day we may hRve a discussion ta:(. the loss Professor Buchler revonuo raised. issues. as to says the Dotter the use of quite invcstod a help to There tee report is defective. capital us accountants. arc a number silent, I had iVays and ~leans and I think chiefly to and the criticism of the failure which ago is that rather hectic early whon authorities in passed, that taxes the Act Washington and therefore be the should to in thing taxes I convinced. as a profits tax for tvronty recall, 1917 and framed. of the ~ore was some late itself computation although or thore in Act con- yeal'S regulations the is regarding along and after cuI points, related submit understand \Vas~lington completed probably those as th~J to an excess and so rcq,uired. of on me. Vlar profits be required as you same a~ there, or Committee a few any recommendation subject then the to Subcommit- cunbiguous before attention proposing was being were Act, to tho be either appear compulsor~r, by regulation The 1918 ought on which to ir.1portant in of on that 1917 to the most report was then consolidatiol~ the point. week assigned the The history things calling been perhaps discussion period--which seems be largely had consolidc'ltion 1918, this it S11bcommittee to include accounts. base important on which Subcommittee of the solidated rather a statement that this of no~v might topic tho (LaUghtcr) others in my remarks I believe for opportun~ty and put the figures The had been excess Act profits had nothing included it in on mandatory form. Then , we had optional. The '34 companies. I believe, a series Act of ,u thdre\v ml1king post-w~lr the years privilege an exception Whore of with it was consolidated respect to to soma extent returns for most railroads. Xhe Xreasury Department in the past has been ver~r much convinced f r the desirability ness, but sorts of readily to From solidation determining is the the tho avel'~\ging Another tho that in the evasion. There familiar or arrangements them to interests reduce thr01~ which might excess out as tho obvious of are fair- certain you can be made of profits simply taxes. devices or advantage of a if r~cognize. of tho profits bct~leen for point vie~l of a rolationship all serve have wouldn't of probably would couldn't point si~ly of inter-colnI)a!ly which courts economic significanco are special Dopartment not possibilities you nature Which returns, reduce Which where artificial Treasury or with imagine, artifices consolidated plinimize cases, somewhat the of of ta~ayer, ancl losses income enterprise I might and capital as a 11hole. mention ...26.. of . / is tl~t tho that the ,vhole '70uld business have Subcommittee and some report con- fails to provide between the tl~ excess through not the beginning of profits of whether, capital in the whether is acquired or some other from the earnings. base period the going or that a company, and reorganization, 1940 If 1.1936. earnings the any, and divide ~J business therefore of the of concern acquired and say, beginning possibly newly earnings they would ta~8lfer base the limits, earnings for to have a similar earni11gs without be in upon normal this invested that tho cor~ carryovers. Now, a comp~'1Y had losses, 1938 and 1939, 1938 and 1939 it would excess and have profits loss the algebraic of by four, enacted. ~hich the is aJoss or take the losses, if capital that co~utation. Method invested apply to determine in don't simply c~pi tal. It of that deficits They One, one de- earnings then invested period the of period, base seem base period not entirely is was intentional. in in car~r interpreting income as defined Act. how loss is recommended in the 1939 seem conceivable that 1936 and 1937. but larger those losses and also, forvrard on top Incidentally, of and that, the net years to Act as ~rou lQ1ow, contained doesn't 1936 and 1937 as such. as to the divide a percentage using respect yee.rs. base year period and take ignore provides that inCOlfiC get the are period. profits, with 1s report recently report. you profits say, to law report you it years is go in would base~period of presumably Act; you base the complication income, tl~t of difference tax by Canadian base the base 'becaU.se excess net the taXable the where the whether which year), a fUl'ther of Subcommittee the in to Sl.1bcommi ttee four capital detail. loss years the to the the number should cases. add up onl~' (under apparent is Code as amended net of provision Tl1ere out T,~ deducted regard whether in but capital within should for sum bJ' the on the earnings work years Method period normal s~, is. earnings sir~ilar earnings that predecessor provision tJ7 in average do as provided of such in clari 'be deducted; on invested percentage, period of the of a parallel base account, As to base course the at would number inclusion some lack income you pendent of would total the with of arriving or years sum of of in earnings. Janua~J 1940, the for bill, There period period, merger be reflected the to invested for tax-free a provision into clear base predecessor alone. written the of year, comparable If year the a subsidiary, be fairly the of presumably poration inclusion taxable some form liquidation would for 'be based or in the a provision if in profits the the the losses car~Jover ...27~ -- - base in di~inish deduct loss ,vould ~~~. deduction provision simple but l1as some rather calculation the net number of in loss factors However, matter detail to go into in I 01~ the the One or that of the blo fairl:' base or exchange of a number that of or at longer read the be "1orked is not net a loss, by a out really expect taxable year, the bill taxable the by the more a Subcommittee for ruajor the be long-term of does not commonly mean items as to the tho taxable losoes upon are many in described of do not earn- from and there which irnportance };!ethod the eliminate capital sort using that period But the are as a so computed to base assets. portions be used you proposes or course, to provide should both certain Comrnittee. whether should roport gains I of pa.raphrase) earnings yea,r iteL1S of (or Ways and llieans nondepreciable items with sale as a nature recur annually some regul.-:irity. such items SubstarJ.tial is account. It would. period capital but Exampl,;~s of it diminished into framed. base extraordinary intervaJ.s years no doubt you and forward previous will the income or other recur, 1. thing the INon-recurrin~;" may never of that profj.ts depreciable non-recurring. actually the obvious long-term of is The Subcommi tteo excess realized that of of and comparablo. any cases is car~/ be brought now to determination it to as I made before period of proceed earnings Two, determination year, the of it, report. I might normal I~ethod sort in merely losses when a bill the foatures you may have prelimina~ think for net questions and not As to ings such statements measure is that draftsmen of whereby deduction othor legislative itsclf, tricky gains are: or losses realized from sale or exchange of incl'Llding depreciable C..S~lcts,that ma;)'have been held for not I!lOre th.'}.n ei gh teen months (the S11.bcom:.m.t 'tee rep ort al re aa.y having propose d to capital s.ssets, eliminate such gains and losses with J:'espcct to items held for more than eighteen months). 2. Losses on abandonment or destruction 3. Taxable profit corporation of its 4. o~ realized upon the purchase bonds or other Doductible of property. loss outstanding incurred ~T evidences a corporation a premi\lm (or at an amO\L~tin excess of the principal balance of unamortized discount its outstanding own bonds or other Those last stantial t~~ items when a corporation has upon eviue11ces of extraordina~r carried through of of by a indebtedness. the at purchaso amount less the related B.t the time of purchase) -28- ", at a discount by a corporation of indebtedness. gain or loss a refunding are usually operation, suband might not simply call from for time It j I of excess excess profits credit " i i r of financing, by is and respect or is net capital affiliated for system of for the but the of bonds operation. and losses the base period determining need not the be eliminated corporations is interest the economic the comp~ and but the two in more the assets is reduced bears to are whole enterprise is absence more invostod or of the group, for assets~ equitable to to of taxpayers combined subsidiary an ac.justment serve total no mau be represented tho I s report if accounts consolid£~tion assets of capital companies by application are the in part consolidated of necessarily the con- wholly detennined of In corporations not is and securities operating would accounts the the business of affiliated stock Subcomr;u ttee adjustment capital in same net or tax basis~ in the Bome COMpany. the a group have howevor, public duplications in the a tomporary to standpoint, investing artificial la\'Ts, reasons, of remarks: on such state divisions whereby revenue of special by the paront tax, conducted because other of made these in arriving ratio of cure such the ratio in that at which the the income. basis is of a weighted and separate a separate effective I just From eliminated, that group, rc"tios profits returns, for issued of invested "On the vested income, of routine in geographical profits inadmissible results of similar be eliminated made up on a consolidated "Consolidated amount the The provision since operating or of the securities to equit~r or acquisition during desirable, so~etimes capital, occurs, equity of or securities companies duplication, the necessa~r of the parent and parent. in a number and not elimination the of injury are subsidiary of a corporation profits consolidated an excess to the the investment in of to invested accounts fund by should corporations. the "Under such excess a unit, in may exist and operations, subsidia~T by reference year, often ducted the I is departments, I taxable business it principally case tl1.""t such extraordinary realized the the some sinking any, subject of the entorprise in purposes. "The exigencies through if profits tax tl1at time adjustment my recommendation On the scale special amount, or the normal to is substantial for ~r the average artificial corporation return tax consolidated rate for each on one accounts, for all the the separate pe~cs and valleys divisions are corporation, enterprise -29- to that off. than in Under be quite in- crthe muv exist would be more to corporations leveled it income such the possible a hundred per cent under a law which asserted a maximcuunoLunal rate of only forty per cent. or even lower. "Without the status consolidation of inter-company Whether such accounts be treated would often open accounts. represented in determining Although ambiguities The question indebtedness statutory invested to debt represented in invested b~r outstanding vrould not have any application evidences temptation corporate minimize duplication direction their of simplification of corporate \'lith a short in order that exchange of property profits. If that in aetermining not quite earnings computations corporate distributions "might put taxpaycrs so as to 30 obvious as some of those I have to taxpewers. not be reflected The Subcommittee it in its Rovenuc Code and profits earnings and wotud presumably be applicable in the computation of earnings of invested to ascertain capital, the tax status and of or dividends. statement if filed "The tax law. the parallel provision a parent company shall tax lavi regarding liquidations of subsidiaries that was not specifically with the 'Vays and lAeans Committee. I said: commencing with conditions compa~r does not result the Revenue Act of 1936. has provided that the basis be the same as the basis committee report recommends a general capital income t~~ basis. In a sup- of a subsidiary gain or loss to the parent in recognized in the bill excepted. the complete liquidation of the law states should be made clear find under and relationships recommendation tha.t tho Internal or profits might work out unfairly at their and apparently t11c unrecognized gain or loss upon the sale or connection that under specific recommendation is limited of indebtedness recommendation were adopted. In this in- of somo of us t\VO or three aays ago, bjr a corporation also for plementary their for structures." that mi~1t in some cases seem to bo unfair be clarified made some allowance structures mentioned, vVhich cama to the attention concludes and how they should of taxes and thus might tend to retard progress in tho There was another point report as to to an opon book account such as we often II I concluded, as to capital." capital. in inter-compa~v records. "Such complications, to rearrange would arise or capital the Subcommittee. you recall. debtedness to be included be encountered rule that tr.is -30- so acquired A by to the subsidiary. The Sub- assets be included in inv~sted In conformit~r that of assets company. general viith this rule principle. applies it to assets acquired by a p~rent company upon liquidation Section 112 (b)-(6), regardless of a subsidiary comproiy under of whether such liquidation resulted in an ,..I unrecognized gain or loss. "Supplementa~.r to such a provision, bill ~~th respect invested capital to the deterr.unation should explicitly Sansomedecision profits of a predecessor year in which it the principle denied) should include company acquired ,"hi ch was a tax~free transaction in the for purposes of established and applied by the ~ince that time that the earnings and the amount of the earnings by a reorganization, merger, or profits or liquidation under the income tax la,v effective for the occurred." seems to me that such a provision ded with respect to 112 (b)-(6), with recognize to be included or profits of the income tax lavIs, viz., of a corporation It of earnings (CCA-2, 1932--certiorari in the administration the rule a requirement as that vlould be entirely or permission for filing and as the one recommen- consistent returns in principle on a consolidated ! account~ ing basis. Consolidated accounts, properly made up and carried base period and the taxab~~ period both--and, dation even in interpreting, accounting the base period or the tax period, company situations difficult transactions and transactions ~hank you, that may have occurred co~licated that would certai~r on [t separate corporntion return the consoli- capital did not or could not file in lr.3.n.}rcases eliminate to deal with let me say, recognizing for purposes of invested prior years when possibl~r the corporatiorJ. dated returns--would through for of in consoli- problems of interarise and be very basis. (Applause) CHAIRl'.iAN ALVORD: Thanl~ you, l.~r. 3yerl;}r. In twenty minutes' an excess profits weeks or eight tax can't time he has ,~iven you innumerable be drafted in two weeks or four are normal weeks or six weeks. 3ear in mind that ,'{hat 1Iveare tt"Jing profits. reasons why What are they? profits. I start to do is to deterJ;line excess out by saying, I suppose excess profits I would ask in considel'ing let are decide what us first something in addition to normal. One question have been your profits in the past? cases where normal profits As I indicated in the past aloe clearly -31.. - --- normal profits to you, there inadequate. is, are what two One case is where your corporation corporation didn't exist has earned admittedly Other yardsticl:s past history, factors. in tl~ past, abnormally The second is \mere your low profits, in the past. have to bo dovised to take care of those two situations trends, rislcs, and nature The complications of business can be piled are probably and important on top of each endlessly, We are going to givc ~rou time to express your vieV1S. I think e~ressed you will by Professor find basicalljr thc differonce Buehler and rnwself is this. to do? Arc you t~Jing to get revenue, protect and prevont normal profits between the views What is it or arc you trying excess profits? you are trying to promote, permit, That seems to me to be the basic issue. But, tax, it regardless of the objective, has to be administered. upon a la~~rer to discuss firing line during on the firing It I kno,v of no one better ROBERT N. l£II,LER Chairman, Committee on Taxation Chairman, Gentlemen: is, what aclministrativ'e drafting to discuss administrative Revenue and past I~r. heard is so apt and so comprehensive I were going to talk to put nyself considerations phases of excess profits about the of getting tax laws. in the place of the Govennment and see the Congress should be giving weight to in the law, in the Government's own interest, Government's interest the war, and staJred as you have heal'd, my assignment is something the administrative I have tried qualified was on the of the American Bar Association); vel"y much embarrassed if but, we should call But Bob I~iller of Wa.Shington. (Applause) (Former Solicitor of Internal What we have all samephase of taxation, different~-that pl'oblems, the war; he merel~r changed camps after line. that I would feel of the purpose of the might seem strange that administrative problems than Robert N. Miller, 1,m. regardless a workable law. and especially It is, in the of course, true that taxpayers want a \vorkable law; but the Gov(!r'nment needs a workable la,v even more tha..'l taxpayers do. 1'lv remarks will eorious difficulties afu~inistoring tho '17 Act, havE) to do Iilainl~r "vi th the past, vihich the Bureau of Ir.ternal the World War high rate the '18 Act, mich wore of vital and t:l0 importance that Rcvenue acually is, the more met with taxes based on income, imposed by 121 Act. Of the hundreds of lLard problems to some gro1;jps of taxp~yers, and hence to the 'Bureau, tho ones I am about to speal: of appeal to mo as the !!lost important just now, ,lhen we are dra!'ting in a bill. ! 1 "'32~ Pure!y Before period. let that. questior.s of that from there however that fear interfering with reasonably had which the and will with developed serious were with an ideal were little case instead that of tax indeed, years of the World of the of probably years the determining is, directed more text of and important, administration detailed that War taxes--that causes. the case in if the difficulties and the taxpayer roach tl.e that of these law as more, than mew be get actually finished~ the job TreasurJr as well something in only with to see how many of the they controversy sidering. involved. morc the study, Cl~airman participated much tax abilitJ' at as a deciding that An official 1927--dealing case it I which when he \~as in taxes the four cases were still in It for shovled that there than $160,000.000 of taxes. v'ohen\'Ie hear how re1ativelJ' is expected to be. substantial character The survey involving the years each promptness in the In controversy. other words. on the various topics one of to taxp~er the many points attack. °wi thout great has confidence the a job being Government to mill. of amount seems worth the end of 1927~ -33- - it. our phases. That in and how administrative yiold '~re of was made in still mentioned giving ashamed were three the 1919 and 1920-- administrative more than of Treasury because 1917.1918, whittle The Government's words. sell or the other 10v1 the probable showed tl.at and up a deficiency Congreas years very so h~~dling involved and the in reasonable inviting the these getting In have promptly, an audit equilibrium. subject can it tl.an each job, Treas"U-r'J in of administra- not making tax more position to taxp~er's of position even. getting involved deal Government's is of of rates, come with case where job task condition Government.s hand; hi&~ amount a great and has Government's the difficulties money, it to the the its aw~y according has a selling - me over problems those greatest but demands embodies the getting as to to administration problems the the difficulty ideally the new law, the equilibrium taking which in Government of in the letter. the that meets involved to a condition real in satisfactory do with or personnel, other and to be under a deficiency letter and prompt Government difficulties writing real graduallJr problem ~J Congre ss. were then tax technical in connection exist I am convinced~ real has criticism--there which Diffic~!~ies single n~~erous would of taxes--causes tion any of law and of fact the problems wri tten speak me say conviction free I Adminisgativ~ con- of this thousand still neil tax cases pending of a near