Concept System Analysis of the ThirdPlaceLearning

ThirdPlaceLearning Theory:
Concept System Analysis
Tatiana Orel
Mara Alagic
Glyn Rimmington
Note
Authors’ manuscript with detailed
references, published in
Terminology and Knowledge Engineering
2014, Berlin: Germany (2014).
It is available at
http://hal.archivesouvertes.fr/docs/01/00/58/70/PDF/ConceptSy
stemAnalysisOfTheThirdPlaceLearning.pdf
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
2
From The Far East of Russia &
Bosnia & Herzegovina
& Australia
To …
We see ourselves as world travelers and global learners.
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
3
OUTLINE
PART I
ThirdPlaceLearning Theory
PART II
Concept System Analysis
PART III
Why CL Approaches to the Concept System
Analysis?
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
4
PART I
ThirdPlaceLearning
Theory
1. Exchange of Perspectives
2. Liminal Phase
3. Knowledge Base: Concept Map
TPL: Exchange of Perspectives
A. Idealized transfer of messages;
B. B. Distortion of messages leading to misunderstanding;
C. Invisible cages causing the distortion.
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
6
TPL Theory:
Liminal Phase
 Liminal phase is considered to be an
essential stage/phase/place in the TPL
process
 A collocutor becomes aware of his/her
own perspective and others' perspectives
 Collocutors may or may not consider,
share, question, take/shift perspectives
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
7
TPL Theory: Liminal Phase
My NEW
WORLDVIEW
State of
Separation
Perspective Two
Integrated
My
WORLDVIEW
My NEW PERSPECTIVE
~ post- liminal state
PERSPECTIVE ONE
pre-liminal state
Process of
Integration
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
8
TPL Theory: The Liminal Phase
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
9
ThirdPlaceLearning Theory:
Knowledge Base Concept Map
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
10
PART II
Concept System Analysis
1. TPL Thesaurus;
2. TPL Categories;
3. Cognitive-Onomasiological Modeling;
4. TPL Knowledge Base: Frame Construction;
5. Example: General TPL Frame;
6. Example: Conscientization Sub-Frame.
TPL Thesaurus:
Terms and Their Definitions
A term is
(i) A means of thought verbalization;
(ii) A model of mediated representation of a phenomenon;
(iii) code of the semiotic system.
Definitions (according to the ISO TC37 standards):
(i) Intensional
(ii) Extensional
(iii) Part-whole
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
12
TPL Thesaurus:
Terms and Their Definitions
A term is
(i) A means of thought verbalization;
(ii) A model of mediated representation of a
phenomenon;
(iii) code of the semiotic system.
Definitions (according to the ISO TC37 standards):
(i) Intentional
(ii) Extensional
(iii)Part-whole
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
13
TPL Thesaurus:
Terms and Their Definitions
A term is
Bodymindfulness is a process of adjusting one's
somatic emotional state during communication and
(i) A means of thought verbalization;
working on SES for improved communication and
(ii) A model of mediatedharmony
representation
of .a phenomenon;
toward resonance
(iii) code of the semiotic system.
Definitions (according
(i) Intentional
(ii) Extensional
(iii) Part-whole
TPL relational criteria are a list of conditions or
suchTC37
as active
listening, dialectic thinking,
toprocesses,
the ISO
standards):
intercultural sensitivity, critical coreflection,
conscientization, and holistic mindfulness.
Amae-based communication model is a communication
model of a certain type of interaction; it captures a
dialectic process of shaping and sending messages
(Enryo) and then interpreting messages while
considering alternatives (Sasshi).
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
14
TPL Thesaurus: Lexical Layers
Underlying the TPL Theory
 88 terms
E.g.: bodymindfulness,
liminal phase
E.g.: dialectic thinking,
somatic-emotional state
E.g.: Ambiguity,
miscommunication
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
15
TPL Thesaurus:
Percentage of Terms per Discipline
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
16
TPL Thesaurus:
Inter-scientific layer disciplines
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
17
TPL Categories
 Basic terms in CL:
Concept (e.g., object, process, space);
Conceptualization; Categorization
 Prototype-based categories
Taxonomic hierarchies with three levels:
superordinate, basic and subordinate.
 TPL categories:
Process, State, Space, Time, Property, Ability,
Action, and Abstract Concept, Hybrid
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
18
TPL Categories: An Example
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
19
Cognitive-Onomasiological Modeling
Cognitive onomasiology
• The study of any nominative unit;
• Seme - a constituent of the semantic structure of the
linguistic sign;
• Proposition and propositional relation.
Aligning represents the process of
regulating somatic-emotional state that
is used for the operation of achieving a
desirable state that is conducive to
productive communication.
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
20
Cognitive-onomasioogical
modeling
Onomasiological
base:
-ing = PROCESS
Onomasiological
predicate:
BE USED FOR
Onomasiological
mark: align =
OPERATION
Onomasiological structure:
[PROCESS – BE USED FOR – OPERATION]
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
21
Onomasiological Models Belonging
to the Category Process
36 onomasiological models of the TPL terminology system.
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
22
Frame Construction of the
TPL Knowledge Base
TPL Frame is the associative network of concepts
and terms belonging to different TPL categories.
The frame of a knowledge sphere can perform
three functions:
i.
reflect the structure of a knowledge sphere,
ii. result in knowledge sphere cognition, and
iii. record knowledge in human mind (mental
representation).
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
23
ThirdPlaceLearning Theory:
Knowledge Base Revisited
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
24
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
25
Conscientization Sub-frame: Categorized
Terms & Related Propositions
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
26
Conscientization Sub-Frame
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
27
Part III
Why CL Approaches to the
Concept System Analysis?
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
28
CL Approaches Give Us:
1. Structure of language units in a corresponding
terminology system;
2. Explanation of the behavior of terminological
units in language;
3. Presentation of a holistic picture of a certain
sphere of knowledge;
4. Explanation and visualization of complex and
abstract concepts of any science;
5. Learning about complex theories of any area of
knowledge by understanding more deeply and
precisely the conception of a theory.
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
29
http://dialog-leader.com/
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
30
Any Questions?
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
31
Authors’ Information
Tatiana Orel
Dialog Leader, Algonquin College Language Institute, Canada
Institute of Global Economy and Informatisation, Russia
tatiana.orel@gmail.com
Mara Alagic
College of Education, Wichita State University, USA
mara.alagic@wichita.edu;
Glyn Rimmington
College of Liberal Arts & Sciences, Wichita State University, USA
glyn.rimmington@wichita.edu
TKE 2014 ~ Berlin DIN ~ June 18-21, 2014
32