Alberta Lands Ltd

1/UflU11 N(I :iz IAA 1U
1Z7 DARRYL CARTER & CUWAI”Y
jOO1/O21
DARRYL CARTER & COMPANY
Barristers & Solicitors
Darryl Carter, aC. (also of the California Bar)
Mikie L Carter
1O3,1G1S4-97Avenu
ande Prairie, êJberta
T8V 7X8
Phone (7SG 882-7296
Fax (780) 882-7297
Wñet’s email Mdmes: darrykcarteroo.abca
Homepage Addrass: Ww.carterco.abca
Our File No.: 61 .267JDCJLZ
December 9, 2011
Secretary to the Joint Review Panel
Joint Review Panel
Enbridge Northern Gateway Project
44.4 Seventh Avenue S.W.
Calgary, Alberta
T2P 0X
Dear Sin Madam:
Re:
Enbrldge Northern Gateway Project Hearing Order OH-4-201 I
File No. OF-Fac-OlI-N304-2010-O1 01
Request for Permission to provide Oral Statement at Community Hearing
—
We represent Alberta Lands Ltd. with respect to the proposed Enbrklge Northern Gateway
Pipeline
project on their lands. We registered for Intervenor Status on June 13, 2011, filIng ID
number A29640.
Please consider this latter our formal request for the permission of the Joint
Review Panel to allow our
client to make an oral statement at the Community Hearing scheduled in Grande
Prairie on March 26
to 28, 2012.
When we filed our application for intervenor status with the panel we were
unaware that such
community hearings would be held in Grande Prairie. Now that we are aware of this fact,
we would
very much appreciate the opportunity to speak directly with the panel regarding the
lack of consultation
that our client has experienced. We expect that the oral statement would not exceed fifteen
minutes
and would be in English.
Our dient’s situation is unique in the sense that they are the only registered owners
of privately held
lands in that area affected by the proposed pipeline. Our client would like
to make the panel aware
that early in the negotiation process Enbridge agreed to undertake review of
a
re-routing possibilities
that could avoid our clients lands. From that point in time, we received
no response from Enbridge
until the summer of 2011. In a letter dated June 24. 2011, notably almost
one year after En bridge filed
their application, Eribridge essentially dismissed all re-routing options that
they claimed to have
considered. There was no discussion with our client of these alternative mutes
or the advantages and
disadvantages of each prior to Enbndge’s decision and ultimate selection
of the preferred route. A
copy of some of the pertinent correspondence with Enbridge between June
1, 2006 and the present is
attached hereto and may be referred to In our client’s oral statement,
should our client be permitted to
make one.
DEC—09-2011
08:37
780 882 7297
eez
P.001
12/09/2011 FRI 8:33 FAX 780 882 7297 DARRYL CARTER & COItIPANY
002/021
In addition to the opportunity to speak directly to the panel regard
ing these concerns, it would be
advantageous for our client with respect to costs should the panel
grant this opportunity in Grande
Prairie.
It is our hope, that in being allowed to make an oral statem
ent at the Grands Prairie
community hearing, our client could potentially avoid having
to incur the costs of attending the formal
hearing.
Please advise whether the panel is prepared to provide us with
an opportunity to provide an oral
statement before the panel at the upcoming Grands Prairie
Community Hearing. I look forward to
hearlngfrom you.
Yours truly,
DARRYL
Per:
J. I
Q.C.
:jw
Enclosures
Cc:
Laura Estep
Fraser Mimer Casgrain LLP
Counse( for
Enbridge Northern Gateway
Wa Fax: (403) 268-3100
Alberta Lands Ltd.
Via Email
DEC—09—2011
08:38
780 882 7297
ee:
P.002
12/09/2011 FRI 8:33 FAX 780 882 7297 DARRYL CARTER & C0PANY
[0U3/O21
E N B PT. DG E
NOTHEi••N
eRTSWI;v
DIPt,Et4e
June. 4, 2011
Darryl Carter &:Compañy
#103, 1O14. 97 AvaUe
Grande Prai,ie
AB TBV ?X6
1
Attn Mr. Darryl Carter, Q.C.
Dear.Sir,
f(E:
Dlbildge
yourdrent Alberta LndI.td, (Grant EVaskeVYCf
I
The purpose of this letter i t respOnd to your email correspondence pf iul 27 200 to Mr
NeifeLd of F5aser Mimer Casgraln LLP in which yoi iequested an update regadlng a
posb
re-route of the Project to 3vold your •dient’ Lands. We hve. álo reehiM your ema1t
correspondence of Jufle 20 2011 to Ms. Estep of Fraser Mrter Casgi-airt LIP Northern Gatey
acknowledges that there ha been a delay l respondLi to yourequest We have taken time to
carefully consider and eva’luäte that rèüest afld efloi able t pràvlde the foIL&iIhg:
4
.&spórie
As you are a’wre, tile malby components of the ppeline prtlon 1 tlProF iildUe awølL
export pipeline, 914 mm 01) (NPS 6). and a ondens?te Import pipeffne 508 mm O (NP
extending from the InitiatIng station near Bruderhelm Alberta to the Kitihiat Te1Wln$ Irt Bvjtlsh
Cournbla.
Northeni Gwas applying 1
ot approval to lnstl. the plpeines Within:
çori4o.r,
which is approxImately 1,177 km long Uuring the routIng procers the Project
has- iti1izEd
rlbros, mult1-dsclpIlpary rOute selecti pybs des1grid to ldeptify a çocrIor
that wl
achieve au acceptable balance of engineerlfl, environmentatand economre-cunslderatlons, and
whOLaonforrn:wjthTahd User)d prdteted
plans MOe aand:Brnrs1 COlumbIa..
FhieatIó
iIlbe:
lnalized1n the N detailed route approval process, which will occur after GIC Approval, suooht
Approval be received The size of the pipeline RoW Is speclflcallV disisSed 1i Noithern
GatewaNE Application (Appljcatloil), Volume 1, SectjQfl Silte wldh otthe pexmuieIIt Row
req4red torthe pipelines will beZ metresin mosloatlons.
DEC—09—2011
08:38
780 882 7297
ee
P.003
1Z/U/2OII IR1 :33 FAA 7J 2 7297 DARRYL CARTER & COPKNY
IOO4/U21
Page 2
Please find attached Map Nc 13-042-001 identIfying the location of the pipeline route in the
vicinity of the Lands. The map Includes the following information:
•
Oetails for the proposed pipeline route near and through the Lands, based on the route
fTled Tn the Application.
•
The 1 km-wide Project pipeline corridor within which the pipelIne RoW will be refined
during detailed engineering and finalized as part of the NEB detailed route approval
process.
•
The location of a proposed pipeline valve at KP 591.3.
•
The location of the l(Tnuseo Creek crossing.
•
The location of the i(inuseo Forest Service Road that is proposed to be used for
construction access to the pipeline RoW.
•
The location of a northern pipeline route alternative that would avoid the Lands, and is
commented on below.
After evaluating a northern route alternative that would avoid the Lands, as shown on the
attached map, Northern Gateway has determined that the proposed route is preferred over the
northern alternative for the following key reasons:
•
The proposed route significantly minimizes grading and associated disturbances by
traversing relatively flat, stable terrain through the valley.
•
The proposed route provides a significantly favourable crossing location for lClnuseo
Creek. A bored crossing is proposed, subject to future geotechnical and constructability
evaluation, and an Isolated crossing is the back-up method. An aerial crossing is not
proposed.
•
The proposed route parallels the Kinuseo Forest Service Road, providing good
construction access and avoiding the development of a new linear corridor.
•
The proposed route will cost less to construct and maintain.
A southern route alternative was also revlewed however the constructability, watercourse
crossing, and cost issues were significantly less favourable than both the proposed route and the
northern alternative.
Northern Gateway acknowledges that the Application describes the pipeline route revisions and
other Project changes that have been made as a result of consultation, but that it does not
descibe the suggested route revisions that were not accepted and incorporated into the
Project. This issue has now been addressed In the Volume 4 Update, tiled in March 2011. Your
client’s specific request and Northern Gateway’s response Is documented in Section 13.1 of the
Update as follows:
DEC—09—2011
08:38
780 882 7297
eaz
P.004
12/09/2011 FRI 8:33 FAX 780 882 7297 DARRYL CARTER & COIPANY
005/021
Page
“A pipeline route alternative from KP 589 to KP 595 to avoid private property was
requested by the landowner. The current route is preferred over the alternative
because it reduces grading requirements substantially, provides a favourable crossing
location for i(lnuseo Creek, parallels the Klnuseo forest Service Road, and has lower
capital and operatrng costs.”
We are prepared to meet with you and your client, at your convenience, to discuss any
additional routing or construction questions that you may have.
Yours truly.
Manager. Lands & ROW (Cda.Prj.)
cc:
DEC—09—2011
08:38
Laura Estep, Fraser Mflrier Casgraln LIP
780 882 7297
8o<
P.OO
1i/O/2O11 F’Rl 8:33 FAX 780 882 7297 DARRYL CARTER & CUPANY
DEC—09—2011
08:38
780 892 7297
L}006/021
ee
P.006
12/09/2011 FRI 8:34 FAX 780 882 7297 DARRYL CARTER & COMPANY
1007/021
Page lotI
1nlferWilkie
From;
Sent:
To:
Cc:
SubJect
Jennifer Wilkie
Monday. June 20, 2011 10:17 AM
‘Estep, t.aura’
Darryi Carter ‘Grant Evaskevich’
Enbridge Northern Gateway: Alberta Lands Ltd.
Hi Laura,
Further to your correspondence with Darryl on July 28, 2010, we are still seeking clarification as to
where exactly the pipeline, valve sites and access roads have been proposed in relation to our client’s
lands. We can not find this information in the application package, nor can we find any reference to the
discussions our office had with Enbridge starting June 1, 2006 concerning a re-routing.
We were contacted by Terry Jeweti from Phoenix Land Services and on October 6, 2010, we provided
him with a copy of Darryl’s July 27, 2010 email to Richard Neufeld outlining our concerns (copied to
you). We have not heard anything back.
Please advise as to where the pipeline, valve sites and access road has been proposed in relation to
our client’s lands.
Thank you,
Jennifer WIlkle,
BA., LIB.
Darrd Carter & Compaj,y
Barrislrs & SoIicitor5
1Q3, 10134.g7Avenue
Grande Prairie, Alberta T8V 7X6
Ph: (780) 862 7296
Fax:(780)882-7297
6/20/2011
DEC—09—2011
08:39
780 882 7297
88
P.007
12/09/2011 FRI 8:34 FAX 780 882 7297 DARRYL CARTER & COMPANY
O08/O21
4.
bdrryl
4.
Ut .J
Carter
From:
Darryl Carter
Wednesday, October 06, 2010 1:24 PM
‘terry.jewellphoenixland.ca’
Sent:
To:
Cc:
Subject:
‘Richard.Neufeld@FMC-Law.com’; ‘Estep, Laura’: ‘Grant Evaskevich’
Enbridge Gateway: Alberta Lands Ltd.
Attachments: Enbridge draft plarul .pdf: Enbridge draft plan.2.pdf; lmageoO2.gif; imageOO4.glf; oledata.mso;
2006 emails.doc: imageOOB.gif; AlbertaLands_Map.pdf: 2008 emails.doc; imageOo6.gif;
imageol4.gif; Letter from Phoenix Land Services.pdf
Terry,
th (attached), please see
Further to our conversation today regarding your letter of September 30
below for the
T.l have been waiting for a full response.
email I mentioned that I had sent to Mr. Neufeld on July 2
J Darr,l Caner,
Q. C
Darryl Carter & Company
Barrister; & Solicitors
$103, 10)34- 97 Avenue
Grande Pmirie, AB T8V 7X6
Ph: (780) 882-7296
Fax: (780) 882-7297
Original Mçssage
From: Terry Jewkll (mailto:terryjewell@phoenixland.ca]
Sent: Wednesday,October 06, 2010 1:09 PM
To: Darryl
Subject: Enbridoe\Northern Gateway
Grant Evaskevich
Cartek
-
As discussed pleas
rorward your emails to Mr. Neufeld, et al.
Terry
Terry Jewell
President
Phoenix Land Services
*105
9425
94 Avenue
Ft. Saskatchewan, AS T8L 1N6
-
—
Off
Cell
Toll Free
email
-
—
—
—
780—589—4400
780—686—3367
877—589—4404
terry.jewell@ph
nixland.ca
www..phoenixland. ca
From: Darryl Carter
Sent: Tuesday
1 July 27, 2010 5:01 PM
To: ‘rlchard.neufeld@fmc-law.corn’
10/6/2010
DEC-03—2011
08:33
780 882 7237
88Z
P.008
12/09/2011 FRI 8:34 FAX 780 882 7297 DARRYL CARTER & C0PANY
009/O21
4
a
rter
Darr’
From:
Sent:
To:
Subject:
Terry Jewell (terry.jeweIl@phoenixland.ca]
Wedresday, Octcber 06. 2010 1:09 PM
Darri Carter
Enbridge Northern Gateway Grant Evaskevich
-
A di5cus3ed please forward your emails to Mr. Neufeld, et al.
Terry
Terry Jewell
President
Phoenix Land Services
#105
9425
94 Avenue
Ft. Saskatchewan, AB T8L 1N6
—
—
Off
Cell
Toll Free
email
—
—
-
-
780—589—4400
780—686—3367
877—589—4404
terry.jewell@phoenixland.ca
www. phoenixiand. ca
1
DEC—09—2011
08:39
780 882 7297
eez
P.009
uiu/zu11 M1
P H
C
LA N D S
:4
VAA
7U 2 7297 DARRYL CARrIIER & COMPANY
Suite 105,9425—94 Avenue, Fort Saskatchewan, AB T8L 1N6
Phone :780-589-4400 ToIl Free : 1-877-589-4404
Far: 1-877-402-0215 ww’w.phoenlxland.ca
N
RV I C E S
September 30, 2010
O1O/O21
V
Darryl Carter & Company
103, 10134—97 Avenue
Grande Prairie, AB
TBV 7X6
OCT 0
1
Attn: Mr. Carter
RE:
ENBRIDGE NORTHERN GATEWAY PROJECT
LAND INTEREST CONSULTATION PROCESS
KP588.2
BC007076436 PJ17051 DL 1476 GRANT EVASKEVICH
As per your conversation with Land Manager Terry Jewell, we have enclosed
the following information Materials as
part of the Land interest Consultation Process for the Northern Gateway Project:
NEB Publication, Pipeline Regulation in Canada: A Guide for Landowners
and the Public
NEB Publication, Living and Working Near Pipelines: Landowner Guide
NEB Publication, A Proposed Pipeline or Power Line Project: What you need
to know
Northern Gateway Project Brochure
Northern Gateway Route Map of Proposed Corridor
Local Map
Landowner Letter
If you have any questions or concerns, please contact Terry Jewell at you
convenience at (780) 686-3367 or the writer
at (780) 589-4400Yours truly,
PHOENIX LAND SERVICES
Agent for
ENBRIDG
1-IER GATEW
PIPELINES LIMITED PARTNERSHIP
Monica P kover
Manager Land Administration
Your Land Team
DEC—09—2011
08:39
780 882 7297
88Z
P.010
12/09/2011 FRI 8:34 FAX 780 882 7297 DARRYL CARTER & CUPANY
I011/021
L’drryl Carter
From:
Sent:
Darryl Carter
Tuesday, July 27, 2010 5:01 PM
To:
‘richard.neufeld@fmc-law.com’
Subject:
Enbridge Gateway: Alberta Lands Ltd.
Attachments: Enbridge draft plan.1 .pdf; Enbridge draft plan.2.
pdf; imageoo2.gif; imageOO4.gif; oledata.mso;
2008 emails.doc: image008.gif; AlbertaLands_Map.pdf; 2008
ema(ls.doc; imageOO6.gif;
imageol4.gif
Mr. Neufeld,
I confirm that we represent Alberta Lands Ltd. the owners
of District Lot 1476, Block A, Peace River
District in British Columbia. This land would be affecte
d by the proposed Enbridge Gateway project. In
response to a voice mail from our office to yours on June
4, 2010 we have received a copy of
Enbridge’s application to the NEB. Thank you for that.
The application is quite voluminous however and we
cannot seem to find anything showing exactly
where the pipeline, valve sites and access roads are propos
ed in relation to our clients land nor can we
find any reference to the discussions we had with
Enbridge starting on June 1 • 2006 about a rerouting,
Enbridge had agreed to examine a rerouting to avoid
my client’s land (see Attached AMEC Draft Plan
we had discussed with Enbridge officials showing the
pipeline routing to the north of my client’s land).
Progress Land was representing En bridge at that time.
Please see the attached exchange of emails in
2006 (titled 2006 emails) regarding the additional studies
Enbridge was undertaking. We never did see
the results of those studies.
When I had heard riöthuii fUrther, on July 7, 2007, I asked
Enbridge (throughPthss Land) if it would
compensate my client for time and legal costs to
date. On January 25, 2008 Enbridge sent a cheque to
cover the legal costs but nothing for my client’s time.
The next thing that happened was that Enbridge sent out
a form letter to my client dated October 10, 2008
with a new information brochure and updated route
map. This prompted me to ask Mr. Becker at
Progress if it meant the project was off the backburner.
I am attaching a series of emails starting with my
email to Mr. Becker dated November 14, 2008 (titled 2008
emails). You will see that Mr. Becker said he
hadn’t been involved in the project lately but would inquire and
get back to me. Then he said Paul Anderson
would get back to me. (then had an exchange of emails
with Mr. Anderson (also part of 2008 emails
attached). In the November 29, 2008 email Mr. Anderson
said he did not know who my client was (although
his email of November 21, 2008 had my email to Mr. Becker
attached). In my email of December 3, 2008 1
advised him of my client’s land description. (also includ
ed correspondence with one of Enbridge’s
consultants showing the trouble I had had trying to convin
ce the consultant that there was no pipeline on my
client’s land.
V
On December 12, 2008 Mr. Anderson sent me the email with
a drawIng of the proposed routing in the
vicinity cf’ rny.client’s land. But the drawing (also attache
d to.this ømil) showed the pipeline going right
through the land! I have no idea what, if anything, happen
ed to the
reroute review Enbridge agreed to
undertake in June, 2006.
In March, 2009. Purvis Kinney, an agent from Mr. Anders
on’s
contact my client directly. On March 27, 2009 my client and company (HMA Land Services) attempted to
I had a conference call with Mr. Kinney. We
tried to explain the background to him of our involvement
with Enbridge since 2006 and my client’s
opposition to the pipeline. Mr. Kinney appeared not to have
been aware of any of this. He said he would
advise Enbridge of the conversation we had.
On September 22, 2009 I received a call from Mr. Kinney
. He said he knew that my client were opposed to
7/27/2010
DEC—0—2011
oa:39
70 a82 727
P.011
iiu/zui1 i
:i iil fbi) bbz 1ZJ7 DARRYL CARTER & COMPANY
LU12/O21
rehUtb
th
xline. He said Enbridge was still looking at optio
ns but wanted to get its filing done and wou
the oute through my client’s land. I asked him
to send me a copy of the application when it was ld show
filed.
On December 15, 2009 I received another call from
Mr. Kinney. He stated that the filing never got done
expected. He said it would now be done In the first
as
or second quarter of 2010. I asked him to let me
when the filing it happened.
know
I did not hear from Mr. Kinney again but my clien
t received an
brochure from Enbridge dated
March 23, 2010 plus an overview map (at a scale
of 50k to a centimetre that told us nothing abou
pipeline location in relation to my dient’s land) and
t the
a news release about the Joint Review Pane
December 4, 2009.
l dated
On May 11, 2010 I received a “New Project Broc
hur& from En bridge and on May 27, 2010 a New
announcing the filing of the application with the
s Release
NEB
our call to your office requesting a copy of the appl but no copy of the applIcation. That is what prompted
ication.
It seems that Enbridge decided to proceed with the
filing of its application without ever getting back
regarding the discussions of the reroute we had
to us
in 2006.
.1. Darryl Carter, QC.
Dariy! Carter & Company
Barrlscers & SollcItotS
4t103, 10134- 97 Avenue
Grpnde Prairie, A5 iSV 7X6
Ph: (780) 882-7296
Fax: (780) 882-7297
Enbridge draft
nbrdQe draft !006 e
plan.L.p&(2M.. plan.2$d(ZM,..
Kb)
5IO6 emails,doc
(124Kb)
PlbertndsJ4ap.
p&(Z29KB)
7/27/2010
DEC—09—2011
Oe:39
780 882 7297
e8
P.012
12/09/2011 FRI 8:35 FAX 780 882 7297 DARRYL CARTER & CQIPANY
!013/021
2006 emails
From: Darryl Carter
Sent: Saturday, September 23, 2006 4:02 PM
To: ‘Phil Becker’
Cc: Grant Evaskevich’
Subject: RE: Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Gateway Pipeline Alberta Lands Inc. Grant Evaskevich
-
Mr. Evaskevich says that Enbrldge could proceed on that basis provided it was agreed
that no trees would be
cut.
3. Darryl Carter, Q.C.
Dariy/ Ca,ter & COmpany
Barristers & Soilcito,s
*103, 10134 - 97Avenue
rande Prairie, AS T8V 7X6
Ph: (280) 892-7296
Fax: (780) 882-7297
From: Phil Becker [mailto:philb@progressland.com]
Sent: Tuesday, August 22, 2006 2:58 PM
To: Darryl Carter
Cc: ‘Grant Evaskevich’
Subject: RE; Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Gateway Pipeline Alberta Lands Inc.
Grant Evaskevich
-
if Enbridge Gateway uses the road for construction purposes Enbridge Gateway
agrees to
that time. They will not have equipment-in the area to enable this work until then. £ñbridge repair the road at
agrees to provide the findings of any investigations of all possible routes and a summary Gatewayalso
report describing the
preferred creek crossing methodology.
In light of the above statement, does Enbridge Gateway’s contractors and personnel have
permission to access
the property as noted below?
Phil Becker
PROGRESS LAND SERVICES LTD.
Land Manager
Phone (780) 454-4717
Cell: (780) 446-2154
From: Darryl Carter [maiito:Darryl@carterco.ab.caJ
Sent: Saturday, July08, 2006 12:31. PM
To: Phil Becker
Cc: Grant Evaskevich
Subject: RE: Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Gateway Pipeline Alberta Lands Inc. Grant
Evaskevich
-
My clients would agreeto the proposal as outlined by you (i.e. no more than 3 crews
at separate times during
the summer of 2006 for work that is neither invasive or destructive and with no tree
cutting or disturbance of any
kind), provided Eribridge agreed to the following conditions:
DEC—09—2011
0839
780 882 7297
98:
P.013
12/09/2011 FRI 8:35 FAX 780 882 7297 DARRYL CARTER & CUPANY
l014/021
1. to repair the erosion ditch presently on the road (although it is passab
le for a truck it needs a culvert and
some maintenance work to allow a car or trailer to pass) and
2. to provide us with a copy of the resulting engineering report.
My clients wish to rernnd you however that they remain opposed to any
pipeline on their land and to any aboveground crossing of the creek.
2. Darryl Carter, Q.C.
barry! Carter & Company
Samsters & Solicitors
#103, 10134 - 97 Avenue
Grande Prairie, AS TBV 7X6
Ph: (780) 882-7296
Far: (780) 882-7297
-—--Original Message----From: Phil Becker [malo:phiIb@progressland.com]
Sent: Wednesday, July 05, 2006 11:16 AM
To: Darryl Carter
Subject: RE; Enbridge Pipelines Inc. Gateway Pipeline Alberta Lands
Inc. Grant Evaskevicti
-
Darryl, have you had a chance to discuss this with Grant and family
?
Phil Becker
PROGRESS LAND SERVICES LTD.
Land Manager
Phone (780) 454-4717
Cell: (780) 446-2154
From: Phil Becker [mailto:philb@’prógressland.comj
Sent: Monday, June 26, 2006 11:16 AM
To: ‘Darryl Carter’
Subject: Enbrldge Pipelines Inc. Gateway Pipeline Alberta Lands
Inc. Grant Evaskevich
-
Darryl, Ive spoken to Enbridge about your proposal which was:
Enbridge to avoid crossing Alberta Lands Inc.’s property with pipelin
e.
Enbridge to construct underground, not aerial crossing of Kinuseo
Creek
If Eribridge agrees to above conditions, your client may agree to
allow Enbridge to use the road through
the property
Enbridge cannot at this time commit to an underground crossin at
g a
pr6perty. They need to do more studies to determine this, as was location that will miss your client’s
noted in our meeting in Grande
Prairie on June 1,06.
In order to gather as iiih information as possible, use of your clients
road and access on thu property
to do some further studies would greatly assist in exploring all options
at the Kinuseo Creek crossing.
Access would entail the following:
Use of road with pickup truck and quad, and subject to weather, by
helicopter.
There would be up to 3 crews at separate times during the summer
of
constructability of the creek including geophysical work. The proposed 2006 to assess the routing and
work is neither invasive or
DEC—03—2011
08:40
780 882 7237
88Z
P.014
12/09/2011 FRI 8:35 FAX 780 882 7297 DARRYL CARTER & C0PAN’Y
015/Q21
destructive. The crews would walk from the road across the proper
ty to look at the northern route
around the property. There would be no tree cutting or disturb
ance of any kind.
Enbridge is trying to find alternatives to routing through the proper
ty and this would greatly assist in this.
The crews would be on site a few days at a time during
the summer.
Would your client consider use of the road and access onto
the property for the above stated reasons?
Phil Becker
PROGRESS LAND SERVICES LTD.
Land Manager
Phone (780) 464-4717
Cell: (780) 446-2154
DEC—09—2011
08:40
760 892 7297
98
P.015
12/09/2011 FRI 8:35 FAX 780 882 7297 DARRYL CARTER & COMPANY
016/021
2008 emails
From: Paul Anderson Emaifto;panderson@hma)and.cc,m
]
Sent: Friday, December 12, 2008 10:38 AM
To: Darryl Carter
Subject: RE Enbridge Gateway Alberta Lands Ltd.
-
I apologize for the delay. Attached is a drawing of the proposed routing
of the Northern
Gateway pipeline in the vicinity of your client’s land (Alberta Lands
Inc.).
Paul
From: Darryl Carter
Sent Wednesday, December 03, 2008 9:49 AM
To: ‘Paul Anderson’
Subject: Enbridge Gateway Alberta Lands Ltd.
-
Paul.
My client is Alberta Lands Ltd.
See the correspondence below for the land description. You will see
that I had some difficultly
explaining to this consultant that there was no pipeline on the land.
He did figure it out later.
I Darryl Carter,
Q C.
Darryl Carter & Company
& $oIicito,
#103, 10134 97Avenue
Grande Prairie, A8 T8V 7X6
Ph: (780) 882-7296
cax: (780) 882-7297
-
From: Darryl Carter
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 8:47 AM
To: ‘Barry Richardson’
Cc ‘Grant Evaskevich’; ‘Phil Becker’
Subject: RE: Enbridge Emergency Response Planning
Mr. Richardson,
It does not clear up matters. I am telling you there is no pipeline there.
You need to check into
this.
Also it is misleading to suggest to landowners that you are follow
ing EUB regulations when those
regulations have no applicationtotheland iriquestion.
Hopefully ERPs are prepared more carefully.
J. Darryl Carter,
Q. C.
Darryl Carter & Company
Barristers & SoIJdtoc
#103, 10134 - 97 Avenue
Grande Prairie, AB T8V 7X6
DEC—09—2011
08:40
780 882 7297
88Z
P.016
12/09/2011 FRI 8:35 FAX 780 882 7297 DARRYL CARTER & COMPANY
t017/021
Ph: (780) 882.7296
Far: (780) 882-7297
From: Barry Richardson [maUto;barrynchardson@polargeomatics.com]
Sent: Friday, October 03, 2008 8:37 AM
To: Darryl Carter
Subject: FW: Enbrldge Emergency Response Planning
—
Mr. Carter,
I was in correspondence with owner Grant Evaskevich on Wednesday, Oct 1 to
update the emergency response plan on Enbridges behalf. At that time Mr
Evaskevick had said he was unaware of Enbridge pipeilne crossing his
property
south of Tumbler Ridge. I stated according to our map the Enbridge pipelin
e
apparently does cross the land and I subsequently sent a map of the land
clearly
showing the pipeline crossing there. We update all properties that either
fall
within an 800 meter buffer zone or if the pipeline is directly on the proper
ty.
Hope this clears up this matterfor you
b”
Barr Richardson
EPSëhótdCosuftàrt
Geomatlc & Securfty Solutions Inc.
Sufte 110 471-51 Ave Red Deer, AS T4N6K8
p
.O3)3O
4
From; Darryl Carter [mailto;darryl@carterco.ab.ca)
Sent: FrIday, October 03, 2008 8:20 AM
To: Barry Richardson
Cc: Grant Evaskevich; Phil Becker
Subject RE: Enbridge Emergency Response Planning
—
Mr. Richardson,
But there is no Enbridge pipeline on the property that I am aware of.
Furthermore, UB
regulations would have no application in British Columbia.
.1 Darryl Carter, Q. C.
Darryl Carter & Company
Sarristers & Solicitors
#103, 10134- 97Avenue
Grande Pr&irie, AB TSV 7X6
Ph: (780) 882-7296
Far: (780) 882-7297
From: Barry Richardson maiIto:barryrichardson@polargeomatics.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 0]., 2008 2:32 PM
To: Darryl Carter
Subject: FW; Enbridge
DEC—03--2011
08:40
—
Emergency Response Planning
780 882 7297
eex
P.017
12/09/2011 FRI :35 FAX 780 882 7297 DARRYL CARTER & COMPANY
IO18/021
Mr. Carter,
Our company is called Polargeomatics based in Red Deer,
Alberta. Our
company is contracted to update Landowners, or com
panies that fall within
an 800 meter buffer zone or if the pipeline is directly on the
property which
is the case for this property. We gather information abou
t the property in
case of an unlikely event of an emergency. We keep this
information
confidential according to Enbrldge’s Privacy Policy
and will only be used to
contact residents if that applies for safety, security or
for responding in the
unlikely event of an emergency. The property owner
on title is Alberta Land
lnc, the parcel identifier is 007-076-436, which is Block
A District Lot 1476
in the Peace River District. It is under EUB regulations that
Pipeline
companies must update stakeholders within our buffer zone
at least every
year so information Is current and accurate. Hope this
assists you in this
matter.
Thank you,
Barry Richardson
ERPStakehoideronsultant
Geomatic ê Serwity iiitTons lnc
Side 110 4711-51 Ave Red Deer AB T4tISHS
P(4ozO92454
Fá4QS):ao922(
From: Darryl Carter [mailto:darryl@carterco.ab.ca]
Sent: Wednesday, October 01, 2008 203 PM
To: Barry Richardson
Cc: Grant Evaskevich; Phil Becker
Subject: Enbridge
Mr. Richardson,
I act on behalf of Grant Evaskevich He advises that he receive
d an email from you today with
the attached map.
We had discussions with Enbridge some time ago regard
came of it. Could you please advise me of the reason foring a proposed pipeline but nothing
your involvernen at this time.
Thank you.
.1. Darryl Carter, Q. C.
bariyi Carter & Company
Rarnsters & Soiic1to,
*103, 10134 - 97 Avenue
Grande Prairie, AR TRy 7X6
DEC—09—2011
08:40
780 882 7297
88
P.018
12/09/2011 FRI 8:35 FAX 780 882 7297 DARRYL CARTER & C0PANY
019/021
Ph: (780) 882-7296
Fax: (780) 882-7297
From: Paul Anderson [mailto:panderson@hmaland.comj
Sent Saturday, November 29, 2008 3:21 PM
To: Danyl Carter
Subject: Re: Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline
Sorxy Darryl I don’t know who your client is.
-
Please send me his name an&or legal land location or call mc. 40351
24472
-
Sent from Paul’s Blackberry Device
Original Message
From: Darryl Carter <darryl@caxterco.ab.ca>
To; Paul Anderson
Cc: Grant Evaskcvich <G.Evaschalbezialands.conc
Sent SatNov 29 13:53:59 2008
Subject RE: Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline
Paul,
What is the current proposal for the area of my client’s land?
3. Darryl Carter, Q.C.
Darryl Carter & Company
& Solickors
#103,10134-97 Avenue
Grande Prairie, AB T8V 7X6
Ph: (780) 8824296
Fax: (780) 882-7297
From: Paul Anderson [mailto:pandersonihinalan4,co]
Sent: Friday, November 21, 2008 2:00 PM
To; Danyl Carter
Cc: philbprogressland.com
Subjecu Eabridge Northern Gatcway Pipeline
Darryl!:
The Enbridge Northern Gateway Pipeline is proceeding to an NEB
application. We have held public open
houses throughout communities almrgtheroute in Alberta over the past month
.
I am responsible for Land & Environment on the project. Please let
me know if you have questions.
Paul.
From: Darryl Carter [mailto:danyJ(cartercoi,]
Sent: Friday, November 14,2008 11:14 AM
To: Phil Becker
DEC—09-2011
08:40
780 882 7297
P.019
12/09/2011 FRI 8:35 FAX 780 882 7297 DARRYL CARTER & C01PANY
020/021
Subject: Enbridgc Gateway Alberta Lands
-
Phil,
My client, Alberta Lands, received some literature recently regard
ing the Gateway Project. Does this mean
that it is off the back burner?
I. Darryl Carter, Q.C.
l)arryl Carter & Company
Banisters & Solicitors
#103, 10134-97 Avenue
Grande Prairie, AB TSV 7X6
Ph: (780) 82-7296
Fax: (780) 882-7297
Sent from Paul’s BlackbetTy Device
From: Phil Becker [mailto:phiib@progressiand.com]
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2008 8:51 AM
To: Darryl Carter
Cc: Elliott Friedricti
Subject: RE: Enbridge Gateway Alberta Lands
-
Darryl, Progress Land will not be involved in the BC portion
of the Gateway project from now on. Paul
Anderson Gatew
of
ay has indicated he will respond to your inquiry.
Phil Becker
PROGRESS LAND SERVICES LTD
Land Manager
Phone (780) 4544717
Cell: (780) 446-2154
From: Phil Becker
Sent: FrIday, November 14, 2008 11:17 AM
To: ‘Darryl Carte?
Subject: RE: Enbricige Gateway Alberta Lands
-
I haven’t actually bccn involved lately with the Proj cct, but I will
inquire and get back to you.
Phil Becicer
PROGRESS LAND SERVICES LTD.
Land Manager
Phone (780) 454-4717
Cell: (780) 446-2154
From: Darryl Carter [maIIto:darryhcafterco.ab.ca]
Sent! Friday, November 14, 2008 11:14 AM
To: Phil Becker
Subject Enbrldge Gateway Alberta Lands
-
Phil,
DEC-09—2011
08:40
780 882 7297
88z
P.020
12/09/2011 FRI 8:36 FAX 780 882 7297 DARRYL CARTER & C0PANY
021/021
My client, Alberta Lands, received some 1iteratre reccntly
regarding the Gateway Projcct. Does this mean
chat it is off the back burn&
J, Dar,yl Carter,
QC
Derryl Carter & Company
Bnisters & SoIicito,s
#103, 10134 - 97 Avenue
Grande Prairie, AB TSV 7X6
Ph: (780) 882-7296
Fax: (780) 882-7297
DEC—09—2011
08:40
780 882 7297
ee
P.021