Quarter 1 - Planning Portal

Transcription

Statistical Report: England
2013/14 - Q1
Quarter 4: January to March
April to June 2013
The Planning Inspectorate
2013/14 - Quarter 1: April to June
Introduction
Commentary
3
4
Section 1: Planning appeals
Table 1.1
Planning appeals
Table 1.2
Table 1.3
Table 1.4
Table 1.5
Table 1.6
Table 1.7
Table 1.8
Table 1.9
-
Average time taken to decide appeals (weeks)
Received, withdrawn, decided, allowed
Received, by procedure type
Decided, by procedure type
Received, decided, allowed, by development type
Received, decided, allowed, by land use type
Major & Minor Dwellings: Received, decided, allowed, by procedure type
Dwellings: Received, decided, allowed by permission type (appeals)
Dwellings: Received, decided, allowed by permission type (dwellings)
6
7
8
9
10
13
16
17
17
Section 2: Enforcement appeals
Table 2.1
Enforcement appeals
Table 2.2
Table 2.3
Table 2.4
-
Average time taken to decide appeals (weeks)
Received, withdrawn, decided, outcome
Received, by procedure type
Decided, by procedure type
18
19
20
20
Section 3: Other types of casework
Table 3.1
Listed Building/Conservation Area Consent appeals
Table 3.2
Listed Building/Conservation Area Enforcement appeals
Table 3.3
Lawful Development Certificate appeals
Table 3.4
Advertisement appeals
Table 3.5
Rights of Way Orders
Table 3.6
Land Compensation appeals
Table 3.7
Purchase Notice appeals
Table 3.8
Environmental appeals
Table 3.9
High Hedges appeals
Table 3.10
Tree Preservation appeals
Table 3.11a
Local Development Plans
Table 3.11b
Table 3.12
Transport & associated appeals
Table 3.13
Commons related casework
Table 3.14
Wildlife & Countryside Act: Definitive Map Modification Orders
Table 3.15
Table 3.16
-
Received, withdrawn, decided, Notice upheld
Submitted, decided, confirmed
Received, withdrawn, decided
Submitted, withdrawn, reports issued (2012/13 Qtr 4)
Submitted, withdrawn, reports issued (2013/14 Qtr 1)
Reports issued
Decided, by procedure
Decided, by outcome
21
21
22
22
23
23
24
24
25
25
26
28
31
32
35
35
35
Page 1
Table 3.17
Table 3.18
Secretary of State Casework
- Called in Planning Applications
- Recovered Planning and Enforcement Appeals
36
37
Section 4: Costs & High Court Challenges
Table 4.1
Costs applications
Table 4.2
Quality
Table 4.3
- Decisions, awards
- Decisions challenged, results, propensity to challenge
- Inspector Complaints received, outcome
38
41
42
Section 5: Decided appeals breakdown by outcome by Inspector
Introduction
Decided appeals: by Inspector
Table 5.1a
Table 5.1b
Table 5.2a
Table 5.2b
-
Planning appeals (2012/13 Qtr 4)
Enforcement appeals (2012/13 Qtr 4)
43
44
56
67
69
Section 6: Decided appeals breakdown by local planning authority
Table 6.1a
Decided appeals: by local planning authority
Table 6.1b
Table 6.2a
Table 6.2b
Table 6.3a
Table 6.3b
Table 6.4a
Table 6.4b
Table 6.5a
Table 6.5b
Table 6.6a
Table 6.6b
Table 6.7a
Table 6.7b
-
Householder appeals (2012/13 Qtr 4)
Householder appeals (2013/14 Qtr 1)
Listed Building/Conservation Area Consent appeals (2012/13 Qtr 4)
Listed Building/Conservation Area Consent appeals (2013/14 Qtr 1)
Advertisement Consent appeals (2012/13 Qtr 4)
Advertisement Consent appeals (2013/14 Qtr 1)
Listed Building/Conservation Area Enf. appeals (2012/13 Qtr 4)
Listed Building/Conservation Area Enf. appeals (2013/14 Qtr 1)
Lawful Development Certificate appeals (2012/13 Qtr 4)
Lawful Development Certificate appeals (2013/14 Qtr 1)
Section 7: Staffing
Table 7.1
Staffing
- Staff Complement
238
Section 8: Freedom of Information
Table 8.1
Freedom of Information
- Requests, responses, reviews
239
Page 2
72
85
97
110
123
136
150
160
171
182
193
204
214
226
Return to Table of Contents
Introduction
Quarterly Statistical Reports
1. This is the first quarterly Statistical Report for 2013-2014. It contains provisional data for the quarter just ended (April to June
2013), and finalised data for the quarter before that (January to March 2013).
Data quality
2. The Inspectorate carries out regular data checks and cleansing exercises to ensure that its information is as up to date, complete
and accurate as possible. The data in this report is therefore the best available at the date of publication. Published figures may be
subject to later adjustment following further checks and cleansing exercises.
Queries
3. Any queries on the content of this report should be sent to the postal or e-mail address given.
Publication
4. This report is available in electronic form on the internet.
5. The Report is also available in hard copy from:
Data Supply Team
Business Improvement Branch
The Planning Inspectorate
Room 4/05 Hawk Wing
Temple Quay House
2 The Square
Temple Quay
Bristol
BS1 6PN
Tel: 0303 444 5357
Email: bi.stats@pins.gsi.gov.uk
8th Aug 2013 to webteam
Page 3
Commentary
Time to decide
1. The provisonal average time to decide Householder Appeals Service (HAS) casework in the 1st Quarter was 7 weeks, down 1 week on finalised
figures for 4th Quarter.
2. Written Representation non-HAS planning appeals were decided in a provisional average of 22 weeks, down from 21 weeks for the finalised figures
for Quarter 4; Hearing appeals were also decided in a provisional average of 21 weeks the same as the finalised figures for the 4th Quarter; Inquiry
appeals were decided in a provisional average of 27 weeks an improvement of 2 weeks on figures for the 4th Quarter.
See Table and graphs at 1.1
3. The provisional average time to decide Written Representation enforcement appeals in the 1st Quarter was 33 weeks compared to finalised figures
of 29 weeks for the 4th Quarter; Hearing cases were decided in a provisional average of 28 weeks compared to a finalised figure of 26 weeks for the
previous quarter; Inquiry cases were decided in a provisional average of 29 weeks compared to finalised figures of 33 weeks for the 4th Quarter.
See Table and graphs at 2.1
Intake
4. Provisional HAS appeal intake figures for the 1st Quarter were down by 146 to 1,070 compared to finalised figures for the 4th Quarter. Provisional
intake for the balance of planning appeals in the 1st Quarter was down by 50 to 2,552 compared to finalised figures for the 4th Quarter. Provisional
enforcement appeal intake in the 1st Quarter was up by 19 to 633 compared to finalised figures for the 4th Quarter.
See Table and Graph at 1.2
See Table and Graph at 2.2
5. During the 1st Quarter 22 Local Development Plans were received, 26 were issued.
Success rates
6. In the 1st Quarter provisional figures show that 35% of HAS appeals were allowed which is slightly down on the previous quarter; provisionally,
32% of Non-HAS Written Representation planning appeals were allowed down 2% from the last quarter, provisionally, 49% of Hearing planning
appeals were allowed compared to a finalised figure of 46% for the 4th Quarter; provisionally, 74% of Inquiry planning appeals were allowed
compared to a finalised figure of 56% for the 4th Quarter.
See Table 1.4
Page 4
Commentary
7. Provisional figures show the percentage of Written Representation enforcement appeals allowed during the 1st Quarter were at 18%; the finalised
number of Hearing enforcement appeals was 40% during the 4th Quarter compared with provisional figures for the 1st Quarter of 29% ;
provisionally, the number of Inquiry enforcement appeals allowed rose by 10% during the 1st Quarter compared with finalised figures for the 4th
Quarter.
See Table 2.4
8. Variations in the success rates for Hearings and Inquiries are disproportionately influenced by the large numbers of appeals that are linked
together and heard at one event, and the small numbers of these events.
Page 5
Statistical Report: England - Planning appeals
Table 1.1 - Average time taken to decide appeals (weeks)
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
6 Weeks
7 Weeks
Non-HAS Written Representations
21 Weeks
22 Weeks
Hearings
21 Weeks
21 Weeks
Inquiries
29 Weeks
27 Weeks
Cases decided by Inspectors
Householder Appeals Service (HAS) Written Reps*
* All HAS cases are determined by the Written Representations procedure.
Time to decide HAS WRs
Time to decide non HAS WRs
150
Decisions
Decisions
300
200
100
100
50
0
0
01
03
05
07
09
19
21
23
01
25
Time to decide Hearings
25
06
11
15
20
Decisions
Decisions
11 13 15 17
Elapsed Weeks
15
10
5
16
21
Elapsed Weeks
26
31
36
41
Time to decide Inquiries
10
5
0
0
08
13
18
23
Elapsed Weeks
28
33
12
Page 6
17
22
27
32
37
Elapsed Weeks
42
47
Table 1.2 - Received, withdrawn, decided, allowed
Received
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
HAS
1,216
1,070
Planning Appeals except
HAS
2,602
2,552
13
11
164
158
HAS
1,313
1,001
HAS
2,509
2,023
HAS
468
346
HAS
896
714
HAS
36%
35%
HAS
36%
35%
HAS
Withdrawn
HAS
Decided
1
Allowed
% Allowed
Planning appeals including HAS decided: Monthly
2500
2500
2000
2000
Decisions
Receipts
Planning appeals including HAS received: Monthly
1500
1000
500
1500
1000
500
0
Jul
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Received 2012/13
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
May
Jun
0
Jul
Aug
Received 2013/14
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Decided 2012/13
Page 7
Jan
Feb
Mar
Apr
Decided 2013/14
May
Jun
Table 1.3 - Received, by procedure type
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
HAS
1,216
1,070
HAS
2,259
2,135
HAS
32%
30%
HAS
59%
59%
All, including HAS
91%
88%
Hearings
258
283
Hearings %
7%
8%
Inquiries
85
134
Inquiries %
2%
4%
Written Representations
Written Representations %
Page 8
Table 1.4 - Decided, by procedure type
Written Representations: HAS
Written Representations: All,
except HAS
Hearings
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
Decided
1,313
1,001
Allowed1
468
346
% allowed
36%
35%
Decided
2,234
1,758
Allowed
763
571
% allowed
34%
32%
Decided
214
211
99
103
46%
49%
61
54
34
40
56%
74%
1
1
Allowed
% allowed
Decided
Inquiries
1
Allowed
% allowed
1
includes split decisions
Page 9
Table 1.5 - Received, decided, allowed, by development type
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
335
324
1427
1255
131
159
6
4
3
2
7
10
Mineral working
4
1
Minor dwellings
1219
1238
Minor manufacturing, storage and warehousing
17
22
Minor offices
16
17
Minor retail, distribution and servicing
61
42
59
46
529
492
Received
Change of use
Householder development
Major dwellings
1
Major manufacturing, storage and warehousing
Major offices
2
2
Major retail, distribution and servicing
Other major development
2
2
Other minor development
1
- number of dwellings proposed was 10 or more or the site area was 0.5 hectares or more
2
- where the gross floor space was 1,000 square metres or more or the site area was 1 hectare or more
Page 10
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
300
246
1541
1164
105
82
3
4
0
0
4
5
Mineral working
3
1
Minor dwellings
1233
994
23
18
Minor offices
15
11
61
44
60
48
474
407
Decided
Change of use
Major dwellings
1
Major offices
2
2
2
2
1
2
Page 11
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
Allowed
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
Number
Percentage
Number
Percentage
117
39%
91
37%
553
36%
403
35%
48
46%
48
59%
2
67%
2
50%
0
-
0
-
2
50%
2
40%
Mineral working
0
-
1
100%
Minor dwellings
350
28%
293
29%
8
35%
9
50%
Minor offices
5
33%
4
36%
23
38%
12
27%
29
48%
21
44%
227
48%
174
43%
Change of use
Major dwellings
1
Major offices
2
2
2
2
1
2
Page 12
Table 1.6 - Received, decided, allowed, by land use type
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
Agriculture, Fisheries and Forestry
73
66
Community, Education and Defence Services
60
58
3112
2973
Industry
40
26
Leisure and Recreation
66
50
2
2
44
35
Shopping
215
214
Transport and Utilities
177
164
Wholesale and storage
25
24
Received
Housing and Residential Development
Mineral Extraction
Offices
Page 13
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
78
58
53
53
3163
2473
Industry
35
26
52
57
1
3
42
27
Shopping
231
189
126
114
41
24
Decided
Mineral Extraction
Offices
Page 14
Allowed
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
Number
Percentage
Number
Percentage
43
55%
25
43%
22
42%
26
49%
1071
34%
812
33%
Industry
13
37%
19
73%
21
40%
20
35%
0
-
1
33%
Offices
14
33%
11
41%
Shopping
94
41%
77
41%
63
50%
57
50%
23
56%
12
50%
Mineral Extraction
Page 15
Table 1.7 - Major & Minor Dwellings: Received, decided, allowed, by procedure type
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
Written Reps
50
61
Hearings
40
36
Inquiries
41
62
Written Reps
47
28
Hearings
32
24
Inquiries
26
30
Written Reps
18
12
Hearings
14
12
Inquiries
16
24
Major Dwellings
Received
Decided
Allowed
1
2
2
1
- number of dwellings proposed was 10 or more or the site area was at least 0.5 hectares
- includes split decisions
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
1127
1093
Hearings
86
121
Inquiries
6
24
1126
904
Hearings
97
84
Inquiries
10
6
308
250
Hearings
38
38
Inquiries
4
5
Minor Dwellings
1
Written Reps
Received
Written Reps
Decided
Written Reps
Allowed
1
2
2
- number of dwellings proposed was 10 or more or the site area was at least 0.5 hectares
- includes split decisions
Page 16
Table 1.8 - Dwellings: Received, decided, allowed by permission type (appeals)
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
196
179
All excluding Outline
1,179
1,236
Total
1,375
1,415
146
130
1,225
974
Total
1,371
1,104
45
47
367
300
Total
412
347
Total
30%
31%
Number of appeals relating to new dwellings
Outline
Received
Outline
Decided
Outline
Allowed
% Allowed
Table 1.9 - Dwellings: Received, decided, allowed by permission type (dwellings)
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
Outline
4,350
5,409
6,293
7,680
10,643
13,089
Outline
2,391
2,628
5,644
4,689
Total
8,035
7,317
Outline
1,188
1,896
2,716
2,499
Total
3,904
4,395
Total
49%
60%
Number of dwellings
Received
Total
Decided
Allowed
% Allowed
Page 17
Statistical Report: England - Enforcement appeals
Table 2.1 - Average time taken to decide appeals (weeks)
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
29 Weeks
33 Weeks
Hearings
26 Weeks
28 Weeks
Inquiries
33 Weeks
29 Weeks
Cases decided by Inspectors
Time to decide WRs
Time to decide Hearings
5
20
Decisions
Decisions
25
15
10
5
3
2
1
0
10
15
20
25
30
Elapsed Weeks
35
40
0
45
15
5
Time to decide Inquiries
4
Decisions
4
3
2
1
0
14
18
22
26
30
Elapsed Weeks
34
38
42
Page 18
18
21
24
27
Elapsed Weeks
30
33
Table 2.2 - Received, withdrawn, decided, outcome
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
Received
614
633
Withdrawn
142
111
Decided
275
275
Notice Upheld
128
128
% Notice Upheld
47%
49%
75
122
% Notice Varied
27%
29%
Notice Quashed
72
90
26%
22%
Outcome
Notice Varied
% Notice Quashed
(Note: Upheld = Invalid or Upheld. Varied = Varied or Varied & Upheld. Quashed = Planning permission granted or Notice quashed & planning permission
granted or Split decision or Quashed on legal grounds)
Enforcement appeals received: Monthly
Enforcement appeals decided: Monthly
350
Decided
Received
350
250
150
250
150
50
50
Jul
Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Jan
Feb Mar Apr May Jun
Jul
Month
Received 2012/13
Received 2013/14
Aug
Sep
Oct
Nov
Dec
Jan
Feb
Mar
Month
Decided 2012/13
Decided 2013/14
Page 19
Apr
May
Jun
Table 2.3 - Received, by procedure type
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
456
482
Written Representations %
74%
76%
89
90
14%
14%
69
61
11%
10%
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
174
322
36
58
21%
18%
55
51
22
15
40%
29%
46
42
14
17
30%
40%
Hearing
Hearing %
Inquiry
Inquiry %
Table 2.4 - Decided, by procedure type
Decided
Allowed
1
% allowed
Decided
Hearing
Allowed
1
% allowed
Decided
Inquiry
Allowed
1
% allowed
 - Allowed = Planning permission granted + Quashed on legal grounds
Page 20
Statistical Report: England - Listed Building/Conservation Area Consent appeals
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
192
160
11
15
Decided
152
136
Allowed
50
47
33%
35%
Received
Withdrawn
% Allowed
Statistical Report: England - Listed Building/Conservation Area Enforcement
appeals
Table 3.2 - Received, withdrawn, decided, Notice upheld
Received
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
27
18
3
2
10
14
6
6
60%
43%
Withdrawn
Decided
Notice Upheld
% of Notices Upheld
(Note: Notice Upheld = Notice Invalid or Upheld).
Page 21
Statistical Report: England - Lawful Development Certificate appeals
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
126
96
Withdrawn
29
15
Decided
52
56
Allowed
18
26
35%
46%
Received
% Allowed
Statistical Report: England - Advertisement appeals
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
210
144
11
15
Decided
155
111
Allowed
4
0
Allowed in part
9
6
37
26
32%
29%
Received
Withdrawn
Allowed with conditions
% Allowed, allowed in part or with conditions
Page 22
Statistical Report: England - Rights of Way Orders
Table 3.5 - Submitted, decided, confirmed
Public Path Orders
Orders submitted
Decisions
1
Confirmed (with or without modifications)
1
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
21
27
35
22
28
14
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
11
17
12
7
4
6
- includes rejected orders
Definitive Map Appeal/Direction Schedule 14
Orders submitted
Decisions
1
1
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
- includes rejected orders and Old & New Schedule 14 Appeals
Statistical Report: England - Land Compensation appeals
Table 3.6 - Received, withdrawn, decided
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
Received
0
Withdrawn
0
Decided/Report Submitted
1
Note
1-
Planning Inspectorate no longer decides Land Compensation appeals
Page 23
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
Note 1
Statistical Report: England - Purchase Notice appeals
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
Received
2
0
Withdrawn
0
0
Decided
0
0
Statistical Report: England - Environmental appeals
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
Received
8
13
Withdrawn
1
7
Decided
5
3
Page 24
Statistical Report: England - High Hedges appeals
Received
Withdrawn
Decided
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
28
14
0
4
13
11
Statistical Report: England - Tree Preservation appeals
Received
Withdrawn
Decided
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
172
152
18
23
142
116
Page 25
Statistical Report: England - Local Development Plans
Table 3.11a - Submitted, withdrawn, reports issued (2012/13 Qtr 4)
Date final report
issued
Outcome
(Sound/Unsound/
Withdrawn)
Assoc of Gt Manchester Authorities - Minerals Plan
18/01/2013
Sound
Blaby DC - Local Plan (Core Strategy 2)
12/02/2013
Sound
01/03/2013
Withdrawn
09/01/2013
Sound
04/02/2013
Sound
17/01/2013
Withdrawn
08/03/2013
Sound
Local Planning Authority & Plan Title
Date submitted
Bournemouth Dorset & Poole - Minerals Core Strategy
30/01/2013
Christchurch & E Dorset - Core Strategy
15/03/2013
Coventry - Core Strategy
Dudley MBC - Halesowen AAP
08/02/2013
Dudley MBC - Stourbridge AAP
08/02/2013
Ealing Council - Development Management
25/02/2013
Ealing Council - Development Sites
25/02/2013
East Sussex, South Downs NPA & Brighton & Hove - Waste &
Minerals Plan
Greater Norwich Partnership - Joint Core Strategy
04/02/2013
Hammersmith & Fulham - Development Management
Hart - Local Plan Core Strategy
28/03/2013
Hull City Council - Core Strategy
Kensington & Chelsea - Core Strategy Review - Protection of Public
Houses
01/02/2013
Lake District NPA - Allocations Of Land
15/03/2013
Lake District NPA - Minerals Safeguarding Areas
15/03/2013
LB of Lewisham - Site Allocations
Lichfield - Local Plan
22/03/2013
Page 26
Table 3.11a - Submitted, withdrawn, reports issued (2012/13 Qtr 4)
Date final report
issued
Outcome
(Sound/Unsound/
Withdrawn)
Merseyside & Halton - Joint Waste Plan
04/03/2013
Sound
Mid Suffolk - Stowmarket AAP
12/02/2013
Sound
North London Authorities - North London Waste Plan
14/03/2013
Unsound
02/01/2013
Sound
Somerset CC - Waste CS
09/01/2013
Sound
South Kesteven - Grantham AAP
30/01/2013
Withdrawn
Staffordshire & Stoke - Joint Waste CS
04/02/2013
Sound
Tamworth - Local Plan
19/03/2013
Withdrawn
Wiltshire & Swindon - Aggregate Minerals Site Allocations
05/02/2013
Sound
Winchester & S.Downs NPA - Joint Core Strategy
11/02/2013
Sound
Date submitted
North Warwickshire BC - Core Strategy
28/02/2013
Nottingham City & Nottinghamshire CC - Waste Core Strategy
14/01/2013
Oxford City Council - Sites & Housing
Richmondshire - Core Strategy
25/02/2013
South Somerset DC - Local Plan
21/01/2013
Southwark - Peckham & Nunhead AAP
26/03/2013
Waverley - Core Strategy
31/01/2013
West Sussex - Waste Plan
26/03/2013
Westminster - Core Strategy - NPPF Revision
25/01/2013
Page 27
Table 3.11b - Submitted, withdrawn, reports issued (2013/14 Qtr 1)
Date submitted
Outcome
Date final report
(Sound/Unsound/
issued
Withdrawn)
Ashford - Chilmington Green AAP
20/05/2013
Sound
Bedford - Allocations & designations
28/06/2013
Sound
Bracknell Forest - Site Allocations
17/06/2013
Sound
24/06/2013
Sound
Chesterfield - Core Strategy
19/06/2013
Sound
Dartmoor NPA - Development Management & Delivery
10/06/2013
Sound
Hampshire CC - Minerals & Waste Plan
23/05/2013
Sound
Harrow - Development Management Policies
28/05/2013
Sound
Harrow - Harrow & Wealdstone AAP
28/05/2013
Sound
Harrow - Site Allocations
28/05/2013
Sound
Islington - Development Management Policies
17/06/2013
Sound
Islington - Site Specific Allocations
17/06/2013
Sound
Brighton & Hove - City Plan
27/06/2013
Camden - Fitzrovia AAP
18/04/2013
Camden - Site Allocations
Cannock Chase - Local Plan Pt 1
31/05/2013
Chelmsford - Core Strategy Focussed Review
09/04/2013
Gravesham - Core Strategy
22/05/2013
Greater Nottingham (Gedling, Broxtowe & Nottingham City) Aligned Core Strategies
07/06/2013
Hertfordshire CC - Waste Site Allocations
24/06/2013
Page 28
Kirklees - Core Strategy
Date submitted
Outcome
Date final report
(Sound/Unsound/
issued
Withdrawn)
02/04/2013
Lancashire CC, Blackpool & Blackburn with Darwen - M&W Site
Allocations & DM Policies
10/06/2013
Sound
LB of Islington - Finsbury Local Plan
30/04/2013
Sound
Melton - Core Strategy
19/04/2013
Withdrawn
Milton Keynes - Core Strategy
29/05/2013
Sound
Newark & Sherwood - Allocations & Development Management
17/05/2013
Sound
28/05/2013
Sound
Selby - Core Strategy
20/06/2013
Sound
Shepway - Core Strategy
10/06/2013
Sound
Leeds - Core Strategy
25/04/2013
North Somerset - Core Strategy (re-opened examination)
17/06/2013
North West Leicestershire - Core Strategy
24/06/2013
Norwich City - Development Management Policies
16/04/2013
Norwich City - Site Allocations
16/04/2013
Richmond Upon Thames - Twickenham AAP
Rochdale - Core Strategy
31/05/2013
Rochford - Allocations
18/04/2013
Rochford - Hockley AAP
18/04/2013
Rotherham - Core Strategy
06/06/2013
South Worcestershire - Development Plan
28/05/2013
Page 29
Date submitted
Suffolk Coastal - Core Strategy
Outcome
Date final report
(Sound/Unsound/
issued
Withdrawn)
06/06/2013
Sound
29/05/2013
Sound
12/06/2013
Sound
Wycombe - Delivery & Site Allocations
20/06/2013
Sound
Wyre Forest - Kidderminster Central AAP
20/05/2013
Sound
Wyre Forest - Site Allocations & Policies
20/05/2013
Sound
Swindon - Local Plan
28/06/2013
Teignbridge - Local Plan
20/06/2013
Three Rivers - Development Management Policies
Three Rivers - Site Allocations
20/06/2013
Warwickshire - Waste CS
West Dorset, Weymouth & Portland - Local Plan
24/06/2013
Page 30
Statistical Report: England - Transport & associated appeals
Table 3.12 - Reports issued
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
Nil
1
Local authority side road and compulsory purchase
orders, stopping up of highways
5
4
Transport & Works Act
3
1
Trunk road and Motorway orders
Nil
1
Cycle Track/Footpaths
Nil
Nil
Toll Review Orders
Nil
Nil
Department of Energy and Climate Change cases
Nil
Nil
Local Authority Traffic regulation orders
Nil
Nil
Cattle Grids
Nil
Nil
Orders linked to Nuclear Power Station (DECC & MMO
but including TWA Order)
Nil
Nil
DfT Stopping up of Highway, Compulsory Purchase
Order and creating of a Bridge
Nil
Nil
Advert Order - Areas of Special Control
Nil
1
Railway Crossing Orders
Nil
Nil
Order Type
Harbour Revision Order
Page 31
Statistical Report: England - Commons related casework
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
Commons Act 2006: Section 16
0
0
17
19
Commons Act 2006: Part 1
10
2
Law of Property Act 1925: Section 194
0
0
Law of Property Act 1925: Section 193 Orders of limitations
0
0
Inclosure Act 1845: Section 147
0
0
Acquisition of Land Act 1981: Section 19 and Schedule 1
0
0
National Trust Act 1971: Section 23
1
0
Greater London Parks & Open Spaces Order 1967
0
0
Approval of Commons Levy Rates
1
0
Other
0
0
Total
29
21
Received
Page 32
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Other
0
0
Total
2
2
Withdrawn
Page 33
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
4
2
14
15
6
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
3
1
1
0
1
Other
0
0
Total
27
28
Decided
Page 34
Statistical Report: England - Wildlife & Countryside Act: Definitive Map Modification
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
55
34
0
0
38
41
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
19
23
Hearings
2
5
Inquiries
17
13
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
23
24
Not confirmed
8
11
Decision not issued (Proposed Modifications) 1
7
6
Definitive Map Orders schedule 15
Received
Withdrawn
Decided
Table 3.15 - Decided, by procedure
Table 3.16 - Decided, by outcome
 - Where Inspector has proposed changes but a decision hasn't been issued
Page 35
Statistical Report: England - Secretary of State Casework
Table 3.17 - Called in Planning Applications
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
Cases2
Appeals
Cases2
Appeals
Planning applications Called In
(Applications covered by those reports)1
3
5
0
0
Withdrawn
0
0
0
0
Inspector reports issued to CLG
(Applications covered by those reports)
1
1
1
1
Reports submitted to CLG by agreed date
1
100%
1
100%
CLG decisions issued
(Applications covered by those decisions)
0
0
1
2
Applications decided in accord with Inspector recommendation
0
N/A
1
100%
Note A: The figures for CLG decisions issued and whether they accorded with the Inspector's recommendation, relate to the original decision
issued by the Secretary of State and does not take into account any revised decision arising from subsequent High Court Challenges.
Note B: The figures for Reports submitted to CLG by the agreed date are measured against any revised date that may have been agreed due to
unforeseen circumstances such as Inspector illness.
1
- Call-ins are planning applications that the Secretary of State (for Communities and Local Government) has decided to determine himself,
rather than a local planning authority, under the powers contained in Section 77 of the Town and Country Planning Act. Additionally, some listed
building/conservation area consent applications are called in under the powers contained in Section 12 of the Planning (Listed Buildings and
2-
A single case can comprise 1 or more appeals
Page 36
Statistical Report: England - Secretary of State Casework
Table 3.18 - Recovered Planning and Enforcement Appeals
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
Received
Withdrawn
Cases2
Appeals
Cases2
Appeals
Planning
24
25
27
36
Enforcement
1
5
1
2
Planning
3
3
1
2
Enforcement
0
0
0
0
Inspector reports issued to CLG
Appeals covered by those reports
19
9
Planning
20
9
Enforcement
14
0
Reports submitted to CLG by agreed date
14
CLG decisions issued
Appeals covered by those decisions
Appeals decided in accord with Inspector
recommendation
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
74%
7
78%
6
8
Planning
6
13
Enforcement
0
10
Planning
5
83%
11
85%
Enforcement
0
N/A
10
100%
Note A: The number of recovered appeals received within the financial year will not correspond to the numbers offered or opened in target or
issued to CLG.
Note B: The figures for CLG decisions issued and whether they accorded with the Inspector's recommendation, relate to the original decision
issued by the Secretary of State and does not take into account any revised decision arising from subsequent High Court Challenges.
Note C: The figures for Reports submitted to CLG by the agreed date are measured against any revised date that may have been agreed due to
unforseen circumstances such as Inspector illness.
2-
A single case can comprise 1 or more appeals
Page 37
Statistical Report: England - Costs applications
Table 4.1 - Decisions, awards
Inspector cases
Decided Cost Applications
Appellant
Against
LPA
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
311
358
Vol
% of Total
Vol
% of Total
Full
12
3.9%
9
2.5%
Partial
13
4.2%
8
2.2%
Refused
22
7.1%
35
9.8%
Full
73
23.5%
70
19.6%
Partial
16
5.1%
31
8.7%
159
51.1%
204
57.0%
Full
0
-
0
-
Partial
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
Refused
0
0.0%
1
0.3%
Refused
Other party
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
Page 38
Secretary of State cases
Other party
39
Vol
% of Total
2
3.5%
1
2.6%
15
26.3%
9
23.1%
8
14.0%
4
10.3%
13
22.8%
10
25.6%
Partial
9
15.8%
11
28.2%
Refused
9
15.8%
4
10.3%
Full
0
-
0
-
Partial
1
1.8%
0
-
Refused
0
0.0%
0
0.0%
Partial
Full
LPA
57
% of Total
Refused
Against
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
Vol
Full
Appellant
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
Page 39
All Cases
Appellant
Against
LPA
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
352
397
Vol
% of Total
Vol
% of Total
Full
14
4.0%
10
2.5%
Partial
28
8.0%
17
4.3%
Refused
30
8.5%
39
9.8%
Full
86
24.4%
80
20.2%
Partial
25
7.1%
42
10.6%
168
47.7%
208
52.4%
Full
0
-
0
-
Partial
1
0.3%
0
0.0%
Refused
0
0.0%
1
0.3%
Refused
Other party
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
Page 40
Statistical Report: England - Quality
Table 4.2 - Decisions challenged, results, propensity to challenge
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
14
19
Enforcement appeals
9
12
Other
3
2
Total
26
33
Planning appeals (inc HAS from 09/10)
6
6
Enforcement appeals
3
4
Other
3
1
Total
12
11
43%
32%
Enforcement appeals
33%
33%
Other
100%
50%
Total
46%
33%
1 in 273
1 in 159
1 in 31
1 in 23
High Court Challenges
Decisions challenged
Decisions quashed
Decisions quashed as
percentage of decisions
challenged
Propensity to challenge
(England)
Enforcement appeals
Page 41
Statistical Report: England - Quality
Table 4.3 - Inspector Complaints received, outcome
Complaints
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
471
345
Enforcement appeals
26
52
Other
38
40
Total
535
437
14
18
Enforcement appeals
0
3
Other
3
0
Total
17
21
3.0%
5.2%
Enforcement appeals
0.0%
5.8%
Other
7.9%
0.0%
Total
3.2%
4.8%
Complaints
Complaints received
Justified complaints
Justified complaints as
percentage of complaints
received
Page 42
Introduction - Decided appeals: by Inspector
1. The tables show the percentage of s78 planning and s174 enforcement appeals allowed and dismissed by each Inspector. Inspectors who dealt with at
least one case in the periods shown are included in the following tables.
2. This report presents data for England. Some Inspectors work in both England and Wales and, if that is the case, this report has been compiled with
reference to their England cases only.
3. We deal with our casework following the principles of fairness, openness and impartiality. Our decisions take account of:
• published national, regional and local policies,
• relevant planning issues and material considerations; and
• the views of all the parties.
4. Inspectors are bound by the Inspectors' Code of Conduct, which can be found at
http://www.planningportal.gov.uk/uploads/pins/advice_for_inspectors/code_of_conduct.pdf
5. Please note that this data is compiled from individual appeal records, and the percentage will be impacted by a number of factors, including those listed
below.
Important information:
For the reasons below, the tables must not be treated as any sort of ‘league table’.
Please note that the Planning Inspectorate will not entertain a challenge to the appointment of any Inspector on the basis of this data.
 All cases are considered on their individual merits, and on the basis of the evidence submitted.
 Targets are not set for the percentage of allowed and dismissed cases.
 Inspectors do not select their own casework, and all Inspectors work on a variety of case types.
 Casework is allocated to Inspectors on the best balance of availability, geography, casework level and expertise. This may produce apparent patterns
of outcome that are in fact artefacts of the way work is allocated and do not provide evidence as to an Inspector's fitness for or approach to a particular
case.
 Inspectors handle different numbers of cases in a year – some dealing with as few as one which would give a result of 100% allowed or 100%
dismissed. All instances in the following tables where the result is in whole percentage points are likely to be a result of a very small number of cases.
 Inspectors are rigorously trained to ensure that they develop and maintain the skills necessary to undertake the work that they are given. These
skills will influence the type of cases they deal with.
 Some appeals are linked together as they relate to the same or similar development on the same site – where this is the case it is likely that they will
have a similar outcome, but each has been treated separately for the production of the percentages.
 The Inspectorate has an exacting Ministerial target which requires all casework to be 99% free from justified complaint or legal challenge.
Page 43
Statistical Report: England - Decided appeals: by Inspector
Table 5.1a - Planning appeals (2012/13 Qtr 4)
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
4
0
25%
0
12
75%
16
10
0
36%
0
18
64%
28
Ammoun Victor F
1
0
50%
0
1
50%
2
Amos Gideon
2
0
40%
0
3
60%
5
Anstey Christopher J
1
0
33%
0
2
67%
3
Armstrong Jennifer
2
0
14%
0
12
86%
14
Arrowsmith George
3
1
27%
0
11
73%
15
Asquith Philip James
10
0
56%
0
8
44%
18
Baird S R George
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Baker Karen L
1
0
10%
0
9
90%
10
Ball Colin John
1
0
33%
0
2
67%
3
Barnes David
14
0
38%
0
23
62%
37
Barnett Bruce
4
0
57%
0
3
43%
7
Barrett Roisin
2
0
7%
0
25
93%
27
Barton Kenneth D
8
0
57%
0
6
43%
14
Bell-Williamson John Robert
9
1
50%
0
10
50%
20
12
1
100%
0
0
0%
13
Berkeley Simon
2
0
29%
0
5
71%
7
Biggers Peter
4
0
29%
0
10
71%
14
Bird Peter S F
1
0
20%
0
4
80%
5
14
1
39%
0
23
61%
38
Board Deborah
2
0
14%
0
12
86%
14
Borman Marion
0
0
0%
0
2
100%
2
Finalised
Aldous Michael F
Allan John D
Benson Elaine
Birkinshaw Matthew
Page 44
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
1
0
7%
0
13
93%
14
Boyd Ron
13
0
45%
0
16
55%
29
Braithwaite John Edward
17
0
57%
0
13
43%
30
Brier David H
1
0
100%
0
0
0%
1
Brookes Martin
1
0
9%
0
10
91%
11
Brooks Robin P
6
0
40%
0
9
60%
15
Brown Stephen
0
1
100%
0
0
0%
1
Burden Wendy J
4
1
62%
0
3
38%
8
Burrows Nigel
0
0
0%
0
10
100%
10
Campbell Bridget M
1
0
100%
0
0
0%
1
Carr Emilie
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Champion Martin A
3
0
21%
0
11
79%
14
Chase John
3
0
43%
0
4
57%
7
Checkley Christopher J
5
0
29%
0
12
71%
17
12
2
29%
0
35
71%
49
Clark Julie
1
0
17%
0
5
83%
6
Clark Paul
3
0
75%
0
1
25%
4
Clegg Richard
2
0
25%
0
6
75%
8
Clews Roger
3
0
38%
0
5
62%
8
Coffey Lesley
9
0
56%
0
7
44%
16
Colebourne Sarah
3
0
43%
0
4
57%
7
Cook Brian
3
0
27%
0
8
73%
11
Cookson Trevor
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Finalised
Bowden Christopher
Cheesley Janet L
Page 45
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
14
3
50%
0
17
50%
34
Cresswell Colin
0
0
0%
0
8
100%
8
Croft Michael J
3
1
33%
0
8
67%
12
Crosby Louise
7
0
54%
0
6
46%
13
Crysell Paul
1
0
8%
0
12
92%
13
Cullingford David R
7
0
28%
1
17
72%
25
Dakeyne Mark
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Dale Andrew John
10
0
45%
0
12
55%
22
Davison Anthony J
5
0
62%
0
3
38%
8
Dean Roger G
6
0
43%
0
8
57%
14
Deane Gary
10
4
27%
0
37
73%
51
Dignan Paul
3
0
43%
0
4
57%
7
12
0
35%
0
22
65%
34
Doward Beverley
6
1
41%
0
10
59%
17
Down Karen E
1
0
17%
0
5
83%
6
Downes Christina
1
1
15%
0
11
85%
13
18
0
47%
0
20
53%
38
Dudley Graham C
5
2
35%
0
13
65%
20
Eagles Jeremy
6
0
46%
0
7
54%
13
Eggleton Peter
8
0
47%
0
9
53%
17
Ellis James
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Ellison Kathleen
5
0
56%
0
4
44%
9
Evans Lynne Judith
9
1
42%
0
14
58%
24
Finalised
Cramond J Douglas
Dobsen Paul E
Drew Peter
Page 46
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
Evans Michael William
2
1
19%
0
13
81%
16
Evans Roderick O
2
0
50%
0
2
50%
4
Fabian Wenda
2
1
38%
0
5
62%
8
Fairclough Alexandra
0
1
33%
0
2
67%
3
Farish E Norma
2
0
14%
0
12
86%
14
Felgate John
2
0
50%
0
2
50%
4
Fieldhouse Elizabeth M
3
0
17%
0
15
83%
18
13
1
40%
0
21
60%
35
Fitzsimon David
5
1
15%
0
35
85%
41
Foster Roy S
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
14
0
37%
0
24
63%
38
Freeman Nicholas Paul
4
0
33%
0
8
67%
12
Frost Christopher Ronald
6
1
78%
0
2
22%
9
Fussey Antony
0
0
0%
0
6
100%
6
10
0
36%
0
18
64%
28
German Julie
7
0
64%
0
4
36%
11
Gethin Christopher J
2
0
25%
0
6
75%
8
Ghafoor Ahsan
4
0
29%
0
10
71%
14
Grace Edward C
6
0
46%
0
7
54%
13
Graham Jessica
3
0
50%
0
3
50%
6
Grainger Philip
1
0
25%
0
3
75%
4
Grantham Rupert William Neil
2
0
15%
0
11
85%
13
Gray John L
9
0
47%
0
10
53%
19
Finalised
Fieldhouse William
Fox Mike
Garnham Graham Martin
Page 47
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
Greenwood J Les
5
0
25%
0
15
75%
20
Gregory Julia
2
0
12%
0
15
88%
17
Gresty Jeremy
4
0
33%
0
8
67%
12
Griffiths Paul
3
0
33%
0
6
67%
9
13
0
72%
0
5
28%
18
Hall Stuart
5
0
26%
0
14
74%
19
Hammond Andrew
2
0
33%
0
4
67%
6
Hand Simon
11
0
58%
0
8
42%
19
Harmston David A
10
1
38%
0
18
62%
29
Harrison Nigel
10
0
71%
0
4
29%
14
Harwood Andrew
3
0
50%
0
3
50%
6
Hellier Bern
3
1
57%
0
3
43%
7
Hetherington Michael
4
1
36%
0
9
64%
14
Heywood Susan
1
1
100%
0
0
0%
2
Higenbottam Hilda
2
0
50%
0
2
50%
4
High Richard
3
0
33%
0
6
67%
9
Hill Elizabeth
3
1
44%
0
5
56%
9
Hill Geoffrey
3
0
25%
0
9
75%
12
Hill Zoe H
1
0
10%
0
9
90%
10
Hogger David
9
1
40%
0
15
60%
25
Holden Sheila
5
0
26%
0
14
74%
19
Holland Keith E B
0
0
0%
0
4
100%
4
Holland Susan
0
0
0%
0
5
100%
5
Finalised
Hainsworth David A
Page 48
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
16
0
52%
0
15
48%
31
Hollox Richard E
0
0
0%
0
3
100%
3
Hoult Chris
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Hughes Andrew C
6
1
44%
0
9
56%
16
Isaac Gareth
3
0
50%
0
3
50%
6
Jackson Paul
7
0
41%
0
10
59%
17
Jagger James Mansell
8
0
53%
0
7
47%
15
Jarratt Peter
2
1
27%
0
8
73%
11
Jarvis Philippa
4
2
32%
0
13
68%
19
Jenkins Ian
5
1
38%
0
10
62%
16
Jeyes Andrew
3
0
14%
0
19
86%
22
12
2
44%
0
18
56%
32
Jordan Anne
1
0
10%
0
9
90%
10
Joyce Martin J
1
0
20%
0
4
80%
5
Kaiserman David S
9
0
36%
0
16
64%
25
King Jonathan George
8
1
53%
0
8
47%
17
Kingaby Jill C
1
0
33%
0
2
67%
3
Kirby Rosalyn
4
0
31%
0
9
69%
13
Kirkbride Clive
6
2
67%
0
4
33%
12
Lawrence Elizabeth A
8
1
26%
0
26
74%
35
Lea Alison
5
0
45%
0
6
55%
11
Leeming David B
18
1
76%
0
6
24%
25
Leigh Christian J
9
0
47%
0
10
53%
19
Finalised
Hollington Gerald M
Jones Gwilym Powys
Page 49
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
Lewis Diane
1
1
50%
0
2
50%
4
Linihan Nicola
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Linscott Benedict M
2
0
67%
0
1
33%
3
Lock Hilary
4
0
22%
0
14
78%
18
Lucas - Gosnold Victoria
7
0
39%
0
11
61%
18
Lyman Anthony
2
1
15%
0
17
85%
20
Lyons Brendan
8
0
32%
0
17
68%
25
Machin Douglas P
4
0
57%
0
3
43%
7
Mahoney Frances M
4
2
43%
0
8
57%
14
16
0
50%
0
16
50%
32
Major Philip John
8
0
40%
0
12
60%
20
Manning Keith
7
0
58%
0
5
42%
12
Mapson George
2
0
33%
0
4
67%
6
Marshall Robert John
5
0
25%
0
15
75%
20
Mattocks John
3
0
60%
0
2
40%
5
McCoy Richard
1
1
17%
0
10
83%
12
McCretton Isobel C
5
0
28%
0
13
72%
18
McFarlane Gloria
2
0
20%
0
8
80%
10
McGurk Nigel
5
0
24%
0
16
76%
21
McHugh Ian
7
0
33%
0
14
67%
21
McKay C Wendy
2
0
11%
0
17
89%
19
Metcalf Jim
1
0
7%
0
13
93%
14
Metcalfe Penelope A
8
0
57%
0
6
43%
14
Finalised
Maile Richard J
Page 50
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
4
0
50%
0
4
50%
8
Miles Jane
12
0
57%
0
9
43%
21
Miles Simon H
10
1
16%
0
56
84%
67
Millard John G
8
2
42%
0
14
58%
24
Moffoot Michael
11
1
38%
0
20
62%
32
Moon Richard W
7
1
33%
0
16
67%
24
Moore Michael
3
0
60%
0
2
40%
5
Morden Douglas E
2
0
25%
0
6
75%
8
Morgan David
10
0
40%
0
15
60%
25
Morgan Sara A
2
0
18%
0
9
82%
11
Munday William D
5
0
62%
0
3
38%
8
Murray David
2
1
18%
0
14
82%
17
Murray John
3
0
38%
0
5
62%
8
Muston Michael John
3
0
27%
0
8
73%
11
Napier - Derere Anne
13
1
40%
0
21
60%
35
Newmarch Christine
5
0
31%
0
11
69%
16
Nicholson David R
5
0
42%
0
7
58%
12
Nield Kevin
3
0
33%
0
6
67%
9
Nixon J Stuart
0
0
0%
0
12
100%
12
Novitzky Alan C
1
0
17%
0
5
83%
6
Nunn Matthew
9
2
50%
0
11
50%
22
Ord Elizabeth
2
0
50%
0
2
50%
4
O'Rourke Mary T
9
0
47%
0
10
53%
19
Finalised
Middleton Melvyn
Page 51
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
Papworth Stephen J
7
0
30%
0
16
70%
23
Partington Alison
6
0
35%
0
11
65%
17
Peerless Katharine J
4
0
36%
0
7
64%
11
Perrins Richard
2
0
33%
0
4
67%
6
Phillimore Terry G
9
0
45%
0
11
55%
20
Pike Martin J
3
0
60%
0
2
40%
5
Pinner David C
2
0
100%
0
0
0%
2
Poole Simon
4
0
22%
0
14
78%
18
Pope Neil
6
0
67%
0
3
33%
9
11
0
35%
0
20
65%
31
Pritchard Roger
1
0
20%
0
4
80%
5
Punshon Roland
4
0
80%
0
1
20%
5
Pykett Andrew Nicholas
1
0
33%
0
2
67%
3
Radcliffe Ian
4
0
57%
0
3
43%
7
Reed David
5
0
20%
0
20
80%
25
Reid Joanna C
5
0
33%
0
10
67%
15
Richards David Y B
2
0
17%
0
10
83%
12
Ridge Karen
3
1
44%
0
5
56%
9
10
0
50%
0
10
50%
20
Robins Michael
7
0
47%
0
8
53%
15
Robinson Alan Douglas
5
0
45%
0
6
55%
11
Rodgers Lloyd
4
0
31%
0
9
69%
13
Rogers Brian S
6
0
43%
0
8
57%
14
Finalised
Prentis David
Roberts Jonathan
Page 52
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
Roland Alison N
3
0
30%
0
7
70%
10
Rollings Glen
6
0
50%
0
6
50%
12
Roscoe Stephen
5
0
42%
0
7
58%
12
Rose David M H
3
0
100%
0
0
0%
3
Russell Jean L
1
0
50%
0
1
50%
2
Sargent Jeremy
3
1
31%
0
9
69%
13
Seaton Martin
3
0
33%
0
6
67%
9
Seddon Martin
10
0
50%
0
10
50%
20
Sheffield Kay
8
0
40%
0
12
60%
20
Sherratt Claire
0
1
14%
0
6
86%
7
Shrimplin Roger C
5
0
31%
0
11
69%
16
Simpson Edward
3
0
18%
0
14
82%
17
Sims Brian J
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Single Martyn
11
0
52%
0
10
48%
21
Skippers Ann
4
1
33%
0
10
67%
15
Smith David
14
2
64%
0
9
36%
25
Smith Tracy
2
0
14%
0
12
86%
14
Snowdon Graham Edward
8
0
57%
0
6
43%
14
Spencer Olivia
4
0
36%
0
7
64%
11
Sproule Clive
2
0
22%
0
7
78%
9
Stephens Harold R
0
0
0%
0
4
100%
4
Stiles Jane Vanessa
1
0
9%
0
10
91%
11
Symons Gareth
6
0
50%
0
6
50%
12
Finalised
Page 53
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
Tamplin Sukie
3
1
14%
0
25
86%
29
Taylor Nicholas
15
1
53%
0
14
47%
30
Tempest Jennifer
3
0
21%
0
11
79%
14
Thickett Anthony
8
0
47%
0
9
53%
17
Thomas Christopher
2
0
22%
0
7
78%
9
Thomas Gwynedd P
1
0
33%
0
2
67%
3
Thomas Megan
4
0
27%
0
11
73%
15
Thorby Christine
3
0
38%
0
5
62%
8
Tokley Clive L
6
0
27%
0
16
73%
22
Trask Janice
2
0
12%
0
15
88%
17
Travers Mary F
0
0
0%
0
5
100%
5
Turner I Keith
0
0
0%
0
5
100%
5
Vyse Jennifer A
0
0
0%
0
2
100%
2
Warden David
3
0
25%
0
9
75%
12
Warder Simon John
9
0
33%
0
18
67%
27
Ware Phillip John Graham
2
0
20%
0
8
80%
10
Watson John
7
0
33%
0
14
67%
21
13
0
34%
0
25
66%
38
Wharton Anthony J
0
3
25%
0
9
75%
12
Whitehead Martin
8
0
42%
0
11
58%
19
Whitehead Patrick
2
0
100%
0
0
0%
2
Wilde John
9
0
50%
0
9
50%
18
Wildsmith David Andrew
7
1
57%
0
6
43%
14
Finalised
Westbrook John
Page 54
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
10
0
77%
0
3
23%
13
Williams Keri L
4
0
44%
0
5
56%
9
Willmer Philip
1
0
6%
0
15
94%
16
Willows Peter
6
0
27%
0
16
73%
22
Wood Alan
7
1
62%
0
5
38%
13
Wood Ava J
4
1
28%
0
13
72%
18
Wood Tim
4
0
22%
0
14
78%
18
Woolcock John F
5
0
36%
0
9
64%
14
Woolnough Alan
1
0
8%
0
12
92%
13
Worthington Elaine
7
0
32%
0
15
68%
22
Wright Raymond
7
0
41%
0
10
59%
17
Yorke Raymond John
5
0
62%
0
3
38%
8
Yuille Robert John
5
0
31%
0
11
69%
16
Finalised
Wilkinson Jacqueline
Page 55
Table 5.1b - Planning appeals (2013/14 Qtr 1)
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
Aldous Michael F
2
0
40%
0
3
60%
5
Allan John D
7
0
27%
0
19
73%
26
Ammoun Victor F
1
0
50%
0
1
50%
2
Amos Gideon
4
0
40%
0
6
60%
10
Andrews Martin
0
0
0%
0
2
100%
2
Anstey Christopher J
2
0
33%
0
4
67%
6
Armstrong Jennifer
2
0
29%
0
5
71%
7
Arrowsmith George
6
0
46%
0
7
54%
13
Asquith Philip James
4
0
50%
0
4
50%
8
Baird S R George
8
0
73%
0
3
27%
11
Baker Karen L
4
0
67%
0
2
33%
6
Ball Colin John
2
0
40%
0
3
60%
5
Barnes David
13
1
33%
0
28
67%
42
Barnett Bruce
1
0
33%
0
2
67%
3
Barrett Roisin
4
1
14%
0
31
86%
36
Barton Kenneth D
4
1
42%
0
7
58%
12
Bell-Williamson John Robert
4
2
35%
0
11
65%
17
Bennett Kim
3
0
75%
0
1
25%
4
Benson Elaine
3
0
30%
0
7
70%
10
Biggers Peter
6
0
38%
0
10
62%
16
Bird Peter S F
5
0
45%
0
6
55%
11
Birkinshaw Matthew
7
0
22%
0
25
78%
32
Board Deborah
9
0
36%
0
16
64%
25
Provisional
Page 56
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
Bowden Christopher
2
0
25%
0
6
75%
8
Boyd Ron
6
0
46%
0
7
54%
13
Boyland Alan R
1
0
10%
0
9
90%
10
7
0
64%
0
4
36%
11
Brier David H
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Brookes Martin
5
0
24%
0
16
76%
21
Brooks Robin P
1
0
33%
0
2
67%
3
Brown Stephen
0
0
0%
0
2
100%
2
Burden Wendy J
7
0
47%
0
8
53%
15
Burrows Nigel
0
0
0%
0
5
100%
5
Butcher Hayley
1
0
100%
0
0
0%
1
Campbell Bridget M
2
0
67%
0
1
33%
3
Champion Martin A
3
0
21%
0
11
79%
14
Chase John
4
0
50%
0
4
50%
8
Checkley Christopher J
9
0
53%
0
8
47%
17
Cheesley Janet L
7
1
17%
0
38
83%
46
Clark Julie
4
2
30%
0
14
70%
20
Clark Paul
2
0
40%
0
3
60%
5
Clegg Richard
2
0
50%
0
2
50%
4
Clews Roger
2
0
33%
0
4
67%
6
Coffey Lesley
2
0
50%
0
2
50%
4
Colebourne Sarah
1
0
17%
0
5
83%
6
Cook Brian
1
0
25%
0
3
75%
4
Provisional
Page 57
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0%
0
2
100%
2
18
1
53%
0
17
47%
36
Cresswell Colin
7
0
33%
0
14
67%
21
Croft Michael J
0
0
0%
0
4
100%
4
Crosby Louise
3
0
43%
0
4
57%
7
Cullingford David R
1
0
9%
0
10
91%
11
Dakeyne Mark
0
0
0%
0
3
100%
3
Dale Andrew John
2
0
25%
0
6
75%
8
Dean Roger G
1
0
20%
0
4
80%
5
Deane Gary
15
1
36%
0
28
64%
44
Dignan Paul
0
0
0%
0
2
100%
2
Dobsen Paul E
3
0
38%
0
5
62%
8
Dodd Brian
2
0
29%
0
5
71%
7
Dow Tracey
1
0
25%
0
3
75%
4
Doward Beverley
12
0
48%
0
13
52%
25
Downes Christina
4
0
50%
0
4
50%
8
Drew Peter
2
0
25%
0
6
75%
8
Dudley Graham C
1
0
20%
0
3
60%
5
12
0
30%
0
28
70%
40
Ellison Kathleen
6
1
100%
0
0
0%
7
Emerson Simon James
1
0
100%
0
0
0%
1
15
1
50%
0
16
50%
32
8
0
32%
0
17
68%
25
Provisional
Couper Chris
Cramond J Douglas
Eggleton Peter
Evans Lynne Judith
Evans Michael William
Page 58
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
Evans Roderick O
2
0
100%
0
0
0%
2
Fabian Wenda
3
0
33%
0
6
67%
9
Fairclough Alexandra
1
0
33%
0
2
67%
3
Farish E Norma
0
0
0%
0
3
100%
3
Felgate John
5
0
42%
0
7
58%
12
Fieldhouse Elizabeth M
3
0
43%
0
4
57%
7
13
0
37%
0
22
63%
35
Fitzsimon David
8
0
20%
0
32
80%
40
Foster Roy S
0
0
0%
0
3
100%
3
Fox Mike
3
0
38%
0
5
62%
8
1
1
67%
0
1
33%
3
Freer Paul
0
0
0%
0
3
100%
3
Garnham Graham Martin
5
0
29%
0
12
71%
17
German Julie
2
0
22%
0
7
78%
9
Ghafoor Ahsan
5
0
36%
0
9
64%
14
Glover Sue
6
0
55%
0
5
45%
11
Gould Grahame
0
0
0%
0
3
100%
3
Graham Jessica
5
0
62%
0
3
38%
8
Graham Laura
6
0
100%
0
0
0%
6
Grainger Philip
0
1
50%
0
1
50%
2
Gray John L
1
0
33%
0
2
67%
3
Greenwood J Les
5
0
36%
0
9
64%
14
Gregory Julia
8
0
47%
0
9
53%
17
Provisional
Fieldhouse William
Page 59
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
Gresty Jeremy
3
0
18%
0
14
82%
17
Griffiths Paul
4
0
24%
0
13
76%
17
Hainsworth David A
1
0
25%
0
3
75%
4
Hall Stuart
5
0
42%
0
7
58%
12
Hammond Andrew
1
0
50%
0
1
50%
2
Hand Simon
0
0
0%
0
10
100%
10
11
0
46%
0
13
54%
24
Harrison Nigel
5
1
75%
0
2
25%
8
Harwood Andrew
4
0
57%
0
3
43%
7
Hellier Bern
4
0
80%
0
1
20%
5
Hetherington Michael
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Higenbottam Hilda
3
1
50%
0
4
50%
8
Hill Geoffrey
7
0
33%
0
14
67%
21
Hill Zoe H
3
0
60%
0
2
40%
5
Hogger David
2
0
50%
0
2
50%
4
Holden Sheila
4
0
16%
0
21
84%
25
Holland Susan
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Hollington Gerald M
5
1
50%
0
6
50%
12
Hollox Richard E
3
0
30%
0
7
70%
10
Horridge Peter Granville
4
0
50%
0
4
50%
8
Hughes Andrew C
1
0
12%
0
7
88%
8
Hughes Catherine
0
0
0%
0
2
100%
2
Jackson Paul
5
0
50%
0
5
50%
10
Provisional
Harmston David A
Page 60
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
Jagger James Mansell
3
0
60%
0
2
40%
5
Jarratt Peter
2
0
100%
0
0
0%
2
Jarvis Philippa
2
0
40%
0
3
60%
5
Jenkins Ian
3
0
23%
0
10
77%
13
Jeyes Andrew
0
0
0%
0
2
100%
2
25
0
49%
0
26
51%
51
Jordan Anne
7
1
28%
0
21
72%
29
Joyce Martin J
0
1
25%
0
3
75%
4
13
0
34%
0
25
66%
38
Kirby Rosalyn
7
0
29%
0
17
71%
24
Kirkbride Clive
1
0
25%
0
3
75%
4
Lamont David
2
0
67%
0
1
33%
3
14
3
34%
0
33
66%
50
Lea Alison
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Leeming David B
6
0
43%
0
8
57%
14
Leigh Christian J
9
0
45%
0
11
55%
20
Lewis Diane
1
0
20%
0
4
80%
5
Linscott Benedict M
2
0
22%
0
7
78%
9
Lock Hilary
3
0
13%
0
20
87%
23
Lucas - Gosnold Victoria
5
0
29%
0
12
71%
17
Lyman Anthony
3
1
50%
0
4
50%
8
Lyons Brendan
6
0
40%
0
9
60%
15
Machin Douglas P
2
0
40%
0
3
60%
5
Provisional
Jones Gwilym Powys
Kaiserman David S
Lawrence Elizabeth A
Page 61
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
3
0
43%
0
4
57%
7
17
0
45%
0
21
55%
38
Major Philip John
3
0
30%
0
7
70%
10
Manning Keith
9
0
75%
0
3
25%
12
Mapson George
4
0
36%
0
7
64%
11
Marshall Robert John
4
0
27%
0
11
73%
15
Mattocks John
7
1
47%
0
9
53%
17
McCoy Richard
2
1
30%
0
7
70%
10
McCretton Isobel C
5
0
56%
0
4
44%
9
McFarlane Gloria
0
0
0%
0
4
100%
4
McGurk Nigel
5
0
15%
0
29
85%
34
McHugh Ian
5
2
32%
0
15
68%
22
McKay C Wendy
3
0
38%
0
5
62%
8
Mellor Robert
3
0
43%
0
4
57%
7
Metcalf Jim
3
0
21%
0
11
79%
14
Metcalfe Penelope A
2
0
20%
0
8
80%
10
Middleton Melvyn
2
0
50%
0
2
50%
4
Miles Jane
4
0
40%
0
6
60%
10
11
0
24%
0
35
76%
46
Moffoot Michael
8
1
29%
0
22
71%
31
Morden Douglas E
0
1
100%
0
0
0%
1
Morgan David
8
0
73%
0
3
27%
11
Morgan Sara A
1
0
33%
0
2
67%
3
Provisional
Mahoney Frances M
Maile Richard J
Miles Simon H
Page 62
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
Munday William D
3
0
38%
0
5
62%
8
Murray David
3
0
50%
0
3
50%
6
Murray John
1
0
100%
0
0
0%
1
Muston Michael John
1
0
8%
0
12
92%
13
Napier - Derere Anne
8
0
31%
0
18
69%
26
Newmarch Christine
6
1
44%
0
9
56%
16
Nield Kevin
4
1
50%
0
5
50%
10
Nixon J Stuart
3
0
50%
0
3
50%
6
Novitzky Alan C
1
0
100%
0
0
0%
1
Nunn Matthew
13
1
44%
0
18
56%
32
Ord Elizabeth
1
0
100%
0
0
0%
1
Papworth Stephen J
11
0
42%
0
15
58%
26
Partington Alison
18
2
56%
0
16
44%
36
0
0
0%
0
2
100%
2
Perrins Richard
1
0
25%
0
3
75%
4
Phillimore Terry G
2
1
43%
0
4
57%
7
Pinner David C
2
0
100%
0
0
0%
2
Poole Simon
3
1
18%
0
18
82%
22
Pope Neil
4
0
44%
0
5
56%
9
Pratt Stephen J
0
0
0%
0
4
100%
4
Prentis David
4
0
44%
0
5
56%
9
Pritchard Roger
4
1
71%
0
2
29%
7
Punshon Roland
1
0
25%
0
3
75%
4
Pykett Andrew Nicholas
2
0
33%
0
4
67%
6
Provisional
Page 63
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
Radcliffe Ian
1
1
33%
0
4
67%
6
Reed David
11
0
37%
0
19
63%
30
Reid Joanna C
4
0
40%
0
6
60%
10
Richards David Y B
4
0
67%
0
2
33%
6
Ridge Karen
3
1
44%
1
4
56%
9
Roberts Jonathan
5
1
43%
0
8
57%
14
Robins Michael
4
0
27%
0
11
73%
15
Robinson Alan Douglas
2
0
33%
0
4
67%
6
Rodgers Lloyd
1
0
50%
0
1
50%
2
Rogers Brian S
0
0
0%
0
2
100%
2
Roland Alison N
7
0
39%
0
11
61%
18
Rollings Glen
8
1
29%
0
22
71%
31
Roscoe Stephen
5
0
62%
0
3
38%
8
Rose David M H
4
0
29%
0
10
71%
14
Russell Jean L
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Sargent Jeremy
5
0
62%
0
3
38%
8
Seaton Martin
9
0
56%
0
7
44%
16
Seddon Martin
2
0
10%
0
19
90%
21
Sherratt Claire
1
0
50%
0
1
50%
2
Shrimplin Roger C
3
0
30%
0
7
70%
10
Simpson Susan
0
0
0%
0
2
100%
2
Single Martyn
6
0
27%
0
16
73%
22
Skippers Ann
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Smith David
8
0
50%
0
8
50%
16
Provisional
Page 64
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
Smith Tracy
0
0
0%
0
24
100%
24
Snowdon Graham Edward
6
1
47%
0
8
53%
15
Spencer Olivia
5
0
50%
0
5
50%
10
Sproule Clive
3
0
50%
0
3
50%
6
Stephens Harold R
0
0
0%
0
7
100%
7
Stiles Jane Vanessa
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Symons Gareth
4
0
80%
0
1
20%
5
Tamplin Sukie
13
1
38%
0
23
62%
37
Taylor Nicholas
14
1
37%
0
26
63%
41
Tempest Jennifer
4
0
14%
0
24
86%
28
Thickett Anthony
1
0
33%
0
2
67%
3
Thomas Christopher
2
1
60%
0
2
40%
5
Thomas Gwynedd P
5
2
78%
0
2
22%
9
Thomas Megan
4
0
57%
0
3
43%
7
Thompson Colin Alexander
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Thorby Christine
1
0
25%
0
3
75%
4
Tivey Christopher
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Tokley Clive L
5
0
56%
0
4
44%
9
Trask Janice
5
0
38%
0
8
62%
13
Travers Mary F
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Turner I Keith
0
0
0%
0
2
100%
2
Vickery David Richard
1
0
100%
0
0
0%
1
Provisional
Page 65
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
Vyse Jennifer A
9
0
39%
0
14
61%
23
Ward Kevin
0
0
0%
0
6
100%
6
Warden David
4
0
33%
0
8
67%
12
10
0
34%
0
19
66%
29
Ware Phillip John Graham
5
0
36%
0
9
64%
14
Watson John
4
0
36%
0
7
64%
11
Westbrook John
6
0
26%
0
17
74%
23
Wharton Anthony J
1
0
17%
0
5
83%
6
Whitehead Martin
4
0
29%
0
10
71%
14
Whitehouse Clive F B
1
0
50%
0
1
50%
2
Wilde John
2
0
100%
0
0
0%
2
Wildsmith David Andrew
1
0
20%
0
4
80%
5
Wilkinson Jacqueline
3
0
27%
0
8
73%
11
Williamson Steven
0
0
0%
0
2
100%
2
Willmer Philip
4
0
25%
0
12
75%
16
Willows Peter
3
0
15%
0
17
85%
20
Wood Alan
4
0
80%
0
1
20%
5
Wood Ava J
0
0
0%
0
10
100%
10
Wood Tim
6
0
26%
0
17
74%
23
Woolcock John F
0
0
0%
0
2
100%
2
Woolnough Alan
0
0
0%
0
3
100%
3
10
0
36%
0
18
64%
28
Wright Raymond
7
0
47%
0
8
53%
15
Yorke Raymond John
1
0
100%
0
0
0%
1
Yuille Robert John
0
0
0%
0
1
100%
1
Provisional
Warder Simon John
Worthington Elaine
Page 66
Table 5.2a - Enforcement appeals (2012/13 Qtr 4)
Finalised
Ammoun Victor F
Planning
permission
granted
1
Quashed on
Split Decision
Legal Grounds
0
0
% Allowed
Notice upheld
Notice varied
and upheld
Invalid
% dismissed
Total
100%
0
0
0
0%
1
Barnett Bruce
1
0
0
33%
1
1
0
67%
3
2
1
0
50%
1
2
0
50%
6
Brier David H
2
0
0
50%
0
2
0
50%
4
Brown Stephen
0
0
0
0%
2
1
0
100%
3
Burrows Nigel
0
0
0
0%
4
1
0
100%
5
Campbell Bridget M
0
1
0
100%
0
0
0
0%
1
Champion Martin A
1
0
0
100%
0
0
0
0%
1
Clews Roger
0
1
0
33%
2
0
0
67%
3
Cook Brian
0
1
1
29%
3
2
0
71%
7
Croft Michael J
0
0
0
0%
0
4
0
100%
4
Dale Andrew John
2
0
0
67%
1
0
0
33%
3
Dignan Paul
1
0
0
12%
7
0
0
88%
8
Drew Peter
0
2
0
29%
1
4
0
71%
7
Dudley Graham C
0
0
0
0%
1
1
0
100%
2
Evans Roderick O
0
0
0
0%
1
0
0
100%
1
1
1
0
29%
2
2
1
71%
7
Fussey Antony
1
1
0
100%
0
0
0
0%
2
Ghafoor Ahsan
2
0
0
17%
7
3
0
83%
12
Grainger Philip
2
0
0
50%
0
2
0
50%
4
Hainsworth David A
2
1
0
75%
0
1
0
25%
4
Hammond Andrew
0
0
0
0%
2
0
0
100%
2
Hand Simon
1
3
0
50%
2
2
0
50%
8
Harrison David
0
1
0
50%
0
0
1
50%
2
Higenbottam Hilda
0
3
0
33%
6
0
0
67%
9
Jarratt Peter
0
0
0
0%
3
0
0
100%
3
Jeyes Andrew
0
0
1
25%
2
1
0
75%
4
Joyce Martin J
0
0
0
0%
7
0
0
100%
7
Kirkbride Clive
3
0
0
60%
2
0
0
40%
5
Page 67
Finalised
Leeming David B
Planning
permission
granted
0
Quashed on
Split Decision
Legal Grounds
0
% Allowed
Notice upheld
Notice varied
and upheld
Invalid
% dismissed
Total
0
0%
1
2
0
100%
3
Lewis Diane
0
2
0
50%
0
2
0
50%
4
Mapson George
0
0
0
0%
0
1
0
100%
1
McFarlane Gloria
0
1
1
13%
5
8
0
87%
15
McKay C Wendy
0
1
0
12%
0
7
0
88%
8
Morgan Sara A
1
1
0
33%
3
1
0
67%
6
Murray David
1
1
0
33%
2
2
0
67%
6
Murray John
0
2
0
50%
2
0
0
50%
4
Nield Kevin
0
0
0
0%
0
3
0
100%
3
Novitzky Alan C
0
0
0
0%
0
1
0
100%
1
1
0
0
17%
2
3
0
83%
6
Perrins Richard
1
0
0
9%
10
0
0
91%
11
Pinner David C
0
0
0
0%
1
0
0
100%
1
Richards David Y B
1
0
0
50%
1
0
0
50%
2
Roberts Jonathan
2
0
0
50%
1
1
0
50%
4
Rogers Brian S
0
3
0
27%
4
4
0
73%
11
Russell Jean L
1
0
0
33%
1
1
0
67%
3
Sargent Jeremy
0
0
0
0%
2
0
0
100%
2
Sherratt Claire
1
0
0
33%
0
1
1
67%
3
Stiles Jane Vanessa
0
2
0
18%
8
0
0
73%
11
Symons Gareth
1
0
1
17%
9
1
0
83%
12
0
0
0
0%
0
1
0
100%
1
Turner I Keith
0
1
0
25%
1
2
0
75%
4
3
0
1
100%
0
0
0
0%
4
Williams Keri L
0
0
0
0%
3
3
1
100%
7
Willows Peter
0
0
0
0%
3
0
0
100%
3
Woolnough Alan
1
0
0
25%
2
1
0
75%
4
Page 68
Table 5.2b - Enforcement appeals (2013/14 Qtr 1)
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
Split
decision
% allowed
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
Ammoun Victor F
0
0
0
0%
1
0
0
100%
1
Barnett Bruce
0
0
0
0%
4
0
0
100%
4
4
0
0
20%
8
7
1
80%
20
Brier David H
2
0
0
100%
0
0
0
0%
2
Brown Stephen
0
0
0
0%
4
3
0
100%
7
Burrows Nigel
0
0
0
0%
2
3
0
100%
5
Campbell Bridget M
1
0
0
25%
0
3
0
75%
4
Champion Martin A
3
0
0
11%
19
5
0
89%
27
Clews Roger
0
1
0
25%
3
0
0
75%
4
Cook Brian
1
1
0
25%
5
1
0
75%
8
Croft Michael J
1
0
1
12%
9
5
0
88%
16
Dale Andrew John
3
0
0
16%
12
4
0
84%
19
Dignan Paul
2
0
0
40%
3
0
0
60%
5
Drew Peter
3
0
0
27%
5
3
0
73%
11
Dudley Graham C
0
0
0
0%
8
1
0
100%
9
Evans Roderick O
1
2
0
16%
0
16
0
84%
19
0
3
0
60%
1
1
0
40%
5
Ghafoor Ahsan
0
0
0
0%
3
4
0
100%
7
Grainger Philip
0
0
0
0%
1
6
0
100%
7
Hainsworth David A
1
2
1
21%
10
4
1
79%
19
Hammond Andrew
1
0
0
14%
3
3
0
86%
7
Hand Simon
1
1
0
40%
3
0
0
60%
5
Harrison David
0
1
0
100%
0
0
0
0%
1
Higenbottam Hilda
0
0
1
14%
6
0
0
86%
7
Provisional
Page 69
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
Split
decision
% allowed
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
Horridge Peter Granville
0
1
0
17%
4
1
0
83%
6
Jarratt Peter
1
0
0
100%
0
0
0
0%
1
Joyce Martin J
0
0
0
0%
7
1
0
100%
8
Kirkbride Clive
0
0
1
33%
2
0
0
67%
3
Leeming David B
2
1
0
43%
3
1
0
57%
7
Lewis Diane
1
0
0
33%
2
0
0
67%
3
Mapson George
0
0
0
0%
6
0
0
100%
6
McFarlane Gloria
0
0
0
0%
7
4
0
100%
11
McKay C Wendy
0
1
0
20%
3
1
0
80%
5
Morgan Sara A
1
6
0
88%
1
0
0
12%
8
Murray David
2
1
0
30%
2
5
0
70%
10
Murray John
1
0
0
25%
3
0
0
75%
4
Nicholson David R
0
0
0
0%
1
0
0
100%
1
Nield Kevin
1
0
0
25%
2
1
0
75%
4
Novitzky Alan C
3
0
0
60%
0
2
0
40%
5
0
1
0
33%
2
0
0
67%
3
Perrins Richard
2
0
0
33%
2
2
0
67%
6
Pinner David C
2
0
0
100%
0
0
0
0%
2
Richards David Y B
2
1
0
75%
1
0
0
25%
4
Roberts Jonathan
1
0
0
10%
5
4
0
90%
10
Rogers Brian S
1
0
0
100%
0
0
0
0%
1
Russell Jean L
0
0
0
0%
3
0
0
100%
3
Sargent Jeremy
0
0
0
0%
1
3
0
100%
4
Sherratt Claire
1
0
0
25%
1
2
0
75%
4
Provisional
Page 70
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
Split
decision
% allowed
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
Stiles Jane Vanessa
0
0
0
0%
2
0
0
100%
2
Symons Gareth
1
0
0
8%
4
7
0
92%
12
0
0
0
0%
1
0
0
100%
1
Turner I Keith
1
2
0
33%
5
1
0
67%
9
Wharton Anthony J
2
0
0
18%
3
6
0
82%
11
3
0
0
50%
3
0
0
50%
6
Williams Keri L
1
2
0
27%
1
7
0
73%
11
Willows Peter
1
0
0
25%
2
1
0
75%
4
Woolnough Alan
0
3
1
36%
4
3
0
64%
11
Provisional
Page 71
Statistical Report: England - Decided appeals: by local planning authority
Finalised
Adur District Council
Allerdale Borough Council
Amber Valley Borough Council
Arun District Council
Ashfield District Council
Ashford Borough Council
Aylesbury Vale District Council
Babergh District Council
Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council
Barrow-in- Furness Borough Council
Basildon District Council
Basingstoke and Deane Borough Council
Bassetlaw District Council
Bath and North East Somerset Council
Bedford Borough Council
Birmingham City Council
Blaby District Council
Blackburn with Darwen Borough Council
Blackpool Borough Council
Bolsover District Council
Bolton Metropolitan Borough Council
Borough of Poole Council
Boston Borough Council
Bournemouth Borough Council
Bracknell Forest Borough Council
Braintree District Council
Breckland Council
Brentwood Borough Council
Brighton and Hove City Council
Bristol City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
1
1
3
2
4
4
3
3
0
2
1
5
3
2
4
2
3
0
0
0
3
1
3
3
8
2
2
5
10
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
50%
100%
30%
50%
67%
36%
60%
50%
18%
20%
42%
29%
50%
29%
67%
60%
0%
0%
50%
33%
17%
33%
56%
33%
67%
35%
42%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
7
2
2
7
2
3
0
9
4
7
10
2
10
1
2
2
0
4
3
2
15
6
7
4
1
11
14
50%
0%
70%
50%
33%
64%
40%
50%
82%
80%
58%
71%
50%
71%
33%
40%
100%
100%
50%
67%
83%
67%
44%
67%
33%
65%
58%
0
2
1
10
4
6
11
5
6
0
11
5
12
14
4
14
3
5
2
0
4
6
3
18
9
16
6
3
17
24
Page 72
Finalised
Broadland District Council
Broads Authority
Bromsgrove District Council
Broxbourne Borough Council
Broxtowe Borough Council
Buckinghamshire County Council
Burnley Borough Council
Bury Metropolitan Borough Council
Calderdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Cambridge City Council
Cambridgeshire County Council
Cannock Chase District Council
Canterbury City Council
Carlisle City Council
Castle Point Borough Council
Central Bedfordshire
Charnwood Borough Council
Chelmsford Borough Council
Cheltenham Borough Council
Cherwell District Council
Cheshire East
Cheshire West and Chester
Chesterfield Borough Council
Chichester District Council
Chiltern District Council
Chorley Borough Council
Christchurch Borough Council
City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
City of Lincoln Council
City of London Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
2
0
3
3
0
0
0
2
0
4
0
1
4
3
1
3
1
3
1
3
11
4
0
3
4
0
4
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
33%
30%
43%
0%
0%
67%
0%
57%
33%
31%
75%
100%
38%
25%
38%
33%
38%
75%
36%
0%
23%
33%
0%
67%
16%
0%
50%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
4
0
7
4
2
0
1
1
5
3
0
2
9
1
0
5
3
5
2
5
4
7
1
10
8
4
2
15
1
1
67%
70%
57%
100%
100%
33%
100%
43%
67%
69%
25%
0%
62%
75%
62%
67%
62%
25%
64%
100%
77%
67%
100%
33%
84%
100%
50%
6
0
10
7
2
0
1
3
5
7
0
3
13
4
1
8
4
8
3
8
16
11
1
13
12
4
6
19
1
2
Page 73
Finalised
City of Westminster Council
City of York Council
Colchester Borough Council
Copeland Borough Council
Corby Borough Council
Cornwall Council
Cotswold District Council
Coventry City Council
Craven District Council
Crawley Borough Council
Cumbria County Council
Dacorum Borough Council
Darlington Borough Council
Dartford Borough Council
Dartmoor National Park Authority
Daventry District Council
Derby City Council
Derbyshire County Council
Derbyshire Dales District Council
Devon County Council
Doncaster Metropolitan Borough Council
Dorset County Council
Dover District Council
Dudley Metropolitan Borough Council
Durham County Council
East Cambridgeshire District Council
East Devon District Council
East Dorset District Council
East Hampshire District Council
East Hertfordshire District Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
8
5
2
0
2
10
3
2
1
1
0
3
3
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
2
6
3
2
4
1
12
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
25%
50%
67%
100%
43%
100%
33%
20%
100%
60%
43%
14%
0%
50%
0%
0%
50%
33%
33%
50%
75%
29%
40%
14%
57%
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23
5
1
0
0
13
0
4
4
0
0
2
4
6
3
1
4
0
6
0
1
0
4
4
7
1
5
6
6
9
75%
50%
33%
0%
57%
0%
67%
80%
0%
40%
57%
86%
100%
50%
100%
100%
50%
67%
67%
50%
25%
71%
60%
86%
43%
32
10
3
0
2
23
3
6
5
1
0
5
7
7
3
2
4
0
6
0
2
0
6
6
14
4
7
10
7
21
Page 74
Finalised
East Lindsey District Council
East Northamptonshire District Council
East Riding of Yorkshire Council
East Staffordshire Borough Council
East Sussex County Council
Eastbourne Borough Council
Eastleigh Borough Council
Eden District Council
Elmbridge Borough Council
Epping Forest District Council
Epsom and Ewell Borough Council
Erewash Borough Council
Essex County Council
Exeter City Council
Exmoor National Park Authority
Fareham Borough Council
Fenland District Council
Forest Heath District Council
Forest of Dean District Council
Fylde Borough Council
Gateshead Metropolitan Borough Council
Gedling Borough Council
Gloucester City Council
Gloucestershire County Council
Gosport Borough Council
Gravesham Borough Council
Great Yarmouth Borough Council
Guildford Borough Council
Halton Borough Council
Hambleton District Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
7
0
8
0
0
2
1
1
4
5
1
1
0
1
0
3
2
1
6
1
1
0
0
0
0
4
0
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
47%
0%
73%
0%
67%
20%
50%
27%
50%
17%
40%
0%
33%
43%
29%
50%
58%
50%
50%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
44%
67%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
2
3
1
0
1
4
1
11
5
5
3
1
2
0
4
5
1
5
1
1
1
1
0
1
8
1
5
1
4
53%
100%
27%
100%
33%
80%
50%
73%
50%
83%
60%
100%
67%
57%
71%
50%
42%
50%
50%
100%
100%
100%
67%
100%
56%
33%
100%
15
2
11
1
0
3
5
2
15
10
6
5
1
3
0
7
7
2
12
2
2
1
1
0
1
12
1
9
3
4
Page 75
Finalised
Hampshire County Council
Harborough District Council
Harlow District Council
Harrogate Borough Council
Hart District Council
Hartlepool Borough Council
Hastings Borough Council
Havant Borough Council
Herefordshire Council
Hertfordshire County Council
Hertsmere Borough Council
High Peak Borough Council
Hinckley and Bosworth Borough Council
Horsham District Council
Huntingdonshire District Council
Hyndburn Borough Council
Ipswich Borough Council
Isle of Wight Council
Kent County Council
Kettering Borough Council
King's Lynn and West Norfolk Borough Council
Kingston-Upon-Hull City Council
Kirklees Metropolitan Council
Knowsley Metropolitan Borough Council
Lake District National Park Authority
Lancashire County Council
Lancaster City Council
Leeds City Council
Leicester City Council
Leicestershire County Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
1
1
6
1
0
3
3
2
0
2
1
2
2
4
0
0
1
0
1
3
2
8
1
3
0
1
8
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
33%
33%
47%
33%
0%
43%
38%
29%
33%
33%
43%
20%
29%
0%
14%
33%
27%
40%
32%
50%
75%
17%
47%
33%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
8
2
2
4
5
10
0
4
2
4
8
10
0
2
6
0
2
8
3
17
1
1
0
5
9
2
0
67%
67%
53%
67%
100%
57%
62%
71%
67%
67%
57%
80%
71%
100%
86%
67%
73%
60%
68%
50%
25%
83%
53%
67%
-
0
3
3
15
3
2
7
8
14
0
6
3
7
10
14
0
2
7
0
3
11
5
25
2
4
0
6
17
3
0
Page 76
Finalised
Lewes District Council
Lichfield District Council
Lincolnshire County Council
Liverpool City Council
London Borough of Barking and Dagenham Council
London Borough of Barnet
London Borough of Bexley
London Borough of Brent
London Borough of Bromley
London Borough of Camden
London Borough of Croydon
London Borough of Ealing
London Borough of Enfield
London Borough of Hackney
London Borough of Hammersmith and Fulham
London Borough of Haringey
London Borough of Harrow
London Borough of Havering
London Borough of Hillingdon
London Borough of Hounslow
London Borough of Islington
London Borough of Lambeth
London Borough of Lewisham
London Borough of Merton
London Borough of Newham
London Borough of Redbridge
London Borough of Southwark
London Borough of Sutton
London Borough of Tower Hamlets
London Borough of Wandsworth
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
1
4
0
3
2
5
2
3
16
8
4
5
0
8
5
7
6
1
6
3
9
15
1
6
1
4
5
6
2
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
50%
100%
75%
22%
19%
33%
17%
34%
31%
11%
29%
0%
44%
42%
47%
33%
11%
29%
12%
37%
60%
11%
47%
100%
22%
42%
67%
25%
50%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
7
22
4
15
31
24
32
12
4
10
7
9
12
8
15
21
17
10
8
9
0
14
7
3
6
3
50%
0%
25%
78%
81%
67%
83%
66%
69%
89%
71%
100%
56%
58%
53%
67%
89%
71%
88%
63%
40%
89%
53%
0%
78%
58%
33%
75%
50%
2
4
0
4
9
27
6
18
47
35
36
17
4
18
12
17
18
9
21
24
27
25
9
17
1
18
12
9
8
6
Page 77
Finalised
London Legacy Development Corporation
London Thames Gateway Development Corporation
Luton Borough Council
Maidstone Borough Council
Maldon District Council
Malvern Hills District Council
Manchester City Council
Mansfield District Council
Medway Council
Melton Borough Council
Mendip District Council
Mid Devon District Council
Mid Suffolk District Council
Mid Sussex District Council
Middlesbrough Council
Milton Keynes Council
Milton Keynes Partnership
Mole Valley District Council
New Forest District Council
New Forest National Park Authority
Newark & Sherwood District Council
Newcastle Upon Tyne City Council
Newcastle-under-Lyme Borough Council
Norfolk County Council
North Devon District Council
North Dorset District Council
North East Derbyshire District Council
North East Lincolnshire Council
North Hertfordshire District Council
North Kesteven District Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
5
2
3
4
5
0
3
0
3
3
6
3
1
1
0
2
4
2
2
2
0
0
5
3
4
1
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
28%
25%
27%
36%
35%
0%
20%
0%
43%
38%
86%
43%
100%
25%
40%
24%
67%
50%
33%
0%
42%
80%
100%
25%
25%
57%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
13
6
8
7
11
1
12
3
4
5
1
4
0
3
0
3
13
1
2
4
1
0
7
1
0
3
3
3
72%
75%
73%
64%
65%
100%
80%
100%
57%
62%
14%
57%
0%
75%
60%
76%
33%
50%
67%
100%
58%
20%
0%
75%
75%
43%
0
0
18
8
11
11
17
1
15
3
7
8
7
7
1
4
0
5
17
3
4
6
1
0
12
5
4
4
4
7
Page 78
Finalised
North Lincolnshire Council
North Norfolk District Council
North Somerset Council
North Tyneside Council
North Warwickshire Borough Council
North West Leicestershire District Council
North York Moors National Park Authority
North Yorkshire County Council
Northampton Borough Council
Northamptonshire County Council
Northumberland County Council
Northumberland National Park Authority
Norwich City Council
Nottingham City Council
Nottinghamshire County Council
Nuneaton and Bedworth Borough Council
Oadby and Wigston Borough Council
Oldham Metropolitan Borough Council
Olympic Delivery Authority
Oxford City Council
Oxfordshire County Council
Peak District National Park Authority
Pendle Borough Council
Peterborough City Council
Plymouth City Council
Portsmouth City Council
Preston City Council
Purbeck District Council
Reading Borough Council
Redcar and Cleveland Borough Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
3
3
2
3
1
1
2
0
1
0
2
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
7
0
4
2
3
2
0
2
2
5
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
38%
60%
25%
60%
50%
33%
33%
14%
27%
0%
40%
33%
0%
44%
50%
40%
33%
29%
0%
20%
67%
56%
60%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
2
6
2
2
2
4
0
6
0
8
0
3
6
0
0
2
6
0
9
0
4
3
8
5
5
8
1
4
2
62%
40%
75%
40%
50%
67%
67%
86%
73%
100%
60%
67%
100%
56%
50%
60%
67%
71%
100%
80%
33%
44%
40%
8
5
8
5
4
3
6
0
7
0
11
0
3
10
0
0
3
6
0
16
0
8
5
12
7
5
10
3
9
5
Page 79
Finalised
Redditch Borough Council
Reigate and Banstead Borough Council
Ribble Valley Borough Council
Richmond Upon Thames London Borough Council
Richmondshire District Council
Rochdale Metropolitan Borough Council
Rochford District Council
Rossendale Borough Council
Rother District Council
Rotherham Metropolitan Borough Council
Royal Borough of Greenwich
Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea
Royal Borough of Kingston Upon Thames
Royal Borough of Windsor and Maidenhead
Rugby Borough Council
Runnymede Borough Council
Rushcliffe Borough Council
Rushmoor Borough Council
Rutland County Council
Ryedale District Council
Salford City Council
Sandwell Metropolitan Borough Council
Scarborough Borough Council
Sedgemoor District Council
Sefton Metropolitan Borough Council
Selby District Council
Sevenoaks District Council
Sheffield City Council
Shepway District Council
Shropshire County Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
1
3
4
10
1
2
1
1
1
2
4
6
5
3
3
3
4
0
1
1
1
2
1
6
1
1
2
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
21%
50%
43%
50%
50%
17%
25%
14%
33%
25%
25%
50%
25%
75%
50%
80%
33%
100%
25%
50%
50%
86%
50%
33%
18%
40%
0%
33%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
11
4
13
1
2
5
3
6
4
12
21
5
9
1
3
1
0
2
0
3
2
1
1
1
2
9
3
1
2
0%
79%
50%
57%
50%
50%
83%
75%
86%
67%
75%
75%
50%
75%
25%
50%
20%
67%
0%
75%
50%
50%
14%
50%
67%
82%
60%
100%
67%
1
14
8
23
2
4
6
4
7
6
16
28
10
12
4
6
5
0
3
1
4
4
2
7
2
3
11
5
1
3
Page 80
Finalised
Slough Borough Council
Solihull Metropolitan Borough Council
Somerset County Council
South Bucks District Council
South Cambridgeshire District Council
South Derbyshire District Council
South Downs National Park Authority
South Gloucestershire Council
South Hams District Council
South Holland District Council
South Kesteven District Council
South Lakeland District Council
South Norfolk District Council
South Northamptonshire District Council
South Oxfordshire District Council
South Ribble Borough Council
South Somerset District Council
South Staffordshire District Council
South Tyneside Council
Southampton City Council
Southend-on-Sea Borough Council
Spelthorne Borough Council
St Albans City Council
St Edmundsbury Borough Council
St Helens Metropolitan Borough Council
Stafford Borough Council
Staffordshire County Council
Staffordshire Moorlands District Council
Stevenage Borough Council
Stockport Metropolitan Borough Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
1
0
4
7
1
2
3
1
1
3
0
0
4
2
0
1
3
1
3
3
2
8
2
2
0
0
4
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
33%
45%
41%
25%
38%
30%
20%
17%
38%
17%
0%
40%
18%
0%
50%
43%
33%
33%
27%
33%
35%
40%
33%
0%
40%
33%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
0
6
10
3
5
7
4
5
5
5
2
6
9
4
1
4
2
6
8
4
15
3
4
2
0
6
0
2
100%
67%
55%
59%
75%
62%
70%
80%
83%
62%
83%
100%
60%
82%
100%
50%
57%
67%
67%
73%
67%
65%
60%
67%
100%
60%
67%
3
3
0
11
17
4
8
10
5
6
8
6
2
10
11
4
2
7
3
9
11
6
23
5
6
2
0
10
0
3
Page 81
Finalised
Stockton-on-Tees Borough Council
Stoke-on-Trent City Council
Stratford-on-Avon District Council
Stroud District Council
Suffolk Coastal District Council
Suffolk County Council
Sunderland City Council
Surrey County Council
Surrey Heath Borough Council
Swale Borough Council
Swindon Borough Council
Tameside Metropolitan Borough Council
Tamworth Borough Council
Tandridge District Council
Taunton Deane Borough Council
Teignbridge District Council
Telford and Wrekin Council
Tendring District Council
Test Valley Borough Council
Tewkesbury Borough Council
Thanet District Council
The Isles of Scilly Council
Three Rivers District Council
Thurrock Borough Council
Thurrock Thames Gateway Development Corporation
Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council
Torbay Council
Torridge District Council
Trafford Metropolitan Borough Council
Tunbridge Wells Borough Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
1
7
2
4
0
2
1
2
5
2
0
0
1
2
0
0
2
1
1
4
0
1
0
0
3
1
3
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0%
50%
50%
50%
50%
100%
100%
40%
50%
40%
0%
11%
67%
0%
0%
22%
8%
20%
44%
0%
25%
0%
33%
33%
75%
44%
57%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
7
2
4
0
0
0
3
5
3
1
0
8
1
3
4
7
12
4
5
1
3
3
0
6
2
1
5
3
100%
50%
50%
50%
50%
0%
0%
60%
50%
60%
100%
89%
33%
100%
100%
78%
92%
80%
56%
100%
75%
100%
67%
67%
25%
56%
43%
3
2
14
4
8
0
2
1
5
10
5
1
0
9
3
3
4
9
13
5
9
1
4
3
0
9
3
4
9
7
Page 82
Finalised
Uttlesford District Council
Vale of White Horse District Council
Wakefield Metropolitan District Council
Walsall Metropolitan Borough Council
Waltham Forest London Borough Council
Warrington Borough Council
Warwick District Council
Warwickshire County Council
Watford Borough Council
Waveney District Council
Waverley Borough Council
Wealden District Council
Wellingborough Borough Council
Welwyn Hatfield Council
West Berkshire District Council
West Devon Borough Council
West Dorset District Council
West Lancashire District Council
West Lindsey District Council
West Northamptonshire Development Corporation
West Oxfordshire District Council
West Somerset District Council
West Sussex County Council
Weymouth and Portland Borough Council
Wigan Metropolitan Borough Council
Wiltshire Council
Winchester City Council
Wirral Metropolitan Borough Council
Woking Borough Council
Wokingham Borough Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
10
3
9
0
3
2
4
0
0
1
1
4
0
2
8
4
3
5
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
11
1
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
67%
75%
60%
0%
25%
100%
50%
0%
0%
25%
20%
33%
25%
44%
67%
43%
56%
43%
18%
0%
0%
0%
50%
29%
33%
22%
29%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
6
1
9
0
4
1
5
3
4
8
0
6
10
2
4
4
4
0
9
3
0
1
3
11
5
4
7
5
33%
25%
40%
100%
75%
0%
50%
100%
100%
75%
80%
67%
75%
56%
33%
57%
44%
57%
82%
100%
100%
100%
50%
71%
67%
78%
71%
15
4
15
1
12
2
8
1
5
4
5
12
0
8
18
6
7
9
7
0
11
3
0
1
3
22
7
6
9
7
Page 83
Finalised
Wolverhampton City Council
Worcester City Council
Worcestershire County Council
Worthing Borough Council
Wychavon District Council
Wycombe District Council
Wyre Borough Council
Wyre Forest District Council
Yorkshire Dales National Park Authority
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
1
1
0
1
4
2
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
50%
33%
31%
25%
50%
33%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
9
6
2
0
2
0%
50%
67%
69%
75%
50%
67%
1
2
0
3
13
8
4
0
3
Page 84
Provisional
Breckland Council
Broads Authority
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
3
0
2
2
2
4
0
0
1
1
0
2
4
4
3
0
2
2
0
1
5
0
4
1
4
1
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0%
60%
25%
50%
40%
50%
0%
0%
100%
50%
0%
40%
44%
57%
16%
0%
60%
33%
0%
25%
50%
0%
40%
25%
40%
20%
29%
14%
8%
20%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
0
6
2
3
4
3
3
0
1
7
3
5
3
16
2
2
4
2
3
5
1
6
3
6
4
5
18
11
4
1
100%
40%
75%
50%
60%
50%
100%
100%
0%
50%
100%
60%
56%
43%
84%
100%
40%
67%
100%
75%
50%
100%
60%
75%
60%
80%
71%
86%
92%
80%
100%
3
5
0
8
4
5
8
3
3
1
2
7
5
9
7
19
2
5
6
2
4
10
1
10
4
10
5
7
21
12
5
1
Page 85
Provisional
Cheshire East
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
2
1
1
0
1
1
3
0
0
0
2
0
2
6
3
1
0
2
5
6
0
6
2
1
2
5
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
20%
17%
50%
50%
50%
43%
0%
0%
67%
0%
33%
50%
60%
33%
0%
50%
50%
67%
0%
67%
15%
100%
67%
28%
35%
0%
0%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
5
1
0
1
1
4
3
0
1
1
2
4
6
2
2
1
2
5
3
3
3
11
0
1
13
0
0
17
3
4
1
80%
83%
50%
50%
50%
57%
100%
100%
33%
100%
67%
50%
40%
67%
100%
50%
50%
33%
100%
33%
85%
0%
33%
72%
65%
100%
100%
100%
10
6
2
0
2
2
7
3
0
1
3
2
6
12
5
3
1
4
10
9
3
9
13
1
3
18
0
0
26
3
4
1
Page 86
Provisional
Cornwall Council
Derby City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
8
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
4
2
5
0
2
2
0
3
7
3
3
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
50%
29%
0%
25%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
67%
100%
0%
50%
40%
56%
22%
40%
0%
40%
64%
67%
33%
0%
50%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
22
3
3
2
1
0
2
0
2
1
4
1
0
0
0
1
0
4
3
4
0
7
3
3
6
4
2
6
3
0
2
50%
71%
100%
75%
100%
100%
50%
100%
100%
100%
33%
0%
100%
50%
60%
44%
78%
60%
100%
60%
36%
33%
67%
100%
50%
2
31
3
4
2
1
0
4
0
2
1
4
3
0
1
0
1
0
8
5
9
0
9
5
3
10
11
6
9
3
0
4
Page 87
Provisional
Exeter City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
2
4
7
1
0
1
1
1
2
0
2
2
6
0
0
0
0
1
1
4
2
0
0
0
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
100%
36%
58%
20%
0%
100%
20%
100%
22%
0%
67%
67%
100%
0%
0%
100%
20%
80%
67%
33%
38%
100%
33%
33%
50%
33%
50%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
7
5
4
2
0
4
0
7
2
1
1
0
3
0
2
0
0
4
1
1
0
2
0
5
0
4
2
1
2
1
100%
0%
64%
42%
80%
100%
0%
80%
0%
78%
100%
33%
33%
0%
100%
100%
0%
80%
20%
33%
67%
62%
0%
67%
67%
50%
67%
50%
1
2
11
12
5
2
1
5
1
9
2
3
3
6
3
0
2
0
1
5
5
3
0
3
0
8
1
6
3
2
3
2
Page 88
Provisional
Kent County Council
Leeds City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
3
0
2
5
5
4
1
0
0
1
0
2
2
2
3
1
0
0
1
2
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
6
6
1
14
8
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
75%
40%
50%
56%
36%
33%
14%
40%
33%
100%
25%
33%
17%
12%
0%
100%
0%
100%
33%
0%
29%
46%
8%
52%
33%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
5
4
7
2
0
0
6
0
3
4
0
9
2
0
0
5
15
3
0
2
0
0
2
6
15
7
11
13
16
25%
60%
50%
44%
64%
67%
86%
60%
67%
0%
75%
67%
83%
88%
100%
0%
100%
0%
67%
100%
71%
54%
92%
48%
67%
4
0
5
10
9
11
3
0
0
7
0
5
6
2
12
3
0
0
6
17
3
1
2
2
0
3
6
21
13
12
27
24
Page 89
Provisional
Medway Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
8
5
4
5
1
4
2
1
5
1
10
7
7
4
2
4
3
4
0
1
0
0
3
2
6
2
5
0
9
2
5
5
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
31%
36%
27%
46%
11%
40%
18%
10%
31%
12%
45%
37%
44%
56%
14%
23%
43%
50%
25%
20%
60%
33%
60%
50%
38%
0%
64%
40%
56%
83%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
18
9
11
7
8
6
9
9
11
7
12
12
9
4
12
17
4
5
3
4
0
0
2
4
4
2
8
1
5
3
4
1
69%
64%
73%
54%
89%
60%
82%
90%
69%
88%
55%
63%
56%
44%
86%
77%
57%
50%
75%
80%
40%
67%
40%
50%
62%
100%
36%
60%
44%
17%
26
14
15
13
9
10
11
10
16
8
22
19
16
9
14
22
7
10
4
5
0
0
5
6
10
4
13
1
14
5
9
6
Page 90
Provisional
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
1
3
0
1
0
1
5
3
3
2
1
0
2
1
0
1
3
0
0
1
2
2
1
2
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
20%
33%
17%
17%
71%
50%
21%
40%
100%
33%
33%
50%
33%
0%
0%
100%
29%
67%
100%
50%
50%
10%
20%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
6
0
5
0
5
2
3
11
3
0
0
4
2
0
1
6
4
5
0
5
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
9
0
4
0
80%
67%
83%
83%
29%
50%
79%
60%
0%
67%
67%
50%
67%
100%
100%
0%
71%
33%
0%
50%
50%
90%
80%
-
5
9
0
6
0
6
7
6
14
5
1
0
6
3
0
2
9
4
5
1
7
3
1
4
2
0
0
0
10
0
5
0
Page 91
Provisional
Oxford City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
2
1
0
0
1
0
4
1
2
0
2
1
0
2
2
0
5
2
1
0
6
0
1
1
1
5
9
1
6
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
33%
50%
0%
17%
57%
20%
33%
0%
33%
33%
0%
22%
40%
0%
33%
29%
10%
67%
0%
100%
12%
33%
62%
29%
14%
37%
40%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
1
1
0
5
0
3
4
4
3
6
2
2
7
3
1
10
5
9
0
3
1
0
7
4
3
24
6
12
3
3
67%
50%
100%
83%
43%
80%
67%
100%
67%
67%
100%
78%
60%
100%
67%
71%
90%
33%
100%
0%
88%
67%
38%
71%
86%
63%
60%
100%
0
6
2
1
0
6
0
7
5
6
3
9
3
2
9
5
1
15
7
10
0
9
1
1
8
6
8
34
7
19
5
3
Page 92
Provisional
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
2
2
1
1
0
0
0
1
2
1
6
4
0
3
1
1
0
3
1
3
7
2
2
1
5
4
1
3
6
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
40%
67%
14%
33%
0%
0%
0%
17%
67%
25%
50%
50%
0%
60%
50%
50%
27%
25%
50%
42%
25%
100%
25%
62%
80%
25%
33%
58%
50%
40%
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
5
2
2
5
1
5
1
3
6
5
3
2
1
1
0
8
3
3
11
6
0
3
3
1
3
6
5
1
3
60%
33%
86%
67%
100%
100%
100%
83%
33%
75%
50%
50%
100%
40%
50%
50%
73%
75%
50%
58%
75%
0%
75%
38%
20%
75%
67%
42%
50%
60%
5
3
7
3
2
5
1
6
3
4
12
10
3
5
2
2
0
11
4
6
19
8
2
4
8
5
4
9
12
2
5
Page 93
Provisional
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
2
0
2
3
0
3
2
0
8
0
7
0
2
2
0
6
0
2
0
2
0
2
4
1
0
2
3
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33%
14%
60%
0%
21%
67%
0%
73%
70%
0%
50%
40%
0%
55%
0%
43%
100%
0%
40%
50%
50%
0%
100%
100%
20%
0%
11%
33%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
12
2
5
11
1
2
3
0
3
1
2
3
2
5
2
4
0
0
1
3
4
1
3
0
0
0
4
3
8
2
67%
86%
40%
100%
79%
33%
100%
27%
30%
100%
50%
60%
100%
45%
100%
57%
0%
100%
60%
50%
50%
100%
0%
0%
80%
100%
89%
67%
6
0
14
5
5
14
3
2
11
0
10
1
4
5
2
11
2
7
0
3
1
5
8
2
3
2
3
0
5
3
9
3
Page 94
Provisional
Torbay Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
2
1
0
3
0
0
1
0
3
3
4
0
0
1
0
0
3
3
0
1
1
4
1
1
2
8
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50%
100%
50%
0%
20%
0%
60%
43%
40%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
60%
30%
20%
25%
40%
11%
33%
33%
53%
50%
25%
20%
0%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
3
6
0
4
2
2
4
6
1
3
1
2
12
2
7
0
4
3
6
8
2
4
7
1
3
4
2
0
4
50%
0%
50%
100%
80%
100%
40%
57%
60%
100%
100%
50%
100%
100%
40%
70%
80%
75%
60%
89%
67%
67%
47%
50%
75%
80%
100%
100%
4
1
0
6
6
0
5
2
5
7
10
1
3
2
2
12
5
10
0
5
4
10
9
3
6
15
2
4
5
2
0
4
Page 95
Provisional
Wiltshire Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
2
2
7
4
2
1
2
4
1
0
0
2
3
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50%
33%
50%
33%
67%
50%
25%
22%
50%
100%
0%
50%
23%
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
2
14
2
2
3
7
4
0
0
3
2
10
0
0
0
50%
67%
50%
67%
33%
50%
75%
78%
50%
0%
100%
50%
77%
0%
0%
-
2
0
6
4
21
6
4
4
9
8
1
0
3
4
13
2
1
0
Page 96
Table 6.2a - Householder appeals (2012/13 Qtr 4)
Finalised
Breckland Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
1
3
2
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
2
1
0
0
1
6
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
33%
25%
75%
100%
33%
0%
0%
50%
25%
8%
22%
100%
0%
50%
29%
33%
0%
25%
36%
50%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
1
0
0
4
3
4
0
1
3
0
12
0
7
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
5
2
7
0
3
14
3
67%
75%
25%
0%
67%
100%
100%
50%
75%
92%
78%
0%
100%
50%
71%
67%
100%
75%
64%
50%
0
3
4
4
2
0
6
3
4
0
2
4
0
13
0
9
0
1
0
0
2
2
0
7
3
7
0
4
22
6
Page 97
Finalised
Broads Authority
Cheshire East
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
1
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
2
1
1
2
0
0
5
0
0
2
3
1
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
20%
50%
0%
100%
50%
0%
100%
67%
25%
33%
33%
0%
42%
0%
100%
42%
100%
67%
29%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
2
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
6
2
4
0
2
7
4
0
0
7
0
1
10
0
0
0%
100%
80%
50%
100%
0%
50%
100%
0%
33%
75%
67%
67%
100%
58%
100%
0%
58%
0%
33%
71%
-
1
1
5
4
0
0
1
0
1
2
0
0
1
1
3
8
3
6
0
2
12
4
0
2
12
1
3
14
0
0
Page 98
Finalised
Cornwall Council
Derby City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
1
1
2
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
4
3
1
1
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
20%
33%
29%
100%
0%
50%
50%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
17%
50%
62%
75%
100%
50%
100%
0%
18%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
2
5
0
0
3
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
4
0
2
0
5
0
1
3
1
0
1
0
2
9
80%
67%
71%
0%
100%
50%
50%
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
83%
50%
38%
25%
0%
50%
0%
100%
82%
5
3
7
0
1
3
2
2
2
1
0
2
0
2
1
2
4
0
2
0
6
0
2
8
4
1
2
3
2
11
Page 99
Finalised
Exeter City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
1
1
0
3
0
0
1
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50%
0%
0%
0%
50%
12%
12%
33%
100%
50%
0%
100%
100%
50%
25%
0%
0%
64%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
1
0
1
1
0
7
7
2
0
0
3
0
2
0
0
0
2
3
0
0
0
0
1
1
4
1
0
50%
100%
100%
100%
50%
88%
88%
67%
0%
50%
100%
0%
0%
50%
75%
100%
100%
36%
100%
-
2
0
4
1
0
1
2
0
8
8
3
1
0
6
0
2
1
1
0
4
4
0
0
0
0
1
1
11
1
0
Page 100
Finalised
Kent County Council
Leeds City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
9
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50%
75%
0%
0%
50%
20%
0%
50%
100%
0%
0%
20%
0%
25%
0%
27%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
2
0
0
1
1
0
4
4
1
0
1
1
4
0
0
0
0
2
3
1
0
0
0
24
2
0
50%
25%
100%
100%
50%
80%
100%
50%
0%
100%
100%
80%
100%
75%
100%
73%
100%
-
0
2
0
4
2
0
0
1
2
0
5
4
2
4
1
1
5
0
0
0
0
2
4
1
0
0
0
33
2
0
Page 101
Finalised
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
2
0
3
0
12
2
6
14
3
2
3
1
2
3
7
9
3
17
7
3
2
2
7
1
8
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0%
50%
33%
0%
42%
29%
50%
33%
33%
18%
30%
11%
75%
33%
64%
41%
25%
55%
39%
30%
22%
33%
42%
20%
36%
50%
14%
0%
18%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
6
3
19
5
8
28
6
9
7
8
1
6
4
13
9
14
11
7
7
4
11
4
14
1
6
3
9
100%
50%
67%
100%
58%
71%
50%
67%
67%
82%
70%
89%
25%
67%
36%
59%
75%
45%
61%
70%
78%
67%
58%
80%
64%
50%
86%
100%
82%
1
4
0
9
3
33
7
16
42
9
11
10
9
4
9
11
22
12
31
18
10
9
6
19
5
22
2
7
3
11
Page 102
Finalised
Medway Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
1
2
1
0
0
0
3
0
2
3
5
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
12%
0%
0%
100%
0%
43%
100%
50%
25%
14%
43%
100%
60%
50%
25%
50%
33%
0%
0%
100%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
7
3
2
0
4
0
4
0
2
3
0
6
0
4
0
0
2
5
3
1
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
88%
100%
100%
0%
100%
57%
0%
50%
75%
86%
57%
0%
40%
50%
75%
50%
67%
100%
100%
0%
0
0
8
3
2
1
4
0
7
1
4
4
0
7
0
7
0
2
5
10
4
2
0
0
3
1
1
0
0
3
Page 103
Finalised
Oxford City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
11%
50%
29%
50%
0%
0%
33%
14%
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
8
1
0
0
0
0
5
0
2
0
1
0
0
2
2
6
0
1
0
2
1
1
0
0
1
2
2
1
100%
89%
50%
71%
50%
100%
100%
67%
86%
50%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
67%
100%
0
1
9
2
0
0
0
0
7
0
4
0
1
0
0
2
3
7
0
2
0
2
1
1
1
0
1
2
3
1
Page 104
Finalised
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
11
0
2
0
0
1
2
2
6
3
4
4
3
2
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
3
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0%
50%
100%
0%
20%
33%
40%
38%
60%
56%
36%
57%
75%
50%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
19%
25%
100%
100%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
12
0
0
2
0
4
4
3
13
2
4
7
3
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
13
3
0
0
100%
50%
0%
100%
80%
67%
60%
62%
40%
44%
64%
43%
25%
50%
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
81%
75%
0%
0%
0
6
0
24
0
3
2
0
5
6
5
21
5
9
11
7
4
0
0
0
2
1
2
1
3
1
16
4
1
1
Page 105
Finalised
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
1
1
0
0
3
1
2
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
3
0
1
0
0
3
6
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17%
50%
0%
71%
100%
40%
33%
25%
50%
100%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
60%
0%
100%
0%
0%
60%
41%
100%
50%
0%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
0
4
2
0
3
2
3
1
0
2
3
0
3
1
2
3
0
5
5
2
10
0
0
2
0
3
0
1
83%
50%
100%
29%
0%
60%
67%
75%
50%
0%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
40%
100%
0%
100%
100%
40%
59%
0%
50%
100%
100%
6
2
0
4
7
1
5
3
4
2
1
2
3
1
3
1
5
3
1
5
5
5
17
2
0
4
0
3
0
1
Page 106
Finalised
Torbay Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
7
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
20%
100%
0%
100%
0%
33%
100%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
50%
0%
0%
50%
67%
0%
0%
100%
54%
40%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
0
1
0
0
2
0
4
0
3
3
1
4
0
4
1
2
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
6
3
100%
80%
0%
100%
0%
100%
67%
0%
100%
100%
100%
67%
100%
50%
100%
100%
50%
33%
100%
100%
0%
46%
60%
1
5
1
1
1
0
2
0
6
1
3
3
1
6
0
4
2
2
0
1
2
0
3
1
0
1
0
1
13
5
Page 107
Finalised
Wiltshire Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
1
2
0
2
4
0
0
0
0
0
5
5
0
1
0
0
1
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
3
4
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
100%
50%
0%
50%
80%
0%
0%
0%
71%
83%
0%
17%
0%
0%
33%
100%
50%
0%
67%
60%
62%
0%
0%
40%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
4
2
1
3
2
0
2
0
2
1
1
5
1
3
2
0
1
0
5
0
0
0
1
2
3
1
7
6
0%
50%
100%
50%
20%
100%
100%
100%
29%
17%
100%
83%
100%
100%
67%
0%
50%
100%
33%
40%
38%
100%
100%
60%
1
4
4
4
5
3
2
0
2
0
7
6
1
6
1
3
3
4
2
0
5
0
0
0
3
5
8
1
7
10
Page 108
Finalised
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
1
0
0
2
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50%
67%
0%
45%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
4
6
0
0
0
50%
33%
100%
55%
-
2
0
0
3
4
11
0
0
0
Page 109
Table 6.2b - Householder appeals (2013/14 Qtr 1)
Provisional
Breckland Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
2
4
0
3
1
6
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
6
11
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
50%
0%
0%
50%
25%
33%
0%
33%
57%
0%
50%
50%
38%
0%
25%
25%
0%
50%
100%
60%
42%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
2
1
3
2
2
0
4
3
1
3
1
10
1
3
0
0
3
2
0
0
1
0
0
4
15
100%
50%
100%
100%
50%
75%
67%
100%
67%
43%
100%
50%
50%
62%
100%
75%
75%
100%
50%
0%
40%
58%
0
1
2
2
2
2
4
3
2
0
6
7
1
6
2
16
1
4
0
0
4
2
0
0
2
0
1
10
26
Page 110
Provisional
Broads Authority
Cheshire East
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
1
0
1
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
14%
20%
0%
33%
20%
100%
38%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
5
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
2
2
1
4
1
0
6
4
1
4
4
0
0
8
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
50%
100%
100%
100%
67%
100%
100%
100%
86%
80%
100%
67%
80%
0%
62%
4
0
0
5
2
1
0
1
1
2
0
0
1
1
0
2
3
1
4
1
0
7
5
1
6
5
0
1
13
Page 111
Provisional
Cornwall Council
Derby City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
25%
0%
0%
0%
67%
33%
67%
0%
0%
50%
100%
33%
100%
0%
67%
0%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
2
5
0
1
1
2
1
2
0
0
3
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
3
75%
100%
100%
100%
33%
67%
33%
100%
100%
50%
0%
67%
0%
100%
33%
100%
100%
0
0
4
2
5
0
1
3
3
3
2
0
0
3
0
2
1
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
3
1
3
Page 112
Provisional
Exeter City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
3
1
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
3
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
75%
20%
100%
0%
33%
100%
0%
0%
50%
17%
0%
67%
100%
0%
0%
100%
50%
0%
0%
25%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
4
0
0
5
2
0
0
3
1
3
5
4
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
3
100%
25%
80%
0%
100%
67%
0%
100%
100%
50%
83%
100%
33%
0%
100%
100%
0%
50%
100%
100%
75%
2
4
5
1
0
5
3
0
1
3
1
6
6
4
3
0
1
1
1
0
0
1
2
1
0
1
0
0
4
Page 113
Provisional
Kent County Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
2
0
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
4
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
25%
100%
100%
100%
25%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
57%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
38%
0%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
6
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
1
1
0
2
1
1
3
2
0
1
1
0
2
1
0
5
1
1
100%
75%
0%
0%
0%
75%
100%
100%
100%
50%
100%
100%
43%
100%
100%
50%
100%
100%
62%
100%
100%
1
8
0
1
0
1
2
4
1
0
0
1
1
0
4
1
1
7
2
0
1
2
0
2
1
0
8
1
1
Page 114
Provisional
Leeds City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
1
2
13
5
2
0
1
4
2
0
5
1
10
1
4
1
1
3
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
36%
0%
0%
0%
0%
27%
33%
25%
48%
60%
25%
0%
29%
50%
40%
33%
50%
33%
50%
12%
40%
50%
14%
43%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
14
3
0
0
1
0
1
2
16
4
6
15
4
6
6
5
4
3
2
5
2
11
7
6
2
6
4
64%
100%
100%
100%
100%
73%
67%
75%
52%
40%
75%
100%
71%
50%
60%
67%
50%
67%
50%
88%
60%
50%
86%
57%
0
0
22
3
0
0
1
0
1
2
22
6
8
29
10
8
6
7
8
5
3
10
3
22
8
10
4
7
7
Page 115
Provisional
Medway Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
5
2
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
3
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
45%
67%
25%
0%
0%
60%
0%
0%
0%
0%
22%
100%
100%
0%
0%
67%
0%
60%
40%
0%
50%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
6
1
3
3
2
0
0
2
1
2
1
0
1
7
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
0
3
2
3
1
1
1
100%
55%
33%
75%
100%
100%
40%
100%
100%
100%
100%
78%
0%
0%
100%
100%
33%
100%
40%
60%
100%
50%
100%
1
11
3
4
3
2
0
0
5
1
2
1
0
1
9
1
0
0
1
3
1
3
0
3
5
5
1
2
1
Page 116
Provisional
Oxford City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0%
33%
50%
0%
17%
0%
14%
100%
60%
33%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
2
0
0
5
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
100%
67%
50%
100%
83%
100%
86%
0%
40%
67%
-
0
1
3
2
0
0
2
0
0
6
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
7
0
0
0
0
1
0
5
0
3
0
0
Page 117
Provisional
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
1
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
7
0
0
0
0
2
3
4
8
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50%
0%
60%
33%
0%
0%
33%
0%
50%
0%
50%
50%
67%
73%
33%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
2
2
0
0
2
1
4
1
9
0
0
1
0
2
3
2
3
4
9
1
2
1
0
1
1
1
50%
100%
40%
67%
100%
100%
67%
100%
50%
100%
50%
50%
33%
27%
67%
100%
50%
100%
100%
100%
100%
50%
2
0
2
5
3
0
0
2
1
6
1
18
0
0
1
0
4
6
6
11
6
9
2
2
1
0
1
1
2
Page 118
Provisional
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
2
1
0
1
0
5
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
1
2
2
1
1
0
0
2
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
100%
100%
0%
50%
0%
45%
67%
0%
0%
0%
30%
40%
0%
33%
67%
40%
50%
25%
50%
0%
50%
33%
100%
0%
50%
100%
33%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
6
1
1
0
8
1
0
7
3
1
2
1
3
1
3
1
1
2
2
0
1
1
0
2
0%
0%
100%
50%
100%
55%
33%
100%
100%
100%
70%
60%
100%
67%
33%
60%
50%
75%
50%
100%
50%
67%
0%
100%
50%
0%
67%
2
1
1
2
2
11
3
1
0
8
1
0
10
5
1
3
3
5
2
4
2
1
4
3
1
1
2
2
3
Page 119
Provisional
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
4
2
14
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
50%
29%
52%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
33%
25%
50%
20%
0%
0%
100%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
5
13
0
0
0
0
0
1
6
1
1
1
2
2
0
0
0
2
0
3
1
0
4
0
2
0
1
0
50%
71%
48%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
67%
67%
75%
50%
80%
100%
100%
0%
8
7
27
2
0
1
0
0
1
6
1
1
1
2
3
0
0
0
3
0
4
2
0
5
0
2
0
1
1
Page 120
Provisional
Torbay Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
3
2
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
2
3
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
33%
0%
100%
0%
50%
30%
100%
100%
50%
50%
0%
25%
0%
0%
100%
100%
75%
0%
17%
20%
0%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
3
0
0
0
1
1
7
0
0
2
1
5
3
2
1
0
0
0
1
6
0
5
4
0
1
1
67%
100%
0%
100%
50%
70%
0%
0%
50%
50%
100%
75%
100%
100%
0%
0%
25%
100%
83%
80%
100%
100%
3
0
0
3
2
0
0
1
2
10
3
1
4
2
5
4
2
1
0
1
2
4
6
0
6
5
0
1
1
Page 121
Provisional
Wiltshire Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
3
2
0
1
3
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
0%
50%
50%
29%
0%
33%
43%
0%
33%
100%
100%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
2
0
0
1
1
3
5
2
2
4
0
0
0
2
0
4
0
0
1
100%
100%
100%
50%
50%
71%
100%
67%
57%
100%
67%
0%
0%
100%
4
0
2
0
0
1
2
6
7
2
3
7
0
0
0
2
0
6
1
1
1
Page 122
Table 6.3a - Listed Building/Conservation Area Consent appeals (2012/13 Qtr 4)
Finalised
Breckland Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
0%
75%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0%
0%
100%
25%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
4
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
Page 123
Finalised
Broads Authority
Cheshire East
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
67%
100%
100%
100%
100%
50%
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Page 124
Finalised
Cornwall Council
Derby City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
23%
0%
100%
50%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
10
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
77%
100%
0%
50%
100%
100%
-
0
0
13
2
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
Page 125
Finalised
Exeter City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
50%
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
Page 126
Finalised
Kent County Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
33%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
67%
-
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 127
Finalised
Leeds City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
100%
100%
50%
50%
0%
0%
43%
67%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
4
1
0
3
0%
0%
50%
50%
100%
100%
57%
33%
100%
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
4
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
7
3
0
3
Page 128
Finalised
Medway Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
100%
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
0
Page 129
Finalised
Oxford City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
100%
50%
100%
100%
100%
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Page 130
Finalised
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
100%
0%
29%
0%
0%
0%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
5
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
100%
100%
0%
100%
71%
100%
100%
100%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
7
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
Page 131
Finalised
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
50%
100%
50%
100%
67%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
50%
0%
50%
0%
33%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
-
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
3
1
0
0
2
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
Page 132
Finalised
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
100%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
3
100%
100%
0%
67%
100%
100%
100%
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
3
Page 133
Finalised
Torbay Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
75%
0%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
25%
100%
0%
-
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
Page 134
Finalised
Wiltshire Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
Page 135
Table 6.3b - Listed Building/Conservation Area Consent appeals (2013/14 Qtr 1)
Provisional
Breckland Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
33%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
4
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0%
100%
67%
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
6
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Page 136
Provisional
Broads Authority
Cheshire East
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Page 137
Provisional
Cornwall Council
Derby City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
27%
100%
100%
0%
50%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
8
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
73%
0%
0%
100%
50%
100%
100%
-
0
3
0
0
11
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 138
Provisional
Exeter City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
-
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Page 139
Provisional
Kent County Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
100%
67%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 140
Provisional
Leeds City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
100%
33%
100%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
100%
100%
100%
100%
50%
100%
0%
67%
0%
100%
100%
-
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
1
6
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
Page 141
Provisional
Medway Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
75%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
25%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0
0
4
2
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
2
0
1
Page 142
Provisional
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
0%
0%
50%
100%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0%
100%
100%
100%
50%
0%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
Page 143
Provisional
Oxford City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
14%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
6
0%
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
86%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
7
Page 144
Provisional
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
50%
0%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
50%
100%
0%
-
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Page 145
Provisional
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50%
100%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
50%
0%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
-
2
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
Page 146
Provisional
Torbay Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
100%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0%
100%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
Page 147
Provisional
Wiltshire Council
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50%
0%
50%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
50%
100%
50%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
Page 148
Provisional
Allowed
Split
decision
%
Allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
-
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
-
0
0
0
1
0
Page 149
Table 6.4a - Advertisement Consent appeals (2012/13 Qtr 4)
Finalised
Breckland Council
Broads Authority
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
% Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
75%
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
Page 150
Finalised
Cheshire East
Cornwall Council
Derby City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
% Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
50%
0%
20%
25%
43%
0%
75%
50%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
3
4
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
50%
100%
80%
75%
57%
100%
25%
50%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
5
0
4
7
1
4
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Page 151
Finalised
Exeter City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
% Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
100%
100%
-
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
50%
100%
0%
0%
-
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
Page 152
Finalised
Kent County Council
Leeds City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
% Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
10%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
90%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
1
1
10
Page 153
Finalised
Medway Council
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
% Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
100%
11%
0%
0%
100%
50%
33%
0%
0%
25%
100%
50%
0%
40%
0%
0%
100%
-
0
2
0
0
5
0
0
1
1
0
1
2
0
1
0
3
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
89%
100%
100%
0%
50%
67%
100%
100%
75%
0%
50%
100%
60%
100%
100%
0%
-
0
2
1
0
9
0
0
1
1
3
2
3
0
1
0
3
4
1
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
5
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
Page 154
Finalised
Oxford City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
% Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
50%
100%
100%
-
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
50%
0%
0%
-
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 155
Finalised
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
% Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
83%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
0%
-
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
17%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
100%
-
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
5
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Page 156
Finalised
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
% Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 157
Finalised
Torbay Council
Wiltshire Council
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
% Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
50%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
50%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
Page 158
Finalised
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
% Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
-
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
-
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Page 159
Table 6.4b - Advertisement Consent appeals (2013/14 Qtr 1)
Provisional
Breckland Council
Broads Authority
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
%
Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
100%
0%
50%
0%
33%
50%
-
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
0%
100%
50%
100%
67%
50%
-
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
Page 160
Provisional
Cheshire East
Cornwall Council
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
%
Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
50%
0%
-
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
100%
100%
80%
50%
100%
-
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 161
Provisional
Derby City Council
Exeter City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
%
Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
100%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
0%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 162
Provisional
Kent County Council
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
%
Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Page 163
Provisional
Leeds City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
%
Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
67%
50%
50%
0%
0%
25%
0%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
1
2
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
33%
50%
50%
100%
100%
75%
100%
100%
100%
-
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
3
2
2
1
0
1
4
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
Page 164
Provisional
Medway Council
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
%
Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
50%
67%
0%
0%
50%
100%
0%
-
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
50%
33%
100%
100%
50%
0%
100%
-
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Page 165
Provisional
Oxford City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
%
Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
50%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
50%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
Page 166
Provisional
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
%
Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
0%
50%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
100%
50%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0
0
0
1
1
1
2
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
Page 167
Provisional
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
%
Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Page 168
Provisional
Torbay Council
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
%
Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
33%
100%
0%
0%
-
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
67%
0%
100%
100%
-
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
2
1
1
3
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
Page 169
Provisional
Wiltshire Council
Allowed
Split
decision
Allowed
with
Conditions
Notice
quashed
%
Allowed
Dismissed
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
100%
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Page 170
Finalised
Breckland Council
Broads Authority
Planning Quashed on
Split
Permission
legal
decision
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 171
%
allowed
Notice
upheld
25%
0%
100%
0%
50%
25%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
75%
100%
0%
100%
50%
75%
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
0
0
2
4
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
Finalised
Cheshire East
Cornwall Council
Planning Quashed on
Split
Permission
legal
decision
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 172
%
allowed
Notice
upheld
0%
0%
50%
0%
100%
0%
100%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
1
0
0
4
0
0
1
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
50%
100%
0%
100%
0%
67%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0
1
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
1
1
0
0
4
0
0
1
1
Finalised
Derby City Council
Exeter City Council
Planning Quashed on
Split
Permission
legal
decision
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 173
%
allowed
Notice
upheld
100%
100%
0%
67%
100%
100%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
100%
33%
0%
0%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
4
0
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
Finalised
Kent County Council
Planning Quashed on
Split
Permission
legal
decision
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 174
%
allowed
Notice
upheld
100%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
6
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
Finalised
Leeds City Council
Planning Quashed on
Split
Permission
legal
decision
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 175
%
allowed
Notice
upheld
0%
50%
0%
100%
0%
33%
100%
22%
33%
50%
0%
33%
0%
0%
17%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
3
0
2
1
0
2
1
3
0
5
1
1
1
0
0
12
Notice
varied
and
upheld
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
4
0
4
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
4
0
1
2
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
50%
100%
0%
100%
67%
0%
78%
67%
50%
100%
67%
100%
100%
83%
100%
50%
100%
100%
100%
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
12
1
9
0
3
4
1
3
2
4
0
6
2
2
5
0
1
14
Finalised
Medway Council
Planning Quashed on
Split
Permission
legal
decision
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 176
%
allowed
Notice
upheld
0%
0%
50%
33%
0%
0%
33%
33%
0%
50%
0%
-
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
3
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
50%
67%
100%
100%
67%
67%
100%
50%
100%
-
1
3
0
2
0
0
0
3
3
3
3
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Finalised
Oxford City Council
Planning Quashed on
Split
Permission
legal
decision
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 177
%
allowed
Notice
upheld
0%
100%
0%
50%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
100%
50%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
Finalised
Planning Quashed on
Split
Permission
legal
decision
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 178
%
allowed
Notice
upheld
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
25%
0%
100%
57%
0%
0%
0%
-
0
2
0
1
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
1
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
1
1
0
2
4
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
67%
100%
100%
100%
75%
100%
0%
43%
100%
100%
100%
-
0
2
0
3
1
0
3
4
4
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
7
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
1
0
0
Finalised
Planning Quashed on
Split
Permission
legal
decision
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 179
%
allowed
Notice
upheld
0%
0%
0%
33%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
100%
67%
0%
100%
0%
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
3
0
0
3
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
1
4
Finalised
Torbay Council
Planning Quashed on
Split
Permission
legal
decision
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 180
%
allowed
Notice
upheld
0%
0%
33%
100%
17%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
40%
100%
0%
0%
50%
0%
-
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
67%
0%
83%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
60%
0%
100%
100%
50%
100%
-
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
2
0
6
1
1
1
1
1
0
5
0
2
0
0
0
1
2
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
Finalised
Wiltshire Council
Planning Quashed on
Split
Permission
legal
decision
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 181
%
allowed
Notice
upheld
100%
67%
0%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
33%
100%
0%
-
0
2
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Provisional
Breckland Council
Broads Authority
Quashed
Planning
Split
%
Permission on legal
decision allowed
grounds
Granted
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 182
50%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
0%
50%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
-
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
4
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
3
5
0
1
2
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
100%
50%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
80%
100%
100%
100%
-
2
1
0
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
4
1
0
0
0
1
3
0
2
1
0
0
0
1
1
2
1
5
7
0
1
5
0
Provisional
Cheshire East
Cornwall Council
Quashed
Planning
Split
%
Permission on legal
decision allowed
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 183
0%
50%
100%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
33%
0%
50%
0%
0%
-
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
50%
0%
50%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
67%
100%
50%
100%
100%
-
0
0
1
4
0
0
1
4
0
1
0
1
1
0
0
3
1
0
2
0
2
0
3
0
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
Provisional
Derby City Council
Exeter City Council
Quashed
Planning
Split
%
Permission on legal
decision allowed
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 184
0%
0%
0%
100%
50%
0%
0%
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
100%
0%
50%
100%
100%
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
2
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
1
Provisional
Kent County Council
Quashed
Planning
Split
%
Permission on legal
decision allowed
grounds
Granted
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 185
100%
50%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
67%
100%
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
50%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
33%
0%
1
0
4
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
0
3
0
1
Provisional
Leeds City Council
Quashed
Planning
Split
%
Permission on legal
decision allowed
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
2
2
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 186
0%
67%
29%
33%
50%
0%
22%
100%
12%
50%
0%
50%
20%
0%
12%
57%
0%
50%
100%
0%
0%
3%
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
1
0
1
0
0
0
7
0
15
1
4
0
0
0
5
1
5
2
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
24
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
16
1
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
33%
71%
67%
50%
100%
78%
0%
88%
50%
100%
50%
80%
100%
88%
43%
100%
50%
0%
100%
100%
97%
2
0
0
0
0
0
3
7
3
2
0
2
0
0
0
9
1
17
2
4
0
2
0
10
1
24
7
2
4
1
2
1
0
0
30
Provisional
Medway Council
Quashed
Planning
Split
%
Permission on legal
decision allowed
grounds
Granted
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 187
50%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
-
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
4
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50%
67%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
80%
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
-
4
0
0
3
1
0
0
2
5
0
2
0
1
5
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
8
1
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
Provisional
Oxford City Council
Quashed
Planning
Split
%
Permission on legal
decision allowed
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 188
0%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
0%
50%
0%
-
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
100%
50%
100%
-
0
0
4
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
1
1
2
0
0
0
0
1
0
Provisional
Quashed
Planning
Split
%
Permission on legal
decision allowed
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Page 189
0%
0%
25%
75%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
12%
100%
-
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
3
0
0
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
75%
25%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
88%
0%
-
0
0
1
0
1
0
4
0
4
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
3
0
0
2
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
3
8
1
0
Provisional
Quashed
Planning
Split
%
Permission on legal
decision allowed
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 190
0%
0%
20%
0%
0%
0%
50%
50%
33%
25%
100%
0%
0%
50%
0%
17%
100%
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
6
0
3
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
2
0
1
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
0
3
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
80%
100%
100%
100%
50%
50%
67%
75%
0%
100%
100%
50%
100%
83%
0%
0
3
6
0
5
0
0
2
1
0
0
3
2
0
0
2
0
3
0
4
1
1
1
2
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
6
0
0
1
Provisional
Torbay Council
Quashed
Planning
Split
%
Permission on legal
decision allowed
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 191
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
33%
0%
0%
-
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
3
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
100%
100%
67%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
67%
100%
100%
-
2
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
5
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
3
2
0
2
0
0
Provisional
Wiltshire Council
Quashed
Planning
Split
%
Permission on legal
decision allowed
grounds
Granted
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 192
0%
0%
100%
20%
0%
0%
0%
0%
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
0%
80%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0
1
0
0
0
4
0
0
0
2
5
0
0
1
1
2
0
0
1
Table 6.6a - Listed Building/Conservation Area Enf. appeals (2012/13 Qtr 4)
Finalised
Breckland Council
Broads Authority
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
%
decision allowed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
-
Page 193
Notice
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Invalid
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
%
Total
dismissed
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Finalised
Cheshire East
Cornwall Council
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
%
decision allowed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
-
Page 194
Notice
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Invalid
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
%
Total
dismissed
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Finalised
Derby City Council
Exeter City Council
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
%
decision allowed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
-
Page 195
Notice
upheld
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Invalid
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
%
Total
dismissed
100%
-
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Finalised
Kent County Council
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
%
decision allowed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
Page 196
Notice
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Invalid
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
%
Total
dismissed
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Finalised
Leeds City Council
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
%
decision allowed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
-
Page 197
Notice
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Invalid
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
%
Total
dismissed
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Finalised
Medway Council
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
%
decision allowed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
Page 198
Notice
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Invalid
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
%
Total
dismissed
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Finalised
Oxford City Council
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
%
decision allowed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
Page 199
Notice
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Invalid
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
%
Total
dismissed
100%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Finalised
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
%
decision allowed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
Page 200
Notice
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Invalid
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
%
Total
dismissed
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Finalised
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
%
decision allowed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
Page 201
Notice
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Invalid
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
%
Total
dismissed
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Finalised
Torbay Council
Wiltshire Council
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
%
decision allowed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
-
Page 202
Notice
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Invalid
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
%
Total
dismissed
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Notice
varied
and
upheld
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
Finalised
Split
%
decision allowed
Page 203
Notice
upheld
Invalid
%
Total
dismissed
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
Table 6.6b - Listed Building/Conservation Area Enf. appeals (2013/14 Qtr 1)
Provisional
Breckland Council
Broads Authority
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
% allowed
decision
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
Page 204
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
Provisional
Cheshire East
Cornwall Council
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
% allowed
decision
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
Page 205
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
-
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Provisional
Derby City Council
Exeter City Council
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
% allowed
decision
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
Page 206
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Provisional
Kent County Council
Leeds City Council
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
% allowed
decision
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
Page 207
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Provisional
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
% allowed
decision
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 208
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Provisional
Medway Council
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
% allowed
decision
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
Page 209
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Provisional
Oxford City Council
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
% allowed
decision
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 210
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Provisional
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
% allowed
decision
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
Page 211
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Provisional
Torbay Council
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
% allowed
decision
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50%
0%
Page 212
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
50%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Provisional
Wiltshire Council
Planning
Permission
Granted
Quashed
on legal
grounds
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Split
% allowed
decision
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
Page 213
Notice
upheld
Notice
varied and
upheld
Invalid
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Table 6.7a - Lawful Development Certificate appeals (2012/13 Qtr 4)
Finalised
Breckland Council
Broads Authority
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Page 214
Finalised
Cheshire East
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 215
Finalised
Cornwall Council
Derby City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Page 216
Finalised
Exeter City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
100%
-
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 217
Finalised
Kent County Council
Leeds City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
100%
0%
50%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
100%
100%
0%
100%
50%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
Page 218
Finalised
Medway Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
25%
100%
50%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0%
100%
75%
0%
50%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
0
4
1
2
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
Page 219
Finalised
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 220
Finalised
Oxford City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
50%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
1
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
50%
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
3
0
2
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 221
Finalised
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
100%
100%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
0%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Page 222
Finalised
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
100%
100%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
Page 223
Finalised
Torbay Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
100%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
0%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
Page 224
Finalised
Wiltshire Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 225
Table 6.7b - Lawful Development Certificate appeals (2013/14 Qtr 1)
Provisional
Breckland Council
Broads Authority
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
Page 226
Provisional
Cheshire East
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
-
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 227
Provisional
Cornwall Council
Derby City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
0%
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
100%
0%
0%
-
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
2
0
0
1
0
0
0
Page 228
Provisional
Exeter City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
0%
0%
-
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 229
Provisional
Kent County Council
Leeds City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
100%
33%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
1
0
100%
100%
0%
67%
100%
-
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
3
1
0
Page 230
Provisional
Medway Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
4
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
0%
0%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
100%
100%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
5
0
0
1
0
0
0
1
0
0
2
0
0
0
1
0
0
1
1
0
0
1
0
0
Page 231
Provisional
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 232
Provisional
Oxford City Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
50%
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
100%
50%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
Page 233
Provisional
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
100%
0%
0%
100%
100%
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
100%
100%
0%
0%
0%
-
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
1
0
1
1
1
0
0
0
0
0
Page 234
Provisional
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
0%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
1
100%
100%
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
2
0
0
0
0
0
1
Page 235
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
-
0
0
-
0
Torbay Council
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
100%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
Provisional
Page 236
Provisional
Wiltshire Council
Allowed
Split
decision
% allowed
Invalid
Dismissed
%
dismissed
Total
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0%
-
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
100%
-
0
0
0
0
1
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
Page 237
Statistical Report: England & Wales - Staffing
Table 7.1 - Staff Complement
(Excludes staff on career breaks and unpaid maternity leave but includes staff on secondment)
As at end 2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
England based staff
Wales based staff
Total
FTE
Headcount
FTE
Headcount
FTE
Headcount
Office Based Staff (Salaried)
423.92
460
22.92
24
446.84
484
Salaried Inspectors
195.95
241
12.65
14
208.60
255
Total Salaried
619.87
701
35.57
38
655.44
739
37.2
79
0.1
0
37.4
79
657.1
780.0
35.7
38.0
692.8
818.0
Fee Paid Inspectors
Total
As at end 2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
England based staff
Wales based staff
Total
FTE
Headcount
FTE
Headcount
FTE
Headcount
Office Based Staff (Salaried)
421.26
460
22.92
24
444.18
484
Salaried Inspectors
200.77
246
12.9
15
213.67
261
Total Salaried
622.03
706
35.82
39
657.85
745
40.1
97
0.0
0
40.1
97
662.1
803.0
35.8
39.0
697.9
842.0
Fee Paid Inspectors (NSIs, NSI(A)s
and NSEIs) *
Total
* Wales does not currently employ fee paid Inspectors, however, some fee paid Inspectors working in England have undertaken work in Wales. The figure shows the equivalent FTE
if work had been undertaken by Salaried Inspectors.
Page 238
Statistical Report: England & Wales - Freedom of Information
Table 8.1 - Requests, responses, reviews
2012/13 Quarter 4
Finalised
2013/14 Quarter 1
Provisional
44
40
Awaiting response
0
2
Advice or assistance provided
1
5
Information not held
2
3
Total resolveable requests
41
30
- Granted in full
34
24
- Partially withheld
3
2
- Fully withheld
4
4
Resolveable requests granted in full (%)
83%
80%
Resolveable requests withheld in full (%)
10%
13%
39
36
89%
95%
Reviews undertaken
0
4
Original Decision upheld
0
3
Upheld in Part
0
0
Complaint upheld
0
1
Freedom of Information: England and Wales
Requests
Responses
Answered within 20 working days
Percentage meeting 20 day deadline
Reviews
Page 239

Quarter 1 - Planning Portal

Transcription

Similar documents

United Kingdom: Local Authority Districts, Counties and Unitary