Burkhart - Repair of Massivr RCT.pptx
Transcription
Burkhart - Repair of Massivr RCT.pptx
5/4/15 Disclosure Arthroscopic Repair of Massive Rotator Cuff Tears: Indications, Techniques, and Results Stephen S. Burkhart, M.D. is a consultant for, and receives inventor's royalties from Arthrex, Inc., Naples, FL Stephen S. Burkhart, M.D., San Antonio, Texas What is a Massive Tear? • 2 or more tendons • > 5 cm. diameter Arthroscopic Massive Cuff Repair Results of Arthroscopic Repair of Massive Cuff Tears Arthroscopic Massive Cuff Repair - Denard & Burkhart, Arthroscopy 2012 Denard & Burkhart, Arthroscopy 2012 • 1998-2005 (341 repairs) • 126 with f/u, 62.3 yrs old at surgery – 107 complete repairs – 19 partial repairs • 62.3 yrs old at time of surgery • Interval slides 54 cases (43%) • • • • Mean follow-up over 8.2 years Forward flexion 132 → 168 ASES 42 → 94 UCLA 16 → 31 – Good or excellent 78% • 81% with complete repair • 58% with partial repair • 75% with double interval slide • 91% patient satisfaction 1 5/4/15 Arthroscopic Massive Cuff Repair Denard & Burkhart, Arthroscopy 2012 • Double-row vs. Single-row repairs – Excluded partial repairs for analysis – UCLA 15 → 33 vs. 16 → 30 – ASES 42 → 94 vs. 43 → 84 (not significant) – Patients rated shoulder 94% vs. 84 % normal – Double-row 4.9 x more likely to lead to good or excellent functional outcome Is the Tear Repairable? The Ugliest Cuff Tears • Tears with pseudoparalysis • Irreparable cuff tears Pseudoparalysis • Yes…..in > 95% of cases (Burkhart 2004) • May need advanced techniques such as interval slides Arthroscopic Cuff Repair for Pseudoparalysis It’s Not Magic -‐ Denard, Jiwani, Burkhart. Arthroscopy 2012. It’s just a bunch of tricks. • 75 month average follow-up (minimum 2 year) • 35/39 (90%) regained overhead motion > 90 degrees • Forward flexion improved from 49° to 155° • 1 re-operation (revision ARCR after a fall) • Patients reported shoulder 82% of normal 2 5/4/15 The Keys • Understand the anatomy • Understand the biomechanics Cable-Crescent Complex -‐ Burkhart et al, Arthroscopy 1995 Suspension Bridge Analogy • Reinforce the cable attachments What About the Anatomy? • Rotator cable-crescent complex Suspension Bridge Analogy for Rotator Cuff Tears Biomechanical Principle • Balanced force couples are critical 3 5/4/15 Biomechanical Principle Arthroscopic Anatomy • Expose the bony landmarks • Restore balanced force couples! – Scapular spine – Define the raphé between SS and IS Use Bony Landmarks to Help Define Cuff Tear Configuration 4 5/4/15 Subscap Tear Should Always Be Repaired, Never Debrided What about the Subscapularis? Origin of Comma Tissue Medial sling of biceps (prior to tear) • Robust deep layer (medial head of CHL) • Tenuous superficial layer (SGHL) • Footprint of medial sling adjacent to subscap footprint Identifying the Comma Creation of Comma Sign • Progressive tearing and retraction of upper subscap • Avulsion of medial sling from humerus • Medial subluxation of biceps Implications of Comma Anatomy 1. It leads to the superolateral subscap tendon 5 5/4/15 Implications of Comma Anatomy 2. The comma connects the subscap to the supraspinatus Finding the Retracted Subscap • Locate the comma and follow it to subscap Repairing the Subscap • Simple upper subscap tears • Single anchor repair Repairing the Subscap • Mobile tendon • Double-row footprint repair The Adhesed Retracted Subscap Tear • Do 3-sided release • Single-row repair • Medialize bone bed 5 to 7 mm if necessary 6 5/4/15 3-Sided Release Medialization of Bone Bed • Anterior • 5 to 7 mm if necessary • Ssup • Posterior Factoids • The subscap is always present and is always repairable • Degree of fatty infiltration does not matter because…… • Much of the subscap function is a tenodesis effect After Subscap Repair: Repair SS/IS Implications of Comma Anatomy • The comma leads to the supraspinatus • Subscap repair reduces the tension on supraspinatus repair Understanding Tear Patterns • The tear pattern is the repair pattern 7 5/4/15 Tear Pattern Recognition Tear Pattern Recognition Crescent Tear Chronic U-Shaped Tear Tear Pattern Recognition Interval Slides Chronic L-Shaped Tear Anterior Interval Slide • Releases coracohumeral ligament (CHL) • 2 ways to accomplish this: Cut the comma • Anterior and posterior New “Modified” Double Interval Slide • Anterior interval slide in-continuity • Posterior interval slide Release CHL “in-‐con=nuity” 8 5/4/15 Dealing with the Massive Adhesed Cuff Tear Finding the Plane Between Acromion and Cuff Finding the Correct Plane Dissect the Plane • Lateral viewing portal • Posterior working portal • Bounce off scapular spine and push laterally through scar 9 5/4/15 Dissect Bursal Leaders Expose Scapular Spine • Expose posterior gutter • • • • Excise Bursal Leaders • Excavate the rotator cuff • Better visualization of rotator cuff and greater tuberosity Anterior Interval Slide In-Continuity Remove fat pad posterior to AC joint Follow acromial arc posteromedially Keel-shaped bone is scapular spine The keel defines border between SS and IS Repair Supra & Infraspinatus • If mobile tear, repair with single or double row • If non-mobile tear, consider double interval slide Posterior Interval Slide 10 5/4/15 Posterior Interval Slide What if SS Will Not Reach Bone Bed After Interval Slides? • Do repair of IS (balance force couples) • Do side-to-side repair of SS to IS • Leave residual defect (partial repair) Poor Tendon Quality • Rip-stop suture What if Tissue is Deficient? Load-Sharing Rip-Stop: Reinforcement of Repair for Short Poor-Quality Tendon • • • • Short tendon Poor quality tissue Load-sharing Stress shielding of sutures from medial anchors Load-Sharing Rip-Stop: 2 FiberTapes • 1 rip-‐stop tape per tendon 11 5/4/15 Biomechanical Testing • 10 N pre-load • Then cyclic loading between 10 and 100 N at 1 Hz, for 200 cycles • Then pull to failure at 33 mm/sec Results: Ultimate Load to Failure • Control (371 ± 102 N); double-loaded single-row repair with 2 anchors • Load-sharing rip-stop (616 ± 185 N) l Load-‐sharing rip-‐stop construct had load-‐ to-‐failure that was 1.7x as strong as control group ! One Additional Feature of LSRS Fixation • Interlocking of 2 structurally distinct types of single-row repairs Indications for Load-Sharing Rip-Stop • • • • Poor-quality tendon Short tendon (e.g. tendon loss) Revision repair Any situation that requires reinforcement Interlocking Provides 3 Things That Neither SR Construct Could Achieve • Ripstop to prevent suture cut-out • Load-sharing between rows • Interlocking self-reinforcing system Case 1 • 62 year old man • Fell 6 feet from ladder 12 5/4/15 What if the Tear Is Not Repairable? (<5% of cases) Augmentation/Bridging with Dermal Allograft • Partial repair • Consider augmentation with dermal allograft (Snyder et al) • Consider superior capsular reconstruction if there is no meaningful tendon to attach dermal graft to (Mihata et al, Arthroscopy 2012) 13 5/4/15 Superior Capsular Reconstruction (SCR): Mihata Procedure Typical Patch GraM SCR SCR Results - Mihata et al, Arthroscopy 2013 • • • • Superior Capsular Reconstruction (SCR): Mihata Procedure Acromiohumeral Interval 24 shoulders, 34 month average follow-up Irreparable RCTs Fascia lata patch Elevation – Pre-op 84° – Post-op 148° • Acromiohumeral interval – Pre-op 4.6 mm – Post-op 8.7 mm • No progression of OA or cuff muscle atrophy Pre-‐Op Post-‐Op The Role of Posterior Interval Slide • Even if mobility of tendon is not improved, the exposure of superior glenoid is improved for medial fixation of dermal allograft 14 5/4/15 Should You Do Reverse TSR for Massive RCT in Patients < 65 Years Old? • Gerber et al, JSES 2013 – 46 rTSR’s, 65 y.o. – Irreparable RCT, with or without DJD – 38% incidence of one or more complications! Remember… Massive cuff tears are almost always reparable. Irreparable SS and IS • Very uncommon • Consider combination of 1. Posterior interval slide 2. Superior capsular reconstruction (SCR) with dermal allograft Recognize the tear patterns and apply the appropriate biomechanical principles 15 5/4/15 Thank You! Consider Dermal Allograft Augmentation or SCR for the Occasional Irreparable RCT 16