PDF - Science Advances
Transcription
PDF - Science Advances
advances.sciencemag.org/cgi/content/full/1/10/e1500709/DC1 Supplementary Materials for Blue reflectance in tarantulas is evolutionarily conserved despite nanostructural diversity Bor-Kai Hsiung, Dimitri D. Deheyn, Matthew D. Shawkey, Todd A. Blackledge Published 27 November 2015, Sci. Adv. 1, e1500709 (2015) DOI: 10.1126/sciadv.1500709 The PDF file includes: Fig. S1. Blue tarantula exemplars. Fig. S2. Color survey and phylogenetic tree of 53 tarantula genera. Fig. S3. Refractive index test. Fig. S4. The blue color in tarantulas has a large viewing angle. Table S1. The distribution of blue coloration in Lepidoptera and Aves. References (54–62) A B C D E F G H I J K L Fig. S1. Blue tarantula exemplars. Blue is a common color in tarantulas. (A) Chromatopelma cyaneopubescens (adult ♂), no sexual dimorphism. (B) Lampropelma violaceopes (adult ♀), sexual dimorphic. (C) Avicularia laeta (spiderling), only spiderling appears to be blue. (D) Bonnetina rudloffi (adult ♀). (E) Avicularia geroldi. (F) Haplopelma lividum (adult ♀), sexual dimorphic. (G) Poecilotheria metallica (adult ♀), no significant sexual dimorphism. (H) Xenesthis sp. (juvenile ♀), sexual dimorphic. (I) Holothele sp. (adult ♀), sexual dimorphic. (J) Monocentropus balfouri (adult ♂), no sexual dimorphism. (K) Psednocnemis brachyramosa (adult ♀), sexual dimorphic. (L) Pseudhapalopus sp. (adult ♀), no sexual dimorphism. Courtesy of Tom Patterson©. (Ischnocolinae) Catumiri Oligoxystre (to the left) Ischnocolus Holothele Euathlus Paraphysa Grammostola Cyriocosmus Chromatopelma Aphonopelma Citharacanthus Cyclosternum (Theraphosinae) Cyrtopholis Phormictopus Acanthoscurria Brachypelma Brachionopus Pterinochilus Harpactira Ceratogyrus (Eumenophorinae) (Aviculariinae + Stromatopelminae) (Ornithoctoninae) Chaetopelma (Harpactirinae) Heterothele (Thrigmopoeinae) Ephebopus Tapinauchenius Avicularia Pachistopelma Iridopelma Psalmopoeus Pterinopelma Lasiodora Nhandu Sericopelma Poecilotheria Haplocosmia (Selenocosmiinae) Eupalaestrus Thrigmopoeus Cyriopagopus Lampropelma Haplopelma Xenesthis Pamphobeteus Pelinobius Chilobrachys Orphnaecus Phlogiellus Lyrognathus Psednocnemis Megaphobema Selenocosmia Schizopelma Coremiocnemis Metriopelma (to the right) Hapalopus Fig. S2. Color survey and phylogenetic tree of 53 tarantula genera. Blue is produced via two different structural mechanisms in tarantulas, multilayer and quasi-‐ordered structure. Comparing to blue, green is rare in tarantulas. bold: nanostructural basis has been investigated ( quasi-‐ordered, : multilayer, : unstructured). box: tarantula genera that are investigated in this research. blue: tarantula genera with blue species. Colors each genus possesses are shown in the color palettes immediate to the right of the genus name. Upper row shows pigmentary colors; lower row shows colors with potential structural origins. : A B Fig. S3. Refractive index test. (A) Hairs and a cuticle fragment of C. cyaneopubescens are observed in air under reflected light microscope with omni-‐directional white LED light as a light source. Hairs reflect blue color. (B) Exactly the same condition as in a, except that hairs and the cuticle are submerge in quinoline solution (n = 1.63), causing the blue color to completely disappear. scale bar: 250 μm. Fig. S4. The blue color in tarantulas has a large viewing angle. Segments of legs covered with blue hairs from P. metallica and L. violaceopes were observed under different viewing angles. A green iridescent tail feather from black-‐billed magpie (P. pica) was subjected under the same observation conditions in comparison. The iridescent green from P. pica has very narrow viewing angles, the green can only be seen around ±30° from normal incidence. Contrast to that, not only can blue colors from tarantulas be seen ±75° from normal, but no conspicuous hue shift was observed within this range. Hence our observation argues that blue colors from tarantulas possessed little iridescent effect. Photos were taken with Canon PowerShot SX60 HS digital camera with Raynox DCR-‐250 Super Macro Snap-‐On Lens and Bestlight® 48 LED Macro Ring Light. Specimens were fixed on a rotatable stage, the tilting angle of the stage was measured by Wixey Digital Angle Gauge (WR300 Type 1) before photos were taken. All photos were taken under the same settings at once without post-‐editing, except cropping. Table S1. The distribution of blue coloration in Lepidoptera and Aves. Lepidoptera species peak (nm) nanostructure reference Morpho adonis 400 (54) M. aega 500 (55) M. didus 460 (54) M. rhetenor 450 (54) Christmas tree, multilayered wing scales M. sulkowskyi 460 (54) (n ~ 1.56) Papilio ulysses 475 (55) Parrhasius moctezuma 495 (55) Troides urvillianus 475 (55) Urania fulgens 473 (55) Agapronis roseicollis 470 (56) Ara macao 474 (57) Melopsittacus undulates 440 (58) Cyanocitta stelleri 413 (59) Eudyptula minor 447 Aves Spongy, quasi-ordered feather barbs (60) /nanofibers Passerina caerulea 400 (61) (n ~ 1.55) Poephila guttata 440 (56) Sialia sialis 401 (62) S. mexicana 412 (62) S. currucoides 442 (62)