Keeping Runways Up When the Snow Comes Down!
Transcription
Keeping Runways Up When the Snow Comes Down!
Contributed by United Rotary Brush Photo Courtesy of Denver International Airport Airports invest significant time and resources in snow removal equipment and operations. Proper brush selection helps increase the return on that investment. Keeping Runways Up When the Snow Comes Down! Over the past 60 years, the average annual snowfall at Washington Dulles International Airport in Washington, DC has been 22.2” according to NCDC/NCOA. This past February, Washington Dulles received nearly a year’s worth of snow in a single day; part of a record-breaking 75-plus-inch winter that underscores the importance of a well-planned snow removal program. When a major blizzard shut down Denver International Airport in late 2006, it provoked a complete overhaul of the airport’s snow removal efforts, according to Ron Morin, Director of Field Maintenance. “The following season we asked several manufacturers of multifunctional snow removal equipment to participate in a field test,” Morin relays. “We formed an evaluation team that included our airline partners as well as our Finance and Operations divisions.” Denver’s new program was fully integrated this past season. “Our philosophy is that we want a broomed surface … we want the highest coefficient of friction possible,” Morin explains. “Brooms are the reason we went with multifunctional equipment,” he elaborates. “The plow takes away the heavy snow; the broom brings Contributed by United Rotary Brush refine the testing and qualification. URB also works with numerous equipment manufacturers and other service providers to improve the performance of airport snow removal brooms. The Science of Snow Removal One such company has been Tradewind Scientific, a leading provider of friction measurement, airfield condition reporting and environmental monitoring solutions. Photo courtesy of Washington Dulles International Airport Airports must be ready to clear runways of snow, ice and slush any time, day or night. it down to the concrete surface. Without the broom, you’re not going to get down to the surface.” Other operators agree. “The broom is our #1 piece of snow removal equipment,” says Shannon Oldfield, Director of Maintenance, Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport. “It’s the most utilized piece of equipment we have. It gives us the feeling we’ve given the best performance we can.” Brooms first began to be used for airport snow removal in Canada in the mid1950s. Convinced sweeping could be a more efficient and economical method than plowing, Transport Canada issued a request for development and testing proposals. United Rotary Brush was one of the early—and only successful—respondents to this RFP, according to Harry Vegter, the company’s Director of Engineering. In the years since, the company has worked with Canada’s Department of National Defense (DND) to “What people misunderstand about friction is that it’s all about the very top of the surface,” explains Len Taylor, President and CEO of Tradewind Scientific. “It doesn’t matter how good the grooving is … how good the pavement is … how good the clearing is … it’s what’s on the surface that counts. That last skiff of snow or slush is where it’s won or lost in the friction world.” Taylor has been involved with runway friction testing for more than 30 years, and has seen the practice evolve from subjective evaluations by snow removal crews to its current, highly scientific process. Transport Canada also helped push many of these developments forward through its program to design, develop and distribute an electronic decelerometer specifically for runway testing. “Equipment has advanced quite a bit,” Taylor concedes, “from mechanical to electromechanical to electronic data collection.” The decelerometer essentially gives a spot check on the runway, according to Taylor. Continuous Friction Measuring Equipment—like the Sarsys Friction Tester and the Findlay-Irvine GripTester Tradewind Scientific represents—give far more accurate and representative readings. ”I’ve had situations where pollen changed the friction,” Taylor emphasizes. “It’s what’s between the airplane and the ground that matters. That’s why brooming is an essential finish. It’s a vital last step.” However, advances in equipment technology are not limited to friction testing. Sweeper manufacturers have steadily increased broom horsepower and rpm in order to increase the amount of material to be moved and the distance it can be thrown. “It’s great to have a lot of torque; it helps keep speed up when you have a lot of load,” explains Mark Philpott, Contributed by United Rotary Brush Equipment Programs Coordinator at Washington Dulles International Airport. “But you also have to have material that will hold up. The harder you work them, the more you want to ensure you have a good quality brush to tolerate the urgency of the task.” “The structural integrity of the individual wafer has become a focus point,” United Rotary Brush’s Vegter acknowledges. He identifies filament material, anchoring technique and wafer balance as key manufacturing issues to address integrity. “We worked very closely with our wire suppliers to get the right combination of tensile strength and carbon content to create the right wire,” Vegter recalls. “It’s similar with our poly bristles. We use a proprietary chemical composition that’s blended to offer greater resistance to breakage in frigid temperatures and, at the same time, the flexibility needed to withstand higher rpm operations.” Learning from Experience Of course, not all advances originate in the laboratory. United Rotary Brush service technicians also work with airport operators to identify and promote usage practices that enhance broom effectiveness and longevity. Vegter grouped field issues affecting the life of the broom into three broad categories: surface conditions, down pressure and operator experience. Airport operators recognize the importance of these issues and are eager to learn—and share—from each others’ experiences. “You can prepare all you want but Mother Nature will throw a monkey wrench at you,” admits Paul Atwal, Technical Inspector, Airfield at Toronto’s Pearson International Airport. “It’s a year-round process. You have to constantly review your plan, tweak it to make it better, learn from your mistakes and have the flexibility to change when you need to.” “That double blizzard was my first year as manager,” chuckles Gary Gottner, Stockroom Manager at Denver International Airport. “You get educated pretty quick.” Others lessons are developed over time, through trial and error. Denver’s method of loading a broom is one example. “We use a specific combination of wire bristles (w), poly bristles (p) and spacers (s) that seem to work best Photo Courtesy of Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport. The tips of the broom provide both the cutting and “flicking” actions needed to remove snow, slush and ice. for our conditions: 2p/s/2w/s/1p/s/2w/s/1p/s/2w/s/2p,” Gottner shares. “The wire gives more of a scrubbing action and the poly more of a sweeping action.” Brush manufacturers recommend wire bristles for icy or frozen, packed snow conditions; when conditions are less severe—dry, powdery snow, for example—poly bristles provide effective cleaning without causing undue stress to the runway surface. Denver expects to get 90 to 110 hours of usage from each set of brooms. Prior to 2006 and the subsequent changes to snow removal operations, they averaged 30 to 45 minutes to clear a runway. This past year, the average was 13 minutes. The goal at Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport is 120 hours of usage, according to Oldfield, although he admits it varies from operator to operator. The facility uses a 50/50 poly/wire combo on its four runways, and periodically does side-by-side tests to compare performance. “We’ll use bristles from different manufacturers on the same core,” Oldfield explains. “You can check at 20 hours, 40 hours, 50 hours, and immediately tell Contributed by United Rotary Brush the difference, based on the length of the bristle and the tendency of the ends to fray. If you look at the end of the bristle, you’ll see some that break apart and mushroom at the end. A good bristle will just get shorter as it wears down.” Oldfield’s snow removal crew averages from 30 to 40 during the winter, but can balloon to twice that size during a moderate to large event. Washington Dulles also uses a 50/50 combination of poly and wire wafers to clear its four runways. Crews normally work six-hour shifts, but in a prolonged event (two days or more) they stretch to eight hours to give the equipment more time on the field and the off-shift more time to rest. Winter temperatures hover around freezing and so the airport deals primarily with wet, heavy snow. While most airports aim for 100+ hours of broom usage, Philpott concedes that isn’t always possible. “When the snow gets heavier, you have to run a heavier pattern,” he acknowledges. “The heavier the pattern, the heavier load you put on a broom. I try to encourage my people to do a 4” pattern; some operators run a little heavier.” Philpott relies on a core group of long-term, experienced operators to train newer users. He also advocates similar shared learning as a part of procurement, insisting on speaking with other like-sized customers about their experience with the product … and the company providing it. “We ask about everything, from how well the bristles last to how well the company fills a rush order to how accurate the invoicing is,” he explains. Pearson International Airport in Toronto uses only wire brooms because the wet, heavy snow tends to get compacted and is more difficult to remove. Cassette style sweepers are used to clear the runways; wafer brooms the taxiways and aprons. “There are benefits to both formats,” Atwal allows. “The cassettes are quicker and much easier to change. But I feel the wafers do a better job of snow removal.” Atwal expects to get 100-plus hours usage from all brooms. The Vammas cassette units have a running clock to verify that performance. But it’s hard to compare which actually lasts longer. Photo Courtesy of Cincinnati/Northern Kentucky International Airport Recent winters have reinforced the need for airport preparedness as major winter storms pummeled a number of high traffic facilities. “The cassette goes down and is on the ground the full length of the runway; wafers are used on shorter surfaces and tend to go up and down more” he explains. “In addition, surfaces are different: aprons and taxiways are a mix of concrete and asphalt, not retextured like the runways are.” An Investment Worth Considering Airports invest significant time and resources in snow removal equipment and operations. They have to; it truly is a matter of life and death. Many other organizations—specialists like United Rotary Brush and Tradewind Scientific—are also working to advance the industry. And to make sure airport maintenance crews have the equipment—and information—they need to keep air travel safe during winter snowfalls. While sweeper brushes may appear to be a minor portion of the overall investment, their importance to the final results far outweighs that relative cost. That makes brush performance even more critical … which, according to Harry Vegter, is why United Rotary Brush will continue to commit such significant investments in airport broom research and development. n