with a Tohono o`odham fanily or a Native Anerican fanity within the
Transcription
with a Tohono o`odham fanily or a Native Anerican fanity within the
RESOLUTIOT OF TfiE TioHOHO O ' ODIIAI'I LEGISI,ATIVE COUNCIL (In the ttatter of hdian Child weuare Act case re: Raynond S') RES- NO. 79-90 WHEREAS, 1 2 J 4 K t) 7 childrentr t and VIHERBAS, 8 I 10 11 the United states congress enacted the hdian child welfare Act of Lg782, pursuant to finding 'that there is noresorrrcemorevitaltothecontinuedexistenceand integEity of Indian Tribes than our children, t and that an ralarningly high percentage of Indian fanilies are broken up ry the removal, often unwarranted, of our WIIEREAS, 12 13 the Tohono orodham lfation recogmizes the enonrous importance of maintaining individual and tribal fanily relationships, and is desirous of uaintaining the intent of integrity of the Indian Child Welfare Act of 1978t and Section 191-5(c) of the Indian child lfetfare Act provides that a preference for the placement of Indian children shall be in accordance sith their tribe's stipulated order 74 of preference i and 15 IfHEREAS, the Tohono O'odhan children's code ( Chapter II' Section 16 31) outline's the Nation's placenent preference i and 17 vlHEREAs, Ralmond S. is an enrolled meDber of the llation t and 18 yfiIEREAS, it appears to the Tohono o'odhar Legislative council that 19 there exists substantial issues related to proceedings 20 and/or actions of the superior court of the State of 2l California in the county of Sacranento i and 22 WHEREAS, 'Iolrono o'odhan Social Service has considered the best 23 interests of Ralmond S. and the best interests of the 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 vltIEREAs, Nation; and the Tohono o'odlra[ Social Service has recomended: in L. That the Nation intervene in the proceedings California in order to deternine the atleged rndian ancestry of the prospective adoptive parents to insure that sacranento tounty's PIan complies with the Tohono o'odhan Childrents code or alternatively; Ralrnond be placed 2. In the event that it does not, tlrat with a Tohono o'odham fanily or a Native Anerican fanity within the jurisdiction of the sacramento county court i or of Native 3. Tlrat in the event that adoptive parents that to request Anerican descent cannot be found, t Tolrono O'odhan to RayDond s case be transf€rred -the coirrts so that he may be placed sith a Tohono o'odhan fanily t and RESOLIITTON NO. 79-90 of rnaian chitd nelfare Act case re: E;-th" l{atter (2) Ralmond s') Page Tno the law firn of Strickland and Altaffer, P'c' (Firn) is empLoyed pursuant to a general counsel contract dated SepteDber 24, L98g to represent the Nation and the Firm cannot represent the Nation in California ' WHEREAS, 1 2 A IT RESOLVED by Tohono o' odhar t',eqislative council that it hereby adopts the reconnendations of Tohono O'odham social service as herein stated ' BE IT FITRTIIER RESOLVED that in accordance with the provisions of pa.ragraph 6 of the Firn's general counsel contract the l{ow, t) ,7 8 THEREF\ORE, o Legislative Council does hereby approve the selection and enployoent, by the rirn, of legal counsel in California to represent the lfation in these proceedings in 10 1t 12 13 BE California. BE IT that shichever attorney is subcontracted by the Firn is licensed to practice in the State of CatiforniaandisfaniliarwiththehdianChildllelfare Act, and that the subcontracted attorney is subject to final revier and approval by the chairnan of the Tohono I'URTHER RESOLVED t4 15 16 r7 18 o'odham ation. t9 BE IT that legal costs not exceed s15,ooo.oo inclusive of fiLing fees, retainer, travel and FURTHER RESOwBD 20 21 miscellaneous extrrenditures. that the Legislative 22 BE 23 council does hereby authorize the initiation of legal proceedings by the Nation's legal counsel in cooperation sith Tohono O'odlral Social service ' The foregoing Resolution was passed by the Tohono o'odham council a quorun sas tn" ZiU aiy of llarch. 199o at a meeting -at.which voting; against; for; 59.q-n9t "" ot i vote -9-. pi"""ttt t-itn Lggg.g 'Oi afsent, pursuant to the powers vested in the Corrncil by Section iTEt fr) tZi i fgt of Article vI of the constitution of the Tohono 6;odhan GEf"n, adopted by the Tohono O, odhan l{ation on January 18, Deputy Assistant .secretary ise6, "tta approved- fy tne Acting 6, 1986, pursuant to section naicn ( on opera€ions arr";.-t-" i"aii" ) 16 of the Act of -une 18, 1934 (48 Stat. 984). 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 IT FT RTIIER RESOLVED _ Tohono o'odham RESOLI'TION ilO. 79-90 (In the l{atter of Indian child welfare Act case re: Page Three (3) Italmond S. ) ATTBST: 1 2 Teresa lt. C lz\tu day of 4 said Resolution was submitted for approval to tlgl^office of the l'* chairnan of the Tohono O'odhan Nation gn +e .day of -n-WN * 4\q4 o'clock, , re 4tt , at the Article vrl of 'Ir', ffisuint to the provisioris of section 5 ofhis or upon approval bonstitution and will become effective upon his failure to either approve or disapprove it within 48 hours of subnittal. 6 1 8 OI|O O 'ODHAII LEGISIATIVE COT]NCIL I l0 11 t2 r/t -ltanirel APPROVED ) , Legiislative t-z on the /1 dlay ot 4. DTSAPPROVm) at o. 7.'33 o'crock, 4 Chairnan , !s?a .u. 13 74 l5 16 17 18 Returned to the Iegislative secretary on the [r\ tt lh= , '.e q.D , at 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 3l 32 . choyguha l,egislative secretary \ u:52 \zs\' day of o'clock, S . r.r. - XOVED: Virgil t€ris SECOND: Alex sItE Eef : Ramon DATB: RESOLIJTIOil DISIR,ICTS BABOQUMRI 1. EarI A. Francisco (Kenneth Chico, Sr. 22g.O 2. iloann Garcia ( Frances Uiqiuel ) CITT'KUT KUK 153.O 166. O GU VO 114.O HICKIWAN 125. O PISINB}TO 119.O .5 x 114.5 x x 1. Percy LoPez 83. O x AIex J. Ramon 2. ---.( Fernando Joaquin ) 83.O x 1. Cross Antone ( Juan Joe Cipriano) 2. virgriJ- Lewis 57.O x 57.O x 62.5 x 62-5 x 59.5 x Harriet AGAINST rcrf vofrl{G 79-90 ABSENT x a1.5 81.5 Toro ) () (ltichael Flores) 1. Lloyd Francisco (Bilfy C. Iilanuel ) 2. Henry Ramon () 1. Johnson Jose () 2. Edward llanuel (Alex Antone SA}I LUCY 106. O FOR 114 ) 1. Rosita Rui z (Rosemary LoPez ) 2- Kennetlr G. wiuians ( GU ACIII VCITES OF REPRESEI{TATIVES , IIO. 59 x .5 ) 1. Albert uanuel, Jr. (}{ax P. Jose) 2. John Reno 53.O x 53.O x 1. Eugene Enis. Sr. (llichael Rios) 2. Joamne C. Preston ( Carnelita Hattias ) 1. JoAnn Francisco ( David valenzuela sr. ) 2. Joseph Juan 63.5 x .5 x 53.5 x 53,5 x x ( SAl{ XAVIER L27.O SCHT]K TOAK lo7. o ( sFJ.T.S 3l-o. o SIF OIDAK 158.O Frances Francisco 1. Joseph T. Joaquin ( Larry Garcia) 2. Andrew Patricio (Daniel Lopez ) 1. Uary Ann Antone (Nina Jose ) 2. I{illard Juan, sr. (llelissa Greqorio) TCIITAL 63 ) 155. O x 155. O x 79.O x 79.O x L,724 -O I,664.5 x -o- 59.5 3