Maintenance and Logistics Experience at Loma Linda Proton
Transcription
Maintenance and Logistics Experience at Loma Linda Proton
Maintenance and Logistics Experience at Loma Linda Proton Treatment Facility Baldev Patyal, Ph.D., Chief Medical Physicist Department of Radiation Medicine 1 2 Outline ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ ¾ Loma Linda Proton Treatment Facility Machine Performance Requirements Measuring Performance Proton Maintenance Program Scope Downtime Contributors Milestones and Upgrades (Seamless Integration) Maintenance: Service & Support Operations LLUMC PTRC: An Impressive Record Summary: Words of Wisdom? 3 James M. Slater, MD, Proton Therapy & Research Center (JMSPTRC), LLUMC World’s first hospital based proton treatment facility (1990) Accelerator: a synchrotron Treatment Machines three isocentric gantries one with robotic patient positioner one horizontal beam line one fixed eye beam line One research room (3 fixed beams) Variable energy capability with energies up to 250 MeV 4 Loma Linda Proton Treatment Facility Layout FIXED BEAMLINES SYNCHROTRON BEAM TRANSPORT SYSTEM RESEARCH BEAMLINE TREATMENT GANTRIES:1-3 5 6 JMSPTRC Operational Achievements » As of April 2010, 14,550 patients treated » Nearly ½ million treatments and a perfect safety record » About 140-150 patients treated daily » As many as 190 patient treatments in one day » Accelerator runs 24 hrs a day, 6 days a week, all year » One day per week reserved for routine/preventive maintenance » 95-98% uptime over 20 years! 7 7 Machine Performance Requirements in a Hospital Setting » Meet patient expectations ¾ Timeliness: Reliability (no delays) ¾ Few interruptions over course of treatment ¾ Overall comfort level » Integrate into a hospital environment ¾ Efficiency Patient satisfaction Patient throughput (revenue generation) Adaptation of newer technologies (without interruptions) » Maintain precision & Quality » Patient & Personnel Safety 8 Measuring Machine Performance »Throughput (Patient Statistics) »Availability: Uptime »Precision & Quality (Medical Physics) »Reproducibility (Medical Physics) »Effort needed for corrective and preventive maintenance ( Service Logs) 9 Reliability » Reliability is the probability that a device or component will perform its intended function over a stated period of time under stated working conditions » A measure of Reliability is a failure free interval » Mean Time Between Failures (MTBF): system’s reliability » Mean Time to Repair (MTTR): System’s maintainability » Mean Logistic Delay Time (MLDT): System’s supportability 10 Availability » Availability refers to the time when system can be used for any of the intended purposes Availability = uptime uptime + downtime Inherent Availability, Ai = MTBF MTBF + MTTR Operational Availability, Ao = MTBF MTBF + MTTR + MLDT 11 Proton Maintenance Program Scope @ LLU Analysis 2009 Work Order » Equipment List: 1,023 » Total Work Orders (WO): 6,628 » Total Planned Maintenance Tasks (PM): 4,131 » Total Unplanned Maintenance (Corrective Maintenance: CM) Tasks: 2,183 » Total Material Maintenance Records (MMR): 306 » Total Incomplete Work orders (IWO): 263 © 2010 Optivus Proton Therapy 12 12 Proton Maintenance Record: 2009 Total Number of Work Orders (WO) for 2009 at the LLUMC PBTS 7000 6628 6000 5000 Quantity 4131 4000 3000 2183 2000 1000 306 263 Total MMR Total IWO 0 Total WO Total PM Total CM Work Order Type © 2010 Optivus Proton Therapy 13 13 Uptime = 100 – downtime Downtime = % of tx lost due to equipment failure Proton Uptime: 2009 LLUMC Facility Uptime 2009 99.9 99.6 100.0 98.4 99.0 98.0 98.0 98.6 98.5 98.4 98.7 98.7 98.8 98.1 97.5 Percentage 97.1 97.0 96.0 95.0 94.0 93.0 92.0 Jan Feb Mar Apr May Jun Jul Aug Sep Oct Nov Dec Annual Month © 2010 Optivus Proton Therapy 14 14 Proton Facility Downtime Snapshot: 2007 Courtesy: Ed Sanders 15 Facility Downtime Contributors (2009) »53% of the total downtime attributed to power supplies »47% of the downtime attributed to electronics, computer and software related components 16 Major Downtime Contributors »Radio Frequency Quadruplole (RFQ) Amplifier (injection line) »Ion Source (injection line) »High Voltage kicker (injection line) »Synchrotron ring power supplies »Legacy accelerator control system electronics »Radiographic imaging equipment »Embedded electronics controllers/computers »Vacuum system equipment 17 Milestones and Major Upgrades (Seamless Integration) 1995: Completed Calibration / Research Room 1987: Ground-breaking for world’s first hospital-based proton therapy system 1990: First Patient Treated with LLUMC Eye Beam Line 1991: Developed our own treatment planning system 1996: World's First Large Format Digital Imaging 1997: NASA Research Room Upgrade First Patient Treated with LLUMC Horizontal Beam Line 1997: 1991: 1997: First Patients Treated in LLUMC Gantry 1 Beam Transport Upgrade 1994: Treated 100 Patients per Day First Patients Treated in LLUMC Gantry 2 and 3 1999: 3,000th patient treated 1998: Accelerator Ion Source Upgrade 2000: PBTS Control System Requirements & Design 2000: Began Beam Scanning Studies in Research Room 2001: Beam Energy/Intensity Performance Upgrade 2005: Beam Transport & Treatment Room Control System Upgraded for Variable Energy 2005: 10,000th patient treated 2002: Treated 150 Patients per Day 2005: Treated 170 Patients in a Day 2002: Accelerator Control System Replacement 2007: DICOM treatment planning integrated into PBTS 2003: Accelerator Control System Upgraded to Electronic Variable Energy 2008-2009: Robotic Precision Patient Alignment System (PPAS) installed at LLUMC 2004: Demonstrated Active Beam Scanning Capability in Research Room April 2010: 14,500th patient treated All upgrades done by Optivus Proton Therapy, San Bernardino, CA 18 Maintenance: Common Sense Approach ¾Minimize interruptions caused by maintenance related tasks ¾Develop a thorough preventive maintenance program ¾Identify “problem” components and develop strategies ¾Have “backup” components where possible ¾Preventive maintenance should be an “ongoing” process ¾Determine the criticality of each component 19 Service & Support »Availability of continuous coverage: 24/7/365 »Highly trained service personnel People make things happen Reduce repair time »Quick response: clear communication pathways Reduce logistic delay time »Maximize the use of the regularly scheduled maintenance time »Enough Manpower ¾ Optivus Proton Therapy, our service provider has 7 FTE in their Field Service Team 20 Operations Typical Proton Facility Weekly Usage MODE HOURS PERCENTAGE Treatment 85 50.6% Calibration 20 11.9% Maintenance 8 4.8% Research 39 23.2% Upgrades 16 9.5% TOTAL 168 100% © 2010 Optivus Proton Therapy 21 Timeline of a Proton Treatment @LLUMC Procedure Time Needed Time before Tx Patient orientation & education 1-2 hours 7-10 days Patient immobilization & imaging 15-30 min 7-10 days Treatment planning 1- 3 days 5-8 days Device manufacture & calibration 1 day 1-3 days Treatment session Patient setup Alignment verification & approval Treatment Room reset 15-45 min 5-10 min 5-25 min 2-5 min 2-5 min …. ….. ….. …. …. 22 LLUPTC: Slow (cautious) start, but an Impressive Record Started with one patient a day (eye patient) in 1990 It took 4 years to go from one patient a day to 40 patients a day. It took three years to treat first 1000 patients To expedite treatment planning, developed our own treatment planning system (Daniel Miller,1995) To further improve throughput and accuracy, developed our own digital alignment system (Optivus Proton Therapy, 1996) To meet increasing patient demand, started a second shift of treatments (2001). A treatment day is 16-17 hours long! Over the last 10 years, we have maintained 98% uptime All upgrades have been accomplished without missing a single patient treatment Initiated and completed several treatment protocols. Our initial clinical results helped pave the way for other centers 23 Summary: Words of Wisdom? » Make all processes “patient-centric” Minimize treatment interruptions High reliability » Establish clear communication pathways between different teams » Have the right manpower Hire, train and retain the best people Have adequate staffing level » Keep up with newer technologies Precision, accuracy, reliability (Patient satisfaction) Throughput (revenue generation) » Last, but not the least, maintain “good relations” with the administration 24 Thanks ありがとう 25