Environmental Impacts Assessment

GOVERNMENT OF GRENADA
Ministry of Finance, Planning, Energy and Corporative
GRENADA DISASTER VULNERABILITY REDUCTION PROJECT
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS ASSESSMENT
Prepared by: Edward Niles
Environmental and Physical Planning Consultant
November2010
i
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1.0 INTRODUCTION---------------------------------------------------------------------------1
1.1 BRIEF BACKGROUND-----------------------------------------------------------1
1.2 OBJECTIVE-----------------------------------------------------------------------1
1.3 METHODOLOGY------------------------------------------------------------------1
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT---------------------------------------------------------1
2.1 PROJECT COMPONENT AND ACTIVITY ---------------------------------------1
3.0 LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR
ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT IN GRENADA.----------------------------2
3.1 BRIEF BACKGROUND------------------------------------------------------------2
3.2 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK-----------------------------------------------------2
3.2.1 Overview-----------------------------------------------------------------------2
3.2.2 Relevant Environmental Legislation------------------------------------4
3.3 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK---------------------------------------------------6
3.3.1 Government Departments-------------------------------------------------6
3.3.2 Statutory Bodies--------------------------------------------------------------7
4.0 DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT--------------------------------------------------7
4.1 PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT --------------------------------------------------------7
4.1.1 Geology and Soil--------------------------------------------------------------7
4.1.2 Topography and Drainage--------------------------------------------------12
4.1.3 Climate---------------------------------------------------------------------------14
4.1.4 Land Use------------------------------------------------------------------------15
4.1.5 Existing social and environmental problems---------------------------14
4.2 Biological Environment -----------------------------------------------------20
4.2.1 Flora and Fauna---------------------------------------------------------------20
4.3 VULNERABILITY--------------------------------------------------------------------21
4.4 ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION ----------------------------------------------------22
5.0 IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS--------------------------22
5.1 OVERVIEW-----------------------------------------------------------------------------22
i
5.2 POSITIVE IMPACTS------------------------------------------------------------------23
5.3 NEGATIVE IMPACTS-----------------------------------------------------------------23
5.3.1 Public inconvenience ---------------------------------------------------------24
5.3.2 Noise nuisance ---------------------------------------------------------------24
5.3.3 Traffic obstruction -------------------------------------------------------------24
5.3.4 Air pollution----------------------------------------------------------------------24
5.3.5 Marine pollution----------------------------------------------------------------24
5.4 RESIDUAL IMPACTS---------------------------------------------------------------24
6.0 MITIGATION MEASURES-----------------------------------------------------------24
6.1 GENERAL CONSIDERATION-----------------------------------------------------24
6.2 SPECIFIC CONSIDERATION------------------------------------------------------24
6..2.1 Public inconvenience ------------------------------------------------------24
6.2.2 Noise nuisance -------------------------------------------------------------25
6.2.3 Traffic obstruction------------------------------------------------------------25
6.2.4 Air pollution--------------------------------------------------------------------25
6.2.5 Marine pollution--------------------------------------------------------------25
7.0 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN-----------------------------------25
7.1 SUPERVISION----------------------------------------------------------------26
7.2 PROJECT LEVEL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT-------------26
7.3 REHABILITATION WORKS ------------------------------------------------26
7.4 SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS FOR REHABILITATION WORKS-28
ii
LIST OF FIGURES
Figure 1: Project Location -------------------------------------------------------------------4
Figure 2: Geology-----------------------------------------------------------------------------10
Figure 3: Soils- --------------------------------------------------------------------------------12
Figure 4: Slopes ------------------------------------------------------------------------------14
Figure 5: Climate------------------------------------------------------------------------------16
Figure 6: National Parks and Protected Areas-----------------------------------------22
iii
APPENDICIES
Appendix A: Terms of Reference
Appendix B: List of persons consulted
iv
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
This document constitutes the Environmental Impacts Assessment Report for the 11 Projects which are
Sub-components of the Disaster Vulnerability Reduction Project (DVRP) prepared by the Government of
Grenada for funding by the World Bank.
Two of the projects - La Sagesse and Beausejour Housing – have been highlighted for special
consideration due to potential hazards observed in those areas. The condition of the houses is very poor
(exposed columns, incorrect column and wooden beam connection, no hurricane straps etc) and they are
all extremely vulnerable to hurricane; sections of the road and other areas are vulnerable to rockfall and
landslip. There is also evidence of pollution in both housing areas created by the inadequate and in most
cases incomplete sewage disposal system. This situation may eventually endanger the health and safety
of the respective communities (See Section 4.1.5 for details).
There is also a potential traffic hazard and health and safety issue in St. Patrick’s Anglican School which
should be given similar considered as the problems listed to be address by the project. Details of the
situation are presented in Section 4.1.5.
Similar attention was given to the Lance Bridge at Gouyave, St. John’s mainly because of the possible
public inconveniences that will most likely occur during construction.
The EIA Report also includes the important issues for consideration (Section 4.4). However, Marine
Pollution is an issue worth mentioning here because of the necessity to avoid implementing flood
mitigation measures for Morne Rouge, Dusty Highway and St. Johns River that may result in a transfer of
the flood related pollution problems into the marine environment.
It is important to note that none of the projects are located within the Protected Areas of Grenada nor will
they have any negative impact on the Grenada Dove or other endangered species. The predicted impacts
are of a social and environmental nature. Most of the negative impacts are expected to be short term
insignificant Impacts that can be easily mitigated. The positive impacts are predicted to be significant and
long term.
The legislative responsibility for environmental management in Grenada is spread among eight different
agencies (five Government Departments and three Statuary Bodies). However, the Physical Planning
Unit through its relationship with the Physical Planning and Development Authority stands out for its
overall responsibility for land use management in general. The Unit is also best positioned to compliment
the environmental monitoring efforts of the relevant authorities during the implementation of those DVRP
Projects.
v
1.0 INTRODUCTION
This Environmental Impacts Assessment was commissioned by the Ministry of Finance, Planning, Energy
and Corporative for the purpose of meeting World Bank’s funding requirements for the Disaster
Vulnerability Reduction Project (DVRP). The Project was designed to contribute to the reduction of
vulnerability to natural disaster in the region. it is expected to include various activities related to
institutional strengthening and training as well as the execution of various works to retrofit or protect
national assets.
According to the Bank’s Environmental Assessment Policy [OP4.01] the project is classified as Category
B meaning that environmental impacts for the type of work anticipated under the project are expected to
be moderate in nature and can be managed through the application of appropriate engineering and
management measures.
1.2 OBJECTIVE
The main objective of this consultancy is to produce a project level environmental assessment based on
the activities planned for execution under the DVRP. This assessment will include an assessment of the
potential impacts and a list of mitigation measures as specified in the Terms of Reference (Appendix A).
1.3 METHODOLOGY
The proposed methodology for conducting the Environmental Impacts Assessment involves surveys and
analysis of the environment of the respective study areas. This will also include a review of the project
proposal; interviews and discussions with relevant Government Officials; persons from the respective
communities and project beneficiaries.
2.0 DESCRIPTION OF PROJECT
2.1 PROJECT COMPONENT AND ACTIVITY
This EIA is concerned with the Projects under Component 2 (Disaster and Climate Risk Reduction) of the
Disaster Vulnerability Reduction Project which would consist of new construction and rehabilitation of
existing infrastructure in order to reduce their vulnerability to natural hazards and climate change. They
are located in various areas of Grenada (Figure 1) and involve the following activities:
1. The construction of drains, roads, retaining structures, sewage system, land regularization and
engineering and supervision consultancy for both La Sagesse and Beausejour Housing
2. Construction of retaining wall structure and installation of gabion baskets in six landslip locations
at Constantine, St. George’s and Gouyave, St. John’s.
3. Consultancy services to undertake soil investigation mitigation measures for Landslip Sites in
Bellevue/Jean Anglais, Brizan, Grand Anse Housing Scheme, Melville Street and Sendall Tunnel
in St. Georges.
4. Consultancy services for the designs, surveys, civil works and construction supervision for flood
mitigation in Morne Rouge, Dusty Highway and St. Johns River in St. Georges
5. Construction of the Hubble Bridge and Lance Bridge at Gouyave, St. Johns
6. Rehabilitation of Holy Cross R. C. School and St. Patrick’s Anglican School, St. Patrick’s.
7. Construction of a reservoir at observatory, St. Georges
8. Construction of a storage reservoir and generator house at Chemin, St. David’s
1
9. Retrofitting Hills View Home for the aged, St. Patricks
10. Retrofitting Cadrona Home for the aged, St. Andrews
3.0 LEGAL AND INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK FOR ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT IN
GRENADA.
3.1 BRIEF BACKGROUND
The legal and institutional framework for environmental management in Grenada have been influenced by
Government’s policies over the years and to a great extent, the policies of some international and
regional funding agencies like the World Bank, Caribbean Development Bank (CDB) the Organization of
East Caribbean States and the United Nations. Their main focus have been on the protection of sensitive
and important natural and cultural resources, preservation of public health and safety, and the
encouragement of appropriate and feasible macro-economic and sectoral policies, which promote sound
environmental and natural resource management principles and practices. In fact, projects submitted to
the World Bank or CDB for funding must include approved EIA’s.
Such policies have resulted in the introduction of several pieces of legislation and institutions with the
main objective of addressing a wide range of issues and problems related to natural and cultural
resources that are of paramount importance to the economic development of Grenada and the wellbeing
of the society in general (for example: the forest, mangrove swamps, marine ecosystems, historic
buildings and sites, sustainable land use, wildlife protection, pollution abatement, solid waste
management and waste disposal).
3.2 LEGISLATIVE FRAMEWORK
3.2.1 Overview
The legislative framework for environmental management in Grenada dates back to the 1946 Town and
Country Planning Ordinance, which introduced Urban and Land Use Planning in Grenada. Two decades
later, in 1965, a central planning and Housing Authority was set up to review and control developments.
The dissolution of Local Government in 1969 left the development control functions exclusively in the
hands of the Central Government. At about the same time, in 1968, a new law, the Land Development
control Act No.40, established the Land Development Control Authority (LDCA) with special
responsibilities for ensuring that developments are undertaken in an orderly and progressive manner.
2
3
Since the 1940’s several other pieces of legislation and regulation including the Public Health Ordinance
have been enacted and amended with the view of providing the necessary legislative framework for the
many different agencies dealing with the environmental management matters. However the more recent
ones are as follows:
• The Beach Protection Amendment Act of 2009, prohibiting sand mining in
Grenada
• The Physical Planning and Development Control Act, No 25, of 2002
• Litter Abatement Act of 1973, which has been supplemented by the
passage of the waste management Act of 2001, addressing pollution
control and abatement of litter
• Waste Management Act No 16 of 2001, to provide for the management
of waste in conformity with best environmental practices and related
matters
• Solid waste management act No 11 of 1995, which established the Solid
Waste Management Authority, charged with the duty of developing the
solid waste management facilities, and improving the coverage and
effectiveness of solid waste storage, collection and disposal facilities of
Grenada;
• National parks and Protected Areas Act of1991, for the designation and
maintenance of National Parks and protected areas
• Environmental Levy Act No 5 of 1997, an act to impose and collect
Environmental Levy on certain goods and services
• Fisheries Act of 1986, which provides for the protection of the marine
resources in Grenada
• National Trust Act set up for the protection of the cultural heritage of
Grenada.
3.2.2: Relevant Environmental Legislation
Grenada now has in place several pieces of legislation to protect its environment. The most relevant ones
to the project are: the Physical Planning and Development Control Act No25, of 2002; the Public Health
Act of 1958 and the litter Abatement Act of 1973, which has been supplemented by the passage of the
Waste Management Act 2001 addressing pollution control and the abatement of litter; the 1986 Fisheries
Act; and the 1990, National Parks and Protected Areas Act.
Every one of those legislations has been playing important resource management roles, which, to some
extent, has contributed to the enhancement and conservation of the natural environment and the
preservation of public health and safety in Grenada. Nevertheless, only two of those legislations (the
Waste Management Act No 16 of 2001 and the Physical Planning and Development Control Act, No 25,
of 2002) include provisions for environmental impact assessment (EIA).
It is important to note here that according to both Acts, the legal responsibility for environmental impacts
assessments and development control in general is shared between none other than the current Physical
Planning and Development Control Authority (PPDA) and the Minister responsible for Planning (Act
16:15-17 and Act 25: 25 & 28). That Minister is responsible for making regulations and appeals. The
PPDA is responsible for everything else, with the support of the Physical Planning Unit functioning as its
staff.
4
In the case of the Solid Waste Facilities (Act 16), the final decision is made by the Minister. A notable
provision in this Act is that the Minister must, when granting approval, designate a person or body to
conduct any inspection necessary to determine whether the design, development and construction of the
facility are in accordance with the program, protection plan or mitigation measures that is made a
condition of the approval (Section 16(2)).
Despite the above, the Physical Planning and Development Control Act No25, of 2002 stands out for its
overall responsibility for land use management in general. It makes fresh provision for the control of
physical development, to continue the Land Development Authority, to require the preparation of physical
plans for Grenada, to protect the natural and cultural heritage, and for related matters. The Physical
Planning and Development Authority (PPDA) is set up under the Act with regulatory powers over any
development taking place in, on, under or over the land.
Part 4 of the Act makes provision for the preparation of Environmental Impacts Assessment. The second
schedule, (section 25(2), lists a total of 18 matters for which an Environment Impact Assessment is
normally required.
The PPDA functions as the national agency for the identification, protection, conservation and
rehabilitation of the natural and cultural heritage in accordance with the United Nations Educational,
Scientific and Cultural Organization. It is a convention for the protection of the World Cultural and Natural
Heritage, to which Grenada is a party.
The staff of the Physical Planning Unit is deemed to be the staff of the Physical Planning and
Development Authority for the purpose of the Act. The Authority meets once a month. It may delegate to
any member of the committee, the Head or any other member of the staff of the Authority, or statutory
body, the power and authority to carry out on its behalf such functions as the Authority determines.
Neither the Minster, any member of the Authority, any person co-opted to help the Authority in dealing
with any matter, the Head or any other member of the staff of the Authority is liable in any court for or in
respect of any act or matter done, or omitted to be done in good faith in the exercise or purported
exercise of any function or power conferred by this Act.
The environmental impact assessment component of the Act is covered in Part III (Appendix C).
According to the Act, the Authority (meaning the Physical Planning and Development Control Authority)
can request an EIA in respect of any development application including application for approval in
principle, if the proposed development could significantly affect the environment (Subsection 1). Section
25 (1) states that the Authority must not grant permission for the development of land pursuant to an
application to which this section applies unless it has first taken the report on the EIA into account.
The Act also includes a list of 18 different types of developments for which an environmental impact
assessment is normally required. They are as follows:
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
Hotels of more than 50 rooms
Sub-divisions of more than 10 lots
Residential development of more than 25 units
Any industrial plant which in the opinion of the Authority is likely to cause significant adverse
environmental impact
Quarrying and other mining activities
Marinas
Land reclamation, dredging and filling of ponds
Airports, ports and harbors
Dams and reservoirs
Hydro-electric projects and power plants
Desalination plants
Water purification plants
Sanitary landfill operations, solid waste disposal sites, toxic waste disposal sites and other similar
sites
5
14. Gas pipeline installations
15. Any development generating or potentially generating emissions, aqueous effluent, solid waste,
noise, vibration or radioactive discharges
16. Any development involving the storage and use of hazardous materials
17. Any coastal zone development
18. Any development in wetlands, marine parks conservation areas, environmental protection areas
or other sensitive environmental areas.
According to the Act, the Minister may make regulations providing for:
(a) The criteria and procedures for determining whether a development is likely to significantly affect
the environment and for which an Environmental Impact Assessment is required;
(b) The procedures for setting the scope of an Environmental Impact Assessment to be carried out
by the applicant in respect of any development;
(c) The minimum contents of a report on an Environmental Impact Assessment;
(d) The qualifications, skills, knowledge or experience which must be possessed by persons
conducting Environmental Impact Assessment for the purpose of this Act;
(e) The procedures for public participation in the Environmental Impact Assessment process and
public scrutiny of any report on an Environmental Impact Assessment submitted to the Authority;
(f) The consideration by the Authority of an application in respect of which an Environmental Impact
Assessment is required, including the criteria and procedures for review of the report.
Another important part of the Act is its provision for preparing physical plans for Grenada (Part III section
13). Such plans are expected to cater for the economic, social, cultural and environmental needs, as well
as addressing critical and sometimes very sensitive land use problems.
The previous lack of such legislation in support of this activity was a major development control
disadvantage. That situation resulted in limited emphasis on the preparation of plans, environmental
degradation; increased incompatible land use, depletion of natural resources and other associated
problems in many areas.
3.3 INSTITUTIONAL FRAMEWORK
There are several different agencies involved in activities that impact on the environment, however only
eight; (five Government Departments and three Statuary Bodies) are directly involved in environmental
management activities on a daily basis:
3.3.1 Government Departments
• Physical Planning Unit, Ministry of Ministry of Communication, Works and
Physical Planning
• The Ministry of Communication, Works and Physical Planning
(responsible for beach protection)
• Forestry Department, Ministry of Agriculture Forestry and Fisheries
Public Utilities, Marketing Board and Energy
• Land Use Department, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry, Fisheries,
And Marketing Board
•
Environmental Health Department, Ministry of Health and the
Environment
6
3.3.2 Statuary Bodies
• Physical Planning and Development Control Authority
• Solid Waste Management Authority
• National Water and Sewage Authority
• Forestry Department, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
• Land Use Department, Ministry of Agriculture, Forestry and Fisheries
• Environmental Health Department, Ministry of Health and the
Environment
• The Ministry of Communication, Works and Physical Planning
(responsible for beach protection)
• Physical Planning and Development Control Authority
• Solid Waste Management Authority
• National Water and Sewage Authority
4.0. DESCRIPTION OF ENVIRONMENT
4.1. PHYSICAL ENVIRONMENT
4.1.1 Geology and Soil
Geology
The island of Grenada consists of 13 different geological categories ranging from Great River Beds to
Tufton Hall Formation (Fig 2). They are of volcanic origin consisting mainly of volcanic products and, to a
lesser degree, of sedimentary rocks formed during the Miocene to the Quaternary period of the Island’s
volcanic history.
They occur as dome flows and as a wide variety of pyroclastics related to eruptions with varying degrees
of explosivity. Agglomerates and ashes in varying degrees are the dominant components of the
pyroclastic rocks. The lava flow and rocks from eruption blasts are andesitic and basaltic in nature. (R.J.
Arculus 1973, 1976).
Within those categories are numerous geological fault lines scattered throughout the Island. They are
defined as planer brake in rock along which one side has moved relative to the other. This movement can
affect the stability of the soil above and cause structural failure to buildings, walls, roads etc.
Despite the spread of fault lines, no definitive signs of associated problems were observed within the
locations of the Project Sites. There are some earth movements in the vicinity of the Holy Cross R.C.
School which may be associated with underground water / drainage problem. The landslips and rockfall
problems of the Project Sites (See Section 2 above) also do not seem to be the result of the above
mentioned fault lines. However, detailed investigation is necessary before arriving at a final conclusion.
Soil
There are 3 different types of soil textures in Grenada (sand, silt and clay) and 4 different types of soils
based on textural classification, clay, clay loam, sandy loam and loamy sand. Loam is basically a mixture
of sand, silt and clay. The percentage range for each texture is clay -7 to 27%, silt 28-50%, and sand 2352%. Clay soil is one that at least 40% clay particles. It may have a maximum of 40% silt or 45% sand.
Sandy loam is loamy soil in which sand is the dominant particle. Loamy Sand is sandy soil in which clay
and silt are the dominant particle.
Clayey soil tends to hold much water for long periods and is also subject to swelling when wet and
shrinking when dry. Continuous fluctuation can affect structures in the area.
7
Sandy soils drains very rapidly and during the process particles tend to disintegrate from each other
because of rapid drainage property.
Clay loam has lower water holding capacity than clay and better drainage property. It is the most
favorable soil for construction since it is not subjected to continuous fluctuation as clay and more stabled
soil than sand.
The soil is also divided into 13 different categories (Figure: 3) according to physical properties (amount of
soil and clay), colour, composition of boulders and stones, chemical properties (nutrient status) and place
where it was originally discovered.
8
9
All the projects are located in areas classified as Clay Loam Soils. However, there may be some
variations in soil composition for some of them that may require special attention. The soils of both La
Sagesse and Beausejour Housing Settlements are typical examples. Although both are within areas
classified as Clay Loam, the soils in the exact location of the Housing Settlements appear to be very
shallow Loamy Sand resting on top of Clay Loam. In addition, the Beausejour Site is more of a boulder
and stony type of soil (Pictures1&2).
Picture1: Beausejour project soil
Picture 2: La Sagesse project soil
Developments on this type of soil within steep sloping areas would require adequate consideration to
drainage, landslip and rockfall mitigation and also sewage disposal in order to avoid potential risks to lives
and property. Both settlements have been experiencing similar problems due mainly to inadequate
consideration to any of the above. Apart from Holy Cross R.C. School and the Landslip and Rockfall
Project Sites, there are no other obvious signs of soil related problems.
10
11
4.1.2 Topography and Drainage
The island of Grenada is dominated by areas of rugged topography increasing in ruggedness and
gradient towards the central mountain range (Figure 4) as it rises to its highest peak at Mt. St. Catherine,
an elevation of 2,756 feet above sea level. The lands along the southern and eastern coastal areas are
less rugged and also involve most of the areas that are vulnerable to flooding.
There are 6 different slope categories in Grenada ranging from A to F (Land Use Department Ministry of
Agriculture). Slope category E, 20-30°, is the second steepest and occupies 20,155 hectares, or 65.59%,
of the total area of the Island. The flood-prone areas are within the slope category A, 0-2°, a total of 583
hectares, or 1.9%, of the Island (Table 4.1).
Table 4.1: Slopes Categories in Grenada
Slopes
Class
A
0-2°
B
C
2-5°
5-10°
Area
(Hectares)
583
959
1,612
D
E
10-20°
20-30°
F
>30°
6,274
20,155
1146
Most areas within this Topographical setting are vulnerable to landslide, rockfall, flooding and other
natural hazards. This situation, together with the apparent inadequate land use planning and
development control, have been the main cause of the abovementioned flooding, landslip and rockfall
problems.
Apart from La Sagesse and Beausejour Housing Settlements, the project sites within the flood-prone
areas (Morne Rouge, Dusty Highway and St. John’s River) are the only ones with existing drainage
problems.
12
13
4.1.3 Climate
Grenada’s climatic condition varies among 13 different locations referred to as Climatic
Zones (Figure 5). The entire island experiences a humid tropical marine type climate with little seasonal
or diurnal variation, and fairly constant, strong easterly trade winds. It is affected by the subtropical
cyclone belt and inter-tropical convergence zone, which influence the climate of the region. The location
of these two meteorological systems varies in a cyclical pattern.
Moderate temperatures prevail in Grenada year round with daily heights averaging around 80 F (30 C).
Although annual and seasonal variations of temperature are small, the temperature at sea level is
generally rather high with little seasonal, diurnal and location variation due to the dampening or stabilizing
effect of the ocean mass. Annual average temperature range from a low of 28.3 C to a high of 33.3 C.
Annual rainfall in Grenada varies from approximately 1,270mm (50 in) in dry coastal locations to 4,060
mm (160 in) in wet central mountains. The lengths of the dry and wet seasons vary greatly depending on
location. However, there tends to be a dry season from about January to May and a wet season from
about June to December. About 75% of annual rainfall occurs during the wet season. No data is available
for evapo-transpiration, but rough estimates from Grenada and neighboring islands range from 1,000mm/year to 1,300mm/year.
There are some risks of hurricanes from June to December, however, Grenada lies just south of the path
of most tropical storms and is only rarely affected by hurricanes. The first hurricane to hit Grenada directly
th
after Hurricane Janet in 1955 was Hurricane Ivan on 7 September 2004.This situation puts the entire
project sites at risk to hurricanes. However, their vulnerability may be increased depending on the
condition of buildings, bridges and physical infrastructure.
The proposed projects are compatible with the existing land use in their respective areas. The
implementation of Chemin Storage Reservoir and Generator House and Tufton Hall Reservoir
Construction Projects will require some clearing of vegetation and excavation which is expected to result
in a minor change to the existing land use of both sites.
The remaining projects do not involve any change of use and there is no indication of potential land use
problems to be created by any of the projects except for possible noise nuisance and inconveniences to
the local communities likely to occur during project implementation, particularly the La Sagesse and
Beausejour Community Housing and the Bridge Replacement Projects.
There will be some temporary land use modification/ adjustments to facilitate the Lance Bridge
Replacement Project which may quite likely include the relocation or demolition of part of at least one of
the houses close to the bridge and traffic diversion.
4.1.5 Existing social and environmental problems
This section is concerned with the projects that are currently experiencing social and environmental
problems that are potentially hazardous or may result in social conflicts. The following details of the
situation were obtained from the surveys and consultations with interested persons and members of the
local communities.
14
4.1.4 Land Use
15
La Sagesse and Beausejour Community Housing
Both La Sagesse and Beausejour Community Housing have been experiencing a number of social and
environmental Problems associated with land tenure, access and the general condition of the houses.
Those problems can best be summarized as physical vulnerability and public health and safety issues.
The general condition of both housing schemes (houses and infrastructure) is highly vulnerable to
hazards such as hurricanes, landslips, earthquakes and fire.
This together with the existing sewage disposal problem can eventually have a negative impact on the
health and safety of the affected communities. The existing land tenure problems are considered by all
concerned to be a major stumbling block due to it’s limitations to individual’s ability to address some of
the problems themselves.
This situation seems to have originated from a type of adhoc resettlement scheme, implemented in 2007
with limited involvement of the Lands and Surveys Department which is the legitimate authority
responsible for land settlement of this nature in Grenada. According to both the Lands Officer and the
Director of Lands and Surveys, the Department’s involvement did not extend beyond the subdivision of
the lands. Details of the problems are as follows:
Land Tenure
Insecure tenure:
• Despite verbal request by some of the affected persons to the relevant authorities, no official title
of ownership has been issued to any of them.
Removal of boundary marks
• Some residents have complained about the removal of boundary marks by some individuals from
the community. This problem is a potential source of conflict.
Access
Inadequate access
• The access road was left unfinished and without proper drainage by the developer, as a result it
is not motorable and very hazardous to pedestrian due to it’s very poor condition and potential
landslip and rockfall risks, which have been occurring in some sections of the roadway (Pictures
3 &4).
Picture 3: Potential roadside rockfall
Picture 4: Large boulders near to house
16
Housing condition
The current housing condition is very poor and vulnerable. The structural integrity of the houses is highly
questionable due to the fact that each of the structural elements (substructure, superstructure and
finishes) falls well below acceptable building regulations / guidelines. The problems observed were as
follows:
Foundation and columns
• Exposed column footings due to the apparent inadequate dept and soil erosion (Picture 5).
•
Damaged columns possibly due to poor material (Picture 6).
Picture 5: Exposed column footing
Wooden structure
•
Inadequate size of wooden beams and method of fastening them to columns (4”x4” Pitch pine
beams with ½” steel bent over and fixed with 4” nails on both sides ( Picture 7)
•
Inadequate method of fastening wooden joist frames and roofs (no hurricane straps etc (Picture
8).
•
Poor quality untreated plywood material. This has resulted in rotting and termite infestation in
some houses
Picture 7: Beam and column fixing method
17
Picture 9: 2”x4”Roofs with no hurricane straps
Inadequate liquid waste disposal system
• Septic tanks are about ½ the recommended size and some have no soak away pits
•
It is quite possible that the area may soon become a health hazard due to grey water and effluent
from sewerage system (Pictures 10 & 11)
Picture10:Sewage pollution problem at
La Sagesse
Picture 11: Sewage pollution problem at Beausejour
The Lance Bridge
Lance Bridge is a single lane steel bridge located in the central part of the town of Gouyave in the Parish
of St. John. It is part of the Western Main Road and currently in poor structural condition (Picture
12&13).There is one single story wooden dwelling house close to each of its abutments on the western
side and 1 residential and commercial building much closer to its southern abutment on the opposite side.
18
Picture12: The Lance Bridge
Picture13: Corroded section of The Lance Bridge
The Hubble Bridge
The Hubble Bridge is a reinforced concrete structure located towards the outer edge of the town of
Gouyave. It is currently closed to vehicular traffic due to major structural damages (Picture 14).
Picture 14: Part of the Structural damages to the Hubble Bridge
St. Patrick’s Anglican School
The School is located on a very small parcel of unfenced land in boundary with the street. According to
the Principal, the situation has become so hazardous for students that the Authorities have, for some
time now, kept that street closed to vehicular traffic during school hours.
It is comprised of 2 sections, a Primary School on the first floor and a Pre-primary School on the ground
floor. The latter is separated from the school’s kitchen by a concrete block wall partition. Ventilation and
lighting in the Pre-primary School is very poor due mainly to the retaining wall along the eastern
19
/windward side extending up to the first floor and adjacent enclosed areas. The air quality is also affected
by odor from the kitchen.
This is clearly a relevant health and safety and possibly inexpensive issue that should have been
considered in this component of the project (for example fencing of the school compound and a look at
the possibility of rearranging or relocating some of the ground floor activities).
4.2 BIOLOGICAL ENVIRONMENT
4.2.1 Flora and Fauna Biodiversity
Grenada biodiversity includes a variety of marine species and their habitat; 5 different types of terrestrial
vegetation / forest ranging from mangrove woodlands and scrub and cactus in the coastal areas to Lower
Montane Rain Forest and Elfin woodland forest in the mountainous regions. They are the natural habitat
for a variety of animals, reptiles and birds (including turtle nesting sites).
Some of the above are part of the National Parks and Protected Areas of Grenada (Figure 6). However,
the most important of those is the Grenada Dove and its habitat. It is the National Bird of Grenada and
considered to be an endangered species located at Mt. Hartman, in the southern part of the island and at
Perseverance close to the Land-field Site. It is important to note that neither of the Project Sites is located
within any of those areas and their proposed activities are not likely to affect or be affected by them in any
way.
20
4.3 VULNERABILITY
It is evident from the above description that apart from hurricane which all the projects are vulnerable to,
the location, condition of structures and associated infrastructure are responsible for the type of
21
risk/disaster they are vulnerable to. Poor / lack of land use planning and development control can also
result in increased vulnerability and environmental problems in some areas. The Flood Mitigation Project
Sites are typical examples. They are all located within the most vulnerable flood prone zones in Grenada.
In each case there were mangrove swamps which served as natural retention ponds and filters.
Their destruction many years ago and increased development / land use changes not only resulted in
increased flooding and marine pollution but it also has resulted in what can be considered as the affected
areas now performing the roles of the former mangrove swamps. Flooding of those Project Sites always
lives various types of waste (plastic, bottles, cans, used engine oil etc.) and silt throughout the affected
areas which would otherwise flow directly into the sea and pollute the marine environment.
4.4 ISSUES FOR CONSIDERATION
The following four main issues were identified during the surveys and consultation exercises that should
be given priority consideration in project design.
1. Protection of lives and property
• The above mentioned physical characteristics of the project sites and in particular the very
poor/hazardous condition of the houses in both La Sagesse and Beausejour Housing
Settlements, are clear indicators that failure to implement appropriate mitigation measures may
result in life threatening problems and damage to property.
2. Public Health and safety
• The existing sewage disposal problems in both La Sagesse and Beausejour housing settlements
and the potential problems associated with construction activities on all of the Sites can become
detrimental to Public Health and safety
3. Public inconvenience
• During the implementation of the project some inconveniences to the adjacent communities and
the general public, especially persons living close to the Lance Bridge, will be created. Careful
consideration must be given to addressing this issue.
4. Marine pollution
• Measures to solve the flooding problem in Morne Rouge, Dusty Highway and St. Johns River
can result in an increased volume of pollution entering the marine environment if solution does
not include appropriate means of minimizing or avoiding current terrestrial flood driven pollution
from getting into the sea.
5.0 IDENTIFICATION AND ASSESSMENT OF IMPACTS
5.1 OVERVIEW
This part of the report is concerned with the identification and assessment of potential positive and
negative environmental and social impacts of the proposed project. A summary of the impacts is
presented in Table 6.1, at the end of the assessment. In that summary the positive impacts are identified
by a plus (+) sign and the negative impacts by a minus (-) sign. They also relate to the respective project
implementation activities/ impacts.
A combination of two criteria was used to determine the environmental significance of predicted impacts:
the intensity of the potential impact of the project component and the importance (value) of the
environmental component (table: 4.1). It should be noted however that the actual extent and intensity of
impacts might be affected by the project planning and implementation procedures.
22
Table 4.1: Criteria Used to Determine the Significance of Environmental Effects
INTENSITY OF
IMPACTS
VALUE PLACED ON THE COMPONENT
Legally
protected
Considered important but not
legally protected
Considered not
important
M AJOR
Significant
Significant
Insignificant
MODERATE
Significant
Significant
Insignificant
MINOR
Significant
Significant/ Insignificant
Insignificant
The Intensity of the impact has been qualified as: Minor, Moderate or Major. To make this judgment, the
following factors were taken into consideration:
• Magnitude of project intervention;
• Frequency of project intervention;
• Irreversibility of impact of the intervention;
• Size of the area affected by the intervention.
The importance of the concerned environmental component is related to the value placed upon it by the
public, environmental experts and the international community. It can be qualified as legally protected,
important or not important. The importance placed on the environmental component may depend on:
• It’s rare or unique nature;
• Professional /experts concerns;
• Public perception of its importance;
• It’s current or potential use.
5.2 POSITIVE IMPACTS
The proposed projects are likely to create the following significant positive socio-economic and
environmental impacts on the affected communities and the country as a whole after completion:
• Reduction/elimination of current and potential hazards.
•
Improvement in public health and safety conditions.
•
Land regularization and Security of tenure
•
Creation of short term employment opportunities
The employment related impact is predicted to occur during the implementation of the project. New skilled
and unskilled jobs should be available to the local people. Formal and informal sector services, such as
trucking, catering, etc., may also be provided by local persons. The other are expected to be long term
significant impacts occurring after project implementation.
5.3 NEGATIVE IMPACTS
There will some short term negative impacts created during the implementation of the project. However,
all except traffic obstruction and public inconvenience are predicted to be insignificant.
23
5.3.1 Public Inconvenience
Some public inconveniences will be created to the users of the associated facilities /areas. However, the
residents of both housing areas and persons living close to both bridges will be more seriously affected. It
is quite likely that some persons living close to the Lance Bridge may have to be temporarily relocated
until the complication.
5.3.2 Noise Nuisance
The use of machinery and equipment during the implementation of the project is also expected to
generate noise. However, except in cases of malfunctioning machinery and equipment, the impact on the
local communities will be insignificant.
5.3.3 Traffic Congestion
During the construction of the Lance Bridges, it may become necessary to close that section of the
roadway to facilitate the proposed works. This will obstruct the flow of traffic and increase travel time for
commuters. This is a negative impact that the affected persons seem prepared to tolerate because,
according to them, this is the only way of illuminating the hazardous condition of the bridge.
5.3.4 Air Pollution
The implementation of the proposed project will involve the use of machinery and equipment which can
result in the discharge of carbon monoxide and dust into the atmosphere. If this should occur in excessive
quantities, it will depreciate the quality of the air in the area. This problem is both social and
environmental.
5.3.5 Marine Pollution
This problem may have serious consequences if more pollutants from Morne Rouge, St. Johns’ River and
Dusty Highway are allowed to flow into the sea, particularly Dusty Highway and the St. Johns’ River.
There is more pollution generating activities (mechanic shops, block plant etc) within both areas.
5.4 RESIDUAL IMPACTS
No significant negative residual impacts are predicted. Nevertheless, improper post-construction site
clearing (removal of construction waste, garbage and/or derelict machinery or equipment) can contribute
to environmental degradation and possible marine pollution if, overtime, they are transported to the sea
via flood waters during heavy rains.
6.0 MITIGATION MEASURES
6.1 General Considerations
In addition to the under mentioned mitigation measures, it is important that the application of good
operation and management practice is administered through the entire implementation process. Public
consultation is also of paramount importance. The affected persons should be informed of the potential
problems and mitigation measures. Their concerns and suggestions should also be given due
consideration. Wherever possible, employment should be provided for the local people. This will enhance
cooperation and support for the project.
6.2 SPECIFIC CONSIDERATIONS
6.2.1 Public inconvenience
An implementation plan should be prepared and implemented with particular emphasis on public
consultation and participation where possible.
24
6.2.2 Noise Nuisance
The mitigation measures recommended are:
• Regular inspection of machinery and equipment used in the operation to ensure
that they are in good working condition, thus avoiding excessive noise
• Avoidance of noise-prone activities between the hours of 6 pm. and 6 am.
6.2.3 Traffic Obstruction
In order to minimize problems associated with the obstruction of traffic it is necessary to:
•
Prepare a Traffic Management Plan for the affected areas in collaboration with the police traffic
department and consultation with officials of the relevant Bus Drivers Association.
•
•
Inform the general public of the necessary traffic adjustments;
Install appropriate traffic signs;
•
Use traffic wardens to assist in regulating traffic during construction;
6.2.4 Air pollution
The predicted air pollution can be mitigated by:
•
Regular inspection of trucks, machinery and equipment used for the project to ensure that they
are in good working condition, thus avoiding excessive discharge of carbon monoxide
•
Covering of dust prone material during transportation.
•
Sprinkling of dust prone areas once per day or as necessary, during construction.
6.2.5 Marine Pollution
•
Flood mitigation designs should include provisions for pollution control
•
The use of equipment and machinery in the river during the construction of both bridges must be
avoided and no material or waste should be stored where they can eventually get into the river
7.0 Environmental Management Plan
This project has been classified as category B in accordance with OP/BP 4.01 Environmental
Assessments. Works proposed under the project are largely rehabilitation and retrofitting of selected
infrastructure and impacts are generally associated with the actual construction phase of the works
activities. However, select works involve new constructions particularly those involving community works
in La Sagesse and Bousejour will likely present the possibility for significant environmental impacts.
As a category B project, the Government of Grenada prepared this Environmental Assessment to
examine project activities and the environmental framework to guide project execution. Two groups of
25
projects have been identified. These are those which will require an Environmental Assessment to be
completed during project execution and those comprising uncomplicated rehabilitation works where the
impacts are limited to the construction phase (e.g. repair and retrofitting). To address these activities,
procedures have been included in the operations manual detailing requirements for a stand-alone
Environmental Assessment and the screening of uncomplicated activities for the inclusion of
environmental compliance contracting clauses to mitigate construction related impacts.
7.1 Supervision
Supervision for environmental compliance will be managed through the PCU in close collaboration with
the Ministry of Housing, Ministry or Works, Ministry of Planning and the Ministry of Health and
Environment as well as other affected ministries. In addition to Bank requirements, the PCU will also be
responsible for ensuring the proper application of any national environmental requirements. The PCU will
be responsible for ensuring environmental compliance in accordance with procedures detailed in the
Project Operations Manual
7.2 Project level Environmental Assessments
Projects requiring an EA have been identified and contracting requirements will be incorporated into the
procurement plan. EAs will be completed during the preparation of works activities and will establish
environmental requirements for the design and construction phase of the activity draft TORs are
presented in annex 1 and will be included in the operations manual. All such projects are subject to prior
review. Specific works identified requiring an EA are:
•
•
La Sagesse community infrastructure Improvements and
Beausejour Housing community infrastructure .
These activities include significant changes to local infrastructure and will require preliminary engineering
designs prior to the development of an EA as specific activities and potential impacts remain to be
defined. The EA will be coordinated with the findings of the Social Assessment and findings from both
studies will be incorporated into the final construction contract requirements.
7.3 Rehabilitation Works
The remaining works under the project involve the rehabilitation, stabilization and improvements to
existing infrastructure. These are relatively uncomplicated activities whose impacts occur during the
construction phase of the project. A screening procedure and draft construction contract clauses are to
be included in the operations manual to be applied as needed to works construction contracts.
In the case of road works, contractors shall develop a traffic management plan to minimize traffic impacts.
This plan will be required in the construction contract and will be subject to approval by the PCU prior to
start of works.
As identified in the EA, construction activities are generally located in urban centres and along vulnerable
roadway areas with respect to landslip and rock fall. No projects in this category have been identified that
will potentially affect sensitive habitats, coastal zone, or that will involve involve any additional application
of environmentally related safeguard policy.
26
7.4 Specific Requirements for Rehabilitation Works
Accordingly, the EMP provides guidance on actions which must be taken during the implementation and
operational phase of the project to ensure that activities are undertaken in an environmentally sustainable
fashion so as to minimize the impact of the initiative on the surrounding environment, both human and
natural. In order to strengthen compliance with the EMP, the actions and recommendations described
below will be applied to rehabilitation works in the form clauses in contracts that govern construction and
project implementation requirements.
a) Site Security
The contractor shall be responsible for maintaining security over the construction site including the
protection of stored materials and equipment. In the event of severe weather, the contractor shall secure
the construction site and associated equipment in such a manner as to protect the site and adjacent
areas from consequential damages. This includes the management of onsite wastes, construction and
sanitary, additional strengthening of erosion control and soil stabilization systems and other conditions
resulting from contractor activities that may increase the potential for damages.
b) Discovery of antiquities
If, during the execution of the activities contained in this contract, any material is discovered onsite which
may be considered of historical or cultural interest, such as evidence of prior settlements, native or
historical activities, evidence of any existence on a site which may be of cultural significance, all work
shall stop and the supervising contracting officer shall be notified immediately. The area in which the
material was discovered shall be marked and the evidence preserved for examination.
Work may resume, without penalty of prejudice to the contractor upon permission from The PCU with any
restrictions offered to protect the site.
c) Asbestos
While asbestos materials have not been identified in structures targeted for repair or reconstruction under
this project, the following asbestos management procedures shall be implemented should they be
discovered during the construction process.
The contractor shall contact the Solid Waste Management Unit to develop an asbestos management
plan. Site management shall consist of stabilizing friable asbestos and the provision of worker protection
to prevent contamination with asbestos fibers.
Respiratory protection together with measures to prevent the contamination of clothing and inadvertent
transport of asbestos fiber off-site shall be provided to exposed workers . The asbestos management
plan shall be developed by the contractor in consultation with the Solid Waste Management Unit to
include as a minimum:
• Description of the issue and extent of contamination
• Site safety measures
• Stabilization techniques to be employed
• Storage and transport plan
• Approved disposal procedure
• Worker awareness and training
This plan shall be approved by the Solid Waste Management Unit and the PCU.
27
d) Worker Sanitation
Sanitation facilities shall be provided to site workers. All sanitary wastes generated as a result of project
activities shall be managed in a manner approved by the PCU. The contractor shall provide a site
sanitation plan for approval and implementation prior to the commencement of site activities.
e) Noise Control
The contractor shall control noise emissions generated as a result of contracting activities to the extent
possible. In the case of site locations where noise disturbance will be a concern, the contractor shall
ensure that the equipment is in good working order with manufacturer supplied noise suppression
(mufflers etc.) systems functioning and in good repair. Where noise management is a concern, the
contractor shall make reasonable efforts to schedule activities during normal working hours (between 8
am and 5 pm). Where noise is likely to pose a risk to the surrounding community, the contractor shall
inform the site manager and shall develop a public notification and noise management plan for approval
by the PCU.
f)
Use and management of hazardous materials, fuels, solvents and petroleum Products
Any use hazardous materials excluding pesticides, oils, fuels and petroleum products shall conform to the
proper use recommendations of the product. Waste hazardous materials and their containers shall be
disposed of in a manner approved by the relevant agency. A site management plan will be developed by
the contractor if the operation involves the use of these materials to include estimated quantities to be
consumed in the process, storage plans, spill control plans, and waste disposal practices to be followed.
This plan is subject to the approval of the PCU.
g) Use of preservatives and paint substances
All paints and preservatives shall be used only with the approval of the contracting officer. Information
shall be provided to the contracting officer that describes the essential components of the materials to be
used so that an informed determination can be made as to the potential for environmental effects and
suitability can be made. Storage, use, and disposal of excess paints and preservatives shall be managed
in conformance with the manufacturers’ recommendations and as approved by the PCU. The contractor
shall provide the PCU with a list of materials and estimated quantities to be used, storage, spill control
and waste disposal plans to be observed during the execution of the contract. This plan is subject to the
approval of the contracting officer.
h) Site stabilization and erosion control
The Contractor shall implement measures at the site of operations to manage soil erosion through
minimization of excavated area, preservation of existing ground cover to the extent possible, provision of
approved ground cover. Where excavations are made, contractor shall implement appropriate stabilizing
techniques to prevent cave-in or landslide. Erosion control measures shall be approved by the PCU.
An erosion management plan will be required where the potential exists for significant sediment quantities
to accumulate in wetlands, lakes, rivers and near-shore marine systems. This plan shall include a
description of the potential threat, mitigation measures to be applied, and consideration for the effects of
severe weather and an emergency response plan.
i)
Traffic Management
In cases where construction activities result in the disruption of area transportation services, including
temporary loss of roadway, blockage due to deliveries and site related activities, the contractor shall
provide the PCU with a traffic management plan including a description of the anticipated service
disruptions, community information plan, and traffic control strategy to be implemented so as to minimize
the impact to the surrounding community. This plan shall consider time of day for planned disruptions,
28
and shall include consideration for access to essential services such as medical, disaster evacuation, and
other critical services. The plan shall be approved by the PCU.
j)
Management of standing water
Under no circumstances shall the contractor permit the collection of standing water as a consequence of
contractor activities without the approval of the contracting officer and consultation with the Environmental
Management Department of the Ministry of Health and the Environment.
k) Management of trash and debris
The contractor shall provide the PCU with a trash and debris management plan that conforms to the solid
waste management policies and regulations of Grenada. Under no circumstances shall the contractor
allow construction wastes to accumulate so as to cause a nuisance or health risk due to the propagation
of pests and disease vectors. The site waste management plan shall include a description of how wastes
will be stored, collected and disposed of, in accordance with current law. Additionally the contractor shall
provide for the regular removal and disposal of all site wastes and provide the contracting officer with a
schedule for such removal.
l)
Schools Construction and Rehabilitation
The project includes rehabilitative works to schools. In some cases, construction may occur while classes
are being held. If this is the case, the school will use undamaged areas for classroom activities. The
contractor shall seek to minimize as much as possible, the impacts to ongoing classes. Contractors shall
also work with the PCU and the Ministry of Education’s designate to manage the storage and flow of
materials so as to minimize disruption to school activities. In cases where this is not an option, the project
implementation unit will coordinate with the Ministry of Education to propose a system which will ensure
that the smallest level of disruption to school activities e.g. shift system in collaboration with neighboring
schools.
29
30
TERMS OF REFERENCE:
ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT
GRENADA
DISASTER VULNERABILITY REDUCTION PROJECT
Introduction
The government of Grenada (GoG) is in the process of preparing a World Bank funded project designed
to contribute to the reduction of vulnerability to natural disaster in the region. The project will include
various activities related to institutional strengthening and training as well as the execution of various
works to retrofit or protect national assets.
According to the Bank’s Environmental Assessment Policy [OP4.01] the project is classified as Category
B meaning that environmental impacts for the type of work anticipated under the project are expected to
be moderate in nature and can be managed through the application of appropriate engineering and
management measures.
The purpose of this consultancy is to produce a project level environmental assessment based on the
activities planned for execution under the DVRP.
Background Information
Grenada is among the most disaster-prone countries in the world, regularly suffering disasters related to
natural events such as, hurricanes (Ivan and Emily being particularly devastating in recent years),
landslides, rain and drought. These hazards have caused significant and recurrent damages to national
infrastructure including housing, road networks, schools, hospitals and other facilities such as phone
lines, water and electricity. The resulting impacts significantly affect human welfare, national economic
activities, property, and natural resources. The effects of climate change are already evident in many
parts of the country with rising sea levels and storm activity continuing to impact on exposed coastlines
and development. The situation is only expected to worsen as Grenada is highly vulnerable to the
impacts of global warming and climate associated impacts.
The environmentally significant project activities will likely focus on small to mid-sized civil works to be
executed under the proposed project. Works activities include retrofitting of structures to improve disaster
resilience, road works and bridge construction/rehabilitation including the possibility of road realignment,
sea defenses, and building construction.
Cultural and historical aspects include archaeological considerations. While no works have been
identified in known historical sites, there remains the possibility for chance discovery of artifacts in the
project area.
Marine habitats are varied and include sand beaches, near-shore reef systems, marine grasses and other
features typical of the geographic setting. Terrestrial habitats are varied and Grenada does have
endemic. Given the current suite of proposed works, there are no implications for the intervention into
natural habitats or critical habitats however this should be verified under the Environmental Assessment.
1
Objectives of the EA
This Environmental Assessment is to be conducted at the project preparation phase in the Bank project
development cycle and is required for project approval under the Bank’s Safeguard System. The EA is a
project level assessment and reflects an analysis of the general impacts and mitigations to be applied
during project execution. At this stage, in most cases, engineering designs do not exist and precise
locations have generally not been identified for specific works. As a result, the assessment will be
forward looking with emphasis on impacts reasonably expected based on the nature of the activities and
the development of an Environmental Management Plan (EMP) to be applied during project execution.
The plan will include activities required based on the specific works to be undertaken and may include the
requirement for separate environmental assessments to be conducted for specific works activities
depending on the magnitude of expected impacts.
To this end, the EMP will include a screening
procedure to identify activities requiring additional analysis.
The EA will be conducted in compliance with World Bank requirements as presented in OP 4.01,
Environmental Assessment and shall include considerations as presented in Bank Safeguards OP/BP
4.04, Natural Habitats and OP/BP 4.11, Physical Cultural Resources.
Scope
This assessment shall include the examination of all activities proposed under the DVRP with particular
emphasis on the civil works activities.
Specific EA Requirements
As a project level assessment, the consultant shall review with the line agencies activities to be included
in the project and assess the potential environmental impacts that may arise. During the assessment the
consultant will assess the environmental management capacity of the various agencies and include a
review of applicable Grenada national regulations to identify specific environmental compliance activities
in addition to those included under OP 4.01 and related safeguards.
At a minimum, the EA will include the following:
1. Executive Summary of not more than 2 pages
2. Description of the Project
3. Legal framework including environmental, land use, water management and other related laws
and regulations
4. Description of the Existing Environment
• Biological
• Physical
• Socioeconomic
5. Analysis of project Impacts
• Biological
• Physical
• Socioeconomic
6. Mitigation Analysis
7. Mitigation plan
8. Environmental Management Plan
9. Record of consultations
10. Technical Annexes
11. List of Preparers
In addition to the assessment, the Consultant shall provide an environmental screening procedure for
works activities designed to identify works activities requiring additional assessment during the project
execution. These procedures will be incorporated in the Project Operations Manual.
2
Schedule
Keeping with the project approval timeline, the Environmental Assessment is expected to be of duration
of 30 working days to be will be completed by October 30, 2010.
Qualifications of Consultant
The consultant shall have a minimum of a bachelor’s degree in natural sciences, engineering or related
discipline and a minimum of 5 years experience in the development of Environmental assessments and
analysis. Consultant shall have demonstrated experience in the analysis of impacts related to civil works.
3
List of persons consulted
Mr. Fabian Purcell
Chief Planning officer
Physics Planning Unit
Ministry of Works, Physical Planning
And Communication
Mr. St. Louis
Chief Engineer
Ministry Of Works, Physical Planning
And Communication
Mr. Lauriston Hustain
Ag. Manager
Planning and Development
NAWASA
Mr. Venance MC. Ackey
Director of lands and Surveys
Ministry of Housing, Lands and
Community Development
Mr. Trevor Barclay
Lands Officer
Ministry of Housing, Lands and
Community Development
Ms. Jean Edwards
The Lance, Gouyave
St. John’s
Mr. Daniel Vincent
The Lance, Gouyave
St. John’s
Ms. Victoria St. Paul
The Lance, Gouyave
St. John’s
Mr. Marvin Henry
The Lance, Gouyave
St. John’s
Mr. Carmu Callomore
The Lance, Gouyave
St. John’s
Mr. Elvis Noel
The Lance, Gouyave
St. John’s
Mr. Joseph Noel
Ministry of Housing, Lands and
Community Development
Ms. Ena Alexis
Gouyave Estate
St. John’s
Ms. Wilma Alexander
Principal
St. Patrick’s Anglican school
Mr. Alwin George
Gouyave Estate
St. John’s
Ms. Claudine Paul
Principal
Holy Cross R. C School
Ms. Carrine Mitchell
Gouyave Estate
St. John’s
4
Mr. Stephen Phillip
La Sagesse
Community Housing
St. David’s
Mr. Maurice Henry
La Sagesse
Community Housing
St. David’s
Ms. Julia Hypolite
La Sagesse
Community Housing
St. David’s
Mr. Johnson George
La Sagesse
Community Housing
St. David’s
Mr. Dexter Patrick
La Sagesse
Community Housing
St. David’s
Ms. Elizabeth Williams
La Sagesse
Community Housing
St. David’s
Mr. Jerome Julien
La Sagesse
Community Housing
St. David’s
Mr. Miguel Henry
La Sagesse
Community Housing
St. David’s
Ms. Denies Marcel
La Sagesse
Community Housing
St. David’s
Mr. Richard Vincent
La Sagesse
Community Housing
St. David’s
Mr. Lennox Mitchell
Beausejour Community Housing
St. George’s
Ms. Retina Bruno
Beausejour Community Housing
St. George’s
Ms. Theodel Duncan
Beausejour Community Housing
St. George’s
Ms. Indra Mc. Queen
Beausejour Community Housing
St. George’s
Ms. Lenardine Phillip
Beausejour Community Housing
St. George’s
Ms. Solisha Simon
Beausejour Community Housing
St. George’s
Mr. Leroy George
Beausejour Community Housing
2
St. George’s
Mr. Dinga Thomas
Beausejour Community Housing
St. George’s
Ms. Lisa John
Beausejour Community Housing
St. George’s
Mr. John
Dusty Highway
St. George’s
The Manager
Daniel and Daniel Engineering
Dusty Highway
St. George’s
The Manager
Johnny’s Sails
Dusty Highway
St. George’s
The Manager
Siesta Hotel
Morne Rouge, St. George’s
Mr. Arnold Bhagwan
NAWASA
Dusty Highway
St. George’s
The Manager
Coyaba Hotel
Morne Rouge, St. George’s
Mr. Josh Lewis
Josh Trucking
Dusty Highway
St. George’s
The Manager
Spice Island Inn Hotel
Morne Rouge, St. George’s
Mr. Budhlal
Grenada Pavement
Dusty Highway
St. George’s
Mr. Sylvester
Independence Agency
Maurice Bishop /Dusty Highway
St. George’s
Mr. R. La Hee
Manager
Huggins Motor
Maurice Bishop /Dusty Highway
St. George’s
Mr. Forteau
Manager, Motor Department
McIntyre
Maurice Bishop /Dusty Highway
St. George’s
3