Will custom orthodontic appliances replace traditional
Transcription
Will custom orthodontic appliances replace traditional
5/8/2014 Will custom orthodontic appliances replace traditional orthodontic appliances? Hero Breuning, DDS,PhD. Department of Orthodontics and Craniofacial Biology, Radboud University Nijmegen, The Netherlands herobreuning@gmail.com Introduction Damon (Ormco) 1 5/8/2014 Individual appliance Archambault A et al. : Torque expression in stainless steel orthodontic brackets. Angle Orthod. 2010 (review article). Wire selection • Breuning KH. Early full size wires. J Clin Orthod 2011 2 5/8/2014 Early full size wires Michael.C.Alpern Neo Sentalloy (GAC) Tritanium wire (American Orthodontics) My first individual appliance: Hero-System In-Ovation (GAC) Time + Empower (AO) Victory (3M Unitek) 3 5/8/2014 Dual activation + bi-dimensional 018 022 • Empower (American Orthodontics) Breuning KH. Am J Orth Dentfacial Orthop 2008. Dual activation Damon Q Gemini Prodigy Victory SL • Ormco 3M Unitek 4 5/8/2014 Individually selected torque values • Breuning KH . Efficient orthodontics-J Clin Orthod 2011. Straight wire appliance ? • Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion.1972 5 5/8/2014 Individual fixed appliance system • • • • • Bracket selection (active/passive) Slot selection (0.018’ vs 0.022”) Torque selection Wire selection Indirect bonding Need for custom appliances • Andrews LF. The six keys to normal occlusion.1972 6 5/8/2014 Bracket selection Breuning KH . Efficient orthodontics-J Clin Orthod 2011. Custom diagnosis and treatment 7 5/8/2014 Virtual treatment planning in 3D • Ludlow JB and Walker C. Assessment of phantom dosimetry and image quality of i-CAT FLX cone-beam computed tomography. AJODO 2013. Virtual treatment presentation in 3D • Anatomage (In Vivo) Dolphin 8 5/8/2014 Fabrication of custom appliances • Digital dental models Heat N Bite (Ormco) Intra oral scanning • iTero scanner (Cadent) 9 5/8/2014 The dentition on CBCT’s • AnatoModels (InVivo dental) Accuracy of digital dental models • I Tero scan CBCT Akyalcin S et al. Diagnostic accuracy of impression-free digital models. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2013. 10 5/8/2014 Accuracy of digital dental models Plaster SureSmile emodels AnatoModels • SureSmile models were the most accurate, and reproducible • emodels were significantly faster than those taken on the other models Grünheid T et al. Accuracy, reproducibility, and time efficiency of dental measurements using different technologies AJODO 2014. Intra oral scanner + software • -Trios scanner (3Shape) Ortho Analyzer software • -Ortho Insight software and Facial Insight software 11 5/8/2014 Digital set up • Set up Insignia 3Shape Custom appliances 12 5/8/2014 Claims of custom appliances Individual System Insignia Custom Damon Brackets • Shorter treatment • Improved results Custom buccal appliances Insignia (Ormco) 13 5/8/2014 Pyamide of evicence for Insignia • Weber DJ 2nd et al. Clinical effectiveness and efficiency of customized vs. conventional preadjusted bracket systems. J Clinical Orthod 2013. Literature on efficiency of Insignia -Final PAR scores, were not significantly different -The Insignia group had a lower average ABO score -Treatment time was significantly shorter -On average 7 fewer appointments needed • . Weber DJ 2nd et al. J Clinical Orthod 2013. 14 5/8/2014 Selection of appliance Suresmile • Shorter treatment • Improved results • Invisable Pyramide of evidence for Suresmile 15 5/8/2014 Literature on Suresmile • Saxe AK, Louie LJ, Mah J. Efficiency and effectiveness of SureSmile. World J Orthod. 2010;11:16-22. • Alford TJ, Roberts WE, Hartsfield JK Jr, Eckert GJ, Snyder RJ. Clinical outcomes for patients finished with the SureSmile™ method compared with conventional fixed orthodontic therapy. Angle Orthod. 2011;81:383-8. • Sachdeva RC, Aranha SL, Egan ME, Gross HT, Sachdeva NS, Currier GF, Kadioglu O. Treatment time: SureSmile vs conventional. Orthodontics (Chic.). 2012;13:72-85. • Larson BE, Vaubel CJ, Grünheid T. Effectiveness of computer-assisted orthodontic treatment technology to achieve predicted outcomes. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:557-62. Some of the articles are biased Suresmile • Treatment time for the Suresmile patients was significantly shorter 31% (7.2 months) and the result increased with 11%. to conventional fixed appliance treatment”. Alford TJ. et al. Angle Orthod 2011. 16 5/8/2014 Custom wires for invisible appliances LINGUAL APPLIANCES • Suresmile Custom lingual bracket systems Incognito,Harmony, E braces, etc. 17 5/8/2014 Pyramide of evidence for Incognito • Grauer D, Proffit WR. Accuracy in tooth positioning with a fully customized • lingual orthodontic appliance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011. Literature on Incognito They concluded: “These fully customized lingual orthodontic appliances were accurate in achieving the goals planned at the initial setup, except for the full amount of planned expansion and the inclination at the second molars. “ Grauer D and Proffit WR. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 2011. 18 5/8/2014 Aligners • Shorter treatment • Improved results • Invisable Pyramide of evidence for Invisalign • Lagravere MO and Flores-Mir C. The treatment effects of Invisalign Orthodontic aligners A systematic review. J Am Dent Assoc 2005. 19 5/8/2014 Conclusions Lagravère 2005 -Unable to draw strong conclusions Djeu 2005 -Deficient in its ability to correct large anteroposterior discrepancies and occlusal contacts -Finished 4 months sooner Kravitz 2009 -To learn regarding the biomechanics Buschang 2013 -Less visits needed (4) -Shorter treatment duration (5.5 months) -More expensive Custom aligners ? • Aligners on printed dental models 20 5/8/2014 Attachments for aligners Retention pads Dimples Invisalign (Align) Orthocaps Ideal Smile (GAC) Scientific proof of efficiency and efficacy Custom brackets and wires Custom Aligners Custom wires 21 5/8/2014 Follow up during treatment • I Tero scanner Follow up during treatment 22 5/8/2014 Main advantage of custom appliances • • • • More predictable treatment Improved communication with the patient More delegation possible Shorter treatment time? Improved results? Main disadvantage of custom appliances Digital planning is time consuming Custom appliances are more expensive 10 take home messages • • • • • • • • • • Individual appliances Indirect bonding Early full size wires Reduced radiation for CBCT’s Intra oral scanners, the orthodontist should have the STL files Setup in the orthodontic office The orthodontist corrects the initial set up Patient selects the appliance The orthodontist selects the company who will make the appliance Follow up appliances are needed (Finishing appliances) 23 5/8/2014 24