The official publication of the BRITISH ASSOCIATION OF
Transcription
The official publication of the BRITISH ASSOCIATION OF
ISSN 1754-3452 The official publication of the BRITISH ASSOCIATION OF SPORT AND EXERCISE SCIENCES ISSUE 24 | SUMMER 2010 Inside the mind of Phil Neville Performing under pressure in sport Team Psychology - what makes a winning team? www.bases.org.uk www.bases.org.uk Issue 24 | Excellence Summer 2010 |inThe Sport and Scientist |1 Promoting Sport andExercise Exercise Sciences Keynote Sessions The Dr Andy Cathcart Symposium: The factors which limit maximal oxygen uptake: The head, the heart or an integrated peripheral system Prof Tim Noakes (the head), Prof Bjorn Ekblom (the heart) and Prof Peter Wagner (an integrated system). Chair: Prof Neil Spurway FBASES Does dehydration impair exercise performance? Prof Ron Maughan (yes) and Prof Tim Noakes (no). Chair: Prof Craig Sharp FBASES The great drugs debate Prof Martial Saugy, Prof Bengt Kayser, Prof David Cowan, Prof Mike Spedding and Charlie Spedding. Chair: Prof Ian McGrath Can we modulate physical activity in children? Prof John Reilly (yes) and Prof Terry Wilkin (no). Chair: Prof Jo Doust FBASES Are we really less active than we used to be? What does the objective evidence show? Prof John Speakman. Symposia Sessions Sports nutrition - What's new? Prof Andy Jones FBASES and Prof Asker Jeukendrup International Centre for East African Running Science (ICEARS) Symposium Dr Robert Scott, Dr Barry Fudge and Dr Yannis Pitsiladis Joint BASES, Royal College of Physicians and Fitness Industry Association Symposium: Linking medicine and exercise Dr John Searle OBE, Dr John Etherington and Dr Gary O'Donovan The female athlete: A multi-disciplinary perspective Dr Joanna Scurr, Prof Mike Tipton, Dr Anne-Marie Elbe, Jenny White and Deirdre Angella Measurement of physical activity in free-living environments Dr David Rowe, Dr Sebastian Chastin and Prof John Reilly Joint BASES/FEPSAC symposia • The training of applied sport psychologists: A critical reflection of issues within Europe • Developmental strategies for consultants working in elite youth sport programmes Dr Chris Harwood, Prof Paul Wylleman plus other speakers to be confirmed. Delegate Fees For further details, visit: www.gla.ac.uk/BASES or email BASES@bio.gla.ac.uk 2 | Issue 24 | Summer 2010 | The Sport and Exercise Scientist www.bases.org.uk | The Sport and Exercise Scientist – published quarterly by BASES Editor l Dr Sarah Rowell FBASES Production Director l Dr Claire Hitchings Editorial Advisory Board l Dr Melissa Day, Dr Lee Ingle, Dr Dominic Micklewright, Claire-Marie Roberts, Len Parker Simpson, Dr Ken van Someren Book and Resource Review l Dr David Tod Advertising l Dr Claire Hitchings - chitchings@bases.org.uk Proofreading l Abi Masha, Coachwise Business Solutions (enquiries@coachwisesolutions.co.uk) Publisher l Mercer Print, Newark Street, Accrington BB5 0PB. Tel: +44 (0)1254 395512 • info@mercer-print.co.uk BASES l Leeds Metropolitan University, Fairfax Hall, Headingley Campus, Beckett Park, Leeds, LS6 3QT Tel/Fax: +44 (0)113 812 6162/63 - jbairstow@bases.org.uk Website l www.bases.org.uk Front Cover Image l World Cup 2010 montage by Darren Brown (full player list at foot of page) Disclaimer l The statements and opinions contained in the articles are solely those of the individual contributors and are not necessarily those of BASES. The appearance of advertisements in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement or approval of products or services. BASES has undertaken all reasonable measures to ensure that the information contained in The SES is accurate and specifically disclaims any liability, loss or risk, personal or otherwise, which is incurred as a consequence, directly or indirectly of the use and application of any of the contents. Copyright © BASES, 2010 l All rights reserved. Reproduction in whole or in substantial part without permission of The SES Production Director is strictly prohibited. An archive is available in the Member Area at www.bases.org.uk Copy deadline 1 July 2010 for Issue 25. All contributions welcomed. Information for contributors www.bases.org.uk The BASES Board Chair | Prof Jo Doust - j.h.doust@brighton.ac.uk BASES Executive Officers | Dr Claire Hitchings - chitchings@bases.org.uk (Wednesday and Thursday only), Debbie Pearce - dpearce@bases.org.uk Divisional Chair of Physical Activity for Health | Dr Jason Gill - j.gill@bio.gla.ac.uk Divisional Chair of Sport and Performance | Dr Dominic Micklewright - dpmick@essex.ac.uk Divisional Chair of Education and Professional Development | Dr Richard Tong - rtong@uwic.ac.uk Non-Executive Directors | Graham Wilson and Sue Anstiss BASES Office Staff Office Manager | Jane Bairstow - jbairstow@bases.org.uk Tel: 0113 812 6162 Education Officer | Kate Yule - kyule@bases.org.uk Tel: 0113 8126165 Administrative Assistants | Marsha Stankler - mstankler@bases.org.uk (Workshops) (Monday-Thursday only) Tel: 0113 812 6163. Jane Gillott - jgillott@bases.org.uk (Membership) (Tuesday and Thursday only) Tel: 0113 812 6164 FOREWORD A ny scientists reading a piece of research would be pretty dismissive if its findings were based on a questionnaire return rate of under 5% of the target population – so what to make of the recent The Sport and Exercise Scientist (The SES) reader survey with a response rate of 3.3% of BASES members? Or should more be read into the lack of response than the detail of the responses received? Potentially – but that is like trying to explain something you do not understand and hence has the potential to bog you down in the purely hypothetical. Better to look at the known and, combing the responses we received (thank you to all those who responded), with the energy and imagination of The SES Editorial Advisory Board has, I believe, resulted in some exciting new ideas for the publication, as well as some more subtle tweaks, which readers will start to see from this issue onwards. So, whether this is being read by 5% or 95% of the membership, I hope you can all take something from the issue to enhance your practice. What will I take? Particularly, having had the recent pleasure of interviewing one of the most professional athletes I have ever come across (one who has spent the last 15 years of his life living in a massive glass fishbowl and who is still performing at the top of his game), it is that elite athletes are, on the one hand, human “just like the rest of us”, and on the other (echoing the words of a very successful Performance Director), they are “freak outliers”. Being able to gauge the balance between the two, to understand how best to provide support at any given time and, subsequently, to be able to apply whatever skill set is required, is what divides the best applied support practitioners from the rest. Dr Sarah Rowell FBASES Editor saz@srowell.demon.co.uk CONTENTS 4 l BASES NEWS 6 l LONDON 2012 DIARIES The SES follows the preparation of the British Sailing and Paralympic teams in the build up to 2012 8 l BASES – PRESENT Prof Edward Winter FBASES continues his history of sports and exercise science and BASES 10 l PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT – THE SEVEN DEADLY SINS OF PRESENTING The BASES Awards Committee shares its expertise on how to avoid the Seven Deadly Sins of Presenting 12 l PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT – SEMINAR SOLUTIONS This new section of The SES starts with Dr Emma Ross sharing her ideas for Problem Based Learning within physiology 13 l APPLIED PRACTICE – INSIDE THE MIND OF PHIL NEVILLE Dr Sarah Rowell FBASES interviews Premier League Footballer Phil Neville 16 l COVER FEATURE – WILL THE BEST TEAM WIN? Dr Barry Drust considers the critical factors that may affect the teams playing in this summer’s soccer World Cup 18 l APPLIED PRACTICE – TEAM PSYCHOLOGY Simon Middlemas reflects on the development of teams within elite sport 20 l STRICTLY FOR STUDENTS First hand experiences of presenting at a BASES Annual Student Conference 22 l ACCREDITATION – BASES LABORATORY ACCREDITATION Dr Glyn Howatson explains the changes that have recently been made to BASES Laboratory Accreditation 25 l RESEARCH – EXERCISE AS A TREATMENT FOR POSTNATAL DEPRESSION Dr Amanda Daley discusses the issues 29 l RESEARCH – PERFORMING UNDER PRESSURE IN SPORT Dr Tim Rees reflects on the invited symposium he presented at 31 l THE HELP BLOG Dr Edwin D. Bayard starts his new column offering advice and solutions to members’ problems 13 16 22 Cover montage: From top left down; Aaron Mokoena (South Africa), Kaka (Brazil) and Park Ji Sung (South Korea). From top right down; Wayne Rooney (England), Fernando Torres (Spain) and Lionel Messi (Argentina). www.bases.org.uk Issue 24 | Summer 2010 | The Sport and Exercise Scientist | 3 NEWS | Update on BASES Awards and Grants The newly appointed Awards Committee provides an update on the new-look BASES Awards and Grants. The key changes to the Awards and Grants will: 1. Streamline existing terminology to either: i.Awards (given for achievement); or ii.Grants (money given for specific purpose). 2. Make it more obvious to members which awards they are eligible for. It was decided to use study level (e.g., Undergraduate, MSc, PhD, Post-PhD, not studying) to categorise awards. Study level also dovetails nicely with BASES membership categories. 3. Rationalise existing Awards. 4. Make Award titles more self-explanatory. 5. Develop new Awards to ensure all membership categories are more equally catered for. 6. Develop new Awards that recognise applied practice. 7. Reduce our impact on the environment by having electronic applications. The BASES Annual Awards are an important part of our work in recognising excellence in sport and exercise science and they exist to reward BASES members who have made outstanding achievements. The Awards support the following objectives of BASES: The promotion of research in sport and exercise science; the encouragement of evidence-based practice in sport and exercise science; and the distribution of knowledge in sport and exercise science. BASES offers five Annual Award schemes. BASES Undergraduate Dissertation of the Year Awards Target BASES membership categories: Student and Graduate NEW The BASES Annual Grants exist to provide financial support to BASES members to support career development and international conference attendance. The Grants support the following objectives of BASES: The promotion of research in sport and exercise science; the encouragement of evidence-based practice in sport and exercise science; and the distribution of knowledge in sport and exercise science. BASES offers three Annual Grant schemes: – support career development opportunities for BASES members who are normally at a relatively early stage of their sport and exercise science career (e.g., work in applied sport/exercise science support, research or pedagogy). Number offered: Four each year, up to a total of £500 Target BASES membership categories: Members that hold a sport-and-exercise-science-related degree BASES International Conference Grants Target BASES membership categories: Professional (for the past two years) BASES Annual Conference Grants NEW – assist researchers to present at the BASES Annual Conference. Number offered: Six each year, up to a total of £500 Number offered: Two each year Target BASES membership categories: Student and Graduate Professor Tom Reilly Doctoral Dissertation of the Year Award NEW Number offered: One each year Target BASES membership categories: Student and Graduate BASES Early Career Researcher Awards (previously known as the Emerging Researcher Medal Award) – recognises excellence in early career BASES members researching within sport and/or exercise science. Three Awards are given annually, normally in each of the areas of “Physical Activity for Health”, “Sport and Performance”, and “Education and Professional Development”. Number offered: Three each year Target BASES membership categories: Graduate and Professional BASES Applied Practitioner Awards – acknowledges outstanding and innovative service delivery in sport and/or exercise science by BASES Accredited Sport and Exercise Scientists. Grants Number offered: 10 each year, up to a total of £500 Number offered: Two each year – for an outstanding doctoral dissertation made in the area of sport and/or exercise science by a BASES member. 2. It was decided that the BASES International Travel Grants should remain exclusive to Professional members to ensure that they have some exclusive membership benefits. Other members could apply for a BASES Career Development Grant to assist with attendance at UK and overseas conferences. n – assist researchers to present oral communications at international sport-and-exercise-science-related scientific conferences. – for outstanding undergraduate sport and/or exercise science dissertations made by BASES members who are final-year undergraduates. – for outstanding sport and/or exercise science dissertations made by BASES members who are this calendar year (i.e., 1 January to 31 December) UK masters students. 1. The BASES Career Development Grants can be used to fund research/visits/work placements at other labs. BASES Career Development Grants Awards BASES Masters Dissertation of the Year Awards The key proposed changes to the Annual Grants are: NEW Number offered: Two each year Target BASES membership categories: Professional (for the past two years) n Conference Awards There are no significant changes to the BASES Annual and Student Conference Awards, although the Award names have been modified slightly for consistency across both BASES Conferences and across Awards. Make sure you don’t miss out on the Award and Grant application closing dates: Annual Awards Professor Tom Reilly Doctoral Dissertation of the Year Award BASES Undergraduate Dissertation of the Year Awards BASES Early Career Researcher Awards BASES Applied Practitioner Awards BASES Masters Dissertation of the Year Awards Annual Grants BASES International Conference Grants BASES Annual Conference Grants BASES Career Development Grants Application Closing Date 31 January 30 September 30 November 30 November 30 December Application Closing Date(s) 1 March, 1 June, 1 September 1 July 30 November Target BASES membership categories: Accredited 4 | Issue 24 | Summer 2010 | The Sport and Exercise Scientist www.bases.org.uk | NEWS 2010 BASES Annual Student Conference Factfile • 330 attendees • 45 Universities represented • 184 scientific oral (96) or poster (88) presentations; 6 keynote presentations; and 5 workshops • Highlights included: - Prof Jo Doust FBASES and Dr Richard Tong’s pre-Conference workshop was attended by about a quarter of delegates and was well received. - Prof Andy Jones’s FBASES opening keynote – it needed two lecture theatres and was video linked to the second hall. - There were positive comments about the Aber-Bangor Skills Centre stand and networking workshop and Simon Payne’s Collaborative Sport and Exercise Science “in Action” symposium. - There were positive comments about the opportunities to meet other students and start building networks. n 2010 BASES Annual Student Conference Award Winners and Runners-Up Undergraduate Award Undergraduate Oral Presentation Award Winner Runner-Up sponsored by BASES sponsored by Human Kinetics Paul Wilkinson, Heriot-Watt University James Wrightson, University of Brighton Undergraduate Poster Presentation Award Postgraduate Award Postgraduate Oral Presentation Award sponsored by Hospitality, Leisure, Sport and Tourism Network sponsored by Human Kinetics Postgraduate Poster Presentation Award sponsored by Routledge sponsored by Human Kinetics Lee Fearn, Bangor University Helen Owton, University of Winchester Paul Wilkinson, Heriot-Watt University Winner sponsored by Routledge Les Tumilty, Aberystwyth University Postgraduate Applied Research sponsored by the University of Aberystwyth Presentation Award Damien Gleadall-Siddall, University of Hull Georgina Clarke, University of Brighton Runner-Up sponsored by Human Kinetics Len Parker Simpson, University of Exeter sponsored by Cranlea Stephen Bailey, University of Exeter 2010 BASES Annual Conference Updates BASES Annual General Meeting All BASES members are invited to the 2010 BASES AGM. This is your opportunity to meet the Board and contribute your views and ideas. The meeting will be held during the 2010 BASES Annual Conference at the University of Glasgow, 6 – 8 September. The British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences Fellow BASES Fellowship In 2008, BASES changed its Fellowship system to Fellowship for BASES members and Honorary Fellowship for non-members. The changes were made to make BASES consistent with other professional associations and reduce confusion. However, one anomaly from this change was that BASES has continued to have Honorary Fellows who are BASES members, but do not meet the existing criteria for Honorary Fellowship (i.e., not eligible for Fellowships). As such, it was considered that the goal of reducing confusion had not really been met. The Board has since decided to “normalise” existing Honorary Fellows and Fellows. This approach was considered to provide clarity, be consistent with other professional bodies and be easy to run. Fellowships: To recognise esteemed professional achievement, skills, knowledge and service to BASES and the sport and exercise science community and to encourage continued service to BASES in leadership and ambassadorial roles. A requirement is Professional Member of BASES for at least eight consecutive years at the time of application. Honorary Fellowships: The award of Honorary Fellowship is the ultimate accolade and highest Award made by BASES to nonmembers. It recognises the eminence of individuals working or achieving in sport and exercise science. It is awarded to those who have made an exceptional contribution to the field of sport and exercise science. www.bases.org.uk/Fellowships n ; BASES Division Annual General Meetings All BASES members are invited to attend the Division AGMs, which will also be held during the 2010 BASES Annual Conference. Please take this opportunity to share your thoughts and ideas with the Divisions and help shape the future of BASES. Accreditation Q&As Kate Yule, BASES Education Officer, will be available at the Conference for any questions and answers relating to Supervised Experience, Accreditation and Re-Accreditation. n Movers and Shakers Samantha Parnell and Dr Garry Tew have joined The Sport and Exercise Scientist Editorial Advisory Board, with a specific focus on Physical Activity for Health. A new Sport, Exercise & Wellbeing Research Centre has been launched at Northumbria University n 12 Samantha Parnell Dr Garry Tew 2011 APRIL Save the Date The 2011 BASES Annual Student Conference will be held at the University of Chester on 12–13 April 2011. n www.bases.org.uk The British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences Accredited Accreditation Amnesty BASES is offering an opportunity to members who have let their Accreditation lapse within the last 5 years to apply for Re-accreditation. The submission deadline for the Amnesty is 1 July 2010. BASES re-accreditation accepts that an accredited individual has already demonstrated that they meet ‘the knowledge, skills and understanding necessary to be safe and fit to practice as a sport and exercise scientist’. Re-accreditation requires the applicant to demonstrate continued delivery of services and continued to development as a practitioner. www.bases.org.uk/Individual Accreditations n ; Issue 24 | Summer 2010 | The Sport and Exercise Scientist | 5 LONDON 2012 |8 ISSUES TO GO London diaries - GB Sailing Drs Melissa Day and Pete Cunningham What is it like working full-time with one of the country’s most successful Olympic sports? For the summer instalment of the London Diaries, we get an insight into the day-to-day work of Dr Pete Cunningham, the Senior Sport Science Support Officer for the Royal Yachting Association (RYA). As well as heading up their sport science support, he also provides physiological support for the upper tier of performance sailors. 6 COURTESY OF RICHARD LANGDON, SKANDIA TEAM GBR Pete, you’ve been working with the RYA since 1993, how did you first get involved in this sport? As part of my third-year undergraduate dissertation, I was looking at elite-level windsurfing. I had informed the RYA that I was doing this and they were interested as the rules of Olympic windsurfing had just changed and the physical aspects of the sport were about to become far more important. From doing this, I built up a good relationship with the RYA who had never really had much sport science input before, with the exception of some sport psychology input. When I finished my undergraduate degree, I was about to apply to do a PhD when I saw a position advertised on the Sport Science Support Programme set up by Sarah Rowell. They were looking for project assistants across a number of sports, including sailing; I decided to apply for this and started work as a project assistant on the sailing programme. On this programme, I was being mentored internally at the University of Chichester by Tudor Hale, who was probably the most influential person over my first three years or so in my applied sport science “apprenticeship”. RYA was already involved with the University and so, once the governing body had seen the contribution that could be made by physiology, it became part of their programme. What was the programme like when you first started? I was working with sailors who had not experienced any sport science support before with regards to physical training. This meant that I was almost preaching to the unconverted and it was hard going to start with. We worked with the senior sailors and then also targeted the young sailors, linking in to the top end of the youth programme. This meant that sailors, such as Ben Ainslie, were receiving sport science support from the age of about 16 years old. How did you then progress in your career? I became BASES Accredited. I always think that for someone starting off in sport science that’s really important. I also completed a PhD on the “physiological demands of elite single-handed dinghy sailing”. I was on a contract that involved working half with the sailors and half on my PhD. However, because my PhD was in sailing, I was pretty much working full-time with the sailors. I’ve also spent time working as a lecturer, but when Lottery funding came in, all the sailors went full-time and so I started working full-time for the RYA. So what is a typical day like for you? Well, there are two types of day for me. About two days a week I am in the office. On these days I would typically spend my time in the morning emailing and talking to sailors on Skype. Sailors are often abroad and need contact and advice. For example, this morning I have been talking to a sailor in Valencia who has a quad problem and trying to get advice from the physiotherapists. In the afternoon, I will often be fitness testing in the labs and doing some general admin work. The other three days of the week I am in Weymouth, working with the sailors. If travelling down from Chichester, a 6 am start is pretty normal to get to Weymouth and I meet the sailors in the gym at around 8 am. We generally touch base as it’s good to have that face-toface contact. The morning is usually spent doing either aerobic training or strength and conditioning work. I think it’s important that, as a physiologist, I have a good knowledge of the strength and conditioning area so that I can speak with reliability; this means that I can give advice while in the gym on aspects such as lifting technique and training progress. We would then usually spend the afternoon out on the water. This might include just spending time with the coach and observing sailing, or running a session, such as an on-water interval session for the windsurfers. I might be taking measurements, such as blood lactate, and be giving advice on exercise intensity. After that, it’s back to the gym in the afternoon and early evening. I then have the option either to stay overnight in the RYA accommodation or to travel back home. | Issue 24 | Summer 2010 | The Sport and Exercise Scientist What is the biggest change that you have seen within sailing since you started? When I started, there were 40 sailors, of whom only one was full-time and all others were working either part- or full-time. Now, I struggle to think of many sailors who work alongside their Olympic training. Instead of being a hobby, sailing has become much more professional. In the 1990s we had some individuals who were not that athletic, whereas now all of our sailors are on full-time training programmes and are full-time athletes. Our work is also much more field-based now in comparison to when I started. We spent years developing sportspecific ergometry, trying to replicate sailing in the lab, and my PhD was quite lab-based. Now, we spend a lot more time actually out on the water. We also have a far bigger support team. I think that 20 years ago, if we were as organised as we are now, we would have won a lot of medals in the Olympics. Now, our biggest challenge is trying to stay ahead and, because of our success, trying to stop others copying the model we use. n Drs Melissa Day and Pete Cunningham Melissa is a Senior Lecturer in Sport and Exercise Psychology at the University of Chichester. Pete is the Senior Sport Science Officer for the RYA. He began working with the RYA on a in 1993, and has seen the team go from strength to strength. www.bases.org.uk | LONDON 2012 Paralympic Sports Science I varying rapidly and uncontrollably. This often manifests as writhing movements of the hands, feet, legs or arms. Hyperactivity in the muscles of the face and tongue, and hearing problems are not uncommon, so communication can sometimes be something of a challenge with this group. Ataxic CP results from damage to the cerebellum, causing a lack of balance and poor depth perception and spatial awareness. Ataxic individuals may exhibit intention tremor, where intentional movements are accompanied by trembling that gets worse when performing under pressure. CP produces the following considerations or issues for a practitioner: • Performance vs. disability attribution • Communication • Intellect • Fatigue. Nik Diaper worked with the Boccia team leading up to the 2008 Beijing Paralympic Games and Chris Wagg currently provides sport-science support to the Great Britain Boccia Federation. How have you identified whether a performance problem was caused by an athlete’s disability or sporting performance? ND: There are a number of ways this can be achieved; for example, comparisons with similar athletes/situations, discussions with the athlete and coach, analysis and monitoring etc. However, I think this ultimately comes down to developing an in-depth understanding of both the sport and each individual. CW: I think it is key to use the coach at the start and get their input. From there, having a structured monitoring and assessment framework will help you COURTESY OF DUNCAN TUNBRIDGE BPA n the Spring instalment of the London Diaries , we introduced Paralympic sport and the sport of Boccia. In this issue, we are going to explore cerebral palsy (CP), one of the main disability groups to be represented in the sport of Boccia. This article will look at the disability, how it can affect performance and what the main considerations are for a practitioner working with athletes with CP. Then we will get two practitioners’ reflections on working with athletes with CP and how they deal with the issues and considerations. The term CP has its roots in Latin, with cerebrum and paralysis meaning literally “brain paralysis”. CP is the result of an injury to brain tissue that occurs either during pregnancy or during labour and birth, or soon after birth. More and more evidence appears to support the influence of antenatal factors, but there is no one single cause; current thinking focuses on genetic abnormalities, maternal infection/ fever and foetal injury. The resulting brain injury impedes complete brain development and the infant is left with one or many of a range of impairments; however, it is a non-progressive disorder. There are three types of CP: Spastic, athetoid and ataxic. Spastic CP accounts for 70–80% of individuals with CP. Damage to the upper motor neurones in the brain disrupt normal muscle tone and spinal function, and results in increased tone (groups of muscles in a sustained and uncontrolled state of contraction). This causes stiffness of the muscles and impacts upon movement, speech and walking. Athetoid CP results in the exhibition of involuntary and irregular motions, with muscle tone Want more information on Boccia? www.gb-boccia.org ; www.bases.org.uk Issue 24 profile and identify the cause of issues over time. It is also important to talk to other support staff, such as the physio, who can provide useful information to explain a problem. What did you find the hardest about communicating with individuals with CP? How did you adapt? ND: I remember feeling quite anxious before the first time I worked with athletes with severe CP; I made the naïve assumption that they would all have speech impairments. I was worried that I was not going to understand them and would be a cause of frustration for both the athletes and myself. CW: I didn’t really know what to expect, so I tried not to have too many expectations. The hardest thing for me was getting to know the nuances of each athlete’s form of communication and not being afraid to ask them to say something again. ND: One of the ways I adapted was learning how to paraphrase appropriately and where necessary. I also had to learn to become more attuned to non-verbal communication, but this is only something that developed by spending time with the athletes. CW: I watched how the coaches interacted with them and tried to learn from them – it takes time, but I am starting to build relationships with the athletes as a result. How have you delivered information to group of CP athletes with a range of intellectual capabilities? ND: I always look to present information in a variety of ways and I believe this applies to communication with any group of people – not just CP athletes. CW: Delivering through the coaching staff is a good method. They can relate it to each athlete more specifically and give them as much as they can take on board. When I am delivering information I always try to do it in small groups so I can support each individual a bit more. How have you compensated for fatigue when supporting athletes with CP? ND: I think this comes down to understanding the individual athlete and the severity and type of CP. There are some athletes where this may be an issue and perhaps require manipulating the volume/intensity/type of training. CW: Being aware of each athlete’s routine and the plan for the competition or training camp is important. It means the timing of any information or feedback is coordinated with when they are able to act on it, and have the energy to understand what is being delivered. n | Summer 2010 | The Sport and Exercise Scientist | 7 FEATURE | BASES-PRESENT Prof Edward M Winter FBASES continues his history of the sport and exercise science profession and the Association COURTESY OF PROF EDWARD WINTER FBASES Introduction In the last issue of The SES (Issue 23, Spring 2010, pp.10-11), I charted the gestation and birth of the Association. In this article, I will give a similar overview of the current role of BASES within the general context of sport and exercise science. BASS to BASES Originally, the Association started as the British Association of Sports Sciences (BASS) and there were approximately 200 members. Some grammarians cast a scornful glance at the absence of an apostrophe in the title but, nevertheless, that was what it was called. The name reflected the Association’s emphasis on sport, but it soon became clear that there were many for whom sport was actually of secondary or even no interest; their interest was in exercise or, as it tends now to be known, physical activity. Such activity is characterised by activities of daily living, such as walking, gardening and shopping, as well as formal and structured activity at health clubs and similar facilities. Here, the emphasis is not so much on performance per se but on health and functional capability. The groundswell grew and, in 1993, BASS became BASES. I was a supporter of that name and, in the intervening 17 years, have seen no reason to change my mind. Members’ interests and involvements span a remarkable spectrum that has professional sportspeople and Olympians at one end and the diseased or infirm, for whom the challenge is survival, at the other. There is an intellectual fascination associated with this spectrum that attempts to identify common and group-specific aspects. In spite of how it might seem as we wrestle with dayto-day challenges that arise, whether as researchers, teachers or practitioners, we are privileged to work in an area that is predominantly fun. However, that fun should not be confused with frivolity. The livelihood of athletes and their entourage of coaches, advisors and administrators can depend on the support we provide. Similarly, the exercise programmes we design, advocate and deliver can markedly change and fundamentally improve the quality of life for participants. These diverse involvements represent serious economic, social, political and technical businesses that amount to an annual turnover in the UK of approximately £20 billion. To put this figure into context, it is about a sixth of the annual health budget and a fifth of the defence budget. 8 A young Professor Winter in 1972 while an undergraduate PE student in Loughborough Sport and exercise science So just what is sport and exercise science, and is that what the current 3,000 or so members of BASES do? In 2009, Prof Neil Fowler and I proposed an answer. Sport and exercise science is: The scientific study of factors that influence our ability to perform exercise. This, in turn, begs two further questions: First, what is science? Second, what is exercise? The second of these terms is perhaps easier to define. “Exercise is a potential disruption to homeostasis by muscle activity that is either, exclusively or in combination, concentric, isometric or eccentric” (Winter & Fowler, 2009). This definition includes dynamic activity but acknowledges that performance in sport and activities of everyday living do not necessarily involve or even require movement. In fact, there are occasions when movement is deprecated (e.g., balance and suspension in gymnastics) and where it is functionally detrimental (e.g., threading the eye of a needle). Moreover, the definition applies precisely to the interests of BASES members. Seven steps to science Science is harder to define precisely but there is perhaps a simple view. Epistemology is the study of how we acquire knowledge and science is simply one epistemological technique. Hence, science is a way of working. However, we need to elaborate on that “way” so as to distinguish it from other ways. In my teaching and elsewhere, I have found it helpful to think of an alliterative sevensteps-to-science approach. So, what are these seven steps? Step one: Observation The first step is the ability to “observe” and, as the inverted commas indicate, this does not necessarily mean observation only through the sense of sight. The ability to notice or recognise phenomena either on an intergalactic, cosmic, atomic or subatomic scale is | Issue 24 | Summer 2010 | The Sport and Exercise Scientist a prerequisite of science and hence, a scientist. It can be encapsulated in the simple exclamation, “Did you see that?” Step two: The research question The question might arise from a sense of wonder. What on earth caused what I have just seen? What is the explanation? What is the mechanism? It is the wellcrafted research question that drives the process of research. “Well crafted” means that a trial can be designed within resource restrictions to answer the question posed and that the answer will be of benefit to humankind in some way. Some argue that such practical beneficence is not necessary, but while I have sympathy with the sentiment, we simply do not have the money to spend on lavish and extravagant navel contemplation. Step three: Hypotheses The third step on our journey to science is the Popperian formulation of hypotheses, named after Karl Popper and his principle of falsifiability. This principle states that a theory or hypothesis can be accepted only when the opposite is shown to be untenable. There are at least two types of hypotheses: Research and null. It is the latter, the statement of no effect, that is tested and it is only when this hypothesis can be rejected that the alternative research hypothesis can be accepted. Karl Popper www.bases.org.uk | I will return to retention and rejection of the null hypothesis in step six, the outcome, in the context of “proof”. Step four: The experiment Next comes the experiment, or, as it tends to be known, the trial. The goldstandard experiment is the randomised, controlled trial in which, in its simplest form, two samples are randomly selected from a parent population and given either a treatment or placebo. Both groups are assessed before and after the treatment. The number in each sample should be determined according to the power of the statistical test that is to be used and not just by whim or whimsy (Prof Greg Atkinson’s particularly helpful article in the September 2005 issue of The SES pp.22-23 provides excellent guidance). While conditions are controlled to minimise the influence of contaminating (nuisance) variables and maximise the effects of influential under-test variables, the control must somehow retain its realworld application, which is sometimes called “ecological validity”. Step five: Analyses Step five is the statistical analysis or analyses that should have been identified before measures were taken. Scientists do not try to decide how to analyse data after these have been gathered; they do so beforehand. Only once all the outcome measures have been recorded and the code in a double-blind trial has been broken as appropriate, are they analysed. The ability to select and apply appropriate analytical techniques correctly is essential. In addition, effect sizes should be calculated so as to distinguish between statistical outcomes and outcomes that are practically or clinically meaningful. Step six: The outcome The outcome states what has been found and it should be expressed simply and clearly. For example, the results suggest that: A beneficially/adversely effects/has no effect on B. Note that this outcome is a statistical probability and should be supported by an accompanying effect size. In step three, I said I would return to the notions of proof and disproof and will do so now. Popper’s principle of falsifiability and acceptance or rejection of the null hypothesis implies a passwww.bases.org.uk or-fail test. While this approach is an advance on that of the fallacious absence of evidence “I believe therefore it is right” stance, it does not fully address uncertainty – a theme that the Royal Society is highlighting in its 350th anniversary year. I am reminded of a response given by eminent geneticist Prof Steve Jones when he was a panel member on a radio programme. A questioner began, “Hasn’t it been scientifically proven that…”, but before the rest could be delivered, Prof Jones interjected with (and I paraphrase), “Let me stop you there. Proof and certainty are the province of priests and politicians, the rest of us have to wrestle with probability.” Results of trials have to be seen in the context of matters such as sampling error, measurement error and extant knowledge, and provide evidence only that one outcome was more or less likely than another. The “suggestion” of an influence or effect of some sort might be based on firm evidence, but can only be a suggestion, nothing more, nothing less. This is a challenge when aggressive interviewers demand a “yes” or “no” answer when such answers are impossible. Every aspect of our lives is fundamentally ruled by probabilities and likelihoods. Walking on pavements is only safer than walking on the road. We cannot say we will go to the pictures on Saturday, we can say only that is our intention. The design, manufacturing and measuring processes for kitchen cupboard doors are not as exacting as those for aircraft. The criticality of applications differs markedly. The National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence formalises all this and has to deal with two key questions. First, does a drug work? Second, is it costeffective? Both answers are based not on facts and certainties, but on probabilities and context. Step seven: The broadcast The outcome has to be broadcast, not disseminated, because only men could do that. Normally, this is in the form of a manuscript submitted to a journal and the peer review to which the manuscript is subjected. The broadcast could be in the form of an oral presentation at a conference or, similarly, a poster. The broadcast could also be by way of the media (e.g., press, radio or television). It could also be a private report because of commercial or other reasons. Especially if the broadcast is a formal journal publication, it must be written skilfully and in accord with the conventions of grammar and syntax as well as the terms and nomenclature laid down by the Système International d’Unités. Issue 24 FEATURE If any of these seven steps is not followed then the effect is simple: The work is not science. This is not necessarily a problem if work is not claimed to be science. If, however, science is claimed and one or other of the seven steps is not followed, it is not science, and even worse, the nonscience might become nonsense. Scholarship In our teaching, research, consultancy and practice, we must follow the seven steps to science; otherwise we cannot claim to be scientists. By the same token, we can take a firm stance against others who contravene principles of science. Overarching all of this, however, is scholarship, which embraces history, literature and other arts that can be brought to bear to increase knowledge and understanding. We, as scientists, have duties to sport, exercise and science, but above all, we have a fundamental responsibility to uphold principles of scholarship. We are fortunate to be able to do so in an area that, for many, characterises enjoyment and embraces sport, health and the performing arts. Conclusion Sport and exercise science is a marvellous way to teach both the principles and practices of science. It applies to attempts to explain rather than simply describe performance in sport and, similarly, considers the probability (i.e., the likelihood) of outcomes in sport and exercise in terms of evidence-based practice. Both of these applications are intellectually and practically demanding. In this article, I have concentrated on principles of science, but in the next I will address how I see the Association developing as it attempts to meet existing and likely challenges. I will do so from the standpoint of particular challenges and needs, but in the context of the “science” that the Association’s name clearly identifies as a principal influence on both the work we do and the way in which we do it. n References Atkinson, G. (2005). How important is sample size in research? The Sport and Exercise Scientist, 5, 22–23. Winter, E.M. & Fowler, N. (2009). Exercise defined and quantified according to the Système International d’Unités. Journal of Sports Sciences, 27, 447–460. Prof Edward M Winter FBASES Edward is Professor of the Physiology of Exercise in the Centre for Sport and Exercise Science at Sheffield Hallam University. He was involved in the formation of BASES and played prominent roles in matters such as the Association’s accreditation scheme and other developments. | Summer 2010 | The Sport and Exercise Scientist | 9 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT | The Seven Deadly Sins of Presenting Presentations have become the de facto communication tool at conferences. There is an art and a science of creating great presentations. However, many conference presentations are delivered poorly. Here, the BASES Awards Committee share their expertise on how to avoid the Seven Deadly Sins of Presenting. Too much text ZZZZslow zzzzstart Slides should be like a billboard. Ask yourself whether your message can be processed within three seconds. The audience should be able to quickly work out the meaning before turning its attention back to the presenter. You need to have enough words to ensure you are comfortable delivering the message, but go for a very low word count. Don’t use a font size smaller than 28 point. Normally, the chair of a session will already have introduced you, named your institution, given the title of your presentation (which will be on the projection screen as well) and might have stated the page number of the conference’s abstract booklet on which your abstract starts. Don’t then start your talk by saying, “As the chair has just said, my name is Josephine Aznobrain and my talk is entitled...” You have only a short period of time in which to present so don’t use some of that valuable time with unnecessary repetition. If you need to reduce your font size lower than this then my guess is that you have created a document, not a slide! If a slide has too many words, highlight one key word per bullet and rehearse the slide until you can remember all the content when you look only at the highlighted word. Then remove all other text leaving just the keywords as mnemonics. Even better, replace the words on the slide with an image. Tip: Don’t over-animate your text. Text flying in from all directions is just distracting and looks like you have just learnt how to use the animation tool on PowerPoint. Dr Claire Hitchings, British Association of Sport and Exercise Sciences 10 additional exercise; it’s normally needed after a few nights at a conference. If only it was that simple. Well, it is if you are not at the mercy of the speaker who cannot tell the time. You know, the individual who insists on taking both their own allocated time in addition to a significant amount of that set aside for others as well. Terrible time keeping I think I’ve lost count of how many presentations I have attended in which the speaker seems to have failed the first rule of presenting; i.e., respect your time. Understanding how long you have sets the framework for all of the major aspects of any presentation in my view (e.g., content, delivery style etc.). If you can’t get the timing right, the audience might just not be in a position to effectively listen to what you have to say (especially if they are contemplating rushing off to another session). You have scanned the programme schedule over breakfast and you are excited about the day’s conference programme. The only problem is the tricky transition that you’ve spotted around 11 am. Should be OK though, you can hear the invited speaker talk about training adaptations and still have time to make it to the other room for that free communication that has direct relevance to your own research. The fast walk between rooms will also act as some There’s a simple rule for time keeping that was passed onto me by the late Prof Reilly that has always served me well: “One slide = approximately one minute”. So, if you’ve got a 10-minute slot then 30 slides just isn’t going to work, no matter how quick you talk. Remembering this simple guide should help you to avoid dramatically exceeding your allotted time. This will help ensure that you get across clearly those complicated data that you have spent many hours collecting and analysing. Use something like, “Good morning, thank you for that introduction. It is well established that…”, and hence, begin with probably the first sentence of your abstract. Prof Edward Winter FBASES, Sheffield Hallam University | Issue 24 | Summer 2010 | The Sport and Exercise Scientist www.bases.org.uk | You’ll also make a few new friends in the audience as well, as I’ve never heard anyone complaining that a session was a little short or ran exactly to time! laser pointers can be distracting for the audience rather than useful. Dr Barry Drust, Liverpool John Moores University Poor presenter presentation A lot of time and effort is understandably spent on preparing the presentation, the information on the slides and the visual impact, but often the presenter forgets about themselves. Too often presentations suffer from a lack of presenter preparation. How are you going to do it? Where are you going to stand? What messages are you trying to send? What can you do with your hands? Many inexperienced presenters become nervous and start fidgeting. This includes walking around continually, rocking forwards and backwards, and putting hands in pockets/ behind the back only to then relocate them almost instantly. PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT Unless there is some sort of “punchline” that you really do want to keep hidden until the last minute then just set up your slides to show all the points at once. One more thing – don’t use any of the super fancy fonts either – they are much harder to read. Tip: Leave special effects to Steven Spielberg. Dr Val Cox, Coventry University Too fast Despite the fact that using a laser pointer on “acupuncture points can stimulate specific memories and innate wisdom” (Gordon, 2010), during scientific presentations the purpose of the laser pointer is to “highlight something of interest” (Wikipedia, 2010), not every word on the slide. Over the years, one of the most frequent thoughts I have going through my head when I’m listening to a presentation is, “please slow down so that I can actually understand the story you are trying to tell me”. People have chosen to come and listen to your research story and want to get something from it. Dr Joanna Scurr, University of Portsmouth References Gordon, S.K. (2010). Body Wisdom. Transpersonal Hypnotherapy Institute. Wikipedia (2010). ‘Laser Pointer’, http:// en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laser_pointer (retrieved April 2010). Death by special effects This nervousness is then, unintentionally, transmitted to the audience by the presenter. If the presenter looks/feels uneasy then the audience will feel uneasy, thus affecting how your presentation is received. Every new version of PowerPoint seems to have yet more special effects (e.g., text flying in, dissolving, changing colour etc.). For some presenters the temptation to use them all is just too great to resist. The effect on the audience is rather like watching a horror film, waiting anxiously for the next surprise. Having slides where the bullet points appear one at a time is also rarely helpful and usually makes the talk seem slower and more ponderous than it really is. Tip: Practise makes perfect. Practice delivering the presentation thinking about how you are going to do it. Good preparation = good performance. My experience is that when you go too fast people lose what you’re saying very quickly and, therefore, can lose interest very quickly. Sometimes I end up singing to myself, “slow down, you move too fast, you’ve got to make the moment last”. Finally, I’ve never ever had anybody give me feedback saying, “That was too slow” except when talking about my running between the wickets in cricket matches. Prof Ian Campbell, Brunel University BASES has three brief guideline documents, written by Prof Edward Winter FBASES and Dr Claire Hitchings, to help you with your conference presentation preparation. Dr Stewart Cotterill, University of Gloucestershire Laser pointer love ;www.bases.org.uk Imagine my distress at the last BASES Annual Conference when I reached for my laser pointer only to discover that it would not work on an interactive screen. Being forced to revert to a metre rule for highlighting key points in my presentation made me realise that there were few occasions when my laser pointer was necessary. Visit Time spent on the preparation of your slides should reduce the need for a laser pointer. The overzealous use of • BASES Guidelines for Preparing Abstracts. n www.bases.org.uk Click About and then click Publications, Documents and Policies • BASES Guidelines for Oral Presentations • BASES Guidelines for Poster Presentations Issue 24 | Summer 2010 | The Sport and Exercise Scientist | 11 PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT | SEMINAR SOLUTIONS Welcome to Seminar Solutions, a new section of The SES where we encourage readers to share their tips and ideas for enhancing the student seminar experience. We start off with one from Dr Emma Ross and we would welcome contributions from BASES members for future issues. Please contact me (Dr Sarah Rowell FBASES) with your ideas, thank you. S port or exercise physiology is an applied science, interpreting evidence and applying it to real life by using reasoning skills and theoretical experience. Too often, though, students fail to integrate and subsequently apply theoretical foundations to real-world situations. Sure, if you have just taught a class about the pathways of anaerobic metabolism, a subsequent discussion on creatine supplementation in power athletes is well understood. However, the integration of information from all of their systems physiology learning, as well as incorporating considerations based in psychology, nutrition, biomechanics and sociology, is often not assessed and, therefore, often not achieved by a large number of students. In my third-year Physiology of Training and Performance module, we have formulated an assessment task based on a case study and small-group problem-based learning (PBL) approach. In PBL, students work cooperatively to solve complex, real-world case studies. The problems lead the students to review basic physiological concepts and learn more advanced ones in the process of working through the case study. The goals are for students to learn and be able to apply the disciplinary content, develop critical thinking abilities and acquire skills of lifelong learning and communication. PBL has been widely used in recent years in medical and related areas of professional education. Self-selected groups of 4–5 students were presented with a case study six weeks prior to their assessment. The assessment comprises a group presentation accompanied by a short, 500-word summary report. It was important that the case studies reflected real-life scenarios and, as such, applied practitioners from within the department supplied a number of case studies that were based on real people. These case studies included elite athletes, individuals trying to become elite athletes, people using exercise for health and exercisers with specific goals (two examples are included right). Where relevant, the case studies might include performance data, data from recent physiological testing, information on the individual’s lifestyle, or clinical risk factors and each case study had a stated time frame. The student groups were then asked to identify the physiological demands and requirements for the specific sport/activity (including analysis of the energetics, fatigue mechanisms and limitations to performance), design an appropriate training intervention and an appropriate strategy for physiological assessment and consider any unique features of the case study that might influence what or how they prescribe to the individual. As well as more traditional training programmes and performance measurements, 12 | Issue 24 | Summer 2010 | The Sport and Exercise Scientist students were encouraged to consider other evidence-based practice that might be appropriate to their specific case study (e.g., heat acclimation or hypoxic training). Unique features of the case studies ranged from the individual having a clinical condition, to age, being from a low socioeconomic background or working long, irregular hours. Although at the time of going to print the students have not made their final presentation, a series of help tutorials over the six weeks has allowed them to discuss ideas and issues with a member of the physiology teaching team. In these sessions it has become clear that this is a challenging experience for the students; they all have sound physiology knowledge, but the integration and application of this to less-conventional scenarios, using evidence-based practice, is less easy than they initially thought. However, because of the vocational nature of the activity, the group-based approach and the “realness” of the case studies, the students have engaged with and been positive about this task. Examples of the case studies DAVID is an elite cyclist who specialises in time trialling over 50 and 100-mile distances. Now 45 years old, he was diagnosed with type 1 diabetes two years ago. He has come to a sport scientist to ask for their input on helping him return to top-level competition: He had been a National Championship winner. His race data shows his performance to have dropped by about 30W, yet his lab . test data shows his VO2 max to be very similar. How could you help John optimise his performance? HANNAH is a 30-year-old accident and emergency doctor, working shift patterns and often a 60-hr week. She is planning to take part in the 2010 Jungle Marathon, a sixstage 222 km foot race through the Brazilian jungle in October. She has participated in marathons previously, with a personal best of 3 hr 27 min. She ran her last 10 km race, two weeks ago, in 42 min. She has never had any fitness testing done before. Hannah has come to you, as an exercise physiologist, to help her achieve her goal. Dr Emma Ross Emma (pictured left) is a lecturer in Sport and Exercise Physiology at the University of Brighton and a BASES Accredited Sport and Exercise Scientist. www.bases.org.uk | INTERVIEW Inside the mind of Phil Neville Interview by Dr Sarah Rowell FBASES I n the last issue of The SES, Len Parker Simpson interviewed leading triathlon coach Jack Maitland. This time around, I talk to someone who can only be described as the ultimate professional and one of the most likeable and down-to-earth sporting stars that I have had the pleasure to meet in over 20 years. At 33, Phil Neville is currently in his 16th season of playing professional football at the highest level. He came through the Manchester United Academy along with his elder brother (Gary) and contemporaries Paul Scholes and Nicky Butt, before making his first team debut in 1994. Over the next 10 years, he won six Premier League titles, three FA Cups and one European Cup, as well as gaining 59 full England caps. In August 2005, he moved to Everton where he is now club captain. Phil joined me straight from training, for an interview arranged by his twin sister Tracey, herself an ex-international netballer, who, after gaining 74 caps for England, had to retire in 2008 due to injuries; she now works as Performance Support Sport Manager at Leeds Metropolitan University. My hopes, however, of a “WAG-style” lunch were dashed by the news that the players all have to eat at the training ground post-training, where the club can keep an eye on them. www.bases.org.uk It soon became clear that Phil is, in his own words, “obsessed with training and doesn’t really like rest” and is also still fully committed to getting the best out of himself, something that he has always been, going right back to when he was at school. Interestingly, his work rate, attitude and willingness to play anywhere on the pitch have been given as reasons why David Moyes (the Everton manager) rates Phil so highly. Phil’s approach did, however, cause an interesting reaction when he first joined Everton from Manchester United; his desire to be the best and hence doing additional training before and after formal training was interpreted as trying to be the “teacher’s pet” and win the manager round. How things change. Whereas when Phil joined the club, there would be only 2–3 players doing extra training in the gym, now nearly all the first team can be found there, influenced in no small part by Phil’s behaviour. Back to this summer and Phil, of his own accord, will be heading over to Los Angeles for four weeks to base himself with Athletes’ Issue 24 Performance, who have been working with the Everton squad over the last year. Here, he will be training twice a day, four days a week, with a focus on speed and strength, before coming back for the final two weeks before club training starts. When asked why, again it is his drive to be the best, to set an example as the club captain, and (at the relatively older age of 33) to keep ahead of the pack that is his focus, something that is in the front of his mind every day in training. Although he also admits that he now has to think about training smarter and not just harder, whether this is doing his own warm-up before the team warm-up each day, posttraining pre-hab – he makes use of Rolfing®, strength and mobility work, and his threetimes-a-week yoga sessions, which he admits he hates doing, but does because they make him feel better. As he noted, “At 33, if you have a bad day in training or in a match, it is because of your age. When you are younger, it is just put down as a bad day.” Having said that, Phil relishes the challenge presented by the younger players coming through and could think of, “Nothing worse than having the complacency of a guaranteed place in the team”. What does training look like at this late stage in the season? One thing is clear, it has changed quite a bit during the time that Phil has been involved in the sport, with science now playing a much bigger part. While Phil really loves the insight that science can provide, there is in his view, a danger it can take over too much. PTO s s s We started talking about the summer, then only three matches away, where the World Cup means that the players will get eight weeks “off” from the clubs rather than the four they normally get. For the Everton players, this will involve two weeks of complete rest, one week of active rest and then getting back into pre-season training, based on programmes provided by the clubs. As Phil noted, the days when it was expected for players to come back to pre-season training significantly overweight and then use plastic bags etc to sweat it off are long gone; now all squad members have regular body fat measurements taken and work within controlled weight allowances. | Summer 2010 | The Sport and Exercise Scientist | 13 INTERVIEW | ACTION IMAGES Training with Everton The better, more experienced managers are the ones who use science to back up their views, while others tend to hide behind it. This season Everton have used global positioning systems in training, with values for distance run, high intensity and overall player load being recorded for each session and displayed afterwards. As you might imagine, there is serious inter-team competition to ensure your name is near the top of the leader board, led by a captain who hates losing at anything. Day-to-day training varies based on when matches are, and all the players do the same training. If the team has played on a Saturday, Sunday is recovery, Monday is low to moderate, both in terms of football and fitness training, and Tuesday is high intensity, with 20–25 minutes in the “red zone”. Wednesday is recovery and Thursday is similar to Monday. Phil likes to have a light day a couple of days before a game and then train a bit harder on the Friday. Compare this to 15 years ago, when, as a trainee, all he and his colleagues did was play. Reflecting on his training and how it has changed, Phil explained that when he was younger, all he and his teammates did was play football and he had never really done much gym work or weights (he did not do any additional leg weight work until he was 30 and had suffered a cruciate ligament injury). Now he uses the gym regularly and has his own leg strength programme, although, he does not do that much heavy upper-body work, 14 not wanting to end up feeling “pumped”. For the stats interested, Phil’s bodyweight has, over the years, increased from 77 kg to 81 kg, while his body fat has fallen from 13% to 8.5%. I suggested that you would not want to go lower than that, to which Phil replied he had been lower but that had been too low and he had ended up with glandular fever. with breakfast followed by a light snack at 11:30 am. After this he will continue to drink mainly water, but some electrolyte, the aim being to feel “light” for the match. Posttraining and matches, there is now much greater recognition of the role protein plays, with protein and milkshakes being much in evidence. It is apparent that, as with many sports, it is in recovery, in particular, where significant changes have been made in recent years, both physically and nutritionally. Players make use of ice baths and compression clothing, post-training and matches, as well as massage. In the time that Phil has been at the club the medical side has grown from one physiotherapist and one masseur to three of each. It is to the medical staff rather than his captain that David Moyes will look to get a gauge on the mood and feeling of the players; a hard physical training session will result in an increase in workload for the masseurs. What of alcohol? Phil joined Manchester United at a time when there was an accepted drinking culture amongst the senior players, as in many clubs. Phil, himself, has never drunk much and in terms of when he did join, United noted he benefited from being one of a group of five or six young players who were all of the same mind; hence, he did not feel under undue peer pressure to change. Nutritionally, things have changed massively too; Phil recalls pre-match meals of fish, chips and peas in his early days. Now, with regular body-fat measures and careful monitoring, in Phil’s words, “the right food is fed into you”, even post-match, when, whether playing at home or away, the club makes sure appropriate recovery-focused food is available in the dressing room. If Phil is playing on a Saturday then Friday is the day to stock up on food and rest/ sleep. If a 3 pm kick-off is scheduled then Saturday morning is, again, focused on rest, | Issue 24 | Summer 2010 | The Sport and Exercise Scientist Now, there is an unwritten rule of no alcohol within 48 hours of a match and it is ingrained in young players as they come through the system. Phil noted that, given the intensity of the Premier League, players cannot get away with excessive drinking any more. If they do drink, they get found out and embarrassed in training; the pressure and level means you have to prepare for training in nearly the same way you do for matches. As someone who has competed at the top level in my sport, I was fascinated, not only with how Phil maintains the same focus and intensity, but also how he coped with the weekly pressure to perform. In many ways, I was not surprised to hear that Phil gets just as nervous before matches today as he did when he was 19. The difference is that at 19 www.bases.org.uk |INTERVIEW he hated the nerves; now he looks forward to them more, with excitement and the channelling of focus as part of his preparation to perform. It will not come as a surprise that Phil also gets nervous before key training sessions nor that he reflects that “when I stop getting nervous before matches it will probably be time to call it a day”. What about playing against Manchester United and, in particular, his brother Gary? At this point in the conversation both Tracey and Phil answered in near tandem “it’s difficult”. The brothers, in fact, the whole family, are very close and are happy for each other to do well. As Phil says, “The day before the match, he is my brother and he is my brother the day after, it is just difficult in between. It is only a game of football after all.” This, however, does not stop Gary phoning up Phil’s son the day before a match to try and wheedle out of him whether his dad is in the starting line-up. Phil went on to say that, in many ways, when the two play each other it is worse for his parents (his father, Neville, played league cricket in Lancashire, a sport at which Phil captained the England under-15 side) and sister, something Tracey confirmed by telling a story of when she was playing netball and her mother was playing on the opposing team; the boys came to watch but found it too hard and left part-way through the match. At this point it seemed time to broach the move from Manchester United to Everton and the differences between the two managers (Sir Alex Ferguson and David Moyes). On the latter point, Phil noted that the two are very similar and that both have been unbelievable to work for as they share they same drive and work ethic; the main difference is that Sir Alex has won so much. Both display the same characteristics, in that they never relax or let standards drop; it’s about hard work and respect, whether that is in dress codes, dealing with the media or talking to the staff in the club canteen; something that helped Phil make up his mind when he moved to Everton. What of the two clubs? While Phil could not comment on changes at United since he joined Everton, at the time he left he went “from the best” to a club “wanting to be the best”. United, while he was there, relied 98% on the ability of the players for their success, while with Everton, as the squad is not so strong overall, they have to be best at everything they do and leave no stone unturned, whether that’s diet, training or player analysis. Phil noted that he had learnt so much since he joined Everton about the football and non-football aspects of performing and he continues to learn every day. Has all changed for the better in the sport? Perhaps starting to show his age, Phil’s view here fits well with everything else about him as someone who came through a successful football apprenticeship. One where, if he did not do a good job, he would have to spend four hours after training cleaning the first-team showers and then he and his peers would all have to stay behind and repeat the job. Where, if he wanted to go into the senior team dressing room, he knocked on the door and waited for a reply before entering. Now, in his words, the young players get everything on a plate (including the money) and lack the toughness, work ethic and discipline instilled by the earlier regime, “For too many of them the football part of being a top player is too small a part of the overall pie chart, rather than being the main part”. For Phil, the current Academy model, with players being signed up at eight years old and having to live within a 30-mile radius, is not the best. At eight, it should be about enjoyment and playing with your mates, while the residency regulations mean it is often cheaper and easier for clubs to have foreign players in the Academy sides than English ones. While accepting that not all with the old Youth Training Scheme was right, Phil’s view is that the current regime is not, “preparing young players for life as a footballer or for life”. The interview comes to an end with Phil needing to go and pick his children up and the impression I am left with is Phil’s drive, passion and curiosity to continue to improve. The whole time we talked, Phil’s enthusiasm for what he does shone through. Phil is the first Premier League football player I have had the pleasure to talk to in-depth, but it should come as no surprise that the key messages and characteristics he displays are the same as those exhibited by the top Olympic and Paralympic performers and winners. Thanks, Phil. n ACTION IMAGES Sharing a joke whilst on international duty for England with former Manchester United team-mates David Beckham and (partly hidden) Paul Scholes www.bases.org.uk Issue 24 | Summer 2010 | The Sport and Exercise Scientist | 15