Milwaukee Brighter Futures
Transcription
Milwaukee Brighter Futures
Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Joseph L. Volk, Executive Director Community Advocates Racquel R. Bell, Project Coordinator Milwaukee Brighter Futures Initiative Janice Wilberg, Ph.D., Evaluation Coordinator Wilberg Community Planning LLC This report was compiled with information provided by the 27 projects supported by Milwaukee Brighter Futures funding in 2008 and represents activities conducted between January 1 and December 31, 2008. Milwaukee Brighter Futures is a program of Community Advocates and is supported with funding from the State of Wisconsin Department of Children and Families. Table of Contents 6-13 Agape Community Center................................................................................................................... 14-15 Boys and Girls Clubs of Greater Milwaukee.................................................................................16-17 COA Youth and Family Centers......................................................................................................... 18-19 Heart Love Place.................................................................................................................................... 20-21 IMPACT.................................................................................................................................................... 22-23 Journey House....................................................................................................................................... 24-25 Latino Community Center................................................................................................................ 26-27 Medical College of Wisconsin..........................................................................................................28-29 Milwaukee Christian Center.............................................................................................................30-31 Milwaukee Urban League................................................................................................................... 32-33 Modjeska Theatre Company............................................................................................................. 34-35 Neighborhood House of Milwaukee............................................................................................... 36-37 Neu-Life Community Resource Center......................................................................................... 38-39 New Concept Self Development Center......................................................................................... 40-41 Next Door Foundation........................................................................................................................ 42-43 The Parenting Network – Family Links.........................................................................................44-45 The Parenting Network – Positive Youth..................................................................................... 46-47 Pathfinders – Hand-in-Hand............................................................................................................ 48-49 Pathfinders – Youth Leadership Development Initiative . .................................................... 50-51 Pearls for Teen Girls............................................................................................................................52-53 Safe & Sound.......................................................................................................................................... 54-55 Silver Spring Neighborhood Center............................................................................................... 56-57 St. Gabriel’s Church of God in Christ............................................................................................ 58-59 St. Vincent de Paul Society-Vincent Family Resource Center................................................60-61 Task Force on Family Violence of Milwaukee.............................................................................. 62-63 Walker’s Point Youth and Family Center..................................................................................... 64-65 West Allis Police Department......................................................................................................... 66-67 Participant Anecdotes....................................................................................................................... 68-73 Introduction............................................................................................................................................... 2008 Brighter futures Year End Report Overview This evaluation report is an analysis of information provided by the 2008 Brighter Futures-funded projects as part of their year-end reporting and is augmented by information gleaned from monitoring and evaluation visits conducted during the year. Each project report includes a description, participant demographics, leverage, collaborative partners, logic model, program activities or outputs, and outcomes analysis from the evaluator’s perspective. In addition, this report provides information on overall Brighter Futures demographics, collaborations, achievements, challenges and lessons learned. New this year is information about the connection between Brighter Futures attendance and a) juvenile delinquency; and b) school attendance. Last, data on four key outcomes is examined historically: delinquency, births to teen mothers, dropping out, and child abuse and neglect – all showing positive downward trends. Brighter Futures Demographics Total Number Served by BFI Projects in 2008:155,750 The total number served includes 142,007 people served in three Community Information/Outreach projects (Safe and Sound Community Partners, 2-1-1 @ IMPACT, and West Allis Police Department) that are high volume information and referral, community outreach and/or community events where engagement with participants is generally a single episode or event and 13,743 people served in sustained engagement projects where the expectation is that participants will be involved in activities on a repeated basis, e.g. after school programs, parenting education. Demographic information for both types of projects - Community Information/Outreach and Sustained Engagement Projects - is provided below. Participant Demographics: Community Information/Outreach Projects Participants in Community Information/Outreach Projects are predominantly adult women; this is largely a function of 2-1-1 @ IMPACT because women are so often the adults in the family who access help – either directly or through an I & R resource. It is also important to note that the demographic data about participants in these programs is not always complete or unduplicated since these programs are not operated in settings appropriate for using the Brighter Futures/UNCOM data system. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 0 0 6 20 40 60 80 10 20 30 40 50 100 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Participant Demographics: Sustained Engagement Projects Milwaukee Brighter Futures Sustained Engagement Projects are primarily focused on children and youth who are involved in a variety of prevention activities including after school and summer programming, leadership development, and academic support and parents who are engaged in parenting education or other parent assistance services. Gender: Brighter Futures sustained engagement programs generally serve more females than males. A calculation of gender distribution shows the following gender distribution. The predominance of females is a reflection of three high volume projects which serve an exclusively or near-exclusively female population: Boys and Girls Clubs Sista Pride Project, PEARLS for Teen Girls, and the Task Force on Family Violence. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Ethnic Origin: Brighter Futures serves a diverse population of youth and adults. An examination of Brighter Futures sustained engagement programs shows the following distribution by ethnic origin. 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 Age: The majority (73%) of Brighter Futures participants in sustained engagement projects are children, ages 0 to 17 years. A focus on the adolescent population (12-17) has been a feature of Brighter Futures for several years; in 2008, this portion comprised 53% of participants. 0 10 20 30 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 40 50 60 7 Participation Frequency Brighter Futures examines the frequency of participation in funded projects as a way to a) insure that projects separate out the ‘event attenders’ from regular participants; and b) continue to examine the linkage between frequent participation and better outcomes. Each project is asked to use their UNCOM data to assess participation frequency using the following classification system. Participation frequency is calculated on all Brighter Futures Projects except IMPACT 2-1-1, Safe and Sound, West Allis Police Department and the education component of Pathfinders Hand-in-Hand Project. All four of these projects are high volume, limited engagement models. An examination of participation frequency on the remaining projects results in the following distribution. 0 20 40 60 80 100 High engagement projects: The following projects reported frequent/very frequent attenders at 40% of participants or above. They are listed in order of the level of participation: 0 20 40 60 80 100 Leverage Twenty-seven (27) Brighter Futures projects received a total of $2,131,300 in 2008. Brighter Futures projects then leveraged an additional $5,862,260 in other funding. This represents leverage in the amount of $2.75 for every Brighter Futures dollar. Funding Source 2008 Amount Brighter Futures $ 2,131,300 Other Government $ 1,384,274 24% Foundations $ 1,133,683 19% United Way $ 1,317,917 22% Community Development Block Grant $ 716,300 12% Safe and Sound $ 310,900 5% DHHS Substance Abuse Block Grant $ 260,773 4% Other $ 738,413 13% Total Leverage $ 5,862,200 8 2008 Percent 100% Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Collaborations Brighter Futures projects collaborated with 131 different public and private entities including 16 colleges and university programs, 9 churches, 17 school systems/schools, 21 government departments, and 68 nonprofit organizations. The collaborative network shows very strong relationships among nonprofit organizations and government with substantial connections to education and postsecondary education as well. Sectors will no representation include the business community, media, and specific government departments where collaboration would be appropriate such as the Milwaukee County Delinquency and Court Services Division and Wraparound Milwaukee. Collaborative Sector Specific Organizations Colleges and universities Cardinal Stritch University, University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee, University of Wisconsin-Extension, Marquette University, Milwaukee Area Technical College, Mount Mary College, Milwaukee School of Engineering, UWM Service Learning Program, Marquette University Crossing the Stream, Springfield College, UWM Planetarium, UWM Cultures and Communities, Milwaukee Institute of Art and Design Pre-College Programs, Medical College of Wisconsin, UWM School of Nursing, Institute for Urban Health Partnership Churches Florist Avenue Baptist Church, Greater New Birth Church, Bethel Baptist Church, St. Benedict the Moor, St. John Vianney, Archdiocese of Milwaukee, St. Vincent De Paul Conferences, St. Stephen’s Family Life Center, Luther Memorial Church School Systems and Schools Milwaukee Public Schools, New School for Community Service, Bradley Tech High School, Hamilton HS, Holy Redeemer HS, Institute for Career Empowerment, Lee Elementary, Madison HS, Milwaukee School of Entrepreneurship, Red Cat HS, Starms Elementary, Travis Academy, Wisconsin Conservatory of Lifelong Learning, Humboldt Park Elementary, West Allis West Milwaukee School District, Nativity Jesuit Middle School, Hoover Elementary Government Milwaukee County Sheriff, City of Milwaukee Police Department, Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare, Milwaukee Area Workforce Investment Board, Milwaukee County Parks, County Supervisors, City Aldermen, Kozsciusko Community Center, City of Milwaukee Municipal Court, Elm Grove Police Department, Milwaukee Commission on Domestic Violence and Sexual Assault, Hillside Family Resource Center, Milwaukee County District Attorney’s Office, Office of the Mayor of the City of Milwaukee, City Health Department, Milwaukee Child Abuse Review Team, West Allis Health Department, Department of Children and Families Nonprofit Organizations UNCOM (United Neighborhood Centers of Milwaukee), Wisconsin Federal for Independent Colleges, Hunger Task Force, COA, Milwaukee Public Theatre, Still Waters Collective, Greatness Now, Chevillia’s, Health Education Center, IMPACT, Riverwest Health Initiative, Community Partners, Joy House, Grace Group Home, Intercession Group Home, Tomorrow’s Future, This House is Home, Meta House, Fighting Back, Safe 7 Sound, Social Development Commission, Center for Neighborhood Enterprise, Acacia, Aurora, Big Brothers Big Sisters, Boys and Girls Clubs, Milwaukee Job Development, Inc., Justice 2000, My Home Your Home, New Concept Self Development, Salvation Army, UMOS, Price is Right, Goodwill, Parenting Network, Second Harvest, Wisconsin Humane Society, Milwaukee Tennis Education Foundation, 16th Street Community Health Center, Boy Scouts of America, Center for Teaching Entrepreneurship, YMCA, Mitchell Street CDC, ACLU,HeartLovePlace, Milwaukee Community Sailing Center, Johnson Park Health Coalition, Residential Living Services, Walker’s Point Youth and Family Center, Northcott Neighborhood House, Mission of Hope Food and clothing Pantry, Girls Scouts of America, Alma Center, Legal Action of Wisconsin, Latina Resource Center, Hmong American Friendship Association, Children’s Service Society, La Causa, Community Advocates, Mental Health America, Task Force on Family Violence, Head Start, Carver Park Towne Homes Community Center, Children’s Trust Fund, Child Abuse Prevention Fund, Wisconsin Tobacco Prevention, Teen Pregnancy Prevention Network, Kiwanis Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 9 Achievements Brighter Futures Collaborative: Milwaukee Brighter Futures continues to conduct monthly meetings that gather representatives of funded agencies as well as other youth and family development programs, schools, child welfare, and other programs. The meetings generally draw from 60-65 people who attend for the information, training, and networking opportunities. Several partnerships have developed out of Brighter Futures meetings that have resulted in better programming, cost efficiencies, and broader coverage of diverse population groups. Each monthly meeting includes reports from M-CAPS (Milwaukee Child Abuse Prevention Services) and the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Network as well as a presentation by an ‘agency of the month,’ describing that agency’s mission, history and programs. In addition, each meeting features a training topic or presentation in which new information is presented with an opportunity for dialogue. Following is a list of topics covered in 2008: Month January February March April May June July August September October November December Brighter Futures Meeting Special Topic Prevention of child sexual assault Milwaukee Police Chief Ed Flynn Education on the abuse of prescription drugs Input sought on proposed Department of Children and Families Teen-produced presentation dramatizing issues relating to pregnancy and teen violence Men’s health issues Futures First Program (for youth returning to school after expulsion, or dropping out) No meeting College preparation and assistance programs Parental involvement in children’s education Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare procedures Role of the Child Welfare Ombudsman Improved Prevention System Communication: The Milwaukee Brighter Futures website has significantly improved the accessibility of information about Brighter Futures as a network and about individual Brighter Futures-funded agencies. The site www.milwaukeebrighterfutures.org provides profile information on each funded project with links to each project’s website. This has helped funders, program planners, and the projects themselves better understand the network and what it has to offer. In addition, Project Liaison Ken Germanson publishes a weekly Brighter Futures Update that is sent electronically to 500 youth and family development practitioners in the Milwaukee area which includes information on upcoming events, funding opportunities, helpful resources such as websites, research, and reports; meeting schedules; and other information focused on prevention education and programming. UNCOM Data Reporting System: This was the first full year of participant tracking through the UNCOM (United Neighborhood Centers of Milwaukee) participant tracking system. The requirement that funded agencies use UNCOM has had the effect of raising the bar on reporting and accountability. Because Brighter Futures can access demographic data directly, it is possible to generate quarterly totals for the Brighter Futures network and to spot check particular agencies. UNCOM also provides an early warning system that reinforces the monthly on-site monitoring in terms of alerting program management to program difficulties as evidenced by low numbers or incomplete data. In addition, the existence of the UNCOM system made it possible, for the first time, to seek outcome data from two key institutions: Milwaukee County Children’s Court Delinquency and Court Services Division (juvenile delinquency) and Milwaukee Public Schools (school attendance). This type of outcome research simply would not have been possible without the UNCOM system in place. Program Monitoring Enhancements: Each Brighter Futures project receives a monthly monitoring visit. (A small number of programs, i.e. Task Force on Family Violence and the Pathfinders Hand-in-Hand program, are generally not visited because of the extremely confidential nature of their activities.) A monitoring form is completed for each visit; the form includes the following information: helpfulness of staff, number of participants present, number of adults present and engaged in activities, description of the activity occurring, a description of the mood/climate of the environment, specifics about project activities, and notes regarding any areas that need attention or improvement in the future. The monitoring results are reviewed at the monthly Brighter Futures management meeting to identify agencies/projects needed technical assistance or other intervention. In addition, unannounced site visits are conducted by the project coordinator and evaluator to obtain additional insight into the quality of day to day program operation. Challenges and Lessons Learned Child Welfare: This year, the evaluation coordinator worked with MPS and Children’s Court to obtain outcome information on Brighter Futures participants. A similar effort was made with the Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare and although there was agreement on the outcome indicator to be used and the general strategy for follow-up, we were unable to finalize an agreement that would allow examination of results for 2008 Brighter Futures participants. Hopefully, in 2009, we will be able to examine child welfare outcomes for parents involved in Brighter Futures-supported parenting programs. 10 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Leverage/Sustainability: The amount of funding leveraged by Brighter Futures funding dropped somewhat– from $3.00 leveraged for every Brighter Futures dollar in 2007 to $2.75 in 2008. This may be a function of economic issues and the greater competition for scarce resources. This is a warning sign, however, because as shrinking dollars are increasingly focused on deeper end services, support for prevention is likely to suffer. A closer examination of what has happened with funding for prevention is required to determine how to best address this growing gap. Basic Needs: Concerns about participants’ ability to meet their basic needs – food, shelter, clothing, health care – have been expressed among Brighter Futures agencies for several years. This has been exacerbated in 2008 with the economic downturn. Any observation of a Brighter Futures program involving youth will quickly reveal that participants are expressing concerns about basic needs, including food. Beyond that day to day situation, it is clear that housing instability and lack of access to health, dental and mental health care are serious problems. In past years, Brighter Futures has sought a closer relationship between 2-1-1@IMPACT and Brighter Futures agencies and this has helped many learn more about how to access services. However, it may be time to examine a more organized interface between Brighter Futures and mainstream resources, e.g. FoodShare, BadgerCare, and others. Parents: Project after project cited the difficulty of attracting and retaining parents in program activities. Some projects indicated that low parent participation practically doomed youth’s chances for program success, i.e. New Concept Truancy Project. In recent years, a family nurturing program became a youth ‘learn to nurture yourself’ program because the parents stopped attending but the youth wanted to continue. The importance of parent involvement in their children’s education has been demonstrated over and over again; yet neither school, nor community-based organizations, nor churches have figured out how to get parents to be consistently involved in their children’s education – both in school and at home. School Attendance: The school attendance of Brighter Futures participants was not good – but it is not much different than MPS students at large. A quarter of Brighter Futures participants are in school 70% or less of the time. This has a huge impact on their ability to learn, participate, and succeed at school and out of school. Low attendance is directly related to school failure and dropping out. This may be an area where the Brighter Futures network, by banding together, can have an important impact in the coming years. Special Outcome Research Projects This year, the Brighter Futures evaluation effort included the use of the UNCOM data base to track juvenile delinquency and school attendance outcomes for Brighter Futures youth, looking specifically at whether dosage (participation frequency) had positive impacts on these two Brighter Futures benchmarks. A similar effort was taken relative to child welfare but was not successful this year. Brighter futures Participation and Juvenile Delinquency Research Question: The prevention of juvenile delinquency is one of the primary goals of the statewide Brighter Futures initiative; in Milwaukee, this has resulted in an emphasis in programming for the teen-age population, specifically youth ages 12 to 17. In 2008, the Brighter Futures evaluation was broadened to include an examination of juvenile delinquency among Brighter Futures participants. We also wanted to examine any possible relationship between the frequency of Brighter Futures participation and delinquency behavior. A group of 500 12-17 year old Brighter Futures participants was randomly drawn from the UNCOM data base; their names and ages were sent to Milwaukee County Delinquency and Court Services Division. The question posed was: How many youth on the list were referred to Milwaukee County Children’s Court on a new delinquency referral between January 1 and June 30, 2008? A new delinquency referral would represent a new charge as opposed to a probation violation, JIPS (Juvenile in Need of Protective Services) or other non-offense related referral. Findings: Out of the group of 500, 487 were determined to be usable names, i.e. other names were missing birthdates or other information. Among the 487 youth, there were eleven (11) new delinquency referrals, including: disorderly conduct (4), drive or operate vehicle without owner’s consent (2), substantial batteryintend bodily harm (1), battery to law officer/fire fighters and/or resisting or obstructing an officer (2), robbery with use of force (1), and burglary-building or dwelling (1). Boys committed seven (7) of the offenses; girls committed four (4). The average age of those with offenses was 13.4 years. Because of the small numbers of offenders, it was not possible to examine any possible connection between the number of offenses and Brighter Futures participation. Offender youth averaged 11.8 days of attendance at Brighter Futures programs between January 1 and June 30, 2008, with a range from 5 to 43 days. It is important to note that this was a totally random sample so the gender and age distribution reflects the Brighter Futures population; it does not reflect the Children’s Court population, e.g. more boys than girls, a higher proportion of older youth than younger youth. In other words, if the sample queried was weighted to increase the proportion of males, the results may have been somewhat different. Future efforts to follow-up on the delinquency outcome for Brighter Futures youth will examine the question of sampling strategy; however, the very low numbers suggest that sampling would have little impact on the overall result. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 11 Brighter Futures Participation and School Attendance School attendance is one of the primary predictors of school success. Several research studies have attempted to establish a relationship between school attendance and participation in afterschool programs. Researchers note that dosage (frequency of participation) is a key variable; in other words, there is increasing evidence of a positive relationship between high dosage (frequent attendance) program participation and good school attendance.1 To determine the possible connection between participation in Brighter Futures programs and school attendance, a special research project was conducted to examine the school attendance of Brighter Futures participants. Specifically, a list of all Brighter Futures participants between the ages of 11 and 17 was sent to the Milwaukee Public Schools; a total of 1,232 were determined to be MPS students. The analysis examined Brighter Futures participation rates relative to school attendance between January 1 and June 30, 2008. The overall results of this analysis are shown below. MPS School BF Very Low attenders3 BF Infrequent attenders BF Frequent attenders (N=513) (N=279) (N=169) attendance rate2 90% or more 80-89% 70-79% Less than 70% 29% 26% 16% 28% 27% 25% 16% 33% BF Very frequent attenders (N=271) 34% 23% 17% 27% 39% 25% 15% 21% This table shows that youth who were Frequent or Very Frequent Attenders of Brighter Futures Projects tended to have higher MPS school attendance (90% or more). Conversely Very Frequent Attenders were somewhat less likely to have very poor (less than 70%) school attendance. Otherwise, there are no striking patterns in the data. However, the most distressing information yielded by this research was the consistently high percentage of students who attend school less than 70% of the time. About one-quarter (27.4%) of Brighter Futures participants ages 11-17 attended school 70% of the time or less; this is the equivalent of being absent 1.5 days per week. Additional analysis indicated that girls who were Brighter Futures Frequent or Very Frequent Attenders were somewhat more likely than boys to have very good (90%+) school attendance. An analysis by age was conducted by grouping ages 11-14 together as Middle School Age and 15-17 as High School Age. Middle School Frequent and Very Frequent Brighter Futures participants were more likely than their High School counterparts to have good (90%+) school attendance. To some extent, this difference is a reflection of the general pattern of better school attendance among younger students; as MPS students age, their school attendance tends to decline. This area requires more investigation. School Attendance Brighter Futures Attenders 90% or more 80-89% 70-79% Less than 70% Very Low Attender Girls 29% 23% 19% 29% 1-3 times* Boys 29% 29% 14% 28% Middle School Age 38% 28% 16% 18% High School Age 23% 25% 16% 36% Infrequent Attender Girls 29% 20% 16% 35% 4-9 times* Boys 24% 29% 16% 31% Middle School Age 29% 28% 17% 26% High School Age 26% 22% 14% 40% Frequent Attender Girls 38% 27% 13% 23% 10-18 times* Boys 30% 19% 20% 31% Middle School Age 46% 25% 14% 15% High School Age 22% 20% 19% 38% Girls 43% 29% 9% 19% Very Frequent Attender More than 19 times* Boys 35% 22% 20% 23% Middle School Age 48% 27% 13% 12% High School Age 26% 22% 17% 34% * Brighter Futures Program Attendance between January 1 and June 30, 2008 Comparison by Gender Comparison by Age See Huang, D. et al, “Examining the Relationship between LA’s BEST Program Attendance and Academic Achievement of LA’s BEST Students, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing, UCLA, December 2008, for a review of the literature. 2 Attendance rate includes the number of school days minus absences (excused + unexcused). 3 Very Low Attenders = 1-3 times; Infrequent Attenders = 4-9 times; Frequent Attenders = 10-18 times; Very Frequent Attenders = 19 or more times. 1 12 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Long Term BFI Outcomes Several key Milwaukee County community indicators show significant change in a positive direction. These indicators include juvenile delinquency including referrals to Children’s Court and placement in juvenile corrections, child abuse and neglect, births to teen mothers, and high school drop-outs. These positive changes cannot be directly attributed to Brighter Futures; however, there is reason to believe that the combined efforts of several major prevention efforts, including Brighter Futures as a prominent entity, are showing measurable results in terms of these key indicators. Juvenile Delinquency: Between 2002 and 2008, the number of referrals to Milwaukee County Children’s Court dropped from 4,847 to 3,425, representing a decrease of 1,422 referrals or 29.3%. At the same time, placements in juvenile corrections also declined dramatically, from 300 youth to 213 youth, a 29.0% drop. (Source: Milwaukee County Delinquency and Court Services) Child Abuse and Neglect: Between 2002 and 2007, the number of substantiated maltreatment cases in Milwaukee County dropped from 2,188 to 1,692, a difference of 496 cases or 22.7%. (Source: Wisconsin Department of Children and Families) Births to Teen Mothers: Births to teen mothers dropped from 2,326 in 2001 to 2,085 in 2007, a difference of 241 birth or 10.4%. (Source: Wisconsin Department of Health Services) High School Drop-Outs: Dropping out of school also declined; from 3,038 drop-outs in 2000-01 to 2,376 in 2007-08, a decrease of 662 or 21.8%. (Source: Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction) Summary Milwaukee Brighter Futures has become a primary component in Milwaukee County’s overall prevention system and has consistently pursued a strategy of using research, best practices, and expertise of practitioners in the field to guide program development and improve quality. Brighter Futures’ strength is its collaborative approach – namely, bringing agencies together to learn from experts and learn from each other. This overarching philosophy fosters a spirit of cooperation and dialogue that overcomes the competitive climate fostered by funding sources. At the same time, Brighter Futures’ monitoring – in person and through the data system – has strengthened accountability and made it possible to connect more dots in the prevention network by bringing similar efforts together, dismantling silos, and generating more shared opportunities. Last, Brighter Futures’ commitment to gathering and analyzing information from programs, through surveys, and from key institutions contributes to a constant improvement process that is evident at the project and network levels. That there is beginning to be real improvements in key indicators such as delinquency and teen pregnancy may be a result of the investment in prevention programming made by Brighter Futures and other entities. Janice Wilberg, Ph.D., Evaluation Coordinator Wilberg Community Planning LLC Racquel R. Bell, Brighter Futures Project Coordinator Community Advocates Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 13 Agape Community Center 6100 N. 42nd Street Director: Eva Spencer – espencer@agape-center.org Brighter Futures Project Name: Youth Program Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff: Janeen Boone – Jboone@agape-center.org Project Description The Agape Youth Programs serve youth ages 7-19 years old. During the school year, youth are served weekly in two age groups: youth ages 7-13 and teens ages 14-19. Preteens ages 11-14 meet once weekly for a specialized session. All youth receive help with homework assignments, have time for games and physical recreation which includes the Healthy and Nutrition program and activities, and spend time each day in Technology Center. The program functions Monday-Friday during the school year from 3:00-9:00 p.m. Every evening a hot meal is served. During summer months, a Summer Youth Program for youth ages 4-12 provides expanded morning and afternoon hours. Daily lunch is provided, and activities are extended to include weekly field trips and cultural arts enrichment. These experiential learning opportunities allow children to explore arts, history, and science beyond the confines of their neighborhood. IOM Classification Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 422 4-9 times 322 10-18 times 277 19 times or more 372 Unduplicated Participants 1393 Percent 30% 23% 20% 27% Program Setting Community or youth center Agape Community Center, 6100 N. 42nd Street, Milwaukee, WI 53209 Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $40,000 Gender Male Female 590 803 42% 58% Project leveraging Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other $40,000 Fighting Back- Purchase ATODA curriculum & Supplies & direct service 1126 12 192 4 7 52 81% 1 % 14% >1% >1% 4 % $45,000 Safe & Sound- Direct service $29,000 CDBG - Direct service $218,034 Various other sources- Salaries/benefits, direct services, etc. Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 261 289 843 19% 21% 61% Collaborations Cardinal Stritch University College of Nursing Nursing faculty and students provide health education and promotion regarding nutrition & exercise, ATODA prevention, violence prevention, etc. United Neighborhood Centers of Milwaukee Sharing of best practices in youth development, access to cultural arts instructors, driver’s education classes, joint youth leadership activities, and sports leagues. Wisconsin Foundation for Independent Colleges College readiness program including twice weekly tutoring sessions, SAT/ACT preparation, college tours, etc. Hunger Task Force/WI Department of Public Instruction Provide food for evening dinners and lunches during the summer Florist Avenue Lutheran Church Site for 4-7 year olds in Summer Youth Program 14 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Agape Community Center Primary Activities: Logic Model EXHIBIT 1 Agency Name: Agape Community Center Goals Objectives (Activities) For youth participants to envision, plan, and achieve a future that strengthens personal, family, and neighborhood prosperity. 1) Provide after school programming to 375 neighborhood youth ages 7-19 that offer opportunities for academic enrichment, personal and interpersonal development, and recreation. Project Name: Programs for Youth and Family Development 2) Provide summer programming for 100 youth ages 4-12 to enhance their development through recreational activities and experiential learning. 3) Engage a core group of 50 youth ages 11-19 and their families in intensive prevention programming and family support services including each of the following: • ATODA prevention curriculum • Protective Behaviors delinquency prevention curriculum • Abstinence-based teen pregnancy prevention curriculum • Job readiness/vocational preparation sessions • Family case management sessions when needed Outputs 1) 235 youth ages 7-13 and 240 teens 15-19 will enroll and attend after school programs at least one time. Outcomes (with indicators) 1) Increased resistance skills: 75% of core participants will demonstrate an ability to resist negative peer pressure and dangerous situations (Data Source: YRBS, prevention curricula pre/post-tests) 2) Average of 15 youth, 20 preteens, and 40 teens will attend After School programs each day. 2) Improved attitude of youth toward school: 70% of core participants will demonstrate a positive attitude about school (Data Source: Supplemental Questionnaire) 3) 100 youth ages 4-12 will participate in Summer Youth Program. 3) Improved ability to envision and plan for the future: 70% of core participants will articulate a plan for a future of selfsufficiency and complete a vocational plan demonstrating vocational preparedness (Data Source: Future planning assessment; resume; at least two interviews and job readiness assessment) 4) 40 youth ages 11-19 and will successfully complete prevention programming (ATODA, Protective Behaviors, and Abstinence curricula), job readiness/vocational preparation sessions, and will work, as needed, with a family case manager. 4) Reduce early on-set of ATODA experimentation and increase awareness of STIs, etc. and risk of premature intimate involvement. 50% of core participants will articulate with the use of brochures and facilitation of a prevention event to their peers and family on one or both of the topic areas. (YSRB, pre/post test & event. Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures Program Activity Not reported Evidence-Based Programming Club Hero, Strengthening Families Outcomes The Agape Brighter Futures Program met all of its planned 2008 outcomes: • Ability to resist negative peer pressure and dangerous situations. (75% planned; 88% achieved) • Improved attitude of youth toward school. (70% planned; 94% achieved) • Improved ability to envision and plan for the future. (70% planned; 89% achieved) Results are for a percentage of youth who attended the program very frequently (3+ times weekly). Several assessment tools were utilized including the Youth Risk Behavior Survey, United Way Youth Survey, and school report cards. About one fourth (27%) of Agape participants attended programming 19 times or more. It is not clear from the data, however, whether the frequent attenders were youth or adults because Agape combines the two populations in its report. Outcome Analysis Agape noted that the population of frequent attendees changed during the program year to include younger teens and youth and fewer older teens. In addition, Agape noted that at year’s end, there seemed to be slight increases in truancy and delinquency behaviors. These changes are not unusual for a community-based program serving a large youth population. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 15 Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Milwaukee 1558 N. 6th St., Milwaukee, WI 53212 Director Name Lesley Salas, Director of Grants – lesleys@girlsboysclubs.org Brighter Futures Project Name Sista Pride Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Natalie Cooper, Director – nataliec@girlsboysclubs.org Project Description Sista Pride provides girl-centered programs at six Boys and Girls Clubs and St. Joan Antida and Marshall High Schools. Regular program activities include discussion and education on the root causes of anger, positive communication skills, family dynamics, self-image and future orientation. Special events include “Princess for Prom,” which combined grooming tips with education on sexually transmitted diseases, dating violence, impact of substance abuse and resisting peer pressure. Goals include improved social and interpersonal skills, reductions in girl-on-girl conflict, improved decision-making skills, increased girl involvement in program planning and implementation, and coordination of community activities involving girls. IOM Classification Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 219 4-9 times 57 10-18 times 331 19 times or more 74 Unduplicated Participants 681 Percent 32% 8% 49% 11% Program Setting School: St. Joan Antida and Marshall High Schools Community or youth center: 6 legacy Boys & Girls Clubs in Milwaukee Public building/facility/park: Various locations for events, field trips Program Funding Gender Male Female 49 632 7% 93% Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 535 124 16 2 - 5 79% 18% 3% .5% .5% Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 104 529 48 15% 78% 7% Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $150,000 Project leveraging $50,000 WE Energies Fdn- Remaining salary costs $10,000 Helen Bader Fdn- Program materials $17,000 Individual donors- Occupancy/Overhead costs $500 Women’s Club of WI - Program materials Collaborations COA Youth and Family Services Allowed access to a different set of resources related to sexual assault amongst teenage girls Milwaukee Public Theater Provide a skill set related to performance arts-Hip Hop, Step, African Dance, Zumba and Salsa. Still Waters Collective Engaged teens in the art of Spoken Word which allows access to educational materials that enhance literacy. Greatness Now The launch of the She Ain’t Angry for Nothin’ curriculum connected Sista Pride with 30 different agencies that share the same issues with relational aggression amongst girls. A support system has been created that will allow us to use each other as a tool to insure the success of our girls. Chevellia’s Provided workshops for girls and parents to enhance their social etiquette skills, parenting skills and love of life. 16 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Milwaukee Primary Activities: Logic Model Agency Name: Boys & Girls Clubs of Greater Milwaukee Objectives (Activities) Goals Goal: to build on initial successes and continue to develop and test a transferable model of effective girl-specific program design that transforms female participants into productive, responsible and caring citizens. Project Name: Sista Pride Outcomes (with indicators) Outputs Frequent attender girls (2378 total) will achieve outcomes consistent or better than other Boys & Girls Clubs frequent attenders and measured through administration of the MYFDA and YRBS surveys annually. Targets for 2008 include healthy eating, avoidance of alcohol and sexual activity and an ability to stand up for one’s beliefs. Agency Culture Change Objective: Increase Girls’ Attendance Frequency and Duration by *216 additional girls will become 10% and Retain 50% of Frequently Attending frequent attenders with the mentioned Girls across the six traditional Club sites of Clubs. Combined with a 50% retention Lavarnway, Daniels-Mardak, Fitzsimmonds, rate there will be a total of 2378 frequent EXHIBIT 1 Mary Ryan, Davis and Pieper-Hillside. attender girls in 2007. Strategies: Targeted effort by Sista Pride staff to increase participation in general Club Agency Name: Community Center Project Name: Programs for Youth and Family Development programming, and memberAgape marketing. *55% (385 of 700) of girls involved will report having not have been in a physical Objectives Outcomes (with indicators) *700 (Activities) girls will participate in Sista Pride Goals Outputs fight within the last 30 days. (YRBSresistance High 1) Increased skills: 75% of specific programming (weekly program School survey) core participants will demonstrate an 1) Provide after school programProgram One:toImprove Social and groups or special events). At least 1) 600235 of youth ages 7-13 and For youthObjective participants ability to resistwill negative peer pressure *70% (490 of 700) of girls involved ming to 375 neighborhood youth ages 240 teens 15-19 will enroll Interpersonal Skills Through Reducing Girlthese girls will be Boys & Girls Clubs and dangerous situations envision, plan, and 7-19 that offer opportunities for acaa weapon in YRBS, the past attend after report schoolnot pro-having carried(Data Source: prevention curricon-Girl Conflict. Members at one the 8 sites Sistaand Pride demic enrichment, personal andof interachieve a future that grams at least one 30 time. days. (YRBS High School survey) ula pre/post-tests) Strategies: Allies in Action curriculum,personal girls development, is offeredand andrecreation. 100 girls will be from the *79% (490 of 700) of girls involved will strengthens personal, only space, multi-site/community events, community at large. Note that often 2) Improved attitude of youth toward 2) girls Average of 15avoid youth, 20 suspension from school during the family, and of neighborschool: 70% of core participants will 2) Provide summer programming forcommunity preteens, employment teen staff members. who attend Sista Pride events and 40 teens will grant period. (MPS infraction data) a positive attitude about demonstrate 100 youth ageslater 4-12become to enhance their hood prosperity. attend After School programs Club members. school (Data Source: Supplemental development through recreational activities and experiential learning. each day. Questionnaire) 3) 100 youth ages 4-12 will 3) Improved ability to envision and plan 3) Engage a core group of 50 youth participate in Summer for the future: will 70% of core participants *65% Youth (455 of 700) of girls involved Program Objective Two: Improve Skills willinparticipate in Sista Pride ages 11-19 and*700 theirgirls families intenProgram. plan for a future of selfreport that they try to do will bestarticulate work ata school. programming and (see above). Necessary for Good Decision Making sive prevention specific programming sufficiency and complete a vocational (YRBS Middle School Survey) plan demonstrating vocational preparedincluding 4) 40 youth ages 11-19 and Strategies: Involvement of girls at everyfamily level support*2services teen staff will be employed by Sista (455 of 700) of girls involved will Future planning ness (Data Source: will successfully *65% complete of planning, design and implementationeach and of the following: Pride to assist with overall implementation resume; at least two interreport that they strongly assessment; agree that they stand • ATODA prevention curriculum prevention programming employment of teen staff members. of the initiative. views and job readiness assessment) • Protective Behaviors delinquency up for their beliefs. (YRBS Middle School (ATODA, Protective Behavprevention curriculum iors, and Abstinence curricSurvey) 4) Reduce early on-set of ATODA ex• Abstinence-based teen pregnancy ula), job readiness/vocational perimentation and increase awareness of *65% (455 of 700) of girls involved will prevention curriculum preparation sessions, and will etc. and risk of premature intimate report that they agree or STIs, strongly agree that involvement. 50% of core participants work, as needed, with a famCommunity Engagement Objective: • Job readiness/vocational prepathey can resist negative peer pressure. (YRBS will articulate with the use of brochures ration sessions ily case manager. Coordinate Community Involvement to More Middle School Survey) and facilitation of a prevention event to • Family case management sesEffectively Engage Girls In Programming. *4 community-wide events, including their peers and family on one or both of sions when needed Strategies: Special events and programming offered to girls communitywide to model effective girls programs as well as learn from other providers through building relationships, partnerships and alliances. one featuring a nationally acclaimed speaker. At least 100 girls from other youth serving agencies and 20 adults from other youth serving agencies will participate. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. the topic areas. (YSRB, pre/post test & event. Brighter Futures Outcomes Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency Program Activity ∑• • • ∑• 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 329 additional girls became frequent attenders at Boys and Girls Clubs between January-December 2008 632 girls participated in Sista Pride-specific programming; 415 girls from Boys and Girls Clubs and 217 girls from community at large 2 teen staff employed by Sista Pride to assist with program facilitation 4 community-wide events conducted Evidence-Based Programming Allies in Action, She Ain’t Angry for Nothin’ Outcomes The Sista Pride Program achieved 90% of its program-specific participation goal. The program planned to involve 700 girls in weekly Sista Pride programming; 632 girls actually participated. The project also planned to increase the number of girls who frequently attend Boys and Girls Clubs general activities by 216 additional girls; the actual number of frequent attenders was 329 additional girls. Three specific outcomes were specified in the logic model; namely, violence reduction, reduction in school suspensions and improved attitudes toward school and ability to resist negative peer pressure. Actual outcomes are not reported; project indicates that data was not available to assess performance on planned outcomes. Sista Pride reported that 60% of its youth participants attended 10 times or more, however, most of these girls were in the 10-18 times range (49% of the total) and only 11% attended 19 times or more. This means that 405 girls fell into the frequent/very frequent participant category. Outcome Analysis Sista Pride continues to undergo refinement as the program matures. New this year was the strategy of forming a stable Sista Pride team that rotated among the eight sites; also new was the use of a 14-week introductory curriculum to introduce new participants to Sista Pride. A “think tank” evaluation format involving 10 girl leaders was used to obtain feedback for program planning; unfortunately, the results of this process were not included in the year-end report. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 17 COA Youth and Family Centers 909 E. North Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53212 Director Name Brighter Futures Project Name Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Tom Schneider - TomSchneider@coa-yfc.org Youth Development Kari Nervig, Youth Development Program Director K_nervig@coa-yfc.org Project Description The COA Youth Development Program provides prevention and asset-based year-round youth development programming for youth ages 7 to 19. The program offers programming and services designed to build the health, resiliency, achievement levels, and self-sufficiency of at-risk youth and their families. Youth programs include academic tutoring, prevention-based programs, leadership training, life skills, sports and recreation, computer skills, arts, and community service. The program operates at two locations: Goldin at 23rd and Burleigh and Riverwest, near Humboldt and North. IOM Classification Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 463 4-9 times 291 10-18 times 172 19 times or more 447 Unduplicated Participants 1373 Percent 34 % 21 % 13 % 33 % Gender Male Female 820 553 60 % 40 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 1212 50 18 3 5 85 88 % 4 % 1 % 0 % 0 % 6 % Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 187 857 329 14 % 62 % 24 % Program Setting Community or youth center: COA Riverwest and COA Goldin Public building/facility/park: Kilbourn/ Kadish Park Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $75,000 Project leveraging $191,500 United Way - youth development $75,000 Safe and Sound- teen youth d evelopment $98,000 MPS - preteen programming $130,000 City of Milw. (CDGA) - youth development $335,000 Foundation + Individuals youth development planning $45,000 Fighting Back, Inc.AODA education/curricula Collaborations Milwaukee Public Schools COA collaborates with MPS schools to provide consistent behavioral and educational opportunities. Health Education Center Health Education Center provided supplemental health and safety programs. Impact, Inc. Impact provided training to staff on AODA Education. Planned Parenthood Planned Parenthood provided supplemental health programs. UW Extension Cost share nutrition programming offered 40 hours per year to 7-19 year olds in after-school programs. UW Milwaukee This partnership provided volunteers and resources in the areas of educational achievement. Marquette University This partnership provided volunteers and resources in the areas of health and fitness. UNCOM 8 member agencies engage in collaborative/joint programming and shared resources including cultural arts, wellness, job readiness, and healthy relationships programming. Riverwest Health Initiative RHI provided access to community resources. Milwaukee County Sheriff Provided health and safety programming. Milwaukee Police Department P rovided collaboration on events and initiatives. Community Partners Community Partners proved access to community resources as well as increased access to law enforcement. 18 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report COA Youth and Family Centers Primary Activities: Logic Model COA YOUTH AND FAMILY CENTERS: GOLDIN & RIVERWEST CENTER YOUTH DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM 2008 LOGIC MODEL GOAL Help youth and families to: 1) improve their personal and social skills; 2) learn and improve in a variety of different academic and career skills; 3) gain a better Agency Name: understanding and appreciation of the importance of goal setting; 4) increase their self-esteem,Goals selfconfidence, and pride in themselves, For their family, and youth participants culture; 5) gain an understanding, plan, and appreciation,envision, sensitivity, and achieve a future respect for people different from that themselves, strengthens and their community; personal, and 6) experience positive, family, and neighbormeaningful activities and find hood prosperity. resources to help lead a successful, healthy and enjoyable lifestyle. OBJECTIVES (ACTIVITIES) OUTPUTS (program year) OUTCOMES 1) Provide prevention- and asset-based, 1) In excess of 100 youth (ages 7-19) average year-round youth development programs for daily will attend after-school and summer program 1300 at-risk youth ages 7-19 focusing on four and receive a healthy snack and/or meal core content areas: (1) Education/Career, 2) Total of 1300 unduplicated new youth ages 7Agape Community Center Programs 19 willProject register for Name: youth programs in 2005-06 for (2) Personal Growth and Development, 3) Average monthly total of 1,500 duplicated (3) Community Building /Cultural Enrichment, youth will participate in Open Gym and/or and (4) Health/ WellnessObjectives (Activities) Outputs organized sports activities. 2) Provide family-centered programs and 1) Provide after school program- 4) Average monthly activities (e.g. dinners, cultural arts total of unduplicated 1) 235 youth 20 ages 7-13 and to to 375 neighborhood performances, ming Open Houses, recreation, fieldyouth ages teens will participate in leadership development 240 teens 15-19 will enroll 7-19 that offer opportunities for aca- activities. and attend after school protrips, family camping weekends, special demic enrichment, personal and intergrams total at least time. 5) Average monthly of 65one unduplicated events) for youth ages 7-19 and their families personalparticipants). development, and recreation. youth will engage in goal setting activities (goal: 1,300 duplicated 2) Average of 15 youth, 20 6) Average monthly total of 100 unduplicated 3) Provide leadership and community 2) Provide summer programming for preteens, and 40 teens will impact activities100 andyouth community eventstotoenhance give will participate in ages 4-12 theiryouth ages 7-19attend After School programs youth opportunities for positivethrough interactions development recreational ac-workshops/activities eachfocusing day. on health and wellness. with adults andtivities to buildand community. experiential learning. 7) Average monthly of 30 youth willwill 3) 100total youth ages 4-12 3) Engage a core group of 50 youth participate in community service projects.Youth participate in Summer ages 11-19 and their families in intenProgram. 8) Over 100 youth (ages (7-12) in the sive prevention programming andcommunity will see a teen-performed play family support services including regarding personal 4) 40 youth ages 11-19 and body safety. each of the following: will successfully complete 9) Average monthly total of 60 youth will receive • ATODA prevention curriculum programming homework helpprevention and/or complete required daily • Protective Behaviors delinquency (ATODA, Protective Behavstudy time. prevention curriculum iors, and Abstinence curric10) A total of 260 (or 20% of the target • Abstinence-based teen pregnancy ula),youth job readiness/vocational population) will preparation complete a retrospective prevention curriculum sessions, and will • Job readiness/vocational prepa-Developmental work, Outcomes Survey, with and Program as needed, a famration sessions Quality Survey ily indicating success of defined case manager. • Family case management ses- program outcomes and quality of the programs. sions when needed 60% of a “sample group” (10% EXHIBIT 1 of total target population selected from a pool of youth attending at least 5 times per Youth and Family Development month on average, aka “regular attendees”.) will be able to indicators) define Outcomes short-term, (with mid-term, and 1) Increased resistance skills: 75% of long-term goals, as well as steps core participants will demonstrate an to achieving those goals.peer pressure ability to resist negative and dangerous situations (Data Source: YRBS, prevention curric70% of the “sample group” will ula pre/post-tests) demonstrate a positive attitude, towards academic achievement. 2) Improved attitude of youth toward school: 70% of core participants will demonstrate a positive attitude about school (Data Source: Supplemental Questionnaire) A total of at least 50 youth will gain increased knowledge 3) Improved ability to envision and plan for the future: 70% body of core participants regarding personal safety. will articulate a plan for a future of selfsufficiency and complete a vocational plan demonstrating vocational preparedness (Data Source: Future planning 60% of “sample group”atwill assessment; resume; least two interviews and job readiness assessment) engage in activities that have a positive community impact. 4) Reduce early on-set of ATODA experimentation and increase awareness of STIs, etc. and risk of premature intimate involvement. 50% of core participants will articulate with the use of brochures and facilitation of a prevention event to their peers and family on one or both of the topic areas. (YSRB, pre/post test & event. Brighter Futures Outcomes Program Activity ∑• ∑• ∑• ∑• ∑• ∑• 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 155 youth, ages 7-19, average daily attendance 1,373 youth registered for programming in 2008 Monthly average of 1,963 youth participated in open gym and organized sports Monthly average of 13 teens participated in leadership activities Monthly average of 35 youth engaged in goal setting activities Monthly average of 123 youth received daily homework help 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures Evidence-Based Programming Safe Dates, Safe Child, Project Trust: Touch, All Stars, Too Good for Drugs, Junior Achievement Outcomes COA exceeded its general attendance goals by achieving an average daily attendance of 165 compared to the planned 100 participants. Additionally, the program registered 1,373 youth for programming compared to the 1,300 planned. Open gym and sports activities also attracted more youth, 1,963 actual compared to 1,500 planned. Specific outcomes as measured by the United Way Youth Development Community Outcomes Survey include: • Ability to define goals and strategies to meet goals. (91% of youth indicated plans for the future; 93% indicated p lans to attend college/training after high school; and 91% said they were on track to graduate) • Positive attitude toward academic achievement. (96% said it is important to do well in school) • Increased knowledge of personal safety. (69% indicated they increased knowledge of sexual abuse) • Increased engagement in community activities. (73% of youth volunteered) One-third (33%) of COA participants attended 19 times or more; another 13% attended 10-18 times. Because COA serves such a high volume of youth, this means that 619 youth were either frequent or very frequent participants in programming. Outcome Analysis COA focused its 2008 efforts on aligning programming at the newer Goldin Center with the standards, practices, and content of the older, more established Riverwest Center. This transition included increased programming at Goldin including cultural arts, educational achievement, health and safety, leadership, crime prevention, and social enrichment; further developing the positive discipline system; and introducing daily mandatory, structured academic enrichment time. The program continues to use a standard outcome assessment instrument to gauge impacts and plan service improvements. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 19 HeartLove Place 3229 N. Dr. Martin Luther King Dr. Milwaukee, WI 53212 Director Name Ms. Vanessa Claypool - vclaypool@heartloveplace.org Brighter Futures Project Name Family Resource Center’s Parenting Programs Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Mrs. Peggy Neal - pneal@heartloveplace.org Project Description HeartLove Place provides child abuse and neglect prevention services through the provision of two parenting education programs. The first, “Nurturing God’s Way,” is a 21-session Christian-focused version of the nationally-recognized Nurturing Program and is targeted to parents age 18 and over. The second, “Nurturing Parenting Program for Teenage Parents” is a 26-week course aimed at parents age 17 and under. In addition to parenting education, HeartLove Place provides support services related to transportation, food, child care, and personal care as part of a comprehensive approach to reduce family stress and improve parenting capabilities. Goals include increased family cohesion, decreased family conflict, increased awareness of children’s developmental needs, and reduced belief in the value of corporal punishment. IOM Classification Selective Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 72 4-9 times 23 10-18 times 10 19 times or more 1 Unduplicated Participants 106 Percent 68 % 22 % 9 % 1 % Program Setting In participants’ homes School: New School for Community Service Community or youth center: HeartLove Place Church/faith institution: Mt. Hermon and Greater New Birth Church Other, specify: One-on- one walk in sessions at HeartLove Place Other, specify: One-on- one scheduled appointments With parents at HeartLove Place Gender Male Female 9 97 8 % 92 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 83 - 5 1 1 16 78 % 5 % 1 % 1 % 15 % Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $75,000 Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + $3,000 Children Hospital of WI Transportation for parents and children - 23 83 22 % 78 % $4,167 Christian Stewardship Fund Graduation Events Program Funding Project leveraging Collaborations Joy House Adult participation for our Nurturing God’s Way Program Grace Group Home Provided Teen Parents Participation Intercession Teen Group Home Provided Teen Parents Participation Tomorrow Future Provided Teen Parents Participation This House is a Home Provided Teen Parent Participation New School for Community Services Provided weekly Teen parenting session Mt. Hermon Church Provided adult participants Greater New Birth Church Provided adult participants The Milwaukee Child Welfare Participant referrals Meta House Participant referrals 20 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report HeartLove Place Primary Activities: Logic Model EXHIBIT 1 Agency Name: HeartLove Place Ministries Goals Goal #1: HeartLove Place will reduce child abuse and neglect by increasing the parenting skills of Central City Milwaukee residents. Goal #2: HeartLove Place will reduce child abuse and neglect by meeting the basic needs of lowincome parents in the Family Resource Centers Parenting Programs Project Name: Family Resource Center Objectives (Activities) * HLP will provide an in-center 21-week parenting program entitled “Nurturing God’s Way” to Central City Milwaukee parents ages 18 and over. * HLP will provide a 26-week in-center “Nurturing Parenting Program for Teenage Parents (NPPTP)” to Central City Milwaukee parents ages 17 and under. * HLP will provide support services to parents in HLP’s Parenting Programs free of charge. Outputs Outcomes (with indicators) * 25 Parents attend HLP’s 21-week NGW parenting program. * 25 Parents attend HLP’s 26-week Nurturing Parenting Program for Teenage Parents. * HLP will provide support services to 50 parents in HLP’s Parenting Programs free of charge. * At-risk parents in the NGW program demonstrate increased parenting skills resulting in significant increases in cohesion, family expressiveness, family independence, and a concurrent significant decrease in family conflict. Indicators: Pre and Post test of family cohesiveness, expressiveness, independence and conflict level; attendance and participation. * At-risk parents in the NPPTP demonstrate increased parenting skills such as: more appropriate expectations in line with the child's abilities; increased awareness of the child's needs and better response to those needs; and reduced belief in the value of corporal punishment. * At-risk parents demonstrate reduced frustration in the family due to lack of transportation, food, child-care and personal care items and a concurrent increase in life-skills. Indicators: Self report on frustrations experienced in the family as a result of the non-availability of basic needs and treatment programs. Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures Program Activity ∑• ∑• ∑• 23 teen parents attended the Nurturing Parenting Program for Teen Parents 83 parents attended the Nurturing God’s Way Parenting Program 106 parents offered support services to facilitate participation in parenting programs, including transportation assistance, child care and food. Evidence-Based Programming Nurturing God’s Way Nurturing Parenting Program for Teenage Parents, but encountered difficulties with retention. Outcomes HeartLove Place was successful in reaching parents. A total of 83 parents attended at least one session of the Nurturing God’s Way program (25 parents was the planned goal); and 23 teen parents attended at least one session of the Nurturing Parenting Program for Teenage Parents (25 planned goal). The program reported that 50% of teen parents and 65% of adult parents who participated improved their parenting skills as measured by the Nurturing Program standard assessment instruments. However, it is important to note that 85% of participants attended nine (9) or fewer sessions, especially critical in light of the length of the two programs (21 and 26 weeks respectively). Outcome Analysis Program retention was the primary challenge for this program. HeartLove Place tried to ameliorate the problem by providing services to address possible barriers, i.e. transportation, food and child care, but the strategy was unsuccessful. Technical assistance provided by Brighter Futures resulted in additional off-site programming in churches and other venues. However, the length of the program (21-26 weeks) coupled with the day to day difficulties encountered by participants resulted in very low program completion. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 21 IMPACT, Inc. 6737 W. Washington St., Ste 2225; Milwaukee 53214 Director Name Michael Davis - mdavis@impactinc.org Brighter Futures Project Name 2-1-1 @ IMPACT Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Bob Waite - bwaite@impactinc.org Project Description 2-1-1 @ IMPACT is the central point of access for Milwaukee County residents seeking food, housing, behavioral health services, health care and many other services 24 hours a day 365 days a year. Nineteen 2-1-1 staff members answered more 130,000 telephone calls in 2008. Community Resource Specialists ensure that information, resources and help on parenting issues, child abuse and neglect is readily available to the customers. The Specialists provide information and assistance and explore with customers what agencies will best meet their needs. In order to provide this level of service, IMPACT maintains a database of over 1,100 agencies that identify over 3,800 programs including those that provide services to parents and families. In addition, 2-1-1 @ IMPACT collaborates with community partners to provide training and continuing education for the staff at IMPACT on issues that affect individuals that contact us. Community Resource Specialists ensure that information and help on parent and family related issues is readily available to customers by connecting them directly to appropriate resources, providing accurate information and be able to develop strategies with customers struggling with these issues. IOM Classification Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times * 4-9 times * 10-18 times * 19 times or more * Unduplicated Participants * Program Setting Percent * * * * * Note: Given the method in which data is collected, it is difficult to determine the frequency of how often an individual contacts 2-1-1 @ IMPACT in a reliable fashion. Contacts are treated as individual “events” and even though we may speak with an individual two or more times over the course of a year, no case management is given. Gender Male Female 27,739 102,344 21 % 79 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 44,652 3,006 15,476 121 317 66,511 34 % 2 % 12 % >1 % >1 % 51 % Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + Unknown 16 902 120,692 8,473 >1 % >1 % 93 % 7 % Other: Telephone Hotline - All activities were provided by accessing the service by dialing 2-1-1, (414) 773-0211 or (866) 211-3380 Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $50,000 Project leveraging $442,932 United Way of Greater Milwaukee $480,000 Milwaukee County Economic Support Division $20,000 Milwaukee County Department on Aging $126,589 Private Foundations and Grants Collaborations Joy House Parenting NetworkAnswer calls for the Parent Helpline for 103 hours each week plus additional hours for holiday, meetings and special events. 22 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report IMPACT, Inc EXHIBIT 1 Primary Activities: Logic Model Agency Name: Agape Community Center Goals Agency Name: IMPACT, Inc. For youth participants to envision, plan, and 1. achieve 2-1-1 @ aIMPACT will future that provide telephone coverage strengthens personal, for the Parent Helpline family, and neighborduring evenings, weekends, hood prosperity. holidays and special events. Goals Community Resource Specialists (CRS) will provide support and reassurance to parents in need, as well as assist them with connecting to Parent Helpline services. Objectives (Activities) 1) Provide after school program- ming to(Activities) 375 neighborhood youth ages Objectives 7-19 that offer opportunities for aca2. Provide 103 personal hours a week of demic enrichment, and intertelephonic support the personal development, andfor recreation. Parent Helpline focused on 2) Provide summer programming preventing child abuse and for 100 youth ages 4-12 to enhance their neglect.through Coverage is development recreational acovernights, tivitiesprovided and experiential learning. weekend, holidays and 3) Engage a core group of 50 youththe special events throughout ages 11-19 and their families in intenyear. sive prevention programming and family support services including each of the following: • ATODA prevention curriculum • Protective Behaviors delinquency prevention curriculum • Abstinence-based teen pregnancy prevention curriculum • Job readiness/vocational preparation sessions • Family case management sessions when needed Project Name: Programs for Youth and Family Development Outcomes (with indicators) ProjectOutputs Name: 2-1-1 @ IMPACT 1) Increased resistance skills: 75% of 1) 235 youth ages 7-13 and Outputs240 teens 15-19 will enroll attend after school pro1. and 2-1-1 @ IMPACT will grams at least one time. provide 103 hours a week of for20the 2)telephonic Average ofsupport 15 youth, preteens, and 40 teens will will Parent Helpline. Calls attend After Schooland programs be documented crisis each day. intervention services which 3)initiated 100 youth agesmay 4-12 include will participate in Summer Youth contacting Parenting Program. Network on-call staff or appropriate emergency 4) 40 youth ages 11-19 and response systems. All calls will successfully complete prevention programming are documented and (ATODA, Protective Behavforwarded to Parent Helpline iors, and Abstinence curricstaff. ula), job readiness/vocational preparation sessions, and will work, as needed, with a family case manager. core participants will demonstrate an ability to resist negative peer pressure Outcomes (withsituations indicators) and dangerous (Data YRBS, prevention curric1. Source: 2-1-1 @ IMPACT will ula pre/post-tests) provide 103 hours a week of 2) Improved attitude support of youth toward telephonic for the school: Parent 70% of core participants will on Helpline focused demonstrate a positive attitude about preventing abuse and school (Data Source: child Supplemental Questionnaire) neglect. 90% of those callers will understand what 3) Improved ability to envision andtheir plan “next 70% step” “plan of for the future: of or core participants will articulate a plan for a future of selfaction” after speaking with a sufficiency and complete a vocational 2-1-1 @ IMPACT plan demonstrating vocational preparedness (Data Source: Future planning Community Resource assessment; resume; at least two interSpecialist. views and job readiness assessment) 2. Reduce the incidence of 4) Reduce early on-set of ATODA exchild abuse by deescalating perimentation and increase awareness of callers andof connecting them STIs, etc. and risk premature intimate involvement. of core participants to the50% appropriate resources. will articulate with the use of brochures Crisis ofsituation is resolved and facilitation a prevention event to their peers family one or both ofwill andand 90% of on those callers the topic areas. (YSRB, pre/post test & understand what their “next event. step” or “plan of action.” Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures Program Activity ∑• 103 hours per week plus holiday and special event support for Parent Helpline (totalling approximately 5,500 hours) ∑• 24/7 service January 1 to December 31, 2008 ∑• Top needs: 1) Food-related needs (36,093); 2) Financial needs (15,048); 3) Shelter needs (11,593); 4) H ousehold needs (10,241); 5) Legal Services (6,917); and 6) Health Care (6,491) ∑•2-1-1 @ IMPACT Online Resource Directory information provided to all BF agencies; presentations to Task Force on Family Violence and West Allis Police Department Evidence-Based Programming The purpose of Information and Referral (I & R) services is to connect people who need resources to the agencies or organizations having those resources. Outcomes 2-1-1 @ IMPACT met its planned output and outcome measures. In addition to its general function as the community’s central information and referral resource, the Brighter Futures project enabled 2-1-1 to provide needed evening and weekend coverage for the Parenting Helpline and to more widely disseminate resource information through the Brighter Futures network. In sum, 2-1-1 provided assistance to 130,083 callers in 2008; 97% of whom indicated at the conclusion of the call that they had a plan and/or knew their next step to resolve their problem. All callers with parenting issues are referred to the Parenting Network. Outcome Analysis 2-1-1 @ IMPACT is a high quality program that provides trained telephone I & R to the community 24/7, maintains the community’s most up-to-date and accurate resource directory, and generates detailed needs data that is regularly reported to the public and is used by other entities for needs assessment and program planning purposes. Its back-up of the Parenting Network’s Parent Helpline reinforces that line’s identity and accessibility among parents seeking specialized help for parenting concerns. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 23 Journey House, Inc 1900 W. Washington, Milwaukee, WI 53207 Director Name Dr. Michele Bria - mbria@journeyhouse.org Brighter Futures Project Name College Careers Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Joel Nelson - jnelson@journeyhouse.org Project Description The Journey House College Careers Program provides instructional and student support services to improve student success in high school and prepare students for higher achievement in college and the workforce. The program provides a flexible package of supports to ensure that youth are prepared, transition, accepted and graduate from an institution of higher education or enter the workforce. The program’s main goal is to produce competent, motivated, active and engaged youth who will become productive college students, dependable employees, and college graduates. IOM Classification Selective Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 21 4-9 times 18 10-18 times 3 19 times or more 8 Unduplicated Participants 50 Program Setting Percent 42 % 36 % 6 % 16 % Gender Male Female 33 17 66 % 34 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 16 29 3 - - 2 32 % 58 % 6 % 4 % Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + - 38 12 76 % 24 % In participants’ homes School: MATC, Cardinal Stritch and UWM Community or youth center: Journey House Youth Center Public building/facility/park: West Allis Public Library Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $75,000 Project leveraging $100,000 Greater Milwaukee Foundation - workforce development, volunteerism, leadership and strong parental involvement $ 50,000 Forrest County Potawatomi Community Foundation - workforce development, volunteerism, leadership and strong parental involvement $ 50,000 Trinity FoundationFocuses - academic enrichment $ 15,000 The Actuarial Foundation - launched Math Academy Collaborations Milwaukee Area Technical College Allowing students to achieve a higher education to pursue a better future. Cardinal Stritch University Allowing students to achieve a higher education to pursue a better future. Mount Mary College Allowing students to achieve a higher education to pursue a better future. Also, offered summer pre-college courses. Milwaukee School of Engineering Offered summer pre-college courses. 24 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Journey House, Inc Primary Activities: Logic Model Agency Name: Journey House Goals Pre-College 1. Youth will be on-grade level in reading and math. 2. High school/GED youth will be adequately prepared to enter postsecondary education and/or enter the workforce. 3. Youth will have a career plan (appropriate to age level) and understand realistic expectations and commitment to achieve career goal. 4. Eligible youth will be enrolled into postsecondary education. College 1.College enrollees will maintain 2.5 GPA 2. Students will continue academic advising and receive on-campus tutoring. Employment 1. Youth will participate in career exploration. 2. Youth will obtain employment. 3. Youth will retain employment. Project Name: College Career Program Objectives (Activities) Pre-College Outputs Pre-College 1. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Orientation to program with signed participant and parent commitment, which outlines responsibilities and time commitment to program. Teens participate in genderspecific career, leadership, & lifeskills programs (males-Esquires and females-Girl in the House). Youth participate in gradeappropriate after-school academic enrichment activities. Youth participate in on-campus college activities (guest lectures, tours, workshops). Youth participate in career and college advising throughout the year. Five Bridge Builders will receive intensive on-the-job career building skills through year-round employment at Journey House College 1. 2. 3. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. 7. 2. 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 100% of parents will sign a waiver allowing Project Director and College Career Coach access to grades, teachers, and advisors. 80% of high school students enrolled and who exceed 40 hours of academic enrichment participation hours will increase a grade level in reading, math, and language (based on TABE scores). 100% of eligible high school students will graduate and transition to post-secondary or workforce. 80% of participants who take the ACT will score over an 18. 100% of eligible students who apply to college will be accepted. College 1. 100% of accepted students will enroll into college. 2. 80% of youth who transition to college will be prepared for college-level courses. College Students will advance on level with cohorts. Students will receive tutoring as needed Students will receive advising from College Career Coach. 1. 2. 3. Employment 1. Outcomes (with indicators) Pre-College Enroll 80 youth in College Career Program. 50 youth will pre and post test using the national & Wisconsin approved Test of Adult Basic Education (TABE) 9 and 10. Youth will participate in 2 college campus tours during program year. Youth will participate in local college campus visits for guest lectures/workshops. Five Bridge Builders will retain their employment and mentor junior Bridge Builders. Youth will complete FAFSA after 11th grade. Youth will maintain resume and portfolio Employees will continue career advising Employees will participate in career appropriate training College enrollees will receive advising and tutoring throughout the year. Students will maintain 2.5 GPA. Students will advance on level with cohorts towards graduation. Employment 1. 2. Employees will retain sustaining employment. Employees will maintain current resume and work portfolio Employment 1. Employees will retain sustaining employment Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency Program Activity ∑• •∑ •∑ •∑ •∑ 50 youth enrolled in the program 14 youth completed TABE (Test of Adult Basic Education) Two college tours conducted; one college lecture attended 14 Bridge Builders employed 62% of high school students maintained 2.5 GPA or higher Evidence-Based Programming Journey House cites Payne (2005), Comer (2005), and Newman (1999) to support its approach of combining intensive academic and workforce development support provided within the context of strong relationships with caring, educated adults. Outcomes Journey House did not meet two key planned outputs, including total enrollment (planned at 80, 50 enrolled; and number of youth TABE-tested (50 planned, 14 actual); however, the program reported that 14 Bridge Builders were employed compared to 5 planned. In addition, the program reported the following outcomes: 100% of students with 40 hours or more of academic support increased math skills; 100% of graduates transitioned into college or employment; 100% of students accepted to college enrolled as planned. Half (50.0%) of LCC participants are frequent or very frequent participants, resulting in a total of 613 youth in this category. LCC continues to function as a high volume youth development program. Most of Journey House’ participants showed a pattern of low engagement with 78.0% falling in the categories of low or infrequent attenders. A small number (11) fell into the categories of frequent/very frequent attenders (24.0%). To some extent, this reflects the more specialized, focused nature of the JH program. Outcome Analysis Journey House did not reach the number of students planned in its logic model; however, there was success reported on enrolled students. More information on academic gains and the specific numbers of youth accepted/enrolled in college would be helpful in more fully assessing the success of this program approach. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 25 Latino Community Center 807 S. 14th Street Milwaukee , WI 53204 Director Name Jorge Perez - jorge@latinocommunitycenter.org Brighter Futures Project Name Youth Prevention Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Jorge Perez - jorge@latinocommunitycenter.org Project Description The Latino Community Center’s Brighter Futures activities take place in multiple sites, primarily the two after-school (Community Learning Center) programs it operates at Kagel Elementary School and South Division High School and LCC’s primary site at 14th St. and National Avenue. Additional activities take place as part of LCC’s Violence Free Zones at South Division, Bay View, Bradley Tech, and Madison High Schools. The LCC program includes recreation and academic support as well as specialized programming such as Teen Nights, Life Skills, Healthy Girls, and Creating Lasting Family Connections. In the summer, program activities run throughout the day and into the evening hours. IOM Classification Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 455 4-9 times 166 10-18 times 132 19 times or more 481 Unduplicated Participants 1234 Program Setting Percent 37 % 13 % 11 % 39 % Gender Male Female 384 850 31 % 69 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 527 619 28 4 3 53 43 % 50 % 2 % >1 % >1 % 4 % Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + - 437 612 35 % 50 % Schools: Kagel Elementary School, South Division High School, Bay View High School, Madison High School and Bradley Tech High School Community or youth center: Latino Community Center and South Division (Milwaukee Rec) Public building/facility/park: Milwaukee Public Pools and Milwaukee Public Parks Other: Fun Services Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $75,000 Project leveraging $18,900 Safe & Sound- Financial Support/Trainings $36,000 Fighting Back- Financial Support for Girl’s Programming $65,800 CDBG - Financial Support $18,700 Bradley Foundation - Financial Support $20,000 Elizabeth Brinn Fnd - Financial Support $144,400 MPS - Financial Support Collaborations Fighting Back Provide youth with services and resources for trainings pertaining to ATODA Safe & Sound Financial support Step Up @ South Division LCC and Step up have an ongoing collaboration. Every year the LCC Summer recreation program is in need of additional staff, and by having Step up as a source is an honor because we contribute to each other. New School of Community Service Drumming classes for students held at LCC Milwaukee Public Theatre African Dance at LCC, Storytelling, Drumming SDC Proves hot and nutritious meals for participants Milwaukee Public Schools 2 CLC sites Milwaukee Police Department The MPD offered their services to LCC staff by joining them for midnight neighborhood walks in search for any concerns/assistance residents may have. Center for Neighborhood Enterprises Provide business training and technical support 26 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Latino Community Center Primary Activities: Logic Model EXHIBIT 1 Agency Name: Latino Community Center Goals Goal 1: LCC will implement programs that help youth avoid violence Objectives (Activities) Milwaukee Violence Free Zone for 30 gang members Outputs • • Street Outreach for 90 youth Goal 2: LCC will implement programs that help youth avoid drug use Project Name: Youth Prevention # of participants (unduplicated) in each activity Daily attendance in each activity (duplicated) Summer programming for 120 youth Teen Programs for 120 youth Goal 3: LCC will implement programs that help youth avoid non-marital teen pregnancy Outcomes (with indicators) Soy Unica Soy Latina for 24 girls Creating Lasting Family Connections for 72 youth/24 parents Life Skills Training for 90 youth Poder Latina for 30 girls/6 teenaged girls Youth Development for 1,404 youth Youth participants will: • Be less likely to engage in highrisk behaviors such as drugs, alcohol, pre-marital sex and crime (85%); LCC staff will administer participant surveys at the end of each curriculum. • Feel safe at the center (85%); LCC staff will administer participant surveys at the end of each curriculum. • Be recognized as assets to the community (85%); LCC staff will administer participant surveys at the end of each curriculum. • Find positive role models at the center (85%); LCC staff will administer participant surveys at the end of each curriculum. • Learn to resist negative peer pressure and dangerous situations (85%); LCC staff will administer participant surveys at the end of each curriculum; and • Build positive self-esteem (85%); LCC staff will administer participant surveys at the end of each curriculum. Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures Program Activity ∑• •∑ •∑ •∑ •∑ •∑ •∑ 22 youth participated in a Violence Free Zone core group 62 youth participated in Teen Nights Average daily attendance of 158 youth at summer programming 20 girls participated in Soy Unica/Soy Latina 232 youth participated in Creating Lasting Families 1,021 youth participated in after-school programming 40 youth participated in Life Skills Evidence-Based Programming Creating Lasting Family Connections Life Skills Outcomes LCC exceeded planned participation for summer programming, and Creating Lasting Family Connections and fell short of planned numbers for Violence Free Zone, teen programs, Soy Unica Soy Latina, Life Skills, and overall youth development (after-school) programming, Participation was not reported for two planned activities; street outreach and Poder Latina. Program reports that 41% of participants showed improved academics, however, there is no information on how this was measured. LCC also utilized the United Way Youth Outcome Survey; however, specific results relative to planned outcomes are not reported. Several outcomes in the logic model are not addressed by LCC in the year end report. Half (50.0%) of LCC participants are frequent or very frequent participants, resulting in a total of 613 youth in this category. LCC continues to function as a high volume youth development program. Outcome Analysis LCC has experienced substantial growth in recent years with program operations extended off-site to several schools. At the same time, the agency has encountered challenges related to program funding and staff transitions. Within this context, LCC continues to provide core youth development services to a very large number of youth and families living in the near south side that may otherwise lack access to recreation, academic support, and family development activities. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 27 Medical College of Wisconsin 1020 North 12th Street Milwaukee, WI 53233 Director Name Dr. Wendi G. Ehrman - wehrman@mcw.edu Brighter Futures Project Name Opportunities Unlimited Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Lenora Shaw Ph. 278-3861 - lbshaw@mcw.edu Project Description The Milwaukee Adolescent Health Program screens 2,500 adolescents served at MAHP program sites for risk factors and behaviors that contribute to negative outcomes and refers 180 youth to Opportunities Unlimited to coordinate extended services and activities that build on protective factors and personal assets through community partnerships and 200 to the Juvenile Detention Center Case Manager to follow up on STD treatment recommendations to improve outcomes. The objectives are to reduce the incidence of and risks associated with non-marital sexual activity; reduce risk of child abuse and neglect among teen parent families; to reduce or eliminate drug use among Opportunities Unlimited participants in ATODA treatment; provide services to meet assessed needs; broker services that increase vocational preparedness, self-sufficiency and academic achievement ; and increase the number of detained youths who access follow-up care and comply with STD treatment recommendations. IOM Classification Indicated Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times (Detention Center) 300 1-3 times (Case Mgt.) 14 4-9 times 95 10-18 times 75 19 times or more - Unduplicated Participants 484 Program Setting Percent 100 % 8 % 70 % 22 % - Gender Male Female 281 203 58 % 42 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 413 38 29 2 - 2 85 % 8 % 6 % >1 % >1 % Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + - 336 148 69 % 31 % School: Lady Pitts/Custer High School Community or youth center: YWCA of Greater Milwaukee Church/faith institution: Mt. Zion Baptist Church Gary Dobbs Resource Center Public building/facility/park: Milwaukee County Courthouse Other: Milwaukee County Juvenile Detention Center Other: Downtown Health Center Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $130,000 Project leveraging $ 14,773 Fighting Back - AODA counselor $ 43,678 Milwaukee County DHHS Nurse Practitioner $ 9,863 WI Maternal Child Health - Medical Assistant for the Adolescent Clinic $ 10,394 Children’s Hospital Foundation - Teen-Tot Clinic Coordinator $ 42,394 MCW - Costs of an MD and a nurse practitioner Collaborations Acacia Mental Health Network Providers Aurora New Parents Initiative Parenting Ed, Child Care Coordination Aurora Sinai T19 Outstation T19 (Limited Assistance) Big Brothers Big Sister Mentoring Program Fitzsimonds Boys and Girls Club Employment Assistance and Job Training Impact 211 Referral Resource Milwaukee Job Development Inc Employment training Justice 2000 Court Advocacy , Failure to Appear Program and Driver License Recovery Program MATC Adult Education Services Maximus W-2 and Employment Assistance 28 Mount Zion Baptist Church Food Pantry and Clothing Drive MPS Central Service Student Services My Home, Your Home Transitional Housing New Concept In Touch Parent Program Salvation Army Basic Needs SDC Youth Diversion Program Court Advocacy, Youth Diversion Program UMOS W-2 and Employment Assistance Services The Price is Right Clothing Bank Goodwill Industries Basic Needs, Job Development Service Marquette University Tutorial Program Parenting Network Parenting Classes Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Medical College of Wisconsin Medical College of WI/Milwaukee Adolescent Health Program (MAHP) Project: Opportunities Unlimited Primary Activities: Logic Model GOAL Objectives (Activities) Outputs Outcomes (with indicators) (1) To reduce the instance of and (1) 120 teens receive pregnancy (1) 95% of participants will not become pregnant in The MAHP will risks associated with non-marital 2008. 85% will keep contraceptive management prevention counseling and/or systematically sexual activity among appointments (Indicators: # of participants in contraceptive management through screen 2,500 Opportunities Unlimited coordination assistance of Opps prevention programming; show rate for Unlimited case managers. contraceptive follow-up appointments; # of teens participants. adolescents served at EXHIBIT 1 who avoid pregnancy.) MAHP program (2) 40 teen parent families will (2) 98% of participants in Teen –Tot services will (2) To reduce risk of child abuse sites for risk factors receive support services coordinated not abuse or neglect their children in 2008. and neglect among teen parent Agency Name: Agape Community Center Project Name: Programs for Youth and Family Development and behaviors that with the Teen-Tot clinic program (Indicators: # of teen parents and children of teen families participating in contribute to Opportunities Unlimited. based on personal care plans. parents participating, services provided, # of Objectives (Activities) Outcomes (with indicators) and neglect) Outputs substantiated cases of abuse negative outcomes Goals 1) Increased resistance skills: 75% of (3) To reduce the frequency and (3) 10 teens who participate in (3) 90% of participants in coordinated AODA and refer (1) 180 to core participants will demonstrate an 1) Provide after school programquantitytoof, or eliminate drug use substance abuse assessments, counseling interventions will abstain from or 1) 235 youth ages 7-13 and For youth participants ability to resist negative peer pressure Opportunities to 375 neighborhood youth ages 240 among Opportunities ming Unlimited counseling and treatment and orteens 15-19 will enroll decrease substance and use dangerous in 2008. (Indicators: # of situations envision, plan, and 7-19 that offer opportunities for acaUnlimited to andwill attend after schoolOpps pro- participants in(Data smoking cessation counseling ATODA programming; percent participants in ATODA treatment. Source: YRBS, prevention curricdemic enrichment, personal andservices inter- from Opportunities achieve a future that grams at least one time. pre/post-tests) receive of participants whoula decrease or abstain from coordinate extended personal development, and recreation. Unlimited. substance abuse. services andstrengthens personal, 2) Improved attitude of youth toward Average of 15 youth, (4) 150 new and continuing2) teens (4)20 80% of Opps. adolescents who require services (4) To provide Opps participants family, school: 70% of core participants will 2) Provide summer programming for activities that build and neighborpreteens, and 40 teenswill willparticipate in one referred to Opportunities Unlimited or more aservice with the contacts and 100 services to demonstrate positiveinterventions attitude about youth ages 4-12 to enhance their hood prosperity. attend After School programs on protective factors will receive direct services and and/or referrals during 2008. (Indicators: numbers meet referral and assessed needs school (Data Source: Supplemental development through recreational aceach day. Questionnaire) and personal assets coordination assistance in accessing served and types and dosages of services provided; and to provide other DHC tivitiesreferrals and experiential learning. other services in 2008. 30 additional number referrals) with information and assistance and /or address 3) 100 youth ages 4-12 will and types of 3) Improved ability to envision and plan cased managed will receive in Summer Youth with immediate needs3) Engage a core groupteens of 50(not youth participate for the future: 70% of core participants immediate concerns requested assistance. ages 11-19 and their families in intenProgram. will articulate a plan for a future of selfand (2) 200 to the andrequesting assistance will (5) 40 teens (5) During the year,sufficiency 70% of youths requesting (5) To broker servicessive thatprevention programming and complete a vocational Juvenile Detention plan demonstrating vocational family support services including receive help preparing for and finding from Opportunities Unlimited with preparedincreases vocational preparedness 4) 40 youth ages 11-19assistance and ness (Data Source: Future each of the following: jobs and volunteer opportunities. will successfully complete employment will be successfully placed in planning and self-sufficiency among Opps Center Case assessment; resume; at least two inter• ATODA prevention curriculum prevention programming employment or referred (Indicator: Unlimited participants. Manager follow up viewsfor andassistance job readiness assessment) • Protective Behaviors (ATODA, Employment prep activities & status) (6)delinquency 25 truant teens will receive re- Protective Behavon STD treatment iors,will and Abstinence curric4) Reduce early ATODA (6) 65% of truants will re-enroll in on-set school.of75% of ex(6)To broker services that prevention increases curriculum enrollment assistance. Students • Abstinence-based teen pregnancy ula), jobas readiness/vocational recommendations to perimentation increase awareness of eligible students will graduate/beand promoted. academic achievement among be referred for academic assistance prevention curriculum preparation sessions, and will STIs, etc. and risk of premature intimate improve outcomes. (Indicators: Enrollment status, academic promotion Opps. participants. • indicated. Job readiness/vocational preparation sessions involvement. 50% of core participants work, as needed, with a famand high-school graduation rates) will articulate with the use of brochures ily case manager. (7) Increase the number youthscase management (7) 200 sesdetained youths will be • ofFamily who access follow-up caresions and when neededreferred to the case manager for comply with STD treatment follow-up on needed services and recommendations during and follow-up during 2008. following detention at the and facilitation of a prevention event to peers and family one or will both of (7) 70% of detainedtheir youths referred for on services theintopic areas. (YSRB, pre/post complete the process 2008. (Indicators: # of test & event. referrals; # of youth treated and followed up for STD’s at Juvenile Detention Center. Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Program Activity ∑• •∑ •∑ •∑ •∑ •∑ •∑ Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 166 teens participated in pregnancy prevention counseling and/or contraceptive management 78 teen parent families received services through Teen Tot Clinic and Pediatric Clinic 6 teens who participated in ATODA services received services through Opportunities Unlimited 184 teens received direct services and coordination assistance 69 teens received help finding jobs and volunteer opportunities 38 truant teens received school re-enrollment assistance; 50 students received academic support 313 youth at the Juvenile Detention Center were referred to case management Evidence-Based Programming Case Management Outcomes The MAHP exceeded all of its planned activity targets in terms of participation in various program components; more over, the program met or exceeded all of its planned outcomes: 96% of participants did not become pregnant in 2008; 91% kept contraceptive follow-up appointments; 97% of participants receiving Teen-Tot services were not reported for child abuse or neglect; 100% of teens participating in ATODA counseling decreased or abstained from use; 91% of youth referred for additional services followed through; 77% of youth who received employment assistance obtained employment; 66% of truants re-enrolled in MPS or GED programs; 77% of eligible students were promoted; 76% of eligible students graduated or completed a GED; 87% of youth referred to case management completed services. The Detention Center component of the program is intended to be a single encounter/assessment; 300 program participants fell into this category. Of youth assigned to case management, 92% participated in direct case management services 4 to 18 times. No youth participated 19 times or more. Outcome Analysis This program consistently meets or exceeds their activity and outcome targets. In addition, each year MAHP develops ways to respond to critical emerging needs; an example is the increasing emphasis on school re-integration assistance over the past two years. As needed, MAHP staff develops new relationships with organizations that can assist clients, steadily expanding its list of collaborative partners. MAHP’s performance has been sustained at a very high level since it initially received Brighter Futures funding in 2001. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 29 Milwaukee Christian Center 2137 West Greenfield Ave Milwaukee 53204 Director Name Ms. Jan Marie Lambert - jlambert@mccwi.org Brighter Futures Project Name Kids Place & Youth Development Program Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Emilio E. Lopez - elopez@mccwi.org Project Description Milwaukee Christian Center focused on strengthening its programming for youth and families in the Kids Place and Youth Development Programs by enhancing work with youth, ages 7-18, who reside in the Clarke Square and Kosciuszko Park neighborhoods. MCC continued its asset building youth program Project Challenge at Kids Place and Proyecto Encuentro Juvenil (Youth Awareness Project) that extended programs and services in a culturally competent manner to Spanish-speaking youth who have recently migrated to Milwaukee and to a growing African American youth population on the south side of Milwaukee; and encouraged parents to become involved in programming with their children by hosting Family Nights once per month at each site, conducting field trips that focused on parent/child relationships, and offering workshops that addressed family concerns such as nutrition, financial literacy and health. IOM Classification Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 76 4-9 times 79 10-18 times 74 19 times or more 180 Unduplicated Participants 409 Program Setting Percent 19 % 19 % 18 % 44 % Gender Male Female 287 122 70 % 30 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 130 228 26 7 5 13 32 % 56 % 6 % 2 % 1 % 3 % Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 168 197 44 41 % 48 % 11 % Other: Variety of venues around county including museums, theaters, roller skating rinks, Humane Society Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $67,300 Project leveraging $90,000 United Way- Staff, supplies, transportation $95,000 City CDGA- Staff, supplies, transportation $30,000 Safe & Sound - Staff, supplies, transportation $15,000 County CDBG- Staff, supplies, transportation $20,000 Betty Brinn Foundation- Staff, supplies, transportation Collaborations Milwaukee County Department of Parks L eased space Second Harvest Food for Kids Café Metro Milwaukee Kiwanis Club Scholarships for camps & monthly events Wisconsin Humane Society Project for kids to learn care of animals UWM Service Learning Program Students to work in program MAWIB Step-Up Program Youth employment slots County Supervisor Peggy West Support for funding & use of county space Milwaukee Tennis & Education Foundation Tennis and life skills instruction Safe & Sound Community Partners Work with youth council & marketing program to youth Kosciuszko Community Ctr Advisory Bd Support for programs and annual events Marquette University’s Crossing the Stream Youth worked with college students & completed service project in San Juan, Puerto Rico 16th Street Community Health Care Ctr KK River Clean-Up Project 30 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Milwaukee Christian Center Primary Activities: Logic Model Agency: Milwaukee Christian Center Project Name: Kids Place and Youth Development Program Goals Objectives (Activities) Outputs Outcomes (with Indicators) 60% of youth participating in Serve 250 pre-teens and workshops will indicate they teens age 7 -19 through 1) provide workshops on anger The Milwaukee have changed their behavior as YDP management, values clarification Christian Center will EXHIBIT 1 shown by survey and their Serve 150 youth age 7-12 and life skills to youth age 7-17 1) improve youths’ involvement in community through Kids Pace mental and physical service and projects 30-50 youth Name: will provideCommunity computer instruction Name: 2)Agape Center Project Programs for Youth Family Development wellness;Agency 2) increase 10 out of 15 (66%) youth and participate in at least one to youth ages 7 to 17. positive family families receiving individual workshop Objectives (Activities) Outcomes (with indicators) Outputs staff time meet atresistance least one of 75% of relationships; and Goals 3) 1) Increased skills: 15 youth will participate in 3) provide leadership their goals as shown child’s an core participants willby demonstrate 1) Provide after school programincrease youths’ 1) 235 youth ages 7-13 and youth leadership development opportunities to For youth participants to ability to resist negative peer pressure to 375 neighborhood youth ages report card, family involvement 240 teens 15-19 will enroll helpfulness and plan, and youth ages 12ming and dangerous situations to 17. envision, 7-19 that offer opportunities for aca- development and attend after school proin community service (Data Source: YRBS,projects, prevention curricconcern for the a future that 15 youth and their families demic enrichment, personal and interachieve grams at least one time. ulaevents pre/post-tests) special and/or staff personal development, and recreation.will work with assigned community. strengthens personal,4) provide educational, evaluation 2) Improved attitude of youth toward 2) Average of 15 youth, 20 staff member arts and programming forKids Placepreteens, family, and neighbor-recreational, cultural school: 70% of core participants 2) Provide summer youth participating in will and 40 teens will 50% of demonstrate a positive attitude about 1-3After goals 100 youth ages 4-12 community service activities toto enhance their and establish hood prosperity. attend School programs computer instruction will school (Data Source: Supplemental development through recreational ac- 60 youth will eachparticipate day. in youth, ages 7-17, and to their indicate increased computer Questionnaire) tivities and experiential learning. computer instruction. families. knowledge and 15 will complete 3) 100 youth ages 4-12 will 3) Improved ability to envision and plan 250 youth will participate 3) Engage a core group of 50 youth a digital photo project participate in Summer Youth for the future: 70% of on coreeither participants 11-19 and their families in inten-in a physical wellness Program. a plan for 5) assign Kidsages Place staff familywillorarticulate community . a future of selfsive prevention programming and sufficiency and complete a vocational activity such as sports 200 out of 250 (80%) of youth members to youth 10-12 plan demonstrating vocational preparedfamily ages support services including 4) 40 youth ages 11-19 and leagues, boxing, fitness, complete who participate in a wellness ness (Data Source: Future planning and their families to the work on each of following: will successfully assessment; resume; at least two inter• ATODA prevention curriculum activity will indicate that nutrition class, dance prevention programming youth and family assets and views and job readiness assessment) • Protective Behaviors delinquency (ATODA, participation helped them class, school breakProtective camps. Behavstrengths prevention curriculum iors, and Abstinence curric4) Reduce early on-set of ATODA understand the consequences of ex 40 parentsula), willjob participate • Abstinence-based teen pregnancy readiness/vocational perimentation and increase awareness of negative asofshown by intimate prevention curriculum in Family preparation Nights, Kids sessions, and will STIs,behavior etc. and risk premature • Job readiness/vocational prepa- Place Café, involvement. 50% of core participants participant survey and regular work, as needed, special eventswith a famwill articulate with the use of brochures ration sessions ily case manager. attendance. and facilitation of a prevention event to • Family case management ses- and field trips 25% parental inorall their peers involvement and family on one both of sions when needed topic areas. (YSRB, pre/post youththe programs activities wheretest & event. parents participate as shown by attendance sheet Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency Program Activity ∑• •∑ •∑ •∑ •∑ •∑ •∑ •∑ 317 preteens and teens, ages 7-19, enrolled and attended Youth Development Programs 92 youth ages, ages 7-12, served in Kids Place 56 youth, ages 7-15, participated in one or more workshops 10 youth participated on MCC Youth Leadership Council 32 assessments conducted with youth and families 97 youth participated in computer instruction 307 participated in a physical wellness activity such as sports, nutrition class, dance 45 parents participated in activities 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures Evidence-Based Programming Youth Development, Multicultural Education, After-School Programming are approaches based on traditional principles of youth engagement. Outcomes MCC exceeded nearly all of its projected participation targets; the higher than planned engagement of youth in YDP, computer instruction, and physical wellness are examples. Participation in Kids Place fell short of planned numbers. 90% of youth who participated in wellness activities reported improvements in their behavior, nutrition and physical activity; 94% of youth who developed individualized plans achieved at least one goal; 77% of youth involved in leadership activities reported improved behavior; and parental involvement exceeded the planned outcome. MCC uses program-specific pre and post surveys to assess activities’ impact. MCC is a high engagement program with 62% (254 of 409) of its youth falling in the frequent/very frequent category. Outcome Analysis MCC’s 2008 project was targeted directly to the challenge of working with recently-arrived Spanish-speaking teens as well as the increasing African American population in two south side neighborhoods. Reported outputs and outcomes do not directly address how well the program approaches worked to help youth bridge the cultural and language divides MCC identified as being critical to a healthy community. The program would benefit from the development of outcomes and measures that get to the heart of its efforts. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 31 Milwaukee Urban League Address: 435 W. North Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53212 Director Name Brighter Futures Project Name Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Nona Taylor/ Shirley Sharp ntaylor@tmul.org and ssharp@tmul.org Campaign for African American Achievement College Preparation Project Joel Nelson - jnelson@journeyhouse.org Project Description The Campaign for African American Achievement College Preparation Program goals are to increase the number of students entering colleges, universities or trade schools and increase the level of college readiness among students entering secondary education. The program provides college preparation instructional sessions for high school and middle school age students, assists applicants in identifying financial aid opportunities, assists with technology support, and implements a community recognition program for students’ academic and social achievements. IOM Classification Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times * 4-9 times * 10-18 times * 19 times or more * Unduplicated Participants 747 Program Setting Percent * * * * * Not provided Gender Male Female 369 378 48 % 52 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 564 68 42 11 62 7 73 % 11 % 5 % 1 % 9 % 1 % Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 139 595 16 16 % 83 % 1 % School Community or youth center Church/faith institution Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $60,000 Project leveraging $159,678 United Way $10,000 Argosy Foundation Collaborations Bayview High School Identified CAAA College prep students & hosted series. Bradley Tech High School I dentified CAAA College prep students & hosted series. Nominated students for MUL’s National Achiever’s Society /Doing The Right Thing Recognition Program. Center for Teaching Entrepreneurship Recruited parents and students & hosted a financial aid workshop. Hamilton High School Identified CAAA College prep students & hosted series. Nominated students for MUL’s National Achiever’s Society /Doing The Right Thing Recognition Program. Holy Redeemer High School I dentified CAAA College prep students & hosted series. Nominated students for MUL’s National Achiever’s Society /Doing The Right Thing Recognition Program. Institute For Career Empowerment Identified CAAA College prep students & hosted series. Lee (K-8) Elementary/Middle School Identified CAAA College prep students & hosted series. Madison High School High School Identified CAAA College prep students & hosted series. Nominated students for MUL’s National Achiever’s Society /Doing The Right Thing Recognition Program. Milwaukee School of Entrepreneurship High School Identified CAAA College prep students & hosted series. Nominated students for MUL’s National Achiever’s Society /Doing The Right Thing Recognition Program. Red Cat High School Identified CAAA College prep students & hosted series. Nominated students for MUL’s National Achiever’s Society /Doing The Right Thing Recognition Program. Springfield College-Women of Empowerment Identified CAAA College prep students & hosted series. Starms (K-8) Elementary School Identified CAAA College prep students & hosted series. Travis Academy Identified CAAA College prep students & hosted series. YMCA Black Achievers Three CAAA – NAS students participated in the YMCA Achievers Black College Tour. 32 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Milwaukee Urban League Primary Activities: Logic Model MILWAUKEE URBAN LEAGUE CAMPAIGN FOR AFRICAN AMERICAN ACHIEVEMENT COLLEGE PREPARATION PROGRAM LOGIC MODEL Objectives (Activities) Outputs Outcomes (With Indicators) Goals The long term goals of the program are: 1. Increase the # of students who attend college among students in the program. 2. Increase the level of college readiness among students in the program. 3. Educational achievement will be raised to priority status within the African American community 4. 5. 6. 7. 8. Implement 9 college preparation series for high school age students. Sixty (60) Students will register/enter a college, university or technical school. 300 Students will be able to identify the requirements necessary to enter college on a post-test upon completion of the program. Implement 4 college preparation series for middle school age students. Fifty (50) Students/parents will receive financial aid information and assistance. 100 Students/parents will have more knowledge about college admission and financial aid process. EXHIBIT 1 Implement 3 financial aid forums for parents and students. Agency Name: Agape Community Center Project Name: Programs for Youth and Family Development Students will receive Identify scholarships for CAAA staff will Identify and 15 students will be accepted into a two (2)Outcomes or four(with (4)indicators) year more scholarships and seniors accepted into(Activities) a two or Solicit Scholarships for Objectives Goals Outputs Increased resistance skills: 75% of College,1)University or trade grants to attend college. four year college/university or qualifying CAAA seniors. core participants will demonstrate an 1) Provide after school program1) 235 youth ages 7-13 and school. school. For youth participants to technical ability to resist negative peer pressure ming to 375 neighborhood youth ages 240 teens 15-19 will enroll and dangerous situations envision,will plan, andthe Students have Distribute technological tools qualifying seniors 7-19 that offer opportunities for aca- Identify technological and attend after tools school pro- 25 students (Data Source: YRBS, prevention curricdemic enrichment, personal and interachieve a future that will receive laptops/ notebooks technology to compete (computers/laptops) to that will allow students totime. grams at least one ula pre/post-tests) personal development, and recreation. strengthens personal, academically after they students accepted into a two compete in the global . . . 2) Improved attitude of youth toward 2) Average of 15 youth, 20 family, and neighborenter college. or four2)year college/ school: 70% of core participants will Provide summeruniversity programming for preteens, and 40 teens will demonstrate a positive attitude about 100 youth ages 4-12 to enhance their hood prosperity. or technical school. attend After School programs school (Data Source: Supplemental development through recreational aceach day. Outstanding students Recognize and reward CAAA staff will recruit students 300 students will be recognized Questionnaire) tivities and experiential learning. for their academic, social, will be Identified & Students for their academic who qualify3)for the “DTRT” 100 youth ages 4-12 will 3) Improved ability to envision and plan 3) Engage a core group of 50 youth and/or “National encouraged to achieve and social achievements. Achievers participate in Summer Youth athletic and for the extracurricular future: 70% of core participants ages 11-19 and their families in intenProgram. will articulate a plan for a future of selfSociety” Recognition achievement. academically & sive prevention programming and sufficiency and complete a vocational demonstrate good plan demonstrating vocational preparedfamily support services including Programs.4) 40 youth ages 11-19 and ness (Data Source: Future planning each of the following: citizenship. will successfully complete assessment; resume; at least two inter• ATODA prevention curriculum prevention programming Students will make Identify• career/job, Provide career/job, (25) Students participate in views and will job readiness assessment) Protective Behaviors delinquency (ATODA, Protective Behavcareer decisions based employment shadowing employment shadowing prevention curriculum iors,shadowing and Abstinence curric- a career/job 4) Reduce early on-set of ATODA ex• Abstinence-based teen pregnancy ula), job readiness/vocational employment on real world opportunities. opportunities. opportunities. perimentation and increase awareness of prevention curriculum preparation sessions, and will STIs, etc. and risk of premature intimate observations in the • Job readiness/vocational prepainvolvement. 50% of core participants work, as needed, with a famwork force. will articulate with the use of brochures ration sessions ily case manager. and facilitation of a prevention event to • Family case management Students will be able to Coordinate/facilitate College ses- Students will gain first-hand 25 students will participate in their peers and family on one or both of sions when needed make more informed Tours for students in the knowledge about several college tours by test & the topiccoordinated areas. (YSRB, pre/post event. decisions re: which CAAA College Preparation colleges. the CAAA program staff. college to attend. Program. Brighter Futures Outcomes Program Activity • • •∑ •∑ 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 76 college preparation workshops for high school age youth were conducted 747 students/participants (high school age) completed workshops 36 students (middle school age) completed four college preparation workshops 42 financial forums implemented for students and parents 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures Evidence-Based Programming Urban League CAAA College Preparation Curriculum, National Urban League’s Project Ready College Preparation Curriculum Outcomes MUL substantially exceeded its planned outputs; for example 9 college prep series for high school students were planned but 76 were implemented. Similarly, MUL planned to provide 3 financial aid forums and reported having conducted 42 financial forums. Another key point is that MUL developed relationships with 14 different public and private schools. However, information regarding the impact of this activity on college preparedness and enrollment is not provided. Outcome Analysis MUL’s program has extensive experience in assisting students and their families in navigating the college application and financial aid process. The MUL workshops reflect only one component of the program; one-on-one assistance is also provided although this activity is not reflected in the outputs and outcomes reporting. Although many students have entered college as a result of the MUL program, to date, there has only been anecdotal information provided. The program would benefit from more extensive tracking of college benchmarks, i.e. ACT scores, applications filed, acceptances, enrollments, and successful first semesters/years. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 33 Modjeska Theatre Company, Inc. 1128 Historic Mitchell Street, Milwaukee, WI 53204 Director Name Terry Grazer - tgrazer@yahoo.com Brighter Futures Project Name Modjeska Youth Theatre Company Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name David O’Day - david_modjeska@sbcglobal.net Project Description The Modjeska Youth Theatre Company promotes self-esteem, alcohol and other drug prevention, and improved academic performance through a disciplined social wellness and musical theatre training program. The program recruits youth from throughout the Milwaukee area to participate in an intensive 7-8 week/6 days per week rehearsal and workshop program for each of four musical theatre shows per year. The program goals are to reduce alcohol and drug use, increase the likelihood of high school graduation, employment and post-secondary education, and increase self esteem through positive adult and youth interaction. IOM Classification Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 102 4-9 times - 10-18 times - 19 times or more 186 Unduplicated Participants 288 Gender Male Female 197 91 Program Setting Percent 35 % 65 % Community or youth center: Modjeska Theatre Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $70,000 Project leveraging 32 % 68 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 70 64 147 3 4 - 24 % 22 % 51 % 1 % 1 % - Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 55 131 102 19 % 45 % 35 % $10,000 Birnschein Found $15,000 Jacobus Foundation $20,000 Brinn Foundation $35,000 CDBG $15,000 Corporate Sponsors $35,000 Annual Funding $31,000 In-Kind $40,000 Ticket Revenue Collaborations Milwaukee Public Schools As always, the ability to garner youth to the project through auditions and school attendance is mandatory to the project’s success. 86% of the schools attending are from MPS. Brighter Futures The monthly meetings and networking opportunities have provided resources and students in our program. Several Community and professional theatres With our newest Artistic Director, we have garnered relationships with other community theatre and professional artistic organizations to utilize their resources in production and support. MSDOC MSDOC is our building partnership that has provided the facility in which we produce all of our activities. 34 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Modjeska Theatre Company, Inc. Primary Activities: Logic Model EXHIBIT 1 Agency Name: Modjeska Theatre Company, Inc. Goals • MYTC will reduce alco- • • • • hol and drug use among youth ages 6-21 years by equipping them with skills necessary to avoid negative behavior and peer pressure. MYTC will increase the likelihood of high school graduation, job and/or secondary educational pursuits among youth by increasing their physical, mental and social capacities. MYTC will increase student self-esteem through adult and youth interaction. MYTC will encourage a sense of hopefulness among youth participants, adult audiences and family supporters. MYTC will encourage support for and awareness of social wellness models that encourage unique disciplines, like integrating the performing arts. Project Name: Modjeska Youth Theatre Company (MYTC) Objectives (Activities) Outputs • Provide social wellness skills, • • • • high standards discipline program and musical theatre training during a 7 to 8 week rehearsal schedule. Create contractual relationships with youth 6-21 years old to include attending rehearsals and school, increasing their grade point averages and committing to high standards of participation. Provide intergenerational workshops, volunteer opportunities and productions where adults and youth can connect. Provide skills in learning to deal with challenges, diverse relationships and instilling a desire to work through problems to a positive resolve. Create areas of resources – parent, student and others – via presentation boards, staff or other communication vehicles. • 250 high risk youth attended rehearsals, integrated workshops and support groups conducted after school, evenings and Saturdays, 6 days a week for 7 to 8 weeks per production. • 235 high risk students attended school and rehearsals, and focused on good study habits. • 250 high risk youth and 200 parents and volunteer adults will spend countless hours together invested in the production. Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency Outcomes (with indicators) • The activities at MYTC will reduce alcohol and drug use among 250 high risk youth by equipping them with skills needed to engage in positive behavior and lessons in avoiding negative influences to enable them to become productive members of society (Perception and Use questionnaires, random drug testing, track incidents, workshop lessons and general demographics). • Of 235 youth, 15% missed an average of 2 days of school and 45% improved/held steady their grade averages. (Attendance recorded, Pre-Post Report Card Comparison, Track Graduates) • 250 youth value themselves as assets and are valued by 200 parents/volunteers by engaging in community-building activities and abstaining from drugs, alcohol or tobacco use or involvement in violent or criminal activities. (Postperception questionnaire) • 250 youth are interested in participating again with the Modjeska, continuing involvement in school and extracurricular activities (community centers, etc) or attending college or school after graduating. 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures /Modjeska Theatre Company Program Activity • • • ∑• ∑• • 228 high risk youth attended rehearsals, integrated workshops and support groups 5-6 days per week for 7 to 8 weeks per production 201 high risk students attended school and rehearsals and focused on good study habits 60 parents and adult volunteers provided support Three musical theatre productions performed for school and community audiences Three shows conducted (Fiddler on the Roof, Once on this Island, and West Side Story) and Breakfast with Santa 2,962 community residents and 2,385 students attended productions Evidence-Based Programming Program cites “A New Framework for Building Participation in the Arts,” The RAND corporation, by Kevin McCarthy and Kimberly Jinnett, 2001; and “the Value of the Arts,” President’s Committee of the Arts and the Humanities, 1995. Outcomes The Modjeska Youth Theatre met 91.2% of its planned participation goal, reaching 228 youth compared to 250 planned. The program fell significantly short of its planned parent participation goal with 60 parent volunteers compared to 200 planned. The Company is a high engagement program model with 64.6% of its 228 participants attending 19 times or more. Outcome Analysis The program was challenged by the transition to a new leadership staff; the change had a destabilizing effect on programming, funding and participation. However, new leadership and a new program model – stressing the attributes and strategies of community theatre – have put the program on more solid ground. The program is working with community partners and technical consultants to pursue rehabilitation of the historic Modjeska Theatre. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 35 Neighborhood House of Milwaukee, Inc. 2819 W Richardson Place, Milwaukee, WI 53208 Director Name Brighter Futures Project Name Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Richard Cox - rcox@nh-milw.org Brighter Futures Michelle Kosalka, Education Coordinator mkosalka@nh-milw.org Project Description The Neighborhood House Brighter Futures Project provides academic support and enrichment to elementary, middle, and high school students including homework help, computer education, career exploration, and SAT/ ACT preparation. The goals of the project are to help students perform at or above grade level in reading, English, and math; learn basic computer skills, develop career plans, and improve SAT/ACT scores for high school students. Further, the project sought to build new and strengthen existing partnerships with colleges, universities, and nonprofit agencies with the overall goal of improving access for Neighborhood House students to postsecondary education and employment. IOM Classification Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 277 4-9 times 126 10-18 times 104 19 times or more 116 Unduplicated Participants 623 Program Setting Percent 44 % 20 % 17 % 19 % Gender Male Female 352 271 57 % 43 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 514 11 14 54 4 - 83 % 3 % 3 % 9 % 1 % - Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 121 393 109 19 % 63 % 18 % School: University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee Planetarium Community or youth center: Neighborhood House of Milwaukee and Neighborhood House Nature Center Public building/facility/park: Wisconsin Black Historical Society, Milwaukee Public Museum and University of Wisconsin Madison Union Other: Wisconsin Humane Society Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $75,000 Project leveraging $1500 UWM Cultures and Communities Provided funding for Teen Speak mentoring Collaborations Wisconsin Humane Society Children learned importance of kindness to all forms of life, especially animals. UWM Planetarium Children learned about solar system, planets. The Other America Tour Teens learned the importance of the ACLU and about how to exercise their rights. UWM Cultures and Communities Provided support for the Teen Speak mentoring and creative arts project. MIAD Pre-College Programs Teens could take summer classes in cartooning, graphic design, and photography on scholarship. UWM, Marquette University Service Learning and internship programs Provided service learning tutors and mentors, as well as interns in Social Work and Criminal Justice. These mentors had a great impact on our teens. 36 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Neighborhood House of Milwaukee, Inc. Primary Activities: Logic Model Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2009 Project Logic Model: Neighborhood House EXHIBIT 1 Objectives (Activities) Goals 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. 6. Agency Name: Students will be at or above grade level in reading, math, and Goals English. Students will learn basic For youth participants computer skills. envision, plan, and Middle and high school youth willachieve have a career a future that plan. strengthens personal, Middle and high school andfor neighboryouth willfamily, be prepared the workforce hoodorprosperity. postsecondary education. Improve SAT/ACT scores. Neighborhood House becomes part of community network working for the empowerment of schoolage youth. Agape Community Center • • • to • • • • Outputs • Homework help Monday-Thursday during school year Weekly literacy, science and math Objectives (Activities) activities for elementary students Week sessions in basic computer 1) Provide after school program• operations andto skills ming 375 neighborhood youth ages Career exploration sessions during for aca7-19 that offer opportunities school year; field trip career personal and interdemic enrichment, exploration during development, summer for and recreation. personal middle and high school youth • Activities,2)guest speakers and programming for Provide summer opportunities for community 100 youth ages 4-12 to enhance their service based on career role recreational acdevelopment through models and participants’ career learning. tivities and experiential interests for middle and high school youth 3) Engage a core group of 50 youth • SAT/ACTages prep 11-19 to interested and their families in intenparticipants sive prevention programming and Build newfamily and strengthen existing including • support services partnerships Milwaukee eachwith of the following: universities, and • colleges, ATODA prevention curriculum nonprofit •agencies Protective Behaviors delinquency prevention curriculum • Abstinence-based teen pregnancy prevention curriculum • Job readiness/vocational preparation sessions • Family case management sessions when needed Outcomes (with indicators) Homework help, Project Name: Programs for Youth and Family Development _ 75%of middle and high school literacy and math skills youth who participate regularly will training and computer indicators) Outputs maintain a GPAOutcomes of 2.5 or(with higher education to 25 1) Increased resistance skills: 75% of elementary students core participants will demonstrate an 1) 235 youth ages 7-13 and_ 75% elementary, middle Partner with schools to ability of to resist negative peer pressure 240 teens 15-19 will enroll and dangerous and high school youth situations will report feeling obtain academic and attend after school pro(Data school Source: and YRBS, prevention positive about learning at curricrecords grams of 80%atof NH least one time. ula pre/post-tests) NH; the same num- ber of middle and elementary students feel positive about 75% of middle and of 15 youth, 20 high youth2)will Improved attitude of youth their toward 2) Average school: 70% of core participants will preteens, high school youthand will40 teens will career plan demonstrate a positive attitude about create aattend careerAfter planSchool programs school (Data Source: Supplemental each day. _ 80% of NH SAT/ACT prep and participate in Questionnaire) participants will scores over 18 on their career exploration 100 youth ages 4-12 will ACT 3) Improved ability to envision and plan Provide 3) SAT/ACT prep participate in Summer Youth for the future: 70% of core participants to 10 participants Program. will articulate a plan for a future of self_ 75% of alland participants will annually sufficiency complete a vocational in basic computer Create an advisory plan demonstrating vocational prepared4) 40 youth ages 11-19 and show improvement ness (Data Source: Future planning skills board forwill Brighter successfully complete assessment; resume; at least two interFutures prevention programs programming at views and job readiness assessment) (ATODA, Protective Behav-_ Tutors will positively influence NH iors, and Abstinence curric- literacy and participants 4) math Reduceskills early for on-set of ATODA exula), job readiness/vocational in all age perimentation and increase awareness of groups. preparation sessions, and will work, as needed, with a family case manager. STIs, etc. and risk of premature intimate involvement. 50% of core participants will articulate with the use of brochures and facilitation of a prevention event to their peers and family on one or both of the topic areas. (YSRB, pre/post test & event. Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Program Activity • • • • • • • Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures ∑ ∑ 121 youth received homework help, literacy and math skills training and computer education ∑ ∑ School records obtained for 30% of elementary-age participants ∑ ∑ 80% of middle and high school participants created a career plan and attended career exploration sessions ∑ ∑ 30 tutor volunteers ∑ ∑ 5 students received SAT/ACT preparation assistance ∑ ∑ Partnerships established with UWM, Wisconsin Humane Society, College Readiness 21, U.S. Forestry Services, Milwaukee Institute for Art and Design and others ∑ ∑ Advisory board for Brighter Futures activities established Evidence-Based Programming WRAT-4 Skills Assessment Test Outcomes Neighborhood House appears to have met participation projections; however, their initial logic model only sets a target for elementary school participation. About one-third of their participants (36.0%) were classified as frequent or very frequent attenders. Based on school records obtained for 30% of participants (vs. 80% planned), 78% of middle school and 80% of high school students who regularly attended attained a GPA of 2.5 or higher. Based on survey data, 85% of elementary and 70% of middle and high school youth felt positive about learning and the older youth expressed feeling positive about their career plan; 100% of youth who received SAT/ACT preparation received an 18 on the ACT; 97% of participants showed improvement in computer skills. Outcome Analysis The Neighborhood House strategy was to infuse academic support for their youth participants – elementary, middle, and high school age. The strategy was somewhat more successful at the elementary school age level because Neighborhood House operates a day care which offered multiple opportunities for enrichment and academic support. The program notes that, while all ages respond well to additional attention and incentives, their elementary students were more responsive to one-on-one mentoring. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 37 Neu-Life Community Resource Center 2014 W North Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53205 Director Name Jody Rhodes - jodyrhodes@sbcglobal.net Brighter Futures Project Name Youth Development Program Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Jody Rhodes - jodyrhodes@sbcglobal.net Project Description Neu-Life Community Resource Center provides academic support, leadership development and enrichment activities for youth and families. Neu-Life provides a safe environment for youth and families in the Amani neighborhood and provides an array of activities that promote positive youth development and positive growth of families. Specific activities include academic tutoring, life skills programming, health and nutrition programming, creative arts, sports leagues and a wide variety of special interest opportunities such as African drumming, swimming lessons, drill team, garden club, and photography. IOM Classification Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 197 4-9 times 34 10-18 times 18 19 times or more 62 Unduplicated Participants 311 Program Setting Percent 63 % 12 % 6 % 20 % Gender Male Female 169 142 54 % 46 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 308 1 2 - - - 99 % >1 % >1 % Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 140 158 13 45 % 51 % 4 % - Community or youth center: Neu-Life Community Center Public building/facility/park: Johnsons Park Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $94,500 Project leveraging 75,000 Lynne and Harry Bradley Foundation Bradley Foundation has given us increases in our grant amount because of the support Milw Brighter Futures has given us 40,000 Fighting Back- Gave us an ATODA component for our BFI project 25,000 Safe and Sound, Inc - We became a Safe Place; gave us money to do more leadership activities and training 10,000 Various Mini GrantsArea businesses and organizations stepped in to help us do special projects Collaborations Milwaukee Public Theater Helped us bring the arts to our BFI project Bethel Baptist Church G ives us in-kind space for special events IMPACT, Inc Provides leadership training for our NL Achievers Program (PEERS with IMPACT) HeartLove Place Meal Program H elp provide free/low cost meals to our program participants Milw Community Sailing Center Free Sailing lessons for BFI youth Northside YMCA Low cost swimming lessons and sports leagues for BFI youth Milwaukee County Parks Free use of Johnsons Park for Wellness Wednesdays program Children’s Health Education Center L ow cost health education for BFI youth Johnsons Park Health Coalition W e collaborate on community events Residential Living Services We collaborate on inter-generational projects 38 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Neu-Life Community Resource Center Primary Activities: Logic Model Agency Name: Neu-Life Community Resource Center Objectives (Activities) Goals 1. Neu-Life Community Resource Center will provide a safe environment for youth and families of the Amani and surrounding neighborhoods. 2. Neu-Life will provide academic, leadership and enrichment activities for youth and families. 3. Provide the older youth (Neu-Life Achievers Leadership Program) with opportunities to be leaders within the Neu-Life programs. Project Name: Youth Development Program 1. To provide an after school and summer youth development program for youth aged 7 to 17. 2. Have two community open house events bringing families from the neighborhood and collaborative partners together. 3. Provide youth an opportunity to be creative with special programs put into place to explore dance, music, theater, poetry and various creative arts. 4. Allow the Neu-Life Achievers Leadership Club to learn leadership skills and help facilitate portions of the Neu-Life program to the younger youth. Outputs Outcomes (with indicators) 1. 350 youth will attend the afterschool program 2. 125 people will attend each of our community open house events (250 total) 3. 20 middle and high school students will complete the NL Peers With IMPACT Club leadership program. 1. 70% of the youth that consistently attend the NL program will avoid delinquent behavior including non-marital teen pregnancy, teen drug and alcohol abuse and teen violence. This will be indicated by the pre and post survey each consistent NL youth fills out. 2. 350 youth are engaged in positive youth development activities in an after school and summer session. 3. 20 students who complete the NL Peers With IMPACT program will exhibit greater leadership skills with the NL program as evident by staff observation and evaluation. Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwa Program Activity • • • 311 youth attended the after-school program 403 people attended four community events 26 youth completed the Neu-Life Peers with IMPACT leadership program; 51 youth participated in other Neu-Life Achiever activities. Evidence-Based Programming Too Good for Drugs and Violence Outcomes Of the 114 youth who attended 9 or more times, 93% showed improved attitudes to avoiding drugs, alcohol, tobacco, violence and teen pregnancy as evidenced by the Too Good for Drugs pre and post survey. The program achieved 89.0% of its planned participation goal for after-school programming; and exceeded its planned goal for participation in the leadership components. Frequent/very frequent participants constituted only 26% of the program’s total participants (80 of 311), although many of these youth attended almost daily. Outcome Analysis Neu-Life is a youth-driven program with a much wide array of activity options than the typical youth development program offers; creative partnerships with community agencies like the Milwaukee Public Theater, IMPACT, Community Sailing Center and others have broadened the agency’s options. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 39 New Concept Self Development Center, Inc. 4828 West Fond Du Lac Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53216 Director Name Vanessa Key, CEO and President - vanessakey@ncsdc-inc.org Brighter Futures Project Name Brighter Futures Drop-Out Prevention Program Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Kayla E. Murphy - kaylacrawford@ncsdc-inc.org Project Description The New Concept Drop-Out Prevention Program uses a family strengthening model coupled with youth tracking services to work with youth, ages 12 to 17, who are chronically truant and have violated the municipal truancy laws but have not yet committed a juvenile offense. The project is a collaborative involving the City of Milwaukee Municipal Court, Milwaukee Public Schools and Milwaukee County Children’s Court. Services include tracking and case management to ensure school attendance, development of individual plans for success, and monthly family meetings. Successful completion results in the dismissal of court fines. IOM Classification Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 67 4-9 times 57 10-18 times 17 19 times or more - Unduplicated Participants 141 Program Setting Percent 47 % 40 % 12 % - Gender Male Female 92 49 65 % 35 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 102 17 15 3 - 4 72 % 12 % 11 % 2 % 3 % Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + - 141 - 100 % - School: UW-Milwaukee, Marquette University Community or youth center: New Concept Self Development Center, Martin Luther King Center Church/faith institution: St. Benedict’s Church and Greater New Birth Church Public building/facility/park: Children’s Outing Association (Kadish Park), Dineen Park Pavilion, and Oakland Trattoria Restaurant Other: Black Health Coalition Walk-a-thon, Hunger Task Force, West Allis Police Department Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $94,500 Project leveraging In-Kind Marquette Univ., UWM, COA Peace Festival- T-shirts, bags, pens, and food In-Kind 5 adult volunteers- 50+ hours of service In-Kind 5 Community Leaders- served as speakers In-Kind Interagency - B ucks Basketball Tickets and Milwaukee Wave Tickets Collaborations Milwaukee Municipal Court- All juveniles are referred to program by either Presiding Judge Mosley or Judge Valerie Hill Milwaukee Public Schools, Private and Charter Schools - Tracking contacts made with youth enrolled in MPS, private or charter schools. MPS Central Services provide avenue for student transfers and re-enrollment when necessary Safe and Sound- Martin Luther King Site- Provide after school activities for youth enrolled in program Community Agencies - Serve as referral sources for youth and family St. Benedict The Moor Church- Provided community service opportunities once/month to participants in program serving food to homeless individuals 40 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report New Concept Self Development Center, Inc. Primary Activities: Logic Model EXHIBIT 1 Agency Name: New Concept Self Development CenterProject Name: Municipal Court Truancy Prevention Program Goals 1.) To Prevent 100- 150 chronically truant youth , ages 12-17 who are on the verge of dropping out of school from leaving school, and becoming involved in risky behaviors. 2.) To foster better parent/child communication 3.) To build interagency collaboration between Municipal Court, MPS school placement & Children’s Court program evaluation of subsequent juvenile activity Objectives (Activities) 1.) Tracking and Case Management services provided to truant youth 2.) Develop Individual Plan for Success for youth 3.) Referrals received from Judges, School placements made, reports on rate of repeat offender Outputs Outcomes (with indicators) 1.) Monitoring school attendance via home visits, school visits and & academic progress via progress reports 2.) Parents/youth attend monthly meetings focusing on the Family Strengthening Model 3.) Court fines dismissed for successful completion of program participants 1.) Increase awareness of need to stay in school and to decrease incidents of risky behaviors among youth - Improved school attendance, - court fines dismissed - improved GPA 2.) Improved communication between parent and youth 3.) Youth enrolled in driver’s education improving employment options - No report of recidivism 3months Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures Program Activity • 73 youth completed the program • 55 anger management and life skills training classes provided • 11 parent meetings conducted ∑ • 4 youth enrolled in driving school (as a program reward) Evidence-Based Programming Traditional methods employed: intensive monitoring of school attendance, “real talk” sessions, parenting meetings, and community service Outcomes Program data indicates that about half (45.4%) of youth referred to the program were engaged in services, attending services between 4 and 18 times, with 39% of youth showing improved school attendance. In addition, 85% of youth avoided subsequent delinquent activities, 80% of parents reported satisfaction with child’s improved behavior; 52% of parents attended parent meetings. 73 youth had court fines waived and avoided further legal action. Outcome Analysis The program identified staff turnover and low parent participation as key issues, noting that among the 73 successful youth, 42% had parents who attended the monthly meetings but only 10% of the non-compliant youth had parents who attended. This program had strong relationships with the essential partners, i.e. Municipal Court and MPS, but recognizes that truancy is a multi-faceted issue that must be addressed by the student, family and community. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 41 Next Door Foundation, Inc. 2545 N. 29th Street, Milwaukee, WI 53210 Director Name Carol Keintz - ckeintz@nextdoormil.org Brighter Futures Project Name Leaders of Tomorrow Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Kenyatta Sinclair - ksinclair@nextdoormil.org Project Description Next Door Foundation’s Leaders of Tomorrow is an education and leadership program for children and youth, ages 6-16. The goal of Leaders of Tomorrow is to provide children and youth with positive educational, cultural and recreational experiences that enrich knowledge, strengthen character, and build the foundation for success in all aspects of life. Leaders of Tomorrow offers central city children and youth an array of positive learning experiences after school and during school breaks. Regular activities include homework help, computer instruction, leadership training, cultural arts, service learning, entrepreneurial projects, recreation, Alcohol, Tobacco and other Drug Abuse (ATODA) prevention, life skills, and healthy choices education. The program recruits students who live in the Metcalfe Park neighborhood, attend school nearby, or have family members who take part in other Next Door Foundation programs. Monthly Family Nights bring participants, parents and siblings together to build family connectedness and strengthen parent/child relationships. IOM Classification Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 14 4-9 times 14 10-18 times 4 19 times or more 66 Unduplicated Participants 98 Program Setting Percent 14 % 14 % 4 % 68 % Gender Male Female 48 50 49 % 51 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 98 - - - - - 100 % - Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 70 28 - 71 % 29 % - School: Clarke Street School Community or youth center: UNCOM Church/faith institution: Greater New Birth Church Public building/facility/park: Milwaukee Police Department (3rd District), Elm Grove law enforcement, Wisconsin Dells, Miller Park and Pabst Theatre Other: Museum of Science and Industry-Chicago, IL Other: Walk for Peace, Milwaukee Public Zoo Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $75,000 Project leveraging $45,000 $32,000 $33,000 $20,000 $15,000 $10,000 $10,000 Fighting Back Safe & Sound Fleck Fdn. Argosy Fdn. US Cellular Kindt Fdn. MBCE Fund Collaborations Elm Grove Police Department Police officer and K-9 unit dog – Family Night Speaker Milwaukee Police Department Family Night Guest Speaker and Walk for Peace Safe and Sound Community Partners Enrollment and Crime Prevention (NDF-Walk for Children) and family night guest speaker, help with crime strategy project Greater New Birth Church Joint Youth Council Meetings/ Peace Walk/Rally UNCOM Cultural arts and city-wide nutrition project St. John Vianney Service-learning volunteer project 42 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Next Door Foundation, Inc. Primary Activities: Logic Model Outcomes (with indicators) Agency Name: Next Door Foundation, Inc. Goals Keeping children engaged in productive activities during after-school hours. Building family identity by encouraging parental involvement. Integrating technology across all program activities to increase long-term educational outcomes and expand future employment opportunities. Teaching children leadership. Reducing the use of illicit drugs, alcohol and tobacco by implementing research-based curriculum. Project Name: Leaders of Tomorrow Objectives (Activities) Provide year-round programming daily on weekdays and at least twice monthly on weekends. Provide continuing academic assistance, technology immersion/ instruction, leadership development, culture and recreation, and personal & interpersonal development activities. Involve parents/caregivers in program activities. Conduct life skills and healthy choices learning sessions based on LifeSkills Training curriculum and other supportive materials. Develop active partnerships with community groups, social service organizations, businesses and educators. Outputs Homework help (Daily during school year) Computer activities (Daily) Service/leadership activities (At least 3 times a week) Business/marketing activities (At least 1 time a week) Music/visual arts experiences (At least 2 times a week) Family Nights (monthly) Parent Interviews (Yearly) Parent Support Group (monthly) Parent/Staff Consultations (At least 4 times yearly) AOTDA Life Skills instruction (Daily) Collaborative Activities with partner organizations (At least 2 times a week) 1. Children/youth will build educational and artistic abilities and demonstrate an increase in social competence Indicator: At least 80% of the children/youth who attend at least 12 sessions will demonstrate ability in at least three of the following: computer applications, writing, math and science projects, public speaking, art, performance, interpersonal skills and leadership qualities. 2. Children/youth will understand the effects and dangers of using alcohol, tobacco and drugs and demonstrate an increase in their ability to make wise decisions. Indicator: At least 80% of the children/ youth who complete ATODA/life skills learning sessions will demonstrate good or excellent comprehension of the subject matter and positive attitudes about resisting negative behaviors. 3. Children/youth will connect with family, school and community. Indicator: At least 80% of the children/youth who attend at least 12 sessions will demonstrate an increase in preprofessional skills and make a verifiable contribution to the community. Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures Program Activity • • • • 25-30 youth average daily attendance 12 family celebrations held Initial interviews conducted with all parents Weekly activities conducted with collaborating organizations Evidence-Based Programming Life Skills Outcomes The program utilized Life Skills pre and post tests, portfolio review, and staff observation to determine that 89% of youth who attended 12+ sessions were able to demonstrate improved ability in at least 3 areas such as writing, math, art, interpersonal skills; and 93% demonstrated an increased ability to make wise decisions. The program had average daily attendance than planned (25-30 actual vs. 40-50 planned). At the same time, the program had a strong core of frequent/very frequent attenders (72%). Outcome Analysis Next Door experienced difficulties with staff turnover; and fluctuations in participants’ attendance, the latter having a significant impact on staff’s ability to consistently and accurately evaluation participant progress. Additional efforts to align the program’s academic activities so they align with the school day learning are planned. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 43 The Parenting Network—Family Links 7516 W. Burleigh St, Milwaukee, WI 53210 Director Name Jan Buchler - jbuchler@theparentingnetwork.org Brighter Futures Project Name Family Links Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Erin Ebert - eebert@theparentingnetwork.org Project Description Family Links’ mission is to empower families through an a community team approach. Families with multiple challenges or who are in crisis are referred to Family Links for direct support /assistance. Family Links receives referrals through the Parent Helpline, Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare (BMCW) Initial Assessment Workers, and other community agencies. The partnership with BMCW involves families that been investigated for potential child abuse or neglect, but where the abuse/neglect was found to be unsubstantiated. When a family is referred, the Family Links Coordinator is able to meet with the families in their homes, in the office, or in the community to develop an action plan based on the families’ identified needs. The plan is family-focused, and family driven, and builds on the families’ strengths. Participation in Family Links is voluntary, and families are able to enter or leave the program at any time. The goal of Family Links is to help families prioritize their needs, connect to community resources, access the support and services they need to become self-sufficient, and safeguard the well-being of their children. IOM Classification Indicated Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 9 4-9 times 29 10-18 times 20 19 times or more 20 Unduplicated Participants 78 Program Setting Percent 11 % 37 % 26 % 26 % In participants’ homes Other: The Parenting Network Other: Other collaborating agencies Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $75,000 Gender Male Female 136 159 46 % 54 % Project leveraging Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 118 52 94 5 10 16 40 % 18 % 32 % 2 % 3 % 5 % $35,000 Greater Milwaukee Foundation - This funding provided Parent Helpline back-up support, as well as parenting education and support programs: Positive Parenting, the Nurturing Program, etc. $4,000 Roundy’s FoundationFamily assistance, Money Matters $1,000 WE energiesFamily assistance In-kind Christ Child SocietyLayettes for newborns In-kind Giving TreeChristmas gifts for 15 families In-Kind TargetDecorated tree for one family Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 177 42 76 60 % 14 % 26 % Collaborations Children’s Service Society R espite care for special needs children, Sherman Park FRC La Causa Respite Nursery, Family Resource Center Community Advocates Housing, Landlord mediation Mental Health America Invisible Children’s Program, mental health services IMPACT 2-1-1 After-hours phone coverage, substance abuse services Task Force on Family Violence Domestic abuse services 44 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report The Parenting Network—Family Links Primary Activities: Logic Model EXHIBIT 1 Agency Name: The Parenting Network Goals The Family Links Program provides personalized services for families dealing with multiple challenges who are referred by the Parent Helpline or by Initial Assessment Workers (IAWs) from the Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare (when abuse /neglect is unsubstantiated.) The goals of this program are: 1) to listen and respond to the immediate needs of families and to assist them in accessing community resources; 2) to help families develop an Action Plan (when needed); 3) to ensure the safety and well-being of children. Project Name: Family Links Objectives (Activities) Family Links Coordinator will respond to families who have immediate needs that could impact the safety and well-being of their children, and that are beyond the scope of the Parent Helpline’s phone counselors. Coordinator will continue to develop collaborative relationships with BMCW IAWs through quarterly presentations and discussions during departmental meetings. The Family Links Coordinating Committee meets quarterly; committee involves more direct service staff. Program brochure will be developed and distributed. Coordinator will be trained in coaching/empowering families to lead Family Team Meetings to address challenges. Program evaluation process will be strengthened and implemented. Outcomes are tracked. Outputs Outcomes (with indicators) 75 families will be engaged with Family Links services during 2008 as evidenced by: - Voluntary involvement - Identification of immediate needs - Development of Action Plans - Follow through and updates to Action Plan A written protocol will be developed for BMCW referrals from IAWs. Brochures and magnets will be distributed to 75 CBOs. Evaluation process will be reviewed and analyzed by Coordinating Committee. 1. While participants are involved in Family Links, there will be no BMCW involvement due to abuse/neglect. 2. 70% of participants who complete an Action Plan will follow through and make progress toward goals. 3. 80% of participants served through Family Links will state that their selfidentified needs have been met. 4. As families exit from the Family Links program, 100% of participants will state that they are providing a safe and stable home for their children. Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures Program Activity • 78 families including 217 children were served • Written protocol developed to guide referrals from the Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare Initial Assessment Workers (IAWs) • Brochures and magnets advertising the program were distributed to 75 community-based organizations and to IAWs for distribution to families whose cases were to be closed • Evaluation process reviewed and analyzed by Coordinating Committee Evidence-Based Programming Family Links adapted organizational materials from Wisconsin Systems of Integrated Services Teams and has worked closely with the Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare to craft a community response program to meet the needs of referred families. Outcomes The program exceeded its planned participation (75 families planned vs. 78 actual); program notes that there was wide variation in the amount of contact per family ranging from 1 visit for one family to 155 for another. The program reports the following results: 96% of families had no BMCW involvement due to abuse/neglect while they were involved with Family Links; 86% of families made progress toward goals identified in their action plans; 94% of participants stated that their self-identified needs were met; 100% of exiting families stated they were able to provide a safe and stable home for their children. Outcome Analysis This is a new program that has had to develop a new set of referral and working relationships with Bureau of Milwaukee Child Welfare staff and establish its own identity as a program cooperating with but apart from BMCW. Families referred to the program present a wide variety of complex needs starting with serious basic needs issues and lack of support networks. The program is a flexible, individualized response that requires extensive community partnerships and substantial staff resourcefulness and commitment. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 45 The Parenting Network—Positive YOuth 7516 W. Burleigh St, Milwaukee, WI 53210 Director Name Brighter Futures Project Name Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Jan Buchler - jbuchler@theparentingnetwork.org Adolescent Parenting, Creating Lasting Family Connections Angela Ellis, Ruth Miller - aellis@theparentingnetwork.org rmiller@theparentingnetwork.org Project Description This project has two components. The Adolescent Parenting Program focuses both on the self-development of the teen parents as well as child development. The program is provided for adolescent parents in middle or high school (9) or community-based settings (3). Parenting education programs are adapted to the needs and schedules of each setting and vary from 6-week series to weekly or bi-monthly sessions throughout the school year. Creating Lasting Family Connections is a ten-week program of substance abuse, violence prevention and family communication designed for middle-school students and their parents at one site each semester. The series is followed by a full-day retreat. Each session is held from 5-8 pm on a week-day evening in a school setting. Evenings begin with a family meal after which facilitators facilitate separate groups for youth and for parents. Childcare is also provided for younger siblings. The Saturday family retreat brings youth and parents together to “practice” all the communication skills they have learned, to enjoy relationship-building activities and to celebrate achievements. IOM Classification Indicated (Adolescent Parenting Program) and Selective (Creating Lasting Family Connections) Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 274 4-9 times 181 10-18 times 58 19 times or more 4 Unduplicated Participants 517 Program Setting Percent 53 % 35 % 11 % 1 % School: Dubois High School; Greenfield H.S.; Hamilton H.S.; Lady Pitts H.S.; Milwaukee School of Entrepreneurship; Northern Star; Notre Dame M.S.; Nova H.S., Shalom H.S.; Washington H.S. Community or youth center: COA and Salvation Army Program Funding Gender Male Female 125 392 24 % 76 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 321 137 13 9 6 31 62 % 26 % 3 % 2 % 1 % 6 % Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 66 344 107 13 % 67 % 20 % Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $75,000 Project leveraging $12,000 Special Event - Golf $1,500 CAP Fund- Parenting materials In-Kind Giving Tree- Christmas gifts for teen moms, dads and babies Collaborations Schools and community-based organizations were our closest collaborators Our community partners provide space, access to program participants, assistance with marketing, presentations at PTOs and PTAs to promote our programs, personnel to assist with resources and referrals. IMPACT Substance abuse information 46 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report The Parenting Network—Positive YOuth Primary Activities: Logic Model EXHIBIT 1 Agency Name: The Parenting Network Goals The Parenting Network will use two evidence-based programs with youth in school and communitybased settings: The goal of Creating Lasting Family Connections (10 sessions + retreat) is to strengthen communication and refusal skills so that youth have positive connections to adults, develop strong interpersonal skills, and make responsible decisions - for the prevention of substance abuse and violence. The goals of MELD for Young Parents (yearlong, weekly sessions) are to empower teen parent participants to provide safe and healthy homes for their young children, learn life skills, avoid additional unplanned teen pregnancies, and continue their education and progress toward self-sufficiency. Project Name: Creating Lasting Family Connections and Meld Objectives (Activities) CLFC: - Partner with schools to establish program: develop flyers, recruit families, coach staff, make all program arrangements, develop Memo of Understanding. - Implement 10-session CLFC in one school during each semester, serving 12-15 families (approx. 18 parents, 14 youth, and 20 children in childcare). - Program adaptations are implemented as needed, i.e. conducting youth or adult group in Spanish, facilitating surveys orally if there are literacy needs. - Make arrangements for weekly dinners, and family retreat (Saturday in a CBO near each school) - Utilize Youth and Parents surveys to measure growth. MELD: - Partner with schools and CBOs to establish programs in 6-8 locations; develop Memos of Understanding - Facilitate weekly Meld sessions in each location; prepare materials - Use outcome measurement tools (surveys) to gather feedback from program participants. - Conduct annual site review to maintain quality partnerships. Outcomes (with indicators) Outputs CLFC: - 24-30 families will voluntarily participate in 10session CLFC series and the full-day family retreat. - Weekly meals will be provided. - Youth and parents will complete three surveys initial, mid-series and final; outcomes will be tracked and measured. MELD: - 375 adolescent parents will participate in weekly classes - Participants will be surveyed and outcomes will be tracked and measured. CLFC: 1. 75% of youth and parents will state that the program has increased positive interactions within the family. 2. 75% of youth will state that the program strengthened their refusal skills. 3. 80% of parents will state that they feel comfortable helping their youth with peer pressure. MELD: 1. 85% of program participants will express being more confident and competent in their parenting. 2. 90% of teen moms have no additional unplanned pregnancies. 3. 95% of participants have no reports of substantiated child abuse or neglect. Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures Program Activity • 394 adolescent parents participated in weekly parenting classes (MELD) • 29 families successfully completed the 10-week CLFC program; 28 families participated in the family retreat Evidence-Based Programming MELD: Parents as Teachers National Center Creating Lasting Family Connections Outcomes Both programs met planned participation targets. The Adolescent Parenting Program (PAT/MELD) produced the following outcomes: 91% of participants expressed being more confident and competent in their parenting; 99% of teen mothers had no additional unplanned pregnancies; 99% had no reports of substantiated abuse or neglect. The CLFC component reported that 95% of youth and 100% of parents stated that CLFC increased positive family interactions; 97% of youth stated that the program strengthened their refusal skills; and 100% of parents stated that they feel more comfortable helping their youth with peer pressure. Outcome Analysis The adolescent parenting program has developed new strategies to address some of the issues of working in the school setting, including developing attendance incentives, seeking school credits for parenting classes, and planning end of year celebrations involving grandparents, teens, and children. CLFC is not being continued into 2009 due to its expense and the limited number of families which could be served. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 47 Pathfinders The Counseling Center of Milwaukee, Inc. 2038 N. Bartlett Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53202 Director Name Daniel O. Magnuson - dmagnuson@pathfindersmke.org Brighter Futures Project Name Hand-in-Hand Program Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Cathy Arney - carney@pathfindersmke.org Project Description Hand-in-Hand is a two level program. First, it provides services to child survivors of sexual violence including individual and family therapy and counseling, advocacy, and case management. Second, the program provides education on sexual violence to elementary and middle school age youth. Hand-in-Hand helps children who have been victims of sexual abuse to learn about child sexual abuse as well as healthy sexuality; therapeutically process traumatic memories; overcome problematic thoughts, feelings and behaviors; and develop effective coping and body safety skills. The educational component is a 3-session curriculum based on the SARR (Sexual Abuse Risk Reduction) Program that focuses on changing the school climate by changing knowledge, attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors related to sexual violence. IOM Classification Indicated/Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 1166 4-9 times 40 10-18 times 27 19 times or more 36 Unduplicated Participants 1269 Program Setting Percent 92 % 3 % 2 % 3 % Gender Male Female 568 477 54 % 46 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 484 22 119 89 6 2 67 % 3 % 16 % 12 % 1 % >1 % Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 63 877 38 6 % 90 % 4 % School: ∑ Wisconsin Conservatory of Lifelong Learning ∑ Humboldt Park Elementary School; ∑ MEC (Milwaukee Education Center; Work Institute Other: Hand-in-Hand Program-The Counseling Center of Milwaukee, Inc.; Lakeland College; United Way;∑ LGBT Community Center; Sexual Assault Awareness Month Event; Child Dynamics; UW-M-School of Educational Psychology; Child Protection Center; UMOS Latina Resource Center; Gallery Night-agency art show Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $75,000 Project leveraging $59,811 Sexual Assault Victims Services $50,000 United Way-Healthy Girls Initiative $950 Victims of CrimeAct/SAVS $1,000 Wisconsin Coalition Against Sexual Assault $5,500 VOCA Collaborations Wisconsin Conservatory of Lifelong Learning This MPS school was selected to pilot the HIH prevention program. The project reached 661 youth grades 6th-12th, plus their staff and parent groups. WCLL welcomed our return a second semester and worked with TCCM staff to develop a plan for continued future prevention efforts. Stop It Now! Provided materials aimed at adult “bystanders” who work with vulnerable youth. These materials are helpful when educating school, community staff and parents about preventing sexual violence. Humboldt Park Elementary School This second MPS school has engaged in a partnership to change their school climate through the HIH presentations. Milwaukee Commission on Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault This group works on decreasing domestic violence & sexual assault city-wide. Program staff serve as a commissioner to the Commission and staff attends several sub-committees. SAAM (Sexual Assault Awareness Month) Event Each year, organizations plan and execute an event for professionals working in the field of sexual violence. TCCM has been the lead organizer and fiscal agent for the event. 48 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Pathfinders The Counseling Center of Milwaukee, Inc. Primary Activities: Logic Model Agency Name: The Counseling Center of Milwaukee, Inc. Goals Objectives (Activities) Primary Prevention: To increase sexual violence prevention education on the individual and relationship levels by assisting youth, parents and those who work with them in developing a clear understanding of sexual violence and its consequences, with a strong focus on encouraging change in knowledge, attitudes, beliefs and behaviors about sexual violence. Primary Prevention: Using an evidence-based curriculum, provide a 3-Phase sexual violence prevention education model to schools or community settings that includes: • Education to youth, staff, parents/guardians and community professionals. Secondary Prevention: To prevent the re-abuse of youth who have already experienced sexual violence. Project Name: Hand-in-Hand Sexual Violence Prevention Program Outputs Outcomes (with indicators) Primary Prevention: • 800 youth will receive education on preventing sexual violence in classroom or community settings. Primary Prevention: • Through pre and post-test measurement, 80% of the youth will identify at least one sexual violence risk reduction strategy. • Evaluation of the model. • 75 parents will receive information on sexual violence. • Development of exit strategy with school staff that will continue prevention efforts. • 200 professionals will receive education on how to prevent sexual violence. Secondary Prevention: Provide cognitive behavioral therapy to youth ages 6-18 who are survivors of sexual violence. Secondary Prevention: • 120 survivors of sexual violence will receive individual/family therapy/ counseling, advocacy and case management services. • Through a post-presentation survey, 90% of parents/guardians attending the informational presentations will be able to define sexual violence and identify at least one resource for victims of sexual violence. Secondary Prevention: • 80% of program participants will experience a reduction in symptoms related to their sexual abuse. • 90% of program participants will learn sexual violence risk reduction tips. Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwa Program Activity • 111 survivors of sexual violence received individual, group or family therapy, advocacy and case management services • 885 youth, 360 professionals, and 24 parents received education on how to prevent sexual violence Evidence-Based Programming Cognitive Behavior Therapy for Child Sexual Abuse Sexual Abuse Risk Reduction Program Outcomes The program’s educational component reached more youth than planned (800 planned vs. 885 actual) and reached almost double the number of professionals (200 planned vs. 360 actual). Fewer parents than planned were reached (75 planned vs. 24 actual), however. The program reached somewhat fewer child victims than planned (120 planned vs. 111 actual). The program met or exceeded all of its planned outcome measures: In the education component, 90% of youth identified at least one sexual violence risk reduction strategy and 100% of parents/guardians were able to define sexual violence and identify at least one resource for victims as a result of training. Of children in the therapy program, 84% experienced a reduction in symptoms related to their sexual abuse and 84% learned sexual violence risk reduction strategies. Outcome Analysis Because of the large Hmong population at one of their partner schools, Pathfinders had to adapt its educational program to become more culturally competent; in addition, the program was challenged by trying to involve students’ parents, many of whom live outside the immediate area of the schools where the program was being delivered. Additional challenges were encountered at the therapy group level where complexity of children’s needs required more intensive services, thus reducing the overall number of children that could be served. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 49 Pathfinders (formerly The Counseling Center of Milwaukee) 2038 N. Bartlett Ave, Milwaukee, WI 53202 Director Name Tim Baack - tbaack@pathfindersmke.org Brighter Futures Project Name Pathfinders Youth Leadership Development Initiative Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Lisa Gumm - lgumm@pathfindersmke.org Project Description The Pathfinders Youth Leadership Development Initiative (YLDI) provides at-risk, runaway and ‘thrown out’ youth with youth-developed services and programming that gives them a sense of structure and belonging as they develop important skills and assets. Through structured group activities, youth can connect with their peers and caring adults in positive ways that allow them to address their disengagement from their families, schools, and communities and reduce their likelihood of engaging in delinquent behaviors. The Initiative’s primary objectives are to enhance youth self-esteem; strengthen youth-adult relationships; improve youth competency and social skills; allow youth to safely socialize, and provide affirming messages regarding youth as valued assets to the community. IOM Classification Indicated Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 107 4-9 times 65 10-18 times 114 19 times or more 32 Unduplicated Participants 318 Program Setting Percent 34 % 20 % 36 % 10 % Gender Male Female 141 177 44 % 56 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 264 27 42 2 1 1 83 % 8 % 13 % >1 % >1 % >1 % Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + - 220 98 69 % 31 % Community or youth center: Hillside Family Resource Center 1452 N. 7th Street Other: Pathfinders Youth Shelter Other: Walker’s Point Youth & Family Center Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $75,000 Project leveraging $14,660 United Way of Greater Milwaukee staffing costs and supplies not within BF grant budget. $ 4,215 Federal Street Outreach Funds - funding to cover portion of the Outreach Specialist staff who assisted with BF YLDI programming. Collaborations Walker’s Point Youth & Family Center Pathfinders’ collaborative partner in the street outreach program, Street Beat. Hillside Family Resource Center Providing space and location for weekly Activity Group in addition to peer leadership support for the planning of youth leadership activities. UMOS (United Immigrant Opportunity Services) Youth leadership opportunities in conference planning activities. 50 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Pathfinders (formerly The Counseling Center of Milwaukee) Primary Activities: Logic Model Agency Name: The Counseling Center of Milwaukee, Inc. Project Name: Pathfinders Youth Development Initiative Goals Objectives (Activities) Outputs To reduce the likelihood of delinquent behaviors and increase self-sufficiency amongst its targeted population of runaway, homeless, and throwaway adolescents by providing youth with positive, empowering discussion opportunities and activities in a safe learning environment, and assisting them in recognizing, developing, and maintaining their role as valued assets in their community. • Leadership Development Meetings • Between 10 and 20 youth will participate in weekly Leadership Meetings – up to 52 meetings held annually. • Youth Activity Group Outcomes (with indicators) • Prevention Education Groups • At least 50 youth will participate in weekly Youth Activity Groups – up to 52 group sessions held annually. • At least 200 youth will participate in daily Prevention Education Groups – up to 275 groups will be held annually. Participating youth will achieve the following: • 75% will demonstrate improved (or sustained if already positive) school attendance. • 90% will demonstrate successful completion of Program Services through discharge to a safe and secure living environment. • 90% will demonstrate successful completion of Program Services through the prevention of subsequent runaway episodes. Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Mil Program Activity • • • • 73 youth completed the program 55 anger management and life skills training classes provided 11 parent meetings conducted 4 youth enrolled in driving school (as a program reward) Evidence-Based Programming Traditional methods employed: intensive monitoring of school attendance, “real talk” sessions, parenting meetings, and community service Outcomes Program data indicates that about half (45.4%) of youth referred to the program were engaged in services, attending services between 4 and 18 times, with 39% of youth showing improved school attendance. In addition, 85% of youth avoided subsequent delinquent activities, 80% of parents reported satisfaction with child’s improved behavior; 52% of parents attended parent meetings. 73 youth had court fines waived and avoided further legal action. Outcome Analysis The program identified staff turnover and low parent participation as key issues, noting that among the 73 successful youth, 42% had parents who attended the monthly meetings but only 10% of the non-compliant youth had parents who attended. This program had strong relationships with the essential partners, i.e. Municipal Court and MPS, but recognizes that truancy is a multi-faceted issue that must be addressed by the student, family and community. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 51 Pearls for Teen Girls, Inc. 2100 N. Palmer Street, Milwaukee, WI 53212 Director Name Danae D. Davis - Danae@pearlsforteengirls.com Brighter Futures Project Name Pearls for Teen Girls, Inc. Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Gerry Howze - gerry@pearlsforteengirls.com Project Description PEARLS for Teen Girls is a leadership and self awareness program for girls ages 11-18. PEARLS programming includes the use of the Leadership Compass to help girls create and work toward goals important to them; program coordinators assist girls in overcoming the obstacles that stand between them and their goals while monitoring and tracking their progress. The program places emphasis on the development of individual accountability for decision-making. PEARLS girls are also involved in community services. Teen facilitators provide additional support and role modeling for younger girls. IOM Classification Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 120 4-9 times 142 10-18 times 232 19 times or more 107 Unduplicated Participants 601 Program Setting Percent 20 % 23 % 39 % 18 % School: Academy of Leadership and Learning, Business and Economic Academy of Milwaukee, Hope School, Keefe Ave. School, Notre Dame Middle School, Silver Spring Academy, South Milwaukee Middle School, St. Joan Antida, Townsend Middle School, Westside Academy Community or youth center: North side YMCA and Marshall Boys & Girls Club Gender Male Female - 601 100 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 527 38 25 1 1 9 88 % 6 % 4 % >1 % >1 % 1 % Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 56 508 37 9 % 85 % 6 % Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $75,000 Project leveraging $30,000 $40,000 $30,000 $40,000 $20,000 $30,000 $20,000 $52,000 United Way Safe & Sound CDBG Fighting Back Harley-Davidson Herzfeld Foundation Miller Brewing Co. Healthier Wisconsin Partnership Program Collaborations Medical College of Wisconsin; Silver Spring Academy; UWM – College of Nursing – Institute for Urban Health Partnerships; UWM – Center for Urban Community Development; Silver Spring Neighborhood Center (HWPP) Partnered to provide PEARLS programming and health services (mental and physical) for students of Silver Spring Academy. Carver Park Towne Homes Community Center Hosted All-site Holiday Party. We were able to bring all of sites together allowing girls to meet and interact with other PEARLS’ sisters citywide. Milwaukee County Sheriff’s Department Two Milwaukee County Sheriff’s partnered with PEARLS participants to develop and provide senior citizens personal safety workshops. 52 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Pearls for Teen Girls, Inc. Primary Activities: Logic Model EXHIBIT 1 Agency Name: Pearls for Teen Girls, Inc. Project Name: Pearls for Teen Girls, Inc. Goals Objectives (Activities) Outputs Pearls Girls will be able to negotiate and sustain positive relationships (Peers, Family, Teachers, and other adults) All groups meet for at least one or two hrs. Each week/minimum 44 wks per yr. Strong program partner relationships established and maintained. 600 girls, ages 11 to 18 experience PEARLS’ custom designed programming Pearls Girls will achieve academic success. Using PEARLS Leadership compass girls learn to identify, set and work toward positive goals that are important to them. Girls receive ongoing coaching/support to reach goals Girls initiate community service projects to address issues important to them. Could include crime, teen pregnancy, hunger, care for less fortunate, and education. Pearls Girls capacity and comfort level for being accountable for their own decisions will be increased AT least 300 girls are served 1 to 3 hours weekly for 44 weeks At least 3 teens qualify for PEARLS post-high school scholarship funds 5 Teen Facilitators attend intensive Rapport Leadership Training 12 teens succeed in part-time employment as Teen Facilitators Teen Facilitators attend 3-day intensive Rapport Leadership Training in addition to receiving ongoing training and development. Parents of PEARLS girls will be encouraged and invited to participate in activities and special events offered by PEARLSL. Outcomes (with indicators) 1. Developing Positive relationships to be determined by Youth Survey 2. Academic Success 100% of seniors will graduate 100% of seniors will be college bound 75% of all girls who set academic achievement goals will achieve them. 3. Accountability for Decisions made 80% of PEARLS girls will set goals 75% will achieve them Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced Child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures Program Activity • 601 girls experienced PEARLS programming • 300 girls were engaged at the level of 1-3 hours weekly for 44 weeks • 6 graduating seniors obtained collage scholarships • 4 teens completed the Rapport Leadership Training • 6 teen facilitators, 3 junior coordinators and 4 college interns assisted in program planning and implementation Evidence-Based Programming Too Good for Drugs Making Proud Choices! Jemmott, L.S., Jemmott, J.B., MCCaffree, K.A. (2003) “Making Proud Choices! A safer-sex approach to HIV/STDs and teen pregnancy prevention. Select Media, Inc.,: New York, New York. Outcomes The majority of PEARLS girls (55.6% or 334) were frequent or very frequent participants, reflecting the weekly meeting nature of the program. The program met or exceeded its planned participation targets. In addition, 100% of girls avoided teen pregnancy; 100% of seniors graduated from high school; 88% were accepted to college; 48% of girls who set academic goals achieved them; 96% of girls set and worked toward 1 or more goals with 73% achieving academic goals. The program is examining ways to increase girls’ academic success. Outcome Analysis The program has been successful in engaging girls and helping them achieve important outcomes such as high school graduation, college acceptance, and pregnancy prevention. The program acknowledges the day to day challenges of working with groups of girls in terms of conflict, anger management, and developing respectful group discourse. In addition, issues outside of the program such as addiction or violence in the family present significant challenges as well. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 53 Safe & Sound Inc. 801 W. Michigan Street, Milwaukee, WI 53233 Director Name Barbara Notestein - bnotestein@milwaukeehidta.org Brighter Futures Project Name Safe & Sound Community Partners program Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Joseph Kubisiak - joe@milwaukeehidta.org0 Project Description Safe & Sound is a community-based, anti-crime strategy designed to reduce youth crime and violence. It utilizes the interdependent strategies of positive youth development at Safe Places, neighborhood organizing through the Community Partners, and tough law enforcement. It is a unique, collaborative approach to fighting crime, violence, illegal alcohol and drug sales, and other neighborhood problems. Safe & Sound’s collaborating partners empower youth and adults to work together, creating a better, safer community for all. The Community Partners conduct outreach and organize residents door-to-door year round, listening to, and addressing, the individual concerns of residents. They recruit youth to attend Safe Places and work with youth leaders to implement community anti-crime initiatives. Partners work with residents to organize block watches, building relationships and communication between residents, law enforcement and city services. These activities involve youth, adults, and our public services and resources in partnerships, enhancing safety and reducing crime, positively impacting the community and improving the overall quality of life for residents. IOM Classification Universal Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 2506 4-9 times 745 10-18 times - 19 times or more - Unduplicated Participants 3251 Program Setting Percent 77 % 23 % - Various locations in Safe & Sound target areas Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $100,000 Project leveraging Gender Male Female 1716 1535 53 % 47 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 1976 546 667 20 - 42 61 % 17 % 20 % 1 % 1 % Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 474 1282 1495 15 % 39 % 46 % $250,000 $80,322 $44,000 CDBG- Salaries, FICA, Pension, U/C, W/C, Life Ins., Disability, Health, Dental, Office Supplies, Local Travel, Phone, Postage Milwaukee HIDTA - Salaries CDBG NSP - Salaries Collaborations Community Prosecutors Meetings, events, resident concerns, and community relations collaboration Milwaukee Police Department Meetings, events, resident concerns, and community relations collaboration Aldermanic Offices Meetings, events, resident concerns, and community relations collaboration County Supervisor Offices Meetings, events, and initiatives collaboration Mayors Office Meetings and initiatives collaboration Safe & Sound funded agencies Youth led events, public safety initiatives and youth recruitment CBOs/FBOs Meetings and events 54 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Safe & Sound Inc. Primary Activities: Logic Model Agency Name: Safe & Sound Project Name: Community Partners Objectives (Activities) Goals Assist and engage youth and residents to participate in proactive youth-led neighborhood anti-crime initiatives. Assist and engage youth in developing recruitment strategies for Safe & Sound targeted youth demographics. Provide training and forums that involve youth in leadership and decision-making roles on crime related issues. Goal 1: Increase youth involvement in violence prevention that will deter delinquent behavior Agency Name: Agape Community Center Objectives (Activities) Goals Goal 2: Foster youth/resident For youth participants involvement by coordinating and supporting initiatives in conjunction envision, plan, and with law enforcement and Community achieve a future that Prosecutors. to strengthens personal, family, and neighborhood prosperity. Goal 3: Physically improve neighborhood environment and appearance for youth and families Outcomes (with indicators) Outputs 10 Safe Place Youth Leadership groups will 65% of youth leadership participants surveyed will demonstrate an increased be established to develop, plan and implement crime prevention activities involving knowledge of leadership ability, confidence and experience. the community. 20 recruitment initiatives will be planned and A 5% increase in the utilization of youth programming throughout the Safe & Sound implemented by Safe Place youth leadership target area by targeted groups as indicated groups. by caparison to 2007 records. 2 DA’s Community Conferencing Program Community Conferencing participants will facilitator trainings and 2 Safe Place youth show a measurable increase in knowledge of participant trainings will be developed and the criminal justice system and the impact of conducted. EXHIBIT 1 crime on victims, offenders and the 10 offenders will participate in the DA’s Office Community Conferencing Program held community. at Safe Places involving trained Safe Place Name:members Programs for Youth and Family Development youthProject and staff, community and Community Partners. Outputs 10 youth- and family-oriented anti-crime Increase youth/resident access and 1) Provide after school program1) 235 ages 7-13 and community events thatyouth involve 1500 hundred collaboration with law enforcement entities ming to 375 neighborhood youth ages teens 15-19 will positive interaction withenroll law through the facilitation of community meetings, residents and 240 7-19 that offer opportunities for acaand afterand school proenforcement will beattend organized conducted group activities, and one-on-one interaction demic enrichment, personal and interat least one time. through youth grams leadership groups. with law enforcement personnel. personal development, and recreation. Personal contact with 6,000 households Conduct door-to-door outreach to provide Average of 15 youth, 20 within the Safe2)& Sound target area. information that increases youth/residents 2) Provide summer programming for preteens, 40 teens 40 existing Block Clubsand and/or Block will awareness of current crime trends and how to 100 youth ages 4-12 to enhance their attend After School programs Watches will be maintained and 8 will be identify and report criminal drug, gun and development through recreational acestablished aseach activeday. participants in gang activity in their neighborhood. tivities and experiential learning. neighborhood crime prevention efforts. Establish and maintain block clubs, block 3) 100 youth ages 4-12 will watches, youth groups, landlord compacts or 3) Engage a core group of 50 youth participate in Summer Youth other community based groups that address ages 11-19 and their families in intenProgram. issues of neighborhood crime and blight. sive prevention programming and family support services including 4) 40 youth ages 11-19 and each of the following: will with successfully complete In collaboration the Department of Inform households of city code • ATODA prevention curriculum programming Neighborhoodprevention Services, 300 households in requirements and homeowner property • Protective Behaviors delinquency (ATODA, Protective Behavthe Safe & Sound target area will receive maintenance responsibilities by conducting prevention curriculum iors, andneeded Abstinence curricwarning notices about exterior home neighborhood housing and blight surveys. • Abstinence-based teen pregnancy ula), job readiness/vocational as well as home Link residents to resources directed towards repair and maintenance prevention curriculum preparation sessions, and will repair resources. first-time home ownership, minor home repair • Job readiness/vocational prepawork, needed,inwith a fam250 individuals willas participate assistance, low cost loans and forgivable ration sessions ily case manager. neighborhood community service activities. home improvement grants. • Family case management sesEngage families, youth and offenders in sions when needed community service that promotes neighborhood pride, health and safety. Outcomes (with indicators) 1) Increased resistance skills: 75% of Residents/youth will demonstrate a core participants will demonstrate an measurable increase personal knowledge ability to resistinnegative peer pressure of law enforcement resources and their and dangerous situations (Data curricwillingness andSource: ability toYRBS, utilizeprevention these ulathrough pre/post-tests) resources survey data. 500 resident referrals or follow-ups in 2) Improved attitude of youth toward response to resident concerns will be school: 70% of core participants will completed. demonstrate a positive attitude about Residents or (Data youthSource: through Supplemental ongoing school collaboration with Safe & Sound will display an Questionnaire) increased knowledge of crime and housing 3) Improved ability to envision related issues and willingness/ability toand plan for compared the future: to 70% of core participants addressas those community articulate plan for a future of selfmemberswill not directly ainvolved. sufficiency and complete a vocational plan demonstrating vocational preparedness (Data Source: Future planning 65% ofassessment; the 300 households resume; atsurveyed least twowill interindicate completed home repair and views and job readiness assessment) maintenance 4) Reduce early on-set of ATODA exwill apply for home 50 households perimentation and increase improvement resources through theawareness referral of STIs, etc. and risk of premature intimate assistance of Safe & Sound. involvement. 50% of core participants will articulate with the use of brochures and facilitation of a prevention event to their peers and family on one or both of the topic areas. (YSRB, pre/post test & event. Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency Program Activity • 12,440 households contacted in Safe & Sound target area 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures • 107 anti-crime activities involving 1,468 people conducted through 26 youth leadership groups • 55 existing block clubs/block watches were maintained; 41 new clubs established • 1 DA Community Conference Program Facilitator training conducted; 14 offenders participated in Community Conferencing • In cooperation with the Department of Neighborhood Services, 1,275 households received warning notices about exterior home repair/maintenance • 3,428 hours logged as a result of 2,068 individuals participation in 79 neighborhood community service activities Evidence-Based Programming Safe & Sound uses a program approach to crime-reduction which has been evaluated by Marquette University (2002) and University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee (2008) and determined to be effective. Outcomes Community Partners exceeded all of its planned outputs; for example, the program contacted double the planned number of households (6,000 planned; 12,440 actual), established 33 more block clubs than planned (8 planned; 41 actual), and worked with DNS to identify four times the planned number of homes in need of repair (250 planned;1,275 actual). Participation in youth programming dropped 10.7% over 2007. Participant surveys indicated that 66% of residents were aware of resources to address crime; 70% were willing to use them; 73% indicated a long term commitment to the neighborhood. Outcome Analysis Community Partners is a unique street outreach and crime prevention program operating in high crime areas of Milwaukee. The program also serves as a conduit to youth programming both Safe Places and other programs. The program was successful in greatly extending its reach to neighbors, addressing problem properties, and engaging residents in community service projects. The program’s comparatively low participation frequency is due to its basic design as a community outreach/crime prevention system. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 55 Silver Spring Neighborhood Center (SSNC) 5460 N. 64th Street, Milwaukee, WI 53218 Director Name Jim Bartos - jbartos@ssnc-milw.org Brighter Futures Project Name Social Development Director Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Anthony McHenry - amchenry@ssnc-milw.org Project Description The Social Development Programs at SSNC are designed to assist youth in becoming self-sufficient adults. Specifically, the LADY (Loving and Developing Yourselves) and Young LADY programs seek to eliminate teen pregnancies among youth by engaging them in activities that promote self-esteem and self-worth. The MALE (Maturing and Loving Everyone) and MALE JR. programs seek to eliminate violent behavior among the participants. The Teen Leadership and Youth Leadership Club seek to enhance leadership skills among participants. Each Social Development Program has a secondary focus on post secondary education, career development, ATODA prevention and building healthy relationships. The programs meet at least once a week during the school year and the teen programs meet through the summer as well. SSNC develops and maintains healthy relationships with participants that will assist in keeping them engaged in SSNC programs through their high school graduation. IOM Classification Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 102 4-9 times 46 10-18 times 26 19 times or more 35 Unduplicated Participants 209 Program Setting Percent 48 % 22 % 12 % 18 % Gender Male Female 123 86 59 % 41 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 205 - 4 - - - 98 % 2 % - Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 80 100 29 38 % 48 % 14 % Community or youth center: 5460 N. 64th Street, Milwaukee, WI 53218 Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $75,000 Project leveraging $339,147 United Way of Greater Milwaukee Staffing, facility overhead, programs and activities $45,000 Safe & Sound- Staffing costs $35,000 City of Milwaukee CDBG - Staffing, program supplies and limited administrative costs $141,000 Milwaukee Public Schools – Browning CLC Staffing for Center’s after-school and summer program Collaborations Teen Pregnancy Prevention Network Collaborated on teen conferences. United Neighborhood Centers of Milwaukee (UNCOM) Added support programming for participants. MPS Provided funding and staff for CLC after school program. New Concepts Offered pregnancy prevention activities. Big Brothers/Big Sisters Provided mentors to youth. Boy Scouts/Girls Scouts Offered programs for youth. 56 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Silver Spring Neighborhood Center (SSNC) Primary Activities: Logic Model EXHIBIT 1 Agency Name:Silver Spring Neighborhood Center Goals Youth will have the skills to becomeself-sufficient and contributing members of society. Project Name: Social Development Program Objectives (Activities) SSNC will provide a weekly Teen Leadership Club for teens ages 13-18 and a weekly Youth Leadership Club for the school year only for ages 1012. Outputs Outcomes (with indicators) 10 Teens will go on Teen Leadership College Tour. Youth abstain from violent behaviors (Social Development Surveys). At least 20 teens will volunteer in the after school program. Youth do not become pregnant (self-report). SSNC will provide LADY two nights a week for the calendar year and Young LADY one night a week for the school year. At least 210 will attend social development programs during the program year. Youth abstain or reduce alcohol/tobacco/drug use (Social Development Survey) SSNC will provide MALE two nights a week for the calendar year and Young MALE one night weekly for the school year. At least 30 youth will attend academic achievement party for honor roll or perfect attendance. Youth attend school on a regular basis (Social Development Surveys). Provide teens with opportunities to visit colleges, job fairs and the black college fair. At least 75 teens will attend the Annual Teen Conference Youth have at least a 2.0 GPA. (Report Cards) SSNC will host an Annual Teen Conference. Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures Program Activity • • • • • 18 youth attended college tours 29 youth volunteered in the after-school program 209 youth attended social development programs 41 youth attended the academic achievement party 108 youth attended Annual Teen Conferences Evidence-Based Programming Academic Tutoring and Social Skills Training Outcomes Silver Spring Neighborhood Center has a core group of frequent/very frequent participants that represents 30.0% of the total 209 participants. About half (48%) of SSNC participants attended only 1-3 times. Those youth who attend regularly have good outcomes as measured by use of a Social Development Survey based on the Youth Risk Behavior Survey: 57% indicated having no physical fights in the last 30 days; 87% indicated no alcohol use in past 30 days; 73% indicated no 30-day use of marijuana; 93% indicated no smoking in past 30 days; 73% indicated that they attended school every day in past 30 days. 100% of participants avoided becoming teen parents. Outcome Analysis SSNC noted that program results are not as good as in prior year, despite significant and measurable positive outcomes. Staff attribute the difference to youth having been engaged for a shorter period of time; traditionally SSNC engages youth in the elementary/middle school years and retains them through high school. Staff are focusing on long-term retention as well as strategies to improve the transition to college. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 57 St. Gabriel’s Church of God in Christ, Inc 5363 N 37th Street, Milwaukee, WI 53209 Director Name Pastor Lee A Shaw - Ishaw92818@aol.com Brighter Futures Project Name Peer-to-Peer Mentoring Program Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Pastor Lee A Shaw - Ishaw92818@aol.com Project Description The Peer-to-Peer Mentoring Program provides mentoring, tutoring, structured recreation, nutritional meals, and other support resources to boys and girls ages 8 to 18 and their parents. Program staff work with each youth to develop and implement an individualized service plan that identifies peer-to-peer goals and includes an acceptance agreement; group activities including athletic competition, field trips, nicotine cessation and prevention, group meals, life skills education, one-on-one counseling, and staff attendance at school conferences, extracurricular activities, juvenile court appearances; rewards and recognition for academic progress. IOM Classification Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times - 4-9 times - 10-18 times 101 19 times or more 396 Unduplicated Participants 497 Program Setting Percent 22 % 78 % Gender Male Female 361 136 74 % 26 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 497 - - - - - 100 % - Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 129 305 63 26 % 61 % 13 % Church/faith institution: St. Gabriel’s COGIC Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $75,000 Project leveraging $15,000 St. Gabriel’s- Helped support the Mentoring Program Collaborations Salvation Army Provided food & Participation in tobacco program Milwaukee Police Dept. Demonstrated proper conduct/intervention with police Northcott Neighborhood Services Outside activities/basketball COA BB League Demonstrated sportsmanship, discipline and commitments Mission of Hope Food & Clothing pantry Donated food and clothing to our participating children’s families Tobacco Milw. Comm Tobacco/Wisconsin Prevention network Provided information about tobacco use Community Services Used to help our youth in trouble with the Law. MPS Reports Cards to measure success MATC Scholarship program provided scholarships to our youth we deemed eligible 58 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report St. Gabriel’s Church of God in Christ, Inc Primary Activities: Logic Model EXHIBIT 1 St. Gabriel’s COGIC Agape Community Center Project Name: Programs for Youth and Family Development Agency Name: Goals Objectives (Activities) Objectives (Activities) Goals Outputs • 1. Peer to Peer mentor For will youth participants your girls and boys and envision, facilitate change in plan, and inappropriate and at-risk achieve a future that behaviors using a broadpersonal, strengthens range of intervention best and neighborpracticesfamily, directly as well as through collaborative hood prosperity. relationships. Administration: implement 1) Create Provideand after school programto individualizedming service plans, Peer to to 375 neighborhood youth ages• Peer program7-19 goals and acceptance that offer opportunities for acaagreement. demic enrichment, personal and inter• personal development, and recreation. Group Activities: • • Recreation 2) Provide summer programming for • Athletic 100 competition youth ages 4-12 to enhance their• • Fielddevelopment trips, nicotine cessation through recreational acand tivities prevention workshops learning. and experiential • Board games • • Art/crafts 3) Engage a core group of 50 youth • • Poolages 11-19 and their families in inten• Counseling sive prevention programming and • Meals/life familyskills support services including • each of the following: Incentives: • ATODA prevention curriculum • Awards • Protective Behaviors delinquency • Recognition prevention curriculum • • Stipends • Abstinence-based teen pregnancy • Special privileges prevention curriculum • Job readiness/vocational prepa-• One-on-One ration sessions • Family case management ses• • Counseling sions when needed • Attendance at school conferences, extracurricular activities; tutoring, monitoring progress, family visits, financial assistance, juvenile court appearances, report card monitoring Outputs Outcomes (with indicators) Outcomes (with indicators) 1) Increased resistance skills: 75% of Individualized Service core will demonstrate of participants report cards to assess an Plans 1) 235 youth ages 7-13 and Monitoring ability to resist negative peer pressure 15-19 will enroll improvements in: 20 youth240 in teens attendance and dangerous situations andbasis attend after school pro(Data Source: YRBS, prevention curricon regular grams least one time. ula pre/post-tests) • Grades Recreation 3 xatper • Conduct week 2) Improved attitude of youth toward 2) Average of 15 youth, 20 • Tardiness Individual tutoringand daily school: 70% of core participants will preteens, 40 teens will • Unexcused absences demonstrate a positive attitude about School, attend court,After School programs school (Data Source: Supplemental • Suspensions probation officer each day. visits Questionnaire) as needed 3) 100 ages 4-12 will Family visit as youth needed 3) Improved ability to envision and plan participate for the future: 70% of core participants Group meals 3 x in Summer Youth Program. meals will articulate a plan for a future of selfweek; individual sufficiency and complete a vocational as needed plan demonstrating vocational prepared4) 40 youth ages 11-19 and Available seven days ness (Data Source: Future planning will successfully complete assessment; resume; at least two interper week face to face prevention programming views and job readiness assessment) time (ATODA, Protective BehavMeaningful iors, and Abstinence curric4) Reduce early on-set of ATODA excollaborations ula), jobwith readiness/vocational perimentation and increase awareness of sessions, and will STIs, etc. and risk of premature intimate memberpreparation organizations involvement. 50% of core participants work,stipends as needed, with a famReport card will articulate with the use of brochures ily case manager. every marking period and facilitation of a prevention event to Employment stipends their peers and family on one or both of on an ongoing basis the topic areas. (YSRB, pre/post test & event. Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures Program Activity • 497 participants in program activities offered three days per week • Program components: Junior Mentors, Report Card Club, Business Club, AAU and BB Basketball Teams, open gym, meals, and game room available three days per week Evidence-Based Programming Mentoring Outcomes St. Gabriel’s program is a high engagement program with all of its youth classified as frequent or very frequent participants. Nearly 8 out of 10 (78%) St. Gabriel’s youth attended 19 times or more. Despite utilizing the UNCOM participant tracking system, St. Gabriel’s program continues to suffer from lack of outcome measurement and reporting beyond participation frequency. Outcome Analysis The program stresses one-on-one ‘face time’ in which the program director who is also a pastor spends time with each individual youth; he provides the recognition, stipends, and other encouragement that are key elements of the program. The program foundation is the strong trusting relationship between the pastor and his associates and the youth participants. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 59 St. Vincent de Paul SocietyVincent Family Resource Center 2610 N Martin Luther King Drive, Milwaukee, WI 53212 Director Name Stephany Pruitt - spruitt@svdpmilw.org Brighter Futures Project Name Families Forward Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Kelly Young - kyoung@svdpmilw.org Project Description The goal of the Vincent Family Resource Center under the Milwaukee Brighter Futures-Families Forward Program is to provide parenting, education and support which promote a better understanding of child development. The major goal is to increase parenting skills to prevent child abuse and neglect among our participant families. In addition, the Family Resource Center also provides services for youth that prevent and reduce the incidence of youth violence and other delinquent behavior. In addition, the program focuses on increasing adolescent self-sufficiency by encouraging high school graduation, vocational preparedness, improve social and other interpersonal skills and responsible decision-making. IOM Classification Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 657 4-9 times 51 10-18 times 27 19 times or more 6 Unduplicated Participants 741 Program Setting Percent 87 % 7 % 3 % 1 % Gender Male Female 355 386 48 % 52 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 661 35 43 - 1 1 89 % 4 % 6 % >1 % >1 % Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 299 114 328 40 % 16 % 44 % In participants’ homes School: St. Charles Youth & Family Services Community or youth center: Vincent Family Resource Center Public building/facility/park Betty Brinn Museum Family Fun Night Other: Butler Skateland Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $75,000 Project leveraging $30,000 $85,000 $20,000 $11,000 Child Abuse Prevention Fund - additional services to families Children’s Trust Fund - helped to cast a larger service net Archdiocese of Milwaukee Supporting Fund Provides necessary matches to leverage additional services Wisconsin Tobacco Prevention - helped with health issues that are an outgrowth of psych-social issues Collaborations Children’s Trust Fund Helped provide programming to a greater number of participants Child Abuse Prevention Fund H elped to provide comprehensive Fatherhood Services and outreach Wisconsin Tobacco Prevention Provided statistics for the zip code and helped to provide health prevention/ intervention services for psych-social issues Archdiocese of Milwaukee Continued support for VFRC family strengthening programs SVDP Conferences Referral source, giving, program partners and volunteer resource MHD-Empowering Families of Milwaukee Provided home visiting and case management to families Department of Family Services Helped build collaboration with child care workers for child abuse and neglect 60 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report St. Vincent de Paul SocietyVincent Family Resource Center Primary Activities: Logic Model Agency Name: St. Vincent de Paul Society/Vincent Family Resource Center Goals Strengthen families by helping parents improve their parenting skills, prevent/decrease child abuse and neglect. Promote youth leadership and development. Connect family members to community resources. Objectives (Activities) Parenting support and education by: Provide Nurturing Fathers, Pre/Postnatal Nurturing, Infant Massage Project Name: Families Forward 2-08-2008 Outputs Outcomes (with indicators) Father’s Nurturing 2 sessions @ 13 weeks each to serve 30 fathers. Reduce child abuse and neglect; parents will increase and demonstrate knowledge of child development and positive parenting techniques as indicated by self-report and parent learning profile. Women’s Support Group Community Activities: Engage parents in 4 family neighborhood events Youth Services To provide: Girl Power group Y-KNOT tobacco prevention program for youth To provide: Individualized and family Coaching, Pre/Post-Natal Nurturing 2 sessions @ 10 weeks each serving 8 parents with their babies. Infant Massage 2 sessions @ 2 _ hours each for 8 parents Reduce non-marital teen pregnancy. 25 sessions once a week for 1 _ hrs serving at least an unduplicated count of 25 women Reduce teen alcohol and other drug abuse. Families are connected to their communities. At least 100 parents and children will engage in 4 family neighborhood events Youth Services Girl Power will have 2 sessions @ 10 weeks each serving at least 8-12 girls Brighter Futures Outcomes Y-KNOT will have 1 session @ 6 weeks each for 12 youth An average of 75 parents will receive coaching 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwa Program Activity • 30 fathers participated in the Father’s Nurturing Program • 31 women participated in an ongoing weekly support group • 299 parents and children participated in family neighborhood events • 18 youth participated in character-building groups: SIMBA and Young Women on a Mission • 167 parents received family coaching sessions addressing parenting challenges Evidence-Based Programming Nurturing Program Outcomes The vast majority of program participants attended Center activities only 1-3 times; 657 of the 741 participants (88.7%) fell in this category. Planned outcomes were not measured and reported despite the use of a well-established evidence-based program which has pre and post test instruments incorporated. Outcome Analysis Vincent Family Resource Center had leadership and staffing changes in 2008 that presented challenges to program continuity. The program has had difficulty engaging and retaining a strong core group of participants and appears to be at a critical juncture in terms of future program directions. New leadership is focusing on the development of new program components. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 61 Task Force on Family Violence 1400 N 6th Street Milwaukee, WI 53212 Director Name Carmen Pitre - cpitre@tffv.org Brighter Futures Project Name Child Witness to Domestic Violence Project Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Wanda Staples - wstaples@tffv.org Project Description The goal of the Child Witness to Domestic Violence Project is to reduce the harmful effects of children’s exposure to domestic violence by identifying and reaching out to the protective parents of these child witnesses; training professionals who work with children in the Milwaukee community, particularly members of the multi-disciplinary Child Abuse Review Team (CART); offering direct case management services to families affected by domestic violence; and offering support / educational groups for child witnesses. IOM Classification Indicated Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 808 4-9 times 291 10-18 times 37 19 times or more 26 Unknown - Unduplicated Participants 1253 Program Setting Percent 64 % 23 % 3 % 2 % 8 % Gender Male Female 202 1051 16 % 84 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 552 66 538 3 5 43 44 % 5 % 43 % >1 % >1 % 3 % Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 225 78 858 18 % 6 % 68 % In participants’ homes Public building/facility/park: Milwaukee County Courthouse Other: Task Force on Family Violence Other: Aurora Family Services Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $75,000 Project leveraging $145,000 DCF- Personnel and overhead costs $1000 Offender fees - O verhead costs $54,500 Charitable Contributions- Personnel and Overhead costs Collaborations Alma Center Referrals to project Milw. Child Abuse Review Team (includes 10 community systems, such as law enforcement and BMCW) Referrals to project; Collaborations to improve systems; Personnel trained Legal Action of Wisconsin, Inc. Legal referrals from project Latina Resource Center Co-facilitation for professional training Hmong Friendship Association Co-facilitation for professional training 62 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Task Force on Family Violence Primary Activities: Logic Model Project: Ending Violence through Education / Child Witness to Domestic Violence Project Agency: Task Force on Family Violence Goals Goal #1 – Identify, engage, and support victims of substantiated cases of domestic abuse and their children in order to reduce their exposure to further violence. Objectives (Activities) Partner contact advocates reach out by phone and mail to victims and child witnesses; enroll in support groups or Parenting classes; provide access to resources Outputs 1000 outreach attempts (500 referrals * 2 efforts each); 250 successful contacts; 125 clients engage ongoing services; 50 clients attend ongoing support groups that meet once per week for two hours; 24 mothers attend Parenting classes (12-wk course, 2 hrs/wk) Outcomes (with indicators) Mothers will learn about the destructive effects of violence on self and children, learn how to help children heal, and reduce future DV-related incidents (self-reports, safety plans, goal-attainment scaling, Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory, CCAP) Goal #2 - Develop and provide training on child witness to domestic violence issues for Milwaukee’s Child Abuse Response Team (CART) membership. Trainings of CART member employees on how to respond to children who have witnessed DV CWDVS trains 400 professionals in a series of workshops CART member employees will learn how to respond more sensitively and effectively to child witnesses (written evaluations of trainings) Goal #3 – Provide advocacy services to families with children adversely affected by witnessing domestic violence. Case management, logistical support, and referrals to other services as needed (e.g. family law attorneys to assist with custody and placement issues ) CWDVS advocates for 300 protective parents with approximately two children each, for a total of 900 individuals served Families will receive material support, advocacy, and case management so that they can move on to lead lives free from domestic violence (client satisfaction surveys and tracking of referrals/services) Goal #4 – Provide ageappropriate support and educational groups for children affected by witnessing domestic violence. Age-appropriate groups for children to learn how to express their feelings about DV and begin the healing process Three 12-week classes meeting 2 hrs/wk will serve a total of 58 child witnesses Children will learn that violence is unacceptable. They will feel less depressed, less responsible for the violence, and more safe (self-reports, Child Exposure to Domestic Violence Scale, and interviews with mother on topics related to curriculum, school performance, and behavior) Brighter Futures Outcome: Reduce child abuse and neglect Program Activity • • ∑• • ∑• • ∑• 1,532 outreach attempts with 766 referrals made 350 clients engaged in ongoing services 99 clients attended ongoing support groups 33 mother attended parenting classes 395 child welfare professionals trained 468 protective parents received advocacy services 66 child witnesses served in 12-week class sessions Evidence-Based Programming “Helping Children Who Witness Domestic Violence: A Guide for Parents,” Meg Crager and Lily Anderson, Minnesota Center against Violence and Abuse, 1997 Outcomes The program significantly exceeded most of its planned participation targets. The program reported the following outcomes: 100% of mothers participating in parenting classes reported learning about the effects of domestic violence and how to help their children; 100% crafted safety plans. 95% of mothers reported that their children who participated in program groups exhibited improved behavior and communication skills; and 100% of families who sought services received safety planning, support and referrals to internal and community resources. 95% of professional trainees reported learning how to better work with child witnesses. The program utilized a combination of evaluation instruments, Adult Adolescent Parenting Inventory (AAPI), service tracking and facilitator observations to assess outcomes. Outcome Analysis The Task Force continues to engage in program improvement; an area of emphasis for 2009 is further diversification of facilitators in terms of gender and ethnic origin and additional efforts to train staff in providing cultural competent services to persons who are Latino, Asian or Native American. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 63 Walker’s Point Youth and Family Center 2030 West National Avenue, Milwaukee, WI 53204 Director Name Andre Olton - walkersp@sbcglobal.net Brighter Futures Project Name Nurturing Program for Parents and Adolescents Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Mary Pat O’Hara - mpoempowerment@sbcglobal.net Project Description The Nurturing Program is designed to help teens and parents deal with the stress and conflict often associated with adolescence, and assist parents who are having trouble encouraging responsible behaviors in their teens. In families where there may be hitting, physical or emotional abuse, or a high risk for abuse, the program teaches ways to interrupt these behaviors through support, education and nurturing. In this way the program addresses not only potentially abusive behavior of the parents, but also teaches teens to respond well to their own needs and develop good parenting skills. The Walker’s Point Nurturing Program uses this strength-based nationally validated approach to child abuse prevention, involving a structured educational and group support experience. It teaches adolescents and their parents greater self-awareness and healthier and more positive ways to interact in order to strengthen family relationships and reduce the potential for abuse and neglect. Inherently family-focused, it also helps them develop empathy and self-awareness, emphasize the positive, clarify and establish appropriate family roles, and foster developmentally realistic expectations for adolescents. IOM Classification Indicated Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times - 4-9 times 24 10-18 times 81 19 times or more - Unduplicated Participants 105 Program Setting Percent 23 % 77 % - School: West Allis/West Milwaukee School District, Nativity Jesuit Middle School Community or youth center: La Causa Family Resource Center, St. Stephen’s Family Life Center, Children’s Outing Association Church/faith institution: Nativity Jesuit Middle School Gender Male Female 34 71 32 % 68 % Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $75,000 Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 15 46 44 - - - 14 % 44 % 42 % - Project leveraging Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 3 52 60 3 % 50 % 57 % Program Funding $28,393 Local Fundraising- Matching funds for project operation $7,425 In-kind Support- Volunteers serving as group facilitators Collaborations West Allis/West Milwaukee School District Provided project site, group facilitators Nativity Jesuit Middle School P rovided project site, group facilitators St. Stephen’s Family Life Center Provided project site, family recruitment, supplies La Causa Family Resource Center Provided project site, family recruitment, food Children’s Outing Association Provided project site, family recruitment Task Force on Family Violence Family recruitment, group facilitators 64 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Walker’s Point Youth and Family Center Primary Activities: Logic Model EXHIBIT 1 Agency Name: Goals To prevent and/or reduce the incidence of child abuse and neglect for families of adolescents through: Increasing empathy, selfesteem and self-awareness in parents and adolescents; Teaching parents alternatives to corporal punishment, and teaching adolescents skills in behavior management; Teaching parents ageappropriate expectations of their adolescents, and establishing appropriate roles for parents and children within the family. Project Name: Objectives (Activities) Outputs Outcomes (with indicators) Provide at least seven separate series of the Nurturing Program for Parents and Adolescents. At least 50 families will take part in seven Nurturing Program groups. Each Nurturing Program series will last about 12 weeks, with each weekly session lasting two hours. At least 85% of families will successfully complete the group program. Each group will be led by a Lead Facilitator and at least three other group co-facilitators. At least 15 persons will successfully complete the Annual Training Institute. Provide an Annual Training Institute for new volunteer group facilitators, in order to expand the pool of trained volunteer group co-facilitators. At least 90% of parents and 90% of adolescents will increase knowledge or skills of effective parenting (as evidenced by a rise in scores from pretest to posttest on the Nurturing Quiz, on the self-esteem inventory, and/or at least two of the five subscales of the AdultAdolescent Parenting Inventory.) At least 67% of parents and adolescents will increase knowledge and skills of effective parenting (as evidenced by a rise in scores from pretest to posttest on the Nurturing Quiz, on the self-esteem inventory, and/or at least two of the five subscales of the AdultAdolescent Parenting Inventory.) Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures Program Activity • 38 families participated in 7 Nurturing Program groups offered during the year • 89% of families who participated successfully completed the group program • 19 persons successfully completed the Annual Nurturing Program Training Institute Evidence-Based Programming Nurturing Program Outcomes The program met 76% of its participation goal (50 families planned vs. 38 families actual) but exceeded its planned completion rate (85% planned vs. 89% actual) and trained 19 persons at the Annual Training Institute, four more than planned (15). In addition, the program reported that 100% of adolescents and 84% of parents increased either their knowledge or skills of effective parenting and 65% of adolescents and 71% of parents and 76% of adolescents and 61% of parents increased both knowledge and skills of effective parenting. The Nurturing Quiz, self-esteem inventory, and the Adult-Adolescent Parenting Inventory were used to assess outcomes. Outcome Analysis The Nurturing Program, though high effective, represents a big time commitment for families – many of whom are struggling with basic needs issues - making recruitment and retention very challenging. Walker’s Point provides gas stipends, bus tickets, childcare and food to help families overcome some of the barriers to participation. Referral to other community resources is also incorporated into the program. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 65 West Allis Police Department 11301 W. Lincoln Ave., West Allis WI 53227 Director Name Brighter Futures Project Name Brighter Futures Project Lead Staff Name Capt. Charles Unger - cunger@ci.west-allis.wi.us Safe Kids/Safe Neighborhoods Lt. Edward Benish WAPD - ebenish@ci.west-allis.wi.us Joanie Luedtke WA/WM Family Resource Center jluedtke@earthlink.net Mary Sue Opperman WA Health Dept mopperman@ci.west-allis.wi.us Melissa Hanson WA Health Dept - mhanson@ci.west-allis.wi.us Project Description This project is a collaborative effort of three agencies: Family Resource Center, Health Department, and Police Department. The Family Resource Center developed the “We Grow Together” program, designed to help parents teach their children the importance of healthy bodies and minds. This is accomplished in a fun, child-friendly environment with hands-on activities that promote wellness and safety. This is incorporated into the “Calling all Dads” program, Reading Buddies and family playgroups. Activities include workshops on nutrition, fussy eaters, well-baby checks, dental care, stranger awareness, and fire safety. The West Allis Health Department works in cooperation with the FRC and School District to provide “Two for the Show,” a child development initiative for parents and their two year olds. This program is a creative screening approach to identify potential learning or developmental concerns for the child. Referrals are made for further developmental screening, lead poisoning, immunizations, WIC and parenting concerns. The Police Department sponsors programs and initiatives designed to help build strong families and reduce crime and disorder in neighborhoods. These family programs promote neighborhood safety, youth and family development, and help reduce the availability of tobacco and alcohol products to youth. All programs are based on a community-wide, collaborative approach for the development of youth and a safe and healthy environment for families. IOM Classification Universal Direct Participant Description Participation Frequency Number Jan. 1 to Dec. 31, 2008 1-3 times 8436 4-9 times 11 10-18 times 18 19 times or more 253 Unduplicated Participants 8718 Program Setting Percent 97 % >1 % >1 % 3 % Gender Male Female 4135 4583 48 % 52 % Ethnic Origin African American Latino/Hispanic Caucasian Asian Native American Other 262 784 7152 177 171 172 3 % 9 % 82 % 2 % 2 % 2 % Age 0-11 years 12-17 years 18 years + 1053 982 6184 12 % 9 % 79 % School: Hoover Elementary School Community or youth center: WA/WM Family Resource Center Public building/facility/park: Betty Brinn Children’s Musuem; Swiss Turners Gym; M&M Gym; Stonefire Pizza and Play Area; West Allis Health Department; West Allis Police Department; West Allis Police Sub Station; West Allis Farmers Market Other: M&W Kids Clubhouse Theatre Program Funding Total amount of Brighter Futures funding in 2008: $75,000 Project leveraging In-kind $500 $2500.00 $1000.00 $500.00 $48,535 City of West Allis- Staffing for event Citizen donations West Allis CDBG Rotary Foundation We Care & Pocket Peelers WA Block Grant Collaborations West Allis Health Department P rovided financial assistance. Personnel worked the event to guide parents in assessing their child for obvious developmental deficits and to provide counseling and follow-up for all areas of concern. Marquette University- College of Nursing Nursing students provided assistance to families with more than one child so adults could concentrate on their two year old. Also provided additional assessment. West Allis resident (local benefactor) A nnual philanthropic donation for program giveaways Professionals from the West Allis/ West Milwaukee School District Personnel (speech pathologist, child development specialist, early childhood educator, social worker) worked the event to provide information regarding school readiness, parenting, and development. Head Start Director of programming provided information and opportunity for clients to sign up for Head Start programming 66 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report West Allis Police Department Family Resource Center Advertised Two for the Show event and referred clients to event Luther Memorial Church Provide location for Shake, Rattle & Grow Hoover Elementary School Reading Buddies (students in ELI Program & Staff Support ) West Allis Police Department Provide Stranger Awareness & Safety for families West Allis Fire Department F ire Safety & Fireman friends for Toddlers West Allis Health Department Nutrition Information & Health Info for toddlers & moms Primary Activities: Logic Model Agency Name: ___West Allis Police Department Project Name: Safe Kids/Safe Neighborhoods EXHIBIT 1 Objectives (Activities) Outputs Name: Programs for Outcomes (with indicators) Goal Agency Name: Agape Community Center Project Youth and Family Development (Police) (Police) (Police) (Police) People will feel safer in their We will sponsor a community By providing activities for youth(with indicators) neighborhoods. Objectives (Activities)Over 7,000 people will benefit Outputs Outcomes Goals safety festival, as well as youth from our programs this year. and families, securing homes, (FRC) 1) Increased resistance skills: 75% of and family programs, delivery preventing illegal purchases The Family Resource Centers core participantsofwill demonstrate an 1) Provide after school program1) 235 youth ages 7-13 and For youth participants to neighborhood 14,000 watch (FRC) alcohol and tobacco, and getting will work with parents to ability to resist negative peer pressure ming to 375 neighborhood youth ages 240 teens 15-19 will enroll month, produce 50 Children will participate in people involvedand in their reduce the risksenvision, of childhood dangerous situations plan, and newsletters each7-19 that TV offer opportunities for our aca-Shake, Rattle &and attend after school proCrime Watch news cable Grow neighborhoods(Data we will see a YRBS, prevention curricSource: obesity. demic enrichment, personal and interachieve a future thatshow, sponsor the grams at least one time. decrease in juvenile ula pre/post-tests) Landlord Program. crime by 5%. personal development, and recreation. secure homes 50-70 children will participate in (Health Dept.) strengthens personal,training program, 2) Improved attitude of youth toward to prevent burglaries, and prevent our Healthy Snack’n2)Play (FRC) Average of 15 youth, 20 The Health Dept. will educate family, and neighbor70% of core participants will Provide summer programming for sales of tobacco2) and alcohol to groups. adopt healthy preteens, and 40 teens will45 Children willschool: parents regarding child demonstrate a positive 100 youth ages 4-12 to enhance minors. 20their children will participate in School programs habits during preschool years as attitude about hood prosperity. development and identify attend After school (Data Source: Supplemental development through recreational ourac“Lets Play in the prevention from obesity. They developmental delays in two each day. Questionnaire) Kitchen”program will take home and use the (FRC) tivities and experiential learning. year olds The Family Resource will provide activities from our workshops and 3) 100 youth ages 4-12 will 3) Improved ability to envision and plan workshops and programs programs. 3) Engageon a core group of 50 youth participate in Summer Youth for the future: 70% of core participants nutrition, exercise and early (Health Dept.) ages 11-19 and their families in intenProgram. will articulate a plan for a future of selfchildhood development that (Health Dept.) sufficiency and complete a vocational two years olds will attend sive prevention programming125 and the show. reduce the risks family of childhood Parents of the 125 year olds vocational preparedplantwo demonstrating support services including 4) 40 youth ages 11-19 and obesity by increasing their who attend will ness learn(Data something Source: Future planning each of the following: will successfully completenew about the effect awareness and providing healthy of dental assessment; resume; at least two inter• ATODA prevention curriculum prevention programming health, safety, nutrition, lead, alternatives. views and job readiness assessment) • Protective Behaviors delinquency (ATODA, Protective Behavimmunization and/or tobacco on prevention curriculum iors, and Abstinence curric(Health Dept.) their child’s development. 4) Reduce early on-set of ATODA exteen pregnancy ula), job readiness/vocational The Health Dept.•will Abstinence-based provide a perimentation and increase awareness of prevention preparation sessions, andIndicators: will STIs, etc. and risk of premature intimate Two for the Show event for 125 curriculum Evaluations Job readiness/vocational prepainvolvement. 50% of core participants two year olds in •the West Alliswork, as needed, with a famwill articulate with the use of brochures ration sessions West Milwaukee School District. Children with developmental ily case manager. and facilitation • Family case management sesdelays attending “Two for theof a prevention event to their peersand and family on one or both of sions when needed Show” will be identified the topic areas. (YSRB, pre/post test & referred. event. Indicator: referrals Brighter Futures Outcomes 1. 2. 3. 4. 5. Program Activity Reduced child abuse and neglect Reduced teen violence and other delinquent behavior Reduced non-marital teen pregnancy Reduced teen alcohol and other drug abuse Increased vocational preparedness and self-sufficiency 2008 Milwaukee Brighter Futures • ∑ 132 two year old children were screened for developmental and learning issues at Two for the Show conducted by the Health Department • ∑ 46 participated in Family Resource Center’s Shake, Rattle and Grow Program • ∑ 78 children participated in FRC’s Healthy Snack ‘n Playgroups ∑ • ∑ 11 children participated in FRC’s Let’s Play in the Kitchen ∑ • ∑ 8,436 people participated in community events; 14,000 neighborhood watch newsletters distributed monthly ∑ • ∑ L andlord training program and compliance checks of alcohol and tobacco sales to minors conducted Evidence-Based Programming Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents published by the American Academy of Pediatrics Ages & Stages Questionnaires: A Parent-Completed, Child Monitoring System Community Alliance against Drugs, US Department of Justice Outcomes The vast majority of this project’s participants (8.436 or 97.0%) participated in community events, brief training programs or other time-limited activities; this is a reflection of the community anti-drug nature of the Police Department’s component and the Health Department screening for two-year olds. A small portion but significant number (253 or 3.0%) participated very frequently; this represents Family Resource Center participants. Outcomes reported include: 126 (94%) of parents attending Two for the show indicated they learned something new; 67 children were given a total of 80 referrals for dental, lead testing, WIC, and public health nursing services. Planned objectives for the FRC were exceeded in terms of families incorporating activities into their daily routine. The Police Department reported 8,115 unduplicated participants at events; completion of 150 compliance checks; 17 homes receiving surety upgrades, and active neighborhood crime watch. Outcome Analysis The West Allis Brighter Futures project has been a unique collaboration of three entities – Police Department, Health Department, and Family Resource Center. The collaboration reflects a good and sustained working relationship between the three entities led by the Police Department’s crime prevention and community anti-drug efforts which go beyond the traditional law enforcement role. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 67 Participant Anecdotes Agape This young man came to Agape Community Center in an angry state, confused and lost. While participating in ACC programs, he has grown and matured to be a responsible young man. He is currently attending college out of state and he still calls to gives updates about his progress and to see how he can help others that may be in the situation that he once was. Boys and Girls Club Mama D, Parent of 2 Sista Pride Teen Advisory Council Members: “In October 2008, I went to the She Ain’t Angry for Nothin’ conference. Sista Pride brought in this wonderful lady to talk about why teen girls are so angry and what can be done to remove unnecessary anger from their lives. I was supposed to be dropping my girls off because I had an appointment, but I could not make myself leave. Ms. Mischa Toland said something that changed my life, “Mothers who are angry and don’t have female friends produce daughters who model the same behavior. Some daughters are angry not due to their own anger, but because of their mother’s anger.” All I could do was cry. Maybe the reason my youngest daughter was fighting in school and at the club is because she saw me fight and argue with women. I was always one of those parents to say “I can do what I want to do cuz I’m fully grown.” What I did not realize is how it was affecting my kids. That day, Ms. Natalie approached me about Mama Pride. She told me it was not by chance that I was at the conference and that she had been working on something with me in mind. We talked for hours about what the needs of the parents were and what Mama Pride would look like. I could not believe when she asked me to lead the group. She saw something in me that no one saw before- the desire to lead by example for my daughters and to do better. I am woman enough to admit I could not do it by myself, but thanks to Sista Pride, we are going to make Mama Pride help women like myself rise above our circumstances to help our children.” COA The Walkers have three children participating in youth development programming at COA. The Walkers’ struggle with a number of issues common to the families COA serves including AODA and unemployment. In addition, one of their children has some special needs. Mr. and Mrs. Walker have been trying to convince the school of their child’s needs but have met many obstacles. The school has denied additional support for the child because she is “borderline” on some of the testing. During the 2008 school year their child was really struggling academically. The parents met with COA staff to develop a plan for incentive-based tutoring after school. Mrs. Walker expressed her fears that an upcoming IEP meeting for her child would again result in no additional services or support. COA staff offered to attend the IEP with Mr. and Mrs. Walker. Having a COA staff that was knowledgeable about the IEP process and that was able to advocate on behalf of the parents and the child resulted in additional math and reading support for the child. Mrs. Walker wrote a letter to COA staff expressing her gratitude: “I just really wanted to express my thanks and appreciation to you for going with me to the IEP. I told you that when they didn’t give me services last year I ran out of that school in tears, well, yesterday I almost did the same thing but instead they were tears of joy. You do not know how much I appreciate your support with all of my children… and without you I would not have found the courage to pursue continuing my education and furthering my skills. You mean a whole lot to our family.” HeartLove Place Ministries Ms. V grew up in an abusive household. Her dad was an alcoholic and was very abusive when he was drunk. She wasn’t allowed to express any emotions. The only emotion that was modeled to Ms. V was anger and the expression of that emotion was violent blow ups. When Ms. V was 20, she fell in love, got pregnant and had a daughter who happened to have special needs. She and the father tried to make it work but they were just too young. Ms. V said “I didn’t have a relationship with Jesus so I didn’t really have a vision for my life. I also didn’t learn to release the pain from my childhood. We broke up and I raised my daughter on my own.” Because she hadn’t dealt with the issues from her past and learned how to respond appropriately to frustration, Ms. V physically abused her daughter until she was eventually taken away from her by the courts. “Having my daughter taken away was the hardest thing I ever had to live through,” Ms. V said. It was a huge wake up call, and was the beginning of the healing process. Eventually the father of Ms. V’s daughter would be awarded primary custody of their daughter, however, and Ms. V was released from the criminal part of her offenses. 68 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Participant Anecdotes Ms. V lived at St. Catherine’s Transitional Home for a couple of years when she started taking anger management and Nurturing God’s Way courses. Now Ms. V sees her daughter regularly and is attending school to be an Optician’s Assistant; a nationally recognized certification. “I decided that since I wouldn’t be able to get my daughter back right away, I decided that I would use this time to go back to school to get a better job that can support her,” Ms. V said.. “Before HeartLove Place, I was out of options and very frustrated. But what is different about Nurturing God’s Way is that it incorporates Christian values into the programming. Ms. Neal is so open about her life and the struggles she has went through, she also live the principles that she teaches. Because of her and what I have learned, I now have options as a parent and hope for the future. She taught me to utilize the Christian principles of patience, and nurturing, love and support.” Journey House A female senior student at South Division High School who has been in the program for almost two years recently received a $10,000 a year, four-year scholarship to Carroll College, here in Milwaukee. This student has benefited from the program through college guidance, advising, and participating in college tours and the mentoring program. She is currently employed at Mayor Barrett’s office as a youth intern through Journey House. Additionally, she is applying to Harvard and has been interviewed for admission by a Harvard Alumnus. This Journey House youth is ranked in the top 5% of her graduating class and wants to pursue a career in business. She will be the first person in her immediate family to attend college. Latino Community Center There was a student being suspended who needed to be escorted out of the building. An LCC staff member realized that this young man was under the influence of illegal substances. The staff person who escorted this student to his locker and then out of the building asked him if, after his suspension, he could try for at least one week not to come to school high. He was hesitant but replied yes. At this time, the young man was failing all of his classes and barely came to school. When he returned he kept up his end of the agreement and got involved in the after-school Community Learning Center and also attended tutoring classes. By the next marking period, he was coming to school every day, no longer used illegal substances, joined the football team and his plan is to graduate from high school. Medical College of Wisconsin A 20 year old Teen-Tot mom with two children, a 2-year old (healthy) and 5-month old with special needs (congenital deformity caused by abnormal facial development during gestation) was initially referred in 2007 for Job Assistance. During the intake process, program staff discovered multiple risk factors including an unstable living environment and lack of family support. The client had also failed to complete 9th grade and was unable to read. Additionally, she was noncompliant with W-2 requirements and with clinic medical appointments for both children. Due to noncompliance, the client was later referred to Milwaukee Bureau of Child Welfare. Program staff, the health care provider and the patient discussed a viable plan to assist her with coordination of medical appointments, transportation for the baby’s scheduled surgery for cleft palate and follow- up visits with program staff. In 2008, with the assistance of Opportunities Unlimited staff, things began to turn around and the client has made significant progress; she is currently receiving supplemental income (SSI-Disability Income) for the baby with special needs. She resides in her own apartment, is compliant with W-2 requirements and is maintaining medical appointments and scheduled visits with program staff at those visits. She decided to concentrate on her child’s health and opted not to work or return to school at this time. Milwaukee Christian Center A young lady who attend Kids Place that was named the 2008 Super Achiever of the Year. She attended Kids Place on just about a daily basis throughout 2008. She meets all federal guidelines for free and reduced lunch. As a Caucasian, she is in the minority on the south side but has shown that she can get along with everyone and respects everybody which she gets back from all her peers. She will have a brighter future. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 69 Participant Anecdotes Modjeska Theatre Company During our first production of 2008, Fiddler on the Roof, there were concerns about a 14 year old girl who was sharing her sexuality issues with younger cast members backstage. While the discussion as her sexuality was inappropriate, nothing else was occurring. Just talk. A plan of action was discussed. The directors came together to explain to this young lady that these discussions were inappropriate in the theatre and while the directors supported her desire to express herself, the rehearsals were not the proper place for this form of expression. This seemed to work and everything calmed down. When it came to casting the next show, this same young lady showed up at the auditions with a shaved head. I asked her about it and she shrugged her shoulders, telling me she was mad at some kids at school. She then added that she hoped her Mom would buy her a wig to wear at school as the “kids at school can be quite mean.” A couple days later, after I cast the young lady in our show, the mother, a foster parent, approached the directors, thanking them for casting the girl as the Modjeska Theatre was the one place where the 14 year old felt safe. I was asked to support the young lady and work with the foster mother and a therapist to help the girl. Rehearsals went well and the young lady was generally appropriate during rehearsals though she now wanted to be known by a male name she had adopted. Following the first performance of this show, the young lady’s therapist approached the artistic director and thanked him for everything the Modjeska’s artistic staff was doing for this young lady. The therapist reported that participating in the Modjeska’s program was very helpful for the girl. Apparently, in addition to some of the other concerns, there was a history of running away and other dangerous behavior, including self-harming events. Since she has attended the Modjeska’s program, all of the concerning behavioral characteristics have vanished. Neighborhood House Jared is a young man who really took off with the teen incentive program during study tables. Jared would never bring his homework in before we started the incentive program, but after we did he worked hard each night to earn tickets so he could attend the special pizza party at the end of the month. His grades turned around and he became more confident in his abilities educationally. Neu-Life Community Resource Center Davey started coming to Neu-Life in early 2008. He was a difficult youth; he had trouble following the rules and getting along with the other youth. He was suspended from school numerous times as well. We decided that he needed a little bit of “one-on-one” programming with some of our staff. Once we started to give him some individual attention, he started to make positive gains. We worked on his anger problem, his conflict resolution issues and his social skills. After about 4 months of some individual attention, he really started to understand the program rules and why everyone needs to follow them. He no longer gets in fights or argues; he has anger management skills he uses; and he also is getting better behavior reports from the teachers. His performance at school has also improved. We are very proud of Davey and we will continue to work on his social skills with him. We are grateful that he came to Neu-Life where we could give him some individual help. He is truly making positive strides in the right direction. Next Door Foundation Deonte came to our program with severe behavioral program. He was defiant, uncooperative, and lacked social skills. The staff noticed that Deonte acted out when he was over-stimulated by larger group. To help Deonte become acclimated to our program and more social, the staff assigned him to small group activities where he thrived. This was a confidence builder and an opportunity for positive reinforcement. Deonte still needs to be redirected at time but he has made noticeable improvement. Pathfinders—Youth Development Talisha was 15 when she first arrived at Pathfinders Youth Shelter to receive services along with her two siblings aged 17 and 14. They arrived at our front door homeless due to a family conflict with relatives they were staying with at the time. Mother resided at Cathedral Square shelter while her children stayed at the shelter. Upon discharge from the shelter, Talisha’s mother was able to secure an apartment where the family resided for a few months. Chronic poverty was a leading factor in the family becoming homeless again. Transitioning to another family member’s residence proved to be temporary as they were soon evicted. This resulted in the family becoming scattered throughout the area as they sought places to live. Talisha has transitioned into many different living environments, some safer than others, but still unstable due to the complexity of family chronic poverty and homelessness. During her times of constant change of living environments, Talisha remained connected to the program. She participated in the peer program and volunteered her time when she could in the shelter. Her involvement grew as she became actively involved in the Activity Group and Leadership Meetings. She has been very instrumental in providing feedback for future planning ventures such as the development of a Drop-in Center. Currently, Talisha has been accepted into the University of Wisconsin-Milwaukee and will be attending classes in the fall. Her resiliency, internal coping skills, and support systems have allowed her to achieve greater success. 70 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Participant Anecdotes Pathfinders—Hand in Hand During a sexual violence prevention presentation, a 6th grader at MEC middle school asked to be excused from the presentation. She was overwhelmed with emotion regarding the subject matter of sexual violence. The teacher and the Pathfinders community educator respectfully excused her and the school social worker talked with her. Due to the intense prevention work presented in this child’s classroom, she was able to disclose to the school social worker that she had been sexually abused in the past. This presentation empowered the child to feel comfortable and trusting enough to disclose this information to school staff. The social worker was able to contact this child’s mother to find out if she was aware of her daughter’s current trauma regarding sexual abuse and to confirm the sexual abuse had been reported. The mother was given sexual violence resources that can provide help for both the child and the mother. After this took place, this student decided to attend and participate in the rest of the presentations in a very effective and helpful way. Pearls for Teen Girls Karen, a Silver Spring Academy Pearls participant, became a student of Silver Spring Academy the beginning of 2008 after she was kicked out of several other schools. She stood at least 5’11” inches tall as an eight grader and used her stature to intimidate others. In the beginning, every word that came from her mouth was very profane. She stayed on the suspension list as a result of her language as well as her behavior. However, once she began to participate in Pearls, small shifts started to appear and, the more she came to school, these shifts began to happen more frequently. Her whole attitude toward her peers, teachers and family members started to move forward in a positive direction. Her mother contacted the Principal and the Pearls Coordinator to say that her daughter has made a change for the better and that she was proud of what her daughter has accomplished so far. Her grade point average went from a 0.0 GPA to a 2.8 by the time she graduated from middle school. In the beginning of the year, the school staff believed she would not graduate from 8th grade. This girl started to believe in herself, she started to love herself and she began to strive to achieve and was one of the students who graduated and received the most improved student award. She credits her school year being a successful one to Pearls. Safe & Sound Working with 6th District Police Capt. Gaglione, Alderman Donovan, Probation and Parole, Sharon Blando of Department of Neighborhood Services Graffiti Removal Program, and local Safe Places, Community Partner Aaron Edwards played an integral role in the removal of hundreds of instances of graffiti on homes and businesses during neighborhood improvement efforts. This project called ‘Operation Pay Back’ was highlighted in the news and continued throughout the summer and into the fall. The young men involved were members of the ‘WR’ graffiti crew that were arrested and sentenced to community service while avoiding a felony record. Through Operation Payback, offenders have gotten to know Community Partners, law enforcement and residents and gained a greater appreciation for the harm they have caused. Aaron has encouraged them to get involved in Safe Places and take advantage of opportunities. TRUE Skool presented to the group and is working with several of the offenders to train them in positive and legal outlets for their painting. With Aaron’s encouragement, one young man enrolled in Journey House’s GED program, which is a funded Safe Place. He called Aaron to just say “thank you” after he got his GED. He told him that it really helped to have people like Aaron that believe in him. He especially appreciated how open and honest he could be with the officers at 6th District and it helped him realize how his actions had harmed real people and he just needed to “grow up.” The program has been so positive and successful that other offenders have contacted Aaron to join in and help keep the South side graffiti free. St. Gabriel’s Church of God in Christ A student who was ready to drop out of school, with health and truancy problems, and low self esteem received mentoring in our program. We assigned him duties and responsibilities within the program to help with our younger participants, including helping to tutor younger students. By receiving encouragement and support, but more importantly love, this young man’s report card for the last three marking periods produced at 4.0 GPA. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 71 Participant Anecdotes St. Vincent de Paul Society “These sessions have been working for me because I have seen an improvement in our behavior toward each other. I am talking about myself as well as my daughter. I have been doing the techniques of “Stop, Listen and Breathe” when tension is escalating between us. Instead of going back and forth, I now stop talking and listen to what she is upset about so that I won’t react to what I see her doing or saying. As she is talking, I just slow my breathing down and when I answer her, I speak calmly. We used to get into it every day - sometimes twice a day. Now it is down to maybe once in seven days. In addition, I have been working on myself too, you know, I’m focused on been more positive and optimistic.” The above quote is from a mother who participates in the “Circle of Women” support/educational group. The daughter is 12 years old, and has a diagnosed mental illness. Prior to the attending the VFRC groups, the mother struggled with giving the daughter psych-medications. The mother had chosen not to give the child her medications as prescribed. When the child was not taking her medications regularly the mother would experience aggressive behavior and outbursts from her daughter. The mother received education on mental illness and medications through her participation in the group. Her attitude toward the medications began to change. She now will give her daughter medications more often than in the past. The mother now expresses she can see the difference in her child’s behavior when the child is on her meds. The family has made good strides in understanding mental illness and the medications. Silver Spring Neighborhood Center KJ, was involved in the Teen Leadership Club and LADY for three years. She graduated from high school in 2008 with a GPA above 3.0, has not become a teen parent, and has entered college with the desire to be an educator. However, life has not been easy for KJ. She is the oldest of three children being raised by a single mother who struggles to balance working, parenting and her own personal issues and barriers. With the guidance of the LADY coordinator, KJ enrolled in college without the support of the mother (she refused to sign the financial aid papers). She also enrolled her younger siblings in programs at SSNC which helped to improve their academic performance and alleviate some of the stress on the mother. KJ is currently employed in SSNC’s Community Learning Center (CLC) and Walgreens while maintaining full time student status at Cardinal Stritch University. Despite her busy schedule KJ continues to attend weekly Teen Leadership Club meetings and serves as a role model at the LADY program meetings. Task Force on Family Violence Beth was referred to the Task Force on Family Violence by her initial assessment worker. The worker was considering detaining the children because she didn’t feel that Beth could protect her kids from their father, her abusive ex-husband. However, Beth was willing to move into her parents’ home with her four children in order to keep the kids away from their father. At her parents’ house, Beth and her children were treated poorly, often berated and made to feel like burdens on the household. All Beth wanted was a place of her own, where Drew, her ex-husband, could not bother her. Beth came to group diligently, participating when she had something to say and always listening. One day she spoke up very clearly and said, “I said “no” to Drew today. This was the first time in my life I have ever been able to say no to him.” The entire group applauded for her. As she had stopped taking Drew’s calls, he had shown up at her place of employment, arguing with her in the hallway. She told him he had to leave immediately, and she wasn’t willing to discuss it further. Without hesitation in group, she said it was what she was learning in group that gave her the confidence to stand up for herself. Throughout the group Beth struggled with living in her parents’ home; her kids were unhappy, and she felt like an inadequate mother. She could clearly identify that she remained with her husband too long because he was in charge of the finances, and she would never had had to live with her parents. But she remained strong. At the end of group, she had found her own place, and one of our facilitators helped her to locate furniture and appliances. They had moved out and the first thing she and her kids did was enjoy a turkey dinner around their mini Christmas tree. Shortly after group ended, Beth was promoted at work (and additional $3.00 an hour) and things were going very well. 72 Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report Participant Anecdotes The Parenting Network Creating Lasting Family Connections and MELD Our parent educator has been working with an adolescent mom, “Tiffany,” for more than six months. Tiffany’s infant was removed from the home where she lived with her biological mother because of domestic violence. Tiffany had a long personal history of child abuse, living in and out of foster care between the ages of three and fifteen. She is now in a stable situation living with her aunt. After completing 14 weeks of Effective Black Parenting (a collaborative program between The Parenting Network and the Vincent FRC) as well as participating in weekly classes in high school, Tiffany, currently 17, was recently reunited with her eight-monthold daughter. She is ecstatic – and very determined to be a good mom! The Parenting Network—Family Links “Cheryl” was referred to Family Links by her sister, who had been working with the program for several months. Cheryl stated that she wanted to move out of her sisters’ house and find a home of her own, but did not have the income to do so. Cheryl was in her sixth month of pregnancy, and had two pre-teen children. Cheryl expressed a willingness to go to a homeless shelter while she worked towards getting her own home. Cheryl stated that she has struggled with depression, and is concerned about the pregnancy. After providing Cheryl with shelter information, Cheryl was able to get in to one of the homeless shelters. The Family Links Coordinator assisted Cheryl with the transition into the shelter, and worked with the Case Manager at the shelter to help the client with her reported needs. Cheryl made connection with a therapist and psychiatrist, and resumed her medication for depression. She also got connected to a Prenatal Care Coordinator who will help to address her concerns about her pregnancy. She also was able to file her taxes and used this money and support from the Red Cross to find an apartment. This specialist assisted her in getting moved in to her new home, and getting supplies for her and the family. Cheryl continues to be proactive in seeking services for herself and family, but needed some supportive services to make the initial connections. Cheryl reports that she is very thankful that Family Links helped her make it through a difficult time, and she feels that it kept her from sinking deeper into depression. Walker’s Point Youth and Family Center A family consisting of mom, grandmother, a teen boy and teen girl participated in our Fall, Crianza group (dad worked 2nd shift). From the beginning the team reported that the family members were very quiet and appeared sad. They continued to come each week and participated, but never really opened up. This changed dramatically during the session on loss and grief. The grandmother sobbed as she told her story of the violent death of her son that had happened over a year ago as well as her sense of isolation with her family peers being in Mexico. The group rallied around her and she was told they were all her family now; they were there to support her. The team said that there was an immediate transformation in this family. A family tragedy had been named and the grieving could begin. The grandmother in her final program evaluation spoke of the tremendous amount of community love she gained from this group and how much happier they were as a family. West Allis Police Department At the October 2008 Two for the Show event, staff members observed that a couple, who were in the middle of a divorce, was participating at the event. They were verbalizing demeaning comments and demonstrating animosity toward the other parent, often in front of their two year old. It was discreetly arranged that a Public Health Nurse (PHN) with advanced training and experience in the Love and Logic parenting theory was able to privately consult with the two adults on the detrimental effects that their angry interchange could have on their two year old. The PHN also provided them with written resources on upcoming parenting classes that may help the entire family through this difficult transition. Milwaukee Brighter Futures 2008 Year End Report 73 For more information about the Milwaukee Brighter Futures Initiative, contact: Racquel R. Bell Project Coordinator Milwaukee Brighter Futures Initiative Community Advocates 4906 W. Fond du Lac Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53216 414-449-4767 Ext 155 racquelb@communityadvocates.net For more information about Brighter Futures evaluation activities, contact: Janice Wilberg, Ph.D. Brighter Futures Evaluation Coordinator Wilberg Community Planning LLC 3269 N. Summit Ave., Milwaukee, WI 53211 414-962-3726 jwilberg@wi.rr.com