as a PDF

Transcription

as a PDF

ARTICLE IN PRESS
Quaternary Science Reviews 23 (2004) 1435–1454
Is the central Arctic Ocean a sediment starved basin?
Jan Backmana,*, Martin Jakobssonb, Reidar L^vliec, Leonid Polyakd,
Lawrence A. Febod
b
a
Department of Geology and Geochemistry, Stockholm University, Stockholm 10691, Sweden
Center for Coastal and Ocean Mapping/Joint Hydrographic Center, University of New Hampshire, USA
c
Institute of Solid Earth Physics, University of Bergen, Norway
d
Byrd Polar Research Center, Ohio State University, USA
Abstract
Numerous short sediment cores have been retrieved from the central Arctic Ocean, many of which have been assigned
sedimentation rates on the order of mm/ka implying that the Arctic Basin was starved of sediments during Plio–Pleistocene times. A
review of both shorter-term sedimentation rates, through analysis of available sediment core data, and longer-term sedimentation
rates, through estimates of total sediment thickness and bedrock age, suggests that cm/ka-scale rates are pervasive in the central
Arctic Ocean. This is not surprising considering the physiographic setting of the Arctic Ocean, being a small land-locked basin since
its initial opening during Early Cretaceous times. We thus conclude that the central Arctic Ocean has not been a sediment starved
basin, either during Plio–Pleistocene times or during pre-Pliocene times. Rigorous chronstratigraphic analysis permits correlation of
sediment cores over a distance of B2600 km, from the northwestern Amerasia Basin to the northwestern Eurasia Basin via the
Lomonosov Ridge, using paleomagnetic, biostratigraphic, and cyclostratigraphic data.
r 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
1. Introduction
The Arctic Ocean is presently undergoing geoscientific
investigations of the type that occurred during the late
1940s through the 1960s in the Atlantic, Indian and
Pacific oceans. Seismic reflection and refraction data are
scarce in the Arctic Ocean and large areas are virtually
unsampled with respect to piston or gravity coring. The
vast majority of available cores are o10 m in length and
largely lack biostratigraphically useful calcareous and
siliceous microfossils. No drill cores exist from the ridges
or deep basins in the central Arctic Ocean. Considering
the limited geophysical and geological data available, it
is not surprising that hypotheses concerning Arctic
Ocean sedimentation rates are currently divergent. The
major point of disagreement is whether or not strongly
subdued rates of sedimentation persisted in the central
Arctic Ocean during Plio–Pleistocene times. The discrepancy between the two scenarios is large enough to
represent a major obstacle for improving our understanding of the paleoceanographic and paleoclimatic
*Corresponding author. Tel.: +46-8-164-720; fax: +46-8-674-7861.
E-mail address: backman@geo.su.se (J. Backman).
0277-3791/$ - see front matter r 2004 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2003.12.005
development in the central Arctic Ocean and its
influence on sub-polar seas.
The low sedimentation rate scenario is based on age
models suggesting Plio–Pleistocene rates that vary
between about 0.04 and 0.4 cm/ka. This scenario is
chiefly derived from cores raised from ridges in the
Amerasia Basin and implies that the majority of cores
presently available extend well into, or encompasses the
entire, Plio–Pleistocene (Clark et al., 1980). A central
thought in this scenario is that the low sedimentation
rate mode developed when sea-ice first formed, in the
Pliocene or earlier (Clark, 1971). One of the T-3 Ice
Island geophysicists expressed this idea in the following
way (Hall, 1979): ‘‘From his investigation of the more
than 100 [Alpha Ridge] cores which include probably
Middle Pliocene (3.5 Myr BP) material, Clark (1971)
was led to conclude that the Arctic Ocean has been
frozen since at least the Middle Pliocene, and probably
even longer. Low rates of sedimentation have accompanied this ice cover.’’ Here, we refer to this mode of
Arctic sedimentation as ‘sediment starved’.
The contrasting high sedimentation rate scenario is
based on age models suggesting rates that vary from
about one to a few cm/ka, based on cores from ridges
and basins in both the Amerasian and Eurasian parts of
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1436
J. Backman et al. / Quaternary Science Reviews 23 (2004) 1435–1454
the central Arctic Ocean (e.g. Jakobsson et al., 2000a;
Nowaczyk et al., 2001). This scenario implies that the
formation of sea-ice did not markedly decrease the
sediment supply and that most short cores rarely extend
beyond the Pleistocene. Erosion and winnowing may
have created low (mm/ka-scale) sedimentation rates in
the Arctic Basin and, vice versa, the influence of
turbidite deposits in the deep basins may have created
high sedimentation rates (Grantz et al., 1996, 1999;
Darby et al., 1997). These issues are however separate
from our key question, which is concerned with the
general sediment input to the Arctic Basin through time:
whether or not the sediment starved mode was a
pervasive condition through Late Neogene, Pleistocene
and Holocene times.
The purpose of this paper is to review the two
contrasting sedimentation rate scenarios: Have two
distinctly different modes of deposition governed the
Plio–Pleistocene sedimentation in the Arctic, one slow on
a mm/ka-scale and the other less so on a cm/ka-scale? Are
the underlying age models of the two depositional modes
realistic? If this is the case, can we determine where the two
modes apply and why? If this is not the case, can we
determine which of the two chronological models to reject?
Moreover, we discuss the sedimentation rate history of the
Arctic in terms of its physiographic setting, and whether or
not the sea-ice cover of the Plio–Pleistocene inhibited the
supply of sediments to the central Arctic Ocean. Finally,
we present a sediment core correlation along a transect
from the southwestern part of the Amerasia Basin to the
southwestern part of the Eurasia Basin, which provides a
crucial link between the sediment stratigraphies of the two
major Arctic Ocean basins.
A handful of short cores exists from the central Arctic
Ocean containing sediments of Mesozoic and Paleogene
ages (Clark, 1974; Bukry, 1984; Grantz et al., 2001).
These cores are not discussed further in this paper
because they only represent fragments of older sediment
sequences lacking accurate age control and because
these cores consequently do not provide insights about
sedimentation rates. The several hundred remaining
short cores may provide information on Plio–Pleistocene paleoenvironmental conditions and sedimentation
rates if their age/depth relationships can be determined.
In the absence of drill cores through central Arctic
sediment sections the longer-term Miocene through
Cretaceous sedimentation history must be estimated
from seismic reflection and refraction data showing
sediment thickness in combination with tectonic models
of seafloor ages.
Siberian and Chukchi Seas, the White Sea and the
narrow continental shelves of the Beaufort Sea, the
Arctic continental margins off the Canadian Arctic
Archipelago and northern Greenland. It is a small,
virtually land-locked ocean, making up a merely 2.6%
of the area, and 1.0% of the volume, of the World
Ocean (Jakobsson, 2002). The Fram Strait, a deep
passage between northeastern Greenland and northwestern Svalbard, is the only real break in the barrier of
continental shelves enclosing the Arctic Ocean. Today,
shelf areas occupy as much as 52.9% of the Arctic
Ocean total area (Jakobsson et al., 2003a), which is in
sharp contrast to the rest of the Worlds oceans where
the combined area of continental shelves and slopes
range from 9.1% to 17.7% (Menard and Smith, 1966).
The second largest physiographic province in the Arctic
Ocean comprises ridges, which again is unique compared to the rest of the World’s oceans where abyssal
plains dominate (Jakobsson et al., 2003a).
The deep central Arctic Ocean basin is commonly
divided into two major sub-basins: (1) the Eurasia Basin,
bounded by the Lomonosov Ridge and the shallow shelves
of the Barents, Kara, and Laptev Seas and northern
Greenland, and (2) the Amerasia Basin bounded by the
Lomonosov Ridge and the shelves of the East Siberian,
Chukchi, and Beaufort Seas and the Canadian Arctic
Archipelago. The Eurasia Basin is subdivided by the
Gakkel Ridge into the Amundsen and Nansen Basins and
the Amerasia Basin is subdivided by the Alpha-Mendeleev
Ridge complex into the Canada and Makarov Basins.
The shallow shelves receive huge amounts of sediments
discharged from some of the largest rivers on Earth. For
example, the Yenisey, Lena, and Ob, together with
Pechora, Kolyma, and Severnaya Dvina, drain two-thirds
of the entire Eurasian arctic landmass into the Arctic
Ocean (Peterson et al., 2002). The catchment area of the
Yenisey, Lena, and Ob alone (8060 103 km2, AARI,
1985) is nearly as large as the entire Arctic Ocean
(9541 103 km2, Jakobsson, 2002). Although the input
from rivers must have varied through time, the key
physiographic setting of the Arctic Ocean, a small basin
surrounded by huge land-masses, has remained constant
since its initial opening during presumably Early Cretaceous times. The thick sediment sections on abyssal plains
and the extensive continental rises are by-and-large a
product of this unique physiographic setting of the central
Arctic Ocean.
2. Physiographic setting of the Arctic Ocean
3.1. The mm-scale scenario
The Arctic Ocean is constrained by the broad
continental shelves of the Barents, Kara, Laptev, East
A total of 580 short (2–5 m) cores were collected from
Ice Island T-3 (Fletcher’s Ice Island or Ice Station
3. Sedimentation rates from piston, gravity, and box core
data
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Bravo) in the Amerasia Basin between 1952 and 1974
(Weber and Roots, 1990). The concept of low, mm/kascale rates, Plio–Pleistocene sedimentation rates in the
central Arctic Ocean originates from interpretations of
paleomagnetic polarity patterns in these T-3 cores,
particularly those that were retrieved from the Alpha
and Mendeleev ridges (e.g. Steuerwald et al., 1968;
Clark, 1970, 1971, 1996; Hunkins et al., 1971; Herman,
1974; Clark et al., 1980, 2000; Witte and Kent, 1988).
Analysis of the Amerasia Basin CESAR (Canadian
Expedition to Study the Alpha Ridge) cores also yielded
interpretations in favour of low sedimentation rates
(Aksu and Mudie, 1985; Aksu et al., 1988; Scott et al.,
1989), as did the study of a few cores from the
Lomonosov Ridge (Morris et al., 1985; Spielhagen
et al., 1997). Low sedimentation rates have also been
suggested for cores retrieved from the periphery of the
central Arctic (Northwind Ridge: Poore et al., 1993,
1994; Phillips and Grantz, 2001).
In a crucial synthesis paper published in 1980, Clark
and others established 13 correlatable lithostratigraphic
units, designated A to M, which include silty and
arenaceous lutites, and carbonate-rich, pinkish white
layers. The content of sand-sized material was considered to be the key sedimentary characteristic that was
used to correlate the 13 lithostratigraphic units ‘‘over
several hundred thousand square kilometers and in
several hundred cores.’’ Paleomagnetic–lithologic correlations were made in a few cores in which units M
through I were interpreted to belong to the Brunhes and
upper Matuyama chrons (Clark et al., 1980, Figs. 2, 30;
Table 2). The average sedimentation rate during the
Brunhes Chron was estimated at 0.11 cm/ka, corresponding to 0.13 cm/ka with an updated age estimate
(Shackleton et al., 1990) for the Brunhes/Matuyama
boundary. The average rate during the Matuyama
Chron was estimated to be 0.07 cm/ka, corresponding
to 0.10 cm/ka if using Shackleton’s estimate for the
duration of the Matuyama Chron.
The lower part of Clark’s lithostratigraphic units, H
through A, was correlated to the geomagnetic polarity
timescale (GPTS) in core FL 224, retrieved from the
Nautilus Basin north of the Chukchi Plateau. The oldest
unit (A) in this core was considered to be of Late
Miocene age: ‘‘The normal polarity magnetic signatures
suggest a maximum age of the oldest undisturbed
sediment in FL 224 to be 5.62 Myr. This age is the
oldest reliable date for in-place sediment in the Arctic
Ocean.’’ (Clark et al., 1980, p. 24). The 5.62 Ma estimate
is based on the timescale of LaBrecque et al. (1977) for
the onset of Anomaly 3A, corresponding to base Chron
C3An.2n in current terminology (Cande and Kent,
1992) and an age estimate of 6.555 Ma (Shackleton et al.,
1995). When using Shackleton’s age estimates of reversal
boundaries, the sedimentation rate in the critical core
FL 224 is 0.05 cm/ka between top Gauss (2.581 Ma) at
1437
100 cm core depth (within unit D) and top Chron
C3An.1n (5.875 Ma) at 255 cm core depth (within unit
A; Clark et al., 1980, Fig. 29). These combined
paleomagnetic-lithostratigraphic data are at the centre
of the ongoing discussion about sedimentation rates in
the central Arctic Ocean, as many of the workers that
employ Clark’s lithostratigraphic units also tend to
employ his age model of these units (e.g. Phillips and
Grantz, 1997, 2001; Jokat et al., 1999a). Two different
correlations (Minicucci and Clark, 1983; Clark, 1996)
between lithologic units A–M and chronostratigraphy
are presented in Fig. 1.
Previously, Steuerwald et al. (1968, Fig. 1) and Clark
(1970, Fig. 1) placed the Brunhes/Matuyama boundary
in the critical core FL 224 at B1 m core depth. Below
1 m depth in FL 224, the polarity pattern was
interpreted differently by these authors, showing no
agreement in number or relative length of the polarity
zones. Clark et al. (1980, Fig. 29, p. 18) introduced a
third interpretation that was ‘‘refined in the present
study. Interpretations in this paper were augmented by
the study and interpretation of physical sedimentological data not previously available.’’ Here, the number,
relative lengths and polarity directions, of the polarity
zones, were completely reinterpreted; for example, what
had been suggested as the Brunhes normal chron by
Steuerwald et al. (1968) and Clark (1970), was considered to be the Matuyama reversed chron by Clark
et al. (1980).
The paleomagnetic age model of Clark et al. (1980)
was challenged by Jones (1987), who cautioned that the
quality of the paleomagnetic data set varies widely, from
samples analysed with full stepwise demagnetisation and
six-spin measurements to no demagnetisation and only
one-spin measurements. By using only those cores that
had been demagnetised up to 50 Oe and that could be
placed into Clark’s lithostratigraphic units, 14 cores
remained for which inclinations were calculated (Jones,
1987). Jones added data from three cores and used
inclination data from these 17 cores to propose that the
‘‘oldest continuously accumulating sediment (i.e. not
found below a hiatus) recovered from the T-3 platform
is approximately 2.5 million years old, and is not
Miocene in age as previously interpreted by Clark et al.
(1980).’’ That is, Jones placed unit A at approximately
the Matuyama/Gauss boundary, which is about 0.8 Myr
younger than Clark’s (1970) estimate (‘‘o3.32 Myr’’; see
Clark et al., 1980, p. 18), and about 3 Myr younger than
Clark’s et al. (1980) estimate (5.62 Ma), of unit A in core
FL 224. Later on, Clark et al. (2000) followed Jones’ age
model, in using an age of 2.6 Ma for unit A. Nevertheless, Jones’ revised age model implies that the oldest
Neogene sediment in the T-3 cores is of late Middle
Pliocene age. His age model also implies that the average
sedimentation rate is approximately 0.15 cm/ka, which is
about two to three times higher than that proposed by
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1438
Fig. 1. Correlations between the GPTS and lithostratigraphic units A–M of Clark et al. (1980). Modified from Minicucci and Clark (1983), which is
largely similar to that of Clark et al. (1980, Fig. 2), and Clark (1996). Notice development of interpretation of the correlations. Ages (Ma) and chron
designations are from Cande and Kent (1995).
Clark et al. (1980); however, this revised age model does
not oppose the view that low sedimentation rates
persisted during the Late Pliocene and Pleistocene in
the central Arctic Ocean. According to this view, large
areas in the central Arctic Ocean consequently were
sediment starved during Plio–Pleistocene times, yielding
sedimentation rates that are comparable to those of the
Cenozoic brown pelagic clay facies of the deep Pacific
Ocean (Doyle and Riedel, 1979).
The age model of Clark et al. (1980) was subsequently
discussed by Darby et al. (1989). They remarked that
Clark’s model was based on approximately 7500 spinner
magnetometer measurements on 146 of the 580 T-3
cores, and that none of these paleomagnetic data was
published. Inclination, declination, and intensity values
were not calculated for any of these 7500 samples. In
their discussion about the quality of the paleomagnetic
data of the T-3 cores, Darby and others remark that ‘‘in
order to obtain as much paleomagnetic data as possible
from many cores shortcuts were made. It was reasoned
that since these cores were collected from such high
latitudes, the inclination vectors would be nearly
straight up or down. Therefore, just the sign of the inphase value from a one-spin measurement would be
sufficient to determine if a sample was of normal or
reversed polarity.’’ Even if the quality of the spinner
measurements of these 146 T-3 cores appears to be
justifiably described as ambiguous, the application of
the paleomagnetic method on Arctic Ocean sediment
cores more than two decades ago would not have
resolved the chronostratigraphic ambiguities in the
raised cores. The reason for this is that excursions of
short durations within the Brunhes Chron complicated
the interpretation of the paleomagnetic stratigraphy, as
discussed below.
3.2. The cm-scale scenario
Arguments for higher Arctic sedimentation rates
appear early in the literature, e.g. 0.7 cm/ka from 14C
dating of the uppermost B10 cm of core T3-67-11 from
the Mendeleev Ridge (van Donk and Mathieu, 1969).
Later on, both scenarios have been suggested for this
core. Herman (1974) suggested that the 210 cm level in
ARTICLE IN PRESS
core T3-67-11 is referable to the Mammoth Subchron
within the Gauss Chron, about 3.23 Ma (modern
estimate), based on paleomagnetic data presented by
Hunkins et al. (1971). In contrast, Sejrup et al. (1984)
argued that the 260 cm level in this core is younger than
0.3 Ma, based on amino acid epimerisation measurements of foraminiferal tests and on the composition of
benthic foraminiferal assemblages: ‘‘biostratigraphy
(y) indicate a late Quaternary rather than a Pliocene
age’’. Herman’s and Sejrup’s age estimates differ by well
over one order of magnitude, thus resulting in a
corresponding major difference in sedimentation rate
estimates.
Another study on amino acid epimerisation in
planktic foraminifers resulted in an estimate of about
0.1 cm/ka in a core from the Alpha Ridge (Macko and
Aksu, 1986). Obviously there is room for systematic
studies, involving more than these two cores, of amino
acid epimerisation of foraminifers from various parts of
the central Arctic Ocean.
Many studies of Arctic Ocean sediment cores argue
for sedimentation rates that are on the order of the cmscale level, rather than mm-scale. Along a transect
across the Amerasia Basin, Darby et al. (1997)
noticed that ‘‘deposition rates are generally less than
0.5 cm/ka for glacial regimes, greater than this for
deglacial regimes and greater than 1–2 cm/ka for
interglacial regimes’’ using radiocarbon dating of boxcore material.
Most data sets reporting cm/ka-scale rates refer to the
Eurasia Basin. Markussen et al. (1985) determined
Holocene and Last Glacial Maximum sedimentation
rates of about 2.0 cm/ka in two cores from the northwestern flank of the Gakkel Ridge using the oxygen
isotope method. Baumann (1990, Fig. 2c) observed
single peak occurrences of the calcareous nannofossil
genus Gephyrocapsa spp. in two cores from the northern
Nansen Basin and the Gakkel Ridge, ‘‘and because of
the presence of E. huxleyi, they should both represent
oxygen isotope stage 5.’’ As these peaks occurred at ca
123 cm and 330 cm core depth, respectively, sedimentation rates of about 1 cm/ka and 3 cm/ka, respectively,
are derived for these two cores. Gard (1993, Table 1)
used nannofossil biostratigraphy to estimate Holocene
sedimentation rates in cores from the Nansen Basin
(5.1 cm/ka, N ¼ 14), the Gakkel Ridge (3.0 cm/ka,
N ¼ 19), the Amundsen Basin (1.8 cm/ka, N ¼ 16), the
Lomonosov Ridge (1.5 cm/ka, N ¼ 16), and the Makarov Basin (1.4 cm/ka, N ¼ 5). The average of all these 70
Holocene estimates is 2.6 cm/ka. In one core, PS2208-2
from the northern Nansen Basin, Gard (1993, Fig. 5)
observed peak abundances of gephyrocapsids co-occurring with E. huxleyi at about 400 cm core depth, and
concluded that ‘‘This core has a high sedimentation rate,
B4.4 cm/ka, for the last glacial and at least 1.4 cm/ka
for the last interglacial.’’ Stein et al. (1994) estimated the
1439
sedimentation rate during MIS 1, using stable
isotopes and AMS 14C datings, in 18 of the 70 cores
that Gard investigated. Stein’s data cover the identical
set of basins and ridges, yielding an average rate of
1.0 cm/ka in these 18 cores. Schneider et al. (1996)
analysed six cores from the eastern Arctic Ocean using
paleomagnetic stratigraphy and AMS 14C datings. Five
of the six cores show rates >1.0 cm/ka, including two
cores showing rates between 3.0 and 4.0 cm/ka. The
sixth core, retrieved from the Morris Jesup Rise, shows a
rate o0.6 cm/ka. Nevertheless, Schneider and others
concluded ‘‘that sedimentation rates on the Eurasian
side of the Lomonosov Ridge can be variable and are
much higher than the few mm/103 yr rates in many
previous studies of Arctic sediments from the Canada
Basin.’’
Nowaczyk et al. (1994) placed MIS 5e at 345–370 cm
depth in core PS2212-3 from the eastern slope of the
Yermak Plateau, implying a rate of about 2.7 cm/ka.
Aldahan et al. (2000) analysed 10Be concentrations in
one of the cores (PS2208-2 from the western Nansen
Basin) studied also by Gard (1993) and Schneider et al.
(1996). Aldahan concludes that the sedimentation rate
varies from 2.4 cm/ka to 5.0 cm/ka between MIS 1 and
MIS 9. Jakobsson et al. (2000a) analysed a 722 cm long
piston core (96/12-1pc) from the crest of the Lomonosov
Ridge using nannofossil biostratigraphy, paleomagnetism, and cyclic variability in colour and manganese
content. The upper 193 cm of the core, through MIS 4,
was interpreted to have a rate of 2.8 cm/ka. The rates in
the remaining lower part (through MIS 21.5) were
estimated to vary between 0.2 and 1.6 cm/ka, with an
average of 0.5 cm/ka. In order to further evaluate the
age model for the Lomonosov Ridge sediments,
Jakobsson (2002) applied an absolute dating method,
Optically Stimulated Luminescence (OSL), on a 4 m
long core from the ridge crest. The OSL results agree
with the age model established for the nearby-located
core 96/12-1pc and, thus, support cm/ka-scale sedimentation rates.
In the Makarov Basin, Nowaczyk et al. (2001) used
paleomagnetic data in two cores and proposed two
possible age models, one based on correlation of
paleointensity records between the Makarov Basin core
and North Atlantic ODP Site 983, and the other on
correlation to North Pacific ODP Site 1010. The two
models are compatible down to 2 m core depth in
showing an average rate of about 4.0 cm/ka (Nowaczyk
et al., 2001, Fig. 17). Below that depth, to about 12 m
core depth, the former age model yields an average
sedimentation rate of B5.0 cm/ka whereas the latter
yields a rate of B1.0 cm/ka. In the southern Canada
Basin, the ‘‘average net accumulation rate of the mixed
sequence of turbidites and thin pelagite interbeds in the
cores is about 1.2 m/1000 yr’’ [=120 cm/ka] (Grantz
et al., 1996). Recently, Svindland and Vorren (2002)
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1440
applied Jakobsson’s et al. (2000a) age model on two
cores from the Amundsen Basin, resulting in sedimentation rates of 5.9 cm/ka (North Pole core) and 24.7 cm/ka
over the past 17 ka.
Key cores representative of both sedimentation rate
scenarios (mm/ka versus cm/ka) are listed in Table 1 and
plotted in Fig. 2.
4. Sedimentation rates from seismic reflection and
refraction data, and tectonic models of bedrock age
Most of the seismic reflection and refraction data in
the Arctic Ocean has been collected from drifting ice
stations on which ‘‘the direction of the lines is controlled
by the whims of nature’’ (Jackson et al., 1990). Her plots
Table 1
Sedimentation rates (cm/ka) in cores from the central Arctic Ocean
Core
Author
Latitude
94-PC29
Grantz et al. (2001, Fig. 7)
88.94
138.71
3010
0.04
FL 224
Clark et al. (1980, Fig. 29)
80.46
158.81
3467
0.05
FL 270
FL 196
T3-67-11
CESAR 14
Herman (1974, Fig. 20)
Aksu and Mudie (1985,
Fig. 2)
83.19
80.56
79.58
85.85
154.01
171.58
172.50
108.36
3280
3327
2810
1370
0.06
0.06
0.06
0.08
84.27
84.63
134.63
128.46
2659
2401
0.09
0.09
85.64
111.12
1585
0.10
80.46
158.81
3467
0.10
80.82
85.63
158.82
111.12
3632
1495
0.10
0.11
86.06
89.08
129.54
168.49
2272
0
0.14
0.16
80.35
173.52
2867
0.16
Top core to Brunhes/Matuyama boundary
Top core to base unit M inferred at 400 ka
(=427 ka if B/M boundary=780 ka)
Top core to base Olduvai
85.38
87.53
155.46
144.17
2071
1052
0.17
0.18
Lithostratigraphic unit B/C boundary at 1.9 Ma
Top core to Gauss/Gilbert boundary
88.50
167.13
0
0.18
84.46
75.87
127.00
155.70
2742
1917
0.19
0.20
79.73
173.07
2815
0.25
Top core to unit K inferred to hold Brunhes/
Matuyama boundary
Top core to ‘‘initiation of glacial ice-rafting at
2.7 Ma’’a
Top core to base Jaramillo
80.20
74.62
87.64
172.79
157.88
156.97
2988
1089
3991
0.26
0.38
0.54
87.10
144.77
1003
0.72
74.61
-157.40
2430
0.86
FL 331
FL 380
CESAR
103
FL 224
Aksu and Mudie (1985,
Fig. 2)
Steuerwald et al. (1968,
Fig. 1)
FL 228
CESAR
102
FL 435
LOREX
B-24
T3-67-12
Macko and Aksu (1986,
Fig. 2)
Morris et al. (1985, Figs. 3
and 9)
Witte and Kent (1988,
Table 1)
Jokat et al. (1999a, Fig. 3)
Spielhagen et al. (1997,
Fig. 2)
Morris et al. (1985, Figs. 2
and 9)
Phillips and Grantz (2001,
Fig. 10)
Witte and Kent (1988,
Table 1)
Poore et al. (1993, Fig. 2)
Nowaczyk et al. (2001, age
model 2)
Jakobsson et al. (2000a, b,
Fig. 3)
Phillips and Grantz (1997,
Fig. 8)
PS51/034-4
PS2185-6
LOREX
B-8
FL 409
92PC-38
T3-67-6
FL 199
NWR 5
PS2178-3/
2180-2
96/12-1pc
Core 4
Longitude
Depth
cm ka
T3-67-11
Sejrup et al. (1984)
79.58
172.50
2810
0.87
PS1527-20
Baumann (1990, Fig. 2c)
86.14
22.06
3780
1.0
PS2178-3/
2180-2
model 2)
87.64
156.97
3991
1.0
Age control
Top core to 220 cm (‘‘lower Pliocene’’) if age is
5.0 Ma; 0.06 cm/ka if age is 4.0 Ma
Top Gauss to top ‘‘polarity epoch 5’’ (=top
Chron C3An.1n)
Top core to middle part of Mammoth Subchron
Top core to Gauss/Gilbert boundary
Top core to unit A assuming linear depth scale in
Fig. 2 and that base unit A2 is 345–
60 cm=285 cm
Base Brunhes to top Gauss ( base Brunhes of
Steuerwald Fig. 1=top Gauss of Clark et al.
(1980, Fig. 29)
Top core to base Jaramillo
Paleointensity correlation; composite depth:
1000–1150 cm
Top core to Brunhes/Matuyama boundary;
‘‘composite stratigraphic section of cores 4, 5 and
9’’
Minimum rate (‘‘260 cm depth...younger than
300 kyr’’; amino acid epimerimisation and
biostratigraphy
Coccolith abundance peak in MIS 5 with E.
huxleyi
Paleointensity correlation; composite depth: 200–
1000 cm
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1441
Table 1 (continued)
Core
Author
Latitude
PS2185-5
Gard (1993, Table 1)
87.53
144.17
1051
1.4
PS2757-8
Matthiessen et al. (2001,
Fig. 9)
81.16
140.20
1230
1.6
86.23
9.59
3873
1.7
84.49
8.97
3820
2.0
83.87
6.95
2990
2.0
PS2192-1
PS2163-2
Markussen et al. (1985,
Fig. 4)
Markussen et al. (1985,
Fig. 4)
88.26
86.24
9.88
59.23
4375
3047
2.1
2.9
PS1529-8
Baumann (1990, Fig. 2c)
85.36
21.74
2917
3.0
PS2208-2
83.65
4.67
3682
3.0
PS2178-3/
2180-2
PS2178-3/
2180-2
PS2208-2
Aldahan et al. (2000, Fig.
7)
model 1)
model 1+2)
Gard (1993, Fig. 5)
88.05
159.17
4009
3.8
88.05
159.17
4009
4.0
83.65
4.67
3682
4.0
PS2161-2
85.45
44.39
4005
5.0
PS2138-1
Matthiessen et al. (2001,
Fig. 3)
Svindland and Vorren
(2002)
Svindland and Vorren
(2002)
Grantz et al. (1996, Fig. 8)
81.54
30.43
995
5.0
4275
5.9
PS2195-4
FRAM-I/4
FRAM-I/7
PS2190-1
PS2176-3
P1-88-AR
(PC-10)
Longitude
90.00
Depth
cm ka
87.77
108.39
4364
24.7
74.73
156.14
3899
120.0
Age control
Holocene coccolith data (represents the average
Holocene rate on the Lomonosov Ridge)
Dinoflagellate cyst stratigraphy correlated to
MIS 5/6 boundary
Holocene rate in the Amundsen Basin)
Oxygen isotopes from top core through
Termination 1A
Oxygen isotopes from top core through
Termination 1A; 3.5 cm during MIS 2
Holocene coccolith data
Holocene rate on the Gakkel Ridge)
huxleyi
10-Be dating through MIS 9
1250 cm
200 cm
huxleyi
Holocene rate in the Nansen Basin)
Linear sedimentation rate from first used 14C
date at 65 cm (12,999 BP)a
Adopting Jakobsson’s et al. (2000a) age model
for the past 17 ka
Adopting Jakobsson’s et al. (2000a) age model
for the past 17 ka
Top core to 847 cm; linear regression of seven
radiocarbon ages (r ¼ 0:9913)
In the four cases where two cores occur in one row, core designations in bold face refer to the core that shows longitude, latitude and water depth. A
few cores are listed twice, when published estimates of sedimentation rates differ widely. Most sedimentation rate values (cm/ka) are approximative
because core depths of age control points are predominantly estimated from published figures.
a 14
C dates further down core show larger sedimentation rates through MIS 2 in core PS2138-1.
of all available seismic reflection and refraction lines
through 1986 emphasises the sparseness of Arctic Ocean
seismic data. New sets of airgun data were acquired after
1990 as a result of successful icebreaker expeditions into
the central Arctic Ocean: 1991 (Oden and Polarstern, the
first conventionally powered surface ships to reach the
North Pole, but the 5th and 6th ships at the North Pole);
1993 (Polar Star); 1994 (Louis St. Laurent and Polar Sea,
the 16th and 17th ships at the North Pole); 1996 (Oden,
23rd ship at the North Pole); 1998 (Arktika and
Polarstern); 2001 (Oden, 33rd ship at the North Pole);
and 2001 (Healy and Polarstern, 36th and 37th ships at
the North Pole). The direction of lines in these efforts are
also heavily influenced ‘‘by the whims of nature’’, with
the result that the seismic data are not acquired in predefined, systematic trackline surveys. When these icebreaker lines are added to those collected from drifting
stations, we still possess only unevenly distributed
glimpses of seismic information from the deep Arctic
Ocean. Cross-lines are rare, making interpretations of
three-dimensional geological structures difficult.
Estimates of sediment thickness based on seismic data
include the compilations by Kristoffersen (1990, Eurasia
Basin), by Grantz et al. (1990, Canada Basin), and by
Weber and Sweeney (1990, Lomonosov, Alpha and
Mendeleev ridges, Makarov Basin). Seismic reflection
and refraction data available before 1990 were summarised in a map showing sedimentary thickness for the
entire Arctic Ocean (Jackson and Oakey, 1990),
incorporating data also from Soviet sources. The
isopach sediment thickness curves from this map are
shown in Fig. 2.
During the 1991 icebreaker expedition, seismic reflection and refraction data were collected along two lines
crossing the Lomonosov Ridge (87–88 N/130–160 E),
and along a profile across the Eurasia Basin (Jokat et al.,
1992, 1995). They demonstrated that almost 500 m of
sediments have been deposited on the top of the
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1442
160˚W
140˚W
180˚
160˚E
140˚E
120˚W
120˚E
100˚W
100˚E
80˚E
80˚W
60˚E
Sedimentation Rates (cm/ka)
60˚W
>1
>0.4 to 1
>0.1 to 0.4
>0.04 to 0.1
40˚W
20˚W
0˚
20˚E
40˚E
Fig. 2. Locations of sediment cores discussed in this study and their inferred sedimentation rates from previous studies (for listing of cores see Table
1). The bathymetry is portrayed by the International Bathymetric Chart of the Arctic Ocean (IBCAO) (see www.ngdc.noaa.gov/mgg/bathymetry/
arctic/arctic.html and Jakobsson et al. (2000b). Contour lines represent sediment thickness isopachs in km (from Jackson and Oakey, 1990). Transect
of four cores from the Barents slope (PS2138-1), via the Gakkel Ridge (PS1527-20) and the Lomonosov Ridge (96/12-1pc), to the Northwind Ridge
(NWR 5), is connected by thick black stippled line. Basis for correlation is presented in Figs. 5 and 6.
Lomonosov Ridge since the subsidence of the ridge
below sea-level at about 50 Ma, implying an average
sedimentation rate of about 1.0 cm/ka since the Early
Eocene.
The Gakkel Ridge is the active spreading ridge in the
Eurasia Basin, bisecting it into two sub-basins, the
Amundsen Basin towards the Lomonosov Ridge and
the Nansen Basin towards the Eurasian margin, which
show a symmetrical progression of seafloor magnetic
anomalies away from the spreading ridge (Kristoffersen,
1990 and references therein). Anomaly 25 (B56 Ma) of
the latest Paleocene is the oldest identified magnetic
lineation in both sub-basins (Kristoffersen, 1990). This
tectonic model was used by Jokat et al. (1995, Figs. 10–
12) when estimating sediment thickness on identified
seafloor magnetic anomalies in the Amundsen Basin,
ARTICLE IN PRESS
resulting in an average sedimentation rate of 1.5 cm/ka
between the Recent and 36 Ma (Anomaly 16), 5.4 cm/ka
between 39 (Anomaly 18) and 46 Ma (Anomaly 21),
8.6 cm/ka between 46 and 49 Ma (Anomaly 22), and
14.0 cm/ka between 49 and 53 Ma (Anomaly 24). The
Nansen Basin received more sediments than the
Amundsen Basin, seen also in its 300–700 m shallower
abyssal plain (Kristoffersen, 1990; see also sediment
isopach lines in Fig. 2), implying higher sedimentation
rates than in the Amundsen Basin. This difference in
sedimentation rates has been suggested to be caused by
larger input of terrestrial sediment to the Nansen
Basin because over most of its length the Amundsen
Basin is isolated from the Eurasia continental
margin by the Gakkel Ridge (Johnson, 1969). Elverhî
et al. (1998) conclude that the dominant Quaternary
sediment supply to the Nansen Basin was derived via
glacial erosion from the Barents–Kara shelf. An average
sedimentation rate of 3.0 cm/ka since the ‘‘post
mid-Oligocene’’ has been suggested for the abyssal plain
of the western Nansen Basin (Kristoffersen and
Husebye, 1985).
Isopach lines showing sedimentary thickness in the
southern Canada Basin yield values ranging from about
6 km at 3.8 km water depth near the Northwind Ridge to
12 km at 2 km water depth near the Mackenzie delta
(Grantz et al., 1990). The opening and formation of the
Canada Basin is considered to have occurred during the
Cretaceous (Grantz et al., 1990; Lawver and Scotese,
1990), beginning in the Hauterivian (B130 Ma) and
ending by middle Aptian time (B110 Ma) (Jakobsson
et al., 2003a). By using the old end-member of this age
range (130 Ma), a minimum average sedimentation rate
of 4.6 cm/ka is obtained from where the total sediment
thickness is 6 km and 9.2 cm/ka from where the sediment
thickness is 12 km.
The crest and southern flank of the Alpha Ridge carry
a sediment drape that is at least 1 km thick according to
reflection seismic data collected from the T-3 Ice Island
(Hall, 1979, Figs. 6 and 7). More recently, multi-channel
seismic profiles (MCS) were collected from an icebreaker
along the strike of the Alpha Ridge, showing a rather
constant sediment thickness of 800–1200 m (Jokat et al.,
1999a, b; Jokat, 2003). The Alpha Ridge is considered to
be broadly contemporary with Canada Basin seafloor
formation, sometime between 120 and 80 Ma (Sweeney,
1985; Weber and Sweeney, 1990). By using averages for
sediment thickness (1000 m) and ridge age (100 Ma), the
sedimentation rate is estimated to 1.0 cm/ka on the
Alpha Ridge along these MCS profiles. A piece of basalt
that was dredged from the Alpha Ridge and dated to
82 Ma (Jokat, 2003) suggests that the average sedimentation rate ranges between 1.0 cm/ka (800 m sediment
thickness) and 1.5 cm/ka (1200 m sediment thickness), if
assuming that this basalt represents the age of the
underlying Alpha Ridge bedrock.
1443
In summary, all longer-term sedimentation rates
estimated from seismic reflection and refraction data,
and current bedrock age models, are on the order of cm/
ka. This applies to both abyssal plains and ridges, except
in those cases where obvious erosion has biased the
sediment thickness.
5. The heart of the problem: dating Arctic Ocean
sediment cores accurately
If sediment cores raised from the seafloor of the
central Arctic Ocean could be dated and correlated
accurately using a combination of absolute and relative
dating methods, the sedimentation rate problem addressed here, with two competing rate scenarios, would
not exist. Below follows a review of the key characteristics of the most common methods that have been
employed to establish age/depth relationships in Arctic
Ocean sediment cores. These methods include biostratigraphy, magnetostratigraphy, oxygen isotopes, and
counts of lithological/climatic cycles.
5.1. Biostratigraphic data
Sediment cores largely composed of marine microfossils with continuously occurring and diversified
assemblages are well suited for highly resolved biostratigraphic work. For dating purposes, biostratigraphic
events must be accurately calibrated to an independent
timescale reflecting, as accurately as possible, the true
progress of time. Magnetostratigraphy is a key technique for age calibration of Cenozoic marine biostratigraphic events (e.g. Berggren et al., 1985). The
introduction of orbitally tuned timescales based on
cyclostratigraphy resulted in huge improvements of age
calibrations of many bio-events (e.g. Shackleton et al.,
1990, 1995, 1999; Hilgen, 1991; Backman and Raffi,
1997), chiefly among the calcareous and biosiliceous
groups. Planktic foraminifers, calcareous nannofossils,
radiolarians and diatoms therefore are key groups for
dating of marine sediments, because they are comparatively well calibrated to independent timescales and
because other dating tools are often not applicable. In
cases where magneto- and cyclostratigraphies are available, these stratigraphies still depend on biostratigraphy
for identification of polarity zones or cycle numbers.
These pre-requisites for accurate biostratigraphic
work are commonly encountered in low to mid-latitude
marine environments. Approaching northern high latitudes, the taxonomic diversity decreases with increasing
latitude. Biostratigraphic marker events that are taxonomically well defined and firmly calibrated to the
GPTS or the astronomical timescale occur rarely in
Arctic Ocean cores. Biosiliceous groups are not preserved in upper Cenozoic cores. Calcareous faunas and
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1444
floras are taxonomically impoverished and occur discontinuously in the cores, commonly only in the upper
few meters of the cores. The forms that are present are
often long-ranging, such as the planktic foraminifer
Neoglogoquadrina pachyderma (sinistral). This species,
completely dominating Arctic Ocean foraminiferal
assemblages in most cores, has its evolutionary appearance during the early Late Miocene (Kennett and
Srinivasan, 1983) at approximately 9 Ma (Berggren
et al., 1995). A recent study suggests, however, that
the modern sinistrally coiled variety of N. pachyderma
appeared at ca 1 Ma, and that this form differs
morphologically and ecologically from its early Pleistocene and Pliocene predecessors (Kucera and Kennett,
2002). Its first appearance and subsequent morphologic
evolution appear to have been synchronous in the North
Pacific and North Atlantic, implying the ‘‘existence of
trans-Arctic gene flow.’’ (Kucera and Kennett, 2002).
These new findings have not yet been applied to Arctic
Ocean planktic foraminiferal assemblages, but hold the
promise of helping to constrain age/depth relationships
in Arctic cores.
Presence of the nannofossil species Emiliana huxleyi is
one of the few marker species providing accurate age
information that have been observed in the Arctic
Ocean. Its first evolutionary appearance is dated to
0.26 Ma (Thierstein et al., 1977), and it has been
observed solely in the Holocene and the penultimate
interglacial in Arctic cores (Baumann, 1990; Gard, 1993;
Jakobsson et al., 2001). Still, the discontinuous occurrence and reduced diversity of calcareous faunas and
floras introduce uncertainties when interpreting their
stratigraphic distribution: Are observed distributions
caused by genuine evolutionary appearances or extinctions, or do they reflect preservational or paleoecologic
bias?
For various reasons the use of other microfossil
groups for biostratigraphic work in Arctic Ocean
sediments, such as benthic foraminifers, dinocysts,
ostracodes, pollen and spores, appears ambiguous as
accurate age indicators. First, the taxonomy is still
under development for some groups (e.g. dinocysts).
Second, their stratigraphic ranges in Arctic Ocean
sediments are insufficiently known, implying that the
ranges are likely to change as new material becomes
available. Third, bio-events among these groups still
appear to be inadequately calibrated to independent
timescales. Fourth, biostratigraphic events indicated by
pollen and spores in Arctic Ocean cores (e.g. Aksu and
Mudie, 1985) chiefly appear to reflect climate driven
biogeographic migration events on surrounding land
masses, rather than evolutionary emergences or
extinctions, making it difficult to judge the precise
biochronologic value of presence/absence of species
of pollen and spores in cores raised from the central
Arctic Ocean.
5.2. The oxygen isotope method
The use of the stable isotope method is constrained by
the discontinuous and limited distribution of foraminiferal calcite in Arctic Ocean sediments. Moreover,
reduced surface water salinities, resulting from voluminous riverine discharge and meltwater events, influence
the oxygen isotope records generated from planktic
foraminifers (e.g. Aksu et al., 1988; Stein et al., 1994;
N^rgaard-Pedersen et al., 1998). These two characteristics hamper the usefulness of the oxygen isotope
method because continuous records through entire cores
cannot be established, and because curves generated
from intervals containing foraminiferal calcite are
blurred by salinity signals (e.g. Stein et al., 1994, Figs.
5 and 6). Therefore correlation of oxygen isotope curves
via pattern recognition between Arctic Ocean cores and
low and middle latitude oxygen isotope records in
general do not yield reliable age information. The
extraction of oxygen isotopes from different materials
such as fish-teeth apatite presumably has future
potential for reconstructing paleoenvironmental conditions in the Arctic Ocean.
5.3. Paleomagnetic age models in the Arctic Ocean:
reversals versus excursions
Paleomagnetic age models are based on interpretation
of changes in measured intervals of uniform geomagnetic polarity directions that are caused by timedependent changes in Earth’s magnetic field. The
measured polarity pattern in a sediment core, commonly
plotted as black and white stripes, does not contain any
direct information on the age and the polarity changes
may represent either full polarity reversals which are
followed by longer time intervals of predominantly one
polarity direction (chrons or subchrons, see Cande and
Kent, 1992), or polarity excursions of shorter duration
(Fig. 3). The duration of a chron is typically on the
order of several hundred thousand years, whereas
excursions may last less than five thousand years
(Jacobs, 1994). Therefore it is crucial to acquire
independent age control to guide the interpretation of
the paleomagnetic polarity pattern in order to establish
an accurate chronology. Central Arctic Ocean sediment
cores by-and-large suffer from the lack of such
independent age control, forcing scientists to rely on
interpretations of paleomagnetic polarity patterns without guidance from independent age control.
The first chronologies of sediment cores retrieved
from the Amerasia Basin were based on the assumption
that zones with negative inclination represented genuine
polarity reversals. The first encountered down-core zone
with negative inclination was interpreted to be the
Brunhes/Matuyama boundary, presently dated to
780 kyr (Shackleton et al., 1990). This approach yielded
ARTICLE IN PRESS
mm-scale Plio–Pleistocene sedimentation rates (Steuerwald et al., 1968; Clark, 1970; Hunkins et al., 1971;
Herman, 1974; Clark et al., 1980, 1984, 2000; Minicucci
and Clark, 1983; Aksu, 1985; Aksu et al., 1988; Witte
and Kent, 1988; Poore et al., 1993), and implies that the
sediment supply to the Amerasia Basin is best described
in terms of starvation during the past 5 Ma.
The first report of a chronostratigraphically confined
geomagnetic excursion in marine sediments appeared
EXCURSIONS
GPTS
C1n
Jaramillo
Mono Lake
Las camp
Fram Strait
BLAKE
100
Biwa I
200
C1r.1n
Olduvai
C2n
Reunion
C2r.1n
Biwa II
C2An.1n
Biwa III
Kaena
Mammoth
300
400
C2An.2n
C2An.3n
Age (Ka)
Gauss
Age (Ma)
3
Matuyama
1
2
0
Brunhes
0
Emperor
500
Gilbert
4
5
Cochiti
C3n.1n
Nunivak
C3n.2n
Sidufjall
C3n.3n
Thvera
C3n.4n
BigLost
600
Delta
700
B/M
6
800
C3An.1n
[Cande and Kent, 1995]
Fig. 3. GPTS (Cande and Kent, 1992) and established excursions
within the Brunhes Chron (Langereis et al., 1997).
1445
during the late 1960s (Smith and Foster, 1969). But the
reality of excursions as genuine geomagnetic features
remained a matter of dispute for decades (Verosub,
1975, 1982), and only recently have excursions achieved
general acceptance (Langereis et al., 1997; Gubbins,
1999). The assumption of early studies that intervals
with negative inclinations in Arctic cores represent
genuine polarity reversals simply reflects the history of
science in this field. Consequently, geomagnetic excursions have not, until recently, been considered an
alternative to polarity reversals when interpreting
paleomagnetic data in sediment cores. The absence of
a commonly accepted standard geomagnetic excursion
timescale has also contributed to reducing the usefulness
of excursions as age indicators.
Geomagnetic excursions are commonly observed in
sediment cores from the Arctic Ocean and the sub-polar
North Atlantic (Sejrup et al., 1984; L^vlie et al., 1986;
Bleil and Gard, 1989; Nowaczyk and Baumann, 1992;
Frederichs, 1995; Nowaczyk et al., 2001). Thus, if
published chronologies based on paleomagnetic records
have been incorrectly interpreted as reversal boundaries
rather than excursions within the Brunhes Chron, it
follows that the resulting estimates of sedimentation
rates must be off by at least one order of magnitude. A
comparison of the reversal boundary alternative versus
the excursion alternative proposed by Frederichs (1995)
based on core PS2185-6 from the crest of the Lomonosov Ridge resulted in significant differences in age
estimates (Fig. 4).
In addition to assigning short reversed polarity
intervals with excursions or sub-chrons, a recurrent
observation is the absence or incomplete records of
geomagnetic excursions in marine cores within the
Brunhes chron. Geomagnetic excursions were rapid,
high-amplitude directional variations of the geomagnetic field, associated with low intensities (Jacobs, 1994).
0
PS2185-6 KAL
PS2185-6 KAL
96/12-1pc
100
Core Depth (cm)
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
0
1000
2000
3000
4000
5000
Age (ka)
Fig. 4. Two alternative age-depth relationships for core PS2185-6 KAL vs. core 96/12-1pc. The excursion scenario (Frederichs, 1995) for core
PS2185-6 is plotted with triangles and the true reversal boundary scenario (Frederichs, 1995; Spielhagen et al., 1997) with squares.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1446
The absence of paleomagnetic excursions in sediments
covering adequate time intervals, can be attributed to
factors controlling the preservation of the time-signal:
e.g. variation in sediment accumulation, intermittent
bioturbation (Watkins, 1968) or the erasing of the
paleomagnetic signal by post-depositional realignment
of magnetic grains. The significance of variations in
accumulation is difficult to assess because the produced
hiatuses/compression only cover a time interval on the
order of the duration of the excursion in question. The
duration of excursions is poorly known except for a few
cases: the Blake excursion has an estimated duration of
B5 ka (Jakobs, 1994), the Laschamp excurions lasted
B2 ka (Nowaczyk and Knies, 2000), and the Lake
Mono excursion lasted B1.5 ka (Nowaczyk and Knies,
2000). There is presently no general method that may
convey such detailed information about variations in
sediment accumulation of Arctic sedimentary cores. The
action of intermittent bioturbation also requires independent observations that are not generally available.
Post-depositional realignment of magnetic grains has
recently been demonstrated to be an intensity-dependent
process (Coe and Liddicoat, 1994; L^vlie, 1994),
implying that paleomagnetic signals imposed in lowintensity geomagnetic fields may be wiped out and
replaced by succeeding geomagnetic directions associated with higher field. This process is not very well
investigated, but it is likely that the important factors
may be grain-size distribution and degree of sorting of
the sediment (Payne and Verosub, 1982).
The youngest excursion recorded in the core investigated by Jakobsson et al. (2001) was identified as Biwa
II occurring at 280 cm depth. There is no evidence for
major hiatuses above this excursion and it may thus be
inferred that records of the Blake, Laschamp and Mono
Lake excursions have been wiped out. The process(es)
erasing the inferred excursions have not been established. However, the drop in grain size distribution
(>63 mm) occurring at 260 cm depth (from ca 30% to ca
10%), may imply post-depositional re-alignment of
magnetic grains in the coarser section of the core, while
the lower, more fine-grained section has retained records
of excursions.
5.4. Lithological and climatic cycles, unconformities and
condensation
Lithological cycles are pervasive in central Arctic
Ocean sediment cores (Clark et al., 1980, Fig. 9). Grain
size, colour and the degree of mottling are key
parameters used to describe the cycles, which are
consistently interpreted in terms of glacial-interglacial
cycles (e.g. Darby et al., 1989; Clark, 1990; Phillips and
Grantz, 1997; Jakobsson et al., 2000a). In a model of a
typical lithostratigraphic cycle on the Northwind Ridge,
Phillips and Grantz (1997, Fig. 6) illustrate the
characteristics of a single depositional cycle, composed
of two parts, one formed during interglacial and the
other during glacial conditions.
Clark et al. (1980) suggest that only a few of the
several hundred cores investigated were compromised
by unconformites, implying strong condensation for the
remaining cores. Well over 50 glacial/interglacial couplets (Tiedemann et al., 1994) occurred over the critical
time interval encompassed by Clark’s 13 lithostratigraphic units if the age model of Jones (1987) for Clark’s
unit A (upper Gauss) is adopted. If averaged over the
entire interval, each lithologic unit has a duration of
200 kyr (13 units deposited over 2.60 Myr). If Clark’s
1980 age model is applied, each unit has an average
duration of 500 kyr (13 units deposited over 6.5 Myr).
None of the well-known Plio–Pleistocene glacial/interglacial couplets (e.g. Shackleton et al., 1990; Tiedemann
et al., 1994) are resolved in this litho- and chronostratigraphic model (Clark et al., 1980, Figs. 9 and 29; Clark,
1990, Figs. 5 and 6).
Unit K is considered to hold the Matuyama/Brunhes
boundary (Clark et al., 1980). The units represented by
the upper half of unit K and the two overlying lithologic
units (L and M) thus have an average duration of
312 kyr (2.5 units deposited over 0.78 Myr). The nine
Pleistocene glacial/interglacial couplets that occurred
during this time interval (Shackleton et al., 1990) are
thus not resolved in Clarks litho- and chronostratigraphic model.
Similarly, unit K is considered to have a duration of
264 kyr (282 kyr when adopting Shackleton’s et al.,
1990, timescale for the Brunhes Chron) and to
encompass the interval from basal MIS 15 through
basal MIS 21 (Clark et al., 1980, Table 3, Fig. 67). Their
model therefore implies that the glacial/interglacial
cyclicity occurring during the formation of these three
glacial/interglacial couplets did not result in any
discernable variability in lithology, as unit K is
described as a virtually homogenous bioturbated silty
lutite (Clark et al., 1980, Fig. 9).
Phillips and Grantz (1997, Figs. 3 and 8) presented a
composite, less condensed, stratigraphic section from
the Northwind Ridge, in which they combined Clark’s
traditional stratigraphy with a new set of lithostratigraphic cyles, each being composed of an interglacial/
glacial couplet correlated to the standard marine oxygen
isotope stages through stage 22/23. Phillips and Grantz
estimated each couplet to have an approximate duration
of 93.5 kyr throughout the Brunhes and about 105 kyr
during the late Matuyama, concluding that ‘‘there was
no large change in the average duration of glacial/
interglacial cycles across the late Matuyama-Brunhes
transition in the Amerasia Basin.’’
Core 96/12-1pc from the Lomonosov Ridge showed
that cyclically occurring medium to dark brown units
were coloured by enhanced concentrations of manga-
ARTICLE IN PRESS
nese related to interglacial conditions. These cycles were
correlated to low-latitude oxygen isotope stages (Jakobsson et al., 2000a). Subsequently, this age model has
been confirmed through MIS 6 by OSL dating
(Jakobsson et al., 2003b). Moreover, this age model
yielded much higher sedimentation rates than in most
earlier models, and indicates that intervals of negative
inclination in this Arctic core represent excursions
within the Brunhes Chron.
6. Estimates of present and past sediment flux
Sea-ice rafting is the major transport mechanism
today that delivers clastic sediments to the central Arctic
Ocean (Pfirman et al., 1990; Nurnberg
.
et al., 1994). This
process appears to have been active at least as far back
in time as the records of most available cores (Clark and
Hanson, 1983). Quantitative estimates of present
entrainment and transport therefore have the potential
to serve as a guide for interpreting Arctic sediment
cores, if we assume that today’s sediment transport
processes show general similarities with those occurring
during previous Pleistocene interglacials.
The Laptev Sea has been characterised as the ‘icefactory’ of the Arctic Ocean, as this shelf sea is a known
locus for ice production. Large amounts of sediments
are known to be incorporated into the sea-ice formed on
the Laptev Sea shelf (Lindemann et al., 1999). Eicken
et al. (2000) studied one such source area near the New
Siberian Islands for sediment sea-ice entrainment and
dispersal through the Transpolar Drift to the Arctic
Basin. By combining field measurements, remote sensing
and numerical modeling, they estimated the total export
of sea-ice carried sediment to be 18.5 106 t for an event
in 1994/1995. To emphasise the magnitude of this source
alone, Eicken et al. (2000) postulated that if 65–80% of
this material would melt out and be distributed over
3 106 km2 along the Transpolar Drift area, it would
contribute to a mass flux of 4–5 g/m2 year1. By
assuming a wet bulk sediment density of 1.8 g/cm3,
Eiken’s flux estimate would yield a sedimentation rate of
B0.2 cm/ka if distributed evenly over 3 million km2, an
area corresponding to 31% of the Arctic’s total area or
67% of the central Arctic Ocean basin (Jakobsson,
2002). The estimate of B0.2 cm/ka represents the clastic
component alone, derived from a single source region.
By adding the Arctic’s other sediment source regions
and input of biogenic components, the value of 0.2 cm/
ka is likely to increase several times. However, it is only
fair to say that this rate estimate may change
substantially to either lower or higher values by
changing the seafloor area over which the sediment is
assumed to be evenly distributed.
Estimates of the average annual sediment accumulation from another of Arctic’s sediment source regions,
1447
the Kara Sea shelf, through Holocene times suggest that
about 82% of the initial input of total terrigenous
sediment is deposited on the shelf and that about 18% is
exported to the interior Arctic Ocean (Stein et al., this
issue). In terms of total sediment flux, these 18%
correspond to about 35 106 t (Stein et al., this issue),
implying a sedimentation rate of B0.4 cm/ka when
assuming that the sediments are distributed evenly over
3 million km2.
N^rgaard-Pedersen et al. (1998) estimated bulk
sediment fluxes in the Holocene central Arctic Ocean
to be close to 10 g/m2 year1 from a study using AMS
14
C dating on planktic foraminifera in box cores. These
authors also suggest low bulk sediment fluxes during
glacial stages MIS 4 and 2, resulting in mm-scale
sedimentation rates, presumably caused by dense seaice cover in combination with generally low biologic
productivity and reduced summer insolation. In one
representative box core, PS2185-3, N^rgaard-Pedersen
et al. (1998, Fig. 4), show an average sedimentation rates
of 0.5 cm/ka from the top of the core to upper MIS 5.
Gard’s (1993) biostratigraphically derived estimate of
the Holocene rate from the same core is 1.4 cm/ka.
Core PS2185-6, which was retrieved from the same
sample station as PS2185-3, has been convincingly
correlated to core 96/12-1pc (Jakobsson et al., 2001,
Fig. 13). Using this correlation and Jakobsson’s et al.
(2001) age model, we estimate a sedimentation rate of
2.0 cm/ka from the top of core PS2185-6 to the inferred
position of upper MIS 5 at ca 160 cm core depth. The
four times lower sedimentation rate value obtained by
N^rgaard-Pedersen et al. (1998) in core PS2185-3 is
possibly explained by their use of a 400 year 14C
reservoir correction, because the ages of glacial deepwater reservoirs may need an order of magnitude higher
reservoir correction (Sikes et al., 2000). Clearly, a lid of
sea-ice covering the central Arctic Ocean during glacial
times may have caused less ventilation and severe, much
larger, 14C reservoir effects in the deep central Arctic
Ocean, which could explain the low sedimentation rate
obtained from 14C dating in core PS2185-3.
7. Estimate of the pelagic ‘rain’ input over the Lomonosov
Ridge
Estimates of sedimentation rates from sediment
thickness and bedrock age suggest that the Arctic Ocean
basin has received such large fluxes of sediments that
long-term average sedimentation rates of centimeters
per thousand years persisted over tens of millions of
years. Short cores retrieved from the abyssal environments indicate the pervasive influence of turbiditic
sedimentation, pushing the rates towards higher values
(e.g. Svindland and Vorren, 2002), thus masking the
input of the true pelagic ‘rain’ of biogenic, eolian, and
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1448
ice-rafted particles. Grantz et al. (1999) compared
Holocene pelagic and turbidite sedimentation rates in
the Amerasia Basin, concluding that ‘‘pelagites were
deposited at rates of 1.4–3.2 cm/kyr, and Holocene distal
turbidites at a rate of 145 cm/kyr, a range of two orders
of magnitude.’’ Modern estimates based on a plethora
of dating techniques applied to sediments from the
central parts of the crest of the Lomonosov Ridge also
indicate cm/ka-scale rates for the preserved pelagic ‘rain’
component alone (Gard, 1993; Stein et al., 1994;
Jakobsson et al., 2000a, 2001, 2002) at coring sites
located well over 700 km away from the nearest, Laptev
Sea, shelf break. However, as the Laptev Sea margin is
approached along the crest of the Lomonosov Ridge, a
progressively thicker sediment sequence is observed
above the early Paleogene erosional unconformity
(Jokat et al., 1992, Fig. 2; Jokat, 1999b, Fig. 9),
presumably reflecting the progressive proximity and
increased influence of the Lena River discharge source.
The crests on the Lomonosov and the Alpha Ridges
are capped by at least 0.5 and 1.0 km of sediments (Hall,
1979; Jokat et al., 1992, 1995; Jokat, 2003), respectively,
thus indicating that the input of the pelagic ‘rain’
components (biogenic, eolian, ice-rafted) alone appears
to have been sufficiently high to maintain a cm/ka-scale
sedimentation on these ridges over tens of millions of
years.
8. Correlating stratigraphies from the Amerasia Basin to
the Eurasia Basin
Despite all the problems encountered in Arctic Ocean
biostratigraphy, compositional and abundance variations among various groups often show coherent
patterns over wide distances. Ishman et al. (1996)
proposed that systematic variations among benthic
foraminiferal assemblages in intermediate to deep
(>1000 m) environments may be more useful for corecorrelations than the lithostratigraphic zonation of
Clark et al. (1980), simply because the variability among
distinctive faunal assemblages yields more easily recognised signals in comparison to the lithostratigraphic
variability in sediment texture (i.e. grain size).
Using this approach, it is possible to correlate cores
between the Northwind Ridge and the Lomonosov
Ridge (Fig. 5), located some 1600 km apart. Cores
NWR 5 (Northwind Ridge) and 96/12-1pc (Lomonosov
Ridge) have been studied using multi-proxy methods
(Poore et al., 1993, 1994; Jakobsson et al., 2000a, 2001),
making them valuable for cross-basinal correlation. The
two cores were raised from comparable water depths
(1089 and 1003 m), which eliminates a bathymetric bias
in comparing benthic foraminifers. The proposed
correlation is based on maxima or the presence of a
few rare foraminiferal species at certain stratigraphic
levels. The zone of abundance of Bulimina aculeata is
confined to foraminiferal maxima F2-F3 in 96/12-1pc
(Jakobsson et al., 2001) and M3-L1 in NWR 5 (Poore
et al., 1994). This peak zone has been observed also at
the corresponding stratigraphic position in other cores
from the Northwind and Mendeleev Ridges (Polyak,
1986; Ishman et al., 1996). Similarly, Oridorsalis
tener occurs in significant amounts only in F3 and L1
and upcore, whereas Pullenia spp. is present only in F7
and K2.
Another useful stratigraphic marker is the boundary
between predominantly calcareous and almost exclusively arenaceous faunas that occurs at 287 cm in core
96/12-1pc and at B445 cm in NWR 5 (Fig. 5). The
relative distance of this boundary from the Pullenia spp.
cluster (F7 and K2) and from the change in polarity
direction at B350 cm in NWR 5 and at B274 cm in 96/
12-1pc (Fig. 5), suggests that the change from arenaceous to calcareous faunas may have occurred 40–50 kyr
earlier in the Arctic’s southwest margin (NWR 5) before
transgressing into the central Arctic Ocean (96/12-1pc).
The position of a decrease in magnetic inclination,
which has been interpreted as the Brunhes-Matuyama
boundary (Poore et al., 1993) or a prominent excursion
in the Brunhes Chron (Jakobsson et al., 2000a), occurs
consistently between peaks F6 and F7 in core 96/12-1pc,
and between the corresponding peaks (K1-K2) in NWR
5 (Fig. 5). This correspondence of independent magnetoand biostratigraphic characteristics lends confidence to
the proposed correlation, regardless of whether the
inclination record is interpreted as a reversal boundary
or an excursion.
A comparison of core 96/12-1pc with CESAR cores
from the Alpha Ridge shows a convincing similarity in
foraminiferal compositions, based on the >63 mm size
class (Fig. 6; Scott et al., 1989). At both sites, the upper
part of the stratigraphic section (F1 to F4 in 96/12-1pc),
corresponding to Clark’s unit M on the Alpha Ridge,
has high content of Buliminella elegantissima hensoni
and consistent occurrences of O. tener/O. umbonatus
(through F3). Below F3, B. e. hensoni is replaced by
Bolivina arctica as the dominant species and O. tener/
O. umbonatus is virtually absent.
Another correlation based on biostratigraphy was
suggested by Jakobsson (2002), by linking fluctuations
of nannofossil abundance peaks during MIS 5.5, 5.3 and
5.1 in core 96/12-1pc (Jakobsson et al., 2000a) from the
Lomonosov Ridge with concentration fluctuations of
dinoflagellate taxa in core PS2138-1 (Knies et al., 1999;
Matthiessen et al., 2001) from the Barents Sea margin
(Figs. 2 and 5). Matthiessen and colleagues suggest that
dinoflagellate cyst events are caused by variable inflow
of relatively warm Atlantic water into the Arctic Ocean
during periods of warm climate conditions. Calcareous
nannofossil peaks in core 96/12-1pc from the Lomonosov Ridge can be clearly correlated to core PS2208-2
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1449
Fig. 5. Correlation of foraminiferal stratigraphies in cores 96/12-1 (Jakobsson et al., 2001; this paper) and NWR 5 (=PI88-P5) (Poore et al., 1993,
1994). Interglacial brown-mud units are shaded; criss-cross pattern in NWR 5 column shows detrital carbonate layers. Curves show numbers of
planktic (103) and benthic (102, shaded) >1.50 mm foraminifers per gram sediment. Letters in foraminiferal-peak indices in NWR 5 correspond to
Clark’s et al. (1980) lithologic units (see also Poore et al., 1994). Indices within unit K (in parentheses) are added. Selected biostratigraphic markers
are shown. The position of the Brunhes/Matuyama boundary in NWR 5 reflects the interpretation of Poore et al. (1993, 1994).
Planktic %
N/g
0
Benthic species %
N.p.r +G.quinq.
5000 10000 0
10
20
30
C.teretis
0
20
40
St.horvathi
60 0
20
40
0
60 0
20
40
Alpha Ridge
CESAR
Bol.arctica
60 0
20
40
60
(1)
(2)
A
F1
Core depth, cm
B.e.hensoni
B
100
M
F2
200
300
F3
F4
C
F5
F6
F7
Arenaceous
only
D-G
H
L
K-I
H-A
Lomonosov Ridge, 96-12-1pc, >63 µm fraction
Fig. 6. Major features of the distribution of >63 mm foraminifers in core 96/12-1 (bar). Foraminiferal peaks are designated F1 to F7. Curves in the
first panel show >125 mm foraminiferal numbers (N/g=Numbers/g sediment). Column on right side shows correlation with the CESAR cores (Scott
et al., 1989): (1) Foraminiferal assemblages, (2) Clark’s et al. (1980) lithologic units. N.p.r.=Neogloboquadrina pachyderma right-coiled; G.
quinq.=Globigerina (=Turborotalita) quinqueloba.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1450
(Gard, 1993, Fig. 5) from the western Nansen Basin
(Fig. 5). By using such biostratigraphic signals caused by
glacial/interglacial climatic variability, it is possible to
correlate cores from the Eurasian margin, via the
Nansen Basin to the Lomonosov Ridge, and further to
the Amerasia margin, a distance exceeding 2600 km
(Figs. 2 and 5).
9. Summary and conclusions
Deciphering the paleoenvironmental history of the
Arctic Ocean requires a thorough understanding of age/
depth relationships in sediment cores retrieved from its
basins and ridges. At present, two contrasting age model
scenarios exist, one implying that the central Arctic
Ocean has been starved of sediments throughout Plio–
Pleistocene times, resulting in mm/ka-scale sedimentation rates, the other implying that the sediment input
yielded cm/ka-scale rates over tens of millions of years.
The two scenarios thus differ by roughly one order of
magnitude.
The litho- and chronostratigraphic model of Clark
et al. (1980) is at the centre of the low sedimentation rate
scenario, commonly resulting in sub-millimetre rates in
cores raised from the Amerasia Basin. This age model is
based on paleomagnetic data that by-and-large lack
independent age control, and in which the first downcore zone with negative inclination is interpreted to be
the Brunhes/Matuyama boundary. At the time when
this age model was established, the presence of short
time paleomagnetic excursions was not yet well understood, and thus reflects the common practice at that
time to assign the first down-core prominent negative
inclination to the Brunhes/Matuyama boundary.
We propose a correlation of sedimentary records
across the Arctic Ocean that allows us a direct
comparison of age models developed for sediment cores
from various parts of that ocean. Analysis of the
composition of benthic foraminifers permits a correlation of sediment cores from the Lomonsov Ridge to the
Alpha Ridge and the Northwind Ridge, that is, across
the Amerasia Basin. This correlation is further extended
into and through the Eurasia Basin by means of
matching nannofossil and dinocyst abundance peaks.
In the centre of this correlation transect is a critical
Lomonosov Ridge core (96/12-1pc) that has been
subjected to rigorous chronostratigraphic analysis using
paleomagnetic stratigraphy, nannofossil biostratigraphy, cyclostratigraphy, and OSL dating. These internally consistent data demonstrate that the Brunhes Chron
in the Arctic Ocean sediments holds several geomagnetic
excursions of short duration. The first down-core zone
of negative inclination in this Lomonosov Ridge core is
interpreted as the Biwa II excursion at 295 ka. In cores
from the Northwind and Alpha Ridges, the correlatable
geomagnetic event has been interpreted as the Brunhes/
Matuyama boundary at 780 ka. This comparison clearly
answers two of our main initial questions: We do not
have two distinctly different modes of deposition that
governed the Plio–Pleistocene sedimentation in the
Amerasia and Eurasia Basins, but rather two different,
non-compatible age models.
Estimates of long-term sedimentation rates derived
from total sediment thickness and bedrock ages based
on current tectonic models consistently yield cm/kascale average ‘pelagic’ sedimentation rates in the central
Arctic Ocean, including the Lomonosov Ridge and the
Alpha-Mendeleev Ridge complex. This is not surprising,
considering the general physiographic setting of the
Arctic Ocean, a small basin surrounded by huge
landmasses since Cretaceous times, which have yielded
km-thick deposits on its abyssal plains.
The Eurasia Basin is connected to the World Ocean
via a single narrow, deep conduit, the Fram Strait. It is
as yet unclear whether or not the Eurasia and Amerasia
Basins are connected through the Lomonosov Ridge at
water depths >1 km. Nevertheless, the relative isolation
of the deep Arctic Basins suggests that glacial deepwater 14C reservoir corrections in these basins may have
been substantially underestimated, resulting in anomalously young 14C age estimates and low sedimentation
rates.
We infer that the seemingly consistent distribution
of cores in Fig. 2, in which cm/ka-scale rate cores
chiefly occur in the Eurasia Basin and mm/ka-scale
rate cores are concentrated in the Amerasia Basin,
reflect a bias stemming from inadequate age models
giving artificially low sedimentation rates for the
Amerasia Basin.
Erosion and/or winnowing may have resulted in
reduced net sedimentation rates in various depositional
settings (e.g. ridges, abyssal plains) in the central Arctic
Ocean. This re-organisation of sediment flow within the
Arctic Basin is however fully compatible with our two
major conclusions:
The Late Neogene formation of a sea-ice cover in the
Arctic Ocean did not markedly inhibit the supply of
material to Arctic’s seafloor.
The central Arctic Ocean has not been, on average, a
sediment starved basin during either Plio–Pleistocene or
pre-Pliocene times, and cm/ka-scale sedimentation rates
are the rule rather than the exception throughout this
small, land-locked ocean basin.
Acknowledgements
We thank Ruth Jackson for sharing a digital version
of her sediment thickness isopach map, and David
Mosher and Calvin Campbell for providing samples
from the CESAR cores. We thank Ted Moore and John
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Hall for valuable discussions and comments. Constructive reviews offered by Jens Matthiessen and an
anonymous reviewer contributed to improve the manuscript. Input by Otto Hermelin is also appreciated. We
gratefully acknowledge the support by the Swedish
Research Council to Jan Backman and by NOAA Grant
NA97OG0241 to Martin Jakobsson.
References
AARI, 1985. Arctic Atlas. Arctic and Antarctic Research Institute,
Moscow, Russia (in Russian).
Aksu, A.E., 1985. Paleomagnetic stratigraphy of CESAR cores. In:
Jackson, H.R., Mudie, P.J., Blasco, S.M. (Eds.), Initial Geological
Report on CESAR—The Canadian Expedition to study the Alpha
Ridge, Arctic Ocean. Geological Survey of Canada Paper, 84–22,
pp. 101–114.
Aksu, A.E., Mudie, P.J., 1985. Magnetostratigraphy and palynology
demonstrate at least 4 million years of Arctic sedimentation.
Nature 318, 280–283.
Aksu, A.E, Mudie, P.J., Macko, S.A., de Vernal, A., 1988. Upper
Cenozoic history of the Labrador Sea, Baffin Bay, and the Arctic
Ocean, a paleoclimatic and paleoceanographic summary. Paleoceanography 5, 519–538.
.
Aldahan, A., Possnert, G., Scherer, R., Shi, N., Backman, J., Bostrom,
K., 2000. Trace-element and major-element stratigraphy in
Quaternary sediments from the Arctic Ocean and implications
for glacial termination. Journal of Sedimentary Research 70,
1095–1106.
Backman, J., Raffi, I., 1997. Calibration of Miocene nannofossil events
to orbitally tuned cyclostratigraphies from Ceara Rise. Proceedings
of the Ocean Drilling Program, Scientific Results 154, 83–99.
Baumann, M., 1990. Coccoliths in sediments of the eastern Arctic
Basin. In: Bleil, U., Thiede, J., (Eds.), Geological History of the
Polar Oceans: Arctic Versus Antarctic, NATO ASI Series C, Vol.
108, pp. 437–445. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
Berggren, W.A., Kent, D.V., Van Couvering, J., 1985. The Neogene:
Part 2. Neogene geochronology and chronostratigraphy. In:
Snelling, N.J. (Ed.), The Chronology of the Geological Record.
Geological Society of London Memoir 10, 211–260.
Berggren, W.A., Kent, D.V., Swisher III, C.C., Aubry, M.-P., 1995. A
revised Cenozoic geochronology and chronostratigraphy. SEPM
Special Publication 54, 129–212.
Bleil, U., Gard, G., 1989. Chronology and correlation of
Quaternary magnetostratigraphy and nannofossil biostratigraphy
in Norwegian-Greenland Sea sediments. Geologische Rundschau
78, 1173–1187.
Bukry, D., 1984. Paleogene paleoceanography of the Arctic Ocean is
constrained by the middle or late Eocene age of USGS Core FI422: evidence from silicoflagellates. Geology 12, 199–201.
Cande, S.C., Kent, D.V., 1992. A new geomagnetic polarity time scale
for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozoic. Journal of Geophysical
Research 97, 13917–13951.
Cande, S.C., Kent, D.V., 1995. Revised calibration of the geomagnetic
polarity timescale for the Late Cretaceous and Cenozic. Journal of
Geophysical Research 100, 6093–6095.
Clark, D.L., 1970. Magnetic reversals and sedimentation rates
in the Arctic Basin. Geological Society of America Bulletin 81,
3129–3134.
Clark, D.L., 1971. Arctic Ocean ice cover and its Late Cenozoic
history. Geological Society of America Bulletin 82, 3313–3324.
Clark, D.L., 1974. Late Mesozoic and Early Cenozoic sediment cores
from the Arctic Ocean. Geology 2, 41–44.
1451
Clark, D.L., 1990. Arctic Ocean ice cover; Geologic history and
climatic significance. In: Grantz, A. et al. (Eds.), The Arctic Ocean
Region, Vol. L. Geological Society of America, The Geology of
North America, Boulder, pp. 53–62.
Clark, D.L., 1996. The Pliocene record in the central Arctic Ocean.
Marine Micropaleontology 27, 157–164.
Clark, D.L., Hanson, A., 1983. Central Arctic Ocean sediment
texture: a key to ice transport mechanisms. In: Molnia, B.F.
(Ed.), Glacial-Marine Sedimentation. Plenum Press, New York,
pp. 301–330.
Clark, D.L., Whitman, R.R., Morgan, K.A., Mackay, S.D., 1980.
Stratigraphy and glacial-marine sediments of the Basin,
central Arctic Ocean. Geological Society of America Special Paper
181, 1–57.
Clark, D.L., Vincent, J.-S., Jones, G.A., Morris, W.A., 1984.
Correlation of marine and continental glacial and interglacial
events, Arctic Ocean and Banks Island. Nature 311, 147–149.
Clark, D.L., Kowallis, B.J., Medaris, L.G., Deino, A.L., 2000. Orphan
Arctic Ocean metasediment clast: local derivation from alpha ridge
pre-2.6 Ma ice rafting? Geology 28, 1143–1146.
Coe, R.S., Liddicoat, J.C., 1994. Overprinting of a natural magnetic
remanence in lake sediments by a subsequent high-intensity filed.
Nature 367, 57–59.
Darby, D.A., Naidu, A.S., Mowatt, T.C., Jones, G., 1989. Sediment
composition and sedimentary processes in the Arctic Ocean. In:
Herman, Y. (Ed.), The Arctic Seas. Van Nostrand Reinhold
Company, New York, pp. 657–720.
Darby, D.A., Bischof, J.F., Jones, G.A., 1997. Radiocarbon dating of
depositional regimes in the western Arctic Ocean. Deep-Sea
Research II 44, 1745–1757.
Doyle, P.S., Riedel, W.R., 1979. Cretaceous to Neogene ichtyoliths in
a giant piston core from the central North Pacific. Micropaleontology 25, 337–364.
Eicken, H., Kolatschek, J., Freitag, J., Lindemann, F., Kassens, H.,
2000. A key source area and constraints on entrainment for basinscale sediment transport by Arctic Ocean. Geophysical Research
Letters 27, 1919–1922.
Elverhî, A., Hooke, R.L.B., Solheim, A., 1998. Late Cenozoic erosion
and sediment yield from the Svalbard–Barents Sea Region:
implications for understanding erosion of glacierized basins.
Quaternary Science Reviews 17, 209–241.
Frederichs, T., 1995. Regional and temporal variations of rock
magnetic parameters in Arctic marine sediments. Berichte zur
Polarforschung 164, 1–212.
Gard, G., 1993. Late Quaternary coccoliths at the North Pole:
evidence of ice-free conditions and rapid sedimentation in the
central Arctic Ocean. Geology 21, 227–230.
Grantz, A., May, S.D., Taylor, P.T., Lawver, L.A., 1990. Canada
Basin. In: Grantz, A. et al. (Eds.), The Arctic Ocean Region, Vol.
L. Geological Society of America, The Geology of North America,
Boulder, pp. 379–402.
Grantz, A., Phillips, R.L., Mullen, M.W., Starratt, S.W., Jones, G.A.,
Sathy Naidu, A., Finney, B.P., 1996. Character, paleoenvironment,
rate of accumulation, and evidence for seismic triggering of
Holocene turbidites, Canada Abyssal Plain, Arctic Ocean. Marine
Geology 133, 51–73.
Grantz, A., Phillips, R.L., Jones, G.A., 1999. Holocene pelagic and
turbidite sedimentation rates in the Amerasia Basin, Arctic Ocean
from radiocarbon age-depth profiles in cores. GeoResearch Forum
5, 209–222.
Grantz, A., Pease, V.L., Willard, D.A., Phillips, R.L., Clark, D.L.,
2001. Bedrock cores from 89 North: implications for the geologic
framework and Neogene paleoceanography of Lomonosov Ridge
and a tie to the Barents shelf. Geological Society of America
Bulletin 113, 1272–1281.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1452
Gubbins, D., 1999. The distinction between geomagnetic excursions
and reversals. Geophysical Journal International 137, F1–F3.
Hall, J.K., 1979. Sediment waves and other evidence of paleo-bottom
currents at two locations in the deep Arctic Ocean. Marine
Geology 23, 269–299.
Herman, Y., 1974. Arctic Ocean sediments, microfauna, and the
climatic record in late Cenozoic time. In: Herman, Y. (Ed.), Marine
Geology and Oceanography of the Arctic Seas. Springer, Berlin,
pp. 283–348.
Hilgen, F.J., 1991. Extension of the astronomically calibrated
(polarity) time scale to the Miocene/Pliocene boundary. Earth
Planetary Science Letters 107, 349–368.
Hunkins, K., B!e, A.W.H., Opdyke, N.D., Mathieu, G., 1971. The Late
Cenozoic history of the Arctic Ocean. In: Turekian, K.K. (Ed.),
The Late Cenozoic Glacial Ages. Yale University Press, New
Haven, pp. 215–237.
Ishman, S.E., Polyak, L.V., Poore, R.Z., 1996. Expanded record of
Quaternary oceanographic change: Amerasian Arctic Ocean.
Geology 24, 139–142.
Jakobsson, M., 2002. Hypsometry and volume of the Arctic Ocean
and its constituent seas. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems 3,
1–18.
Jakobsson, M., L^vlie, R., Al-Hanbali, H., Arnold, E., Backman, J.,
.
Morth,
M., 2000a. Manganese and color cycles in Arctic Ocean
sediments constrain Pleistocene chronology. Geology 28, 23–26.
Jakobsson, M., Cherkis, N., Woodward, J., Coakley, B., Macnab, R.,
2000b. A new grid of arctic bathymetry: a significant resource for
scientists and mapmakers. EOS Transactions, American Geophysical Union 81 (89), 93–96.
Jakobsson, M., L^vlie, R., Arnold, E.M., Backman, J., Polyak, L.,
Knutsen, J.-O., Musatov, E., 2001. Pleistocene stratigraphy and
paleoenvironmental variation from Lomonsov Ridge sediments,
central Arctic Ocean. Global and Planetary Change 31, 1–22.
Jakobsson, M., Grantz, A., Kristoffersen, Y., Macnab, R., 2003a.
Physiographic provinces of the Arctic Ocean. Geological Society of
America Bulletin 115, December 2003.
Jakobsson, M., Backman, J., Murray, A., L^vlie, R., 2003b. Optically
stimulated luminescence dating supports central Arctic Ocean cmscale sedimentation rates. Geochemistry, Geophysics, Geosystems
4, 1–11.
Jackson, H.R., Oakey, G.N., 1990. Sedimentary thickness map of the
Arctic Ocean. In: Grantz, A. et al. (Eds.), The Arctic Ocean
Region, Vol. L. Geological Society of America, The Geology of
North America, Boulder, Plate 5.
Jackson, H.R., Forsyth, D.A., Hall, J.K., Overton, A., 1990. Seismic
reflection and refraction. In: Grantz, A. et al. (Eds.), The Arctic
Ocean Region, Vol. L. Geological Society of America, The
Geology of North America, Boulder, pp. 153–170.
Jacobs, J.A., 1994. Reversals of the Earth’s Magnetic Field. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp. 1–346.
Johnson, G.L., 1969. Morphology of the Eurasian Arctic Basin. Polar
Record 14, 619–628.
Jokat, W., 2003. Seismic investigations along the western sector of
Alpha Ridge, Central Arctic Ocean. Geophysical Journal International 152, 185–201.
Jokat, W., Uenzelmann-Neben, G., Kristoffersen, Y., Rasmussen, T.,
1992. ARCTIC’91: Lomonosov Ridge—a double sided continental
margin. Geology 20, 887–890.
.
Jokat, W., Weigelt, E., Kristoffersen, Y., Rasmussen, T., Schone,
T.,
1995. New insights into the evolution of the Lomonosov Ridge
and the Eurasian Basin. Geophysical Journal International 122,
378–392.
Jokat, W., Stein, R., Rachor, E., Schewe, I., Shipboard Scientific
Party, 1999a. Expedition gives fresh view of Central Arctic geology.
EOS Transactions American Geophysical Union 80(465),
472–473.
Jokat, W. (Ed.), and shipboard participants, 1999b. ARCTIC ‘98: The
Expedition ARK-XIV/1a of RV ‘‘Polarstern’’ in 1998. Berichte zur
Polarforschung 308, 1–159.
Jones, G.A., 1987. The central Arctic Ocean sediment record: current
progress in moving from a litho- to a chronostratigraphy. Polar
Research 5, 309–311.
Kennett, J.P., Srinivasan, M.S., 1983. Neogene Planktonic Foraminifera. Hutchinson Ross Publishing Company, Stroudsburg, PA, pp.
1–165.
Knies, J., Vogt, C., Stein, R., 1999. Late Quaternary growth and decay
of the Svalbard/Barents Sea ice sheet and paleoceanograpic
evolution in the adjacent Arctic Ocean. Geo-Marine Letters 18,
195–202.
Kristoffersen,Y., 1990. Eurasia Basin. In: Grantz, A. et al. (Eds.), The
Arctic Ocean Region, Vol. L. Geological Society of America, The
Kristoffersen, Y., Husebye, E.S., 1985. Multi-channel seismic reflection measurements in the Eurasia Basin, Arctic Ocean, from the US
ice station FRAM IV. Tectonophysics 114, 103–115.
Kucera, M., Kennett, J.P., 2002. Causes and consequences of a middle
Pleistocene origin of the modern planktonic foraminifer Neogloboquadrina pachyderma sinistral. Geology 30, 539–542.
LaBrecque, J.L., Kent, D.V., Cande, S.C., 1977. Revised magnetic
polarity time scale for late cretaceous and cenozoic time. Geology
5, 330–335.
Langereis, C.G., Dekkers, M J., de Lange, G.J., Paterne, M., van
Santvoort, P.J.M., 1997. Magnetostratigraphy and astronomical
calibration of the last 1.1 Ma from an eastern Mediterranean piston
core and dating of short events in the Brunhes. Geophysical
Journal International 129, 75–94.
Lawver, L.A., Scotese, C.R., 1990. A review of tectonic models
for the evolution of the Canada Basin. In: Grantz, A., et al. (Eds.),
The Arctic Ocean Region, Vol. L. Geological Society of
America, The Geology of North America, Boulder, Vol. L,
pp. 593–618.
.
Lindemann, F., Holemann,
J.A., Korablev, A., Zachek, A., 1999.
Particle entrainment into newly forming sea ice—freeze-up studies
in October 1995. In: Kassens, H., et al. (Ed.), Land-Ocean Systems
in the Siberian Arctic: Dynamics and History. Springer, Berlin,
pp. 113–123.
L^vlie, R., 1994. Field-dependent postdepositional grain realignment
in the PDRM process: experimental evidence and implications.
Physics of the Earth and Planetary Interiors 85, 101–111.
L^vlie, R., Markussen, B., Sejrup, H-P., Thiede, J., 1986. Magnetostratigraphy in three Arctic Ocean cores; arguments for geomagnetic
excursions within oxygen-isotope stage 2–3. Physics of the Earth
and Planetary Interiors 43, 173–184.
Macko, S.A., Aksu, A.E., 1986. Amino acid epimerization in
planktonic foraminfera suggests slow sedimentation rates for
Alpha Ridge, Arctic Ocean. Nature 322, 730–732.
Markussen, B., Zahn, R., Thiede, J., 1985. Late Quaternary
sedimentation in the eastern Arctic Basin: stratigraphy and
depositional environment. Palaeogeography, Palaeoclimatology,
Palaeoecology 50, 271–284.
Matthiessen, J., Knies, J., Nowaczyk, N.R., Stein, R., 2001. Late
Quaternary dinoflagellate cyst stratigraphy at the Eurasian
continental margin, Arctic Ocean: indications for Atlantic water
inflow in the past 150,000 years. Global and Planetary Change 31,
65–86.
Menard, H.W., Smith, S.M., 1966. Hypsometry of Ocean
Basin provinces. Journal of Geophysical Research 71,
4305–4325.
Minicucci, D.A., Clark, D.L., 1983. A Late Cenozoic stratigraphy for
glacial-marine sediments of the eastern Alpha Cordillera, central
Arctic Ocean. In: Molnia, B.F. (Ed.), Glacial-marine sedimentation. Plenum Press, New York, pp. 331–365.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
Morris, T.H., Clark, D.L., Blasco, S.M., 1985. Sediments of the
Lomonosov Ridge and Makarov Basin: a Pleistocene stratigraphy
for the North Pole. Geological Society of America Bulletin 96,
901–910.
N^rgaard-Pedersen, N., Spielhagen, R.F., Thiede, J., Kassens, H.,
1998. Central Arctic surface ocean environment during the past
80,000 years. Paleoceanography 13, 193–204.
Nowaczyk, N.R., Baumann, M., 1992. Combined high-resolution
magnetostratigraphy and nannofossil biostratigraphy for
Late Quaternary Arctic Ocean sediments. Deep-Sea Research 39,
567–601.
Nowaczyk, N.R., Knies, J., 2000. Magnetostratigraphic results from
the eastern Arctic Ocean: AMS 14C ages and relative palaeointensity data of the Mono Lake and Laschamp geomagnetic
reversal excursions. Geophysical Journal International 140,
185–197.
Nowaczyk, N.R., Frederichs, T.W., Eisenhauer, A., Gard, G., 1994.
Magnetostratigraphic data from Late Quaternary sediments from
the Yermak Plateau, Arctic Ocean. Evidence for four geomagnetic
polarity events within the last 170 Ka of the Brunhes Chron.
Geophysical Journal International 117, 453–471.
Nowaczyk, N.R., Frederichs, T.W., Kassens, H., Norgaard-Pedersen,
N., Spielhagen, R., Stein, R., Weiel, D., 2001. Sedimentation rates
in the Makarov Basin, central Arctic Ocean: a paleomagnetic and
rock magnetic approach. Paleoceanography 16, 368–389.
Nurnberg,
.
D., Wollenburg, I., Dethleff, D., Eicken, H., Kassens, H.,
Letzig, T., Reimnitz, E., Thiede, J., 1994. Sediments in Arctic sea
ice: implications for entrainment transport and release. Marine
Geology 119, 184–214.
Payne, M.A., Verosub, K.L., 1982. The acquisition of post-depositional detrital remanent magnetization in a variety of natural
sediments. Geophysical Journal of Royal Astronomical Society 68,
625–642.
. osmarty,
.
Peterson, B.J., Holmes, R.M., McClelland, J.W., Vor
C.J.,
Lammers, R.B., Shiklomanov, A.I., Shiklomanov, I.A., Rhamstorf, S., 2002. Increasing river discharge to the Arctic Ocean.
Science 298, 2171–2173.
Pfirman, S., Lange, M.A., Wollenburg, I., Schlosser, P., 1990. Sea ice
charcteristics and the role of sediment inclusions in deep-sea
deposition: Arctic-Antarctic comparisons. In: Bleil, U., Thiede, J.
(Eds.), Geological History of the Polar Oceans: Arctic Versus
Antarctic. NATO ASI Series C, Vol. 108, pp. 187–211.
Phillips, L.R., Grantz, A., 1997. Quaternary history of sea ice and
paleoclimate in the Amerasia Basin, Arctic Ocean, as recorded in
the cyclical strata of Northwind Ridge. Geological Society of
America Bulletin 109, 1101–1115.
Phillips, R.L., Grantz, A., 2001. Regional variations in provenance
and abundance of ice-rafted clasts in Arctic Ocean sediments:
implications for the configuration of Late Quaternary oceanic and
atmospheric circulation in the arctic. Marine Geology 172,
91–115.
Polyak, L.V., 1986. New data on microfauna and stratigraphy
of bottom sediments of the Mendeleev Ridge, Arctic
Ocean. In: Andreev, S.I. (Ed.), Sedimentogenesis and NoduleFormation in the Ocean. Sevmorgeologia, Leningrad, pp. 40–50
(in Russian).
Poore, R.Z., Phillips, R.L., Rieck, H.J., 1993. Paloeclimate record for
Northwind Ridge, Western Arctic Ocean. Paleoceanography 8,
149–159.
Poore, R.Z., Ishman, S.E., Phillips, L., McNeil, D., 1994.
Quaternary stratigraphy and paleoceanography of the Canada
Basin, western Arctic Ocean. US Geological Survey Bulletin 2080,
1–32.
Schneider, D.A., Backman, J., Curry, W.B., Possnert, G., 1996.
Paleomagnetic constraints on sedimentation rates in eastern Arctic
Ocean. Quaternary Research 46, 62–71.
1453
Scott, D.B., Mudie, P.J., Baki, V., MacKinnon, K.D., Cole, F.E.,
1989. Biostratigraphy and Late Cenozoic paleoceanography of the
Arctic Ocean: foraminiferal, lithostratigraphic, and isotopic
evidence. Geological Society of America Bulletin 101, 260–277.
Sejrup, H.P., Gifford, H.M., Brigham-Grette, J., L^vlie, R., Hopkins,
D., 1984. Amino acid epimerization implies rapid sedimentation
rates in Arctic ocean cores. Nature 310, 772–775.
Shackleton, N.J., Berger, A., Peltier, W.R., 1990. An alternative
astronomical calibration of the lower Pleistocene timescale based
on ODP Site 677. Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh
81, 251–261.
Shackleton, N.J., Crowhurst, S., Hagelberg, T., Pisias, N.G.,
Schneider, D.A., 1995. A new late Neogene time scale: application
to leg 138 sites. Proceedings of the Ocean Drilling Program,
Scientific Results 138, 73–101.
Shackleton, N.J., Crowhurst, S.J., Weedon, G.P., Laskar, J., 1999.
Astronomical calibration of Oligocene-Miocene time. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 357, 1907–1929.
Sikes, E.L., Samson, C.R, Guilderson, T.P., Howard, W.R., 2000. Old
radiocarbon ages in the southwest Pacific Ocean during the last
glacial period and deglaciation. Nature 405, 555–559.
Smith J, D., Foster, J.H., 1969. Geomagnetic reversal in Brunhes
normal polarity epoch. Science 163, 565–567.
Spielhagen, R.F., Bonani, G., Eisenhauer, A., Frank, M., Frederichs,
T., Kassens, H., Kubik, P.W., Mangini, A., N^rgaard-Pedersen,
N., Nowaczyk, N.R., Sch.aper, S., Stein, R., Thiede, J., Tiedemann,
R., Wahsner, M., 1997. Arctic Ocean evidence for Late
Quaternary initiation of northern Eurasian ice sheets. Geology
25, 783–786.
Stein, R., Schubert, C., Vogt, C., Futterer,
.
D., 1994. Stable isotope
stratigraphy, sedimentation rates, and salinity changes in the latest
Pleistocene to Holocene eastern central Arctic Ocean. Marine
Geology 119, 333–355.
Stein, R., Steinke, T., Dittmers, K., Fahl, K., Kraus, M., Matthiessen,
J., Niessen, F., Pirrung, M., Polyakova, Ye., Schoster, F., Futterer,
.
D.K., 2004. Arctic (paleo) river discharge and environmental
change: evidence from the Holocene Kara Sea sedimentary records.
Quaternary Science Reviews, this issue (doi:10.1016/j.quascirev.2003.12.004).
Steuerwald, B.A., Clark, D.L., Andrew, J.A., 1968. Magnetic
stratigraphy and faunal patterns in Arctic Ocean sediments. Earth
and Planetary Science Letters 5, 79–85.
Svindland, K.T., Vorren, T.O., 2002. Late Cenozoic sedimentary
environments in the Amundsen Basin, Arctic Ocean. Marine
Geology 186, 541–555.
Sweeney, J.F., 1985. Comments about the age of the Canada Basin.
Tectonophysics 114, 1–10.
Tiedemann, R., Sarnthein, M., Shackleton, N.J., 1994. Astronomic
timescale for the Pliocene Atlantic d18O and dust flux records of
Ocean Drilling Program Site 659. Paleoceanography 9,
619–638.
Thierstein, H.R., Geitzenauer, K.R., Molfino, B., Shackleton, N.J.,
1977. Global synchroneity of Late Quaternary coccolith datum
levels: validation by oxygen isotopes. Geology 5, 400–404.
van Donk, J., Mathieu, G., 1969. Oxygen isotope compositions of
foraminfera and water samples from the Arctic Ocean. Journal of
Geophysical Research 74, 3369–3407.
Verosub, K.L., 1975. Paleomagnetic excursions as magnetostratigraphic horizons: a cautionary note. Science 190, 48–50.
Verosub, K.L., 1982. Geomagnetic excursions: a critical assessment of
the evidence as recorder in sediments of the Brunhes Epoch.
Philosophical Transactions Royal Society London A 306,
161–168.
Watkins, N.D., 1968. Short period geomagnetic polarity events in
deep-sea sedimentary cores. Earth and Planetary Science Letters 4,
341–349.
ARTICLE IN PRESS
1454
Weber, J.R., Roots, E.F., 1990. Historical background; Exploration,
concepts,and observations. In: Grantz, A., et al. (Eds.), The Arctic
Ocean Region, Vol. L. Geological Society of America, The
Weber, J.R., Sweeney, J.F., 1990. Ridges and basins in the central
Arctic Ocean. In: Grantz, A., et al. (Eds.), The Arctic Ocean
Region, Vol. L. Boulder, Geological Society of America, The
Witte, W.K., Kent, D.V., 1988. Revised magnetostratigraphies confirm
low sedimentation rates in Arctic Ocean cores. Quaternary
Research 29, 43–53.

as a PDF

Transcription

Similar documents

Arctic IO by Analogy - Center for Integrated Operations in the

10_crane faro and pag proposal 2015

The role of Danish Armed Forces in the Arctic and KNUD

Happy Skin - Provital Group

Artic King Crab flyer

Headings in Calibri bold

Tree Top Ocean Views

DENTAL low res - Plummers Lodges

Research Station of Natural History in Greenland

FMSEA 2012 Field Trips: A. Snorkeling at Egmont Key