to full article
Transcription
to full article
Hungry for More Exclusive Technomic report reveals what consumers want from their c-store foodservice program—and shows who’s delivering it By Samantha Oller and Abbie Westra || soller@cspnet.com and awestra@cspnet.com I f you’re looking for a retailer to model your foodservice program after, consider two venerable operators with radically different approaches: Wawa and QuikTrip. It’s not the price that beats all for these retail leaders. Rather, it’s their remarkable consistency of execution and customer service; their high-quality value and atmosphere; and their attention to increasingly important side issues, such as portion size and healthy options, that had consumers rating their foodservice offerings as best in class in a recent groundbreaking study on c-store foodservice. Mike Sherlock, director of foodservice for Wawa Inc., Wawa, Pa., is pleased with not only his company’s ratings, but also those of the other top scorers. “Had you done this study five, 10 years ago, you probably would have seen very different scores,” he says. “The industry as a whole is going in the right direction, and Wawa as well.” In one of the most comprehensive consumer-driven studies conducted in 50 CSP J une 2 0 1 2 the channel, foodservice expert Technomic Inc., Chicago, surveyed consumers to identify the most important attributes they consider when buying food at c-stores, and then rank how well 20 separate regional and national c-store brands delivered on these attributes. So the scores come from the very shoppers who patronize these convenience chains. Technomic gave CSP an exclusive look at its 2012 Consumer C-Store Brand Metrics Study to peel back consumer motives and perceptions, and find out how the industry is doing in the race for share of stomach. We also benchmarked the results against the restaurant industry (see “Rating the Restaurants,” p. 54) to measure how c-stores are competing against quick-service restaurants (QSR) and fast-casual chains. The retail chains featured in the Technomic study represent a who’s who of the c-store industry, a collection of some of the largest companies, all offering prepared food programs of varying complexity. Of the 20 chains, Wawa and QuikTrip ranked highest in many of the 10 food and beverage attributes—including food taste and flavor, visual appeal and variety—and appeared in the top three nearly every time. Others represented the next tier of strong foodservice players, including Midwest stalwarts Casey’s General Stores and Kum & Go, the Stripes concept from Susser Petroleum, travel center behemoth Pilot Flying J, and Atlanta-based RaceTrac. Despite the accolades for the leaders, the overall rating for the c-store industry and performance of some of the nation’s largest chains also showed room for improvement. The c-store channel is delivering on some important attributes, but it is barely passing on too many— especially when compared to QSRs. That said, among the Technomic study’s most interesting findings is that there is a heavy halo effect emanating from certain chains that transcends the food itself. This discovery is prompting experts to agree that a successful program must be about the food—and the experience. Some of the study’s other conclusions: ▶ Big Misses: C-stores overall are Photos by Abbey Lewis falling short on several fundamentals, including food quality and taste/flavor. ▶ Good Looks: Several retailers, notably Wawa, QuikTrip, RaceTrac and Pilot Flying J, had more than 90% of consumers ranking them “good” and/or “very good” on food visual appeal. ▶ Uniquely Yours: When it comes to unique food items, c-stores perform modestly, with not one chain hitting 80%. However, four companies—QuikTrip, Wawa, Stripes and Casey’s General Stores—had scores totaling at least 70%. The 3,755 consumers in the Technomic shopper panel purchased foodservice from a c-store within two months of the September 2011 report. They were asked to rank the level of importance of approximately 50 attributes, and then “If you score well within [attribute] categories, you’re going to drive loyalty, and loyalty drives high scores.” how well 20 large c-store chains delivered on these expectations. The operators were selected by store count, the estimated percentage of units offering prepared food and foodservice share of in-store sales. (One major retailer with a prominent foodservice reputation that is missing from the list is Sheetz Inc. The Altoona, Pa.-based chain just missed the top 20 by these metrics for the study, according to Technomic.) Within the top 10 most important attributes (see chart on p. 52), c-stores overall are delivering at or above importance levels in only four categories: convenient location, beverage quality, speed of visit and order accuracy. Food quality, taste and flavor, service, cleanliness and value all need work. When examining the 10 attributes that focus purely on food and beverage (as we did for this article), c-stores overall delivered below expectations on some of the more important attributes such as food quality, taste and flavor, variety and availability of healthy items. The study confirmed that c-store retailers have mastered dispensed beverages, meeting consumers’ high expectations for this critical product with highly satisfying offers. However, in other areas—quality of kids’ menus, craveable and unique items, CSP June 2012 51 2012 Technomic 2012 Consumer C-Store Brand Metrics Study In its first c-store brand-focused study, Technomic Inc. asked an online panel of 3,755 convenience-store shoppers—nationally representative for age, gender, ethnicity and income—about their last experience at one convenience store that they had visited in the past two months. If a consumer had visited more than one store brand in the past two months, that person was randomly assigned one of those store brands to review for the survey. The chains were assessed by 115 to 200 respondents each, with most being reviewed by 200. Shoppers were asked to rate the importance of 50 attributes, as well as how well the c-store chains performed in meeting them. Importance of Attributes, C-Store Foodservice Visitation Attribute Important Very important Total Quality of food 40% 51% 91% Taste and flavor of food 40% 51% 91% Convenient location 41% 50% 91% Quality of beverages 45% 45% 90% Pleasant/friendly service 47% 42% 89% Clean kitchen/food prep area 35% 53% 88% Speed of visit 49% 39% 88% Offers good value through low prices 46% 42% 88% Order accuracy 42% 45% 87% Offers good value through quick, high-quality service 47% 40% 87% Source: Technomic Inc. Base: 3,755, based on most recent visit For more on the findings, see p. 57. and limited-time-only offers—chains were ranked higher than consumer expectations, but those were low to begin with. A Tale of Two Retailers Among the 20 chains rated in the Technomic study, Wawa scored highest among consumers for seven of the 10 food-specific attributes measured. This is no big surprise. Indeed, “the Wawas of the world” is a common refrain for an industry person talking about the pinnacle of c-store foodservice, leaps and bounds ahead of most others. Consumers have their own fanatical love of the chain, whose emphasis is made-to-order hoagies and a recently revamped coffee program. Wawa stores sell more than 195 million cups of coffee and 52 million 52 CSP J une 2 0 1 2 hoagies per year. Wawa’s foodservice legacy goes back to when the chain began offering deli meats and cheeses in the 1960s. Along with the iconic hoagie, Wawa has since pioneered programs such as smoothies (launched at the same time as McDonald’s own platform); coffee from airpots instead of glass carafes; and breakfast items such as the Sizzli breakfast sandwich. In April, CEO Howard Stoeckel announced stores will begin offering full-service, barista-style coffee and more items that embrace consumers’ desire for “freshness,” such as a new California Classic Hoagie, with bacon, avocado and cucumber. Wawa has now turned its focus to the store experience, redesigning its prototype to fit Stoeckel’s vision for his chain: fast casual to go. “We cleaned up the clutter,” Stoeckel shared with attendees of CSP’s Restaurant Leadership Conference earlier this year. Bright colors, sleek display cabinets, digital menu boards and touch-screen ordering terminals all make for a streamlined, restaurant-like experience. “Wawa has always been viewed as a c-store, but we now want to be viewed as a restaurant that sells gas. We want to be more like you when we grow up,” Stoeckel told the audience of restaurant franchisors and franchisees at the conference. With nearly 600 stores in the fold and a new café-style store being unveiled in Florida, Wawa ranked toward the top of the study in both theater and fundamentals, scoring high on customer services and cleanliness. And, like QuikTrip, the company taps its store associates to elevate the food experience. “They are the greatest brand ambassadors,” says Sherlock. That manifests not only in granular tools such as employee taste testing and feedback, but also giving them what they need to execute consistently. For Wawa, that has meant investing in new technology such as touch-screen ordering. It is a service to customers, and it streamlines production as orders appear on the screen in an intuitive way for employees to execute. The same thought is given to new menu platforms, whether it’s a smoothie program or transitioning from glass coffee pots to thermals. “How do we make it as easy as possible for the associates to deliver a high-quality experience on a consistent basis?” Sherlock says. Meanwhile, QuikTrip’s path to foodservice excellence is a winding one. Less than a decade ago, the Tulsa, Okla.-based company owned one of the best fountain programs in the convenience channel. But its approach to food was driven more by size than quality. Spokesperson Mike Thornbrugh said the chain figured out that wasn’t necessarily the case. (For more on this topic, see p. 59.) Then in 2006, the company hatched QT Kitchens, a bakery and commissary creation that delivers fresh sandwiches, wraps, salads, fruit and pastries daily. So confident is QuikTrip today that the 600store operator most recently launched what it calls the Generation Three store, which places foodservice front and center (CSP—May ’12, p. 18). The store features a broad array of prepared foods, nearly two dozen flavors of smoothies and frozen drinks, more hot dogs and hot food, and an emphasis on take-and-bake food, such as lasagna and pizza. And while QuikTrip was forced to embrace a speed course in foodservice specifics, the company had the critical intangibles in place: namely, a phenomenal corporate culture and coveted base of die-hard customers. So it wasn’t surprising that QuikTrip ranked first in the Technomic study for friendly service, staff product and concept knowledge, as well as store cleanliness—in addition to food taste and flavor, portion size for price paid and unique items. “QuikTrip is leveraging their employees,” says Tim Powell, Technomic’s director of research and consulting. “They understand they have that point of contact with the customer.” It’s this sense of culture and environment that the Technomic report finds to be at least as important as the food quality itself in building a dynamic foodservice program. “Customers have to trust that the employees are top-notch,” says Thornbrugh. “You have all these great ideas, but without people, stores and cleanliness, you can forget it.” And despite the strong ranking, the company is not ready to rest on its laurels. “Selfishly, we want to be No. 1 in everything,” says Thornbrugh. “We freely admit this is still new for us. [QuikTrip CEO Chet Cadieux] has said many times it’s taken us 20 to 30 years to get to be good in selling gasoline and other merchandise. We’re going to be patient, continue to learn the business and continue to get better.” Consistency Is Key Despite their different paths to foodservice excellence, what Wawa and QuikTrip both have ultimately achieved is consistency in execution—a quality that is built into the DNA of their foodservice programs, which creates a brand promise to the customer. Indeed, a lack of consistency from store to store is often what separates most c-stores from QSRs. Franchise models, stores that were folded in via acquisition and a general backpedaling to get into the foodservice game all lead to a collection of stores at which a customer doesn’t know what to expect from visit to visit. “Everyone uses the McDonald’s model,” says Powell of Technomic, citing the fast-food behemoth’s reputation for consistent—if not consistently excellent— food, despite its franchise base. “Wherever you buy that hamburger, even if it’s bad, it’s going to be consistently bad. You know what you’re going to get.” Consumers’ uncertainty about c-stores, meanwhile, bears out even among the most prominent chains. The Technomic report shows some national brands scoring in the low 70s for food quality, flavor and taste, variety and visual appeal. The number drops even lower—mostly 50s and 60s—for less significant categories such as appeal of limited-time-only offers (LTO) and availability of healthy foods. “When you’re a little more decentralized and you have franchised stores, it’s more difficult to keep it consistent,” says Powell. “That’s just inherent in the segment right now, the inconsistency.” For San Antonio-based Valero, it can be challenging to correlate execuCSP June 2012 53 Rating the Restaurants Leaders in c-store foodservice will tell scale (92% for quality, 91% for taste/ you they don’t line their programs up flavor) and casual dining (93% each). against fellow convenience retailers. It’s C-stores, meanwhile, had a compos- the quick-service restaurants (QSR) that ite score of 85% for food quality and keep a fire under their seats. taste/flavor—a significant gap compared “If we’re just trying to challenge to its restaurant counterparts. c-stores, that’s pretty limited,” says Mike “These numbers will increase, but Thornbrugh, spokesperson for QuikTrip there is still a perception that to get high- Corp., Tulsa, Okla. “We’re going after the quality food you might have to get that food industry in its entirety.” from a restaurant today,” says Monnette. “functional intent.” Start with what you want out of a product or program, such as extended shelf life. Through that lens, answer questions of storage, distribution and operations to find the product that meets your goal. “Not training your people properly, along with a complex conceptual model—you put that with our high turnover ratio in c-stores, and it’s a recipe for disaster,” he says. For the Technomic study, consumers’ One bright spot for c-stores is bever- top priorities for restaurants were similar ages. Ninety percent of survey respon- to those of c-stores. “Everybody across dents said beverage quality was good Introspection Time the board wants clean restaurants and or very good, and they gave retailers a high-quality food,” says Sara Mon- composite score of 91%. With their eyes on the goal, c-store retailers are attempting to transform consumers’ perception about the quality of food and the experience in a c-store. But preliminary figures from the NACS State of the Industry Report of 2011 Data shined a spotlight on a glaring disparity. When it comes to foodservice, topquartile players such as QuikTrip and Wawa generate two to four times the sales as that of the remaining 75%. Industry folks therefore suggest that the top performers are raising the rest of the industry. Can the opposite be said when looking at foodservice from a consumer perspective? Are the lower performers bringing down the rest of the channel? Powell of Technomic says no. “I don’t think customers think like that,” he says. “Consumers look at wherever that option is within the radius of where they want to travel and what they’re in the mood for,” whether it’s a Kum & Go, a Publix or a CVS. For Powell, the issue is matter of fact: “If you’re a c-store, you have to perform as a restaurant and execute on the basics. That way, you become an option for them.” nette, Technomic’s director of consumer Monnette was surprised by the research. From there, consumers put similar level of importance customers more emphasis on speed, convenience place on atmosphere at both restau- and accuracy of order at restaurants. rants and c-stores. Comparing performance in those “I would have expected that atmo- top attributes, restaurants performed sphere is more important at fast food better than c-stores. QSRs received a because even though a lot of the occa- 90% performance ranking for both sions are to-go or through the drive- quality and flavor/taste. Fast casual thru, a lot of people are still dining ranked 94% for each, beating out mid- inside the restaurant,” she says. tion with sales projections, says Geoff DeCastro, senior category manager of foodservice. This is doubly so because Valero also does not have the same food offer available at all sites. Of its 1,000 Valero Corner Store locations, only 300 stores offer the full program—or “real food,” as DeCastro describes it—which varies from straight grab and go, such as fresh hot dogs and other roller-grill products, to breakfast tacos made with homemade tortillas, fried chicken and chicken sandwiches. “We have a good field organization, but you never really know 100% that the execution is there or not,” says DeCastro. Valero area managers each visit 10 stores monthly to evaluate execution of the 54 CSP J une 2 0 1 2 foodservice offer, while zone managers and Ecosure perform quarterly checks. For QuikTrip, consistency comes with not only offering the same retail offer at each store, but also vertical integration. The chain runs its own commissaries and distribution, ensuring consistent product and deliveries. “I think we’ve been superb at it,” says Thornbrugh. “There have been a couple of times where you’ve had ice and snowstorms. QuikTrip—not just for a c-store but any retail outlet—was one of the few that was still able to get product out for people to purchase. But our folks deliver regardless of the weather.” Joe Chiovera, vice president of foodservice for Alimentation Couche-Tard’s Circle K Stores, focuses on what he calls For information on obtaining the complete Consumer C-Store Brand Metrics study, visit www.technomic.com. Quality, Flavor and Taste Importance: ▶ 91% of consumers said food quality was an important or very important factor influencing c-store foodservice visitation (93% for QSR visits; 94% for fast casual). ▶ 91% said that food taste and flavor was important or very important (93% for QSR; 95% for fast casual). ▶ 90% said beverage quality was important or very important (78% for QSRs; 80% for fast casual). Delivery: ▶ 85% of consumers said c-stores were good or very good at delivering on food quality expectations, as well as food taste and flavor. ▶ 91% said c-stores were good or very good at delivering beverage quality. A Leaders: ccording to Sara Monnette, flavor, despite having disparate store director of consumer research types. The new concept stores [CSP— for Technomic, the gap between Jan. ’12, p. 58] are actually intended importance and delivery is wider than to address many of those experiential desired here, especially compared attributes—specifically service and with how the QSR and fast-casual consistent execution. Until then, a segments scored on delivery (90% halo effect may be helping boost Taste and Flavor for QSRs and 94% for fast casual). their numbers. QuikTrip 94% Wawa 93% Food Quality (customers citing the food was good or very good): Wawa 91% Kum & Go and QuikTrip 90% Pilot Flying J 89% Casey’s General Stores 87% Where do you go from here if For QuikTrip, with consistency you’re Wawa, with very strong scores? comes quality. “It’s one of the reasons Kum & Go 90% Focus on the intangibles. “We’re why QuikTrip wanted to have total con- trying to look at the whole shopper trol over everything,” says spokesman Stripes (Susser Petroleum) and Pilot Flying J 89% experience,” says Mike Sherlock, Mike Thornbrugh. “It would be our director of foodservice for Wawa. That workers, our ideas, the way we trans- includes digital signage and sprucing ported, the way we merchandised it.” up the foodservice area to eliminate QuikTrip’s Generation Three stores clutter and provide more interaction offer a wider selection of prepared between customers and associates. foods and beverages, including 22 fla- Kum & Go L.C., West Des Moines, vors of smoothies and frozen drinks, Iowa, received a strong score of 90% and an emphasis on take-and-bake for both food quality and taste and food, such as lasagna and pizza. Beverage Quality Wawa and Stripes 96% QuikTrip 95% Pilot Flying J and Speedway 94% BP ampm 93% Source: Technomic Inc. CSP June 2012 57 Visual Appeal and Portion Size Importance: ▶ 85% of consumers said food visual appeal is an important or very important factor influencing c-store foodservice visitation (88% for QSR visits; 90% for fast casual). ▶ 69% said portion sizes are important or very important (71% for QSR visits; 74% for fast casual). Delivery: ▶ 85% of consumers said c-stores are good or very good at delivering on food visual appeal. ▶ 82% said c-stores are good or very good at delivering on portion size expectations. W Leaders: hile Valero Corner Stores did not Valero Corner Stores’ foodservice rank in the top 10 of brands by program is currently in between the visual appeal, it has made a real effort commissary stage and made to order. Wawa and QuikTrip 92% to address this attribute, which it sees To help bridge customers’ assumption RaceTrac and Pilot Flying J 91% as a fundamental reason why c-stores about a lack of freshness, the chain are not more widely embraced as a makes a point of removing food from Casey’s General Stores and Kum & Go 88% foodservice option. its packaging and displaying it in a fix- Stripes and Kwik Trip 86% “Take the hot dog as your starting ture. “Our program is generally grab point; most c-stores will serve product and go,” DeCastro says. “If you walk that they buy packaged, and they just up to a case, you can see hot, glisten- heat it up and put it in a warmer,” says ing kolaches, and not in bags and Geoff DeCastro, senior category man- packaging.” ager of foodservice. “Until customers Meanwhile, c-stores ranked fairly can see the product made in the store well in portion size, with 82% of con- and understand that it’s fresh, it’s sumers saying it’s good or very good. going to be a slow process.” And yet just 69% of consumers said Even after this step has been taken, portion size was important in the first many customers may still assume that place. Turns out supersizing may be the retailer brought the food in from getting downsized. the outside, says DeCastro: “Have your “We thought everything had to be oven out front, create some theater big—huge slices of bread, meat, etc.,” behind the food prep so customers can says QuikTrip’s Mike Thornbrugh. “We see you making it, see it coming out of found out that’s not necessarily accu- the oven, and then they can start to rate. People wanted a competitive really trust you a lot more.” price and a good-quality food item.” Food Visual Appeal (customers citing food visual appeal was good or very good) Portion Size QuikTrip 88% Wawa 87% RaceTrac 86% Casey’s General Stores and Kangaroo Express (The Pantry) 85% Source: Technomic Inc. CSP June 2012 59 Appeal of LTOs, Seasonal Offers, Craveable Items and Unique Items Importance: ▶ 46% of consumers said LTOs and seasonal offers are an important or very important factor influencing c-store foodservice visitation. (46% for QSR visits; 47% for fast casual). ▶ 59% said the same for craveable items they can’t get at home (68% for QSR visits; 73% for fast casual). ▶ 56% said unique items they can’t get elsewhere are important or very important (63% for QSR visits; 65% for fast casual) Delivery: ▶ 68% of consumers said c-stores are good or very good at offering appealing T he levels of importance here are to the power of LTOs to generate actually quite low, so it’s in a buzz, best exemplified by McDonald’s retailer’s best interest to focus on the McRib. “You create this desire by tak- more critical attributes before tackling ing it away from them and not being these types of factors. apologetic about it,” he says. “[You LTOs. ▶ 70% said they are good or very good at offering craveable items they can’t get elsewhere. ▶ 65% said the same for unique items. The low importance of such items could say], ‘It’s working now so let’s is “not terribly surprising” to Mike keep it on the menu,’ but it’s going to Leaders: Sherlock of Wawa. “Many consumers lose its sizzle because it’s not a main are routine-oriented, and LTOs need to item. Every item you roll out cannot LTO or Seasonal Offers simultaneously deliver on the appeal be a signature item.” Wawa 83% QuikTrip 76% LTOs, which explains its No. 5 ranking Holiday Stationstores 75% in this area. The chain charts out its RaceTrac 73% of the offer (variety, taste, etc.), as well Valero Corner Stores has embraced as value perception to change normal purchasing habits,” he says. And yet retailers shouldn’t ignore programs on a three-month calendar these attributes altogether. As a pro- and promotes the LTOs with outside gram continues to evolve, consumer signage. expectations will evolve as well. (customers citing LTO or seasonal offers were good or very good) Each LTO offer serves a different Craveable Items Wawa 81% Casey’s General Stores 77% QuikTrip 76% Valero Corner Stores 73% “If you’re not used to seeing purpose. For example, Valero may sell healthy options or unique, higher- a fish sandwich during Lent to maintain quality food at a convenience store, sales, while introducing an LTO bakery Unique Items you might not expect it or find it to item to spike sales another month. It QuikTrip 79% be important because that’s not why is also a way to test new options to Wawa 77% you’re going there. But then as you further grow the lunch day-part, a big Stripes 72% start to see it, your perceptions and focus for Valero Corner Stores, which Casey’s General Stores 70% expectations change,” says Sara Mon- is testing an LTO personal-size pizza for nette of Technomic. three months to see how it performs as Joe Chiovera of Circle K points 60 CSP J une 2 0 1 2 a lunch option. Source: Technomic Inc. Variety of Offer, Availability of Healthy Items, and Quality of Kids Meals Importance: ▶ 85% of consumers said variety was important or very important. (Technomic’s QSR study did not ask about the importance of variety.) ▶ 65% said the availability of healthy items was important or very important (67% for QSR visits; 69% for fast casual). ▶ 49% said that how kid-friendly a store is was important or very important (47% said kids’ menu variety was important; 46% for fast casual). V Delivery: ariety is important or very impor- to satisfy their need state for that tant to 85% of consumers, but particular experience,” says Wawa’s Joe Chiovera of Alimentation CoucheTard’s Circle K warns against going overboard with products. Mike Sherlock. While Valero Corner Stores has no formal healthy program, it has ▶ 82% of consumers said that c-stores were good or very good at delivering on variety. ▶ 58% said c-stores were good or very good at offering healthy options. ▶ 57% said that c-stores were good or very “Variety is the spice of life, but made an effort to offer products for not when you’re starting out in food- different lifestyles. One that has hit a service,” he says. “Throw your pitch nerve is sugar-free cappuccino. “We down the center of the plate and get got a lot of positive response, almost Leaders: it right. Build the foundation and grow more than anything we’ve ever done, from there; it’s not like you have to when we put sugar-free options in the Variety of Offer get there tomorrow. You have to go stores,” says Geoff DeCastro. good at offering a quality kids’ menu. (customers citing variety of offer as good or very good) Wawa 93% QuikTrip 92% Stores ranked tops in kids’ meals, the Pilot Flying J 87% chain doesn’t offer an official kids Casey’s General Stores 84% station to station in this business. Oth- Interestingly, while Valero Corner erwise you’ll never be able to sustain any growth.” Meanwhile, the paradox of con- menu. DeCastro suspects that cus- sumers talking thin and eating fat is tomers are reacting to its ICEE frozen- Healthy Options waning, albeit slowly and dependent beverage program, which has grown Wawa 80% in popularity over the past two years QuikTrip 71% from 15% of cold dispensed beverage RaceTrac 65% noticed the increased interest, and sales to 35% of sales in the summer. Valero Corner Stores 64% many of its recent rollouts are veering He credits not only the ICEE’s $1 pro- toward more healthfulness. Wawa motional price point during the sum- is likewise watching healthy trends, mer, but also the availability of regional while being careful to offer a balance. offers for the program’s growth. For “We’ve found the importance upon the market. Mike Thornburgh of QuikTrip has Kids’ Menu Quality Corner Stores and Wawa 66% RaceTrac and QuikTrip 63% example, in Texas, Valero Corner APlus (Sunoco), Kwik Trip and Kangaroo Express 62% within our offer is variety of options Stores have found success with Big Cumberland Farms 56% for our customers—fruits, salads, Red flavored ICEEs, while in the South, etc.—as well as more indulgent offers Mountain Dew Blue Shock is popular. 62 CSP J une 2 0 1 2 Source: Technomic Inc.