here - Ceramic Arts Daily
Transcription
here - Ceramic Arts Daily
William Hunt............................................Editor Ruth C. Butler..........................Associate Editor Robert L. Creager............................ Art Director Kim S. Nagorski.......................Assistant Editor Mary Rushley.................. Circulation Manager MaryE. Beaver.................Circulation Assistant Connie Belcher................ Advertising Manager Spencer L. Davis.................................Publisher Editorial, Advertising and Circulation Offices 1609 Northwest Boulevard Box 12448, Columbus, Ohio 43212 (614) 488-8236 FAX (614) 488-4561 Ceramics Monthly (ISSN 0009-0328) is pub lished monthly except July and August by Professional Publications, Inc., 1609 North west Blvd., Columbus, Ohio 43212. Second Class postage paid at Columbus, Ohio. Subscription Rates: One year $22, two years $40, three years $55. Add $10 per year for subscriptions outside the U.S.A. Change of Address: Please give us four weeks advance notice. Send the magazine address label as well as your new address to: Ceramics Monthly, Circulation Offices, Box 12448, Columbus, Ohio 43212. Contributors: Manuscripts, photographs, color separations, color transparencies (in cluding 35mm slides), graphic illustrations, announcements and news releases about ceramics are welcome and will be consid ered for publication. Mail submissions to Ceramics Monthly, Box 12448, Columbus, Ohio 43212. We also accept unillustrated materials faxed to (614) 488-4561. Writing and Photographic Guidelines: A booklet describing standards and proce dures for submitting materials is available upon request. Indexing: An index of each year’s articles appears in the December issue. Addition ally, Ceramics Monthly articles are indexed in the Art Index. Printed, on-line and CD-ROM (computer) indexing is available through Wilsonline, 950 University Ave., Bronx, New York 10452; and from Information Access Co., 362 Lakeside Dr., Forest City, Califor nia 94404. These services are available through your local library. A 20-year subject index (1953-1972), covering Ceramics Monthly feature articles, and the Sugges tions and Questions columns, is available for $1.50, postpaid, from the Ceramics Monthly Book Department, Box 12448, Co lumbus, Ohio 43212. Copies and Reprints: Microfiche, 16mm and 35mm microfilm copies, and xerographic reprints are available to subscribers from University Microfilms, 300 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48106. Back Issues: When available, back issues are $4 each, postpaid. Write for a list. Postmaster: Please send address changes to Ceramics Monthly, Box 12448, Columbus, Ohio 43212. Form 3579 requested. Copyright © 1992 Professional Publications, Inc. All rights reserved 2 Ceramics Monthly May 1992 3 4 Ceramics Monthly Volume 40, Number 5 • May 1992 Feature Articles Fred Stodder by Anne Telford, ................................................................................ 27 Without Laws by Paul Soldner ............................................................................... 30 Ron Kovatch a review by Michael Madonick ......................................................... 32 Table Settings by Catherine White ......................................................................... 34 Coconut Grove For northern potters like Cheryl Husby, getting ready for a February show can mean digging an outdoor kiln out of drifted snow. But the task is psycho logically easier when the pots are destined for a fair such as the “Coconut Grove Arts Festival” in Miami, where warm weather and retail sales can provide a successful “working vacation.” Participants point out pros and cons beginning on page 43. Without Laws Paul Soldner discusses the pitfalls of heeding or needing critiques and “expert” opinions; turn to page 30. American Wood Fire by George Lowe ................................................................... 35 with No Ideas but in Things by Jack Troy ............................................................... 36 Coconut Grove with reports by Ed Risak, Bob and Cheryl Husby, Robert Briscoe, Rick Foris, Steve Howell and Peter Saenger........................................................... 43 Portfolio: Sandy Brown and Takeshi Yasuda by Tony Birks ....................................... 49 Displays that Sell by Ernest Fair ........................................................................... 80 Geyser Bottle Performance Raku by Jerry Crimmins ........................................ 82 Wood Ash in Glazes: Economical and Ecological by Art Grupe................... 84 Up Front Ron Nagle..................................................... 14 California Clay............................................. 18 Contemporary Clay at Sotheby’s................. 14 Robert Harrison Workshop.......................... 20 Mexican Folk Ceramics............................... 14 Fred Stodder Attributes of music and architecture are reflected in the colorful low-fire sculpture of this San Francisco artist; see page 27. Geyser Bottle Performance Raku Dan gerous but fun—pots “spout off” when quenched in water; page 82. The cover Both Sandy Brown (shown in her studio in South Molton, Devon, En gland) and husband Takeshi Yasuda “came to pottery largely by accident ” yet now they produce “some of the most vital ceramic work in Britain today,” says author Tony Birks; their profile begins on page 49. Kevin Kautenburger.................................... 20 Marvin Sweet............................................... 16 Northern Musings by Deborah McWatters........................... 20 Clay on Walls............................................... 18 A Vase for Flowers...................................... 22 Departments Letters......................................... 8 New Books.................................. 78 Call for Entries ...........................58 Comment: Suggestions................................. 64 Politically Correct Pots by Brad Sondahl.................................... 86 Calendar .....................................66 Classified Advertising................ 86 Questions.................................... 76 Index to Advertisers ...................88 May 1992 5 Letters Hair Sculpture Response Continues Regarding “Hair Sculpture and Its Roots” [February 1992], I wonder at the difference between what I call art and what is portrayed in Ceramics Monthly. Even though I often disagree with what potters or ceramists are producing, they make me think. But CM’s article on hair sculpture was bizarre, to say the least. I do believe in freedom of expression, but if I want to see “body decoration in primitive cultures,” I’ll watch Wilma Flintstone. The boundaries of art haven’t been stretched; they’ve been snapped. Just my opinion. Keep the weird articles coming. Don Edwards Whitecourt, Alberta In “Hair Sculpture and Its Roots,” the pictures alone brought many thoughts to my “head.” But the article didn’t recom mend how high to fire this art. Thinking of “coneheads” (since they aren’t on TV anymore), one wonders, “with blurred boundaries,” how high did the artist fry her own head and when? I hope that Ceramics Monthly is showing me the difference between sculpture, fashion, performance art and garbage. Carol Leworthy Scarborough, Ontario Every month, just when you think you’ve seen it all, CM proves you haven’t. Nice going! Micheline Likas Oakville, Ontario March Critique There are times when I feel a msyor value of Ceramics Monthly is in the use of the glossy cover as a pot wrap for low-fire salting. The March issue is a case in point. I fail to see value in the detailed recount ing of the London auction, Elizabeth MacDonald’s life history or the “Confes sions of a Collector.” On the other hand, I was disappointed in the limited coverage given Ruth Duckworth and her work—certainly de serving of a Ceramics Monthly portfolio. I did appreciate the presentation on Steve Davis-Rosenbaum, as well as the lengthy, detailed article “Crystalline Glazes: A Precise Method.” Even though I am not interested in the subject now, I am confident that it could become of real 8 CERAMICS MONTHLY value to me or one of my students some time in the future. My real complaint is with the Ceramics Monthly technical staff and the answer to the questions relative to ceramic magnets. Considering the readership of Ceramics Monthly, I would guess that a far simpler answer would have been sufficient. I won der how many readers give a hoot about the technicalities of ceramic magnets or would ever make any use at all of the information presented. Second, the answer to the question on ‘jiggering” and ‘jolleying” was not clearly written for novice potters. Both terms are correct only if used properly. It would have been clearer if CM had said that jolleying is the term for “forming a pot by using a spinning mold, usually of plaster, which shapes the outside of the pot,” and where the inside of the pot is formed first by pressing clay against the inside of the spinning mold, then by drawing a metal template on a pivoted arm down into the hollow of the mold to form the inside of the pot—usually a cup or bowl. Jiggering makes use of a spinning mold that defines the inside of the form. Clay is placed on the plaster form, then the outside of the piece is formed by a metal template “fastened to a pivoted arm, ...brought down onto the mold” shaping the piece—usually a plate or platter. The quotes are from Frank Hamer’s book The Potter’s Dictionary of Materials and Techniques, first edition. It would have been a whole lot clearer and easier if CM would have gotten permission from the publisher to reprint [Hamer’s] diagrams of a jigger and jolley. Finally, the CM answer states that ‘jolleying is the proper term for produc ing flatware.” I would guess that most people would think of flatware as dining utensils, such as knives, forks and spoons, more readily than plates and platters. It would have been clearer had CM simply said plates and platters. Kurt Wild River Falls, Wis. Hot for “How To” I know why CM foists the functional versus nonfunctional issue on us every month. It is to hide the fact that the gen eral writing in the magazine along with its poor photography is going down rapidly. The February 1992 issue had a cover story about [Christine Federighi] making 6-foot-tall [sculptures], placing them in a 6-foot-tall kiln [in a room] with an 8-foot ceiling. CM almost always leaves out the “how do they do it” part of an article. I know that “how-to” articles are be neath CM’s editorial prowess, but some of us would like to know how it was done. In the March issue, the cover story had nice words, nice generalities, but not one fact—besides MacDonald using a slab roller. Questions I would like answered are: What kind of slab roller? How does she dry tiles to keep them from warping? How does she adhere tiles to the wall? Does she grout the tiles, and with what? The March technical article [“Crystal line Glazes: A Precise Method”] was writ ten by a mad scientist reinventing the wheel. With the hundreds of kilns avail able all inspected by UL, why waste our time with what must have made Mr. Norkin’s life insurance agent cancel his policy upon reading the article? The March issue had some very good photographic illustrations. The Third World articles CM runs seem to be accom panied by photographs taken with Third World cameras equipped with pin-hole lenses, as they are so out of focus. Please improve the magazine with “how-to” articles or, at the very minimum, answer the obvious questions potters want to know the answers to. Edward Higgins Pittsboro, N.C. Keep It Coming I love CM as it is. Just keep it coming. Bodil Andersen Humble Denmark Cultural Fantasy Intrigued by the photographs of Gail Kendall’s glazed earthenware tureens in February’s Ceramics Monthly, I read her article, expecting it to illuminate her work. Unfortunately, the article is built upon one ridiculous statement after an other. The further I read, the more ap palled I became. Ms. Kendall subsumes all of the Afri can continent’s diverse cultures into one, claiming that it lacks a category called art (even as recently as 1989). Although she deems the hollow categorization of ob jects as “art” to be beneath Africans, she pigeonholes all the non-art they create to be of a utilitarian or religious nature. Her culturally acute observations continue with how all Africans uniformly appre hend the non-art that surrounds them. How do millions of people overnight assimilate all their cultures into one non-art art loving consensus? Has the CIA infiltrated and brainwashed the continent into a terrifying Group Think? No, even May 1992 9 Letters more horrible, it turns out that Africans group think non-thought about non-art art that surrounds them; they accept that objects “simply are what they are.” Did Ms. Kendall leave her eyeglasses and hearing aids back in Nebraska or lose them during her voyage? I’m thankful she was able to avoid using the words dark, exotic and rhythmic during her descrip tion. I can’t imagine even the continent of Australia receiving such a limited cultural depiction, and it only has one country. Ms. Kendall claims she went to Africa in search of how to make art more mean ingful to the average person, to close the gap between the “cultural elite” and the “uninitiated.” This can indeed be done quickly when the significance of art is reduced to beer commercial slogans (“it’s it and that’s that” so “why ask why”). Un fortunately (especially since she teaches), Ms. Kendall’s false forays into African life seem to have stemmed from her desire to escape rigorous thought (the “dense theories” of her own culture’s art). She sought a culture that would reaffirm her belief that art and intellect are as compat ible as vinegar and water. I’m amused she appears to think that before modernism the art world dutifully served the public, knew its culturally sig nificant place and, by God, never strayed onto the path of personal whimsy and money. The disparity between the “cul tural elite” and “the uninitiated” is centu ries old; patrons and collectors didn’t just crop up. It used to be that the public at large wasn’t even given a chance to see art, much less judge it as culturally rele vant. Now we are lucky enough to have museums allowing us the opportunity to chastise art for not being decipherable at first glance. I do want art to be more prevalent in American society, but I wish this because of the sense of mystery and discovery that it can offer. Immediately perceptible meanings don’t promote discovery; they annihilate it. What’s wrong with being required to use your mind when viewing an artwork? Art appreciation is not inher ent. Newborns don’t look at the foot of a pot and automatically goo in pleasure. If the average person is taught how to read art and unearth its layers of meaning, the gap between the “cultural elite” and the “uninitiated” would be greatly reduced without any art abasement. However, a mindless approach to art isn’t the least of Ms. Kendall’s worries. 10 CERAMICS MONTHLY She’s bored of art museums that display work by the same artists (collective thought might be admirable in Africans but a no-no for curators). It seems bring ing as many of the best artists as possible for the local viewing public, rather than specializing their collections for museum hoppers like herself, might result in the loss of some entrance fees (which turns out not to be such a bad thing). I have no qualms with questioning what falls into the category of best art (women and minorities are too under represented not to question who’s “in”), I just don’t find it logical that museum curators should enter into art speculation rather than representing art world trends. So much name repetition turns artists into upscale, mass-market, fashion design ers (Good lord, not another Picasso. Could that man produce or what?). Does she produce the designer analogy to shame museums for collecting the four particular artists she mentions? (Appar ently she hasn’t seen enough Kiefers to know how to spell his name correctly.) For jumping on the current art-scene band wagon too soon? Or is she equally bored of all Chagalls, Kandinskys and Monets scattered about the U.S.? I was previously under the impression that snobbery was a trait based on intellect, not lack thereof. I personally can hardly wait for the day Kiefers come to K-Mart; I’ll be pacing the aisles expectantly, ears cocked for the blue light special of my dreams. While Ms. Kendall gives museums low originality points for their “high” art collections, all is not lost. Luckily their decorative art collections have grown wonderfully unique over the years of financial and curatorial neglect. No prob lem of having to wade through Levi Leaches, Reebok Robineaus and Movado Morrises. Neglect sounds like the best thing that could ever happen to a mu seum. I should thank my lucky stars Michi gan drastically cut funding to the arts; the DIA [Detroit Institute of Arts] will soon be very unique, perhaps even saved from the brink of disaster. I hope Ms. Kendall remembers to include it in her guide to America’s most underfunded/unique museums (though it might come up against some pretty tough competition over the next few years). Those of you who return to Ms. Kendall’s article will notice that most of the outrageous statements that I mention, Ms. Kendall presents more subtly. This subtlety makes me unsure of whether her negligence results from inaccurate com prehension or sloppy presentation. I hope May 1992 11 Letters poor content is the result of lousy writing. But whichever the case, she deserves to be chastised. Craftspeople need to pay atten tion to the accuracy of their writing as well as the astuteness of their perception. And bad articles don’t deserve to be published. I wish CM editors would start address ing their skills toward content as well as layout. A well-written magazine should be founded on more than luck. Emily Severance Ann Arbor, Mich. Tatsuzo Shimaoka With great interest we always read the latest issue of Ceramics Monthly, but with special interest we read the autobiography of Tatsuzo Shimaoka in the January and February 1992 issues. We highly appreciate that CM allotted so much space to these richly illustrated and very personal statements, which are nevertheless of great general interest. Karl and Ursula Scheid Budingen Germany I found it interesting that someone wrote to clarify the difference between mishima and zougan. [See Celina Clavijo’s letter in the February issue.] I have asked several people here [in Japan] what, if any, difference there is between the two. The majority said they are the same. When I was interviewing Tatsuzo Shi maoka, I asked him what the difference was. He brought out a Korean bowl of the classic mishima type. It was made from an iron-rich clay, and impressed with flower stamps and maybe some kind of jumping tool. I don’t know if the slip was brushed or poured on, or if the piece was dipped. All seem to be ways of doing slip inlay. [When the Japanese do differentiate,] what they refer to as mishima is the classic Korean design, which was given the name mishima after the old Japanese calendar; I was told the calendar was decorated or looked somewhat like the Korean bowls. I get the impression that mishima is a littleused term here and that, stylistically, zougan covers a broader meaning—in other words, it can mean just about any thing that is decorated with an inlaying technique. For the record, a lot of Shimaoka’s work is either dipped in slip, or slip is poured into the recessed areas to ensure an even coating, particularly on forms like plates. 12 CERAMICS MONTHLY I don’t know if an exact definition can be made of either term. Perhaps, in order to avoid any more semantic confusion, such work should just be called “inlay.” Darice Veri Motegi Japan Casting Mileage Let’s see more about casting technol ogy and process. It is truly an answer for artists-potters who like spending a lot of time on one piece, but also need to get some mileage out of their efforts. Bruce Loivry Millstadt, 111. Prices Appreciated I really appreciate it when Ceramics Monthly includes the sale price of an ob ject/artwork in the caption to a picture. It helps me (as a businessperson) to see where my prices stand with other selling artists/craftspeople. Thanks for a great magazine! Patricia Broum Whittier, Calif. Ad-miration CM’s advertisements...have taught me as much about pottery (as a commercial venture) as any of the books I’ve read. Ray Pacquette Alamo, Tex. Not Time to Give Up After 35 years teaching junior high and elementary classes, I decided it was not time to “give up.” I’d taken an education course during my sabbatical year and it highlighted daywork. Our instructor was Tom Smith, a well-known potter in New Brunswick; I was “bitten.” I was so de lighted to be allowed to take three years clay study at the New Brunswick College of Craft and Design here in Fredericton. My “pottery shed” is nearly complete, equipment-wise. I work there daily experi menting with glazes and firing stoneware to Cones 8 and 9 in an electrical kiln. Life has never been so good! I eagerly await every issue of Ceramics Monthly. I read and re-read them with pleasure, deriving many useful ideas and answers to my conundrums. Liese O’Hara Fredericton, New Brunswick Share your thoughts with other readers. All letters must be signed, but names mill be xvithheld on request. Mail to The Editor, Ceramics Monthly, Box 12448, Columbus, Ohio 43212; or fax to (614) 488-4561. Up Front Ron Nagle’s “Incense Burner V,” 41/4 inches in length; at Michael Himovitz Gallery, Sacramento, California. Ron Nagle Works by Ron Nagle (faculty artist at Mills College in Oakland) were featured recently in an exhibition at Michael Himovitz Gallery, Sacramento, California. While continuing his investigation of the cup, Nagle has ex panded on this form in a variety of ways, as in the incense burner shown here. For both the cups and these new forms, he uses a layered glazing technique—firing and reglazing each piece as many as 30 times. Contemporary Clay at Sotheby’s In mid March, Sotheby’s New York followed the lead of rival auction houses at home and abroad (see “Contem porary Ceramics at Christie’s” in the April 1989 CM and “A Hot London Summer” in the October 1991 issue) with its first sale devoted solely to works by contemporary artists working in craft media. Drawn from various sources (individuals, galleries, museum deaccessions), the offer ing was basically a hodgepodge, rather than a significant You are invited to send news and photos about people, places or events of interest. We will be pleased to consider them for publication in this column. Mail submissions to Up Front, Ceramics Monthly, Box 12448, Columbus, Ohio 43212. 14 CERAMICS MONTHLY collection, which may help account for the fact that nearly 40% of the 102 lots remained unsold by the close of the auction. Statistically speaking, however, clay did better than the other so-called craft media (fiber, glass, metal and wood). Of the 31 ceramic lots in this sale, only 10 were “bought in” (not sold) to protect their reserve prices (minimum sale prices set by the seller). And several of the sold lots went for well above their catalog estimates. For example, a Viola Frey bricolage plate, estimated to sell for between $3500 and $4000, brought $5000; a Peter Voulkos pierced platter, estimated at $4500-$5500, brought $6500; and a Betty Woodman pillow pitcher, estimated at $6000-$8000, brought $10,000. A 10% buyer’s premium was added to each winning bid listed here. Mexican Folk Ceramics “Mexican Folk Ceramics,” an exhibition of 20th-century works by Mexican artists, was shown recently at Pewabic Pottery in Detroit. Curated by photographer/educator/ museum director Van Deren Coke, the exhibition pre sented diverse wares from 14 different villages. While domestic pots (large water jars, loop-handled bowls and three-legged vessels designed for open-hearth cooking) May 1992 15 heal or to perform feats of magic, to sanctify marriage and ensure fertility, to promote rainfall and ample crops, to drive off evil spirits, venerate the dead or guard and sustain the living—in short, to ensure success in life. “In many instances, reality was not only expressed by art, but determined by it. Art forms were allowed to serve as the controlling agent over the things people could not control or understand. A sculpted figure became the focus of a ritual and provided the feeling of protection.” For works in this exhibition, Sweet “intertwined the figure with the vessel, as the human form and the vessel are analogous byway of their component parts (i.e., foot, body, shoulder, neck, lip). And in a metaphoric sense, they both serve as a vehicle of the physical and conduit of the spiritual. “I have not prescribed a specific function to any of these vessels. Their use and meaning should remain a matter of continuous conjecture. While this ambiguity leaves their meaning obscure,” Sweet concluded, “what should remain clear is their continuity with the past and Teodora Blanco’s “embroidered” figure, handbuilt, unglazed terra cotta, approximately 28 inches in height; at Pewabic Pottery in Detroit. have changed little in the past century, sculptural works (figures and elaborate candelabra made for religious and national holidays) reflect modern influences, with some forms having been developed in direct response to tourist and gallery interest. Some of the most respected Mexican ceramists of this century were represented in the Pewabic show, including Candelario Medrano of Jalisco, Heron Martum Mendoza of Puebla, and the late Teodora Blanco of Oaxaca. Marvin Sweet Sculptural vessels by Marvin Sweet (faculty artist at Brad ford College in Maine) were exhibited recently at the Society of Arts and Crafts in Boston. Coil built and raku fired, the forms are then sandblasted to achieve a surface suggesting the effect of natural forces. Historically, “figures made in clay have provided us with the visual reminders of cultures and religions,” Sweet commented. “People would assign clay forms a power to 16 CERAMICS MONTHLY Marvin Swee,,s „Earth Bjrth;, coj| bui|t sandb,astedi 28 inches in height; at the Society of Arts and Crafts in Boston. May 1992 17 Up Front their ability to sensitize audiences to respond to the memory of our collective experience” Clay on Walls “Clay on Walls,” an exhibition of works by northern Ohio artists, was presented recently at the Great Northern Corporate Center in Cleveland. The goal of the show, as stated by curator George Woideck, was to document a recent trend toward wall work among northern Ohio ceramic artists. “For millennia, clay in the form of tile, mosaic and relief wall sculpture (constructed of shaped brick) long enhanced secular and religious life,” he noted. “In more recent history, unfortunately, it became a medium locked in tradition, used all but exclusively in imitative architec tural components.” This show, which belies that fact, included works by Woideck, David Alban, David Batz, Paula Dubaniewicz, Hans Tegebo’s “Cutter,” 70 inches in diameter, Cone 03 earthenware saggar fired to Cone 05, $3000; at the Artery, Davis, California. juried by Robert Brady (ceramic and wood artist, and instructor at the California State University, Sacramento). From the 280 slide entries to the “California Clay Compe tition,” Brady selected 38 works for exhibition. From those, four were chosen by Brady to receive cash awards of $1000 each, with one receiving an additional $100 award donated by Alpha Ceramics in Sacramento. Three of the cash prizes were awarded to Kit Davenport, David Alban untitled mural, 84 inches in height, carved, unglazed bricks, $4000; at the Great Northern Corporate Center, Cleveland. Angelica Pozo and Andrea Serafino, all of Cleveland; Steve and Debra Bures, Peninsula; Nancy Finesilver, Bedford Heights; Bonnie Gordon, Seville; and Claudia Zeber, Akron. After opening in Cleveland, “Clay on Walls” then traveled to the Mansfield (Ohio) Art Center. California Clay The Artery, home of the Artists’ Cooperative of Davis, California, recently presented a statewide competition 18 CERAMICS MONTHLY John Slavonic, “Queen,” 41 inches in height, Lincoln fireclay and sand, with kiln wash, slip and copper carbonate, fired to Cone 6 reduction, $1200; winner of a $1000 prize and the $100 Alpha Award in the “California Clay Competition.” May 1992 19 Up Front Oakland, for “The Curl”; Randy Grimmel, Modesto, for “Three of You”; and Judy Hiromoto, San Francisco, for “Tibet on My Mind” The fourth cash prize went to John Slavonic, Grass Valley, who also received the additional $100 Alpha Award, for his fireclay sculpture “Queen” (shown on page 18). Robert Harrison Workshop Architectural artist Robert Harrison (Helena, Montana), who works in a variety of media including ceramics, completed a site-specific sculpture during a 1991 work shop at the University of Arizona, Tucson. Graduate and undergraduate students at the university and several members of Southern Arizona Clay Artists assisted in the construction of “Tucsonarch,” a 9-foot-high adobe and steel pipe arch, reinforced and secured by a rebar infra structure set in cement foundations. Harrison arrived with a yellow-green enameled, spiral culvert pipe strapped to the top of his car. This became one of the arch supports. The other support was con structed by packing a 12-inch-diameter cardboard tube (the kind used for casting concrete columns) with adobe, then pressing glazed shards (donated by local ceramists) into its wall. Next, a wooden arch support was hoisted into position, secured on scaffolding and filled with adobe. Against the adobe column, an adobe buttress was similarly constructed, and the surface carved into a spiral relief. All the plain adobe surfaces were then coated with terra-cotta red, blue and white stucco. The arch’s form and surface reference the work of Antonio Gaudi, Southwest architecture and the saguaro cactus of the Sonora Desert. It was also sited to echo the architecture of the UA. ceramics studio, built in 1942 as an adobe revival church. Kevin Kautenburger A solo exhibition featuring recent sculpture by resident artist Kevin Kautenburger was presented earlier this year in the Arcadia Gallery of the Clay Studio in Philadelphia. Memory and subconscious played a key role in this work. “I spend much of my time as an artist trying to summon fragments of reverie,” Kautenburger commented. To him it seems that “making art is starting from behind at the beginning, with clues fading fast and these Kevin Kautenburger earthenware sculpture, 3 feet in height, handbuilt, painted with oils; at the Clay Studio, Philadelphia. being evasive themselves. My forms may almost have to be formless themselves ” Kautenburger noted, “as it seems futile to try to make ghosts tangible ” Northern Musings by Deborah McWatters Robert Harrison’s “Tucsonarch,” 9 feet in height, adobe with shards and stucco, and painted steel culvert pipe; site-specific sculpture at the University of Arizona, Tucson. 20 CERAMICS MONTHLY In the north country, heavily influenced as we are by our neighbors from, say, Lake Wobegon, we do our thinking kind of slow, over a cup of coffee or during a walk with our jackets zipped up over our ears “to keep the brains May 1992 21 Up Front warm.” One such walk got me started thinking (slowly, of course) about “Dual Function: Ceramics for the Tabletop and the Eye,” a show on view recently at the Northern Clay Center in Saint Paul. This exhibition, which in cluded pots by Joseph Bennion, Malcolm Davis, Kathey Ervin, John Glick, Woody Hughes, Paul Kotula, Diana Kulisek, Jeff Oestreich and Susanne Stephenson, was curated by ceramist Michael Padgett (whose own work is sculptural, but who trained as a functional potter). Having some awareness of the curator’s work (i.e., his limited emphasis on producing pots in the past decade), I felt compelled to muse on the rationale he applied to putting together what proved to be an impressive exhibi tion, reflecting a variety of approaches to contemporary pot making. I added tq my musings a talk with Padgett and recalled, as I walked, that he had stressed his particu lar interest was in the sincerity and integrity of the “pur pose” of those artists he’d asked to participate, rather than his having a consuming hunger for production pottery and a commitment to functionalism. Since Padgett’s motivation in agreeing to put together this exhibition had everything to do with his respect for the work of participants and very little to do with fascina tion with the history of functional ceramics, it seemed only right that musings on the “why” of this show center around the role of “art” in pot making. Archaeologists have discovered that the earliest clay creations were not, as one might expect, bowls, plates or cups, but were artifacts representing some human or spiritual presence or belief, objects with no function except to remind, contemplate or protect. Ultimately, of course, these artifacts served to adorn the camps and caves of their creators or recipients. Discoveries were made about the durability and malleability of clay, and it has served as a medium for plates, cups, bowls, etc., ever since. Musing on, I made an attempt to tie my thoughts together into the context of history, contemporary clay artists and the Northern Clay Center. I thought about clay as a medium for function, fine art, creative expression, industry and business. Clearly, collecting is about decora tion, uniqueness and the very human desire to remem ber, to reflect, to hold dear an object made with great care, integrity and sincerity. I thought further how clay as fine art and decoration, and clay as functional object have, truly, always run parallel. In our society it often seems that making anything is mostly about making a living and has a heck of a lot to do with supply and demand. Every artist-potter is confronted with the livelihood dilemma, causing questions about the utility of what she/he is spending time doing, perhaps wondering “Am I being selfish to want to spend my life making things, expressing myself?” On the other hand, is the artist terribly materialistic to think the work should sell and provide a significant source of income? So, we have these potters showing at the Northern Clay Center, and their answer to this dilemma was to make, not from a spirit of greedy materialism or egoism, but, as I see 22 CERAMICS MONTHLY Jeff Oestreich stoneware pitcher, 10 inches in height, wheel thrown and altered; at the Northern Clay Center in Saint Paul, Minnesota. it, from a spirit of truth telling and generosity. It all comes down to that same old question—sure it’s a pot, but is it worthy of our attention as art? In the case of this particu lar show, the answer is “Yes ” The reason I decided to impose my musings on a reading audience is that I wanted to stress the importance of pot making as a way of truth telling, generous expres sion, even treasuring. I want to share that there is as much validity in making pots in our modern world of consumer ism and materialism as there was the day the first potter picked up some mud, squeezed it, dropped it (by acci dent) into the fire and later, when the fire went out, discovered what looked like the spittin’ image of a par ticularly influential spirit; what’s more, it was hollow so anyone could drink from it, and it was quite decorative on that particular shelf in the cave. A Vase for Flowers The invitational exhibition “A Vase for Flowers” at Green wich House Pottery in New York City featured works by 14 ceramists known for their vase forms. A few of the works on view were not vases, but all were connected to the floral motif—as can be seen in Linda Arbuckle’s teapot “Overview,” below, handbuilt terra cotta, decorated with brushed majolica flowers. Vases on display were filled weekly with fresh flower arrangements designed by local floral artists. Linda Arbuckle’s “Overview,” 20 inches long, terra cotta with majolica glaze; at Greenwich House Pottery, New York City. May 1992 23 26 Ceramics Monthly Fred Stodder by Anne Telford California artist Fred Stodder wants to get inside his sculpture. “Instead of looking around the piece, like a lot of sculpture, I was thinking ‘What if I cut into the space?”’ he said. To create spaces that echo passage ways or windows, he consciously in corporates architectural elements into his free-standing ceramic sculpture. Simple shapes are broken up into planes and carefully delineated by col orful glazes. Stodder might spend three weeks sketching and thinking out the form before creating a foam prototype. “I’m pretty meticulous about every idea,” he remarked. He chose foam because of famil iarity. “I used to make surfboards when I was in high school in Laguna Beach. This is like a higher density form of the same thing. I’ve used foam off and on for maybe 12 years. It’s expen sive, but it’s the ultimate material for what I’m doing.” Wood is harder to shape and the grain can translate into the mold. Plus the foam won’t absorb water or mois ture because it’s a plastic. From the foam prototype, he then casts a plas ter mold. Stodder cites Frank Stella’s paint ings, David Smith’s metal sculptures and Ken Price’s ceramics as inspira tional, but is influenced most by mu sic. “I’m really inspired byjazz. I’d like my sculptures to radiate in a musical way,” he said. An average day in his San Fran cisco studio involves playing the key board for an hour or two before he begins work on the latest series of sculptures. And music accompanies him throughout the day as he plays selections from a sprawling collection of cassettes. Although Stodder works with molds, they do not expedite the pro cess. “When you cast clay with plaster molds, completely negative shapes have to be cut off, then cast separately In his tightly packed, convertedwarehouse studio, San Francisco artist Fred Stodder has been developing a series of architectural ceramic forms. May 1992 27 and put back together while they’re wet,” he explained. Still, the molds allow freedom to “go almost anywhere with the form. With slab construction [which he used to do], it takes so long just to do one piece, it would be impractical.” Stodder will do multiples of one sculptural form, but finish each dif ferently with commercial low-fire glazes. He doesn’t use overglazes. A perfectionist, Stodder insists on the colors being right the first time. Glazes are applied so that color edges are knife sharp. Sometimes he incorporates texture into the surface, and will contrast gloss and matt glazes; these combinations of color and tex ture add illusionistic dimension. “I see colors as very similar to har mony; you do have to have dissonance along with consonance,” he said. “If you don’t, they’re really going to be boring, just like a major triad chord. “Architectural pieces are fun in that they lend themselves to a little more freedom with surface; somehow that association with architecture—with flat finishes and texture—makes more sense,” Stodder said. “I’m able to play with the colors in a painterly way. “I like to work with these bright colors and somehow try to make them not look cheap. That’s the goal, [al though] it’s hard,” he added. “I try to pop as much color in there as I can without making it look like a circus.” Stodder’s ceramic sculptures shown recently at Viewpoint Gallery in Carmel, California, evoke classic forms of architecture—a skyline in a city of the imagination. A Several weeks of sketching may precede the cutting and assembling ofhighdensity foam prototypes. Foam forms are divided into separate elements, molds made of them and clay castings reassembled still wet. Masking with tape allows Stodder to airbrush or brush areas of glaze with edges that are knife sharp. Though forms are cast in multiples, each is individualized with a different combination of underglazes and glazes, Stodder’s glazing goal is “to pop as much color in there as I can without making it look like a circus” Sometimes underglaze or glaze is airbrushed on adjoining planes at the edge to produce a softer line. 28 CERAMICS MONTHLY Untitled sculpture, 22 inches in height, slip-cast and assembled whiteware, with low-fire underglazes and glazes. Whiteware sculpture, 22 ½ inches in height, cast and assembled, brushed and sprayed with underglazes and glazes. right Low-fire sculpture, 22½ inches high, with textured matt and gloss glazes, by Fred Stodder, San Francisco. May 1992 29 Without Laws by Paul Soldner A leader is best When people barely know he exists Not so good when people obey and acclaim him, Worse when they despise him. “Fail to honor people, They fail to honor you’.’ But of a good leader, who talks little, When his work is done, his aim fulfilled, They will say, “We did this ourselves —Lao Tzu A few years ago, I was doing a work shop at a school with a strong clay program. When my session was fin ished, one of the students asked me to critique his work. I responded with my usual question, “What difference should it make?” As expected, he said it would help him know if he was do ing it right! Again I asked, “What dif ference should it make?” This time he gave me a quizzical smile and said that since I was the expert, I should know more than he did. This same reliance on what others think about art has led to a commonly held precept that outside opinion is important...and correct! Both students and teachers rely on it. We foster this attitude when looking at exhibitions, for example. Almost without excep tion, friends ask, “Do you like it?” Or they offer a defensive, “I don’t like it.” Other critical declarations reflecting their own tastes are stated with an absolute authority that suggests their judgment is important. What differ ence should it make? On the way to my flight, the previ ously mentioned student wanted to talk more about my refusal to analyze his work. I explained that making art was different than other academic courses in that the object or concept was a solitary, unique manifestation of each artist’s inventive vision, and as far as I was concerned that included students. Of course, we are influenced by other art and artists. Historical ex amples abound in books, magazines, museums, schools, and more recently in film and video. But, unlike the study of other subjects that depend on us ing laws of physics, laws of grammar, laws of medicine, laws of math, laws of the law and laws of almost everything, the making of fine art today should be without laws. What difference should it make? Making art, as a profession, is a creative act not unlike scientific in vention. It is about the discovery of things not known (or seen) before. At its best, it adds to history instead of repeating history. Put simply, creativ ity is an individual inventive/creative process. Therefore, if artists rely on the judgment of others, they are not being creative. They may be involved with the field of art, may enjoy mak ing it, but it’s as different as being the composer of music or a performer of music. Both are important in their own way, but the composer created the original. Such inventive work may not be easy or immediately accepted. Keep in mind the problems of Vincent Van Gogh. He wasn’t accepted by the art community, galleries or collectors, and sold only one painting in his lifetime. Nevertheless, because his work was so special, his place in history is now as sured. His skill, drive and vision caused the work to be collected, protected, documented and appreciated, mak ing it undeniably important in the world of Art. If art is essentially a one-person in vestigation, why then is there the need to critique or be critiqued? One rea son seems to be a desire to speed up one’s career, to become rich and fa mous as soon as possible. At the gradu ate school level, such achievement sometimes seems to be the ultimate goal. Along with learning the politics of Art, students are led to believe there are people and ways that really do hasten the process. And so we look to them for guidance. We long to be told what is good and bad. Given this desire, it’s easy to become dependent on, even addicted to, their opinion and even easier to offer an opinion. Thus we elevate the role of teachers, art historians, art critics, reviewers, museum directors, gallery owners, even collectors, as artistic experts. Because of the power inherent in these roles and our desire for success, is it any wonder we think critiquing should make a difference? At its best, it can. But that requires a very mature (or mad) student, independent enough not to need it, as well as opin ion givers secure enough in themselves to withhold personal bias and judg mental pronouncements. Through the years, I found one way to avoid falling into the critiquing trap. When students ask for a critique, I ask that they assemble a body of work, not just one or two pieces. Also, that a number of faculty, fellow stu dents and even friends outside the field come and look at it in the re laxed atmosphere of a small party. By the time they have put the work to gether, they often don’t need outside advice. They have been able to cri tique themselves! I’m sure there are other ways to avoid playing Artistic God, but real problems arise if grades are affected by a critique. Giving grades on artistic effort seems contradictory. On one hand we expect the students to be original, self-motivated and inventive, but then we judge their success or failure by personal feelings. Such pres sure can result in emotional stress, misunderstandings and unfairness. As a student at the Los Angeles Art Institute, I was fortunate to have Peter Voulkos as my mentor. In the two years I was there, I cannot remember hav “Creativity is an individual inventive/creative process. Therefore, if artists rely on the judgment of others, they are not being creative.” 30 Ceramics Monthly ing an official critique by Pete. Yet we students gained self-confidence to cri tique our own work without feeling defensive or the need to please him. Nevertheless, we learned to read Pete’s body language, which “told us” what he was feeling. For example, if he smoked his cigarette with an impa tient draw, the work could be of bet ter quality. If instead he exhaled with a slow, easy release, then he approved. I’ll never forget one kiln opening. I had great admiration for Pete’s sur face embellishment and had tried to duplicate his calligraphy on one of my pots. I must have missed by a mile because as I removed the piece, he gently said, “You don’t need to deco rate unless you have a reason.” He then added quietly, “More good pots are ruined by bad decoration than bad pots are made good. But if you really want to try it, do it on your ‘dogs.’ You might make them better.” And the young man who wanted me to critique his work? As I was board ing the plane, he laughed and said, “I had six different people ask to cri tique that piece in four days. Thanks for not doing it again.” Editor’s note: Marking the close of his 30-year teaching career at Scripps Col lege in Claremont, California, “Paul Soldner: A Retrospective” opened at Lang Gallery of Scripps College, and will travel to 11 other sites during the next three years; the exhibition features 75 works from the late 1950s through the 1980s. Presented concurrently with the retro spective’s premier showing was an exhibi tion of Paul Soldner’s current work, low-temperature-salt sculpture, at the Louis Newman Galleries in Beverly Hills. “Pedestal Piece #9026,” low-fire clay with slip, salt vapor fired, 28V2 inches high, by Paul Soldner, Aspen, Colorado. above “Pedestal Piece #9112,” slab built, with white terra sigillata, lowtemperature salt, 23¾ inches in height; at Louis Newman Galleries in Beverly Hills, California. May 1992 31 Ron Kovatch a review by Michael Madonick Baudelaire spoke of the genius of the child. Artists con stantly strive for that freedom of hand, that innocence of spirit, the naivete that reflects a child’s freshness and surprise. As with the art of many successful neoexpressionists, Ron Kovatch’s new work (shown at Gallery Nine in Champaign, Illinois) evidences a childlike sense in his use of color, form and scale. Additionally, his work in all its forms (drawings, reliquary cups, architectural altar pieces) integrates the delight and magnanimity of a child’s spirit with the disappointments and successes of an adult mind. These sculptures have a spirit that asserts and doubts, one that can view the world of material things and beliefs with a measure of humor and seriousness that magnifies and penetrates human experience. Though Kovatch’s early struggle with Catholicism is clearly the dominant theme in these works, one does not sense an overbearing self-consciousness or myopic view of the world. The altar pieces establish the cross as a huge architectural form, towering and sometimes teetering over a staircase that is surely meant to imply the sacrificial elements of church and that resembles in form and color “Homage to Gauguin ,” 22 inches in height, residual-salt-glazed porcelain, with enamels and gold luster, $1500. 32 CERAMICS MONTHLY the Aztec or Mayan temples of a pre-Columbian land scape. While sometimes clearly humorous, almost Monty Pythonesque, they can be as poignant and probing as the knife driven through the heart of a human sacrifice in those primal jungles. Kovatch, it seems, offers his own heart to us on these porcelain shrines, which are assertions of intellectual doubt and aesthetic strength. It is on this primal level, the force ful expression of doubt, that we find his childlike genius moving freely. The slabs of porcelain seem at once to be dominant structures, but also appear imbued with their own destruction. Something always is not quite right; the shrines are cracked, unstable, trying to convince them selves, their own parishioners, of a confidence that their structure seems to lack. Kovatch has brought each piece to the precarious edge of its own demise. The shrine as an entity takes on a frailness, a humanity that begins to evidence Kovatch’s own faith—one that rises from doubt, a faith in human frailty, a holistic canon that seeks to embrace even the unsavory elements of human nature and of disparate beliefs. ▲ Untitled shrine, 12 inches high, residual salt glazed at Cone 10, then enameled, lustered and sandblasted, $1200. Residual-salt-glazed porcelain shrine, 14 inches in height, with enamels and gold luster, sandblasted, $1200. Ron Kovatch untitled shrine, 24 inches in height, handbuilt porcelain, residual salt glazed at Cone 10, brushed with enamels, low fired and sandblasted, $1500; shown at Gallery Nine in Champaign, Illinois. May 1992 33 Table Settings by Catherine White Though pottery must stand on its own, it need not stand alone. Ideally, pot tery is part of a table setting that is a well-tuned grouping of accoutre ments, food, people and occasion. The viewer is induced to imagine a table setting in use, but it is the actual user who can create a complete aesthetic performance, one in which the pot ter plays a partial role. The context within which pottery appears is the essence of its power to affect us. A recent focus on place settings led me to create ensembles of pottery and tablecloths. The tablecloths evolved from a series of unfolding boxes, each of which held a single cup. Drawings of the cup in use are seen as the box is opened to a flat position. Like the cup boxes, the table cloths allude to the contexts in which I imagine my pots to be used—a din ner table, breakfast nook or elsewhere. For example, “Picnic” provides the beginnings of a table setting for an imagined “ideal” picnic. The center piece is a six-pack of ceramic bottles for serving the thirst quenchers of choice. These bottles are a reminder of the fact that all too often the ob jects around us are taken for granted. The pairing of wood-fired plates and cups with glazed, gas-fired botdes aims to emphasize the value of contrasting rather than identically matching com ponents. For “Ceremonial Coffee,” an imag ined performance art piece, mysteri ous simple boxes initially would be encountered. People would select closed boxes from a tray; as each is opened, the cup in which the partici pant would be served coffee is re vealed. These boxes seek to impart 34 CERAMICS MONTHLY “Picnic ” wood-fired stoneware plates and cups with gas-fired porcelain six-pack, 7½ inches in height, on tablecloth painted with acrylic washes. top “Red Cup Box”3¾ inches high, wood-fired stoneware cup, in unfolding board-and-cloth box with acrylic and India ink images of the cup in use. greater “weight” and a broader sense of setting (or context) to cups that might otherwise get short shrift. This is an active encounter, requiring the box to be unfolded, the drawings to be interpreted, related to the cup, and finally, the coffee to be drunk in cele bration of the rituals/occasions in which coffee is used. Pottery that can be made for table settings is limitless, as is the aesthetic experience that awaits participants who collaboratively create a significant occasion. The life of pottery lies within its creative use, a use that the potter must consider and empower through her or his aesthetic vision. The author Studio potter Catherine White resides in Warrenton, Virginia. “Platter, Sorting Out the Pieces” 30 inches in diameter, 200 glazed and unglazed stoneware chunks, wood fired, by George Lowe, Gainesville, Florida. A recent conference at the University of Iowa focused on wood firing in America. It was planned by Chuck Hindes, head of the ceramics department at the univer sity; he became interested in wood firing in the late 1960s when the process was “rediscovered” by American potters. Since then, the popularity of wood firing has increased dramatically. Randy Johnston [see the October 1991 CM] provided the conference keynote address. He spoke about the relevancy of wood firing in the 1990s, its historical roots and why potters choose to fire with wood in a technically advanced culture. “We seek the accidents of the fire more than we need the warmth. Firing with wood, we surrender control and the acci dents give our pots nuance and life.” The keynote was followed by the open ing of an invitational and juried exhibi tion at the university’s museum; selections from slide entries were made by studio potters Karen Karnes and David Shaner. “American Woodfire” included works by 57 artists to provide a comprehensive view of the movement in America. Hindes said he was “encouraged by the diversity of the work, especially the conceptual diversity. Without a doubt, there is still a strong Japanese influence; however, there are clear signs of move ment away from that primary element, toward a conceptual integration of the medium. The challenge is for us to take this inspiration and make it an American aesthetic.” Philip Rawson, author of Ceramics, be gan the second day of the conference with an overview in which he identified the wood-firing movement as a “true-cult” rejection of the totally new and commer cially beautiful in favor of the seriously old. Rawson senses a genuine romanti cism in the wood-firing trend that con nects us to the roots of ceramic value. He reminded the audience that Greek and pre-Columbian pots were also wood fired, and wondered why more potters didn’t explore the possibilities of wood firing at lower temperatures. Rawson also acknowledged the ele ment of chance, inherent to the woodfiring process, which enables one to produce truly unique, artistically valuable works. But he cautioned against allowing the process’ arbitrary effects (flashing and ash buildup) to overshadow the pot. Next, Charles Zug, author of Turners and Burners, provided a glimpse into the unpretentious nature of the southeastern folk potters during the 1800s; they dug their own clay, fired wood-burning groundhog kilns, then sold their ware for ten cents a gallon, no matter what the shape or decoration. He went on to ex plain how southeastern folk pottery tradi tions have continued, with minor changes in character, over the years. A series of slides showed how North Carolina folk potter Burlon Craig loads and fires his groundhog kiln in much the same man ner as previous generations. That evening, Louise Cort, curator at the Freer Gallery in Washington, D.C., presented a slide lecture on wood firing in Thailand. This view of ancient firing techniques still in use by large-scale pro duction potteries demonstrates that for Thai folk potters, wood as a fuel reflects necessity rather than aesthetic preference. A day was devoted to defining and addressing issues of the wood-fired aes thetic with panels led by various potters, art critic Janet Koplos and Philip Rawson. It became obvious that the wood-fired aesthetic currently revolves around a pref erence for stoneware temperatures at which the wood ash melts and becomes an integral part of the surface. A May 1992 35 No Ideas but in Things by Jack Troy What, if anything, is American about wood firing? The exhibition “Ameri can Woodfire” answers the question better than any critic can—in accor dance with William Carlos Williams’ dictum used here as this article’s title. With all the gusto and curiosity that characterized investigations of raku and salt glazing more than 20 years ago, many potters and sculptors have turned to wood firing as their process of choice. Peripatetic questing, more than any other characteristic or qual ity, seems to compel the creators and to inhabit the work itself. Several approaches, each at vari ance with the others, characterize the Americanization of wood firing, if there is such a thing: (1) that of the faction of neo-Nippons who emulate and, to whatever degree, cultivate an East Asian connoisseurship in the U.S. or Japan (A subgroup of this category includes ceramic artists whose inspi ration from Asia is less direct, deriv ing from books, exhibitions and contact with those who have lived and worked in Japan.); (2) that of those who regard this approach as a skele ton in the closet and work purposely to avoid any association with Japanese values, real or imagined; and (3) that of still others who give little thought to historical precedent outside the U.S., preferring to follow the only con tinuing tradition of high firing with wood in this country—using ground hog kilns of Staffordshire origin. Ubiquitous and eclectic, wood fir ing in North America has gained pop ularity because its enthusiasts have decided that their work demands the effects of the process. The genre has had virtually no critical support. If any thing, contemporary authors have ig nored wood-fired ceramics; one in particular, Garth Clark, in comment ing on Peter Voulkos’ anagama-fired work, has written: “In 1979, Voulkos began to fire the plates in a Japanesestyle, wood-fired anagama and pro duced a few masterpieces, but these pieces were generally retrogressive in their aesthetic, too dependent on the generosity of the kiln, and too imita 36 CERAMICS MONTHLY tive of Bizen, Seto and other tradi tional Japanese kilns.” Clark’s book, American Ceramics, contains 240 illus trations, only one of which is of a wood-fired object. Elaine Levin’s His tory of American Ceramics contains 352 illustrations, two of which depict pots identified as having been wood fired. No other genre of daywork is so con sistently ignored. Despite the lack of critical sawy by contemporary ceramic historians, the movement has proceeded on level ter rain, with neither a verbal headwind nor a boost from comprehending and appreciative writers who might have advanced the climate of acceptance for this type of work by the public at large. The result is that those ceram ists who fire with wood are themselves the most reliable and articulate speak ers for the movement, at present. As always, the work itself is the best state ment about why wood firing contin ues to grow in popularity among its practitioners and connoisseurs. Regardless of one’s experience with the wood-firing process, this exhibi tion offered a panoramic vista of what is happening in this country today. The extremes of approach call to mind Robert Frost’s statement about the two kinds of potato farmers, one of whom holds out his potato with earth cling ing to the root hairs, as if to say, “Here’s a real potato!” Frost, like the second type he mentioned, preferred his po tatoes (and poems) brushed clean. Among wood firers, the choice of how autobiographical a pot should be— how much fire-genesis it should re veal—is an important concern. Paul Chaleff often solicits the highrisk areas of his anagama-type kiln for effects impossible to achieve by other measure up, aesthetically. (So much for the “generosity” of the kiln.) The Chaleff jar in this exhibition typifies the quiet strength of his best work, pots that hover on their feet like hot-air balloons about to rise, tense with that last volume-defining pull. This jar is a real survivor, document ing the border zone where conscious intent and serendipity mingle. In its presence we are reminded of cultural inhibitions that may have prevented many of us from experiencing such a pot as “beautiful.” Chaleff s work often embodies val ues that confront established norms in our culture, that test the elasticity of our perspective. For example, must “beautiful roughness” always be an oxymoron when it comes to judging ceramics? Must the artist display whiteknuckle control over every square centimeter of an object for it to be considered a success? (Is anything else simply luck?) Will anyone dare to ad mit that an artist’s handling of mate rials can reveal the materials themselves to contain tactile and vi sual expressiveness? Has status hun ger made ceramics a medium to be done increasingly from the neck up rather than from the heart out? That fire can express delicate, painterly qualities, as well as the surflike pounding of an anagama firebox, could be seen in the work of Barbara Diduk, whose four gravity-flirting pieces made us hope Iowa City was not earthquake-prone. Their under stated color modulations have visual depth appearing to grow out of the clay rather than having been applied. Occasionally, one gets a sense of cosmic blessing emanating from woodfired work—the feeling that every means. Exposure to violent heat in or thing and everyone was at the right near the firebox subjects clay to great place at the right time, and the only stress; objects made with this firing way to prove this improbable conjunc space in mind must be from a clay tion is the existence of the work itself. whose refractory qualities will be ap Encounters between matter and spirit; propriate for such a tumultuous zone, the linking of human with nonhuman yet sensitive enough to capture the forces; the interface between con fire’s visual/tactile statement. Even sciousness and chance—all are evident then, a very small percentage will sur in works in this exhibition, particu vive and, among those, fewer still will larly in those reflecting concern in “Chimney Pot ,” I5V2 inches in height, wood-fired porcelaneous stoneware, by David Shaner, Big Fork, Montana. Surface patterning/glazing results from natural ash fall during firing. “Winged Vessel”20V2 inches in length, thrown and assembled “Double Bump,” 22 inches in length, handbuilt stoneware, stoneware, by Karen Karnes, Morgan, Vermont. wood fired, by Eva Kwong, Kent, Ohio. May 1992 37 the selection of clays with great poten tial for color variation when fired, so as to document nuances in atmo spheric variation. Certain other works eschew the vo luptuous surface, revealing a kind of Spartan astringency. Highly refractory clays when lightly salt glazed some times have the texture of a mild case of goose bumps, which came to mind when I handled Linda Christianson’s squat, ascetic teapot; it bears a re semblance to armored vehicles—pro tective of its contents. This nakedness twits with conventional preferences for “pretty” surfaces. It’s impossible to imagine such work being made in the tropics; somehow there’s a presence of winter, that underfired season, in these pots. To their credit, some pieces in the exhibition seemed out of place— Vernon Owens’ salt-glazed jug, for ex ample. They say “home” so clearly, a corner of the gallery should have been set up to look as if people actually lived there. These pots manifest quali ties that will always make the best writ ers sound pretentious. Complete clay statements first and foremost, they were made by potters whose life work, if arranged chronologically pot by pot, might line both sides of the Iowa River as it passes through the campus. That kind of confident making can’t be bought at any price; years of daily com mitment live in such pots. This was one of the best exhibi tions of wood-fired ceramics ever as sembled in the U.S. It was surely the most comprehensive. The work of many other deserving ceramists could not be accommodated, but there is a sense that all are involved in a vital search for information. Nearly every day of the week, somewhere in this country, a wood kiln is being fired. The quest is ongoing. Wood firing in the U.S. is not nearly so well integrated into the ceramics milieu as it is in England, Australia and New Zealand—to name three countries outside Japan where the pro cess has developed and prospered. No doubt there are some who wish it would become just another way to fire; still others would have it no other way—for all its laboriousness, devilish variables and exasperations, wood fir ing offers unique rewards. “Bamboo Jar ” 6 inches in height, wheel-thrown porcelain, wood fired to 2370°F, by Byron Temple, Louisville, Kentucky. 38 CERAMICS MONTHLY In an attempt to eliminate the un predictable and to bolster the notion of “mastering materials,” the dominant influences in our ceramic heritage have weaned heat from fire. Enlisting flame as an ally in the firing process engages a vast palette of potentially discordant or harmonious values. Suc cess often lies in the willingness to court risk as a catalyst between the rational and the intuitive. Trust, rather than fear, character izes the wood firer’s approach to the unpredictable, for, in the words of Louis Pasteur, “chance favors only the prepared mind.” The very fire that can ruin our best work can also bless it beyond our best intentions. Whether we choose wood firing for purely prac tical or for more esoteric reasons, the wish to participate in an ancient dia logue with materials characterizes much of what this exhibition was about. The ghostly counterparts to these pieces lie in shard piles across the country. It is humbling to note that they could well fill the gallery from floor to ceiling as a perverse endorsement of electric kilns and their heated but unfired wares. “Figure #3,” 34 inches in height, slab-built stoneware, by David Dyche, Logan, Utah. “Four Sculptures,” to approximately 24 inches in height, stoneware, by Barbara Diduk, Carlisle, Pennsylvania. Wood-fired porcelain pitcher, 8 inches in height, by Peg Malloy, Edwards, Colorado. Jar, MV2 inches in height, thrown porcelaneous stoneware with natural ash glaze, by Paul Chaleff, Pine Plains, New York. May 1992 39 “Tea-Mate,” to 11 inches in height, wood-fired local stoneware/protoporcelain, by Richard Bresnahan, Avon, Minnesota. “Jar with Bronze Lid,” 8V2 inches in height, thrown stoneware with Shino glaze, by Robert Archambeau, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada. 40 CERAMICS MONTHLY Stoneware covered jar with brushed slips, 8V2 inches in height, by Douglass Rankin and Will Ruggles, Bakersville, North Carolina. May 1992 41 Thrown stoneware vase, 12 inches in height, by Richard Macatee, Athens, Ohio. Salt-glazed jug, IOV2 inches high, fired in a groundhog kiln, by Vernon Owens, Seagrove, North Carolina. Thrown and glazed stoneware coffeepot, 7 inches in height, wood fired, by McKenzie Smith, Miami Beach, Florida. 42 CERAMICS MONTHLY Teapot, 12 inches in length, thrown and altered, by Linda Christianson, Lindstrom, Minnesota. Coconut Grove Crowds estimated near 800,000 attended the 29th annual “Coconut Grove Arts Fes tival” in Miami. A retail fair, “the Grove” draws applicants from across the U.S. It is also the first show of the year for many. Views on the Grove, as well as craft fairs in general, and issues of retail/whole sale selling and economic survival are dis cussed in the following reports by a representative 7 of the 40+ clay exhibitors who were juried into this year’s show: EdRisak As the cold winds of November blew, I walked to the mailbox with anticipation and anxiety. The letter from Coconut Grove was too thin to contain the dreaded “returned slides” of rejection; it may still have contained the awful indecision of being “wait listed.” This year the accep tance letter was there and elation set in. “The Coconut Grove Arts Festival” is one of the first major art fairs of the year. Inclusion means the possibility of begin ning the season with financial success, as well as giving a warm start to someone The fair takes place at a waterfront site in Miami. coming from the frozen north. This marks the initiation of an extremely busy sched ule. Selecting from all the available shows, I try to begin with the most predictable, profitable show possible. This has tradi tionally been the Grove for me. It’s an unusual show in that it runs three days, Saturday through Monday, in mid February. Sales are strong each day. Crowds are always enormous; even when it rains (which is rare), people turn out in full force either to see or to be seen. They include buyers, browsers, bargain hunt ers, exhibitors and exhibitionists in a wild regalia of costumes, jewelry and bizarre hairstyles. Here, crowd watching can be a cheap form of entertainment. Fortunately, bikes, skateboards, skates and dogs have all been banned from the show. This is a great relief to artists, as dogs never bought anything anyway. The secu rity has also been beefed up and that helps provide a more relaxed sales environment. I sell a lot of work through wholesale markets, so I find that the Grove is a per fect testing ground to try out new forms and color combinations. Demographically speaking, there is a good cross section of Southern and East Coast buyers. I make a lot of sales to vacationers from the Eastern Seaboard as well as to local patrons. The new best sellers can then be presented to wholesale clients with a marketability seal of approval. In the first nonrecession of the early 1980s, I observed a drop in wholesale or ders, so I focused on selling retail. Oddly, Terra-cotta box, 7 inches high, with burnished terra sigillata and copper foil, $700, by Sang Roberson, Ormond Beach, Florida. May 1992 43 my mid- to upper-range pieces sold best during this period. In this second nonrecession, I have used the same strat egy, focusing on selling mid- to upperrange pieces through retail shows. So far, it’s been working for the early 1990s. Bob and Cheryl Husby We were firing our salt kiln Halloween night and it started to snow. We reached temperature about midnight. The next morning and 39 inches of snowfall later, the kiln was cooling and totally drifted over. We were glad that the pots in this firing were earmarked for a series of Flor ida shows. When you are making pots in Duluth, Minnesota, selling in the tropics sounds pretty appealing. Getting ready for the shows actually starts with taking good slides, sending for applications and projecting a schedule. This is especially important for Florida shows. Most ask for the booth fee in ad vance; acceptance into the show is an im mediate contract. This can mean a tre mendous outlay of money, with no return for three to six months. Not getting into consecutive shows can cause an expensive two-week break with no income at all, but double booking can cost you one booth fee. We applied to seven, were rejected from one, wait listed for another (which we got into) and accepted to five. Playing the waiting game with applica tions is not the only disadvantage in mar keting through art fairs. It is expensive to travel (food, motels, gas). There is also potential damage to work and display equipment from dirt, winds and rain. Sit ting with the work for hours with no inter ested buyers may convince you that wholesale is a much neater and more profit able way to sell, even at half price. But at this time, we still see advantages in doing good art fairs: It’s fun to travel and you do get retail prices for the pots. You also get customer feedback on prices. We have made price adjustments (up and down) from comments, watching hesitant buyers and some work selling just too fast. There is something to be said for selling your own work directly to the public. We had tried a few Florida art fairs before, but never Coconut Grove. We had heard stories about “buying frenzies,” art ists running out of stock before the show was over, the high quality of the work, etc. So we were excited about getting in and experiencing it first hand. It was evident from the beginning this was a well-run show that considered the needs of exhibiting artists. The advance information was clear and thorough. It was very easy to unload and load our dis play. We were provided with T-shirts, cof fee and an air-conditioned hospitality house with free beer, soft drinks, fruit and cookies. Most importantly, the show at tracted large crowds for three days. Collec Raku vessel, 8 inches high, with white crackle glaze and acrylics, $375, by Rick Foris, Amherst Junction, Wisconsin, 44 CERAMICS MONTHLY tors previewed the show by tram and there was easy access for all customers. Art fairs usually represent 50% of our yearly income and the Grove sales look like they may constitute 10%. We were not disappointed and are definitely looking forward to applying next year. Robert Briscoe I am a professional functional potter who has marketed primarily through art fairs. In the late 1970s, when the Midwest ern economy began to soften, I needed markets outside the agricultural and in dustrial focus of the Great Lakes region, so I began to seek opportunities elsewhere. Common wisdom then was that sales were good in the Sunbelt, particularly in Florida where there were two distinct kinds of shows. Those with “reputation,” which included the Grove, were believed to offer outstanding sales opportunities; the lesser shows were thought to be more of agamble. I first applied to the Grove in 1982, but wasn’t accepted until 1986. Since then, I’ve been accepted on average every other year. The competition is fierce—over 2000 applicants for 350 spaces—about like the currentjob market. On receipt of that first acceptance, I was ecstatic. I had had some success at smaller shows in Florida, but now I was headed to the “biggie.” Excite ment at getting in helped me produce the quantity of work I thought was needed. The show was excellent, although it didn’t match my naive expectations. In the years since, it has remained one of my top events, but has never matched that first year. Occasionally I explore alternative mar keting techniques. I currently sell work through a few galleries, but 70% to 85% of my income is from retail sales. After 20 years of selling at art fairs, being an itiner ant potter has become a large part of who I am. I now know there is not much differ ence in net income between selling whole sale or retail: the costs of going on the road eat up the additional money received. Art fairs are a strange way to make a living and I accept that. I also accept that marketing through art fairs requires many days away from the studio. But all forms of marketing are expensive; moderating these costs is how you survive. My wife thinks I market through fairs because I am a “risk junkie.” I admit loving the unpredictability of acceptance, weather, travel and chang ing tastes. This lack of security creates an edginess that I try to use in my work. The chief benefit from art fairs is the freedom to change at will, to create work I want to make rather than having to dupli cate work from a brochure that may have been published six months or a year ago. Art fairs also offer the opportunity to inter act directly with potential customers, to observe their reactions and to have a dia logue about the work. I especially enjoy hearing how people have used my pots in Porcelain vessel, 15V2 inches high, $400, by Andrea Joseph, Ypsilanti, Michigan. “Cosmic Offering Wall Platter ,” 22 inches in diameter, straw fired, accented with paints, $395, by Christine Colombarini, Dowelltown, Tennessee. top Low-fired wall plaque, 12 inches high, $165, by Toni Mann, Lake Worth, Florida. May 1992 45 Cast porcelain tea service with Cone 5 oxidation glaze, 8 inches in height, $300, by Peter Saenger, Newark, Delaware. their homes (a piece I thought I sold as a vase somehow became a favorite chili pot). RickForis I work alone in a studio behind my home in rural Wisconsin. There are few other artists in the area with whom to get together and share ideas, problems and gripes on a regular basis, so I often feel isolated from the rest of the craft scene. When February rolls around I’m ready to escape for a week or two, renew contacts with the real world, hit a few good restau rants and take in a little sun. Coconut Grove provides an opportu nity to get an immediate critique on the work I’ve been doing for the past months. After looking at a studio full of my own work for so long, it gets to the point where I’m not able to see it objectively. It’s re freshing to see how my work fits within the context of a quality national show. Be cause I only do a few art fairs each year, the volume of images is a creative stimulation rather than a sensory overload. After be ing in such close contact with my work, I’m able to step back and view what I’ve done in a new light. Often I can see the next logical step to take much more clearly 46 CERAMICS MONTHLY than I would had I not left the confines of my studio. The most important aspect of doing this show is feedback (both positive and, even more so, negative) that I get from other artists, gallery owners and the average person on the street. I try to bring pieces in a range of prices, but don’t necessarily make work primarily because I think it will sell. That’s one of the nicest aspects of doing an art fair like this. All parameters disappear and I can con centrate on new ideas and not worry too much about the inevitable mistakes that a new direction brings. There are no spe cific pieces being ordered (as in much of my gallery wholesale business) so there’s freedom to make whatever I please. There is no pressure to insure that all of the special orders survive the work cycle. Any one working in raku, with its high losses, certainly knows the feeling of having to produce multiples of a particular piece to make sure one turns out successfully. I’ve noticed in the last few years that with the increasing glut of wholesale trade and gift shows, featuring the same craftspeople and work year after year, that more gallery owners have gone back to street shows to seek out fresh and innova tive work. It’s not unusual for me to make several gallery contacts at this show. The international flavor of the Miami area also draws dealers and collectors from around the world. Collectors like the possibility of “discovering” new talent as well as the renewal of personal contact with artists already in their collections. Of course, traveling halfway across the country to do an outdoor show can have its downside. It’s an expensive proposition just keeping your vehicle and display in working and presentable condition. Hotel bills and meals add up a lot faster than you can imagine. The vagaries of inclement weather, crowds of would-be customers not in tune with your particular vision, and time away from production add to the already high stress level. To offset the financial risk involved, I try to schedule two or three shows in south Florida for the weekends following the Grove. It’s a lifestyle full of question marks, but I’m still here after 17 years. I must be doing something right. Steve Howell I do six to eight of what I call “varsity team” sidewalk shows each year. That’s “Vessel with Pedestal,” 16 inches long, with sprayed stains, Cone 06 oxidation fired, $450, by Ed Risak, Marquette, Michigan. Footed bowl, 4Vi inches in height, stoneware, with ash glaze over slip, $60, by Robert Briscoe, Harris, Minnesota. May 1992 47 PHOTOS: ALLEN BRYAN, J. BRIAN KING, BILL LEMKE, DAVID MARTEENY, JON MCDOWELL, WAYNE TORBORG AND COURTESY OF THE ARTISTS Burnished and saggar-fired porcelain vases, 5 to 11 inches high, $125 to $600, by Scott Tubby, Georgetown, Connecticut. plenty. I have many friends who do be tween 20 and 30 such shows each year. I get tired at just the thought of being on the road that much. Coconut Grove is a perfect example of a varsity team show. It has a paid perma nent staff who are interested, friendly and attentive. The show has good access and room for setting up and loading after ward. It has good parking, reasonable secur ity and most importantly a well-established reputation for showing quality work. People come expecting to see excellence and they are prepared to pay for it. The Grove was good this year. I have gone there five consecutive years and this was my best. There were two reasons for such a good show: 1) my highest total sales yet, and 2) sales were good across the entire price spectrum. In 1991 my sales were limited to $50 items and a few $750$1000 pieces. This year I had numerous sales in the $250-$450 range along with purchases of the lower- and higher-priced pieces too. And—this is important—it was an easy sell. There was no gnashing of teeth over spending $200, as there was in ’91.1 found many other craftspeople had the same sort of response to their work. 48 CERAMICS MONTHLY The crowd was awake and buying. I wish all shows could be so easy. Peter Saenger When the desserts were good, I de flected my sibling’s interest with words— hoping to hoard the sweets for myself. Now writing about Coconut Grove, I’m tempted to do the same. The show works for me. I’ve had my most successful days here, and this year was close to my best, in spite of the trickling-down economics. The pros of the Grove are: Attendance is huge, hundreds of thousands, some say a million. I’ve met U.S. and international tourists, as well as a “bah-zillion” south Floridians. They have contemporary tastes and are enthusiastic patrons. The mid February dates are perfect, far enough past the December holidays to allow some recovery, yet right in the middle of the winter doldrums. And it is a pleasant expe rience to receive full price for one’s work. Another very important element is the direct contact with people who buy the work, and those who don’t. The show’s energy—all the faces, the whirling inten sity, giggling Lycra and gushing buyers—is both an immense reconnection with the object-appreciating world and my most exhausting week of the year. I enjoy the rapid-fire, direct connections with buyers, who really like to meet artists and ask about the work. Some visit for only a few seconds, others come every day and many return year after year. The downside of this show includes long days, beginning before the sun rises and ending at twilight; contingency plans for weather hazards; nightly packing of all the wares into the truck, while the display stays in place; the 2500-mile roundtrip in the old van; and each year I seem to be included in that elite group of exhibitors who are awarded one bogus purchase by the “stolen credit cards scam committee.” It’s an award I could do without, butit’s the price one pays for dropping one’s guard. Thankfully they are few and far between. The lasting images of the Grove are tropical skyscapes with cloud castles on the horizon; noisy flocks of green parrots rap idly diving in and out of view; and the occasional pair of neon macaws casually flying overhead, underwhelmed by the mayhem below. I can still see and hear them clearly, and I hope to be with them again next year. Sandy Brown and Takeshi Yasuda by Tony Birks A Ceramics Monthly Portfolio Sandy Brown and Takeshi Yasuda by Tony Birks PORTFOLIO COVER Sandy Brown and Takeshi Yasuda in their separate studios, South Molton, England. Some of the most vital ceramic work in Brit ain today is being turned out from a single house in Devon. Sixty-five years ago, with much less competition around, the same would have been said about a small studio not too far away in Saint Ives, Cornwall, where the Leach/ Hamada partnership was forging the famous East/West amalgam that was first to revitalize and finally to dog British ceramics until a decade or so ago. It seems purely fortuitous that once again it is an English/Japanese partnership that is producing the magic mixture, for the Devon house contains the studios of Sandy Brown, English (born in Hampshire in 1946); and Takeshi Yasuda, Japanese (born in Tokyo in 1943). Unlike Leach and Hamada, they work separately and competitively, but the comple mentary nature of their work is striking and I think the Japanese influence is crucial. I must declare my own ignorance of Japanese cul ture and am ready to be told that I am missing the point, or misjudging the priorities in Japa nese ceramics, yet to eyes trained at an En glish art school, it seems that this particular mixture of vitality and fluency could not have been engineered in England or even America. I also believe that critical to the mix is the absence of art school training for these two potters. Their masters were country potters of Mashiko, Japan, not academics of Camber well or the Royal College in London. Art school training can stifle or divert talent and pro duce professional conformists or professional nonconformists who relate, in Britain at least, to a scrambled-together, 20th-century tradi tion of studio ceramics in the absence of much else. I envy Sandy and Takeshi their good fortune in having avoided this, while I recog nize in them the hard-cutting edge of profes sionalism that comes from working in a commercial “market” environment. Mashiko, where they trained and met, is a center of folk pottery in Japan; it is close enough to Tokyo to keep both standards and demand high. Competition is high, too, so the effete or feeble will not survive for long. And there is a real tradition of domestic pot tery widely admired by people of all types for its aesthetic qualities. In a sense, what Sandy and Takeshi have brought from Japan and planted in British soil is more Japanese than what Leach and Hamada took to Saint Ives. Leach’s Oriental ism was pan-Oriental and intellectual, deliber ately and inseparably mixed with Western techniques—witness his slipware chargers decorated with Chinese dragons. If Leach and his followers delighted their customers with “well-found” pots of aesthetic and often graphic excellence, then Sandy and Takeshi differ by designing most of their pot tery output as part of a pattern of living. Their tableware heightens the pleasure of eating or drinking. The pots themselves look better when charged with food. Their high quality of finish ensures that they pass muster in any company, and their vibrant design makes most other studio pottery nearby look somnolent or desiccated. It is in the comparison between their work and that of others that their professionalism and energy set them apart. Although Sandy makes sculpture (which she carefully segre gates from her pots), I would like to focus on describing the vessels she and Takeshi make for use, and the very different and comple mentary personalities behind them. Both came to pottery largely by accident. Both want to make good and spectacular pots and to be recognized for doing so. Sandy talks and writes a great deal about her aims and emotions, and perhaps alienates some read ers by the frank way she describes her potmaking activities, relating them to body cycles and rhythms. Ultimately this is irrelevant, just as Takeshi’s unnerving, pregnant silences are irrelevant, for the pots are self-justifying, asser tive and will still be there when verbiage spo ken and written about them is forgotten. The years in which they worked in Mashiko (though not together) have given them both the assurance in the handling of materials that comes through trade apprenticeship, not academic study. They know their materials— their handling qualities and limitations—ex tremely well. It is an object lesson to other potters to see their separate, well-ordered, clean, tidy, disci plined studios in South Mol ton. Creativity in their case is born out of order, not out of chaos. Technical experiment is largely a thing of the past now, and little is left to chance. Their creative ability is not hindered by the unexpected or unpredictable. Each insists on working alone—they get quite irritable with one another if their respective territories are invaded, even if only for a cup of coffee. Takeshi is a masterly thrower, handling soft plates and bowls as a baker does dough, allow ing natural forces in the freshly thrown pieces to reassert themselves as they dry, having been indented, impressed or twisted as they came off the wheel. The massive, spiral throwing lines, the added feet, handles and lugs of twisted and patterned clay, and the organic Lasagna dish, approximately 10 inches in length, stoneware with oxide decoration trailed over brushed polychrome glazes, clear glaze and white slip, by Sandy Brown. above Slab-built stoneware lasagna dish, with brushed and trailed glaze decoration, approximately 10 inches in length, by Sandy Brown. left A Ceramics Monthly Portfolio What Sandy and Takeshi have broughtfrom Japan and planted in British soil is moreJapanese than what Leach and Hamada took to Saint Ives. symmetry of the decoration, all relate to the Japan of his birth. The restriction in his use of materials and forms indicates his determina tion, like a violinist at practice, to do things again and again until they are just right. Typically, his work is fired by electricity, the gray stoneware having been covered by a white slip and an ample, transparent, shiny glaze. Occasionally, reduction firing will produce more colored, colder and less transparent glazes, but in either case the decoration al most always consists of green and brown stain ing from manganese and copper carbonate, linked with the decorative additions to the forms. This green and brown will flow around the handles and ridges, and bleed from the navel-like indentations or sprigging on jugs and teapots. His luscious handles make other potters’ handles look stiff, and the unconventional patterning—sometimes bamboolike ridging, sometimes spirals, sometimes with the regular patterning of a crustacean or an armadillo— are important and handsome features, which make his pots readily recognizable and diffi cult to copy. With the innate sense of balance and har mony found in peasant pottery worldwide, he will raise his elegant platters on tripod feet, or convert an otherwise unexceptional pedestal dish into an attention-gripping flower by the deft manipulation of the rim into a petal form. I can vouch for the fact that Takeshi’s pots, in use, enhance food, and vice versa, and once in the house, they change one’s eating habits to suit the pottery. He is a perfectionist who looks long and hard at his pots, and in so doing develops them. Takeshi’s wife and partner also owes a debt tojapan, although “debt” in Sandy’s case seems hardly the right word. It is rather that her pottery has grown out of Japan and, though outwardly iconoclastic, depends on a strict discipline that is truly Japanese. It also seems likely that, if she had not become inspired by the vibrant commercial pottery of Mashiko, she would never have become a potter at all. She has never learned or wanted to iron out emotional hills and valleys in her work. Sandy, with a natural sense of form, applies bright and energetic decoration of abstract, sometimes figurative, design so that the pat terns seem to be in a perpetual state of move ment around the three-dimensional pot. They chase one another around the perimeter, as do Picasso’s brushmarks on the rims of his platters. Her decoration looks less studied than, but has much the same sort of energy as, Hamada’s painting; and we know that it is only by superlative control and experience that calligraphic spontaneity in ceramics is achieved. She uses a fine-nozzle slip trailer and a house-painter’s brush to produce the counterpoint and contrasting marks in pink, dark blue and yellow applied over a white slip and under a transparent glaze. The luscious shininess of the glaze is almost as important in her work as Takeshi’s, and I think the occa sional pot that has a matt or semimatt glaze suffers by comparison with its fellows. In her case, it is the painted pattern that dominates, and the pots themselves dominate their surroundings in a room. Teapots, cande labra, dinner plates, deep dishes for lasagna, are typical of Sandy Brown’s work for the table. It is all identified with a long, spidery, sliptrailed signature, which is, in itself, quite beau tiful and somehow as necessary to the pot as that of Cocteau. Like Takeshi, she throws with very soft clay; she manipulates and augments the precise, radial symmetry of the wheel-thrown forms with deep, scarlike throwing lines and other organic wobbles that would have made Leach shudder. Her sense of form is put to the test and triumphs here. It is no less important, even if less spectacularly evident, in the humpmolded dishes and slab forms for table use, which, though simple in form, are never dull. In her well-ordered month, time is care fully parceled out for the making of pottery, sculpture (not ceramic sculpture, but sculp ture that happens to be made of fired clay), drawing and painting. It has to be Henri Matisse and Georges Braque who come to mind as her sources, though she herself might possibly be offended, not by this flattering comparison, but by the idea that she has any “sources” at all. The leaping, dancing figures, the earthbound but flying forms leaning into the wind, are her own—they are usually the visual expressions of dreams or fears. Simpli fied, stripey, circus-clown forms made of white clay painted with cobalt are very strong im ages indeed. Sandy Brown is above all an original artist, with a personal vision that changes the way we look at the world. Like most originals, she breaks conventions and proves the irrelevancy of many accepted methods of working. The author Tony Birks has written extensively about modem British potters; his latest book, Ber nard Leach, Hamada and Their Circle, was released in the United States last summer (see the New Books column in the September 1991 CM). Wheel-thrown stoneware dish with twisted handles, coated with white slip and clear glaze, accented with manganese and copper carbonate glazes, oxidation fired, approximately 14 inches in diameter, by Takeshi Yasuda. above “Cushion,” approximately 12 inches in diameter, glazed stoneware, by Takeshi Yasuda. left A Ceramics Monthly Portfolio “Blue Circle with Splodge,” plate, approximately 10 inches in diameter, wheel thrown from soft stoneware, by Sandy Brown. above aCandelabrum with Dancing Lady,” handbuilt stoneware, approximately 14 inches in height (without candle), by Sandy Brown. right A Ceramics Monthly Portfolio “Fat Rim Dish on Three Feet ” approximately 12 inches in diameter, by Takeshi Yasuda. left “Large Platter with Two Handles,” wheel-thrown stoneware with white slip and three glazes (clear, manganese brown and copper carbonate green), oxidation fired, approximately 23 inches in diameter, by Takeshi Yasuda. below “Softly Thrown Platter with Blue Circle,” slipped and glazed stoneware, approximately 12 inches in diameter, by Sandy Brown. right Glazed stoneware teapot, wheel thrown, with sprigged decoration, approximately 11 inches in height, by Takeshi Yasuda. right A Ceramics Monthly Portfolio May 1992 57 Call for Entries Exhibitions, Fairs, Festivals and Sales International Exhibitions May 31 entry deadline Mino,Japan “The 3rd International Ceramics Competition ’92 Mino” (October 25-November 3), judging in 2 categories: ceramics design and ceramic arts. Juried from up to 3 actual works. Shipped entries due betweenjuly 1 and 15; handdelivered entries due August 29-30. Entry fee: 1 entry, 3000 yen (approximately US$23); 2 en tries, 5000yen (approximatelyUS$40); 3entries, 7000yen (approximatelyUS$54).Jurors, ceram ics design: Nino Caruso, Toshiyuki Kita, Kather ine McCoy, Masahiro Mori, Timo Sarpaneva, Karl Scheid and Osamu Suzuki. Jurors, ceramic arts: Robert Arneson, Garth Clark, Yoshiaki Inui, Takuo Kato, Kyubei Kiyomizu, Pompeo Pianezzola and Rudolf Schnyder. Awards (per cate gory) : grand prize, 3 million yen (approximately US$23,000), plus a domestic or foreign study trip; gold award, 1 million yen (approximately US$7700); 2 silver awards, 500,000 yen (approxi mately US$3900); 5 bronze awards, 300,000 yen (approximately US$2300); and 7 special judges’ awards, 200,000 yen (approximately US$1540). For application forms, contact International Ce ramics Festival ’92 Mino,Japan Organizing Com mittee Office, 2-15 Hinode-machi, Tajimi City, Gifu Pref. 507, Japan. National Exhibitions May 13 entry deadline Cambridge, Massachusetts “Annual Teapot Show” (June 4—27). Juried from 5-10 slides with descriptions/retail prices. Contact Cambridge Artists Cooperative, Attention: Kathleen, 59A Church Street, Cambridge 02138; or telephone (617) 868-4434. May 15 entry deadline Shelburne, Vermont “Envisioned in a Pastoral Setting” (September 26-October 12) .Juried from slides. Entry fee: $15. For prospectus, send sase to Art Exhibition, Shelburne Farms, 102 Harbor Road, Shelburne 05482; or telephone (802) 9859585. May 29 entry deadline New York, New York “1992 Grand Exhibition” (June 27-July 18). Juried from slides or photo graphs. Jurors: Victoria Clark, curator, Carnegie Museum of Art, Pittsburgh; Nina Cohen, artist and director of the “1992 Grand Exhibition,” New York; Philip Ginsburg, Aaron Ashley Art Publishing, New York; and Eric Zafran, associate curator, Museum of Fine Arts, Boston. Entry fee: $6 per slide. Awards: $10,000; with 50 finalists showing work in a group exhibition. For entry form, send a postcard with your name and ad dress to Art Horizons, Craft Deptartment, 140 Prospect Avenue, Suite 16R, Hackensack, New Jersey 07601; or telephone (201) 487-7277 or fax (201) 343-5353. May 30 entry deadline Philadelphia, Pennsylvania “Figurative Clay” (November 6-29). Juried from slides. Send SASE to the Clay Studio, 139 North Second Street, Philadelphia 19106; or for information only, telephone (215) 925-3453. June 12 entry deadline Bethlehem, Pennsylvania “Head to Toes: Hats, Buttons, Belts, Purses and Shoes” (October 3November 8), open to craft media dealing with body ornamentation/accessories. Juried from up to 3 slides per work; up to 3 works. Jurors: Dorothy McCoach, textile conservator, Bethle hem; Allison Watson, fiber artist, Jacksonville, Florida. Cash awards. For further information, send SASE for prospectus to Luckenbach Mill Gallery, 459 Old York Road, Bethlehem 18018; or telephone (215) 691-0603. Milwaukee, Wisconsin “Not Just Another Fur niture Show: More than Just a Fixture” (August 28-October 23). Juried from 5 slides and re sume. Entry fee: $10. For further information, send sase to A. Houberbocken, 230 West Wells Street, Suite 202, Milwaukee 53203; telephone (414) 276-6002. June 19 entry deadline Chicago, Illinois “Anticipation ’92” (Septem ber 17-20, in conjunction with the Chicago In ternational New Art Forms Exposition), open to emerging, unrepresented artists and craftspersons. Juried from 1 slide of each piece, up to 3 works. Entry fee: $20. Awards: $4000. Jurors: Ron Kuchta, director, Everson Museum of Art, Syracuse, New York; John McNaughton, artist/ professor, University of Southern Indiana; and Ann Nathan, owner, Objects Gallery, Chicago. For further information, send sase to Anticipa tion ’92,600 North McClurg Court, Suite 1302A, Chicago 60611; or telephone (312) 787-6858 or fax (312) 787-2928. July 1 entry deadline New Haven, Connecticut “The Celebration of American Crafts” (November 9-December 23). Juried from slides. For prospectus, send sase to The Celebration, Creative Arts Workshop, 80 Audubon Street, New Haven 06510; or telephone (203) 562-4927. July 11 entry deadline Rockford, Illinois “Lilliputian Landscapes” (Au gust 7-September 11), open to all fine arts and crafts media not over 6 inches in dimension (excluding frame or pedestal) .Juried from work. Fee: $15 for up to 3 entries. For prospectus, send SASE to Gallery Ten, 514 East State Street, Rock ford 61104; or telephone (815) 965-1743. August 3 entry deadline Mesa, Arizona “Table Trappings” (December 1-23), exhibition of functional/sculptural table ware in all media. Juried from slides. Jurors: Yvette Goldstein, David Pimentel. Awards: $1000. For further information contact Table Trap pings, Galeria Mesa, Box 1466, Mesa 85211; or telephone (602) 644-2242. August 15 entry deadline Rockford, Illinois“Menagerie” (September 25October 30). Juried from slides. Entry fee: $15 for 3 slides. For prospectus, send SASE to Gallery Ten, 514 East State Street, Rockford 61104; or telephone (815) 965-1743. August 31 entry deadline Northfield, Illinois “Teapots—Pour and Proud of It” (October 2-31). Juried from slides. Entry fee: $18-$24. Juror: Harris Deller, professor of ceramics at Southern Illinois University. Cash and purchase awards. For prospectus, send legal sized sase to Northfield Gallery, 1741 Orchard Lane, Northfield 60093. September 4 entry deadline Tempe, Arizona “Animal, Vegetable, Mineral: Functional and Nonfunctional Ceramics” (No vember 20-January 10, 1993). Juried from a maximum of 15 slides. Entry fee: $15 for up to 5 works. Awards: $500-$1000 minimum. For pro spectus, send sase to Tempe Arts Center, Box 549, Tempe 85280; or telephone (602) 9680888. Regional Exhibitions Send announcements of juried exhibitions, fairs, festi vals and sales at least four months before the event’s May 7 entry deadline entry deadline (please add one month for listings inJuly Kingston, Rhode Island “Earthworks ’92” (May and two months for those in August) to Call for Entries, 14-25), open to clay artists who are past or present Rhode Island residents. Juried from handCeramics Monthly, Box 12448, Columbus, Ohio 43212; or telephone (614) 488-8236. Fax announce delivered work. Fee: $5 per entry; up to 6 entries. Awards: $500. Juror: Steven Hill. For prospectus, ments to (614) 488-4561. 58 CERAMICS MONTHLY Call for Entries contact Suzi Caswell, South County Art Associa tion, 2587 Kingstown Road, Kingston 02881; or telephone (401) 783-2195, 1-4 P.M. May 29 entry deadline Sioux City, Iowa “51st Annual Juried Compet itive Exhibition” (November 7-December 27), open to artists residing in Illinois, Iowa, Kansas, Minnesota, Missouri, Nebraska, North Dakota, South Dakota and Wisconsin. Juried from slides. Fee: $20 for up to 3 entries. For prospectus, contact the Sioux City Art Center, 513 Nebraska Street, Sioux City 51101; or telephone (712) 2796272. June 6 entry deadline Huntsville, Alabama Contemporary Southern art exhibition (August 30-November 1), open to artists residing in Alabama, Arkansas, Georgia, Kentucky, Louisiana, Mississippi, North Caro lina, South Carolina and Tennessee. Juror: Marcia Yockey Manhart. Entry fee. Awards: $6000. For prospectus, contact Red Clay Survey Biennial, Huntsville Museum of Art, 700 Monroe Street, Southwest, Huntsville 35801; or telephone (205) 535-4350. Fairs, Festivals and Sales May 8 entry deadline Beaver Creek, Colorado “Beaver Creek Arts Fes tival” (August 15-16). Juried from 4 slides of work plus 1 of booth. Entry fee: $15. Booth fee: $100 for a 10x10- or 8x12-foot space. Commission: 10%. Send#10sASE with52£ in stamps to Pamela Story, Director, Vail Valley Arts Council, Box 1153, Vail, Colorado 81658; or telephone (303) 476-4255. May 15 entry deadline Sausalito, California “40th Annual Sausalito Art Festival” (September 5-7) .Juried from slides. Entry fee: $20. Exhibition fee: $450. Awards: $5000. For application, send postcard with name/ address/phone number to Sausalito Art Festival, Box 566, Sausalito 94966; or telephone (415) 332-0505. South Norwalk, Connecticut “SoNo Arts Cele bration” (August 1-2). Juried from 4 slides of work plus 1 of booth. Entry fee: $12. Booth fee: $85, $ 105 or $135. Awards: over $2000. Send sase to SoNo Arts Celebration, c/o Exhibiting Arts Committee, Box 2222, Norwalk 06852; or tele phone (203) 866-7916. New York, New York “21st Annual WBAI Holi day Crafts Fair” (December 4-6, 11-13 and 1820). Juried from 5 slides. Entry fee: $25. Booth fee: $800-$850. For further information, send sase to Matthew Alperin, WBAI Crafts Fair, Box 889, Times Square Station, New York 10108; oi telephone (212) 279-0707. Groveport, Ohio “Groveport Festival of the Arts” (September 26-27). Juried from 3 slides. Entry fee: $3. Booth fee: $95 for a 10x10-foot, tented space. Awards: $250, best of show; $125, first place; $100, second; and $75, third. For further information, send legal-size SASE to Festival of the Arts, Village of Groveport, 605 Cherry Street, Groveport 43125. May 22 entry deadline Norman, Oklahoma “A Midsummer Night’s Fair” (July 10-11). Juried from 4 slides or photos. Booth fee: $45 for a 10x10-foot space. Send sase to MSNF Artist Selection Committee, Firehouse Art Center, 444 South Flood, Norman 73069; or telephone (405) 329-4523. June 1 entry deadline Manitou Springs, Colorado “Second Annual Clayfest and Mud Ball” (June 20), competition for amateurs and professionals in throwing and handbuilding skills. Awards. Send sase to Clayfest, Sharon Cupit, Box 945, Manitou Springs 80829; or telephone (719) 685-1982. Gaithersburg, Maryland “17th Annual National Craft Fair” (October 16-18). Juried from 5 slides. May 1992 61 Call for Entries Entry fee: $10. Booth fee: $250-$375. For further information contact National Crafts, Noel Clark, Director, 4845 Rumler Road, Chambersburg, Pennsylvania 17201; or telephone (717) 3694810. Granite Falls, Minnesota “Riverwalk” (June 2627). Juried from 5 slides and resume. Entry fee: $10. Booth fee: $40. Send sase to Riverside Col lectors Society, 176 East Highway 212, Granite Falls 56241; or telephone (612) 564-4770. Herkimer, New York “17th Annual Herkimer County Arts and Crafts Fair” (November 14-15). Juried from 5 slides. Fee: $100, plus $5 nonrefundable. No commission. Awards. Send sase to Herkimer County Community College Arts and Crafts Fair, Jacqueline Baggetta, Reservoir Road, Herkimer 13350. Richmond, Virginia “17th Annual Richmond Craft and Design Show” (November 20-22). Ju ried from slides. Booth fee: $250 for a 1 Ox 10-foot space; $375 for a 10x15-foot space; or $500 for a 10x20-foot space. Contact the Hand Workshop, 1812 West Main Street, Richmond 23220; or telephone (804) 353-0094. June 15 entry deadline SanFrancisco, California “Contemporary Crafts Market” (March 18-21, 1993). Juried from 5 slides or photographs and resume. Entry fee: $15. Booth fee: ¾294-$735. Contact Roy Helms or Chris Andrews, 1142 Auahi Street, Suite 2820, Honolulu, Hawaii 96814; or telephone (808) 422-7362. Santa Monica, California “Con temporary Crafts Market” (November 6-8) .Juried from 5 slides or photographs and resume. Entry fee: $15. Booth fee: $260-$795. For further information contact Roy Helms or Chris Andrews, 1142 Auahi Street, Suite 2820, Honolulu, Hawaii 96814; or tele phone (808) 422-7362. Manitou Springs, Colorado “Commonwheel Artists 18th Annual Labor Day Arts and Crafts Festival” (September 5-7). Juried from slides. Jury fee: $5. Entry fee: $60. Commission: 10%. For further information contact Commonwheel Fairs, Box 42, Manitou Springs 80829; or tele phone (719) 685-1008. FairviewHeights, Illinois “Midwest Salute to the Masters” (September 25-27), open to artists who have received an award since January 1, 1989. Juried from 4 slides. Jury fee: $10. Entry fee: $100. For further information contact Susan Burgess, Midwest Salute to the Masters, 10025 Bunkum Road, Fairview Heights 62208; or telephone (618) 397-7743. Havre de Grace, Maryland “29th Annual Havre de Grace Art Show” (August 15-16). Juried from photo or slide. Fee: $50 for 10 feet offence; $100 for 20 feet of fence; students 18 and under, no fee. Awards: over $1500. Send #10 or larger sase with 90£ postage to Havre de Grace Arts and Crafts Show, Box 174, Havre de Grace 21078; or telephone (410) 879-4404, (410) 939-9427, (410) 939-1155 or (410) 939-3303. June 27 entry deadline Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania “23rd A Fair in the Park” (September 11-13). Juried from 5 slides. Entry fee: $5. Booth fee: $125 for a lOxlO-foot space. For further information contact A Fair in the Park, Box 10128, Pittsburgh 15232; or tele phone (412) 361-8287. June 30 entry deadline Mobile, Alabama “28th Annual Outdoor Arts and Crafts Fair” (September 26-27). Juried from slides. Entry fee: $10. Booth fee: $75. Awards: up to $6500 in purchase, distinction and merit awards. For further information contact the Fine Arts Museum of the South, Outdoor Arts and Crafts Fair, Box 8426, Mobile 36698; or tele phone (205) 343-2667. July 1 entry deadline Eureka Springs, Arkansas “16th Fall Art Fair” (October 9-11). Juried from 5 slides. Entry fee: $10. Booth fee: $65-$95. Awards. For further information contact Lynn Williams, Uptown Gal lery, 123 Spring Street, Eureka Springs 72632; or telephone (501) 253-8313. Mason City, Iowa “MacNider Arts Festival” (August 23). Juried from 5 slides. Cash awards. For prospectus, contact MacNider Art Museum, 303 Second Street, Southeast, Mason City 50401; or telephone (515) 421-3666. July 15 entry deadline Glastonbury, Connecticut “On the Green” (Sep tember 12-13). Juried from slides. Booth fee: $75. Cash awards. Contact On the Green, Glas tonbury Art Guild, 1396 Hebron Avenue, Glas tonbury 06033; or telephone (203) 659-1196. July 31 entry deadline Augusta, Georgia “Arts in the Heart of Au gusta” (September 19-20). Juried from slides. Cash awards. Contact the Greater Augusta Arts Council, Box 1776, Augusta 30903; or telephone (404) 826-4702. September 8 entry deadline White Plains, New York “10th Westchester Art Workshop Fine Art and Craft Fair” (October 31November 1). Juried from 5 slides or photo graphs. Booth fee: $200 for an 8x10-foot space or $240 for a 10x10-foot space. Contact Westchester Art Workshop/Craft Fair, Westchester County Center, White Plains 10606; or telephone (914) 684-0094. September 15 entry deadline Miami, Florida “Coconut Grove Arts Festival” (February 13-15, 1993). Juried from 4 slides of work plus 1 of booth. Entry fee: $20. Booth fee: $300 for a 12x10-foot space. Awards: $17,250 in cash and approximately $60,000 in purchase awards. Contact Coconut Grove Arts Festival, Box 330757, Coconut Grove 33233; or telephone (305) 447-0401. May 1992 63 Suggestions From Readers Cut-Off Wire Flotation To keep track of your cut-off wire when throwing, simply knot one end, insert it in a plastic photo film container, then snap on the lid. The trapped air will always keep the container afloat and visible in your water bucket.—Cynthia Bringle, Penland, N.C. Kiln Mock-up Before building a kiln, it’s a good idea to take the time to build a scale model. This allows the potter to try a number of designs, make and correct mistakes, and come up with the best plan in much less time than going directly to a full-scale kiln. To build one or more models, cut out appropriately sized “bricks” (1 inch to 10 inches is a good ratio), using a ruler (as a guide), a fettling knife and a consistently thick slab of clay. Be sure to make enough of all the shapes you plan to use: splits, skews, straights, etc. You’ll need quite a few, but they are easy to cut out production style. After the model bricks have been bisque fired, they are ready to assemble, and can be reused again and again. The model kiln can even be fired in a very fireproof location using one or more Bunsen burners (or one or more propane torches) for a test of how the real kiln might fire. Even if you decide not to fire the model, a mock kiln will definitely help you avoid construction mistakes and will provide an accurate materials count prior to ordering refractories.—Anne Bracker, Lawrence, Kans. Making the Most of Commercial Glazes You can raku fire commercial crystalline glazes that contain copper. You can also try firing them to Cone 6 to achieve a watery effect. They will run significandy, however, so leave an inch unglazed at the bottom of the pot to accommodate drips.—Maryann Zagieboylo, Franklin, Mass. 64 CERAMICS MONTHLY one brick hole, under the handle and through the corresponding brick hole.— EarlineAllen, Huntington, W.Va. Free Equipment/Supplies from Industry At Marshall University, we have benefited from equipment and supplies donated by a local industrial plant. Often such businesses will give used equipment or inventory sur plus to schools as tax write-offs. This past year, we received a very nice test kiln, a pyrometer, replacement elements and highgrade chemicals. Other schools and craft centers inter ested in obtaining free equipment and sup plies should try contacting local industries; they will probably be happy to keep your name on file so that they can let you know if anything becomes available.—Mona Arritt, Huntington, W.Va. Ball Mill Jar Rejuvenation Old ball mill jars can be rejuvenated by resurfacing. Use fused alumina mixed with epoxy resin to patch interiors, and apply a fiber-glass and resin shell to exteriors.— LukeHaatz, Columbia, Mo. Flat Slabs Two methods I use in slab work increase the probability of flat drying. The first in volves the use of a pasta roller (it looks like a ribbed rolling pin) purchased at an import store. After flinging or rolling out a large slab, I turn it over and roll with the ribbed pin in one direction, then roll perpendicu larly to create a checkerboard effect. After work on the top side is complete, the slab is laid on a ½-inch-thick layer of sand to dry. The cross-hatched back promotes even drying by allowing air to circulate, and the sand lets the clay shrink without warp ing.—Laurie Sylwester, Tuolumne, Calif. Texture Tools Like lots of texture? Don’t rely just on found objects, walls, floors, etc., to create textured slabs. A trip to a good thrift store will yield great things. Look in the used silverware/kitchen utensils sections. For a few pennies you can find obsolete gadgets that make wonderful stamps and press molds.—Ilisa Slavin, Los Angeles Terra Sigillata Siphoning Aid To remove the top layer of unwanted water after allowing terra sigillata to settle, use an aquarium gravel-cleaning siphon. It comes equipped with an in-line rubber bulb that is squeezed in order to start the siphon ing process.—-Janice Strawder, Belleair, Fla. Bookend Lifters If you need to lift a delicate piece off the wheel, but don’t have pot lifters, a pair of metal bookends is a fine substitute.—Quen tin Olson, Baltimore Easy Support Studio shelving supports are easily made by inserting dowel rods through the holes of facing bricks stood on their sides; the bricks can be spaced up to 28 inches apart. The dowel rod and brick combination also works well as a handle support; just place vertical bricks on either side of the handled form, then insert the rod through Dollars for Your Ideas Ceramics Monthly pays $10 for each suggestion published; submissions are welcome individually or in quantity. Include an illustration or photo to accompany your suggestion and we will pay $10 more if we use it. Mail ideas to Suggestions, Ceramics Monthly, Box 12448, Columbus, Ohio 43212; or fax to (614) 488-4561. Sorry, but we can ’t acknowledge or return unused items. May 1992 65 Calendar Conferences, Exhibitions, Fairs, Workshops and Other Events to Attend Conferences Tennessee, Gatlinburg September 11-12 “Utilitar ian Clay: Celebrate the Object” will include pre sentations by Linda Arbuckle, Rob Barnard, Cynthia Bringle, Larry Bush, Patrick Horsley, Clary Illian, Andy Martin, Jeff Oestreich, Pete Pinnell, Carol Roorbach, David Shaner, Michael Simon, Byron Temple and Farley Tobin, plus panel discussions on the dynamics of useful ob jects and how they affect people; the place of functional ceramics in the schools; and appren ticeships, residencies and survival opportunities. Preconference activities (September 9-10) will include hands-on presentations. Contact Arrowmont School of Arts and Crafts, Box 567, Gatlin burg 37738; or telephone (615) 436-5860. Washington, Ellensburg October 2-3 “Functional Pottery: Past, Present, Future.” See the March issue for specific topics and speakers. Contact Central Washington University Conference Cen ter, Central Washington University, Ellensburg 98926; or telephone (509) 963-1141. International Conferences Canada, Ontario, North Bay May 29-31 “North ern Exposure,” the Ontario Clay and Glass Asso ciation conference, will include lectures, dem onstrations and slide presentations by Andrea Gill and Randy Johnston. Location: Canadore College. Fee: members, Can$235 (approximately US$200); nonmembers, Can$270 (approxi mately US$230) ; students/seniors, Can$180 (ap proximately US$153). Contact Elin Racine, Fu sion, 140 Yorkville Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M5R 1C2; or telephone (416) 923-7406. Finland, Helsinki June 16-18 “Interaction in Ce ramics—Art, Design and Research.” For specifics, see September or October 1991 issue. Contact the University of Industrial Arts Helsinki (UIAH), Centre for Advanced Studies, Hameentie 135 C, SF-00560 Helsinki. Telephone Tuulikki SimilaLehdnen, secretary general (358) 0 7563-344; Marianne Finnila, press/marketing (358) 0 7563539; orTainaSarvikas, conference secretary (358) 0 7563-234. Or fax (358) 0 7563-537. Indiana, Indianapolis May 1-30 Cheryl Williams, pottery; at Alliance Museum Shop, Indianapolis Museum of Art, 1200 West 38th Street. Massachusetts, Worcester May 21-June 20 Rosa lie Olds, “Soup’s On”; at the Worcester Center for Crafts, Atrium Gallery, 25 Sagamore Road. Michigan, Detroit May 1-June 20 Harrison McIn tosh; at Pewabic Pottery, 10125 E. Jefferson Ave. Michigan, Farmington Hills May 23-June 20 George Ohr; at Habatat/Shaw Gallery, 32255 Northwestern Highway, #25. Michigan, Royal Oak through May 23 Andrea Gill, vessels. May 30-June 27Judith Salomon; at Swidler Gallery, Washington Square Plaza, 308 West Fourth Street. Minnesota, Minneapolis through May 10 Ken Price retrospective; at the Walker Art Center, Vineland Place. Missouri, Saint Louis May 16-June 30 Karen Karnes. Catherine White; at Pro-Art, 1214 Wash ington Avenue. New York, Alfred through June 14 Charles Fergus Binns, “A Chair Must Invite the Sitter,” stone ware; at the Museum of Ceramic Art at Alfred, New York State College of Ceramics at Alfred University, Harder Hall, Fifth Floor. New York, New York through May I6Jun Kaneko; at Helen Drutt Gallery, 724 Fifth Ave., Ninth FI. May 5-June 6 Anne Hirondelle. Babs Haenen. June9-July 11 Anthony Bennett. Andreas Schneid er; at Garth Clark Gallery, 24 West 57th Street. New York, Roslyn through May 9 Virginia Zohn, stoneware with overglazed designs. May 16-June 13 Coco Schoenberg; at Gallery Authentique, 1499 Old Northern Boulevard. Ohio, Columbus through June #Jack Earl; at the Ohio Designer Craftsmen Gallery, 2164 River side Drive. Pennsylvania, Philadelphia throughFebruary 1993 Arnold Zimmerman, outdoor installation of 4 large-scale sculptures; in Arco Park, next to Haviland Hall, University of the Arts. May 1-24 Sally Brogden, juried solo; at the Clay Studio, 139 North Second Street. May 20-June 14 Etta Winigrad; at Muse Gallery, 60 North Second Street. Pennsylvania, Pittsburgh through May 20 Eva Kwong; at the Clay Place, 5416 Walnut Street. Tennessee, Smithville May 1-July 7 Junko Yamanto; at the Appalachian Center for Crafts, Route 3. Washington, Seattle May 7-31 Geoffrey Pagen, wall reliefs; at Foster/White Gallery, 311½ Occi dental Avenue, South. Group Ceramics Exhibitions Solo Exhibitions California, Lincoln June 3-27 “Feats of Clay V,” Alabama, HuntsvilleJune 28-August 16Paul Sold juried national; at Gladding, McBean terra cotta ner retrospective; at the Huntsville Museum of factory—by reservation only, telephone (916) Art, 700 Monroe Street, Southwest. 645-9713. Arizona, Scottsdale May 1-31 Linda Mundwiler; California, Walnut Creek throughJune 6 Works by atjoanne Rapp Gallery/The Hand and the Spirit, Susan Eslick and Cheryl Williams; at Banaker 4222 North Marshall Way. Gallery, 1373 Locust Street. California, Los Angeles May 2-June 3 Ralph D.C., Washington May 3-June 7 “Ceramic Work Bacerra. June 6-July 8 Richard Notkin; at Garth by 30 MFA Graduates.” June 14-July 12 “The Clark Gallery, 170 South La Brea Avenue. Leach Influence,” includes works by Clary Illian, California, Palo Alto through May 16 Christine Jeff Larkin, Warren MacKenzie, Jeff Oestreich, Pendergrass, wall sculpture; at Stanford Univer Dave Stannard, Byron Temple and others; at the sity, Tressider. Farrell Collection, 2633 Connecticut Ave., NW. California, Sacramento through May 17 Viola Florida, Coral Gables May 13-June 11 Works by Frey, “Figures”; at the Crocker Art Museum, 216 Sherry Jordan and Megan Wolfe, artists-in-resiO Street. dence; at the University of Miami, New Gallery, California, San Francisco May 7-29 Ruth Duck 1300 Campo Sano, Entrance 8, Room 105. worth. June 4-27 Jack Earl; at Dorothy Weiss Georgia, Atlanta May 2-June 6 Figurative sculp Gallery, 256 Sutter Street. ture by Doug Jeck and murals by Delia D.C., Washington June 7-2 7RudyAutio; atMaurSeigenthaler; at Connell Gallery/Great Ameri ine Litdeton Gallery, 1667 Wisconsin Ave., NW. can Gallery, 333 Buckhead Avenue. Illinois, Carbondale May 12-June 10 “Clay Cup Send announcements of conferences, exhibitions, ju IV”; at the University Museum, Southern Illinois ried fairs, workshops and other events at least two University at Carbondale. months before the month of opening (add one month forIllinois, Chicago through May 6“Art for the Table,” listings in July and two months for those in August) to works by Stanley Mace Andersen, Val Cushing, Calendar, Ceramics Monthly, Box 12448, Columbus, Don Reitz and Norman Schulman; at SchneiderOhio 43212; or telephone (614) 488-8236. Fax an Bluhm-Loeb Gallery, £30 West Superior Street. nouncements to (614) 488-4561. May 8-June 4Jay and Toni Mann, ‘Who Says You 66 Ceramics Monthly May 1992 67 Calendar Can’t Teach an Old Dog New Tricks?”; at Chiar oscuro, 750 N. Orleans. June 6-July 5 “The Great Lakes National”; at Lill Street Gallery, 1021 West Lill Street. Massachusetts, Ipswich June 6-30“ln and Abound the Garden,” works by Northshore Clayworks members; at Ocmulgee Pottery and Gallery, 263 High Street-Route 1A. Michigan, Detroit June 26-August 8 “Pewabic Students, Faculty and Staff”; at Pewabic Pottery, 10125 East Jefferson Avenue. Minnesota, Saint Paul May 8-June 20 Works by Scott Chamberlain and Robert Turner; at North ern Clay Center, 2375 University Avenue, West. New Jersey, Camden May 22-July 17“Keramion,” a collection of works from Germany; at the Campbell Museum, Campbell Place. New York, New York May 21-July 12 “The Radi ance of Jade and the Crystal Clarity of Water: Korean Ceramics from the Ataka Collection”; at the Metropolitan Museum of Art, Fifth Avenue at 82nd Street. North Carolina, Charlotte through June 30 “A Study of English Pottery”; at the Mint Museum of Art, 2730 Randolph Road. Ohio, Cincinnati May 4-15 “Sweet Mud,” sculp ture by students; at 840 Gallery, College of De sign, Architecture, Art and Planning, University of Cincinnati. Pennsylvania, Philadelphia May 1-24 “Clay in Motion,” works by Robert Bede Clark, Michelle Coakes, Malcolm Davis, Woody Hughes andjared Jaffe; at the Clay Studio, 139 North Second Street. Rhode Island, Kingston May 14-25 “Earthworks ’92”; at the Helme House Gallery, South County Art Association, 2587 Kingstown Road. Texas, Lubbock through September 30 “Fire and Clay”; at the Museum at Texas Tech University. Texas, San Angelo through May 24 “Seventh An nual San Angelo National Ceramic Competi tion”; at the San Angelo Museum of Fine Arts, 704 Burgess Street. Virginia, Norfolk through June 30 “Natural Inspi rations,” works by the Ceramic Designers Associa tion; at Dominion Bank, 999 Waterside Drive. Washington, Seattle through February 1993Works by Patty Detzer, John Downs, Margaret Ford, Larry Halvorsen, John Harris, Anne Hirondelle, Jim Kraft, Debra Norby, Geoffrey Pagen, David Shaner and Patti Warashina; at the Sea-Tac Inter national Airport, Main Concourse. Wisconsin, Madison through May 31 “16th- to 19th-Century Porcelains from the Permanent Collection”; at the Elvehjem Museum of Art, 800 University Avenue. Ceramics in Multimedia Exhibitions Alabama, Huntsville through May 31 “Patchwork of Many Lives: Fourth Annual Fine Arts Exhibi tion”; at Huntsville Museum of Art, 700 Monroe Street, Southwest. Arkansas, Little Rock May 9-July 5 “Art that Works”; at the Arkansas Arts Center, MacArthur Park, Ninth and Commerce Street. California, Davis June 5-July 26Two-person exhi bition with clayworks by David Gilhooly; at John Natsoulas Gallery, 140 F Street. California, La Jolla May 2-June 13 “Salt and Peppery World,” salt and pepper containers in ceramics, metal, glass and wood; at Gallery Eight, 7464 Girard Avenue. California, San Diego through May 25 “Te Waka Toi: Contemporary Maori Art of New Zealand”; at the San Diego Museum of Man, 1350 El Prado, Balboa Park. California, San Francisco May 2-June 28 “Pond Farm,” works from the artists’ colony, including ceramics by Marguerite Wildenhain; at San Fran cisco Craft and Folk Art Museum, Landmark Building A, Fort Mason. California, Sonora June 2-22 “Contours VI— 68 Ceramics Monthly Expressions in Form”; at Central Sierra Arts Council, 48 South Washington Street. Colorado, Golden May 3-June 16 “North Ameri can Sculpture Exhibition”; at the Foothills Art Center, 809 15th Street. D.C., Washington through August 9 ‘When King ship Descended from Heaven: Masterpieces of Mesopotamian Art from the Louvre”; at Arthur M. Sackler Gallery, Smithsonian Institution. Georgia, Carrollton May 16-June 19 “Ritual and Myth,’ includes clayworks by Melanie Turner; at the Carrollton Community Center, Gallery 118, 118 South White Street. Georgia, LaGrange through May 15 “LaGrange National XVII”; at the Chattahoochee Valley Art Museum, 112 Hines Street. Illinois, Chicago May 8-June 13 Four-person ex hibition featuring ceramics by Patrick Horsley and David Shaner; at Schneider-Bluhm-Loeb Gallery, 230 West Superior Street. Illinois, Rockford through May 29 “2x2x2”; at Gallery Ten, 514 East State Street. Indiana, Indianapolis through June 6 “Art of the Americas before Columbus.” through March 14, 1993 “African, South Pacific and Pre-Columbian Art from Private Indianapolis Collections”; at the Indianapolis Museum of Art, 1200 W. 38th St. Kansas, Lenexa June 12-14 “Lenexa’s National Art Show”; at Sar-Ko-Par Trails Park. Kentucky, Louisville through May 17 Two-person exhibition featuring ceramics by Gayle Cerlan; at Swanson Cralle Gallery, 1377 Bardstown Road. Maryland, Baltimore June 7-August 2 “Design 1935-1965: What Modern Was”; at the Baltimore Museum of Art, Art Museum Drive. Maryland, Rockville June 3-July 13 “The Crafts Collection 1992”; at Strathmore Hall Arts Cen ter, 10701 Rockville Pike. Massachusetts, Boston May 9-July 11 “Garden Treasures,” includes works by more than 20 ce ramists; at the Society of Arts and Crafts, 175 Newbury Street. May 13-July 11 “Garden Treasures,” includes works by more than 20 ceramists; at the Society of Arts and Crafts, 101 Arch Street. Massachusetts, Northampton May 2-June 28 “A Tea Party”; at Ferrin Gallery, 179 Main Street. Michigan, Detroit through May 15 “Lighten Up,” exhibition of functional lighting, including ce ramics by Curtis and Suzan Benzie, and Janna Vgone; at the Detroit Gallery of Contemporary Crafts, 104 Fisher Building. Michigan, Dexter through May 15 “National Ju ried Fine Arts Exhibition”; at Farrington Keith Creative Arts Center, 8099 Main Street. Michigan, Midland through May 10 Two-person exhibition featuring porcelain by Elizabeth Lurie; at Northwood Gallery, 144 East Main. Minnesota, Bloomington May 4-29 “Images in Abstract,” including ceramic sculpture by Attila Dabasi; at the Norwest Bank, 7900 Xerxes Ave., S. Missouri, Saint Louis May 16-June 30 “100 Cups”; at Pro-Art, 1214 Washington Avenue. New Jersey, Montclair throughJune 7 “Highlights from the Native American Collection”; at Mont clair Museum, 3 South Mountain Avenue. New Mexico, Los Alamos June 19-July 19 “Bien nial Crafts 1992 Exhibition”; at Fuller Lodge Art Center, 2132 Central Avenue. New York, Albany through May 31 “The Enduring Flower,” includes Early American stoneware; at the New York State Museum, Empire State Plaza. New York, Brooklyn through December 13 “Biomorphicism and Organic Abstraction in 20thCentury Decorative Arts”; at the Brooklyn Mu seum, 200 Eastern Parkway. New York, New York through May 17 “New Art Forms from the South,” with ceramics by Kathy Triplett; at Wheeler-Seidel Gallery, 129 Prince Street, Soho. through May 31 Three-person show featuring ceramics by Barbara Diduk; at Nancy Margolis Gallery, 121 West 21st Street. New York, Piermont-on-Hudson May 2-31 Fourperson exhibition featuring ceramics by Dale Shuffler; at America House, 466 Piermont Ave. New York, Rochester May 29-July 12 “Rochester- May 1992 69 Calendar Finger Lakes Exhibition”; at Memorial Art Gal lery, University of Rochester, 500 University Ave. Ohio, Cleveland through November 8 “Gruener Collection of Pre-Columbian Art” includes West Mexican ceramic sculpture; at the Cleveland Museum of Art, 11150 East Boulevard. May 8-June 30 “Art in the Garden X”; at Ameri can Crafts Gallery, Sylvia Ullman, 13010 Larchmere. Ohio, Columbus through May 17 “The Best of 1992,” statewide juried exhibition of fine crafts; at Columbus Cultural Arts Center, 139 W. Main St. through October 12 ‘Just Naturally Splendid: Ohio Designer Craftsmen Celebrate Nature”; at Ameriflora ’92, the Franklin Park Conservatory, Grand Foyer. Oregon, Portland May 17-June 20 “Garden Exhi bition”; at Contemporary Crafts Gallery, 3934 Southwest Corbett Avenue. Pennsylvania, Bethlehem May 2-June 7 “Re awakening: A Celebration of Spring”; at the Luckenbach Mill Gallery, 459 Old York Road. Pennsylvania, Doylestown through May 24 “Re volving Techniques,” over 60 works in clay, glass, metal and wood; at James A. Michener Art Mu seum, 138 South Pine Street. Pennsylvania, University Park June 7-July 26 “Crafts National 26”; at Zoller Gallery, 101 Visual Arts Building, Penn State University. Tennessee, Gatlinburg through May 16 “Spring Faculty and Staff Exhibition,” with clayworks by Mary Barringer, Sandra Blain, Karl Borgeson, Bill Griffith and Byron Temple. “Everything but the Kitchen Sink: Artists and the Kitchen, New Forms, New Functions. ” May 22-August 14 “Sum mer Faculty and Staff Exhibition”; at Arrowmont School of Arts and Crafts, 556 Parkway. Texas, Beaumont May 9-June 6 “The Art Studio, Inc., Members Jurored Exhibition”; at the Art Studio, 700 Orleans at Forsythe. Texas, San Antonio May 15-June 27 “In House/ Recent Works,” including ceramics by Dennis Smith; at Southwest Craft Center, 300 Augusta. Vermont, MiddleburyJune 6-July 19 “In and Out of the Garden”; at the Vermont State Craft Cen ter, Frog Hollow. Virginia, Richmond May 8-July 31 “Spotlight ’92”; at the Hand Workshop, 1812 W. Main St. Wisconsin, Milwaukee May 15-June 26 “Vessels”; at A. Houberbocken, Century Building, 230 West Wells, Suite 202. Wisconsin, Racine June 7-September 13 ‘Just Plane Screwy: Metaphysical and Metaphorical Tools by Artists”; at Charles A. Wustum Museum of Fine Arts, 2519 Northwestern Avenue. Fairs, Festivals and Sales California, Oxnard May 16-17 “California Straw berry Festival”; at Strawberry Meadows, College Park. California, Santa Monica May 29-31 “Contem porary Crafts Market”; at the Santa Monica Civic Auditorium, Main Street at Pico Boulevard. Colorado, Boulder May 7-10 “Boulder Potters Guild Spring Sale”; at the Armory Building, 4750 North Broadway. Illinois, Chicago May 15-18 “13th Annual Chi cago International Art Exposition”; at Donnelley International Hall, McCormick Place Complex, 23rd Street and Lake Shore Drive. Illinois, Winnetka May 23-24 “19th Annual Mid west Craft Festival”; at the North Shore Art League, 620 Lincoln Avenue. Iowa, Clinton May 16-17 “Art in the Park”; at Four Square Park, Main Avenue. Kentucky, Louisville July 3-5 “Waterside Art and Blues Festival”; at the Water Tower, 3005 Upper River Road. Maryland, Columbia June 26-28 “Columbia Fes tival of the Arts”; on the Kittamaqundi Lakefront. Maryland, Frederick May 15-17 “18th Annual 70 Ceramics Monthly Frederick Craft Fair”; at the Frederick Fair grounds. Massachusetts, Lexington May 8-9 “28th Annual May Pottery Fair”; at the Lexington Arts and Crafts Society, 130 Waltham Street. Massachusetts, Worcester May 15-17 “22nd An nual May Craft Fair”; at the Worcester Center for Crafts, 25 Sagamore Road. Michigan, Midland June 6-7 “Summer Art Fair”; at the Midland Center for the Arts, 1801 West Saint Andrews. North Carolina, Asheville May 23-24 “Guild May Fair”; at the Folk Art Center, Blue Ridge Parkway. Ohio, Chagrin Falls June 13-14 “Art by the Falls ’92”; at Riverside Park. Ohio, Cleveland May 17 “Trinity Celebration of the Arts”; at Trinity Lutheran Church, Historic Ohio City, West 30th and Lorain Avenue. Ohio, Columbus June 5-14 “Columbus Arts Fes tival Streetfair”; downtown. Ohio, Dayton May 23-24 “25th Annual Art in the Park”; at the Riverbend Art Center, 1301 East Siebenthaler Avenue. Ohio, Shaker Heights June 19-21 “Craftfair at Hathaway Brown”; at Hathaway Brown School. Ohio, Toledo June 6-7 “1992 Old West End Art Fair”; across from the Toledo Museum of Art. Oregon, Portland May 15-17 “Oregon Potters’ Association’s 10th Annual Showcase”; at Memo rial Coliseum, Convention Hall. Washington, Spokane May 29-31 “Artfest: Spo kane ’92”; at the Cheney Cowles Museum, West 2316 First Avenue. Wisconsin, Cambridge June 13-14 “First Annual Cambridge Pottery Festival”; at West Side Park. Wisconsin, Milwaukee June 12-14 “Lakefront Festival of the Arts”; at the Milwaukee Art Mu seum, 750 North Lincoln Memorial Drive. Workshops Arizona, Prescott July 13-17“Teapots” with Chuck Hindes. Fee: $425. Campus housing and meals: $114. Contact 1992 Yavapai Summer Art Insti tute, Registrar, Yavapai College, 1100 East Shel don Street, Prescott 86301; or telephone (602) 776-2303orfax (602) 776-2193,attention: Regis trar. Or telephone Arizona State University Col lege of Extended Education, Division of Confer ences and Institutes (602) 965-5757. California, Davis May 23 “Magic Fire—An Over view of Primitive Methods of Firing” with Molly Prier. Fee: $25; seniors/full-time students, $20; YCAC members, 10% discount. Contact Yolo County Arts Council, Box 2252, Woodland, Cali fornia 95695; or telephone (916) 662-4145 or (916) 756-CLAY. California, Mendocino June-August Summer ses sions with Robert Harrison, Steven Hill, Torbjom Kvasbo,Janet Lohr, Tony Marsh, Karen Massaro, Alleghany Meadows, Bill Walden and Lana Wil son. Contact Mendocino Art Center, Depart ment 3, Box 765, Mendocino 95460; or tele phone Peter Von Wilken Zook (707) 937-5818. Colorado, Cortez June 28-July 8 “8th Annual Sand Canyon Primitive Pottery Workshop,” handbuilding, tool making, learning clay processings and firing Anasazi ceramics, using native materi als, tools and techniques of the Mesa Verde region. Fee: $1000. July 12-24 “From Baskets to Bee Plant,” studying all periods of Anasazi primi tive pottery. Open to ambitious beginners and advanced students. Fee: $1200. Contact Kelly Place, 14663 County Road G, McElmo Canyon, Cortez 81321; or telephone (303) 565-3125. D.C., Washington June 7 Lecture by Rudy Autio (see workshop listing under Rockville, Mary land). Contact James Renwick Alliance, 4414 Klingle St., NW, Washington, D.C. 20016; or telephone the Renwick Gallery (202) 357-2531. June 13-14 Workshop (June 13) and lecture (June 14) with Byron Temple. Fee: $50. Work shop location: Hinckley Pottery. Lecture loca tion: Renwick Gallery. Contact James Renwick Alliance, 4414 Klingle St., NW, Washington, D.C. 20016; telephone Shelley Gollust (301) 229-2148. Florida, Fort Lauderdale May 9-10 “Handbuild- May 1992 71 Calendar ing and Decorating Ceramics” with Rudy Autio. Intermediate. Fee: $65 or $75. Contact Florida Craftsmen, Broward Community College, Cen tral Campus, Davie, 235 Third St., S, Saint Peters burg, Florida 33701; telephone (813) 821-7391. Florida, Oviedo May 11-15 “Architectural Ce ramics” with Peter King and Marni Jaime. May 16-17“Finding One’s Way with Clay” with Paulus Berensohn. Contact Axner Pottery Supply, Box 1484, Oviedo 32765; or telephone (800) 8437057 or (407) 365-2600. Florida, Saint Petersburg May 9-10 “Handbuilding and Decorating Ceramics” with Rudy Autio. Fee: $75; Florida Craftsmen or Ceramic League of Miami member, $65. Contact Florida Crafts men, 235 Third Street, South, Saint Petersburg 33701; or telephone (813) 821-7391. Indiana, Indianapolis May 9 Handbuilding with Randy Schmidt, plus a slide show of his recent trip to the former Soviet Union. Location: India napolis Art League. Fee: $5; free for Potter’s Guild of Indiana and Art League members. Con tact Marie Harnish, 5141 Lancelot Drive, India napolis 46208; or telephone (317) 291-7695. Indiana, New Harmony June8-july 7(/‘University of Evansville Ceramics Workshop” with Les Miley, handbuilding, throwing, salt glazing, raku and electric low firing. Beginning through advanced. Live-in accommodations available. Contact Les Miley, University of Evansville, Department of Art, 1800 Lincoln Avenue, Evansville 47702; or telephone (812) 479-2043. Maryland, Rockville June 6 A session with Rudy Autio. Fee: $50; Alliance members, $45. Contact James Renwick Alliance, 4414 Klingle Street, Northwest, Washington, D.C. 20016; or telephone Shelley Gollust (301) 229-2148. 72 Ceramics Monthly Massachusetts, Williamsburg May 8-10 “Clay: Surfaces, Textures, Saggar Firing” with Elizabeth MacDonald. Fee: $195. Contact Jane Sinauer, Horizons, 374 Old Montague Rd., Amherst, Mas sachusetts 01002; or telephone (413) 549-4841. Michigan, Detroit May 9 A session with John Glick. Registration deadline: May 5.Contact Pe wabic Pottery, 10125 EastJefferson, Detroit48214; or telephone (313) 822-0954. Michigan, Midland May 16-17 “Form and Sur face” with Andrea Gill. Contact the Midland Art Council, Midland Center for the Arts, 1801 West Saint Andrews, Midland 48640; or telephone (517) 631-3250. Minnesota, Saint Paul May 21 Slide lecture with Gail Kendall. Contact the Northern Clay Center, 2375 University Avenue, West, Saint Paul 55114; or telephone (612) 642-1735. New Jersey, Belvidere August 8-9 Demonstra tions, lectures, slide/video presentations with Rudy Autio, Don Reitz and Peter Voulkos. Fee: $200/2 days; $125/1 day. Contact Peter Callas, RD 2, Box 213, Belvidere 07823; or telephone or fax (908) 475-8907. New Mexico, Abiquiu May 28-31 “New Sources for New Directions” with Jim Romberg. Loca tion: Ghost Ranch. Fee: $105; New Mexico Pot ters Association members, $90. Contact Penne Roberts, 4530 Bermuda, NE, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87111; or telephone (505) 293-3107. New Mexico, Pilar June 27 “Decorate Ceramics” with S. Kilborn. Fee: $425. Contact Plum Tree, Box A-l, Pilar 87531; telephone (800) 678-7586. New York, New York June 1-July 24 Weekly por celain workshops with Carmen Soriano, Claire Weissberg, Bruce Winn and Dave Wright, with special instruction in glaze techniques for gas and electric kilns. Workshop with Carmen Soriano entided “Inspiration from Nature.” In struction in English, Spanish and Israeli. All skill levels. Fee: $160; includes materials, firing and lodging. Contact Jeff Cox, Director of Ceramics, 92nd Street Y, 1395 Lexington, New York 10128; or telephone (212) 415-5565. North Carolina, Brasstown May 3-8 “Primitive Firing Techniques” with Bob Wagar. May 10-16 “Terra Sigillata” with Barbara Joiner. May 17-23 “Raku” with Obie Clark. Contact John C. Camp bell Folk School, Route 1, Box 14-A, Brasstown 28902; or telephone (800) 562-2440. Pennsylvania, Cheltenham June 1-12 “How to Say It in Clay.” Fee: $400, includes 75 pounds of clay and firing. Live-in accommodations: $75. Con tact Billie Wish, Director of Events, Cheltenham Center for the Arts, 439 Ashbourne Road, Chel tenham 19012; or telephone (215) 379-4660. Pennsylvania, Chester Springs May 9 Throwing demonstration with Chris Staley. Fee: $15; studio members, $10. Contact Chester Springs Studio, 1668 Art School Rd., Box 329, Chester Springs 19425; telephone (215) 827-7277. Pennsylvania, State College May 9 “Zen and the Art of Pottery’’with Ken Beittel. Fee: $65. Contact the Pennsylvania Guild of Craftsmen, Box 820, Richboro, Pennsylvania 18954; or telephone (215) 860-0731. Rhode Island, Kingston May 10 “Functional Ce ramics—Usable Art” with Steven Hill. Fee: $35. Contact South County Art Association, 2587 Kingstown Road, Kingston 02881; or telephone (401) 783-2195. Tennessee, Smithville May 31-June 6 “Raku.”/zz?ze 18-July 3 “Diversity in Raku.” Contact Appala chian Center for Crafts, Route 3, Box 430, Smithville 37166; or telephone (615) 372-3051. Utah, Logan May 14-15 A session with Robert Turner. Contact Dept, of Art, Utah State Univer sity, Logan 84322; or telephone (801) 750-3460. International Events Belgium, Gent May 26-June 28 “Vase in Form,” ceramics by Heleen Dekkers, Piet Kerkhof, Frans Ottink, Piet Stockmans and Netty Van Den May 1992 73 Calendar Heuvel; at Gallery “Verzameld Werk,” Onderstraat 21. Canada, B.C., Victoria May 30-31 “On the Patio,” works in clay; at the Metchosin Community Hall, Happy Valley and Metchosin Roads. Canada, Ontario, Brantford through May 10 “Earth, Hand and Fire,” exhibition of works by the Brantford Potters’ Guild; at the Glenhyrst Art Gallery of Brant, 20 Ava Road. Canada, Ontario, Toronto through August 16 “Words under Glaze: Inscribed Medieval Persian Pottery”; at the Royal Ontario Museum, 100 Queen’s Park. through August 16 “Of Cabbages and Kings: Natu ralistic Ceramics 1700-1850,” tureens shaped like animals and vegetables; at George R. Gardiner Museum of Ceramic Art, 111 Queen’s Park. England, Lewes June 7-July 5 “Dances with Clay,” ceramic sculpture by Martin Hearne; at Charles ton Gallery, Charleston Farmhouse, near Firle. England, London through May 9 “Lucie Rie 90th Birthday Exhibition ” May 20-June 26Alev Siesbye; at Galerie Besson, 15 Royal Arcade, 28 Old Bond Street. through May 9 Ceramic sculpture byjill Crowley. June 19-August 1 “Summer Show Part 1,” featur ing clayworks; at Contemporary Applied Arts, 43 Earlham Street, Covent Garden. England, Sherborne through May 31 Two-person exhibition featuring pottery by Steve Sheridan. June 6-July 10 Two-person exhibition featuring ceramics by Ewen Henderson; at Alpha House Gallery, South Street. England, Stamford through October 4 “Ten Years of Discoveries at Burghley”; at Burghley House. England, West Dean May 8-12 “Pots and Dishes for Food and Drink—Table- and Kitchenware” with John Gunn. May 24-29 “Decorating Tiles” withjan O’Highway. May 29-31 “Porcelain” with Alison Sandeman. June 7-11 “General Pottery” with John Gunn. July 3-5 “Pottery for Beginners” with John Gunn. Contact West Dean College, West Dean, Chichester, West Sussex P018 0QZ; or telephone (243) 63 301 or fax (243) 63 343. Germany, Hohr-Grenzhausen through May 10 Works by Colin Pearson. May 9-31 “Wendelin Stahl und seine Schuler”; at Keramikmuseum Westerwald. Hungary, Bartoky June 28-July 25 “Szonyi Istvan Summer School of Fine Arts,” will include ceram ics session with Ascher Zoltan. Registration dead line: May 30. Contact Szonyi Istvan Summer School of Fine Arts, 2627 Zebegeny, Bartoky u. 7; or telephone (27) 70 104. Italy, Milan through May 10 “11 th Biannual Inter national Antiques Fair”; at Milan Fairground, Via Spinola. Netherlands, Deventer through May 6 Gerard Prungnaud, porcelain pipes, through May 25 Clayworks by Brigitte Penicaud and Claude Varlan. May 10-June 21 Mariet Schmidt, figurative porcelain sculpture; at Kunstand Keramiek, Korte Assenstraat 15. New Zealand, Auckland May 28-June 28 “Fletcher Challenge Ceramics Award 1992”; at the Auckland Museum of Art, Private bag. Scodand, Glasgow May 1-31 Clayworks by Rosann Cherubini and Baajie Pickard; at Royal Scottish Academy of Music and Drama, 100 Renfrew St. Switzerland, Lausanne through May 16Small bowls by 150 ceramists from around the world; at Galerie Leonelli, Rue Vuillermet 6. Switzerland, Nyon June 6-November 1 “Triennale de la Porcelaine”; at the Historic and Porcelain Museum, Casde of Nyon. Wales, Rhayader May 25-30, June 1-6, August 38 and 10-16 Workshops with Phil Rogers, throw ing and stoneware reduction firing. All skill lev els. Fee: £180 (approximately US$308); includes materials, firing and lunch. Contact Phil Rogers, Marston Pottery, Lower Cefn Faes, Rhayader, Powys LD6 5LT; or telephone (597) 810 875. 74 Ceramics Monthly May 1992 75 Questions then one part slammed down on top of the other). If the clay to be wedged is too dry or the force integrating the pieces is insuffi Answered by the CM Technical Staff cient, the parts do not blend, which means the potter then begins work with a mass of clay that is really many layers just waiting to crack apart. Finally, some de-airing pug mills intro Q I just had a kiln load of sculpture separate like duce this problem, particularly when clay is slate does. It didn’t explode; instead, it fell into used directly from the mill. The machine’s vertical layers. I do large flat sculptures (I call cutting blades (because of their force in them two-sided reliefs) and would welcome your combination with a vacuum) actually create comments on why this happened to them.—P.R. a layer of steam during each revolution, When clay separates from itself during which causes a spiral crack in finished ware. drying and/or firing, chances are that ad While this problem is rare, the only solution joining segments were not well integrated is a change in pug mill design. or not attached well enough during con struction. There are many causes for this Q I have found a good Cone 04-02 glaze for problem; the most common is insufficient terra-cotta coffee mugs, but now I am concerned working of pieces together. But ineffective about the safety of this recipe. Can you tell me if wedging and poor pug mill design may also drinking coffee from cups glazed with the follow be implicated. ing batch recipe could be harmful?—A.N. When working two pieces of clay to Earthenware Glaze gether, it’s common to slide one back and (Cone 04-02) forth across the other until it is stuck down Whiting.................................................... 6% to the other by suction. If the two clay parts Frit 3124 (Ferro) .................................... 80 are joined properly, the previously mobile Edgar Plastic Kaolin............................... 14 one virtually cannot be moved any further. 100% The resulting multipart piece should be Add: Ultrox.............................................. 12 % dried slowly to allow equalization of mois Black Cofrper Oxide...................... 8% ture throughout. Frit 3124 is a leadless frit containing Improper wedging creates a variety of layers (particularly with cut-and-slam wedg potassium, sodium, calcium, alumina, bo ron and silica, with a fusion temperature of ing where a chunk of clay is sliced in two, 76 CERAMICS MONTHLY approximately 1600°F when fired alone. Whiting is calcium carbonate. Edgar Plastic Kaolin (EPK) can be considered a relatively pure mix of alumina and silica. Ultrox is a commercially blended opacifier that can be considered relatively inert. The only item in question is black copper oxide, which is a relatively high percentage of the overall batch recipe. Whenever there is a substantial amount of coloring oxide in a glaze recipe, the potter should be concerned that this mate rial might leach out of an underfired or insufficiently fired glaze. Nevertheless, in gestion of the very small amounts of copper possible with leaching from this glaze nor mally couldn’t be more than that found in a mineral supplement vitamin pill. If the glaze is fired properly, we wouldn’t expect there to be any leaching since the alumina and silica are appropriate for this firing range. Thus this recipe seems safe, theoretically. But only laboratory testing can confirm the true safety of a glaze. Some labs that run such tests were listed in the May 1978 article “Frit Formulas” and the May 1986 article “Testing for Barium”; most labs have a minimum charge of $50 to $150. Subscribers’ questions are welcome and those of general interest will be answered in this column. Due to volume, letters may not be answered person ally. Address the Technical Staff Ceramics Monthly, Box 12448, Columbus, Ohio 43212. May 1992 77 New Books pottery was selected for reissue following recommendations by Bruce Bernstein, then of the Wheel wright Museum in Santa Fe; and Jona Ceramics of the World than Batkin, then with the Southwest From 4000 B.C. to the Present Museum in Los An edited by Lorenzo Camusso and Sandro Bortone geles. Both agreed it would be of interest to A “coffee-table” book apparently as collectors, dealers, educators and students sembled with the collector in mind, this of Pueblo pottery. In his foreword to this history is illustrated by color photographs slighdy revised edition, Bernstein credits of examples from museums worldwide, but Mera’s work “as the foundation for under is decidedly not a comprehensive survey of standing the nomenclature and develop ceramics; and there is little doubt that deci mental sequence of historic Pueblo potters.” sions about what to include were heavily The text begins by identifying the region’s influenced by bias, ignorance or both. “five ceramic provinces,” then notes societal An explanation for the book’s emphasis conditions affecting production during the on decorated tableware is given in its intro Spanish colonial period. Part I goes on to duction: “The most explain the evolution of shapes, while Part II spectacular aspect of traces the use of decorative motifs within the story of ceramics, each of these geographical areas. [exciting] the great The m^ority of the text is devoted to est. . .in terest, is that of specific pots, their linear cross sections and their painted decora schematics of the decoration. Accompany tion; and the main ing notes place each example in historical aim...will be to illus context and explain the symbolism of the trate this.” design motifs. $29.95, softcover. 165 pages. The text is basi 67 plates. Avanyu Publishing, Inc., P. O. Box cally a collection of 27134, Albuquerque, New Mexico 87125. individuals’ essays on major periods of ce ramic production in the Near East, Egypt Derby Porcelain 1750-1798 and the Mediterranean, ancient Greece and by Gilbert Bradley Rome, Islamic countries, Europe, and the Of interest to collectors, this history of Orient, with the largest sections devoted to the Derby Porcelain Factory in England European majolica and porcelain. However, includes annotated color photographs of the illustrations include some baffling selec the figures/dinnerware produced during tions: A cobalt-decorated, salt-glazed stone ware pitcher is shown in the midst of the second half of the 18th century. In examples of European majolica! Not only is volved in “ye Art of making English China the pot out of sync in decoration and firing and also in buying and selling all sorts of range, it is also incorrecdy described as “the Wares belonging to ye Art of making China,” oldest stoneware jug known from Germany.” the factory competed directly with the Con The final puzzle in this odd assortment tinent; owner William Duesbury marketed of “world ceramics” is the inclusion of a his wares as “the Second Dresden.” In the beginning, Derby production was section misleadingly titled “North Ameri can Ceramics.” It is actually a well-written inspired by Meissen, but Duesbury liked to summary of European-inspired ceramics in keep abreast of fashion and often commis sioned work from leading painters and de the U.S. (with some reference to Canada) from colonial times to the 1990s. But there signers of the day. Later his son looked to Sevres to keep up with is no mention of Native American or Mexi changing tastes. can work. And only two of the illustrations Much of what is relate to the book’s stated interest in decora known about the fac tive tableware; most are of one-of-a-kind tory was derived from pots/sculpture by 20th-century studio art the Duesbury Papers, ists. Perhaps these were included in an at the collective name tempt to support the book’s subtitle. 399 given to the numer pages, including glossary, bibliography and ous letters, account index. 250 color plates; 40 black-and-white books and miscella illustrations. $95. Harry N. Abrams, Inc., 100 neous documents re Fifth Avenue, New York, New York 10011. lated to the Duesbury family and its business, which are now housed in the Local Studies Style Trends of Pueblo Pottery, Library in Derby. 182 pages, including bib 1500-1840 liography and index. 124 color plates. $75. by H. P. Mera Thomas Heneage & Company, Limited, Lon Originally published in 1939, this guide don; distributed by Seven Hills Book Distributors, to historical Southwest Native American 49 Central Avenue, Cincinnati, Ohio 45202. 78 CERAMICS MONTHLY May 1992 79 Displays that Sell by Ernest Fair There are several basic principles to good sales displays that every ceram ist should be aware of, whether selling at a craft fair or from your own studio shop. There are also a lot of little extras that make the difference be tween modestly successful and highly profitable merchandising. When designing a sales area, plan to give the customer a good clear view of as much of the area as possible upon first entering. That will help de velop receptiveness to all items on dis- play- Try to maintain the same pattern and style throughout your displays. Doing so avoids clashes within the customer’s receptive emotions. Stick to accepted geometric pat terns for displays. These are what cus tomers have been oriented to all their lives. Anything radically different may prove distracting. Color choice is also important in selling. Be certain there are no clash ing colors from nearby displays. Try to erect major displays so that they face the best light sources. The smallest shadow can materially reduce effectiveness of the best display. Check the lighting two or three times during the day after a display has been set up. This is particularly important where natural sunlight reaches the work. Glare can adversely affect even the best display. Mass or quantity displays that hide or overpower other merchandise can actually hamper sales. On occasion, mass can be a great selling force, but it is best kept under control. Mixed displays of items have value 80 CERAMICS MONTHLY only for bargain tables. It is just an other way of creating confusion in cus tomers’ minds. Elaborate displays can be decora tive, but not always profitable. The primary purpose of each display is to sell merchandise. Avoid permitting a special display to be solely a creation of beauty or entertainment. Work with such qualities, of course, but only as aids to selling. If you use dated displays, remove them as soon as the event has passed. They are occupying space better used for something newer and fresher. Never hesitate to ask customers what they think about special displays. Some of your most profitable future display ideas will be inspired by what the customers have to say about pres ent ones. Give every item in your inventory a chance to be sold through display emphasis at one time or another. One display expert estimates that 25% of the average store stock gets 95% of special display space. Have a good reason for displaying each item. Never pass judgment solely upon how much it is liked personally or the profit margin entailed. Rapid turnover is the most important sales event. Every item has a best side or plus feature. Make sure that the customer sees this first. No customer is going to stop to look for it. Carefully display (or even protect) items with sharp or projecting edges that might injure a customer or be come caught in a garment. Change items in key display spots as often as time permits. By leaving them there too long, they may be come so familiar to the customer that they are ignored. But there is a limit on frequent changes within the display area. Most customers like to know exactly where they can find favored items, and re sent having to search for them when they are in a hurry. Post prices where they can be seen easily by everyone. This reduces han dling, and possible damage. Craft/art has to be neatly presented every hour of the day. That calls for constant attention and immediate sprucing up of any messes that cus tomers have made. Remove a damaged or soiled item quickly. It acts negatively upon the average customer’s subconscious mind. Even a single negative impres sion from a display is one too many. Restock, but not totally, as the day moves along. Missing items suggest to the customer that others have made purchases. Full displays sometimes sug gest that no one is buying the work. But excessively empty display areas are sales killers. Make sure they are never allowed to exist, particularly where there is heavy customer traffic. Never get annoyed with questions customers ask about items on display. That is a sure sign a positive impres sion has been created and interest aroused in that merchandise. Attention given to displaying work returns worthwhile dividends. Giving some thought to each of these steps can make even a modest display a more valuable selling tool. ▲ May 1992 81 Geyser Bottle Performance Raku by Jerry Crimmins Performance raku is the most recent phase of the raku continuum. First there was the ancient Korean potter making roof tiles, then came Chojiro and the tea ceremony, then Paul Soldner and postfiring reduction, and now there is the Secret Ceramic Society with its “geyser bottles.” This group of ceramists first got together at California State University-Hayward (CSUH) for barbecues, primitive music sessions (dominated by heavy percussion and screams) and an occasional sale of student works under the guidance and protection of professor Clayton Bailey. Then, in 1987, Bailey, Fernando Hernandez, other Secret Ceramic Society mem bers and I began experimenting with steam-powered pottery—red-hot ob jects removed from a kiln, then im mersed in water so that steam jets into the air or causes bi zarre reactions. The inspiration for this perfor mance was a lec ture at CSUH by A1 Tratnick (in 1977) concerning the dangers of quench ing narrow-necked bottles, as they might emit super heated jets of steam or even ex plode. Ten years 82 CERAMICS MONTHLY For a performance in Davis, California, Clayton Bailey added a secret ingredient to the water—dish detergent. later, facing an uninspired advanced ceramics class, Clayton Bailey pro posed a geyser bottle contest. The as signment reminded me of the PBS videos about engineering design con tests, and I decided we should invite the public, make it a performance and produce a video as a documenta tion of the work. The philosophy behind this type of work is as varied as the people who take the risk. Mostly it’s for fun, but there is an element of competition. I like it because it makes a mockery of the function versus nonfunction de bate in contemporary ceramics, and then again I love being on stage. Clayton Bailey seems to have a good time, too. The central function of the ceramic object is to turn water to steam (al though in one case it was to fry eggs). The objects behave in surprising ways, sometimes exploding against the planned function, but this is good too. Afterward, they have little importance and are often destroyed by the artist, who doesn’t really want a bunch of old clay steam en gines cluttering the garage. My hope is that all my geyser bottles will per form briefly but violently, accord ing to plan, then explode with a loud noise and a cloud of steam. In the history of ceramic arts the only work that might resemble performance raku was found in creased mass of the water versus steam and the higher muzzle velocity make a spectacular geyser. The main difference between the “Bailey Blaster” and the “Crimmins Check Ball” is that my design has more than one hole and is self-regulating (a clay ball provides a check valve ac tion) ; that is, it can be placed in water and will pretty much operate by itself, whereas the Bailey design must be regulated manually with tongs. Of course, the ceramic object plays a major part in the staging, but the actual work of art is the performance and the associated documentation that proves the event took place. The documentation process also allows the artist to influence the memory of the event so that it more closely resembles her/his vision (confabulation and gos sip as artists’ tools). The point is to get people together to see the performance. There is a party atmosphere with an element of shared danger and excitement. Un like traditional American-style raku, there is no toxic smoke pouring from a bucket to ruin the taste of the wine, irritate eyes and stink up everyone’s clothes. This is non toxic, smoke-free raku that can be done anywhere. ▲ Czechoslovakia. Anthropologists claim that thousands of fragmented ceramic figures from the Stone Age (some 26,000 years ago) may have been tossed in the fire to explode deliber ately as sort of a prehistoric fireworks display. In fact, Olga Soffer (University of Illinois) and Pamela Vandiver (Smith sonian Institute), along with their Czech colleagues, claim the Dolni Vestonice Venus, revered as the oldest known sculpture, was intended to ex plode but failed in that only her feet blew up! [See “Ice Age Ceramics” in the February 1992 CM.] In this high-tech era, Clayton Bai ley and I have provided the design technology required for just this sort of event. Both of our designs are called geyser bottles so I will differentiate between the two with my own labels: the “Bailey Blaster” and the “Crimmins Check Ball.” The overall theory of operation was deduced by observing ordinary raku objects being cooled with water from a hose. Water could be seen en tering and exiting from the hollowed bottoms of sculptures, and obvious slurping noises indicated hydraulic forces equalizing the internal pressure. This was a common and often-talkedabout phenomenon. The “Bailey Blaster” is made by throwing a short, wide, narrow-necked bottle. The neck is cut off, inverted and reattached so that the neck points into (instead of away from) the body of the bottle. After reaching full raku tempera ture, the incandescent bottle, full of super-heated air/gasses, is removed from the kiln. It immediately begins to cool down. Quickly, the bottle is plunged into cold water; as it gives up heat, water is converted to steam. As die botde cools, the gas inside condenses enough to allow water pressure to force water into the bottle. The water that enters turns to steam. Water converted to steam has an expansion coefficient of about 1700 to 1, if conversion is in stantaneous, so the steam raises the gas pressure inside the bottle, and steam and water come rushing out. The process is cyclic and continues until the pot no longer boils water. The primary source of heat for gener ating steam comes from the thick clay walls. Fluctuating gas pressure inside the bottle serves to regulate introduc tion of water and to propel the con tents out the inverted neck, thus converting heat to mechanical force. The inverted neck is the real ge nius behind Bailey’s bottle. Descend ing down so close to the bottom of the botde, the neck increases the prob ability that water will be trapped be tween the exit and the pressurized gas, ensuring that water will be pro pelled out the neck and increasing the gas pressure so that higher exit velocities will be attained. The in An early “Bailey Blaster ” (glazed on the exterior to decrease the porosity of the walls) spouting off. Jerry Crimmins manipulating a “Crimmins Check Ball” with tongs to encourage an eruption in the opposite direction. Observers stand well back. Caution: If you decide to experiment with geyser bottles, remember you will be working with potentially explosive steam. Use common sense, and wear adequate clothing and eye protection. May 1992 83 Wood Ash in Glazes: Economical and Ecological by Art Grupe Ever since pre-Han Chinese potters dis covered that the shoulders of their ware were covered with a glassy glaze from ashes blown through their kilns during the firing process, wood ash has enjoyed popu larity as a glaze ingredient. It’s easy to see why: ash is available free nearly every where; wood ash glazes are easy to fit (without crazing or crawling) to clay bod ies; and a unique “runny” surface texture, complemented by spontaneous metallic splashes from iron or other trace ele ments, is created when large amounts of ash are used in a glaze. There are, of course, some drawbacks: overfired ash glazes may run onto kiln shelves, and obtaining consistent results from one batch of wood ash to another may be difficult. But these drawbacks can be easily overcome, making the material valuable for both aesthetic and economic reasons. Depending on its source, wood ash varies widely in chemical composition, which makes testing crucial in develop ing suitable glaze recipes. The silica con tent can vary from 30% to 70%, alumina content from 10% to 15% and calcium can reach 30%. Other elements found in lesser amounts include potassium, so dium, iron, magnesium, manganese and phosphorus. The high calcium content helps produce, with the proper ratio of chromium and tin in an oxidation firing, significant pink and rose tints. Any wood or vegetable ash can be used in formulating glazes. In Japan, rice straw ash is a popular ingredient because of its abundance there. In the U.S., wood ash from scrap Douglas fir lumber yields good glazes. Ashes from fruit pits and almond or walnut shells (available from a cannery), corn cobs, and waste from sawmills or furniture factories can provide consistent raw materials. When such sources are un with ash glazes, with the fault being in the recipe or the firing. If the glaze runs too much, clay can be added to the batch. Soaking the kiln at the glaze’s maturation point (or overfiring) should be avoided. The first step is to collect ash in a large container, such as a 50-gallon drum. The ash can then be wet screened into an other 50-gallon drum, using a garden hose with a spray nozzle. For those who plan to apply glaze by dipping, a coarse lawn such as an old piece of window screen (18 mesh) will be adequate. However, a 100mesh or finer screen should be used to prevent clogging of the spray gun or air brush if the glaze is intended for spray ing. Remember, though, that fired results will be affected by screening: finer wood ash particles melt at a lower temperature than the larger ones. Care should be taken when handling wood ash and the water used to wash it. Always wear a mask to prevent inhalation of very fine ash particles, and rubber gloves to protect hands from the sodium hydroxide (caustic soda) that is the major soluble ingredient in ash wash water. Once the water and ash mixture has settled, which may take as long as over night, the caustic water is decanted with a siphon from the drum. After an addi tional drying period in the drum, the pro cessed ash can be spread out to dry. Because heavy particles tend to settle out of suspension sooner than smaller ones, I appreciate being able to make something beautiful and useful from a material that is usually discarded. using the washed wood ash by merely available, friends with fireplaces or wood- scooping it out of the drum can yield burning stoves can provide suitable ash if collected in large enough quantities to make batch-specific testing practical. Firing test tiles vertically to determine runniness of a recipe is a must. Drawing a line horizontally across the tile with an underglaze pencil will enable measuring precisely how much the glaze will run during firing. Runniness can be a chronic problem 84 CERAMICS MONTHLY inconsistent results—ash taken from the top of the drum would be a finer mesh than that found at the bottom. While ash can be screened without water, then used in a glaze, the potter must contend with the possibility of skin irritation on the hands and arms, or worse if it is splashed into an eye. However, the more times ash is washed, the less fusible it will be in glaze. Ash glazes can be as simple or compli cated as the potter wants. The following simple recipes yield beautiful results: Jokon Ash Glaze (Cone 6, oxidation or reduction) Barium Carbonate................................. 45 % Washed Wood Ash.................................... 55 100% Add: Copper Carbonate.......................... 3 % A dark green, runny matt. AG19 (Cone 6, reduction) Washed Wood Ash................................50 % Red Earthenware Clay.......................... 50 100% A clear olive-green. Recycling clay body scraps as glaze ma terial appeals to many potters. Clay in a glaze helps keep it in suspension. The following base recipe was developed with those two factors in mind: AG13 Base Glaze (Cone 6) Washed Wood Ash............................... 44% Whiting.................................................. 21 Potash Feldspar..................................... 21 Clay Body (any) ................................... 14 100% The clay body I use consists of 100 parts G-200 feldspar, 100 parts ball clay, 100 parts kaolin and 45 parts flint. The large amount of calcium in this base glaze makes it ideal for the produc tion of pinks, roses and maroons in oxida tion firings. A mixture of 1 part chromium oxide to 18 parts tin oxide is prepared, then added in varying amounts accord ing to desired effect; 5% (by weight) yields a medium rose pink in oxidation. An addition of 2% rutile, 0.5% copper carbonate and 0.5% cobalt yields a me dium blue with a green-gold background in a reduction firing. Lowering the firing temperature of AG13 to Cone 4 produces a shiny, opaque glaze without the runniness that might cause glaze accidents on kiln shelves. A glaze that has fascinated me for years with its ability to produce subtle shades of turquoise blue through the use of barium and lithium is Carlton Ball’s MC 532. While not an ash glaze, it was the inspira tion for the following oxidation glaze: LBC Turquoise Green Glaze (Cone 6) Barium Carbonate........................... 2.11 % Lithium Carbonate.......................... 2.11 Washed Wood Ash.......................... 44.21 Whiting............................................ 13.68 Potash Feldspar............................... 22.10 Clay Body (any) ............................. 15.79 100.00% Add: Copper Carbonate................... 5.26 % Contrary to most ash glazes, which have a relatively narrow firing range, the fol lowing recipe works well over a wide range, and in both oxidation and reduction firings: Honey Yellow Glaze (Cone 3-6, oxidation or reduction) Gerstley Borate..................................... 10% Washed Wood Ash............................... 50 Cedar Heights Redart........................... 40 100% While wood ash isn’t the primary in gredient of the next glaze, it is a good example of how the material can be used to “stretch” a recipe: Penicillin Blue Glaze (Cone 6) Barium Carbonate........................... Spodumene...................................... Washed Wood Ash.......................... Clay Body (any) ............................. 48.39 % 27.96 8.60 15.05 100.00 % Add: Copper Carbonate................... 8.60 % Applying wood ash glazes to ware can prove challenging. The glaze coating usu ally appears “fuzzy,” making it easy to ap ply an ash glaze too thinly. Use of a hydrometer to measure specific gravity is highly recommended so the optimum ra tio of glaze to water can be determined precisely for each recipe. Becoming proficient with ash glazes yields tremendous satisfaction. I appreci ate being able to make something beauti ful and useful from a material that is usually discarded. Ash also offers the po tential for glaze recipes that are more economical to produce than many in stu dio use today. Because of the varying fusion points of different ash types, recipes listed in this article should be considered starting points for each potter’s venture into the world of ash glazes. ▲ May 1992 85 Comment Politically Correct Pots by Brad Sondahl Is pottery political? Musician Frank Zappa once said that everything you wear is your uniform. Stretching the analogy, if your pottery is apolitical, per haps this merely reflects your personal politics. Has pottery been political? I think about the ruckus caused by Judy Chicago’s “Dinner Party,” and know that it has. Is pottery subject to the current trend of political correctness? Ponder lighdy and read on. Since everything else in life is sub ject to standards of political correct ness, from grocery bags to dorm room doors, let’s consider whether pottery meets today’s high standards of behav ior. When I began “doing” pottery in the early ’70s, there was no question that it was the right thing to do. After all, at about that time Ceramics Monthly began printing in full color. If that’s not evidence of a mass movement, I don’t know what is. Pottery was then clearly a direct counterpoint to the prevalent military-industrial complex that afflicted the psyche of our coun try. To avoid contracting that disease, I would retire to a kick wheel and think peaceful thoughts. I knew back in college that pottery was more politically correct than the other arts, because it didn’t require any models sitting around naked. This, and the “elite”-ist tendencies of art, con vinced me that art was politically in correct, and prompted my final art production, a happening called “Art as a Bourgeois Sham.” In the current lan guage of -ists and -isms for every occa sion, this clearly labels me an “art”-ist (despite and because of my attempts to disavow it) and a non-“nude”-ist (as I am obviously a prudist). Getting back to my historical critique, I moved into a chicken coop and tepee with another potter, and learned how to live righteously, scraping along with scrap clay, used kilns and a big garden. Living close to the earth was synony mous with making pottery then, espe cially since the pottery studio had a dirt floor. This was the good life, although Minnesota winters are justiy famous for 86 CERAMICS MONTHLY May 1992 87 Even the earthy wood or salt kilns, and reduction firing in general, represent greater environmental degradation than sane-but-bland electric kilns. (If I label them bland, does that make me an “oxidation”-ist? In this case, no, since it is my sole firing mode.) At any rate, environmentalism poses a quandary for me (as it does to the world in general), because artists-pot- and reuse of these materials. Even failed pots can be put to good use as material for mosaics, best evidenced by the fan ciful architecture of Barcelona’s Anto wearing down good-lifers. We lasted sev nio Gaudi. eral years before moving on to other In that pottery is a product to be possibilities. sold, the buyers participate in the craft, By the eighties, the age of greed took through their appreciation of pots and its toll among the ranks of potters who their support of craftspeople. However, wanted to have some semblance of there is a tendency toward exclusivity financial security in addition to in catering to the rich, and I per their good life and political cor sonally affirm craft that can be By the eighties, the age of greed rectness. Teaching became an at purchased by the less affluent. tractive second career option, and Whether as a teacher or a pro took its toll among the ranks of potters who the ones who remained in the ducer, the potter’s talents can be ranks split between those empha wanted to have some semblance of financial shared with a broad spectrum of sizing production and those capi society through demonstrations security in addition to their good life and talizing on artistic quality and for groups, from preschools to se uniqueness. At the same time, liv nior centers. This can be consid political correctness. ing close to the earth was begin ered self-serving promotion, but ning to suggest silicosis from the immediate rewards are appar long-term occupational exposure. ters tend to use fewer materials than ent (both to the audience and the one Meanwhile, glaze leachates implied po production potters, as more time is de presenting) and can help in the most tential government regulation and skit voted to each expensive piece. This con politically important part of pottery tish consumers, while leftover glaze flicts with my own populist-derived making—keeping craftspeople in con chemicals and pottery wastes became functional nature. I console myself, tact with the community as a whole. not so environmentally correct (and though, with the belief that artists-potCaveats aside, pottery is still a very even glossy pottery magazines posed a ters also tend to use more exotic chemi inclusive discipline, for it can be en problem for recyclers). cals and techniques, which have equally joyed at some level by nearly everyone. In the light of all these environmen exotic effects on the environment. When it comes time to face a ball of tal considerations (which potters have So here it is, the nineties, and while clay, we are all wonderfully challenged tended to know about, but chosen to handmade pottery has gained a per by it. continue anyway), suddenly the politi manent niche in the world’s artistic life, cally correct choice lies in the route of is it still the right thing to do? Of course. The author A frequent contributor to the less consumption, since materials pro But with some reservations. Suppliers Ceramics Monthly Comment column, Brad cessing and usage both denote (to some and users of ceramic materials must be Sondahl maintains a storefront studio in degree) environmental degradation. environmentally responsible in their use Spirit Lake, Idaho. Comment Index to Advertisers A.R.T. Studio.............................11, 19 Aftosa...............................................77 Aim ..................................................12 Amaco.............................................. 57 Amherst Potters................................66 Anderson Ranch...............................58 Arkansas Art Center.........................65 Axner..........................................24, 25 Bailey.....................................1, 6, 7, 9 Banff Centre.....................................65 Bartow History................................ 10 Bennett’s........................................... 3 Bison Studio.....................................10 Bluebird............................................65 Brent.................................................21 Brickyard .........................................68 Ceramic Review...............................67 CeramiCorner...................................71 Ceramics Monthly.............. 17, 60, 75 Classified..........................................86 Clay Factory.....................................70 Clay Studio.......................................68 Contemporary Kilns.........................71 88 Ceramics Monthly Continental Clay.............................. 85 Cornell..............................................64 Creative Industries........................... 26 Creek Turn....................................... 66 Davens..............................................64 Dawson.............................................71 Del Val............................................. 70 Dolan................................................ 64 Duncan............................................. 59 Duralite.............................................71 Falcon............................................... 12 Flotsam & Jetsam.............................71 Geil................................................... 67 Giffin................................................ 79 Great Lakes Clay..............................73 Handmade Lampshade.....................70 Hartford Art School..........................77 Highwater Clays...............................72 Hood................................................. 74 IMC...................................................58 Kelly Place....................................... 64 Kickwheel ......................................... 4 Kraft Korner..................................... 70 Laguna Clay..................................... 13 Leslie................................................ 71 Marjon ............................................. 71 Mendocino Art Center..................... 69 Miami Clay.......................................74 Miami Cork...................................... 63 Mid-South......................................... 2 Mile-Hi............................................. 78 Miller................................................75 Minnesota Clay................................ 76 Molly’s............................................. 70 Montgomery College ...................... 80 National Artcraft.............................. 78 North Star......................................... 69 Olsen.................................................73 Orton.................................................85 Paragon.............................................58 Peter Pugger..................................... 58 Peters Valley.................................... 78 Polglase............................................ 58 Potters Shop......................................70 Pure & Simple.................................. 70 Ram.................................................. 81 Red Deer College.............................68 Resco.......................................Cover 3 Rings 8c Things............................... 80 Sapir................................................. 77 Scott Creek.......................................62 Sheffield...........................................81 Shimpo.................................... Cover 2 Sierra Nevada College..................... 68 Skutt........................................ Cover 4 Soldner............................................. 23 Standard........................................... 73 Summit............................................. 68 Trinity...............................................61 Tucker’s............................................61 Tuscarora Pottery............................. 70 Venco................................................15 Vent-A-Kiln .................................... 75 West Coast Kilns..............................69 Wise..................................................70 Wolfe................................................ 70 Worcester Center..............................67