1 - Lewisboro

CONTENTS
December 17, 2013
AGENDA PACKET (PART I)
Agenda
Wetland Violations
DeCandia
Alderman
Oliveira
Guilliermo Arias & Lexus Holding Company, LTD
New Cal#
Project Description
Application
Site Design Response to Kellard Sessions Memo
Full EAF
NYS DEC Document
Wetland Investigation Report - 12/5/00
Wetland Investigation Report - 3/6/07
Coleman - Wetlands Delineation - 12/27/01
Coleman - Revised Wetlands Delineation - 6/19/07
National Flood Insurance Program Map
Aerial Map
USGS Map
Sirignano Letter - 3/5/08
Declaration of 20 Foot Landscape Buffer Area
One Republic National Title Insurance Company
CAL#
1-13WV
2-13WV
1-10WV
9-04PB
12-13PB
PAGE(S)
2
3 -12
3-6
7 - 11
N/A
12 - 75
12 - 13
14 - 15
16 - 17
18 - 38
39 - 42
43 - 44
45
46 - 48
49 - 50
51
52
53
54
55 - 61
62 - 75
TOWN OF LEWISBORO
Westchester County, New York
Planning Board
PO Box 725
Cross River, New York 10518
Tel: (914) 763-5592
Fax: (914) 763-3637
Email: planning@lewisborogov.com
AGENDA
Tuesday December 17, 2013
7:30 P.M.
Note:
Town Offices @ Cross River
Cross River Plaza, Cross River
Meeting to end at or before 11:30 P.M.
.
I.
WETLAND VIOLATIONS
Michael DeCandia, 174 North Salem Road, Katonah, Cal # 1-13WV and Cal# 109-12WP
Kenneth Alderman, 11 Birch Spring Road, South Salem, Cal# 2-13WV
Rui Ferreira Oliveira, 8 Brookside Trail, South Salem – Cal# 1-10 WV & Cal# 25-12 WP
II.
PROJECT REVIEW
Guiliermo Arias & Lexus Holding Company, LTD, 411 Smith Ridge Road, Vista – Application for Preliminary
Subdivision Plat Approval of a two (2) lot subdivision – Cal# 9-04 PB
James Snyder, 42 Bishop Park Road, Pound Ridge, New York – Applications for Wetland Activity Permit and
Stormwater Permit Approvals to construct a 3 season porch and new terrace, enclose existing porch, replace existing
deck, and make interior renovations. Cal# 105-13WP
III.
SKETCH PLAN REVIEW
JT Farm (Peace & Carrots, LLC), 1125 Route 35, South Salem – Subdivision application for a lot line change between
two (2) parcels of land identified as Sheet 26, Block 10541, Lots 27 & 28 on the Town Tax Maps. Cal# 9-13PB
IV.
EXTENSION OF TIME
Charisma Holding Corp. d/b/a Estate Motors-Mercedes Benz, 321 Main Street (NYS Route 22), Goldens Bridge –
Request for extension of time needed to secure financing for the overall project - Cal# 8-09 PB
Pasquale Popoli & Angelo Sicuranza, 1437 Route 35, South Salem – Application for Final Subdivision Plat Approval –
Request for extension of time to meet requirements of amended approval resolution dated September 28, 2010. Cal#
8-02 PB
V.
CORRESPONDENCE AND GENERAL BUSINESS
VI.
MINUTES OF October 15, 2013 and November 19, 2013
r" ,. ~
f.
riioPY DELALLA
&
LLC.
ASSOCIATES,
L~ndsc~pe
A~chlt<CCt5
PROJECT DESCRIPTION
--
-,
Arias/ Lexus Holding, Co., LLC Subdivision Smith Ridge Road (Route 123) (Sheet 20, Block 10801, Lot 162/28)
The Arias/Lexus subdivision consists of approximately 17.712 acres located on the eastern side
of Smith Ridge Road (Route 123) in the Town of Lewisboro. The site currently includes an
existing residence, garage, barn, sheds, driveway, septic and well; all of which are currently
located in the northwestern portion of the property. A wetland area is located near the central
portion of the property dividing the large unregulated upland areas on the parcel into two main
areas. Another smaller band of wetland is located along the extreme eastern edge of the
property. A third area of Town of Lewisboro regulated wetland is located along the northern
boundary of the parcel in the central portion of the property. The wetland areas on the site were
field designated by certified soil scientists Steve Coleman on the southern portion of the parcel
and Otto Theall on the northern portions, and are illustrated on the enclosed site plan. The
wetland areas encompass approximately 77,786 SF or 1.79 acres of the parcel, with land within
the regulated 100 foot wetland buffer area accounting for an additional 241,410 SF or 5.54 acres
of the site area. Both wetland areas D-45 & 7 are regulated by the NYS DEC and consist of
relatively narrow bands which drain in a southerly direction. The western portion of the site is
gently sloping with steeper areas adjacent to the wetland area in the central portion of the
property. The upland area along the eastern portion of the property slopes in both a westerly and
easterly direction towards the adjacent wetland areas. The majority of the property is wooded
with the exception of the western part of the parcel where all of the proposed construction
activity will occur.
The property is located in the R-2A single-family residence zone and is currently tiled on the
Westchester County Land Records as two separate lots. I lowever the property was not legally
subdivided, therefore it is not recognized as valid subdivision by the Town of Lewisboro. The
proposed subdivision of the property will divide the site into two building lots consisting of a
5.00 acre parcel located in the northwest corner, which would include all of the existing
structures and developed portions of the site, and a 12.712 acre currently undeveloped parcel to
the south. No development is proposed within any of the regulated wetland or buffer areas of the
site, with all proposed development occurring towards Smith Ridge Road in the western portion
of the property. Proposed Lot 50 would include approximately 111,759 SF or 2.57 acres of
contiguous buildable area with adequate room for both the existing and potential future uses.
This lot contains only a small unregulated area on the eastern side of the existing wetland.
Proposed Lot 50.1 contains approximately 101,528 SF or 2.33 acres of contiguous buildable area
in the western portion of the lot, with an additional 211,678 SF or 4.86 acres of buildable area
located in the eastern half of the parcel.
L.1
t)
d , c ~ f' cAr chi tee t
~ () 0 I d Q
II "
~ r y R0
"
d
U 1-
e
"Sit e
[I
5 U 1 t e :2 0:; "
e S 19 n
Rid ~ e
,'E n v
r
1e
IJ
1 1- 0
n rn e n t .1 I
CT 0
f,
H7 7 "
r)
I .1 n n 1 n ~
rei
,'L " n d II c v " I () f'
:2 0 3 - '" ~ 1 - ~' 1 1;' " C 01'
In
e n t C () n S
1I
I tin ~
:2 0 :; -- '" :; 1 - -' '" '" :2
The proposed subdivision results in all development on the property occurring to the west of the
central wetland areas on the site. The enclosed plans illustrate the location of existing and
proposed residences, driveways, septic systems and wells. The wetland and buffer areas on the
property will be protected during construction by appropriate erosion control measures to be
installed as illustrated on the enclosed plans and details. These measures will minimize the
encroachment into regulated areas on the property and mitigate the potential for soi I erosion and
sedimentation to the greatest extent practicable. Upon completion or the construction and
grading activity all disturbed areas will be seeded to stabilize the site. Once all areas have been
thoroughly stabilized, the erosion controls will be removed.
TOWN OF LEWISBORO PLANNING BOARD Onatru Farm, elmwood Road, South Salem! New York 10590 • TEL (914) 763-55921 FAX (914) 163-3637 STEP U: APPLlCAnON FOR PRELrMINARY SUBPIVISfON PLAT APPROVAL
AriaslLexus Holding Company LLC Subdivision
project name
.
zoning disf1icl
Smith Ridge Road (Route 123)
50
site location
..
..
17.712
2
sit~
acreage
number ofproposed lots
9834
162
brock
lot
.. Is the site located within 500 FT of any Town boundaty7
YES 0
Nom
.. Is t11£1 silo /ocatfJd wirhin the New York City Watershed?
YES 0
NO rb
.. N/A
length of new streets
./sthesite!ocs(edonaStataorCouniyHlghway7 Route # 123
YES~ NOD
Site Design Consultants 251 F Underhill Avenue Yorktown Heights! NY 10598 (914) 962 4488
r
(914) {ti2J-0'304
address
enginoorSffame
phone
Kulhanek & Plan Land Surveyors P.C. P,O. Box 178 Westchester Avenue Pound Ridge, NY 10576
.-.Sl6Veynr'S r.ame
Bunney Associates
ar:k:IIsss
301 Fie/ds Lane Brewster, NY 10509
(914) 277-3404·
TI-ie FoU.OWlNG MATERlAl.S SHALl BEATTACHBJ:
o
.E'J
~
~
r!J
~
13
~
~
~
~
PRaNINARY SUBDMSION PLAT per SscOon 195-15 and Append'oc A oflhe land SUbdMsion ReglJafions.
PRBJMINARY CONSTRUCTION PlANS per section 195-15 and Appendix A-4 offhe 18nd SulxJMsion Regulafons.
VIIRfl1'EN NARRJ\TJVE describing the enYIronrrentaJ ctErac:Iar, physical ~tures and scop;l dthe proposa:J acOOn.
TOPOGRAPHIC SURVEY per ~1XA-2 of the I..a1d SubdMsioo R6g\Jalions, shcMrg twt::Hoot o:noor intervals,
MAP OF- CONTIGUOUS HOLDINGS per ApperdX M or /tle -Land SubcfNlsion Regu:alions...
WEll.AND DElJNEAnON per Chapter 217\11k!1ands and Watercourses law, ~'VittI NYSDEC endorsement where appropriate.
WETIAND AC'TMTYPERMJT APPUCAllOI"lFORM a:xrp:ete if any weUandsf100-fooI ~ adMy is proJX>Sed.
SEQR ENVIRONMENTAl. ASSESSMENT FORM. COMPLETED AFFJDAvrr OF OWNERSHIP FO~ oortiIying CNJI1~af reoold as ci date of the applicalion. COMPLETED AFFIDAVIT ~M RECEIVER OF TAXES (Biifying payrrentct air faxes ~~tsdue. FlUNG FEE: $400 PER LOT SHOVVN payab/elD: m,WlVOFLEWlSBORO, Total ~ _ _' _ - - - - - Lexus Holding Co., LLC PO Box 170 Garrison, NY 10524 (845) 424-4400
GuiliermoArias 411 Smith Ridge Road Soutll Salem, NY 10590 (91
·Lexus Hoiding Co., LLC PO
DafaolreoefXbyPr~8oard ~
_ _ _ _ __
1JppIc8fia'I1D: SUBfI _ _ _ _ _~
phooe
'i
(203)431-241~O.
" ..
b IOj
AFFIDAVIT OF OWNERSHIP
STAT6 OF New York
COUNTY OF Westchester Co~nty
Paul Guillaro
~
_______
)
} ss:
:-::--c:;;:----;-----::-:~l
h"';nn
dlliv
"'\A1nrn
'"
I] V
• _.
I..
..... -
t ~
t.A
depoe",,,," -.:::>nrl
r;:..,,,,..
'cn u v Y
•...d ......
U
.....l
J
that shefhe resides at: PO Box 170 Garrison, NY 10590
in the County of: Westchester
and that she/he
.
IS (chc::;k one)
.
.
, State of New York
Presiclen::Tt-----------"
'j) the owner, or 2) the _~
title
- Lexus Hoiding Company, LLC
OT __~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~-----------------------113m!;! of corporatlon, partnerShip or othor If!sal entJty
which is the owner, in fee of afl that certain lot, piece or parcel of land situated, lying and
.... ,,;~ ... in th"",
tn not .........
I 8 u •i, sb">r'"
.....I(cn;>s...,;rl
<:>n" vn,-,.,,,,., ~nd .-l"'s·!'"'nate"
"''' ~ho.
UI\",oo T"..
IVVy'\VJ
v J v , 'NQ'"
...... ' UVert..
nlQ
\v
uy.
I..I~JtI~U
::.:ilUr...UIU4\fIV,""P.;;.;I:1
Tax Assessor Map of the Town of Lewisboro as Lot Number _162
~l
. Block
\..JVH~i'O::::= ~_34__
on Sheet 50
• and that said depon=ntfcorpor.atipn/partoership/entity acquired title to
o.·d
.
b do d . Jacobson Capita, Services
th ~ S81 premises y _e· Tram. ~_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _~_.--_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
dated 07114/98
• recorded in the Office of the Westchester County Clerk. uivisior;
07/14/98
..
12147
109
of Land Records on
In Llber
of Conveyances at Page _ _ _,
and thai 1he deponent/corporation/partneiship/entity hereby consents to the annexed
application for (chE:ck on!:):
C WAlVE,'<. OEStT!;.£'I-t.oN PROC.EOUR,E~ .
. D SITE DEVELOPMENT Pi..AN "0 SPEcIAl.. PERMI; USE
:J WETLt..NDS PERM!T
0 FlUNG W!TH THE WESTCHESTER COUNTY CLERK
1qf~ d ./bIY
r
Signed
Swon to before me this
(:
tb
_
1
1:.)
.,,)..
day of
f ~{tla/~· , 20ecl
I
/
-h(~~~~__
..otnry public (affix. stamp)
DiANE FERRIS
Notary Public. State of New York
QualHied in Dutcness County
No.01FE4960853
I'~",,,.,i,.~inr\
!='vnirlJ.'\ I~nuarv
... \....,., ......
VUI~!tlll.J
'1""'.
~.
,
~
2.
Sire Design Consulranrs
Civil Engineers • Land Planners
October 21,2013
Hand Delivered
Ms. Lisa Pisera, Secretary Planning Board Cross River Shopping Center at Orchard Square Suite L - Lower Level 20 North Salem Road Cross River, NY 10518 Re: Arias / Lexus Holding Co., Ltd.
Dear Ms. Pisera:
We are in receipt of the memos to the Town of Lewisboro Planning Board from the Lewisboro Conservation Advisory Council; and Jan K. Johannessen, AICP and Joseph M. Cerrnele, P.E. of Kellard Sessions Consulting, P.C, both memos dated March 8, 2013.
We have reviewed these memos and submit the following comments and revisions to the
plans as noted.
Memo from Kellard Sessions Consulting, P.C. Planning and Engineering Comments for the items relevant to Site Design Consultants: 1. We have clarified the improvements for the septic system on Lot 1. The
WCHD required new testing of the septic areas on each lot since the original
testing had expired. The new testing is reflected on the WCHD chart located
on the Improvement Plan. The existing gravel driveway has been shown to be
removed where necessary. The septic area is no longer under the driveway; it
is now on both sides of the driveway. When available, we will provide copies
of the WCDH subdivision approvals.
5. The Bulk Zoning Table has been removed from Sheet 1 of 3.
6. The location of the proposed residence has been repositioned to the high point
on the site. This will be reflected on Sheet SP-I of the DeLalla and Associates
plan set.
7. The wetland area and corresponding wetland buffer has been shown.
9. We have shown the existing 2-foot contours on Lot 1 using the Westchester
County GIS database.
10. Check darns have been added to the swale and reflected on the D e t
shee~=a5==~
,il
251-F Underhill Avenue. Yorktown Heights, New York 10598 :
60 Walnut Grove Road • Ridgefield, Connecticut 06877 :
(91 4J 962-4488
(203) 431 ·9504
Fax (914J 962-7386
f'
f!J
Ms. Lisa Pisera, Secretary
Planning Board
October 2, 2013
Page 2 of2
11. A driveway profile has been provided for Lot 2 as well as site distance
profiles from the proposed driveway looking north and south on Smith Ridge
Road.
13. NYS DOT plan has been added to the drawing set. We have received a verbal
approval from the NYS DOT on our application for renewal.
16. The bedroom count has been noted on the house footprint and in the WCHD
Chart.
18. Soil testing for the stormwater management system has been completed and
witnessed by a representative of Kellard Sessions Consulting.
22. The Planning Board signature block has been added to all our plan sheets.
As we have discussed, we are enclosing the following items of the above referenced
project for placement on the Agenda for the November 19,2013 Planning Board
Meeting.
As required, we have enclosed ten packages each containing the following items:
Plans titled "Proposed Subdivision Plan Prepared for Arias/Lex Holding Company, LLC" dated 1111812002, last revised 817113, Sheets 1-3 of 3; Mr. James DeLalla of DeLalla & Associates will be submitting additional plans, the
required Town Applications, and EAF under separate cover.
Please contact us if you have any questions or need additional copies. Thank you.
Sincerely, ,/
/
htt.Ri
Josep'I.Y' ..lOa, P
.E
.
Cc: G. Arias
Lexus Holding Co., Ltd.
DeLalla & Associates
JCRlcmJEnc./sdc 02-20
617.20
Appendix A
State Environmental Quality Review
FULL ENVIRONMENTAL ASSESSMENT FORM
Purpose: The full E A F is designed to help applicants and agencies determine, in an orderly manner, w hether a project or action may
be significant. The question of w hether an action may be significant is not alw ays easy to ans w er. Frequently, there are aspects of
a project that are subjective or unmeasurable. It is also understood that those w ho determine significance may have little or no formal
kno w ledge of the environment or may not be technically expert in environmental analysis. In addition, many w ho have kno w ledge
in one particular area may not be a w are of the broader concerns affecting the question of significance.
T h e full E A F is intended to provide a method w hereby applicants and agencies can be assured that the determination process
has been orderly, comprehensive in nature, yet flexible enough to allo w introduction of information to fit a project or action.
Full EAF Components: The full E A F is comprised of three parts:
Part 1:
Provides objective data and information about a given project and its site. By identifying basic project data, it assists
a revie w er in the analysis that takes place in Parts 2 and 3.
Part 2: Focuses on identifying the range of possible impacts that may occur from a project or action. It provides guidance
as to w hether an impact is likely to be considered small to moderate or w hether it is a potentially-large impact. The
form also identifies w hether an impact can be mitigated or reduced.
Part 3: If any impact in Part 2 is identified as potentially-large, then Part 3 is used to evaluate w hether or not the impact is
actually important.
THIS AREA FOR LEAD AGENCY USE ONLY
DETERMINATION OF SIGNIFICANCE -- Type 1 and Unlisted Actions
Identify the Portions of EAF completed for this project:
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Upon revie w of the information recorded on this E A F (Parts 1 and 2 and 3 if appropriate), and any other supporting information, and
considering both the magnitude and importance of each impact, it is reasonably determined by the lead agency that:
A.
T h e project will not result in any large and important impact(s) and, therefore, is one w hich will not ha v e a
significant impact on the environment, therefore a negative declaration will be prepared.
B.
Although the project could have a significant effect on the environment, there will not be a significant effect
for this Unlisted A ction because the mitigation measures described in PART 3 have been required, therefore
a CONDITIONED negative declaration will be prepared.*
C.
The project may result in one or more large and important impacts that may have a significant impact on the
environment, therefore a positive declaration will be prepared .
* A Conditioned Negative Declaration is only valid for Unlisted A ctions
Arias/Lexus Holding Co., LLC Sub.
Name of A ction
Town of Lewisboro Planning Board
Name of Lead Agency
Jerome Kerner
Chairman, Planning Board
Print or Type Name of Responsible Officer in Lead A gency
Title of Responsible Officer
Signature of Responsible Officer in Lead A gency
Signature of Preparer (If different from responsible officer)
November 13, 2013
w ebsite
Date
Page 1 of 21
PART 1--PROJECT INFORMATION
Prepared by Project Sponsor
NOTICE: This document is designed to assist in determining whether the action proposed may have a significant effect on the
environment. Please complete the entire form, Parts A through E. Answers to these questions will be considered as part of the
application for approval and may be subject to further verification and public review. Provide any additional information you believe
will be needed to complete Parts 2 and 3.
It is expected that completion of the full EAF will be dependent on information currently available and will not involve new studies,
research or investigation. If information requiring such additional work is unavailable, so indicate and specify each instance.
Name of Action
Arias/Lexus Holding Company LLC Subdivision
Location of Action (include Street Address, Municipality and County)
Smith Ridge Road (Route 123) South Salem, Westchester County, NY
Name of Applicant/Sponsor
Guilliermo Arias
Address 411 Smith Ridge Road (Route 123)
City / PO South Salem
Business Telephone
Lexus Holding Company, LLC
Paul Guillaro President
P.O. Box 170
Garrison, NY 10524
(845) 424-4400
State NY
Zip Code
10590
(914) 533-5157
Lexus Holding Company, LLC
Paul Guillaro President
P.O. Box 170
Garrison, NY 10524
(845) 424-4400
Name of Owner (if different) Guilliermo Arias
Address 411 Smith Ridge Road (Route 123)
City / PO South Salem
State NY
Zip Code 10590
Business Telephone (914) 533-5157
Description of Action:
The Arias/Lexus Holding Company LLC subdivision consists of approximately 17.712 acres located on the eastern side of Smith Ridge Road (Route 123) in the Town of
Lewisboro. The site currently includes an existing residence, garage, barn shed, driveway, septic, and well; all of which is currently located on the northern portion of the
property. A small wetland runs through the middle of the property cutting the unregulated upland areas in half. Another small wetland is location along the extreme rear of
the property. The wetland areas on the site were filed designated by Steve Coleman, certified soil scientist and Otto R. Theall, certified soil scientist on December 27,2001
and December 5, 2001 respectively. The wetland areas encompass approximately 77,786 SF. or 1.79 acres of the parcel, with land within the regulated 150 foot buffer areas
accounting for the additional 241,410 SF or 5.54 acres of the site area. The front portion of the site is fairly flat and gets steeper as it descends to the wetlands that are located
through the middle portion of the property. The upland area near the rear of the property descends on both a westerly and easterly direction towards the two wetland areas.
The majority of the property is wooded except for the extreme front part of the lot where all the proposed construction activity will occur. Currently the property is filed on the Westchester County Land Records as a 2 lot subdivision; however the property was not subdivided appropriately so it is recognized as
an illegal subdivision by the Town of Lewisboro. The proposed legalization to the subdivision of the property will divide the property into two buildable lots consisting of a
5 acre parcel to the north and a larger 12.712 acre parcel to the south. In addition no development is proposed within any of the regulated areas of the site with any
development occurring towards the front of the property. Lot 50 contains approximately 111,759 or 2.57 acres of contiguous buildable area with plenty of room for any
existing or future uses. This lot has little or no unregulated developable land on the eastern side of the existing wetland. Lot 50.1 contains approximately 101,528 SF or 2.33
acres of contiguous buildable area with an additional 211,678 SF or 4.86 acres of non regulated land none of which is currently accessible because of the existing wetland
configuration. Under the current zoning this property could be subdivided into more lots; however with the limitation of access and the steeper slope areas this would be difficult so
development is currently limited to the extreme western portions of the property to protect the existing site wetlands. In addition wetlands on the site will be protected with
the proper erosion control measures installed as illustrated on the enclosed plans which will minimize the encroachment into regulated areas on the property and mitigate the
potential for soil erosion and sedimentation to the greatest extent practicable. Upon completion of the construction and grading activity all disturbed areas will be seeded to
stabilize the site. Once all areas have been thoroughly stabilized the erosion controls will be removed.
Page 2 of 21
Please Complete Each Question--Indicate N.A. if not applicable
A. SITE DESCRIPTION
Physical setting of overall project, both developed and undeveloped areas.
1.
2.
Present Land Use:
Urban
Industrial
Commercial
Forest
A griculture
Other
✔
Residential (suburban)
17.712 acres.
Total acreage of project area:
A PPRO XIM A TE A CRE A GE
PRESEN TLY
A F TER C O MPLETIO N
Meado w or Brushland (Non-agricultural)
2.688 acres
2.588 acres
12.769 acres
12.755 acres
0 acres
0 acres
2.078 acres
2.078 acres
Forested
A gricultural (Includes orchards, cropland, pasture, etc.)
W etland (Fresh w ater or tidal as per Articles 2 4,2 5 of ECL)
Water Surface Area
0 acres
Unvegetated (Rock, earth or fill)
0 acres
Roads, buildings and other paved surfaces
Soil drainage:
79 % of site
✔ W ell drained
Poorly drained
b.
0
acres
.291 acres
0 acres
0 acres
11 % of site.
Moderately w ell drained
10 % of site
If any agricultural land is involved, ho w many acres of soil are classified w ithin soil group 1 through 4 of the NYS Land
acres (see 1 N Y CRR 3 7 0).
Classification System?
Are there bedrock outcroppings on project site?
a.
5.
acres
W hat is predominant soil type(s) on project site?
a.
4.
0
.1766 acres
Other (Indicate type)
3.
Rural (non-farm)
What is depth to bedrock
■
Yes
No
0 < 6 ft. (in feet) Soil Survey of Putnam & Westchester Counties, NY USDA Soil Conservation
Service 1994
A pproximate percentage of proposed project site with slopes:
✔
0-1 0 %
59 %
1 0- 1 5 %
10 %
1 5 % or greater 31
%
6.
Is project substantially contiguous to, or contain a building, site, or district, listed on the State or National Registers of
■
Historic Places?
Yes
No
7.
Is project substantially contiguous to a site listed on the Register of National Natural Landmarks?
8.
What is the depth of the w ater table?
9.
Is site located over a primary, principal, or sole source aquifer?
Yes
■
0 < 6 ft. (in feet) Soil Survey of Putnam & Westchester Counties, NY USDA Soil
Conservation Service 1994
Yes
1 0 . Do hunting, fishing or shell fishing opportunities presently exist in the project area?
Page 3 of 21
■
No
Yes
■
No
No
1 1 . Does project site contain any species of plant or animal life that is identified as threatened or endangered?
Yes
■
A ccording to:
No
According to NYSDEC correspondence dated 11/17/06 there are no species of plant or animal that are identified as threatened or
endangered. To be updated.
T
Identify each species:
1 2 . Are there any unique or unusual land forms on the project site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, other geological formations?
Yes
■
No
Describe:
1 3 . Is the project site presently used by the community or neighborhood as an open space or recreation area?
Yes
■
No
If yes, explain:
1 4 . Does the present site include scenic vie w s kno w n to be important to the community?
Yes
■
No
1 5 . Streams within or contiguous to project area:
NYSDEC D-45 Wetland and unnamed stream flows south through the property.
a.
Name of Stream and name of River to w hich it is tributary
Silvermine River (Milne Reservoir)
16.
Lakes, ponds, w etland areas within or contiguous to project area:
NYSDEC D-7 and D-45 Wetlands, Town of Lewisboro Jurisdictional Wetlands, and unnamed stream flows south through the
property.
b.
Size (in acres):
1.79 Acres of wetland on-site, undetermined wetland areas off-site.
Page 4 of 21
1 7 . Is the site served by existing public utilities?
■ Yes
No
■
a.
If YES, does sufficient capacity exist to allo w connection?
b.
If YES, will improvements be necessary to allo w connection?
Yes
No
■
Yes
No
1 8 . Is the site located in an agricultural district certified pursuant to A griculture and Markets La w , Article 2 5-A A , Section 3 0 3 and
■ No
3 0 4?
Yes
1 9 . Is the site located in or substantially contiguous to a Critical Environmental Area designated pursuant to Article 8 of the ECL,
Yes
■ No
and 6 N Y CRR 6 1 7?
2 0 . Has the site ever been used for the disposal of solid or hazardous w astes?
B.
Project Description
1.
Physical dimensions and scale of project (fill in dimensions as appropriate).
Total contiguous acreage o w ned or controlled by project sponsor:
b.
Project acreage to be developed:
c.
Project acreage to remain undeveloped: 16.762
d.
Length of project, in miles:
e.
If the project is an expansion, indicate percent of expansion proposed.
f.
Number of off-street parking spaces existing
g.
Maximum vehicular trips generated per hour:
h.
If residential: Number and type of housing units:
Ultimately
1.40 acres ultimately.
acres.
2;
%
4
proposed
4 (upon completion of project)?
T w o Family
Multiple Family
2
30 height;
57 w idth;
j. Linear feet of frontage along a public thoroughfare project will occupy is?
2.
Ho w much natural material (i.e. rock, earth, etc.) will be removed from the site?
3.
Will disturbed areas be reclaimed
■ Y es
No
490.1 ft.
0 tons/cubic yards.
N/ A
If yes, for w hat intended purpose is the site being reclaimed?
Landscaping and stabilization of disturbed areas.
4.
C ondominium
1
i. Dimensions (in feet) of largest proposed structure:
a.
No
N/A (if appropriate)
One Family
Initially
■
17.712 acres.
a.
1.40 acres initially;
Yes
b.
Will topsoil be stockpiled for reclamation?
c.
Will upper subsoil be stockpiled for reclamation?
■ Yes
No
■ Yes
No
Ho w many acres of vegetation (trees, shrubs, ground covers) will be removed from site?
Page 5 of 21
1.40 acres.
26 length.
5.
Will any mature forest (over 1 0 0 years old) or other locally-important vegetation be removed by this project?
Yes
■
No
6.
If single phase project: A nticipated period of construction:
7.
If multi-phased:
12 months, (including demolition)
1 (number)
a.
Total number of phases anticipated
b.
Anticipated date of commencement phase 1:
month
year, (including demolition)
c.
A pproximate completion date of final phase:
month
year.
d.
Is phase 1 functionally dependent on subsequent phases?
8.
Will blasting occur during construction ?
9.
Number of jobs generated: during construction
■
Yes
No
No
4 ; after project is complete
0
1 0 . Number of jobs eliminated by this project
Yes
.
1 1 . Will project require relocation of any projects or facilities?
Yes
■
No
If yes, explain:
1 2 . Is surface liquid w aste disposal involved?
■
Yes
No
a.
If yes, indicate type of w aste (se w age, industrial, etc) and amount
b.
Name of w ater body into w hich effluent will be discharged
1 3 . Is subsurface liquid w aste disposal involved?
■
Yes
No
T ype
1 4 . Will surface area of an existing w ater body increase or decrease by proposal?
Septic Systems
Yes ■ No
If yes, explain:
1 5 . Is project or any portion of project located in a 1 0 0 year flood plain?
1 6 . Will the project generate solid w aste?
■
Yes
Yes
■
No
0.8 tons
a.
If yes, w hat is the amount per month?
b.
If yes, w ill an existing solid w aste facility be used?
c.
If yes, give name
d.
Will any w astes not go into a se w age disposal system or into a sanitary landfill?
Local Carter
No
■
Yes
No
; location
Page 6 of 21
Yes
■
No
e.
If yes, explain:
1 7 . Will the project involve the disposal of solid w aste?
a.
If yes, w hat is the anticipated rate of disposal?
b.
If yes, w hat is the anticipated site life?
1 8 . Will project use herbicides or pesticides?
Yes
■ No
tons/month.
years.
■ No
Yes
Yes ■ No
1 9 . Will project routinely produce odors (more than one hour per day)?
2 0 . Will project produce operating noise exceeding the local ambient noise levels?
2 1 . Will project result in an increase in energy use?
■
Yes
No
If yes, indicate type(s)
Additional electricity, heating oil required for one additional single family residence.
2 2 . If w ater supply is from w ells, indicate pumping capacity Min. 5 gallons/minute.
2 3 . Total anticipated w ater usage per day
300 gallons/day.
2 4 . Does project involve Local, State or Federal funding?
Yes
■
If yes, explain:
Page 7 of 21
No
Yes ■ No
25. Approvals Required:
T ype
City, To w n, Village Board
Yes
■
Submittal Date
No
Subdivision Approval
City, To w n, Village Planning Board
■
City, To w n Zoning Board
Yes
Yes
No
■
Issued 6/10/08
No
Septic and water supply
City, County Health Department
■
Other Local A gencies
Yes
Yes
No
■
Subdivision Plat
No
Westchester County
Other Regional A gencies
■
State Agencies
■
Federal A gencies
Yes
No
Yes
No
Yes
■
Planning
NYSDOT Highway Work
08/10/04
Permit & curb cut approval
Issued 12/15/04
No
C.
Zoning and Planning Information
1.
Does proposed action involve a planning or zoning decision?
■
Yes
No
If Yes, indicate decision required:
Zoning amendment
Zoning variance
Ne w /revision of master plan
Site plan
Special use permit
Resource management plan
Page 8 of 21
■
Subdivision
Other
2.
What is the zoning classification(s) of the site?
R-2A Residence Zone
3.
What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the present zoning?
Two single family residences - without further subdivision approvals and wetland activity permits.
4.
W hat is the proposed zoning of the site?
N/A
5.
What is the maximum potential development of the site if developed as permitted by the proposed zoning?
N/A
6.
Is the proposed action consistent with the recommended uses in adopted local land use plans?
7.
What are the predominant land use(s) and zoning classifications within a
■
Yes
No
mile radius of proposed action?
Single Family Residential R-2A, R-4A, R-1A, and General Business GB
8.
Is the proposed action compatible w ith adjoining/surrounding land uses w ith a
mile?
9.
If the proposed action is the subdivision of land, ho w many lots are proposed?
2
a.
W hat is the minimum lot size proposed?
5.00 Acres
Page 9 of 21
■
Yes
No
1 0 . Will proposed action require any authorization(s) for the formation of se w er or w ater districts?
Yes
■
No
1 1 . Will the proposed action create a demand for any community provided services (recreation, education, police, fire protection?
■
a.
Yes
No
If yes, is existing capacity sufficient to handle projected demand?
■
Yes
No
One additional residence will not effect existing capacity and will have a minimal increase on any demands for community
services.
1 2 . Will the proposed action result in the generation of traffic significantly above present levels?
a.
If yes, is the existing road net w ork adequate to handle the additional traffic.
Yes
Yes ■ No
No
D. Informational Details
A ttach any additional information as may be needed to clarify your project. If there are or may be any adverse impacts
associated with your proposal, please discuss such impacts and the measures w hich you propose to mitigate or avoid them.
E.
Verification
I certify that the information provided above is true to the best of my kno wledge.
A pplicant/Sponsor Name James DeLalla, RLA Agent
Date
11/13/13
Signature
Title
Agent for applicant, member - DeLalla & Associates, LLC
If the action is in the Coastal Area, and you are a state agency, complete the Coastal Assessment Form before proceeding with this
assessment.
Page 10 of 21
PART 2 - PROJECT IMPACTS AND THEIR MAGNITUDE
Responsibility of Lead Agency
General Information (Read Carefully)
In completing the form the reviewer should be guided by the question: Have my responses and determinations been
!
reasonable? The reviewer is not expected to be an expert environmental analyst.
The Examples provided are to assist the reviewer by showing types of impacts and wherever possible the threshold of
!
magnitude that would trigger a response in column 2. The examples are generally applicable throughout the State and for
most situations. But, for any specific project or site other examples and/or lower thresholds may be appropriate for a
Potential Large Impact response, thus requiring evaluation in Part 3.
The impacts of each project, on each site, in each locality, will vary. Therefore, the examples are illustrative and have been
!
offered as guidance. They do not constitute an exhaustive list of impacts and thresholds to answer each question.
The number of examples per question does not indicate the importance of each question.
!
!
In identifying impacts, consider long term, short term and cumulative effects.
Instructions (Read carefully)
Answer each of the 20 questions in PART 2. Answer Yes if there will be any impact.
a.
b.
Maybe answers should be considered as Yes answers.
If answering Yes to a question then check the appropriate box(column 1 or 2)to indicate the potential size of the impact. If
c.
impact threshold equals or exceeds any example provided, check column 2. If impact will occur but threshold is lower than
example, check column 1.
d.
Identifying that an Impact will be potentially large (column 2) does not mean that it is also necessarily significant. Any
large impact must be evaluated in PART 3 to determine significance. Identifying an impact in column 2 simply asks that it
be looked at further.
If reviewer has doubt about size of the impact then consider the impact as potentially large and proceed to PART 3.
e.
f.
If a potentially large impact checked in column 2 can be mitigated by change(s) in the project to a small to moderate
impact, also check the Yes box in column 3. A No response indicates that such a reduction is not possible. This must be
explained in Part 3.
1
Small to
Moderate
Impact
2
Potential
Large
Impact
3
Can Impact Be
Mitigated by
Project Change
Impact on Land
1. Will the Proposed Action result in a physical change to the project
site?
NO
YES ■
Examples that would apply to column 2
C
Any construction on slopes of 15% or greater, (15 foot
rise per 100 foot of length), or where the general slopes
in the project area exceed 10%.
Yes
No
C
Construction on land where the depth to the water table
is less than 3 feet.
Yes
No
C
Construction of paved parking area for 1,000 or more
vehicles.
Yes
No
C
Construction on land where bedrock is exposed or
generally within 3 feet of existing ground surface.
Yes
No
C
Construction that will continue for more than 1 year or
involve more than one phase or stage.
Yes
No
C
Excavation for mining purposes that would remove
more than 1,000 tons of natural material (i.e., rock or
soil) per year.
Yes
No
Page 11 of 21
1
Small to
Moderate
Impact
2
Potential
Large
Impact
3
Can Impact Be
Mitigated by
Project Change
C
Construction or expansion of a santary landfill.
Yes
No
C
Construction in a designated floodway.
Yes
No
C
Other impacts:
■
Yes
■
No
Grading and construction activity & increased impervious areas of the parcel. No activity will occur in areas having shallow
depth to bedrock or groundwater - per USDA Soil Suvey.
2.
Will there be an effect to any unique or unusual land forms found on
the site? (i.e., cliffs, dunes, geological formations, etc.)
YES
■ NO
C
Specific land forms:
Yes
No
Examples that would apply to column 2
C
Developable area of site contains a protected water body.
Yes
No
C
Dredging more than 100 cubic yards of material from channel of
a protected stream.
Yes
No
C
Extension of utility distribution facilities through a protected water
body.
Yes
No
C
Construction in a designated freshwater or tidal wetland.
Yes
No
C
Other impacts:
Yes
No
Examples that would apply to column 2
C
A 10% increase or decrease in the surface area of any body of
water or more than a 10 acre increase or decrease.
Yes
No
C
Construction of a body of water that exceeds 10 acres of surface
area.
Yes
No
C
Other impacts:
Yes
No
Impact on Water
3.
4.
Will Proposed Action affect any water body designated as protected?
(Under Articles 15, 24, 25 of the Environmental Conservation Law,
ECL)
YES
■ NO
Will Proposed Action affect any non-protected existing or new body of
water?
■ NO
YES
Page 12 of 21
1
Small to
Moderate
Impact
5.
2
Potential
Large
Impact
3
Can Impact Be
Mitigated by
Project Change
Will Proposed Action affect surface or groundwater quality or
quantity?
NO
■ YES
Examples that would apply to column 2
C
Proposed Action will require a discharge permit.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action requires use of a source of water that does not
have approval to serve proposed (project) action.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action requires water supply from wells with greater
than 45 gallons per minute pumping capacity.
Yes
No
C
Construction or operation causing any contamination of a water
supply system.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will adversely affect groundwater.
Yes
No
C
Liquid effluent will be conveyed off the site to facilities which
presently do not exist or have inadequate capacity.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action would use water in excess of 20,000 gallons
per day.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will likely cause siltation or other discharge into
an existing body of water to the extent that there will be an
obvious visual contrast to natural conditions.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will require the storage of petroleum or
chemical products greater than 1,100 gallons.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will allow residential uses in areas without
water and/or sewer services.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action locates commercial and/or industrial uses
which may require new or expansion of existing waste treatment
and/or storage facilities.
Yes
No
C
Other impacts:
■
Yes
■
The proposed work will results in additional site runoff. Stormwater infiltrators will collect and mitigate these additional
flows and increase groundwater recharge capacity on the property.
Page 13 of 21
No
1
Small to
Moderate
Impact
6.
2
Potential
Large
Impact
3
Can Impact Be
Mitigated by
Project Change
Will Proposed Action alter drainage flow or patterns, or surface water
runoff?
YES
■ NO
Examples that would apply to column 2
C
Proposed Action would change flood water flows
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action may cause substantial erosion.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action is incompatible with existing drainage patterns.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will allow development in a designated
floodway.
Yes
No
C
Other impacts:
Yes
No
Examples that would apply to column 2
C
Proposed Action will induce 1,000 or more vehicle trips in any
given hour.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will result in the incineration of more than 1 ton
of refuse per hour.
Yes
No
C
Emission rate of total contaminants will exceed 5 lbs. per hour
or a heat source producing more than 10 million BTU’s per
hour.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will allow an increase in the amount of land
committed to industrial use.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will allow an increase in the density of
industrial development within existing industrial areas.
Yes
No
C
Other impacts:
Yes
No
Yes
No
IMPACT ON AIR
7.
Will Proposed Action affect air quality?
YES
■ NO
IMPACT ON PLANTS AND ANIMALS
8.
Will Proposed Action affect any threatened or endangered species?
YES
■ NO
Examples that would apply to column 2
C
Reduction of one or more species listed on the New York or
Federal list, using the site, over or near
the site, or found on the site.
Page 14 of 21
1
Small to
Moderate
Impact
9.
2
Potential
Large
Impact
3
Can Impact Be
Mitigated by
Project Change
C
Removal of any portion of a critical or significant wildlife habitat.
Yes
No
C
Application of pesticide or herbicide more than twice a year,
other than for agricultural purposes.
Yes
No
C
Other impacts:
Yes
No
Examples that would apply to column 2
C
Proposed Action would substantially interfere with any resident
or migratory fish, shellfish or wildlife species.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action requires the removal of more than 10 acres of
mature forest (over 100 years of age) or other locally important
vegetation.
Yes
No
C
Other impacts:
Yes
No
Yes
No
Will Proposed Action substantially affect non-threatened or nonendangered species?
YES
■ NO
IMPACT ON AGRICULTURAL LAND RESOURCES
10. Will Proposed Action affect agricultural land resources?
YES
■ NO
Examples that would apply to column 2
C
The Proposed Action would sever, cross or limit access to
agricultural land (includes cropland, hayfields, pasture, vineyard,
orchard, etc.)
C
Construction activity would excavate or compact the soil profile of
agricultural land.
Yes
No
C
The Proposed Action would irreversibly convert more than 10
acres of agricultural land or, if located in an Agricultural District,
more than 2.5 acres of agricultural land.
Yes
No
Page 15 of 21
1
Small to
Moderate
Impact
2
Potential
Large
Impact
3
Can Impact Be
Mitigated by
Project Change
C
The Proposed Action would disrupt or prevent installation of
agricultural land management systems (e.g., subsurface drain
lines, outlet ditches, strip cropping); or create a need for such
measures (e.g. cause a farm field to drain poorly due to
increased runoff).
Yes
No
C
Other impacts:
Yes
No
Yes
No
IMPACT ON AESTHETIC RESOURCES
11. Will Proposed Action affect aesthetic resources? (If necessary, use
the Visual EAF Addendum in Section 617.20, Appendix B.)
YES
■ NO
Examples that would apply to column 2
C
Proposed land uses, or project components obviously different
from or in sharp contrast to current surrounding land use
patterns, whether man-made or natural.
C
Proposed land uses, or project components visible to users of
aesthetic resources which will eliminate or significantly reduce
their enjoyment of the aesthetic qualities of that resource.
Yes
No
C
Project components that will result in the elimination or
significant screening of scenic views known to be important to
the area.
Yes
No
C
Other impacts:
Yes
No
Yes
No
IMPACT ON HISTORIC AND ARCHAEOLOGICAL RESOURCES
12. Will Proposed Action impact any site or structure of historic,
prehistoric or paleontological importance?
YES
■ NO
Examples that would apply to column 2
C
Proposed Action occurring wholly or partially within or
substantially contiguous to any facility or site listed on the State
or National Register of historic places.
C
Any impact to an archaeological site or fossil bed located within
the project site.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will occur in an area designated as sensitive
for archaeological sites on the NYS Site Inventory.
Yes
No
Page 16 of 21
1
Small to
Moderate
Impact
C
Other impacts:
2
Potential
Large
Impact
3
Can Impact Be
Mitigated by
Project Change
Yes
No
Examples that would apply to column 2
C
The permanent foreclosure of a future recreational opportunity.
Yes
No
C
A major reduction of an open space important to the community.
Yes
No
C
Other impacts:
Yes
No
Examples that would apply to column 2
C
Proposed Action to locate within the CEA?
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quantity of the
resource?
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will result in a reduction in the quality of the
resource?
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will impact the use, function or enjoyment of the
resource?
Yes
No
C
Other impacts:
Yes
No
IMPACT ON OPEN SPACE AND RECREATION
13. Will proposed Action affect the quantity or quality of existing or future
open spaces or recreational opportunities?
YES
■ NO
IMPACT ON CRITICAL ENVIRONMENTAL AREAS
14. Will Proposed Action impact the exceptional or unique
characteristics of a critical environmental area (CEA) established
pursuant to subdivision 6NYCRR 617.14(g)?
YES
■ NO
List the environmental characteristics that caused the designation of
the CEA.
Page 17 of 21
1
Small to
Moderate
Impact
2
Potential
Large
Impact
3
Can Impact Be
Mitigated by
Project Change
IMPACT ON TRANSPORTATION
15. Will there be an effect to existing transportation systems?
YES
■ NO
Examples that would apply to column 2
C
Alteration of present patterns of movement of people and/or
goods.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will result in major traffic problems.
Yes
No
C
Other impacts:
Yes
No
Examples that would apply to column 2
C
Proposed Action will cause a greater than 5% increase in the
use of any form of energy in the municipality.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will require the creation or extension of an
energy transmission or supply system to serve more than 50
single or two family residences or to serve a major commercial
or industrial use.
Yes
No
C
Other impacts:
Yes
No
Examples that would apply to column 2
C
Blasting within 1,500 feet of a hospital, school or other sensitive
facility.
Yes
No
C
Odors will occur routinely (more than one hour per day).
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will produce operating noise exceeding the
local ambient noise levels for noise outside of structures.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will remove natural barriers that would act as a
noise screen.
Yes
No
C
Other impacts:
Yes
No
IMPACT ON ENERGY
16. Will Proposed Action affect the community’s sources of fuel or
energy supply?
■
NO
YES
NOISE AND ODOR IMPACT
17. Will there be objectionable odors, noise, or vibration as a result of
the Proposed Action?
■
NO
YES
Page 18 of 21
1
Small to
Moderate
Impact
2
Potential
Large
Impact
3
Can Impact Be
Mitigated by
Project Change
IMPACT ON PUBLIC HEALTH
18. Will Proposed Action affect public health and safety?
YES
■ NO
C
Proposed Action may cause a risk of explosion or release of
hazardous substances (i.e. oil, pesticides, chemicals, radiation,
etc.) in the event of accident or upset conditions, or there may be
a chronic low level discharge or emission.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action may result in the burial of “hazardous wastes”
in any form (i.e. toxic, poisonous, highly reactive, radioactive,
irritating, infectious, etc.)
Yes
No
C
Storage facilities for one million or more gallons of liquefied
natural gas or other flammable liquids.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action may result in the excavation or other
disturbance within 2,000 feet of a site used for the disposal of
solid or hazardous waste.
Yes
No
C
Other impacts:
Yes
No
Examples that would apply to column 2
C
The permanent population of the city, town or village in which the
project is located is likely to grow by more than 5%.
Yes
No
C
The municipal budget for capital expenditures or operating
services will increase by more than 5% per year as a result of
this project.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will conflict with officially adopted plans or
goals.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will cause a change in the density of land use.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will replace or eliminate existing facilities,
structures or areas of historic importance to the community.
Yes
No
C
Development will create a demand for additional community
services (e.g. schools, police and fire, etc.)
Yes
No
IMPACT ON GROWTH AND CHARACTER
OF COMMUNITY OR NEIGHBORHOOD
19. Will Proposed Action affect the character of the existing community?
YES
■ NO
Page 19 of 21
1
Small to
Moderate
Impact
2
Potential
Large
Impact
3
Can Impact Be
Mitigated by
Project Change
C
Proposed Action will set an important precedent for future
projects.
Yes
No
C
Proposed Action will create or eliminate employment.
Yes
No
C
Other impacts:
Yes
No
20. Is there, or is there likely to be, public controversy related to potential
adverse environment impacts?
■ NO
YES
If Any Action in Part 2 Is Identified as a Potential Large Impact or If you Cannot Determine the Magnitude of
Impact, Proceed to Part 3
Page 20 of 21
Part 3 - EVALUATION OF THE IMPORTANCE OF IMPACTS
Responsibility of Lead Agency
Part 3 must be prepared if one or more impact(s) is considered to be potentially large, even if the impact(s) may
be mitigated.
Instructions (If you need more space, attach additional sheets)
Discuss the following for each impact identified in Column 2 of Part 2:
1.
Briefly describe the impact.
2.
Describe (if applicable) how the impact could be mitigated or reduced to a small to moderate impact by
project change(s).
3.
Based on the information available, decide if it is reasonable to conclude that this impact is important.
To answer the question of importance, consider:
!
!
!
!
!
!
!
The probability of the impact occurring
The duration of the impact
Its irreversibility, including permanently lost resources of value
Whether the impact can or will be controlled
The regional consequence of the impact
Its potential divergence from local needs and goals
Whether known objections to the project relate to this impact.
Page 21 of 21
Reset
~
&
l\oew York State Department Ii/'Environmental Conservation Division of Environmental Permits, Region 3
21 South Putt Comers Road, New Paltz. New York 12561-1620
• Phone: (845) 256-3054 • FAX: (845) 255-3042
Website: www.dec.state.ny.us
': 'Denise M. Sheehan
.; ,! Commissioner
,
Jo.m~,5
, De lCA..fl ~
Date:----l/....:.(-+~-!.1...;.7....,.~_O_'~_ _
De...to...l/~
/j
AS50C;oJeS,
C-T
r'
LLC
DG€77
RE:
Location: T/ L-e''W'i5 horo
Based upon our review of your inquiry dated __
I2
___.:.../'....,:2-_2..........:/_6_5_ ___ , we
offer the following comments:
PROTECTION OF WATERS
~The followingstream(s}/pond(s)/waterbody(ies) is (are) located within
Name
rf:bo?'
JQnfl De-.f/I;ln-e.... L....14-
or near the site you indicated:
"Cla~,:~~DEG.~W~t~rlndex~~mber· _
Status
., rAtI ... 1 CT - (0- Pl/105 .. I
(protect~non-protected, navigable]
____________ [
]
[Protected, non-protected, navigable]
'( A Protection of Waters permit is required to physically distufb the bed or banks (up to 50 feet from stream)
If any streams identified above as "protected," A permit is not required to disturb the bed or banks of "non­
,rotected" streams.
J A Protection of Waters permit is required for any excavation or filling below the mean high water Ifne of any
'aterbodies identified above as "navigable."
~,
There are no waterbodies that appear on our reguJatory maps at the location/project site you identified,
herefore, if there is a stream or pond outlet present'at the site with year-round flow, it assumes tlie classification
: the watercourse into which it feeds,
''
, Class II
", and a
-otection of Waters permit islis not required. If there is a stream or pond outlet present at the site that runs
termittently (seasonally), it is not protected, and a Protection of Waters permit is not required.
!
a permit is not required, please note; however, you are still responsible for ensuring that work shaU not pollute
'y stream or waterbody. Care shall be taken to stabilize any disturued areas promptly after construction, and
necessary precautions shall be taken to prevent contamination of the stream or waterbody by silt, sediment,
31s, solvents,lubricants, or any other pollutant associated with the project.
:ESHWATER"WeTtANbs
/
1) -1{5
O-7
,
.2­
Your project/site is near or in Freshwater Wetland ~
Class
2. Be aware that a
!shwater Wetlands permit is required for any physical disturbance within these boundaries or within the 100
t adjacent area. To have the boundary delineated, please read the attached notice. '
- OVER PLEASE ­
J
Your project/site is not within a New York State protected Freshwater Wetlarid. However, please contact
'our town officials and the United States Army Corps of Engineers in New york City, tefephone (917) 799:,~511
Westchester/Rockland Cqunties), or (9J7) 790-8411 (other counties), fora[1y permitt{ng th~y mjg~~tequire.;
,TATE-LISTED SPECIES
•
,.:.-",'
',' "
"'~~<.;k;.
,'~"
I.'
':",
'.~.,
,/'
,:-
,:' ,;:,.
'
~'
"
,/
;
- "
DEC has revlewe~nhe State~s'Master Hab.ltat[l)~tabanK (MHOS) recbtds':We navedetermihed that the site
" . If your inquiry is
; located within or near record(s) of theJoliowin9state-iisted species:
!lated to a specific development project, additional evaluation of the potential impacts of this project related to
Ie sensitive resource(s) identified by this review, may be required. Please contact the person noted below.
J
(
No records of sensitive
resou~ces were identified by this review.
THER: __________- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -__~-----------------
ease note that this letter only addresses the requirements for the following permits from the Department:
)r'Master Habitat Databank
0 O t h e r : _ - _ - - - -..........
Protection of Waters
.
Id that other permits frQm this Department or other agencies may be required for projects conducted on this
operty now or in the future. Also, regulations applicable to the location subject to this determination
:casionally are revised and .you shoUld, therefore, verify the need for permits if your project is. '(,lfeiayed or
Istpone~. This determinationregarding the '!l~edJpr permits·wilf r,e~ain e,ffective.fora maximum of 0l1e ·year
Iless you are otherwise notified. Appliqations:mayJ.>e downloaded from PlJ~.website alwww.dec.'state.ny.u5· .
der ··ProgramS" th,en "Division of Environmental Permits;" ,> • "
•
"
.'- • .
. ..
.
~.eshwater Wetlands
3ase contact this office if you have questions reg.ar<Jin~'theabo~e'inform~ti6n .. Thank you.
Division of Environmental ermits
Region 3, Telephone No. 845/256- 3 o $"b
--
InformationlPermit MaterialslRegUlatione< .
Quadrangle) Attached.
Web page information
NYC DEP' Contact Information (this site is within the NYC Watershed).
IOTE: Regarding erosion/sedimentation control requirements:
tormwater discharges now require a SPDES Stormwater permit .from this Department if they either:
• occur at industrial facilities and contain either toxic contaminants or priority pollutants OR
• result from construction projects involving the disturbance of one (1) or more acres of land.
our project may be covered under one of two Statewide General Permits or niayrequire an
dividual permit. If you believe your project would be covered under one of the General Permits and
)es not require any other DEC permits you may apply for coverage by filing a Notice of Intent with
YSDEC,Division of Water, 625 Broadway, Albany NY 12233-3505, (forms & permits available from
is office or DEC Website at www.dec.state.ny.us or call 518-402-8109). If your project involves
1er DEC permits, please contact the regional Division of Environmental Permits office (see above).
'ERMITS\FORMS D.1\GENJURSD\GenerafAei
Rev.. 6106
",.
,"
I.
,
NOTI
CT-/O- Pf/I~ -
I
Joh"
De f"I;/ne...... ~Jc.e.
Tfib 0(2
AA - spec;(/,. I
This map!
protected under A
State Environment
Law. Whether the
this map or not. we
be protected und!
pursuant to Sect
Clean Water Act.
law. Interested r
consult with their ap
of Engineers of
government to detl
other permits are r£
New York State Freshwater Wetli ." .
PoW"'llf-
R;cJ5e. G~A
FINAL FRESHWATER WETLANDS MAP
~eS+c.hes./-e( . '
COUNTY
Prepared pursu;ot tri.A,!:ticle of the.,
.' Environmental Conservation Law
NYS Department of'Environmental Conservation
FILED DATE: jO/7/'87
{LAST REVISED: 7 /28/0 '1
}
APPROXIMATE SCALE: 1 INCH EQUALS 2000 FEET
(All Wetland Boundaries Are Approximate)
24
• • , __... _L..- ... .&....... New York State Departrr..... J of Environmental Conservation 21 South Putt Corners Rd., New Paltz, NY 12561·1620 Telephone: (845) 256·3054· FAX: (845) 255·3042 Website: www.dec.state.ny.us DELINEATING AND SURVEYING FRESHWATER WETLAND BOUNDARIES­
1. The purpose of the delineation of freshwater wetland boundaries is to provide a precise identification of the regulated
wetland boundary and its 100 foot adjacent area in order to aid in the planning and design ofprojects which may affect
the wetland resource.
2. New York State regulated freshwater wetlands may be delineated by qualified consultants. However, for a delineation
to be official (e.g., for use in permit applications), it must be validated by Department of Environmental Conservation
(DEC) staff. For more information, contact the appropriate staff, as follows:
(845) 256·3086
(845) 256·3057
(845) 256-3091
Heather Gierloff
Doug Gaugler Brian Drumm Dutchess & Westchester
Orange & Sullivan
Putnam, Rockland & Ulster
3. In general, DEC requires that sponsors ofdevelopment projects retain licensed engineers or surveyors to accurately plot
the delineated wetland boundary on project plans. However, such surveys may not be needed for very small projects,
inquiries of a general nature, or certain iand sales.
4. Surveys and development plans for DEC permit applications must include the following validation block:
NYSDEC FRESHWATER WETLAND BOUNDARY VALIDATION
The freshwater wetland boundary as represented on these plans accurately depicts the limits of Freshwater
Wetland
as delineated by
on _ _ _ _ __
DECStaff________~-------Date:_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
SurveyorlEngineer:,_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ _ __
SEAL
Wetland boundary delineations as validated by the New York State Deparbnent of Environmental
Conservation remain valid for 10 years unless existing exempt activities, area hydrology, orland use practices
change (e.g., agricultural to residential). After 10 years the boundary must be revalidated by DEC staff.
Revalidation may include a new delineation and survey of the wetland boundary.
Any proposed construction, grading, filling, excavating, clearing or other regulated activity in the freshwater
wetland or within 100 feet of the wetland boundary as depicted on this plan ·requires a permit from the NYS
Department of Environmental Conservation under Article 24 of the Environmental Conservation Law
(Freshwater Wetlands Act) prior to commencement ·of work.
5. In addition to the accurate identification ofthe freshwater wetland boundary, the limit ofthe 100 foot adjacent area must
also be plotted on development plans and survey.
6. Copies ofplans or surveys containing the boundary delineation and validation block must be submitted to the appropriate
DEC staffperson as listed above in item #2 for validation and original signature before applying for a DEC permit. One
copy will be retained by DEC as a file copy. The signature and seal of the surveyor/engineer must be present prior
to requesting DEC validation.
s:lpmnilSlformsl/'wvalid Iim.wpd (5/10106)
'.
.
u
SOIL & WETLAND SCIENCE, LLC
OTTO R. THEALL
PROFESSIONAL SOIL SCIENTIST PROFESSIONAL WETLAND SCIENTIST 2 LLOYD ROAD NORWALK, CONNEC'-ICUT 06850 TELEPHONE (203) 845-0278 FACSIMILE (203) 354-4881 WETLAND INVESTIGATION REPORT 411 SMITH RIDGE ROAD VISTA. NEW YORK DECEMBER 6. 2000 I conducted an investigation of the wetlands on the property at 411 Smith Ridge
Road in Vista, New York on December 5, 2000. The identification of wetlands
was made on the basis -of soils and vegetation. The wetland soils were identified
in the field by inspection of approximately 100 soil samples taken with an auger.
. The wetlands on-site were marked in the field with orange flags numbered 1
through 12 and 13 through 24. The wetland soils on the site consist of Leicester
-loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, vel}' stony (LeB). The non-wetland soils consist of
.Charlton loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, vel}' stony (CIB), Charlton loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes, very stony (CIC), Sutton loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes (SuB) and
Udorthents, smoothed (Ub).
Vegetation within the wetlands consisted of Black Birch. Red Maple, Rose •
. Burning Bush, Japanese Barberry, Spicebush, Greenbrier and Cinnamon Fern.
Vegetation in the upland consisted of Black Oak, Red Oak, Hemlock, Tulip Tree,
Christmas Fern, Asiatic Bittersweet and Goldenrod.
Respectfully submitted:
ff2tft 12. v~
Otto R. Theall
­
Professional Soil Scientist ", Professional Wetland Scientist "
SKETCH OF WETLAND DELINEATION, 411 SMITH RIDGE ROAD, VlSTA, N'f
SOIL & WETLAND SCIENCE, LLC, OTTO R. THEALL, SOIL SCIENTIST, 12/5
SOIL LEGEND:
LeB =Leicester loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, very stony
CIB = Charlton loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, very stony
CIC = Charlton loam, 8 to 15 percent slopes, very stony
_ .' SuB = Sutton loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes
Ub =. Udorthents, smoothed
SOIL & WETLAND SCIENCE, LLC OTTO R. THEALL PROFESSIONAL SOIL SCI'ENTIST PR.OFESSIONAL WETLAND SCIENTIST 2 LLOYD ROAD NORWALK, CONNECTICUT 06850 TELEPHONE (203) 845-0278 FACSIMILE (203) 354-4881 WETLAND INVESTIGATION REPORT
411 SMITH'~IOG-E'ROAO >
VISTA, NEW YORK
, MARCH 6. 2007
-I conducted an investigation of the wetlands on the property at 411 Smith Ridge
Road in Vista, New York on December 5, 2000. The wetland soils were identified
in the field by inspection of approximately 100 soil samples taken with an auger.
The wetlands on-site were marked in the field with orange flags numbered 1
through 12,and 13 through 24. The wetland soils o'n the site consist of Leicester
loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, very stony (LeB). The non-wetland soils consist of
Charlton loam, 2 to 8 percent slopes, very stony (C/B). Charlton loam, 8 to 15
percent slopes, very stony (CrC), Sutton loam, 3 to 8 percent slopes (SuB) and
Udorthents, smoothed (Ub). Vegetation within the wetlands consisted of Black
Birch, Red Maple, Rose, Burning Bush, Japanese Barberry, Spicebush,
Greenbrier and Cinnamon Fern. Vegetation in the upland consisted of Black
, Oak, Red Oak, Hemlock, Tulip Tree, Christmas Fern, Asiatic Bittersweet and
Goldenrod.
On March 6, 2007, r returned to the site and determined that the wetland line as
flagged meets the definition of wetlands and waterco.urses in Chapter 217 of the
Code of the Town of Lewisboro. Additionally, I examined the rest of the
property. No additional wetland areas (particularly vernal pools) were found on
the property outside of the flagged wetland line.
,
, - - .. ,."
Respectfully· subm itted:
,~ -.~.,
-.
. ... .. ~""
... ...
.....
" _.
.
,
.
" .
'"
,
."
,
~
'
Otto' R. Theall Professional Soil Scientist Professional Wetland Scientist .
·
STEPHEN W. COLEMAN
Environmental Consulting
J Aspen Colin
Ossining, New York 10562
December 27,2001
Mr. Paul Ga11aro Unicorn Contracting Inc. 46 Overlook Drive Chappaqua, New York 10514 Re: Wetlands Delineation, Smith Ridge Road Tax Lot 162, Block 9834, Sheet 50, Town of Lewisboro, New York The following is an environmental assessment ofthe existing wetlands and watercourses present on the proposed "Smith Ridge Road Parcel, located adjacent to Smith Ridge Road in the Town of Lewisboro, New York The subject parcel was originally flagged'in 1995 by Evans Associates Environmental Consulting and re-delineated on December 13,2001. Pink surveyor . flagging labeled "Wetland Boundary" were hung on the boundaries of each wetland/watercourse
area Each wetland was assigned a letter and sequentially numbered. The wetland delineation
was performed in accordance with Chapter. 129 Freshwater Wetlands, of the Code of the Town
of Lewisboro, New York, and suppl~mented by the technical criteria fot routine determinations
as outlined in the 1987 Army Corps of Engineers Wetland Delineation Manual. Vegetation, soils
and hydrological parameters were used to determine the outer wetland boundary limits.
Two distinct wetland areas were observed to be present oli the subj ect parcel. Both wetland
areas are linear in shape and located at the base of side slopes. Each wetland area extends onto
the adjoining parcels on both sides ofthe property to the north and south respectively. Please
refer to the attached sketch map for the location of the individual wetland areas. The topography
of the site consists ofsteep slope areas with prominent rock outcrops and surficial bedrock.
interspersed with ravines and rolling slopes. The wetland areas are generally located in the
ravines and rolling slope areas ofthe property. The plant community is typical for the area
consisting predominantly of an oak-hickory-maple dominated forest.
Phone: (9J.f) 762-7288
Fax: (914) 762.;.5260
·
.,
The wetland areas that have been identified are as follows:
Wetland A:
Wetland A consists of a forested wetland that is seasonally flooded and saturated. Standing
water ofvarious depths were observed within the wetland. The source of water emanates from a
small watercourse channel to the south, and fr~m the surrounding slopes.
Dominant tree species consisted of Red Maple (Acre rubrum) and American Elm (Ulmus
Americana). The sapling/shrub layer is dominated by Spicebush (Lindera benzoin), with minor
representatives of Common Greenbriar (Smilax rotundifolia), Silky dogwood (Comus
amomum). Winterberry (Ilex verticillata), and Arrowood Viburnum (Viburnum dentatum).
Tussock sedge (Carex stricta) and Skunk Cabbage (Symplocarpus foetidius) dominated the
herbaceous layer. The wetland is interspersed with small pockets of upland areas that are
dominated by Black Birch (Betula lenta) and Red Oak (Quercus rubra).
The wetland/upland boundary is very distinct due to the steeper slopes which occur adjacent to
the wetland. Inundation or saturated soils near the surface are evident throughout the wetland. A
histic epipedon layer was present and average 12-16 inches in depth. Water stained leaves and
oxidized rhozospheres were also present near the soil surface.
A previously constructed. road bisects wetland # A on the northern property boundary. The road
travels in a west to easterly direction. An existing stone-wall essentially serves as the eastern
most boundarY of this wetland.,
Wetland A has sequentially numbered flags # 01-19.
Wetland B:
Wetland B consists of a large forested wetland that is seasonally flooded and saturated. A
perennial stream travels within and through this wetland'complex. Wetland B is part of a much
larger wetlaIJ.d area that extends to adjoining parcels to the north and south. Standing water of
various depths were observed within the wetland .. The source of water emanates from the
prominent watercourse channel. and from the surrounding slopes.
Dominant tree species within the wetland area consisted of Red Maple (Acer rubrum) and
American Elm (Ulmu~ Americana). Along the watercourse channel, several typical upland tree
species were also present. The sapling/shrub layer was dominated by Swamp Azalea.
(Rhododendron nudiflorum), Winterberry (Ilex vcerticillata), Silky dogwood (Comus amomum),
SWeet Pepperbush (Clethra a1nifolia) and Spicebush (Lindera benzoin), and Arrowood Viburnum
(Viburnum dentatum). Tussock sedge (Carex stricta) and Skunk Cabbage (Symplocarpus '
foetidius) dominated the herbaceous layer.
The watercourse channel is lined with more upland tree species such as Black Birch (Betula
lenta), Red Oak (Quercus ruhra), Tulip Tree (Liriodendron tulipifera), American Beech (Fagus
grandifolia), Black Cherry (Prunus serotina), and White Ash (Fraxinus Americana).
The wetland/upland boundary is very distinct due to the steeper slopes which occur adjacent to
the wetland. Inundation or saturated soils near the surface are evident throughout the wetland. A
histic epipedon layer was present and averaged 12-16 inches in depth. Water stained leaves and
buttressed roots on the trees were evident.
Wetland # B has sequentially numbered flags # 01-35.
This completes my initial assessment of this parcel. Please let me know if you need additional .
infonnation or assistance.
Sincerely,
Stephen W.Coleman
Principal
SWCltbh
enclosures
O
.
TEPHEN W. COLEMAN
ENVIRONMENTAL CONSULTING, u.c
June 19. 2007
Envfronmental Plannfng 6: Site Analysis Wetland MItigation a Restoration Plans Wetland Delfneatfon 6: Assessment
Natural Resource Management
Pond &: lake Management
Wildlife &: Plant Surveys
Breeding Bfrd Surveys
landscape Design
Mr. Paul Guillaro
Unicorn Contracting Corp.
P.O. Box 170 Garrison. New York 10524 Re: Revised Wetlands Delineation and Field Investigation for Vernal Pools -
Arias/Lexus Holding Company LLC Subdivision .. Smith Ridge Road Tax Lot 162, Block 9834, Sheet 50, Town of Lewisboro, New York As per the request of DeLalla & Associates; LLC., the wetlands previously flagged by my
office in 2001 were re-evaluated in the field. In addition, the site was investigated to
determine the presence of potential vernal pool habitat on the property and immediately
adjacent to the subject parcel. Field investigations were completed on 04-28-07 and
04-29-07. The revised wetland delineation was perfQrmed in accordance with Chapter 217
"Wetlands and Watercourses". of the Code of the Town of Lewisboro. New York.. Orange
surveyor flagging labeled "Wetland Boundary" were hung on any additional areas that may
not have been included previously. Based upon field investigation, the north end of wetland
A had a lobe that was not previously flagged that extends to the property line and confmues
on the adjacent parcel. The flag numbers were extended from flag # 19 with new flag tf!s A­
01-A-04 on the western side of the wetland and from the eastern property line with new flag
#'s B-01 -B-05 with B-05 joining previously flag # 17.
In addition a small depressional wetland that exhibits vernal pool features was observed to be
present between wetland areas A and B previously flagged. This area was flagged with C­
01-C-10 and straddles the northeastern property line and extends onto the adjacent property.
This particular area showed standing water (approximately 1 foot in depthl. water-stained
leaves, but no hydric soil features. The substrate was a rocky bottom with minimal soil that
was primarily organiC. No egg masses were present and no activity by amphibian species
were observed..
Immediately offsite to the northwest of wetland area A. a vemalpool is present that does
drain into wetland A. The pool exhibited all of the typical features of a vernal pool and egg
masses of spotted salamanders, wood frogs and spring peepers were observed in limited
quantities. Spring peepers and wood frogs were also heard calling within the pool. This area
was not flagged.
A second vernal pool is present approximately 200 feet off of the property to the northeast
above the eastern end of wetfand A This was the most active of the vernal pools and
contained visible egg masses of wood frog~, spotted salamanders, and spring peepers. This
. area does appear to drain towards wetfand A This area was not flagged.
3 ASPEN COURT, OSSINING, NY 10562. 914-494-55441FAX 914-762-5260 .steve.Coleman88verfzon.net
A third vema I pool area was observed off of the property above vernal pool area C, and located approximately 250-300 feet from the property line. This area exhibits all of the features of a vernal pool and had a good amount of breeding activity. This area was not flagged.
.
The new flag numbers should be survey located and the wetland delineation map updated to
reflect this additional information. Also you should still reference the 2001 wetland
delineation report for general information on the wetlands. The soils, vegetation and
hydrological features identified are still valid and descriptive of site features, including the
new areas added to the delineation. Please let me know if you have any questions or require
additional information.
Sincerely.
Stephen W. Coleman
Principal
SWCltbh
Ene!.
3 ASPEN COURT, OSSINING, NY 1()562 - 914-494-55441FAX 914-762-"260 _Steve.ColemanlJt)verfzon.net
•
MAP SCALE 1" = 1000'
o
1000
I H
2000
I FEET
HIT
PANEL 0185F
FIRM
FLOOD INSURANCE RATE MAP
for WESTCHESTER COUNTY, NEW YORK
(AlL JURISDICT10NS)
CONTAINS:
COMMUNITY
NUMBER
LEWISBORO. TOWN OF
POUND RIDGE, TOWN
OF
361227
360929
PANEL 185 OF 426
MAP SUFFIX: F
(SEE MAP INDEX FOR FIRM PANEL LAYOUl)
Notice 10 User The Map Number shawn below
used 'When placing map orders. the Community
sl'K:Mrl above should be used on insurance applications for the
subject community
MAP NUMBER
36119C0185F
Federal Emergency Management Agency
SITE
LOCATION AERIAL MAP USGS LOCATION MAP ~~tdhc~~
~~ and ?tkuwekz,,., at ~
Ou ~ (f5J{'oadf§O'~@(f~
898 (f5J{'~ 86 - ~({). @8tk ? 84
~~J<, ~WwJ 10618
!!J;l (914) 76:5·&500
~., (914) 76.8-9689
e-'I'lUliL· mieltad@&b1!na/!W.tt!J
March 5,2008
P. J. Rossi Planning Board Chairman Town of Lewisboro Onatru Farm 99 Elmwood'R-oad South Salem, New York 10590 Re:
AriaslLexus Holding Co. Subdivision
Dear Mr. Rossi:
First, I am responding to the request by Cornerstone Associates (Item 7 in Memorandum
dated 3/22/07) for details regarding the right-of-way along the northern perimeter of the
property. I have reviewed Mr. Arias' title report issued by Old Republic National Title
Insurance Company (copy enclosed). Mr. Arias purchased his 5.001 acre parcel subject to an
existing 15± foot wide right-of-way along his northerly border.
The right-of-way was created on September 15, 1952 when Robert Edward Lee and Anne
Lee filed Map No. 7805 in the Office of the Westchester County Clerk. Said right-of-way runs
in favor of tax lot 21 which is located to the northeast of Mr. Arias' parcel. Mr. Arias cannot
alter or extinguish this right-of-way as it was granted in perpetuity for the benefit of said lot 23.
I trust this responds to Cornerstone's inquiry.
Secondly, I have revised our proposed Declaration of 20 Foot Landscape Buffer Area in
accordance with paragraph 5 of Will Agresta's 3/22/007 Memorandum.
I understand that Jim DeLalla's office will shortly be sUbmitting the surveyor's final plat
containing the NYS DEC's sign-off as to the state wetland boundaries together with his revised
subdivision map. We Jook forward to bringing this unusual matter to its long overdue resolution.
MFSlcp
Enclosure
CC~alla & Associates, LLC
Guillenno Arias
DECLARATION OF 20 FOOT LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA This Declaration made as of the
day of
, 2008 by
.GUILLERMO ARIAS residing at 411 Smith Ridge Road, South Salem, New York 10590 and
LEXUS HOLDING CO., LLC, 44 Algonquin Drive, Chappaqua, New York 10514 (hereinafter
collectiveJy referred to as "Declarants").
'WHEREAS, Guillermo Arias is the owner of certain real property which is shown as Lot
1 on a certain subdivision plan entitled "Final Plat prepared for Arias/Lexus Holding Company,
LLC" in the Town of Lewisboro, Westchester County, New York and filed in the Westchester
on
County Clerk's Office, Division' of Land Records as Map No.
_ _ _ _ _ _ _ _• 2008("Filed Map"); and
'WHEREAS, Lexus Holding Company, LLC is the owner of certain real property which
is shown as Lot 2 on a certain subdivision plan entitled "Final Plat prepared for AriaslLexus
Holding Company, LLC," in the Town of Lewisboro, Westchester County, New York and filed
in the Westchester County Clerk's Office, Division of Land Records as Map No. _ _ _ __
on
, 2008 ("Filed Map"); and
'WHEREAS, as a condition of the approval of the aforementioned two lot subdivision, the
Planning Board of the Town of Lewisboro ("Planning Board") required that this Declaration be
recorded in the Westchester County Clerk's Office, Division of Land Records.
NOW, THEREFORE, the Declarants represent and declare that said subdivision Lots 1
and 2 shall be held, transferred, conveyed and occupied subject to the fonowing condition:
The Declarants and any future owners of Lots 1 and 2 shall maintain a landscape buffer
area of 20 feet in depth from and along Smith Ridge Road as shown on said Filed Map and as
more particularly described by metes and bounds on the attached Schedule "A-I" and "A-2" for
Lot 1 and the attached Schedule "B-1" and B-2" for Lot 2. The area within the buffer zone shall
be maintained in its natural state. The natural vegetation within the buffer zone shall not be
clear-cut nor shall any live trees with a diameter greater than 12 inches be removed without
permission of the Planning Board. The following activities are prohibited in the Landscape
Buffer Area: excavation, filling, removing of topsoil, construction or expansion of buildings,
structures, roadways or driveways, changing or altering topography, removing or destroying
trees or plants (excluding dead or diseased trees as determined by a New York State licensed
Ar~orist).
.
This Declaration shall run with the land and be binding upon the DecIarants, their
grantees, successors, heirs, executors, administrators, personal representatives and assigns.
This Declaration may not be amended, modified, rescinded or changed in any manner
without the express approval of the Planning Board.
IN WITNESS WHEREOF, the undersigned have caused this Declaration to be executed
and effective immediately as of the date above stated.
.
Guillermo Arias
LEXUS HOLDING COMPANY, LLC
By:
Paul Guillaro. President
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER
)
) ss.: )
,2008 before me, the undersigned, personally appeared
On the
day of
GUILLERMO ARIAS personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity, and that by his signature on the
instrument, the individual, or the persons upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed the
instrument.
Notary Public
STATE OF NEW YORK
COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER
)
) ss.:
)
,2008 before me, the undersigned, personally appeared
On the .
day of
PAUL GUILLARO personally known to me or proved to me on the basis of satisfactory
evidence to be the individual whose name is subscribed to the within instrument and
acknowledged to me that he executed the same in his capacity, and that by his signature on the
instrument, the individual, or the persons upon behalf of which the individual acted, executed the
instrument.
Notary Public
August 3,2004
Revised February 8, 2007
Revised March 4, 2008
SCHEDULE A-I FOR LOT 1 DESCRIPTION OF 20 FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA NO. I THROUGH LANDS OF ARIAS ALL that certain piece or parcel. of land situate, lying and being in the Town of
Lewisboro, County of Westchester and State of New York, bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the easterly line of Route 123, a/kIa Smith Ridge Road. where
the same is intersected by the division line between lands now or formerly belonging to
Guilliermo Arias, on the south. and lands now or formerly belonging to Ruhi Toska and Aris
Lutviu, on the north; thence running along said division line N. 65° 26' 39" E 20.15 feet; thence
running through said lands of Arias, the following courses and distances, S. 31 ° 23' 46" E 29.23
feet, S. 32° 32' 30" E 32.81 feet, S. 39° 40' 30" E 26.21 feet and S. 59° 25' W 20.26 feet to a
point on the easterly line of Route 123, alkJa Smith Ridge Road; thence running along said
easterly line of Route 123, the following courses and distances, N. 39° 49' 30" W 24.26 feet, N.
0
32 32' 30" W 34.26 feet and N. 31 0 23' 30" W 31.82 feet to the point or place of beginning.
August 3, 2004
Revised February 8, 2007
Revised March 4, 2008
SCHEDULE A-2 FOR LOTI DESCRIPTION OF 20 FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA NO.2 THROUGH LANDS OF ARIAS ALL that certain piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being in the Town of
Lewisboro, County of Westchester and State of New York, bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the easterly line of Route 123, afkJa Smith Ridge Road, where
the same is intersected by the division line between lands now or formerly belonging to
Guilliermo Arias, on the north, and lands now or formerly belonging to Lexus Holding Co., Ltd.,
on the south; thence running along said easterly line of Route 123, N. 37° 40' 30" W 100.37 feet
and N. 38° 08' 30" W 31.65 feet; thence running through said lands of Arias, the following
courses and distances, N. 55° 17' 52" E 20.04 feet, S. 38° 08' 30" E 30.53 feet, S. 37° 40' 30" E
99.72 feet and S. 41° 52' 30" E 7.90 feet to lands now or formerly belonging to Lexus Holding
Co., Ltd.; thence running along said lands of Lexus Holding Co., Ltd., S. 71° 28' 30" W 21.78 .
feet to the point or place of beginning.
August 3, 2004
Revised March 27,2006
Revised February 8, 2007
Revised March 4, 2008
SCHEDULE B-2 FOR LOT 2 DESCRIPTION OF 20. FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA NO.3 THROUGH LANDS OF LEXUS HOLDING CO., LTD. ALL that certain piece or parcel of land situate, lying and. being in the Town of
Lewisboro, County of Westchester and State of New York, bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the easterly line of Route 123, alkJa Smith Ridge Road, where
the same is intersected by the division line between lands now or formerly belonging to
Guilliermo Arias, on the north, and lands now or formerly belonging to Lexus Holding Co., Ltd.,
on the south; thence running along said division line N. 71 0 28'.30" E 21.78 feet; thence running
through said lands of Lexus Holding Co., Ltd., S. 41 0 52' 30" E 13.37 feet and S. 48° 07' 30" W
20.00 feet to a point on the easterly line of route 123, alkJa Smith Ridge Road; thence running
along said easterly line of Route 123, N. 41 0 52' 30" W 22.00 feet to the point or place of
beginning.
August 3, 2004
Revised March 27, 2006
Revised June 28,2006
Revised February 8, 2007
Revised March 4, 2008
SCHEDULE B~2
FOR LOT 2 DESCRIPTION OF 20 FOOT WIDE LANDSCAPE BUFFER AREA NO.4 THROUGH LANDS OF LEXUS HOLDING CO., LTD. ALL that certain piece or parcel of land situate, lying and being in the Town of
Lewisboro, County of Westchester and State of New York, bounded and described as follows:
BEGINNING at a point on the easterly line of Route 123, aJk/a Smith Ridge Road, said
point being distant S. 41° 52' 30" E 33.41 feet and S. 47° 17' 30" E 20.39 feet as measured along
said easterly line of Route 123 from its intersection with the division line between lands now or
formerly belonging to Guiliermo Arias, on the north, and lands now or formerly belonging to
Lexus Holding co., Ltd., on the south; thence running through said lands of Lexus Holding Co.,
Ltd., the following courses and distances, N. 48° 07' 30" E 20.09 feet, S. 47° 17' 30" E 24.42
feet, S. 28° 28' 30" E 110.61 feet, S. 24° 30' 30" E 43.94 feet, N. 71 0 32' 30" E 2.50 feet and S.
22° 58' 30' E 10.31 feet to lands now or formerly belonging to Marquette L. Wilson; thence
running along said lands of Marquette L. Wilson, S. 80° 13' 15" W 20.54 feet to a point on the
easterly line of Route 123; thence running along said easterly line of Route 123, the following
courses and distances, N. 220 58' 30" W 5.09 feet, S. 71 ° 32' 30" W 2.50 feet, N. 24° 30' 30" W
43.25 feet, N. 28° 28" 30" W 106.60 feet and N. 47° 17' 30" W 23.00 feet to the point or place of
beginning.
OLD REPUBLIC NATIONAL TITLE INSURANCE COMPANY RGAgency 1000 N. Division St. PO Box 431 Peekskill, NY 10566 telephone 914 739-2700 fax 914 739·2808 rransaction:
'remises:
Title No. RGW 1540!
FRANK POLICASTRO,JR., AND JOSEPH POLICASTRO TO GUILLERMO ARIAS W/TO BE
DETERMINED
411 SMITH RIDGE ROAD
TOWN OF LEWISBORO, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER
'ax designation: 50-9834-:t6Z.l 'l
roposed Insured:
Purchaser: GUILLERMO ARIAS
Mortgagee: TO BE DETERMINED
mount of Insurance:
Fee
$495,000.00
Mortgage $TBD
11S COMPANY CERTIFIES that a good and marketable title to the premises descnbed in Schedule A, subject to the liens,
Icumbrances and other matters, if any, set forth in this certificate may be conveyed and/or mortgaged by:
tANK POLICASTRO, JR. AND JOSEPH L. POLICASTRO who acquired title by deed from Union Trust Company, as
Jstee dated December 3,1984 and recorded on December 19,1984 in Liber 7995 cp 17. (Parcell covers premises and
)re property.)
!d: 9 a:m. December 1, 2002
3ted 9a.m.
Questions regarding this report may be discussed with RG Agency 914 739·2700
Old Republic National Title Insurance Company
SCHEDULE B. Title No. RGW 15409
Hereinafter set forth are the additional matters which will appear in the policy as exceptions from coverage,
unless disposed of to the Company's satisfaction prior to the closing or delivery of the policy.
,osition
1. Taxes, tax liens, tax sales, water charges, sewer rents and assessments as set forth herein.
2. Mortgages returned herein (NONE). Detailed statement within.
3. Any state of facts an accurate survey might show.
or Survey exception set forth herein. 4. Rights of tenants and persons in possession.
5. Utility company agreement(s) in Liber 2875 cp 206, Liber 2875 cp 211, Liber 2875 cp 210 and Liber 3482
cp460.
.
6. Right of Way shown on Filed Map 7805.
7. Bankruptcy searches have been run against Frank Policastro, Jr., Joseph L. Policastro and Guillermo
Arias in the Southern District Court, White Plains and nothing found of record.
8. Please submit survey.
9. Please advise the name of the lender and the lender's attorney.
,: On titles where we have been asked to insure the interest of a mortgagee, the name(s) of the proposed mortgagor
have been run for any and all liens that could affect or attach to the premises. Returns, if any, are set forth above .
•: Insurance Law Sec. 64 Subdivision 6409(c) requires that title companies offer, at or prior to closing, an optional policy to
,r the homeowner for the FUTURE market value of his house. You may, therefore, elect to obtain protection in excess of
purchase price. If you do not wish this additional statutory coverage, you MUST WAIVE by signing in the space below.
Questions regarding this report may be discussed with RG Agency 914739-2700
SCHEDULE B CONTINUED
A. Proof required that the certified owners have not been known by any other married or maiden name or
names during the past ten years, otherwise, such other name or names must be disclosed and the
searches amended to cover same.
• .. B.
Real Property Transfer Report (EA-5217) and Real Property Transfer Gains Tax Affidavit (with the
social security numbers of all parties) must both be completed, executed and presented with closing
deed(s).
C. Possible affect of withholding obligation to transferee herein pursuant to Section 1445 of the Internal
Revenue Code, as amended, effective January 1, 1985. This exception will not appear in the title policy
as it represents an obligation against which the policy does not protect.
D. A Building Loan Contract, pursuant to Section 22 of the Lien Law, must be filed at or before the time of
recording of any Building Loan Mortgage, to be insured. The following exception will appear in the title
policy and removed by endorsement after the final advance, unless other instructions are received and
approved by this Compa.ny:
.
Pending disbursement of the full proceeds of the loan secured by the mortgage insured, the policy
IlJsures only to the extent of the amount actually disbursed, but Increases as each disbursement Is made
in good faith and without knowledge of any defects in or objections to the title up to the face amount of
the policy. At the time of each disbursement, the examination of title must be continued to the date
thereof. Each report of the result of such continuation examination will include a statement showing
survey variations or encroachments, if any, at such date, provided current survey is furnished to the
compa~y without cost.
.
.
E. Due to problems encountered with dishonored checks, no uncertIfied checks for $1500.00 or more will
be accepted unless approved by this Company: Under no circumstances will third party or sellers
checks be accepted in any amount at closing without advance approval by this Company.
Endorsements
Initialed endorsements will become part of the mortgage policy to be issued. A Standard New York
Endorsement will become part of all mortgage policies.
___ Environmental Protection Lien ($25)
_ _Waiver of Arbitration ($25)
_ _Variable Rate Mortgage ($25)
_Residential Revolving Rate (10% basic rate)
_ _Condominium ($25)
_ _Planned Unit Development ($25)
_ _Survey (1 O~ basic rate)
_ _Residential Mortgage ($25)
____ALTA Endorsement 9 (10% basic rate)
AFFIRMATIVE INSURANCE CLAUSES
A. Policy insures, for mortgage purposes, that the same have not been violated by the existing
improvements. There is no condition, right of re-entry or forfeiture under which the insured can be cut
off, subordinated or otherwise distUrbed.
B. Policy insures, for mortgage purposes, that except for anchor guys and any Wires to the house on the
premises, for the purpose of servicing the same, the easement affects property lines only and does not
exceed ten (10) feet in width inside record lines.
C. Policy insures, for mortgage purposes, that the exercise of the rights thereunder will not interfere with­
the use of any present improvement on the premises upon which the security of the insured mortgage is
based.
D. Company insures against loss or damage by reason of the future exercise of the said mineral rights in
such manner as to cause structural damage to the buildings on the premises. There is no right of
surface entry incident to such mineral rights and rights of subadjacent support of the premises are
provided. .
Title No. RGW 15409
Schedule A
(description)
All that certain piece, plot or parcel of land situate lying and being in the TOWN OF LEWISBORO, COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER, State of New York. more particularly . bounded and described as follows: BEGINNING at a pOint on the easterly side of Smith Ridge Road at a point formiti9 the
southwesterly corner of lands now or formerly of The Anvil Inn, Inc. said point being 388.04
feet distant from the southerly side of Tommy's Lane at its intersection with the easterly side
of said Smith Ridge Road;
RUNNING THENCE along the southerly side of lands now or formerly of The Anvil Inn, Inc.
North 65° 28' East 180.81 feet, North 66° 11' East 22.52 feet. North 71 0 04' East 123.81 feet.
North 69 0 16' East 40.56 feet, North 71 ° 36' East 71.09 feet, North 75° 23' East 45.01 feet.
North 68° 03' East 56.34 feet, North 85° 01' East 10.69 feet, North 70° 30" East 37.58 feet,
North 78° 31' East 20.55 feet. North 71° 51' East 53.54 feet. North 74° 53' East 18.01 feet.
North 71° 43' East 31.52 feet. South 12° 54' East 18.59 feet, North 82° 11' East 131.72 feet,
North 84° 08' East 78.01 feet to a point;
RUNNING THENCE South 7° 15' East 204.59 feet to a point;
RUNNING THENCE South 71° 30' West 794.95 feet to the easterly side of Smith Ridge
Road;
RUNNING THENCE along the easterly side of Smith Ridge Road, North 37° 39' West 100.37
feet, North 38° 01' West 60.95 feet. North 39 0 39' West 28.46 feet, North 32° 31' West 34.26
feet and North 31'" 22' West 31.82 feet to tlie southwesterly comer of land now or formerly of
The Anvil Inn, Inc. and the point and place of BEGINNING.
p. 3/4
No· 1IbS
"'t~tAKl,;H
455 Central Par1l: Ave .. Suite 209 • Sca~ale • New Yor1l: • 10583
Phone (g14) 472.4728 Fax (914) 472.7386
Website! WWW.vaIJechresearch.(lom
E-mail: Infa@valtechresearch.com
TAX SEARCH
TITLE NUMBER: R297· RGW·15409 DATE: 1110103
PREMISES: 411 SMITH RIDGE RD, LEWISBORO TAX CLASS; 240
TOWN: LEWISBORO COUNlY: WESTCHESTER
NEW YORK
VILLAGE: (NONE) 'STATE:
\SSESSED TO: POLICASTRO. FRANK ASSESSED VALUE:
SeCT; 50
BLOCK: 9834 10,400/43.600
LOT(s): 28
;CHOOL DISTRICT NAME: KATONAH LEWISBORO UF SO
=
'ag81of 1
200212003 SCHOOL TAX. 2002 TOWN/COUNTY TAX. 1112 $2,927.02
PAID
21/2 $2,927.02
OPEN
DUE 911
DUE 1/1
FULL $1,812.65
PAID
DUe: 4/1
WATER INFORMATION: PRIVATe.
"'NONEXEMPT
·SUBJECT TO CONTINUATION
'!'IOAVIT SHOULD BIi TAKEN AT CLOSING TlfAT OWNER. KA!J MOT ~CElVEO NoncE OF $IOew.u.x RePAIRS, 1.0T C~ANCe. SlEAGENCY RePAIRS OllfoJ('( OTHeR Sl'ecw.
II!NT. TItS TAX SeARCH DOES NOTCUARAH'lEeAGAIH$T~ OF SUCH NOllr;J;S. ," teWmed 1I.~n mar IlaVIJ been paid but pa~ not oR"oci!llly 1I01Ied. Sc;J1'Ch 110..... not lIW1ranle.o against i!I;rna not II U.... lIP 10 lIIe d;tto &I\OWt\ hereon. SeArch doea nol guarani. 89,init1*l1li1g lIS dw alter dolIlIJ 6t\(l'M'l t.o:reon. fi<""'Ilt l'I'OperW RIIIlIl:Ited "F,(;1X)rJI. (if ..nYllIWwfl above repntScn1#lalax s;rvi..ga dLr&'" (l>I;8IJ1ptior'(s). Raatored t."1X iI; n~ 011 a I)r_13 t>asl$ ftom d;1to or d of rlJ(:lll year Qf _ell tax SCI ~ed. Tax croe. nOi ilUBl'llfllee ;;rgarna! My c:l8ima rblliling from L<Mes of restored taxes. l WolI; prllp......d excusive/r for RG AGENCY on 11<31'03
- . - . - ­ .. - - - - - - - ­
---------
94
- '"
"til
C>
.c
til_I
-8
23
J
=- ~\
\
,.
\
'v:
!
I
19
.- ­ -­'" ...., - ...J
10
-q
.
,~
I
8
"'-.
qI
-0
.---~
9834
------------.----­
I
-I
o.
..t.,
50'~
",(.,"J.~'i
23
2~~4IAC
en O'l \
!.G0'l
t-ch
0)
~
•
T-­
79
(1) \
=0 ' "-.
·~···l ~
00
~1
,
01__
ai
~i
j},
24
~
::: \
~
: \\
4
a4
q
...
\ 5
Il
'\
I'"
IS. -6
II
\0
\
'2
\
.
\SO
I
24
..
._--_.. --­
\8
--.
c:..>.I
:x::
~
_._.I.!.i'._~
.
;~--
..
or
= r----__
162
9831
3..LI 43
... _ ... . .
'~
•r:;
::> .....
"'.
0-
...
...
p,~~.!.~....
19
~
..
I
-:.1
::> At
,.
I ••
\
29~~~
." \
-- ......-....-.....
...
..J...-.
~
'~
~:i
10.",63 AC­
\\
=:'1
4.3~1
'f
""I
'-........ . . . . . . . . . . . .
;.
164
tI
12.:rt7 tt:.
.2
<:C
....
'
n
:.;\
-:> ·t~..1
-.~
~
,I
;;;\
...w ~..... I
-.... ..... '-­.~
Ito
___
-
._____ J,a,;;:..--.....",....----­
159
\
163
3.Gl3AC.
DELALLA ASSOCIATES
PAGE
03/12
I:. ,.,..", ....
AI."'" •
I .. ~"··A"C.
~/,.",,. . P'ARCE.L c..
="'" 9.l5 ACRES
A'R.EA
MAP R.06J]~T
~. ~..... ..:.:.
...
~--,,-
fDWARD L[[ and ANNI It(;', .................
~."
.... .
. .....
~"'
... ,__ " ____ . . . ...,IIJ
..... ( • LtJ.
D~LALLA
ASSOCIATES
PAGE
04/12
____________________________~____________~S~I~~5t~I~____'-_-_-_·'·_"___-·~·. .~\
!
I
'.
"
•
WU"'£.'J't.VV<.l
v·LII"IVI
.~ltech-
VflLltLH
No.2421
KttltAKCH
RESEARCH
P.2/8
465 Central Park Ave. ,. Suite 209 .. Soarsdafe • New York • 10583
Phone (914) 472.4728
Fax (914) 472.7386
Website: www.valtecilresearch.com
E-mail: lnfo@lvaltechresearch.com
RECORD DATA s,eCIALISTS@
CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY REPORT
TITLE NUMBER: R297 RGW-15409
DATE: 1/10103
PREMrSES: 411 SMITH RIDGE RD. LEWISBORO
TAX CLASS: 240
MUNICIPALITY: TOWN OF LEWISBORO
STATE: NEWYORK
R
::OUNTY: WESTCHESTER
~ECT: 50
BLOCK: 9834
LOTes): 28
'HE FOLLOWING INFORMATION IS ON FILE WITH THE DEPARTMENT OF BUILDINGS:
THERE WAS NO CERTIFICATE OF OCCUPANCY FOUND ON FILE FOR THE ABOVE MENTIONED
PREMISE.
TAX ASSESSOR'S RECORDS SHOW THAT THE ORIGINAL STRUCTURE WAS BUILTIN 1aoo.
THE TOWN OF LEWISBORO BEGAN ISSUING CERTIFIC~TE OF OCCUPANCIES IN 1936.
""'OPEN PERMIT#: 125~55 IS~UED:
12106/1955 • FOR FENCE
IRPose Of' THIS REPORT 1$ 'TO PROVIDE LEGAL OCCUPANCY INI=ORMATION ALONGlMTH ADOmONAL CERTlf'ICAT1!'.S AND PEIUIIT$ PROVIDED BY TH£ tdiSl'EC7Mi BU1(J)ING
rMENT. ASsessoRSINFO~MAnONlIlAYBEINCL.UDEDIf'L&GAL.OCCUf'ANCYfWIN0T8E1iNDE'l"I!!RMIN&D.
I u·
1', 4/l:!.1'27
-r I c; '.JOO I~ 0 ' L 4; L I
..
...
"
,
.
"
Zoning 20ard
,TOh"n
of
or
Appeals,
Ne~
lork • ~.'
"''';
..
I
\
t~1,t1sboro J South :qlem,
. C$ntleme:l:
~WS.
. '!
~arjor1e
Butcher has
be~n
.: -'
denied a
Certificat.e c:£ O,ccupa.ncy £or a. 'kennel for
breeding and t.r'si.ning in an !\-2 District,
on the
~a&t
side of Route 123, Vista, New York
..., ;.
on the ;,It'opert.y known 011 thg tax map or the
To'Wll of' r...,w1sQo.ro as Lot 20 t Sbeet 50 11 Itlock
It
•
..'ti
«
"
,
"-', ..:
98)4.
"
,
'1..:
Gr-anting the Certificat.e an rOGllft~t.od
WrjUld ;'9 a violation or Article V, Section
1 of the Euilding Zone
cr !.ew1s:,oro.
Ord!nane~
.
.. Iio..",
0'
..
of tr.a Town
,
.
~~r
w
,
Spnncer Collln
Building In~p~~~ar
'
SC::r.h
...... ,
..
...
.
'
.
....
,
'
..
,,
"
.
','
.. ,
;..
",
" 'I
.,
.' .. ...
..~
Co..
,.' . .
.~·BUILDING
\1,-- ~-
PERN!IT '
~r~ TO~IN
OF LEWISBORO
SOUfH
S4~m~
N. Y.
"4. "-T
P'~nnl"
:.~O.
1 L;-5'i
":'::.:
...._ ,0(';....... . Peritlit is h~by ~1,led to .........f.~~.n~ ...f..?l."~~~N.:r..9...............................................................................
(D!e.-:t Q,
tc.. [ ~!'l~ltlt !. ........._
..f'.at1c.e.........................
~iJiit f)ll property destg.l!.a.t.t:!d
l~1
I", .
h
as Shpet .......
-
...............
s.P...... Block §~jf....... Lot .....~,....... lU8~d RQM~.~t.l·,f.1.,... Y.i.~.~..."........................ 011
-.~"
( OIrM~1..
in accordanco with. plaua aM li~lf'iO'!.tion filed with Buildm,r PermIt Appl1cat1oo MoO•
.l.J:J."'"!5,'................ All prO":J!sioDa of the Building- Code Ordinance eud .Bul'SaIDg'- ~on., O:d!IU'/!lC9- of the ~~wn of Lewis..
boro shatl be complied witb in the e~tion of said buildb:ta".
BSTIMATED COST '·.. 20.0..,J).O......
FEE RECEIV.ED $ ..1I\.o.o...p.lY.s $1.00 £or
eertU!r:ate 'ot:' OCCJ11)2ncy
Date ... 1).ft.~~9.l.~~.r.. ..5...... ~95 5....................
-
.....
• •••
,.
'.
:
.~
.
...........
~-./.J .... _.
~~-."
BWJdtng- In.epecWr
Town of LewJsbGro, N. Y.
••••
4O .VC;:II·£,,,.
(UUv
".lOt'M
VALltLH
~lteeh
No.24.27
t(t:>tAKt:H
455 Central Part Ave • Suite 209 • Scarsdale • New Vort • 10583
Phone (914) 472.4728
Fax (914) 472.7385
RESEARCH
R
e c:
0 R D
I)
A,. II
~ PEe I A 1.'1 B T
p. 6/8
Website: www.valtec;hres~arch .eom
E-mail: lnto@valtechresearch.com
,®
STREET MAINTENANCE REPORT DATE: 1/10/03
TITLE NUMBER: R297 - RGW-15409
PREMISES: 411 SMITH RIDGE RD, LEWISBORO
MUNICIPALITY: TOWN OF LEWISBORO
STATE: NEW YORK
:OUN1Y: WESTCHESTER
SECT:50
BLOCK: 9834 '
LOT(s): 28
>LEASE BE ADVISED THAT THE STREET FRONTING THE ABOVE PREMISES IS:
j;IJ
MAINTAINED BY THE ABOVE MUNICIPALI:rY
I I
DEDICATED TO THE ABOVE MUNICIPAJJTY
U
MAINTAINED BY THE COUNTY OF WESTCHESTER
U
MAINTAINED BY THE STATE OF NEW YORK
o
PENDING SUB-DIVISION
'0
o
A PRIVATE ROAD
OTHER
,
.
JRPOSE OFlltlS SEARCH IS TO PROVIDE STREET MAINTENANCE INFORMAnOl-t $UPPUED BY THE D£PART/,IEHT OF IIICHWAYG OF T14E J,SOVE M£tmONED GOVeRNMeNTAL.
!Y. THIS REPORT IS SUBMIT'l'ED FOR INFORMAnON PURPOSES ONLY.
_.,
,-vvu
""V~
YI'II.II.:"n
v-L..VIUI
NO.HZ!
nC')CRIi",n
~lteeh
~EARCH
p. Ilij
455 Central Park Ave • Suile 209 • Scarsdale • New Yoric .. 10563
Phone (914) 472.4728
Fa~ (914) 472.7386
Website: WWW.vtJltechresearch.com
E-mail: Info@valtechresearch.com
HOUSING AND BUILDING VIOLATION REPORT TIITE NUMBER: R297 - RGW-15409
DATE: 1110/03
PREMISES: 411 SMITH RIDGE RD, LEWISBORO
TAX CLASS: 240
MUNICIPALITY: TOWN OF LEWISBORO
STATE: NEWYORK
CQUNTY;WESTCHESTER
3ECT:50
BLOCK: 9834
r;;J
LOT(s}: 28
THERE WERE NO PENDING VIOLATraNS FOUND ON FILE AS PER
SEARCH DATED: 0112712003
l.J
SEE BELOW FOR PENDING VIOLATIONS FOUND ON FILE AS PER
SEARCH DATED:
IRPOse Of THIS REPORT IS TO PROVIDE INfO~TION ON V10U110N$ SUPPUI!.D BY THI: AllOW; NIO.IlT'IOHEI:I GOVERNM&NTAl AGENCY. 'THIS REPORT IS $UPMIITI!D FOR
~llON PURPOSES ONlY. nus SEARCH DOES NOT INCLUt/EOlllER AGENCIES VlOI..Al1ON8.
~lt~c"h
U\L I L.\.Ifl
455 Central Park Ave • Suite 209 .. Scarsdale "
Phone (914) 472.4726
RESEARCH
R E COR D
0 A T ASP & C I A 1..1 S '\"
No.2427
l\[vCMrivn
p, 8/8
New York • 10583
Fax (914) 472.7386
Website! www.valtechresearch.com
E-mail; tnfo@valtechresearch.oom
s®
FIRE VIOLATION REPORT
TITLE NUMBER: R297 ~ RGW-15409
DATE: 1/10103
PREMISES: 411 SMITH RIDGE RD, LEWISBORO
TAX CLASS: 240
MUNICIPALITY: TOWN OF LEWISBORO
STATE: NEW YORK
~OUNTY:WESTCHESTER
SECT: 50 ...
BLOCK: 9834
LOT(s): 28
;
~ SEARCH OF THE RECORDS CONDUCTED BY THE FIRE PREVENTION BUREAU INDICATES
HE FOLLOWING:
~I THERE ARE NO PENDING VIOLATIONS FOUND ON FILE AS PER
SEARCH DATED; 01/2712003
n SeE BELOW FOR PENDING VIOLATIONS FOUND ON FILE AS PER
SEARCH DATED:
!"ose. OF THIS REPORT IS TO PROVIDE INFORYATION OF fiRE VIOLATIONS SUPPUEO BY THE ABOVE MENTlONEO GCM:RmlENTAI. .AGGHCY. nus REPORT IS lIUBMIfTEO
fRMATlON PURPOSES ONLY.