The Projects - Princeton High School
Transcription
The Projects - Princeton High School
The Columbia River Mr. A’s Sample The Promise • "To build an industrial empire from the wasted power of the Columbia...They moved mountains and froze a land slide...Bonneville and Grand Coulee are only the beginning. Ten million horsepower of new energy swiftly can be harnessed on America's mightiest stream. Tame the hazardous rapids. Open the Columbia waterway to navigation 500 miles inland. Provide endless water power...Reclaim another million acres of dry but fertile land." --Bonneville Power Administration film The Columbia, circa 1950 http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20ZffI6by3A Successes • 1339 miles of irrigation canals • 2.2 million Acres Irrigated (670 million acrer potential) $630,000,000 of crops annually • Falls .41 m/km, meaning it has a ton of potential energy • 38,760 MW Generated in all Columbia River Dams worth $950,000,000 • $20,000,000 in flood control benefit • $50,000,000 in recreation economy Problems • Impacts to Migratory Fish • Recognized impact by 1890s in legislation prohibiting dams without ladders • Ladders fail to pass all fish upstream + dowstream • Grand Coulee has no ladder (it would have to be 5 miles long…fish would die in the process) • River flow is reduced • Increased nitrogen in water • Logging in the basin increases silt, reduces shade • Navigation • Construction of jetties, Dredging, canals, navigation locks REFERENCES • http://www.funbeach.com/attractions/ shipwrecks.html • http://www.oregon.gov/OSMB/library/docs/ CoastalBoating/ColumbiaRiver.pdf • http://web.bryant.edu/~langlois/ecology/ columbiahomepage.html • http://www.nwcouncil.org/history/Chronology.asp • http://oregonstate.edu/instruct/anth481/sal/ crintro1.htm High Aswan Dam Grace Stephenson, Harmony Kingsley, Cathy Gonzalez, Zaynab Zaman Site Map Key Reasons • control flooding • provide irrigation water • generate hydroelectricity • Before the dam was built, the Nile river would flood annually every late summer. This lead to enriched soil during ancient times, but following the floods there would be severe drought. The Aswan Dam was created to ultimately control the release of water to prevent flooding and droughts. Successes • • • • • • majority of the population depends on the river for irrigation, drinking water, electricity, or transportation dam allowed for irrigation systems to be built which increased the amount of land that farmers could utilize to cultivate their crops 30% of economy based on agriculture 3.3 million hectares of land irrigated in Egypt in 1997 control water levels could build cities without tsunamis destroying them List of Negative Effects • Coastline Erosion • Soil salinity problems • Negative health effects • Environmental impact • Drains money from economy, requiring annual repairs. Original project costed 450 million dollars. Most Crucial Negative Effect Environmental Impact: • Before construction of the dam, the river used • • to flood annually, depositing 12 million tonnes of silt on land along the Nile, fertilizing the farms along the banks of the river. Number of islands in the river declined from 150 to 36 before and after construction. After the dam was built, the annual flooding stopped, forcing farmers to use approx. 13,000 tonnes of line-nitrate fertilizer instead. References • • • • • • • http://sitemaker.umich.edu/sec004_gp5/ the_aswan_high_dam_benefits http://www.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/40203/Aswan-HighDam http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/buildingbig/wonder/structure/ aswan_high.html http://www.mbarron.net/Nile/envir_nf.html http://geography.about.com/od/specificplacesofinterest/a/nile.htm http://www.ci.uri.edu/ciip/FallClass/Docs_2006/UrbanWaterfronts/ Abu-Zeid%20and%20El-Shibini.pdf http://www3.giz.de/E+Z/zeitschr/de602-11.htm High Aswan Dam Quinn Cummings, Asha Cheerath, Jessie Campisi, Melody Ting Site Maps Key Reasons for Diversion • The Nile River flooded every year during the summer • • • and water flowed down the valley During high water years, whole crops could be wiped out, whereas low water years there was widespread drought and famine occasionally occurred With Egypt's population growing, there was a need to protect and support farmland, as well as the important cotton crop The reservoir storage of the Aswan Dam allowed floods to be lessened and the water could be stored for later release. Success Measure - Annual Nile flood is stopped - provides 10 billion KW-hours annually - As of 1997, 3.3 million hectares irrigated (this figure is increasing as population increases) - produces 15% of Egypt's energy yearly - estimated national income: 225 million • 140 million agricultural production • 100 million from hydropower • 10 million from flood production • 5 million from improved navigation Negative Impacts of the Dam • • • • No more yearly flooding of the Nile o Erosion– More silt and sediments trapped in the soil has begun to cause erosion of the river bank, and this lack of sediment has accelerated the erosion of coastlines and along the eastern Mediterranean. o Problems for Farmers– As a result of the loss of flooding, all farmers downstream have to use fertilizers for their crops, which is very expensive. Sardine Decreasing - When the dam was first built in the 1960's, the sardine fish population decreased dramatically. They have only begun recovering 20 years ago (reason still unknown). Lake Evaporation -Lake Nassar in Egypt was built in a very hot and dry area. River flow has changed, causing the lake to lose water. Now it is steadily evaporating, hurting the fishing industries as well as the ecosystem there. Loss of Archaeological Artifacts -Due to the flooding of the area, many of the artifacts located there have been lost. Negative Impact: Increase in Soil Salinity How? -The groundwater levels in the Nile Valley fluctuated between 8-9 m/yr with the water level -When evaporation was highest (summer), the groundwater level was too deep to allow salts in the water to be pulled to the surface -The distance between the surface and the groundwater (1-2 m) was small enough to allow water to be pulled up by evaporation -These relatively small concentrations of salt have accumulated over the years The Effects -Most farmland did not have proper subsurface drainage to lower the groundwater table -As a result, 2.1 million hectares requires subsurface drainage, and the cost of this was greater than the construction of the Dam -This increase in salinity has also hurt the life forms which live in the water, such as fish References -http://sitemaker.umich.edu/sec004_gp5/the_aswan_high_dam_benefits -http://www3.giz.de/E+Z/zeitschr/de602-11.htm -http://sitemaker.umich.edu/sec004_gp5/the_aswan_dam_disadvantages http://www.umsl.edu/~naumannj/Geography%20PowerPoint%20Slides/ecology/Egypt%20-the %20aswan%20dam%20environmental%20impact.pptx Aral Sea Dam Ben, Mara, Tomaz, and Lawrence Basic Informa9on • The Aral Sea Dam is a seven-‐mile dam built across a small northern sec9on of the shrunken Aral Sea in Central Asia • Loca9on of the dam itself is Kazakhstan. Reasons for construction. In the late 1960’s the Soviet union diverted the Amu Darya and Syr Darya rivers in order to irrigate cotton crops in Uzbeki and Kazakh stan. The effects were disastrous, within 30 years the Aral sea which had been the fourth largest inland body of water, had shrunk to a quarter of it’s size. The Aral sea Dam was built to feed water back into the Aral sea, and hopefully bring back fishing as a local industry. http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=xwxhKE_Lx7c&sns=em Successes • At the Aral Sea’s low point, rising salt levels and desertification brought salt storms, which ravaged the surrounding area. Almost all of the fish living died off leaving thousands of fishermen out of work. • The Aral sea dam has returned 40% of the water missing. • Fishing has returned to the Aral sea as a thriving industry. List of Negative Impacts • •Decrease in Water Levels • •Negative Correlation of Salinity in water levels • •Salinization of soil • •Sea Surface Temperature Changes • •Desertification • •Dust Storms carried from the Aral Sea Region • •Desiccation Water Levels • • • • The positive feedback between evaporation and the Sea Surface Temperature Heat of smaller volumes of water leading to an increase of water temperature at the surface Lowers the specific humidity which increases the evaporation rate Another factor is poor salt concentration distribution leading to increase in evaporation References • Brown, Paul. "The Guardian." Guardian. n. page. Web. 6 Dec. 2012. <hPp:// www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2003/oct/ 29/sciencenews.theguardianlifesupplement>. • •hPp://www.columbia.edu/~tmt2120/ environmental%20impacts.htm • hPp://www.aralsea.org/ • hPp://nailaokda.8m.com/north.html Aral Sea Christopher Sims, Nicolas Firbas Site Map The Aral Sea is locdated on the border of Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan Key Issues Soviet union: " WE NEED MORE WHITE GOLD!" - Need more cotton and rice but they require water for irrigation Success Measure Uzbekistan is the world’s second largest exporter of cotton 300 thousand tons in 1950 5 million tons today Heres the twist, cotton yields are declining due to the negative impacts of the aral sea diversion project Negative Impacts • water level fell 20m • Total volume of aral sea decreased ~1000km3 1,060 km3 to 210 km3 • salinity up from 10 ppt to 92 ppt(ocean salinity 35ppt • fish caught 43,430 tons in 1960 to 0 in 1980 • Temperature varies more in the region around the Aral sea (water is a air conditioner) • 20 species of fish to 1. • salinization of soil, which prevents anything from growing there • Desertification(land and natural resourses can no longer be used) Focus On One Negative Aspect In the last 15 years there has been a 3,000% increase in reported chronic bronchitis, anemia, tuberculosis, kidney and liver diseases, respiratory infections, The Aral Sea was once home to a thriving waterborne industry allergies, and cancer, while arthritic diseases have increased by 6,000%. live expectancy down 4 years infant mortality rate is amoung the highest in the world ( 1 in 20) References http://www.columbia.edu/~tmt2120/impacts %20to%20life%20in%20the %20region.htm http://gallery.mailchimp.com/ 31982f6e4937945bfaddf6712/files/ Aral_Sea_cotton_impacts.pdf http://www.zef.de/module/register/media/ 83a8_Abdullaev%20100807.pdf http://serc.carleton.edu/eet/measure_sat2/ NYC Water Supply Arielle, Casey, Meggie, Zoe Site Map Reasons for Diversion • Before the NYC Water Supply was established, the • • • • water supply was polluted and insufficient. Waste and sewage was originally disposed in pits and open dumps, effective until the population grew many citizens died and grew ill with diseases, such as typhoid fever, due to contaminated water As the population grew rapidly, the demand for clean water became prominent. To assure the high quality of NYC's water supply by providing a balanced assessment of the impacts of natural gas development activities Success Measure • Without the Croton system the city would not have • • grown from 300,000 to 3.5 million, delivering 30 million gallons a day As population grew, the Ashokan reservoir was built and water was transported over 92 mile distance Today, 50% of the city's water comes from the Delaware system, 40% from the catskill system, and 10% from the Croton system, containing 19 reservoirs Potential Weaknesses- • One bacteria invading in the water in E.coli, a • • • bacteria that grows in the colon of humans and animals High e.coli count increases the probability of the water contaminated by giardia and cryptosporidium, responsible for diseases such as hepatitis and Salmonella It cannot expand its water use or tolerate a break in one of the aqueducts supplying water to the city The system is aging, chlorination can’t handle all problems with pathogens Water Withdrawals • Exaggeration of drought conditions • Freezing of streams at lower levels • Irregular water temperature • Poor water quality- pollutants are concentrated and • not diluted Reduction of aquatic animals and plant species as a result Sources • www.dec.ny.gov/docs/ • • materials_minerals_pdf/ ogdsgeischap6.pdf http://www.eserc.stonybrook.edu/cen514/ info/nyc/watersupply.html http://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/html/ drinking_water/history.shtml Colorado River Water Diversion Patrick, Evan, Zack, and John Site Map Key Reasons for Diversion • To irrigate Imperial Valley in Southern California (Hoover Dam) • To provide electricity to Arizona, Nevada, and Southern California (Hoover Dam) • To create reservoirs/provide stored water to Upper Basin states (Lake Powell- Glen Canyon Dam) • To help stimulate the economy/create jobs and to prevent future depressions (during the Great Depression) Success Measure (Quantitative) • Hoover Dam has 17 Turbines that can produce an • • • • • • output is of 2.08 Gigawatts. Average= approx. 4 billion Kilowatt-hours/year 4 billion Kilowatt serves 1.3 million people per year. Irrigation-More than one million acres of land in the United States and nearly half a million acres in Mexico. Glen Canyon has 8 turbines and can produce around 1,320 megawatts 730,000 acres of irrigation in the average year Creates 32.3km^3 of reservoir area (Lake Powell) Impacts • Predicted higher temperatures- shorter winters and • • • • increased evaporation- less water supply Increased allocation of water- to seven states and Mexico Dramatically changing water levels in the two largest reservoirs, Lake Mead and Lake Powell Supply for larger cities with increasing population Silt trapped behind dams- limits extent of river habitats Lake Powell and Lake Mead's water levels Data taken in the summers of 2012 and 2011 Lake Powell and Lake Mead's water levels • Steady high flows wash away beaches • • and backwater habitats Occasional heavy floods are preferred because it mimics the natural spring floods down the river The steady high flow is for more electricity and does not take the environmental impact into account References http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/ environment/freshwater/colorado-rivermap/ http://www.smithsonianmag.com/sciencenature/The-Colorado-River-Runs-Dry.html http://cpluhna.nau.edu/Change/ waterdevelopment5.htm http://w3.geo.arizona.edu/ceam/ Colorado River By: James, Alex, Timmy, and Riley Site Map Key Purposes •Supplies over 30,000,000 people with water –Mostly sanitary purposes •Turbines that create hydropower for Arizona and Southern California •Irrigation – Laguna Dam – Provides water to farms in the Yuma area –Palo Verde Diversion Dam – Provides irrigation water to the Palo Verde Irrigation District Success of Dam Work • Eight turbines at Glen Canyon Dam • Revenues from selling electricity have • • paid off completely the cost of the dam. Dam Cost $272 million dollars in 1963 and will keep generating money. Other dams provide irrigation and lakes that fill giving opportunities of tourist revenue. Negative Impacts 1) Dams depleting lake water in Lake Mead and Lake Powell- behind the Hoover and Glen Canyon Dam. 2) Salinity- 9,000,000 tons of salt flows down the river which diminishes water quality. 3) Temperature Change killing wildlife Specific Negative Effect: Thermal Pollution The Humpback Chub has been endangered due to loss of dam construction on the Colorado River. Typically, the water released from the dams are too cold for the Chub to reproduce. The cold water has also introduced nonnative predators, such as rainbow trout, have put the Humpback Chub nearly into extension. References -http://www.usbr.gov/lc/yuma/facilities/dams/yao_dams_map.html -http://environment.nationalgeographic.com/environment/freshwater/colorado-river-map/ -http://www2.kenyon.edu/projects/Dams/gec02tfin.html -http://www.classzone.com/books/earth_science/terc/content/investigations/esu401/ esu401page09.cfm -http://web.mit.edu/12.000/www/m2012/finalwebsite/problem/coloradoriver.shtml#overdraw http://studentweb.fortlewis.edu/MRWHITEHAIR/Main.html -http://www.coloradoriverrecovery.org/documents-publications/technical-reports/rsch/ WWHBCPopEst98-00.pdf Tennessee Valley Authority Jamie Choy, Irene Klimoff, Jelani McMath, Amara Qureshi Site Map Tennessee, Kentucky, Virginia, North Carolina, Georgia, Alabama, and Mississippi. 41,000 square miles Reasons for Diversion • The TVA was created in 1933 (New Deal) for: – Navigation – Flood control – a national defence – Generate/sell surplus electricity – Prevention of waste of water power – Control of water resources required building a dam —designed to maintain 9-ft navigation tunnel (650 mi) Successes • Today, TVA manages 50 dams to: • control floods, • provide electricity, • increase water supply, • provide recreational lakes Major Dams: – Wilson Dam (completed before creation of TVA) – Wheeler Dam in Alabama (1936) • land eroded from excess farming & deforestation • taught farmers to: • improve crop yields, • produce fertilizers, • replant forests, • control forest fires, • improve wildlife and fish habitats • 34,000 barges annually travel the Tennessee • The flood-controlling saves $194 million in annual damage List of Negative Impacts • • • • Flooded land TVA-subsidized electricity worse than others Became monopoly Confiscated private land + had relocation programs that infuriated families • TVA’s nuclear power program created debt • TVA’s coal-fired plants put greenhouse gases and toxic fumes into the atmosphere Focus on One Negative Impact • 2011 - EPA accused TVA of not complying with Clean Air Act at 11 of its plants • Coal-fired plants found to emit greenhouse gases, sulfur dioxide, and nitrogen oxides • 18 units shut down that emitted 15 mill tons of carbon dioxide in 2008 • By end of 2018, almost 1% of nation’s coal-fired power capacity offline • TVA to replace capacity with low or zero emission electricity sources such as renewable energy, natural gas, nuclear power, energy efficiency • Will shrink TVA’s carbon footprint by about 10% References • http://www.irwinator.com/126/w544.jpg • http://www.archives.gov/atlanta/exhibit/images/photos/ photo-5-1-13.jpg • http://newdeal.feri.org/guides/tnguide/ch09.htm • http://www.waterencyclopedia.com/St-Ts/TennesseeValley-Authority.html • http://reason.com/archives/2009/03/02/how-biggovernment-infrastruct • http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=onepercent-us-coal-plants-closed-avoid-pollution James Bay Project By Dmitry Styrkas, Tom Cacciola, Maddy Besselaar, and Will Hare James Bay Project Site Map Goals for James Bay Project 1. The James Bay project original goal was to provide Quebec with hydroelectric power. 2. In addition to the initial goal, it was also provides new jobs and expands the area by altering 19 waterways and creating 27 new reservoirs. Success measure of James Bay Project 1. Produce 83 Terawatts-hour, enough to supply a small developed economy, like Belgium 2. 150 km (93 mi) coastal plain, a rolling plateau with a maximum elevation of 400 m (1,300 ft)[3] and the Otish Mountains to the east of the territory, with peaks Negative Impacts of the Project 1. Diversion of 4 major waterways, changing dynamics of the land. 2. Geological tremors. 3. Change in physical lay out of the land. 4. Changes in animal migration, salmon spawning and destruction of wildlife areas. Diversion of 4 Main Waterways 2 of the major waterways (the Caniapiscau and Eastmain rivers) that are being diverted and thus submerging about 11,000 km² of boreal forest and substantially affecting the water flow of the La Grande River. Also the water flow was reduced by 90% at the mouth of the Eastmain references 1. http://wiki.answers.com/Q/ What_is_the_purpose_of_the_James_ba y_project 2. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ James_Bay_Project 3. http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/ articles/james-bay-project Three Gorges Dam Alex Costin ~ Menelaos Mazarakis ~ Liv Rand ~ Jeni Schapire Site Map Key Reasons for Building The controversial Golden Waterway's Three Gorges Project (TGP) has been proposed for three reasons: to produce more efficient hydroelectric power (power generation) for the country flood control waterway navigation purposes (Ryder, 1990). • • • Immediate goal is to provide China with clean, renewable energy, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. One Measure of Success • • • • • Immediate goal is to provide China with clean, renewable energy, while reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Currently, China relies heavily on coal, a highly polluting fossil fuel, to supply a large percentage of their energy needs. It takes about 366 grams of coal to generate 1 kWh of electricity, and since the dam started generating power over 5 years ago, its total power production is equivalent to 84 million tonnes of standard coal. Dam aims to reduce the coal consumption by 31 million tonnes per year, cutting the atmospheric emission of 100 million tonnes of greenhouse gas, millions of tonnes of dust, one million tonnes of sulfur dioxide, 370,000 tonnes of nitric oxide, 10,000 tonnes of carbon monoxide, and a significant amount of mercury. will also reduce the carbon footprint of supplying 31 million tons of coal to other regions of China. Negative Impacts - harder to sustain economic capital - benefits of must compensate for the initial cost - forces relocation of 727,000 civilians due to resettlement • Number of countries affected are 19 • Total number of population affected: 14 million • Number of towns submerged: 104 • Urban centers submerged - destructive to the environment The Environment The building of the dam can have a negative effect on the surrounding environment: 1. water pollution which includes ground water contamination of Shanghai 2. water loss of the "Great Lakes" of China 3. disruption of fish migration 4. inundation-possible flooding 5. landslides along the banks of the Yangtze River 6. sedimentation 7. soil erosion 8. increase in water borne diseases 9. the aggravation of droughts which can affect the productivity of farmlands in the lake areas 10. possible termination of land formation which can aggravate the saltwater intrusion at the estuary. References http://darwin.bio.uci.edu/~sustain/state/ kmin.html http://www.greeniacs.com/GreeniacsArticles/ Energy/Three-Gorges-Dam.html Three Gorges Dam Key Reasons for diversion • To produce more effective hydroelectric power for China. • To assist in flood control. • For navigation purposes. On land and sea. • Create a deep water port for the city Chongqing, which will thus become one of the largest seaports in the world, as a result of the increased sea navigation. Success Measure Success Measure continued Success Measure Continued List of negative impacts • • • • Downstream water supply issues. Negative impact on natural lakes. Loss of sedimentation. Forced resettlement of people living in flooded areas. • Potential failure. • Siltation issues. Negative sedimentation • Sedimentation often plays a large role as well. For the Yangtze Delta, the agriculture and fishery depends on the constant sedimentation flow from the upper Yangtze River. The sedimentation acts as a "natural" fertilizer for the down stream Yangtze Delta. • Because of intensified use of land, an accelerated rate of soil erosion is displayed. Since the agricultural land is depleted of its natural fertilizer, the Referenes • http://darwin.bio.uci.edu/~sustain/state/ kmin.html • http://www.mtholyoke.edu/~vanti20m/ classweb/website/ socialconsequences.html • http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Three_Gorges_Dam • http://toxipedia.org/display/toxipedia/Three +Gorges+Dam James Bay Project Raz, Taylor, Bobby, and Adam Site Map • Expands over a region of 620 km • There are a total of 215 ditches and dams • Entire project cost 17.5 billion dollars Key Reasons for Diversion • From 1950-1970, studies began to show • • the hydroelectric potential of the region of Quebec east of the James Bay. Can provide (Quebec) and export (to US) large amounts of hydroelectricity Opens up area for development o Would clear Native Americans from the land Success Measure • Brought the price of electricity down • No chemical or waste heat pollution • Reservoirs can be used to breed fish. • Produces more than half of Quebec's hydroelectricity (16,530 Megawatts) Negative Impacts • affects migration of caribou • leads to the destruction of wetland • • • • habitats for moose and beavers too expensive to make another dam because the price of electricity has gone down so much large levels of organic mercury are released into environment interrupts the river flow interference with fish populations- sucked into turbines Negative Impact: Dead Caribou • the diversion of rivers in the James Bay • affects the river flow and the river water discharge into the sea the change in the water proved to be too much for the caribou population, who follow a migration through those rivers, and therefore large numbers drowned during flooding (about 10,000) References • http://www.hydroquebec.com • http://jamesbayroad.com/hydro/index.html • http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.com/ • articles/james-bay-project http://www.culturalsurvival.org/ publications/cultural-survival-quarterly/ canada/hydro-quebec-and-native-people Mekong River dams By: Bonnie Davis, Victoria Kim, and Nicole Kahn Site map- Mekong River-2,700 miles Key reasons for diversion • Laos proposed building the dam on the • • • Mekong at Thahouy district in Xayaburi province, to generate more than 1,000 MW of power to sell to Thailand. To produce hydropower and electricity Electricity for Vietnam, Laos, China, Cambodia, and Thailand. Developing countries-growing industries-new reliance on electricity Shipping farther indam-transportation Success measure • Estimated potential of lower Mekong • Basin-excluding China- 30,000 MW Upper Mekong basin- 28,930 MW; Lower Mekong Basin- 3,235 MW; 3,209 MW under construction Negative impacts • Block critical fish migration routes-the • • • highly endangered Mekong giant Catfish Block spawning grounds for fish Block sediment flows and affect agriculture in Thailand and Vietnam People depend on the river for food and general living Migratory flows/Mekong Giant Catfish • Sayabouly Province, Northern Laos- Giant • • • • • • Catfish habitat-spawning grounds Sahong channel-migration route for fish Because the river is so large, it can accommodate large fish such as the Giant Catfish. Floodplains and flooded forests- source of food for fish during rainy season. 3rd most biodiverse river on Earth. Fisheries and people depend on fish/giants Critically endangered already References • http://www.nationmultimedia.com/ • • national/Mekong-river-dam-will-kill-usprotesters-tell-PM-30190576.html http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Mekong_River_Basin_Hydropower http:// environment.nationalgeographic.com/ environment/freshwater/lessons-from-thefield-mekong-giant-fish/ St. Lawrence Seaway by Katie Hastings, Dana Barry, and Sarah Anderson Site Map Site Map Reason For Diversion They made all these diversions to connect all the great lakes and to have a system that connects the great lakes to the Atlantic Ocean. Many vessels use these channels for carrying cargo but it was first made to create better trade. Success Measure Economic Success: "Each navigation season, more than 2,000 commercial vessel transits are made through the Seaway System's locks to call on major U.S. and Canadian ports. The Great Lakes region, home to North America's industrial and agricultural centers, directly benefits from shipping commerce on the Seaway. In fact, every 10,000 tons of general cargo handled by a Great Lakes port community. " Negatives • The Seaway has introduced 57 invasive species of aquatic • animals, most importantly the Zebra Mussel which have seriously affected other species in the system. "eight major environmental issues: mercury contamination, PCB contamination, the presence of other contaminants, bacterial (fecal) contamination, excessive growth of nuisance aquatic plants, habitat destruction and degradation, impacts of exotic species, and fish and wildlife health effects." The Zebra Mussel • Zebra mussels were accidentally brought to the great lakes on ships going through the seaway. • The organisms are filter feeders so they have taken • • away a vast majority of the food from competing organisms. They grow so densely they clog pipelines and water supplies. Eliminated many types of fish and hurt the fishing industry. References http://www.greatlakes-seaway.com/en/ seaway/history/index.html http://www.glwi.freshwater.uwm.edu/ ourwaters/documents/DiversionsCWeb.pdf http://www.vsr.cape.com/~powens/ riverhistory.htm http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Zebra_mussel http://www.glwi.freshwater.uwm.edu/ ourwaters/documents/DiversionsCWeb.pdf NYC Watershed Jeremy Louis Andrew Molly Site Map Reason • Water is transported from Croton watershed area and • • • Catskill/ Delaware watershed area because of the high demand for water in NYC Wells were sufficient until about 1842 when they became too polluted for the fast growing New York so the decision was made to impound water from the Croton River and build an aqueduct to transport the water Later the Catskill watershed area was added to their water supply because of the population growth Approximately 95% of the water is transported by gravity Success • 1.4 Billion Gallons of water/day to NY state (90% of NYC's water supply). • The New York City drinking water supply system is the largest unfiltered water supply in the United States. • It provides high quality drinking water to nearly one-half the population of New York State every day. • 95% of total water is supplied by gravity, very little pumping is required since the water runs downhill. Negatives • Stop Fish migrations to upstream of dams • Consumes potential real estate land • Creates low oxygen concentrations Negative Focus NY's Decrepit Dams: "They're older structures down your way, some 100 years old or more," said Alon Dominitz, an engineer and chief of the state's dam safety program in Albany. "It's rare that we inspect a dam and find no deficiencies." New York has had a large population since it's founding, so many dams were constructed as soon as the technology was available (~100 years ago) The 389 dams in Westchester, Rockland and Putnam average 75 years old, with the oldest dating to 1800 Dam failures could cause flash-flooding, and large loss of life in such a densely populated area • • • • References http://www.epa.gov/region2/water/nycshed/ http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/25599.html http://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/html/drinking_water/ history.shtml http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/76065.html NYC Watershed Jeremy Louis Andrew Molly Site Map Reservoir Levels Reason • Water is transported from Croton watershed area and • • • Catskill/ Delaware watershed area because of the high demand for water in NYC Wells were sufficient until about 1842 when they became too polluted for the fast growing New York so the decision was made to impound water from the Croton River and build an aqueduct to transport the water Later the Catskill watershed area was added to their water supply because of the population growth Approximately 95% of the water is transported by gravity Success • 1.4 Billion Gallons of water/day to NY state (90% of NYC's water supply). • The New York City drinking water supply system is the largest unfiltered water supply in the United States. • It provides high quality drinking water to nearly one-half the population of New York State every day. • 95% of total water is supplied by gravity, very little pumping is required since the water runs downhill. Negatives • Stop fish migrations upstream of dams • Consumes potential real estate land • Creates low oxygen concentrations • Sediments can transport pathogens and interfere with • • • effectiveness of water filtration and disinfection Excess nutrients- high phosphorus causes algae blooms that effect oder, taste, and color Excess phosphorus can cause eutrophic water conditions and increased carbon This water mixed with chlorine can result in the formation of "disinfection byproducts" (may cause risk of early term miscarriages) Negative Focus NY's Decrepit Dams: "They're older structures down your way, some 100 years old or more," said Alon Dominitz, an engineer and chief of the state's dam safety program in Albany. "It's rare that we inspect a dam and find no deficiencies." New York has had a large population since it's founding, so many dams were constructed as soon as the technology was available (~100 years ago) The 389 dams in Westchester, Rockland and Putnam average 75 years old, with the oldest dating to 1800 Dam failures could cause flash-flooding, and large loss of life in such a densely populated area • • • • References http://www.epa.gov/region2/water/nycshed/ http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/25599.html http://www.nyc.gov/html/dep/html/drinking_water/ history.shtml http://www.dec.ny.gov/lands/76065.html