Canterbury Tales - New Zealand Law Society
Transcription
Canterbury Tales - New Zealand Law Society
Canterbury tales Canterbury tales Canterbury Westland Branch New Zealand Law Society September 2013, Vol. 19, No. 8 Selma Scott adds to her busy workload By Zylpha Kovacs Congratulations to Selma Scott, who has been appointed as Chair of the Pacific Trust Board. Selma, who is principal of her Christchurch law firm Scott & Co, has been a member of the board since 2007 and as Pacific Island Affairs Minister Hekia Parata says, “Selma’s legal background and long-term membership of the board offer a perspective which will be of great benefit to Pacific businesses.” There is one more thing that will be of great benefit to Pacific Businesses and that is Selma’s passion for the work the Trust does and what they are achieving. The Pacific Business Trust (PBT) was set up in 1985 and is a not for profit Charitable Trust. Initially it was set up to improve employment opportunities for Pacific people in New Zealand. Over the next 25 years the Trust, while still improving employment opportunities, expanded its services to provide training and assistance for Pacific people to set up their own businesses and encourage their entrepreneurial skills. This expansion has led to PBT in the 2010-2011 year supporting 49 business startups, $4,619,832 sales turnover and 109 jobs created. The training, practical advice and coaching given by the Pacific Business Trust Facilitators is one of the main reasons PBT has had such successful results but the collaboration with Te Wananga o Aotearoa is also a very important factor in the positive outcomes. Selma Scott....facing some big challenges. Te Wananga o Aotearoa works with PBT to offer free NZQA recognised qualification courses. With Te Wananga o Aotearoa being one of the largest tertiary education providers in New Zealand their holistic approach to education sits well with the goals and aims of PBT. Some of the courses available are Certificates in First Steps to Business, Computer and Business Administration, and Computing, all of them being NZQA Level 2. Entrepreneurial and business skills in Pacific secondary school students are also supported by PBT’s involvement with The Young Enterprise Scheme (YES). Pacific students are encouraged to enter this scheme, which is open to all schools and students throughout New Zealand. The challenges for the students are that they form a company, create a product or service and then market and sell it. This course is a one-year programme and in 2012 the overall winner was one of the teams that PBT had provided with mentoring support. PBT also has a joint project with Manukau Institute of Technology (MIT) and Auckland University of Technology (AUT) where they organise a competition for year 13 students. The students identify a business concept and investigate its viability. The concept plan is presented to a panel of judges with the winners gaining scholarships to study at either MIT or AUT. PBT also has programmes with individual schools where students are given a realistic glimpse into the business world. The Pacific Business Awards and other business events, which are hosted by PBT, acknowledge and celebrate the successes of Pacific business and are a reflection of the success that PBT has achieved out in our communities. Holding the position of Chair of PBT, which involves a lot of travel, and running her own law practice as well as spending quality time with her family would seem like enough for any person but Selma also holds two other Ministerial appointed roles. The first one is a member of the Human Rights Review Tribunal, where she is one of 11 members including four who are either practicing lawyers or who have legal qualifications. The second is a member of the State Housing Appeal Authority, where she is one of nine members. Selma acknowledges that the support of her husband Nick, their three children and extended family allows her the flexibility to be able to successfully achieve in all these areas of her life. She is looking forward to the challenges that will face her in the future. 22 Canterbury Canterburytales tales Vino Fino Photo Caption Each month we have a photo caption competition where we invite you to submit a caption. The winner will receive two bottles of wine sponsored by Vino Fino (www.vinifinoco.nz, 188 Durham Street). Send your entry to the Canterbury Westland Branch New Zealand Law Society, P. O. Box 565, Christchurch. Or email to canterburywestland@lawsociety.org.nz. All entries must be received by October 9 2013. The winner will be announced in the next edition of Canterbury Tales. The winning entry for last month’s picture (below) was submitted by Grant Tyrrell. “You wouldn’t believe how good the president’s column is this month.” President’s Column One of life’s truisms is that you do not know how much you value something until you lose it. This applies as much to the small things in life as to the big things. The monthly ritual of receiving Canterbury Tales in your offices is one of those small pleasures that we take for granted, but should not. Indeed, our branch of the NZLS is the exception to most, in producing a good quality, hard copy magazine for our members every month. While the move to electronic communications continues unabated, there are some publications where, at least some of us think, the tactile satisfaction of a glossy page and a tangible record is to be preferred over an electronic page which can be deleted by the touch of a button. However, in order to keep receiving your hard copy of Canterbury Tales, we need our magazine to be supported by our advertisers. By using the services of our advertisers and letting them know that you see and appreciate their support of the magazine, we can continue to bring you a monthly hard copy edition of Canterbury Tales. Even better, if you know of other compatible businesses that offer services or goods that complement the legal audience who read this publication, then please encourage them to advertise in this magazine. Maybe, in the future, there will be a time when moving to an electronic format is warranted because that is what our members want, but my personal view is that we are not there yet. That said, I invite you to share your views on this subject. One of the aspects of Canterbury Tales which is most enjoyed is its coverage of social functions held by the profession in the previous month. In that regard I attended two quite different, but equally enjoyable functions in late August. The first was the Canterbury Women’s Legal Association annual dinner, which was a great success. Tickets sold out well in advance of the event and it was attended by a wide range of female practitioners from all levels and types of practice. We were thoroughly entertained by three professional women speakers — Pam Clark, a partner at HFK Limited, Doctor Jane McDonald, a urologist, and Ingrid Taylor, a partner at Taylor Shaw. After each speaker I felt sorry for the person who had to follow, thinking they would struggle to maintain the standard set by the previous speaker of combining humour with a serious message, but in every case I was proved wrong. Every speaker was worth listening to and added to the evening’s enjoyment. I know at our table, they were the catalyst for animated discussions on health, happiness, job satisfaction and other profound subjects. On the following evening a dinner was held to honour the appointment of the three new South Island silks — Jonathan Eaton, Trevor Shiels and Pip Hall. Again, the evening was punctuated by speeches from the three newly appointed QCs and each combined an appropriate mix of self-deprecating humour, reflections on their career to date, and tributes to their mentors and predecessors. It has been a long time since the last round of appointments, and an even longer time since members of the local Criminal Bar have been recognised for their excellence in this way It was a wonderful evening to be part of. I am reliably told this will feature in next month’s Canterbury Tales. Something to look forward to! Rachel Dunningham Canterbury tales 3 Enjoyable CWLA dinner By Melanie Jones The Canterbury Women’s Legal Association held its annual midwinter dinner on August 29 at the Shilling Club on the University of Canterbury’s campus. This dinner, which was sponsored by Chapman Tripp, Baldwins and Craigs Investment Partners, is the fundraiser for the scholarship that the CWLA awards to the top non-honours law graduate. The recipient, who was awarded her 2011 scholarship at the dinner, this year was Rachel Forde. The Committee approached the dinner this year with a different theme by inviting an accountant, (Pam Clarke from HFK Ltd), a doctor (Jane MacDonald from Urology Associates), and a lawyer (Ingrid Taylor) to speak on the subject of Do as I say, not as I do. Professor Ursula Cheer was the Master of Ceremonies for the evening and she did a stellar job of keeping such a large group of very noisy women under control. Pam kept us all amused with her enviable strategy of making full use of her work from home husband. Her MOTH (man of the house) has been well trained to cope with the daily demands of their young children. However, Pam did admit defeat on the washing front when expensive white shirts came out the other end a definite shade of grey! Jane brought the house down with her uniquely female viewpoint of a medical speciality dominated by male patients and surgeons. Needless to say, all present will never quite look at that cut of chicken in quite the same way again!! Amidst all the laughing, Jane reminded us of the important medical test we should prioritise to keep our health in tip-top shape. To round off the evening, Ingrid tackled the quest for happiness, and the juggling of partners and children. I am Rachel Forde, centre, with Rachel Dunningham not sure that Ingrid gave us any golden and Catherine Bibbey. answers, but she did give some useful tips and recommended reading. (Lean In by afternoon of 22 November 2013 at the new Sheryl Sandberg and The Happiness Project Rydges in Latimer Square. by Gretchen Rubin). Having read both these The CWLA sees the seminar as a way for women practitioners in Christchurch to books, I can highly recommend them. Despite the serious topic, Ingrid managed to reconnect and benefit from the speakers’ make us all laugh, and we now realise it is OK presentations, which will focus on strategies to desire a designer handbag after all. It may for a successful working life. The line-up of confirmed speakers includes Helen Clark (via make you happy. A most enjoyable evening finished with the video), the Right Honourable Judith Collins, The announcement of CWLA’s next event, The New Honourable Susan Glazebrook, Carmel Fisher Zealand Bar Association is co-hosting a seminar (Fisher Funds), Mai Chen (Chen Palmer) and called Obstacles and Opportunities on the Lisa O’Neil. The registrations will open soon. The speakers, left Pam Clarke, right Dr Jane MacDonald and below Ingrid Taylor. Far right, some of the diners. 24 Canterbury Canterburytales tales Untied from the timesheet By Andrew Nuttall have reported record years in 2011 and 2012. Director Bradley Nuttall Limited The partnership model Over the last 25 years I have had the pleasure of working closely with a number of lawyers, including partners both senior and junior and younger practitioners. It has been very interesting work as the profession attracts some of the greatest talent from our universities and this talent is accompanied by a strong work ethic, personal pride, a desire to achieve and a willingness to help and serve their clients. However, law is competitive and not without its pressure and stresses. The law provides an ability to generate incomes well above the national average but why is it that some of the highest earners do not become the wealthiest and provide themselves with options and choices during their lives and in retirement? Why is it that too many are burnt out, suffer stress and fail to achieve a work life balance that gives them peace of mind and contentment? These questions motivated me to undertake some research and over the last six months I have interviewed practice managers, practitioners, senior and junior partners and others closely connected to the legal fraternity. The objective is to better understand the needs and requirement of members of the legal fraternity to not only help me to serve them better but to also provide a basis for thought planning and discussion. Series of articles During my interviews a number of trends and themes emerged that are likely to influence the legal community in years to come and more importantly have an impact on the financial security of its members. Over the next few months, I will write a series of articles covering some of the key findings from my research and trust that they will be helpful and constructive. Please be mindful that some of the views expressed are not necessarily mine but have been expressed by those whom I have met with. I will cover the following areas: 1. Challenges faced by law firms. 2. Financial challenges of the individual lawyer. 3. Some thoughts and ideas on how practitioners may be able to better plan to give themselves choices and options at a future date so they can untie themselves from the timesheet when it suits them. A number of the partners I interviewed reported that they are experiencing their most profitable years. There are cost pressures, primarily with staffing and rent. However, many are reporting they have more work than ever and a number Over the last 20 years or so, the percentage of principals holding practising certificates has fallen and this consolidation and tighter control of equity within firms has enabled partners to retain control of both decision making and distribution of revenue and profit. While partners have generally earned very good incomes, there is disparity of performance and the measurement of personal contributions to the partnership has caused tensions and at times led to dispute. Female numbers Today two-thirds of law graduates are female, however, only 20% of partners are women. Although females have historically been well represented within law firms, 25 years ago there were only two female partners in Christchurch. While there are a greater number of female partners now, will females be proportionately represented in the future? Will female practitioners want to and be prepared to do what it takes to become a partner? Generational differences are also imposing pressure on the partnership model. A high proportion of New Zealand’s population was born between 1946 and 1964. Partners in their 50s and 60s today, need to recognise there are relatively fewer people aged 35-45 and in addition gen X and Ys have different attitudes to work/life balance, money and consumption. tend to have their families later in life and because of student loans, travel to work in the UK and the weaker UK pound might not have the balance sheet and the willingness to buy into a partnership. Most respondents were of the opinion that partners should make a capital contribution and have ‘skin in the game’, but partners who are looking to retire in the next 5 to10 years, may not be able to release capital from the partnership that they are hopeful of. Added attractions There is a reported skill shortage in the Christchurch market place and to attract and retain bright young minds law firms will not only need to meet their income demands but also provide good quality office space, up to date technology, a work life balance and a harmonious work place. A number of respondents reported that their firms were allocating considerable time and resource to help ensure that their firm was an “employer of choice.” I hope this is a helpful insight that stimulates some discussion and planning. Over the next few months I will write about additional challenges facing law firms as well as some of the financial challenges. I will provide insight to recommendations and advice from a number of senior partners who have been successful in maintaining their desired quality of life as they transition into retirement and retire from practice. Duncan Cotterill moving back into the central city Christchurch’s and the South Island’s largest law firm, Duncan Cotterill, will return to the city by October next year, signing a lease on a new building in the Knox Plaza development on Victoria St. The firm, which has more than 130 staff in Christchurch, has been based in Burnside since the February 2011 earthquake. Chief executive Terry McLaughlin says the firm is delighted to be moving back to the city. “We have always said that we are committed to moving back into town. The opportunity to fully lease the office space in this development means we can be back much sooner than we might otherwise have been, and within an emerging professional services precinct.” He sees Victoria Street as one of several professional precincts in the central city, home to the likes of legal, accounting, financial services, engineering and architecture firms. The Victoria Street precinct will soon be up and running and offers excellent parking and access for our clients at the door. The Knox Plaza development will be part of an emerging fresh business face in an entrance to the city. Construction of the new four-level building, which will be set behind a “transparent” single storey structure housing retail and hospitality outlets, is under way and scheduled for completion by September 2014. It has been designed to complement the neighbouring Knox Church, which is undergoing restoration work, with a campus-style setting incorporating a cloistered walkway and internal courtyard, and architectural features sympathetic to the church’s Gothic proportions. The courtyard will feature a 12-metre high sculpture by leading Christchurch sculptor Graham Bennett. Terry McLaughlin says Duncan Cotterill will occupy all of the building’s office space, with some 2,800 square metres over three levels. “It means we will have our own building, with our own naming and signage rights. We will be making a highly visible commitment to Christchurch, our clients will enjoy easy access and on-site parking, and our staff will be working in an excellent environment.” Canterbury tales 5 THE GREAT DEBATE So who does do it better? By Madeleine Thwaites and Stephanie Mann This article was written by members of the Junior Practitioners’ Committee and accordingly presents a biased report of the evening as we recall it. On Tuesday 3 September the Junior Practitioners’ Committee successfully hosted “The Great Debate” for the second successive year. More than 100 people attended to see the female junior practitioners take on the elderly — we mean, senior — practitioners to argue Who does it (the law) better? Judge Neave had the honour of presiding over this much-anticipated event, setting the tone and jokes at an appropriately low level before the debaters kicked off. For the young females, Renee Powell, from Helmore Bowron & Scott, was up first to convince Judge Neave that, of course, females do it better on top. Renee outlined the history of female involvement in the practice of law and named the many females in some of the top legal jobs in the country. Jeremy Johnson, of Wynn Williams, himself nearly eligible to represent the junior practitioners, was first speaker for the seniors. Jeremy took the moot further by arguing that Judge Raoul Neave.....his opening remarks set a suitably low tone. Other photographs on this page show some of those in attendance. although men did the law better, gay men did the law best of all. Sarah Hoffman, also from Wynn Williams, spoke second for the ladies. Threatened with a performance review from Jeremy, she retorted with a threat of a personal grievance. Silencing the boys, Sarah took the junior girls’ argument through until Duncan Webb took to the lectern. Doctor Professor “I-want-to-be-a-juniorforever-so-I-won’t-leave-law-school-for-17years” Webb talked about something for a good wee while and managed to be rather entertaining, before fellow Lane Neaver Fiona McMillan ripped the boys to shreds. If the insults were not personal before, they certainly were by this stage. Entertaining, engaging, and a highlight before the men put their last, and certainly not their best, foot forward. Phil Shamy, well, what can we say? Some of us thought we had filthy minds but even we could not understand Phil’s jokes. We are not sure it added to the men’s argument, and by that stage, the junior female practitioners had stamped their claim as the winners of the debate (in the eyes of the writers). All in all, the evening was incredibly entertaining. We had a fantastic new venue in the Elmwood Theatre in Aikmans Road, Merivale. Drinks and nibbles provided a g reat opportunity for both junior and senior practitioners alike to mix and mingle, and the debate itself provided many laughs and much food for thought. The Committee would like to publicly thank Judge Neave and the debaters for putting on a fantastic show. We would also like to thank the caterer, Jenny Dodd from Culinary Capers, for the excellent food. We hope to be able to bring this event back for a third year next year, and hope to see even more faces come along to enjoy the friendly banter on offer. 26 Canterbury Canterburytales tales Jeff Goldstein goes on an By Zylpha Kovacs For those of you who don’t know, Jeff Goldstein was a seriously good football player. At 18 years of age he was playing at a semiprofessional level in Sydney, Australia. While working hard as a footballer he was also studying law. The time came when he had to make a decision between the two and as football was not a high paying profession back then Jeff chose a career in law. He continued to play at a highly competitive level in Australia and this was continued when he made his move over to New Zealand. Jeff’s football playing career was bought to a sudden halt in New Zealand when he fell and severally damaged his knee. This injury left Jeff unable to even kick a football let alone play a competitive game. To fill the void that football had left behind he took up playing golf and this became a sport that he both excelled in and enjoyed. While golf was not as physical on his knee as football, the knee still deteriorated over the years to the point that in 2012 he had to have replacement surgery. The surgery was such a success that Jeff found that he could now not only kick a football but he thought he might be able to take to the pitch in an actual game. While on a visit to Australia a footballing friend who was organising a team to play in the 2013 World Masters Games asked him to join and Jeff signed up! Now that he was on his way to Turin (also known as Torino) in the northwest of Italy for the Masters Games, his son Michael said they should organise a father/son golfing trip through the UK while he was over on that side of the world. Now as many of us know it is very hard to say no to our children even when they have grown up and left the nest, consequently, Jeff said yes and the golfing/soccer trip was underway. Michael was to organise the golfing sector of the trip as he had extensive experience in this field. In 2010 Michael and his friend Jamie set themselves the challenge of playing a game of Michael and Jeff Goldstein on the famous Swilcairn Bridge at the 18th hole on the Old Course at St Andrews. golf every day for a year! They called the challenge Puregolf 2010 (you can look at their website www.puregolf2010.com.) They left their jobs as lawyers and set off over the world playing golf and raising funds for and awareness of the New Zealand youth programme, “The First Tee”. This program teaches life skills to young people through the game of golf and Michael and Jamie raised significant funds for them as well as completing their goal of a game of golf every day for a year. With this success under his hat organising nine games of golf in 10 days for him, his dad and their friend (also Michael) ‘would be a walk in the park’! While maybe not a walk in the park, the golfing trip, which saw them travel from The Old Course St Andrews Golf Links in Edinburgh right down to Dover in the South of England was a memorable trip albeit lots of travel and lots of golf. A great time had by all! When Jeff moved on from England to Turin the great time continued. The World Masters Games consisted of 30 different sports and 18,000 competitors. Jeff’s football team was playing in the over 45 years age group and Canterbury tales 7 nother sporting odyssey of the best. It is the highest museum in the world at 167 metres high and has a huge collection ranging from the very beginnings of magic lantern shadow shows through to current film technology. It contains paintings, books, posters and movie reels. There are three movie theatres running movies constantly and hosts several film festivals each year. The highlight is a panoramic glass elevator that covers its 75-metre ride up to the top in 59 seconds. The ride is in the central open space of the building and goes up to the “Small Temple” at the top where you then have a 360degree view of the city. After all this sport, sightseeing and travel Jeff was happy to get back to Christchurch to oversee the 2013 Employment Conference and possibly consider where to next! Jeff Goldstein at the opening ceremony of the Masters Games in the piazza in Turin. had a number of players over 50 and 60 years of age (Jeff included!). The team had 20 players in the squad but was only able to have a team list of 18 for each game. Rolling subs were the order of the day. There were six teams in their pool, two from Brazil and four from Australia. They made it through to the quarterfinals where their game was 0-0 at full time and required a penalty shoot-out, which they lost. Still Jeff and his team were very happy with their result. The games were played early morning or late afternoon/early evening as the temperatures in the middle of the day were 35-40 degrees. This left the middle of the day for sightseeing around Turin. Jeff said that while Turin was largely an industrial town it had a number of outstanding places to visit. Three that Jeff would recommend are the Egyptian Museum, National Car Museum and the National Cinema Museum. The Egyptian Museum is rated as the 2nd most important in the world after the Cairo Museum and is the only place you can see an unwrapped mummy along with many other outstanding Egyptian exhibits. The National Car Museum, which naturally features a large number of Fiats, has one of the largest collection of cars in the world and a must see for all car enthusiasts but the highlight for Jeff was the National Cinema Museum. Jeff has travelled extensively and visited many of the popular attractions around the world and he rates the National Cinema Museum as one 28 Canterbury Canterburytales tales CCCL spring seminars Following the very successful 2012 conference “Legal issues arising from the earthquakes” held by the Centre for Commercial and Corporate Law, Inc, the Centre is pleased to announce its 2013 “Spring Seminar Series”. The series of three one-hour seminars, will be held in October and November at the James Hight Library Undercroft 101, University of Canterbury. Each seminar will commence at 5:30 and will be followed by drinks and nibbles. The dates, topics and presenters are as follows: 10 October — White-Collar and Blue-Collar Crime in New Zealand: Investigating the different treatments of tax evasion and welfare fraud (Dr Lisa Marriott, Associate Professor, Victoria University of Wellington) This study investigates the extent to which similar offences are treated equally in the New Zealand justice system. Specifically, the study compares white- and blue-collar offending, using tax evasion as a proxy for white-collar crime and benefit fraud as a proxy for bluecollar crime. These offences are conceptually similar: both are nonviolent and financial in nature. Importantly, they have the same ‘victim’ (the government and society) and both reduce government resources available to provide services for society. However, an important distinction is that tax evasion is typically undertaken by individuals in privileged positions, while benefit fraud is typically undertaken by those less advantaged in society. Findings of this study to date indicate that higher proportions of investigations and prosecutions will take place for those engaging in welfare fraud as compared to those engaging in tax evasion. This study highlights the differences in treatments of tax evasion and welfare fraud at a range of junctures. The ultimate objective of the study is to challenge what appears to be a differential system for the treatment of conceptually similar financial offending in New Zealand. 24 October — Insurance Law, an update following the Christchurch earthquakes (Dr Duncan Webb, Partner, Lane Neave). It is a pleasure to welcome Duncan to back to the University to present one of the Spring Seminars. Duncan specialises in insurance and liability work. In recent times he has become a well known advocate for insureds in the wake of the Canterbury Earthquakes. He has a comprehensive knowledge of law after many years in practice as well as a distinguished academic career as a professor of law who has taught insurance law at both Canterbury and Auckland universities. He has also written extensively in insurance including the book Insurance Law Practice Policy and Principles (2004) and has been a contributor to the New Zealand Insurance Law Association presenting papers to the Association’s annual conferences. Duncan and Lane Neave have assisted a number of clients, including major insurers, with insurance work of all kinds. Recently Duncan has been invited by The Press to its Live Chat Show to answer earthquake insurance queries and has also contributed articles in the newspaper. 7 November — Charity Sector Update (Dr Michael Gousmett, Public Historian). In this presentation Michael will consider (i) the disestablishment of the Charities Commission; (ii) shortcomings in reporting by Charities and Continued Page 9 Canterbury tales the need for Public Benefit Reports; (iii) tax issues including, deregistration and its consequences as well as defining “gift” for the purposes of the Income Tax Act 2007; and provide (iv) an overview of charity tax history: Pitt, Pemsel, Ballance, Grey, and Holyoake. Michael’s 2009 doctoral thesis is a study of the origins of the charitable purposes exemption tax from its inception in England in 1799 to the seminal charity lay case, Pemsel, in 1891. This has since been followed up by a study of the history of charity tax concessions in New Zealand, which is about to be published in the New Zealand Journal of Taxation Law and Policy. Dr Gousmett also presents an annual guest lecture on charity taxation to the senior tax students at the University of Canterbury. He is a regular contributor to the New Zealand Law Journal, as well as a presenter at national and international conferences. As a practitioner since 1989, and a public historian, Dr Gousmett is able to bring a perspective from those experiences to his work. He is also a co-author with Susan Barker and Ken Lord, of The Law and Practice of Charities in New Zealand, the first comprehensive text of its kind in New Zealand which was published by LexisNexis this year. To register your interest to attend any of these spring seminars please email lawenquiries@canterbury.ac.nz. There is no charge for attendance at these seminars. Comings & Goings Joined firm/organisation Alison Daly (Ministry of Social Development), Jennifer Goldsmith (PayGlobal Ltd), Tiffany McRae (Russell Moon & Fail), Jennifer Miles (Lumley General Insurance (NZ) Ltd), Donald Matthews (Public Defence Service), Michael Mayman (Heartland Law Ltd), Deborah Moore (CERA), Thomas Nation (Timpany Walton), Leigh Rodgers (Community Law Canterbury), Glen Ryan (White Fox & Jones), Harry Shaw (Wynn Williams Lawyers), Mikaela Taggart (Community Law Canterbury). Moved Craig Hock (Geddes & Maciaszek to Argyle Welsh Finnigan), Lisa Smith (Te Runanga o Ngai to Rooney Group Ltd), Gemma Woods (Goodman Tavendale Reid to Anderson Lloyd). Change of status Purnell Creighton, relocated to 35 Leslie Hills Drive, PO Box 9307, Christchurch 8149. All other details remain the same. Rebecca Morgan Barrister, postal address 62 Riccarton Road, Level 1, Canterbury Chambers, Christchurch 8011. David Stringer, postal address 62a Woodbury Street, Avonhead, Christchurch 8042. Katherine Ewer, postal address 3 Hackthorne Road, Cashmere, Christchurch 8022. New attraction coming to Tekapo Springs Tekapo Springs will soon have the world’s largest inflatable water slide and the first location outside the USA to have the attraction. The multi-award winning South 9 Island tourism attraction will unveil its brand new Trippo Slide on November 1 2013 in time for the busy summer season. The oversized inflatable water slide with three slide chutes spans an impressive 11 metre high and 53 metres in length and will be located on Tekapo Springs’ outdoor skating rink during the summer season. The slide will be permanently inflated throughout summer until end March 2014 and will replace the company’s roller-skating attraction, which normally operates in summer. Tekapo Springs General Manager Cathy Hemsworth said the company had been looking for “an iconic and fun” summer activity for some time and that the Trippo Slide had literally “jumped out” as a perfect fit. “We came across this via a contact in the USA and thought it looked fantastic. It’s exactly what we’ve been searching for,” said Mrs Hemsworth. The Trippo Slide is currently only being used by three other operators in the USA and has not even been officially launched to market yet. Pricing for the slide will be $20 for an adult (16yrs and over) and $15 for a child (3yrs15yrs). Family passes will be available and the price covers an all-day pass. Christchurch and Canterbury Tourism Chief Executive Tim Hunter said the new attraction was “an exciting and welcome addition” to the Mackenzie region’s tourism offering. “It’s imperative that we continue to expand and grow the Mackenzie District’s tourism economy and the addition of such a fun and quirky new product will attract a lot of interest from a broad range of visitors,” said Mr Hunter. Advert 2 10 Canterbury Canterburytales tales Requirements under CPD By Julie Hutton, Solicitor, Notary Public and Director of Plain English Law Ltd Under the Lawyers and Conveyancers Act (Lawyers: Ongoing Legal Education — Continuing Professional Development) Rules 2013 (“Rules”), there are two important dates to n ote: 1 October 2013 — the optional date from which lawyers can begin to record their Continuing Professional Development (“CPD”) hours and activities and 1 April 2014 — the mandatory date from which lawyers are obliged to record their CPD hours and activities for the twelve-month period ending on 31 March 2015. Although the responsibility for complying with the Rules rests with each individual lawyer, one aspect of the Rules that has not received Canterbury Westland Branch/NZLS Education Programme Proudly sponsored by significant publicity is the ability of organisations to apply for approved self-audit status (“ASAS”). Under Rule 8, the New Zealand Law Society (“NZLS”) has the power to audit any lawyer to verify compliance with the Rules. However, if a lawyer is part of an organisation with ASAS, then the audit responsibility shifts from the NZLS to that organisation. The provisions enabling ASAS are set out in Rule 9 (and are further clarified in the NZLS Guidelines for the Rules). The essential terms are: • An organisation seeking ASAS is required to make an initial approval application to the NZLS; • Eligibility is dependent on the organisation satisfying the NZLS that it: — “has effective policies and procedures in place for ensuring all lawyers in the organisation comply with these rules” (Rule 9.2 (a)); and _ “appoints a lawyer, of sufficient seniority and standing, who is approved by the Law Society, as a CPD officer to monitor compliance with these rules” (Rule 9.2(b)). 21 — IT Projects and Disputes, Webinar. 22 — Criminal Appellate Advocacy. 22 — The NZLS CPD Rules, a practical guide. 24 — Financial Markets Conduct Reforms, Webinar. November 5 — Update on Contract. 12 — The Role of the Trustee (also Webinar, 20 November). 20-21 — Reading accounts and balance sheets. 26 — Immigration and Protection Tribunal. 27 — Trust Account Supervisor Training. Out of Christchurch NZLS Continuing Legal Education (CLE Limited) To register and for other information check the CLE website, www.lawyerseducation.co.nz Christchurch October 7-8 — Intro to Family Law Advocacy and Practice. 15 — The Difficult Property File. 15 — Trusts can survive a relationship breakdown — myth or reality? Webinar. 18 — Seminar, The Honourable Justice Young and The Honourable Justice French give overviews of their respective roles in The Supreme Court and The Court of Appeal. Watch for flyer. Commerce Act reforms: cartels and criminalisation, Auckland 8 October. Takeovers Intensive, Wellington 23 October, Auckland 24 October. Introduction to High Court Civil Litigation Skills, Auckland 14-15 October, Wellington 29-30 October, Auckland 25-26 November. Family Law Conference, Auckland 21-22 November. Pre-conference workshop 20 November Mediating Dangerously, workshop, Auckland 15 November, Wellington 18 November. Negotiation Masterclass, Auckland 27 November. Social Quiz Evening — 16th October 2013. Watch for flyer. Informal Family Law Dinner — 17th October 2013. Watch for flyer. South Island Devils Own Golf Tournament — 1-3rd November. Watch for flyer. • Once an organisation has achieved ASAS, there is an on-going requirement to retain a NZLS approved CPD officer and to ensure that there are “suitable arrangements in place to ensure that the CPD officer is able to discharge his or her duties in accordance with these rules” (Rule 9.3(b)). As to be expected, the role of the CPD officer is one of review, compliance, monitoring and maintenance. This is a dual role, covering not only the organisation’s CPD policies and procedures, but also compliance with the Rules by members of the organisation. The “transfer” effect of audit responsibility from the NZLS to the self-auditing organisation, enabled by Rule 9, applies to the individual lawyers in the organisation, but not to the organisation, itself. Rule 9.5 provides that selfauditing organisations are, themselves, subject to audit by the NZLS to verify that they are complying with the Rules. Under Rule 9.8, the NZLS may revoke an organisation’s ASAS, if the NZLS reaches the view that the organisation is not complying with the self-auditing provisions of the Rules. Rule 9.9 permits subsequent re-application by an organisation with a revoked status. In no circumstances does ASAS given to any organisation, absolve the individual lawyers within that organisation from complying with their obligation under Rule 7.1, to make an annual declaration of compliance with the CPD requirements. For all organisations given ASAS, it remains the obligation of each lawyer within each organisation to remain personally responsible for making his or her own annual declaration of compliance under Rule 7.1. Organisations interested in applying for ASAS will be able to find further information on the process, on NZLS website later in the year. In the meantime, an essential starting point for all firms, regardless of whether they intend to apply for ASAS or not, is to create a continuing professional development plan and record (“CPDPR”) as required by Rule 5, for each lawyer in the organisation. I have developed a comprehensive template form of CPDPR which is available for purchase — either from my website http:// www.cpdforlawyers.co.nz/ or by emailing me at cpdforlawyers@xtra.co.nz. Have you organised your CPD Plan and Record format? Let us do it for you. www.cpdforlawyers.co.nz or email Julie at cpdforlawyers@xtra.co.nz for a free demonstration. Canterbury tales 11 To Lease Canterbury Tales is the official newsletter of the Canterbury Westland Branch New Zealand Law Society. Publications Committee: Karen Feltham (editor), Brendan Callaghan, Aliza Eveleigh, Zylpha Kovacs and Kate Dougherty. All correspondence and photographs should be forwarded to: The Branch Manager, Canterbury-Westland Branch New Zealand Law Society, Unit 1, 8 Homersham Place, Russley, Christchurch. P. O. Box 565 Christchurch. Phone 358-3147, fax 358-3148. email canterbury-westland@lawsociety.org.nz. Canterbury Tales is published 11 times per year. The deadline for editorial and photographs is the 8th of the month. Disclaimer: Canterbury Tales is published by the Canterbury Westland Branch New Zealand Law Society. The opinions expressed herein may not necessarily be those of the Branch and have not been expressly authorised. The Branch accepts no responsibility whatsoever for any error, omission or statement. 2 12 Canterbury Canterburytales tales Crazy Carvers cut capers By Jen Crawford The legal profession turned out in force to enjoy the annual Ski Day at Cheeseman on 14 August 2013. This was the second time the Ski Day has been held at Cheeseman and we were welcomed with the usual friendly club field hospitality. The weather turned on a cracker bluebird day, which also resulted in a few racers being spotted sneaking away early to enjoy a sly ale on the deck (you know who you are). While the snow was variable, with a few rocks underfoot on the lower mountain, the course itself was in good condition. There were two short GS courses for the racers to enjoy — for both skiers and snowboarders — as well as a more casual boarder-cross event that was held later in the day. Billed as a fun day in the snow, it is fair to say that there is also a healthy dose of competition when it comes to the business end of the day’s events — the Lawyers v Accountants ski race. As with past years, the lawyers managed to take out top honours as the fastest profession, although it should be noted that the fastest individual racer was an accountant, so the lawyers should not sit back and relax for too long. I have a feeling that the accountants may give us all a run for our money next year. The Fastest Profession Trophy is based on the fastest individuals combined times over two races. This year’s winners: 1. Sam Hutchings (Anderson Lloyd) 38.38. 2. Katie Jackson (Saunders Robinson Brown) 39.05. 3. Jen Crawford (Anderson Lloyd) 39.14. 4. Oliver Boyd (Duncan Cotterill) 39.31. The fastest law firms were: 1. Anderson Lloyd Crazy Carvers. 2. Duncan Cotterill. 3. Saunders Robinson Brown WC Croozers. The slowest skier and snowboarder awards were also hotly contested titles in 2013. The boarder-cross quickly descended into chaos on the course, which kept things interesting for the spectators. In terms of the race results, it is great to see the ladies continuing to keep up with the lads each year. What is particularly exciting this year is that we had some fast and furious competition with the two incumbents from 2012 (Oli and Jen) being knocked off their respective perches by two fresh-faced newcomers. The writer could be encouraged to claim an Above, some happy participants at Ski Day and, below, a possible reason......the Snow Bar. age handicap, but that would involve disclosing one’s age which a lady never does (so I am told). In all seriousness though, the most promising aspect of this year’s competition was the number of newcomers to the event. We need more of this and I would really encourage everyone with an interest in snow to have a go in 2014. The courses are short, relatively straightforward and lots of fun. Aside from being an excellent team building experience, the opportunities for networking should not be under-estimated, although it is probably best to let your supervising partner beat you down the hill or it could be a severe career-limiting move. A special mention must go to Crombie Lockwood for sponsoring the event, with support from Crighton Anderson, and the event organiser Suzanne Jordan, from the Institute of Chartered Accountants. In addition to supplying some fabulous prizes, our sponsors made sure there was plenty of schnapps on tap at the Snow Bar at the start of the course, which is a vital component of any successful ski race. Let’s work on getting a few more accountants involved next time and also think about bringing a client or two along for a fun day on the snow. In the meantime, enjoy the rest of the season (and spring storms). See you in 2014.
Similar documents
Canterbury Tales - New Zealand Law Society
Canterbury-Westland Branch New Zealand Law Society, Unit 1, 8 Homersham Place, Russley, Christchurch. P. O. Box 565 Christchurch. Phone 358-3147, fax 358-3148. email canterbury-westland@lawsociety....
More informationCanterbury Tales - New Zealand Law Society
making in individual case where that would tend to question decision made and limited by minority to pretermination challenges of individual decisions - majority in SC derived support for its view ...
More information