The Official Newsletter of THE AUSTRALIAN VINTAGE AVIATION
Transcription
The Official Newsletter of THE AUSTRALIAN VINTAGE AVIATION
CONTACT The Official Newsletter of THE AUSTRALIAN VINTAGE AVIATION SOCIETY Issue 8 December 2013 www.tavas.com.au T he main reason for establishing TAVAS is to bring to life early aviation and introduce it to the Australian public - to educate them about the aircraft and the pilots of the past. We choose to do this, because no other group in Australia is. It still amazes me that as we approach the centenary of World War One, no State or even National body or museum has a collection of flying aircraft to highlight the incredibly significant contribution and advancement of aviation during that war. Even the RAAF museum at Point Cook, had only a replica Sopwith Pup for this important four year period. However, there are individuals around Australia with a unique passion and willingness to create these machines themselves, which has resulted in some truly magnificent builds from some very talented people. In this issue we concentrate on one such person who realised the need to produce one of the first official trainers used by the RAAF in 1914. He intends to have it completed by centenary celebrations of the first flight to take place at Point Cook, in March 2014 and he is well on track to achieving that. As we enter 2014 many remembrance and centenary events will take place over this and the following four years, culminating in the centenary of Armistice on 11th November 1918. TAVAS will be a major part of many of these events, being the only ones with a collection of flying WW1 aircraft and as the National body encouraging others to build and fly these historically significant aircraft. We need assistance during this time and are looking for volunteers. Please contact us, no matter where you are, to find out how you can be involved. We have a new website up and running put together by a volunteer and we are incredibly happy with it. It is much more in keeping with what I originally wanted for this organization. It is very user friendly, CONTACT – Issue 8 Editor: Andrew Carter and can be used on computer, ipad’s and smart phones. It has plenty of pictures and videos – many of which we have not made public till now. There is an updated shop page with plenty of fascinating products on early aviation you can purchase online. There is a donation page in which you can help yourself whilst helping the Society (check it out to see what I mean) and our unique crowdfunding concept. Click on www.tavas.com.au Take the time to have a look through it and keep coming back to see what’s new. We will keep adding regular updates to our facebook page. You do NOT need to be a member of facebook to view this page. Simply click on www.facebook.com\TAVASWW1 Also it is with great relief that I can announce in this issue that the Fokker Triplane has finally flown – Some 12 months after I had hoped it would! Initial flying report on the next page. IN THIS ISSUE From the Cockpit – flying the TAVAS Dr.I Special Upcoming Event History of the B.E.2 The B.E.2 in Australian service Australian B.E.2 Replica Build From the cockpit – flying the B.E.2 Importing Part 2 110 Years Ago Additional info www.tavas.com.au Pg 2 Pg 3 Pg 4 Pg 6 Pg 8 Pg 12 Pg 15 Pg 16 17&18 Page 1 FROM THE COCKPIT - TAVAS DR.I FLIES On the 17th of December the TAVAS Dr.I took off at Caboolture airfield, becoming the first Australian based Fokker Triplane to fly in Australia since the RAAF Museum at Point Cook retired theirs back in January 2000. This aircraft was a lot easier to handle on the ground than I had been led to believe. Small rudder inputs were all that was required to keep it straight. The tail came up sooner than expected without any harsh tendency to swing and the aircraft became airborne quickly and easily. All controls were positive and only small movements required. A simple circuit was completed and I flew final at 70 knots, directly over the Bruce Highway, which I was later told caused quite a commotion as many cars slowed down to look and others had to take evasive action to avoid hitting those in front of them! Engineer extraordinaire Dave Walsh doing the final once over before the aircraft’s first flight. It was not a promising start to the day. Although the weather reports were good, looking at the BOM site and radar pic, we soon realised that the Gods were not only not smiling on us, they were actively mocking us. The rest of south East QLD was clear with perfect flying conditions, whereas dark, very low level cloud and heavy rain was sitting just over the Caboolture airfield. That just proved that this aircraft is the right one to have as the flag ship. It is instantly recognisable and turns heads and creates attention wherever it goes and gets people thinking and talking about true vintage aviation. As soon as I began to flare, I had an increasing rate of descent which had to be corrected with power. A little bounce and I was down. Second circuit on the same day was much more successful, carrying 1400 rpm into the flare which resulted in the smoothest and most satisfying touchdown. We have to fly off the hours in the test schedule locally and then we are able to take it places. The first will be to Watts Bridge, which it will do for the special event we are holding there in the new year (see full details in the article on the next page). Dark clouds ahead as we taxy out between showers. At the time of writing, I have only managed to complete 3 hours flying, but I am very happy with it so far and will write more about it in the next issue. After sitting around for an hour and a half, a break in the showers and low cloud presented an opportunity for a circuit. A video of the first flight can be seen at http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rhpuuv6TPL0 Taxying for runway 12 at Caboolture. CONTACT – Issue 8 Airborne for the first time in Australian skies. www.tavas.com.au Page 2 SPECIAL UPCOMING EVENT The Watts Bridge Memorial airfield in South East QLD, will be holding a unique get together for anyone with an interest in seeing the WW1 and vintage aviation movement grow in this country. The event is being organized by Ross Stenhouse, President of the Queensland Vintage Aviation Group (QVAG) and held at the groups premises on the field. Although TAVAS has held several presentations throughout 2013 and spoke at length on its growing collection and encouraging others to build and fly WW1 aircraft, this is the first such event involving different groups promoting the same message and working towards a common goal. This is incredibly important as we enter the years of the centenary of WW1. We want more people building and flying WW1 aircraft in this country and it’s not too late to get started now and have one finished well in time for the centenary of Armistice on 11th November 2018. Although our aim is to promote and help grow all types of vintage aviation from the first 25 years of flight, this particular seminar concentrates solely on WW1 reproductions and replicas. It will cover in detail the growing TAVAS collection, other reproductions and replicas currently being built in Australia, and a full run down on the Airdrome Kits and their method of construction. TAVAS member Bruce Clarke will have his magnificent full scale Sopwith Pup on display and we hope to have our Fokker Dr.I triplane there as well. You will also be able to see the Airdrome Aeroplane kits of the Sopwith Camel and E.I Eindekker under construction. The day will be very informative and any questions you may have, will be answered. If you have any interest in WW1 aviation, you should be at this seminar. If you would like to build a replica, this event is a must attend. For those who would like to be part of the WW1 scene in Australia but don’t intend building an aircraft, you should still come along, learn what’s happening, what is being planned for the future, meet other like minded people and find out how you can be involved. Not only should you come along, but we would encourage you to bring your partners, so that they can see for themselves what this is all about and hopefully we can impart some understanding upon them and as a result they may end up sharing your enthusiasm and supporting you in whatever way you decide to be part of it in the future. This unique event is being held from 10:30am on Sunday, 26th January 2014 at the QVAG building on Watts Bridge Airfield. Watts Bridge is about a 1.5 hour drive NW from Brisbane. It has two grass strips for those who wish to fly in. Regardless of whether you are flying or driving, directions can be found here – http://www.wattsbridge.com.au/location.php Please let me know via email if you expect to be attending this unique day, so we can ensure there are sufficient comforts and light catering for all who attend. This will be a great day and I hope to see you there. Quite a few of our members (some of whom flew in from interstate) attended Bruce’s open hangar day after our successful ‘Meet The Fokkers’ event mid year. The feedback from that was incredible, with a couple of members actually purchasing Airdrome kits as a result of their visit. For those of you who didn’t get to attend, this is your chance to see it. CONTACT – Issue 8 www.tavas.com.au Page 3 HISTORY OF THE B.E.2 The Royal Aircraft Factory B.E.2 (Blériot Experimental) was a British single-engine two-seat biplane which was in service with the Royal Flying Corps (RFC) from 1912 until the end of World War I. The "Bleriot" in its designation refers to the fact that, like the Bleriot types it was of tractor configuration, with the propeller in front. The B.E.2 was designed by Geoffrey de Havilland as a development of his B.E.1, being virtually identical with the earlier aircraft, apart from the replacement of the water-cooled Wolseley of the B.E.1 with a 60 hp air-cooled Renault V-8 engine. It first flew on 1 February 1912 with de Havilland as test pilot. The Renault proved a more satisfactory powerplant than the Wolesley, especially after a 70 hp model was fitted in May that year and on 12 August 1912 it set a British altitude record of 10,560 ft (3,220 m). About 3,500 were built. Initially used as front-line reconnaissance aircraft and light bombers, variants of the type were also used as night fighters. Like many warplanes, the B.E.2 was retained in front line service after it had become obsolete, for want of a suitable replacement. After its belated withdrawal it finally served as a trainer, communications aircraft and on anti-submarine coastal patrol duties. While the type was designed and tested at the Royal Aircraft Factory, the vast majority of production aircraft were built under contract by private companies, including well known manufacturers as well as firms that had not previously built aircraft. The B.E.2 has always been the subject of a good deal of controversy. While it proved fundamentally unsuited to air-to-air combat, it had a relatively low accident rate and its stability actually proved helpful in its artillery observation and aerial photography duties. Variations / developments The first production machines, basically identical with the prototypes, were all powered by Renault engines from the outset, and were designated B.E.2a. The B.E.2b which followed was very similar, but included revised cockpit coamings, affording better protection to the crew. CONTACT – Issue 8 The B.E.2c was a major redesign which was the result of research by E.T. Busk and was intended to provide an inherently stable aeroplane. This was considered desirable to allow the crew's full attention to be devoted to reconnaissance duties. The first example, a converted B.E.2b, flew on 30 May 1914 and went into squadron service just before the outbreak of war. The B.E.2c used the same fuselage as the B.E.2b, but was otherwise really a new type, being fitted with new wings of different plan form, increased dihedral, and forward stagger. The redesigned tail plane was also new. Ailerons replaced the wing warping of the earlier models, and a triangular fixed fin was fitted in front of the rudder. On later machines this fin was enlarged to reduce a tendency to swing on takeoff, and to improve spin recovery. After the first few aircraft, production machines were powered by a development of the Renault engine, the RAF 1a, and the twin skid undercarriage was replaced by a plain "V" undercarriage. A streamlined cowling to the sump was also fitted to later models, while a cut-out in the rear of the center section marginally improved the observer's field of fire, as well as giving the pilot a better view forward over the wing. At the outbreak of war these early B.E.2’s formed part of the equipment of the first three squadrons of the RFC to be sent to France. In fact a B.E.2a of No.2 Squadron RFC was the first aircraft of the Royal Flying Corps to arrive in France after the start of the First World War, on 26 August 1914. www.tavas.com.au Page 4 The B.E.2d was a dual control version. Otherwise identical to the "c" variant it had full controls in the front cockpit. This required a revised fuel system, and the "d" usually featured a large gravity tank under the center section. It was heavier than the "c" and had a reduced performance, climb in particular suffering in comparison with the "c". Most B.E.2ds were used as trainers, but a few supplied to Belgium were used operationally. These were re-engined with Hispano engines, apparently with further modifications to the fuel system, and as they could be flown from the front cockpit the occupant of the rear cockpit had a much better field of fire for his gun(s). The c began to be superseded by the final version, the B.E.2e, nicknamed the "Quirk", in 1916. This variant was again distinguished by completely new wings, braced by a single pair of interplane struts per side (as a "single-bay" biplane), and a set of shorter wingspan lower wing panels. The ailerons, on upper and lower wings, were joined by light struts. The tail plane was again a new unit - being smaller than that of the B.E.2c and d - and the larger, quadrant shaped vertical fin of the late B.E.2c became standard. Instead of a more powerful engine, it used the same as its predecessor, reducing the expected improvement in performance. Many B.E.2c and B.E.2d aircraft still under construction when the ‘e’ model entered production were completed with B.E.2e wings - to rationalise the supply of spare parts. These aircraft were officially designated as the "B.E.2f" and "B.E.2g". Of all variants, the most built were the B.E.2e. The B.E.9 and the B.E.12 were variants designed to give the B.E.2 an effective forward-firing armament the B.E.12 (a single seater) went into production and squadron service, but was not a great success. the center of gravity, in front of the pilot. In this awkward position his view was poor, and the degree to which he could handle a camera (or, later, a gun) was hampered by the struts and wires supporting the center section of the top wing. In practice the pilot of a B.E.2c handled the camera and the observer, when he was armed at all, had a rather poor field of fire to the rear, having at best to shoot back over his pilot's head. As early as 1915, the B.E.2c entered service as a pioneer night fighter being used in attempts to intercept and destroy the German Zeppelin airship raiders. The interceptor version of the B.E.2c was flown as a single-seater with an auxiliary fuel tank on the CoG, in the position of the observer's seat. After an initial lack of success while using darts and small incendiary bombs to attack airships from above, a Lewis gun was mounted to fire incendiary ammo upwards, at an angle of 45°, to attack the airship from below. The new tactic proved very effective. On the night of 2–3 September 1916, a B.E.2c downed the SL 11, the first German airship to be shot down over Britain after over a year of night raids. This won the pilot, Captain William Leefe Robinson, a Victoria Cross and cash prizes totaling £3,500 put up by a number of individuals. This was not an isolated victory - five more German airships were destroyed by Home Defence B.E.2c interceptors between October and December 1916. The airship campaign faltered - this rate of attrition could not be sustained, especially in combination with quite high non-combat losses. The performance of the B.E.2 was inadequate to intercept the Gotha bombers of 1917, but the techniques it pioneered were used by the later night fighters. The effectiveness (or lack of?) during the War. Like all service aircraft of this period, the B.E.2 had been designed at a time when the qualities required by a warplane were largely a matter for conjecture, in the absence of any actual experience of the use of aircraft in warfare. When bombs were to be carried or maximum endurance was required the observer had to be left behind, so it was still necessary to have him sit over CONTACT – Issue 8 Withdrawal from combat From 1917 onwards, the B.E.2 was mostly withdrawn from both the front line and night fighter use. The surviving examples continued in use for submarine spotting and as trainers for the rest of the war. In spite of the type's stability it was capable of comprehensive (if somewhat stately) aerobatics, and was by no means a bad trainer. www.tavas.com.au Page 5 THE B.E.2 IN AUSTRALIAN SERVICE He flew for 35 minutes, over Werribee and Sunshine and up to 3700 feet. As it had greater speed than the Boxkite and instruments (ASI, Altimeter & compass), On the 2nd July 1912, the Australian Department of Defence ordered two B.E.2a aircraft and two Deperdussin monoplanes (total cost of 2600 pounds) Later an order was placed for a single Boxkite. Williams said it was much easier to fly than the Boxkite. Training for the first 4 students of the newly formed Australian Flying Corp, at Point Cook, in late August of 1914, began on the Boxkite. At the very end of their initial pilots course and after a quick demonstration from his instructor, Lt Richard Williams (later to become the founding Chief of the RAAF), was the first student to fly the B.E.2a Lt Richard Williams as a student pilot in a B.E.2a in 1915. Although two such aircraft were ordered in July 1912, they didn’t arrive until February 1914. One of the CFS B.E.2a aircraft was meant to be the first Australian Military aircraft to serve overseas when it was crated and shipped to then German New Guinea on 30 November 1914 on the HMAS Una, along with a Farman Waterplane to assist in the campaign to seize German forces in New Guinea following the commencement of WW1. However as it turned out neither aircraft was uncrated or used, and both returned to Point Cook early in 1915. Australia's first two military flying instructors Lt Henry Petre (front) and Lt Eric Harrison, in a B.E.2a at Central Flying School at Point Cook – 1914. The two B.E.2a aircraft remained in service for all eight pilot training courses held at Point Cook up until 1917. CFS-1 was demolished in a crash in 1918 and CFS-2 retired in the same year with the arrival of D.H.6 trainers. Interestingly, two upper wing panels from both these aircraft survive at the Moorabbin Air Museum and are considered to be amongst the rarest and most important aviation artefacts in the world. In 1916 the CFS received an incomplete B.E.2c and it was eventually put into service in 1918 as a B.E.2e as CFS-18 when the balance of parts arrived. Point Cook’s first 4 students pose before a B.E.2a at the Central Flying School in 1914. Back row: Richard Williams and Thomas White. Front Row: George Merz, Henry Petre, Eric Harrison and David Manwell CONTACT – Issue 8 Overseas, Australian pilots both in training and operationally, used a number of BE2 variants during WW1. No.1 Sqn AFC used the B.E.2e operationally in the Middle East (Egypt and Palestine) during 191617. No. 4 Sqn AFC had one it used for flying training. www.tavas.com.au Page 6 No.7 AFC Training Squadron at Leighterton had up to 13 B.E.2e's during its time in the UK. Four B.E.2c aircraft were used by the Mesopotamian Half Flight (so called because in its infancy, half a flight was all the AFC could muster) out of their base in Kut, 160km South East of Bagdad. The B.E.2c and e models would also have been flown by Australian pilots in the RFC, throughout the war. General characteristics of the B.E.2 design Crew: Two, pilot and observer Length: 27 ft 3 in (8.31 m) Wingspan: 37 ft 0 in (11.28 m) Height: 11 ft 1½ in (3.39 m) Wing area: 371 ft² (34.8 m²) Empty weight: 1,370 lb (623 kg) Loaded weight: 2,350 lb (1,068 kg) Powerplant: varied for different models, from a 1 x Renault air cooled V-8 engine 60 hp through to 1 × RAF 1a air cooled V-8 engine, 90 hp Performance (varied depending on engine type) Maximum speed: 63 knots (116 km/h) at 6,500 ft Endurance: 3 hr 15 min Service ceiling: 10,000 ft (3,050 m) Climb to 3,500 ft (1,070 m): 6 min 30 s Climb to 10,000 ft (3,050 m): 45 min 15 s Armament: Initially – Nil, but later models had a variety. An aerial shot form a B.E.2. Reg Baillieu piloting one along the Mediterranean coast. Guns: Normally 1 × .303 in Lewis gun for observer Bombs: 224 lb (100 kg) of bombs (with full bomb load usually flown as a single-seater, and without the machine gun). An aerial reconnaissance camera as operated by the pilot of a B.E.2c in 1916. Photo of 1 Sqn AFC with a BE2e. In the middle is Richard Williams, who was the CO at the time. B.E.2a Biplane (CFS-1) at the Central Flying School Point Cook, Victoria. CFS 2 – clearly marked on the side, outside its brand new hangar at the newly formed Point Cook airfield CONTACT – Issue 8 www.tavas.com.au Page 7 ANDREW WILLOX’S B.E.2A REPLICA BUILD The other two aircraft types Australia purchased were two Deperdussin Type A monoplanes, which were built at the Deperdussin factory in Highgate and two early-variant Royal Aircraft Factory BE2a’s, being built at British & Colonial in Bristol, along with the Boxkite which had been ordered almost as an afterthought, following the consideration that the other types were probably far too advanced for novices. The following article is from Andrew Willox in Victoria who has produced an amazing replica and donated it to the RAAF museum at Point Cook. “It was during 2006 I finally realized that I HAD to build an aircraft. I’d harboured such thoughts for many years; a Bristol Fighter being the original aspiration – and that borne of a deep love for my favourite aeroplane anywhere in the world – the Shuttleworth Trust’s own D8096 – with which I had fallen for as an adolescent having the opportunity to visit the collection many times during the ‘60s and early ‘70s, living as we did in adjacent Hertforshire. Well, even I knew that a Bristol F2b was probably beyond my abilities, budget and the tiny cottage I was living in at the time (the wing span is wider than the building was deep), especially as I now live in Australia. As a newly-joined volunteer with the Friends of the RAAF Museum at Point Cook, about 25ks south-west of Melbourne, I was starting to learn about Australia’s flying heritage and the first aircraft the Australian government ordered from Britain during 1912. Five aircraft across three types were to form the fleet at the Army’s newly-established flying training ground at Point Cook – a square mile of grazing land owned by the Chirnsides, a family of sheep farmers. Flying training started in August 1914, but the first test flight by a Bristol Military Boxkite happened at daybreak on the 1st of March of that year. CONTACT – Issue 8 It transpired that the two Deperdussins quickly ended up being used for ground instruction only, the Boxkite soldiering on almost exclusively as the instructional machine where students were actually allowed to take the controls, and the two BE2a’s were used to take students up for practice in military observation and advanced instruction, with the most competent graduate students being allowed to fly them solo. During 1915 another Boxkite was constructed at Point Cook to add to the school’s strength and, 100 years later, yet another example has been completed by volunteers (see previous Newsletter – Contact Issue 7 – for full details) with the idea of reenacting that first military flight on the occasion of Point Cook’s centenary in 2014. However, this whole idea of gifting the Air Force with its original flying types started with Mr Jack Gillies who built an example of a Deperdussin and which has been on display at the Point Cook Museum since 2009. Jack’s father was an Army blacksmith at Point Cook during its establishment and Jack wanted to gift something to the nation out of respect for those days. He has in fact built two of this type and the other is on display at the Army’s Museum of Flight at Oakey in Queensland. This museum also has one of the other Boxkites built for the Magnificent Men film, with the third hanging in the atrium of the Bristol Museum. So, the RAAF Museum was to have two of the original training aircraft in time for the centenary and that’s when I realised that the collection really should be completed with the donation of a BE2a. www.tavas.com.au Page 8 Knowing about my interest in aircraft, in the middle of 2007 a friend dropped in my lap an advertisement for the sale of a small private airfield. Reading this for about a minute and thirty seconds I then picked up the phone and seven months later found myself in the middle of nowhere, about 150 kilometers west of Melbourne with my own airfield, extensive workshop/hangars, a dream but with lots of cautious ambition. The township’s local blacksmith proved to be knowledgeable about the old ways and we set to, making three BE2 rudder frames as a test of my competency and “project stamina”. A test rudder, made to the original plans, linen covered and clear doped was displayed at the Avalon Air Show in March 2009. Knowing now that this was the life for me, I started to put all the pieces together to build a complete BE2a that would be representative of the ones used at Point Cook. importance, as they are possibly the only remaining examples of the NPL3a aerofoil which was used on BE1, BE2 and very early 2a variants, like the ones that flew at Point Cook. The Royal Aircraft Factory, not permitted to manufacture aircraft of their own design at that time, produced drawings that anyone with some practical experience could follow. Using local craftsmen and women, contractors could easily make and assemble all the component parts and in doing so myself, I have been able to prove that this really was the case. Even a weekend course in basic basket weaving allowed me to make the two seats so clearly drawn on the relevant plan (A1393 Details of Engine Fittings). Maintaining an interest in the project has been easy – the more I have completed, the more I wish to see the project fulfilled and gifted to the nation. Repetition is something peculiar to aircraft building and a mindset of ‘just doing it’ is essential. In September 2012, I completed the fuselage and control rigging. The wings have all been finished with their wiring plates and had a trial assembly of the whole airframe. Andrew rolls out the bare fuselage at his private property / airfield, some 150kms west of Melbourne We are fortunate here to have two extant BE2 wings on display at the National Aviation Museum at Moorabbin, a suburb south-east of Melbourne. As a wing warping biplane, the rigging is ‘interesting’ to say the least and I have to say that the further we get the more exciting the whole project is becoming. Photos from the Museum archives help to supplement gaps in the record, of which there are a few, but nothing so far has proved to be insurmountable. Andrew’s B.E.2a rigged and looking great. The rare surviving B.E.2 wings at Moorabin, VIC These have proved, through research, to be amongst the rarest aviation artefacts in the world, ranking, I believe, alongside the Trust’s Blériot in their CONTACT – Issue 8 As almost all BE2s were contractor-built, I consider my example to be a late-production model by yet another contractor and it is fitting to thank my good friend Richard Gardner at the Farnborough Air Sciences Trust for his enthusiastic approach to www.tavas.com.au Page 9 furnishing me with those first three-view drawings that proved to be such an authoritative foundation to my research – and to the success of this project. It will be covered in unbleached aviation linen, clear doped, and will join the other two exhibits in telling something of the story of Australia’s first military flying school. Thanks must also go to the RAAF Museum for its support in making the engine a possibility and also to the Friends for some support in the purchase of materials. The RAAF Museum’s early-variant, unequal span BE2a, dating from 1912-13 is a static exhibit with a new dummy Renault V8, pattern-made to a licensebuilt example on display at Moorabbin. Much of the airframe is airworthy and has been constructed in a manner that should last for 100 years. Marine products have been used to preserve all wood components with hand-painted automotive finishes employed on all metalwork. Lacing together the authentic period linen. The Central Flying School operated at Point Cook from 1914 to 1992 but the airfield remained in Air Force use and is now the oldest continuously operating airfield of its type in the world. I’d be very happy to answer any further questions readers may have about this project.” Thanks so much Andrew for the article and to you and Ron Gretton for all the pictures supplied. This photo best shows the incredible woodwork in this construction and the very authentic looking dummy V8 Renault engine. Andrew Willox is a member of the Friends of the RAAF Museum, Point Cook and can be contacted at awillox@skymesh.com.au More pictures of this great build on the following page The linen laced and loosely applied to the fuselage CONTACT – Issue 8 Water is initially used to pull the linen taut, then dope is used to tighten it more & protect it. www.tavas.com.au Page 10 The magnificent Prop Andrew had made At Pt Cook, with dummy motor fitted. Boxkite in background A picture of a Royal Aircraft Factory early wing warping B.E.2 at Hampshire in 1914 This comparative picture is of Andrew Willox’s incredible example, taken at Point cook in May 2013 CONTACT – Issue 8 www.tavas.com.au Page 11 FROM THE COCKPIT – FLYING THE B.E.2 I spend a lot of time reading actual accounts of aircraft operations from the pilots who flew them during the war, but rarely do any of these authors spend great detail describing what it is actually like flying their particular aircraft. A frustration that I know is shared by many of our members, pilots and non aviators alike, who would like to know ‘just what is it really like to fly?’ So I asked Gene Demarko of The Vintage Aviator in NZ (TVAL) if he could write a brief report. What he sent was an extremely detailed account for which I and I’m sure many of you, will be very grateful for. for the observer’s entertainment, one on each side of the cockpit, mounted on swivels. Fire straight ahead and you will shoot off your own propeller. Too far either side and struts and rigging will be hit which will easily facilitate the premature and rather unfortunate loss of the top wing, which would ruin your day rather quickly. Firing back puts your tail at risk, and again more struts and rigging. There is no wonder that BE2 crews were referred to as “Fokker fodder”. I was glad I was just along for a joy ride.” Before that though, I thought it was worth reading this report from Tony Haycock, a modern day ‘observer’ attempting to ride in this 100 year old design. “This example is a genuine WWI veteran, built in 1917 and found forming part of a barn in the UK before coming to New Zealand to be restored and fitted with a TVAL reproduction of the original 90hp air cooled RAF (Royal Aircraft Factory) V8. In a triumph of British logic, the observer rode in the front cockpit of the BE2. Even getting to the cockpit required the dexterity of a contortionist, carefully threading my way between flying wires, landing wires, struts and various impedimenta. The two TVAL examples showing the obvious differences between the early and later types. Once in the observer’s seat came the next revelation. BE2 observers must have been very short, or possibly legless. My legs are not long at all, but the distance between seat and fuel tank was so small that even after only a few minutes in the air I was suffering! I was supposedly there to spot enemy troop movements and artillery, but there were issues with this premise. Looking straight ahead, the view is of a small oil coated windscreen. Forward of that is the engine with the very reassuring sight of all 16 rockers and pushrods happily going up and down. Over the side of the cockpit and there is nothing but wing. The ground is impossible to see. How anyone could do the job of artillery spotting from there I have no idea! Then there is the small matter of defence. As a later version of the BE2, this aircraft has two Lewis guns CONTACT – Issue 8 This shot shows the Union Jack under the wing, prior to roundels being adopted as the preferred method of recognition. The following flight report is from Gene Demarko at TVAL about the same B.E.2f that Tony flew front seat “A BLOODY AWFUL AEROPLANE – That is just how Ace Albert Ball described the BE.2 back in late 1915. The German pilots nicknamed it kaltes Fleisch ("cold meat"). Neither description is particularly becoming of one of the most widely produced series of aircraft during the Great War. www.tavas.com.au Page 12 Even the British press began to refer to the BE.2 aircraft as “Fokker Fodder” because it was so inferior to the newer faster more manoeuvrable German fighters. It is estimated that over 3,500 BE.2’s of various types were produced. The BE.2 saw action on many fronts and served many roles, observer, fighter, submarine spotter, light bomber, trainer, night fighter, balloon buster and zeppelin destroyer (six German airships were destroyed between October and December 1916 by BE.2c ‘s). A huge controversy surrounded the BE.2 aircraft, some said young RFC pilots were being “murdered” in these machines, it was this kind of thinking that led to a judicial enquiry. There were those however, that praised the BE.2 for being a stable, predictable aircraft in which poorly trained pilots had a chance to learn the finer art of flying. This was a good thing in a time when so many were killed in training accidents. The Sopwith Camel being one of the worst, some records show nearly forty percent of the pilots training in them were killed before ever seeing combat. Produced in a time when most people hadn’t even set eyes on an airplane, for this was the horse and buggy age, the cavalry was still an integral part of the military and these brave soldiers would become the eyes of the army. With a birds eye view high above the battle ground; the importance of aerial reconnaissance was quickly realized. The aircraft and its observer were so important to the slow moving ground based troops that the enemy quickly tried to knock these airborne spies out of the sky - air combat had begun. The original BE.2f that The Vintage Aviator Ltd has just restored is serial number A1325 built by Napier and Miller Lt of old Kirkpatrick Glasgow in batch A1311-1360. These aircraft were recorded as being BE.2c and BE.2E types hence the slight confusion in this aircraft’s description over the years. A1325 has a BE.2c fuselage, does not have dual controls and uses BE.2e type wings and empennage making this aircraft a BE.2f. Powered by a reproduction RAF1a engine of the V-8 air cooled type and rated at just under 100 horsepower, this big aircraft is seriously underpowered. This particular machine is the world’s only airworthy original RAF BE.2f, and it currently is flown regularly at various Vintage Aviator Ltd events in Masterton, New Zealand. Despite this machine being an early design and extremely simple, it requires a good understanding and thorough briefing, partly because aircraft of this time period are quite different from what the average pilot is used to today, but mostly because of the responsibility attached with operating any original machine that is nearly 100 years old. At least the flight controls are relatively standard; a control stick to operate the ailerons and elevator, a ruder bar to actuate the rudder and a hint of tailskid steering. No brakes, no electrical system, no flaps, no carburetor heat, just the bare essentials in fact in an era where rotary engines are popular it seems like a luxury to have a throttle, despite it being mounted on the control stick. The pilot brief and preflight includes a number of chores that must be performed prior to every flight such as lubricating each overhead valve rocker and pushrod and cleaning the spark plugs regularly. Even the starting procedure is more like starting an old tractor rather than an aircraft. The wheels are chocked, there are no brakes, and the choke cable is pulled as the propeller is rotated, this admits an over rich mixture of fuel and air to the cylinders in preparation of the ground crew swinging the propeller in the old “Armstrong” fashion for starting. While the engine is warming up the pilot can check over the aircraft instruments, all four of them; an airspeed indicator, a height gauge, a tachometer and an air pressure gauge. There are no engine instruments other than the tachometer, in fact the engine doesn’t even have an oil pump! One assumes, since the engine is essentially out in plain view of the pilot where he can see and smell it, he can keep an eye on it without having to worry about troublesome gauges. This machine requires all of your senses in order to make up for the lack of instrumentation. As the engine warms it becomes smoother and will actually CONTACT – Issue 8 www.tavas.com.au Page 13 idle, the long exhaust stacks make it much quieter than you would expect. The valve train ahead vibrates up and down and as the temperature rises some of the oil vapor begins to vent from two copper tubes just ahead of the cylinders in line with the valve train, this oil will keep everything (including the pilot) lubed throughout the flight. You can smell that it’s almost up to operating temperature. slowly, giving the pilot time to ponder the structure and rethink dives to VNE. The large upper wing leaves a tremendous unbraced area outboard of the single set of interplane struts, just part of the frailty of this very early Geoffrey DeHaviland design. With a single magneto and only one set of spark plugs there is no need for a magneto check, a simple run up to make sure the engine will accelerate to about 1500 RPM is all that is necessary before setting off. Once overhead the airfield and ready to land, the throttle only needs to be reduced about 100 RPM, indicating 1400 RPM on the tacho, resulting in a stable approach airspeed of 60 MPH. On short final reducing the power too much ends up with the prop driving the engine and a very noticeable aerodynamic vibration form the tailplane being exposed to the turbulence created by the slow turning prop. Ground handling is relatively easy, the long fuselage and steerable skid make taxiing to the runway easy with the use of power and proper technique. Lined up and ready for takeoff, all that is left to do is to crank the throttle lever forward and …wait. Visibility during landing is quite good, the attitude is quite flat and the airplane is easy to flare provided the right amount of power is maintained through the descent. Once on the ground the BE.2 tracks straight and slows quickly. The engine rev’s increase slowly and the big plane starts to move forward without much sense of acceleration, just as you are thinking about how slowly everything happens in this machine, you notice you are flying. As with most taildraggers the flight isn’t over until the plane is either in the hangar or tied down. With this machine, the flight is over after the rockers are lubed again (to prevent a valve from sticking) and a post flight is conducted, checking the bungee cords, lower wing aileron horns and wiping down the oil expelled by the engine breathers. The BE.2 starts to fly just as the airspeed registers around 40 MPH. The climb rate is less than spectacular but you feel secure and in control, positive response to every control input provided you give this ‘ole girl time to react. In most cases it feels better to simply let the airplane find its own way through the sky and nudge her in the direction you want to go. It’s certainly a privilege to be able to fly an original World War One aeroplane, even more so to be able to demonstrate these fine machines to the public nearly 100 years after they first took to the skies.” With a cruise speed of just under 70 MPH you have plenty of time to take in the sights and get a feel for the primary mission of this design - reconnaissance. The view from either cockpit is good, provided you brought along a scarf to wipe the oil from your goggles. Loitering above the airfield instead of the trenches, the full flight envelope can be explored. With this machine it’s a very small envelope! A speed range of 30 MPH and huge barn doors for ailerons make for quite heavy controls. Gentle “S” turns are accomplished with some adverse yaw and need to be well coordinated or what little airspeed you have starts to drop off. A huge thanks to Gene for this most comprehensive report he has put together for us over Christmas. It is a rare insight into what airmen of the type experienced a century ago and what a few very fortunate pilots get to experience today. Steep banks need to be planned and often feel better with two hands on the oversize control stick. Even with the nose pointed down the speed builds The next flying display at Masterton, where the B.E.2 will be on display, is on the 22nd February 2014 and will be a great weekend for those who can attend. CONTACT – Issue 8 www.tavas.com.au Page 14 IMPORTING PART 2 In issue 3 of the Contact Newsletter, I wrote about importing completed aircraft, or partially completed projects, from overseas as being the quickest way to get flying a unique vintage type. I wrote about the pitfalls to avoid when purchasing and what sort of prices to expect for shipping and importing. At that time however I was not able to personally recommend a good shipping agent, especially as the one we had used was so incredibly bad. That has changed and now we have had several very successful dealings with Greg Selsby of Selsby Solutions and mention them here for anyone who might be considering importing in the future. Therefore it is reasonable to expect some variation in the quote from any agent – but how many of them would you expect would give you any money back after you had paid the expected amount? In our case, the variances worked out in our favour and Greg paid us back a substantial amount of money which we certainly weren’t expecting. We have now found ourselves in the very fortunate position of having obtained an original Gnome 160hp Rotary engine from New York and having a unique 1909 designed aircraft donated to us from overseas. Of course we contacted Greg straight away to take care of both of these unique purchases and ensure the quickest, safest and cheapest way of getting them here. Greg has been in the importing business for 28 years and has been a licensed broker for over 21 years. He has imported everything from fresh fish to Combine harvesters and everything in between and has brought numerous aircraft and helicopters into this country. It doesn’t matter what state you live in or where you want the goods delivered, Greg can arrange it all Australia wide. All our dealings with him have been from a different State and we have had no problems. Greg at work Importing the 3 Engels Fokkers from Germany was not a simple task by any stretch. There was a lot involved and required good communication amongst several parties and a good agent in Germany. You can contact Greg at greg@selsby.com.au or on 02 955 77 989. Let him know you are a member of TAVAS. Greg Selsby organized all this under challenging circumstances and had the right people in place overseas to execute this with the least amount of fuss to us and ultimately, expense. We were more than happy with the price quoted and what we paid. However, the quote was not 100% complete as Greg explained to us, that some charges vary with time and some in foreign currency need to be converted at a later stage at the value on the day it is done. CONTACT – Issue 8 www.tavas.com.au Page 15 110 YEARS AGO ‘100 years ago’ has become a regular part of these newsletters and lets us reflect on how things were and just how far aviation has come. In this issue however, we choose to acknowledge the most significant event in aviation history - its beginning, which occurred on the 17th of December, 110 years ago. Even today there still remains a lot of false information and controversy over what the Wrights achieved and how they achieved it. The fact remains that what they achieved was truly remarkable and possible only topped as mans greatest achievement, when Neil Armstrong first set foot on the moon. What has to be admired most about the Wrights is the fact that they realised sustained powered man carrying flight had to be achievable, at a time when most people (including many very prominent scientist of the day) knew that it was completely and utterly impossible. At no time does it ever seem to have occurred to them that they could not achieve the ‘impossible’. On that day in late 1903, achieve it they did. The fact that the media all but overlooked this event seems staggering. The controversy that followed later and the problems that caused the Wrights, is incredible and the lawsuits that followed with patent infringements effectively held the US aviation industry back almost 20 years. The Wrights finally proved themselves in Le Mans, France on the 8th of August of 1908, demonstrating their completely manoeuvrable machines in complex sequences, at a time when most other flying machines could only do short hops in a straight line. I have to admire them for their foresight, problem solving ability and their persistence. These were clever men who overcame great obstacles and resistance to achieve mankinds greatest dream – to fly. They set about contacting all the well known personalities in aviation circles at the time and asked for information so that they could learn. It would appear all these people freely shared their information. People have become detached from that dream, in large part because Low Cost Carriers have made flying so available to so many people on at least a semi regular basis, that most people give flying no more thought then they would any other form of mass transport. The Wright Brothers then set about systematically addressing and overcoming each issue that had prevented sustained flight. The more sophisticated aircraft become, the less feel the pilot has for the machine and the medium in which it operates. They taught themselves how to glide and how to overcome control issues as a result. When their second glider did not perform as well as the first, they were smart enough to realise the accepted theory of lift at the time was not correct and they created a wind tunnel. They used this to develop their own accurate data and formulas which led to them building a successful flying machine. It may be because precisely of this detachment with an increase in aviation technology that we find more people now turning to vintage aviation to experience flying as it once was and probably, really, should be. Thank you Orville and Wilbur Wright for daring to dream and achieving the impossible. Undaunted by the fact that no sufficient power plant was available with the required power to weight ratio, the brothers simply set about building their own. CONTACT – Issue 8 www.tavas.com.au Page 16 AS 2013 COMES TO AN END… TAVAS has been going for two full years now and we have set up this unique organization well for the upcoming centenary. Robin Paveley is a very interesting individual, who approached me after having seen an article on TAVAS in the local paper. This could not have been possible without the help and support of so many people. Thank you to all of you who have contributed in some way over the last two years. He asked me to clarify exactly what it was we were hoping to achieve. I explained it to him, he politely waited till I was finished and then told me I was mad. - Well I had to appreciate his honesty. There are just too many people to thank individually, but a few we just have to single out. First and foremost, Jack MacDonald, for his uncompromising support of TAVAS. Without him we would have had nowhere for the collection to reside and be worked on and we simply couldn’t have held an event like “Meet The Fokkers” mid year. Luckily for us, Rob had some time on his hand and a soft spot for mad people, so he offered to help out – and that he has done in ways we could never have imagined. Jack has been a true champion of trying to create the WW1 aviation movement in Australia and we are incredibly grateful for all he has done, at no charge to the organization. Thanks Jack. Dave Walsh is our engineer extraordinaire, without whom we would have nothing but static museum exhibits. Dave has donated an incredible amount of his time and engineering talent (gained from an extensive airline background both as ground & flight engineer) to getting the TAVAS fleet airborne. He has gone above and beyond at every stage and we are incredibly grateful for his time, energy and enthusiasm for the TAVAS concept and the aircraft he works on. Bernard ‘Speedy’ Gonsalves is a master fabric worker and painter. Some of the best looking restorations and privately owned aircraft in Queensland are as a result of Speedy’s work. Speedy is a WW1 aero historian in his own right and apart from ongoing repairs and painting of the TAVAS fleet, he has given presentations to large groups on the TAVAS aircraft, the history behind the machines and the men who flew them. We hope he continues to give such educational and interesting talks in the future and continues to apply his incredible knowledge and skills to finishing each of these aircraft to highly accurate standards. CONTACT – Issue 8 He has a superb 3D video set up and has taken unique footage of TAVAS aircraft in this medium. Some of which he showed at the Caboolture Airfield open day in November – which attracted a lot of attention, with many people saying they had never seen 3D content before. He then went on and set up a 3D simulator screen in our scaled Spad XIII aircraft which was used to successfully introduce young people to early aviation in a truly interactive way. Rob has set up our new website and online store and crowdfunding for current and future TAVAS projects. I am waiting with eager anticipation to see what he comes up with next. Thanks so much to these guys and to everyone who has been involved with TAVAS over the last two, very busy and very interesting years. Sponsorship is now the biggest challenge facing TAVAS as we cannot complete the aircraft and fly them for the Australian public without further funding. TAVAS provides a unique opportunity for sponsorship over the next four years. Please share our details with anyone you think could help. A hell of a lot of activity will be taking place over the next 4 years and all of you have a chance to be involved. Please email me at info@tavas.com.au to find out more, or make the effort to get along to our unique event at Watts Bridge Memorial Airfield on the 26th of January where you can learn more and speak to us in person. www.tavas.com.au Page 17 LAST BUT NOT LEAST Tony Wytenburg has done an exceptional job with reverse engineering a Gnome 100hp Rotary engine for us. This is only one of the many incredibly successful engineering challenges Tony has overcome in his career. If there is something you need manufactured, no matter how hard it may seem, contact Tony – that’s what he specializes in. TAVAS member David Foxx has worked long hours to create a unique online magazine – Airscape. The first 2 issues were released late 2013. It is an impressive magazine in its own right, but even more so as these first two issues are free. Some great WW1 content in it. Well worth the read. Download it at the App store or on Google play now. That’s all for another issue and another year. We look forward to your continuing support over the next four years in particular. Take the time to have a look at the new website especially the crowdfunding and shop pages – We need your support to continue. Wishing all of you the very best for the New Year and hope it proves to be a safe and enjoyable one for you and yours. Next newsletter due out end of March 2014. Until then, build light and strong and fly safe. CONTACT – Issue 8 www.tavas.com.au Page 18