scaffolding the literacy leadership team
Transcription
scaffolding the literacy leadership team
2009 Literacy Symposium University of Central Florida, Orlando SCAFFOLDING THE LITERACY LEADERSHIP TEAM A three-part model to sustain and expand success Enrique A. Puig epuig@mail.ucf.edu Florida Literacy and Reading Excellence Center at the University of Central Florida FOUNDATION | | | | | Understanding literacy as a process Understanding adult learning theory Developing a common language U d Understanding di conditions di i ffor llearning i Setting ground rules CONSTRUCTION Identifying an adaptive challenge | Investigating an adaptive challenge | Refining an adaptive challenge | Developing action steps | Studying and reflecting on action steps | SCAFFOLDS Utilizing the literacy coach | Developing D l i a long-term l t school-wide h l id plan l | Establishing support at the state level | FOUNDATION Literacy As a Process: a framework for guiding learners Strategic Activities to Sustain Learning Strategic Activities to Expand Learning References: g Comprehension p ((2008), ), E.O. Keene To Understand: New Horizons in Reading Change Over Time In Children’s Literacy Development (2001), M.M. Clay Teaching for Comprehending and Fluency K-8 (2006), Fountas & Pinnell The Literacy Coach: Guiding in the Right Direction (2007), Puig & Froelich The Literacy Leadership Team: Sustaining and Expanding Success, (2009) Froelich & Puig Strategic Activities to Sustain Learning Decoding Segmenting words Blending words Checking (monitoring) Predicting Anticipating Fluency Integrating Flexibility Phrasing h i Word recognition Rereading Self-correcting S Searching hi Strategic Behaviors to Sustain Learning O One-to-one matching hi Cross-checking Locating known and unknown words Directionality (L-R, Lp-Rp, etc.) Strategic Activities to Expand Learning Making connections Text to self Text to text Text to world Inferring Summarizing Synthesizing/creating Analyzing Critiquing Questioning i i Clarifying Visualizing Evaluating Note: Proficient readers use strategic g activities to sustain reading and expand meaning fluidly before, during, and after reading. This list is illustrative, not exhaustive. To create a common language g g and a solid foundation, how is your school or g understanding g literacy y district addressing as a process? Talk with a mentor-colleague. ADULT LEARNING Pedagogy g gy – learningg and instruction with children | Hebegogy – learning and instruction with adolescents | Andragogy – learning and instruction with adults | Gerontogogy – learning and instruction with older adults | Heutagogy – learning and instruction with self-directed learners | What a has as bee been you your e experience pe e ce when e adults have been supported from a pedagogical p g g p perspective p rather than an andragogical perspective? Talk with mentor-colleagues. DEVELOPING A COMMON LANGUAGE Improves p communication and better interpretation of data | Expands thinking by applying new concepts to k known words d | Economizes on time when meeting to discuss adaptive challenges | Develops a sense of community | Creates a safe environment | How is your school or district developing a common language, particularly with the current impetus to Response to Intervention? Talk with mentor-colleagues. CAMBOURNE’S CONDITIONS FOR LEARNING Immersion | Approximation | Use | Response | Responsibility | Demonstration | Engagement | Expectation E t ti | How are conditions for learning being considered id d att th the school h l and d di district t i t llevell in an effort to make forward shifts or positive iti change h iin iinstruction t ti ? With students? With adults? Talk with mentor-colleagues. SETTING GROUND RULES | Always be respectful of others when they are speaking | When talking try to use our own experiences | Always be punctual and attend the assigned meetings | Try to value others’ others experiences | Try to explore common as well as divergent themes | Be appreciative of other’s responses by giving appropriate feedback | Be open and honest | Find things g y you have in common CONSTRUCTION LITERACY LEADERSHIP TEAM INVESTIGATIVE CYCLE Brainstorming an initial adaptive challenge Revisioning: reflecting on the limitations and success of the action plan Investigating a specific adaptive h ll g challenge Scheduling: developing and executing an action plan Considering the literacy leadership team i investigative ti ti cycle, l what h th hurdles dl and d successes have you encountered at the school h l llevell and d th the di district t i t llevel? l? T lk with Talk ith mentor t –colleagues. ll SCAFFOLDS UTILIZING THE LITERACY COACH CONTINUUM OF COACHING Transformation may occur when teachers/coaches are provided opportunities to observe, co-teach, confer, study, research, and reflect on practice. Inter-active coaching Facilitate a workshop or session to improve instruction and student learning Provide an observation lesson to improve instruction and student learning with feedback and collaborative input. Increased scaffolding SUBJECT-CENTERED Intra-active coaching Co-teach with colleague to improve instruction and student learning based on mutually agreed upon learning goals and success indicators. Confer, observe, and debrief to improve instruction and student learning. Facilitate a study group or literacy leadership team to investigate common interest topics to improve instruction and student learning. Facilitate action research to seek resources after reflection to improve instruction and student learning. Decreased scaffolding PROBLEM-CENTERED adapted from E. A. Puig & K. S. Froelich, 2007 The Literacyy Coach: Guiding g in the Right g Direction How do you see the continuum of coaching in supporting the work of the literacy coach, the literacy leadership team, and administrators? Talk with mentor-colleagues. DEVELOPING A LONG-TERM SCHOOL-WIDE PLAN Development p of the literacy yp principal p | Development of the literacy leadership team | Development of the literacy coach | Development of classroom teachers | Collaborative action research | ESTABLISHING SUPPORT AT THE STATE LEVEL K-12 literacy yp plan | University-based support | University Faculty Fellows | K-12 literacy leadership conference | K-12 literacy coach academy | K-12 literacy institute | Summer literacy leadership team institutes | What events or functions has your state or di t i t putt in district i place l tto sustain t i and d expand d the work of literacy coaches and literacy l d hi tteams? leadership ? T lk with Talk ith mentor-colleagues. t ll FOUNDATION | | | | | Understanding literacy as a process Understanding adult learning theory Developing a common language U d Understanding di conditions di i ffor llearning i Setting ground rules CONSTRUCTION Identifying an adaptive challenge | Investigating an adaptive challenge | Refining an adaptive challenge | Developing action steps | Studying and reflecting on action steps | SCAFFOLDS Utilizing the literacy coach | Developing D l i a long-term l t school-wide h l id plan l | Establishing support at the state level | THE LITERACY LEADERSHIP TEAM | A three-part p model to sustain and expand p success Constructing a plan Laying a foundation Utilizing scaffolds REFERENCES | | | | | | | | | | | The Literacy Principal: Leading, Supporting, and Assessing Reading and Writing Initiatives. Booth, D & Rowsell, J. ((2007)) Second Edition, Pembroke Publishing. g The K-12 Literacy Leadership Fieldbook. Taylor, R.T. & Gunter, G.A. (2005). Corwin Press. The Literacy Leadership Team: Sustaining and Expanding Success, Froelich, K.S. & Puig, E.A. (2009). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/ Pearson. The Literacy Coach: Guiding in the right direction. Puig, E.A. & Froelich, K.S. (2007). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon/ Pearson. Literacy coaching: The essentials. Casey, K. (2006). Portsmouth, NH: Heinemann. The Literacy Coach's Handbook: A Guide to Research-Based Practice. Walpole, S. & McKenna, M.C. (2004). Guilford Press Teaching for Comprehending and Fluency Fluency, K K-8. 8 Fountas, Fountas II.C. C & Pinnell, Pinnell G.S., G S (2006). (2006) Portsmouth, NH. Heinemann. Reading & Writing in the Middle Years. Booth, D. (2001). Portland, Maine, Stenhouse Publishers. Creating Literacy-Rich Schools for Adolescents. Ivey, G. & Fisher, D. (2006). ASCD. Lit Literacy Learning L i C Communities: iti A Guided G id d ffor C Creating ti S Sustainable t i bl Ch Change iin Secondary Schools. Lent, R.C. (2007). Portsmouth, NH. Heinemann. The Whole Story: Natural Learning and the Acquisition of Literacy. Cambourne, B. (1990). Scholastic Paperbacks. SCAFFOLDING THE LITERACY LEADERSHIP TEAM Questions and discussion Q PowerPoint presentation can be downloaded at flare.ucf.edu