Visitor`s motivations at sites of death and disaster. The case of
Transcription
Visitor`s motivations at sites of death and disaster. The case of
Visitor’s motivations at sites of death and disaster. The case of former transit camp Westerbork, The Netherlands Westerbork • Served as a transit camp in the east of NL • During the WWII the camp had ‘double life’ • Another group of circa 2000 people mostly German Jews, Jewish council members lived permanently • In 1949, The ‘Foundation 40–45’ started • An initiative to build a memorial for resistance fighters who died in the camp Westerbork • In 1983, the Commemoration Center Camp Westerbork was opened • Emphasize three principles of commemoration, remembrance and contemplation. • When opened, attracted 40.000 visitors • Increased to 140.000 visitors in 2012. Methodology • Survey 16 July-10 Sept. 2011 • Self-administrated questionnaire of four sections • Main question: own agreement with 20 motives of visit (collected from the literature) 1-7 (strongly disagree) (strongly agree) • A pilot study was conducted to check the questionnaire Methodology • In total, 266 have participated in the study • 28 were deleted because of the missing data, resulting in 238 useable responses Motivations ( Isaac and Çakmak (2014) Table 1. Mean scores on motivation scale. N Mean SD I visited Westerbork (because) such a horrific occurrence may never happen again 238 6.43 1.29 I want to understand what happened there I am curious to know what happened here this is the place where it really happened it is an uncommon place to visit out of empathy for the victims I wanted to learn more about the Holocaust/Second World War we speak for those who no longer can, but also for humanity more generally 238 238 238 238 238 238 238 5.76 5.63 5.55 5.32 5.17 5.12 5.02 1.28 1.36 1.60 1.70 1.67 1.61 1.89 I feel responsible for the coming generations I want to tell the story further to next generations I want to commemorate the victims it is a part of my history/heritage where I want to know more about I wanted to see expositions/evidence/artifacts it is a moment of coming to one’s senses and thankfulness I am afraid that something can happen in the future again I became interested in the subject after the theme Holocaust/Second World War at school 238 238 238 238 238 238 238 238 4.88 4.87 4.82 4.66 4.61 4.44 4.31 3.86 1.99 1.93 1.77 2.04 1.86 1.97 2.09 2.08 it is a famous tourist destination in the Netherlands 238 2.81 1.95 I need to see it to believe that something can happen I see it as a pilgrimage spot I have family/friends who were victims of the Holocaust 238 238 238 2.61 2.58 1.83 2.00 1.95 1.65 Does ‘dark’ tourism exist? • Motives as ‘dark’ were not mentioned • Interest in death no reason to visit • Replaced by “sites associated with death and suffering” • Visitors wanted to feel empathy • Day out/random stop “not pre-planned” Does ‘dark’ tourism exist? • • • • • • • • Defined by the motivations of the visitors Stone (2006) not characteristics of the site Makes the distinction a dark site or not Visitors to sites can be ‘dark’ or ‘light’! Example: A visitor with a camp number tattoo; Army veterans; Bored Polish school children playing; Does ‘dark’ tourism exist? • A visitor waving an Israeli flag • And two cheerful tourists having their photo. • Experience was different for each • For some shades of dark for other quite light. • A site may evoke different experiences, • Pyramids – slave labor or beauty Does ‘dark’ tourism exist? • The argument: not necessarily constitute dark, nor make those visitors ‘dark’ tourists • Dark tourism is “socially constructed” (Jamal & Leo, 2011, p.40). • No essence of darkness • Dark tourism doesn't’ exist, but the experience does. Conclusions • This study based on a quantitative survey • Further research would permit participants to mention other types of motivations • Interviews • Fascination with death was not exposed • Visitors reluctant to admit • “less socially acceptable” (Ashworth, 2004,p.96).