Lunar Magnetic Anomalies
Transcription
Lunar Magnetic Anomalies
Lunar Magnetic Anomalies Arianna Sorba Student Number: 14R55018 Home Institution: Imperial College London Academic Advisor: Prof. Hideo Tsunakawa Department of Earth and Planetary Sciences Background • Unlike Earth, the moon now has no global magnetic field • However, small spot-like magnetic fields are detected by lunar satellites – lunar magnetic anomalies • Anomalies suggest remanent magnetisation of lunar crust à Possibly caused by an ancient dipolar magnetic field 3-4 billion years ago • Most likely generated by ancient core dynamo, which puts constraints on formation and evolution of Earth-Moon system • Size of lunar core • Lunar rotation axis 1 Research Method • I analysed 7 isolated anomalies à to make judgments about a possible ancient dipolar magnetic field • Each anomaly was approximated by a dipole source buried in the lunar crust, and dipole parameters (location, magnitude, orientation, pole position) were calculated as an inverse problem • Pole positions compared to recent previous results (Takahashi et al. 2014) RGS LM2 LM1 LM4 Nearside Radial North East LM5 LM6 Farside LM3 nT −100 −80 −60 −40 −20 0 20 40 60 80 100 Map of the radial magnetic field at the lunar surface, measured by Kaguya and Lunar Prospector satellites 2 Takahashi et al. 2014 Results Analysed 24 anomalies, found 2 clusters: ancient dipole with wander event P2 à P1 90°N 45°N P2 0°E 90°E 0°N 180°E -45°N P1 Takahashi et al. poles 90°N 270°E 360°E Analysis (LM4 example) Iterative inversion method (Kurata et al. 2005) used in Fortran to find best fit dipole model for the observed magnetic field data NORTH EAST TOTAL r = 0.8470 r = 0.8933 r = 0.8217 r = 0.9642 Model Fields Observed Data RADIAL 4 Results 3 distinct clusters, agreeing with Takahashi et al. 2014 plus anomaly 90°N LM3 1 45°N LM3 2 P2 0°E LM4 Anomaly poles 90°E RGS 2 P3 RGS 1 Takahashi et al. poles LM1 P1 0°N 180°E LM6 LM2 270°E LM5 360°E Conclusions • 7 isolated lunar magnetic anomalies were analysed and well-fitted by one or two remanent dipole sources • 3 distinct clusters, broadly agrees with Takahashi et al. including outlier • Suggests an ancient lunar dipole, undergoing one or more polar wander events • Analysis of more isolated and lineated anomalies needed to corroborate 6 Thank you TokyoTech! 7